Likkutei Torah · Parshas Shir HaShirim · Maamar 13
קול דודי הנה זה בא מדלג על ההרים…
“The Voice of My Beloved! Behold, He Comes, Leaping over the Mountains”
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
At the Exodus G‑d’s own essence, “He and His Name alone,” far above the chain of worlds that His Name sustains, was revealed to Israel by a “leap,” out of all proportion to their low state; only such a revelation could free them from Mitzrayim, the realm of limit. Israel’s own service (the guarded first matzah, reached through the bitterness of maror, and later the Counting of the Omer) prepares for this revelation and draws it down, and it will return openly in the future.
The maamar in brief
The maamar asks why the verse says “leaping” over the mountains but “skipping” over the hills, and how matzah eaten before midnight can be explained by a revelation that came after it. Before creation there were “He and His Name alone”: the life-force of the worlds is only G‑d’s radiance, Name and Kingship, “the kingship of all worlds,” while “Your kingship” is Malchus included in His essence. At the Exodus this higher level, “the King of the kings of kings,” was revealed, and so Israel left Mitzrayim, the realm of limit. There were two matzos: the first, before midnight, was Israel’s own self-nullification, which needed guarding and came with maror, the bitterness that arouses compassion; through it came the second, after midnight, a nullification from Above that could not leaven. “Voice” is a drawing from concealment into revelation. The revelation “leapt” over the chain of worlds: on one foot, love, in the merit of the Patriarchs, the Torah; on two, love and awe, in the merit of the Matriarchs, the mitzvos, whose root is higher. The gazelle that turns its head back is the will above wisdom enclothed in the mitzvos; after Pesach comes “Arise,” the Counting toward Shavuos.
Outline
- The question“The voice of my beloved … leaping over the mountains, skipping over the hills”: why “leaping” for the mountains and “skipping” for the hills? The Midrash reads the verse as the Exodus, when G‑d “leapt” from four hundred years to two hundred and ten.¶1
- Matzah and midnight; He and His NameThe Haggadah explains matzah by a revelation that came after midnight, though matzah must be eaten before it. To answer: the life-force of the worlds is only G‑d’s light, Name and Kingship, which change nothing in His essence; hence the prayer’s version “before [the world] was created,” as if the world came about of itself.¶2–7
- Two kinds of kingship; leaving the realm of limit“The kingship of all worlds” gives life to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, the souls, angels and stars; “Your kingship” is Malchus included in the essence. This, “the King of the kings of kings,” was revealed at the Exodus, and it freed Israel from Mitzrayim, the limit that binds every world.¶8–10
- Two matzos and the marorMatzah, like grain for a child, brings recognition of G‑d. The first matzah, before midnight, was Israel’s own self-nullification; it needed guarding from chametz, self-exaltation, and came with maror, the bitterness that arouses abundant compassion, which is why the maror stands on the middle line. Through it came the second matzah, revealed from Above, which needed neither guarding nor maror.¶11–16
- The voice“Voice” is a drawing from concealment into revelation; the revelation of the essence at the Exodus is “the voice of my beloved.”¶17
- Leaping over the mountainsThe revelation skipped the chain of cause and effect, coming “with great awe,” in the merit of the Patriarchs or from above them. The Torah calls it pesach, “And G‑d will pass over the doorway”: it entered Malchus, the gate of awe.¶18
- Skipping over the hillsLeaping is on one foot and skipping on two: through the Patriarchs the revelation came only as love, through the Matriarchs also as awe, which is rooted higher. The Matriarchs, though recipients, are higher from below to above, “last in deed, first in thought”; below, the mountains are the Torah and the hills the mitzvos, rooted in Keser. “Behold, he comes” is also the future: “I will show him wonders.”¶19–21
- The gazelle and the CountingThe gazelle turns its head back: the will above wisdom is enclothed in physical mitzvos. At Pesach it came by a leap, with no arousal from below; then comes “Arise,” the Counting of the Omer, which refines the middos so that Shavuos is “face to face” and leavened bread can be offered.¶22–23
Key concepts
- He and His Name aloneהוא ושמו בלבד
- Before creation G‑d’s Name, the radiance that would give life to the worlds, was included in His essence. The life-force of the worlds is only His “Name,” which changes nothing in Him.
- The kingship of all worlds and Your kingshipמלכות כל עולמים / מלכותך
- Two levels of Malchus: the kingship that gives life to the worlds, a mere radiance and name, and Malchus as included in G‑d’s essence. The second, “the King of the kings of kings,” was revealed at the Exodus.
- Leapדילוג
- A revelation that skips the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), the order of cause and effect, coming from above to below out of proportion to the recipient.
- The two matzosמצה ראשונה ומצה שניה
- The first matzah, before midnight, is Israel’s own self-nullification, which must be guarded; the second, after midnight, is a nullification brought by the revelation from Above, which cannot leaven.
- Bitterness and abundant compassionמרירות ורחמים רבים
- Bitterness over one’s distance from G‑d arouses His abundant compassion, which applies only to one who is low; so the maror stands on the middle line, the line of compassion.
- Voiceקול
- A drawing from concealment into revelation, from intellect into emotion or from above intellect into it; the “great voice” of Sinai is the inner voice that is not heard.
- Leaping and skippingדילוג וקפיצה
- Leaping is on one foot, skipping on two: the revelation came as love through the Patriarchs and the Torah, and as love and awe through the Matriarchs and the mitzvos.
- Supernal aweיראה עילאה
- An awe rooted higher than love, in the hidden levels of Keser; at the Exodus it was revealed within the lower awe of Malchus, “with great awe.”
- Last in deed, first in thoughtסוף מעשה במחשבה תחלה
- What comes last in the order of descent has the highest root; so the recipient, the Matriarchs and the mitzvos, can stand above the giver.
The question ¶1
1קול דודי1 הנה זה בא2 מדלג על ההרים מקפץ על הגבעות. דומה דודי לצבי345 כו׳. וצריך להבין שינוי הלשון שבהרים כתיב מדלג ובגבעות מקפץ.
“The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes, leaping (medaleg) over the mountains, skipping (mekapetz) over the hills. My beloved is like a gazelle, etc.” Now, we need to understand the change of wording: of the mountains it is written medaleg (“leaping”), and of the hills mekapetz (“skipping”).
The maamar opens with Song of Songs 2:8–9, where the beloved comes “leaping over the mountains, skipping over the hills” and is compared to a gazelle. Its first question is about wording: why “leaping” (medaleg) for the mountains but “skipping” (mekapetz) for the hills? The answer comes later in the maamar.
הנה פסוק זה נאמר על יציאת מצרים שהיה הגאולה בדלוג מארבע מאות שנה לרד״ו שנה כמ״ש במדרש שיר השירים בפסוק זה.
Now, this verse was said about the Exodus from Egypt, when the redemption came by a leap: from four hundred years to two hundred and ten years, as is written in the Midrash on Shir HaShirim, on this verse.
The Midrash on this verse reads it as Moshe’s announcement of the redemption from Egypt. G‑d had told Avraham of four hundred years of bondage, yet only two hundred and ten had passed; G‑d “leapt” over the reckoning and redeemed them early.
The maamar sets out its verse and its question, the difference between “leaping” over the mountains and “skipping” over the hills, and ties the verse, with the Midrash, to the Exodus, when G‑d “leapt” over the end of the bondage.
According to the Kehot notes, a transcript of this discourse by the Mitteler Rebbe is printed in Sefer HaMaamarim 5569, and in manuscript volume 4 it stands among the Pesach discourses, just before the discourse on the Haggadah’s “This matzah” (Likkutei Torah, Tzav). This is why the maamar later speaks of Parshas Bamidbar as “below.”
Marei mekomos
- 1קול דודי · הנחת כ״ק אדמו״ר האמצעי נדפס בסה״מ תקס״ט ע׳ מ. בבוך 4 נמצא מאמר זה בין מאמרי פסח אחר ד״ה ואכלתם אכול וקודם ד״ה להבין מ״ש בהגדה מצה זו בפ׳ צו יא, ג. ובזה מתורץ מה שכתוב לקמן יד, ד ”וכמ״ש ג״כ (לקמן) בפ׳ במדבר”. במהדו״ק סבר לסדר מאמר זה בין מאמרי פסח. הגהות וקיצורים באוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רמה. וע׳ רנ (בבוך 1376 רשום עליו ”קיצור מד״ה קול דודי שבלק״ת). ע׳ רנב. ונדפסו גם באוה״ת ויקרא כרך ג ע׳ תשסח. ביאור שם ע׳ תשעה. באוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתפד מציין כ״ק מהורש״ב ”נר׳ שייך לדרוש קול דודי שבלק״ת” ע״ש. ראה להלן בהוספות להערות וציונים השוואה לד״ה זה. נזכר באוה״ת שופטים ע׳ תתלה. שה״ש ע׳ רפב. ובבוך 1039 נרשם בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ ברשימת המאמרים המבארים ”ענין מצה”. הובא באור התורה בראשית (מ, ב). וע׳ ביכעל קטן שמינית בויגין שתח״י (עב, ב). עם תוס׳ ביאור ע״ז באורך, יעו״ש היטיב. [כ].
- 2
- 3קול דודי הנה זה בא . . דומה דודי לצבי · Song of Songs 2:8
- 4
- 5דומה דודי לצבי · Song of Songs 2:9
Matzah and midnight; He and His Name ¶2–7
2ולהבין כל זה הנה אנו אומרים בהגדה מצה זו שאנו אוכלים על שום מה ע״ש [על שם] שלא הספיק בצקת של אבותינו להחמיץ עד שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים הקב״ה וגאלם.
To understand all this: we say in the Haggadah, “This matzah that we eat—on account of what? On account of the fact that the dough of our fathers did not have time to become leavened before the King of the kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, was revealed to them and redeemed them.”
To explain the verse, the maamar turns to the Haggadah’s reason for eating matzah: our ancestors’ dough had no time to rise before “the King of the kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He,” was revealed to them and redeemed them. The whole maamar builds on this phrase.
והנה לכאורה אין זה טעם מספיק כי ענין התגלות זו שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים היה אחר חצות. כמ״ש ויהי בחצי הלילה12 כו׳.
Now, at first glance this is not a sufficient reason, for this revelation, when the King of the kings of kings was revealed to them, was after midnight, as it is written, “And it came to pass at midnight, etc.”
The difficulty: that revelation came only from midnight on, when G‑d struck the firstborn of Egypt (Exodus 12:29). So the reason the Haggadah gives for the matzah is an event that took place after midnight.
ואכילת מצה שאנו אוכלים (וכן בפסח מצרים) צריך להיות קודם חצות דייקא כמ״ד [כמה דאת אמר] שהפסח אינו נאכל אלא עד חצות3 ובפסח נאמר על מצות ומרורים4 וגו׳.
Yet the eating of the matzah that we eat (and so too with the Pesach in Egypt) must be specifically before midnight, according to the one who holds that the Pesach offering is eaten only until midnight; and of the Pesach offering it is said, “With matzos and bitter herbs, etc.”
Yet the matzah must be eaten before midnight, in Egypt and at our seder alike, according to Rabbi Elazar ben Azaryah, who holds that the Pesach offering may be eaten only until midnight; the Torah joins the matzah to the Pesach offering, “with matzos and bitter herbs they shall eat it.” So the question is how matzah eaten before midnight can be explained by a revelation that came after it.
ולהבין כ״ז [כל זה] הנה ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] עד שלא נברא העולם56 היה הוא ושמו בלבד.7 דהנה חיות כל העולמות שנמשך ממנו ית׳ אינו
To understand all this: our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Before the world was created, there were He and His Name alone.” For the life-force of all the worlds, which is drawn from Him, blessed be He, is nothing
The answer begins with the saying in Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer that before the world was created there were only “He and His Name.” The life-force of all the worlds is not G‑d’s essence; it is only light and radiance from Him.
אלא בחינת אור וזיו בלבד ממנו ית׳. כמו עד״מ זיו השמש או זיו הנר שאינו נוגע אל העצם כלל.
but the level of light and radiance alone, from Him, blessed be He; as, by way of analogy, the radiance of the sun or the radiance of a candle, which does not touch the essence at all.
Radiance comes from its source without touching the source itself, like the rays of the sun or the glow of a candle. The maamar will give two more images for the life-force of the worlds: a name and a king.
The paragraph raises the maamar’s question about matzah (how can matzah eaten before midnight be explained by a revelation that came after midnight?) and begins the answer with the teaching that before creation there were “He and His Name alone”: the life-force of the worlds is only a light and radiance from G‑d.
Likkutei Torah, Behar, in the explanation on “My Sabbaths you shall keep,” opens with the same saying, “He and His Name alone,” and explains that names join the lights with the vessels: a person needs his name only to turn to those who call him. According to the Kehot note, Or HaTorah on Vayikra (vol. 2, p. 626) refers to several works of Kabbalah and Chassidus that explain this saying.
Marei mekomos
- 1ויהי בחצי הלילה · Exodus 12:29
- 2
- 3שהפסח אינו נאכל אלא עד חצות · Pesachim 120b:8–9
- 4על מצות ומרורים · Numbers 9:11
- 5הנה ארז״ל עד שלא נברא העולם · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ב ע׳ תרכו שמציין לכמה ספרי קבלה ודא״ח שמבואר ענין זה. וראה גם באוה״ת פ׳ בא ע׳ שח.
- 6ארז״ל עד שלא נברא העולם · פדר״א (פ״ג). [כ]. ראה לעיל פ׳ בהר מג, ב ובמ״מ לשם. באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמה יש הגהה לכאן.
- 7עד שלא נברא העולם היה הוא ושמו בלבד · Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 3:2–3
3והראיה שאף אם יש מסך מפסיק באופן שאין הזיו יכול להתפשט מ״מ אין בהעצם שום שינוי.
The proof [of this]: even if there is an intervening screen, so that the radiance cannot spread forth, nevertheless there is no change whatsoever in the essence.
The proof that radiance does not touch its source: when a screen blocks the sun’s rays, the sun itself does not change at all. Only the glow is affected, not the luminary.
כמ״כ [כמו כן] למעלה כח אלקי המחיה כל העולמות נק׳ בשם אור שאינו נוגע לעצמותו ית׳ כלל ואינו פועל בו שום שינוי כמ״ש אני1 ה׳ לא שניתי ואתה הוא קודם שנברא העולם כו׳.
So too Above: the G‑dly power that gives life to all the worlds is called by the name “light,” for it does not touch His essence, blessed be He, at all, and effects no change in Him, as it is written, “I, G‑d, have not changed”; and “You are He before the world was created, etc.”
So the divine power that gives life to the worlds is called “light”: it does not touch G‑d’s essence and changes nothing in Him. Hence Malachi’s “I, G‑d, have not changed,” and the morning prayer “You are He before the world was created,” and the same after it was created.
The paragraph proves the analogy (blocking the sun’s rays does not change the sun) and applies it: the power that gives life to the worlds is called “light” because it changes nothing in G‑d.
According to the Kehot note, the Rebbe Rashab in Hemshech 5666 takes the analogy further: not only does the sun’s unchanging nature illustrate “I, G‑d, have not changed,” but the simplicity of the light itself, which has no changes in it, illustrates the simplicity of the light Above.
Marei mekomos
- 1ואינו פועל בו שום שינוי כמ״ש אני ה׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
4ונק׳ גם כן בחינת שם וכמ״ש יהללו את שם1 כו׳. וכמו עד״מ האדם כשהוא בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] אינו צריך לשם כלל רק לזולתו שיקראו אותו בשמו ואינו נוגע לעצמותו כלל.
It is also called the level of a “name,” as it is written, “Let them praise the Name, etc.” And as, by way of analogy, a person: when he is by himself he has no need of a name at all; [he needs it] only for others, so that they may call him by his name, and it does not touch his essence at all.
The same life-force is also called a “name,” as in “Let them praise the Name.” A person alone has no need of a name; a name exists only so that others can call him, and it adds nothing to who he is.
כן הוא בחינת כח האלקי המחיה כל העולמות הוא רק בחינת שם בלבד ואינו נוגע לעצמותו כלל.
So too the level of the G‑dly power that gives life to all the worlds is only the level of a name alone, and it does not touch His essence at all.
So the divine power that gives life to the worlds is only G‑d’s “Name”: it exists for the sake of the created beings and does not touch His essence.
A second image: the life-force of the worlds is G‑d’s “Name,” which, like a person’s name, exists for others and does not touch the essence.
The verse the Kehot note gives for this quotation, Psalms 148:13, goes on: “for His Name alone is exalted; His glory is above the earth and the heavens.”
Marei mekomos
- 1יהללו את שם · Psalms 148:13
5ונק׳ בחינת מלך. כמו למשל המלך על מדינתו שאין עצמותו ומהותו נתפס ומתפשט במדינה כולה רק שמו לבדו שנקרא מלך עליהם.
