LikuteiTorah.comThe Chassidishe Parsha

Likkutei Torah · Parshas Shir HaShirim · Maamar 13

קול דודי הנה זה בא מדלג על ההרים…

“The Voice of My Beloved! Behold, He Comes, Leaping over the Mountains”

  • 23 paragraphs · 159 sections
  • about 1 h 30 min of study
  • 209 sources

The Rebbe on this maamar

The Rebbe built on it in these maamarim of his: ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא (5736)ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא (5736)

Begin the maamar Download PDFPDF · 1.0 MB

Your progress 0 of 159 sections

Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device

The big idea

At the Exodus a great illumination from the level of G‑d’s essence, “He and His Name alone,” far above the chain of worlds that His Name sustains, was revealed to Israel by a “leap,” out of all proportion to their low state; only such a revelation could free them from Mitzrayim, the realm of limit. Israel’s own service (the guarded first matzah, reached through the bitterness of maror, and later the Counting of the Omer) prepares for this revelation and draws it down, and it will return openly in the future.

The maamar in brief

The maamar asks why the verse says “leaping” over the mountains but “skipping” over the hills, and how matzah eaten before midnight can be explained by a revelation that came after it. Before creation there were “He and His Name alone”: the life-force of the worlds is only G‑d’s radiance, Name and Kingship, “the kingship of all worlds,” while “Your kingship” is Malchus included in His essence. At the Exodus this higher level, “the King of the kings of kings,” was revealed, and so Israel left Mitzrayim, the realm of limit. There were two matzos: the first, before midnight, was Israel’s own self-nullification, which needed guarding and came with maror, the bitterness that arouses compassion; through it came the second, after midnight, a nullification from Above that could not leaven. “Voice” is a drawing from concealment into revelation. The revelation “leapt” over the chain of worlds: on one foot, love, in the merit of the Patriarchs, the Torah; on two, love and awe, in the merit of the Matriarchs, the mitzvos, whose root is higher. The gazelle that turns its head back is the will above wisdom enclothed in the mitzvos; after Pesach comes “Arise,” the Counting toward Shavuos.

Outline

  1. The question“The voice of my beloved … leaping over the mountains, skipping over the hills”: why “leaping” for the mountains and “skipping” for the hills? The Midrash reads the verse as the Exodus, when G‑d “leapt” from four hundred years to two hundred and ten.¶1
  2. Matzah and midnight; He and His NameThe Haggadah explains matzah by a revelation that came after midnight, though matzah must be eaten before it. To answer: the life-force of the worlds is only G‑d’s light, Name and Kingship, which change nothing in His essence; hence the prayer’s version “before [the world] was created,” as if the world came about of itself.¶2–7
  3. Two kinds of kingship; leaving the realm of limit“The kingship of all worlds” gives life to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, the souls, angels and stars; “Your kingship” is Malchus included in the essence. This, “the King of the kings of kings,” was revealed at the Exodus, and it freed Israel from Mitzrayim, the limit that binds every world.¶8–10
  4. Two matzos and the marorMatzah, like grain for a child, brings recognition of G‑d. The first matzah, before midnight, was Israel’s own self-nullification; it needed guarding from chametz, self-exaltation, and came with maror, the bitterness that arouses abundant compassion, which is why the maror stands on the middle line. Through it came the second matzah, revealed from Above, which needed neither guarding nor maror.¶11–16
  5. The voice“Voice” is a drawing from concealment into revelation; the revelation at the Exodus of a great illumination from the level of the essence is “the voice of my beloved.”¶17
  6. Leaping over the mountainsThe revelation skipped the chain of cause and effect, coming “with great awe,” in the merit of the Patriarchs or from above them. The Torah calls it pesach, “And Havayah will pass over the doorway”: it entered Malchus, the gate of awe.¶18
  7. Skipping over the hillsLeaping is on one foot and skipping on two: through the Patriarchs the revelation came only as love, through the Matriarchs also as awe, which is rooted higher. The Matriarchs, though recipients, are higher from below to above, “last in deed, first in thought”; below, the mountains are the Torah and the hills the mitzvos, rooted in Keser. “Behold, he comes” is also the future: “I will show him wonders.”¶19–21
  8. The gazelle and the CountingThe gazelle turns its head back: the will above wisdom is enclothed in physical mitzvos. At Pesach it came by a leap, with no arousal from below; then comes “Arise,” the Counting of the Omer, which refines the middos so that Shavuos is “face to face” and leavened bread can be offered.¶22–23

Key concepts

He and His Name aloneהוא ושמו בלבד
Before creation G‑d’s Name, the radiance that would give life to the worlds, was included in His essence. The life-force of the worlds is only His “Name,” which changes nothing in Him.
The kingship of all worlds and Your kingshipמלכות כל עולמים / מלכותך
Two levels of Malchus: the kingship that gives life to the worlds, a mere radiance and name, and Malchus as included in G‑d’s essence. The second, “the King of the kings of kings,” was revealed at the Exodus.
Leapדילוג
A revelation that skips the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), the order of cause and effect, coming from above to below out of proportion to the recipient.
The two matzosמצה ראשונה ומצה שניה
The first matzah, before midnight, is Israel’s own self-nullification, which must be guarded; the second, after midnight, is a nullification brought by the revelation from Above, which cannot leaven.
Bitterness and abundant compassionמרירות ורחמים רבים
Bitterness over one’s distance from G‑d arouses His abundant compassion, which applies only to one who is low; so the maror stands on the middle line, the line of compassion.
Voiceקול
A drawing from concealment into revelation, from intellect into emotion or from above intellect into it; the “great voice” of Sinai is the inner voice that is not heard.
Leaping and skippingדילוג וקפיצה
Leaping is on one foot, skipping on two: the revelation came as love through the Patriarchs and the Torah, and as love and awe through the Matriarchs and the mitzvos.
Supernal aweיראה עילאה
An awe rooted higher than love, in the hidden levels of Keser; at the Exodus it was revealed within the lower awe of Malchus, “with great awe.”
Last in deed, first in thoughtסוף מעשה במחשבה תחלה
What comes last in the order of descent has the highest root; so the recipient, the Matriarchs and the mitzvos, can stand above the giver.

The Rebbe’s maamarim on this maamar · 2

AI summaries Written by AI from each maamar and checked against it by a second AI reader; no person has reviewed them yet, so check the maamar itself before relying on a detail. See something to correct?

The Rebbe built these 2 maamarim (5736) on the Alter Rebbe’s. Open one for a summary, for what it adds paragraph by paragraph, and its lesson. All of them, by parsha.

1.5736Built on itד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא ש״פ מצורע, יו״ד ניסן, שבת הגדול, ה׳תשל״ו · ספר המאמרים תשל״ו · עמ׳ 161The Rebbe opens with several questions. The Midrash says the Exodus came by a “leap,” after 210 years instead of the decreed 400. The Rebbe says it was known Above from the start that the Exodus would be after 210 years; he then applies…

Summary

The Rebbe opens with several questions. The Midrash says the Exodus came by a “leap,” after 210 years instead of the decreed 400. The Rebbe says it was known Above from the start that the Exodus would be after 210 years; he then applies the Sages’ dictum to Egypt, saying its end was revealed as 400 years. So why decree 400, and how could the work of 400 years be done in 210? What does “leaping over the mountains” have to do with Pesach? And why is leaping tied to Pesach specifically, the “head of the festivals,” when all three festivals have the mitzvah of “appearing”? Why does the Zohar link the tenth of Nissan with Yom Kippur, the tenth of Tishrei, when Nissan is the service of tzaddikim and Tishrei is the completion of teshuvah? And how do the two readings of “over the mountains” fit together: “in the merit of the Patriarchs” and literally “over” them?

The Rebbe explains that Shavuos and Sukkos come through Israel’s service: the seven weeks of counting, and the “ingathering” of Elul and Tishrei. Pesach came when Israel were “naked and bare,” sunk in Egypt, the lowest place. Precisely for that reason the revelation had to come from “He and His Name alone,” above hishtalshelus. From that level, bringing anything into being is “as though of itself,” by a leap, and only from there can light reach all the way down to Egypt. The descent was “by His Glory and by Himself,” passing through “King of the kings of kings” (Keser, Chochmah and Binah, the seven middos) and Malchus, “the doorway.” The leap still needed a semblance from below. The taking of the lamb on the tenth of Nissan is described as mesirus nefesh. Separately, the first matzah embodied bittul and required guarding; through that bittul came the second matzah. These do not compel the revelation or form a fitting vessel for it. The power for this mesirus nefesh came from the faith inherited from the Patriarchs, which is the “merit” reading. The revelation itself comes from above the mountains and hills, the “mountains of darkness,” which is the literal reading. Yom Kippur is likewise above measure. As for 400 versus 210: by the reckoning of hishtalshelus, Egypt needed 400 years. But the descent went further than intended, as hinted in רד״ו, a term of descent. This extra descent called forth a leap that accomplished in 210 years what should have taken 400. The Rebbe discusses the instruction “עשו כל עבודתכם דרך דילוג וקפיצה” for Pesach services, then explains leap-like service as the highest completeness, beyond standing and walking and all measure; the closing lines separately connect teshuvah’s leap in a single moment with Israel’s immediate redemption.

What the Rebbe adds

  1. ¶18

    The Alter Rebbe lists the two readings of “over the mountains” side by side. The Rebbe joins them. The Patriarchs’ merit, read as the inherited faith that gave Israel strength for mesirus nefesh even in Egypt, produces the service from below. The leap it calls forth comes from above the mountains and hills, the level that merit reaches. It comes from “He and His Name alone.”

    The Alter Rebbeא׳ על ההרים בזכותן כנ״ל והב׳ על ההרים למעלה מן ההרים

    The Rebbeדהרים וגבעות הוא הבחינה ששם מגיע זכות אבות וכו׳

  2. ¶7

    The Alter Rebbe uses “as though created of itself” to explain the passive wording of the prayer. The Rebbe reads it as the key to the leap. From “He and His Name alone,” bringing into being is itself a leap. Ordinary creation needs tzimtzumim down to the possibility of evil. Reaching Egypt, the lowest place, needs a revelation from the level where bringing into being is by leap.

    The Alter Rebbeוהרי הוא כאילו נברא ממילא

    The Rebbeשלגבי מדריגה זו ההתהוות היא כאילו מעצמו, והיינו שההתהוות ממדריגה זו היא בדרך דילוג

  3. ¶15

    The Alter Rebbe says the first matzah, an arousal from below, brought about the second. The Rebbe defines how. A revelation above hishtalshelus cannot be compelled by service below, nor received in a fitting vessel. It still needs a semblance of itself below. He identifies that semblance with the mesirus nefesh of “draw and take” on the tenth of Nissan, done “by way of leaping and skipping.”

    The Alter Rebbeוזה היה הכל בחי׳ מצה ראשונה בחינת אתעדל״ת שהיו ישראל עושים ועי״ז

    The Rebbeאמנם אעפ״כ גם בהמשכה שבבחינת דילוג צ״ל מעין ודוגמא להההמשכה

  4. ¶22–23

    The Alter Rebbe contrasts Pesach, which had no arousal from below, with the Omer and Shavuos. The Rebbe uses the contrast to explain why leaping belongs to Pesach as “head of the festivals.” He adds Sukkos, the ingathering of Elul and Tishrei, as another festival that comes through service. He also stresses that the lowliness itself is what demanded the leap.

    The Alter Rebbeולא היה אתערותא דלתתא כלל רק שנגלה כביכול מעצמו בבחי׳ דילוג

    The Rebbeואדרבא, דוקא מצד זה שהי׳ במעמד ומצב דאת ערום וערי׳

  5. ¶1

    The Alter Rebbe states the leap from 400 to 210 years without asking why 400 was decreed. The Rebbe explains that 400 was the reckoning of hishtalshelus. The descent went beyond what was intended, as with the Egyptians, who added harm beyond the decree. That extra descent drew down a leap even in time, accomplishing in רד״ו years (a term of descent) what would otherwise have taken 400.

    The Alter Rebbeשהיה הגאולה בדלוג מארבע מאות שנה לרד״ו שנה

    The Rebbeאמנם ע״י שהיתה ירידה נוספת מהמכוון

The lesson

The maamar presents leap-like service, including mesirus nefesh, as drawing down the revelation described by “אראנו נפלאות”; separately, it concludes that teshuvah can be a leap “בשעתא חדא וברגעא חדא” and that “ישראל עושין תשובה ומיד הם נגאלין.”

AI summary

The full maamar: read or print it free at Lahak Hanochos (lahak.org)

2.5736Built on itד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא י״א ניסן, ה׳תשל״ו · ספר המאמרים תשל״ו · עמ׳ 168The Rebbe opens from the Midrash that “the voice of my beloved, leaping over the mountains” refers to the Exodus, when G‑d leapt from four hundred years to two hundred and ten. He asks three questions. First, if the exile was a process of…

Summary

The Rebbe opens from the Midrash that “the voice of my beloved, leaping over the mountains” refers to the Exodus, when G‑d leapt from four hundred years to two hundred and ten. He asks three questions. First, if the exile was a process of refining (according to Kabbalah, refining the sparks of the generation of the Dispersion), how did 210 years accomplish what was set for 400? And if 210 sufficed, why was 400 decreed at all? Second, the Midrash gives two readings of “over the mountains … over the hills.” One is “in the merit of” the Patriarchs and Matriarchs, which puts the redemption below them. The other is “above” them. These seem contradictory. Third, why does the leap belong specifically to Pesach, so that the offering, the manner of eating it, “Havayah will pass over the doorway,” and the festival’s very name all mean leaping?

He answers that Pesach, unlike Shavuos (reached through the Counting) and Sukkos (the festival of ingathering, after Elul and the Ten Days of Teshuvah), is a leap that does not come from human service. Israel were then at the lowest point, “naked and bare,” sunk in forty-nine gates of impurity. Only “I and not an angel,” the King of the kings of kings “in His glory and His essence” (Malchus and Tiferes of Ein Sof before the tzimtzum, Keser), could reach them, and only by a leap. Yet some likeness of this was needed from below: the open self-sacrifice of taking the lamb on Shabbos HaGadol. In daily service the pattern is standing (angels, the worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah), walking (tzaddikim, Torah and mitzvos, rising to Atzilus, which still has ten limited sefiros), and leaping (mesirus nefesh in the Shema, teshuvah, Yom Kippur). This leap reaches Keser, and teshuvah is therefore tied to Mashiach. The two readings agree: the Patriarchs’ and Matriarchs’ service of faith was only a hint, a likeness, yet it drew down a revelation from inner Atik and beyond, far above them. The Matriarchs drew the higher “skipping on two feet”; so too the righteous women of Egypt, and the women who build Jewish homes today. He closes with the “horns”: from the lowest point, “all the horns of the wicked I will cut off,” come the ten horns, from Avraham’s to the horn of Mashiach.

What the Rebbe adds

  1. ¶18

    The Alter Rebbe simply lists the two readings: in the Patriarchs’ merit, or above them. The Rebbe points out that they seem to contradict each other. He reconciles them: the service of the Patriarchs and Matriarchs (faith) was only a hint and likeness ("מעין ודוגמא ורמז") of what was to come. Through that hint a revelation was drawn down that is beyond any comparison with them, even with their root above Atzilus. So it is both “in their merit” and “above them.”

    The Alter Rebbeויש בזה ב׳ פירושים. א׳ על ההרים בזכותן כנ״ל והב׳ על ההרים למעלה מן ההרים

    The Rebbeישנם שני פירושים, שלכאורה הם פירושים הפכיים

  2. ¶4

    The Alter Rebbe uses the name to show that the life-force of the worlds does not touch the essence, and says that before creation the Name was included in the essence. The Rebbe adds two things. First, in “He and His Name alone,” the Name itself was “alone” ("דגם שמו הי׳ באופן בלבד"). Second, a name has an advantage: when a person is called by it, he turns with his whole essence. He then equates “His glory” (Malchus of Ein Sof) with this Name, and makes it the source of the revelation “in His glory and His essence” at the Exodus.

    The Alter Rebbeהאדם כשהוא בפ״ע אינו צריך לשם כלל רק לזולתו

    The Rebbeפונה לקוראו בכל עצמותו

  3. ¶22

    The Alter Rebbe says the Pesach revelation came with no arousal from below, unlike Shavuos, which came through the Counting. The Rebbe adds Sukkos to this contrast: its joy comes through the prior service of ingathering. He explains that Pesach, as “head of the festivals,” draws its leap into the others. He also specifies the minimal “likeness” that was needed from below: the open self-sacrifice of taking Egypt’s idol on Shabbos HaGadol, which is itself a leap within service.

    The Alter Rebbeולא היה אתערותא דלתתא כלל רק שנגלה כביכול מעצמו בבחי׳ דילוג

    The Rebbeהי׳ צ״ל עבודת האדם עכ״פ מעין זה. וזהו מה שאז היתה עבודתם במס״נ

  4. ¶10

    The Alter Rebbe shows that even angels and souls are limit, “Mitzrayim.” The Rebbe takes this higher. Even Atzilus, the world of unity reached by the tzaddik’s “walking” in Torah and mitzvos, is still bounded: “ten and not nine.” The first tzimtzum is the beginning of all limit. True Exodus therefore comes only from Keser. Following the Pardes that the Alter Rebbe cites in ¶9, the Rebbe identifies “King of the kings of kings” with Keser and with the level before the tzimtzum. He builds a three-step scheme: standing (the worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah), walking (tzaddikim), and leaping (mesirus nefesh and teshuvah).

    The Alter Rebbeוגם עולם הנשמות המה בחינת גבול

    The Rebbeהנה גם אצילות נקרא בשם עולם, ויש בו עשר ספירות

  5. ¶19

    The Alter Rebbe explains one foot and two feet as love and awe. The Rebbe maps the leap and the skip onto levels within Keser itself: Atik enclothed in Arich, the first three sefiros of Atik, and the Unknowable Head (Radla). He applies the Matriarchs’ higher role to the righteous women whose merit brought the Exodus, and to women today: chinuch, family purity, kashrus, Shabbos candles, and building a Jewish home.

    The Alter Rebbeדילוג ברגל א׳ וקפיצה בב׳ רגלים

    The Rebbeוגילוי זה דקפיצה שלמעלה גם מדילוג נמשך ע״י האמהות

The lesson

Beyond ordered service in Torah, mitzvos and prayer, a Jew must reach the “leap” of mesirus nefesh and teshuvah, which rests on faith renewed each morning with Modeh Ani; this is what draws down the redemption. The work of Jewish women in building homes in which G‑d dwells hastens the Geulah, as the righteous women did in Egypt.

AI summary

The full maamar: read or print it free at Lahak Hanochos (lahak.org)

AI summary Written by Claude Opus 5.5 reading each of the Rebbe’s maamarim, from the scan corrected by AI, beside the Alter Rebbe’s maamar and our translation; not yet reviewed by a human editor: check the maamar itself before relying on a detail. The Hebrew words are quoted exactly. The full text of the Rebbe’s maamarim is published by Vaad Hanochos B’Lahak, free to read and print on lahak.org, and in print by Kehot. This page gives only short summaries and brief quotes.

In the Rebbe’s light · 4

AI research Found by AI reading every place in the Rebbe’s works that cites this maamar, and checked against each source by a second AI reader, the less certain by a third. Only what rated high is shown: the Rebbe’s own words, about this very passage. No person has reviewed it yet, so check the place itself before relying on a detail. See something to correct?

The maamar in the Rebbe’s light

Read together, the Rebbe’s teachings on this maamar seem to return to one question: when the Alter Rebbe sets two things side by side, is the lower one simply lacking? In a talk of Shabbos Mishpatim 5722 he shows that the old wording of the prayer, „בראת” (“You created”), was no mistake but guarded against a coarser error, and that the image of a person absorbed in thought pictures exactly the subtle error that „נברא” (“was created”) now excludes; both wordings, he adds, remain true, each in its place. In his maamar Kimei Tzeis’cha 5742 the Exodus too revealed the very highest level, as the Rebbe Rashab explains, but clothed in Malchus, the “doorway”, while the future will reveal it with no garment, a contrast he takes from the Rebbe Rayatz. Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar), read in his light, the maamar’s pairs (the two wordings, the doorway and the future) appear less as higher and lower than as one light in two settings.

Paragraph by paragraph

  1. ¶6

    The Rebbe explains

    At the farbrengen of Shabbos Mishpatim, Shabbos Mevarchim and eve of Rosh Chodesh Adar I 5722, explaining the Tanya chapter then being studied on the radio (chapter 20, on „אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם”, “You are He before the world was created”), the Rebbe first takes up this paragraph, whose wording he calls „בלשון שאינו רגיל” (“unusual”).

    The Rebbe explains why there were two versions at all. Since the world was made so that there is room for error, there are two errors: a coarse one, that the world is eternal or was made by another, which „בראת” (“You created”) rules out, and a subtle one, that creation is from G‑d but makes some change in Him, which only „נברא” (“was created”) rules out. So the old version was no mistake: „קודם שהי׳ העולם חדור באור התורה בכלל, ובאור פנימיות התורה בפרט” (“before the world was permeated with the light of the Torah, and of its inner dimension in particular”), it was even the more exact word; once the inner Torah was revealed, the coarse error needs no warning, and what must be denied is any existence beside Him, even a subtle one.

    The Alter Rebbeוהנה בנוסחא הישנה הי׳ כתוב אתה הוא עד שלא בראת ועתה הוא הנוסחא עד שלא נברא כו׳

    The Rebbeבדורות הקודמים — קודם שהי׳ העולם חדור באור התורה בכלל, ובאור פנימיות התורה בפרט — הי׳ ביאור ענין האחדות רק באופן שאין מציאות ממש

    Toras Menachem – Hisvaaduyos (unedited), vol. תשכ״ב, vol. 2, p. 120–123 · ש״פ משפטים, מבה״ח וער״ח אדר ראשון, ה׳תשכ״ב

  2. ¶7

    The Rebbe explains

    In the same talk of Shabbos Mishpatim 5722, having quoted the Alter Rebbe’s reason for the new version, the Rebbe sets Tanya’s account of creation through G‑d’s speech, „דבר ה׳ ורוח פיו” (“the word of G‑d and the breath of His mouth”), beside this paragraph’s image of a person thinking.

    The Rebbe explains that the two images match the two errors. Thought, though only a garment of the soul, is „לבוש המיוחד” (“a united garment”) that never leaves the thinker to become a thing of its own, while speech is „לבוש הנפרד” (“a separate garment”), heard even when one does not know who spoke. So creation from speech, „עלמא דאתגליא” (“the revealed world”), leaves room for the coarse error that creatures exist of themselves, while creation from thought leaves room only for the subtle error, that G‑d Himself is drawn into it; in the Yiddish transcript he ties that error to this very image of a person whose essence is drawn into his thought.

    The Alter Rebbeכמו עד״מ האדם כשחושב ומעיין באיזה דבר אזי עצמותו ג״כ נמשך במחשבה זו שאינו חושב דבר אחר

    The Rebbeהיא לבוש המיוחד, ולא שייך שתיפרד מהאדם החושב ותהי׳ מציאות לעצמה; משא״כ הדיבור הוא לבוש הנפרד

    Toras Menachem – Hisvaaduyos (unedited), vol. תשכ״ב, vol. 2, p. 120–121 · ש״פ משפטים, מבה״ח וער״ח אדר ראשון, ה׳תשכ״ב

  3. ¶18

    Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    In the maamar Kimei Tzeis’cha of 11 Nissan 5742 (Sefer HaMaamarim Melukat vol. 2), the Rebbe asks why Micah likens the wonders of the future redemption to those of the Exodus, „כימי צאתך מארץ מצרים אראנו נפלאות” (“As in the days of your going out of the land of Egypt I will show him wonders”), when the future redemption will be so much greater.

