Likkutei Torah · Parshas Shir HaShirim · Maamar 8
ביאור הדברים ע״פ שחורה אני ונאוה
An Explanation of the Matters on “I Am Black, Yet Comely”
Biur · an explanation of maamar 7Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
The soul’s descent into a limited, physical world makes it “black,” yet that very blackness is the source of its beauty: through mitzvos done with physical things, and above all through the prohibitive commandments, which reject what cannot be elevated, a light is revealed that is higher than anything the soul knew above, reaching even to G‑d’s essence.
The maamar in brief
The maamar first establishes that G‑d’s essence relates to the Sefiros only through an intermediary, Keser, whose upper side is the “last level” of the Infinite, His “Name.” Malchus of Atzilus likewise mediates between Atzilus and Beriah; descended, it is called Shechinah and kallah, a bride who longs from afar, and souls follow the same pattern. Their descent is “black” but “comely,” because only then does the Torah, drawn from the essence of supernal wisdom, become their “groom,” and only the descended Malchus raises the “feminine waters” that make the supernal union possible. The halachos stem from two beards: the white hair of Arich Anpin (positive commandments) and the black hair of Z’eir Anpin (prohibitions). Because what is higher in root falls lower in the shattering of Tohu, forbidden things hold the highest sparks, and rejecting them reveals more than the positive commandments can: not only the light that encompasses the worlds, but Atik and the hidden light, “comely like the tents of Kedar” and finally “the curtains of Shlomo.” The maamar closes by reading “Rise before the hoary head” as honoring the mitzvos.
Outline
- Keser, the intermediaryBetween G‑d and the Sefiros stands Keser; its upper side is the “last level” of the Infinite, which is G‑d’s “Name,” the kav from which Atik and Arich Anpin emerge.¶1–7
- Malchus, the Shechinah and the brideMalchus of Atzilus becomes Atik of Beriah and is then called Shechinah and kallah; souls too descend from “daughters of Jerusalem” to “bride,” receiving the Torah as their groom; the supernal union depends on the feminine waters the descended Malchus refines.¶8–20
- The black and white hairThe positive commandments come from the white hair of Arich Anpin and reveal the encompassing light; the prohibitions and rabbinic fences come from the black hair of Z’eir Anpin and will reveal G‑d’s essence.¶21–27
- Tohu and Tikkun: the lion and the oxWhat is higher in root falls lower: the lion is forbidden though its root is above the ox, so the prohibitions, which deal with forbidden things, reveal higher lights.¶28–34
- The sun, the salt and the tents of KedarSeverity is rooted above kindness; the prohibitions reveal the higher encompassing light, Atik, compared to the distant “tents of Kedar,” and the hidden light above the white light of the flame.¶35–42
- “Comely” and the curtains of ShlomoThe prohibitions draw from Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik, revealing the shining face above all hair; higher still is “the curtains of Shlomo,” the peace where nothing needs reconciling, glimpsed on Purim and Yom Kippur.¶43–48
- “Rise before the hoary head”The verse refers to the mitzvos from the two beards; “and you shall fear your G‑d” is Malchus, the Oral Torah, whose rabbinic commandments repel evil through positive action.¶49–54
Key concepts
- Intermediary (memutza)ממוצע
- Keser, which links G‑d’s essence to the Sefiros: its upper side belongs to the Emanator and its lower side is the root of the Sefiros. Malchus of Atzilus plays the same role between Atzilus and Beriah.
- Shechinahשכינה
- Malchus of Atzilus once it descends to become Atik of Beriah and “dwells” among created beings; within Atzilus it is wholly one with the Infinite.
- Bride (kallah)כלה
- The soul, and Malchus, after descending into the lower worlds; the word is read as kalsah, pining, and as kol hei, the gathering of all the attributes in revelation.
- Feminine waters (mayin nukvin)מיין נוקבין
- The refined sparks raised from below through prayer and mitzvos; though the masculine waters refine them, once refined they rise above the masculine waters.
- White hair and black hairשערות דאריך אנפין ודזעיר אנפין
- Narrow channels that convey a reduced light: the white hair of Arich Anpin is the source of the positive commandments, the black hair of Z’eir Anpin the source of the prohibitions.
- Tohu and Tikkunתהו ותיקון
- The world of great lights and shattered vessels, and the world of rectified, diminished light; the higher a light was in Tohu, the lower its fragments fell.
- Encompassing light (makif)מקיף
- Light that surrounds rather than enters: close like a garment (the positive commandments) or distant like a tent (Atik, revealed through the prohibitions).
- Atikעתיק
- The inner aspect of Keser, not counted among the ten Sefiros and not called even “encompassing all worlds”; its first three Sefiros are drawn only through the prohibitions.
Keser, the intermediary ¶1–7
An explanation of the matters [set out] on the verse “I am black, yet comely.”
The heading marks this as a biur, an extended explanation of a discourse on the verse “I am black, yet comely, O daughters of Jerusalem” (Song of Songs 1:5). In that verse the Community of Israel describes herself as dark and yet beautiful, and the maamar will show how the darkness itself becomes the source of the beauty.
The title names the verse the whole maamar sets out to explain.
Marei mekomos
- 1ביאור הדברים · הנחת הר״פ בס׳ מאמרי אדה״ז הנחות הר״פ ע׳ קכז. עוד הנחה במאמרי אדה״ז כתובים ח״ב ע׳ נד. בבוך 4 רשום: פ׳ קדושים. באוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתל עם הגהות.
- 2
2הנה בין המאציל לנאצלים צריך להיות בחינת ממוצע1 כמ״ש בע״ח [בעץ חיים] שמ״א פ״ג [פרק ג׳]2 והוא משום דלאו ביה מכל אינון מדות כלל.34
Now, between the Emanator and the emanated [levels] there must be an intermediary level, as is written in Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 41, chapter 3. This is because “none of these attributes is in Him at all.”
The Emanator is G‑d Himself, and the emanated levels are the Sefiros of Atzilus. The Arizal teaches that a middle level must link the two; the reason, the Alter Rebbe adds, is that, as the Tikkunei Zohar says, G‑d in His essence has none of the attributes (wisdom, kindness and the rest) that the Sefiros express.
ואפילו בהע״ס [בהעשר ספירות] מה שנקרא ספירת חכמה היינו הכלי המגביל את האור דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] נקרא בשם חכמה
Even in the Ten Sefiros, what is called the Sefirah of Chochmah (wisdom) means the vessel that limits the light of the Ten Sefiros: [that vessel] is what is called by the name Chochmah,
Every Sefirah consists of a light and a vessel. The name “Chochmah” properly belongs to the vessel, which gives the light a defined and limited form, the form of wisdom.
וכן בבינה וחסד כו׳. אבל עצם האור לא שייך לקרותו בשם חכמה רק אור המהווה ספי׳ [ספירה / ספירות] חכמה.
and so too with Binah (understanding) and Chesed (kindness), etc. But the light itself cannot properly be called by the name Chochmah; [it is] only “the light that brings the Sefirah of Chochmah into being.”
The same holds for every Sefirah. The light inside the vessel is not itself “wisdom” or “kindness”; it is only the light that brings that Sefirah into being, so the attributes describe the vessels and not the light, and certainly not G‑d’s essence.
The paragraph opens the maamar’s first theme: an intermediary must stand between G‑d and the Sefiros, since G‑d has none of their attributes. Even within the Sefiros, the names Chochmah, Binah and Chesed describe the limiting vessels, not the light.
The Alter Rebbe cites Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 41, chapter 3, following the Shklov printing of 1800; as the Kehot note points out, in current editions the passage is Sha’ar 42 (Drushei ABYA), chapter 1. The words “none of these attributes is in Him at all” come from Patach Eliyahu in the introduction to Tikkunei Zohar.
Marei mekomos
- 1בין המאציל לנאצלים צריך להיות בחינת ממוצע · Sefer Etz Chaim 42:3
- 2שמ״א פ״ג · בדפוס שקלאוו תק״ס. לפננו הוא שמ״ב (דרושי אבי״ע) פ״א. [כ]. ראה לעיל בחקותי מו, ג. נצבים נב, ג. ביאור הע״ח בביאוה״ז להצ״צ ע׳ רנו ואילך.
- 3דלאו בי׳ מכל אינון מדות כלל · ת״ז בהקדמה (פתח אלי׳).
- 4דלאו ביה מכל אינון מדות כלל · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:5–7
3והאור הוא רק זיו והארה מעצמות המאציל ואין פועל שום שינוי במהותו ועצמותו. וזהו אני הוי׳ לא שניתי1 כמו קודם שנבראו כל העולמו׳ [העולמות]
And the light is only a radiance and illumination from the essence of the Emanator, and it effects no change whatsoever in His being and essence. This is [the meaning of] “I, G‑d, have not changed”: [He is] just as [He was] before all the worlds were created.
The light that flows into the Sefiros is only a radiance from G‑d, the way sunlight comes from the sun, so its going forth changes nothing in Him. This is how the Alter Rebbe reads Malachi’s “I, G‑d, have not changed”: G‑d is exactly as He was before creation.
ובזה מתורץ קושיית הפלסופים2 איך כל התוארים אין פועלים שום שינוי בעצמות כי אינם שייכים כלל להעצמות
This resolves the question of the philosophers: how is it that none of the descriptions [ascribed to G‑d] effects any change in [His] essence? [The answer is] that they do not pertain to the essence at all.
Medieval philosophers asked how Scripture can describe G‑d with so many attributes without implying change or multiplicity in Him. The answer given here is that these descriptions do not refer to His essence at all.
(ר״ל [רוצה לומר] מ״ש בתורה3 ותחת רגליו4 כו׳ כתובים באצבע אלקים5 כו׳ עיני67 ה׳ אזני ה׳ וכיוצא וכבר האריך בזה בפרדס שער כ״ב פ״א והשל״ה [והשני לוחות הברית] בהקדמה)
(That is, what is written in the Torah, “and under His feet, etc.,” “written with the finger of G‑d, etc.,” “the eyes of G‑d,” “the ears of G‑d,” and the like. The Pardes has already discussed this at length in Sha’ar 22, chapter 1, and so has the Shelah in [his] introduction)
The “descriptions” in question are the Torah’s bodily images of G‑d: His feet, His finger, His eyes and ears. The Pardes Rimonim of R. Moshe Cordovero and the introduction to the Shelah already treat this question at length.
(דף י״א י״ג י״ד) ע״ש שביארו הענין אל נכון אך עכ״ז [עם כל זה] אינו שייך רק בע״ס [בעשר ספירות].
(pages 11, 13, 14). See there, for they explained the matter correctly. Nevertheless, [all] this pertains only to the Ten Sefiros.
Those works explain the matter properly. The Alter Rebbe adds his own point: all such descriptions apply only to the Ten Sefiros, never to G‑d’s essence.
וכן המדות כמו רחום או נוקם כו׳ אף שבאמת המדות עליונות אינן כלל מעין וסוג המדות שבנבראים וכמשנ״ת [וכמו שנתבאר] באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש] בד״ה להבין משל ומליצה8.9
So too the attributes (middos), such as “compassionate” or “avenging,” etc.: although in truth the supernal attributes are not at all of the same kind and category as the attributes in created beings, as explained in Iggeres HaKodesh, in the epistle beginning “To understand a parable and a figure,”
Attributes such as “compassionate” or “avenging” are a further case. Even granting that the divine attributes are utterly unlike human feelings, as Iggeres HaKodesh 15 explains, the decisive point is the one that follows.
אך עכ״ז [עם כל זה] הם שייכים רק בבחינת הכלים דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] לבד10 וכמאמר הת״ז [התיקוני זהר] כולא לאחזאה איך מתנהג עלמא11 אבל לאו כו׳ מכל אלין מדות כלל ועיין בסש״ב [בספר של בינונים] (ח״א [חלק א׳] פ״ב [פרק ב׳] בהג״ה [בהגהה] וח״ב [וחלק ב׳] פ״ט בהג״ה [בהגהה]).
nevertheless they pertain only to the level of the vessels of the Ten Sefiros alone, as in the saying of the Tikkunei Zohar, “All [this is] to show how the world is conducted, but not, etc., any of these attributes at all.” See Sefer Shel Beinonim (Part I, chapter 2, in the gloss, and Part II, chapter 9, in the gloss).
The divine attributes belong only to the vessels of the Sefiros. The Tikkunei Zohar says they exist “to show how the world is conducted,” not because G‑d Himself possesses any of them, and the glosses in two chapters of the Tanya discuss this further.
ואעפ״כ [ואף על פי כן] מתייחס כ״ז [כל זה] לו ית׳ ממש שהוא עצמו ית׳ ממש הרחמן והחסדן או הנוקם כו׳
And even so, all this is truly ascribed to Him, blessed be He: that He Himself, blessed be He, is truly the Merciful One and the Kind One, or the Avenger, etc.,
Nevertheless it is true to call G‑d Himself “Merciful,” “Kind” or “Avenger.” The next part explains how this can be.
ע״י התלבשות האור שהוא ית׳ מאיר ממנו בהכלים12 להחיותן והאור מתייחד עמהן דאיהו וגרמוהי חד ממש ומ״מ אין זה פועל שום שינוי והתפעלות בעצמותו ית׳
through the enclothing of the light that He, blessed be He, shines forth from Himself into the vessels to give them life; and the light unites with them, for “He and His vessels are one” in the fullest sense. Even so, this effects no change whatsoever in His essence, blessed be He, nor is He affected [by it],
These names apply to G‑d because His own light enters the vessels and becomes one with them; the Tikkunei Zohar’s phrase “He and His vessels are one” means that even the vessels are united with Him. Yet this union leaves His essence unaffected.
כי גם האור המתלבש בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] הוא רק כענין זיו והארה לבד אבל עצמותו ית׳ קדוש ומובדל כו׳ ואינו כדמיון הנשמה שהיא עצמה מתלבשת בגוף כו׳
for the light that is enclothed in the Ten Sefiros, too, is only like a radiance and illumination, while His essence, blessed be He, is holy and separate, etc. It is not like the soul, which is itself enclothed in the body, etc.
The light in the Sefiros is a radiance, not G‑d’s essence. Here the familiar comparison to a soul in a body falls short: the soul itself enters the body, while G‑d’s essence remains holy and apart.
וגדולה מזו כתב בפרדס שער עצמות וכלים13 פ״ד שאפילו בהאור והזיו המלובש בהכלים דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] אין בעצמות ההוא שינוי וגוון כלל לא דין14
Even more than this is written in the Pardes, Sha’ar Atzmus VeKeilim (the Gate of Essence and Vessels), chapter 4: that even in the light and radiance enclothed in the vessels of the Ten Sefiros, there is in that essence no change or hue at all, neither judgment
The Pardes goes further still: even the light within the vessels has no “hue” of its own. Judgment and mercy, right and left, are distinctions of the vessels, not of the light.
ולא רחמים לא ימין ולא שמאל כו׳ ואע״פ [ואף על פי] שכל פעולות אלו הבאים מהרחמים והדין נשפע ונמשך מהאור דייקא. ע״י הכלים.
nor mercy, neither right nor left, etc., even though all these actions that come from mercy and judgment flow and are drawn specifically from the light, by means of the vessels.
The light is not itself mercy or judgment, even though every act of mercy or judgment draws its power from that very light. The difference in effect comes from the vessels through which it passes.
The vessels of Atzilus, too, are G‑dliness, wholly one with G‑d. The Kehot note sums up the point of Iggeres HaKodesh 20: these vessels can create something from nothing as the Infinite does, not merely as a cause produces an effect.
ואף האור המהוה כל הספירות הוא רק כמו זיו השמש אשר אינו פועל שום שינוי בעצם המאור לכן נקרא בשם אור א״ס שהוא לשון זיו והארה בעלמא.
And even the light that brings all the Sefiros into being is only like the radiance of the sun, which effects no change in the luminary itself. Therefore it is called by the name “the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof),” “light” being a term for a mere radiance and illumination.
Sunlight does not alter or diminish the sun. This, the Alter Rebbe says, is why Kabbalah speaks of the Infinite Light: the very word “light” signals a mere radiance, not the essence.
אך גם זאת כדי שיהיה האור א״ס יכול לבוא לידי גילוי שיתהוה מזה כל הספירות צריך להיות מקודם בחינת ממוצע בין המאציל לנאצלים ואז יוכל האור א״ס להוות ולהחיות הספירות והממוצע זהו18 כתר.
Yet even so, for the Infinite Light to be able to come into revelation, so that all the Sefiros come into being from it, there must first be an intermediary level between the Emanator and the emanated; then the Infinite Light can bring the Sefiros into being and give them life. The intermediary is Keser (the Crown),
Even this radiance cannot produce the Sefiros directly. It needs an intermediary between G‑d and the Sefiros, and that intermediary is Keser, the Crown.
for it contains [something] of the last level of the Emanator, and it contains a level called “the root of the emanated.” Therefore Keser is sometimes called the Infinite Light
Keser has two sides: one belongs to the Emanator, as His “last level,” and the other is the root of the Sefiros. Because of its upper side, Keser is sometimes called “the Infinite Light” itself.
(דהיינו מצד בחינה האחרונה שבמאציל שיש בו שבחי׳ זו אינה במנין ע״ס [עשר ספירות] כלל ומצד בחינת שרש הנאצלים נמנה בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] ע״כ הוא בחינת ממוצע)
(that is, from the side of the last level of the Emanator that is in it, for this level is not counted among the Ten Sefiros at all; while from the side of the level of the root of the emanated, it is counted among the Ten Sefiros. Therefore it is an intermediary level).
This settles the Kabbalists’ dispute over whether Keser is counted among the Ten Sefiros. Its upper side is not counted and its lower side is, and having both is exactly what makes it an intermediary.
כי עצמותו ומהותו של המאציל עצם א״ס אינו בגדר כל עלמין שיוכל לבוא בגילוי האור וההשפעה ממנו אף בעולם אצילות אם לא ע״י בחינת ממוצע הנ״ל
For the essence and being of the Emanator, the very essence of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), is not within the bounds of “all worlds,” such that the light and influence from Him could come into revelation even in the World of Atzilus, except through the intermediary level mentioned above.
G‑d’s essence is beyond every category of worlds, even the highest, Atzilus. Light from Him can be revealed there only through the intermediary, Keser.
(ומה שיש להבין איך שייך לומר באין סוף בחי׳ אחרונה.21 כי לא שייך בחי׳ אחרונה או ראשונה רק במקום ששייך לומר ראש וסוף והיינו בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] שהחכמה נקרא ראשית ההשתלשלות כו׳ והמל׳ נקרא סופא דכל דרגין.
(As for what needs to be understood, how one can speak of a “last level” in the Infinite One: for “last” or “first” applies only where one can speak of beginning and end, that is, in the Ten Sefiros, where Chochmah is called the beginning of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), etc., and Malchus is called “the end of all levels.”
A long parenthetical question begins here: how can the Infinite have a “last” level? First and last exist only where there is a beginning and an end, as in the Sefiros, where Chochmah begins the chain of descent and Malchus is called “the end of all levels.”
משא״כ בא״ס ב״ה שאין לו קץ וראש והוא פשוט בתכלית הפשיטות מהו ענין בחי׳ אחרונה.
This is not so with the Infinite One, blessed be He, Who has no end and no beginning and is simple in the utmost simplicity: what does “last level” mean [there]?
The Infinite has neither beginning nor end and is utterly simple, without parts. So the phrase “last level” seems to make no sense when applied to Him.
והיה נראה לומר ע״פ משנ״ת [מה שנתבאר] בכמה דוכתי בפירוש מארז״ל [מאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] עד שלא נברא העולם22 היה הוא ושמו בלבד.23 דידוע הקושיא איך שייך קודם בריאת העולמות להיות בחינת שם להקב״ה ומי קראו בשמו.
It would seem [possible] to say [this] according to what has been explained in several places on the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, “Before the world was created, there were He and His Name alone.” For the question is well known: how, before the creation of the worlds, could there be a name for the Holy One, blessed be He? Who called Him by His name?
The answer draws on the teaching in Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer that before creation there were only G‑d “and His Name.” A name exists so that others can call someone by it, so it is puzzling that G‑d should have had a Name before anyone existed to call Him.
אך הענין כי התפשטות החיות הנמשך ממנו ית׳24 להחיות כל העולמות והע״ס [והעשר ספירות] אין התפשטות והמשכה זו רק בחינת שם שהוא רק זיו והארה בעלמא ונקרא אור אין סוף אבל מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ הוא רם ונשא
But the matter is this: the spreading forth of the life-force drawn from Him, blessed be He, to give life to all the worlds and the Ten Sefiros—this spreading forth and drawing down is only the level of a name, which is only a mere radiance and illumination and is called the Infinite Light. But His being and essence, blessed be He, is high and exalted,
The life-force that spreads from G‑d to the worlds and the Sefiros is His “Name”: like a name, it is only an outward radiance, and it is what Kabbalah calls the Infinite Light. G‑d’s own essence is far above it.
כי אני ה׳ לא שניתי כתיב כו׳. והנה גם קודם שנברא העולם. מה שיכול להיות מתגלה ושיומשך ממנו ההארה והזיו ברצונו הפשוט זהו הנקרא בחינת שמו שהיה עד שלא נברא העולם.
for it is written, “I, G‑d, have not changed,” etc. Now, even before the world was created, the fact that He can be revealed, and that illumination and radiance be drawn from Him by His simple will—this is what is called the level of His Name, which existed before the world was created.
Even before creation, G‑d had the capacity to reveal Himself and radiate light, should His simple will so decide. That latent capacity is the “Name” that existed before the world was created.
שכח ויכולת זה נקרא בחי׳ שמו הכלול בעצמותו. וזהו ענין בחי׳ אחרונה שבמאציל וכמו שם האדם עד״מ שהוא אין ואפס ממש לגבי עצמותו כו׳.
For this power and capability is called the level of His Name, included in His essence. This is the meaning of “the last level of the Emanator”: like a person’s name, by way of analogy, which is truly naught and nothing compared to his essence, etc.
This capacity, held within G‑d’s essence, is His “last level.” A person’s name is a fitting analogy: it lets others call him and adds nothing to who he is.
ומבחינה זו לבד הוא שנמשך להיות עתיק וכתר האצילות כו׳ ויצדק מאד לקרוא זה בחינה אחרונה לפי הלשון המבואר במ״א כי לא זה הוא עיקר האלקות25 מה שהעולמות מתהוים ממנו ומקבלים חיותם והתהוותם מאלקותו ית׳
It is from this level alone that [light] is drawn to become Atik and the Keser of Atzilus, etc. It is very fitting to call this “the last level,” according to the wording explained elsewhere: for the core of G‑dliness is not that the worlds come into being from Him and receive their life-force and existence from His G‑dliness, blessed be He,
Only from this level does light extend to become Atik, the inner aspect of the Keser of Atzilus. It is rightly called “last,” because, as Torah Ohr explains, being the source of the worlds is not what G‑dliness essentially is.
שהרי אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם ולאחר שנברא בשוה ממש. וגם אילו לא היה בורא העולמות הי׳ [היה] הכל שוה לפניו ית׳ כמו עכשיו שברא כו׳.
for “You are He before the world was created, and after it was created,” exactly alike. And even had He not created the worlds, all would be equal before Him, blessed be He, just as now that He has created [them], etc.
G‑d is exactly the same before and after creation, in the words of the prayer “You are He before the world was created.” Had He never created, nothing in Him would be different.
אלא מה שמחיה ומהוה העולמות זהו רק ע״י הארה לבד ממנו ית׳ והיא חיי החיים של כל השתלשלות העולמות אבל מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ הוא למעלה אין קץ מבחי׳ הארה זו שהיא חיי החיים של כל העולות.
Rather, His giving life to the worlds and bringing them into being is only through a mere illumination from Him, blessed be He; it is the Life of all life of the entire chain of descending worlds. But His being and essence, blessed be He, is infinitely above this illumination, which is the Life of all life of all the worlds,
Creating and sustaining the worlds requires only a glimmer of G‑d, the “Life of all life” of every world. His essence is infinitely beyond even this.
וכלא ממש חשיבי קמי׳ [קמיה] ית׳ ולכן נקרא הארה זו בחי׳ היותר אחרונה מכל האפשר בא״ס המאציל ב״ה דהנה גם בחינת זיו ואור המתפשט מן השמש
and they are considered as truly nothing before Him, blessed be He. Therefore this illumination is called “the very last level possible” in the Infinite One, the Emanator, blessed be He. For even with the radiance and light that spreads forth from the sun,
Compared to Him the worlds are as nothing, so the light that gives them life is called “the very last level possible” in the Infinite. The analogy of the sun is brought to clarify this.
הנה זה פשוט שאור וזיו הזה ישנו ג״כ בגוף כדור השמש עצמו כו׳ ונחשב הזיו הזה לאין ואפס ממש לגבי גוף כדור השמש שהוא מקור האור והזיו הזה כו׳ וכמ״ש באריכות בסש״ב [בספר של בינונים])
it is obvious that this light and radiance exists also in the body of the sun’s orb itself, etc., and this radiance is considered truly naught and nothing compared to the body of the sun’s orb, which is the source of this light and radiance, etc., as is written at length in Sefer Shel Beinonim)
The sun’s light also exists within the sun’s orb, but there it is wholly absorbed in its source and counts as nothing. The Tanya develops this analogy at length.
(שער היחוד והאמונה פ״ג [פרק ג׳]) שבהיותו כלול בשמש אין נופל עליו שם יש כלל רק שם אין ואפס26
(Sha’ar HaYichud VehaEmunah, chapter 3): that while it is included in the sun, the name “existence” does not apply to it at all, only the name “naught and nothing,”
Sha’ar HaYichud VehaEmunah, chapter 3, the second part of the Tanya, says that light contained within the sun cannot be called an existing thing at all. It can be called only “naught and nothing.”
כי באמת הוא שם לאין ואפס ממש כו׳ ע״ש והנה זיו השמש מאיר מהשמש שלא ברצון ובחירה מהשמש.
for in truth, there it is as utter naught and nothing, etc. See there. Now, the sun’s radiance shines from the sun without will or choice on the sun’s part.
Within its source the light is truly nothing. Moreover, the sun gives off light without choosing to: it cannot help but shine.
וכ״ש [וכל שכן] וק״ו [וקל וחומר] באלף אלפי הבדלות לאין קץ למעלה שלהיות גילוי האור הוא כשעלה ברצונו וחפצו.
How much more so, by an a fortiori argument with thousands upon thousands of distinctions without end, [is this so] Above, where the light comes to be revealed when it arose in His will and desire.
With G‑d the gap is infinitely greater, since His light is revealed only because He willed it. If the involuntary rays of the sun are nothing compared to the sun, His freely chosen light is all the more nothing compared to Him.
וא״כ כח זה הכלול בעצמותו הוא אין ואפס ממש לגבי מהותו ועצמותו. כמו שם האדם ממש לגבי עצמותו.
If so, this power included in His essence is truly naught and nothing compared to His being and essence, exactly like a person’s name compared to his essence.
The capacity to radiate light, included in G‑d’s essence, is therefore truly nothing compared to that essence. It is like a person’s name compared to the person himself.
וזהו ענין עד שלא נברא העולם היה הוא ושמו בלבד וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] האריז״ל [האר״י זכרונו לברכה]27 בחינה היותר אחרונה מכל האפשר28 כו׳.293031
This is the meaning of “Before the world was created, there were He and His Name alone,” and this is what the Arizal said: “the very last level possible, etc.”
This resolves the question: the “Name” that existed before creation is this capacity for revelation, and it is the “very last level” of the Infinite of which the Arizal speaks in Etz Chaim. The digression on the “last level” ends here.
The paragraph explains why an intermediary is needed: the light that forms the Sefiros is only a radiance that changes nothing in G‑d, and the attributes ascribed to Him belong to the vessels. Keser is that intermediary, and its upper side, the “last level” of the Infinite, is identified in a long parenthesis with the “Name” that existed before creation.
The phrase “the very last level possible” comes from Etz Chaim (Sha’ar 42, chapter 1, in current editions), where the Arizal uses it to explain how Keser mediates. The Kehot note records that in manuscript 1102 the parenthesis opened at “That is, what is written in the Torah” closes only after the reference to “I will go down now and see.”
Marei mekomos
- 1אני הוי׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
- 2מתורץ קושיית הפלסופים · ראה לעיל שלח נ, א. אוה״ת — ענינים ע׳ קפב.
- 3(ר״ל מ״ש בתורה · הסוף מוסגר ע״פ כת״י 1102 דף תשא הוא בשורה האחרונה בהעמוד אחר תי׳ ”ארדה נא ואראה כו׳)”.
- 4ותחת רגליו · Exodus 24:10
- 5
- 6עיני ה׳ · Psalms 34:16
- 7ותחת רגליו כו׳ כתובים באצבע אלקים כו׳ עיני ה׳ אזני ה׳ · Pardes Rimmonim 22:4–5
- 8
- 9באגה״ק בד״ה להבין משל ומליצה · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 15:1–2
- 10אך עכ״ז הם שייכים רק בבחינת הכלים דע״ס לבד · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 2:3
- 11וכמא׳ הת״ז כולא לאחזאה איך מתנהג עלמא · בהקדמה (פתח אלי׳).
- 12ע״י התלבשות האור שהוא ית׳ מאיר ממנו בהכלים · Tanya, Sha’ar HaYichud 9:6
- 13כתב בפרדס שער עצמות וכלים · ראה גם דרך מצותיך דף קנו, א.
- 14אין בעצמות ההוא שינוי וגוון כלל לא דין · Pardes Rimmonim 4:8
- 15והנה הכלים דאצילות הם ג״כ אלקות ממש ואיהו וגרמוהי חד · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 20:1
- 16באגה״ק בד״ה איהו וחיוהי · שהן אלקות לברוא יש מאין כמו הא״ס ולא בבחי׳ השתלשלות עילה ועלול לבד.
- 17ע״פ ארדה נא ואראה · אולי הכוונה לתו״א פ׳ וירא שבע״ס יש אורות וכלים.
- 18אך גם זאת . . והממוצע זהו הכתר · מובא באוה״ת בהעלותך ע׳ שצ. ראה המשך תרס״ו ע׳ קסד ואילך. המשך תער״ב פרק קצה. ובכ״מ.
- 19שיש בו מבחינה אחרונה שבמאציל · נזכר בביאוה״ז להצ״צ כרך ב ע׳ תרמב.
- 20לפעמים נקרא הכתר אור א״ס · בארוכה בענין מה שנחלקו המקובלים בענין הכתר אם הוא ממנין הע״ס — ראה אוה״ת ענינים ע׳ קסא ואילך־ קעה ואילך־ קפא, ואילך. אוה״ת וישב כרך ו תתרפח, א ואילך. יתרו ע׳ תתלט. ביאורי זהר ע׳ ערה ואילך.
- 21איך שייך לומר באין סוף בחי׳ אחרונה · ראה ד״ה אלה תולדות השמים תרס״ט ע׳ נב. ובליקוט פירושים וכו׳ לאגה״ק סי׳ כ לדף קל, ב בקטע ”בחי׳ אחרונה של הא״ס”.
- 22עד שלא נברא העולם · פדר״א פ״ג. וראה לעיל בהר מג, ב. ובמ״מ לשם.
- 23עד שלא נברא העולם היה הוא ושמו בלבד · Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 3:2–3
- 24כי התפשטות החיות הנמשך ממנו ית׳ · ראה סה״מ תרפ״ז ע׳ לד.
- 25המבואר במ״א כי לא זה הוא עיקר האלקות · תו״א צט, ב. ראה לקו״ש חי״ט ע׳ 190 הערה 31.
- 26שבהיותו כלול בשמש אין נופל עליו שם יש כלל רק שם אין ואפס · Tanya, Sha’ar HaYichud 3:3–4
- 27וז״ש האריז״ל · בפ״א [בע״ח] (שם). [כ].
- 28בחינה היותר אחרונה מכל האפשר · Sefer Etz Chaim 42:3
- 29רק בחי׳ שם . . ונקרא אור אין סוף · ראה תו״א קה, א. ספר הערכים-חב״ד כרך ג ע׳ קמג.
- 30
- 31
4והנה מדברי האריז״ל [האר״י זכרונו לברכה] אלו הוא הכרח וראיה גמורה למ״ש בכמה דוכתי דפירוש אור א״ס היינו האור והגילוי אבל מהותו ועצמותו הוא עד״מ בחי׳ המאור שהוא מקור האור כו׳.
Now, these words of the Arizal are a compelling proof and conclusive evidence for what is written in several places: that “the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)” means the light and the revelation, whereas His being and essence is, by way of analogy, the level of the luminary, which is the source of the light, etc.
The Arizal’s words show that “the Infinite Light” refers to G‑d’s radiance, not to His essence. The essence is compared to the luminary, the sun itself, and the light to what shines out from it.
דאל״כ [דאם לא כן] מהו פי׳ בחינה תחתונה ושפלה מכל בחי׳ א״ס דקאמר האריז״ל [האר״י זכרונו לברכה].12 אלא ודאי דר״ל [דרוצה לומר] עד״מ האור והזיו כו׳.
For otherwise, what is the meaning of “the lowest and humblest of all the levels of the Infinite One,” which the Arizal says? Rather, he certainly means, by way of analogy, the light and the radiance, etc.
Etz Chaim calls the upper side of Keser “the lowest and humblest of all the levels of the Infinite One.” Such a phrase makes sense only of the light, which can have levels, and not of the essence, which has none.
The paragraph draws a proof from the Arizal’s wording: if Keser’s upper side is “the lowest level of the Infinite,” then “the Infinite Light” must mean G‑d’s radiance and not His essence.
The pairing of luminary (ma’or) and light (or) runs through the whole maamar: the Infinite Light is the light, while G‑d’s essence is the “luminary,” the source beyond all light.
Marei mekomos
- 1דקאמר האריז״ל · שם בפ״א. [כ].
- 2בחינה תחתונה ושפלה מכל בחי׳ א״ס דקאמר האריז״ל · Sefer Etz Chaim 42:3
5וכ״כ [וכן כתב] הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] בהג״ה [בהגהה] בתחלת האוצ״ח [האוצרות חיים] וז״ל [וזה לשונו] דוקא הארה מן הא״ס אבל לא מעצמותו ב״ה. וזהו המשיך ר״ל [רוצה לומר] מאורו בלבד האיר למטה עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו].
