LikuteiTorah.comThe Chassidishe Parsha

Likkutei Torah · Parshas Shir HaShirim · Maamar 33

הנה ענין מדלג על ההרים הוא עד״מ שההפרש…

“Leaping upon the Mountains”

  • 11 paragraphs · 96 sections
  • about 1 h of study
  • 81 sources

Begin the maamar Download PDFPDF · 618 KB

Your progress 0 of 96 sections

Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device

The big idea

Torah study can draw sovev, the light beyond all worlds, into memalei, the light that descends step by step through the worlds, though light reaches the worlds at all only by a “leap” across the empty space of the tzimtzum. It does so only after prayer has first raised the soul to self-sacrifice without limit: “One is she, my dove,” and then “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes.”

The maamar in brief

A leap, unlike walking, lifts both feet from the ground and leaves empty air beneath them. So the worlds could not come from the Infinite Light by a chain of cause and effect: there had to be a tzimtzum and an empty space, and only then the kav, drawn from the Malchus of the Infinite Light. That is “leaping”; everything from Atzilus down, even across the parsa, is an ordered chain of descent. This chain is memalei, the light that fills each world by its measure, and so the worlds can change. Sovev, the essence of the light, does not change; before it above and below are equal, which is why G‑d watches over every detail, as Bilam failed to grasp. Sovev shines within memalei through Torah study, read here through “Sixty are the queens and eighty concubines, and maidens without number” (Song of Songs 6:8): the Mishnah, the “queen,” in Yetzirah; the Baraisos, the concubines; the laws of the Talmud, the “maidens” of Beriah, where Chochmah is hidden in darkness. But this comes only after prayer: the soul that, through contemplation and the strength of refined food, gives itself over “with all your might” rises to Binah, and then Torah study draws sovev into memalei.

Outline

  1. Leaping and walkingA leap leaves empty space between the feet and the ground. The worlds could not come from the Infinite Light by cause and effect, so there was first a tzimtzum and an empty space and then the kav, drawn from the Malchus of the Infinite Light: this is “leaping.” Within the worlds, even across the parsa between Atzilus and Beriah, the descent is an ordered chain, as the soul is enclothed in the body.¶1–3
  2. Memalei and sovevFrom Atzilus down, the light fills each world according to its measure, as intellect descends into the emotions, speech and even writing; therefore the worlds change. Sovev, the essence of the light, does not change: before it above and below are equal, which is why G‑d watches over every detail, as Bilam’s error denied. In the Time to Come sovev will be revealed and the body will live from the radiance of the Shechinah.¶4–5
  3. Queens, concubines and maidensSovev shines within memalei through Torah study. The Mishnah, the “queen,” is the emotive attributes of Yetzirah, where the revelation is constant and clear; the Baraisos, the concubines, are Netzach, Hod and Yesod, outer and slight, and multiplied in exile; the laws of the Babylonian Talmud are the “maidens” of Beriah, where Chochmah is concealed: “Who forms light and creates darkness.” When Malchus rises to the King, they rise with her.¶6–7
  4. Prayer, the arousal from belowDrawing this down needs an arousal from below in the Shema and prayer. Contemplation in Pesukei deZimra makes the soul achas, included in echad, and brings it to love “with all your might,” self-sacrifice without limit, natural to the G‑dly soul as a foot obeys the head; the strength of permitted food refines sparks from kelipas nogah, and even the animal side’s intellect consents. Without this, “one who says ‘I have nothing but Torah’ does not have even Torah.”¶8–10
  5. Rising to Binah“One is she to her mother”: the soul rises to Binah, the level of thought in which the souls are rooted, and the whole chain of descent rises with it. “Pure is she to the one who bore her”: the refinements, whose root in food is from Tohu, are completed. Prayer raises mayin nukvin first, and then Torah study draws sovev into memalei: “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes.”¶11