    The Rebbe answers that the Exodus too revealed the very highest level, „בכבודו ובעצמו” (“in His glory and Himself”), as the Rebbe Rashab explains in Hemshech 5672; only „שביצי״מ הי׳ הגילוי דבחינה זו ע״י ההתלבשות בבחינת מלכות” (“at the Exodus this level was revealed clothed in Malchus”), „ופסח ה׳ על הפתח” (“and Havayah will pass over the doorway”), the doorway being Malchus, as our paragraph explains, while in the future it will be revealed with no garment at all. For the doorway as Malchus his note cites this column of Likkutei Torah, with the Zohar and the Rebbe Rayatz’s maamar Kimei Tzeis’cha 5708, where the Rebbe Rayatz draws this very contrast between an Exodus clothed in Malchus and a future without a garment. So the future wonders are “as in the days of your going out of Egypt”, and yet wonders even beside them.

    The Alter Rebbeוזהו ופסח ה׳ על הפתח כו׳ שנגלה עליהם בבחי׳ פתח

    The Rebbeאלא שביצי״מ הי׳ הגילוי דבחינה זו ע״י ההתלבשות בבחינת מלכות, ופסח ה׳ על הפתח, דפתח הוא בחינת המלכות, ולע״ל יהי׳ זה בגילוי בלי שום לבוש

    Sefer HaMaamarim Melukat, vol. ב, p. לז–לח · י״א ניסן, ה׳תשמ״ב

  4. ¶18

    Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    In the maamar Vehenif Yado al HaNahar of Acharon shel Pesach 5748, built on the Alter Rebbe’s discourse on that haftarah verse in Likkutei Torah, Tzav, the Rebbe sets the exile of Egypt, bound up with the supernal speech, Malchus, against the present exile, bound up also with the supernal thought, Binah.

    The Rebbe explains that because the exile of Egypt was bound up with Malchus, its redemption too came through „ופסח הוי׳ על הפתח” (“and Havayah passed over the doorway”), the doorway being Malchus, while the future redemption will be a redemption of Binah too, „גאולה שני׳” (“a second redemption”). Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) this gives our paragraph’s “doorway” a further sense: the place of the leap matches the place of the exile.

    The Alter Rebbeעל הפתח היינו בחי׳ מל׳ זה השער לה׳ כו׳

    The Rebbeדמכיון שגלות מצרים קשור עם בחי׳ המל׳, לכן גם אופן הגאולה הוא ע״י ופסח הוי׳ על הפתח

    Sefer HaMaamarim (unedited, old edition), vol. תשמ״ח, p. קכה–קכז · אחרון של פסח, ה׳תשמ״ח

Short quotes only, with the place of each so it can be read in full. The Rebbe’s sichos, letters and maamarim are published by Kehot and by Vaad Hanochos B’Lahak (lahak.org).

Skip to the text

The question ¶1

1קול דודי הנה זה בא מדלג על ההרים מקפץ על הגבעות. דומה דודי לצבי כו׳. וצריך להבין שינוי הלשון יד, גשבהרים כתיב מדלג ובגבעות מקפץ.

“The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes, leaping (medaleg) over the mountains, skipping (mekapetz) over the hills. My beloved is like a gazelle, etc.” Now, we need to understand the change of wording: of the mountains it is written medaleg (“leaping”), and of the hills mekapetz (“skipping”).

Explanation

The maamar opens with Song of Songs 2:8–9, where the beloved comes “leaping over the mountains, skipping over the hills” and is compared to a gazelle. Its first question is about wording: why “leaping” (medaleg) for the mountains but “skipping” (mekapetz) for the hills? The answer comes later in the maamar.

¶20 Hold this question: paragraphs 19–20 explain leaping versus skipping.

הנה פסוק זה נאמר על יציאת מצרים שהיה הגאולה בדלוג מארבע מאות שנה לרד״ו שנה כמ״ש במדרש שיר השירים בפסוק זה.

Now, this verse was said about the Exodus from Egypt, when the redemption came by a leap: from four hundred years to two hundred and ten years, as is written in the Midrash on Shir HaShirim, on this verse.

Explanation

The Midrash on this verse reads it as Moshe’s announcement of the redemption from Egypt. G‑d had told Avraham of four hundred years of bondage, yet only two hundred and ten had passed; G‑d “leapt” over the reckoning and redeemed them early.

Paragraph 1 in brief

The maamar sets out its verse and its question, the difference between “leaping” over the mountains and “skipping” over the hills, and ties the verse, with the Midrash, to the Exodus, when G‑d “leapt” over the end of the bondage.

Deeper

According to the Kehot notes, a transcript of this discourse by the Mitteler Rebbe is printed in Sefer HaMaamarim 5569, and in manuscript volume 4 it stands among the Pesach discourses, just before the discourse on the Haggadah’s “This matzah” (Likkutei Torah, Tzav). This is why the maamar later speaks of Parshas Bamidbar as “below.”

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe states the leap from 400 to 210 years without asking why 400 was decreed. The Rebbe explains that 400 was the reckoning of hishtalshelus. The descent went beyond what was intended, as with the Egyptians, who added harm beyond the decree. That extra descent drew down a leap even in time, accomplishing in רד״ו years (a term of descent) what would otherwise have taken 400.

    The Alter Rebbeשהיה הגאולה בדלוג מארבע מאות שנה לרד״ו שנה

    The Rebbeאמנם ע״י שהיתה ירידה נוספת מהמכוון

    The whole maamar, summarized

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.

TermsDilug

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    קול דודי · הנחת כ״ק אדמו״ר האמצעי נדפס בסה״מ תקס״ט ע׳ מ. בבוך 4 נמצא מאמר זה בין מאמרי פסח אחר ד״ה ואכלתם אכול וקודם ד״ה להבין מ״ש בהגדה מצה זו בפ׳ צו יא, ג. ובזה מתורץ מה שכתוב לקמן יד, ד ”וכמ״ש ג״כ (לקמן) בפ׳ במדבר”. במהדו״ק סבר לסדר מאמר זה בין מאמרי פסח. הגהות וקיצורים באוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רמה. וע׳ רנ (בבוך 1376 רשום עליו ”קיצור מד״ה קול דודי שבלק״ת). ע׳ רנב. ונדפסו גם באוה״ת ויקרא כרך ג ע׳ תשסח. ביאור שם ע׳ תשעה. באוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתפד מציין כ״ק מהורש״ב ”נר׳ שייך לדרוש קול דודי שבלק״ת” ע״ש. ראה להלן בהוספות להערות וציונים השוואה לד״ה זה. נזכר באוה״ת שופטים ע׳ תתלה. שה״ש ע׳ רפב. ובבוך 1039 נרשם בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ ברשימת המאמרים המבארים ”ענין מצה”. הובא באור התורה בראשית (מ, ב). וע׳ ביכעל קטן שמינית בויגין שתח״י (עב, ב). עם תוס׳ ביאור ע״ז באורך, יעו״ש היטיב. [כ].
  2. 2
  3. 3
    קול דודי הנה זה בא מדלג על ההרים מקפץ על הגבעות · Song of Songs 2:8
  4. 4
    קול דודי הנה זה בא . . דומה דודי לצבי · Song of Songs 2:8–9
  5. 5
    דומה דודי לצבי · Song of Songs 2:9

Matzah and midnight; He and His Name ¶2–7

2ולהבין כל זה הנה אנו אומרים בהגדה מצה זו שאנו אוכלים על שום מה ע״ש [על שם] שלא הספיק בצקת של אבותינו להחמיץ עד שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים הקב״ה וגאלם.

To understand all this: we say in the Haggadah, “This matzah that we eat—on account of what? On account of the fact that the dough of our fathers did not have time to become leavened before the King of the kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, was revealed to them and redeemed them.”

Explanation

To explain the verse, the maamar turns to the Haggadah’s reason for eating matzah: our ancestors’ dough had no time to rise before “the King of the kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He,” was revealed to them and redeemed them. The whole maamar builds on this phrase.

והנה לכאורה אין זה טעם מספיק כי ענין התגלות זו שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים היה אחר חצות. כמ״ש ויהי בחצי הלילה כו׳.

Now, at first glance this is not a sufficient reason, for this revelation, when the King of the kings of kings was revealed to them, was after midnight, as it is written, “And it came to pass at midnight, etc.”

Explanation

The difficulty: that revelation came only from midnight on, when G‑d struck the firstborn of Egypt (Exodus 12:29). So the reason the Haggadah gives for the matzah is an event that took place after midnight.

¶15 Hold this question: the two matzos, explained through paragraph 15, answer it.

ואכילת מצה שאנו אוכלים (וכן בפסח מצרים) צריך להיות קודם חצות דייקא כמ״ד [כמה דאת אמר] שהפסח אינו נאכל אלא עד חצות ובפסח נאמר על מצות ומרורים וגו׳.

Yet the eating of the matzah that we eat (and so too with the Pesach in Egypt) must be specifically before midnight, according to the one who holds that the Pesach offering is eaten only until midnight; and of the Pesach offering it is said, “With matzos and bitter herbs, etc.”

Explanation

Yet the matzah must be eaten before midnight, in Egypt and at our seder alike, according to Rabbi Elazar ben Azaryah, who holds that the Pesach offering may be eaten only until midnight; the Torah joins the matzah to the Pesach offering, “with matzos and bitter herbs they shall eat it.” So the question is how matzah eaten before midnight can be explained by a revelation that came after it.

ולהבין כ״ז [כל זה] הנה ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] עד שלא נברא העולם היה הוא ושמו בלבד.

To understand all this: our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Before the world was created, there were He and His Name alone.”

Explanation

The answer begins with the saying in Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer (chapter 3) that before the world was created there were only “He and His Name.” In Likkutei Torah, Behar, the Alter Rebbe opens his explanation of “My Sabbaths you shall keep” with the same saying: a name is what joins the lights with the vessels, as a person needs his name only for those who call him.

דהנה חיות כל העולמות שנמשך ממנו ית׳ אינו אלא בחינת אור וזיו בלבד ממנו ית׳. כמו עד״מ זיו השמש או זיו הנר שאינו נוגע אל העצם כלל.

For the life-force of all the worlds, which is drawn from Him, blessed be He, is nothing but the level of light and radiance alone, from Him, blessed be He; as, by way of analogy, the radiance of the sun or the radiance of a candle, which does not touch the essence at all.

Explanation

The life-force of all the worlds is not G‑d’s essence; it is only light and radiance from Him, and radiance comes from its source without touching the source itself, like the rays of the sun or the glow of a candle. The maamar will give two more images for the life-force of the worlds: a name and a king.

Paragraph 2 in brief

The paragraph raises the maamar’s question about matzah (how can matzah eaten before midnight be explained by a revelation that came after midnight?) and begins the answer with the teaching that before creation there were “He and His Name alone”: the life-force of the worlds is only a light and radiance from G‑d.

Deeper

Likkutei Torah, Behar, in the explanation on “My Sabbaths you shall keep,” opens with the same saying, “He and His Name alone,” and explains that names join the lights with the vessels: a person needs his name only to turn to those who call him. According to the Kehot note, Or HaTorah on Vayikra (vol. 2, p. 626) refers to several works of Kabbalah and Chassidus that explain this saying.

TermsMayin nukvin and mayin duchrinZiv haShechinah+2

Also ChayusTorah and mitzvos

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ויהי בחצי הלילה · Exodus 12:29
  2. 2
  3. 3
    שהפסח אינו נאכל אלא עד חצות · Pesachim 120b:8–9
  4. 4
    על מצות ומרורים · Numbers 9:11
  5. 5
    הנה ארז״ל עד שלא נברא העולם · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ב ע׳ תרכו שמציין לכמה ספרי קבלה ודא״ח שמבואר ענין זה. וראה גם באוה״ת פ׳ בא ע׳ שח.
  6. 6
    ארז״ל עד שלא נברא העולם · פדר״א (פ״ג). [כ]. ראה לעיל פ׳ בהר מג, ב ובמ״מ לשם. באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמה יש הגהה לכאן.
  7. 7
    עד שלא נברא העולם היה הוא ושמו בלבד · Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 3:2–3

3והראיה שאף אם יש מסך מפסיק באופן שאין הזיו יכול להתפשט מ״מ אין בהעצם שום שינוי.

The proof [of this]: even if there is an intervening screen, so that the radiance cannot spread forth, nevertheless there is no change whatsoever in the essence.

Explanation

The proof that radiance does not touch its source: when a screen blocks the sun’s rays, the sun itself does not change at all. Only the glow is affected, not the luminary.

כמ״כ [כמו כן] למעלה כח אלקי המחיה כל העולמות נק׳ בשם אור שאינו נוגע לעצמותו ית׳ כלל ואינו פועל בו שום שינוי כמ״ש אני ה׳ לא שניתי ואתה הוא קודם שנברא העולם כו׳.

So too Above: the G‑dly power that gives life to all the worlds is called by the name “light,” for it does not touch His essence, blessed be He, at all, and effects no change in Him, as it is written, “I, Havayah, have not changed”; and “You are He before the world was created, etc.”

Explanation

So the divine power that gives life to the worlds is called “light”: it does not touch G‑d’s essence and changes nothing in Him. Hence Malachi’s “I, Havayah, have not changed,” and the morning prayer “You are He before the world was created,” and the same after it was created.

Paragraph 3 in brief

The paragraph proves the analogy (blocking the sun’s rays does not change the sun) and applies it: the power that gives life to the worlds is called “light” because it changes nothing in G‑d.

Deeper

According to the Kehot note, the Rebbe Rashab in Hemshech 5666 takes the analogy further: not only does the sun’s unchanging nature illustrate “I, Havayah, have not changed,” but the simplicity of the light itself, which has no changes in it, illustrates the simplicity of the light Above.

TermsParsa, masachRe’iyah and shmiahZiv haShechinahAtzmus u’mahus

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ואינו פועל בו שום שינוי כמ״ש אני ה׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6

4ונק׳ גם כן בחינת שם וכמ״ש יהללו את שם כו׳. וכמו עד״מ האדם כשהוא בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] אינו צריך לשם כלל רק לזולתו שיקראו אותו בשמו ואינו נוגע לעצמותו כלל.

It is also called the level of a “name,” as it is written, “Let them praise the Name, etc.” And as, by way of analogy, a person: when he is by himself he has no need of a name at all; [he needs it] only for others, so that they may call him by his name, and it does not touch his essence at all.

Explanation

The same life-force is also called a “name,” as in “Let them praise the Name.” A person alone has no need of a name; a name exists only so that others can call him, and it adds nothing to who he is.

כן הוא בחינת כח האלקי המחיה כל העולמות הוא רק בחינת שם בלבד ואינו נוגע לעצמותו כלל.

So too the level of the G‑dly power that gives life to all the worlds is only the level of a name alone, and it does not touch His essence at all.

Explanation

So the divine power that gives life to the worlds is only G‑d’s “Name”: it exists for the sake of the created beings and does not touch His essence.

Paragraph 4 in brief

A second image: the life-force of the worlds is G‑d’s “Name,” which, like a person’s name, exists for others and does not touch the essence.

Deeper

The verse the Kehot note gives for this quotation, Psalms 148:13, goes on: “for His Name alone is exalted; His glory is above the earth and the heavens.”

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe uses the name to show that the life-force of the worlds does not touch the essence, and says that before creation the Name was included in the essence. The Rebbe adds two things. First, in “He and His Name alone,” the Name itself was “alone” ("דגם שמו הי׳ באופן בלבד"). Second, a name has an advantage: when a person is called by it, he turns with his whole essence. He then equates “His glory” (Malchus of Ein Sof) with this Name, and makes it the source of the revelation “in His glory and His essence” at the Exodus.

    The Alter Rebbeהאדם כשהוא בפ״ע אינו צריך לשם כלל רק לזולתו

    The Rebbeפונה לקוראו בכל עצמותו

    The whole maamar, summarized

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.

TermsAtzmus u’mahus

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    יהללו את שם · Psalms 148:13

5ונק׳ בחינת מלך. כמו למשל המלך על מדינתו שאין עצמותו ומהותו נתפס ומתפשט במדינה כולה רק שמו לבדו שנקרא מלך עליהם.

And it is called the level of “King.” As, for example, a king over his country: his essence and being are not contained in and spread through the whole country; only his name alone, in that he is called king over them.

Explanation

A third image is a king. The king’s own person does not spread through his country; only his name, his being called king over the people, reaches every part of it.

כמו״כ [כמו כן] למעלה מה שאלקות מחיה כל העולמות הוא רק בחי׳ מלכות שבמה שהוא מלך עליהם מחיה ומהוה אותם דהיינו שמו יתברך בלבד

So too Above: that G‑dliness gives life to all the worlds is only the level of Malchus (sovereignty): in that He is King over them, He gives them life and brings them into being; that is, His Name, blessed be He, alone.

Explanation

Likewise, the life G‑d gives the worlds comes from His Malchus, His being King over them. That is only His “Name,” not His essence.

אבל מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ אינו בגדר המשכה והתגלות כי הוא לבדו מרום וקדוש כו׳ אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם כו׳.

But His being and essence, blessed be He, is not within the bounds of drawing down and revelation, for He alone is exalted and holy, etc.: “You are He before the world was created, etc.”

Explanation

His being and essence are beyond drawing down and revelation altogether: He alone is exalted and holy. This is what the prayer means by “You are He before the world was created”: He remains as He was, untouched by creation.

Paragraph 5 in brief

A third image: the life-force of the worlds is G‑d’s Malchus, His Kingship, which, like a king’s name over his country, reaches the subjects, while His essence remains beyond revelation.

TermsKadoshAtzmus u’mahusMalchus+1

Also Haalaah vehamshachah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמה יש הגהה לכאן.

6והנה בנוסחא הישנה הי׳ [היה] כתוב אתה הוא עד שלא בראת ועתה הוא הנוסחא עד שלא נברא כו׳.

Now, in the old version it was written, “You are He before You created”; and now the version is “before [the world] was created, etc.”

Explanation

The maamar notes that the wording of that prayer was changed. The older version read “before You created,” in the active voice; the current version reads “before [the world] was created,” in the passive.

והעיקר הוא כנוסחא זו כי כן הוא לשון הפסוק יהללו את שם כו׳ כי הוא צוה ונבראו כו׳.

And the correct [version] is this one, for this is the wording of the verse, “Let them praise the Name, etc., for He commanded and they were created, etc.”

Explanation

The current version is the correct one, because it follows the verse “Let them praise the Name … for He commanded and they were created,” where the creatures “were created,” in the passive. Why the passive matters is explained in the next paragraph.

Paragraph 6 in brief

The paragraph notes the change in the prayer’s wording from “before You created” to “before [the world] was created” and upholds the second as matching the verse “for He commanded and they were created.”

Deeper

In a note to his discourse beginning “Lecha Amar Libi” (5720), cited by the Kehot note, the Rebbe explains the change of version. In the early generations there was room to think that creation is a true existence, and that had to be denied; after the revelation of Kabbalah, which was also a preparation for Chassidus with its stress on G‑d’s unity, there is no room for that thought, and what must be denied is that there is even the subtlest “existence,” as in “You are He before [the world] was created, You are He after [the world] was created.”

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. The Rebbe explains

    At the farbrengen of Shabbos Mishpatim, Shabbos Mevarchim and eve of Rosh Chodesh Adar I 5722, explaining the Tanya chapter then being studied on the radio (chapter 20, on „אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם”, “You are He before the world was created”), the Rebbe first takes up this paragraph, whose wording he calls „בלשון שאינו רגיל” (“unusual”).

    The Rebbe explains why there were two versions at all. Since the world was made so that there is room for error, there are two errors: a coarse one, that the world is eternal or was made by another, which „בראת” (“You created”) rules out, and a subtle one, that creation is from G‑d but makes some change in Him, which only „נברא” (“was created”) rules out. So the old version was no mistake: „קודם שהי׳ העולם חדור באור התורה בכלל, ובאור פנימיות התורה בפרט” (“before the world was permeated with the light of the Torah, and of its inner dimension in particular”), it was even the more exact word; once the inner Torah was revealed, the coarse error needs no warning, and what must be denied is any existence beside Him, even a subtle one.

    The Alter Rebbeוהנה בנוסחא הישנה הי׳ כתוב אתה הוא עד שלא בראת ועתה הוא הנוסחא עד שלא נברא כו׳

    The Rebbeבדורות הקודמים — קודם שהי׳ העולם חדור באור התורה בכלל, ובאור פנימיות התורה בפרט — הי׳ ביאור ענין האחדות רק באופן שאין מציאות ממש

    Toras Menachem – Hisvaaduyos (unedited), vol. תשכ״ב, vol. 2, p. 120–123 · ש״פ משפטים, מבה״ח וער״ח אדר ראשון, ה׳תשכ״ב

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    והנה בנוסחא הישנה . . ועתה הוא הנוסחא עד שלא נברא · ”כי בדורות הראשונים הי׳ מקום לקס״ד שישנה גם מציאות ממש והי׳ צריך לשלול קס״ד זה. אבל לאחרי שנתגלתה תורת הקבלה, שזה היה גם הקדמה לגילוי תורת החסידות שבה מודגש ענין אחדותו ית׳ — בנוגע למציאות ממש, אין מקום לקס״ד כזה, וזה שצריך לשלול הוא שלא ישנו אפילו ”מציאות” שבתכלית הדקות אתה הוא עד שלא נברא כו׳ אתה הוא משנברא כו׳” — ד״ה לך אמר לבי תש״כ הערה 49. (נדפס בסה״מ מלוקט ח״ג ע׳ רפז).
  2. 2

7וההפרש בין בראת לנברא הוא כי בראת משמע שהעצמות נמשך ג״כ בבחינה זו כמו עד״מ האדם כשחושב ומעיין באיזה דבר אזי עצמותו ג״כ נמשך במחשבה זו שאינו חושב דבר אחר.

The difference between “You created” and “was created” is this: “You created” implies that the essence too is drawn into this level; as, by way of analogy, when a person thinks about and studies some matter, his essence too is drawn into this thought, so that he thinks of nothing else.

Explanation

“You created” implies that the Creator Himself is drawn into the act, as a person who concentrates on a subject is wholly drawn into that thought and thinks of nothing else.

אבל אצלו ית׳ הוא אינו כן שאינו נוגע לעצמותו כלל רק דרך זיו והארה בעלמא והרי הוא כאילו נברא ממילא כי אינו פועל שום שינוי ח״ו [חס ושלום] בעצמותו כלל.

But with Him, blessed be He, it is not so: it does not touch His essence at all, but is only by way of a mere radiance and illumination; and so it is as though it were created of itself, for it effects no change, Heaven forbid, in His essence at all.

Explanation

With G‑d it is not so: creation does not touch His essence and is only a glow and illumination from Him. So it is as though the world “was created” of itself, and nothing changes in Him.

ולכן נכון הוא זאת הנוסחא עד שלא נברא כו׳ (וכמ״ש השל״ה [השני לוחות הברית] בהקדמה דף ג׳ ע״ב)

Therefore this version, “before [the world] was created, etc.,” is correct (and as the Shelah wrote in the Introduction, page 3b);

Explanation

This is why the passive wording, “before [the world] was created,” is correct. The text notes that the Shelah (the Shnei Luchos HaBris of Rabbi Yeshayah Horowitz) writes so in his Introduction.

וכמו זיו השמש מן השמש שאין שייך לומר שהשמש מאיר זיוו רק שנמשך ממילא הזיו מן השמש.

and as with the radiance of the sun from the sun: it is not fitting to say that the sun shines its radiance; rather, the radiance is drawn from the sun of itself.

Explanation

The sun gives the analogy: one cannot say that the sun “shines out” its rays as an act; the rays simply come from it of themselves.

וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] למעלה כשעלה ברצונו יתברך שמו לברוא את העולם האציל והמשיך מבחי׳ אורו ית׳ שאינו נוגע לעצמותו ב״ה כלל רק דרך זיו והארה בעלמא

So too Above: when it arose in His will, blessed be His Name, to create the world, He emanated and drew down from the level of His light, blessed be He, which does not touch His essence, blessed be He, at all, but only by way of a mere radiance and illumination.

Explanation

So too, when G‑d willed to create the world, He emanated and drew down from His light, which does not touch His essence, but only as a mere glow and illumination.

והארה זו היא מקור חיות והתהוות כל העולמות והרי הוא רק כאילו צוה ונבראו ממילא שאין להם ערך ויחוס כלל אליו יתברך.

And this illumination is the source of the life-force and the coming into being of all the worlds. And so it is only as though “He commanded and they were created” of themselves, for they bear no comparison or relation to Him, blessed be He, at all.