The Ramaz, too, wrote thus in a gloss at the beginning of Otzros Chaim; these are his words: “Specifically an illumination from the Infinite One, but not from His essence, blessed be He. And this is [the meaning of] ‘He drew forth’: that is, from His light alone He shone below.” End of quote.
R. Moshe Zacuto (the Ramaz), in a gloss on Otzros Chaim, likewise writes that what the Infinite One drew forth was only an illumination of His light, not of His essence. His words support the reading given in the previous paragraph.
גם הרמ״ע [הרב מנחם עזריה] בהקדמת ספרו יונת אלם כתב דאין סוף הוא שייך לומר על שמו ית׳ ולא על מהותו ועצמותו כו׳.
Rabbi Menachem Azariah [of Fano], too, in the introduction to his book Yonas Elem, wrote that “Infinite” can be said of His Name, blessed be He, but not of His being and essence, etc.
R. Menachem Azariah of Fano makes the same point in the introduction to his book Yonas Elem: the term “Infinite” (Ein Sof) properly describes G‑d’s Name, not His essence. This fits the explanation above that the light is G‑d’s “Name.”
אך אמנם עם היות שאמת נכון הדבר דעל האור לבד יתכן לומר מ״ש בע״ח [בעץ חיים] בחי׳ היותר אחרונה1 כו׳
However, although it is true and correct that only of the light can one say what is written in Etz Chaim, “the very last level, etc.,”
The Alter Rebbe agrees that the phrase “the very last level” can refer only to the light. He now refines what exactly it refers to.
מ״מ באמת פי׳ בחי׳ היותר אחרונה שבא״ס דקאמר בע״ח [בעץ חיים] אין הכוונה על כללות האור והזיו ממש.
nevertheless, in truth, the meaning of “the very last level in the Infinite One” of which Etz Chaim speaks does not refer to the light and radiance as a whole.
The “very last level” is not the Infinite Light as a whole. It is something narrower, as the next part explains.
כ״א עוד זאת ר״ל [רוצה לומר] שבחי׳ היותר אחרונה שבהאור והזיו מזה נמשך להיות עתיק לאצילות וכנודע שמתחלה הי׳ [היה] צמצום בהאור ואח״כ נמשך רק קו וחוט לבד מהאור א״ס כו׳.2
Rather, it means something further: that from the very last level within the light and radiance, [light] is drawn to become Atik of Atzilus. As is known, at first there was a tzimtzum (contraction) in the light, and afterwards only a kav (line) and thread alone was drawn from the Infinite Light, etc.
It refers to the lowest point of the light, from which Atik of Atzilus emerges. According to the Arizal, the Infinite Light was first withdrawn in the tzimtzum, and afterwards only a thin ray, the kav, was drawn into the vacated space; this ray is that lowest level.
Two Kabbalists, the Ramaz and R. Menachem Azariah of Fano, are cited in support of reading “Ein Sof” as G‑d’s light or Name rather than His essence. The Alter Rebbe then narrows the Arizal’s “very last level” to the lowest point of that light, the kav, from which Atik emerges.
Marei mekomos
- 1מ״ש בע״ח בחי׳ היותר אחרונה · Sefer Etz Chaim 42:3
- 2
And the kav is called “the last level” relative to the light, etc. See what is written on this subject in the explanation on “I have seen, and behold, a menorah of gold,”
Compared with the Infinite Light as it was before the tzimtzum, the kav is its “last” and most limited level. The Alter Rebbe refers to his fuller treatment in discourses on verses from Zechariah and Esther.
ובביאור ע״פ יביאו לבוש3 מלכות4 כו׳ ומהקו הוא שנמשך להיות בחי׳ עתיק דאצילות והנה בחי׳ עתיק נמשך ומתלבש בא״א שהוא שרש ומקור הנאצלים.
and in the explanation on “Let them bring royal apparel, etc.” It is from the kav that [light] is drawn to become the level of Atik of Atzilus; and the level of Atik is drawn into and enclothed in Arich Anpin, which is the root and source of the emanated.
From the kav comes Atik, the inner aspect of the Keser of Atzilus, and Atik is enclothed in Arich Anpin, the outer aspect of Keser and the root of all the Sefiros. The chain therefore runs: the Infinite Light, the kav, Atik, Arich Anpin, the Sefiros.
The kav is identified as the “last level” of the light. From it Atik of Atzilus is formed, and Atik is enclothed in Arich Anpin, the root of all the Sefiros.
Atik and Arich Anpin are the two configurations (partzufim) of Keser in the Arizal’s system: Atik is the inner dimension, still bound up with the Emanator, and Arich Anpin the outer dimension, which is the source of the Sefiros below it.
Marei mekomos
- 1
- 2בביאור ע״פ ראיתי והנה מנורת זהב · לעיל בהעלותך לו, א.
- 3ובביאור ע״פ יביאו לבוש מל׳ · תו״א צא, ג. והנה על הכתר ומו״ס מלביש בחי׳ לבוש כמו עד״מ טלית שמשימין על הראש.
- 4
7וזהו ענין שהכתר נקרא ממוצע בין המאציל לנאצלים כו׳ דהיינו שכדי להיות הארת אור א״ס נמשך ומתלבש בכלים דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] דאצי׳ הוא על ידי שמתחלה נמשך ומתלבש בחי׳ תחתונה שבהאור והזיו בשרש הע״ס [העשר ספירות]
This is the meaning of Keser being called the intermediary between the Emanator and the emanated, etc. That is, for the illumination of the Infinite Light to be drawn into and enclothed in the vessels of the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus, this comes about by the lowest level of the light and radiance first being drawn into and enclothed in the root of the Ten Sefiros,
This is why Keser is the intermediary. The Infinite Light reaches the vessels of the Sefiros of Atzilus only by first entering their common root.
דהיינו בבחי׳ שבכתר הנקרא שרש הנאצלים שגבהה מעלתו לאין קץ מבחי׳ פרטי הע״ס [העשר ספירות] וגם כוללן יחד.
that is, in the level within Keser that is called “the root of the emanated,” whose stature is infinitely higher than the level of the individual Ten Sefiros, and which also includes them all together.
That root is the aspect of Keser called “the root of the emanated.” It is infinitely higher than the individual Sefiros, yet contains them all in a general way.
ועי״ז אח״כ נמשך הארה מבחי׳ זו להתלבש בכל פרטי הכלים דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] לכל כלי כפי ערכו1 כו׳. ועיין בסש״ב [בספר של בינונים] פנ״א.
Through this, afterwards, illumination is drawn from this level to be enclothed in all the individual vessels of the Ten Sefiros, in each vessel according to its measure, etc. See Sefer Shel Beinonim, chapter 51.
From this general root the light then spreads into each individual vessel according to its capacity. Tanya, chapter 51, compares this to the soul, whose life-force is concentrated in the brain and from there reaches each limb according to its nature.
שהמשל ונמשל הנזכר שם יובן כאן בדרך נפלאה יותר לאין קץ. (ועיין בע״ח [בעץ חיים] שער שמיני פרק חמישי2 ולעילא מגולגלתא דיליה כו׳ עתיק דאצילות3 ומ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ מוצאיהם למסעיהם):45
The analogy and its application mentioned there will be understood here in an infinitely more wondrous way. (See Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 8, chapter 5, [on] “and above his skull, etc.,” [concerning] Atik of Atzilus, and what is written on this in the explanation on “their goings forth according to their journeys.”)
The Tanya’s analogy applies here in an infinitely more wondrous way, since here the source is the Infinite Light itself. The parenthesis adds references to Etz Chaim on Atik of Atzilus and to a discourse in Likkutei Torah, Masei.
Keser mediates because the light first enters the common root of the Sefiros in Keser and only afterwards spreads into each Sefirah according to its capacity.
The Kehot note explains that the Alter Rebbe’s “Sha’ar 8, chapter 5” follows the Shklov printing of Etz Chaim; in current editions the passage is in Sha’ar 9 (Shevirat HaKelim), at the beginning of chapter 6.
Marei mekomos
- 1לכל כלי כפי ערכו · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 51:4
- 2שער שמיני פרק חמישי · בדפוס שקלאוו תק״ס. לפננו פ״ט ש׳ שבירת הכלים וגם לא פ״ה רק רפ״ו, יעו״ש. [כ].
- 3ועיין בע״ח שער שמיני פרק חמישי ולעילא מגולגלתא דיליה כו׳ עתיק דאצילות · Sefer Etz Chaim 9:6
- 4מוצאיהם למסעיהם · Numbers 33:2
- 5ומ״ש בזה בביאור · והוא (ב[מסעי] ד׳ צה, ב). וש״נ. [כ].
Malchus, the Shechinah and the bride ¶8–20
8ב והנה כתיב לך ה׳ הגדולה והגבורה1 היינו שהמדות דאצילו׳ [דאצילות] בטלים בעצמות אור א״ס דלאו ביה מכל אינון מדות כלל2 וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] בחי׳ מלכות דאצי׳ היא בטילה ומיוחדת בא״ס ב״ה כמ״ש לך ה׳ הממלכה.
2. Now, it is written, “Yours, G‑d, are the greatness and the might”: that is, the attributes (middos) of Atzilus are nullified in the essence of the Infinite Light, for “none of these attributes is in Him at all.” Likewise, the level of Malchus of Atzilus is nullified and united with the Infinite One, blessed be He, as it is written, “Yours, G‑d, is the kingdom.”
A new section turns to Malchus. The verse “Yours, G‑d, are the greatness and the might ... Yours is the kingdom” teaches that within Atzilus the attributes, Malchus among them, are wholly nullified and united with the Infinite, since G‑d Himself has none of these attributes.
The second section begins by establishing, from the verse in Chronicles, that in Atzilus the attributes and Malchus are nullified within the Infinite.
Marei mekomos
- 1לך ה׳ הגדולה והגבורה · I Chronicles 29:11
- 2דלאו ביה מכל אינון מדות כלל · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:5–7
9וכנודע דבאצי׳ איהו וגרמוהי חד אפילו בבחי׳ הכלים. משא״כ עולם הבריאה הוא בחי׳ יש מאין שהנברא הוא יש ודבר נפרד ואפילו הכלים דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] דבי״ע הם נבראים ולאו איהו וגרמוהי חד בהון.
As is known, in Atzilus “He and His vessels are one,” even at the level of the vessels. This is not so with the World of Beriah, which is at the level of something from nothing: the created being is a “something” and a separate entity, and even the vessels of the Ten Sefiros of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are created beings, and “He and His vessels are one” does not apply to them.
Atzilus is one with G‑d even in its vessels. Beriah is “something from nothing”: its beings, even the vessels of its Sefiros, are created and separate, so the formula “He and His vessels are one” no longer applies.
Atzilus and Beriah are contrasted: in Atzilus even the vessels are one with G‑d, while in Beriah everything is created and separate.
10ולכן כדי להיות ההמשכה מע״ס [מעשר ספירות] דאצילות בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] דבי״ע הוא ג״כ ע״י בחי׳ ממוצע שבחינת מלכות דאצילות נעשית עתיק לבריאה. ופי׳ בע״ח [בעץ חיים] שמ״א פ״ד1 שמתלבשת בכתר דבריאה2 דהיינו בא״א דבריאה.
Therefore, for there to be a drawing down from the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus into the Ten Sefiros of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, this too is through an intermediary level: the level of Malchus of Atzilus becomes Atik for Beriah. Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 41, chapter 4, explains that it is enclothed in the Keser of Beriah, that is, in Arich Anpin of Beriah.
Just as Keser bridges the Infinite and Atzilus, a bridge is needed between Atzilus and Beriah. That bridge is Malchus of Atzilus, which becomes Atik, the innermost aspect of the Keser of Beriah, as Etz Chaim explains.
ולכן זהו בחי׳ ממוצע בין אצילות לבריאה וכנ״ל בענין הכתר דאצי׳ כו׳ ונמצא יש בבחינת מלכות דאצילות ב׳ בחינות.
Therefore this is the intermediary level between Atzilus and Beriah, as [explained] above regarding the Keser of Atzilus, etc. It follows that in the level of Malchus of Atzilus there are two levels.
Malchus of Atzilus therefore plays the same role between Atzilus and Beriah that Keser plays between the Emanator and Atzilus. This gives Malchus of Atzilus two distinct states.
הא׳ הוא בהיותה באצילות קודם שיורדת להיות עתיק לבריאה אשר באצילות הוא בחי׳ היחוד באור א״ס לך ה׳ הממלכה.
The first is while it is in Atzilus, before it descends to become Atik for Beriah; in Atzilus it is the level of union with the Infinite Light: “Yours, G‑d, is the kingdom.”
In its first state, Malchus remains in Atzilus, wholly united with the Infinite Light. The verse “Yours, G‑d, is the kingdom” describes this: the kingship belongs entirely to G‑d.
הב׳ כשנמשכת מאצילות3 ומתלבשת בבריאה להיות עתיק לבריאה וזהו בחי׳ מלך מלך וימלוך שאז נעשית מקור להתהוות הזמן עבר הוה ועתיד משא״כ באצי׳ אין שייך בחי׳ זו שהוא היה הוה ויהיה ברגע א׳.4
The second is when it is drawn from Atzilus and enclothed in Beriah, to become Atik for Beriah. This is the level of “[He] is King, [He] was King, and [He] will reign,” for then it becomes the source for the coming into being of time—past, present and future. This is not so in Atzilus, where this level does not apply, for [there] “He was, is and will be” in a single moment.
In its second state, Malchus descends to become the source of Beriah, and only there does time come into being, as the phrase “He is King, He was King, He will reign” implies. In Atzilus past, present and future are a single moment.
Malchus of Atzilus is the intermediary between Atzilus and Beriah and so has two states: united with the Infinite within Atzilus, and descended as the source of Beriah, where time begins.
The Kehot note explains that the Alter Rebbe’s “Sha’ar 41, chapter 4” follows the Shklov printing; in current editions it is Sha’ar 42 (Drushei ABYA), and the passage should be read as the end of chapter 1.
Marei mekomos
- 1שמ״א פ״ד · בדפוס שקלאוו תק״ס. לפננו שמ״ב (דרושי אבי״ע) וצ״ל כאן ספ״א, ודו״ק. [כ].
- 2ופי׳ בע״ח שמ״א פ״ד שמתלבשת בכתר דבריאה · Sefer Etz Chaim 42:1
- 3כשנמשכת מאצילות . . להיות עתיק לבריאה . . שייך לשון שכינה · בד״ה באתי לגני תשי״א מבואר שאין זה סתירה למ״ש בכ״מ שהקו נק׳ שכינה כי שכינה שנאמר בדרז״ל היינו מל׳ דאצילות, ואף גם זאת רק כשנעשית בחי׳ עתיק לבריאה דוקא, אבל בשרשה, היינו כמו שהוא לגבי אוא״ס, הנה גם הקו נק׳ בשם שכינה ע״ש. וראה גם ד״ה וידבר אלקים אנכי תרצ״ט ע׳ 175 ואילך. ובמאמרי אדה״א נ״ך ע׳ רכז.
- 4לך ה׳ הממלכה · I Chronicles 29:11
11והנה כשיורדת המל׳ בבריאה נקראת בלשון הגמרא והתרגום אונקלוס בשם שכינה ששוכן בהיכל קדשי קדשים שהיה שורה שם בחי׳ אלקות כמבואר בסש״ב [בספר של בינונים] פנ״ג [פרק נ״ג]1 ושם [בהיכל ק״ק [קדש הקדשים] דבי״ע
Now, when Malchus descends into Beriah, it is called, in the language of the Gemara and of Targum Onkelos, by the name Shechinah, [meaning] that which dwells in the chamber of the Holy of Holies, where the level of G‑dliness used to rest, as explained in Sefer Shel Beinonim, chapter 53. There [in the chamber of the Holy of Holies of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah,
When Malchus of Atzilus descends into Beriah, it is called Shechinah, the term the Talmud and Targum Onkelos use for G‑d’s presence. The word means “that which dwells,” and it fits the Divine presence that rested in the Holy of Holies, as the Tanya, chapter 53, explains.
וכן בהיכל ק״ק [קדש הקדשים] שבבהמ״ק [שבבית המקדש]]2 שייך לשון שכינה משא״כ בהיותה באצי׳ לא שייך לשון שכינה מאחר שמיוחדת שם באור א״ס בתכלית היחוד ואינה מתלבשת ושורה במקור הנבראים עדיין.
and likewise in the chamber of the Holy of Holies in the Holy Temple] the term Shechinah applies. This is not so when it is in Atzilus: there the term Shechinah does not apply, since there it is united with the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) in the utmost unity and is not yet enclothed and dwelling in the source of the created beings.
“Dwelling” applies in the Holy of Holies of the lower worlds and in the Temple’s Holy of Holies, where G‑dliness rests within something other than itself. In Atzilus, Malchus is wholly one with the Infinite Light and does not yet rest within any source of created beings, so the term Shechinah does not fit. The words in square brackets in this part and the one before are the printed text’s own bracketed insertion.
רק כשנעשית בחי׳ עתיק לבריאה ומתלבשת בא״א דבריאה. שהוא שרש ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דבריאה. ובריאה הוא נבראים.
Only when it becomes the level of Atik for Beriah and is enclothed in Arich Anpin of Beriah—which is the root of the Ten Sefiros of Beriah, and Beriah is created beings—
The term applies only once Malchus becomes Atik, the innermost root, of Beriah, enclothed in Arich Anpin of Beriah. Beriah is the realm of created beings, so there G‑dliness truly dwells within something separate.
ושורה שם התגלות אלקות שייך לשון שכינה3 שבחינת מלכותו ית׳ שבאצילות שבה מלובש הקו מאור א״ס ב״ה שוכנת בתוך בריאה
and a revelation of G‑dliness dwells there, does the term Shechinah apply: for the level of His Malchus, blessed be He, in Atzilus, in which the kav from the Infinite Light, blessed be He, is enclothed, dwells within Beriah.
Then a revelation of G‑dliness rests in Beriah, and Malchus of Atzilus, which carries within it the kav of the Infinite Light, is said to “dwell” within Beriah. This is the meaning of the name Shechinah.
(וכמ״ש בפרדס בעה״כ [בערכי הכינויים] ערך שכינה שמשכנת בעולם התחתון כל האצילות העליון4 כו׳ ע״ש וע״ז נאמר ושכנתי בתוכם5 כו׳ לשכנו תדרשו6 כו׳.
(As is written in the Pardes, in Erchei HaKinuyim, under the entry “Shechinah,” that it causes the entire supernal Atzilus to dwell in the lower world, etc.; see there. Of this it is said, “that I may dwell in their midst, etc.,” [and] “to His dwelling shall you seek, etc.”
The Pardes Rimonim explains that Malchus is called Shechinah because it brings all of the higher Atzilus to dwell in the lower world. The verses “that I may dwell in their midst” and “to His dwelling shall you seek” use the same root.
ועפ״ז [ועל פי זה] יתבאר מ״ש המגיד להבית יוסף בענין פי׳ שכינתא הביאו השל״ה [השני לוחות הברית] בסוף ההקדמה7 בד״ה ולשלימות ענין זה אעתיק דעת דברי המגיד כו׳ עד ועליה רמז הרמב״ן [הרבי משה בן נחמן] במ״ש
On this basis one can explain what the Maggid said to the Beis Yosef about the meaning of “Shechinta,” which the Shelah brought at the end of [his] introduction, in the passage beginning “To complete this matter I will copy the view of the words of the Maggid, etc.,” up to: “And the Ramban alluded to it in what he wrote,
The Maggid, the heavenly teacher who spoke with R. Yosef Karo, author of the Beis Yosef, explained the term “Shechinta,” and the Shelah quotes this at the end of his introduction. The Alter Rebbe will show that the distinction just made clarifies the Maggid’s words.
כי היא עמהם באחדות ולא באצילות ורבים נבוכו בפי׳ דבריו אמנם לפי׳ המגיד מבואר היטב כי שכינתא מטרוניתא היא עם י״ס [י׳ ספירות] עילאין באחדות א׳ כו׳ ואינה עמהם באצילות כו׳ עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו] השל״ה [השני לוחות הברית].
‘that she is with them in oneness but not in emanation’; and many were perplexed in explaining his words. However, according to the Maggid’s explanation it is well explained, that the Shechinta, the Matronita, is with the ten supernal Sefiros in a single oneness, etc., but is not with them in emanation, etc.” End of the Shelah’s words.
The Ramban wrote that the Shechinah is “with them [the Sefiros] in oneness but not in emanation,” a statement many found puzzling. The Maggid explained that the Shechinah is united with the ten Sefiros but is not with them as an emanated level.
אשר לכאורה הוא נגד המבואר בכהאריז״ל [בכתבי האריז״ל] דשכינתא היא מל׳ דאצילות. ולפמ״ש [ולפי מה שכתוב] א״ש [אתי שפיר] דכוונתו הוא ג״כ כמש״ל [כמה שכתוב לעיל] בשם האריז״ל [האר״י זכרונו לברכה] שהמלכות דאצי׳ יש בה ב׳ בחי׳ הא׳ מה שהיא מיוחדת בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] דאצי׳ והב׳ מה שנעשית עתיק לבריאה.
This seems, on the face of it, to contradict what is explained in the writings of the Arizal, that the Shechinta is Malchus of Atzilus. But according to what has been written [here], it is well [resolved]: his intention, too, is as written above in the name of the Arizal, that Malchus of Atzilus has two levels: the first, as it is united with the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus; and the second, as it becomes Atik for Beriah.
This seems to contradict the Arizal, for whom the Shechinah is Malchus of Atzilus, which is certainly emanated. The Alter Rebbe reconciles them: Malchus of Atzilus has two levels, and the Maggid speaks of the one that has descended to become Atik of Beriah.
ושכינתא נקרא הבחי׳ השנית שבמל׳ דוקא. מיהו ע״פ שיר השירים נתבאר לעיל בחינת שכינתא עילאה והיינו בחי׳ בינה ופי׳ הטעם בפרדס שם מפני שמשכנת ג׳ ראשונות על שבע ספירות הבנין.
And Shechinta is the name specifically of the second level in Malchus. However, [in the discourse] on “The Song of Songs,” the level of the supernal Shechinah was explained above, namely the level of Binah, and the Pardes there explains the reason: because it causes the first three [Sefiros] to dwell upon the seven Sefiros of the structure.
Strictly, “Shechinta” names Malchus in its second, descended state. Yet an earlier discourse on the Song of Songs spoke of a “supernal Shechinah,” Binah, which the Pardes says is so called because it brings the first three Sefiros to dwell upon the seven lower ones.
וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] י״ל [יש לומר] דהבחי׳ מל׳ כמו שהיא באצי׳ נק׳ כן עיין בזהר הרקיע ר״פ בראשית ובספר אשל אברהם שם גבי כשושנה כו׳ כן רעיתי8 כו׳.
Likewise one may say that the level of Malchus as it is in Atzilus is also called so. See the Zohar HaRakia at the beginning of Parshas Bereishis, and the book Eshel Avraham there, on “As a rose, etc., so is My beloved, etc.”
By the same logic, Malchus within Atzilus may also be called Shechinah. The Zohar HaRakia and the book Eshel Avraham discuss this on the verse “As a rose among the thorns, so is My beloved among the daughters.”
והנה בליקוטי הש״ס [הששה סדרים] להאריז״ל [להאר״י זכרונו לברכה] בד״ה דע משארז״ל [מה שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] לכי ומעטי את עצמך9 משמע ג״כ כמ״ש המגיד להרב״י [להרב בית יוסף] ע״ש במ״ש ולבחינה זו נאמר לכי ומעטי את עצמך כו׳ כי המלכות דאצילות אינו יורדת למטה כו׳ ע״ש.
Now, in Likkutei HaShas of the Arizal, in the passage beginning “Know that from what our Sages, of blessed memory, said, ‘Go and diminish yourself,’” it is also implied as the Maggid said to the Beis Yosef. See there, where it says, “And of this level it was said, ‘Go and diminish yourself, etc.,’ for Malchus of Atzilus does not descend below, etc.” See there.
The Talmud recounts that when the moon complained, G‑d told it, “Go and diminish yourself.” The Arizal’s Likkutei HaShas applies this to Malchus and says that Malchus of Atzilus itself does not descend, which agrees with the Maggid.
ובע״ח [ובעץ חיים] שער מ״ז רפ״ה כ׳ [כתב] והנה סוד ע״י דבריאה הוא סוד נקודת מלכות דאצי׳ שאמר לה הקב״ה לכי ומעטי10 והוי ראש לשועלים כי זו היא ראש לכל הבריאה והוא סוד ע״י דבריאה עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו] וע״ש ג״כ שמ״א ספ״ב [סוף פרק ב׳].
And in Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 47, beginning of chapter 5, it is written: “Now, the secret of Atik Yomin of Beriah is the secret of the point of Malchus of Atzilus, to which the Holy One, blessed be He, said, ‘Go and diminish yourself, and be a head to foxes,’ for this is the head of all of Beriah, and it is the secret of Atik Yomin of Beriah.” End of quote. See there also, Sha’ar 41, end of chapter 2,
Etz Chaim says that the “diminished” point of Malchus of Atzilus becomes Atik Yomin of Beriah, the “head to foxes,” that is, the head of all of Beriah. This is Malchus in its descended state, and further references in Etz Chaim are added.
ובשער מ״ז פ״א. והנה כל דבר שבקדושה עושה רושם במקומו אע״פ [אף על פי] שנסתלק משם ותמיד נשארה נקודה זו בראש הבריאה כו׳ ע״ש)
and Sha’ar 47, chapter 1. Now, every holy thing leaves an impression in its place even though it has departed from there, and this point always remained at the head of Beriah, etc. See there.)
Anything holy leaves an impression where it once was. So the point of Malchus, even after it ascends again, remains always at the head of Beriah.
(ועיין בפרדס שער המציאות פ״א ועיין בפי׳ הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] בזהר ר״פ יתרו דס״ז ע״ב גבי אית מלך לתתא11 כו׳):12
(And see the Pardes, Sha’ar HaMetzius, chapter 1; and see the commentary of the Ramaz on the Zohar, at the beginning of Parshas Yisro, folio 67b, on “There is a King below, etc.”).
Two further references close the paragraph: the Pardes, Sha’ar HaMetzius, and the Ramaz’s commentary on the Zohar’s words “There is a King below.” Both bear on the same theme of Malchus in the lower worlds.
The paragraph defines the term Shechinah: Malchus of Atzilus is so called only when it descends to become Atik of Beriah and dwells among created beings, whereas within Atzilus it is wholly united with the Infinite. This resolves the Maggid’s statement that the Shechinah is “with the Sefiros in oneness but not in emanation.”
The Kehot notes cite the Mitteler Rebbe’s explanation that “resting” and “dwelling” apply only where G‑dliness rests in something created from nothing, and a later discourse (Basi LeGani 5711), which infers that in its root the name Shechinah reaches even above Atzilus, to the Infinite Light before the tzimtzum.
Marei mekomos
- 1כמבואר בסש״ב פנ״ג · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 53:2
- 2בהיכל ק״ק דבי״ע וכן בהיכל ק״ק שבבהמ״ק · במאמרי אדה״א נ״ך ע׳ רכז מבאר זה ”לפי שכאשר בחי׳ אלקות דמל׳ דאצי׳ שורה בהיכל ק״ק דבריאה שהוא נתהווה יש מאין שייך לומר בזה לשון השראה ושכינה ששורה אלקות ושוכן בתחתונים כו׳, אבל בעולם האצי׳ דאיהו וחיוהי חד כנ״ל, שהע״ס דאצי׳ כולם עם כל פרטי פרטיהם מיוחדים בעצמות המאציל לא שייך לומר במדת מל׳ דאצי׳ לשון שכינה ששוכנת באיזה דבר מה כו׳”.
- 3ושורה שם התגלות אלקות שייך לשון שכינה · ”ממה שכותב שראשית התגלות אוא״ס נק׳ בשם שכינה, מובן מזה שענין שכינה הוא למעלה מעלה מאצי׳ ג״כ. גם מבחי׳ האור שלפני הצמצום, שהרי ראשית ההתגלות הוא באור א״ס שלפני הצמצום” — ד״ה באתי לגני תשי״א סעי׳ א.
- 4שמשכנת בעולם התחתון כל האצילות העליון · Pardes Rimmonim 23:21
- 5ושכנתי בתוכם · Exodus 25:8
- 6לשכנו תדרשו · Deuteronomy 12:5
- 7הביאו השל״ה בסוף ההקדמה · דף לט, ב. וראה אוה״ת פ׳ שלח ע׳ תרי.
- 8כשושנה כו׳ כן רעיתי · Song of Songs 2:2
- 9לכי ומעטי את עצמך · Chullin 60b:2–3
- 10שאמר לה הקב״ה לכי ומעטי והוי ראש לשועלים כי זו היא ראש לכל הבריאה · Sefer Etz Chaim 47:4–5
- 11אית מלך לתתא · Zohar, Yitro 1:8–18
- 12
12והנה כמ״כ [כמו כן] בנשמות יש ב׳ בחי׳ כי הנה הנשמות שרשן הוא מבחי׳ פנימית הכלים דאצי׳. והגם שהנשמה היא בעל גבול.
Likewise, in souls there are two levels. For the root of the souls is from the level of the inner dimension of the vessels of Atzilus. And although the soul is a limited being,
Souls, like Malchus, have two levels, because they come from the inner dimension of the vessels of Atzilus. Yet souls are limited, and this needs explaining.
אך כי הנה ענין אורות וכלים דאצי׳ האורות הם א״ס אבל הכלים הם בבחי׳ גבול ותכלית (וכמבואר באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש] בד״ה איהו וחיוהי)1
[this is] because, regarding the lights and vessels of Atzilus, the lights are infinite but the vessels are in a state of limit and finitude (as explained in Iggeres HaKodesh, in the epistle beginning “He and His life-forces”).
In Atzilus the lights are infinite but the vessels are finite, as Iggeres HaKodesh 20 explains. Since souls come from the vessels, their limitation follows.
ועז״א [ועל זה אמר] שיעור קומה של יוצר בראשית רל״ו אלפים רבבות פרסאות כו׳ ולכן בענין גילוי ההארה מע״ס [מעשר ספירות] יש כמה בחינות שונות פעמים האור גובר על הכלי.
Of this it is said, “The measure of the stature of the Creator of the beginning is two hundred thirty-six thousand myriads of parsangs, etc.” Therefore, regarding the revelation of the illumination from the Ten Sefiros, there are several different modes: sometimes the light prevails over the vessel,
The Shiur Komah describes the “stature” of the Creator with an enormous but finite number, showing that the vessels have measure. So the revelation of the Sefiros varies: at times the light dominates the vessel.
ואז הגילוי בבחי׳ ע״ס [עשר ספירות] ופעמים הכלי גובר כו׳ והנשמות נמשכו מפנימית הכלים לכן הם בבחי׳ גבול.
and then the revelation is at the level of the Ten Sefiros; and sometimes the vessel prevails, etc. And the souls were drawn from the inner dimension of the vessels; therefore they are in a state of limitation,
When the light dominates, the revelation is in the manner of the Sefiros; at other times the vessel dominates. Souls derive from the inner dimension of the vessels, so they are bounded.
שהכלים מגבילים האור. ולכן שייך להקרא בשם נשמה וגם שהנשמה קטנה הרבה מהכלים עצמן וכטפה מים כו׳.
for the vessels limit the light. Therefore the name “neshamah” (soul) can apply [to them]; and also, the soul is much smaller than the vessels themselves, like a drop of water, etc.
Because the vessels limit the light, the soul that derives from them is a defined, limited entity, and so the term “neshamah” applies to it. A soul is also far smaller than the vessels themselves, like a mere drop of water.
Souls, too, have two levels, and the paragraph explains why they are finite: they derive from the vessels of Atzilus, which, unlike its lights, are limited.
Marei mekomos
- 1(וכמבואר באגה״ק בד״ה איהו וחיוהי) · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 20:21
13והנה בעוד הנשמות למעלה נק׳ אחים ורעים לז״א ואח״כ נמשכים ע״י יחוד זו״נ [זעיר אנפין ונוקבא] להיות בבחי׳ עיבור במל׳ דאצילות
Now, while the souls are above, they are called “brothers and friends” of Z’eir Anpin. Afterwards they are drawn, through the union of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva, to be in a state of gestation (ibbur) in Malchus of Atzilus.
Before descending, souls in Atzilus are called “brothers and friends” of Z’eir Anpin, close to the divine attributes themselves. They are then drawn down, through the union of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva (Malchus), into a state of “gestation” within Malchus of Atzilus.
וזהו מאמר אליהו חי ה׳ אשר עמדתי לפניו12 ואז נקרא בנות ירושלים לפי שכשהנשמה עומדת שם היא בתכלית היחוד וביטול באור א״ס שקודם הפרסא מעין ביטול הכלים דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] עצמן דאיהו וגרמוהי חד.
This is the saying of Eliyahu, “As G‑d lives, before Whom I have stood.” Then they are called “daughters of Jerusalem,” because when the soul stands there, it is in the utmost unity and self-nullification (bittul) in the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) that is before the partition (parsa), akin to the nullification of the vessels of the Ten Sefiros themselves, for “He and His vessels are one.”
Eliyahu’s words “before Whom I have stood” describe a soul standing before G‑d prior to its descent. In this state the souls are called “daughters of Jerusalem,” wholly nullified in the Infinite Light above the partition that separates Atzilus from the created worlds, like the vessels of Atzilus themselves.
(ועמ״ש בפ׳ יתרו בביאור דזכור את יום השבת34 כו׳ וע״פ ושמתי כדכד)56 וזהו יפ׳ [פירוש] בנות ירושלים שיכולים לקבל בחי׳ יראה שבמלכות בשלימות וזהו בחי׳ נשמה שנתת בי טהורה היא7
(See what is written in Parshas Yisro in the explanation of “Remember the Shabbos day, etc.,” and on “I will make [your windows] of kadkod.”) This is the explanation of “daughters of Jerusalem”: that they are able to receive the level of awe (yirah) that is in Malchus in completeness. And this is the level of “The soul that You have placed within me is pure,”
The name Yerushalayim is read as yirah shleimah, “complete awe”: souls in Atzilus can receive the awe that flows from Malchus in its fullness. The morning blessing “The soul You placed within me is pure” refers to this stage.