Key concepts

leapingדילוג
The passage from the Infinite Light to Atzilus, which is not a continuous chain: the light first withdraws completely, leaving an empty space, and then a kav is drawn from its Malchus, like a leap that leaves air beneath the feet.
the chain of descent (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
Descent by cause and effect, like the linked rings of a chain. It governs everything from Atzilus down, even across the parsa between Atzilus and Beriah, which is like light shining through a screen.
memalei and sovevממלא כל עלמין / סובב כל עלמין
Memalei is the radiance that fills each world according to its measure, so the worlds can change; sovev is the essence of the light, before which above and below are equal. Torah study draws sovev into memalei.
Mishnah, Baraisa and Talmudמשנה, ברייתא, תלמוד
The “queens,” “concubines” and “maidens” of the verse “Sixty are the queens” (Song of Songs 6:8): the Mishnah in Yetzirah (Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes), the Baraisos “outside the body” (Netzach, Hod and Yesod), and the laws of the Babylonian Talmud in Beriah, where Chochmah is hidden.
achas and echadאחת / אחד
Achas, “one” in the feminine, is Nukva, the receiving side, and the soul as recipient; echad is Z’eir Anpin. Through prayer achas is included in echad.
mayin nukvin and mayin duchrinמיין נוקבין / מיין דוכרין
The “feminine waters” raised from below and the “masculine waters” drawn down in response: “no drop descends from above without two drops rising from below.”
self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
Love “with all your might,” without limit, natural to the G‑dly soul as a portion of G‑d. It is what allows Torah study to draw down sovev.
refinement from kelipas nogahבירור מקליפת נוגה
The sparks in permitted food, whose root is in the World of Tohu, are refined and raised when one prays with the strength that the food has given.

In the Rebbe’s light · 1

AI research Found by AI reading every place in the Rebbe’s works that cites this maamar, and checked against each source by a second AI reader, the less certain by a third. Only what rated high is shown: the Rebbe’s own words, about this very passage. No person has reviewed it yet, so check the place itself before relying on a detail. See something to correct?

Paragraph by paragraph

  1. ¶1

    The Rebbe explains

    In a sicha of Shabbos Mattos-Masei (5713 and 5721), the Rebbe asks why the Torah lists the wilderness stations as „אלה מסעי” (these are the journeys) and not as encampments, and answers that a Jew is meant always to be journeying; in note 22 he links the sicha’s two stages of that journey to walking and leaping.

    The sicha distinguishes going onward to a level beyond comparison from uprooting oneself from the level one stood on, and the Rebbe suggests (note 22) that the two are like „הילוך ודילוג” (walking and leaping). Walking, he writes, is to a place that bears relation to the place before it, an ascent in order, while leaping is „עלי׳ שלא בערך” (an ascent beyond comparison). He gives it in this paragraph’s own terms: the leap lifts the whole body and both feet from the ground, unlike walking, even running, where „שרגל א׳ נשאר על הארץ” (one foot stays on the ground). For the definition he cites the Rebbe Rashab (Sefer HaMaamarim 5671; Hemshech 5672) together with this maamar.

    The Alter Rebbeאבל הדילוג הוא שמגביה כל גופו ושני רגליו מן הארץ ונעשה חלל ומקום פנוי

    The Rebbeדהילוך הוא למקום (דרגא) שיש לו ערך לגבי מקומו הקודם, שלכן נק׳ עלי׳ בסדר והדרגה (לגבי דילוג), משא״כ דילוג הוא עלי׳ שלא בערך

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. כג, p. 227 (note 22) · משיחות ש״פ מטו״מ תשי״ג, תשכ״א

Short quotes only, with the place of each so it can be read in full. The Rebbe’s sichos, letters and maamarim are published by Kehot and by Vaad Hanochos B’Lahak (lahak.org).

Skip to the text

Leaping and walking ¶1–3

1הנה ענין מדלג על ההרים הוא עד״מ שההפרש בין הילוך לדילוג שמי שהוא הולך כדרכו הרי רגליו עומדות על הארץ ממש

Now, the meaning of “leaping upon the mountains” is, by way of analogy, [as follows]: the difference between walking and leaping is that one who walks in his usual way has his feet standing right on the ground.

Explanation

The maamar opens with a phrase from Song of Songs 2:8, where the beloved comes “leaping upon the mountains, skipping upon the hills.” To explain what “leaping” means, the Alter Rebbe first compares walking with leaping: one who walks keeps his feet on the ground itself. The Kehot note records that the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah treats this discourse as an explanation of “Sixty are the queens and eighty concubines, and maidens without number” (Song of Songs 6:8), which is why it later speaks of the Mishnah as a queen, the Baraisa as a concubine and the laws of the Talmud as maidens.