Explanation

That illumination is the source of the life and existence of all the worlds. So they came into being as the verse says, “He commanded and they were created,” as if of themselves, since they bear no comparison or relation to Him.

Paragraph 7 in brief

The paragraph explains the passive wording: “You created” would imply that G‑d’s essence is involved in creation, but the worlds come from a mere radiance, like the sun’s rays that issue of themselves, so it is as though they “were created” of themselves.

Deeper

In the same discourse of 5720 (sec. 5, note 35), cited by the Kehot note, the Rebbe asks what is new in saying that creation makes no change in G‑d. He answers that even an action that comes about “of itself” shows that its origin is in the category of a source of that action, and an action that comes from a “source,” even of itself, does make a change, at least a subtle one.

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. The Rebbe explains

    In the same talk of Shabbos Mishpatim 5722, having quoted the Alter Rebbe’s reason for the new version, the Rebbe sets Tanya’s account of creation through G‑d’s speech, „דבר ה׳ ורוח פיו” (“the word of G‑d and the breath of His mouth”), beside this paragraph’s image of a person thinking.

    The Rebbe explains that the two images match the two errors. Thought, though only a garment of the soul, is „לבוש המיוחד” (“a united garment”) that never leaves the thinker to become a thing of its own, while speech is „לבוש הנפרד” (“a separate garment”), heard even when one does not know who spoke. So creation from speech, „עלמא דאתגליא” (“the revealed world”), leaves room for the coarse error that creatures exist of themselves, while creation from thought leaves room only for the subtle error, that G‑d Himself is drawn into it; in the Yiddish transcript he ties that error to this very image of a person whose essence is drawn into his thought.

    The Alter Rebbeכמו עד״מ האדם כשחושב ומעיין באיזה דבר אזי עצמותו ג״כ נמשך במחשבה זו שאינו חושב דבר אחר

    The Rebbeהיא לבוש המיוחד, ולא שייך שתיפרד מהאדם החושב ותהי׳ מציאות לעצמה; משא״כ הדיבור הוא לבוש הנפרד

    Toras Menachem – Hisvaaduyos (unedited), vol. תשכ״ב, vol. 2, p. 120–121 · ש״פ משפטים, מבה״ח וער״ח אדר ראשון, ה׳תשכ״ב

  2. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe uses “as though created of itself” to explain the passive wording of the prayer. The Rebbe reads it as the key to the leap. From “He and His Name alone,” bringing into being is itself a leap. Ordinary creation needs tzimtzumim down to the possibility of evil. Reaching Egypt, the lowest place, needs a revelation from the level where bringing into being is by leap.

    The Alter Rebbeוהרי הוא כאילו נברא ממילא

    The Rebbeשלגבי מדריגה זו ההתהוות היא כאילו מעצמו, והיינו שההתהוות ממדריגה זו היא בדרך דילוג

    The whole maamar, summarized

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made

TermsAtzmus u’mahusZiv haShechinahRatzon+1
  • Atzmus u’mahus עצמות ומהות explained hereWhen a person thinks about something, his essence goes into that thought. Creation does not touch His Essence at all: it is only by way of a radiance, like sunlight from the sun, so it makes no change in Him and is as if created of itself.אבל אצלו ית׳ הוא אינו כן שאינו נוגע לעצמותו כלל רק דרך זיו והארה בעלמא
  • Ziv haShechinah זיו השכינה
  • Ratzon רצון

Also Chayus

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    וההפרש בין בראת לנברא · ראה אוה״ת מג״א ע׳ ב׳שסג [בהוצאה החדשה ע׳ קעב]. מובא בהגהות לד״ה פתח אליהו תרנ״ח ע׳ לד.
  2. 2
    כאלו נברא ממילא · בד״ה לך אמר לבי תש״כ סעי׳ ה׳ הערה 35 (נ׳ סה״מ מלוקט ח״ג ע׳ רפה) מבאר ”מהו החידוש בזה שהבריאה אינו פועלת שינוי בו׳ ית׳. והביאור בזה כי גם פעולה הבאה בדרך ממילא מורה שהדבר שממנו באה הפעולה הוא בגדר מקור להפעולה . . דפעולה שבאה מ”מקור” (גם כשהיא באופן דבדרך ממילא) עושה שינוי (בדקות עכ״פ)” ע״ש.
  3. 3
    צוה ונבראו · Psalms 148:5

Two kinds of kingship; leaving the realm of limit ¶8–10

8וזהו מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים כי יש ב׳ בחינות היינו בחי׳ מלכותך ובחינת מלכות כל עולמים.

This is [the meaning of] “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds”: for there are two levels, namely the level of “Your kingship” and the level of “the kingship of all worlds.”

Explanation

Psalms 145:13 says, “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds.” The maamar reads the two phrases as two levels: “Your kingship,” Malchus as it is within G‑d Himself, and “the kingship of all worlds,” Malchus as it gives life to the worlds.

פי׳ מלכות כל עולמים היינו מה שמחיה כל עולמים והוא בחי׳ מלכותו לבד כו׳. ויש כמה עולמות בי״ע כי הנה כתיב כל הנקרא בשמי ולכבודי בראתיו יצרתיו אף עשיתיו.

The explanation: “the kingship of all worlds” is that which gives life to all worlds, and it is the level of His Malchus alone, etc. And there are several worlds, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah; for it is written, “Everyone that is called by My Name, and for My glory, I have created him, I have formed him, indeed I have made him.”

Explanation

“The kingship of all worlds” is the Malchus that gives life to the worlds. These are the worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, named after the three verbs of Isaiah 43:7: “I have created him (berasiv), I have formed him (yetzartiv), indeed I have made him (asisiv).”

בראתיו היינו בחי׳ בריאה והיינו בחי׳ הנשמות שהמה בחי׳ בריאה כי בריאה הוא יש מאין ממש

“I have created him” is the level of Beriah (Creation), namely the level of the souls, which are the level of Beriah; for Beriah is truly something from nothing,

Explanation

“I have created” refers to Beriah, the realm of the souls. Beriah, creation, means bringing about something from nothing: a new existence where there was none.

וכמו למשל המחשבה הוא בחי׳ בריאה שהוא יש מאין ממש כי קודם שחושב לא היו האותיות כלל ואח״כ בבחי׳ מחשבה הם האותיו׳ [האותיות].

as, for example, thought is the level of Beriah, since it is truly something from nothing: for before one thinks, the letters did not exist at all, and afterwards, in the level of thought, the letters are there.

Explanation

The analogy is thought: before a person thinks, the letters of the thought did not exist at all, and then they are there. Thought is thus “something from nothing,” and it corresponds to Beriah.

Paragraph 8 in brief

The paragraph begins to explain “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds” as two levels of Malchus, and starts to describe the worlds that the lower level gives life to, beginning with Beriah, the realm of the souls, which is “something from nothing,” like thought.

TermsYesh me’ayinYetzirahOsiyosAsiyah+3

Also Neshamah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    וזהו מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים · ראה ביאוה״ז להצ״צ כרך א ע׳ רמא שמציין לכאן.
  2. 2
    מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים · Psalms 145:13
  3. 3
    כל הנקרא בשמי · Isaiah 43:7
  4. 4
    כי בריאה הוא יש מאין · ראה לעיל פ׳ ראה כ, ג. ואתחנן ב, ב ואילך. וראה במ״מ לשם.

9וכמו״כ [וכמו כן] נשמות ישראל עלו במחשבה כו׳. ולכן נק׳ בחי׳ בריאה. יצרתיו הוא עולם המלאכים שהמה בחי׳ יצירה כי המה בחינת דיבור בדבר ה׳ שמים נעשו וברוח פיו כו׳.

So too, the souls of Israel “arose in thought,” etc.; therefore they are called the level of Beriah. “I have formed him” is the world of the angels, who are the level of Yetzirah (Formation), for they are the level of speech: “By the word of Havayah the heavens were made, and by the breath of His mouth, etc.”

Explanation

The souls of Israel “arose in thought” before creation, so they correspond to Beriah, which is like thought. “I have formed him” is the world of the angels, Yetzirah, which corresponds to speech, as in “By the word of Havayah the heavens were made.”

וכמו הדיבור שנמשך מהמחשבה כי יד, דמה שהאדם חושב הוא מדבר ואינו בחי׳ יש מאין רק בחי׳ יש מיש

As with speech, which is drawn from thought: for what a person thinks, he speaks; and it is not the level of something from nothing, but only the level of something from something;

Explanation

Speech comes from thought: what a person says is what he has already thought. So speech is not “something from nothing,” only “something from something.”

רק מה שהיה בתחלה בהעלם המחשבה ועתה הוא בגלוי בדבור ואינו רק בחינת חומר וצורה חומר הוא ההעלם כח היולי וצורה הוא הגילוי

only, what was at first in the concealment of thought is now revealed in speech. And it is only the level of matter and form: matter is the concealment, the hylic potential, and form is the revelation;

Explanation

Speech only reveals what was hidden in thought, as form shapes matter. Matter here is the hidden, potential stage (the philosophers’ “hylic” matter, matter before it takes any shape), and form is its revelation.

ולכן נקרא בשם יצירה כו׳ (כמ״ש מזה במ״א בד״ה מי מנה בפ׳ בלק ובד״ה שובה ישראל)

and therefore it is called by the name Yetzirah (Formation), etc. (as is written about this elsewhere, in the discourse beginning “Who can count” in Parshas Balak, and in the discourse beginning “Return, O Israel”).

Explanation

Yetzirah means “formation,” giving form to what already exists, as speech gives outward form to thought. The Alter Rebbe reads the verse the same way in Likkutei Torah, Balak (“Who can count”) and Shabbos Shuvah (“Return, O Israel”): “I have created him” is thought, something from nothing, and “I have formed him” is speech, the form that shapes the letters already present in thought.

אף עשיתיו היינו בחינת עולם העשי׳ [העשיה] כוכבים ומזלות כו׳. וכל העולמות הנ״ל אינם מקבלים חיותם רק מבחינת שם בלבד כל הנקרא בשמי כו׳.

“Indeed I have made him” is the level of the World of Asiyah: the stars and the constellations, etc. And all the worlds mentioned above receive their life-force only from the level of a name alone: “Everyone that is called by My Name, etc.”

Explanation

“Indeed I have made him” is Asiyah, the world of the stars and the constellations. All three worlds receive their life only from G‑d’s “Name,” as the verse begins: “Everyone that is called by My Name.”

וזהו הכל בחינת מלכות כל עולמים אבל בחינת מלכותך הוא כמו שבחינת מל׳ הוא בטל בעצמותו

And all this is the level of “the kingship of all worlds.” But the level of “Your kingship” is as the level of Malchus is nullified within His essence;

Explanation

All this is “the kingship of all worlds.” “Your kingship,” by contrast, is Malchus as it is nullified within G‑d’s own essence, before it turns toward the worlds.

כמו עד״מ זיו השמש הכלול בשמש עצמו שאינו נראה שם כלל רק הוא בטל בעצמותו ואין אורו וזיוו ניכר ונראה רק על הארץ כו׳.

as, by way of analogy, the radiance of the sun as it is included in the sun itself: there it is not seen at all, but is nullified within its essence, and its light and radiance are discernible and seen only on the earth, etc.

Explanation

The analogy: the sun’s radiance, inside the sun itself, is not seen at all, for it is swallowed up in its source. It becomes visible as light only on the earth, away from the sun.

וזהו קודם שנברא העולם הי׳ [היה] הוא ושמו בלבד דהיינו שהי׳ [שהיה] שמו נכלל בעצמותו (ועמ״ש בד״ה תקעו בחודש מזה ובד״ה שיר השירים ובביאור ע״פ שחורה אני ונאוה) וזהו ג״כ ענין נגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים הקדוש ב״ה כו׳.

This is [the meaning of] “Before the world was created, there were He and His Name alone”: that is, His Name was included in His essence (and see what is written about this in the discourse beginning “Blow the shofar at the New Moon,” and in the discourse beginning “The Song of Songs,” and in the explanation on “I am black, yet comely”). And this is also the meaning of “the King of the kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, was revealed to them,” etc.

Explanation

This explains “Before the world was created, there were He and His Name alone”: before creation G‑d’s Name, His Malchus, was included in His essence. In Likkutei Torah, Rosh Hashanah (“Blow the shofar”), the Alter Rebbe explains that the sun’s radiance shines out only because of its shield, Elokim; without it the radiance would be nullified in its source, and this is the difference between the two kingships. The same distinction explains the Haggadah’s phrase “the King of the kings of kings.”

מלך היינו בחינת מלכות כל עולמים שמחי׳ כ״ע [כל עלמין] בחינת זיו ושם לבד כו׳ ובחינת מלך מלכי המלכים היינו בחינת מלכותך כמו שנכלל בבחינת עצמותו הוא ושמו לבד.

“King” is the level of “the kingship of all worlds,” which gives life to all worlds: the level of radiance and a name alone, etc. And the level of “King of the kings of kings” is the level of “Your kingship,” as it is included in the level of His essence: He and His Name alone.

Explanation

“King” alone is Malchus as the kingship of the worlds, a mere radiance and name. “King of the kings of kings” is “Your kingship,” Malchus as it is included in G‑d’s essence, the state of “He and His Name alone.”

(ועיין בפרדס בעה״כ [בערכי הכינויים] ערך מלך והיותר מתיישב אצלנו כו׳ ע״ש) וזה היה נגלה עליהם אז בחי׳ מלכותך שלמעלה מן ההשתלשלות שהוא בחינת מהותו ועצמותו כו׳.

(And see the Pardes, in Erchei HaKinuyim, the entry “Melech” (King): “And what sits better with us,” etc.; see there.) And this is what was revealed to them then: the level of “Your kingship,” which is above the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), the level of His being and essence, etc.

Explanation

The text refers to the Pardes Rimonim of Rabbi Moshe Cordovero, to its glossary of Kabbalistic terms (Erchei HaKinuyim) under “Melech,” whose preferred reading, as the Kehot note quotes it, is that “King” is Keser, reigning over the kings Chochmah and Binah, who reign over the seven lower Sefiros. What was revealed at the Exodus was “Your kingship,” which is above the whole chain of worlds: G‑d’s very being and essence.

וזהו כי אז היה יציאת מצרים כי ענין מצרים הוא בחינת מיצר וגבול כמו עולם הגשמי הוא גבול מהלך ת״ק שנה ואף עולם המלאכים הוא בחינת גבול וצבא השמים לך משתחוים בחינת יש כו׳.

And this is why the Exodus from Egypt took place then. For Mitzrayim (Egypt) is the level of meitzar (constriction) and limit: just as the physical world is a limit, a journey of five hundred years, and even the world of the angels is the level of limit, “And the host of heaven bow down to You,” the level of yesh (a [separate] something), etc.

Explanation

Hence the Exodus came then. Mitzrayim, Egypt, is read as meitzar, constriction and limit, and every created world is limited: the physical world is bounded, “a journey of five hundred years” (the Talmud’s distance from the earth to the firmament), and the angels, who “bow down to You,” are each a separate existence (yesh) before G‑d.

Paragraph 9 in brief

The paragraph completes the account of the worlds that receive life from “the kingship of all worlds” (Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah) and contrasts it with “Your kingship,” Malchus included in G‑d’s essence. This higher level, “the King of the kings of kings,” was revealed at the Exodus, and because it is beyond all limit it could bring Israel out of Mitzrayim, the realm of limit.

Deeper

On “Blow the shofar at the New Moon” the Kehot note brings Or HaTorah’s summary: Havayah is like the sun and Elokim like its shield; without the shield the sun would not shine as radiance, and in the future G‑d will take the sun out of its sheath. The radiance that shines through the shield is “the kingship of all worlds”; what is above it is “Your kingship.” Likkutei Torah, Tzav, explains “King of the kings of kings” through the Sefiros: the “kings” are Netzach, Hod and Yesod, the “kings of kings” Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes, and the “King of the kings of kings” Chochmah, Binah and Daas, for the Infinite Light rests in Chochmah.

TermsChomer vetzurahYetzirahMazalYesh me’ayin+13
  • Chomer vetzurah חומר וצורה explained hereThe souls arose in thought and are Beriah, something from nothing. The angels are Yetzirah, the level of speech: as speech is drawn from thought, something from something, what was hidden in thought now revealed. That is only matter and form: matter is the concealment, the potential (hyle); form is the revelation. Hence the name Yetzirah, “formation.”ואינו רק בחינת חומר וצורה חומר הוא ההעלם כח היולי וצורה הוא הגילוי ולכן נקרא בשם יצירה
  • Yetzirah יצירה explained here“I formed it” is the world of the angels, who are speech (“by the word of G‑d the heavens were made”); speech is not something from nothing but something from something: what was hidden in thought is revealed, as matter and form. The souls, which rose in thought, are Beriah.יצרתיו הוא עולם המלאכים שהמה בחי׳ יצירה כי המה בחינת דיבור
  • Mazal מזל
  • Yesh me’ayin יש מאין
  • Ziv haShechinah זיו השכינה
  • Kadosh קדוש
  • Atzmus u’mahus עצמות ומהות
  • Malachim מלאכים
  • Yesh and ayin יש ואין
  • Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
  • Dibbur elyon דבור עליון
  • Beriah בריאה
  • Malchus מלכות
  • Hiskallelus התכללות

Also NeshamahChayusBittul

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    נשמות ישראל עלו במחשבה · ב״ר רפ״א.
  2. 2
    נשמות ישראל עלו במחשבה · Bereshit Rabbah 1:4
  3. 3
    בדבר ה׳ שמים נעשו · Psalms 33:6
  4. 4
    בד״ה מי מנה · לעיל פ׳ חקת סז, א: ”בראתיו הוא בחי׳ מחשבה שהוא יש מאין יצרתיו הוא בחי׳ דיבור שהוא בחי׳ צורה שמצייר האותיות שבמחשבה אף עשיתיו הוא בחי׳ המעשה”.
  5. 5
    מי מנה · Numbers 23:10
  6. 6
    ובד״ה שובה ישראל · לעיל שבת שובה סו, ב: ”בראתיו בחי׳ מחשבה כי בריאה היא מאין ליש כך המחשבה היא מאין שלא נולדו ונתהוו בחי׳ אותיות קודם המחשבה ואותיות המחשבה הן בבחי׳ העלם . . ויצרתיו . . מלשון צורה שמצייר חומר ההיולי שהוא בבחי׳ ההעלם והצורה הוא גילוי להחומר.
  7. 7
    שובה ישראל · Hosea 14:2
  8. 8
    שו״ה ומזלות כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמו הגהה לכאן.
  9. 9
    כל הנקרא בשמי · Isaiah 43:7
  10. 10
    הכלול בשמש עצמו · ראה אוה״ת יתרו ע׳ תתלד.
  11. 11
    בד״ה תקעו בחדש · לעיל ר״ה נה, א: ”שאם לא הי׳ המגן והמכסה לא היה השמש מאיר בבחי׳ זו כו׳ ולע״ל הקב״ה מוציא חמה מנרתיקה כו׳ ע״ש. וזהו שלמעלה מבחי׳ זיו והארה המאיר ע״י מגן ונרתק כו׳ ומזה יובן ההפרש בין מלכות כ״ע ובין מלכותך כו׳” — אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמו הערה לכאן.
  12. 12
    ובד״ה שיר השירים · לעיל א, סע״ב.
  13. 13
    ובביאור ע״פ שחורה אני · לעיל ח, א במ״ש שם בענין בחי׳ זיו ואור השמש המתפשט מן השמש ע״ש.
  14. 14
    שחורה אני ונאוה · Song of Songs 1:5
  15. 15
    בבחינת עצמותו הוא ושמו לבד · ראה אוה״ת תרומה ע׳ א׳תא.
  16. 16
    בפרדס בעה״כ ערך מלך · ”והיותר מתיישב אצלנו, כי מלך הוא כ״ע והוא מלך המולך על מלכי שהם שני מלכים חכמה ובינה שהם מלכים המולכים על שבעה מלכים שהם שבע׳ ימי הבנין”. — אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ב ע׳ תשע. ראה אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רנג.
  17. 17
    שו״ה שהוא בחינת — מהותו ועצמותו כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמו הגהה לכאן.
  18. 18
    מהלך ת״ק שנה · Chagigah 13a:3
  19. 19
    וצבא השמים לך משתחוים · Nehemiah 9:6
  20. 20
    ובחי׳ מלך מלכי המלכים היינו בחי׳ מלכותך · ראה לעיל פ׳ צו יב, ב. דשם נראה שהוא חב״ד, וראה במ״מ לשם.

10וגם עולם הנשמות המה בחינת גבול כי כל צדיק נכוה מחופתו של חבירו ממילא הם בחינת גבול ויש גבול להשגתן

And the world of the souls, too, is the level of limit, for “every tzaddik is burned by the canopy of his fellow”; consequently they are the level of limit, and there is a limit to their comprehension.

Explanation

Even the souls are limited: the Talmud says that in the World to Come each tzaddik, each righteous person, “is burned by the canopy of his fellow,” so each has his own measure, and his comprehension has a limit.

וכשנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים כו׳ בחינת הוא ושמו לבד שלמעלה מההשתלשלות העולמות בחי׳ מהותו ועצמותו אז הי׳ [היה] יציאת מצרים כו׳.

And when the King of the kings of kings, etc., was revealed to them, the level of “He and His Name alone,” which is above the chain of descent of the worlds, the level of His being and essence, then the Exodus from Egypt took place, etc.

Explanation

When the King of the kings of kings was revealed, it was “He and His Name alone,” G‑d’s essence above the whole chain of worlds and beyond every limit. That is why it could bring Israel out of Mitzrayim, the realm of limit.

(ועמ״ש מענין בחינות מצרים ויציאת מצרים בד״ה בחדש השלישי לצאת בנ״י [בני ישראל] מאמ״צ [מארץ מצרים] ובד״ה אני הוי׳ אלקיכם אשר הוצאתי אתכם מארץ מצרים ס״פ שלח):

(And see what is written on the matter of the levels of Egypt and of the Exodus from Egypt in the discourse beginning “In the third month after the Children of Israel went out of the land of Egypt,” and in the discourse beginning “I am Havayah your G‑d, who brought you out of the land of Egypt,” at the end of Parshas Shelach.)

Explanation

The text refers to two discourses on Egypt and the Exodus. In Torah Ohr, Yisro (“In the third month”), Mitzrayim is the constraint that the body and the animal soul place on the G‑dly soul, which cannot by its own strength leave that “sheath”; the other, at the end of Parshas Shelach, is on the verse that closes the Shema, “I am Havayah your G‑d, who brought you out of the land of Egypt.”

Paragraph 10 in brief

Even the souls are limited, so only a revelation of G‑d’s essence, above all the worlds, could bring Israel out of Mitzrayim, the realm of limit.

Deeper

According to the Kehot note, the relevant passage of the Torah Ohr discourse on “In the third month” runs from “to go out of the sheath of the animal soul” to “And Avram went up out of Egypt.”

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe shows that even angels and souls are limit, “Mitzrayim.” The Rebbe takes this higher. Even Atzilus, the world of unity reached by the tzaddik’s “walking” in Torah and mitzvos, is still bounded: “ten and not nine.” The first tzimtzum is the beginning of all limit. True Exodus therefore comes only from Keser. Following the Pardes that the Alter Rebbe cites in ¶9, the Rebbe identifies “King of the kings of kings” with Keser and with the level before the tzimtzum. He builds a three-step scheme: standing (the worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah), walking (tzaddikim), and leaping (mesirus nefesh and teshuvah).

    The Alter Rebbeוגם עולם הנשמות המה בחינת גבול

    The Rebbeהנה גם אצילות נקרא בשם עולם, ויש בו עשר ספירות

    The whole maamar, summarized

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.

TermsChuppahTzaddikAtzmus u’mahusHishtalshelus+2

Also NeshamahHavayah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    כל צדיק נכוה מחופתו של חברו · Bava Batra 75a:15
  2. 2
    בד״ה בחדש השלישי · בתו״א פ׳ יתרו ”לצאת מנרתק נה״ב כו׳, עד ויעל אברם ממצרים” — אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רנב.
  3. 3
    בחדש השלישי לצאת · Exodus 19:1
  4. 4
    אני הוי׳ אלקיכם אשר הוצאתי אתכם מארץ מצרים · Numbers 15:41
  5. 5
    שו״ה יציאת מצרים — (ועמ״ש . . ס״פ שלח) · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמו נמצא הגהה אחרת וקיצור.