דהיינו בעודה באצי׳ כנ״ל ואח״כ אתה בראתה היינו כשיורדת הנשמה לבריאה וידוע שבין אצי׳ לבריאה יש פרסא הנקרא בלשון הגמרא פרגוד89 כדי שיוכל להיות בחי׳ נברא.
that is, while it is in Atzilus, as above; and afterwards, “You created it,” that is, when the soul descends to Beriah. It is known that between Atzilus and Beriah there is a partition, called in the language of the Gemara a “curtain” (pargod), so that there can be the level of a created being.
The blessing continues “You created it,” which refers to the soul’s descent into Beriah. Between Atzilus and Beriah stands a partition, which the Talmud calls the pargod (curtain); it is what allows a separate, created being to exist.
נמצא כמו שבבחי׳ מל׳ יש ב׳ בחי׳. הא׳ היותה באצילות. הב׳ מה ששוכנת בהיכל קדשי קדשים דבי״ע ונעשי׳ [ונעשית / ונעשים] עתיק דבריאה כנ״ל כמ״כ [כמו כן] בהנשמות שנמשכין מפנימי׳ [מפנימיות / מפנימית] הכלים דמל׳ יש ג״כ ב׳ בחי׳ עד״ז.
It follows that just as in the level of Malchus there are two levels—the first, its being in Atzilus; the second, its dwelling in the chamber of the Holy of Holies of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah and becoming Atik of Beriah, as above—so too in the souls, which are drawn from the inner dimension of the vessels of Malchus, there are likewise two levels in this manner.
The two levels of Malchus, in Atzilus and as Atik of Beriah, are paralleled in the souls, which derive from the inner dimension of the vessels of Malchus. Each soul, too, has a level in Atzilus and a level below it.
וזהו ענין טהורה היא אתה בראתה כו׳ והנה בירידת הנשמה בבי״ע (וכן בבחי׳ מל׳) אז נקראת כלה לשון כלתה נפשי.10
This is the meaning of “It is pure; You created it, etc.” Now, with the soul’s descent into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah (and likewise with the level of Malchus), it is then called kallah (bride), a term related to “my soul pines (kalsah).”
“It is pure” and “You created it” are thus the soul’s two stages. Once it descends into the lower worlds, the soul (like Malchus) is called kallah, “bride,” which the Alter Rebbe connects with kalsah, the pining of the soul.
וכמ״ש באדר״ז [באדרא זוטא] (דף ר״צ ע״ב) כדין אקרי כלה11 כו׳ והיינו דלפי שירדה בבריאה שהוא בעל גבול
As is written in the Idra Zuta (folio 290b), “Then she is called kallah, etc.” That is: because it descended into Beriah, which is limited
The Idra Zuta of the Zohar also uses the name kallah for this stage. The soul pines because it has come down into Beriah, a world of limitation.
(משא״כ באצי׳ הרי האורות הם בחי׳ א״ס) ע״כ כלתה נפשה מתי אבוא ואראה12 התגלות אור א״ס.
(which is not so in Atzilus, where the lights are at the level of the Infinite), therefore her soul pines: “When shall I come and see” the revelation of the Infinite Light?
In Atzilus the lights are infinite, but in Beriah the soul is limited, and so it pines to see the revelation of the Infinite Light, in the psalmist’s words, “When shall I come and see?” The Kehot note quotes the Mitteler Rebbe: the phrase implies that the soul has not yet come near, but only longs to.
כי בבריאה ההתגלות הוא בבחי׳ גבול וצמצום וע״י הפרסא. שלכן המלאכים אומרים13 ג׳ פעמים קדוש. שבכל ד׳ שעות אומר קדוש מחדש.14
For in Beriah the revelation is in a mode of limitation and contraction, and through the partition. This is why the angels say “Holy” three times: every four hours [the angel] says “Holy” anew,
In Beriah revelation is limited and comes through the partition. Tanna DeVei Eliyahu teaches that the angels say “Holy” three times, each four hours apart.
כי ההשגה וההשפעה הנמשך לו הוא בגבול ונמשך לו ההתפעלות מזה ד׳ שעות עד שאח״כ אומר עוד קדוש כו׳.
because the comprehension and influx drawn to him is limited, and the stirring it produces in him lasts four hours, until afterwards he says “Holy” again, etc.
The angel receives only a limited measure of comprehension, which stirs him for four hours; then he says “Holy” anew. This shows how measured the revelation in Beriah is.
שאילו היה נמשך לו התגלות ההשגה מבחי׳ מלכות יותר היה מתבטל ממציאותו וכמאמר הושיט הקב״ה אצבעו הקטנה15 ביניהן ושרפן.
For were a greater revelation of comprehension drawn to him from the level of Malchus, he would be nullified out of existence, as in the saying, “The Holy One, blessed be He, stretched out His little finger among them and burned them.”
A greater revelation from Malchus would annihilate the angel. The Talmud relates that when angels objected to the creation of man, G‑d put out His little finger among them and burned them.
Souls, like Malchus, have two levels: in Atzilus they are “daughters of Jerusalem,” nullified within the Infinite; after descending into Beriah they become a “bride,” pining for a revelation they lack, because Beriah’s revelation is limited, as the angels’ measured “Holy” shows.
The partition (parsa) between Atzilus and Beriah is what makes created existence possible: above it, souls are like the vessels of Atzilus, one with G‑d; below it, they become distinct beings. The Alter Rebbe reads the morning blessing’s “pure” and “You created it” as these two stages.
Marei mekomos
- 1הי ה׳ אשר עמדתי לפניו · מ״א יז, א. וראה לעיל ו, ג.
- 2חי ה׳ אשר עמדתי לפניו · I Kings 17:1
- 3בביאור דזכור את יום השבת · תו״א עא, א ואיהו וגרמוהי קאי על בחי׳ אותיות המחשבה.
- 4זכור את יום השבת · Exodus 20:8
- 5וע״פ ושמתי כדכד · לעיל פ׳ ראה כז, א מקור הנשמה מבחי׳ פנימי׳ הכלים.
- 6ושמתי כדכד · Isaiah 54:12
- 7נשמה שנתת בי טהורה היא · Berakhot 60b:4
- 8בלשון הגמרא פרגוד · ברכות (יח, ב). [כ].
- 9הנקרא בלשון הגמרא פרגוד · Berakhot 18b
- 10מלשון כלתה נפשי · Psalms 84:3
- 11באדר״ז (דף ר״צ ע״ב) כדין אקרי כלה · Zohar, Idra Zuta 16:69–19:77
- 12מתי אבוא ואראה · Psalms 42:3
- 13המלאכים אומרים ג״פ קדוש שבכל ד׳ שעות · תנא דבי אליהו רבה פ״ו, פי״ז, פל״א ועוד. במאמרי אדה״ז על מארז״ל ע׳ קכג מביא זה בשם ספר הבהיר. על״ק ד״ה לבבתני פ״ג (כט, ב). וש״נ. שם (ל, ד). [כ].
- 14המלאכים אומרים ג׳ פעמים קדוש. שבכל ד׳ שעות אומר קדוש מחדש · Tanna DeBei Eliyahu Rabbah 6:1
- 15הושיט הקב״ה אצבעו הקטנה · Sanhedrin 38b:5
14ולכן הנשמה שהיא שם בבחי׳ בע״ג [בעלי גבול / בעל גבול] אז הכלות הנפש לבוא מבחי׳ בע״ג [בעלי גבול / בעל גבול] להתגלות בלתי בע״ג [בעלי גבול / בעל גבול] הוא התשוקה בהתגלות וכלות הנפש יתירה מתי אבוא ואראה1 כי עדיין לא בא וזהו זכרו את2 ה׳ מרחוק.
Therefore the soul that is there in a state of limitation—its pining to come from the state of limitation to a revelation without limitation is then a longing in revelation and an intense pining of the soul: “When shall I come and see,” for it has not yet come. And this is “Remember G‑d from afar.”
Because the soul in Beriah is limited, its longing for what is unlimited is open and intense: it pines precisely because it has not yet arrived. Jeremiah’s words “Remember G‑d from afar” describe this love from a distance.
The bride’s longing is intense precisely because of the distance: the soul in Beriah has not yet reached what it yearns for.
The Kehot note observes that in Jeremiah the verse has “from afar” before “G‑d,” and it also points to the other transcript of this discourse, in Maamarei Admur HaZaken, Kesuvim.
Marei mekomos
- 1מתי אבוא ואראה · Psalms 42:3
- 2זכרו את ה׳ מרחוק · Jeremiah 51:50
15וע״כ נקרא כלה. אבל הנשמות העומדים בבחי׳ אצי׳ נקראו אחותי שאין האהבה ברשפי אש ע״ד בחי׳ כלה כ״א אהבה בהסתר ובבחי׳ ביטול ושם נאמר בתולות אחריה רעותיה כו׳
Therefore it is called kallah. But the souls that stand at the level of Atzilus are called “my sister,” for [their] love is not with fiery flashes in the manner of the level of kallah, but a hidden love, in a state of self-nullification. And there it is said, “Maidens, her companions, following after her, etc.,
This is why the soul below is called “bride.” Souls in Atzilus are called “my sister” instead: their love is not a fiery yearning but a hidden love expressed as self-nullification, and of them the psalm says, “Maidens, her companions, following after her.”
בהיכלי מלך12 שעומדים שם בהיכלות דאצילות ומקבלים בחי׳ יראה שבשם בשלימות ולכן נק׳ בנות ירושלים ואע״פ [ואף על פי]
in the King’s chambers,” for they stand there in the chambers of Atzilus and receive the level of awe that is there in completeness. Therefore they are called “daughters of Jerusalem.” And although
They are “in the King’s chambers,” the chambers of Atzilus, where they receive complete awe. That is why they are called “daughters of Jerusalem.”
שהם שם ג״כ בבחי׳ בעל גבול כמש״ל [כמה שכתוב לעיל] שהנשמות נמשכים מפנימי׳ [מפנימיות / מפנימית] הכלים מ״מ שם איהו וחיוהי וגרמוהי חד והאור הוא בבחי׳ א״ס.
they too are there in a limited state, as explained above, that the souls are drawn from the inner dimension of the vessels, nevertheless there “He and His life-forces and His vessels are one,” and the light is at the level of the Infinite.
Even there souls are limited, since they come from the vessels, as explained above. But in Atzilus G‑d is one with His life-forces and His vessels, and the light there is infinite.
Souls in Atzilus are called “sister” rather than “bride”: their love is hidden and expressed as self-nullification, and they receive complete awe in the King’s chambers.
The Kehot note points out that the verse itself (Psalms 45:16) reads “in the King’s palace” in the singular, heichal, while the text here has the plural, heichalei (“chambers”).
Marei mekomos
- 1בתולות אחרי׳ רעותי׳ . . בהיכלי מלך · Psalms 45:15
- 2בהיכלי מלך · Psalms 45:16
16ולכן עכ״פ [על כל פנים] הם בטלים בתכלית הביטול לאור א״ס קודם הפרגוד. משא״כ בבריאה ולכן נק׳ כלה
Therefore, at any rate, they are nullified in the utmost self-nullification to the Infinite Light before the curtain. This is not so in Beriah; therefore [there] it is called kallah.
So souls in Atzilus, though limited, are wholly nullified to the Infinite Light above the curtain. In Beriah this is not so, and there the soul is called “bride.”
ונמצא א״כ ירידה וריחוק זה גורם עלייה יתירה שעי״ז נעשים בבחי׳ כלה ואז דווקא הקב״ה נקרא אצלם בשם חתן וכמ״ש ביום חתונתו1 זו מ״ת [מתן תורה].2
It follows, then, that this descent and distance cause an additional ascent, for through it they come to be at the level of kallah, and then specifically the Holy One, blessed be He, is called, in relation to them, by the name chasan (bridegroom), as it is written, “on the day of his wedding”—this is the Giving of the Torah.
The soul’s descent and distance thus bring a greater ascent: only as a “bride” does it have G‑d as its “bridegroom.” The Mishnah reads “the day of his wedding” in the Song of Songs as the Giving of the Torah.
כי נובלות חכמה שלמעלה תורה3 וכמשל הטפה גשמיות שיורדת ונמשכ׳ [ונמשכת] מהמוח ממש וע״י ירידת׳ בהשתלשלו׳ [בהשתלשלות] דרך חוט השדרה נתגשמה ונעשה טפה גשמיות ומ״מ יש בה
For “the Torah is the fallen fruit of the supernal wisdom,” like the analogy of the physical drop that descends and is drawn from the brain itself, and through its descent in stages by way of the spinal cord it became physical and turned into a physical drop; and nevertheless there is in it
The Midrash calls the Torah “the fallen fruit of supernal wisdom.” The Alter Rebbe compares it to a seed-drop, which originates in the brain and becomes physical as it descends through the spinal cord.
מכח המוחין ועצמיותם ממש להוליד בדומה לו כמ״כ [כמו כן] התורה נמשכה מבחי׳ חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא4 ונשתלשלה למטה עד שיוכל להיות מלובשת בגשמיות וע״כ נקרא נובלות
of the power of the intellect (mochin) and their very essence, to beget [one] like itself. So too, the Torah was drawn from the level of “wise, but not with a known wisdom,” and descended in stages below until it could be enclothed in physicality; therefore it is called “fallen fruit.”
Though physical, the drop carries the very essence of the father’s mind and can produce a being like him. So too the Torah comes from G‑d’s wisdom that is beyond any knowable wisdom and descends until it is enclothed in physical matters, yet it carries its source within it.
(ועמ״ש בד״ה ושבתה הארץ56 בענין זריעת הגרעין כו׳ ומ״ש במ״א ע״פ המאמר בזוהר בפ׳ בראשית7 דכ״ז אעשה לו עזר8 דא משנה) וכמו הטפה שנתגשמה כו׳ ונקלטת בבחינת כלה היינו בנשמות ישראל שלומדים התורה בעוה״ז
(See what is written in the discourse beginning “The land shall rest” on the sowing of the seed, etc., and what is written elsewhere on the statement in the Zohar, Parshas Bereishis, folio 27, “‘I will make him a helpmate’—this is the Mishnah.”) And like the drop that became physical, etc., and is taken in by the level of kallah—that is, by the souls of Israel who study the Torah in this world.
As the drop is received by the mother, the Torah is received by the “bride,” the souls of Israel who study it in this world. The parenthesis points to other discourses, including one on the Zohar’s reading of “I will make him a helpmate” as the Mishnah.
לכן הנשמות קודם שנבראים בעודם בבחינת עיבור במל׳ דאצילות מלמדים אותה כל התורה9 ואח״כ בא מלאך וסטרו כו׳10
Therefore, before the souls are created, while they are still in a state of gestation in Malchus of Atzilus, they teach [the soul] the entire Torah, and afterwards an angel comes and strikes him, etc.,
The Talmud teaches that before birth, while in the womb, a child is taught the whole Torah, and then an angel strikes him on the mouth and he forgets it. Here that “gestation” is in Malchus of Atzilus.
כדי שע״י יגיעתו יחזור ללימודו שהוא קליטת הטפה עד״מ שהוא התורה כמו שהיא למטה ולכן ביום חתונתו זו מ״ת [מתן תורה]
so that through his toil he will return to his learning, which is, by way of analogy, the taking in of the drop, that is, the Torah as it is below. Therefore, “on the day of his wedding”—this is the Giving of the Torah,
The forgetting is so that by his own toil he will learn it again, which corresponds to the conception of the seed. This is why the Giving of the Torah is called “the day of his wedding.”
כי בחינת התגלות התורה וירידתה למטה הוא בחינת חתן חות דרגא לבוא בהתגלות התורה מחכמה עילאה עד שנקלטת בבחינת כלה.
for the level of the revelation of the Torah and its descent below is the level of chasan, [as in] chos darga, “descending a level,” to come into the revelation of the Torah from the supernal wisdom until it is taken in by the level of kallah.
Chasan (bridegroom) is read as chos darga, “descending a level”: the Torah comes down from supernal wisdom until the bride receives it. The groom is the Torah descending; the bride is the soul that takes it in.
The descent makes the soul a bride and G‑d a bridegroom, and their union is the Torah: like a seed drawn from the brain, the Torah descends from G‑d’s wisdom into physical form and is received by souls who study it in this world.
The Kehot note cites Or HaTorah’s version, “they teach the whole Torah while it is in the womb,” matching the Talmud in Niddah; here the “womb” is Malchus of Atzilus. The image of the Torah carrying the essence of its source, as the drop carries the essence of the mind, explains why studying it below unites the soul with G‑d’s own wisdom.
Marei mekomos
- 1ביום חתונתו · Song of Songs 3:11
- 2ביום חתונתו זו מ״ת · Taanit 26b:6–7
- 3כי נובלות חכמה שלמעלה תורה · Bereshit Rabbah 17:5
- 4חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:3–4
- 5בד״ה ושבתה הארץ · לעיל פ׳ בהר מ, ב.
- 6ושבתה הארץ · Leviticus 25:2
- 7ע״פ המאמר בזהר בפ׳ בראשית · בביאוה״ז בתחילתו ההפרש בין חיצוניות התורה הנגלית לחיצוניות פנימי׳ התורה.
- 8אעשה לו עזר · Genesis 2:18
- 9מלמדים אותה כל התורה · Niddah 30b:23–24
- 10בעודם בבחי׳ עיבור במל׳ דאצילות · באוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתלב: ”מלמדין כל התורה כולה כשהיא ברחם”.
17ולכן בשיר השירים נזכר הכל בלשון חתן וכלה וגם בלשון דודי. שכמו שהוא בכל נשמה בפרט שבירידתה בבי״ע דוקא נקרא כלה כך הוא בבחינת מל׳ שבירידתה להיות עתיק לבריאה אז דוקא נקרא בשם כלה.
Therefore in the Song of Songs everything is spoken of in terms of chasan and kallah, and also in terms of “my beloved.” For just as with every individual soul, it is specifically in its descent into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah that it is called kallah, so it is with the level of Malchus: specifically in its descent to become Atik for Beriah is it then called by the name kallah.
This explains why the Song of Songs speaks of groom and bride and of “my beloved.” Both the individual soul and Malchus are called “bride” only in their descent into the lower worlds.
The Song of Songs uses the language of bride and groom because it describes souls and Malchus in their descent below Atzilus.
18ופי׳ כלה כל ה׳ היינו כל ר״ל [רוצה לומר] בחי׳ כלליות מכל המדות כי ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דמל׳ נמשכים מעשר מלכיות דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] דאצילות ממל׳ שבכתר נעשה כתר שבמל׳ כו׳ והה׳ הוא בחינת התגלות ועמ״ש ע״פ עיני כל אליך ישברו12 כו׳.
And the meaning of kallah is kol hei: kol (“all”) means the level of the inclusion of all the attributes (middos), for the Ten Sefiros of Malchus are drawn from the ten [aspects of] Malchus of the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus—from the Malchus of Keser comes the Keser of Malchus, etc.—and the hei is the level of revelation. And see what is written on the verse “The eyes of all look to You, etc.”
Kallah (bride) is read as kol hei, “all” and the letter hei. “All” means that Malchus gathers all the attributes, since the ten Sefiros of Malchus come from the Malchus within each of the ten Sefiros of Atzilus, while the hei stands for revelation.
A play on kallah as kol hei: Malchus gathers all the attributes and is the level of revelation.
Marei mekomos
- 1ע״פ עיני כל אליך ישברו · לעיל פ׳ מטות פה, ג.
- 2עיני כל אליך ישברו · Psalms 145:15
19וזהו פי׳ שחורה אני ונאוה1 שמקור נש״י [נשמות ישראל] שבבריאה שהיא בחי׳ המל׳ כשנקרא שכינה כנ״ל אומרת לבנות ירושלים היינו הנשמות שבאצילות שחורה אני מחמת הירידה בבחינת בעל גבול.
This is the meaning of “I am black, yet comely”: the source of the souls of Israel that is in Beriah, which is the level of Malchus when it is called Shechinah, as above, says to the “daughters of Jerusalem,” that is, to the souls that are in Atzilus, “I am black,” because of the descent into a state of limitation.
Here all this is applied to the verse. The speaker is the source of the souls in Beriah, Malchus as Shechinah; she addresses the “daughters of Jerusalem,” the souls still in Atzilus, and says she is “black” because she has descended into limitation.
אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] ונאוה שעי״ז יש התגלות יותר מכמו שהיתה בבחינת בנות ירושלים שהיתה הנשמה אז בהיכלות דאצילות
Even so, “[I am] comely,” for through this there is a greater revelation than there was in the state of “daughters of Jerusalem,” when the soul was then in the chambers of Atzilus.
Yet she is “comely,” because the descent brings a greater revelation than the souls had in the chambers of Atzilus. The darkness of the descent is what makes the greater beauty possible.
This is [the meaning of] “He goes along weeping, carrying the bag of seed; he will surely come back with joyful song, carrying his sheaves,” as the explanation of this is written in the discourse beginning “Return, O Israel”; see there.
The psalm pictures a farmer who sows in tears and reaps in joy: the seed must be buried in the earth to yield a harvest. The soul’s descent is likewise a sowing that yields far more than was sown.
(והטעם כנ״ל שאז דייקא נעשית בבחינת כלה והקב״ה נקרא אצלה בחינת חתן דהיינו המשכת התורה מעצמיות ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] יותר גבוה בשרשה מההשגות שהיה להן בהיכלות דאצילות וכמ״ש בפ׳ לך לך בד״ה ענין לך לך5 בענין נובלות חכמה שלמעלה תורה6 כו׳ ע״ש.
(The reason is as above: that specifically then it comes to be at the level of kallah, and the Holy One, blessed be He, is called, in relation to her, the level of chasan—that is, the drawing down of the Torah from the very essence of the supernal Chochmah, which is higher in its root than the comprehensions they had in the chambers of Atzilus—as is written in Parshas Lech Lecha, in the discourse beginning “The matter of ‘Go forth,’” on “The Torah is the fallen fruit of supernal wisdom, etc.” See there.
The reason, as explained above, is that only after the descent is the soul a “bride,” with G‑d as “groom,” which means receiving the Torah drawn from the very essence of supernal wisdom. That is higher in its source than anything the souls grasped in Atzilus, as the discourse in Torah Ohr on “Go forth” develops.
ובזה יובן מ״ש המגיד להב״י [להבית יוסף] הובא בשל״ה [בשני לוחות הברית] שם שכל מה שנאמר בענין יחוד תפארת ומלכות הכל הוא בבחינת הארתם בנרתק שלהם דהיינו בבחינת מל׳ הנקרא שכינתא. והיינו כמ״ש כאן שאזי דייקא נקרא כלה כו׳ וכדלעיל.
This will explain what the Maggid said to the Beis Yosef, cited in the Shelah there: that everything said about the union of Tiferes and Malchus is all in terms of their illumination within their sheath, that is, in the level of Malchus that is called Shechinta. This is as written here, that specifically then it is called kallah, etc., as above.
The Maggid told the Beis Yosef that all talk of the union of Tiferes and Malchus (the Holy One and the Shechinah) refers to their light within a “sheath,” Malchus called Shechinta. This fits what was said here: Malchus is “bride” precisely after its descent.
והטעם לזה דלכאורה אינו מובן הרי המל׳ כמו שהיא באצילות היא בחי׳ עליונה יותר הרבה כנ״ל ולמה א״כ ענין היחוד דזו״נ [דזעיר אנפין ונוקבא] שנקרא יחוד קב״ה [קודשא בריך הוא] ושכינתיה שהוא המשכת סוכ״ע בממכ״ע [בממלא כל עלמין] שהוא בחינה והמשכה היותר עליונה
The reason for this—for at first glance it is not understood: Malchus as it is in Atzilus is a far higher level, as above. Why then should the union of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva, which is called the union of the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shechinah—which is the drawing down of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) into the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin), the highest level and drawing down—
But why should this be? Malchus within Atzilus is far higher, and the union of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva, which draws the encompassing light (sovev) into the indwelling light (memalei), is the highest kind of drawing down.
יהיה כל זה נמשך דייקא בבחינת כלה שהוא המל׳ שירדה לבריאה כו׳ אלא שהיא עולה באצילות ומתייחדת שם עם ז״א פב״פ [פנים בפנים] עיין בע״ח [בעץ חיים] שמ״ז פ״א ובפע״ח [ובפרי עץ חיים] בכוונות ק״ש [קריאת שמע] ושמ״ע [ושמונה עשרה]. ועיין בזהר בראשית) (דמ״ט סע״א [סוף עמוד א]).
all be drawn specifically in the level of kallah, which is Malchus that descended into Beriah, etc., except that she ascends into Atzilus and unites there with Z’eir Anpin face to face? See Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 47, chapter 1, and Pri Etz Chaim, on the intentions of the Shema and the Shemoneh Esreh. And see the Zohar, Bereishis) (folio 49, end of side a).
Granted that Malchus ascends into Atzilus to unite with Z’eir Anpin face to face, as Etz Chaim, Pri Etz Chaim and the Zohar describe, the partner in this union is still the Malchus that went down to Beriah. That is what needs explaining.
אמנם הענין יובן בהקדים מ״ש במ״א אשר צריך להבין בענין היחודים העליונים למה כינו אותן בזהר וע״כ בלשון זיווג גשמי ונקרא זיווג ז״א ונוקבא וכיוצא.
However, the matter will be understood by first introducing what is written elsewhere: that one needs to understand, regarding the supernal unions, why they are described in the Zohar and Etz Chaim in the language of physical coupling, and called the coupling of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva, and the like.
To answer, the Alter Rebbe first asks why the Zohar and Etz Chaim describe the supernal unions with the imagery of physical marital union, as the “coupling” of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva.
והרי עיקר ענין פי׳ הזיווג והיחוד אינו אלא שפע וגילוי האור מן המשפיע למקבל.
After all, the essential meaning of coupling and union is nothing but the flow and revelation of light from the giver to the receiver.
In essence, “union” means only that light flows from the giver to the receiver. Nothing in that definition calls for a marital image.
א״כ לכאורה יותר היה נראה להמשיל ענין השפעה זו עד״מ משפע הרב לתלמיד או מהשפעת העשיר לעני צדקה כו׳ ולמה הוצרכו להלבישו במשל גשמי מאד.
If so, at first glance it would seem more fitting to compare this bestowal, by way of analogy, to the influence of a teacher on a student, or to a rich man’s giving charity to a poor man, etc. Why did they need to clothe it in a very physical analogy?
A teacher instructing a student, or a rich man giving to a poor man, would seem a more fitting analogy. Why choose so physical an image?
אך הענין הוא שיש הפרש גדול בין שפע הרב לתלמיד ובין יחוד דכר ונוקבא כי בשפע הרב לתלמיד אין כאן רק השפעה מהרב לבד והתלמיד הוא טפל לגמרי שאינו
But the matter is that there is a great difference between the influence of a teacher on a student and the union of male and female. For in the influence of a teacher on a student there is nothing but bestowal from the teacher alone, and the student is entirely secondary, being
The difference is this: between teacher and student, all the giving comes from the teacher, and the student contributes nothing of his own.
אלא בחינת מקבל לבד משא״כ ביחוד דכר ונוקבא הרי האשה ג״כ מזרעת אודם שממנו בשר7 כו׳ וכמ״ש אשה כי תזריע8 וארז״ל [ואמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] אשה מזרעת תחלה יולדת זכר כו׳
only at the level of a recipient alone. This is not so with the union of male and female: the woman too emits seed, the red, from which comes flesh, etc., as it is written, “When a woman emits seed,” and our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “If the woman emits seed first, she gives birth to a male, etc.”
In marital union the woman also contributes seed, from which, the Talmud says, the child’s flesh is formed. The Torah says “When a woman emits seed,” and the Sages teach that if she emits seed first, the child will be male.
ואדרבה עיקר הווית הולד הוא מזרע הנקבה רק שמ״מ נקרא הנקבה בחינת מקבל כי זרע הנקבה אין בה כח להקפיא ולהתרקם ממנו הולד רק ע״י זרע הזכר
On the contrary, the main formation of the child is from the female’s seed; it is only that the female is nevertheless called the recipient, because the female’s seed has no power to congeal so that the child be formed from it, except through the male’s seed,
The child is in fact formed mainly from the woman’s contribution. She is called the receiver only because her seed cannot take form without the man’s.
וכמו החלב שנקפא להיות גבינה ע״י שנותנים בו קיבה וכה״ג [וכהאי גוונא] וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] כחלב תתיכני וכגבינה תקפיאני9 כו׳
like milk that congeals into cheese when rennet is put into it, and the like. This is what is written, “You poured me out like milk and curdled me like cheese, etc.”
Rennet turning milk into cheese illustrates this: the cheese is made of the milk, but it sets only through the rennet. Job describes his own formation in these terms: “You poured me out like milk and curdled me like cheese.”
והנה למעלה ביחוד העליון הוא ג״כ בחינת מ״ן [מיין נוקבין] ומ״ד [ומיין דוכרין] עם היות שבחינת המ״ד [המיין דוכרין] הוא המשכת חכמה עילאה שבתוכה מלובש אור א״ס ב״ה.
Now, above, in the supernal union, there are also the levels of “feminine waters” (mayin nukvin) and “masculine waters” (mayin duchrin). Although the level of the masculine waters is the drawing down of the supernal Chochmah, within which the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, is enclothed,
In the supernal union there is likewise a feminine contribution, mayin nukvin (“feminine waters”), and a masculine one, mayin duchrin (“masculine waters”). The masculine waters are the supernal Chochmah, which bears the Infinite Light.
אך זהו על ידי העלאת מ״ן [מיין נוקבין] שהוא בירורי רפ״ח ניצוצים על ידי שהאדם מתפלל באהוי״ר [באהבה ויראה] בכח האכילה ושתיה שהוא בירורי ק״נ [קליפת נוגה]
this comes about through the raising of the feminine waters, which are the refinements of the 288 sparks, through a person praying with love and awe by the strength of [his] eating and drinking, which is the refinement of kelipas nogah,
Yet that flow comes only in response to the raising of the feminine waters: the refinement of the 288 sparks of holiness that fell in the shattering of the vessels. A person refines them when he prays with love and awe using the strength he drew from food and drink, which belong to kelipas nogah, the realm that is neither holy nor wholly evil.
וכן צמר דציצית וקלף דתפילין כו׳ וזהו ענין מ״ן [מיין נוקבין] דנוקבא שהמלכות דאצילות מתלבשת בבי״ע לברר הרפ״ח ניצוצים כו׳.10
and likewise the wool of tzitzis and the parchment of tefillin, etc. This is the meaning of the feminine waters of Nukva: that Malchus of Atzilus is enclothed in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah to refine the 288 sparks, etc.
Physical things used for mitzvos, such as wool for tzitzis and parchment for tefillin, are refined in the same way. This is the meaning of the “feminine waters” of Nukva: Malchus of Atzilus enters the lower worlds in order to refine these sparks.
The verse is now read: Malchus as Shechinah, descended into Beriah, tells the souls of Atzilus that she is “black” from the descent but “comely” from the greater revelation it brings. The paragraph then asks why the supernal union takes place through the descended Malchus, and begins to answer by explaining why it is pictured as the union of male and female: the female contributes her own seed, as the lower realms contribute “feminine waters” refined through prayer and mitzvos.
The 288 sparks are the fragments of holiness that fell in the shattering of the vessels of Tohu; refining them is what Kabbalah calls “raising feminine waters.” The Kehot note on the Torah Ohr reference sums it up: drawing supernal wisdom down into physical things is accomplished through Keser.
Marei mekomos
- 1וזהו פי׳ שחורה אני ונאוה · Song of Songs 1:5
- 2לך לך · Genesis 12:1
- 3הלוך ילך ובכה נושא משך הזרע · Psalms 126:6
- 4שובה ישרא ל · Hosea 14:2
- 5בד״ה ענין לך לך · תו״א יא, ג. המשכת חכ׳ עליונה בדברים גשמיים הוא ע״י הכתר.
- 6נובלות חכמה שלמעלה תורה · Bereshit Rabbah 17:5
- 7הרי האשה ג״כ מזרעת אודם שממנו בשר · Niddah 31a:9
- 8אשה כי תזריע · Leviticus 12:2
- 9כחלב תתיכני וכגבינה תקפיאני · Job 10:10
- 10בד״ה שובה ישראל · לעיל שבת תשובה סה, ב.
20והנה שרש המ״ן [המיין נוקבין] גבוה מאד לפי שהיא מעולם התהו מלפני מלוך מלך1 כו׳. אלא שמ״מ המ״ד [המיין דוכרין] הוא המברר המ״ן [המיין נוקבין] כו׳
Now, the root of the feminine waters is very high, for it is from the World of Tohu, “before any king reigned, etc.” Yet nevertheless, the masculine waters are what refine the feminine waters, etc.;
The feminine waters come from the World of Tohu, which Kabbalah identifies with the kings who reigned “before any king reigned” over Israel. Their source is therefore very high, even though the masculine waters are what refine them.
אבל אחר הבירור עולה בס״ג [בשם ס״ג] שלמעלה ממ״ד [ממיין דוכרין] דמ״ה [דשם מ״ה] וכנודע מענין אשת חיל עטרת בעלה.2 ולכן הוכרחו להמשיל יחוד העליון לזיווג דכר ונוקבא דייקא אע״פ [אף על פי] שהוא משל גשמי מאד.
but after the refinement, it ascends into [the Name] Sag, which is above the masculine waters of [the Name] Mah, as is known regarding “A woman of valor is the crown of her husband.” Therefore they were compelled to compare the supernal union specifically to the coupling of male and female, even though it is a very physical analogy.
Once refined, the feminine waters rise to the level of the divine Name Sag, higher than the Name Mah from which the masculine waters come. As Proverbs says, “A woman of valor is the crown of her husband,” and this is why only the image of male and female union fits.