ואף בשעה שהוא הולך הוא מגביה רק רגלו אחת אבל רגלו השנית עומדת על הארץ

Even while he is walking, he lifts only one foot, but his second foot stands on the ground.

Explanation

In walking only one foot is raised at a time, while the other stays planted. There is never a moment when the walker is wholly off the ground.

ואף מי שהוא רץ במרוצה היינו רק שהוא מגביה רגלו במהירות גדול אבל מ״מ רגל אחת ימין או שמאל עומדת על הארץ ורגלו השני׳ [השניה] באויר

And even one who runs swiftly: that is only that he lifts his foot with great speed; but nevertheless one foot, right or left, stands on the ground, and his second foot is in the air.

Explanation

Running is faster but no different in kind: however quick the steps, one foot, right or left, is always touching the ground while the other is in the air. (The printed מגיה is evidently a misprint for מגביה, “lifts,” the word used in the previous part.)

אבל הדילוג הוא שמגביה כל גופו ושני רגליו מן הארץ ונעשה חלל ומקום פנוי ואויר בין רגליו לארץ עד שאח״כ עומדות רגליו על הארץ.

But leaping is when one lifts his whole body and both his feet from the ground, and there comes to be a void and an empty space, and air, between his feet and the ground, until afterwards his feet stand on the ground.

Explanation

A leap is different in kind: the whole body and both feet leave the ground, so that for a moment there is a gap, an empty space of air, between the feet and the ground, and only afterwards do the feet land. This gap is what the analogy will turn on.

Paragraph 1 in brief

The Alter Rebbe sets up a physical analogy for the word “leaping”: in walking and even in running there is always contact with the ground, while in a leap the whole body leaves the ground and an empty gap opens before the feet land again.

Deeper

The words chosen for the gap, “a void and an empty space” (chalal and makom panui), are the very terms used for the space left by the tzimtzum. The next paragraph applies the analogy in exactly those terms.

Explained elsewhere AI research

  1. Explained by the Rebbe Rashab and the Rebbe

    The paragraph sets three gaits side by side, walking (הילוך), running (מרוצה) and leaping (דילוג), but the maamar goes on to give the meaning only of walking (the chain of descent) and of leaping (the tzimtzum); what running stands for, and why walking keeps one foot on the ground, is not said.

    The Rebbe Rashab, quoting this analogy almost word for word, gives all three gaits their meaning (Hemshech 5672, vol. 2 p. תתקמא). Walking is the light drawn in the order of the chain of descent: the outer level of the higher becomes the inner level of the lower, and to draw the outer level down the inner must be hidden, which is lifting one foot while the other stays on the ground. „וענין המרוצה הוא בהאור שלמע׳ מהשתל׳” (running is the light above the chain of descent), which does not come step by step, yet even it keeps some order, so one foot still touches the ground. Leaping is the tzimtzum (צמצום), in which the light withdrew entirely and was then drawn anew. The Rebbe repeats the reading of walking and leaping in a maamar of Shabbos Shemini 5715. Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) it is also why ¶3 says the partition between Atzilus and Beriah is not called a leap but part of the chain of descent: it hides, but nothing is withdrawn.

    the Rebbe Rashab: Hemshech Be-shaah Shehikdimu 5672 (old edition), vol. ב, p. תתקמא וענין המרוצה הוא בהאור שלמע׳ מהשתל׳ שבא שלא בס׳ והדרגה

    the Rebbe: Sefer HaMaamarim 5715 (unedited, new edition), p. קל ובכדי שיהי׳ גילוי החיצוניות (שבעליון) צ״ל צמצום והעלם בחי׳ הפנימיות, שזהו״ע שמגבי׳ רגלו א׳ למעלה

Where the maamar leaves something unexplained, found by AI in the library and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. The Rebbe explains

    In a sicha of Shabbos Mattos-Masei (5713 and 5721), the Rebbe asks why the Torah lists the wilderness stations as „אלה מסעי” (these are the journeys) and not as encampments, and answers that a Jew is meant always to be journeying; in note 22 he links the sicha’s two stages of that journey to walking and leaping.