And it is called the level of “King.” As, for example, a king over his country: his essence and being are not caught up in and spread through the whole country; only his name alone, in that he is called king over them.
A third image is a king. The king’s own person does not spread through his country; only his name, his being called king over the people, reaches every part of it.
כמו״כ [כמו כן] למעלה מה שאלקות מחיה כל העולמות הוא רק בחי׳ מלכות שבמה שהוא מלך עליהם מחיה ומהוה אותם דהיינו שמו יתברך בלבד
So too Above: that G‑dliness gives life to all the worlds is only the level of Malchus (sovereignty): in that He is King over them, He gives them life and brings them into being; that is, His Name, blessed be He, alone.
Likewise, the life G‑d gives the worlds comes from His Malchus, His being King over them. That is only His “Name,” not His essence.
אבל מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ אינו בגדר המשכה והתגלות כי הוא לבדו מרום וקדוש כו׳ אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם כו׳.1
But His being and essence, blessed be He, is not within the bounds of drawing down and revelation, for He alone is exalted and holy, etc.: “You are He before the world was created, etc.”
His being and essence are beyond drawing down and revelation altogether: He alone is exalted and holy. This is what the prayer means by “You are He before the world was created”: He remains as He was, untouched by creation.
A third image: the life-force of the worlds is G‑d’s Malchus, His Kingship, which, like a king’s name over his country, reaches the subjects, while His essence remains beyond revelation.
Marei mekomos
- 1אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמה יש הגהה לכאן.
Now, in the old version it was written, “You are He before You created”; and now the version is “before [the world] was created, etc.”
The maamar notes that the wording of that prayer was changed. The older version read “before You created,” in the active voice; the current version reads “before [the world] was created,” in the passive.
והעיקר הוא כנוסחא זו כי כן הוא לשון הפסוק יהללו את שם כו׳ כי הוא צוה ונבראו2 כו׳.
And the correct [version] is this one, for this is the wording of the verse, “Let them praise the Name, etc., for He commanded and they were created, etc.”
The current version is the correct one, because it follows the verse “Let them praise the Name … for He commanded and they were created,” where the creatures “were created,” in the passive. Why the passive matters is explained in the next paragraph.
The paragraph notes the change in the prayer’s wording from “before You created” to “before [the world] was created” and upholds the second as matching the verse “for He commanded and they were created.”
In a note to his discourse beginning “Lecha Amar Libi” (5720), cited by the Kehot note, the Rebbe explains the change of version. In the early generations there was room to think that creation is a true existence, and that had to be denied; after the revelation of Kabbalah, which was also a preparation for Chassidus with its stress on G‑d’s unity, there is no room for that thought, and what must be denied is that there is even the subtlest “existence,” as in “You are He before [the world] was created, You are He after [the world] was created.”
Marei mekomos
- 1והנה בנוסחא הישנה . . ועתה הוא הנוסחא עד שלא נברא · ”כי בדורות הראשונים הי׳ מקום לקס״ד שישנה גם מציאות ממש והי׳ צריך לשלול קס״ד זה. אבל לאחרי שנתגלתה תורת הקבלה, שזה היה גם הקדמה לגילוי תורת החסידות שבה מודגש ענין אחדותו ית׳ — בנוגע למציאות ממש, אין מקום לקס״ד כזה, וזה שצריך לשלול הוא שלא ישנו אפילו ”מציאות” שבתכלית הדקות אתה הוא עד שלא נברא כו׳ אתה הוא משנברא כו׳” — ד״ה לך אמר לבי תש״כ הערה 49. (נדפס בסה״מ מלוקט ח״ג ע׳ רפז).
- 2
7וההפרש בין בראת לנברא1 הוא כי בראת משמע שהעצמות נמשך ג״כ בבחינה זו כמו עד״מ האדם כשחושב ומעיין באיזה דבר אזי עצמותו ג״כ נמשך במחשבה זו שאינו חושב דבר אחר.
The difference between “You created” and “was created” is this: “You created” implies that the essence too is drawn into this level; as, by way of analogy, when a person thinks about and studies some matter, his essence too is drawn into this thought, so that he thinks of nothing else.
“You created” implies that the Creator Himself is drawn into the act, as a person who concentrates on a subject is wholly drawn into that thought and thinks of nothing else.
אבל אצלו ית׳ הוא אינו כן שאינו נוגע לעצמותו כלל רק דרך זיו והארה בעלמא והרי הוא כאילו נברא ממילא2 כי אינו פועל שום שינוי ח״ו [חס ושלום] בעצמותו כלל.
But with Him, blessed be He, it is not so: it does not touch His essence at all, but is only by way of a mere radiance and illumination; and so it is as though it were created of itself, for it effects no change, Heaven forbid, in His essence at all.
With G‑d it is not so: creation does not touch His essence and is only a glow and illumination from Him. So it is as though the world “was created” of itself, and nothing changes in Him.
ולכן נכון הוא זאת הנוסחא עד שלא נברא כו׳ (וכמ״ש השל״ה [השני לוחות הברית] בהקדמה דף ג׳ ע״ב)
Therefore this version, “before [the world] was created, etc.,” is correct (and as the Shelah wrote in the Introduction, page 3b);
This is why the passive wording, “before [the world] was created,” is correct. The text notes that the Shelah (Shnei Luchos HaBris) writes so in his Introduction.
וכמו זיו השמש מן השמש שאין שייך לומר שהשמש מאיר זיוו רק שנמשך ממילא הזיו מן השמש.
and as with the radiance of the sun from the sun: it is not fitting to say that the sun shines its radiance; rather, the radiance is drawn from the sun of itself.
The sun gives the analogy: one cannot say that the sun “shines out” its rays as an act; the rays simply come from it of themselves.
וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] למעלה כשעלה ברצונו יתברך שמו לברוא את העולם האציל והמשיך מבחי׳ אורו ית׳ שאינו נוגע לעצמותו ב״ה כלל
So too Above: when it arose in His will, blessed be His Name, to create the world, He emanated and drew down from the level of His light, blessed be He, which does not touch His essence, blessed be He, at all,
So too, when G‑d willed to create the world, He emanated and drew down from His light, which does not touch His essence.
רק דרך זיו והארה בעלמא והארה זו היא מקור חיות והתהוות כל העולמות והרי הוא רק כאילו צוה ונבראו3 ממילא שאין להם ערך ויחוס כלל אליו יתברך.
but only by way of a mere radiance and illumination. And this illumination is the source of the life-force and the coming into being of all the worlds. And so it is only as though “He commanded and they were created” of themselves, for they bear no comparison or relation to Him, blessed be He, at all.
That illumination, a mere glow, is the source of the life and existence of all the worlds. So they came into being as the verse says, “He commanded and they were created,” as if of themselves, since they bear no comparison or relation to Him.
The paragraph explains the passive wording: “You created” would imply that G‑d’s essence is involved in creation, but the worlds come from a mere radiance, like the sun’s rays that issue of themselves, so it is as though they “were created” of themselves.
In the same discourse of 5720 (sec. 5, note 35), cited by the Kehot note, the Rebbe asks what is new in saying that creation makes no change in G‑d. He answers that even an action that comes about “of itself” shows that its origin is in the category of a source of that action, and an action that comes from a “source,” even of itself, does make a change, at least a subtle one.
Marei mekomos
- 1וההפרש בין בראת לנברא · ראה אוה״ת מג״א ע׳ ב׳שסג [בהוצאה החדשה ע׳ קעב]. מובא בהגהות לד״ה פתח אליהו תרנ״ח ע׳ לד.
- 2כאלו נברא ממילא · בד״ה לך אמר לבי תש״כ סעי׳ ה׳ הערה 35 (נ׳ סה״מ מלוקט ח״ג ע׳ רפה) מבאר ”מהו החידוש בזה שהבריאה אינו פועלת שינוי בו׳ ית׳. והביאור בזה כי גם פעולה הבאה בדרך ממילא מורה שהדבר שממנו באה הפעולה הוא בגדר מקור להפעולה . . דפעולה שבאה מ”מקור” (גם כשהיא באופן דבדרך ממילא) עושה שינוי (בדקות עכ״פ)” ע״ש.
- 3צוה ונבראו · Psalms 148:5
Two kinds of kingship; leaving the realm of limit ¶8–10
This is [the meaning of] “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds”: for there are two levels, namely the level of “Your kingship” and the level of “the kingship of all worlds.”
Psalms 145:13 says, “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds.” The maamar reads the two phrases as two levels: “Your kingship,” Malchus as it is within G‑d Himself, and “the kingship of all worlds,” Malchus as it gives life to the worlds.
פי׳ מלכות כל עולמים היינו מה שמחיה כל עולמים והוא בחי׳ מלכותו לבד כו׳. ויש כמה עולמות בי״ע כי הנה כתיב כל הנקרא בשמי3 ולכבודי בראתיו יצרתיו אף עשיתיו.
The explanation: “the kingship of all worlds” is that which gives life to all worlds, and it is the level of His Malchus alone, etc. And there are several worlds, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah; for it is written, “Everyone that is called by My Name, and for My glory, I have created him, I have formed him, indeed I have made him.”
“The kingship of all worlds” is the Malchus that gives life to the worlds. These are the worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, named after the three verbs of Isaiah 43:7: “I have created him (berasiv), I have formed him (yetzartiv), indeed I have made him (asisiv).”
בראתיו היינו בחי׳ בריאה והיינו בחי׳ הנשמות שהמה בחי׳ בריאה כי בריאה הוא יש מאין4 ממש
“I have created him” is the level of Beriah (Creation), namely the level of the souls, which are the level of Beriah; for Beriah is truly something from nothing,
“I have created” refers to Beriah, the realm of the souls. Beriah, creation, means bringing about something from nothing: a new existence where there was none.
וכמו למשל המחשבה הוא בחי׳ בריאה שהוא יש מאין ממש כי קודם שחושב לא היו האותיות כלל ואח״כ בבחי׳ מחשבה הם האותיו׳ [האותיות].
as, for example, thought is the level of Beriah, since it is truly something from nothing: for before one thinks, the letters did not exist at all, and afterwards, in the level of thought, the letters are there.
The analogy is thought: before a person thinks, the letters of the thought did not exist at all, and then they are there. Thought is thus “something from nothing,” and it corresponds to Beriah.
The paragraph begins to explain “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds” as two levels of Malchus, and starts to describe the worlds that the lower level gives life to, beginning with Beriah, the realm of the souls, which is “something from nothing,” like thought.
Marei mekomos
- 1וזהו מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים · ראה ביאוה״ז להצ״צ כרך א ע׳ רמא שמציין לכאן.
- 2מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים · Psalms 145:13
- 3כל הנקרא בשמי · Isaiah 43:7
- 4כי בריאה הוא יש מאין · ראה לעיל פ׳ ראה כ, ג. ואתחנן ב, ב ואילך. וראה במ״מ לשם.
9וכמו״כ [וכמו כן] נשמות ישראל עלו במחשבה12 כו׳. ולכן נק׳ בחי׳ בריאה. יצרתיו הוא עולם המלאכים שהמה בחי׳ יצירה כי המה בחינת דיבור בדבר ה׳ שמים נעשו3 וברוח פיו כו׳.
So too, the souls of Israel “arose in thought,” etc.; therefore they are called the level of Beriah. “I have formed him” is the world of the angels, who are the level of Yetzirah (Formation), for they are the level of speech: “By the word of G‑d the heavens were made, and by the breath of His mouth, etc.”
The souls of Israel “arose in thought” before creation, so they correspond to Beriah, which is like thought. “I have formed him” is the world of the angels, Yetzirah, which corresponds to speech, as in “By the word of G‑d the heavens were made.”
וכמו הדיבור שנמשך מהמחשבה כי מה שהאדם חושב הוא מדבר ואינו בחי׳ יש מאין רק בחי׳ יש מיש
As with speech, which is drawn from thought: for what a person thinks, he speaks; and it is not the level of something from nothing, but only the level of something from something;
Speech comes from thought: what a person says is what he has already thought. So speech is not “something from nothing,” only “something from something.”
רק מה שהיה בתחלה בהעלם המחשבה ועתה הוא בגלוי בדבור ואינו רק בחינת חומר וצורה חומר הוא ההעלם כח היולי וצורה הוא הגילוי
only, what was at first in the concealment of thought is now revealed in speech. And it is only the level of matter and form: matter is the concealment, the hylic potential, and form is the revelation;
Speech only reveals what was hidden in thought, as form shapes matter. Matter here is the hidden, potential stage (the philosophers’ “hylic” matter, matter before it takes any shape), and form is its revelation.
and therefore it is called by the name Yetzirah (Formation), etc. (as is written about this elsewhere, in the discourse beginning “Who can count” in Parshas Balak, and in the discourse beginning “Return, O Israel”).
Yetzirah means “formation,” giving form to what already exists, as speech gives outward form to thought. The text refers to two other discourses in Likkutei Torah that explain the three verbs of the verse in the same way.
אף עשיתיו היינו בחינת עולם העשי׳ [העשיה] כוכבים ומזלות כו׳.6 וכל העולמות הנ״ל אינם מקבלים חיותם רק מבחינת שם בלבד כל הנקרא בשמי7 כו׳.
“Indeed I have made him” is the level of the World of Asiyah: the stars and the constellations, etc. And all the worlds mentioned above receive their life-force only from the level of a name alone: “Everyone that is called by My Name, etc.”
“Indeed I have made him” is Asiyah, the world of the stars and the constellations. All three worlds receive their life only from G‑d’s “Name,” as the verse begins: “Everyone that is called by My Name.”
וזהו הכל בחינת מלכות כל עולמים אבל בחינת מלכותך הוא כמו שבחינת מל׳ הוא בטל בעצמותו
And all this is the level of “the kingship of all worlds.” But the level of “Your kingship” is as the level of Malchus is nullified within His essence;
All this is “the kingship of all worlds.” “Your kingship,” by contrast, is Malchus as it is nullified within G‑d’s own essence, before it turns toward the worlds.
כמו עד״מ זיו השמש הכלול בשמש עצמו8 שאינו נראה שם כלל רק הוא בטל בעצמותו ואין אורו וזיוו ניכר ונראה רק על הארץ כו׳.
as, by way of analogy, the radiance of the sun as it is included in the sun itself: there it is not seen at all, but is nullified within its essence, and its light and radiance are discernible and seen only on the earth, etc.
The analogy: the sun’s radiance, inside the sun itself, is not seen at all, for it is swallowed up in its source. It becomes visible as light only on the earth, away from the sun.
וזהו קודם שנברא העולם הי׳ [היה] הוא ושמו בלבד דהיינו שהי׳ [שהיה] שמו נכלל בעצמותו (ועמ״ש בד״ה תקעו בחודש9 מזה ובד״ה שיר השירים10 ובביאור ע״פ שחורה אני11 ונאוה) וזהו ג״כ ענין נגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים הקדוש ב״ה כו׳.
This is [the meaning of] “Before the world was created, there were He and His Name alone”: that is, His Name was included in His essence (and see what is written about this in the discourse beginning “Blow the shofar at the New Moon,” and in the discourse beginning “The Song of Songs,” and in the explanation on “I am black, yet comely”). And this is also the meaning of “the King of the kings of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, was revealed to them,” etc.
This explains “Before the world was created, there were He and His Name alone”: before creation G‑d’s Name, His Malchus, was included in His essence. The same distinction explains the Haggadah’s phrase “the King of the kings of kings.”
מלך היינו בחינת מלכות כל עולמים שמחי׳ כ״ע [כל עלמין] בחינת זיו ושם לבד כו׳ ובחינת מלך מלכי המלכים היינו בחינת מלכותך כמו שנכלל בבחינת עצמותו הוא ושמו לבד.12
“King” is the level of “the kingship of all worlds,” which gives life to all worlds: the level of radiance and a name alone, etc. And the level of “King of the kings of kings” is the level of “Your kingship,” as it is included in the level of His essence: He and His Name alone.
“King” alone is Malchus as the kingship of the worlds, a mere radiance and name. “King of the kings of kings” is “Your kingship,” Malchus as it is included in G‑d’s essence, the state of “He and His Name alone.”
(ועיין בפרדס בעה״כ [בערכי הכינויים] ערך מלך13 והיותר מתיישב אצלנו כו׳ ע״ש) וזה היה נגלה עליהם אז בחי׳ מלכותך שלמעלה מן ההשתלשלות שהוא בחינת14 מהותו וע צמותו כו׳.
(And see the Pardes, in Erchei HaKinuyim, the entry “Melech” (King): “And what sits better with us,” etc.; see there.) And this is what was revealed to them then: the level of “Your kingship,” which is above the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), the level of His being and essence, etc.
The text refers to the Pardes, which treats “King” in its section on the Kabbalistic names, and to the reading there that “sits better.” What was revealed at the Exodus was “Your kingship,” which is above the whole chain of worlds: G‑d’s very being and essence.