(ועמ״ש סד״ה קול דודי בענין מקפץ על הגבעות3 כו׳ ובביאור ע״פ אז ישיר ישראל4 כו׳ עלי באר כו׳) ועפ״ז [ועל פי זה] יובן הטעם דהיחוד עליון הוא דייקא בבחינת שכינתא שהיא המל׳ שיורדת בבריאה כו׳
(See what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “The voice of my beloved” on “leaping over the hills, etc.,” and in the explanation on “Then Israel sang, etc., ‘Spring up, O well, etc.’”) On this basis one will understand the reason that the supernal union is specifically in the level of Shechinta, which is Malchus that descends into Beriah, etc.:
References are given to discourses on “The voice of my beloved” and “Then Israel sang.” Now the question is answered: the supernal union happens through the Shechinah that descended into Beriah.
כי עיקר בירור הרפ״ח ניצוצים הוא בבי״ע משא״כ באצילות לא יגורך רע5 כתיב ובירידתה לבריאה היא מבררת המ״ן [המיין נוקבין] ועי״ז דוקא נעשה היחוד העליון
for the main refinement of the 288 sparks is in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, whereas of Atzilus it is written, “Evil shall not dwell with You.” And in her descent to Beriah she refines the feminine waters, and specifically through this the supernal union takes place;
The 288 sparks are refined mainly in the lower worlds, while Atzilus contains no evil, as the psalm says, “Evil shall not dwell with You.” Only by descending can Malchus gather the feminine waters that make the supernal union possible.
והיינו שהיא עולה באצילות פב״פ [פנים בפנים] עם ז״א כו׳ ומ״מ הענין הוא ע״ד מ״ש הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] פ׳ כי תשא (בדף קפ״ט ע״ב) ודע
that is, she ascends into Atzilus, face to face with Z’eir Anpin, etc. Nevertheless, the matter is along the lines of what the Ramaz wrote in Parshas Ki Sisa (folio 189b): “Know
Having refined them, Malchus rises into Atzilus to unite face to face with Z’eir Anpin. The Ramaz, in his commentary on the Zohar, Parshas Ki Sisa, describes this process.
כי שושנה העליונה היא מלכות דאצילות הנקרא רעיתי וארז״ל [ואמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] מפרנסתי67 מפני שכל הבירורים המתעלים מלמטה ע״י מלכות התחתונה עולים עד מל׳ דאצילות
that the upper rose is Malchus of Atzilus, which is called ‘My beloved’ (rayasi), and our Sages, of blessed memory, said, ‘[read] she who sustains Me (mefarnesasi),’ because all the refinements that are elevated from below by the lower Malchus ascend up to Malchus of Atzilus,
The Ramaz writes that the “upper rose” is Malchus of Atzilus, called “My beloved” (rayasi), which the Sages read as “she who sustains Me” (mefarnesasi). She sustains, because the sparks raised by the lower Malchus reach up to her.
והיא מעלה מ״ן [מיין נוקבין] לבעלה ועי״כ [ועל ידי כך] יורד השפע לעולמות עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו] ועיין מ״ש סד״ה מזמור שיר חנוכת הבית8 בענין אבן מאסו הבונים9 כו׳ ועמ״ש הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] פ׳ כי תצא (דרע״ו) ד״ה ואיהו גדיל לה ומזה נלמוד כו׳ ע״ש.
and she raises feminine waters to her Husband, and through this the bounty descends to the worlds.” End of quote. And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “A psalm, a song of the dedication of the House,” on “The stone the builders rejected, etc.”; and see what the Ramaz wrote in Parshas Ki Seitzei (folio 276), in the passage beginning “And He makes her grow, and from this we learn, etc.” See there.
Malchus then raises these as feminine waters to her Husband, Z’eir Anpin, and blessing descends to the worlds. Further references follow, including a discourse on “The stone the builders rejected,” which became the cornerstone.
ובפ׳ פנחס (דרט״ו ב׳) לאה ורחל נעשים אחד וכ״כ [וכן כתב] עוד ר״פ תרומה (דקכ״ו ע״ב) גבי מי זאת כו׳
And in Parshas Pinchas (folio 215b): Leah and Rachel become one. He also wrote so at the beginning of Parshas Terumah (folio 126b), on “Who is this, etc.”
The Ramaz also says that Leah and Rachel, two aspects of the feminine, become one, and he makes a similar point at the beginning of Parshas Terumah. The Kehot note records a chassid’s manuscript suggesting that the Pinchas reference should read 214b.
ועמ״ש בפ׳ יתרו בד״ה זכור את יום השבת10 בענין עליית הנשמות ע״י ירידתן ב גוף שמתחלה היו מבחינת היחוד דאיהו וגרמוהי חד
And see what is written in Parshas Yisro, in the discourse beginning “Remember the Shabbos day,” on the ascent of the souls through their descent into the body: that at first they were from the level of the unity of “He and His vessels are one,”
The discourse in Torah Ohr on “Remember the Shabbos day” explains that souls rise by descending into the body. At first they belong to the level of “He and His vessels are one,” the level of the vessels of Atzilus.
וע״י התלבשותן בנה״ב [בנפש הבהמית] מתעלות להיות בבחי׳ היחוד דאיהו וחיוהי חד ומובן זה ג״כ עפמ״ש [על פי מה שכתוב] כאן שכשהן באצילות נמשכו מפנימית הכלים שזהו ענין איהו וגרמוהי כו׳
and through their enclothing in the animal soul they ascend to be at the level of the unity of “He and His life-forces are one.” This is also understood according to what is written here: that while in Atzilus they were drawn from the inner dimension of the vessels, which is the matter of “He and His vessels, etc.,”
Clothed in the animal soul, they rise to the level of “He and His life-forces are one,” the level of the lights. This fits the present discourse, which said that in Atzilus the souls derive from the inner dimension of the vessels.
וע״י ירידתן בבי״ע יתעלו יותר כמשי״ת [כמו שיתבאר] בפי׳ שחורה אני ונאוה (ועמ״ש בד״ה אם בחקתי11 הנה מבואר בע״ח [בעץ חיים]):
and through their descent into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah they will ascend higher, as will be explained in the meaning of “I am black, yet comely.” (And see what is written in the discourse beginning “If you walk in My statutes: Now, it is explained in Etz Chaim.”)
Through the descent into the lower worlds they will rise higher still, as the explanation of “I am black, yet comely” will show. The discourse on “If you walk in My statutes” is also cited.
The feminine waters come from Tohu and, once refined, rise above the masculine waters, so the female role in the supernal union is essential. That is why the union takes place through the Shechinah that descended into Beriah, which alone can refine the sparks; the souls likewise ascend higher through their descent.
Sag (63) and Mah (45) are two spellings of the Name Havayah. That the refined feminine waters rise to Sag, above the Mah of the masculine waters, is the Kabbalistic reading of “A woman of valor is the crown of her husband.”
Marei mekomos
- 1מלפני מלוך מלך · Genesis 36:31
- 2אשת חיל עטרת בעלה · Proverbs 12:4
- 3מקפץ על הגבעות · Song of Songs 2:8
- 4אז ישיר ישראל · Numbers 21:17
- 5לא יגורך רע · Psalms 5:5
- 6רעיתי וארז״ל מפרנסתי · Shir HaShirim Rabbah 1:14
- 7רעיתי וארז״ל מפרנסתי · Zohar, Vayikra 16:104–18:111
- 8מזמור שיר חנוכת הבית · Psalms 30:1
- 9אבן מאסו הבונים · Psalms 118:22
- 10זכור את יום השבת · Exodus 20:8
- 11אם בחקתי · Leviticus 26:3
The black and white hair ¶21–27
21ג והנה להבין ביאור ענין שחורה אני שמקבלת בחינת הטפה היא בחינת ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] בבחינת שחורה דהיינו בבחינת ההלכות ודקדוקי סופרים שהן קווצותיו תלתלים שחורות כעורב.1
3. Now, to understand the explanation of “I am black”: that she receives the level of the drop, which is the level of the supernal Chochmah, in the aspect of “black,” that is, in the aspect of the halachos and the fine points of the Scribes, which are [the meaning of] “His locks are curled, black as a raven.”
A new section explains the “blackness.” The soul receives the “drop” of supernal Chochmah, the Torah, in a “black” form: the detailed halachos and the fine points of the Scribes, which are the “locks” of the verse “His locks are curled, black as a raven.”
הענין דאיתא באדרא דנשא (דקל״ב) וז״ל [וזה לשונו] דתניא כתיב קווצותיו תלתלים שחורות כעורב וכתיב ושער רישיה כעמר נקא.2 לא קשיא הא בדיקנא עילאה הא בדיקנא תתאה.3
The matter is that it is stated in the Idra of Naso (folio 132), and these are its words: “For it was taught: it is written, ‘His locks are curled, black as a raven,’ and it is written, ‘and the hair of His head like pure wool.’ There is no difficulty: this is in the upper beard, and this is in the lower beard.
The Idra in the Zohar, Parshas Naso, contrasts two verses: the Song of Songs describes black hair, while Daniel sees the Ancient of Days with hair “like pure wool.” The Zohar answers that the white hair belongs to the upper beard (of Arich Anpin) and the black to the lower beard (of Z’eir Anpin).
וע״ד כד אתייהיבת אורייתא לישראל אתייהיבת באש שחורה על גבי אש לבנה עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו] ודף קל״ו ע״א איתא קוצי דשערי אוכמן כו׳
And on this account, when the Torah was given to Israel, it was given in black fire upon white fire.” End of quote. And on folio 136a it says: “The locks of black hair, etc.,
Hence, says the Zohar, the Torah was given as “black fire upon white fire.” Another passage of the Idra speaks of the black locks of hair.
דאחידן ביה דכיין ומסאבן45 ומכאן אתאחדן טעמי אורייתא בדכייא במסאבא עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו] דפי׳ דכיין ומסאבן היינו מה שהוא כשר ופסול טמא או טהור.
to which pure and impure are attached; and from here the reasons of the Torah are attached, in purity [and] in impurity.” End of quote. The meaning of “pure and impure” is what is kosher and unfit, impure or pure.
From those black locks hang “pure and impure,” and from there the reasons of the Torah branch into purity and impurity. The Alter Rebbe explains that this means the halachic rulings of fit and unfit, pure and impure.
נמצא שרש ההלכות שבל״ת [שבלא תעשה] נמשכין משערות דז״א וההלכות שבמצות עשה נמשכים מבחינת עמר נקא שערות דא״א.67891011
It follows that the root of the halachos of the prohibitive commandments is drawn from the hairs of Z’eir Anpin, while the halachos of the positive commandments are drawn from the level of “pure wool,” the hairs of Arich Anpin.
The conclusion: the laws of the prohibitions stem from the black hairs of Z’eir Anpin, and the laws of the positive commandments from the white hairs of Arich Anpin. This sets up the maamar’s central contrast between the two kinds of mitzvos.
The new section begins the explanation of “black”: the Torah reaches the soul through halachos, rooted, according to the Idra, in the black hair of Z’eir Anpin (the prohibitions) and the white hair of Arich Anpin (the positive commandments).
In this system the “hairs” are narrow channels that convey a reduced light, and the beard of Arich Anpin has thirteen tikkunim corresponding to the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy. The Kehot note says that the Idra’s passage on “pure and impure” is explained at length by the Mitteler Rebbe.
Marei mekomos
- 1קווצותיו תלתלים שחורות כעורב · Song of Songs 5:11
- 2ושער רישיה כעמר נקא · Daniel 7:9
- 3לא קשיא הא בדיקנא עילאה הא בדיקנא תתאה · Zohar, Idra Rabba 11:100–112
- 4ודף קל״ו ע״א . . דכיין ומסאבן · נתבאר בארוכה במאמרי אדה״א נ״ך ע׳ רלז ואילך.
- 5קוצי דשערי אוכמן כו׳ דאחידן ביה דכיין ומסאבן · Zohar, Idra Rabba 25:188–28:199
- 6ובביאור ע״פ אז ישיר ישראל · לעיל חקת סג, ג כמו בגשמיות מה שהאשה מזרעת אע״פ שנמשך ממוח שלה עכ״ז עיקרו בא מהמאכלים שהיא אוכלת כו׳.
- 7לא יגורך רע · Psalms 5:5
- 8רעיתי וארז״ל מפרנסתי · Zohar III, 7b
- 9סד״ה מזמור שיר חנוכת הבית · לעיל פ׳ ברכה צט, ד.
- 10ובפ׳ פנחס דרט״ו ב׳ · בכת״י מחסיד מציין אולי יש כאן טעות הדפוס וצ״ל ריד, ב שכתב שם ”ואז מקבלת רחל אור יסוד אבא הגנוז ביסוד זעיר וזוהי שמחת תורה הנזכרת למהוי כלא חד”.
- 11בד״ה אם בחקתי הנה מבואר בע״ח · כנראה הכוונה להנדפס לעיל פ׳ בחקותי מז, ג.
22והענין כי הנה כבר נתבאר למעלה שכשנצרך להיות המשכה והתגלות חדשה מאור א״ס ב״ה צ״ל הכל ע״י כתר שהוא ממוצע בין המאציל לנאצלים.
The explanation is this: it has already been explained above that when there needs to be a new drawing down and revelation from the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, it must all be through Keser, which is the intermediary between the Emanator and the emanated.
To explain the role of the “hair,” the Alter Rebbe recalls that every new revelation from the Infinite Light must pass through Keser, the intermediary between G‑d and the Sefiros.
וזהו המחדש בטובו. פי׳ שממשיך האור חדש ממקור בחינת א״ס ב״ה על ידי טובו הוא בחינת ורב חסד1 שהוא מדת הכתר ועי״ז אח״כ אור חדש על ציון תאיר.2
This is [the meaning of] “Who renews in His goodness.” That is: He draws new light from the source, the level of the Infinite One, blessed be He, through His goodness, which is the level of “abundant in kindness,” the attribute of Keser; and through this, afterwards, “Shine a new light upon Zion.”
The morning prayer speaks of G‑d “Who renews in His goodness” the work of creation; “His goodness” is “abundant in kindness,” one of the Thirteen Attributes, which belongs to Keser. Through it a new light is drawn down, as the prayer “Shine a new light upon Zion” asks.
Every new revelation must come through Keser and its quality of “abundant kindness.”
The Kehot note points out that “Shine a new light upon Zion” is the wording of Nusach Ashkenaz, not of the Alter Rebbe’s own prayer rite, yet Chassidic discourses explain it nonetheless.
Marei mekomos
- 1ורב חסד · Exodus 34:6
- 2אור חדש על ציון תאיר · נוסח אשכנז — וראה גם סידור סח, ב. אוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתלד ובכ״מ מבארים נוסח התפילה אף שאינו בנוסח אדה״ז.
23והמשכה זו מהכתר בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] הוא רק ע״י בחינת שערות כמ״ש בע״ח [בעץ חיים] ובזהר1 דאו״א [דאבא ואימא] יונקים ממזלות.
This drawing down from Keser into the Ten Sefiros is only through the level of hairs, as is written in Etz Chaim and in the Zohar, that Abba and Imma draw nourishment from the mazalos.
The flow from Keser into the Sefiros passes only through “hairs.” Etz Chaim and the Zohar say that Abba and Imma, Chochmah and Binah, draw from the mazalos, two of the thirteen tikkunim of the beard of Arich Anpin.
והענין כי הנה בעצמותו יתברך נאמר אני הוי׳ לא שניתי2 ולאו ביה מכל אינון מדות כלל3 ולכן בכדי שיהיה ההמשכה והתגלות מא״ס בבחינת חכמה שיומשך מאנת בחינת חכים.
The explanation is this: of His essence, blessed be He, it is said, “I, G‑d, have not changed,” and “none of these attributes is in Him at all.” Therefore, for there to be a drawing down and revelation from the Infinite One in the level of Chochmah—that from “You” there be drawn the level of “wise”—
G‑d’s essence does not change and has none of the attributes. For Him to be revealed as “wise,” in the words of the Tikkunei Zohar, “You are wise,” requires a channel.
this is a great descent, and it comes about through “abundant in kindness,” as it is written, “The world is built by kindness”: that He lowers Himself to be called by the name “wise” and “understanding.”
Being called “wise” and “understanding” is a great descent for G‑d. It comes about through His abundant kindness, as the psalm says, “The world is built by kindness.”
The flow from Keser into Chochmah passes through the “hairs”; for G‑d to be called “wise” is a great descent, made possible by His kindness.
The Kehot note locates the Etz Chaim passage in the Gate of the Birth of Abba and Imma and of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva, at the beginning of chapter 6, where the Zohar is also cited, and points as well to the Idra in Parshas Haazinu (folios 291a and 292a).
Marei mekomos
- 1כמ״ש בע״ח ובזהר · ש׳ הולדת או״א וזו״ן רפ״ו ומביא הזהר שם. וע׳ באד״ר האזינו (רצא, א. רצב, א). [כ].
- 2אני ה׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
- 3ולאו ביה מכל אינון מדות כלל · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:5–7
- 4על ידי רב חסד · Exodus 34:6
- 5עולם חסד יבנה · Psalms 89:3
24ואי אפשר להיות נמשך מבחינת ורב חסד בחכמה כ״א על ידי בחינת שערות לבד. והכלי לזה שיהיה זה הגילוי מאור א״ס הוא על ידי
And it is impossible for [light] to be drawn from the level of “abundant in kindness” into Chochmah except through the level of hairs alone. And the vessel for this, that this revelation from the Infinite Light should come about, is through
From Keser’s kindness into Chochmah the flow can pass only through the “hairs,” narrow channels that convey a reduced light. The vessel through which this revelation of the Infinite Light comes about is the mitzvos.
המצות תרי״ג ארחין דגלגלתא12 שרש המצות רצון עליון ונמשך ע״י שערות י״ג תקוני דיקנא דא״א מדה״ר [מדות הרחמים] ורב חסד3 ואבא יונק ממזל השמיני התגלות טעמי המצות.
the mitzvos, the 613 paths of the Skull (Gulgalta), the root of the mitzvos, the supernal will; and it is drawn through the hairs, the thirteen tikkunim of the beard of Arich Anpin, the attributes of mercy and “abundant in kindness.” And Abba draws nourishment from the eighth mazal, the revelation of the reasons of the mitzvos.
The Zohar speaks of 613 paths in the Gulgalta, the “skull” of Arich Anpin, which are the root of the 613 mitzvos in the supernal will. This will is drawn down through the thirteen tikkunim of the beard of Arich Anpin, the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy, and Chochmah (Abba) draws from the eighth of them, revealing the reasons of the mitzvos.
אך הנה כל בחי׳ ההשתלשלות הנ״ל הוא רק מבחינת יוד אחרונה דשם ס״ג [שם ס״ג] שבטהירו עילאה כמ״ש בספר עמק המלך שער ג׳ (והובא מזה במק״מ [במקדש מלך] פ׳ בראשית4 על דף ט״ו)
However, the whole chain of descent mentioned above is only from the level of the final yud of the Name Sag that is in the Supernal Brightness (Tehiru Ila’ah), as is written in the book Emek HaMelech, Sha’ar 3 (and cited from it in Mikdash Melech, Parshas Bereishis, on folio 15),
Yet this whole chain of descent comes only from the last yud of the Name Sag in the Tehiru Ila’ah, the primordial supernal light, according to Emek HaMelech. It is a tiny aspect relative to what lies above it.
ובזהר פ׳ שמות5 (נ״א [נוסחא אחרינא] פ׳ בראשית) איתא שהתהוות כל העולמות הוא ע״י מחשבה אחת6 ולכן הכל נחשב כטפה בים אוקיינוס.7
and in the Zohar, Parshas Shemos (another reading: Parshas Bereishis), it is stated that the coming into being of all the worlds is through a single thought, and therefore everything is considered like a drop in the ocean.
The Zohar says that all the worlds came into being through a single thought, so that everything is like a drop in the ocean. A drop in the ocean has no separate existence at all, as the Mitteler Rebbe explains in the work cited in the Kehot note.
Therefore, of His essence, blessed be He, one cannot say even “encompassing all worlds” (sovev kol almin), for He is not within the bounds of worlds at all; and also what he said, “You are wise,”
Therefore G‑d’s essence cannot even be called “encompassing all worlds,” since it has no relation to worlds at all. The same applies to Eliyahu’s words “You are wise.”
דהיינו שמבחינת אנת נמשך להתלבש בבחי׳ חכים כנ״ל הנה בעצמותו ומהותו אין שייך גם זאת אלא אנת ר״ל [רוצה לומר] על סכ״ע [סובב כל עלמין].
that is, that from the level of “You” [light] is drawn to be enclothed in the level of “wise,” as above—of His essence and being even this does not apply; rather, “You” refers to the level of “encompassing all worlds.”
Those words mean that from “You” light is drawn into “wise,” but this too cannot describe His essence. “You” there refers only to the light that encompasses all worlds.
כי עצמות א״ס פשוט בתכלית הפשיטות ואור צח ומצוחצח10 אוכם הוא קמי׳ [קמיה]11 וכלא ממש חשיבי אני הוי׳ לא שניתי12 וכמו קודם שנברא העולם וכל מקור ההמשכה וההתגלות הוא רק מבחי׳ מל׳ דא״ס.
For the essence of the Infinite One is simple in the utmost simplicity, and “a clear and lucid light is darkness before Him,” and [all] are considered as truly nothing: “I, G‑d, have not changed,” just as before the world was created. And the entire source of the drawing down and revelation is only from the level of Malchus of the Infinite One.
G‑d’s essence is absolutely simple, and even the purest light is “darkness before Him,” as the Tikkunei Zohar says. The source of all revelation is only Malchus of the Infinite, the aspect of G‑d that relates outward.
אבל בעצמות א״ס לא שייך גם זאת שיהי׳ [שיהיה] מקור שיתגלה איזה הארה ואינו שייך לעולמות כלל שיאמר אנת חכים.
But of the essence of the Infinite One even this does not apply, that there be a source from which any illumination would be revealed; and it does not pertain to the worlds at all, such that one would say, “You are wise.”
G‑d’s essence is not even a source from which some light could be revealed. It has no relation to worlds such that one could say of it, “You are wise.”
רק מבחי׳ מל׳ דא״ס אף שהוא אור א״ס מ״מ היא בחי׳ שיוכל לומר ולהשתלשל מזה עולמות אבי״ע [אצילות בריאה יצירה עשיה] סוכ״ע ע״י דילוג והארת קו וחוט. וע״ז אמר אנת חכים.13
Only from the level of Malchus of the Infinite One: although it is the Infinite Light, nevertheless it is a level of which one can say [this], and from which the worlds of Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah and [the light that] encompasses all worlds can descend, through a leap and through the illumination of the kav and thread. And of this he said, “You are wise.”
Malchus of the Infinite, though it is itself infinite light, is a level of which this can be said, and from it the four worlds and the light that encompasses them unfold, by way of a leap and the thin line of the kav. Eliyahu’s “You are wise” refers to this level.
The mitzvos are the vessel that draws the supernal will through the hairs of Arich Anpin; yet this whole chain is a tiny aspect, and even “encompassing all worlds” and “You are wise” refer only to Malchus of the Infinite, not to G‑d’s essence.
The Kehot note explains, from the Mitteler Rebbe, why the image is a drop in the ocean and not a mustard seed beside the sun: a mustard seed, however small, is still a thing of its own, while a drop in the sea merges with the water and ceases to exist as itself. Malchus of the Infinite, named here as the source of all revelation, corresponds to the “last level” of the Emanator discussed in the first section.
Marei mekomos
- 1תרי״ג ארחין דגלגלתא · זח״ג (קלו, א). [כ].
- 2המצות תרי״ג ארחין דגלגלתא · Zohar, Idra Rabba 25:188–28:199
- 3מדה״ר ורב חסד · Exodus 34:6
- 4במק״מ פ׳ בראשית · מובא גם באוה״ת ויקרא כרך ד ע׳ א׳קסד.
- 5ובזהר פ׳ שמות · (כ, א) להדיא כלשונו הטהור. וע״ל עקב (טז, ריש ד׳). וש״נ. ועל״ק (יז, ד). [כ]. ראה באוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתלד בהמ״מ לשם, ובכמה מקומות מצויין לזהר פ׳ בראשית ע״ש. במאמרי אדה״א נ״ך ע׳ רלג מציין לזהר בראשית.
- 6שהתהוות כל העולמות הוא ע״י מחשבה אחת · Zohar, Shemot 49:354–50:364
- 7כטפה בים אוקיינוס · דיוק הלשון ”כטפה בים אוקיינוס” ולא הלשון ”כמו גרגיר חרדל” נתבאר במאמרי אדה״א נ״ך ע׳ שלח שאף שגרגיר חרדל הוא בתכלית ערך הקטנות לגבי גדלות הגלגל החמה מ״מ הוא מהות בפ״ע. והמשל מטיפה בים שבטילה במציאותה ואינה במהות בפ״ע כלל לפי שמתכללת ומתאחדת ומתאחדת בריבוי המים ע״ש.
- 8אנת חכים · ת״ז בהקדמה (פתח אלי׳).
- 9וגם מה שאמר אנת חכים · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:3–4
- 10ואור צח ומצוחצח · ת״ז תיקון ע.
- 11ואור צח ומצוחצח אוכם הוא קמי׳ · Tikkunei Zohar 135b:1
- 12אני הוי׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
- 13
25והנה התגלות האור מבחינ׳ [מבחינת / מבחינה] זו מבחי׳ אנת לבחי׳ חכים דהיינו שיהיה נמשך התגלות מסכ״ע [מסובב כל עלמין] הארה לעלמין שהחכמה היא ראשית עולם האצי׳ וכתיב כולם בחכמה עשית.1
Now, the revelation of the light from this level, from the level of “You” to the level of “wise”—that is, that there be drawn a revelation from [the light that] encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), an illumination for the worlds, for Chochmah is the beginning of the World of Atzilus, and it is written, “You made them all with wisdom”—
The revelation from “You” into “wise” means that light from the level that encompasses all worlds becomes an illumination for the worlds. Chochmah is the start of Atzilus, and all creation is made through it, as the psalm says, “You made them all with wisdom.”
הוא ע״י מצות עשה וע״ז הגילוי נאמר ושער רישי׳ [רישיה] כעמר נקא2 בחי׳ לובן עליון התגלות רצונו וחסדו ממש.
comes about through the positive commandments. Of this revelation it is said, “and the hair of His head like pure wool”: the level of the supernal whiteness, the revelation of His very will and kindness.
This revelation is drawn down through the positive commandments. It is the “hair like pure wool” of Daniel’s vision, the supernal whiteness: the open revelation of G‑d’s will and kindness.
(וע׳ מזה בביאור ע״פ כי ביום הזה יכפר3 בפ׳ אחרי) והוא פי׳ דיקנא עילאה דר״ל [דרוצה לומר] דיקנא דא״א
(See on this the explanation on “For on this day He shall atone,” in Parshas Acharei.) This is the meaning of “the upper beard,” which means the beard of Arich Anpin,
The positive commandments thus belong to the “upper beard,” the beard of Arich Anpin. The Alter Rebbe refers to his discourse on Yom Kippur, “For on this day He shall atone.”
והיינו ע״י קיום רמ״ח מ״ע [מצות עשה] רמ״ח אברים דמלכא4567 שע״י שעושין המצוה ומקיימין רצונו ית׳ ממשיכין רצונו ממש בעולמות.
that is, through the fulfillment of the 248 positive commandments, “the 248 limbs of the King”: by performing the mitzvah and fulfilling His will, blessed be He, one draws His very will into the worlds.
The Tikkunei Zohar calls the 248 positive commandments “the 248 limbs of the King.” Performing a mitzvah fulfills G‑d’s will and so draws that very will into the worlds.
והאבות קיימו את התורה8 ברוחניות9 הי׳ [היה] ההתגלות למעלה באצי׳ ע״י עובדות שלהם אבל כדי שיהי׳ [שיהיה]
The Patriarchs fulfilled the Torah in a spiritual manner; the revelation through their deeds was above, in Atzilus. But for there to be
The Patriarchs kept the Torah before it was given, but in a spiritual way, and their deeds brought revelation only in the higher world of Atzilus. The Midrash calls their mitzvos “fragrances,” in contrast to Israel’s mitzvos after Sinai.
ההתגלות למטה ממש מבחי׳ עשר רישי׳ [רישיה] כעמר נקא הוא ע״י מעשה המצות בגשמיות ממש שע״י זה נמשך גילוי בחי׳ סכ״ע [סובב כל עלמין] למטה שיהי׳ [שיהיה] למטה ג״כ הגילוי
a revelation literally below, from the level of “the hair of His head like pure wool,” it is through the performance of the mitzvos with actual physical things. Through this a revelation of the level of “encompassing all worlds” is drawn below, so that below too there is the revelation
To bring the revelation of “pure wool” down into this world requires mitzvos done with physical objects. Through them the encompassing light is revealed below.
כמו למעלה בחכמה עילאה שנמשך בחי׳ אנת בבחי׳ חכים כנ״ל (ועמש״ל [ועיין מה שכתוב לעיל] בפ׳ לך לך10 ועמ״ש מענין השערות ע״פ ועשית בגדי קדש11 לאהרן12 כו׳ ומ״ש ע״פ והיה לכם לציצית13 בפי׳ והייתם קדושים).14
as above in the supernal Chochmah, where the level of “You” is drawn into the level of “wise,” as above. (See what was written above in Parshas Lech Lecha; see what is written on the hairs on the verse “You shall make holy garments for Aharon, etc.”; and what is written on the verse “It shall be tzitzis for you,” on the meaning of “and you shall be holy.”)
Below then mirrors above, where “You” is drawn into “wise.” References follow to discourses in Torah Ohr on Lech Lecha and Tetzaveh and to a discourse on tzitzis.
אך שיהי׳ [שיהיה] התגלות עצמותו כביכול שלמעלה מבחי׳ סוכ״ע לא יוכל להיות כ״א לעתיד לבוא (ועיין בהרמ״ז [בהרב משה זכות] בפ׳ בראשית) (בדף ד׳ ע״ב) שכתב.
But that there be a revelation of His essence, as it were, which is above the level of “encompassing all worlds,” cannot be except in the Time to Come. (See the Ramaz on Parshas Bereishis) (on folio 4b), who wrote,
A revelation of G‑d’s essence itself, above even the encompassing light, will come only in the Time to Come. The Ramaz, in his commentary on the Zohar, says the same.
וז״ל [וזה לשונו] ונלע״ד [ונראה לעניות דעתי] שעיקר התיקון הוא לזמן תיקון העולמות אחר זמן המשיח שאז יהיה בנו כח להמשיך הטפה מפנימיות עתיק משא״כ עתה עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו]
and these are his words: “It seems to my humble mind that the main rectification is for the time of the rectification of the worlds after the time of Mashiach, for then we will have the power to draw the drop from the inner dimension of Atik, which is not so now.” End of quote.
The Ramaz writes that the full rectification belongs to the era after Mashiach, when it will be possible to draw down from the inner dimension of Atik, the innermost level of Keser. Now that is not yet possible.
והנה אז יהיה הגילוי גם למטה ממש (ועמ״ש ע״פ שימני כחותם)15 ועל ידי שמקיימין מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] כמשי״ת [כמו שיתבאר]
Then the revelation will be literally below as well (see what is written on the verse “Set me as a seal”), and [it will come about] through the fulfillment of the prohibitive commandments, as will be explained.
Then the revelation will reach even this physical world. It will come about through the prohibitive commandments, as the maamar goes on to explain.
והנה מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] הם בבחינת דיקנא תתאה דהיינו דיקנא דז״א קווצותיו תלתלים שחורות כעורב16 תלתלים תלי תלים של הלכות17 דברי סופרים בחי׳ סופר שלמעלה מבחי׳ ספר
Now, the prohibitive commandments are at the level of the lower beard, that is, the beard of Z’eir Anpin: “His locks are curled (taltalim), black as a raven”—taltalim, tilei tilim, “mounds upon mounds” of halachos, the words of the Scribes (soferim), the level of the scribe (sofer), which is above the level of the book (sefer);
The prohibitions belong to the “lower beard,” Z’eir Anpin’s black locks. The Talmud reads taltalim as tilei tilim, “mounds upon mounds” of halachos; these are the words of the Scribes (soferim), whose root, the “scribe,” is above the “book,” the written Torah.
וגם גדרים וסייגים שמדרבנן רובם הם במצות לא תעשה והם שחורות כעורב בבחינת אכזריות דהיינו שנצרך לזה ג״כ מדת גבורות לפסוק שהדבר פסול ולא יוכל להתעלות אף שבהכרח יש בו ניצוץ מקדושה עכ״ז [עם כל זה] דוחין אותו.
and also the rabbinic fences and safeguards, most of which concern prohibitions. And they are “black as a raven,” in a mode of cruelty; that is, this also requires the attribute of severities (gevuros), to rule that the thing is unfit and cannot be elevated: although of necessity there is a spark of holiness in it, nevertheless it is rejected.
Most rabbinic fences also concern prohibitions. They are “black as a raven,” harsh, because ruling something forbidden requires severity: the forbidden thing contains a spark of holiness, yet it is rejected and cannot be elevated.
Positive commandments, rooted in the white hair of Arich Anpin, draw G‑d’s will, the encompassing light, into this world. The revelation of His essence itself, above even that, will come in the Time to Come through the prohibitions, which belong to the black hair of Z’eir Anpin and require severity to reject what cannot be elevated.
The Kehot note points to the Zohar (3:170b), whose wording matches this one, to the Tikkunei Zohar (Tikkun 30, 74a) and to the opening of Tanya, chapter 23, for “the 248 limbs of the King.” The Ramaz’s phrase “to draw the drop from the inner dimension of Atik” echoes the image of the drop of Chochmah from the previous section.
Marei mekomos
- 1וכתיב כולם בחכמה עשית · Psalms 104:24
- 2ושער רישי׳ כעמר נקא · Daniel 7:9
- 3כי ביום הזה יכפר · Leviticus 16:30
- 4רמ״ח מ״ע רמ״ח אברים דמלכא · ע׳ זח״ג (קע, ב) לי׳ כמ״ש כאן. וע׳ ת״ז (ת״ל) עד, סע״א מכוון לכאן. וע׳ בסש״ב רפכ״ג מתקונים. [כ].