    The sicha distinguishes going onward to a level beyond comparison from uprooting oneself from the level one stood on, and the Rebbe suggests (note 22) that the two are like „הילוך ודילוג” (walking and leaping). Walking, he writes, is to a place that bears relation to the place before it, an ascent in order, while leaping is „עלי׳ שלא בערך” (an ascent beyond comparison). He gives it in this paragraph’s own terms: the leap lifts the whole body and both feet from the ground, unlike walking, even running, where „שרגל א׳ נשאר על הארץ” (one foot stays on the ground). For the definition he cites the Rebbe Rashab (Sefer HaMaamarim 5671; Hemshech 5672) together with this maamar.

    The Alter Rebbeאבל הדילוג הוא שמגביה כל גופו ושני רגליו מן הארץ ונעשה חלל ומקום פנוי

    The Rebbeדהילוך הוא למקום (דרגא) שיש לו ערך לגבי מקומו הקודם, שלכן נק׳ עלי׳ בסדר והדרגה (לגבי דילוג), משא״כ דילוג הוא עלי׳ שלא בערך

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. כג, p. 227 (note 22) · משיחות ש״פ מטו״מ תשי״ג, תשכ״א

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made

TermsDilugTzimtzum
  • Dilug דילוג explained hereHere, leaping differs from walking or running, where one foot stays down: the whole body and both feet leave the ground, opening a void and empty space before landing.אבל הדילוג הוא שמגביה כל גופו ושני רגליו מן הארץ ונעשה חלל ומקום פנוי ואויר בין רגליו לארץ
  • Tzimtzum צמצום

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    הנה ענין מדלג על ההרים · המאמר כאן כנראה שזהו הנחת הר״פ כמו שנדפס שם ע׳ קסח, עם שינויים קלים. הנחת כ״ק אדה״א בסה״מ תק״ע ע׳ יב. וראה ביהל אור ע׳ קצ שמציין לד״ה זה הנחת הר״פ ומוסיף: ”שכ׳ אות באות משמו”. בהנחות הר״פ ע׳ קעג נמצא אחר מאמר זה ד״ה ולתוס׳ ביאור ענין מקרא משנה ותלמוד, ובאוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתקסט מציין ”ושייך לד״ה ששים המה מלכות בלקו״ת בשה״ש דרוש השני”. באוה״ת וארא ע׳ קמח מציין למאמר זה ”בביאור ע״פ ששים המה מלכות בד״ה הנה ענין מדלג על ההרים” וכ״ה בכ״מ. וכ״ה באוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתקסה ”לביאור דששים המה כו׳ בד״ה לבאר ענין מדלג” ושם הגהות. בסיום ד״ה וישמע יתרו תרמ״ז ע׳ פ׳ מציין כ״ק אדמו״ר מוהרש״ב שהמאמר מיוסד על ד״ה זה. ראה להלן בהוספות להערות וציונים השוואה לד״ה זה. ראה אוה״ת ענינים ע׳ רפה ואילך. הגהות לד״ה פתח אליהו תרנ״ח ע׳ נו (שם הוא על הנדפס באוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתקסה) סה״מ תרס״ו ע׳ קפד ואילך. המשך תער״ב ח״א ע׳ כו ואילך.
  2. 2

2ועד״ז יובן הנמשל ענין מדלג כי הנה כדי שיהיה התהוות עולמות אבי״ע [אצילות בריאה יצירה עשיה] מאור א״ס ב״ה לא היה יכול להיות על ידי השתלשלות עילה ועלול

In the same way the analogue, the meaning of “leaping,” will be understood. For behold, in order for the worlds of Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah to come into being from the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, this could not have been through a chain of descent (hishtalshelus) of cause and effect,

Explanation

Now the Alter Rebbe applies the analogy to what it illustrates (the nimshal): the coming-into-being of the four worlds. He begins with the problem: the worlds could not have come from the Infinite Light by a gradual chain of cause and effect, each level stepping down from the one above.

כי מאחר שהוא א״ס איך יכול להתהוות מזה עולם ע״י השתלשלות שהרי העלול יש לו ערך לעילתו משא״כ העולמות לגבי א״ס ב״ה

for since it is infinite (Ein Sof), how could a world come into being from it through hishtalshelus? For an effect bears a relation to its cause, which is not so with the worlds in relation to the Infinite One, blessed be He.

Explanation

In any chain of cause and effect, the effect bears some relation and proportion to its cause. The finite worlds bear no relation at all to the Infinite One, so no gradual chain could ever lead from Him to a world.