וזהו כי אז היה יציאת מצרים כי ענין מצרים הוא בחינת מיצר וגבול כמו עולם הגשמי הוא גבול מהלך ת״ק שנה15 ואף עולם המלאכים הוא בחינת גבול וצבא השמים לך משתחוים16 בחינת יש כו׳.17
And this is why the Exodus from Egypt took place then. For Mitzrayim (Egypt) is the level of meitzar (constriction) and limit: just as the physical world is a limit, a journey of five hundred years, and even the world of the angels is the level of limit, “And the host of heaven bow down to You,” the level of yesh (a [separate] something), etc.
Hence the Exodus came then. Mitzrayim, Egypt, is read as meitzar, constriction and limit, and every created world is limited: the physical world is bounded, “a journey of five hundred years” (the Talmud’s distance from the earth to the firmament), and the angels, who “bow down to You,” are each a separate existence (yesh) before G‑d.
The paragraph completes the account of the worlds that receive life from “the kingship of all worlds” (Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah) and contrasts it with “Your kingship,” Malchus included in G‑d’s essence. This higher level, “the King of the kings of kings,” was revealed at the Exodus, and because it is beyond all limit it could bring Israel out of Mitzrayim, the realm of limit.
On “Blow the shofar at the New Moon” the Kehot note brings Or HaTorah’s summary: Havayah is like the sun and Elokim like its shield; without the shield the sun would not shine as radiance, and in the future G‑d will take the sun out of its sheath. The radiance that shines through the shield is “the kingship of all worlds”; what is above it is “Your kingship.” Likkutei Torah, Tzav, explains “King of the kings of kings” through the Sefiros: the “kings” are Netzach, Hod and Yesod, the “kings of kings” Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes, and the “King of the kings of kings” Chochmah, Binah and Daas, for the Infinite Light rests in Chochmah.
Marei mekomos
- 1נשמות ישראל עלו במחשבה · ב״ר רפ״א.
- 2נשמות ישראל עלו במחשבה · Bereshit Rabbah 1:4
- 3בדבר ה׳ שמים נעשו · Psalms 33:6
- 4בד״ה מי מנה · לעיל פ׳ חקת סז, א: ”בראתיו הוא בחי׳ מחשבה שהוא יש מאין יצרתיו הוא בחי׳ דיבור שהוא בחי׳ צורה שמצייר האותיות שבמחשבה אף עשיתיו הוא בחי׳ המעשה”.
- 5ובד״ה שובה ישראל · לעיל שבת שובה סו, ב: ”בראתיו בחי׳ מחשבה כי בריאה היא מאין ליש כך המחשבה היא מאין שלא נולדו ונתהוו בחי׳ אותיות קודם המחשבה ואותיות המחשבה הן בבחי׳ העלם . . ויצרתיו . . מלשון צורה שמצייר חומר ההיולי שהוא בבחי׳ ההעלם והצורה הוא גילוי להחומר.
- 6שו״ה ומזלות כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמו הגהה לכאן.
- 7כל הנקרא בשמי · Isaiah 43:7
- 8הכלול בשמש עצמו · ראה אוה״ת יתרו ע׳ תתלד.
- 9בד״ה תקעו בחדש · לעיל ר״ה נה, א: ”שאם לא הי׳ המגן והמכסה לא היה השמש מאיר בבחי׳ זו כו׳ ולע״ל הקב״ה מוציא חמה מנרתיקה כו׳ ע״ש. וזהו שלמעלה מבחי׳ זיו והארה המאיר ע״י מגן ונרתק כו׳ ומזה יובן ההפרש בין מלכות כ״ע ובין מלכותך כו׳” — אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמו הערה לכאן.
- 10ובד״ה שיר השירים · לעיל א, סע״ב.
- 11ובביאור ע״פ שחורה אני · לעיל ח, א במ״ש שם בענין בחי׳ זיו ואור השמש המתפשט מן השמש ע״ש.
- 12בבחינת עצמותו הוא ושמו לבד · ראה אוה״ת תרומה ע׳ א׳תא.
- 13בפרדס בעה״כ ערך מלך · ”והיותר מתיישב אצלנו, כי מלך הוא כ״ע והוא מלך המולך על מלכי שהם שני מלכים חכמה ובינה שהם מלכים המולכים על שבעה מלכים שהם שבע׳ ימי הבנין”. — אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ב ע׳ תשע. ראה אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רנג.
- 14שו״ה שהוא בחינת — מהותו ועצמותו כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמו הגהה לכאן.
- 15מהלך ת״ק שנה · Chagigah 13a:3
- 16וצבא השמים לך משתחוים · Nehemiah 9:6
- 17ובחי׳ מלך מלכי המלכים היינו בחי׳ מלכותך · ראה לעיל פ׳ צו יב, ב. דשם נראה שהוא חב״ד, וראה במ״מ לשם.
10וגם עולם הנשמות המה בחינת גבול כי כל צדיק נכוה מחופתו של חבירו1 ממילא הם בחינת גבול ויש גבול להשגתן וכשנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים כו׳
And the world of the souls, too, is the level of limit, for “every tzaddik is burned by the canopy of his fellow”; consequently they are the level of limit, and there is a limit to their comprehension. And when the King of the kings of kings was revealed to them, etc.,
Even the souls are limited: the Talmud says that in the World to Come each tzaddik “is burned by the canopy of his fellow,” so each has his own measure, and his comprehension has a limit. The text then returns to the revelation of the King of the kings of kings.
בחינת הוא ושמו לבד שלמעלה מההשתלשלות העולמות בחי׳ מהותו ועצמותו אז הי׳ [היה] יציאת מצרים כו׳.
the level of “He and His Name alone,” which is above the chain of descent of the worlds, the level of His being and essence, then the Exodus from Egypt took place, etc.
That revelation was of “He and His Name alone,” G‑d’s essence above the whole chain of worlds and beyond every limit. That is why it could bring Israel out of Mitzrayim, the realm of limit.
(ועמ״ש מענין בחינות מצרים ויציאת מצרים בד״ה בחדש השלישי2 לצאת בנ״י [בני ישראל] מאמ״צ [מארץ מצרים] ובד״ה אני הוי׳ אלקיכם אשר הוצאתי אתכם מארץ מצרים ס״פ שלח):3
(And see what is written on the matter of the levels of Egypt and of the Exodus from Egypt in the discourse beginning “In the third month after the Children of Israel went out of the land of Egypt,” and in the discourse beginning “I am Havayah your G‑d, who brought you out of the land of Egypt,” at the end of Parshas Shelach.)
The text refers to two discourses on Egypt and the Exodus: one on “In the third month” (in Torah Ohr, Yisro), and one at the end of Parshas Shelach on the verse that closes the Shema, “I am Havayah your G‑d, who brought you out of the land of Egypt.”
Even the souls are limited, so only a revelation of G‑d’s essence, above all the worlds, could bring Israel out of Mitzrayim, the realm of limit.
According to the Kehot note, the relevant passage of the Torah Ohr discourse on “In the third month” runs from “to go out of the sheath of the animal soul” to “And Avram went up out of Egypt.”
Marei mekomos
- 1כל צדיק נכוה מחופתו של חברו · Bava Batra 75a:15
- 2בד״ה בחדש השלישי · בתו״א פ׳ יתרו ”לצאת מנרתק נה״ב כו׳, עד ויעל אברם ממצרים” — אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רנב.
- 3שו״ה יציאת מצרים — (ועמ״ש . . ס״פ שלח) · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמו נמצא הגהה אחרת וקיצור.
Two matzos and the maror ¶11–16
11ב והנה כדי שיהי׳ [שיהיה] בחי׳ גילוי זה היו צריכים לאכול מצה. וענין מצה הוא ע״ד שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] (ברכות ד״מ סע״א [סוף עמוד א])1 אין התינוק יודע לקרות אבא2 ואימא עד שיטעום דגן3
2. Now, in order that there be this level of revelation, they had to eat matzah. The matter of matzah is like what our Sages, of blessed memory, said (Berachos, folio 40, end of side a): “A child does not know how to call ‘Father’ and ‘Mother’ until he tastes grain.”
Chapter 2. To receive this revelation Israel had to eat matzah. The Talmud says that a child cannot call “Father” and “Mother” until he has tasted grain.
הנה יש בבחי׳ דגן כח שעל ידו יוכל התינוק להכיר אביו ואמו כמ״כ [כמו כן] ע״י בחי׳ מצה הכירו את אלקות בחי׳ מהותו ועצמותו דע את אלקי אביך4 לשון הכרה והרגשה כו׳.
Now, there is in grain a power through which the child can recognize his father and mother. So too, through matzah they recognized G‑dliness, the level of His being and essence: “Know the G‑d of your father,” a term of recognition and feeling, etc.
Grain gives the child the power to recognize his parents; so matzah, bread of grain, gave Israel the power to recognize G‑d’s own being. In “Know the G‑d of your father,” “know” means recognition and feeling.
The second chapter begins: matzah was needed in order to receive the revelation, because, as grain does for a child, matzah gives the power to recognize G‑d’s very being.
Marei mekomos
- 1שארז״ל (ברכות ד״מ סע״א) · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ג ע׳ תשמה.
- 2
- 3שו״ה יודע לקרות — טעם דגן · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמז יש הגהה לכאן.
- 4דע את אלקי אביך · I Chronicles 28:9
Now, there are two levels of matzah. The first was before midnight, and this one requires guarding: “And you shall guard the matzos,” etc.
There were two levels of matzah. The first, eaten before midnight, needed guarding against leavening, as the verse says, “And you shall guard the matzos.”
והב׳ שהוא בחי׳ עד שנגלה כו׳ שם נאמר לא הספיק בצקת של אבותינו כו׳ שאינה באה לידי חימוץ כלל.
And the second is the level of “before … was revealed,” etc.; there it is said, “The dough of our fathers did not have time,” etc., for it does not come to leavening at all.
The second came with the revelation after midnight; of it the Haggadah says that “the dough did not have time,” for it could not become leavened at all. This begins to answer the question of paragraph 2.
There are two matzos: the first, before midnight, needed guarding; the second, which came with the revelation after midnight, could not become leavened at all, and it is the one of which the Haggadah speaks.
According to the Kehot note, Or HaTorah on Bo observes that a difficulty still remains, since the Haggadah says that “this matzah that we eat,” the matzah eaten before midnight, is because the dough had no time to leaven. The note also refers to Pesachim 36a and its commentators, and to the Jerusalem Talmud, Pesachim 2:4.
Marei mekomos
- 1ב׳ בחי׳ מצה · Pesachim 36a
- 2ושמרתם את המצות · Exodus 12:17
13וצריך להבין ענין חמץ ומצה חמץ הוא בחי׳ הגבהה וההתנשאות ויש בו טעם. ומצה הוא בחי׳ שאין בה גובה והתנשאות כלל ואין בה טעם כלל.
We need to understand the matter of chametz and matzah. Chametz is the level of elevation and self-exaltation, and it has taste. Matzah is the level that has no height or self-exaltation at all, and it has no taste at all,
Chametz, leavened bread, rises and has flavor: it stands for elevation and self-exaltation. Matzah does not rise and has no flavor: it has no height or self-exaltation.
כמארז״ל [כמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] בלע מצה יצא1 וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] בעבודה ענין מצה הוא בחי׳ ביטול בטל רצונך2 כו׳3 וזה הי׳ [היה] בחי׳ מצה הראשונה שאכלו קודם חצות היינו אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא] בחי׳ בטל רצונך כו׳.
as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “If one swallowed matzah, he has fulfilled [his obligation].” So too in divine service, the matter of matzah is the level of self-nullification (bittul): “Nullify your will,” etc. And this was the level of the first matzah, which they ate before midnight, namely an arousal from below, the level of “Nullify your will,” etc.;
Matzah has so little taste that one who swallows it without tasting has fulfilled the mitzvah. In divine service matzah is self-nullification, “Nullify your will before His will”; this was the first matzah, eaten before midnight, Israel’s own effort: an arousal from below.
בחי׳ אתכפייא כו׳ (ועמ״ש מזה בפ׳ ויקהל בד״ה קחו מאתכם תרומה) שלא להיות בחי׳ גסות הקליפה אם תגביה כנשר4 כו׳5
the level of subduing (iskafya), etc. (and see what is written about this in Parshas Vayakhel, in the discourse beginning “Take from among you an offering”), so as not to be the level of the coarseness of kelipah: “Though you soar as high as the eagle, etc.”
This nullification is iskafya, subduing one’s nature, so as not to fall into the coarseness of kelipah, to which the prophet says, “Though you soar as high as the eagle … from there I will bring you down.”
וכידוע שבחי׳ גסות נקרא אבי אבות הטומאה67 שהוא מקור על התאוות כו׳ ולכן בבחי׳ בטל רצונך ממילא היא בחי׳ אתכפיא וכמ״ש ובערת הרע8 כו׳.9
And, as is known, the level of coarseness is called “the father of all fathers of impurity,” for it is the source of all the desires, etc. Therefore, in the level of “Nullify your will” there is of itself the level of subduing, as it is written, “And you shall eradicate the evil,” etc.
Coarseness, a person’s inflated sense of self, is called “the father of all fathers of impurity,” because every desire grows from it (the print has על, read as כל, “all”). So nullifying one’s will subdues the evil of itself, as in “And you shall eradicate the evil.”
Chametz is self-exaltation and matzah is self-nullification. The first matzah stood for Israel’s own bittul, “Nullify your will,” which subdues the coarseness of kelipah, the root of all desires.
A gloss in Or HaTorah on Shir HaShirim, quoted in the Kehot note, explains that the aim of this “elevation” of kelipah is to draw from the level where “darkness is as light” before G‑d, and “if you are righteous, [what do you give Him]?”, so as not to need submission and self-nullification; and this, it says, is chametz.
Marei mekomos
- 1בלע מצה יצא · Pesachim 115b:6–7
- 2בטל רצונך · Pirkei Avot 2:4
- 3שו״ה וכמ״כ — בטל רצונך כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמט יש הגהה וקיצור לכאן.
- 4אם תגביה כנשר · Obadiah 1:4
- 5שו״ה להיות בחי׳ — כנשר כו׳ · אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמט הגהה לכאן. ”שהמכוון בהגבהה זו לינק מבחי׳ דקמי׳ כחשכא כאורה ואם צדקת כו׳ כדי שלא יצטרך להכנעה וביטול, וזהו ענין החמץ” ע״ש בארוכה.
- 6אבי אבות הטומאה · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רמט יש הגהה לכאן בפי׳ אבי אבות הטומאה.
- 7גסות נקרא אבי אבות הטומאה · ראה קונטרס ומעין מאמר ט״ו ואילך. ד״ה אני ישנה — תש״ט סעי׳ יא (ע׳ 119).
- 8ובערת הרע · Deuteronomy 17:7
- 9שו״ה ממילא — ובערת הרע כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רנ יש הגהה לכאן.
14וזהו ע״י בחי׳ מצה גם מלשון מצה ומריבה שהיא מלחמה גדולה לבטל היש כו׳.1 ובבחינת מצה זו היה ג״כ בחי׳ מרור על מצת ומרורים יאכלוהו2
And this is through the level of matzah, also in the sense of matzah u-merivah (“strife and contention”), for it is a great war to nullify the yesh (the sense of self), etc. And in this level of matzah there was also the level of maror (bitter herbs): “With matzos and bitter herbs they shall eat it,”
Matzah is also related to matzah in the sense of strife, as in matzah u-merivah: nullifying one’s sense of self is a great war. The first matzah came together with maror, bitter herbs, as the verse says, “with matzos and bitter herbs they shall eat it.”
כי בחינת מצה זו בחי׳ בטל רצונך לא היו יכולים לבוא אליו כ״א ע״י בחי׳ מרור בחינת מרירות כו׳.
for this level of matzah, the level of “Nullify your will,” they could not reach except through the level of maror, the level of bitterness, etc.
The bittul of “Nullify your will” could be reached only through maror, bitterness: a bitter feeling over one’s distance from G‑d, as the next paragraph explains.
דהנה כפי סדור הקערה הוא מרור באמצע בחי׳ קו האמצעי3 ולכאורה הי׳ [היה] צריך להיות המרור בקו שמאל
For according to the arrangement of the [seder] plate, the maror is in the middle, the level of the middle line. Yet at first glance the maror should have been on the left line,
On the seder plate as it is arranged, the maror sits in the middle, on the middle line of the Sefiros. One would expect it on the left line, the side of Gevurah, since bitterness is a form of severity.