Two matzos and the maror ¶11–16

11ב והנה כדי שיהי׳ [שיהיה] בחי׳ גילוי זה היו צריכים לאכול מצה. וענין מצה הוא ע״ד שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] (ברכות ד״מ סע״א [סוף עמוד א]) אין התינוק יודע לקרות אבא ואימא עד שיטעום דגן

2. Now, in order that there be this level of revelation, they had to eat matzah. The matter of matzah is like what our Sages, of blessed memory, said (Berachos, folio 40, end of side a): “A child does not know how to call ‘Father’ and ‘Mother’ until he tastes grain.”

Explanation

Chapter 2. To receive this revelation Israel had to eat matzah. The Talmud says that a child cannot call “Father” and “Mother” until he has tasted grain.

הנה יש בבחי׳ דגן כח שעל ידו יוכל התינוק להכיר אביו ואמו כמ״כ [כמו כן] ע״י בחי׳ מצה הכירו את אלקות בחי׳ מהותו ועצמותו דע את אלקי אביך לשון הכרה והרגשה כו׳.

Now, there is in grain a power through which the child can recognize his father and mother. So too, through matzah they recognized G‑dliness, the level of His being and essence: “Know the G‑d of your father,” a term of recognition and feeling, etc.

Explanation

Grain gives the child the power to recognize his parents; so matzah, bread of grain, gave Israel the power to recognize G‑d’s own being. In “Know the G‑d of your father,” “know” means recognition and feeling.

Paragraph 11 in brief

The second chapter begins: matzah was needed in order to receive the revelation, because, as grain does for a child, matzah gives the power to recognize G‑d’s very being.

TermsBerachahAtzmus u’mahusAbba and Imma

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    שארז״ל (ברכות ד״מ סע״א) · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ג ע׳ תשמה.
  2. 2
  3. 3
    שו״ה יודע לקרות — טעם דגן · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמז יש הגהה לכאן.
  4. 4
    דע את אלקי אביך · I Chronicles 28:9

12והנה יש ב׳ בחי׳ מצה א׳ שהי׳ [שהיה] קודם חצות וזו צריכה שמור ושמרתם את המצות כו׳.

Now, there are two levels of matzah. The first was before midnight, and this one requires guarding: “And you shall guard the matzos,” etc.

Explanation

There were two levels of matzah. The first, eaten before midnight, needed guarding against leavening, as the verse says, “And you shall guard the matzos.”

והב׳ שהוא בחי׳ עד שנגלה כו׳ שם נאמר לא הספיק בצקת של אבותינו כו׳ שאינה באה לידי חימוץ כלל.

And the second is the level of “before [the King] was revealed,” etc.; there it is said, “The dough of our fathers did not have time,” etc., for it does not come to leavening at all.

Explanation

The second came with the revelation after midnight; of it the Haggadah says that “the dough did not have time,” for it could not become leavened at all. This begins to answer the question of paragraph 2.

Paragraph 12 in brief

There are two matzos: the first, before midnight, needed guarding; the second, which came with the revelation after midnight, could not become leavened at all, and it is the one of which the Haggadah speaks.

Deeper

According to the Kehot note, Or HaTorah on Bo observes that a difficulty still remains, since the Haggadah says that “this matzah that we eat,” the matzah eaten before midnight, is because the dough had no time to leaven. The note also refers to Pesachim 36a and its commentators, and to the Jerusalem Talmud, Pesachim 2:4.

TermsTorah and mitzvos

Terms Torah and mitzvos

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ב׳ בחי׳ מצה · Pesachim 36a
  2. 2
    ושמרתם את המצות · Exodus 12:17

13וצריך להבין ענין חמץ ומצה חמץ הוא בחי׳ הגבהה וההתנשאות ויש בו טעם. ומצה הוא בחי׳ שאין בה גובה והתנשאות כלל ואין בה טעם כלל.

We need to understand the matter of chametz and matzah. Chametz is the level of elevation and self-exaltation, and it has taste. Matzah is the level that has no height or self-exaltation at all, and it has no taste at all,

Explanation

Chametz, leavened bread, rises and has flavor: it stands for elevation and self-exaltation. Matzah does not rise and has no flavor: it has no height or self-exaltation.

כמארז״ל [כמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] בלע מצה יצא וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] בעבודה ענין מצה הוא בחי׳ ביטול בטל רצונך כו׳ וזה הי׳ [היה] בחי׳ מצה הראשונה שאכלו קודם חצות היינו אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא] בחי׳ בטל רצונך כו׳.

as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “If one swallowed matzah, he has fulfilled [his obligation].” So too in divine service, the matter of matzah is the level of self-nullification (bittul): “Nullify your will,” etc. And this was the level of the first matzah, which they ate before midnight, namely an arousal from below, the level of “Nullify your will,” etc.;

Explanation

Rava rules in the Talmud that one who swallowed matzah without chewing it has fulfilled the mitzvah, though one who swallowed maror, the bitter herbs, has not; matzah, Rashi explains, does not need to be tasted. The Alter Rebbe takes this as a sign that matzah has no “taste” at all. In divine service matzah is self-nullification, “Nullify your will before His will”; this was the first matzah, eaten before midnight, Israel’s own effort: an arousal from below.

בחי׳ אתכפייא כו׳ (ועמ״ש מזה בפ׳ ויקהל בד״ה קחו מאתכם תרומה) שלא להיות בחי׳ גסות הקליפה אם תגביה כנשר כו׳

the level of subduing (iskafya), etc. (and see what is written about this in Parshas Vayakhel, in the discourse beginning “Take from among you an offering”), so as not to be the level of the coarseness of kelipah: “Though you soar as high as the eagle, etc.”

Explanation

This nullification is iskafya, subduing one’s nature, so as not to fall into the coarseness of kelipah, to which the prophet says, “Though you soar as high as the eagle … from there I will bring you down.”

וכידוע שבחי׳ גסות נקרא אבי אבות הטומאה שהוא מקור על התאוות כו׳ ולכן בבחי׳ בטל רצונך ממילא היא בחי׳ אתכפיא וכמ״ש ובערת הרע כו׳.

And, as is known, the level of coarseness is called “the father of all fathers of impurity,” for it is the source of all the desires, etc. Therefore, in the level of “Nullify your will” there is of itself the level of subduing, as it is written, “And you shall eradicate the evil,” etc.

Explanation

Coarseness, a person’s inflated sense of self, is called “the father of all fathers of impurity,” the halachic term for the gravest source of impurity, a human corpse, because every desire grows from it (the print has על, read as כל, “all”). So nullifying one’s will subdues the evil of itself, as in “And you shall eradicate the evil.”

Paragraph 13 in brief

Chametz is self-exaltation and matzah is self-nullification. The first matzah stood for Israel’s own bittul, “Nullify your will,” which subdues the coarseness of kelipah, the root of all desires.

Deeper

A gloss in Or HaTorah on Shir HaShirim, quoted in the Kehot note, explains that the aim of this “elevation” of kelipah is to draw from the level where “darkness is as light” before G‑d, and “if you are righteous, [what do you give Him]?”, so as not to need submission and self-nullification; and this, it says, is chametz.

TermsGasus haruachBittul haratzonKoach hamisavehAvos+6

Also Bittul

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    בלע מצה יצא · Pesachim 115b:6–7
  2. 2
    בטל רצונך · Pirkei Avot 2:4
  3. 3
    שו״ה וכמ״כ — בטל רצונך כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמט יש הגהה וקיצור לכאן.
  4. 4
    קחו מאתכם תרומה · Exodus 35:5
  5. 5
    אם תגביה כנשר · Obadiah 1:4
  6. 6
    שו״ה להיות בחי׳ — כנשר כו׳ · אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמט הגהה לכאן. ”שהמכוון בהגבהה זו לינק מבחי׳ דקמי׳ כחשכא כאורה ואם צדקת כו׳ כדי שלא יצטרך להכנעה וביטול, וזהו ענין החמץ” ע״ש בארוכה.
  7. 7
    אבי אבות הטומאה · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמט יש הגהה לכאן בפי׳ אבי אבות הטומאה.
  8. 8
    גסות נקרא אבי אבות הטומאה · ראה קונטרס ומעין מאמר ט״ו ואילך. ד״ה אני ישנה — תש״ט סעי׳ יא (ע׳ 119).
  9. 9
    ובערת הרע · Deuteronomy 17:7
  10. 10
    שו״ה ממילא — ובערת הרע כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רנ יש הגהה לכאן.

14וזהו ע״י בחי׳ מצה גם מלשון מצה ומריבה שהיא מלחמה גדולה לבטל היש כו׳. ובבחינת מצה זו היה ג״כ בחי׳ מרור על מצת ומרורים יאכלוהו

And this is through the level of matzah, also in the sense of matzah u-merivah (“strife and contention”), for it is a great war to nullify the yesh (the sense of self), etc. And in this level of matzah there was also the level of maror (bitter herbs): “With matzos and bitter herbs they shall eat it,”

Explanation

Matzah is also related to matzah in the sense of strife, as in matzah u-merivah: nullifying one’s sense of self is a great war. The first matzah came together with maror, bitter herbs, as the verse says, “with matzos and bitter herbs they shall eat it.”

כי בחינת מצה זו בחי׳ בטל רצונך לא היו יכולים לבוא אליו כ״א ע״י בחי׳ מרור בחינת מרירות כו׳.

for this level of matzah, the level of “Nullify your will,” they could not reach except through the level of maror, the level of bitterness, etc.

Explanation

The bittul of “Nullify your will” could be reached only through maror, bitterness: a bitter feeling over one’s distance from G‑d, as the next paragraph explains.

דהנה כפי סדור הקערה הוא מרור באמצע בחי׳ קו האמצעי ולכאורה הי׳ [היה] צריך להיות המרור בקו שמאל כי הוא בחי׳ גבורות כו׳

For according to the arrangement of the [seder] plate, the maror is in the middle, the level of the middle line. Yet at first glance the maror should have been on the left line, for it is the level of Gevuros (restraints), etc.

Explanation

On the seder plate as it is arranged, the maror sits in the middle, on the middle line of the Sefiros. One would expect it on the left line, the side of Gevurah, since bitterness belongs to the Gevuros, the powers of restraint and severity.

(כמבואר בסש״ב [בספר של בינונים] בפל״א וכמ״ש ג״כ) (לקמן) בפ׳ במדבר בד״ה וידבר כו׳ מענין הג׳ לוים. מררי הוא בחי׳ המרירות כו׳ ע״ש

(As is explained in Sefer Shel Beinonim [the Tanya], chapter 31, and as is also written) (below) in Parshas Bamidbar, in the discourse beginning “And He spoke,” etc., on the matter of the three Levites. Merari is the level of bitterness (merirus), etc.; see there.

Explanation

The text gives two places for this. In Tanya, chapter 31, bitterness of soul over one’s distance from G‑d is not sadness, for it has life in it, a life from the holy Gevuros; and in Likkutei Torah, Bamidbar, the discourse “And He spoke” reads the Levite family of Merari as merirus, bitterness, from the Gevuros. Bamidbar is called “below” because, as the Kehot note at the start of the maamar says, the manuscript places this maamar among the Pesach discourses, which come before Bamidbar.

טו, אוכ״ה בלק״ת [בלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] מהאריז״ל [מהאר״י זכרונו לברכה] פ׳ נשא והוא מבחינת גבורות כו׳ ועמ״ש מענין מררי בביאור ע״פ נשא את ראש בני גרשון

And so it is in the Likkutei Torah of the Arizal, Parshas Naso, and it is from the level of Gevuros, etc. And see what is written on the matter of Merari in the explanation on “Take a census of the sons of Gershon.”

Explanation

The Likkutei Torah of the Arizal (his teachings on Scripture as Rabbi Chaim Vital recorded them), on Parshas Naso, also places Merari in the Gevuros. The text refers as well to its own explanation on “Take a census of the sons of Gershon” in Likkutei Torah, Naso, which treats the three Levite families.

אך מפני זה הוא בקו האמצעי מפני שבחינת מרירות מעוררת המשכת רחמים רבים כי בחי׳ רחמים אינו שייך כ״א על מי שהוא במדרגה התחתונה ואין טוב לו

However, it is in the middle line for this reason: because the level of bitterness arouses the drawing down of abundant compassion. For compassion applies only to one who is at the lower level and is not well off;

Explanation

Why then is the maror in the middle line? Because bitterness arouses an abundance of divine compassion, and compassion applies only to one who is low and lacking.

אבל על מי שהוא במדרגה העליונה ולא חסר לו כלל לא שייך עליו רחמנות כלל ומפני זה בחינת רחמים הוא בחינת קו האמצעי.

but for one who is at the higher level and lacks nothing at all, compassion does not apply to him at all. And for this reason the level of compassion is the level of the middle line.

Explanation

No one has compassion on someone who lacks nothing. Compassion is the middle line, between kindness and restraint, so the maror, which arouses it, is placed in the middle.

Paragraph 14 in brief

The first matzah came with maror: the bittul it expresses is reached through bitterness, and the maror stands on the middle line of the seder plate, the line of compassion, because bitterness arouses G‑d’s abundant compassion.

Deeper

In Tanya, chapter 31, bitterness and a broken heart are distinguished from sadness: they have life in them, a life from the holy Gevuros, while joy comes from the Chasadim. Here the maamar adds that this bitterness, though from Gevuros, is placed in the middle line because its effect is to arouse compassion. In Likkutei Torah, Naso, the discourse “Take a census of the sons of Gershon” says the same of the sons of Merari: their service is bitterness over one’s distance from G‑d, which arouses abundant compassion so that one can reach “Nullify your will,” and it refers back to this discourse on “with matzos and bitter herbs.”

TermsMerirusGimmel kavinBittul haratzonBittul hayesh+4

Also BittulHaalaah vehamshachah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    שו״ה גם מלשון — לבטל היש כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רנ יש הגהה לכאן.
  2. 2
    על מצות ומרורים יאכלוהו · Numbers 9:11
  3. 3
    מרור באמצע בחי׳ קו האמצעי · מובא גם באוה״ת פ׳ בהעלותך ע׳ תיט.
  4. 4
    כי הוא בחי׳ גבורות · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 31
  5. 5
    וכמ״ש ג״כ לקמן · ראה הערה בתחילת המאמר.
  6. 6
    בביאור ע״פ נשא את ראש בני גרשון · ראה לעיל פ׳ נשא כב, ב.
  7. 7
    נשא את ראש בני גרשון · Numbers 4:22

15ולעורר בחינת רחמים רבים הוא על ידי בחי׳ מרירות כשמתבונן בשכלו איך שחיות כל העולמות הוא רק בחינת זיו ושם בלבד

To arouse abundant compassion is through the level of bitterness: when one contemplates with his intellect how the life-force of all the worlds is only the level of radiance and a name alone,

Explanation

Compassion is aroused through bitterness, and bitterness comes from contemplation: one thinks about how the life of all the worlds is only G‑d’s radiance and Name.

אבל מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ אני הוי׳ לא שניתי אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם כו׳

but His being and essence, blessed be He: “I, Havayah, have not changed”; “You are He before the world was created,” etc.,

Explanation

G‑d’s own being, by contrast, is untouched by the worlds: “I, Havayah, have not changed”; “You are He before the world was created,” and the same after it was created.

בחי׳ הוא ושמו לבד ואין פועלים בו שום שינוי כי אין לו תחלה ולא תכלה כו׳

the level of “He and His Name alone,” and [the worlds] effect no change in Him, for He has no beginning and no end, etc.

Explanation

That is the level of “He and His Name alone”: the worlds change nothing in Him, for He has no beginning and no end.

ואזי תשתפך במר נפשו ויבא לידי מרירות גדולים איך שהוא רחוק מאלקות ועל ידי זה מעורר בחינת רחמים רבים כו׳

Then he will pour out [his heart] in the bitterness of his soul, and he will come to great bitterness over how far he is from G‑dliness; and through this he arouses abundant compassion, etc.

Explanation

Seeing how far he himself is from G‑dliness, a person pours out his heart in bitterness. That bitterness arouses G‑d’s abundant compassion.

וכמו שאומרים בכל יום ביוצר אור המלך המרומם לבדו הו׳ היינו כנ״ל מה רבו מעשיך ה׳ כולם בחכמה עשית כו׳ הוא רק מבחינת המלך בחינת מלכות שם בלבד.

And as we say every day in [the blessing] Yotzer Or, “The King who alone is exalted,” etc.: that is, as mentioned above, “How manifold are Your works, Havayah; in wisdom You have made them all,” etc., is only from the level of “the King,” the level of Malchus, a name alone.

Explanation

The daily blessing Yotzer Or expresses this. “The King” there refers back to “How manifold are Your works, Havayah,” which it follows: the works come only from G‑d as King, from Malchus, His Name.

אבל המרומם לבדו כו׳ היינו כמו שהוא לבדו בחי׳ הוא ושמו בלבד הוא מרומם שאין לו ערך ושינוי כלל אין ערוך לך כו׳ המתנשא מימות עולם

But “who alone is exalted,” etc., means: as He is alone, the level of “He and His Name alone,” He is exalted, for He has no comparison and no change at all: “There is none to compare to You,” etc., “who is elevated since days of old.”

Explanation

But “who alone is exalted” is G‑d as He is alone, “He and His Name alone,” beyond all comparison and change, as the same prayer goes on: “There is none to compare to You” and “who is elevated since days of old.”

ואם כן הרחמנות גדולה עלינו ומפני זה אנו אומרים ברחמיך הרבים רחם עלינו כו׳.

If so, there is great cause for compassion on us; and therefore we say, “In Your abundant compassion, have compassion on us,” etc.

Explanation

Since He is so far above the worlds, we, who are far from Him, are greatly in need of compassion; hence the prayer goes on, “In Your abundant compassion, have compassion on us.” In Likkutei Torah, Pinchas, the Alter Rebbe explains this request: by his own measure a person thinks his bodily life is as it should be, but before G‑d the soul’s descent into it is very great, so we ask for His abundant compassion even though we do not feel the need.

(ועמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ והנה מנורת זהב. וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] בחנה והיא מרת נפש ועל ידי זה ותתפלל על ה׳. עמ״ש בד״ה לא תהיה מכשלה.

(And see what is written about this in the explanation on “And behold, a candelabrum of gold.” And this is what is said of Channah, “And she was bitter of soul,” and through this, “And she prayed to (al) Havayah”; see what is written in the discourse beginning “None shall miscarry.”

Explanation

The text refers to the explanation on “And behold, a candelabrum of gold” in Likkutei Torah, Beha’aloscha. Channah too was “bitter of soul,” and through this “she prayed al Havayah”: in Torah Ohr, Mishpatim, in the discourse on “None shall miscarry,” the Alter Rebbe reads al, “upon,” as “above,” for tefillah means binding oneself, and she bound herself above the Name Havayah, which denotes bringing the worlds into being. (The print has מכשלה, “one who makes stumble,” read as משכלה, “one who miscarries,” the word of the verse, as in the Kehot note.)

וזהו וימררוהו כו׳ ועל ידי זה ותשב באיתן קשתו עמ״ש מענין איתן בד״ה ראה אנכי נותן. ובחרבי ובקשתי היינו בצלותי ובעותי) וזהו ענין מרור קו האמצעי כו׳.

And this is “And they embittered him,” etc., and through this, “But his bow abode in strength (eisan)”; see what is written on the matter of eisan in the discourse beginning “See, I set before you.” And “with my sword and with my bow” means “with my prayer and with my supplication.”) And this is the matter of maror [as] the middle line, etc.

Explanation

So too with Yosef: “they embittered him,” and through this “his bow abode in strength (eisan).” In Likkutei Torah, Re’eh (“See, I set before you”), eisan is explained as strength: the bittul of Chochmah, beyond reason, which stands firm in every Jew. Yaakov’s “with my sword and with my bow” is read, with the Targum, as “with my prayer and with my supplication”: bitterness leads to prayer, which draws compassion, and that is why the maror is on the middle line.

ועל ידי זה יכולים לבא לבחי׳ מצה הנ״ל בחינת בטל רצונך כו׳ בחינת אתכפיא בלי טעם ובלי שום התנשאות והגבהה וצריכה שמור ושמרתם את המצות שלא תבא לידי חימוץ ח״ו [חס ושלום] הגבהה והתנשאות

And through this one can come to the level of matzah mentioned above, the level of “Nullify your will,” etc., the level of subduing (iskafya), without taste and without any self-exaltation or elevation. And it requires guarding, “And you shall guard the matzos,” so that it does not come to leavening, Heaven forbid, [that is,] elevation and self-exaltation

Explanation

Bitterness opens the way to the matzah of “Nullify your will,” a subduing of self without “taste” or self-exaltation. This matzah needs guarding, so that it does not turn into chametz, self-exaltation.

(ועיין בפרדס בעה״כ [בערכי הכינויים] ערך ושמירה אחת. ועיין בזח״ב [בזהר חלק ב׳]) (דקל״א א׳) בענין ליל שמורים. (ודל״ח ב׳).

(and see the Pardes, in Erchei HaKinuyim, the entry “And one guarding”; and see the Zohar, Part II) (131a), on the matter of “a night of guarding” (leil shimurim) (and 38b);

Explanation

The text gives sources on guarding: the Pardes, which (as the Kehot note quotes it) says that it needs guarding because the kelipah surrounds it, and the Zohar on “a night of guarding.”

ור״פ בראשית גבי כשושנה בין החוחים לסחרא לה לכנסת ישראל ולנטרא לה כו׳ ועיין מ״ש בד״ה צו את בני ישראל את קרבני כו׳ תשמרו להקריב לי.

and at the beginning of Parshas Bereishis, concerning “as a lily among the thorns”: “to encircle her, the Community of Israel, and to guard her,” etc. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “Command the Children of Israel: My offering,” etc., “you shall guard to offer to Me.”

Explanation

In the Zohar’s opening, the “lily among the thorns,” the Community of Israel, is encircled and guarded. The text also refers to the discourse on “Command the Children of Israel: My offering … you shall guard to offer to Me” in Likkutei Torah, Pinchas.

שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שמור זו משנה כו׳ והיינו לפי שבתורה שבעל פה הוא גילוי רצה״ע [רצון העליון] כו׳ ע״ש.

For our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “‘Guard’ refers to Mishnah,” etc.; and that is because in the Oral Torah there is the revelation of the supernal will, etc.; see there.

Explanation

That discourse explains the Sages’ saying that “guard” refers to Mishnah: the Oral Torah reveals the supernal will. Guarding is thus tied to the revelation of G‑d’s will.

וע׳ עוד בפרדס ערך מצה ודבריו יובן עפמ״ש [על פי מה שכתוב] בד״ה זכור ושמור בדבור אחד נאמרו ועיין ברבות ר״פ עקב (דף רצ״ב ב׳) על פסוק ושמר ה׳ לך כו׳ ושמרתם את המצות כו׳

And see further in the Pardes, the entry “Matzah”; his words will be understood according to what is written in the discourse beginning “‘Remember’ and ‘Guard’ were said in a single utterance.” And see the Midrash Rabbah, at the beginning of Parshas Eikev (folio 292b), on the verse “And Havayah will guard for you,” etc.; “And you shall guard the matzos,” etc.

Explanation

The Pardes, under “Matzah,” reads shemurah (“guarded”) as adorned and waiting for her husband, and the Torah Ohr discourse on “‘Remember’ and ‘Guard’” reads shamor as waiting, as in “and his father kept the matter” (both as the Kehot notes report). The Midrash Rabbah at the start of Eikev reads “And Havayah your G‑d will guard for you” in the same sense of keeping in store: the blessings of the Patriarchs are kept for the time to come. All these bear on “And you shall guard the matzos.”

ועיין מ״ש סד״ה את שבתותי תשמרו ומ״ש במ״א ע״פ לעבדה ולשמרה.

And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “My Sabbaths you shall keep,” and what is written elsewhere on “to work it and to guard it.”