ולכן היה צ״ל צמצום ומקום פנוי כמבואר בתחלת ספר ע״ח [עץ חיים] דהיינו שמתחלה צמצם אורו לגמרי שנסתלק ונכלל האור במקורו במאור ונעשה חלל ומקום פנוי ואח״כ נתגלה קו וחוט והארת הקו הוא ממלכות דאור א״ס ב״ה

Therefore there had to be a tzimtzum (contraction) and an empty space, as explained at the beginning of the book Etz Chaim. That is: at first He contracted His light completely, so that the light withdrew and was included in its source, in the Luminary, and there came to be a void and an empty space; and afterwards a kav and chut (line and thread) were revealed. And the radiance of the kav is from the Malchus (sovereignty) of the Infinite Light, blessed be He,

Explanation

The answer is the tzimtzum taught at the opening of Etz Chaim: first G‑d withdrew His light entirely, so that it was absorbed back into its source, the Luminary, leaving a void, and only then was a thin line of light revealed in it, the kav, also called chut, “thread.” That line comes from the Malchus of the Infinite Light, its last and lowest aspect.

ולא מעצם אור א״ס ב״ה דאם היה הגילוי מעצמותו ית׳ הי׳ [היה] חוזר לקדמותו בלי שום עלמין וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים שמבחי׳ מלכותך הי׳ [היה] התהוות כל העלמין ע״י קו״ח [קו וחוט] (וענין מלכות דאור א״ס עיין בע״ח [בעץ חיים])

and not from the essence of the Infinite Light, blessed be He; for if the revelation were from His essence, may He be blessed, it would revert to its former state, without any worlds at all. And this is [the meaning of] what is written, “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds”: from the level of “Your kingship” came the coming-into-being of all the worlds, through the kav and chut. (And concerning the matter of the Malchus of the Infinite Light, see in Etz Chaim)

Explanation

The kav cannot come from the essence of the Infinite Light, for a revelation of the essence would return everything to how it was before creation, with no worlds at all. So the verse “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds” (Psalms 145:13) is read as saying that all the worlds come into being from G‑d’s “kingship,” His Malchus, through the kav; the text then refers to Etz Chaim on what “the Malchus of the Infinite Light” means.

(שמ״א פ״ג [פרק ג׳]) וז״ל [וזה לשונו] וכאילו נאמר דרך משל שהוא בחינת מלכות שבמלכות ואע״פ [ואף על פי] שאין כן כי אין שם דמות וספירה ח״ו [חס ושלום] רק לשכך האוזן נדבר כך עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו]:

(Sha’ar (Gate) 41, chapter 3); these are his words: “And it is as though we were to say, by way of analogy, that it is the level of the Malchus within Malchus. And although it is not so, for there is no image or Sefirah there, G‑d forbid, it is only to soothe the ear that we speak so.” End of quote.

Explanation

Etz Chaim is quoted to qualify the expression: to speak of “the Malchus within Malchus” of the Infinite is only an analogy, for there is no image or Sefirah in the Infinite at all. Such language is used only “to soothe the ear,” to give the listener something he can grasp.

Paragraph 2 in brief

The worlds could not come from the Infinite by a gradual chain, since the finite bears no relation to the Infinite. So there first had to be a tzimtzum, a complete withdrawal leaving a void, and only then a kav drawn from the Malchus of the Infinite Light and not from its essence: the pattern of the leap.

Deeper

Etz Chaim insists that a Sefirah-name like Malchus is borrowed when applied to the Infinite Light, and the Alter Rebbe quotes this so that “the Malchus of the Infinite Light” is not taken literally. Another transcript of this discourse adds here that no Sefirah-name applies to G‑d’s essence at all, and even of the Infinite Light it can be used only without number.