כי הוא בחי׳ גבורות4 כו׳ (כמבואר בסש״ב [בספר של בינונים] בפל״א וכמ״ש ג״כ) (לקמן)5 בפ׳ במדבר בד״ה וידבר כו׳ מענין הג׳ לוים.
for it is the level of Gevuros (restraints), etc. (as is explained in Sefer Shel Beinonim, chapter 31, and as is also written) (below) in Parshas Bamidbar, in the discourse beginning “And He spoke,” etc., on the matter of the three Levites.
Bitterness belongs to the Gevuros, as Tanya, chapter 31, explains, and as a discourse in Parshas Bamidbar explains when it discusses the three Levite families.
מררי הוא בחי׳ המרירות כו׳ ע״ש וכ״ה בלק״ת [בלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] מהאריז״ל [מהאר״י זכרונו לברכה] פ׳ נשא והוא מבחינת גבורות כו׳ ועמ״ש מענין מררי בביאור ע״פ נשא את ראש בני גרשון6
Merari is the level of bitterness (merirus), etc.; see there. And so it is in Likkutei Torah of the Arizal, Parshas Naso, and it is from the level of Gevuros, etc. And see what is written on the matter of Merari in the explanation on “Take a census of the sons of Gershon.”
There Merari, from merirus (bitterness), is the level of bitterness, and the Arizal’s Likkutei Torah on Naso also places him in the Gevuros. The text refers as well to its explanation on the census of the sons of Gershon in Parshas Naso.
אך מפני זה הוא בקו האמצעי מפני שבחינת מרירות מעוררת המשכת רחמים רבים כי בחי׳ רחמים אינו שייך כ״א על מי שהוא במדרגה התחתונה ואין טוב לו
However, it is in the middle line for this reason: because the level of bitterness arouses the drawing down of abundant compassion. For compassion applies only to one who is at the lower level and is not well off;
Why then is the maror in the middle line? Because bitterness arouses an abundance of divine compassion, and compassion applies only to one who is low and lacking.
אבל על מי שהוא במדרגה העליונה ולא חסר לו כלל לא שייך עליו רחמנות כלל ומפני זה בחינת רחמים הוא בחינת קו האמצעי.
but for one who is at the higher level and lacks nothing at all, compassion does not apply to him at all. And for this reason the level of compassion is the level of the middle line.
No one has compassion on someone who lacks nothing. Compassion is the middle line, between kindness and restraint, so the maror, which arouses it, is placed in the middle.
The first matzah came with maror: the bittul it expresses is reached through bitterness, and the maror stands on the middle line of the seder plate, the line of compassion, because bitterness arouses G‑d’s abundant compassion.
In Tanya, chapter 31, bitterness and a broken heart are distinguished from sadness: they have life in them, a life from the holy Gevuros, while joy comes from the Chasadim. Here the maamar adds that this bitterness, though from Gevuros, is placed in the middle line because its effect is to arouse compassion.
Marei mekomos
- 1שו״ה גם מלשון — לבטל היש כו׳ · באוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ רנ יש הגהה לכאן.
- 2על מצות ומרורים יאכלוהו · Numbers 9:11
- 3מרור באמצע בחי׳ קו האמצעי · מובא גם באוה״ת פ׳ בהעלותך ע׳ תיט.
- 4כי הוא בחי׳ גבורות · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 31
- 5וכמ״ש ג״כ לקמן · ראה הערה בתחילת המאמר.
- 6בביאור ע״פ נשא את ראש בני גרשון · ראה לעיל פ׳ נשא כב, ב.
15ולעורר בחינת רחמים רבים הוא על ידי בחי׳ מרירות כשמתבונן בשכלו איך שחיות כל העולמות הוא רק בחינת זיו ושם בלבד
To arouse abundant compassion is through the level of bitterness: when one contemplates with his intellect how the life-force of all the worlds is only the level of radiance and a name alone,
Compassion is aroused through bitterness, and bitterness comes from contemplation: one thinks about how the life of all the worlds is only G‑d’s radiance and Name.
אבל מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ אני הוי׳ לא שניתי1 אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם כו׳
but His being and essence, blessed be He: “I, G‑d, have not changed”; “You are He before the world was created,” etc.,
G‑d’s own being, by contrast, is untouched by the worlds: “I, G‑d, have not changed”; “You are He before the world was created,” and the same after it was created.
בחי׳ הוא ושמו לבד ואין פועלים בו שום שינוי כי אין לו תחלה ולא תכלה כו׳
the level of “He and His Name alone,” and they effect no change in Him, for He has no beginning and no end, etc.
That is the level of “He and His Name alone”: the worlds change nothing in Him, for He has no beginning and no end.
ואזי תשתפך במר נפשו ויבא לידי מרירות גדולים איך שהוא רחוק מאלקות ועל ידי זה מעורר בחינת רחמים רבים כו׳
Then he will pour out [his heart] in the bitterness of his soul, and he will come to great bitterness over how far he is from G‑dliness; and through this he arouses abundant compassion, etc.
Seeing how far he himself is from G‑dliness, a person pours out his heart in bitterness. That bitterness arouses G‑d’s abundant compassion.
וכמו שאומרים בכל יום ביוצר אור המלך המרומם לבדו הו׳ היינו כנ״ל מה רבו מעשיך2 ה׳ כולם בחכמה עשית כו׳ הוא רק מבחינת המלך בחינת מלכות שם בלבד.
And as we say every day in [the blessing] Yotzer Or, “The King who alone is exalted,” etc.: that is, as mentioned above, “How manifold are Your works, G‑d; in wisdom You have made them all,” etc., is only from the level of “the King,” the level of Malchus, a name alone.
The daily blessing Yotzer Or expresses this. “The King” there refers back to “How manifold are Your works, G‑d,” which it follows: the works come only from G‑d as King, from Malchus, His Name.
אבל המרומם לבדו כו׳ היינו כמו שהוא לבדו בחי׳ הוא ושמו בלבד הוא מרומם שאין לו ערך ושינוי כלל אין ערוך לך כו׳
But “who alone is exalted,” etc., means: as He is alone, the level of “He and His Name alone,” He is exalted, for He has no comparison and no change at all: “There is none to compare to You,” etc.,
But “who alone is exalted” is G‑d as He is alone, “He and His Name alone,” beyond all comparison and change, as the same prayer says, “There is none to compare to You.”
המתנשא מימות עולם ואם כן הרחמנות גדולה עלינו ומפני זה אנו אומרים ברחמיך הרבים רחם עלינו3 כו׳.
“who is elevated since days of old.” If so, there is great cause for compassion on us; and therefore we say, “In Your abundant compassion, have compassion on us,” etc.
He is “elevated since days of old,” far above the worlds; so we, who are far from Him, are greatly in need of compassion. Hence the prayer goes on, “In Your abundant compassion, have compassion on us.”
(ועמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ והנה מנורת זהב.4 וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] בחנה והיא מרת נפש5 ועל ידי זה ותתפלל על ה׳. עמ״ש בד״ה לא תהיה6 מכשלה.
(And see what is written about this in the explanation on “And behold, a candelabrum of gold.” And this is what is said of Channah, “And she was bitter of soul,” and through this, “And she prayed to (al) G‑d”; see what is written in the discourse beginning “None shall miscarry.”
The text refers to the explanation on “And behold, a candelabrum of gold” in Likkutei Torah, Behaalosecha. Channah too was “bitter of soul,” and through this she prayed to G‑d (the verse says al, literally “upon”); the text refers to the Torah Ohr discourse on “None shall miscarry” (the print has מכשלה, read as משכלה, as in the Kehot note).
וזהו וימררוהו כו׳7 ועל ידי זה ותשב באיתן קשתו8 עמ״ש מענין איתן בד״ה ראה אנכי נותן.9 ובחרבי ובקשתי10 היינו בצלותי ובעותי)11 וזהו ענין מרור קו האמצעי כו׳.
And this is “And they embittered him,” etc., and through this, “But his bow abode in strength (eisan)”; see what is written on the matter of eisan in the discourse beginning “See, I set before you.” And “with my sword and with my bow” means “with my prayer and with my supplication.”) And this is the matter of maror [as] the middle line, etc.
So too with Yosef: “they embittered him,” and through this “his bow abode in strength.” Yaakov’s “with my sword and with my bow” is read as “with my prayer and with my supplication,” as the Targum renders it; bitterness leads to prayer, which draws compassion, and that is why the maror is on the middle line.
ועל ידי זה יכולים לבא לבחי׳ מצה הנ״ל בחינת בטל רצונך כו׳ בחינת אתכפיא בלי טעם ובלי שום התנשאות והגבהה וצריכה שמור ושמרתם את המצות12 שלא תבא לידי חימוץ ח״ו [חס ושלום] הגבהה והתנשאות
And through this one can come to the level of matzah mentioned above, the level of “Nullify your will,” etc., the level of subduing (iskafya), without taste and without any self-exaltation or elevation. And it requires guarding, “And you shall guard the matzos,” so that it does not come to leavening, Heaven forbid, [that is,] elevation and self-exaltation
Bitterness opens the way to the matzah of “Nullify your will,” a subduing of self without “taste” or self-exaltation. This matzah needs guarding, so that it does not turn into chametz, self-exaltation.
(ועיין בפרדס בעה״כ [בערכי הכינויים] ערך ושמירה אחת.13 ועיין בזח״ב [בזהר חלק ב׳]) (דקל״א14 א׳) בענין ליל שמורים.151617 (ודל״ח ב׳).18
(and see the Pardes, in Erchei HaKinuyim, the entry “And one guarding”; and see the Zohar, Part II) (131a), on the matter of “a night of guarding” (leil shimurim) (and 38b);
The text gives sources on guarding: the Pardes, which (as the Kehot note quotes it) says that it needs guarding because the kelipah surrounds it, and the Zohar on “a night of guarding.”
ור״פ בראשית גבי כשושנה בין החוחים19 לסחרא לה לכנסת ישראל ולנטרא לה20 כו׳21 ועיין מ״ש בד״ה צו את בני22 ישראל את קרבני כו׳ תשמרו להקריב לי.23
and at the beginning of Parshas Bereshit, concerning “as a lily among the thorns”: “to encircle her, the Community of Israel, and to guard her,” etc. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “Command the Children of Israel: My offering,” etc., “you shall guard to offer to Me.”
In the Zohar’s opening, the “lily among the thorns,” the Community of Israel, is encircled and guarded. The text also refers to the discourse on “Command the Children of Israel: My offering … you shall guard to offer to Me” in Likkutei Torah, Pinchas.
שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שמור זו משנה24 כו׳ והיינו לפי שבתורה שבעל פה הוא גילוי רצה״ע [רצון העליון] כו׳ ע״ש.
For our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “‘Guard’ refers to Mishnah,” etc.; and that is because in the Oral Torah there is the revelation of the supernal will, etc.; see there.
That discourse explains the Sages’ saying that “guard” refers to Mishnah: the Oral Torah reveals the supernal will. Guarding is thus tied to the revelation of G‑d’s will.
וע׳ עוד בפרדס ערך מצה25 ודבריו יובן עפמ״ש [על פי מה שכתוב] בד״ה זכור ושמור בדבור אחד26 נאמרו ועיין ברבות ר״פ עקב (דף רצ״ב ב׳) על פסוק ושמר ה׳ לך כו׳
And see further in the Pardes, the entry “Matzah”; his words will be understood according to what is written in the discourse beginning “‘Remember’ and ‘Guard’ were said in a single utterance.” And see the Midrash Rabbah, at the beginning of Parshas Eikev (folio 292b), on the verse “And G‑d will guard for you,” etc.,
The Pardes, under “Matzah,” reads shemurah (“guarded”) as a bride waiting for her husband, and the Torah Ohr discourse on “‘Remember’ and ‘Guard’” reads shamor as waiting, as in “and his father kept the matter” (both as the Kehot notes report). The text also points to the Midrash Rabbah on “And G‑d will guard for you.”
ושמרתם את המצות כו׳ ועיין מ״ש סד״ה את שבתותי תשמרו ומ״ש במ״א ע״פ לעבדה ולשמרה.27
“And you shall guard the matzos,” etc. And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “My Sabbaths you shall keep,” and what is written elsewhere on “to work it and to guard it.”
The reference continues with “And you shall guard the matzos.” The text adds the end of the discourse on “My Sabbaths you shall keep” and an explanation elsewhere of “to work it and to guard it.”
וזה היה הכל בחי׳ מצה ראשונה בחינת אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא] שהיו ישראל עושים ועי״ז היה אחר כך אחר חצות בחי׳ מצה שניה בחי׳ ביטול ע״י שנגלה עליהם מלך מלכי המלכים כו׳.28
And all this was the level of the first matzah, the level of an arousal from below, which Israel performed; and through this there came afterwards, after midnight, the level of the second matzah, the level of self-nullification, through the King of the kings of kings being revealed to them, etc.
All this, the bitterness and the guarded matzah, belongs to the first matzah, Israel’s own effort from below. Through it came the second matzah after midnight: a self-nullification brought about by the revelation of the King of the kings of kings.
The paragraph explains how bitterness arouses abundant compassion: contemplating that G‑d’s essence is untouched by the worlds, a person feels how far he is from Him, and his bitterness draws compassion, as the morning prayers say. Bitterness leads to the guarded first matzah, Israel’s own work, and through it came the second matzah after midnight.
Likkutei Torah, Pinchas, explains the prayer “In Your abundant compassion, have compassion on us”: the soul’s descent into the body, to occupy itself with eating and drinking, seems right to a person by his own measure, but before G‑d it is a very great descent. So we ask for His abundant compassion even though we do not feel the need for it, and this compassion has the power to arouse the love in the heart.
Marei mekomos
- 1אני הוי׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
- 2מה רבו מעשיך ה׳ · Psalms 104:24
- 3ברחמיך הרבים רחם עלינו · ראה לעיל פנחס עח, ג.
- 4בביאור ע״פ והנה מנורת זהב · לעיל פ׳ בהעלותך.
- 5והיא מרת נפש · I Samuel 1:10
- 6בד״ה לא תהיה משכלה · תו״א משפטים עט, ב.
- 7וימררוהו כו׳ ותשב באיתן קשתו · Genesis 49:23
- 8ותשב באיתן קשתו · Genesis 49:24
- 9בד״ה ראה אנכי נותן · לעיל פ׳ ראה בתחלתו.
- 10ובחרבי ובקשתי · Genesis 48:22
- 11בצלותי ובעותי · Onkelos Genesis 48:22
- 12ושמרתם את המצות · Exodus 12:17
- 13בפרדס בעה״כ ערך ושמירה אחת · ”והיא צריכה שמירה שסביבה הקליפה כו׳” — אוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רנג. אוה״ת בא ע׳ שב.
- 14בזח״ב (דקל״א א׳) · נעתק באוה״ת שמות ע׳ שב ”בענין שומר מה מליל ליל אצטריך לנטורא” וראה גם אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ג ע׳ תשנ.
- 15ליל שמורים · Exodus 12:42
- 16ליל שמורים · Zohar, Bo 5:129–6:141
- 17ליל שמורים · Zohar, Terumah 10:81–88
- 18ודל״ח ב׳ · ”בענין ליל שמורים” — אוה״ת ויקרא כרך ג ע׳ תשמה שם נעתק הלשון. אוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רנג. וראה גם אוה״ת שמות ע׳ שב.
- 19כשושנה בין החוחים · Song of Songs 2:2
- 20כשושנה בין החוחים לסחרא לה לכנסת ישראל ולנטרא לה · Zohar, Introduction 1:1–2:4
- 21ור״פ בראשית . . ולנטרא לה כו׳ · ”מכל סטרהא דלפי שהיא בין החוחים ע״כ דוקא נמשך בה הארת הכתר דהיינו י״ג ת״ד כדי לשמרה מן החיצונים” — אוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רנג.
- 22בד״ה צו את בנ״י את קרבני · לעיל פנחס עו, ב.
- 23צו את בני ישראל את קרבני כו׳ תשמרו להקריב לי · Numbers 28:2
- 24שמור זו משנה · Kiddushin 37a
- 25בפרדס ערך מצה · ”שמורה ר״ל מקושטת ממתנת לבעלה ל׳ שומרת יבם” — אוה״ת שה״ש כרך א ע׳ רנד. וראה גם אוה״ת פ׳ בא ע׳
- 26בד״ה זכור ושמור בדבור אחד · ”בפי׳ שמור מלשון ואביו שמר את הדבר [תו״א עא, ד]” — אוה״ת פ׳ בא ע׳ שב.
- 27לעבדה ולשמרה · Genesis 2:15
- 28ושמר ה׳ לך · Deuteronomy 7:12
16ובחי׳ מצה זו היא שלא הספיק בצקת כו׳ שאינה צריכה שימור כלל שאינה באה לידי חימוץ כלל מחמת שנגלה עליהם כו׳
And the level of this matzah is “the dough did not have time,” etc.: it needs no guarding at all, for it does not come to leavening at all, because [the King] was revealed to them, etc.