Explanation

The text adds the end of the discourse on “My Sabbaths you shall keep” in Likkutei Torah, Behar, and an explanation elsewhere of “to work it and to guard it.”

וזה היה הכל בחי׳ מצה ראשונה בחינת אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא] שהיו ישראל עושים ועי״ז היה אחר כך אחר חצות בחי׳ מצה שניה בחי׳ ביטול ע״י שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים כו׳.

And all this was the level of the first matzah, the level of an arousal from below, which Israel performed; and through this there came afterwards, after midnight, the level of the second matzah, the level of self-nullification, through the King of the kings of kings being revealed to them, etc.

Explanation

All this, the bitterness and the guarded matzah, belongs to the first matzah, Israel’s own effort from below. Through it came the second matzah after midnight: a self-nullification brought about by the revelation of the King of the kings of kings.

¶2 This answers the question from paragraph 2.

Paragraph 15 in brief

The paragraph explains how bitterness arouses abundant compassion: contemplating that G‑d’s essence is untouched by the worlds, a person feels how far he is from Him, and his bitterness draws compassion, as the morning prayers say. Bitterness leads to the guarded first matzah, Israel’s own work, and through it came the second matzah after midnight.

Deeper

In Likkutei Torah, Beha’aloscha, the discourse “I have seen, and behold, a candelabrum of gold” uses the same lines of Yotzer Or to show how abundant compassion is aroused: “the King” is the Malchus from which all creatures live, while He alone is exalted, beyond all place; and it refers back to this discourse for why the maror stands on the middle line. Torah Ohr, Mishpatim, adds that because He is exalted beyond all measure, all the worlds, even the highest, are low before Him, and so His compassion extends to them all.

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe says the first matzah, an arousal from below, brought about the second. The Rebbe defines how. A revelation above hishtalshelus cannot be compelled by service below, nor received in a fitting vessel. It still needs a semblance of itself below. He identifies that semblance with the mesirus nefesh of “draw and take” on the tenth of Nissan, done “by way of leaping and skipping.”

    The Alter Rebbeוזה היה הכל בחי׳ מצה ראשונה בחינת אתעדל״ת שהיו ישראל עושים ועי״ז

    The Rebbeאמנם אעפ״כ גם בהמשכה שבבחינת דילוג צ״ל מעין ודוגמא להההמשכה

    The whole maamar, summarized

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.

TermsMerirusGimmel kavinBittul haratzonRachamim rabim+22

Also ChayusBittulHavayahTorah and mitzvosChochmahTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    אני הוי׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
  2. 2
    מה רבו מעשיך ה׳ · Psalms 104:24
  3. 3
    ברחמיך הרבים רחם עלינו · ראה לעיל פנחס עח, ג.
  4. 4
    בביאור ע״פ והנה מנורת זהב · לעיל פ׳ בהעלותך.
  5. 5
    והנה מנורת זהב · Zechariah 4:2
  6. 6
    והיא מרת נפש · I Samuel 1:10
  7. 7
    בד״ה לא תהיה משכלה · תו״א משפטים עט, ב.
  8. 8
    וימררוהו · Genesis 49:23
  9. 9
    וימררוהו כו׳ ותשב באיתן קשתו · Genesis 49:23–24
  10. 10
    ותשב באיתן קשתו · Genesis 49:24
  11. 11
    בד״ה ראה אנכי נותן · לעיל פ׳ ראה בתחלתו.
  12. 12
    ובחרבי ובקשתי · Genesis 48:22
  13. 13
    בצלותי ובעותי · Onkelos Genesis 48:22
  14. 14
    ושמרתם את המצות · Exodus 12:17
  15. 15
    בפרדס בעה״כ ערך ושמירה אחת · ”והיא צריכה שמירה שסביבה הקליפה כו׳” — אוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רנג. אוה״ת בא ע׳ שב.
  16. 16
    בזח״ב (דקל״א א׳) · נעתק באוה״ת שמות ע׳ שב ”בענין שומר מה מליל ליל אצטריך לנטורא” וראה גם אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ג ע׳ תשנ.
  17. 17
    ליל שמורים · Exodus 12:42
  18. 18
    ליל שמורים · Zohar, Bo 5:129–6:141
  19. 19
    ליל שמורים · Zohar, Terumah 10:81–88
  20. 20
    ודל״ח ב׳ · ”בענין ליל שמורים” — אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ג ע׳ תשמה שם נעתק הלשון. אוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רנג. וראה גם אוה״ת שמות ע׳ שב.
  21. 21
    כשושנה בין החוחים · Song of Songs 2:2
  22. 22
    כשושנה בין החוחים לסחרא לה לכנסת ישראל ולנטרא לה · Zohar, Introduction 1:1–2:4
  23. 23
    ור״פ בראשית . . ולנטרא לה כו׳ · ”מכל סטרהא דלפי שהיא בין החוחים ע״כ דוקא נמשך בה הארת הכתר דהיינו י״ג ת״ד כדי לשמרה מן החיצונים” — אוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רנג.
  24. 24
    בד״ה צו את בנ״י את קרבני · לעיל פנחס עו, ב.
  25. 25
    צו את בני ישראל את קרבני כו׳ תשמרו להקריב לי · Numbers 28:2
  26. 26
    שמור זו משנה · Kiddushin 37a
  27. 27
    בפרדס ערך מצה · ”שמורה ר״ל מקושטת ממתנת לבעלה ל׳ שומרת יבם” — אוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רנד. וראה גם אוה״ת פ׳ בא ע׳
  28. 28
    בד״ה זכור ושמור בדבור אחד · ”בפי׳ שמור מלשון ואביו שמר את הדבר [תו״א עא, ד]” — אוה״ת פ׳ בא ע׳ שב.
  29. 29
    לעבדה ולשמרה · Genesis 2:15
  30. 30
    ושמר ה׳ לך · Deuteronomy 7:12

16ובחי׳ מצה זו היא שלא הספיק בצקת כו׳ שאינה צריכה שימור כלל שאינה באה לידי חימוץ כלל מחמת שנגלה עליהם כו׳

And the level of this matzah is “the dough did not have time,” etc.: it needs no guarding at all, for it does not come to leavening at all, because [the King] was revealed to them, etc.

Explanation

The second matzah is the one of which it is said that “the dough did not have time.” It needs no guarding, because the revelation of the King made leavening impossible.

והיא בחי׳ ביטול אמיתי שאין יכול לבא לידי בחינת הגבהה והתנשאות כלל ונגלה עליהם בחי׳ זו כדי שיהיה יציאת מצרים

And it is the level of true self-nullification, which cannot come to the level of elevation and self-exaltation at all. And this level was revealed to them so that the Exodus from Egypt could take place;

Explanation

It is a true self-nullification, in which self-exaltation cannot arise at all. This level was revealed so that the Exodus could take place.

כי מחמת שהיו אז ישראל במדרגה שפלה מאד משוקעים בין הקליפות כידוע לא היו יכולים לצאת מבחי׳ זו עד שנגלה עליהם כו׳

for since Israel were then at a very low level, sunk among the kelipos, as is known, they could not go out from this level until [the King] was revealed to them, etc.;

Explanation

Israel were then very low, sunk among the kelipos, the forces of concealment, and could not leave that state until G‑d was revealed to them.

ועל ידי גילוי הארה גדולה כזו היו יכולים לצאת כו׳ ולא היה בה מרור כלל כי היה גילוי מלמעלה למטה הארה גדולה כנ״ל ולא תוכל לבא לידי חימוץ

and through the revelation of so great an illumination they were able to go out, etc. And there was no maror in it at all, for it was a revelation from above to below, a great illumination, as mentioned above, and it could not come to leavening.

Explanation

Only so great an illumination could bring them out. This matzah needed no maror, since it came from above to below, a revelation that left no room for leavening.

אבל מצה הראשונה הי׳ [היה] עבודתם מלמטה למעלה (ועמ״ש עוד מענין ב׳ בחינות מצה הנ״ל ע״פ ששת ימים תאכל מצות) ולכן היו צריכים מרור כו׳ לעורר רחמים רבים.

But [with] the first matzah, their service was from below to above (and see what is written further on the matter of the two levels of matzah mentioned above, on “Six days you shall eat matzos”); therefore they needed maror, etc., to arouse abundant compassion.

Explanation

The first matzah was Israel’s service from below to above, and so it needed maror, bitterness, to arouse G‑d’s abundant compassion. The text refers to its discussion of the two matzos on “Six days you shall eat matzos” in Likkutei Torah, Tzav, which adds that since the Torah was given, the matzah we eat before midnight can also receive the revelation of the second matzah, through the Torah and mitzvos of the whole year.

וזהו שאנו אומרים מרור זה שאנו אוכלים ע״ש [על שם] מה ע״ש [על שם] שמררו המצרים את חיי אבותינו במצרים

And this is what we say: “This maror that we eat—on account of what? On account of the fact that the Egyptians embittered the lives of our fathers in Egypt.”

Explanation

The Haggadah’s words on the maror fit this: we eat it “because the Egyptians embittered the lives of our fathers in Egypt.”

אבותינו הם המדות כידוע וחיי אבותינו הם המוחין שבמדות ובחינת מצרים ממררים את המדות כו׳ (ועמ״ש מזה בפ׳ שמות בד״ה קול דודי):

“Our fathers” are the emotive attributes (middos), as is known, and “the lives of our fathers” are the intellect (mochin) within the middos; and the level of Egypt embitters the middos, etc. (And see what is written about this in Parshas Shemos, in the discourse beginning “The voice of my beloved.”)

Explanation

“Our fathers” are the middos, the emotions, and “the lives of our fathers” are the mochin, the intellect within the emotions that gives them life. “Egypt,” the state of constriction, embitters these emotions; in Torah Ohr’s own discourse on “The voice of my beloved” (Shemos), this life of the middos went down into the meitzar ha-garon, the “strait of the throat,” and so became bitter.

Paragraph 16 in brief

The second matzah, revealed from above after midnight, needed neither guarding nor maror, and this revelation freed Israel from the depths of Egypt. The first matzah, Israel’s own service from below, needed maror to arouse compassion, as the Haggadah’s words on the maror hint.

TermsRomemusKelipahMochinMiddos+2

Also BittulTorah and mitzvos

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ע״פ ששת ימים תאכל מצות · לעיל פ׳ צו.
  2. 2
    ששת ימים תאכל מצות · Deuteronomy 16:8
  3. 3
    מרור זה שאנו אוכלים ע״ש . . שמררו המצרים · Pesachim 116b:2
  4. 4
    בפ׳ שמות בד״ה קול דודי · בתו״א פ׳ שמות.

The voice ¶17

17ג ועתה יובן פי׳ הפסוק קול דודי הנה זה בא מדלג על ההרים כו׳ דקאי על יציאת מצרים כו׳

3. Now the explanation of the verse “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes, leaping over the mountains,” etc., will be understood; for it refers to the Exodus from Egypt, etc.

Explanation

Chapter 3 returns to the verse. With the foundations laid, the maamar can now explain “The voice of my beloved … leaping over the mountains” as describing the Exodus.

פי׳ קול הוא בחי׳ המשכה בלשון פסוק ואינו דוקא קול גשמי דהיינו בחי׳ הדבור דאדרבה זה נקרא טו, בקול זוטא שנמשך מן המדות אל הדבור ה׳ מוצאות הפה כו׳

The explanation: kol (“voice”) is the level of drawing down, in the language of the verse. And it is not necessarily a physical voice, that is, the level of speech; on the contrary, that is called the “small voice” (kol zuta), which is drawn from the middos into speech, [through] the five articulations of the mouth, etc.

Explanation

In the verse “voice” (kol) means a drawing forth, not necessarily physical sound. Ordinary speech is only the “small voice,” which carries the emotions outward through the five organs of articulation (throat, palate, tongue, teeth and lips).

ויש קול גדול ולא יסף היינו בחינת קלא פנימאה דלא אשתמע כי בחינת קול זוטא הנ״ל נקרא קלא דאשתמע ובחינת קול גדול הנ״ל הוא קלא דלא אשתמע

And there is “a great voice that did not cease,” which is the level of the inner voice that is not heard (kala penima’ah delo ishtema). For the level of the “small voice” mentioned above is called “the voice that is heard,” and the level of the “great voice” mentioned above is “the voice that is not heard.”

Explanation

At Sinai there was “a great voice that did not cease,” which the Zohar calls the inner voice that is not heard. Speech is “the voice that is heard”; the “great voice” is a voice that is not heard.

(עיין מענין קול גדול ברבות יתרו ס״פ כ״ח וס״פ כ״ט. במדבר רבה ס״פ בלק) (סוף ד׳ רע״ט).

(See on the matter of the “great voice” in the Midrash Rabbah on Yisro, at the end of section 28 and at the end of section 29; Bamidbar Rabbah, at the end of Balak) (end of folio 279).

Explanation

The text gives sources on the “great voice” in the Midrash Rabbah, on Yisro and at the end of Balak.

ובזח״א [ובזהר חלק א] בראשית (דף נ׳ ע״ב. דר״י ע״א) ח״ב [חלק ב׳] (קל״ז א׳). ח״ג [חלק ג׳] (דרס״א א׳). ועיין מ״ש מענין קול סד״ה הבאים ישרש ובד״ה וכל העם רואים.

And in the Zohar, Part I, Bereishis (folio 50b; folio 210a); Part II (137a); Part III (261a). And see what is written on the matter of kol at the end of the discourse beginning “Those who come, he shall cause to take root,” and in the discourse beginning “And all the people saw.”

Explanation

It adds passages of the Zohar and two discourses in Torah Ohr on kol: on “Those who come, he shall cause to take root” (Shemos), near whose end the voice is explained as the revealing of what is hidden, made of fire and water joined by breath, and on “And all the people saw the voices” (Yisro).

ובד״ה הקל קול יעקב ובד״ה ויהי קול מעל לרקיע. ובד״ה משה ידבר ובענין מהרה ישמע כו׳ קול חתן וקול כלה כו׳

And in the discourse beginning “The voice is the voice of Yaakov,” and in the discourse beginning “And there was a voice from above the firmament,” and in the discourse beginning “Moshe would speak,” and on the matter of “Soon may there be heard,” etc., “the voice of the groom and the voice of the bride,” etc.

Explanation

Further discourses on kol are listed: on “The voice is the voice of Yaakov,” on Yechezkel’s “voice from above the firmament,” on “Moshe would speak” (Torah Ohr, Yisro), and on the wedding blessing’s “the voice of the groom and the voice of the bride.”

והיינו בחי׳ המשכה מההעלם אל הגילוי היינו מן השכל אל המדות או אל השכל מלמעלה מן השכל שנמשך הכל מהעלם אל הגילוי נק׳ קול בחינת המשכה

And this is the level of drawing down from concealment into revelation: that is, from the intellect to the middos, or to the intellect from above the intellect. Whatever is drawn from concealment into revelation is called kol (“voice”), the level of drawing down.

Explanation

In all these, “voice” is the drawing of something from concealment into revelation: from intellect into emotion, or into intellect from what is above intellect.

וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] הוא כאן שנגלה עליהם מלך כו׳ הארה גדולה שלמעלה מהשתלשלות מהותו ועצמותו כו׳ נקרא גם כן בחינת קול המשכה מההעלם אל הגילוי. (ופירוש הנה זה בא עמ״ש לקמן בענן והגדת לבנך כו׳ בעבור זה כו׳):

So too here: the revelation of the King, etc., to them, a great illumination that is above the chain of descent, His being and essence, etc., is also called the level of “voice,” a drawing down from concealment into revelation. (And for the explanation of “Behold, this one (zeh) comes,” see what is written below on the matter of “And you shall tell your son,” etc., “because of this (zeh),” etc.)

Explanation

So too the revelation of the King at the Exodus, a great illumination above the chain of worlds, G‑d’s very being, drawn from concealment into revelation, is a “voice”: “the voice of my beloved.” The word zeh in “Behold, this one comes” is explained later, with the Haggadah’s “because of this (zeh).” (The printed Hebrew’s בענן, “in a cloud,” is a misprint for בענין, “on the matter of.”)

Paragraph 17 in brief

Chapter 3 begins to explain the verse: “voice” means a drawing down from concealment into revelation, and the revelation at the Exodus of a great illumination from the level of G‑d’s essence is “the voice of my beloved.”

Deeper

The Torah Ohr discourse on “Those who come, Yaakov shall take root” explains that, in order to receive the Torah, Israel first came to Egypt, the level of bitterness, “with mortar and with bricks,” and afterward received it; so too the present exile prepares them to receive the inner dimension of the Torah in the future.

TermsHei motzaos hapehDilugIbbur and leidahAtzmus u’mahus+4

Also Haalaah vehamshachah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    קול הוא בחי׳ המשכה · ראה אוה״ת בהעלותך ע׳ שסז.
  2. 2
    קול גדול ולא יסף · Deuteronomy 5:19
  3. 3
    קלא פנימאה דלא אשתמע · Zohar, Vayigash 10:99–11:108
  4. 4
    קלא דאשתמע · זח״א (נ, ב). [כ].
  5. 5
    קלא דאשתמע · Zohar, Bereshit 83:235–86:248
  6. 6
    ובזח״א בראשית (דף נ׳ ע״ב דר״י ע״א) · ראה אוה״ת בראשית כרך ב רסד, א שם נעתק הלשון, ובכרך ד תתכה, א. תתצה, ב.
  7. 7
    סד״ה הבאים ישרש · תו״א נד, א.
  8. 8
    הבאים ישרש · Isaiah 27:6
  9. 9
    ובד״ה וכל העם רואים · תו״א עג, ג ואילך.
  10. 10
    וכל העם רואים · Exodus 20:15
  11. 11
    ובד״ה הקל קול יעקב · בסידור עם דא״ח יח, ב ואילך. עם הגהות באוה״ת בראשית כרך ד תתכב, א ואילך.
  12. 12
    הקל קול יעקב · Genesis 27:22
  13. 13
    ובד״ה ויהי קול מעל לרקיע · מאמרי אדה״ז נ״ך — יחזקאל ע׳ רלב. עם הגהות באוה״ת שבועות כרך ו ע׳ א׳תשכד. וראה בהמצויין לשם.
  14. 14
    ויהי קול מעל לרקיע · Ezekiel 1:25
  15. 15
    ובד״ה משה ידבר · בתו״א פ׳ יתרו.
  16. 16
    משה ידבר · Exodus 19:19
  17. 17
    והגדת לבנך כו׳ בעבור זה · Exodus 13:8

Leaping over the mountains ¶18

18מדלג על ההרים כו׳. שבחי׳ הארה גדולה לגילוי זה בא עליהם דרך דילוג ולא כסדר השתלשלות שהוא דרך עילה ועלול שיש ערך ושייכות זה לזה

“Leaping over the mountains,” etc.: the level of the great illumination for this revelation came upon them by way of a leap, and not in the order of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), which is by way of cause and effect, where there is a proportion and relation of one to the other;

Explanation

“Leaping” means that the revelation skipped the ordinary order of the worlds. That order, hishtalshelus, is cause and effect, where each level stands in proportion and relation to the next.

כמו עד״מ מבשרי אחזה שהדבור נמשך מהמחשבה ומחשבה ממדות ומדות משכל כל זה נק׳ בחי׳ השתלשלות כו׳.

as, by way of analogy, “From my flesh I behold”: speech is drawn from thought, and thought from the middos, and the middos from the intellect; all this is called the level of hishtalshelus, etc.

Explanation

Job’s “From my flesh I behold [G‑d]” makes the human soul a model: speech comes from thought, thought from emotion, emotion from intellect. Each stage grows from the one before it; this is called hishtalshelus.

אבל בחינת גילוי זה שהיה בשעת יציאת מצרים שנגלה עליהם מלך כו׳. מבחינת הוא ושמו לבד שלמעלה מהשתלשלות והארה כזו אינה יכולה לבא בדרך השתלשלות רק דרך דילוג

But this level of revelation, which took place at the time of the Exodus from Egypt, when the King, etc., was revealed to them, [was] from the level of “He and His Name alone,” which is above hishtalshelus; and such an illumination cannot come by way of hishtalshelus, but only by way of a leap;

Explanation

The revelation at the Exodus came from “He and His Name alone,” which is above the whole chain. Such an illumination cannot come down step by step; it can only “leap.”

כמו עד״מ א׳ שמדלג מהר להר אחר שרחוק ממנו שאינו יכול לילך לשם רק דרך דילוג יכול לדלג עליו כו׳

as, by way of analogy, one who leaps from one mountain to another mountain far from it: he cannot walk there, and only by way of a leap can he leap over to it, etc.

Explanation

It is like someone who must reach a distant mountain: he cannot walk there, but he can leap over to it.

כמ״כ [כמו כן] כאן נגלה עליהם בחי׳ והארה גדולה כזו מלמעלה למטה לפי שלא ערכם דרך דילוג והיינו ובמורא גדול זה גילוי שכינה

So too here: such a level and so great an illumination was revealed to them from above to below, not in proportion to them, by way of a leap. And this is “and with great awe”: this is the revelation of the Shechinah;

Explanation

So the great illumination came from above to below, out of all proportion to Israel’s level. The Haggadah reads “and with great awe” as the revelation of the Shechinah.

היינו שנגלה עליהם בחי׳ מלך בחי׳ הוא ושמו לבד ונגלה עליהם בגילוי כ״כ [כל כך] עד שנפל עליהם מורא גדול ופחד מפני ה׳ כמ״ש או הנסה אלקים לבא לקחת לו גוי מקרב גוי כו׳.

that is, the level of King, the level of “He and His Name alone,” was revealed to them, and was revealed to them so openly that great awe and fear of G‑d fell upon them, as it is written, “Or has G‑d ventured to come and take for Himself a nation from the midst of a nation,” etc.

Explanation

The King, “He and His Name alone,” was revealed so openly that great awe of G‑d fell upon them. Moshe’s words, “Or has G‑d ventured to come and take for Himself a nation from the midst of a nation,” describe this revelation, which ends “and with great terrors.”

מדלג על ההרים בזכות הרים היינו אבות וכמ״ש בגמרא (פרק קמא דראש השנה דף י״א א׳) ובמדרש (שמות רבה פרשה ט״ו)

“Leaping over the mountains”: in the merit of the mountains, that is, the Patriarchs, as is written in the Gemara (first chapter of Rosh Hashanah, folio 11a) and in the Midrash (Shemos Rabbah, section 15);

Explanation

The Talmud and the Midrash say that G‑d “leapt over the mountains” in the merit of the Patriarchs, who are called mountains. In Likkutei Torah, Ki Seitzei, the Alter Rebbe explains the name: as a mountain rises from the flat earth toward the heavens, so the Patriarchs lift the Community of Israel to the heights.

והיינו שעל ידי פסח מצה ומרור שאכלו שהם בחי׳ ג׳ קוין היו מעוררים למעלה בחי׳ אורות עליונים שהמה אברהם יצחק ויעקב מדות דאצילות ועל ידם היה בחי׳ דילוג בחי׳ ונגלה מדלג כו׳

that is, through the Pesach offering, the matzah and the maror that they ate, which are the level of the three lines, they aroused Above the level of the supernal lights, which are Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov, the middos of Atzilus; and through them came the level of the leap, the level of “and He was revealed, leaping,” etc.

Explanation

The Pesach offering, the matzah and the maror correspond to the three lines, right, left and middle. By eating them Israel aroused the supernal Patriarchs, Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov, the attributes of Atzilus, and through them came the “leap.”

והנה בשיר השירים נאמר בלשון דילוג ובתורה נקרא בלשון פסח כמ״ש ופסח ה׳ על הפתח והוא ג״כ דילוג וקפיצה

Now, in Shir HaShirim it is said in terms of leaping, and in the Torah it is called by the term pesach (“passing over”), as it is written, “And Havayah will pass over the doorway”; and this too is leaping and skipping.

Explanation

The Song speaks of “leaping,” while the Torah uses pesach, “passing over”: “And Havayah will pass over the doorway.” Both mean a leap and a skip.

והענין הוא שבתורה נאמר לאיזה מקום היה הדילוג דהיינו על הפתח היינו בחי׳ מל׳ זה השער לה׳ כו׳.