- 5רמ״ח מ״ע רמ״ח אברים דמלכא · Zohar, Sh'lach 33:244–34:252
- 6רמ״ח מ״ע רמ״ח אברים דמלכא · Tikkunei Zohar 74a:8
- 7רמ״ח מ״ע רמ״ח אברים דמלכא · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 23:1
- 8והאבות קיימו את התורה · Shir HaShirim Rabbah 1:3
- 9האבות קיימו את התורה ברוחניות · ראה שהש״ר ב, ע״פ לריח שמניך.
- 10בפ׳ לך לך · תו״א י, ב ואילך.
- 11ע״פ ועשית בגדי קדש · תו״א פב, ב.
- 12ועשית בגדי קדש לאהרן · Exodus 28:2
- 13והיה לכם לציצית · Numbers 15:39
- 14והייתם קדושים · Numbers 15:40
- 15שימני כחותם · Song of Songs 8:6
- 16קווצותיו תלתלים שחורות כעורב · Song of Songs 5:11
- 17תלי תלים של הלכות · Eruvin 21b:23–25
26וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] באדרא דשערי אוכמן כו׳ דאחידן בי׳ [ביה] דכיין ומסאבן1 לפסוק שזה הוא טהור וכשר ויכול להתעלות ודבר אחר טמא ופסול ואינו יכול להתעלות אף שיש בו ניצוץ.
This is what is said in the Idra: “the black hairs, etc., to which pure and impure are attached”: to rule that this is pure and kosher and can be elevated, while another thing is impure and unfit and cannot be elevated, although it has a spark in it.
This is the Idra’s statement that “pure and impure” hang from the black hair. It refers to halachic rulings that one thing is pure and can be elevated, while another is impure and cannot be elevated, though it too contains a spark.
ויש בדברים אסורים ג״כ ב׳ בחינות דכמו שבקדושה יש פנימי ומקיף כן יש בקליפה ג״כ ב׳ בחי׳ הנ״ל
And in forbidden things, too, there are two levels: just as in holiness there is the inner and the encompassing, so in kelipah too there are the two levels mentioned above.
Forbidden things have two levels, mirroring holiness, which has an “inner” and an “encompassing” aspect. Kelipah too has both.
כמו לא תאכל חלב2 וכדומה זהו בחינת פנימית שהמאכל נכנס בפנימית ויש בחינת מקיף היינו אף שאין נכנס בפנימית שום דבר נטמא גופו כשנוגע בו וזהו בחי׳ מקיף דקליפה שזהו כל ענין סדר טהרות.
For example, “You shall not eat forbidden fat” and the like: this is the level of the inner, for the food enters within. And there is the level of the encompassing: even though nothing enters within, his body becomes impure when he touches it. This is the level of the encompassing of kelipah, which is the whole subject of the Order of Taharos.
Forbidden food, such as cheilev (forbidden fat), is the “inner” kelipah, for it enters the body. Ritual impurity, contracted merely by touch, is the “encompassing” kelipah; this is the subject of the Order of Taharos in the Mishnah.
The halachic rulings of pure and impure, rooted in the black hair, distinguish what can be elevated from what cannot; forbidden things have an inner kelipah (forbidden food) and an encompassing one (impurity by touch).
Marei mekomos
- 1דשערי אוכמן כו׳ דאחידן בי׳ דכיין ומסאבן · Zohar, Idra Rabba 25:188–28:199
- 2לא תאכל חלב · Leviticus 7:23
27ולכן ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] ודעת זה סדר טהרות.1 שצ״ל שלא יהיה שום מסך מבדיל לא מפנימי ולא ממקיף דקליפה ועל ידי זה לעתיד לבוא יהיה התגלות הארה מעצמותו ומהותו.
Therefore our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “‘And knowledge’—this is the Order of Taharos.” For there must be no separating screen, neither from the inner nor from the encompassing [aspect] of kelipah; and through this, in the Time to Come, there will be a revelation of an illumination from His essence and being.
The Talmud says the word “knowledge” in Isaiah’s verse refers to the Order of Taharos. Both the inner and the encompassing kelipah must be removed, so that no screen divides, and this will bring the revelation of G‑d’s essence in the Time to Come.
וזהו שחורה אני ועי״ז דוקא ונאוה.2 היינו דעם היות שהנשמה כשיורדת בבי״ע בבחינת גבול היא בבחינת שחורה אני.
This is “I am black,” and specifically through this, “comely.” That is: although the soul, when it descends into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, into a state of limitation, is in the state of “I am black,”
This is “I am black,” and through it “comely.” The soul that has descended into the lower worlds is limited, and so “black.”
אבל על ידי קיום המצות ג״כ בבחינת קוצותיו תלתלים שחורות כעורב3 בדקדוקי סופרים גדרים וסייגים שהם מבחי׳ גבורות קדושות ונדחה עי״ז הסט״א [הסטרא אחרא]. לכן אף שלמטה אני שחורה ג״כ כעורב שלא בבחינת המשכה.
yet through fulfilling the mitzvos also in the manner of “his locks are curled, black as a raven”—in the fine points of the Scribes, the fences and safeguards, which are from the level of holy severities (gevuros)—the sitra achra is thereby repelled. Therefore, although below I am black as well, like a raven, not in a mode of drawing down,
But by keeping the mitzvos in the “black” manner as well, through the rulings and fences of the Scribes, which come from holy severity, the soul drives away the sitra achra. This “blackness” is not a drawing down of light but a rejection.
אבל עי״ז ונאוה כי המצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] הם כלים שעל ידי קיומן יהי׳ [יהיה] לע״ל [לעתיד לבוא] התגלות עצמותו ומהותו מה שנאמר בו אני הוי׳ לא שניתי4 ואינו בגדר שום הארת המשכה מאתו יתברך
yet through this, “comely”: for the prohibitive commandments are vessels through whose fulfillment there will be, in the Time to Come, a revelation of His essence and being, of which it is said, “I, G‑d, have not changed,” and which is not within the bounds of any illumination drawn from Him, blessed be He.
That is exactly why she is “comely”: the prohibitions are vessels through which G‑d’s essence itself will be revealed in the Time to Come. That essence, “I, G‑d, have not changed,” is beyond any illumination drawn from Him.
(ואמנם מה דהלכות דל״ת [דלא תעשה] תלויין בדיקנא דז״א שהוא למטה הרבה מבחי׳ דיקנא דא״א דשם תלויין הלכות דמ״ע [דמצות עשה] ובמ״א איתא דל״ת [דלא תעשה] נמשכין מי״ה ומ״ע [ומצות עשה] מו״ה ית׳ לקמן אי״ה [אם ירצה השם]):
(As for the halachos of the prohibitions depending on the beard of Z’eir Anpin, which is far below the level of the beard of Arich Anpin, on which the halachos of the positive commandments depend—and elsewhere it is stated that the prohibitions are drawn from yud-hei and the positive commandments from vav-hei—this will be explained below, G‑d willing.)
Two questions are left for later: why the prohibitions depend on Z’eir Anpin’s beard, which is far lower than Arich Anpin’s, and how this fits the teaching that prohibitions come from the letters yud-hei of G‑d’s Name and positive commandments from vav-hei.
Keeping the prohibitions removes both kinds of kelipah; this “blackness” is what makes the soul “comely,” since the prohibitions are vessels for the revelation of G‑d’s essence in the Time to Come.
Marei mekomos
- 1ולכן ארז״ל ודעת זה סדר טהרות · Shabbat 31a:10
- 2וזהו שחורה אני ועי״ז דוקא ונאוה · Song of Songs 1:5
- 3קוצותיו תלתלים שחורות כעורב · Song of Songs 5:11
- 4אני הוי׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
Tohu and Tikkun: the lion and the ox ¶28–34
28ד ולבאר הטעם צריך להקדים ענין תוהו ותיקון דהנה שבה״כ [שבירת הכלים] דתהו הי׳ [היה] מחמת שהיה האור רב והכלים קטנים מהכיל
4. To explain the reason, one must first introduce the subject of Tohu and Tikkun. The shattering of the vessels of Tohu came about because the light was abundant and the vessels too small to contain [it],
A new section explains the reason by introducing Tohu (chaos) and Tikkun (rectification). In the World of Tohu the vessels shattered because the light was too great for them to hold.
ולא יכלה הכלי להגביל את האור לכן נשברו הכלים ונפלו למטה והאורות נסתלקו בעצמות המאציל.
and the vessel could not limit the light. Therefore the vessels shattered and fell below, and the lights withdrew into the essence of the Emanator.
The vessels could not contain and limit the light, so they broke and fell to lower levels, while the lights withdrew back into their source in the Emanator.
ואח״כ נבררו ונתקנו והתיקון הוא שנעשו בבחינת פרצופים ולהיות כל מדה כלולה מעשר ובריבוי הכלים נתקנו האורות וכמ״ש הרח״ו [הרבי חיים ויטאל] בפי׳ האדר״ז [האדרא זוטא] כי סוד התיקון הוא המעטת האור ואדרבה זו היא סיבה שיוכלו לקבלו הכלים המתבררים.
Afterwards they were refined and rectified. The rectification (tikkun) is that they became configurations (partzufim), each attribute being composed of ten, and through the multiplicity of vessels the lights were rectified. As R. Chaim Vital wrote in his commentary on the Idra Zuta, the secret of the rectification is the diminishing of the light; on the contrary, this is what enables the vessels being refined to receive it.
In Tikkun the fragments were refined and rebuilt as partzufim, “configurations,” each attribute including all ten, so that the many vessels can hold the light. R. Chaim Vital explains that the secret of rectification is a diminishing of the light, which is precisely what lets the vessels receive it.
The fourth section introduces Tohu and Tikkun: the vessels of Tohu shattered because their light was too great, and Tikkun works by diminishing the light so that the vessels can hold it.
This sets up the argument that follows: the higher a light is in its root, the lower its fragments fall, which will explain why forbidden things, though lower, hold sparks of a higher root.
29והנה תחלה נתברר מהכלים דתהו מה שנכלל בעולם האצי׳ בכלים דע״ס [דעשר ספירות] דתיקון ומה שלא היה יכול להכלל באצילות ירד לבי״ע ונבררו שם שנתגלו נשמות ומלאכים.
Now, first there was refined from the vessels of Tohu what was included in the World of Atzilus, in the vessels of the Ten Sefiros of Tikkun; and what could not be included in Atzilus descended to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah and was refined there, so that souls and angels came forth.
After the shattering, the fragments of Tohu were sorted. What could be integrated into the vessels of Atzilus became part of the World of Tikkun; what could not descended into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, where its refinement brought forth souls and angels.
Therefore the angels have the power to be [as in] “and the Chayos carry the Throne,” and “upon the Throne, as the appearance of a man”—the level of the lights and vessels of Atzilus.
This explains a striking power of the angels: the Chayos (the “living creatures” of Ezekiel’s Chariot) “carry the Throne,” and on the Throne is Ezekiel’s “likeness of the appearance of a man,” the lights and vessels of Atzilus. Lower beings bear a higher level.
וזהו לפי ששרשם מעולם התהו ואורות דתהו גבוהים יותר מאורות דתיקון שהרי התיקון הוא המעטת האור (דרך נקבים וצינורות ושערות)
This is because their root is from the World of Tohu, and the lights of Tohu are higher than the lights of Tikkun, for Tikkun is the diminishing of the light (through apertures, channels and hairs);
They can do so because their root is in Tohu, whose lights are higher than those of Tikkun. Tikkun works by diminishing the light, channeling it through “apertures, channels and hairs.”
רק שמחמת שבה״כ [שבירת הכלים] נסתלקו האורות במאצילן והכלים נפלו למטה אכן אחר שנבררו הכלים ונתעלו מנפילתן חוזר להתגלות בהן שרשן אורות דתהו שהוא בחי׳ לפני מלך מלך לבנ״י [לבני ישראל].3
only that because of the shattering of the vessels the lights withdrew into their Emanator and the vessels fell below. But after the vessels have been refined and raised from their fall, their root, the lights of Tohu, returns to be revealed in them, which is the level of “before any king reigned over the Children of Israel.”
In the shattering, the lights of Tohu withdrew to their source while the vessels fell. Once the vessels are refined and raised, the high lights of Tohu shine in them again. Kabbalah identifies Tohu with the kings of Edom who reigned “before any king reigned over the Children of Israel.”
וזהו שע״י הביטול שבחיות המרכבה זעות מחיל כסא שהוא בירור ותיקון מה שיש בהם משבה״כ [משבירת הכלים] שנברר ונתקן עד שנכלל בבחי׳ ביטול
This is [the meaning of the fact] that through the self-nullification (bittul) of the Chayos of the Chariot, [who] “tremble from the might of the Throne”—which is the refinement and rectification of what is in them from the shattering of the vessels, which was refined and rectified until it was included in the state of self-nullification—
The Chayos “tremble from the might of the Throne.” Their trembling self-nullification is itself the refinement of the Tohu fragments within them, now absorbed into nullification.
אז נתגלה בהם הארה מאורות דתהו שנסתלקו לעצמות המאציל ועי״ז נושאות את הכסא והאדם שעל הכסא לבחי׳ עצמיות א״ס ב״ה בחי׳ כי לא אדם הוא4
then an illumination from the lights of Tohu, which withdrew into the essence of the Emanator, is revealed in them; and through this they carry the Throne and the Man upon the Throne, [up] to the level of the very essence of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, the level of “for He is not a man.”
Then the withdrawn lights of Tohu shine in them, and so they can carry the Throne and the “Man” upon it, reaching even the essence of the Infinite, of which it is said, “for He is not a man.”
והנה המלאכים הם שכבר נברר וזהו ואשר משרתיו כולם עומדים שעומדים בבחי׳ ביטול וכן הנשמות וכמ״ש בע״ח [בעץ חיים]5 שהנשמה עצמה אין צריכה תיקון ולא ירדה רק לברר הנה״ב [הנפש הבהמית]6 כו׳.
Now, the angels are what has already been refined; this is [the meaning of] “and those who serve Him all stand,” for they stand in a state of self-nullification. And so too the souls, as written in Etz Chaim, that the soul itself needs no rectification and descended only to refine the animal soul, etc.
The angels are already refined, which is why the liturgy says they “all stand” in self-nullification. The souls too need no refinement themselves: Etz Chaim says they descend only to refine the animal soul.
The fragments of Tohu that could not be absorbed into Atzilus were refined in the lower worlds into souls and angels. Since the lights of Tohu are higher, the refined angels can “carry the Throne,” bearing what is above them.
The Kehot note locates the Etz Chaim reference in Sha’ar 26 (Sha’ar HaTzelem), end of chapter 1, and points to Tanya, chapter 37, which makes the same point that the soul itself needs no rectification.
Marei mekomos
- 1והחיות נושאות את הכסא · ע״ל שלח (מא, סע״ד). וש״נ. [כ].
- 2ועל הכסא כמראה אדם · Ezekiel 1:26
- 3לפני מלך מלך לבנ״י · Genesis 36:31
- 4כי לא אדם הוא · I Samuel 15:29
- 5וכמ״ש בע״ח · ע׳ סש״ב ח״א (פל״ז) והוא בש׳ כ״ו (ש׳ הצלם) ספ״א. [כ]. ראה בליקוט פירושים ומ״מ — חיטריק שם.
- 6שהנשמה עצמה אין צריכה תיקון ולא ירדה רק לברר הנה״ב · Sefer Etz Chaim 26:2
30והנה כמו שיש ג׳ שותפים באדם1 אב ואם והקב״ה נותן בו נשמה. כמ״כ [כמו כן] בבהמה הגשמי׳ [הגשמיים / הגשמיות / הגשמית] יש בה נפש מבחי׳ החיות שבמרכבה מבחינת השמרים והפסולת שעדיין לא נברר והם מתבררים על ידי
Now, just as there are three partners in a person—father, mother, and the Holy One, blessed be He, Who places a soul in him—so too in the physical animal there is a soul from the level of the Chayos in the Chariot, from the aspect of the dregs and waste that have not yet been refined. They are refined through
The Talmud speaks of three partners in a person: father, mother and G‑d, Who gives the soul. In the same way an animal’s life-force comes from the Chayos of the Chariot, but from their unrefined “dregs.”
האדם שאוכלן ובכח שאכל הבהמה יוכל לומר אחד ואהבת בכל לבבך2 בב׳ יצריך34 ולהתפלל במס״נ [במסירות נפש] על ידי זה נבררו גם הבהמות וכל הדברים המותרים לאוכלן ועי״ז מתגלה הארה מאורות דתהו כנ״ל בענין והחיות נושאות כו׳
the person who eats them: by the strength of having eaten the animal he can say “One” and “You shall love [G‑d] ... with all your heart”—with both your inclinations—and pray with self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh). Through this the animals, too, are refined, and all the things permitted to eat; and through this an illumination from the lights of Tohu is revealed, as above regarding “and the Chayos carry, etc.”
A person refines the animal by eating it and using its energy to say “One” in the Shema, to love G‑d “with all your heart,” which the Mishnah reads as with both inclinations, and to pray with self-sacrifice. Permitted foods are thus elevated, and a light from Tohu is revealed, as with the Chayos that carry the Throne.
וכן כשעושין מהם מצות עשה כמו שופר סוכה ולולב ציצית ותפילין ממשיכים התגלות האורות דתהו שנסתלקו שיתגלו בכלים דתיקון
And likewise when positive commandments are performed with them, such as shofar, sukkah and lulav, tzitzis and tefillin, one draws down the revelation of the lights of Tohu that withdrew, so that they are revealed in the vessels of Tikkun
Using physical things for positive commandments, such as shofar, sukkah, lulav, tzitzis and tefillin, likewise draws the withdrawn lights of Tohu into the vessels of Tikkun.
(ויומשך גילוי זה בנפש האלקי׳ וכמו למעלה והחיות נושאות את בחינת האדם שלו). וכ״ז [וכל זה] הוא בדברים המותרים לפיך. משא״כ הדברים האסורים שלא יוכלו להתעלות כלל.
(and this revelation will be drawn into the G‑dly soul, just as above “the Chayos carry” the level of its “Man”). All this is with things “permitted to your mouth.” This is not so with forbidden things, which cannot be elevated at all.
This revelation reaches the G‑dly soul, just as the Chayos carry the “Man” above. But all this applies only to permitted things; forbidden things cannot be elevated in this way at all.
והנה צ״ל דבמרכבה הקדושה פני אריה אל הימין5 הרי הוא קודם במעלה וגבוה מפני שור ולכן ג״כ בקרבנות הי׳ [היה] אריה דאכיל קרבנין.6
Now, one must understand: in the holy Chariot, “the face of a lion on the right” precedes in rank and is higher than “the face of an ox”; and therefore also in the offerings there was “a lion that devours the offerings.”
A question follows: in Ezekiel’s Chariot the lion’s face is on the right, higher than the ox’s. The Zohar even speaks of a lion that consumed the offerings on the altar.
Permitted animals and objects contain unrefined sparks from the Chayos; eating them for divine service or using them for mitzvos elevates them and reveals light from Tohu. The question is then raised why the lion, higher above, is forbidden below.
Marei mekomos
- 1ג׳ שותפים באדם · Kiddushin 30b
- 2ואהבת בכל לבבך · Deuteronomy 6:5
- 3בכל לבבך בב׳ יצריך · ברכות פ״ט, מ״ה.
- 4בכל לבבך בב׳ יצריך · Mishnah Berakhot 9:5
- 5פני אריה אל הימין · Ezekiel 1:10
- 6ארי׳ דאכיל קרבנין · Zohar I, 6b
31ומדוע למטה השור מותר לאוכלו ויוכ ל להתעלות ע״י האדם שאוכלו או שמקריבו ע״ג [על גבי] המזבח שעי״ז נתעלה
Why, then, below, is the ox permitted to be eaten, and can be elevated by the person who eats it or offers it upon the altar, so that through this
So why, below, is the ox permitted for eating and for the altar, where it is elevated?
עצם השור ונכלל בקדושה משא״כ האריה הוא מחיות טמאות אשר אסורים באכילה ואינו ראוי לכל דבר שבקדושה שלא הוכשר למלאכת שמים אלא מן המותר בפיך.1
the ox itself is elevated and included in holiness; whereas the lion is among the impure beasts, which are forbidden to be eaten, and is unfit for anything holy, for “only what is permitted to your mouth was approved for the work of Heaven”?
The ox itself becomes part of holiness, while the lion is an impure animal, forbidden to eat and unfit for any holy use. The Talmud rules that only what is permitted to eat may be used for sacred work.
והענין כי הנה נודע שהקליפה קדמה לפרי.2 ולא שהקליפה ממש קדמה לפרי ח״ו [חס ושלום] אלא שהאור וחיות הלובש בתוכו בבחינת גלות ונפל שמה משבה״כ [משבירת הכלים]
The explanation is this: it is known that “the husk precedes the fruit.” Not that the husk literally precedes the fruit, G‑d forbid; rather, the light and life-force that is enclothed within it in a state of exile, having fallen there from the shattering of the vessels,
The answer is the principle that “the husk precedes the fruit.” It does not mean the husk is truly prior or better; it refers to the light trapped in the husk, which fell there in the shattering and is in exile there.
הנה הוא ממדרגות עליונות יותר מהפרי עצמה (וכמ״ש בד״ה ויהי בשלח פרעה)34 וכנ״ל מענין תוהו ותיקון ואעפ״כ [ואף על פי כן] הקליפה עצמה היא סיגים וקליפה.
is from higher levels than the fruit itself (as is written in the discourse beginning “And it was when Pharaoh sent”), as above regarding Tohu and Tikkun. Nevertheless, the husk itself is dross and husk (kelipah).
That trapped light comes from higher levels than the fruit itself, as Tohu is higher than Tikkun. Yet the husk itself is dross.
ולכן האריה למטה5 הוא חיה טמאה ולמטה מהשור שהוא לגבי האריה כמו פרי לקליפה ואמנם שרש האור והחיות והניצוץ המלובש בו הוא מבחינת שלמעלה מהשור שהרי למעלה פני אריה אל הימין6 כו׳.
Therefore the lion below is an impure beast and below the ox, which relative to the lion is like fruit relative to husk. However, the root of the light, life-force and spark enclothed in it is from a level above the ox, for above, “the face of a lion is on the right, etc.”
So below, the lion is impure and lower than the ox, as husk is to fruit. But the spark within the lion comes from a root higher than the ox, matching the lion’s place on the right in the Chariot.
“The husk precedes the fruit”: the light trapped in kelipah comes from a higher level than the fruit. So the lion below is impure, yet its spark is rooted higher than the ox’s.
The principle that the husk “precedes” the fruit reflects the order of Tohu before Tikkun: the world of chaos, with its great lights and broken vessels, came first.
Marei mekomos
- 1שלא הוכשר למלאכת שמים אלא מן המותר בפיך · Shabbat 28b:2
- 2שהקליפה קדמה לפרי · ראה אוה״ת פ׳ שופטים ע׳ תתל.
- 3בד״ה ויהי בשלח פרעה · בתו״א סא, א. וראה אוה״ת שמות כרך ז ע׳ ב׳תרנג.
- 4ויהי בשלח פרעה · Exodus 13:17
- 5ולכן הארי׳ למטה · ראה תו״א כה, ג.
- 6שהרי למעלה פני אריה אל הימין · Ezekiel 1:10
32והנה כענין התהוות הארי׳ [האריה] שלמטה מפני ארי׳ [אריה] כך עד״ז הוא ענין אברהם שיצא ממנו ישמעאל1 פי׳ שיצא ממנו בבחינת סיגים שנפרדו2 מהכסף ואז נעשה אברהם מרכבה לחסד דאצילות כמו הכסף לאחר שהוטהר מהסיגים.
Now, like the coming into being of the lion below from the face of the lion, so in the same way is the matter of Avraham, from whom Yishmael came forth. This means that he came forth from him as dross separated from the silver; and then Avraham became a chariot for the Chesed (kindness) of Atzilus, like silver after it has been purified of its dross.
The same pattern explains the Talmud’s phrase “Avraham, from whom Yishmael came forth.” In the Kabbalistic reading followed here, Yishmael emerged like dross separated from silver, and once it was removed Avraham became a pure “chariot,” a vessel for the Chesed of Atzilus.
The pattern is applied to Avraham and Yishmael: Yishmael emerged as the dross separated from Avraham, leaving Avraham a pure vessel for the Chesed of Atzilus.
The phrase “Avraham, from whom Yishmael came forth” is the Talmud’s (Pesachim 56a); the Alter Rebbe reads it through the Kabbalistic model of refinement, in which dross is separated so that the silver becomes pure.
Marei mekomos
- 1אברהם שיצא ממנו ישמעאל · Pesachim 56a:7
- 2בבחינת סיגים שנפרדו · ראה לעיל פ׳ ואתחנן ה, א.
33ובעת שהיה קודם בירור הכלים דתהו הי׳ [היה] כלול ישמעאל ג״כ בבחינת אברהם ונעשה שבה״כ [שבירת הכלים] וישמעאל קדם ליצחק כמו קליפה קדמה לפרי
And at the time before the refinement of the vessels of Tohu, Yishmael too was included in the level of Avraham, and the shattering of the vessels took place; and Yishmael preceded Yitzchak, as the husk precedes the fruit.
Before the vessels of Tohu were refined, Yishmael was still contained within Avraham, and so a “shattering of the vessels” took place. Yishmael was born before Yitzchak, just as the husk precedes the fruit.
ולכן היה הוא הבכור והיינו כמו בחינת האריה שלמטה לגבי השור עד״מ כי בחינת יצחק הוא
Therefore he was the firstborn. This is like the level of the lion below relative to the ox, by way of analogy: for the level of Yitzchak is
That is why he was the firstborn. The relationship parallels that of the lion below to the ox.
כמו בחינת פני שור שבמרכבה הקדושה וישמעאל הוא כמו בחינת האריה שלמטה שהרי שרשו גבוה יותר דהיינו מבחינת פני אריה
like the level of the face of the ox in the holy Chariot, and Yishmael is like the level of the lion below, for his root is higher, that is, from the level of the face of the lion;
Yitzchak corresponds to the face of the ox in the holy Chariot, while Yishmael corresponds to the lion below, whose root is the higher face of the lion.
אמנם הוא עצמו יצא בבחי׳ סיגים וקליפה (ומזה יובן ענין שחורה אני ונאוה כאהלי קדר1 כדלקמן) וכמו השליא שמקפת לולד
but he himself came forth as dross and husk (and from this will be understood the meaning of “I am black, yet comely, like the tents of Kedar,” as below), like the afterbirth that surrounds the child.
Yet Yishmael himself emerged as dross and husk. The text notes in passing that this will later explain the comparison to “the tents of Kedar,” Kedar being a son of Yishmael; it also likens him to the afterbirth that surrounds a child.
וזהו לפי שבשרשה כשהיתה כלולה בהטפה היא נעלה יותר ואח״כ ע״י הבירור נפרדת וזורקין אותה. והענין הוא כי מה שהוא גבוה יותר בשרשו כשנופל בבחינת שבה״כ [שבירת הכלים] נופל למטה יותר.
This is because in its root, when it was included in the drop, it is more exalted, and afterwards, through the refinement, it is separated and thrown away. The explanation is that what is higher in its root, when it falls through the shattering of the vessels, falls lower.
The afterbirth was once part of the seed and, in its root, higher; yet in the process of refinement it is separated and discarded. The general rule: what is higher in its root falls lower when it falls.
ולכן גם בענין שבה״כ [שבירת הכלים] דתהו יש כמה בחינות שמה שנפל למטה יותר זהו מפני ששרשה היה גבוה יותר שהיו האורות גבוהים יותר
Therefore, in the shattering of the vessels of Tohu too, there are several levels: what fell lower did so because its root was higher, for the lights were higher;
So in the shattering of Tohu, the fragments that fell lowest came from the highest lights.
ולכן הכלים לא הכילום ונפלו בכח למטה יותר ויש מבחינת הכלים שנשברו ונפלו שנשתלשלו בבחינת בהמות וחיות המותרים באכילה ומה שגבוה יותר בשרשו נפל למטה יותר בדברים שאסור באכילה.
therefore the vessels could not contain them and fell with force further below. Some of the vessels that shattered and fell descended into domestic animals and beasts permitted to be eaten, and what was higher in its root fell lower, into things forbidden to be eaten.
Those vessels could not hold their great light and fell with greater force. Fragments of lower lights became permitted animals; those of higher lights fell further, into forbidden things.
Yishmael preceded Yitzchak as husk precedes fruit; his root, like the lion’s, is higher, which is why he fell lower. The general rule is that what is higher in its root falls lower.
Marei mekomos
- 1שחורה אני ונאוה כאהלי קדר · Song of Songs 1:5
34והנה קיום המצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] הוא הכל בדברים האסורים ששרשן גבוה יותר מהדברים המותרים כמו אריה נגד שור
Now, the fulfillment of the prohibitive commandments is entirely with forbidden things, whose root is higher than that of the permitted things, like the lion as against the ox.
The prohibitions all concern forbidden things, whose root is higher than that of permitted things, as the lion’s root is higher than the ox’s.
ועל ידי קיום רצונו ית׳ בבחינת הל״ת [הלא תעשה] היינו בבחינת דחייה שדוחין אותן הפנימי׳ [הפנימיות / הפנימית] ומקיפים דקליפה
And through fulfilling His will, blessed be He, in the manner of the prohibitions, that is, in the manner of rejection, in which the inner and encompassing [forces] of kelipah are rejected—
Fulfilling G‑d’s will through the prohibitions means rejecting both the inner and the encompassing kelipah.
היינו על ידי מניעת האכילה לא תאכל או שנזהרים מלטמא בהם וכל הגדרים והסייגים שבהם עי״ז רוח הטומאה יעביר מן הארץ1
that is, through refraining from eating, “You shall not eat,” or being careful not to become impure through them, and all the fences and safeguards concerning them—through this “He will remove the spirit of impurity from the land,”
One rejects them by not eating forbidden foods, by avoiding impurity, and by keeping the fences around them. This brings about the prophecy “the spirit of impurity will be removed from the land.”
ולא יהיה שום הסתר וקליפה ומתגלה עי״ז עצמיות האורות עליונים הגבוהים יותר מהאורות המתגלים ע״י מ״ע [מצות עשה] שבד ברים המותרים כו׳
and there will be no concealment or kelipah; and through this there is revealed the very essence of the supernal lights, which are higher than the lights revealed through the positive commandments performed with permitted things, etc.,
When no concealment remains, the very essence of the highest lights is revealed, higher than the lights revealed through positive commandments with permitted things.
וכמו שלמעלה גילוי בחינת פני אריה2 הוא גבוה מבחינת פני שור כו׳ ועמ״ש בפ׳ עקב ע״פ ויאכילך את המן34 כו׳:
just as above the revelation of the level of the face of the lion is higher than the level of the face of the ox, etc. And see what is written in Parshas Eikev on the verse “And He fed you the manna, etc.”
This parallels the lion’s face, higher than the ox’s, in the Chariot. A discourse in Likkutei Torah, Eikev, on the manna, is cited for further study.
The prohibitions deal with things of higher root; rejecting the kelipah through them removes all concealment and reveals higher lights than the positive commandments do.
Marei mekomos
- 1רוח הטומאה יעביר מן הארץ · Zechariah 13:2
- 2פני אריה · Ezekiel 1:10
- 3בפ׳ עקב ע״פ ויאכילך את המן · לעיל עקב יג, ג.
- 4ויאכילך את המן · Deuteronomy 8:3
The sun, the salt and the tents of Kedar ¶35–42
35ה וזהו שחורה אני כו׳1 אל תראוני שאני שחרחורת ששזפתני השמש.2 היינו כי אף שלמטה אני בבחינת שחרות ובע״ג [ובעלי גבול / ובעל גבול] ובקיום דברים גשמיים
5. And this is [the meaning of] “I am black, etc.; do not look upon me that I am swarthy, for the sun has tanned me.” That is: although below I am in a state of blackness and of limitation, and in the fulfillment of physical things,
A new section reads the next verse: “Do not look upon me that I am swarthy, for the sun has tanned me.” The soul admits that below it is “black,” limited and occupied with physical things.
אבל ע״י כל זה דוקא הנני בא למעלה גדולה שעי״ז יתגלה חדשות התגלות עצמותו ומהותו דהיינו דרך כלל ע״י קיום כל המצות מ״ע [מצות עשה] ומצות ל״ת [לא תעשה].
yet specifically through all this I come to a great elevation, for through this there will be revealed something new: a revelation of His essence and being—that is, in general, through the fulfillment of all the mitzvos, the positive commandments and the prohibitive commandments,
Yet precisely this brings it to a great height, because through it something new will be revealed: G‑d’s essence itself. This comes through keeping all the mitzvos, positive and prohibitive.
שהם בדברים גשמיים אשר שרשם מעולם התהו ואורות דתהו נסתלקו בעצמות המאציל ולכן ע״י קיום רצונו רצון העליון דוקא בדברים הנ״ל יתגלה אור א״ס גילוי יותר נעלה ממה שנתגלה באורות דתיקון.
which are with physical things whose root is from the World of Tohu, and the lights of Tohu withdrew into the essence of the Emanator. Therefore, specifically through fulfilling His will, the supernal will, with these things, the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) will be revealed, a revelation more exalted than what was revealed in the lights of Tikkun.
The mitzvos involve physical things whose root is in Tohu, whose lights withdrew into G‑d’s essence. So doing G‑d’s will with them reveals the Infinite Light more fully than the lights of Tikkun can.
The new section reads “Do not look upon me that I am swarthy”: the soul’s descent into limitation and into physical mitzvos brings a new revelation of G‑d’s essence, because physical things are rooted in Tohu.
Marei mekomos
- 1וזהו שחורה אני כו׳ · Song of Songs 1:5
- 2אל תראוני שאני שחרחורת ששזפתני השמש · Song of Songs 1:6
36ואף שלמטה אני בהסתר וצמצום אבל ששזפתני השמש.1 כי שמש ומגן2 הוי׳ אלקים ושמש הוא בחינת יחו״ע [יחודא עילאה] לך הוי׳ הגדולה כו׳ שבטלים באור א״ס.