The second matzah is the one of which it is said that “the dough did not have time.” It needs no guarding, because the revelation of the King made leavening impossible.
והיא בחי׳ ביטול אמיתי שאין יכול לבא לידי בחינת הגבהה והתנשאות כלל ונגלה עליהם בחי׳ זו כדי שיהיה יציאת מצרים
And it is the level of true self-nullification, which cannot come to the level of elevation and self-exaltation at all. And this level was revealed to them so that the Exodus from Egypt could take place;
It is a true self-nullification, in which self-exaltation cannot arise at all. This level was revealed so that the Exodus could take place.
כי מחמת שהיו אז ישראל במדרגה שפלה מאד משוקעים בין הקליפות כידוע לא היו יכולים לצאת מבחי׳ זו עד שנגלה עליהם כו׳
for since Israel were then at a very low level, sunk among the kelipos, as is known, they could not go out from this level until [the King] was revealed to them, etc.;
Israel were then very low, sunk among the kelipos, the forces of concealment, and could not leave that state until G‑d was revealed to them.
ועל ידי גילוי הארה גדולה כזו היו יכולים לצאת כו׳ ולא היה בה מרור כלל כי היה גילוי מלמעלה למטה הארה גדולה כנ״ל ולא תוכל לבא לידי חימוץ
and through the revelation of so great an illumination they were able to go out, etc. And there was no maror in it at all, for it was a revelation from above to below, a great illumination, as mentioned above, and it could not come to leavening.
Only so great an illumination could bring them out. This matzah needed no maror, since it came from above to below, a revelation that left no room for leavening.
אבל מצה הראשונה הי׳ [היה] עבודתם מלמטה למעלה (ועמ״ש עוד מענין ב׳ בחינות מצה הנ״ל ע״פ ששת ימים תאכל מצות)12 ולכן היו צריכים מרור כו׳ לעורר רח מים רב ים.
But [with] the first matzah, their service was from below to above (and see what is written further on the matter of the two levels of matzah mentioned above, on “Six days you shall eat matzos”); therefore they needed maror, etc., to arouse abundant compassion.
The first matzah was Israel’s service from below to above, and so it needed maror, bitterness, to arouse G‑d’s abundant compassion. The text refers to its discussion of the two matzos on “Six days you shall eat matzos” in Likkutei Torah, Tzav.
וזהו שאנו אומרים מרור זה שאנו אוכלים ע״ש [על שם] מה ע״ש [על שם] שמררו המצרים3 את חיי אבותינו
And this is what we say: “This maror that we eat—on account of what? On account of the fact that the Egyptians embittered the lives of our fathers
The Haggadah’s words on the maror fit this: we eat it “because the Egyptians embittered the lives of our fathers.”
במצרים אבותינו הם המדות כידוע וחיי אבותינו הם המוחין שבמדות ובחינת מצרים ממררים את המדות כו׳ (ועמ״ש מזה בפ׳ שמות בד״ה קול דודי):4
in Egypt.” “Our fathers” are the emotive attributes (middos), as is known, and “the lives of our fathers” are the intellect (mochin) within the middos; and the level of Egypt embitters the middos, etc. (And see what is written about this in Parshas Shemos, in the discourse beginning “The voice of my beloved.”)
“Our fathers” are the middos, the emotions, and “the lives of our fathers” are the mochin, the intellect within the emotions that gives them life. “Egypt,” the state of constriction, embitters these emotions; the text refers to the Torah Ohr discourse on “The voice of my beloved” in Shemos.
The second matzah, revealed from above after midnight, needed neither guarding nor maror, and this revelation freed Israel from the depths of Egypt. The first matzah, Israel’s own service from below, needed maror to arouse compassion, as the Haggadah’s words on the maror hint.
Marei mekomos
- 1ע״פ ששת ימים תאכל מצות · לעיל פ׳ צו.
- 2ששת ימים תאכל מצות · Deuteronomy 16:8
- 3מרור זה שאנו אוכלים ע״ש . . שמררו המצרים · Pesachim 116b:2
- 4בפ׳ שמות בד״ה קול דודי · בתו״א פ׳ שמות.
The voice ¶17
17ג ועתה יובן פי׳ הפסוק קול דודי הנה זה בא מדלג על ההרים כו׳ דקאי על יציאת מצרים כו׳
3. Now the explanation of the verse “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes, leaping over the mountains,” etc., will be understood; for it refers to the Exodus from Egypt, etc.
Chapter 3 returns to the verse. With the foundations laid, the maamar can now explain “The voice of my beloved … leaping over the mountains” as describing the Exodus.
פי׳ קול הוא בחי׳ המשכה1 בלשון פסוק ואינו דוקא קול גשמי דהיינו בחי׳ הדבור דאדרבה זה נקרא קול זוטא שנמשך מן המדות אל הדבור ה׳ מוצאות הפה כו׳
The explanation: kol (“voice”) is the level of drawing down, in the language of the verse. And it is not necessarily a physical voice, that is, the level of speech; on the contrary, that is called the “small voice” (kol zuta), which is drawn from the middos into speech, [through] the five articulations of the mouth, etc.
In the verse “voice” (kol) means a drawing forth, not necessarily physical sound. Ordinary speech is only the “small voice,” which carries the emotions outward through the five organs of articulation (throat, palate, tongue, teeth and lips).
ויש קול גדול ולא יסף2 היינו בחינת קלא פנימאה דלא אשתמע3 כי בחינת קול זוטא הנ״ל נקרא קלא דאשתמע45 ובחינת קול גדול הנ״ל הוא קלא דלא אשתמע
And there is “a great voice that did not cease,” which is the level of the inner voice that is not heard (kala penima’ah delo ishtema). For the level of the “small voice” mentioned above is called “the voice that is heard,” and the level of the “great voice” mentioned above is “the voice that is not heard.”
At Sinai there was “a great voice that did not cease,” which the Zohar calls the inner voice that is not heard. Speech is “the voice that is heard”; the “great voice” is a voice that is not heard.
(עיין מענין קול גדול ברבות יתרו ס״פ כ״ח וס״פ כ״ט. במדבר רבה ס״פ בלק) (סוף ד׳ רע״ט).
(See on the matter of the “great voice” in the Midrash Rabbah on Yisro, at the end of section 28 and at the end of section 29; Bamidbar Rabbah, at the end of Balak) (end of folio 279).
The text gives sources on the “great voice” in the Midrash Rabbah, on Yisro and at the end of Balak.
ובזח״א [ובזהר חלק א] בראשית (דף נ׳ ע״ב. דר״י [דרבינו יצחק] ע״א)6 ח״ב [חלק ב׳] (קל״ז א׳). ח״ג [חלק ג׳] (דרס״א א׳). ועיין מ״ש מענין קול סד״ה הבאים ישרש78 ובד״ה וכל העם רואים.910
And in the Zohar, Part I, Bereshit (folio 50b; folio 210a); Part II (137a); Part III (261a). And see what is written on the matter of kol at the end of the discourse beginning “Those who come, he shall cause to take root,” and in the discourse beginning “And all the people saw.”
It adds passages of the Zohar and two discourses in Torah Ohr on kol: on “Those who come, he shall cause to take root” (Shemos) and on “And all the people saw the voices” (Yisro).
ובד״ה הקל קול יעקב1112 ובד״ה ויהי קול מעל לרקיע.1314 ובד״ה משה ידבר1516 ובענין מהרה ישמע כו׳ קול חתן וקול כלה כו׳
And in the discourse beginning “The voice is the voice of Yaakov,” and in the discourse beginning “And there was a voice from above the firmament,” and in the discourse beginning “Moshe would speak,” and on the matter of “Soon may there be heard,” etc., “the voice of the groom and the voice of the bride,” etc.
Further discourses on kol are listed: on “The voice is the voice of Yaakov,” on Yechezkel’s “voice from above the firmament,” on “Moshe would speak” (Torah Ohr, Yisro), and on the wedding blessing’s “the voice of the groom and the voice of the bride.”
והיינו בחי׳ המשכה מההעלם אל הגילוי היינו מן השכל אל המדות או אל השכל מלמעלה מן השכל שנמשך הכל מהעלם אל הגילוי נק׳ קול בחינת המשכה וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] הוא כאן שנגלה עליהם מלך כו׳
And this is the level of drawing down from concealment into revelation: that is, from the intellect to the middos, or to the intellect from above the intellect. Whatever is drawn from concealment into revelation is called kol (“voice”), the level of drawing down. So too here: that the King, etc., was revealed to them,
In all these, “voice” is the drawing of something from concealment into revelation: from intellect into emotion, or into intellect from what is above intellect. So too the revelation of the King at the Exodus is a “voice.”
הארה גדולה שלמעלה מהשתלשלות מהותו ועצמותו כו׳ נקרא גם כן בחינת קול המשכה מההעלם אל הגילוי. (ופירוש הנה זה בא עמ״ש לקמן בענן והגדת לבנך כו׳ בעבור זה17 כו׳):
a great illumination that is above the chain of descent, His being and essence, etc., is also called the level of “voice,” a drawing down from concealment into revelation. (And for the explanation of “Behold, this one (zeh) comes,” see what is written below on the matter of “And you shall tell your son,” etc., “because of this (zeh),” etc.)
The great illumination above the chain of worlds, G‑d’s very being, was drawn from concealment into revelation: this is “the voice of my beloved.” The word zeh in “Behold, this one comes” is explained later, with the Haggadah’s “because of this (zeh).”
Chapter 3 begins to explain the verse: “voice” means a drawing down from concealment into revelation, and the revelation of G‑d’s essence at the Exodus is “the voice of my beloved.”
The Torah Ohr discourse on “Those who come, Yaakov shall take root” explains that, in order to receive the Torah, Israel first came to Egypt, the level of bitterness, “with mortar and with bricks,” and afterward received it; so too the present exile prepares them to receive the inner dimension of the Torah in the future.
Marei mekomos
- 1קול הוא בחי׳ המשכה · ראה אוה״ת בהעלותך ע׳ שסז.
- 2קול גדול ולא יסף · Deuteronomy 5:19
- 3קלא פנימאה דלא אשתמע · Zohar, Vayigash 10:99–11:108
- 4קלא דאשתמע · זח״א (נ, ב). [כ].
- 5קלא דאשתמע · Zohar, Bereshit 83:235–86:248
- 6ובזח״א בראשית (דף נ׳ ע״ב דר״י ע״א) · ראה אוה״ת בראשית כרך ב רסד, א שם נעתק הלשון, ובכרך ד תתכה, א. תתצה, ב.
- 7סד״ה הבאים ישרש · תו״א נד, א.
- 8הבאים ישרש · Isaiah 27:6
- 9ובד״ה וכל העם רואים · תו״א עג, ג ואילך.
- 10וכל העם רואים · Exodus 20:15
- 11ובד״ה הקל קול יעקב · בסידור עם דא״ח יח, ב ואילך. עם הגהות באוה״ת בראשית כרך ד תתכב, א ואילך.
- 12הקל קול יעקב · Genesis 27:22
- 13ובד״ה ויהי קול מעל לרקיע · מאמרי אדה״ז נ״ך — יחזקאל ע׳ רלב. עם הגהות באוה״ת שבועות כרך ו ע׳ א׳תשכד. וראה בהמצויין לשם.
- 14ויהי קול מעל לרקיע · Ezekiel 1:25
- 15ובד״ה משה ידבר · בתו״א פ׳ יתרו.
- 16משה ידבר · Exodus 19:19
- 17והגדת לבנך כו׳ בעבור זה · Exodus 13:8
Leaping over the mountains ¶18
18מדלג על ההרים כו׳. שבחי׳ הארה גדולה לגילוי זה בא עליהם דרך דילוג ולא כסדר השתלשלות שהוא דרך עילה ועלול שיש ערך ושייכות זה לזה
“Leaping over the mountains,” etc.: the level of the great illumination for this revelation came upon them by way of a leap, and not in the order of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), which is by way of cause and effect, where there is a proportion and relation of one to the other;
“Leaping” means that the revelation skipped the ordinary order of the worlds. That order, hishtalshelus, is cause and effect, where each level stands in proportion and relation to the next.
כמו עד״מ מבשרי אחזה1 שהדבור נמשך מהמחשבה ומחשבה ממדות ומדות משכל כל זה נק׳ בחי׳ השתלשלות כו׳.
as, by way of analogy, “From my flesh I behold”: speech is drawn from thought, and thought from the middos, and the middos from the intellect; all this is called the level of hishtalshelus, etc.
Job’s “From my flesh I behold [G‑d]” makes the human soul a model: speech comes from thought, thought from emotion, emotion from intellect. Each stage grows from the one before it; this is called hishtalshelus.
אבל בחינת גילוי זה שהיה בשעת יציאת מצרים שנגלה עליהם מלך כו׳. מבחינת הוא ושמו לבד שלמעלה מהשתלשלות והארה כזו אינה יכולה לבא בדרך השתלשלות רק דרך דילוג
But this level of revelation, which took place at the time of the Exodus from Egypt, when the King, etc., was revealed to them, [was] from the level of “He and His Name alone,” which is above hishtalshelus; and such an illumination cannot come by way of hishtalshelus, but only by way of a leap;
The revelation at the Exodus came from “He and His Name alone,” which is above the whole chain. Such an illumination cannot come down step by step; it can only “leap.”
כמו עד״מ א׳ שמדלג מהר להר אחר שרחוק ממנו שאינו יכול לילך לשם רק דרך דילוג יכול לדלג עליו כו׳
as, by way of analogy, one who leaps from one mountain to another mountain far from it: he cannot walk there, and only by way of a leap can he leap over to it, etc.
It is like someone who must reach a distant mountain: he cannot walk there, but he can leap over to it.
כמ״כ [כמו כן] כאן נגלה עליהם בחי׳ והארה גדולה כזו מלמעלה למטה לפי שלא ערכם דרך דילוג והיינו ובמורא גדול2 זה גילוי שכינה
So too here: such a level and so great an illumination was revealed to them from above to below, not in proportion to them, by way of a leap. And this is “and with great awe”: this is the revelation of the Shechinah;
So the great illumination came from above to below, out of all proportion to Israel’s level. The Haggadah reads “and with great awe” as the revelation of the Shechinah.
היינו שנגלה עליהם בחי׳ מלך בחי׳ הוא ושמו לבד ונגלה עליהם בגילוי כ״כ [כל כך] עד שנפל עליהם מורא גדול ופחד מפני ה׳ כמ״ש או הנסה אלקים לבא3 לקחת לו גוי מקרב גוי כו׳.
that is, the level of King, the level of “He and His Name alone,” was revealed to them, and was revealed to them so openly that great awe and fear of G‑d fell upon them, as it is written, “Or has G‑d ventured to come and take for Himself a nation from the midst of a nation,” etc.
The King, “He and His Name alone,” was revealed so openly that great awe of G‑d fell upon them. Moshe’s words, “Or has G‑d ventured to come and take for Himself a nation from the midst of a nation,” describe this revelation, which ends “and with great terrors.”
מדלג על ההרים בזכות4 הרים היינו אבות5 וכמ״ש בגמרא (פרק קמא דראש השנה דף י״א א׳) ובמדרש (שמות רבה פרשה ט״ו)
“Leaping over the mountains”: in the merit of the mountains, that is, the Patriarchs, as is written in the Gemara (first chapter of Rosh Hashanah, folio 11a) and in the Midrash (Shemos Rabbah, section 15);
The Talmud and the Midrash say that G‑d “leapt over the mountains” in the merit of the Patriarchs, who are called mountains.
והיינו שעל ידי פסח מצה ומרור שאכלו שהם בחי׳ ג׳ קוין היו מעוררים למעלה בחי׳ אורות עליונים שהמה אברהם יצחק ויעקב מדות דאצילות6 ועל ידם היה בחי׳ דילוג בחי׳ ונגלה מדלג כו׳
that is, through the Pesach offering, the matzah and the maror that they ate, which are the level of the three lines, they aroused Above the level of the supernal lights, which are Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov, the middos of Atzilus; and through them came the level of the leap, the level of “and He was revealed, leaping,” etc.
The Pesach offering, the matzah and the maror correspond to the three lines, right, left and middle. By eating them Israel aroused the supernal Patriarchs, Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov, the attributes of Atzilus, and through them came the “leap.”
והנה בשיר השירים נאמר בלשון דילוג ובתורה נקרא בלשון פסח כמ״ש ופסח ה׳ על הפתח7 והוא ג״כ דילוג וקפיצה
Now, in Shir HaShirim it is said in terms of leaping, and in the Torah it is called by the term pesach (“passing over”), as it is written, “And G‑d will pass over the doorway”; and this too is leaping and skipping.
The Song speaks of “leaping,” while the Torah uses pesach, “passing over”: “And G‑d will pass over the doorway.” Both mean a leap and a skip.
והענין הוא שבתורה נאמר לאיזה מקום היה הדילוג דהיינו על הפתח היינו בחי׳ מל׳ זה השער לה׳8 כו׳.