And the matter is that the Torah says to which place the leap was: “over the doorway,” that is, the level of Malchus: “This is the gate to Havayah,” etc.;

Explanation

The Torah adds where the leap went: “over the doorway.” The doorway is Malchus, “the gate to Havayah.”

ראשית חכמה יראת ה׳ כו׳ והיינו בחינת מלכות הנקרא מלכות כל עולמים שיורדת להחיות כל עולמים

“The beginning of wisdom is the fear of Havayah,” etc. This is the level of Malchus, which is called “the kingship of all worlds,” which descends to give life to all worlds.

Explanation

“The beginning of wisdom is the fear of Havayah”: awe is the entrance to all service. Malchus, the gate of awe, is “the kingship of all worlds,” which descends to give life to the worlds.

ונגלה בחי׳ מלך כו׳ הארה גדולה הנ״ל בבחי׳ מל׳ היינו בגילוי שנקרא פתח כו׳ שיכול להיות ובמורא גדול שיהיה פחד ויראה מפני ה׳ שזה נק׳ זה השער כו׳

And the level of King, etc., was revealed, the great illumination mentioned above, in the level of Malchus, that is, in revelation, which is called “doorway,” etc., so that there could be “and with great awe,” that there be fear and awe of G‑d; for this is what is called “This is the gate,” etc.:

Explanation

The King, the great illumination, was revealed within Malchus, the “doorway,” so that it could be felt as “great awe,” the fear of G‑d. That is why Malchus is called “the gate.”

זהו התחלת עבודת ה׳ בחינת יראה כו׳ רק שאז נגלה עליהם בבחי׳ זו הארה מבחינת מלך הוא ושמו כו׳.

this is the beginning of the service of G‑d, the level of awe, etc. Only, at that time there was revealed to them in this level an illumination from the level of King, “He and His Name,” etc.

Explanation

Awe is the beginning of serving G‑d. At the Exodus, however, this awe came from a revelation of the King, “He and His Name,” from far above.

וזהו ובמורא גדול כו׳. וזהו ופסח ה׳ על הפתח כו׳ שנגלה עליהם בבחי׳ פתח (ועיין בפ׳ אמור דף צ״ה ע״א בפי׳ פתחי לי)

And this is “and with great awe,” etc. And this is “And Havayah will pass over the doorway,” etc.: that He was revealed to them in the level of “doorway” (and see in Parshas Emor, folio 95a, on the explanation of “Open to me”).

Explanation

This is “with great awe,” and this is “And Havayah will pass over the doorway”: G‑d was revealed in Malchus, the doorway. The text refers to the Zohar in Parshas Emor on “Open to me,” which, as the Kehot note quotes it, reads: “You are the opening for Me to enter.”

ובשה״ש [ובשיר השירים] לא נאמר לאיזה מקום היה הדילוג רק נתפרש באיזה אופן היה הדילוג היינו על ההרים כו׳. ויש בזה ב׳ פירושים.

And Shir HaShirim does not say to which place the leap was; rather, it specifies in what manner the leap was, namely “over the mountains,” etc. And there are two explanations of this:

Explanation

The Song does not say where the leap went; it says how: “over the mountains.” This has two meanings.

א׳ על ההרים בזכותן כנ״ל והב׳ על ההרים למעלה מן ההרים שהם מדות דאצי׳ שהארה הנ״ל היה למעלה מהם דהיינו בחינת מלך כו׳:

the first, “over the mountains”: in their merit, as mentioned above; and the second, “over the mountains”: above the mountains, which are the middos of Atzilus, for the illumination mentioned above was above them, namely the level of King, etc.

Explanation

Either “in the merit of” the mountains, the Patriarchs, or “above” the mountains: the revelation was higher than the attributes of Atzilus themselves, the level of the King.

Paragraph 18 in brief

The paragraph explains “leaping”: the revelation came not through the step-by-step chain of worlds but by a leap from above to below, in the merit of the Patriarchs or from above them, and it entered Malchus, “the doorway,” as great awe.

Deeper

According to the Kehot note, the Tzemach Tzedek’s Yahel Or cites this passage: “And Havayah will pass over the doorway” is the revelation of the Infinite Light by a leap above the order of hishtalshelus, drawn into the “doorway,” which is Malchus; and the Zohar, Vayera 103b, explains in the same way that in the future all the supernal lights will be drawn and revealed in this “doorway.”

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    In the maamar Kimei Tzeis’cha of 11 Nissan 5742 (Sefer HaMaamarim Melukat vol. 2), the Rebbe asks why Micah likens the wonders of the future redemption to those of the Exodus, „כימי צאתך מארץ מצרים אראנו נפלאות” (“As in the days of your going out of the land of Egypt I will show him wonders”), when the future redemption will be so much greater.

    The Rebbe answers that the Exodus too revealed the very highest level, „בכבודו ובעצמו” (“in His glory and Himself”), as the Rebbe Rashab explains in Hemshech 5672; only „שביצי״מ הי׳ הגילוי דבחינה זו ע״י ההתלבשות בבחינת מלכות” (“at the Exodus this level was revealed clothed in Malchus”), „ופסח ה׳ על הפתח” (“and Havayah will pass over the doorway”), the doorway being Malchus, as our paragraph explains, while in the future it will be revealed with no garment at all. For the doorway as Malchus his note cites this column of Likkutei Torah, with the Zohar and the Rebbe Rayatz’s maamar Kimei Tzeis’cha 5708, where the Rebbe Rayatz draws this very contrast between an Exodus clothed in Malchus and a future without a garment. So the future wonders are “as in the days of your going out of Egypt”, and yet wonders even beside them.

    The Alter Rebbeוזהו ופסח ה׳ על הפתח כו׳ שנגלה עליהם בבחי׳ פתח

    The Rebbeאלא שביצי״מ הי׳ הגילוי דבחינה זו ע״י ההתלבשות בבחינת מלכות, ופסח ה׳ על הפתח, דפתח הוא בחינת המלכות, ולע״ל יהי׳ זה בגילוי בלי שום לבוש

    Sefer HaMaamarim Melukat, vol. ב, p. לז–לח · י״א ניסן, ה׳תשמ״ב

  2. Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    In the maamar Vehenif Yado al HaNahar of Acharon shel Pesach 5748, built on the Alter Rebbe’s discourse on that haftarah verse in Likkutei Torah, Tzav, the Rebbe sets the exile of Egypt, bound up with the supernal speech, Malchus, against the present exile, bound up also with the supernal thought, Binah.

    The Rebbe explains that because the exile of Egypt was bound up with Malchus, its redemption too came through „ופסח הוי׳ על הפתח” (“and Havayah passed over the doorway”), the doorway being Malchus, while the future redemption will be a redemption of Binah too, „גאולה שני׳” (“a second redemption”). Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) this gives our paragraph’s “doorway” a further sense: the place of the leap matches the place of the exile.

    The Alter Rebbeעל הפתח היינו בחי׳ מל׳ זה השער לה׳ כו׳

    The Rebbeדמכיון שגלות מצרים קשור עם בחי׳ המל׳, לכן גם אופן הגאולה הוא ע״י ופסח הוי׳ על הפתח

    Sefer HaMaamarim (unedited, old edition), vol. תשמ״ח, p. קכה–קכז · אחרון של פסח, ה׳תשמ״ח

  3. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe lists the two readings of “over the mountains” side by side. The Rebbe joins them. The Patriarchs’ merit, read as the inherited faith that gave Israel strength for mesirus nefesh even in Egypt, produces the service from below. The leap it calls forth comes from above the mountains and hills, the level that merit reaches. It comes from “He and His Name alone.”

    The Alter Rebbeא׳ על ההרים בזכותן כנ״ל והב׳ על ההרים למעלה מן ההרים

    The Rebbeדהרים וגבעות הוא הבחינה ששם מגיע זכות אבות וכו׳

    The whole maamar, summarized

  4. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe simply lists the two readings: in the Patriarchs’ merit, or above them. The Rebbe points out that they seem to contradict each other. He reconciles them: the service of the Patriarchs and Matriarchs (faith) was only a hint and likeness ("מעין ודוגמא ורמז") of what was to come. Through that hint a revelation was drawn down that is beyond any comparison with them, even with their root above Atzilus. So it is both “in their merit” and “above them.”

    The Alter Rebbeויש בזה ב׳ פירושים. א׳ על ההרים בזכותן כנ״ל והב׳ על ההרים למעלה מן ההרים

    The Rebbeישנם שני פירושים, שלכאורה הם פירושים הפכיים

    The whole maamar, summarized

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made

TermsDilugGimmel kavinIlah ve’alulAvos+12
  • Dilug דילוג explained hereHishtalshelus is cause and effect, where each level bears a proportion to the next, as speech comes from thought and thought from the middos. The great revelation of the Exodus, from “He and His Name alone,” could not come that way, only by a leap, like one who leaps from a mountain to a distant mountain he cannot walk to.בא עליהם דרך דילוג ולא כסדר השתלשלות שהוא דרך עילה ועלול שיש ערך ושייכות זה לזה
  • Gimmel kavin ג׳ קוין
  • Ilah ve’alul עילה ועלול
  • Avos אבות
  • Richuk makom ריחוק מקום
  • Shechinah שכינה
  • Avodas Hashem עבודת ה׳
  • Elokim אלקים
  • Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
  • Dibbur elyon דבור עליון
  • Malchus מלכות
  • Atzilus אצילות
  • Middos מדות

Also ChayusChochmahTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    מבשרי אחזה · Job 19:26
  2. 2
    ובמורא גדול · Deuteronomy 26:8
  3. 3
    או הנסה אלקים לבא · Deuteronomy 4:34
  4. 4
  5. 5
    בזכות הרים היינו אבות · ראה לעיל פ׳ תצא מ, א.
  6. 6
    שהמה אברהם יצחק ויעקב מדות דאצילות · ”ובלקו״ת בשה״ש בד״ה קול דודי מדלג על ההרים שהם האבות ויעקב כלול מכולם” — אוה״ת נ״ך כרך ב ע׳ תתג.
  7. 7
    ופסח ה׳ על הפתח · Exodus 12:23
  8. 8
    זה השער לה׳ · Psalms 118:20
  9. 9
    ראשית חכמה יראת ה׳ · Psalms 111:10
  10. 10
    מלכות כל עולמים · Psalms 145:13
  11. 11
    ופסח ה׳ . . בבחי׳ פתח · ביהל אור ע׳ תנד מציין שכאן ”בפי׳ ופסח ה׳ על הפתח שהוא גילוי אור א״ס בבחי׳ דילוג למעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות וגילוי זה נמשך על הפתח שהוא מל׳, ועד״ז נת׳ בזהר וירא ק״ג ע״ב שלע״ל יהיו כל האורות עליונים נמשכים ומתגלים בבחי׳ פתח הנ״ל”.
  12. 12
    בפ׳ אמור דף צ״ה ע״א · ”אנת הוא פתחא לאעלאה לי כו׳” — יהל אור ע׳ תנד.
  13. 13
    פתחי לי · Song of Songs 5:2
  14. 14
  15. 15

Skipping over the hills ¶19–21

19ד מקפץ על הגבעות. ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] גבעות הם אמהות.

4. “Skipping over the hills”: our Sages, of blessed memory, said that the hills are the Matriarchs.

Explanation

Chapter 4 takes up the second half of the verse, “skipping over the hills,” which the Talmud reads as “in the merit of the Matriarchs.”

ולהבין זאת הנה ההפרש בין דילוג לקפיצה הוא כי דילוג ברגל א׳ וקפיצה בב׳ רגלים וכמבואר במשנה פ״ח [פרק ח׳] דאהלות והדולג ממקום למקום והקופץ ממקום למקום

To understand this: the difference between leaping (dilug) and skipping (kefitzah) is that leaping is with one foot and skipping with two feet, as is explained in the Mishnah, chapter 8 of Ohalos: “one who leaps from place to place, and one who skips from place to place”

Explanation

To understand it, the maamar first defines the difference: leaping uses one foot and skipping both feet. The Mishnah in Ohalos mentions both, “one who leaps” and “one who skips,” as two different movements.

(ע״ש בפי׳ רבינו עובדיה מברטנורה ובפי׳ המשניות להרמב״ם [להרבי משה בן מימון] וגם בירושלמי פ״ה דביצה קיפוץ עוקר שתי רגליו כאחת כו׳).

(see there in the commentary of Rabbeinu Ovadiah of Bartenura and in the Rambam’s Commentary on the Mishnah; and also in the Jerusalem Talmud, chapter 5 of Beitzah: “Skipping: one lifts both his feet at once,” etc.).

Explanation

The commentators on that Mishnah, Rabbi Ovadiah of Bartenura and the Rambam, explain the difference. According to the Rambam (as the Kehot note quotes him), one who leaps keeps one foot on the ground and springs with the other, while one who skips lifts both feet from the ground together; the Jerusalem Talmud says the same of skipping.

ולהבין זה דהנה כל בחי׳ דילוג והארה גדולה שבאה טו, גמלמעלה אינה יכולה להתגלות כי אם בבחינת רגלים

To understand this: every level of leaping and great illumination that comes from Above can be revealed only in the level of “feet.”

Explanation

Applying this Above: any great illumination that comes from Above by a “leap” can be revealed only through “feet,” the lowest level, which reaches down to the ground.

כי זהו הכלל בכל בחינת גילוי אינו נגלה כ״א בבחי׳ רגלים כו׳ כמ״ש ועמדו רגליו ביום ההוא כו׳ והארץ הדום רגלי

For this is the rule in every level of revelation: it is revealed only in the level of “feet,” etc., as it is written, “And His feet shall stand on that day,” etc., and “the earth is My footstool”

Explanation

This is a general rule: revelation comes through “feet.” So Zechariah says of the future revelation, “And His feet shall stand on that day,” and Isaiah says, “the earth is My footstool”: G‑d’s “feet” are where He touches the lowest realm.

(ועמ״ש בד״ה כיצד מרקדין לפני הכלה כו׳ ובד״ה למנצח על השמינית וע׳ בלק״ת [בלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] ס״פ משפטים בד״ה מצות ראיה כו׳).

(and see what is written in the discourse beginning “How does one dance before the bride,” etc., and in the discourse beginning “For the conductor, on the Sheminis [the eighth]”; and see the Likkutei Torah of the Arizal, at the end of Parshas Mishpatim, in the discourse beginning “The mitzvah of appearing,” etc.).

Explanation

The text refers to further discussions, among them the Likkutei Torah of the Arizal at the end of Mishpatim, on the mitzvah of appearing at the Temple on the three pilgrimage festivals, which the Torah calls regalim, literally “feet.”

ויש ב׳ בחי׳ רגלים היינו ב׳ בחינות בבחינת גילוי והארה הנ״ל בחינת קו הימין וקו השמאל בחי׳ אהוי״ר [אהבה ויראה] כו׳.

And there are two levels of “feet,” that is, two levels in the revelation and illumination mentioned above: the level of the right line and the left line, the level of love and awe, etc.

Explanation

The two “feet” are the two lines of revelation, right and left: love and awe.

והנה ע״י ההרים אבות הנ״ל היה נגלה עליהם הארה הנ״ל רק בבחי׳ אהבה וימינו תחבקני.

Now, through the mountains, the Patriarchs mentioned above, the illumination mentioned above was revealed to them only in the level of love: “and his right hand embraces me.”

Explanation

Through the mountains, the Patriarchs, the revelation came only through love, the right side, as in “and his right hand embraces me.” That is a leap with one foot.

Paragraph 19 in brief

The paragraph explains the difference between leaping (one foot) and skipping (two feet), and that revelation from Above comes through “feet,” the two lines of love and awe. Through the Patriarchs the revelation came only in love, one foot.

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe explains one foot and two feet as love and awe. The Rebbe maps the leap and the skip onto levels within Keser itself: Atik enclothed in Arich, the first three sefiros of Atik, and the Unknowable Head (Radla). He applies the Matriarchs’ higher role to the righteous women whose merit brought the Exodus, and to women today: chinuch, family purity, kashrus, Shabbos candles, and building a Jewish home.

    The Alter Rebbeדילוג ברגל א׳ וקפיצה בב׳ רגלים

    The Rebbeוגילוי זה דקפיצה שלמעלה גם מדילוג נמשך ע״י האמהות

    The whole maamar, summarized

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.

TermsDilugGimmel kavinAvosRe’iyah and shmiah+2

Also Torah and mitzvos

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    גבעות הם אמהות · ר״ה (יא, א). [כ].
  2. 2
    גבעות הם אמהות · Rosh Hashanah 11a:8
  3. 3
    ההפרש בין דילוג וקפיצה · השפת אמת (להאדמו״ר מגור) בדרושים לפסח על הפסוק מקפץ על הגבעות מציין לכאן.
  4. 4
    במשנה פ״ח דאהלות · מ״ה.
  5. 5
  6. 6
    בפי׳ רבינו עובדיה מברטנורה · ”דולג בבהמה וחיה, וקופץ באדם, ויש אומרים דולג וקופץ תרווייהו באדם, אלא דולג שרגלו אחת מונחת בארץ ודולג בשניה, וקופץ בשתי רגליו” עכ״ל. וראה במלאכת שלמה שם ”פי׳ הראשון שהביא רעז״ל הוא פי׳ הר״ש ז״ל, והפירוש השני הוא להרמב״ם ז״ל וכותיה הסכים הרא״ש ז״ל.
  7. 7
    ובפי׳ המשניות להרמב״ם · ”ודולג הוא שיהיה רגלו אחד קיים בארץ וידלג בשני למקום אחר. וקופץ הוא שיסיר ב׳ רגליו יחד מהארץ ויקפוץ למקום אחר”.
  8. 8
    בירושלמי פ״ה דביצה · ה״ב.
  9. 9
  10. 10
    ועמדו רגליו ביום ההוא · Zechariah 14:4
  11. 11
    והארץ הדום רגלי · Isaiah 66:1
  12. 12
    וע׳ בלקו״ת ס״פ משפטים · להאריז״ל. נזכר גם לקמן נא, ג. אוה״ת פ׳ משפטים ע׳ א׳קעה. אוה״ת ויקרא כרך א ע׳ שכז. נתבאר באוה״ת בראשית כרך א רה, ב. שם כרך ה תתקטו, ב.
  13. 13
    וימינו תחבקני · Song of Songs 2:6

20וזהו מדלג ברגל א׳ על ההרים אבות ומקפץ על הגבעות בב׳ רגלים היינו שהיה גילוי זה בבחי׳ יראה ובמורא גדול כו׳.

And this is “leaping” with one foot “over the mountains,” the Patriarchs, and “skipping over the hills” with two feet: that is, this revelation was in the level of awe, “and with great awe,” etc.

Explanation

So the verse’s two verbs fit: through the Patriarchs, the mountains, the revelation “leapt” on one foot; through the Matriarchs, the hills, it “skipped” on both feet, so that it came also as awe, “with great awe.”

¶1 This answers the question from paragraph 1.

על הגבעות אלו אמהות והנה בחינת אהבה בנקל יכול לבא לידי גילוי מבחי׳ יראה

“Over the hills”: these are the Matriarchs. Now, the level of love can come into revelation more easily than the level of awe.

Explanation

The hills are the Matriarchs. Love comes into revelation more easily than awe.

כנראה בחוש שכל אדם יכול להתפעל בבחי׳ אהבה כרגע ובבחי׳ יראה אינו כ״כ [כל כך] מפני שבחי׳ יראה עילאה הוא למעלה במדרגה מבחי׳ אהבה כו׳

As is seen by experience: every person can be stirred to love in a moment, but to awe not so much, because the level of supernal awe (yirah ila’ah) is higher in rank than the level of love, etc.

Explanation

Experience shows it: anyone can be moved to love in an instant, but awe is harder to reach, because supernal awe stands higher than love.

(ועיין בפ׳ מקץ בביאור על פסוק כי אתה נרי שאהבה רבה היא בחינת ה׳ עילאה ויראה עילאה היא בחי׳ יוד כו׳

(And see in Parshas Miketz, in the explanation on the verse “For You are my lamp,” that great love (ahavah rabbah) is the level of the upper hei, and supernal awe is the level of the yud, etc.

Explanation

The text refers to the explanation on “For You are my lamp” in Torah Ohr, Miketz: great love corresponds to the upper hei of the Name (Binah), and supernal awe to the yud (Chochmah), which is higher.

וגם למעלה יותר כי הנה יש טורי נהורא וטורי חשוכא פי׳ טורי נהורא הם המדות שנמשכים מן השכל חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דז״א וטורי חשוכא הם המדות שלמעלה מהשכל אהבה רבה חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א

And even higher: for there are “mountains of light” (turei nehora) and “mountains of darkness” (turei chashocha). The explanation: the “mountains of light” are the middos that are drawn from the intellect, Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin; and the “mountains of darkness” are the middos that are above the intellect, great love, Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin [the Long Countenance].

Explanation

Higher still, the Zohar speaks of “mountains of light” and “mountains of darkness.” The mountains of light are emotions born of intellect, the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin; the mountains of darkness are emotions above intellect, the great love of the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, the “Long Countenance,” the outer dimension of Keser. In Likkutei Torah, Naso, they are called “darkness” because, as emotions within the will itself, they are above intellect and cannot be grasped.

וזהו ענין מדלג על ההרים שנמשך מבחי׳ טורי חשוכא חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א בחג״ת [בחסד גבורה תפארת] דז״א וזהו ענין ההרים רקדו כאילי׳ [כאילים] עליי׳ [עלייה] חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דז״א והתכללותן בגילוי אור חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א וכמ״ש במ״א בד״ה הים ראה כו׳ ההרים רקדו כו׳.

And this is the meaning of “leaping over the mountains”: that it is drawn from the level of the “mountains of darkness,” Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, into Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin. And this is the meaning of “The mountains danced like rams”: the ascents of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin and their inclusion in the revelation of the light of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin; as is written elsewhere, in the discourse beginning “The sea saw,” etc., “The mountains danced,” etc.

Explanation

“Leaping over the mountains” is then a drawing from the mountains of darkness, Arich Anpin, into the emotions of Z’eir Anpin. Psalm 114’s “The mountains danced like rams” is read the same way: the emotions of Z’eir Anpin rise and are included in the light of Arich Anpin. In Likkutei Torah, Tzav, the discourse on “The sea saw” explains that the mountains’ “dancing” is a sudden ascent, not step by step, in which they are included in the encompassing light like a candle before a torch.

אכן יראה עילאה שרשה במו״ס [במוחא סתימאה] שהיא מגבורה דעתיק כמ״ש ע״פ כי אתה נרי הנ״ל וכמ״ש הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] פ׳ וישב דקע״ט ב׳. והוא למעלה מבחי׳ חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א ומשם נמשך בחי׳ גילוי זה במורא גדול כו׳

However, supernal awe has its root in Mocha Stima’ah (the hidden brain), which is from the Gevurah of Atik [the Ancient One], as is written on “For You are my lamp,” mentioned above, and as the Ramaz wrote on Parshas Vayeishev, folio 179b. And it is higher than the level of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin; and from there is drawn the level of this revelation, “with great awe,” etc.,

Explanation

Supernal awe is rooted higher still, in Mocha Stima’ah, the hidden brain, which derives from the Gevurah of Atik, the “Ancient One,” the inner dimension of Keser, as Torah Ohr and the Ramaz (Rabbi Moshe Zacuto, in his glosses on the Zohar) explain. It is above even the emotions of Arich Anpin, and from there came the revelation “with great awe.”

שהוא התגלות יראה עילאה זו בבחי׳ יראה תתאה הנמשך מבחי׳ מלכות כל עולמים וע״ז נאמר ופסח ה׳ על הפתח כו׳ וזהו ענין מקפץ על הגבעות בחי׳ קו הימין וקו השמאל כו׳

which is the revelation of this supernal awe in the level of lower awe (yirah tata’ah), which is drawn from the level of “the kingship of all worlds.” And of this it is said, “And Havayah will pass over the doorway,” etc. And this is the meaning of “skipping over the hills”: the level of the right line and the left line, etc.

Explanation

That supernal awe was revealed within the lower awe, which comes from “the kingship of all worlds,” Malchus: this is “And Havayah will pass over the doorway.” So “skipping over the hills” is with both feet, the right line of love and the left line of awe.