And although below I am in concealment and contraction, yet “the sun has tanned me.” For “a sun and a shield is Havayah Elokim,” and “sun” is the level of the higher unity (yichuda ila’ah)—“Yours, Havayah, is the greatness, etc.”—which are nullified in the Infinite Light.
The “sun” that tanned her is Havayah, as in “a sun and a shield is Havayah Elokim.” The sun stands for the higher unity, in which all things are nullified in the Infinite Light, as in “Yours, Havayah, is the greatness.”
ולכן כשמאיר למטה השמש התגלות הארה מבחי׳ יחו״ע [יחודא עילאה] בנפש ע״י ההתבוננות בק״ש [בקריאת שמע] בבחינת יחודא עילאה.
Therefore, when the sun shines below—the revelation of an illumination from the level of the higher unity in the soul—[it is] through contemplation during the Shema, in the manner of the higher unity,
The sun shines below when a person, reciting the Shema, contemplates the higher unity and an illumination of it enters his soul.
איך דכולא קמיה כלא חשיב וע״י קיום המצות כי כל התגלות אור חדש מאור א״ס שאינו בגדר ההשתלשלות צ״ל ע״י בחינת ממוצע היינו בחינת כתר וע״י תרי״ג ארחין שנמשכו מגלגלתא3 ונשתלשלו למטה בקיום רצונו ממש.4
of how “all before Him is considered as nothing,” and through the fulfillment of the mitzvos. For every revelation of new light from the Infinite Light, which is not within the bounds of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), must come through the level of an intermediary, that is, the level of Keser, and through the 613 paths that were drawn from the Gulgalta and descended below in the fulfillment of His very will.
That contemplation is that “all before Him is considered as nothing.” The sun also shines through the mitzvos, because every new revelation from beyond the chain of descent comes through Keser and through the 613 paths of the Gulgalta (the “skull” of Arich Anpin, within Keser), which reach down into the fulfillment of G‑d’s will.
The “sun” is Havayah, the higher unity, which shines into the soul through contemplation in the Shema and through the mitzvos, which draw new light by way of Keser.
In the verse “a sun and a shield is Havayah Elokim,” Chassidus reads the sun as the Name Havayah and the shield as the Name Elokim, which conceals and filters the sun’s light; the higher unity is the perspective from which all is nullified before Him.
Marei mekomos
- 1ששזפתני השמש · Song of Songs 1:6
- 2כי שמש ומגן הוי׳ אלקים · Psalms 84:12
- 3תרי״ג ארחין שנמשכו מגלגלתא · Zohar III, 129a
- 4לך הוי׳ הגדולה · I Chronicles 29:11
37ועי״ז ונתגלה האור מסוכ״ע ע״י קיום רצונו בדברים גשמיים אשר שרשם מעולם התהו שנסתלקו האורות למעלה כנ״ל.
Through this the light from [the level that] encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) is revealed, through fulfilling His will with physical things whose root is from the World of Tohu, whose lights withdrew on high, as mentioned above.
Doing G‑d’s will with physical things rooted in Tohu reveals the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev).
אך מעלת הגילוי שע״י קיום מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] יותר מהגילוי שע״י קיום מ״ע [מצות עשה] הוא כי הנה בבחינת סכ״ע [סובב כל עלמין] יש ג״כ ב׳ מדרגות האחד מה שנקרא סוכ״ע א״כ הוא שייך לעלמין שאף
But the superiority of the revelation through fulfilling the prohibitive commandments over the revelation through fulfilling the positive commandments is this: in the level of “encompassing all worlds” there are also two levels. The first is what is called “encompassing all worlds”; if so, it pertains to worlds, for although
Why are the prohibitions superior? Because the encompassing light itself has two levels. The first is called “encompassing the worlds,” and as its name says, it still relates to worlds.
שהוא סובב ואינו מתגלה מ״מ שייך לקרותו בשם סובב לעלמין ושיהיה הסכ״ע [הסובב כל עלמין] בבחי׳ גילוי ממש הוא ע״י קיום המ״ע [המצות עשה] שהם בדברים המותרים.
it encompasses and is not revealed, nevertheless it can be called by the name “encompassing the worlds.” And that [the light that] encompasses all worlds be in actual revelation comes through fulfilling the positive commandments, which are with permitted things.
Though it does not enter the worlds, it is defined in relation to them. The positive commandments, done with permitted things, bring this encompassing light into actual revelation.
אבל עצמותו ומהותו לא שייך לקרותו באמת בשם סוכ״ע כנזכר לעיל והוא בחינת אני הוי׳ לא שניתי1 כמו קודם שנברא העולם ממש.
But His essence and being cannot truly be called by the name “encompassing all worlds,” as mentioned above; it is the level of “I, G‑d, have not changed,” exactly as before the world was created.
G‑d’s essence, however, cannot truly be called “encompassing the worlds” at all. It is “I, G‑d, have not changed,” exactly as before creation.
The positive commandments reveal the encompassing light, which still relates to worlds; G‑d’s essence, beyond even that, is a different and higher level.
Marei mekomos
- 1אני הוי׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
38והוא המתגלה ע״י קיום מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] דוקא ע״י גבורות ודחיי׳ [ודחיית] הקליפה כי הגבורות בשרשם גבוהים מהחסדים כמו מעלת הזהב על הכסף או כמו שמלח ממתיק הבשר.
And it is this that is revealed specifically through fulfilling the prohibitive commandments, through severities (gevuros) and the rejection of kelipah. For the severities in their root are higher than the kindnesses (chasadim), like the superiority of gold over silver, or as salt sweetens meat:
This essence is revealed specifically through the prohibitions, which work through severity (gevuros) and the rejection of kelipah. In their root severities are higher than kindnesses, as gold is more precious than silver, and as salt brings out the flavor of meat.
היאכל תפל מבלי מלח1 שע״י המלח נתגלה הטעם הרי טעמים שהוא בחינת גבוה (וחיך אוכל יטעם.2 לכן גם אותיות גיכ״ק שמהחיך גבוהים משאר אותיות כמ״ש ע״פ וספרתם לכם ממחרת34 כו׳ עיין באדר״ז [באדרא זוטא] דף רצ״ה ע״ב)
“Can what is tasteless be eaten without salt?” For through the salt the taste is revealed. Thus taste, which is a high level (“and the palate tastes food”; therefore the letters gimmel, yud, kaf, kuf, too, which are from the palate, are higher than the other letters, as is written on the verse “And you shall count for yourselves from the morrow, etc.”; see the Idra Zuta, folio 295b),
Job asks, “Can what is tasteless be eaten without salt?” Taste is a high faculty, and the letters formed with the palate (gimmel, yud, kaf, kuf) are considered higher than the others, as a discourse in Likkutei Torah and the Idra Zuta explain.
מתגלה ע״י המלח דוקא שהוא בעצמו למטה מהמאכל שהרי אינו ראוי לאכילה והוא בבחינת גבורות וגם כמו מלה בסלע משתוקא בתרין5
is revealed specifically through the salt, which in itself is below the food, for it is not fit to be eaten, and it is in the aspect of severities. It is also like [the saying], “A word is worth a sela, silence is worth two,”
Salt itself is not food and belongs to severity, yet it reveals the taste. The Talmud’s saying “A word is worth a sela, silence is worth two” makes a similar point: restraint is worth more than expression.
דהיינו ע״י קיום הל״ת [הלא תעשה] בבחינת שלילה אשר הם בדברים האסורים אשר הניצוצים שנפלו בהן שרשן ממקום גבוה יותר לכן ע״י קיום רצונו ית׳ בהן לדחות הקליפה עי״ז הוא התגלות עצמותו ומהותו ממש.6
that is, through fulfilling the prohibitions in the manner of negation, which concern forbidden things, whose fallen sparks have their root in a higher place. Therefore, through fulfilling His will, blessed be He, with them—to reject the kelipah—through this there is a revelation of His very essence and being.
The prohibitions work by negation and deal with forbidden things whose sparks have a higher root. Fulfilling G‑d’s will by rejecting the kelipah in them reveals His very essence.
The prohibitions, through severity and rejection, reveal G‑d’s essence, as salt, inedible in itself, brings out taste, and as silence is worth more than speech.
The Kehot note quotes Or HaTorah: “If so, salt is like the words of the Scribes, stringencies and fences,” linking the image of salt to the rabbinic prohibitions.
Marei mekomos
- 1היאכל תפל מבלי מלח · Job 6:6
- 2וחיך אוכל יטעם · Job 12:11
- 3ע״פ וספרתם לכם ממחרת · Numbers 10:1
- 4וספרתם לכם ממחרת · Leviticus 23:15
- 5מלה בסלע משתוקא בתרין · Megillah 18a:11
- 6והוא בבחי׳ גבורות . . דהיינו ע״י קיום הל״ת · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא ע׳ רכו: ”א״כ מלח כמו ד״ס חומרות וסייגים”. וראה לקו״ש חכ״ה ע׳ 122 הערה 60.
And this is the meaning of “I am black, yet comely, like the tents of Kedar.” For it was explained above regarding Avraham, from whom Yishmael came forth,
Now the phrase “like the tents of Kedar” is explained. It builds on what was said about Avraham, from whom Yishmael came forth.
שיצא בבחינת סיגים כמו התהוות האריה למ טה מבח ינת פני אריה שבמרכבה. ואעפ״כ [ואף על פי כן] מקבל חיותו מאברהם
that he came forth as dross, like the coming into being of the lion below from the level of the face of the lion in the Chariot. Nevertheless, he receives his life-force from Avraham,
Yishmael emerged as dross, like the lion below from the lion’s face above. Still, his life-force comes from Avraham.
אלא שהחיות הוא עיקר בבחינת מקיף כי הסט״א [הסטרא אחרא] אינו יכול לקבל את הקדושה בבחינת גילוי פנימית רק בבחינת מקיף
only that the life-force is mainly in the manner of the encompassing, for the sitra achra cannot receive holiness in the manner of inner revelation, only in the manner of the encompassing;
That life-force reaches him only as an encompassing influence, because the sitra achra cannot receive holiness inwardly, only from without.
וכמו י״א סממני הקטורת שהעשרה הן המלובשים בקליפות בבחינת גלות והי״א הוא בבחינת מקיף והוא לבונה שהוא בעצם לבן ועיקר חיותם הוא מהמקיף כו׳ (ועמש״ל [ועיין מה שכתוב לעיל] מזה בפ׳ תולדות ע״פ ראה ריח בני34 כו׳)
as with the eleven spices of the incense: the ten are those enclothed in the kelipos in a state of exile, and the eleventh is in the manner of the encompassing—this is the frankincense (levonah), which is essentially white (lavan)—and their main life-force is from the encompassing, etc. (See what was written on this above in Parshas Toldos, on the verse “See, the fragrance of my son, etc.”)
The incense had eleven spices: ten correspond to sparks exiled in the kelipos, while the eleventh, frankincense (levonah, from lavan, “white”), is their encompassing source of life. The text refers to the discourse in Torah Ohr, Toldos, on this.
והנה יש ב׳ מקיפים האחד כמו בחינת לבוש שהוא מקיף מקרוב הב׳ מקיף עליון יותר
Now, there are two [kinds of] encompassing: one like a garment, which encompasses from close by; the second, a higher encompassing,
There are two kinds of encompassing: a garment, which surrounds closely, and a higher kind.
כמו אהל ודירה שהוא מקיף ג״כ אך הוא מקיף מרחוק וגם האהל והדירה יקר יותר מהלבוש כו׳.
like a tent and a dwelling, which also encompasses, but encompasses from afar; and the tent and dwelling are also more precious than the garment, etc.
A tent or a home also surrounds a person, but from a distance, and it is more precious than a garment. This prepares the reading of the “tents” of Kedar.
The analogy of Yishmael leads to “the tents of Kedar”: kelipah receives life only from an encompassing influence, and of the two kinds of encompassing, garment and tent, the tent is the higher and more distant.
Marei mekomos
- 1וזהו ענין שחורה אני ונאוה. כאהלי קדר · Song of Songs 1:5
- 2אברהם שיצא ממנו ישמעאל · Pesachim 56a:7
- 3בפ׳ תולדות ע״פ ראה ריח בני · תו״א כ, ב.
- 4ראה ריח בני · Genesis 27:27
40והנה מה שהקדושה מחיה לסט״א [לסטרא אחרא] הוא רק מרחוק. וזהו ענין אהלי קדר. אהל דוקא ואומרת כנ״י [כנסת ישראל] שכך יש אצלי גילוי בחינת מקיף עליון אשר הוא מקיף מרחוק כדכתיב זכרו את1 ה׳ מרחוק.
Now, the way holiness gives life to the sitra achra is only from afar. This is the meaning of “the tents of Kedar”: specifically a tent. And the Community of Israel says that so too there is with me a revelation of the level of a higher encompassing [light], which encompasses from afar, as it is written, “Remember G‑d from afar.”
Holiness gives life to the sitra achra only from a distance, which is why the verse speaks of “tents” of Kedar: a tent surrounds from afar. The Community of Israel says that she too has a revelation of a higher encompassing light, one that is “from afar,” as Jeremiah says, “Remember G‑d from afar.”
והיינו כי בחינה סוכ״ע נקרא סובב לעלמין. וזהו ענין הלבושים הנעשים ממעשה המצות והוא בקיום מ״ע [מצות עשה]
That is: the level of “encompassing all worlds” (sovev kol almin) is called “encompassing the worlds.” And this is the matter of the garments made from the performance of the mitzvos, which is through fulfilling the positive commandments.
The lower encompassing light, “encompassing all worlds,” still relates to worlds. It corresponds to the “garments” that the performance of the positive commandments makes for the soul.
אמנם ע״י שחורה אני בקום מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] שהוא בחינת שחורות כעורב2 עי״ז ונאוה כאהלי קדר3 שנמשך גילוי עצמותו ומהותו שאין שייך לקרותו אפילו סובב לעלמין כנ״ל
But through “I am black,” in fulfilling the prohibitive commandments, which is the level of “black as a raven”—through this, “comely, like the tents of Kedar”: there is drawn a revelation of His essence and being, which cannot be called even “encompassing the worlds,” as above.
Through the “blackness” of the prohibitions, “black as a raven,” comes the beauty “like the tents of Kedar”: the revelation of G‑d’s essence, which cannot be called even “encompassing the worlds.”
(והיינו דכמו שהמקיף המחיה הסט״א [הסטרא אחרא] הרי רחוק הוא בערך מהם וכמ״ש בע״ח [בעץ חיים] שער עשירי פרק4 י״א כי אין קדש מתערב בחול5 כו׳
(That is: just as the encompassing [light] that gives life to the sitra achra is far removed from them in rank, as written in Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 10, chapter 11, “for the holy does not mix with the profane, etc.,”
A long parenthesis explains the comparison. The encompassing light that sustains the sitra achra is vastly removed from it, for, as Etz Chaim says, the holy does not mix with the profane.
כמ״כ [כמו כן] לגבי עצמות א״ס ב״ה הרי גםהעולמות היותר עליונים כלא ממש חשיבי ורחוקים יותר בערך לגבי אור א״ס ב״ה יותר לאין קץ מערך ריחוק שבמשל דלעומת זה לגבי בחינת המקיף שלהם דאהלי קדר.
so too, relative to the essence of the Infinite One, blessed be He, even the highest worlds are considered as truly nothing, and they are infinitely more distant in rank from the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, than the distance, in the analogy, of the opposing side from its encompassing [light], the “tents of Kedar.”
In the same way, compared with G‑d’s essence even the highest worlds are as nothing, and their distance from Him is infinitely greater than the distance between kelipah and the light that encompasses it.
ולכן נמשל מקיף זה העליון הנמשך מאור א״ס ב״ה ממש. למשל אהלי קדר כו׳ דוקא.
Therefore this higher encompassing [light], drawn from the Infinite Light itself, blessed be He, is compared specifically to the analogy of “the tents of Kedar, etc.”
That is why this higher encompassing light, drawn from the Infinite Light itself, is compared specifically to the tents of Kedar.
ועמ״ש ע״פ מזמור שיר חנוכת הבית67 מענין ב׳ מקיפים אלו דלבוש ובית כו׳ ועוד יש להטעים הענין שנמשל לאהלי קדר דוקא כי הנה בקדושה הם ע״ס [עשר ספירות] עשר ולא אחד עשר8 וכמ״ש בס״י [בספר יצירה]9 והובא ברע״מ [ברעיא מהימנא]10 ר״פ כי תשא.
And see what is written on the verse “A psalm, a song of the dedication of the House” on these two encompassing [lights], garment and house, etc. One can further explain why it is compared specifically to the tents of Kedar: in holiness there are ten Sefiros, “ten and not eleven,” as is written in Sefer Yetzirah and cited in the Raaya Mehemna at the beginning of Parshas Ki Sisa.
The discourse on Psalm 30 discusses these two encompassing lights, garment and house. A second explanation draws on Sefer Yetzirah: in holiness there are ten Sefiros, “ten and not eleven.”
ור״ל [ורוצה לומר] כי בכתר יש ב׳ בחינות עתיק ואריך ובחינת עתיק אינו ממנין הע״ס [העשר ספירות]11 וזהו ולא אחד עשר כו׳ ועיין בע״ח [בעץ חיים] שער כ״ב פ״א12 אות ד׳ ואין אנו מונין13 כו׳ וכן בכל כללות האצילות עתיק יומין כו׳.
This means that in Keser there are two levels, Atik and Arich, and the level of Atik is not counted among the Ten Sefiros; this is “and not eleven, etc.” See Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 22, chapter 1, section 4, “and we do not count, etc.”; and so too in the whole of Atzilus, Atik Yomin, etc.
Keser has two levels, Atik (“the Ancient One,” its inner, higher level) and Arich Anpin (“the Long Countenance,” its outer level), and Atik is not counted among the ten Sefiros, which is why they are “not eleven.” Etz Chaim says the same of Atik.
והנה המשכת בחינת מקיף העליון הנ״ל שבבחינת אהל ובית שלמעלה מבחינת לבוש כו׳ זהו בחינת עתיק שהוא בחינה תחתונה שבמאציל אור א״ס ב״ה ממש.
Now, the drawing down of the level of the higher encompassing [light] mentioned above, at the level of tent and house, which is above the level of garment, etc., is the level of Atik, which is the lowest level in the Emanator, the Infinite Light, blessed be He, itself.
The higher encompassing light, the “tent” or “house” that is above the “garment,” is Atik, the lowest level of the Emanator, the Infinite Light itself.
ולכן נמשל לאהלי קדר דוקא משום דשם ודאי אין המקיף בערך הפנימי כנ״ל כמ״כ [כמו כן] אפילו עולמות היותר עליונים רחוקים מאד בערך לגבי א״ס ב״ה יותר לאין קץ מערך ריחוק שבמשל דאהלי קדר לא מיניה ולא מקצתיה.
Therefore it is compared specifically to the tents of Kedar, because there the encompassing is certainly not commensurate with the inner, as above. So too, even the highest worlds are very far in rank from the Infinite One, blessed be He, infinitely more than the distance in the analogy of the tents of Kedar, [having] nothing whatsoever [in common with Him].
It is compared to the tents of Kedar because there the encompassing light has no proportion to what it surrounds. Likewise even the highest worlds bear no proportion whatsoever to the Infinite.
ועכ״ז [ועם כל זה] גם מקיף העליון זה מתגלה ע״י קיום מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה]. ומטעם הנ״ל. וע״פ לשון הקבלה י״ל [יש לומר] הטעם שנמשל לאהלי קדר דוקא כי הנה בקדושה הם עשר ולא אחד ע שר דהיינו ע״ס [עשר ספירות] והתחלתן מבחינת א״א ופי׳ ולא י״א היינו
Even so, this higher encompassing [light] too is revealed through fulfilling the prohibitive commandments, for the reason mentioned above. And according to the language of the Kabbalah one may give the reason it is compared specifically to the tents of Kedar: in holiness there are ten and not eleven, that is, the Ten Sefiros, and they begin from the level of Arich Anpin; and the meaning of “and not eleven” is
This higher encompassing light too is revealed through the prohibitions. The Kabbalistic reason for the comparison is that holiness has ten Sefiros, beginning from Arich Anpin, and not eleven.
כי בחינת עתיק אינו ממנין הע״ס [העשר ספירות] והנה א״א נקרא סוכ״ע אכן בחינת עתיק אינו נקרא אפילו סוכ״ע לכן נמשל לאהלי קדר ששם יש י״א כתרין והבחינה הי״א שזהו בחי׳ לבונה נקרא בחינת אהלי קדר כנ״ל.
that the level of Atik is not counted among the Ten Sefiros. Now, Arich Anpin is called “encompassing all worlds,” but the level of Atik is not called even “encompassing all worlds.” Therefore it is compared to the tents of Kedar, for there, there are eleven crowns, and the eleventh level, which is the level of frankincense, is called the level of “the tents of Kedar,” as above.
Atik is not counted among them, and while Arich Anpin is called “encompassing all worlds,” Atik is not called even that. Kelipah has “eleven crowns,” and its eleventh, corresponding to the frankincense discussed above, is what “the tents of Kedar” refers to.
וא״כ ע״י דקדושה שאינו ממנין העשר ספי׳ [ספירה / ספירות] נמשל לבחינת זו דוקא. וזהו שהיו במשכן י״א יריעות עזים14 שיומשך גם בחינת מקיף העליון כו׳.
If so, Atik Yomin of holiness, which is not counted among the Ten Sefiros, is compared specifically to this level. And this is why in the Tabernacle there were eleven curtains of goats’ hair: so that the level of the higher encompassing [light], too, would be drawn, etc.
So Atik of holiness, uncounted among the ten, is compared to that eleventh level. This is why the Tabernacle had eleven curtains of goats’ hair: to draw down the higher encompassing light as well.
ועיין מ״ש בד״ה ויקרא אל משה15 בפי׳ ולא יכול משה לבוא אל אהל ועד כי שכן עליו הענן16 ע״ש. והנה הגם דבמ״ע [דבמצות עשה] נמשך ג״כ מבחינת עתיק אך כי במ״ע [במצות עשה] נמשך מז״ת [מז׳ תחתונות] דע״י [דעתיק יומין] המלובשים בא״א
And see what is written in the discourse beginning “And He called to Moshe,” on the meaning of “And Moshe could not enter the Tent of Meeting, for the cloud rested upon it”; see there. Now, although through the positive commandments [light] is also drawn from the level of Atik, through the positive commandments it is drawn from the seven lower [Sefiros] of Atik Yomin, which are enclothed in Arich Anpin;
The discourse on “And He called to Moshe” discusses why Moshe could not enter the Tent when the cloud rested on it. The positive commandments also draw from Atik, but only from its seven lower Sefiros, which are enclothed in Arich Anpin.
אבל בחינת ג״ר [ג׳ ראשונות] דע״י [דעתיק יומין] שאינן מלובשים כלל בא״א נמשך ע״י [עתיק יומין] קיום מל״ת [מצות לא תעשה] דוקא וכדלקמן ועפ״ז [ועל פי זה] יובן ג״כ הטעם דמצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] תלויין בשערות דז״א דוקא ומ״ע [ומצות עשה] בת״ד [בתיקוני דיקנא] דא״א. וזהו ענין שהתורה ניתנה באש שחורה ע״ג [על גבי] אש לבנה כמש״ל [כמה שכתוב לעיל] בשם האד״ר [האדרא רבא])
but the level of the first three [Sefiros] of Atik Yomin, which are not enclothed in Arich Anpin at all, is drawn specifically through fulfilling the prohibitive commandments, as [will be explained] below. According to this, the reason will also be understood why the prohibitive commandments depend specifically on the hairs of Z’eir Anpin, and the positive commandments on the tikkunim of the beard of Arich Anpin. And this is the meaning of the Torah having been given in black fire upon white fire, as was written above in the name of the Idra Rabba)
The first three Sefiros of Atik, not enclothed in Arich Anpin at all, are drawn only through the prohibitions. This explains why the prohibitions depend on the hairs of Z’eir Anpin (the configuration of the emotive attributes) and the positive commandments on the beard of Arich Anpin, and it is the meaning of the Torah being given as black fire upon white fire.
(דקל״ב) ור״ל [ורוצה לומר] דאש שחורה זהו בחינת מל״ת [מצות לא תעשה] ואש לבנה זהו בחי׳ מ״ע [מצות עשה] וכ״ה בסה״מ [בספר הדרת מלך] סי׳ קל״ט בשם הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות].
(folio 132). This means that “black fire” is the level of the prohibitive commandments, and “white fire” is the level of the positive commandments; and so it is in Sefer Hadras Melech, section 139, in the name of the Ramaz.
Black fire is the prohibitions and white fire the positive commandments, as Hadras Melech, a commentary on the Zohar by R. Shalom Buzaglo, also says in the name of the Ramaz (R. Moshe Zacuto).
והענין דכתיב ותורה אור17 והנה עיקר אור הנר המאיר הוא מגוון הסמוך לפתילה אבל הגוון לבן המקיף עליו הוא אינו מאיר בעצמו כו׳
The explanation: it is written, “and Torah is light.” Now, the main light of a burning lamp is from the hue next to the wick, but the white hue that surrounds it does not itself give light, etc.;
Proverbs says, “Torah is light.” It was said above that in a flame the main light comes from the part next to the wick, while the white part surrounding it does not itself give light.
כן הוא לעיל ולכאורה אדרבה עיקר האור הוא מגוון לבן משא״כ הגוון הסמוך לפתילה הוא שחור או גוון תכלת ואינו מאיר כ״כ [כל כך].
so it is [stated] above. But seemingly, on the contrary, the main light is from the white hue, whereas the hue next to the wick is black, or a blue hue, and does not give so much light.
This seems backwards, since the white part shines most, while the part next to the wick is dark or bluish.
אמנם נראה שהכוונה ע״ד מ״ש בזהר בראשית (דנ״א ע״א) ועל נהורא חוורא שרייא לעילא נהורא סתימאה דאקיף ליה וכ״כ [וכמו כן] בפ׳ לך לך (דפ״ג ע״ב)
However, it seems that the intent is along the lines of what is written in the Zohar, Bereishis (folio 51a): “And upon the white light, above, rests a hidden light that surrounds it”; and so too in Parshas Lech Lecha (folio 83b);
The answer comes from the Zohar: above the white light rests a hidden light that surrounds it.
ופי׳ הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] (הובא בסה״מ [בספר הדרת מלך] סי׳ קל״ט) דנהורא סתימאה הוא על סוד הכתר הסתום ומקיף את הכל כו׳.
and the Ramaz explained (cited in Sefer Hadras Melech, section 139) that the hidden light refers to the secret of the concealed Keser, which surrounds everything, etc.
The Ramaz, as cited in Hadras Melech, explains that this hidden light is the secret of the concealed Keser, which surrounds everything.
ומעתה יש להבין ג״כ בענין התורה שנתנה באש שחורה ע״ג [על גבי] אש לבנה שהם בחינת ב׳ גוונים הראשוני׳ [הראשונים] וזהו ותורה אור.18
Accordingly, one can also understand the matter of the Torah having been given in black fire upon white fire, which are the level of the first two hues; and this is “and Torah is light.”
With this, the black fire and white fire of the Torah can be understood as the two primary hues of the flame, and this is the meaning of “Torah is light.” The next paragraph develops the point.
“The tents of Kedar” is explained: kelipah is sustained by an encompassing light utterly removed from it, and so the prohibitions reveal an encompassing light, Atik, utterly beyond the worlds. The first three Sefiros of Atik, not enclothed in Arich Anpin, are drawn only through the prohibitions, which is the meaning of the Torah’s black fire upon white fire.
The Kehot notes explain that the text’s two Etz Chaim references follow the Shklov printing of 1800, whose numbering differs: Sha’ar 10, chapter 11, is in current editions Sha’ar 11, chapter 10; and Sha’ar 22 is Sha’ar 23 (Mochin deTzelem), where “chapter 1” is a misprint for chapter 5. The Kehot note also quotes Or HaTorah: “the holy does not mix with the profane but stands over them from above,” citing Pri Etz Chaim, Sha’ar HaKaddish.
Marei mekomos
- 1זכרו את ה׳ מרחוק · Jeremiah 51:50
- 2שחורות כעורב · Song of Songs 5:11
- 3ונאוה כאהלי קדר · Song of Songs 1:5
- 4בע״ח שער עשירי פרק י״א · בדפוס שקלאוו תק״ס. לפננו ש׳ יא (ש׳ המלאכים) ופי״א לי׳ שם, וצ״ל פ״י, יעו״ש. [כ]. מובא באוה״ת נ״ך כרך א ע׳ תקיג: ”אין קדש מתערב בחול אלא עומד עליהם מלמעלה וכ״כ בפע״ח שער הקדיש”.
- 5כי אין קדש מתערב בחול · Sefer Etz Chaim 11:10
- 6ע״פ מזמור שיר חנוכת הבית · לעיל פ׳ ברכה צט, א.
- 7מזמור שיר חנוכת הבית · Psalms 30:1
- 8עשר ולא אחד עשר · Sefer Yetzirah 1:4
- 9וכמ״ש בס״י · פ״א.
- 10והובא ברע״מ · זח״ב. [כ]. ראה גם אוה״ת בראשית כרך ד תשלח, א.
- 11ובחי׳ עתיק אינו ממנין הע״ס · ראה גם אוה״ת פ׳ בשלח ע׳ שסג בשם האריז״ל.
- 12בע״ח שער כ״ב פ״א · בדפוס שקלאוו תק״ס. לפננו הוא שכ״ג (ש׳ מוחין דצלם) וטה״ד כאן פ״א וצ״ל פ״ה. [כ].
- 13ואין אנו מונין · Sefer Etz Chaim 23:5
- 14י״א יריעות עזים · Exodus 26:7
- 15ויקרא אל משה · Leviticus 1:1
- 16ולא יכול משה לבוא אל אהל ועד כי שכן עליו הענן · Exodus 40:35
- 17ותורה אור · Proverbs 6:23
- 18
41ויש עוד בחינת נהורא סתימאה שהוא מקור האור וזהו ענין דברי סופרים שמהם נמשך להיות בחינת הספר הוא בחינת ותורה אור1 כו׳
And there is yet the level of the hidden light (nehora setima’ah), which is the source of the light. And this is the matter of the words of the Scribes, from which is drawn the level of the book, which is the level of “and Torah is light, etc.”
Beyond the white and black lights there is a third, the “hidden light,” which is the source of light itself. It corresponds to the words of the Scribes, from which the written Torah, the “book,” is drawn, as in “Torah is light.”
והנה מ״ע [מצות עשה] הוא בחינת נהורא חיוורא הוא אור אשר יוכל לבא לידי גילוי האור וחסדו מאתו ית׳ קיום רצונו בקום ועשה והוא בחינת שערות דא״א
Now, the positive commandments are the level of the white light (nehora chivara): it is a light that can come into revelation—the light and kindness from Him, blessed be He—the fulfillment of His will by active doing. It is the level of the hairs of Arich Anpin,
The positive commandments are the “white light”: a light that can be openly revealed, G‑d’s kindness, His will fulfilled through action. They correspond to the hairs of Arich Anpin.
שהם בחינת כעמר נקא2 נהורא חיוורא שכדי שיהיה האור בבחי׳ גילוי א״א רק ע״י בחי׳ שערות וכמש״ל [וכמה שכתוב לעיל] בענין התיקון שהוא הממעטת האור כו׳.
which are the level of “like pure wool,” the white light; for in order for the light to be in a state of revelation, it is impossible except through the level of hairs, as was written above regarding the rectification, which is the diminishing of the light, etc.
These are the hairs “like pure wool.” Light can be revealed only through such “hairs,” because, as explained above, Tikkun works by diminishing the light.
אבל הל״ת [הלא תעשה] הם תלויין בשערות דז״א שנקרא שחורה נהורא אוכמא שלמטה מת״ד [מתיקוני דיקנא] דא״א שנקרא אש לבנה והיינו כי אין האור בא בבחינת גילוי רצונו בקום ועשה רק בבחינת לא
But the prohibitions depend on the hairs of Z’eir Anpin, which are called “black,” the black light (nehora uchma), which is below the tikkunim of the beard of Arich Anpin, called “white fire.” That is, the light does not come as a revelation of His will by active doing, but only by way of “not.”
The prohibitions depend on the hairs of Z’eir Anpin, the “black light,” which is lower than the beard of Arich Anpin, the “white fire.” Here the light is not revealed through action but only through refraining, through “not.”
ולכן נקרא ג״כ נהורא תכלא שמכלה דבר אחר כי עיקר אתכפיא סט״א [סטרא אחרא] הוא ע״י קיום מל״ת [מצות לא תעשה].
Therefore it is also called the blue light (nehora techela), which consumes (mechaleh) something else; for the main subjugation of the sitra achra is through fulfilling the prohibitive commandments.
This light is also called the “blue light” (nehora techela), a word linked to kilayon, “consuming,” for it consumes what opposes it. The sitra achra is subdued mainly through keeping the prohibitions.
אמנם אף שהה למטה משערות דא״א שהם אש לבנה כעמר נקא. אבל באמת שרש האור שבל״ת [שבלא תעשה] גבוה יותר מאש לבנה דמ ״ע
However, although it is below the hairs of Arich Anpin, which are white fire, “like pure wool,” in truth the root of the light in the prohibitions is higher than the white fire of the positive commandments,
Although this black light is lower than the white hairs of Arich Anpin, the root of the light in the prohibitions is actually higher than that of the positive commandments.
דהיינו שהוא מבחינת נהורא סתימאה המקיף על נהורא חיוורא אשר לגודל מדרגתו אינו מושג ענינו ומהותו וכמ״ש בפע״ח [בפרי עץ חיים] שער השבת ספ״ד [סוף פרק ד׳] ועיין מ״ש בביאור ע״פ וקבל היהודים3 מענין יסוד האש עצמו כו׳
that is, it is from the level of the hidden light that surrounds the white light, whose nature and essence, because of the greatness of its level, cannot be grasped, as written in Pri Etz Chaim, Sha’ar HaShabbos, end of chapter 4. And see what is written in the explanation on “And the Jews accepted” on the element of fire itself, etc.;
Its root is the hidden light that surrounds the white light, too exalted to be grasped, as Pri Etz Chaim writes. The text also points to the explanation on “And the Jews accepted,” on the element of fire itself.