And the matter is that the Torah says to which place the leap was: “over the doorway,” that is, the level of Malchus: “This is the gate to G‑d,” etc.;
The Torah adds where the leap went: “over the doorway.” The doorway is Malchus, “the gate to G‑d.”
ראשית חכמה יראת9 ה׳ כו׳ והיינו בחינת מלכות הנקרא מלכות כל עולמים10 שיורדת להחיות כל עולמים ונגלה בחי׳ מלך כו׳
“The beginning of wisdom is the fear of G‑d,” etc. This is the level of Malchus, which is called “the kingship of all worlds,” which descends to give life to all worlds; and the level of King, etc., was revealed,
“The beginning of wisdom is the fear of G‑d”: awe is the entrance to all service. Malchus is “the kingship of all worlds,” which descends to give life to the worlds, and into it the revelation of the King came.
הארה גדולה הנ״ל בבחי׳ מל׳ היינו בגילוי שנקרא פתח כו׳ שיכול להיות ובמורא גדול שיהיה פחד ויראה מפני ה׳ שזה נק׳ זה השער כו׳
the great illumination mentioned above, in the level of Malchus, that is, in revelation, which is called “doorway,” etc., so that there could be “and with great awe,” that there be fear and awe of G‑d; for this is what is called “This is the gate,” etc.:
The great illumination came into Malchus, the “doorway,” so that it could be felt as “great awe,” the fear of G‑d. That is why Malchus is called “the gate.”
זהו התחלת עבודת ה׳ בחינת יראה כו׳ רק שאז נגלה עליהם בבחי׳ זו הארה מבחינת מלך הוא ושמו כו׳.
this is the beginning of the service of G‑d, the level of awe, etc. Only, at that time there was revealed to them in this level an illumination from the level of King, “He and His Name,” etc.
Awe is the beginning of serving G‑d. At the Exodus, however, this awe came from a revelation of the King, “He and His Name,” from far above.
וזהו ובמורא גדול כו׳. וזהו ופסח ה׳ על הפתח כו׳ שנגלה עליהם בבחי׳ פתח11 (ועיין בפ׳ אמור דף צ״ה ע״א12 בפי׳ פתחי לי)1314
And this is “and with great awe,” etc. And this is “And G‑d will pass over the doorway,” etc.: that He was revealed to them in the level of “doorway” (and see in Parshas Emor, folio 95a, on the explanation of “Open to me”).
This is “with great awe,” and this is “And G‑d will pass over the doorway”: G‑d was revealed in Malchus, the doorway. The text refers to the Zohar in Parshas Emor on “Open to me,” which, as the Kehot note quotes it, reads: “You are the opening for Me to enter.”
ובשה״ש [ובשיר השירים] לא נאמר לאיזה מקום היה הדילוג רק נתפרש באיזה אופן היה הדילוג היינו על ההרים כו׳. ויש בזה ב׳ פירושים.
And Shir HaShirim does not say to which place the leap was; rather, it specifies in what manner the leap was, namely “over the mountains,” etc. And there are two explanations of this:
The Song does not say where the leap went; it says how: “over the mountains.” This has two meanings.
א׳ על ההרים בזכותן כנ״ל והב׳ על ההרים למעלה מן ההרים שהם מדות דאצי׳ שהארה הנ״ל היה למעלה מהם דהיינו בחינת מלך כו׳:15
the first, “over the mountains”: in their merit, as mentioned above; and the second, “over the mountains”: above the mountains, which are the middos of Atzilus, for the illumination mentioned above was above them, namely the level of King, etc.
Either “in the merit of” the mountains, the Patriarchs, or “above” the mountains: the revelation was higher than the attributes of Atzilus themselves, the level of the King.
The paragraph explains “leaping”: the revelation came not through the step-by-step chain of worlds but by a leap from above to below, in the merit of the Patriarchs or from above them, and it entered Malchus, “the doorway,” as great awe.
According to the Kehot note, the Tzemach Tzedek’s Yahel Or cites this passage: “And G‑d will pass over the doorway” is the revelation of the Infinite Light by a leap above the order of hishtalshelus, drawn into the “doorway,” which is Malchus; and the Zohar, Vayera 103b, explains in the same way that in the future all the supernal lights will be drawn and revealed in this “doorway.”
Marei mekomos
- 1מבשרי אחזה · Job 19:26
- 2ובמורא גדול · Deuteronomy 26:8
- 3או הנסה אלקים לבא · Deuteronomy 4:34
- 4
- 5בזכות הרים היינו אבות · ראה לעיל פ׳ תצא מ, א.
- 6שהמה אברהם יצחק ויעקב מדות דאצילות · ”ובלקו״ת בשה״ש בד״ה קול דודי מדלג על ההרים שהם האבות ויעקב כלול מכולם” — אוה״ת נ״ך כרך ב ע׳ תתג.
- 7ופסח ה׳ על הפתח · Exodus 12:23
- 8זה השער לה׳ · Psalms 118:20
- 9ראשית חכמה יראת ה׳ · Psalms 111:10
- 10מלכות כל עולמים · Psalms 145:13
- 11ופסח ה׳ . . בבחי׳ פתח · ביהל אור ע׳ תנד מציין שכאן ”בפי׳ ופסח ה׳ על הפתח שהוא גילוי אור א״ס בבחי׳ דילוג למעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות וגילוי זה נמשך על הפתח שהוא מל׳, ועד״ז נת׳ בזהר וירא ק״ג ע״ב שלע״ל יהיו כל האורות עליונים נמשכים ומתגלים בבחי׳ פתח הנ״ל”.
- 12בפ׳ אמור דף צ״ה ע״א · ”אנת הוא פתחא לאעלאה לי כו׳” — יהל אור ע׳ תנד.
- 13פתחי לי · Song of Songs 5:2
- 14פתחי לי · Zohar, Emor 25:123–26:131
- 15
Skipping over the hills ¶19–21
19ד מקפץ על הגבעות. ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] גבעות הם אמהות.12 ולהבין זאת הנה ההפרש בין דילוג3 לקפיצה הוא
4. “Skipping over the hills”: our Sages, of blessed memory, said that the hills are the Matriarchs. To understand this: the difference between leaping (dilug) and skipping (kefitzah) is
Chapter 4 takes up the second half of the verse, “skipping over the hills,” which the Talmud reads as “in the merit of the Matriarchs.” To understand it, the maamar first defines the difference between leaping and skipping.
כי דילוג ברגל א׳ וקפיצה בב׳ רגלים וכמבואר במשנה פ״ח [פרק ח׳] דאהלות4 והדולג ממקום למקום והקופץ ממקום למקום5
that leaping is with one foot and skipping with two feet, as is explained in the Mishnah, chapter 8 of Ohalos: “one who leaps from place to place, and one who skips from place to place”
Leaping uses one foot and skipping both feet. The Mishnah in Ohalos mentions both, “one who leaps” and “one who skips,” as two different movements.
(ע״ש בפי׳ רבינו עובדיה מברטנורה6 ובפי׳ המשניות להרמב״ם [להרבי משה בן מימון]7 וגם בירושלמי פ״ה דביצה8 קיפוץ עוקר שתי רגליו כאחת9 כו׳).
(see there in the commentary of Rabbeinu Ovadiah of Bartenura and in the Rambam’s Commentary on the Mishnah; and also in the Jerusalem Talmud, chapter 5 of Beitzah: “Skipping: one lifts both his feet at once,” etc.).
The commentators on that Mishnah explain the difference. According to the Rambam (as the Kehot note quotes him), one who leaps keeps one foot on the ground and springs with the other, while one who skips lifts both feet from the ground together; the Jerusalem Talmud says the same of skipping.
ולהבין זה דהנה כל בחי׳ דילוג והארה גדולה שבאה מלמעלה אינה יכולה להתגלות כי אם בבחינת רגלים
To understand this: every level of leaping and great illumination that comes from Above can be revealed only in the level of “feet.”
Applying this Above: any great illumination that comes from Above by a “leap” can be revealed only through “feet,” the lowest level, which reaches down to the ground.
כי זהו הכלל בכל גחינת גילוי אינו נגלה כ״א בבחי׳ רגלים כו׳ כמ״ש ועמדו רגליו ביום ההוא10 כו׳
For this is the rule in every level of revelation: it is revealed only in the level of “feet,” etc., as it is written, “And His feet shall stand on that day,” etc.,
This is a general rule: revelation comes through “feet.” So Zechariah says of the future revelation, “And His feet shall stand on that day.”
והארץ הדום רגלי11 (ועמ״ש בד״ה כיצד מרקדין לפני הכלה כו׳ ובד״ה למנצח על השמינית וע׳ בלק״ת [בלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] ס״פ משפטים12 בד״ה מצות ראיה כו׳).
and “the earth is My footstool” (and see what is written in the discourse beginning “How does one dance before the bride,” etc., and in the discourse beginning “For the conductor, on the Sheminis”; and see Likkutei Torah, at the end of Parshas Mishpatim, in the discourse beginning “The mitzvah of appearing,” etc.).
And Isaiah says, “the earth is My footstool”: G‑d’s “feet” are where He touches the lowest realm. The text refers to further discussions, among them the Arizal’s Likkutei Torah on Mishpatim (so the Kehot note identifies it).
ויש ב׳ בחי׳ רגלים היינו ב׳ בחינות בבחינת גילוי והארה הנ״ל בחינת קו הימין וקו השמאל בחי׳ אהוי״ר [אהבה ויראה] כו׳.
And there are two levels of “feet,” that is, two levels in the revelation and illumination mentioned above: the level of the right line and the left line, the level of love and awe, etc.
The two “feet” are the two lines of revelation, right and left: love and awe.
והנה ע״י ההרים אבות הנ״ל היה נגלה עליהם הארה הנ״ל רק בבחי׳ אהבה וימינו תחבקני.13
Now, through the mountains, the Patriarchs mentioned above, the illumination mentioned above was revealed to them only in the level of love: “and his right hand embraces me.”
Through the mountains, the Patriarchs, the revelation came only through love, the right side, as in “and his right hand embraces me.” That is a leap with one foot.
The paragraph explains the difference between leaping (one foot) and skipping (two feet), and that revelation from Above comes through “feet,” the two lines of love and awe. Through the Patriarchs the revelation came only in love, one foot.
Marei mekomos
- 1גבעות הם אמהות · ר״ה (יא, א). [כ].
- 2גבעות הם אמהות · Rosh Hashanah 11a:8
- 3ההפרש בין דילוג וקפיצה · השפת אמת (להאדמו״ר מגור) בדרושים לפסח על הפסוק מקפץ על הגבעות מציין לכאן.
- 4במשנה פ״ח דאהלות · מ״ה.
- 5
- 6בפי׳ רבינו עובדיה מברטנורה · ”דולג בבהמה וחיה, וקופץ באדם, ויש אומרים דולג וקופץ תרווייהו באדם, אלא דולג שרגלו אחת מונחת בארץ ודולג בשניה, וקופץ בשתי רגליו” עכ״ל. וראה במלאכת שלמה שם ”פי׳ הראשון שהביא רעז״ל הוא פי׳ הר״ש ז״ל, והפירוש השני הוא להרמב״ם ז״ל וכותיה הסכים הרא״ש ז״ל.
- 7ובפי׳ המשניות להרמב״ם · ”ודולג הוא שיהיה רגלו אחד קיים בארץ וידלג בשני למקום אחר. וקופץ הוא שיסיר ב׳ רגליו יחד מהארץ ויקפוץ למקום אחר”.
- 8בירושלמי פ״ה דביצה · ה״ב.
- 9
- 10ועמדו רגליו ביום ההוא · Zechariah 14:4
- 11והארץ הדום רגלי · Isaiah 66:1
- 12וע׳ בלקו״ת ס״פ משפטים · להאריז״ל. נזכר גם לקמן נא, ג. אוה״ת פ׳ משפטים ע׳ א׳קעה. אוה״ת ויקרא כרך א ע׳ שכז. נתבאר באוה״ת בראשית כרך א רה, ב. שם כרך ה תתקטו, ב.
- 13וימינו תחבקני · Song of Songs 2:6
20וזהו מדלג ברגל א׳ על ההרים אבות ומקפץ על הגבעות בב׳ רגלים היינו שהיה גילוי זה בבחי׳ יראה ובמורא גדול כו׳.
And this is “leaping” with one foot “over the mountains,” the Patriarchs, and “skipping over the hills” with two feet: that is, this revelation was in the level of awe, “and with great awe,” etc.
So the verse’s two verbs fit: through the Patriarchs, the mountains, the revelation “leapt” on one foot; through the Matriarchs, the hills, it “skipped” on both feet, so that it came also as awe, “with great awe.”
על הגבעות אלו אמהות והנה בחינת אהבה בנקל יכול לבא לידי גילוי מבחי׳ יראה כנראה
“Over the hills”: these are the Matriarchs. Now, the level of love can come into revelation more easily than the level of awe, as is seen
The hills are the Matriarchs. Love comes into revelation more easily than awe, as experience shows.
בחוש שכל אדם יכול להתפעל בבחי׳ אהבה כרגע ובבחי׳ יראה אינו כ״כ [כל כך] מפני שבחי׳ יראה עילאה הוא למעלה במדרגה מבחי׳ אהבה כו׳
by experience: every person can be stirred to love in a moment, but to awe not so much, because the level of supernal awe (yirah ila’ah) is higher in rank than the level of love, etc.
Anyone can be moved to love in an instant, but awe is harder to reach, because supernal awe stands higher than love.
(ועיין בפ׳ מקץ בביאור על פסוק כי אתה נרי שאהבה רבה היא בחינת ה׳ עילאה ויראה עילאה היא בחי׳ יוד כו׳ וגם למעלה יותר כי
(And see in Parshas Miketz, in the explanation on the verse “For You are my lamp,” that great love (ahavah rabbah) is the level of the upper hei, and supernal awe is the level of the yud, etc. And even higher: for
The text refers to the explanation on “For You are my lamp” in Torah Ohr, Miketz: great love corresponds to the upper hei of the Name (Binah), and supernal awe to the yud (Chochmah), which is higher. It then goes higher still.
הנה יש טורי נהורא וטורי חשוכא1 פי׳ טורי נהורא הם המדות שנמשכים מן השכל חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דז״א וטורי חשוכא הם המדות שלמעלה מהשכל אהבה רבה חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א
there are “mountains of light” (turei nehora) and “mountains of darkness” (turei chashocha). The explanation: the “mountains of light” are the middos that are drawn from the intellect, Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin; and the “mountains of darkness” are the middos that are above the intellect, great love, Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin.
The Zohar speaks of “mountains of light” and “mountains of darkness.” The mountains of light are emotions born of intellect, the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin; the mountains of darkness are emotions above intellect, the great love of the Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, the outer dimension of Keser.
וזהו ענין מדלג על ההרים שנמשך מבחי׳ טורי חשוכא חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א בחג״ת [בחסד גבורה תפארת] דז״א וזהו ענין ההרים רקדו2 כאילי׳ [כאילים] עליי׳ [עלייה] חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דז״א והתכללותן בגילוי אור חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א וכמ״ש במ״א בד״ה הים ראה34 כו׳ ההרים רקדו כו׳.
And this is the meaning of “leaping over the mountains”: that it is drawn from the level of the “mountains of darkness,” Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin, into Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin. And this is the meaning of “The mountains danced like rams”: the ascents of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin and their inclusion in the revelation of the light of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin; as is written elsewhere, in the discourse beginning “The sea saw,” etc., “The mountains danced,” etc.
“Leaping over the mountains” is then a drawing from the mountains of darkness, Arich Anpin, into the emotions of Z’eir Anpin. Psalm 114’s “The mountains danced like rams” is read the same way: the emotions of Z’eir Anpin rise and are included in the light of Arich Anpin, as the discourse on “The sea saw” in Likkutei Torah, Tzav, explains.
אכן יראה עילאה שרשה במו״ס [במוחא סתימאה] שהיא מגבורה דעתיק כמ״ש ע״פ כי אתה נרי56 הנ״ל וכמ״ש הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] פ׳ וישב דקע״ט ב׳. והוא למעלה מבחי׳ חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] דא״א ומשם נמשך בחי׳ גילוי זה במורא גדול כו׳
However, supernal awe has its root in Mocha Stima’ah (the hidden brain), which is from the Gevurah of Atik, as is written on “For You are my lamp,” mentioned above, and as the Ramaz wrote on Parshas Vayeshev, folio 179b. And it is higher than the level of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Arich Anpin; and from there is drawn the level of this revelation, “with great awe,” etc.,
Supernal awe is rooted higher still, in Mocha Stima’ah, the hidden brain, which derives from the Gevurah of Atik, the inner dimension of Keser, as Torah Ohr and the Ramaz’s commentary on the Zohar explain. It is above even the emotions of Arich Anpin, and from there came the revelation “with great awe.”