וכתיב בחכמה יסד ארץ כונן שמים בתבונה כו׳ ושמים וארץ זהו בחינת האבות ואמהות כו׳ ולכן יראה עילאה נמשך בזכות האמהות דייקא ועמ״ש ע״פ שימני כחותם בענין אשה כי תזריע וילדה זכר)

And it is written, “With wisdom He founded the earth; He established the heavens with understanding,” etc. And heaven and earth are the level of the Patriarchs and the Matriarchs, etc. Therefore supernal awe is drawn specifically in the merit of the Matriarchs. And see what is written on “Set me as a seal,” on the matter of “When a woman conceives and bears a male.”)

Explanation

In “With wisdom He founded the earth; He established the heavens with understanding,” heaven and earth are the Patriarchs and the Matriarchs: the earth, the Matriarchs, is founded with Chochmah, the yud that is the root of supernal awe, and the heavens with Binah. That is why supernal awe came in the merit of the Matriarchs. In Likkutei Torah, the explanation on “Set me as a seal” shows that awe and self-nullification from below draw a higher revelation from above than love does, as the Sages say that “a woman who gives seed first bears a male.”

ולהבין מפני מה ע״י האבות לא היה הגילוי רק בבחינת אהבה בחינת רגל אחת וע״י האמהות היה הגילוי גם בבחינת יראה בב׳ רגלים כו׳

Now, to understand why through the Patriarchs the revelation was only in the level of love, the level of one foot, while through the Matriarchs the revelation was also in the level of awe, with two feet, etc.:

Explanation

The question is why the Patriarchs brought a revelation only of love, one foot, while the Matriarchs brought a revelation of awe as well, two feet.

ולכאורה האבות הן במדרגה גדולה מן האמהות כי המה בחי׳ משפיעים בחינת דכר והאמהות הם בחינת מקבלים בחינת נקבה.

at first glance, the Patriarchs are of a greater rank than the Matriarchs, for they are the level of givers, the male level, while the Matriarchs are the level of recipients, the female level.

Explanation

Surely the Patriarchs rank higher: they are the givers, the male, and the Matriarchs are the recipients, the female.

אך האמת הוא ודאי כן שהמה בחי׳ מקבלים אבל הם גבוהים מן האבות במדרגה אחת והמה המשפיעים.

But the truth is this: it is certainly so that they are the level of recipients; but in one level they are higher than the Patriarchs, and they are the givers.

Explanation

The answer: the Matriarchs are indeed recipients, but in one respect they are higher than the Patriarchs and are themselves the givers.

דהנה בשרה נאמר כל אשר תאמר אליך שרה שמע בקולה שהיה אברהם צריך לקבל ממנה וכמארז״ל [וכמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שהיה אברהם טפל לגבי שרה בנביאות וברבקה נאמר טובת מראה מאד בלי גבול ותרד העינה ותמלא כדה ותעל

For of Sarah it is said, “Whatever Sarah tells you, listen to her voice,” for Avraham had to receive from her; and as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, Avraham was secondary to Sarah in prophecy. And of Rivkah it is said, “very (me’od) fair to look upon,” without limit; “and she went down to the spring, and filled her pitcher (kadah), and came up.”

Explanation

G‑d told Avraham, “Whatever Sarah tells you, listen to her voice”: he had to receive from her, and the Sages say that he was secondary to her in prophecy. Of Rivkah the Torah says she was “very fair to look upon,” “very” (me’od) meaning without limit, and that she went down to the spring, filled her pitcher and came up.

ותאמר שתה וגם לגמליך כו׳ שהיתה גם כן בחינת משפיע ותרד העינה שבחינת חכמה כ״ד ספרים הם בחינת ירידה נגדה (ועמ״ש בזה בפ׳ תולדות)

“And she said, ‘Drink, and your camels too,’” etc.: for she too was the level of a giver. And “she went down to the spring”: for the level of Chochmah, the twenty-four books, is the level of a descent in relation to her (and see what is written about this in Parshas Toldos).

Explanation

Offering water to Eliezer and to his camels, Rivkah was a giver. In Torah Ohr, Toldos, to which the text refers, “the spring” is Chochmah, and “her pitcher,” kadah, is read as kaf-dalet, the twenty-four books of Scripture, which come from Chochmah: going down to them was a descent for Rivkah, who stands for the emotions within Keser, above Chochmah.

ולהבין זאת דהנה ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שלשה הטעימן הקב״ה בעולם הזה מעין עולם הבא אברהם יצחק ויעקב שנאמר בהם בכל מכל כל כו׳.

To understand this: our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Three the Holy One, blessed be He, gave a taste in this world of the World to Come: Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov, for of them it is said ‘with everything,’ ‘from everything,’ ‘everything,’” etc.

Explanation

To explain this the maamar brings the Talmud’s teaching that G‑d gave the three Patriarchs a taste of the World to Come in this world, for the Torah says of them “with everything,” “from everything,” “everything.”

והנה לעתיד כתיב נקבה תסובב גבר היינו שיתעלה בחינת המקבל ויהיה למעלה מבחי׳ דכר המשפיע אשת חיל עטרת בעלה כו׳

Now, of the future it is written, “A female shall encompass a male”: that is, the level of the recipient will be elevated and will be above the level of the male, the giver: “A woman of valor is the crown of her husband,” etc.,

Explanation

Of the future it is written, “A female shall encompass a male”: the recipient will rise above the giver, as “a woman of valor is the crown of her husband.”

מחמת שסוף מעשה במחשבה תחלה כו׳ (שם ב״ן [שם ב״ן] שרשו למעלה משם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] כו׳)

because “last in deed, first in thought,” etc. (the Name Ban [52] has its root above the Name Mah [45], etc.).

Explanation

This is because “last in deed, first in thought”: what comes last in the order of creation was first in the original intent. In Kabbalistic terms, the Name Ban (the Name Havayah spelled out to the value 52, associated with the recipient) has its root above the Name Mah (spelled out to 45, associated with the giver).

ומפני שהאבות הטעימן מעין עולם הבא ולכן היה אצלם גם כן בחי׳ זו שהיו מקבלים מהאמהות כו׳ אף שודאי האמהות היו בחינת נוק׳ [נוקבא] בחינת מקבלים רק שיש ב׳ בחי׳.

And because the Patriarchs were given a taste of the World to Come, therefore they too had this level, that they received from the Matriarchs, etc.; even though the Matriarchs were certainly the level of Nukva, the level of recipients. Only, there are two levels:

Explanation

Because the Patriarchs tasted the World to Come, they already had something of that future state, in which they received from the Matriarchs, even though in the order of things the Matriarchs were Nukva, the recipients.

מלמעלה למטה היו האבות משפיעים והאמהות מקבלים. אבל מלמטה למעלה בבחינת או״ח [אור חוזר] היו האמהות למעלה במדרגה סוף מעשה כו׳

from above to below, the Patriarchs were givers and the Matriarchs recipients; but from below to above, in the level of returning light, the Matriarchs were higher in rank: “last in deed,” etc.

Explanation

There are two directions. From above to below the Patriarchs give and the Matriarchs receive; from below to above, in “returning light” (or chozer), the light that rises from below, the Matriarchs rank higher, as in “last in deed.”

(ועמ״ש לקמן בביאור על פסוק כי על כל כבוד ועל פסוק הראיני את מראיך ובביאור על פסוק עלי באר)

(and see what is written below, in the explanation on the verse “For over all the glory,” and on the verse “Let me see your appearance,” and in the explanation on the verse “Spring up, O well”);

Explanation

The text refers to its later explanations in Likkutei Torah on “For over all the glory,” on “Let me see your appearance,” and on “Spring up, O well.”

כי כן כל מדות דקדושה נעוץ סופן בתחלתן ותחלה בסוף שיש בסוף מבחינת תחלה סוף מעשה כו׳

for so it is with all the attributes of holiness: “their end is embedded in their beginning,” and the beginning in the end, for in the end there is [something] of the level of the beginning: “last in deed,” etc.,

Explanation

This follows a general rule stated in Sefer Yetzirah: in all the holy attributes, “their end is embedded in their beginning,” so the last level carries something of the first.

ובבחינת ההשתלשלות הוא סוף במדרגה כו׳ (וכמ״ש ע״פ השמים כסאי והארץ הדום רגלי כו׳) וזהו למעלה בחינות אבות ואמהות

while in the order of hishtalshelus it is last in rank, etc. (as is written on “The heavens are My throne and the earth is My footstool,” etc.). And this is Above, the levels of Patriarchs and Matriarchs.

Explanation

In the descending order the last is lowest, yet its root is highest; the text refers to its discussion on “The heavens are My throne and the earth is My footstool.” This is the pair of Patriarchs and Matriarchs Above.

וגם למטה יש שני הבחי׳ והיינו תורה ומצות שבבחי׳ א׳ תורה גדולה כמארז״ל [כמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] גדול תלמוד שמביא לידי מעשה דהיינו ע״י חכמת התורה יודעים האיך לעשות המצות כידוע

And below too there are the two levels, namely Torah and mitzvos. In one respect Torah is greater, as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Study is great, for it leads to action”: that is, through the wisdom of the Torah one knows how to perform the mitzvos, as is known;

Explanation

Below there is the same pair: Torah and mitzvos. In one sense Torah is greater: the Talmud says “study is great, for it leads to action,” since only through the Torah does one know how to do the mitzvos.

ואם אין עושים כן רק באופן אחר אין זו מצוה ובבחי׳ ב׳ מצוה גדולה גדול תלמוד שמביא לידי מעשה

and if one does not do so, but in another way, it is not a mitzvah. And in the second respect the mitzvah is greater: “Study is great, for it leads to action”;

Explanation

A mitzvah done in any other way than the Torah prescribes is no mitzvah. But in the other sense the mitzvah is greater: study is great because it leads to action, so action is the goal.

נמצא המעשה היא גדולה ולא המדרש עיקר אלא המעשה כו׳ והיינו מפני ששרש טו, דהמצות הוא בבחי׳ כתר תר״ך עמודי אור כידוע תרי״ג מצות דאורייתא וז׳ דרבנן הם תר״ך ששרשם בבחינת כתר וכמ״ש והחכמה תחיה בעליה

it follows that the action is greater, and “it is not study that is the main thing, but action,” etc. And that is because the root of the mitzvos is in the level of Keser, “620 pillars of light,” as is known: the 613 mitzvos of the Torah and the 7 of the Rabbis are 620, whose root is in the level of Keser. And as it is written, “and wisdom gives life to its owners (be’aleha),”

Explanation

So action is greater, as the Mishnah says, “it is not study that is the main thing, but action.” The reason is that the mitzvos are rooted in Keser, the “620 pillars of light” (613 biblical and 7 rabbinic commandments, and the letters of Keser, כתר, add up to 620), which is above Chochmah; and this is “wisdom gives life to its owners.”

דהיינו בבחי׳ מלמעלה למטה החכמה מחיה המצות דהיינו שע״י חכמת התורה יודעים היאך לעשות המצוה

that is, in the level of from above to below, wisdom gives life to the mitzvos, namely that through the wisdom of the Torah one knows how to perform the mitzvah;

Explanation

Read from above to below, wisdom gives life to the mitzvos: through the Torah’s wisdom one knows how to perform them.

אבל אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] המצות הם בעליה של החכמה ששרשם של המצות הם גבוהים במדרגה מבחי׳ החכמה כו׳ (ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה ראיתי והנה מנורת זהב)

but nevertheless the mitzvos are the owners of the wisdom, for the root of the mitzvos is higher in rank than the level of Chochmah, etc. (and see what is written about this in the discourse beginning “I have seen, and behold, a candelabrum of gold”).

Explanation

Yet the mitzvos are the “owners” of wisdom, because their root is higher than Chochmah. In Likkutei Torah, Beha’aloscha, the discourse on “I have seen, and behold, a candelabrum of gold” says so: in their source the mitzvos are G‑d’s will, above Chochmah, while the Torah is Chochmah, their explanation; yet to draw this down into a person, “wisdom gives life to its owners.”

וזהו מדלג על ההרים בזכות התורה שהתורה נקר׳ [נקרא / נקראת / נקראות] ג״כ הר ישאו הרים שלום והתורה נקרא שלום ה׳ עוז לעמו יתן ה׳ יברך את עמו בשלום

And this is “leaping over the mountains”: in the merit of the Torah, for the Torah too is called a mountain: “The mountains shall bear peace.” And the Torah is called peace: “Havayah will give strength to His people; Havayah will bless His people with peace.”

Explanation

Now the verse is applied below: “leaping over the mountains” is in the merit of the Torah, for the Torah is called a mountain, as in “The mountains shall bear peace,” and the Torah is called peace, as in “Havayah will give strength (oz) to His people; Havayah will bless His people with peace,” for the Sages read oz, “strength,” as the Torah.

או יחזק במעוזי יעשה שלום לי שלום יעשה לי כו׳ והמצות נקראו ג״כ שלום והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום כו׳.

“Or let him take hold of My strength, that he may make peace with Me; peace he shall make with Me,” etc. And the mitzvos too are called peace: “And the work of righteousness shall be peace,” etc.

Explanation

Isaiah’s “take hold of My strength … make peace with Me” likewise joins “strength,” the Torah, to peace. The mitzvos too are called peace: “the work of righteousness shall be peace.”

כי יש שני בחינת שלום מלמעלה למטה ומלמטה למעלה ועל ידי התורה נגלה בחי׳ הארה הנ״ל בבחינת אהבה שהוא בחי׳ רגל א׳.

For there are two levels of peace, from above to below and from below to above. And through the Torah the level of the illumination mentioned above was revealed in the level of love, which is the level of one foot.

Explanation

There are two kinds of peace, from above to below and from below to above. Through the Torah the revelation came only as love, one foot.

מקפץ על הגבעות היינו בזכות המצות כי המצות נק׳ גבעות כמ״ש וגבעות בצדקה כו׳.

“Skipping over the hills” is in the merit of the mitzvos, for the mitzvos are called hills, as it is written, “and the hills, through righteousness,” etc.

Explanation

“Skipping over the hills” is in the merit of the mitzvos, which the verse calls “hills” in “and the hills, through righteousness.” The mitzvos, rooted higher than the Torah’s wisdom, brought the revelation on both feet.

Paragraph 20 in brief

The paragraph explains why the Patriarchs brought the revelation with one foot (love) and the Matriarchs with two (love and awe): supernal awe is rooted higher than love, and the Matriarchs, though recipients, are higher “from below to above,” for the end is rooted in the beginning. Below, the same pair is Torah and mitzvos: the mountains are the Torah, and the hills are the mitzvos, whose root in Keser is above Chochmah.

Deeper

In Torah Ohr, Miketz, the verse “For You are my lamp, Havayah; and Havayah will light up my darkness” is read as two levels of Havayah: that of Z’eir Anpin, which comes through the chain of descent and corresponds to the early generations, and that of Arich Anpin, which is drawn down not by way of hishtalshelus, in the darkness of the generation before Mashiach. In Likkutei Torah, Achrei, “study is great, for it leads to action” is read as showing that action is the main thing, and study is great only in that it leads to action.

TermsSof maaseh bemachshavah techilahEshes chayil ateres baalahOr chozerTevunah+29

Also ChayusTorah and mitzvosChochmahTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    טורי נהורא וטורי חשוכא · Zohar III, 249b
  2. 2
    ההרים רקדו כאילים · Psalms 114:4
  3. 3
    בד״ה הים ראה · לעיל פ׳ צו טז, ד.
  4. 4
    הים ראה · Psalms 114:3
  5. 5
    בביאור ע״פ כי אתה נרי · תו״א מ, ד ובמ״מ לשם.
  6. 6
    ע״פ כי אתה נרי · תו״א מא, ג.
  7. 7
    בחכמה יסד ארץ · Proverbs 10:19
  8. 8
    בחכמה יסד ארץ כונן שמים בתבונה · Proverbs 3:19
  9. 9
    ע״פ שימני כחותם · לקמן מו, ב.
  10. 10
    שימני כחותם · Song of Songs 8:6
  11. 11
    אשה כי תזריע וילדה זכר · Leviticus 12:2
  12. 12
    כל אשר תאמר אליך שרה · Genesis 21:12
  13. 13
    שהי׳ אברהם טפל לגבי שרה בנביאות · שמ״ר רפ״א. הובא ברש״י בראשית שם. [תנחומא ר״פ שמות]. רש״י בחומש עזה״פ וגם במדרש אגדה שם יעו״ש. [כ]. ראה אוה״ת בראשית קכא, א.
  14. 14
    שהיה אברהם טפל לגבי שרה בנביאות · Shemot Rabbah 1:1
  15. 15
    שהיה אברהם טפל לגבי שרה בנביאות · Rashi on Genesis 21:12
  16. 16
    טובת מראה מאד . . ותרד העינה ותמלא כדה ותעל · Genesis 24:16
  17. 17
    כ״ד ספרים · ראה ת״ז תכ״א (מו, ב).
  18. 18
    שלשה הטעימן הקב״ה בעוה״ז · ב״ב טז, סע״ב.
  19. 19
    שלשה הטעימן הקב״ה בעולם הזה מעין עולם הבא · Bava Batra 16b:17–18
  20. 20
    נקבה תסובב גבר · Jeremiah 31:22
  21. 21
    אשת חיל עטרת בעלה · Proverbs 12:4
  22. 22
    שם ב״ן שרשו · ע״ל ד״ה ואתחנן ספ״ג. [ראה בחקותי מז, ג]. [כ].
  23. 23
    שהאבות הטעימן מעין עולם הבא · ראה ספר החקירה סו, א.
  24. 24
    כי על כל כבוד · Isaiah 4:5
  25. 25
    הראיני את מראיך · Song of Songs 2:14
  26. 26
    עלי באר · Numbers 21:17
  27. 27
    נעוץ סופן בתחלתן · ס״י פ״א, מ״ז.
  28. 28
    נעוץ סופן בתחלתן · Sefer Yetzirah 1:7
  29. 29
    השמים כסאי והארץ הדום רגלי · Isaiah 66:1
  30. 30
    גדול תלמוד שמביא לידי מעשה · Kiddushin 40b:8–9
  31. 31
    נמצא המעשה היא גדולה · ראה לעיל אחרי כו, ד ובמ״מ לשם. ד״ה השקיפה תשכ״ו (נד׳ בקונטרס ח״י אלול תש״נ) סעי׳ ג.
  32. 32
    ולא המדרש עיקר · אבות א, יז.
  33. 33
    ולא המדרש עיקר אלא המעשה · Pirkei Avot 1:17
  34. 34
    תר״ך עמודי אור · ע״ל בחקותי (מז, ד). וש״נ. [כ].
  35. 35
    והחכמה תחי׳ בעלי׳ · Ecclesiastes 7:12
  36. 36
    בד״ה ראיתי והנה מנורת זהב · לעיל פ׳ בהעלותך לד, ג.
  37. 37
    ראיתי והנה מנורת זהב · Zechariah 4:2
  38. 38
    ישאו הרים שלום · Psalms 72:3
  39. 39
    ה׳ עוז לעמו יתן · Psalms 29:11
  40. 40
    או יחזיק במעוזי · Isaiah 27:5
  41. 41
    והי׳ מעשה הצדקה שלום · Isaiah 32:17
  42. 42
    וגבעות בצדקה · Psalms 72:3
  43. 43
    ששרשם מבחי׳ כתר · ראה אגה״ק סי׳ כ״ט. פרדס ש״ח פ״ג.

21ועל ידי המצות נגלה בחי׳ הארה הנ״ל בחינת הוא ושמו בלבד כו׳ בבחינת ב׳ רגלים

And through the mitzvos the level of the illumination mentioned above, the level of “He and His Name alone,” etc., was revealed in the level of two feet,

Explanation

Through the mitzvos, the hills, the revelation of “He and His Name alone” came on two feet.

היינו בבחינת יראה גם כן מפני שהמצות בשרשם הם למעלה במדרגה מבחי׳ התורה כו׳ ע״כ על ידם יכול להתגלות בבחי׳ יראה גם כן

that is, in the level of awe as well, because the mitzvos in their root are higher in rank than the level of the Torah, etc.; therefore through them it can be revealed in the level of awe as well.

Explanation

That is, it came also as awe, because the root of the mitzvos is higher than the Torah’s wisdom, so through them the revelation could reach the level of awe.

וזהו הכל בבחינת יצ״מ [יציאת מצרים] וכתיב הנה בא לשון הוה ולשון עתיד ג״כ שאז יהיה ג״כ בחינת גילוי והארה גדולה זו שלמעלה מבחי׳ ההשתלשלות בחי׳ דילוג כמ״ש כימי צאתך מארץ מצרים אראנו נפלאות

And all this is in the level of the Exodus from Egypt. And it is written, “Behold, he comes,” a term of the present and also of the future: for then too there will be the level of this revelation and great illumination which is above the level of hishtalshelus, the level of a leap, as it is written, “As in the days of your going out of the land of Egypt, I will show him wonders”;

Explanation

All this was at the Exodus. But “he comes” (ba) can be read as present and as future: the same revelation, above the chain of worlds and by a leap, will come again, as Micah says, “As in the days of your going out of the land of Egypt, I will show him wonders.”

דהיינו שיתגלה בבחינה זו נפלאות שהיה בבחי׳ פלא מופלא ומכוסה כמו שהיה בבחינת יציאת מצרים כו׳ שנגלה עליהם אז מבחינת מלך כו׳ סתימו דכל סתימין להיות בגילוי ובמורא גדול כו׳.

that is, in this level there will be revealed wonders that were in the level of the wondrous, hidden and covered, as it was in the level of the Exodus from Egypt, etc., when there was revealed to them then, from the level of King, etc., “the most hidden of all hidden” (sesimu dechol sesimin), so that it was in revelation, “and with great awe,” etc.

Explanation

The “wonders” are what was utterly hidden, as at the Exodus, when the King, “the most hidden of all hidden,” was revealed openly, with great awe.

כן יהיה לעתיד ג״כ אראנו נפלאות כו׳ ועמ״ש במ״א בפי׳ אשר עשה עמכם להפליא והיינו ע״י תורה ומצות שעושים עתה ממשיכים בחי׳ זו

So it will be in the future too: “I will show him wonders,” etc. And see what is written elsewhere on the explanation of “who has dealt wondrously with you.” And that is: through the Torah and mitzvos that we perform now, we draw down this level;

Explanation

So it will be in the future. Through the Torah and mitzvos we perform now we already draw down this level; the text refers to its explanation elsewhere of “who has dealt wondrously with you.”

רק שעתה אינה בגילוי ולעתיד יהיה בחי׳ זו בגילוי וראו כל בשר כו׳ (ועמ״ש ע״פ כי ההרים ימושו כו׳ וחסדי מאתך לא ימוש כו׳):

only, now it is not in revelation, and in the future this level will be in revelation: “And all flesh shall see,” etc. (And see what is written on “For the mountains shall depart,” etc., “but My kindness shall not depart from you,” etc.)

Explanation

Now the level remains hidden; in the future it will be revealed, as Isaiah says, “And all flesh shall see.” The text refers to its discussion of “For the mountains shall depart … but My kindness shall not depart from you,” which the Kehot note suggests is the passage in Likkutei Torah, Ki Seitzei, on the mountains as the Patriarchs.

Paragraph 21 in brief

The mitzvos brought the revelation on both feet, love and awe, because their root is higher than the Torah. The same revelation, drawn down hidden now through Torah and mitzvos, will be revealed openly in the future, for “Behold, he comes” speaks also of the future.

TermsDilugHishtalshelus+2

Also Torah and mitzvosTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    כימי צאתך מאמ״צ אראנו נפלאות · Micah 7:15
  2. 2
    אשר עשה עמכם להפליא · Joel 2:26
  3. 3
    וראו כל בשר · Isaiah 40:5
  4. 4
    ע״פ כי ההרים ימושו · אולי הכוונה ללעיל פ׳ תצא מ, א דשם מביא הרים נק׳ האבות.
  5. 5
    כי ההרים ימושו כו׳ וחסדי מאתך לא ימוש · Isaiah 54:10

The gazelle and the Counting ¶22–23

22ה דומה דודי לצבי וגו׳. הנה ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שנמשל לצבי מה צבי מחזיר ראשו לאחוריו כו׳.