ע״ש והתגלותו הוא ע״י שערות שחורות דז״א שהם בחינת נהורא אוכמא ממש שכמו שהם למטה הם למטה הרבה משערות דא״א
see there. Its revelation is through the black hairs of Z’eir Anpin, which are the level of the black light itself; for as they are below, they are far below the hairs of Arich Anpin,
This hidden light is revealed through the black hairs of Z’eir Anpin, the black light. In their place below they are far lower than the hairs of Arich Anpin.
שהם כעמר נקא בחינת ורב חסד4 להעלות הדברים המותרים שתהיינה כלים ממש לאור א״ס משא״כ בחינת שערות דז״א שחורות
which are “like pure wool,” the level of “abundant in kindness,” to elevate the permitted things so that they become actual vessels for the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof); whereas the level of the hairs of Z’eir Anpin, black
The white hairs of Arich Anpin are “abundant in kindness,” and they elevate permitted things to become vessels for the Infinite Light. The black hairs of Z’eir Anpin work differently.
כעורב5 בבחינת גבורות לדחות הדברים האסורים אף שיש בהן ניצוץ כו׳ עכ״ז [עם כל זה] דוחין אותו בשתי ידים והרי מעלת ורב חסד גבוה יותר מבחינת הגבורות.
as a raven, is in the aspect of severities (gevuros), to reject the forbidden things—although there is a spark in them, etc., nevertheless one rejects it with both hands—and the quality of “abundant in kindness” is higher than the level of the severities.
The black hairs act through severity, rejecting forbidden things outright, though a spark is in them. In itself, “abundant in kindness” is higher than severity.
אמנם מ״מ בהגבורות דנהורא אוכמא דוקא מתלבש ונמשך בחינת נהורא סתימאה הנ״ל ולא בנהורא חיורא.
Nevertheless, it is specifically in the severities of the black light that the level of the hidden light mentioned above is enclothed and drawn, and not in the white light.
Nevertheless, the hidden light is drawn down specifically through the severities of the black light, not through the white light.
משום כי ע״י נהורא חיורא ורב חסד שמזה נמשך ימין מקרבת6 להעלות הדברים המותרים שתהיינה כלי לגילוי אא״ס [אור אין סוף].
For through the white light, “abundant in kindness,” from which comes “the right [hand] draws near,” to elevate the permitted things so that they become a vessel for the revelation of the Infinite Light—
The white light is the “right hand that draws near,” in the Talmud’s phrase: it elevates permitted things so they become vessels for G‑dly revelation.
הנה א״א להיות כלי לאור א״ס אשר אינו בגדר המשכה ולא בגדר סובב רק הם כלי לאור הסכ״ע [הסובב כל עלמין]
it is impossible [for them] to be a vessel for the Infinite Light that is not within the bounds of drawing down, nor within the bounds of encompassing; they are a vessel only for the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin),
But such vessels cannot hold the Infinite Light that is beyond both drawing down and encompassing. They can hold only the light that encompasses all worlds.
ולא לעצמותו ומהותו שאינו בגדר שום המשכה אכן בתלת חללי גלגלתא דז״א אשר שם הוא מקור התחלקות מדות חסדים וגבורות
and not for His essence and being, which is not within the bounds of any drawing down. However, in the three cavities of the Skull (Gulgalta) of Z’eir Anpin, where the source of the division of the attributes into kindnesses and severities is,
They cannot hold G‑d’s essence, which is beyond any drawing down. In the three cavities of the skull of Z’eir Anpin, however, the attributes first divide into kindnesses and severities.
ולכן שם הי׳ [היה] יכול להיות גילוי מעלת הגבורות שהוא בחינת ל״ת [לא תעשה] והדחיה לדחות דברים האסורים אשר ענין דחיה זו הוא קיום הרצון עליון בדבר גבוה יותר מקיום הרצון שבדברים המותרים וכנ״ל בענין קליפה קדמה לפרי כו׳
there, therefore, there could be a revelation of the superiority of the severities, which is the level of the prohibitions and of rejection, to reject forbidden things. This rejection is the fulfillment of the supernal will in a thing higher than the fulfillment of the will in permitted things, as above regarding “the husk precedes the fruit, etc.”
There the special quality of severity can be revealed: the prohibitions, the rejection of forbidden things. Rejecting them fulfills G‑d’s will with something of higher root than permitted things, as with “the husk precedes the fruit.”
וזה לא היה יכול להיות בדיקנא דא״א אשר שם הכל בחינת רחמים רבים ורב חסד נהורא חיורא כעמר נקא ומעלת הגבורה בדחיה זו שרשה גבוה יותר מן ורב חסד הנ״ל וכענין מלה בסלע משתוקא בתרין7
And this could not be in the beard of Arich Anpin, where all is the level of great mercy and “abundant in kindness,” the white light, “like pure wool.” And the superiority of severity in this rejection is rooted higher than the “abundant in kindness” mentioned above, as in “A word is worth a sela, silence is worth two,”
This could not happen in the beard of Arich Anpin, which is all great mercy and kindness. The severity of rejection is rooted higher than that kindness, as “silence is worth two” sela’im while speech is worth one.
דהיינו שעי״ז יהיה גילוי עצמות אור א״ס נהורא סתימאה סתימא דכל סתימין. לכן אף שלמטה השערות דז״א הן ודאי למטה במדרגה משערות דא״א מ״מ בהן
that is, through this there will be a revelation of the essence of the Infinite Light, the hidden light, “the most hidden of all hidden.” Therefore, although below, the hairs of Z’eir Anpin are certainly lower in level than the hairs of Arich Anpin, nevertheless in them
Through this rejection the very essence of the Infinite Light, the hidden light, “the most hidden of all hidden,” is revealed. So although Z’eir Anpin’s hairs are lower, it is in them that this happens.
ועל ידן ע״י קיום מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] התלוין בהן נמשך ומתגלה עצמות אור א״ס שלמעלה מהגילוי שע״י מ״ע [מצות עשה] הנמשך ע״י שערות דא״א שהן כעמר נקא.
and through them, through fulfilling the prohibitive commandments that depend on them, the essence of the Infinite Light is drawn down and revealed, which is above the revelation through the positive commandments that is drawn through the hairs of Arich Anpin, which are “like pure wool.”
Through the prohibitions that depend on these hairs, the essence of the Infinite Light is revealed, above the revelation drawn through the positive commandments and the white hairs of Arich Anpin.
וזהו מ״ש באד״ר [באדרא רבא] (דק״מ ע״א) ובגין דהני שערי אוכמי וחשוכן כתיב מגלה עמוקות מני חשך89 וע״ש בביאור האדרא מהאריז״ל [מהאר״י זכרונו לברכה].
This is what is said in the Idra Rabba (folio 140a): “And because these hairs are black and dark, it is written, ‘He reveals deep things out of darkness.’” And see there in the Arizal’s explanation of the Idra.
The Idra Rabba says that because these hairs are black and dark, the verse in Job says, “He reveals deep things out of darkness.” The Arizal’s commentary on the Idra is cited.
והכוונה כנ״ל שע״י הל״ת [הלא תעשה] נמשך גילוי עמוקות מה שאינו מתגלה עמוקות כאלו ע״י נהורא חיורא דמ״ע [דמצות עשה] כו׳.
The intent is as above: through the prohibitions there is drawn a revelation of deep things, such depths as are not revealed through the white light of the positive commandments, etc.
The prohibitions, the “darkness,” reveal depths that the white light of the positive commandments cannot reveal.
The prohibitions, rooted in the black hair of Z’eir Anpin, are lower in place than the positive commandments but higher in root: through their severity and rejection they reveal the “hidden light,” the essence of the Infinite, which the white light of kindness cannot carry. As the Idra says, He “reveals deep things out of darkness.”
The three colors of the flame map onto the three levels: the white light (positive commandments, the beard of Arich Anpin), the black or blue light (prohibitions, the hair of Z’eir Anpin), and the hidden light that surrounds the white (the essence that only the prohibitions reveal). The Kehot note points to Or HaTorah, Vayikra, vol. 2, p. 636, on “He reveals deep things out of darkness.”
Marei mekomos
- 1ותורה אור · Proverbs 6:23
- 2כעמר נקא · Daniel 7:9
- 3וקבל היהודים · Esther 9:23
- 4ורב חסד · Exodus 34:6
- 5שחורות כעורב · Song of Songs 5:11
- 6ימין מקרבת · Sotah 47a
- 7מלה בסלע משתוקא בתרין · Megillah 18a:11
- 8מגלה עמוקות מני חשך · Job 12:22
- 9ובגין דהני שערי אוכמי וחשוכן כתיב מגלה עמוקות מני חשך · Zohar, Idra Rabba 33:268–278
42וכענין ממעמקים קראתיך1 כו׳. וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] מאד עמקו מחשבותיך2 כו׳ בפרוח כו׳ להשמידם עדי עד3 שע״י דחיית הקליפות דוקא נמשך גילוי מבחינת עומק המחשבה עליונה כו׳.
And as in “Out of the depths I have called You, etc.” And this is what is written, “Your thoughts are very deep, etc.; when [the wicked] spring up, etc., it is to destroy them forever”: that specifically through the rejection of the kelipos a revelation is drawn from the level of the depth of the supernal thought, etc.
The psalmist calls to G‑d “out of the depths,” and says, “Your thoughts are very deep ... when the wicked spring up ... it is to destroy them forever.” Read here: only through the rejection of the kelipos is the depth of the supernal thought revealed.
ועד״ז מצינו במצות ציצית דהתכלת גבוה מהלבן כו׳ עיין בפע״ח [בפרי עץ חיים] והיינו הך ממש כי ע״י מצות ציצית כתיב ולא תתורו4 כו׳
In the same way we find with the mitzvah of tzitzis, that the blue (techeles) is higher than the white, etc.; see Pri Etz Chaim. And this is exactly the same thing: for of the mitzvah of tzitzis it is written, “and you shall not stray, etc.,”
The same pattern appears in tzitzis, where, according to Pri Etz Chaim, the blue thread (techeles) is higher than the white. The Torah says of tzitzis, “and you shall not stray,” a prohibition.
זהו קיום מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] והוא ע״י גוון תכלת שמכלה הרע ודוחהו וע״י גוון לבן כתיב למען תזכרו ועשיתם את כל מצותי5 קיום המצות עשה וכמ״ש במ״א. ועוד יתבאר לקמן בטעם שהמל״ת [שהמצות לא תעשה] נמשכים משערות דז״א דוקא:
which is the fulfillment of the prohibitive commandments, and it is through the blue hue, which consumes the evil and rejects it; while of the white hue it is written, “so that you remember and do all My commandments,” the fulfillment of the positive commandments, as written elsewhere. And it will be further explained below why the prohibitions are drawn specifically from the hairs of Z’eir Anpin.
The blue thread corresponds to the prohibitions, consuming and rejecting evil, while the white corresponds to “remember and do all My commandments,” the positive commandments. Why the prohibitions come from Z’eir Anpin’s hairs will be explained further.
Psalms and the mitzvah of tzitzis illustrate the same principle: the rejection of evil reveals a depth beyond what positive action reveals, as the blue thread is higher than the white.
Marei mekomos
- 1ממעמקים קראתיך · Psalms 130:1
- 2מאד עמקו מחשבותיך · Psalms 92:6
- 3בפרוח . . להשמדם עדי עד · Psalms 92:8
- 4ולא תתורו · Numbers 15:39
- 5למען תזכרו ועשיתם את כל מצותי · Numbers 15:40
“Comely” and the curtains of Shlomo ¶43–48
43ו והנה פי׳ וענין ונאוה הענין הוא כי הנה המדות שלמעלה מהחכמה היינו שהם מקור המדות
6. Now, the meaning and matter of “comely” is this: [there are] attributes that are above Chochmah, that is, they are the source of the attributes (middos),
A new section explains “comely.” It begins from the idea that there are attributes above Chochmah, which are the source of the attributes.
וכמו שבמוסף ר״ה [ראש השנה] ויוה״כ [ויום הכפורים] ובנעילה אומרים מי כמוך אב הרחמים שהוא גילוי בחינה עליונה יותר מבחינת אב הרחמן
as in the Musaf of Rosh HaShanah and Yom Kippur, and in Ne’ilah, we say, “Who is like You, Father of mercies,” which is a revelation of a higher level than the level of “Merciful Father.”
In the Musaf prayer of Rosh HaShanah and Yom Kippur and in Ne’ilah we say “Who is like You, Father of mercies,” a higher expression than “Merciful Father.”
כי פי׳ אב הרחמן היינו בהתלבשות האור במדת הרחמנות והוא ממדות דאצילות אבל אב הרחמים פי׳ שמהווה וממשיך מדת רחמנות לרחם על העולמות ולהחיותם
For the meaning of “Merciful Father” is the enclothing of the light in the attribute of mercy, which is among the attributes of Atzilus; but “Father of mercies” means that He brings into being and draws down the attribute of mercy, to have mercy on the worlds and give them life
“Merciful Father” refers to G‑d’s light enclothed in the attribute of mercy within Atzilus. “Father of mercies” refers to the source that brings mercy into being and draws it down to sustain the worlds.
(וזהו הטוב כי לא כלו רחמיך) והוא בחינות המדות שלמעלה מהחכמה ולכן אומרים זה במוסף ונעילה כשאומרים קדושת כתר.
(and this is “the Good One, for Your mercies have not ended”). This is the level of the attributes that are above Chochmah; and therefore it is said in Musaf and Ne’ilah, when the Kedushah of “Keser” is said.
The prayer “the Good One, for Your mercies have not ended” refers to this source. It belongs above Chochmah, which is why it is said in Musaf and Ne’ilah, when the Kedushah of “Keser” (the Crown) is recited.
והנה להיות הגילוי משם במדות דאצילות הוא ע״י בחינת שערות. שהשערות הן רק בחינת צומח עד״מ
Now, for the revelation from there to come into the attributes of Atzilus, it is through the level of hairs. For the hairs are only, by way of analogy, the level of the vegetative,
This source is revealed in the attributes of Atzilus only through the “hairs,” which by analogy are the vegetative part of a person.
כי גם המדבר כלול מדצח״מ [מדומם צומח חי מדבר] ובחינת שערות הם רק בחינת צומח שבו שהוא בחינת המדות שנקרא צומח. משא״כ החכמה נקרא חי שלמעלה מבחינת צומח וכמ״ש והחכמה תחיה.1
for the speaking [being] too comprises mineral, vegetative, animal and speaking, and the level of hairs is only the vegetative within him, which is the level of the attributes, called “vegetative.” This is not so with Chochmah, which is called “living,” above the vegetative level, as it is written, “and wisdom gives life.”
A person contains all four levels of creation: mineral, vegetative, animal and speaking. Hair is the vegetative level, which corresponds to the attributes; Chochmah is the “living” level, above it, as in “wisdom gives life.”
The sixth section begins to explain “comely” through the attributes above Chochmah, such as the “Father of mercies,” which are revealed through the “hairs,” the vegetative level, below Chochmah, the living level.
Marei mekomos
- 1והחכמה תחי׳ · Ecclesiastes 7:12
44וכמו שהחכמה דאצילות היא למעלה מהמדות דאצילות ונקרא חיה והמדות הן בחינת צומח כך ג״כ בבחינת ע״י [עתיק יומין] וא״א המדות נקרא צומח
And just as the Chochmah of Atzilus is above the attributes of Atzilus and is called “living,” while the attributes (middos) are the level of “vegetative,” so too in the level of Atik Yomin and Arich Anpin the attributes are called “vegetative.”
The analogy of levels applies at every stage. Just as in Atzilus Chochmah is “living” and the attributes “vegetative,” so in Atik and Arich Anpin, the levels of Keser, the attributes are “vegetative.”
וזהו בחינת ושער רישיה כעמר נקא.1 ומשם שרש הגילוי שע״י [שעתיק יומין] מ״ע [מצות עשה]. אבל ע״י [עתיק יומין] הל״ת [הלא תעשה] נמשך גילוי חב״ד [חכמה בינה ודעת] דע״י [דעתיק יומין].
And this is the level of “and the hair of His head like pure wool”; from there is the root of the revelation through the positive commandments. But through the prohibitions there is drawn a revelation of Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik Yomin.
The white hair “like pure wool” belongs to this vegetative level, and it is the root of what the positive commandments reveal. The prohibitions, however, reveal Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik, its intellect.
כי הנה מ״ע [מצות עשה] ומל״ת [ומצות לא תעשה]2 נמשכים משם הוי׳ הל״ת [הלא תעשה] מי״ה ומ״ע [ומצות עשה] מו״ה3 ואין הפי׳ שהם משם הוי׳ שמלובש בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] דאצילות שהרי מבואר למעלה באריכות שהמצות הם גילוי אור א״ס ע״י בחינת הכתר שהוא הממוצע כו׳.
For the positive commandments and the prohibitions are drawn from the Name Havayah: the prohibitions from yud-hei and the positive commandments from vav-hei. This does not mean that they are from the Name Havayah enclothed in the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus, for it was explained above at length that the mitzvos are a revelation of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) through the level of Keser, which is the intermediary, etc.
The Kabbalists say that prohibitions come from the letters yud-hei of the Name Havayah and positive commandments from vav-hei. This cannot mean the Name as it is enclothed in the Sefiros of Atzilus, since the mitzvos come from above Atzilus, through Keser.
אלא הפי׳ שנמשכים משם4 הוי׳ דע״י [דעתיק יומין] וא״כ המ״ע [המצות עשה] שנמשכים מו״ה היינו גילוי בחינת ז״ת [ז׳ תחתונות] דע״י [דעתיק יומין] שהם המדות וגילוי זה הוא ע״י [עתיק יומין] בחינת השערות ושער רישיה כעמר נקא בחינת צומח
Rather, it means that they are drawn from the Name Havayah of Atik Yomin. If so, the positive commandments, which are drawn from vav-hei, are the revelation of the level of the seven lower [Sefiros] of Atik Yomin, which are the attributes; and this revelation is through the level of the hairs, “and the hair of His head like pure wool,” the vegetative level.
It means the Name Havayah of Atik. The vav-hei, the lower letters, are Atik’s seven lower Sefiros, its attributes, revealed through the vegetative “hairs” of white wool; this is the source of the positive commandments.
אמנם הל״ת [הלא תעשה] שנמשכים מי״ה היינו חב״ד [חכמה בינה ודעת] דע״י [דעתיק יומין] א״א שיהיה גילוי בחינה זו ע״י [עתיק יומין] שערות ובחינת צומח כו׳.
But the prohibitions, which are drawn from yud-hei, are Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik Yomin; it is impossible for this level to be revealed through hairs and the vegetative level, etc.
The yud-hei, the upper letters, are Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik, the source of the prohibitions. Such a level cannot be revealed through hairs, the vegetative level.
The positive commandments come from the vav-hei of the Name Havayah of Atik, its attributes, revealed through the white hairs; the prohibitions come from its yud-hei, Atik’s intellect, which cannot be revealed through hair at all.
In the Name Havayah the yud and first hei correspond to Chochmah and Binah, the vav to the six attributes and the final hei to Malchus; applied to Atik, this places the prohibitions in its intellect and the positive commandments in its attributes. The Kehot note adds that the Or HaTorah version of this passage refers to Torah Ohr, Beshalach, “Vayar Yisrael,” on two levels of the Name Havayah.
Marei mekomos
- 1ושער רישיה כעמר נקא · Daniel 7:9
- 2כי הנה מ״ע ומל״ת · קטע באוה״ת פ׳ פנחס כרך ו ע׳ א׳תתקמ.
- 3הל״ת מי״ה ומ״ע מו״ה · ראה בד״ה אלו דברים תרנ״א ע׳ קפט.
- 4אלא הפי׳ שנמשכים משם הוי׳ דע״י · באוה״ת שם נוסף: ”וכן נתבאר בתו״א פ׳ בשלח בד״ה וירא ישראל”.
Nevertheless, this revelation is drawn through the black hairs of Z’eir Anpin, which are below the hairs of Arich Anpin; and this is “He reveals deep things out of darkness, etc.”
Even so, this highest revelation comes through the black hairs of Z’eir Anpin, which are lower than those of Arich Anpin. This is “He reveals deep things out of darkness.”
והענין כי אדרבה לפי שבחינת חב״ד [חכמה בינה ודעת] דע״י [דעתיק יומין] הוא בחינת היותר גבוה לכן יהי׳ [יהיה] התלבשותו בבחינת שלמטה יותר וכענין הנזכר לעיל מאריה ושור דהאריה שרשו גבוה יותר הרבה משרש השור
The explanation: on the contrary, because the level of Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik Yomin is the highest level, therefore its enclothing will be in a lower level, as in the matter mentioned above of the lion and the ox: the lion’s root is much higher than the ox’s root,
On the contrary, it is because Atik’s intellect is the highest level that it must clothe itself in something lower, as with the lion, whose root is higher than the ox’s.
והרי למטה האריה הוא למטה במדרגה אלא דהיא הנותנת כו׳ וכך עד״מ זה להבדיל יובן גם למעלה יותר אשר האור מבחינת חב״ד [חכמה בינה ודעת] דע״י [דעתיק יומין] לא יוכל להתלבש בשערות דא״א
and yet below, the lion is lower in level—but that very thing is the cause, etc. And by way of this analogy—making the necessary distinction—it will be understood even higher above: that the light from the level of Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik Yomin cannot be enclothed in the hairs of Arich Anpin,
Below, the lion is lower, and that is precisely because its root is higher. In the same way, the light of Atik’s intellect cannot clothe itself in the hairs of Arich Anpin.
רק למטה מהן בשערות דז״א אשר שם האור מאיר על ידי הדחייה בדרך לא כו׳.
but only below them, in the hairs of Z’eir Anpin, where the light shines through rejection, by way of “not,” etc.
It can clothe itself only lower down, in the hairs of Z’eir Anpin, where light shines through rejection, through “not.”
The highest light, Atik’s intellect, is revealed through the lowest channel, the black hair of Z’eir Anpin, following the rule that what is highest in root comes to rest lowest.
Marei mekomos
- 1מגלה עמוקות מני חשך · Job 12:22
With this the meaning of “I am black, yet comely” will be understood: that the revelation of the level of “comely” comes specifically through “I am black,” “black as a raven.”
Now the verse can be read: the beauty, “comely,” comes specifically through the blackness, “black as a raven.”
The explanation is that “comely” means as it is written, “A man’s wisdom lights up his face,” and it is the level of “May G‑d make His face shine upon you,”
“Comely” refers to a shining face, as in “A man’s wisdom lights up his face,” and the Priestly Blessing, “May G‑d make His face shine upon you.”
שהוא תיקון השביעי מי״ג תקונים דא״א תיקון ואמת שהוא הארת פנים שהפנים פנוי משערות כי הוא למעלה מבחינת שערות וצמצומים שהן רק בחינת צומח.
which is the seventh of the thirteen tikkunim of Arich Anpin, the tikkun of “and truth,” which is the illumination of the face; for the face is free of hair, because it is above the level of hairs and contractions, which are only the vegetative level.
This is the seventh of the thirteen tikkunim (the “arrangements” of the beard of Arich Anpin, which correspond to the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy), called “and truth”: the face itself, which is free of hair. The face is above hair and its contractions, which are only the vegetative level.
אבל חכמת אדם תאיר פניו היינו עצמות חכמה שבכתר שלמעלה מבחינת צומח כנ״ל (ועיין מ״ש מענין זה בביאור ע״פ ויכתוב משה את מוצאיהם4 למסעיהם5 ועיין בהרמ״ז [בהרב משה זכות] בפרשה ויקרא בתחלת הפ׳ שכ׳ [שכתב] שבתיקון ואמת מאיר דעת דעתיק כו׳ ע״ש).
But “A man’s wisdom lights up his face” means the essence of Chochmah within Keser, which is above the vegetative level, as above. (See what is written on this subject in the explanation on “And Moshe wrote their goings forth according to their journeys”; and see the Ramaz on Parshas Vayikra, at the beginning of the parsha, who wrote that in the tikkun of “and truth” the Daas of Atik shines, etc.; see there.)
The wisdom that “lights up the face” is the essence of Chochmah within Keser, above the vegetative level. The Ramaz writes that in the tikkun of “and truth” the Daas of Atik shines.
וזהו שחורה אני ונאוה6 שע״י קיום מצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] שהם נמשכים מבחי׳ שערי אוכמי. עי״ז ונאוה הוא גילוי הארת פנים שהוא למעלה מעלה מבחינת השערות דא״א וכנ״ל.
And this is “I am black, yet comely”: through fulfilling the prohibitive commandments, which are drawn from the level of the black hairs—through this, “comely,” which is the revelation of the illumination of the face, far above the level of the hairs of Arich Anpin, as above.
So “I am black, yet comely” means: through keeping the prohibitions, drawn from the black hairs, comes the illumination of the face, far above the hairs of Arich Anpin.
ועוד בחינה גבוה יותר והוא ענין כיריעת שלמה שהשלום שלו ע״ש הפסוק או יחזיק במעוזי יעשה שלום לי7 שלום יעשה לי.
And there is a still higher level: this is the matter of “like the curtains of Shlomo”—[the King] to Whom peace (shalom) belongs—on the basis of the verse, “Or let him take hold of My strength, that he may make peace with Me; peace he shall make with Me.”
There is a still higher level: “like the curtains of Shlomo,” read as the King to Whom peace (shalom) belongs. Isaiah’s verse says “peace” twice: “he may make peace with Me; peace he shall make with Me.”
ב״פ [ב׳ פעמים] שלום היינו בפמליא של מעלה ובפמליא של מטה.89 פי׳ בפמליא של מטה היינו שיהיה התאחדות וגילוי אצילות בבי״ע צ״ל ע״י שלום המחברן ומקשרן.
“Peace” twice: that is, in the heavenly household and in the earthly household. The meaning of “in the earthly household” is that for there to be a union and revelation of Atzilus in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, there must be a peace that joins and binds them.
The Talmud reads the two mentions of peace as peace in the heavenly household and in the earthly household. Peace below means the bond that joins Atzilus to the lower worlds and lets it be revealed there.
“Comely” is the shining face, the tikkun “and truth,” above all hair, revealed through the “black” prohibitions; a still higher level is “the curtains of Shlomo,” the peace that joins the higher and lower realms.
In the thirteen tikkunim of Arich Anpin’s beard, the seventh, “and truth,” is the bare face between the hairs; it stands for a revelation not filtered through the narrow channels of hair. The Ramaz’s comment that Daas of Atik shines there fits the claim that the prohibitions, rooted in Atik’s intellect, bring this illumination.
Marei mekomos
- 1שחורות כעורב · Song of Songs 5:11
- 2חכמת אדם תאיר פניו · Ecclesiastes 8:1
- 3יאר ה׳ פניו אליך · Numbers 6:25
- 4ע״פ ויכתוב משה את מוצאיהם · לעיל פ׳ מסעי.
- 5ויכתוב משה את מוצאיהם למסעיהם · Numbers 33:2
- 6וזהו שחורה אני ונאוה · Song of Songs 1:5
- 7או יחזיק במעוזי יעשה שלום לי · Isaiah 27:5
- 8בפמליא . . של מטה · סנהדרין (צט, ב). [כ].
- 9בפמליא של מעלה ובפמליא של מטה · Sanhedrin 99b:10–11
47ושלום בפמליא של מעלה היינו התקשרות וגילוי אור המאציל בנאצלים הוא על ידי בחינת יסוד המייחדן ועושה שלום בין דברים רחוקים אשר אין ערוך זה לזה
And peace in the heavenly household means the binding and revelation of the Emanator’s light in the emanated [levels]; it is through the level of Yesod, which unites them and makes peace between distant things that bear no comparison to each other.
Peace in the heavenly household is the bond that joins the Emanator’s light to the emanated levels. It comes through Yesod, which unites things so distant that they bear no comparison.
שהרי הוא יתברך המתנשא מימות עולם דאצילות ומ״מ מחדש בטובו בכל יום תמיד מעשה בראשית כו׳
For He, blessed be He, is “exalted from the days of the world” of Atzilus, and nevertheless “in His goodness He renews each day, continually, the work of creation, etc.”
G‑d is “exalted” far above Atzilus, as the morning prayer says, and yet “in His goodness He renews each day the work of creation.” Bridging these two is the peace that Yesod makes.
(ולפמ״ש [ולפי מה שכתוב] בשל״ה [בשני לוחות הברית] פ׳ ואתחנן1 דטוב במלופם הוא הטוביות התוכיות הנבחרת מהטוב כו׳ עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו] ועיין בזהר תרומה קס״ה י״ל [יש לומר] דטובו הוא הבחי׳ העליונה שבכתר שעי״ז מחדש וממשיך האור ברב חסד דא״א2 כו׳ ועיין בזהר ר״פ אמור ובהרמ״ז [ובהרב משה זכות] שם ועמ״ש בד״ה ואתחנן מענין ובטובו מחדש כו׳)
(According to what is written in the Shelah, Parshas Va’eschanan, that “good” in its full sense is the inner goodness, the choicest of the good, etc., end of quote—and see the Zohar, Terumah, [folio] 165—one may say that “His goodness” is the highest level in Keser, through which He renews and draws down the light into the “abundant in kindness” of Arich Anpin, etc. And see the Zohar at the beginning of Parshas Emor, and the Ramaz there; and see what is written in the discourse beginning “Va’eschanan” on “and in His goodness He renews, etc.”)
The Shelah writes that “good” in its full sense is the inner, choicest goodness. On that basis, “His goodness” is the highest level in Keser, through which new light is drawn into the “abundant kindness” of Arich Anpin; further references to the Zohar and to a discourse on “Va’eschanan” are given.
גם באצילות לבד יש ב״פ [ב׳ פעמים] שלום היינו יחוד חו״ב [חכמה ובינה] ע״י הדעת המחברן והתכללות חו״ג [חסד וגבורה] ע״י הת״ת [התפארת] גם להיות כל מדה כלולה מעשר כ״ז [כל זה] הוא ענין עושה שלום במרומיו.3
Also within Atzilus alone there is peace in two ways: the union of Chochmah and Binah through Daas, which joins them, and the inclusion of Chesed and Gevurah in each other through Tiferes; also that each attribute be composed of ten—all this is the matter of “He makes peace in His heights.”
Within Atzilus itself there are also two kinds of peace: Daas unites Chochmah and Binah, and Tiferes blends Chesed and Gevurah; each attribute also includes all ten. This is “He makes peace in His heights.”
Peace “above” is the bond, through Yesod, between the Emanator and the emanated; within Atzilus there is also the peace of Daas between Chochmah and Binah and of Tiferes between Chesed and Gevurah.
The Kehot note adds that the Shelah’s comment on “good” is also cited in the Tzemach Tzedek’s Biurei HaZohar.
Marei mekomos
- 1ולפמ״ש בשל״ה פ׳ ואתחנן · מובא גם בביאוה״ז להצ״צ ע׳ קלא.
- 2ברב חסד דא״א · Exodus 34:6
- 3עושה שלום במרומיו · Job 25:2
48וכל זה הוא ענין התלבשותו בעולמות ועושה שלום ביניהם עיין באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש] ע״פ והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום12
All this is the matter of His enclothing in the worlds and making peace between them; see Iggeres HaKodesh on the verse “And the work of righteousness shall be peace.”
All the kinds of peace described so far belong to G‑d’s enclothing in the worlds, where separate things must be reconciled. Iggeres HaKodesh, on “the work of righteousness shall be peace,” discusses this.
אבל יריעות שלמה היינו שהשלום שלו שאין שייך כלל שם לומר שיש שני דברים שצריך לעשות שלום ביניהם כ״א הכל כלא ממש חשיבי.
But “the curtains of Shlomo” means [the One] to Whom peace belongs, where it does not apply at all to say that there are two things between which peace must be made; rather, all are considered as truly nothing.
“The curtains of Shlomo” point to the King to Whom peace belongs: a level where there are not two things needing reconciliation at all, because everything is utterly nullified before Him.
אפילו אור צח אוכם הוא קמיה34 ובטלים במקורן כזיו השמש במקורו אשר אין שייך לקרוא בשם אור מחמת כי הוא בטל במאור
Even “a clear light is darkness before Him,” and they are nullified in their source like the sun’s radiance in its source, which cannot be called by the name “light,” because it is nullified in the luminary
As the Tikkunei Zohar says, even the clearest light is darkness before Him. Everything is nullified in its source like sunlight within the sun, which is not even called “light” there.
(וזהו כענין יחוד וביטול ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דעקודים במאצילן שהם עקודים בכלי אחד שמעוצם הביטול בא״ס ב״ה הרי הם בכלי אחד כו׳ ואין שייך לומר שיש שנ דברים שצריך לעשות שלום ביניהם כמו בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] דאצילות שכל אחד בכלי מיוחד)
(and this is like the union and nullification of the Ten Sefiros of Akudim in their Emanator: they are “bound” in one vessel, for out of the intensity of their nullification in the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, they are in one vessel, etc.; and it does not apply to say that there are two things between which peace must be made, as with the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus, where each is in a vessel of its own).
This resembles the World of Akudim, an early stage in the Arizal’s account of emanation, in which the ten Sefiros were “bound” in a single vessel because of their intense nullification in the Infinite. In Atzilus, by contrast, each Sefirah has its own vessel, so peace must be made between them.
ולע״ל [ולעתיד לבוא] יתגלה בחי׳ זו גם כן דיריעות שלמה דהיינו כאשר יהיה התגלות עצמותו ומהותו אני הוי׳ לא שניתי זהו נקרא יריעות שלמה שהוא מקיף על כל בחי׳ השלום וגבוה מהם.
And in the Time to Come this level too, of “the curtains of Shlomo,” will be revealed: that is, when there will be a revelation of His essence and being, “I, G‑d, have not changed”—this is called “the curtains of Shlomo,” which encompasses all the levels of peace and is higher than them.
This level, where there is nothing to reconcile, will be revealed in the Time to Come, when G‑d’s essence, “I, G‑d, have not changed,” is revealed. It encompasses and transcends every kind of peace.