שהוא התגלות יראה עילאה זו בבחי׳ יראה תתאה הנמשך מבחי׳ מלכות כל עולמים וע״ז נאמר ופסח ה׳ על הפתח כו׳ וזהו ענין מקפץ על הגבעות בחי׳ קו הימין וקו השמאל כו׳
which is the revelation of this supernal awe in the level of lower awe (yirah tata’ah), which is drawn from the level of “the kingship of all worlds.” And of this it is said, “And G‑d will pass over the doorway,” etc. And this is the meaning of “skipping over the hills”: the level of the right line and the left line, etc.
That supernal awe was revealed within the lower awe, which comes from “the kingship of all worlds,” Malchus: this is “And G‑d will pass over the doorway.” So “skipping over the hills” is with both feet, the right line of love and the left line of awe.
וכתיב בחכמה יסד ארץ7 כונן שמים בתבונה8 כו׳ ושמים וארץ זהו בחינת האבות ואמהות כו׳ ולכן יראה עילאה נמשך בזכות האמהות דייקא ועמ״ש ע״פ שימני כחותם910 בענין אשה כי תזריע וילדה זכר)11
And it is written, “With wisdom He founded the earth; He established the heavens with understanding,” etc. And heaven and earth are the level of the Patriarchs and the Matriarchs, etc. Therefore supernal awe is drawn specifically in the merit of the Matriarchs. And see what is written on “Set me as a seal,” on the matter of “When a woman conceives and bears a male.”)
In “With wisdom He founded the earth; He established the heavens with understanding,” heaven and earth are the Patriarchs and the Matriarchs: the earth, the Matriarchs, is founded with Chochmah, the yud that is the root of supernal awe, and the heavens with Binah. That is why supernal awe came in the merit of the Matriarchs; the text refers to the discourse on “Set me as a seal” in Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim.
ולהבין מפני מה ע״י האבות לא היה הגילוי רק בבחינת אהבה בח ינת רגל אחת וע״י האמהות היה הגילוי גם בבחינת יראה בב׳ רגלים כו׳
Now, to understand why through the Patriarchs the revelation was only in the level of love, the level of one foot, while through the Matriarchs the revelation was also in the level of awe, with two feet, etc.:
The question is why the Patriarchs brought a revelation only of love, one foot, while the Matriarchs brought a revelation of awe as well, two feet.
ולכאורה האבות הן במדרגה גדולה מן האמהות כי המה בחי׳ משפיעים בחינת דכר והאמהות הם בחינת מקבלים בחינת נקבה.
at first glance, the Patriarchs are of a greater rank than the Matriarchs, for they are the level of givers, the male level, while the Matriarchs are the level of recipients, the female level.
Surely the Patriarchs rank higher: they are the givers, the male, and the Matriarchs are the recipients, the female.
אך האמת הוא ודאי כן שהמה בחי׳ מקבלים אבל הם גבוהים מן האבות במדרגה אחת והמה השפיעים.
But the truth is this: it is certainly so that they are the level of recipients; but in one level they are higher than the Patriarchs, and they are the givers.
The answer: the Matriarchs are indeed recipients, but in one respect they are higher than the Patriarchs and are themselves the givers.
דהנה בשרה נאמר כל אשר תאמר אליך שרה12 שמע בקולה שהיה אברהם צריך לקבל ממנה וכמארז״ל [וכמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שהיה אברהם טפל לגבי שרה בנביאות131415 וברבקה נאמר טובת מראה מאד בלי גבול ותרד העינה ותמלא כדה ותעל16 ותאמר שתה
For of Sarah it is said, “Whatever Sarah tells you, listen to her voice,” for Avraham had to receive from her; and as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, Avraham was secondary to Sarah in prophecy. And of Rivkah it is said, “very fair to look upon,” without limit; “and she went down to the spring, and filled her pitcher, and came up”; “and she said, ‘Drink,
G‑d told Avraham, “Whatever Sarah tells you, listen to her voice”: he had to receive from her, and the Sages say that he was secondary to her in prophecy. Of Rivkah the Torah says she was “very fair to look upon,” “very” (me’od) meaning without limit, and that she went down to the spring and drew water.
וגם לגמליך כו׳ שהיתה גם כן בחינת משפיע ותרד העינה שבחינת חכמה כ״ד ספרים17 הם בחינת ירידה נגדה (ועמ״ש בזה בפ׳ תולדות)
and your camels too,’” etc.: for she too was the level of a giver. And “she went down to the spring”: for the level of Chochmah, the twenty-four books, is the level of a descent in relation to her (and see what is written about this in Parshas Toldos).
Offering water to Eliezer and to his camels, Rivkah was a giver. “She went down to the spring”: Chochmah, the twenty-four books of Scripture, is a “descent” in relation to her; the text refers to its discussion in Parshas Toldos.
ולהבין זאת דהנה ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שלשה הטעימן הקב״ה18 בעולם הזה מעין עולם הבא19 אברהם יצחק ויעקב שנאמר בהם בכל מכל כל כו׳.
To understand this: our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Three the Holy One, blessed be He, gave a taste in this world of the World to Come: Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov, for of them it is said ‘with everything,’ ‘from everything,’ ‘everything,’” etc.
To explain this the maamar brings the Talmud’s teaching that G‑d gave the three Patriarchs a taste of the World to Come in this world, for the Torah says of them “with everything,” “from everything,” “everything.”
והנה לעתיד כתיב נקבה תסובב גבר20 היינו שיתעלה בחינת המקבל ויהיה למעלה מבחי׳ דכר המשפיע אשת חיל עטרת בעלה21 כו׳
Now, of the future it is written, “A female shall encompass a male”: that is, the level of the recipient will be elevated and will be above the level of the male, the giver: “A woman of valor is the crown of her husband,” etc.,
Of the future it is written, “A female shall encompass a male”: the recipient will rise above the giver, as “a woman of valor is the crown of her husband.”
מחמת שסוף מעשה במחשבה תחלה כו׳ (שם ב״ן [שם ב״ן] שרשו22 למעלה משם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] כו׳) ומפני שהאבות הטעימן מעין עולם הבא23
because “last in deed, first in thought,” etc. (the Name Ban has its root above the Name Mah, etc.). And because the Patriarchs were given a taste of the World to Come,
This is because “last in deed, first in thought”: what comes last in the order of creation was first in the original intent. In Kabbalistic terms, the Name Ban (the Name Havayah spelled out to the value 52, associated with the recipient) has its root above the Name Mah (spelled out to 45, associated with the giver).
ולכן היה אצלם גם כן בחי׳ זו שהיו מקבלים מהאמהות כו׳ אף שודאי האמהות היו בחינת נוק׳ [נוקבא] בחינת מקבלים רק שיש ב׳ בחי׳.
therefore they too had this level, that they received from the Matriarchs, etc.; even though the Matriarchs were certainly the level of Nukva, the level of recipients. Only, there are two levels:
Because the Patriarchs tasted the World to Come, they already had something of that future state, in which they received from the Matriarchs, even though in the order of things the Matriarchs were Nukva, the recipients.
מלמעלה למטה היו האבות משפיעים והאמהות מקבלים. אבל מלמטה למעלה בבחינת או״ח [אור חוזר] היו האמהות למעלה במדרגה סוף מעשה כו׳
from above to below, the Patriarchs were givers and the Matriarchs recipients; but from below to above, in the level of returning light, the Matriarchs were higher in rank: “last in deed,” etc.
There are two directions. From above to below the Patriarchs give and the Matriarchs receive; from below to above, in “returning light” (or chozer), the light that rises from below, the Matriarchs rank higher, as in “last in deed.”
(and see what is written below, in the explanation on the verse “For over all the glory,” and on the verse “Let me see your appearance,” and in the explanation on the verse “Spring up, O well”);
The text refers to its later explanations in Likkutei Torah on “For over all the glory,” on “Let me see your appearance,” and on “Spring up, O well.”
for so it is with all the attributes of holiness: “their end is embedded in their beginning,” and the beginning in the end, for in the end there is [something] of the level of the beginning: “last in deed,” etc.,
This follows a general rule stated in Sefer Yetzirah: in all the holy attributes, “their end is embedded in their beginning,” so the last level carries something of the first.
ובבחינת ההשתלשלות הוא סוף במדרגה כו׳ (וכמ״ש ע״פ השמים כסאי והארץ הדום רגלי29 כו׳) וזהו למעלה בחינות אבות ואמהות וגם למטה יש שני הבחי׳
while in the order of hishtalshelus it is last in rank, etc. (as is written on “The heavens are My throne and the earth is My footstool,” etc.). And this is Above, the levels of Patriarchs and Matriarchs; and below too there are the two levels,
In the descending order the last is lowest, yet its root is highest; the text refers to its discussion on “The heavens are My throne and the earth is My footstool.” The two levels of Patriarchs and Matriarchs Above have a counterpart below.
והיינו תורה ומצות שבבחי׳ א׳ תורה גדולה כמארז״ל [כמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] גדול תלמוד שמביא לידי מעשה30 דהיינו ע״י חכמת התורה יודעים האיך לעשות המצות כידוע
namely Torah and mitzvos. In one respect Torah is greater, as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Study is great, for it leads to action”: that is, through the wisdom of the Torah one knows how to perform the mitzvos, as is known;
Below, the two are Torah and mitzvos. In one sense Torah is greater: the Talmud says “study is great, for it leads to action,” since only through the Torah does one know how to do the mitzvos.
ואם אין עושים כן רק באופן אחר אין זו מצוה ובבחי׳ ב׳ מצוה גדולה גדול תלמוד שמביא לידי מעשה
and if one does not do so, but in another way, it is not a mitzvah. And in the second respect the mitzvah is greater: “Study is great, for it leads to action”;
A mitzvah done in any other way than the Torah prescribes is no mitzvah. But in the other sense the mitzvah is greater: study is great because it leads to action, so action is the goal.
נמצא המעשה היא גדולה31 ולא המדרש עיקר32 אלא המעשה33 כו׳ והיינו מפני ששרש המצות הוא בבחי׳ כתר תר״ך עמודי אור34 כידוע תרי״ג מצות דאורייתא וז׳ דרבנן הם תר״ך ששרשם בבחינת כתר וכמ״ש והחכמה תחיה בעליה35
it follows that the action is greater, and “not study is the main thing, but action,” etc. And that is because the root of the mitzvos is in the level of Keser, “620 pillars of light,” as is known: the 613 mitzvos of the Torah and the 7 of the Rabbis are 620, whose root is in the level of Keser. And as it is written, “and wisdom gives life to its owners (be’aleha),”
So action is greater, as the Mishnah says, “not study is the main thing, but action.” The reason is that the mitzvos are rooted in Keser, the “620 pillars of light” (613 biblical and 7 rabbinic commandments), which is above Chochmah; and this is “wisdom gives life to its owners.”
דהיינו בבחי׳ מלמעלה למטה החכמה מחיה המצות דהיינו שע״י חכמת התורה יודעים היאך לעשות המצוה
that is, in the level of from above to below, wisdom gives life to the mitzvos, namely that through the wisdom of the Torah one knows how to perform the mitzvah;
Read from above to below, wisdom gives life to the mitzvos: through the Torah’s wisdom one knows how to perform them.
אבל אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] המצות הם בעליה של החכמה ששרשם של המצות הם גבוהים במדרגה מבחי׳ החכמה כו׳ (ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה ראיתי והנה מנורת זהב)36
but nevertheless the mitzvos are the owners of the wisdom, for the root of the mitzvos is higher in rank than the level of Chochmah, etc. (and see what is written about this in the discourse beginning “I have seen, and behold, a candelabrum of gold”).
Yet the mitzvos are the “owners” of wisdom, because their root is higher than Chochmah. The text refers to the discourse on “I have seen, and behold, a candelabrum of gold” in Likkutei Torah, Behaalosecha.
וזהו מדלג על ההרים בזכות התורה שהתורה נקר׳ [נקרא / נקראת / נקראות] ג״כ הר ישאו הרים שלום37 והתורה נקרא שלום ה׳ עוז לעמו
And this is “leaping over the mountains”: in the merit of the Torah, for the Torah too is called a mountain: “The mountains shall bear peace.” And the Torah is called peace: “G‑d will give strength to His people;
Now the verse is applied below: “leaping over the mountains” is in the merit of the Torah, for the Torah is called a mountain, as in “The mountains shall bear peace,” and the Torah is called peace.
יתן38 ה׳ יברך את עמו בשלום או יחזק במעוזי39 יעשה שלום לי שלום יעשה לי כו׳ והמצות נקראו ג״כ שלום והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום40 כו׳.
G‑d will bless His people with peace”; “Or let him take hold of My strength, that he may make peace with Me; peace he shall make with Me,” etc. And the mitzvos too are called peace: “And the work of righteousness shall be peace,” etc.
Psalms 29:11 joins the “strength” G‑d gives His people to peace, and Isaiah’s “take hold of My strength … make peace with Me” does the same; the text reads both of the Torah. The mitzvos too are called peace: “the work of righteousness shall be peace.”
כי יש שני בחינת שלום מלמעלה למטה ומלמטה למעלה ועל ידי התורה נגלה בחי׳ הארה הנ״ל בבחינת אהבה
For there are two levels of peace, from above to below and from below to above. And through the Torah the level of the illumination mentioned above was revealed in the level of love,
There are two kinds of peace, from above to below and from below to above. Through the Torah the revelation came only as love, one foot.
which is the level of one foot. “Skipping over the hills” is in the merit of the mitzvos, for the mitzvos are called hills, as it is written, “and the hills, through righteousness,” etc.
“Skipping over the hills” is in the merit of the mitzvos, which the verse calls “hills” in “and the hills, through righteousness.” The mitzvos, rooted higher than the Torah’s wisdom, brought the revelation on both feet.
The paragraph explains why the Patriarchs brought the revelation with one foot (love) and the Matriarchs with two (love and awe): supernal awe is rooted higher than love, and the Matriarchs, though recipients, are higher “from below to above,” for the end is rooted in the beginning. Below, the same pair is Torah and mitzvos: the mountains are the Torah, and the hills are the mitzvos, whose root in Keser is above Chochmah.
In Torah Ohr, Miketz, the verse “For You are my lamp, Havayah; and Havayah will light up my darkness” is read as two levels of Havayah: that of Z’eir Anpin, which comes through the chain of descent and corresponds to the early generations, and that of Arich Anpin, which is drawn down not by way of hishtalshelus, in the darkness of the generation before Mashiach. In Likkutei Torah, Achrei, “study is great, for it leads to action” is read as showing that action is the main thing, and study is great only in that it leads to action.
Marei mekomos
- 1טורי נהורא וטורי חשוכא · Zohar III, 249b
- 2ההרים רקדו כאילים · Psalms 114:4
- 3בד״ה הים ראה · לעיל פ׳ צו טז, ד.
- 4הים ראה · Psalms 114:3
- 5בביאור ע״פ כי אתה נרי · תו״א מ, ד ובמ״מ לשם.
- 6ע״פ כי אתה נרי · תו״א מא, ג.
- 7בחכמה יסד ארץ · Proverbs 10:19
- 8בחכמה יסד ארץ כונן שמים בתבונה · Proverbs 3:19
- 9ע״פ שימני כחותם · לקמן מו, ב.
- 10שימני כחותם · Song of Songs 8:6
- 11אשה כי תזריע וילדה זכר · Leviticus 12:2
- 12כל אשר תאמר אליך שרה · Genesis 21:12
- 13שהי׳ אברהם טפל לגבי שרה בנביאות · שמ״ר רפ״א. הובא ברש״י בראשית שם. [תנחומא ר״פ שמות]. רש״י בחומש עזה״פ וגם במדרש אגדה שם יעו״ש. [כ]. ראה אוה״ת בראשית קכא, א.
- 14שהיה אברהם טפל לגבי שרה בנביאות · Shemot Rabbah 1:1
- 15שהיה אברהם טפל לגבי שרה בנביאות · Rashi on Genesis 21:12
- 16טובת מראה מאד . . ותרד העינה ותמלא כדה ותעל · Genesis 24:16
- 17כ״ד ספרים · ראה ת״ז תכ״א (מו, ב).
- 18שלשה הטעימן הקב״ה בעוה״ז · ב״ב טז, סע״ב.
- 19שלשה הטעימן הקב״ה בעולם הזה מעין עולם הבא · Bava Batra 16b:17–18
- 20נקבה תסובב גבר · Jeremiah 31:22
- 21אשת חיל עטרת בעלה · Proverbs 12:4
- 22שם ב״ן שרשו · ע״ל ד״ה ואתחנן ספ״ג. [ראה בחקותי מז, ג]. [כ].
- 23שהאבות הטעימן מעין עולם הבא · ראה ספר החקירה סו, א.