5. “My beloved is like a gazelle,” etc. Now, our Sages, of blessed memory, said that He is compared to a gazelle: just as a gazelle turns its head backward, etc.

Explanation

Chapter 5 turns to the next verse, “My beloved is like a gazelle.” The Sages (the Kehot note gives the Zohar) say that G‑d is compared to a gazelle because a gazelle turns its head backward. In its setting the image is of a gazelle that, even as it runs off, turns its head back toward the place it left. So too G‑d, even when He seems to withdraw from Israel, keeps looking back at them. The maamar reads this backward turn as the supernal will, which is above wisdom, turning back down to the lowest level, the physical mitzvos.

וענין משל זה הוא למעלה גם כן מחזיר ראשו לאחוריו היינו בחי׳ חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא ואף למעלה מבחינת חכמה

And the matter of this analogy is that Above too He “turns His head backward”: that is, the level of “wise, but not with a known wisdom,” and even above the level of Chochmah,

Explanation

Above, the “head” that turns back is the level above Chochmah, which the Tikkunei Zohar (a companion work to the Zohar) describes as G‑d being “wise, but not with a known wisdom.”

דהיינו קרקפתא דתפילין גלגלתא דחפיא על מוחא ירד ונשתלשל בבחינת אחוריים היינו בחי׳ מצות שהם הכל בדברים גשמיים כמו ציצית ותפילין בבחי׳ אחוריים כו׳. ושרשם מבחי׳ כת״ר תר״ך כו׳.

namely “the skull of the tefillin,” “the Skull (Gulgalta) that covers the brain,” descended and came down by stages into the level of the back, that is, the level of the mitzvos, which are all in physical things, such as tzitzis and tefillin, in the level of the back, etc. And their root is from the level of Keser, [which is] 620, etc.;

Explanation

This is the “skull” on which the tefillin are placed, “the Skull that covers the brain,” Keser, above intellect. It descended into the “back,” the mitzvos, which are performed with physical things such as tzitzis and tefillin; yet they are rooted in Keser, the “620” (the numerical value of כתר).

דהיינו שנמשך ונתלבש רצונו הפשוט שלמעלה מבחי׳ חכמה אפילו מבחי׳ חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא כו׳ בדברים גשמיים למטה דוקא

that is, His simple will, which is above the level of Chochmah, even above the level of “wise, but not with a known wisdom,” etc., was drawn down and enclothed in physical things below, specifically,

Explanation

That is, G‑d’s simple will, above all wisdom, is enclothed specifically in physical things below.

כמו כל המצות כו׳ (ועמ״ש מזה גם כן בד״ה ויושט המלך לאסתר כו׳) וזה הכל היה בפסח בחינת יציאת מצרים בחי׳ דילוג כו׳

such as all the mitzvos, etc. (and see what is written about this, too, in the discourse beginning “And the king extended to Esther,” etc.). And all this was on Pesach, the level of the Exodus from Egypt, the level of a leap, etc.,

Explanation

This is so with every mitzvah; in Torah Ohr, Megillas Esther (“And the king extended to Esther”), the gazelle that turns its head back is G‑d enclothing His will and wisdom in physical things. All this was at Pesach, at the Exodus, by a leap.

שלא היו ישראל ראויים לזה שהיו במצרים בתכלית השפלו׳ ולא היה אתערותא דלתתא כלל רק שנגלה כביכול מעצמו בבחי׳ דילוג כו׳

for Israel were not worthy of this, since in Egypt they were in the utmost lowliness, and there was no arousal from below at all; rather, it was revealed, as it were, of itself, in the level of a leap, etc.

Explanation

Israel did not deserve it, for in Egypt they were utterly low, with no arousal from below; the revelation came, as it were, of itself, by a leap.

אבל אח״כ נאמר קומי לך היינו בחי׳ ספירה היום יום א׳ לעומר כו׳ שהיו ישראל סופרים כל ימי הספירה מ״ט יומין והיינו לטהר כל המדות כידוע שיש ז׳ מדות.

But afterwards it is said, “Arise” (kumi lach), that is, the level of the Counting, “Today is the first day of the Omer,” etc. For Israel would count all the days of the Counting, forty-nine days, and that is to purify all the middos; for, as is known, there are seven middos,

Explanation

Afterwards comes “Arise”: the Counting of the Omer, “Today is the first day of the Omer.” Israel counted forty-nine days to purify the seven middos.

Paragraph 22 in brief

The gazelle that turns its head back stands for G‑d’s will, above wisdom, “turning back” into the physical mitzvos. At Pesach it was revealed by a leap, without Israel’s effort; afterwards came “Arise,” the Counting of the Omer, Israel’s own work of refining the middos.

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe contrasts Pesach, which had no arousal from below, with the Omer and Shavuos. The Rebbe uses the contrast to explain why leaping belongs to Pesach as “head of the festivals.” He adds Sukkos, the ingathering of Elul and Tishrei, as another festival that comes through service. He also stresses that the lowliness itself is what demanded the leap.

    The Alter Rebbeולא היה אתערותא דלתתא כלל רק שנגלה כביכול מעצמו בבחי׳ דילוג

    The Rebbeואדרבא, דוקא מצד זה שהי׳ במעמד ומצב דאת ערום וערי׳

    The whole maamar, summarized

  2. From the Rebbe’s maamar ד״ה קולי דודי הנה זה בא, 5736

    The Alter Rebbe says the Pesach revelation came with no arousal from below, unlike Shavuos, which came through the Counting. The Rebbe adds Sukkos to this contrast: its joy comes through the prior service of ingathering. He explains that Pesach, as “head of the festivals,” draws its leap into the others. He also specifies the minimal “likeness” that was needed from below: the open self-sacrifice of taking Egypt’s idol on Shabbos HaGadol, which is itself a leap within service.

    The Alter Rebbeולא היה אתערותא דלתתא כלל רק שנגלה כביכול מעצמו בבחי׳ דילוג

    The Rebbeהי׳ צ״ל עבודת האדם עכ״פ מעין זה. וזהו מה שאז היתה עבודתם במס״נ

    The whole maamar, summarized

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.

TermsTaryach amudei orDilugGulgalta of Arich AnpinPanim and achor+6

Also Torah and mitzvosChochmah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    דומה דודי לצבי · Song of Songs 2:9
  2. 2
    ארז״ל שנמשל לצבי · זח״ב (יד, א). [כ].
  3. 3
    מה צבי מחזיר ראשו לאחוריו · Zohar, Shemot 24:231–25:240
  4. 4
    חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא · ת״ז בהקדמה (פתח אלי׳).
  5. 5
    בחכמה ידיעא · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:3–4
  6. 6
    בד״ה ויושט המלך לאסתר · תו״א צד, ג.
  7. 7
    קומי לך · Song of Songs 2:10
  8. 8
    שהיו ישראל סופרים . . הספירה · ראה בהוספות להערות וציונים כאן.

23וכ״א [וכל אחד / וכל אחת] כלולה מז׳ והוא מ״ט והיינו הכנת עצמם שיהיו בחי׳ כלי לקבל בחי׳ גילוי אלקות שיהיה אח״כ בשבועות מתן תורה שאז נגלה ג״כ בחי׳ גילוי שלמעלה מההשתלשלות בחי׳ כתר כו׳

and each one is comprised of seven, and that is forty-nine. And this was their preparing themselves to be the level of a vessel to receive the level of G‑dly revelation that would come afterwards on Shavuos, at the Giving of the Torah, when there was also revealed the level of revelation that is above hishtalshelus, the level of Keser, etc.;

Explanation

Each of the seven middos includes all seven, forty-nine in all. The Counting prepared Israel to be vessels for the revelation of Shavuos, when the Torah was given and the level of Keser, above the chain of worlds, was revealed again.

רק שאז נגלה ה׳ פב״פ [פנים בפנים] כו׳ כי היו אז ישראל ג״כ בבחי׳ פנים בחי׳ כלי לקבל גילוי אלקות ע״י עבודתם וע״י ספירה כו׳.

only, then G‑d was revealed “face to face,” etc., for then Israel too were in the level of “face,” the level of a vessel to receive G‑dly revelation, through their service and through the Counting, etc.

Explanation

On Shavuos, however, G‑d spoke “face to face,” because Israel too were a “face”: vessels prepared by their own service and their counting.

והיינו ע״י אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא]. אבל לא כמו שהיה בפסח בחי׳ מצה כו׳ שלא הספיק בצקת כו׳.

And that is through an arousal from below. But it was not as it was on Pesach, the level of matzah, etc., “the dough did not have time,” etc.

Explanation

This came through an arousal from below, unlike Pesach, when the revelation came before the dough had time to rise.

ואדרבה בשבועות היו מביאים לחם מצה (והיינו לפי שנזדככו המדות כו׳ ואז ההתנשאות אינה אלא בבחי׳ הקדושה המתנשא מימות עולם כו׳ וכמ״ש מזה גבי שבועות בד״ה וידבר אלקים כו׳ ע״ש).

And on the contrary, on Shavuos they would bring leavened bread (and that is because the middos had been refined, etc., and then self-exaltation is only in the level of holiness, “who is elevated since days of old,” etc.; and as is written about this concerning Shavuos, in the discourse beginning “And G‑d spoke,” etc.; see there).

Explanation

On Shavuos, on the contrary, the offering was leavened bread: the two loaves that the Torah commands to be baked chametz (the print reads לחם מצה, but the contrast requires חמץ). Once the middos are refined, “rising” is only in holiness, the exaltation of G‑d “who is elevated since days of old”: as the Shavuos discourse “And G‑d spoke” in Likkutei Torah, Bamidbar, explains, chametz is forbidden on Pesach because self-exaltation feeds the kelipos, but once the middos are refined it no longer can.

וזהו קומי לך בחי׳ קימה מלמטה למעלה דקאי על בחי׳ ספירה שאחר הפסח כדי שיהיה בחי׳ פב״פ [פנים בפנים] ולעתיד יהיה ג״כ בחי׳ גילוי זה שלמעלה מהשתלשלות סתימו כו׳ אראנו נפלאות כו׳:

And this is “Arise”: the level of rising from below to above, which refers to the level of the Counting after Pesach, so that there be the level of “face to face.” And in the future there will also be the level of this revelation which is above hishtalshelus, “the most hidden,” etc.: “I will show him wonders,” etc.

Explanation

“Arise” is rising from below to above, the Counting after Pesach, which leads to “face to face.” In the future the revelation above the chain of worlds, the most hidden, will come again: “I will show him wonders.”

Paragraph 23 in brief

Shavuos is contrasted with Pesach: through the Counting Israel became vessels, so the revelation of Shavuos came “face to face” through their own work, and leavened bread could be offered because the middos had been refined. In the future the revelation of the Exodus will return.

TermsRomemusPanim and achorSefirosIsarusa dilesata+7

Also Torah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    גבי שבועות בד״ה וידבר אלקים · לעיל פ׳ במדבר.
  2. 2
    אראנו נפלאות · Micah 7:15

Finished the maamar?

Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.

Download PDFPDF · 1.0 MB

Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.

In one’s avodah

Contemplating that all the life of the worlds is only G‑d’s Name, while His essence is untouched and far beyond, a person should feel bitterness at his own distance from G‑dliness. That bitterness arouses G‑d’s abundant compassion and leads to the self-nullification of matzah, “Nullify your will,” guarded so that it never turns into the self-exaltation of chametz. Israel’s own service, the first matzah and the Counting of the Omer that refines the middos, makes them vessels for revelation; and through the Torah and mitzvos done now the hidden revelation of the Exodus is already drawn down, to be revealed in the future.

Questions for discussion

  1. The Haggadah explains matzah by a revelation that came after midnight, yet matzah must be eaten before midnight. How does the maamar’s distinction between two matzos answer this?
  2. What is the difference between “the kingship of all worlds” and “Your kingship,” and why could only the higher level bring Israel out of Mitzrayim?
  3. Why is the maror placed on the middle line of the seder plate rather than on the left, and what does this teach about bitterness in serving G‑d?
  4. Why did the revelation come on one foot through the Patriarchs and on two through the Matriarchs, and how does the same pair appear below as Torah and mitzvos?
  5. How does “Arise,” the Counting of the Omer, differ from the “leap” of Pesach, and why could leavened bread be offered on Shavuos?

Key terms in this maamar

The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
Aramaic, “the Holy One, blessed be He”: G‑d as holy, set apart from the worlds, paired with Shechinteh, His indwelling; read as sovev kol almin, Z’eir Anpin, Atzmus, and sometimes memalei kol almin.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Life-forceחיות
Life-force: the G‑dly vitality that brings each creation into being and keeps it alive, drawn to each according to its level and renewed from nothing, as the soul enlivens the body. ×4Where it’s explained, stated differently
Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
G‑d’s kingship: the lowest Sefirah, His “speech” and the revealed world, through which all worlds come into being from nothing and live, without touching His essence (“there is no king without a people”). ×10Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
The first created world, below the partition (parsa) under Atzilus: something new from nothing (yesh me’ayin), corresponding to thought, where Binah of Atzilus dwells; world of the seraphim, souls and Gan Eden HaElyon. ×5Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
The world of formation, between Beriah and Asiyah: like speech, it reveals what was hidden in Beriah (something from something, not new creation); the middos of Atzilus shine there; the world of the angels. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
The lowest of the four worlds, corresponding to action: its ten Sefiros are still holy, but below them lies kelipas nogah; this physical world is Malchus of Asiyah, its lowest level.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
The descent of levels from cause to effect, linked like the rings of a chain, from Chochmah downward; each reveals what was hidden in the one above. Or Ein Sof itself is above this order. ×11Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Name Havayahהוי׳
The Name meaning “He brings into being”: by contraction and expansion, its four letters, He brings all worlds into being while Himself unchanged; was, is and will be are one to Him. Elokim conceals it.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
Self-nullification before G‑d, the condition for the Or Ein Sof to rest. Its lower degree is a “something” that bows; its higher, Chochmah’s “what are we,” takes up no place at all. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
A stirring that begins with the person (love and awe won by toil, self-nullification, the deed of the mitzvos) which, “as water reflects a face,” awakens a matching arousal from above. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
The “husks” that cover and conceal holiness: forces of yesh set opposite holiness, whose mark is bittul. They came into being through the breaking of the vessels and draw their nurture from holiness. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
The Sefirah of might (the left; Yitzchak), opposite Chesed: described as what limits and contracts Chesed’s flow, and as the life-force in greater intensity, which becomes judgment; included in Chesed, it gives life. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
The emotive powers (in the soul: love, fear, mercy). Born from the intellect and matching its measure, they are rooted above it, in the will; above, the middos of Z”A, emanated to conduct the worlds. ×15Where it’s explained
The intellect (mochin)מוחין
The intellect, Chochmah, Binah and Daas, as the “brains” of a level; chiefly the light of Abba and Imma clothed in Z’eir Anpin, the middos, by which they grow. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
G‑d’s Malchus as it “dwells” among created beings to give them life: Malchus of Atzilus come down below Atzilus. Its being clothed below, down to the kelipos, is called the exile of the Shechinah. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
The first revelation in the chain of worlds (vayaetzel, “drew off”): the ten Sefiros, where Or Ein Sof rests and lights and vessels are one with Him; Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are created from nothing. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
Love and aweאהבה ויראה
Love, the soul’s longing to cleave to G‑d, and awe, its self-nullification before Him: opposites born of the mind (“son and daughter”), called the two “wings” that lift one’s service on high.Where it’s explained, stated differently, Sefer HaErchim
Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
The first Sefirah of revelation: a single point of insight (koach mah, the yud of Havayah) that comes from the “nothing” above it; being bittul, Or Ein Sof rests in it, and Binah expands it. ×12Where it’s explained, stated differently
Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
The Sefirah of the middle line (Yaakov’s attribute) between Chesed and Gevurah: it joins and includes them, so Or Ein Sof shines in it constantly. It is mercy and truth, and is rooted in Keser.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Chesed (kindness)חסד
The Sefirah of kindness (the right arm; Avraham): giving that comes from its nature to do good, spreading from highest to lowest like water. Gevurah, its opposite, limits it; in tikkun each includes the other.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Keser (the Crown)כתר
The Crown over the Sefiros: intermediary between Or Ein Sof and the emanated, holding the lowest level of the Infinite; the Supernal Will and source of delight, beyond grasp; Chochmah emerges from it. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
Malchus of Atzilus as a partzuf: the feminine partner of Z’eir Anpin, built after it and from the gevuros; receiving from above, she gives to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah below.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Willרצון
Will, which rules the middos: a lower will born of intellect, and the Supernal Will above intellect (Keser, Gulgalta), which covers a hidden reason and delight and is the root of the mitzvos.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The kav (line of light)קו
The thread-like line of Or Ein Sof drawn into the vacated space after the tzimtzum: a small revelation, root of all hishtalshelus and the inner light, narrowing as it descends until it ends in Atzilus. ×9Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Name Elokimאלקים
The Name of contraction and concealment, the shield and sheath over Havayah, through which creation appears separate (yesh) and runs as nature (hateva, numerically Elokim). Relative to a higher revelation, Havayah counts as Elokim. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
Netzach (victory)נצח
The Sefirah below Chesed on the right line, its branch: giving carried through by resolve after its reason has gone. With its partner Hod it is “outside the body,” yet rooted in Keser. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently

Hebrew size

100%

English size

100%

Hebrew letters

Theme

How I learn

Calendar

Freg button

Show

Abbreviations

Tap an abbreviation, or turn on Written out. A Kindle has no hover, so Written out is how to read them there.

NikudBeta

Vowels on the maamar’s Hebrew. Verses take theirs from the Leningrad Codex; every other word is vowelled by Dicta’s Nakdan, automatically, and has not been proofread, so expect mistakes. The letters are Kehot’s, unchanged.

Review mode

Off hides the review bar and your notes on this device, to read without them.

PDF

CompleteHebrew, translation, explanations and notes · PDF · 1.0 MBText onlyThe Hebrew and the translation · PDF · 295 KB

EPUB

For your e-readerThe Hebrew, translation, explanations and notes · EPUB · 282 KB
The whole books, ready to print

Language

English

This page is in English only for now. Also in, so far:

العربية71 maamarim so farDeutsch71 maamarim so farEspañol71 maamarim so farفارسی71 maamarim so farFrançais71 maamarim so farעברית71 maamarim so farItaliano71 maamarim so farPortuguês71 maamarim so farРусский71 maamarim so farУкраїнська71 maamarim so far中文(简体)71 maamarim so far中文(繁體)71 maamarim so far

Send us a suggestion

Corrections, ideas, questions. Leave your email so we can answer.

We send it by email to the editor, with the page you’re on. Nothing is published.

Contents

Likkutei Torahלקוטי תורה

Parshas Shir HaShirimשיר השירים

  1. 1שיר השירים אשר לשלמה ישקנו מנשיקות…The Song of Songs, which is Shlomo’s
  2. 2שיר השירים אשר לשלמהThe Song of Songs, which is Shlomo’s
  3. 3לריח שמניך טובים שמן תורק שמך…For Fragrance, Your Oils Are Good
  4. 4לריח שמניך טובים שמן תורק שמך…For the fragrance of your goodly oils
  5. 5שחורה אני ונאוה בנות ירושלים וגו׳“I am black and comely, O daughters of Jerusalem”
  6. 6שחורה אני ונאוה בנות ירושלים כאהלי…“I Am Black, yet Comely, O Daughters of Jerusalem”
  7. 7ביאור ענין שחורה אני ונאוהAn Explanation of “I Am Black, yet Comely”
  8. 8ביאור הדברים ע״פ שחורה אני ונאוהAn Explanation of the Matters on “I Am Black, Yet Comely”
  9. 9לסוסתי ברכבי פרעה דמיתיך רעיתי“To My Mare Among Pharaoh’s Chariots I Have Likened You, My Beloved”
  10. 10לסוסתי ברכבי פרעה דמיתיך רעיתיTo My Mare Among Pharaoh’s Chariots
  11. 11נאוו לחייך בתורים צוארך בחרוזים“Your Cheeks Are Comely with Torim, Your Neck with Strings of Beads”
  12. 12הנך יפה רעיתי יפה עיניך יונים…“Behold, You Are Fair, My Beloved; Your Eyes Are Doves”
  13. 13קול דודי הנה זה בא מדלג…“The Voice of My Beloved! Behold, He Comes, Leaping over the Mountains”
    1. The question ¶1
    2. Matzah and midnight; He and His Name ¶2–7
    3. Two kinds of kingship; leaving the realm of limit ¶8–10
    4. Two matzos and the maror ¶11–16
    5. The voice ¶17
    6. Leaping over the mountains ¶18
    7. Skipping over the hills ¶19–21
    8. The gazelle and the Counting ¶22–23
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    5. 5
    6. 6
    7. 7
    8. 8
    9. 9
    10. 10
    11. 11
    12. 12
    13. 13
    14. 14
    15. 15
    16. 16
    17. 17
    18. 18
    19. 19
    20. 20
    21. 21
    22. 22
    23. 23
  14. 14ולהבין ענין מדלג על ההרים מקפץ…To Understand “Leaping over the Mountains, Skipping over the Hills”
  15. 15יונתי בחגוי הסלע בסתר המדרגהMy dove, in the clefts of the rock, in the hidden place of the step: show me your appearance
  16. 16ביאור ע״פ יונתי בחגוי הסלע וגו׳An explanation of the verse “My dove, in the clefts of the rock”
  17. 17עוד ביאור הדברים ע״פ יונתי בחגוי…A further explanation of “My dove, in the clefts of the rock”
  18. 18צאינה וראינה בנות ציון במלך שלמה…Go Out and Gaze, O Daughters of Zion
  19. 19להבין ענין הטעם למה שהאתדל״ע הבאה…To Understand Why the Arousal from Above That Follows the Arousal from Below…
  20. 20צאינה וראינה בנות ציון במלך שלמה…Go Out and Gaze, O Daughters of Zion
  21. 21ביאור הדבריםAn Explanation of the Matter: “Keser Is Above All the Ten Sefiros”
  22. 22לבבתני אחותי כלהYou Have Captured My Heart, My Sister, My Bride
  23. 23ביאור על פסוק לבבתניAn Explanation of the Verse “You Have Captured My Heart”
  24. 24באתי לגני אחותי כלה אריתי מורי…“I Have Come into My Garden, My Sister, [My] Bride”
  25. 25ביאור ע״פ באתי לגניAn Explanation of the Verse “I Have Come into My Garden”
  26. 26אני ישנה ולבי ער קול דודי…“I Am Asleep, but My Heart Is Awake”
  27. 27להבין ביאור הדברים ע״פ אני ישנה…To Understand the Explanation of “I Am Asleep, but My Heart Is Awake”
  28. 28הסבי עיניך וגו׳“Turn Away Your Eyes”
  29. 29שניך כעדר הרחלים שעלו מן הרחצה…Your Teeth Are Like a Flock of Ewes That Have Come Up from the Washing
  30. 30ששים המה מלכות ושמונים פילגשים ועלמות…There are sixty queens, and eighty concubines, and maidens without number
  31. 31לבאר הדברים ע״פ ששים המה מלכות…“There Are Sixty Queens”
  32. 32ששים המה מלכות ושמונים פילגשים כו׳There are sixty queens and eighty concubines
  33. 33הנה ענין מדלג על ההרים הוא…“Leaping upon the Mountains”
  34. 34מה יפו פעמיך בנעלים כו׳How Beautiful Are Your Footsteps in Shoes
  35. 35מי יתנך כאח לי יונק שדי…“Who Will Make You as a Brother to Me”
  36. 36שימני כחותם על לבך כו׳“Set Me as a Seal upon Your Heart”
  37. 37ביאור על זהAn Explanation of “Set Me as a Seal upon Your Heart”
  38. 38כי על כל כבוד חופה“For Over All Glory, a Chuppah”
  39. 39ביאור הדברים ע״פ כי על כל…An Explanation of “For Over All Glory, a Canopy”
  40. 40תנו רבנן כיצד מרקדין לפני הכלה…Our Rabbis Taught: How Does One Dance Before the Bride?
  41. 41כי כאשר השמים החדשים כו׳For just as the new heavens
  42. 42ביאור ע״פ כי כאשר השמים כו׳An explanation of “For just as the heavens…”
Ask Freg about any paragraph