הנה יריעות שלמה הם לבנים דהנה כתיב וישכם לבן בבקר5 היינו הארה מבחינת לובן העליון התגלות חסד עליון בכל הפרצופים וינשק לבניו17
Now, the curtains of Shlomo are white. For it is written, “And Lavan rose early in the morning”: that is, an illumination from the level of the supernal whiteness, the revelation of the supernal kindness in all the partzufim; “and he kissed his sons
The curtains of Shlomo are white. The verse about Lavan (whose name means “white”) rising in the morning is read as the supernal whiteness, G‑d’s kindness, shining through all the partzufim (the “configurations” in which the Sefiros of Atzilus are arranged).
ולבנותיו הם בחינת עילה ועלול משפיע מקבל ואח״כ וישב ל בן למק ומו אך זהו הכל בחינת הארת החסד א״ס ב״ה המתגלה באצי׳
and his daughters”: these are the level of cause and effect, giver and receiver; and afterwards, “and Lavan returned to his place.” But all this is the level of the illumination of the kindness of the Infinite One, blessed be He, revealed in Atzilus.
His kissing his “sons and daughters” is the flow from cause to effect, from giver to receiver, and then “Lavan returned to his place.” All this is the kindness of the Infinite revealed within Atzilus.
אמנם מרבע״ה [משה רבינו עליו השלום] ביקש אעברה נא ואראה6 את ההר הטוב הזה והלבנון ופי׳ לבנון כפל לשון הליבון היינו מקור הלבנונית שאינו יכול להתלבש כלל בע״ס [בעשר ספירות] ומאיר רק בבחינת מקיף
Moshe our teacher, peace be upon him, however, asked, “Let me cross over, please, and see the good mountain and the Levanon.” The meaning of Levanon is a doubled form of “whiteness” (libun), that is, the source of whiteness, which cannot be enclothed at all in the Ten Sefiros and shines only in an encompassing manner
Moshe asked to see “the good mountain and the Levanon.” Levanon doubles the root of “white”: it is the source of whiteness, which cannot enter the Sefiros at all and shines only as an encompassing light.
(וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] ואראה כו׳ כי עצם הגילוי יהיה רק לעתיד והתהלכתי בתוככם7 או אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] על ידי קיום מצות התלויות בארץ יוכל לבא לבחינת שיראה את בחינת הלבנון בבחינת ראיה לבד)8 ונקרא יריעות שלמה. נוטה שמים כיריעה.9
(and this is what is written, “and see, etc.”: for the essential revelation will be only in the Time to Come, “and I will walk among you”; or, nevertheless, through fulfilling the mitzvos dependent on the Land, he could come to the level of seeing the level of Levanon, as sight alone). And it is called “the curtains of Shlomo”: “He stretches out the heavens like a curtain.”
He asked only to “see,” because the full revelation belongs to the Time to Come, when “I will walk among you”; yet by keeping the mitzvos that depend on the Land he could at least glimpse the Levanon. This is “the curtains of Shlomo,” as the psalm says, “He stretches out the heavens like a curtain.”
והענין דמבואר למעלה דעל ידי קיום מל״ת [מצות לא תעשה] נמשך גילוי חב״ד [חכמה בינה ודעת] דע״י [דעתיק יומין] וזהו מ״ש דל״ת [דלא תעשה] נמשכים מי״ה.
The explanation: it was explained above that through fulfilling the prohibitions there is drawn a revelation of Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik Yomin; and this is what is said, that the prohibitions are drawn from yud-hei.
As explained above, the prohibitions reveal Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik; that is why they are said to come from the letters yud-hei.
ועל גילוי זה אמר ונאוה כאהלי קדר וכמש״ל [וכמה שכתוב לעיל] הטעם שהמשיל גילוי זה כאהלי קדר. ואח״כ אמר עוד שיתגלה בחינת גבוה יותר
And of this revelation it said, “comely, like the tents of Kedar”; the reason this revelation was compared to the tents of Kedar was written above. And afterwards it further said that a still higher level will be revealed,
That revelation is “comely, like the tents of Kedar,” as explained. The verse then speaks of a still higher level.
והיינו מקיפים דחב״ד [דחכמה בינה ודעת] דע״י [דעתיק יומין] וזהו בחינת כיריעות שלמה (ועיין במבוא שערים) (שער שני חלק שלישי פ״ה) החלק המעולה והגדול מאד הוא הנשאר מקיף כו׳ ע״ש.
namely the encompassing [lights] of Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atik Yomin; and this is the level of “like the curtains of Shlomo.” (And see Mevo She’arim) (Sha’ar 2, Part 3, chapter 5): “The superior and very great part is what remains encompassing, etc.”; see there.
That higher level is the encompassing lights of Atik’s intellect, “the curtains of Shlomo.” The Mevo She’arim says that the greater and superior part of the light remains encompassing.
וצ״ל ממ״ש (בשער ג׳ ח״א [חלק א׳] פ״ה) כי אור הפנימי גדול כו׳ וכ״כ [וכמו כן] בע״ח [בעץ חיים] (במהדורא קמא ש״י ספ״ב [סוף פרק ב׳]).
This needs to be reconciled with what is written (in Sha’ar 3, Part 1, chapter 5), that the inner light is great, etc.; and so too wrote Etz Chaim (in the first edition, Sha’ar 10, end of chapter 2).
This must be reconciled with the statement elsewhere in Mevo She’arim, and in the first edition of Etz Chaim, that the inner light is the great one.
וכ״כ [וכמו כן] במ״ח מס׳ [מסכת] עתיק ספ״א [סוף פרק א׳]. ועיין מש״ש [מה שכתוב שם] במבוא שערים (ש״ג ח״א [חלק א׳] רפ״ה) ואולי המעיין כו׳
And so too it is written in Mishnas Chassidim, Maseches Atik, end of chapter 1. And see what is written there in Mevo She’arim (Sha’ar 3, Part 1, beginning of chapter 5): “And perhaps the student, etc.”;
The same is said in Mishnas Chassidim, a work that sets out the Arizal’s Kabbalah in the form of the Mishnah, in its tractate on Atik; and the reader is referred to a passage in Mevo She’arim that begins “And perhaps the student….”
ע״ש ועיין בהרמ״ז [בהרב משה זכות] ר״פ שמיני מענין א״פ [אור פנימי] וא״מ [ואור מקיף] דעתיק שהא״מ [שהאור מקיף] הוא מתפשט וכו׳ עד אין חקר עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו]
see there. And see the Ramaz at the beginning of Parshas Shemini on the inner light and encompassing light of Atik: that the encompassing light spreads, etc., beyond all searching. End of quote.
The Ramaz says that the encompassing light of Atik spreads without limit, beyond all searching.
והיינו כמ״ש כאן והכל על ידי בחי׳ שחורה אני שירדה הנשמה למטה בכדי לקיים בחינת אתכפיא ואתהפכא חשוכא לנהורא כו׳
And this is as written here. And all is through the level of “I am black”: that the soul descended below in order to carry out the subjugation (iskafya) and transformation (is’hapcha) of darkness into light, etc.,
This matches what is said here. All of it comes about through “I am black”: the soul descends in order to subdue darkness and transform it into light.
על ידי סור מרע ועשה טוב10 שעי״ז יתבררו כל הסיגים ממה שנפל משבירת הכלים ולא יהיה שום מסך מבדיל. ונגלה כבוד11 ה׳ עין בעין יראו.12 ביום ההוא13 יהיה ה׳ אחד ושמו אחד.
through “turn from evil and do good,” for through this all the dross from what fell in the shattering of the vessels will be refined, and there will be no separating screen. “And the glory of G‑d will be revealed”; “eye to eye they shall see”; “on that day G‑d will be One and His Name One.”
By turning from evil and doing good, all the dross of the shattering will be refined and no screen will remain. Then “the glory of G‑d will be revealed,” “eye to eye they shall see,” and “G‑d will be One and His Name One.”
(ויובן עוד ענין בחינת יריעות שלמה ממ״ש במ״א סד״ה עד דלא ידעי בין ארור המן לברוך מרדכי14 כי ארור המן הוא הקליפה המכסה ומסתיר שם י״ה בחינת הל״ת [הלא תעשה] וברוך מרדכי הוא המשכת מ״ע [מצות עשה] בחינת ו״ה.
(The level of “the curtains of Shlomo” will be further understood from what is written elsewhere, at the end of the discourse beginning “Until he does not know [the difference] between ‘Cursed is Haman’ and ‘Blessed is Mordechai’”: “Cursed is Haman” is the kelipah that covers and conceals the Name yud-hei, the level of the prohibitions, and “Blessed is Mordechai” is the drawing down of the positive commandments, the level of vav-hei.
Another discourse explains the Purim saying “until he does not know between ‘Cursed is Haman’ and ‘Blessed is Mordechai.’” “Cursed is Haman” is the kelipah that conceals the yud-hei, the source of the prohibitions, while “Blessed is Mordechai” is the flow of the positive commandments, the vav-hei.
ובחינת תשובה עילאה עולה למעלה מבחינת י״ה ומבחינת ו״ה וכמ״ש גבי יום הכפורים לפני הוי׳ תטהרו למעלה מבחינת שם הוי׳ שבו תלויין המצות עשה ומצות לא תעשה כו׳.
And the level of higher teshuvah (teshuvah ila’ah) rises above the level of yud-hei and the level of vav-hei, as it is written regarding Yom Kippur, “before Havayah you shall be purified”: above the level of the Name Havayah, on which the positive commandments and the prohibitive commandments depend, etc.
Higher teshuvah reaches above both yud-hei and vav-hei. That is why the Torah says of Yom Kippur, “before Havayah you shall be purified”: from above the Name on which all the mitzvos depend.
וכן בפורים זכו לגילוי זה ע״י המס״נ [המסירות נפש] בגזירת המן שהושחרו פניהם וזהו בחינת שחורה אני ונאוה כיריעות שלמה.15
And so on Purim they merited this revelation through the self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh) in [the face of] Haman’s decree, when their faces were blackened; and this is the level of “I am black, yet comely, like the curtains of Shlomo.”
On Purim the Jews reached this level through their self-sacrifice when Haman’s decree “blackened their faces.” That is “I am black, yet comely, like the curtains of Shlomo.”
ולכן השמחה עד דלא ידעי בין כו׳ כי הוא גבוה הרבה מב׳ הבחינות דעשה ול״ת [ולא תעשה] כו׳ ולכן ביוהכ״פ [ביום הכפורים] היה מלבין הלשון של זהורית16 והוא ע״י ההמשכה ממקור הלבנונית וכענין והלבנון כו׳):18
Therefore the rejoicing is “until he does not know [the difference] between, etc.,” for it is much higher than the two levels of positive and prohibitive, etc. And therefore on Yom Kippur the strip of crimson wool would turn white, and this is through the drawing down from the source of whiteness, as in “and the Levanon, etc.”)
So the Purim joy goes beyond knowing the difference between the two, since it is above both positive and prohibitive. Likewise on Yom Kippur the crimson strip turned white, through the source of whiteness, the “Levanon.”
Above the peace that reconciles separate things stands “the curtains of Shlomo,” where nothing needs reconciling because all is nullified in G‑d. This source of whiteness, the encompassing light of Atik’s intellect, will be revealed in the Time to Come; it is reached through the soul’s descent and, at times like Purim and Yom Kippur, through self-sacrifice and higher teshuvah.
The Kehot note records two variants of the parenthesis about Moshe: Hanachos HaRap has it without parentheses, and Or HaTorah has a fuller version, in which Moshe wanted to keep the mitzvos of the Land, though they are positive commandments, to attain “seeing,” while the main revelation will come from the “not” of the prohibitions; it ends with the remark, “so I found, and it is not understood.”
Marei mekomos
- 1והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום · Isaiah 32:17
- 2באגה״ק ע״פ והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 12:1
- 3אור צח אוכם הוא קמי׳ · ת״ז ת״ע קלה, ב.
- 4אור צח אוכם הוא קמיה · Tikkunei Zohar 135b:1
- 5וישכם לבן בבקר · Genesis 32:1
- 6אעברה נא ואראה · Deuteronomy 3:25
- 7והתהלכתי בתוככם · Leviticus 26:12
- 8(וז״ש ואראה כו׳ . . בבחינת ראיה לבד) · המוסגר נמצא גם בס׳ הנחות הר״פ ע׳ קלד בלי סוגריים. וראה באוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתלח: (ולכן רצה משה לבא לא״י לקיים מצות התלויות בארץ תרומות כו׳ ואף שהם בחי׳ מ״ע מ״מ עי״ז יכול להיות רואה בחי׳ ואראה את הארץ כי עיקר ההתגלות יהי׳ לע״ל מבחי׳ לא דהיינו מהל״ת וזהו רק שהי׳ יכול להיות ואראה בחי׳ ראיה, כך מצאתי ואינו מובן)”. וכ״ה בד״ה שחורה אני במאמרי אדה״א.
- 9נוטה שמים כיריעה · Psalms 104:2
- 10סור מרע ועשה טוב · Psalms 34:15
- 11ונגלה כבוד ה׳ · Isaiah 40:5
- 12עין בעין יראו · Isaiah 52:8
- 13ביום ההוא יהי׳ ה׳ אחד · Zechariah 14:9
- 14עד דלא ידעי בין ארור המן לברוך מרדכי · Megillah 7b:7–8
- 15שחורה אני ונאוה כיריעות שלמה · Song of Songs 1:5
- 16מלבין הלשון של זהורית · Yoma 68b:9
- 17הארה מבחי׳ לובן העליון · ראה תו״א כג, ג. ובאוה״ת בראשית פ׳ ויצא כרך א רכו, א בשם מגיד מישרים ישן.
- 18לפני הוי׳ תטהרו · Leviticus 16:30
“Rise before the hoary head” ¶49–54
49ז ואחכ״ז [ואחר כל זה] יובן ג״כ פי׳ הפסוק מפני שיבה תקום1 כו׳. דהנה מבואר בלק״ת [בלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] מהאריז״ל [מהאר״י זכרונו לברכה] בטעמי מצות סוף פר׳ [פרשת] קדושים. דמפני שיבה תקום. היינו דיקנא דא״א. והדרת פני זקן. היינו דיקנא דז״א.
7. After all this, the meaning of the verse “Rise before the hoary head, etc.” will also be understood. For it is explained in the Likkutei Torah of the Arizal, in Taamei HaMitzvos, at the end of Parshas Kedoshim, that “Rise before the hoary head” refers to the beard of Arich Anpin, and “and honor the face of the elder” refers to the beard of Z’eir Anpin.
A seventh section applies all this to the verse “Rise before the hoary head and honor the face of the elder.” The Arizal reads “the hoary head” as the white beard of Arich Anpin and “the elder” as the beard of Z’eir Anpin.
The final section turns to the verse in Parshas Kedoshim, which the Arizal relates to the two supernal beards.
Marei mekomos
- 1מפני שיבה תקום · Leviticus 19:32
50ואיך שייך לומר על האדם שלמטה שיקום מפני אריך וז״א כו׳ והלא לית מחשבה תפיסא1 כו׳ וכתיב כי לא יראני האדם וחי2 כו׳.
But how can one say of a person below that he should rise before Arich [Anpin] and Z’eir Anpin, etc.? Is it not [said], “No thought can grasp, etc.,” and is it not written, “For no man can see Me and live, etc.”?
How can a person stand before Arich Anpin and Z’eir Anpin, levels that “no thought can grasp”? The Torah even says, “No man can see Me and live.”
אלא הענין דהכוונה על קיום התורה ומצות שהן נמשכין מדיקנא דא״א ומדיקנא דז״א. המ״ע [המצות עשה] הן המשכות מדיקנא דא״א והלא תעשה הם בדיקנא דז״א.
Rather, the matter is that it refers to the fulfillment of the Torah and mitzvos, which are drawn from the beard of Arich Anpin and from the beard of Z’eir Anpin: the positive commandments are drawn from the beard of Arich Anpin, and the prohibitions are in the beard of Z’eir Anpin.
The answer is that the verse refers to keeping the Torah and mitzvos, which flow from these two beards: positive commandments from the beard of Arich Anpin, prohibitions from the beard of Z’eir Anpin.
Standing before the supernal beards means keeping the mitzvos that flow from them.
Marei mekomos
- 1לית מחשבה תפיסא · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:10–12
- 2כי לא יראני האדם וחי · Exodus 33:20
51וכשמקיים המצוה בהידור מצוה כדין ה״ז [הרי זה] מקיים מפני שיבה תקום12 כו׳ וביותר לפמ״ש [לפי מה שכתוב] במ״א שהמצות נקרא שלוחי3 ה׳ ושלוחו של אדם כמותו4 א״כ זהו ממש מפני שיבה תקום כו׳
And when one fulfills the mitzvah with beautification of the mitzvah, as is proper, he thereby fulfills “Rise before the hoary head, etc.” And all the more so according to what is written elsewhere, that the mitzvos are called “G‑d’s agents,” and “a person’s agent is like himself”; if so, this is literally “Rise before the hoary head, etc.”
Keeping a mitzvah beautifully fulfills “Rise before the hoary head,” since the mitzvos flow from the supernal beards. Moreover, the Midrash calls the mitzvos G‑d’s agents, and a person’s agent is like himself, so honoring a mitzvah is honoring G‑d.
וכן בכלל זה הידור ת״ח [תלמיד חכם / תלמידי חכמים] וקימה מפני ס״ת [ספר תורה] וכמבואר בזהר ס״פ קדושים רב המנונא סבא כד הוה חמא ס״ת [ספר תורה] הוה קם מקמי׳ [מקמיה] ואמר מפני שיבה תקום כו׳.
And included in this is honoring a Torah scholar and rising before a Torah scroll, as explained in the Zohar at the end of Parshas Kedoshim: Rav Hamnuna Sava, when he would see a Torah scroll, would rise before it and say, “Rise before the hoary head, etc.”
Honoring a Torah scholar and standing for a Torah scroll are included. The Zohar relates that Rav Hamnuna Sava would rise before a Torah scroll and quote this verse.
וזהו דקיי״ל [דקיימא לן] (בקידושין דף ל״ב ע״ב) דמפני שיבה תקום היינו זקן וחכם.5 והדרת פני זקן היינו שקנה חכמה ואפילו יניק וחכים
And this is what we hold (in Kiddushin, folio 32b), that “Rise before the hoary head” refers to one who is old and wise, while “and honor the face of the elder” refers to one who has acquired wisdom, even a youth who is wise.
As the text cites from Kiddushin, “the hoary head” is one who is old and wise, while “the elder” is anyone who has acquired wisdom, even a young person.
והיינו כפירוש הלק״ת [הלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] דמפני שיבה תקום היינו דיקנא דא״א שהוא בחי׳ סבא כמ״ש ועתיק יומין יתיב6 כו׳
This is like the explanation of the Likkutei Torah [of the Arizal], that “Rise before the hoary head” refers to the beard of Arich Anpin, which is the level of “the Elder” (Sava), as it is written, “and the Ancient of Days sat, etc.,
This parallels the Arizal’s reading: “the hoary head” is the beard of Arich Anpin, the “Elder,” whom Daniel saw as the Ancient of Days.
ושער רישי׳ [רישיה] כעמר נקא אבל והדרת פני זקן היינו בדיקנא דז״א אשר הוא בחי׳ קווצותיו תלתלים שחורות7 כו׳
and the hair of His head like pure wool.” But “and honor the face of the elder” refers to the beard of Z’eir Anpin, which is the level of “his locks are curled, black, etc.,”
Daniel saw Him with hair “like pure wool.” “The elder” is the beard of Z’eir Anpin, whose locks are “black.”
אלא שקנה חכמה קנין הוא המשכה מההעלם אל הגילוי שנמשך בו מח״ס [מוחא סתימאה] וכדפי׳ באדרא (דק״מ ע״א)
only that “he acquired wisdom”: acquisition (kinyan) is a drawing from concealment into revelation, so that the hidden brain (mocha setima’ah) is drawn into it, as is explained in the Idra (folio 140a):
Z’eir Anpin is the “elder” in the sense of one who has “acquired” wisdom: acquisition means drawing something from concealment into revelation, and through the black hair the hidden brain is drawn into it, as the Idra says.
ובגין דהני שערי אוכמי וחשוכן כתיב מגלה עמוקות מני חשך8 כו׳ שנמשך ע״י קיום מל״ת [מצות לא תעשה] בחי׳ עומק הח״ע [החכמה עילאה] עמקו מחשבותיך9 כו׳.
“And because these hairs are black and dark, it is written, ‘He reveals deep things out of darkness,’ etc.”—that through fulfilling the prohibitions there is drawn the level of the depth of the supernal Chochmah, “Your thoughts are very deep, etc.,”
The Idra links the black hair to “He reveals deep things out of darkness.” Through the prohibitions the depth of supernal wisdom is revealed, as in “Your thoughts are very deep.”
וכמבואר לעיל באריכות. והנה פי׳ ויראת מאלקיך פי׳ בלק״ת [בלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] שם שהוא בחי׳ נוק׳ [נוקבא] מל׳ דאצילות.1011
as explained above at length. Now, the meaning of “and you shall fear your G‑d”: the Likkutei Torah [of the Arizal] explains there that it is the level of Nukva, Malchus of Atzilus.
This was explained above at length. The verse continues “and you shall fear your G‑d,” which the Arizal reads as Nukva, Malchus of Atzilus.
The verse “Rise before the hoary head” is read as the mitzvos: the hoary head is the white beard of Arich Anpin (the positive commandments), the elder is the black beard of Z’eir Anpin (the prohibitions), in which hidden wisdom is revealed; “and you shall fear your G‑d” is Malchus.
The Talmud’s definition of the “elder” as “one who has acquired wisdom” becomes, in the Kabbalistic reading, Z’eir Anpin “acquiring” the hidden brain through its black hair, that is, the prohibitions drawing down a depth that the white hair of the positive commandments does not.
Marei mekomos
- 1
- 2מפני שיבה תקום · Leviticus 19:32
- 3שהמצות נקרא שלוחי ה׳ · Midrash Tanchuma, Vayigash 6:2
- 4ושלוחו של אדם כמותו · Mishnah Berakhot 5:5
- 5דמפני שיבה תקום היינו זקן וחכם · ראה בלקו״ש חכ״ז ע׳ 377.
- 6ועתיק יומין יתיב · Daniel 7:9
- 7קווצותיו תלתלים שחורות · Song of Songs 5:11
- 8ובגין דהני שערי אוכמי וחשוכן כתיב מגלה עמוקות מני חשך · Zohar, Idra Rabba 33:268–278
- 9עמקו מחשבותיך · Psalms 92:6
- 10שהמצות נק׳ שלוחי׳ ה׳ · מ׳ תנחומא פ׳ ויגש [ו]. [כ].
- 11
52והענין דזה קאי על תשבע״פ [תורה שבעל פה] דמלכות פה תורה שבעל פה קרינן לה.1 וז׳ מצות דרבנן ושאר סייגים וגדרים שמדברי סופרים
The explanation is that this refers to the Oral Torah, for “Malchus is the mouth; we call it the Oral Torah”; and the seven rabbinic commandments and the other safeguards and fences that are from the words of the Scribes.
“And you shall fear your G‑d” refers to the Oral Torah, for the Tikkunei Zohar says that Malchus is “the mouth” and is called the Oral Torah. It includes the seven rabbinic commandments and the fences of the Scribes.
וכן משמע בזהר שם אמר ר׳ [רבי] שמעון מכאן רמז לתשב״כ [לתורה שבכתב] ורמז לתשבע״פ [לתורה שבעל פה] וכמ״ש במק״מ [במקדש מלך] שם דתשבע״פ [דתורה שבעל פה] היא בחינת נוק׳ [נוקבא] וע״ז נאמר ויראת מאלקיך
And so it is implied in the Zohar there: Rabbi Shimon said, “From here is an allusion to the Written Torah and an allusion to the Oral Torah”; and as written in Mikdash Melech there, that the Oral Torah is the level of Nukva, and of it is said, “and you shall fear your G‑d.”
The Zohar on this verse says it alludes to both the Written and the Oral Torah, and Mikdash Melech, a commentary on the Zohar, explains that the Oral Torah is Nukva, of whom “and you shall fear your G‑d” is said.
והענין כי המל׳ היא למטה מז״א וכ״ש [וכל שכן] מאריך וע״ז נאמר שערך כעדר העזים2 כו׳ ולכן הוצרך לומר על זה ויראת
The explanation: Malchus is below Z’eir Anpin, and all the more so below Arich [Anpin]; and of this it is said, “Your hair is like a flock of goats, etc.” Therefore it was necessary to say of this, “and you shall fear,”
Malchus is lower than Z’eir Anpin and certainly than Arich Anpin; its “hair” is compared to “a flock of goats.” That is why the verse adds a special call to fear.
כי באמת חמורים דברי סופרים מדברי תורה כו׳ וכנודע מענין ערבים עלי דברי סופרים3 יותר מיינה של תורה ששרשן מבחינת סופר שלמעלה מתשב״כ [מתורה שבכתב] שהיא בחי׳ ספר.4
for in truth the words of the Scribes are more stringent than the words of the Torah, etc., as is known regarding “The words of the Scribes are dearer to me than the wine of the Torah,” for their root is from the level of the scribe (sofer), which is above the Written Torah, the level of the book (sefer).
The words of the Scribes are in truth weightier than words of Torah, as the Talmud says, and “dearer than the wine of the Torah,” because their root, the “scribe,” is above the “book,” the Written Torah.
“And you shall fear your G‑d” refers to Malchus, the Oral Torah with its rabbinic fences, which demands awe because the words of the Scribes are rooted above the Written Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1דמלכות פה תורה שבעל פה קרינן לה · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:16–17
- 2שערך כעדר העזים · Song of Songs 4:1
- 3ערבים עלי דברי סופרים · Avodah Zarah 35a:6
- 4חמורים ד״ס מד״ת · Sanhedrin 88b:14–15
53וכמ״ש עוד במ״א בפי׳ בינה יתירה ניתנה באשה1 מבאיש. דקאי על תשבע״פ [תורה שבעל פה]. דענין שבע מצות דרבנן
As is written further elsewhere on the meaning of “Greater understanding (binah yeseirah) was given to woman than to man,” that it refers to the Oral Torah. For the matter of the seven rabbinic commandments,
Another discourse explains “Greater understanding was given to woman than to man” as referring to the Oral Torah, the feminine Malchus. The seven rabbinic commandments illustrate this.
כמו נט״י [נטילת ידים] ועירובין ונר חנוכה ענינם ג״כ לדחות יניקת החיצונים כמו במצות ל״ת [לא תעשה] שע״י נט״י [נטילת ידים] לא יינקו החיצונים מהמדות מהצפרנים כו׳
such as washing the hands, eruvin and the Chanukah lamp, is also to repel the nurture of the external forces, as with the prohibitive commandments: through washing the hands the external forces do not draw nurture from the attributes, from the fingernails, etc.
Rabbinic commandments such as washing the hands, eruv and the Chanukah lights also repel the external forces, as the prohibitions do. Washing the hands, for example, keeps the external forces from drawing nurture from the fingernails.
וזה נעשה במצות דרבנן ע״י קום ועשה מה שבתשב״כ [שבתורה שבכתב] לא יוכל להיות בחי׳ זו רק על ידי לא שזהו ענין מל״ת [מצות לא תעשה] ובתשבע״פ [ובתורה שבעל פה] בא ונמשך בחי׳ זו בז׳ מצות דרבנן שהם מ״ע [מצות עשה] דרבנן
And this is accomplished in the rabbinic commandments through active doing, whereas in the Written Torah this level can come about only through “not,” which is the matter of the prohibitions; and in the Oral Torah this level comes and is drawn into the seven rabbinic commandments, which are rabbinic positive commandments.
The rabbinic commandments do this through positive action, while in the Written Torah repelling evil is possible only through the “not” of the prohibitions. In the Oral Torah this power enters positive commandments.
וזהו בינה יתירה ניתנה באשה ועמ״ש בביאור ע״פ כה תברכו2 בענין ואיך לא אשא פנים לישראל שאני כתבתי ואכלת ושבעת וברכת3 והם דקדקו על עצמן עד כזית4 כו׳
And this is “Greater understanding was given to woman.” And see what is written in the explanation on “Thus shall you bless,” on “How can I not show favor to Israel? For I wrote, ‘And you shall eat and be satisfied and bless,’ and they are scrupulous with themselves down to an olive’s bulk, etc.,”
That is the woman’s “greater understanding.” The Talmud relates that G‑d favors Israel because, though the Torah requires blessing after eating to satiety, they are strict with themselves and bless even after an olive’s bulk.
דהיינו שהם המשיכו מלמעלה מבחינת ההמשכה שעל ידי תשב״כ [תורה שבכתב] כו׳ ע״ש ועמ״ש מזה עוד בפרשה מטות בד״ה ושמע אביה5 את נדרה ולכן נאמר על זה ויראת מאלקיך בחינת מל׳ תשבע״פ [תורה שבעל פה] קרינן לה.
that is, they drew down from higher than the level of the drawing down that comes through the Written Torah, etc.; see there. And see what is written further on this in Parshas Matos, in the discourse beginning “And her father hears her vow.” Therefore it is said of this, “and you shall fear your G‑d”: the level of Malchus, “we call it the Oral Torah.”
By that strictness they draw down from above the level that the Written Torah draws. A discourse on vows is also cited, and this is why “and you shall fear your G‑d” refers to Malchus, the Oral Torah.
The rabbinic commandments bring the power of repelling evil, which in the Written Torah belongs only to the prohibitions, into positive action; this is the “greater understanding” of the feminine, the Oral Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1בינה יתירה ניתנה באשה · Niddah 45b:11–12
- 2כה תברכו · Numbers 6:23
- 3ואכלת ושבעת וברכת · Deuteronomy 8:10
- 4והם דקדקו על עצמן עד כזית · Berakhot 20b:15
- 5
54ועיין מ״ש סד״ה קול דודי1 בענין הרים וגבעות אבות ואמהות כו׳ ועל דרך זה יובן גם כן בענין תשב״כ [תורה שבכתב] ותשבע״פ [ותורה שבעל פה] וסיום הפסוק אני הוי׳ דכולא חד וכמ״ש סד״ה את שבתתי תשמרו2 כו׳:
And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “The voice of my beloved” on “mountains and hills, the Patriarchs and the Matriarchs, etc.”; in the same way it will also be understood regarding the Written Torah and the Oral Torah. And the end of the verse, “I am Havayah,” [means] that all is one, as written at the end of the discourse beginning “Keep My Shabbosos, etc.”
The discourse on “The voice of my beloved” explains the “mountains and hills” as the Patriarchs and Matriarchs, and the Written and Oral Torah are understood the same way. The verse ends “I am Havayah,” for all is one, as the discourse on “Keep My Shabbosos” explains.
The maamar closes by pointing to the unity of the Written and Oral Torah under the one Name, as the verse ends, “I am Havayah.”
Marei mekomos
- 1קול דודי · Song of Songs 2:8
- 2את שבתתי תשמרו · Leviticus 26:2
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
In one’s avodah
The soul came down to refine the world through mitzvos with physical things: eating in order to say the Shema and pray with self-sacrifice, using physical things for shofar, sukkah, lulav, tzitzis and tefillin. Above all it must keep the prohibitions and the fine points and fences of the Scribes, rejecting what cannot be elevated, for through this “blackness” the highest light is revealed. Performing mitzvos with beauty and honoring Torah scholars and the Torah scroll is “rising before the hoary head,” and the words of the Scribes call for special awe.
Questions for discussion
- Why does the maamar insist that even “the Infinite Light” is only a radiance, and what does the comparison to a person’s name add?
- In what sense is the descended soul, the “bride,” higher than the souls that remain in Atzilus as “daughters of Jerusalem”?
- How does the principle that what is higher in root falls lower explain why the prohibitions reveal more than the positive commandments?
- What is the difference between the encompassing light of a “garment” and that of a “tent,” and why is the higher one compared to the tents of Kedar?
- How does the reading of “Rise before the hoary head” change the way one might approach rabbinic commandments and the beautification of mitzvos?
Key terms in this maamar
- The Sefirosספירות
- The ten divine attributes through which G‑d relates to creation. ×4
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×23
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×15
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×4
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×21
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d. ×48
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×5
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction. ×1
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence. ×3
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×18
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds. ×14
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×4
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×12
- Tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
- The self-concealment of the Infinite Light that makes room for finite worlds. ×3
- The kav (line of light)קו
- The thin ray of light drawn into the space left after the tzimtzum. ×4
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×30
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions.
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d's presence as it dwells in the world. ×6
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level. ×1
- Lights and vesselsאורות וכלים
- Divine revelation and the forms that contain and express it. ×2
- Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
- Malchus as the receiving configuration. ×5
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×9
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- Chochmah, Binah and Daas as a whole. ×1
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- Harmony of kindness and restraint; associated with compassion. ×1
- The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
- Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond.
- The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
- Divine light that enters each world and gives it life according to its measure.
- Love and aweאהבה ויראה
- The two 'wings' of divine service.
- The animal soulנפש הבהמית
- The soul that animates the body and its drives.
- Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah)אבא ואמא
- The intellectual configurations.
- Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
- The forces of concealment that oppose holiness. ×16
- The sitra achra (the other side)סטרא אחרא
- The realm opposed to holiness.
- Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
- Giving oneself over entirely to G‑d.
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'.
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×2
- The higher unity (yichuda ila'ah)יחודא עילאה
- The world is nothing next to G‑d. ×1
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- Measure, limitation and judgment. ×2
- Z'eir Anpin (the emotive attributes)ז״א
- The six emotive Sefiros as one configuration.
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×4
- Yesod (foundation)יסוד
- The channel that connects and transmits. ×2
- Teshuvah (return)תשובה
- Returning to G‑d; not only repentance. ×1
- “He and His vessels” (ihu vegarmohi)איהו וגרמוהי
- From the Tikkunei Zohar: in Atzilus the Light and the vessels are one. Always “vessels”, never “organs”, “causations” or “bones”. Its companion איהו וחיוהי is “He and His life-forces”. Not מגרמיה (“of itself”). ×7