- 24כי על כל כבוד · Isaiah 4:5
- 25הראיני את מראיך · Song of Songs 2:14
- 26עלי באר · Numbers 21:17
- 27נעוץ סופן בתחלתן · ס״י פ״א, מ״ז.
- 28נעוץ סופן בתחלתן · Sefer Yetzirah 1:7
- 29השמים כסאי והארץ הדום רגלי · Isaiah 66:1
- 30גדול תלמוד שמביא לידי מעשה · Kiddushin 40b:8–9
- 31נמצא המעשה היא גדולה · ראה לעיל אחרי כו, ד ובמ״מ לשם. ד״ה השקיפה תשכ״ו (נד׳ בקונטרס ח״י אלול תש״נ) סעי׳ ג.
- 32ולא המדרש עיקר · אבות א, יז.
- 33ולא המדרש עיקר אלא המעשה · Pirkei Avot 1:17
- 34תר״ך עמודי אור · ע״ל בחקותי (מז, ד). וש״נ. [כ].
- 35והחכמה תחי׳ בעלי׳ · Ecclesiastes 7:12
- 36בד״ה ראיתי והנה מנורת זהב · לעיל פ׳ בהעלותך לד, ג.
- 37ישאו הרים שלום · Psalms 72:3
- 38ה׳ עוז לעמו יתן · Psalms 29:11
- 39או יחזיק במעוזי · Isaiah 27:5
- 40והי׳ מעשה הצדקה שלום · Isaiah 32:17
- 41וגבעות בצדקה · Psalms 72:3
- 42ששרשם מבחי׳ כתר · ראה אגה״ק סי׳ כ״ט. פרדס ש״ח פ״ג.
21ועל ידי המצות נגלה בחי׳ הארה הנ״ל בחינת הוא ושמו בלבד כו׳ בבחינת ב׳ רגלים
And through the mitzvos the level of the illumination mentioned above, the level of “He and His Name alone,” etc., was revealed in the level of two feet,
Through the mitzvos, the hills, the revelation of “He and His Name alone” came on two feet.
היינו בבחינת יראה גם כן מפני שהמצות בשרשם הם למעלה במדרגה מבחי׳ התורה כו׳ ע״כ על ידם יכול להתגלות בבחי׳ יראה גם כן
that is, in the level of awe as well, because the mitzvos in their root are higher in rank than the level of the Torah, etc.; therefore through them it can be revealed in the level of awe as well.
That is, it came also as awe, because the root of the mitzvos is higher than the Torah’s wisdom, so through them the revelation could reach the level of awe.
וזהו הכל בבחינת יצ״מ [יציאת מצרים] וכתיב הנה בא לשון הוה ולשון עתיד ג״כ שאז יהיה ג״כ בחינת גילוי והארה גדולה זו שלמעלה מבחי׳ ההשתלשלות בחי׳ דילוג כמ״ש כימי צאתך1 מארץ מצרים אראנו נפלאות
And all this is in the level of the Exodus from Egypt. And it is written, “Behold, he comes,” a term of the present and also of the future: for then too there will be the level of this revelation and great illumination which is above the level of hishtalshelus, the level of a leap, as it is written, “As in the days of your going out of the land of Egypt, I will show him wonders”;
All this was at the Exodus. But “he comes” (ba) can be read as present and as future: the same revelation, above the chain of worlds and by a leap, will come again, as Micah says, “As in the days of your going out of the land of Egypt, I will show him wonders.”
דהיינו שיתגלה בבחינה זו נפלאות שהיה בבחי׳ פלא מופלא ומכוסה כמו שהיה בבחינת יציאת מצרים כו׳ שנגלה עליהם אז מבחינת מלך כו׳ סתימו דכל סתימין להיות בגילוי ובמורא גדול כו׳.
that is, in this level there will be revealed wonders that were in the level of the wondrous, hidden and covered, as it was in the level of the Exodus from Egypt, etc., when there was revealed to them then, from the level of King, etc., “the most hidden of all hidden” (sesimu dechol sesimin), so that it was in revelation, “and with great awe,” etc.
The “wonders” are what was utterly hidden, as at the Exodus, when the King, “the most hidden of all hidden,” was revealed openly, with great awe.
כן יהיה לעתיד ג״כ אראנו נפלאות כו׳ ועמ״ש במ״א בפי׳ אשר עשה עמכם להפליא2 והיינו ע״י תורה ומצות שעושים עתה ממשיכים בחי׳ זו
So it will be in the future too: “I will show him wonders,” etc. And see what is written elsewhere on the explanation of “who has dealt wondrously with you.” And that is: through the Torah and mitzvos that we perform now, we draw down this level;
So it will be in the future. Through the Torah and mitzvos we perform now we already draw down this level; the text refers to its explanation elsewhere of “who has dealt wondrously with you.”
רק שעתה אינה בגילוי ולעתיד יהיה בחי׳ זו בגילוי וראו כל בשר3 כו׳ (ועמ״ש ע״פ כי ההרים ימושו4 כו׳ וחסדי מאתך לא ימוש5 כו׳):
only, now it is not in revelation, and in the future this level will be in revelation: “And all flesh shall see,” etc. (And see what is written on “For the mountains shall depart,” etc., “but My kindness shall not depart from you,” etc.)
Now the level remains hidden; in the future it will be revealed, as Isaiah says, “And all flesh shall see.” The text refers to its discussion of “For the mountains shall depart … but My kindness shall not depart from you,” which the Kehot note suggests is the passage in Likkutei Torah, Ki Seitzei, on the mountains as the Patriarchs.
The mitzvos brought the revelation on both feet, love and awe, because their root is higher than the Torah. The same revelation, drawn down hidden now through Torah and mitzvos, will be revealed openly in the future, for “Behold, he comes” speaks also of the future.
Marei mekomos
- 1כימי צאתך מאמ״צ אראנו נפלאות · Micah 7:15
- 2אשר עשה עמכם להפליא · Joel 2:26
- 3וראו כל בשר · Isaiah 40:5
- 4ע״פ כי ההרים ימושו · אולי הכוונה ללעיל פ׳ תצא מ, א דשם מביא הרים נק׳ האבות.
- 5כי ההרים ימושו כו׳ וחסדי מאתך לא ימוש · Isaiah 54:10
The gazelle and the Counting ¶22–23
22ה דומה דודי לצבי1 וגו׳. הנה ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שנמשל לצבי2 מה צבי מחזיר ראשו לאחוריו3 כו׳.
5. “My beloved is like a gazelle,” etc. Now, our Sages, of blessed memory, said that He is compared to a gazelle: just as a gazelle turns its head backward, etc.
Chapter 5 turns to the next verse, “My beloved is like a gazelle.” The Sages (the Kehot note gives the Zohar) say that G‑d is compared to a gazelle because a gazelle turns its head backward.
וענין משל זה הוא למעלה גם כן מחזיר ראשו לאחוריו היינו בחי׳ חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא4 ואף למעלה מבחינת חכמה
And the matter of this analogy is that Above too He “turns His head backward”: that is, the level of “wise, but not with a known wisdom,” and even above the level of Chochmah,
Above, the “head” that turns back is the level above Chochmah, which the Tikkunei Zohar describes as G‑d being “wise, but not with a known wisdom.”
דהיינו קרקפתא דתפילין גלגלתא דחפיא על מוחא ירד ונשתלשל בבחינת אחוריים היינו בחי׳ מצות שהם הכל בדברים גשמיים כמו ציצית ותפילין בבחי׳ אחוריים כו׳. ושרשם מבחי׳ כת״ר תר״ך כו׳.
namely “the skull of the tefillin,” “the Skull (Gulgalta) that covers the brain,” descended and came down by stages into the level of the back, that is, the level of the mitzvos, which are all in physical things, such as tzitzis and tefillin, in the level of the back, etc. And their root is from the level of Keser, [which is] 620, etc.;
This is the “skull” on which the tefillin are placed, “the Skull that covers the brain,” Keser, above intellect. It descended into the “back,” the mitzvos, which are performed with physical things such as tzitzis and tefillin; yet they are rooted in Keser, the “620” (the numerical value of כתר).
דהיינו שנמשך ונתלבש רצונו הפשוט שלמעלה מבחי׳ חכמה אפילו מבחי׳ חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא כו׳ בדברים גשמיים למטה דוקא
that is, His simple will, which is above the level of Chochmah, even above the level of “wise, but not with a known wisdom,” etc., was drawn down and enclothed in physical things below, specifically,
That is, G‑d’s simple will, above all wisdom, is enclothed specifically in physical things below.
כמו כל המצות כו׳ (ועמ״ש מזה גם כן בד״ה ויושט המלך לאסתר5 כו׳) וזה הכל היה בפסח בחינת יציאת מצרים בחי׳ דילוג כו׳
such as all the mitzvos, etc. (and see what is written about this, too, in the discourse beginning “And the king extended to Esther,” etc.). And all this was on Pesach, the level of the Exodus from Egypt, the level of a leap, etc.,
This is so with every mitzvah; the text refers to the Torah Ohr discourse on “And the king extended to Esther.” All this was at Pesach, at the Exodus, by a leap.
שלא היו ישראל ראויים לזה שהיו במצרים בתכלית השפלו׳ ולא היה אתערותא דלתתא כלל רק שנגלה כביכול מעצמו בבחי׳ דילוג כו׳
for Israel were not worthy of this, since in Egypt they were in the utmost lowliness, and there was no arousal from below at all; rather, it was revealed, as it were, of itself, in the level of a leap, etc.
Israel did not deserve it, for in Egypt they were utterly low, with no arousal from below; the revelation came, as it were, of itself, by a leap.
אבל אח״כ נאמר קומי לך6 היינו בחי׳ ספירה היום יום א׳ לעומר כו׳ שהיו ישראל סופרים כל ימי הספירה7 מ״ט יומין והיינו לטהר כל המדות כידוע שיש ז׳ מדות.
But afterwards it is said, “Arise” (kumi lach), that is, the level of the Counting, “Today is the first day of the Omer,” etc. For Israel would count all the days of the Counting, forty-nine days, and that is to purify all the middos; for, as is known, there are seven middos,
Afterwards comes “Arise”: the Counting of the Omer, “Today is the first day of the Omer.” Israel counted forty-nine days to purify the seven middos.
The gazelle that turns its head back stands for G‑d’s will, above wisdom, “turning back” into the physical mitzvos. At Pesach it was revealed by a leap, without Israel’s effort; afterwards came “Arise,” the Counting of the Omer, Israel’s own work of refining the middos.
Marei mekomos
- 1דומה דודי לצבי · Song of Songs 2:9
- 2ארז״ל שנמשל לצבי · זח״ב (יד, א). [כ].
- 3מה צבי מחזיר ראשו לאחוריו · Zohar, Shemot 24:231–25:240
- 4חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא · ת״ז בהקדמה (פתח אלי׳).
- 5בד״ה ויושט המלך לאסתר · תו״א צד, ג.
- 6קומי לך · Song of Songs 2:10
- 7שהיו ישראל סופרים . . הספירה · ראה בהוספות להערות וציונים כאן.
23וכ״א [וכל אחד / וכל אחת] כלולה מז׳ והוא מ״ט והיינו הכנת עצמם שיהיו בחי׳ כלי לקבל בחי׳ גילוי אלקות שיהיה אח״כ בשבועות מתן תורה שאז נגלה ג״כ בחי׳ גילוי שלמעלה מההשתלשלות בחי׳ כתר כו׳
and each one is comprised of seven, and that is forty-nine. And this was their preparing themselves to be the level of a vessel to receive the level of G‑dly revelation that would come afterwards on Shavuos, at the Giving of the Torah, when there was also revealed the level of revelation that is above hishtalshelus, the level of Keser, etc.;
Each of the seven middos includes all seven, forty-nine in all. The Counting prepared Israel to be vessels for the revelation of Shavuos, when the Torah was given and the level of Keser, above the chain of worlds, was revealed again.
רק שאז נגלה ה׳ פב״פ [פנים בפנים] כו׳ כי היו אז ישראל ג״כ בבחי׳ פנים בחי׳ כלי לקבל גילוי אלקות ע״י עבודתם וע״י ספירה כו׳.
only, then G‑d was revealed “face to face,” etc., for then Israel too were in the level of “face,” the level of a vessel to receive G‑dly revelation, through their service and through the Counting, etc.
On Shavuos, however, G‑d spoke “face to face,” because Israel too were a “face”: vessels prepared by their own service and their counting.
והיינו ע״י אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא]. אבל לא כמו שהיה בפסח בחי׳ מצה כו׳ שלא הספיק בצקת כו׳.
And that is through an arousal from below. But it was not as it was on Pesach, the level of matzah, etc., “the dough did not have time,” etc.
This came through an arousal from below, unlike Pesach, when the revelation came before the dough had time to rise.
ואדרבה בשבועות היו מביאים לחם מצה (והיינו לפי שנזדככו המדות כו׳ ואז ההתנשאות אינה אלא בבחי׳ הקדושה המתנשא מימות עולם כו׳ וכמ״ש מזה גבי שבועות בד״ה וידבר אלקים1 כו׳ ע״ש).
And on the contrary, on Shavuos they would bring leavened bread (and that is because the middos had been refined, etc., and then self-exaltation is only in the level of holiness, “who is elevated since days of old,” etc.; and as is written about this concerning Shavuos, in the discourse beginning “And G‑d spoke,” etc.; see there).
On Shavuos, on the contrary, the offering was leavened bread: the two loaves that the Torah commands to be baked chametz (the print reads לחם מצה, but the contrast requires חמץ). Once the middos are refined, “rising” is only in holiness, the exaltation of G‑d “who is elevated since days of old”; the text refers to the discourse on “And G‑d spoke” (Likkutei Torah, Bamidbar).
וזהו קומי לך בחי׳ קימה מלמטה למעלה דקאי על בחי׳ ספירה שאחר הפסח כדי שיהיה בחי׳ פב״פ [פנים בפנים] ולעתיד יהיה ג״כ בחי׳ גילוי זה שלמעלה מהשתלשלות סתימו כו׳ אראנו נפלאות2 כו׳:
And this is “Arise”: the level of rising from below to above, which refers to the level of the Counting after Pesach, so that there be the level of “face to face.” And in the future there will also be the level of this revelation which is above hishtalshelus, “the most hidden,” etc.: “I will show him wonders,” etc.
“Arise” is rising from below to above, the Counting after Pesach, which leads to “face to face.” In the future the revelation above the chain of worlds, the most hidden, will come again: “I will show him wonders.”
Shavuos is contrasted with Pesach: through the Counting Israel became vessels, so the revelation of Shavuos came “face to face” through their own work, and leavened bread could be offered because the middos had been refined. In the future the revelation of the Exodus will return.
Marei mekomos
- 1גבי שבועות בד״ה וידבר אלקים · לעיל פ׳ במדבר.
- 2אראנו נפלאות · Micah 7:15
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
In one’s avodah
Contemplating that all the life of the worlds is only G‑d’s Name, while His essence is untouched and far beyond, a person should feel bitterness at his own distance from G‑dliness. That bitterness arouses G‑d’s abundant compassion and leads to the self-nullification of matzah, “Nullify your will,” guarded so that it never turns into the self-exaltation of chametz. Israel’s own service, the first matzah and the Counting of the Omer that refines the middos, makes them vessels for revelation; and through the Torah and mitzvos done now the hidden revelation of the Exodus is already drawn down, to be revealed in the future.
Questions for discussion
- The Haggadah explains matzah by a revelation that came after midnight, yet matzah must be eaten before midnight. How does the maamar’s distinction between two matzos answer this?
- What is the difference between “the kingship of all worlds” and “Your kingship,” and why could only the higher level bring Israel out of Mitzrayim?
- Why is the maror placed on the middle line of the seder plate rather than on the left, and what does this teach about bitterness in serving G‑d?
- Why did the revelation come on one foot through the Patriarchs and on two through the Matriarchs, and how does the same pair appear below as Torah and mitzvos?
- How does “Arise,” the Counting of the Omer, differ from the “leap” of Pesach, and why could leavened bread be offered on Shavuos?
Key terms in this maamar
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×4
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds. ×10
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×5
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions. ×2
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×11
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×3
- An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
- Human initiative that draws down a divine response. ×1
- Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
- The forces of concealment that oppose holiness. ×1
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- Measure, limitation and judgment. ×1
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×15
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- Chochmah, Binah and Daas as a whole. ×1
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d's presence as it dwells in the world. ×1
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d. ×1
- Love and aweאהבה ויראה
- The two 'wings' of divine service.
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×12
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- Harmony of kindness and restraint; associated with compassion.
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving.
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×3
- Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
- Malchus as the receiving configuration.
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect.
- The kav (line of light)קו
- The thin ray of light drawn into the space left after the tzimtzum. ×9
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×2
- Netzach (victory)נצח
- Perseverance, the drive to overcome. ×1