TermsTzimtzumDilugKavIlah ve’alul+7
  • Tzimtzum צמצום explained hereAn effect has a relation to its cause, but the worlds have none to the Infinite, so they could not come about by cause and effect; there had to be a tzimtzum and vacated space, then a kav from Malchus of Or Ein Sof, for a revelation of His essence would leave no worlds.כדי שיהיה התהוות עולמות אבי״ע מאור א״ס ב״ה לא היה יכול להיות על ידי השתלשלות עילה ועלול
  • Dilug דילוג
  • Kav קו
  • Ilah ve’alul עילה ועלול
  • Sefiros ספירות
  • Atzmus u’mahus עצמות ומהות
  • Ein Sof אין סוף
  • Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
  • Malchus מלכות
  • Hiskallelus התכללות

Also Or Ein Sof

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    צמצום ומקום פנוי · Sefer Etz Chaim 1:2:2–3
  2. 2
    בתחלת ספר ע״ח · ראה לעיל הוספות לויקרא נא, ב.
  3. 3
  4. 4
    שמבחי׳ מלכותך הי׳ התהוות כל העלמין ע״י קו״ח · בהנחת הר״פ ע׳ קסט יש כאן הוספה: ”וכל שם ספירה לא שייך לקרא בעצמותו ומהותו רק בבחי׳ אוא״ס שם שייך לקרא בשם ספירה אבל לא בבחי׳ ע״ס, כי גם בבחי׳ אור א״ס ב״ה אין מספר ואף בעקודים היה הכל עקוד בכלי אחד רק אח״ז יחשב לעשר ספירות בעולם נקודים זת״ז, אבל באור א״ס ב״ה לא יש מספר לספי׳ רק כי באוא״ס ב״ה שייך לקרא בשם ספירה, וקודם שנברא העולם היה הוא ושמו בלבד, אבל בעצמותו ומהותו לא שייך שם ספי׳ כלל”. על קטע זה מהנחת הר״פ מיוסד ההגהות באוה״ת שה״ש כרך ג ע׳ תתקסה, ומובא כמה פעמים בדא״ח.
  5. 5
    וכאילו נאמר דרך משל שהוא בחינת מלכות שבמלכות ואע״פ שאין כן כי אין שם דמות וספירה ח״ו רק לשכך האוזן נדבר כך · Sefer Etz Chaim 42:1:3

3ועל זה נאמר קול דודי כו׳ מדלג כי הנה אורייתא מחכמה נפקת וההתגלות וההמשכה מאור א״ס ב״ה לבחי׳ חכמה בא בבחי׳ דילוג דוקא

And of this it is said, “The voice of my beloved,” etc., “leaping.” For behold, “the Torah came forth from Chochmah (wisdom),” and the revelation and drawing-down from the Infinite Light, blessed be He, to the level of Chochmah comes specifically in the manner of leaping,

Explanation

The verse “The voice of my beloved… leaping” is now applied to this leap. The Torah has its source in Chochmah, and the revelation of the Infinite Light into Chochmah, the first revealed level, comes specifically by way of a leap.

שהרי צריך להיות מקודם חלל ומקום פנוי ואח״כ נמשך הקו ה״ז [הרי זה] בחי׳ דילוג כמשל הדולג שקודם נעשה חלל ומקום פנוי ואויר בין רגליו לארץ (ועמ״ש סד״ה קול דודי גבי מדלג ומקפץ) ואח״כ יעמדו רגליו על הארץ משא״כ בהילוך

for there must first be a void and an empty space, and afterwards the kav is drawn down. This is the level of leaping, like the analogy of one who leaps, where first there comes to be a void and an empty space, and air, between his feet and the ground (and see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “The voice of my beloved,” concerning “leaping” and “skipping”), and afterwards his feet will stand on the ground; which is not so with walking.

Explanation

A leap means that first there is a void and only afterwards the kav is drawn into it, just as a jumper first leaves a gap of air between his feet and the ground and only afterwards lands, which never happens in walking. The parenthesis sends the reader to the end of the discourse “The voice of my beloved” (Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim 13), where the Alter Rebbe explains that the great revelation of the Exodus came “by way of a leap” and not in the step-by-step order of cause and effect, like one who leaps to a distant mountain he could not walk to, and that “leaping” is on one foot while “skipping” is on both.

וכך הוא למעלה שההמשכה מא״ס ב״ה לחכמה נמשך שלא ע״י דרך וסדר ההשתלשלות

And so it is above: the drawing-down from the Infinite One, blessed be He, to Chochmah is drawn not by way of the path and order of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus).

Explanation

So too above: the light that reaches Chochmah from the Infinite One does not come through the orderly, step-by-step chain of descent.

כי לשון ההשתלשלות הוא כמו שלשלת אשר טבעת זה אחוז ואדוק בזה בלי שום הפסק בינתיים

For the term hishtalshelus is like a chain (shalsheles), in which one ring is held and fastened to the next, without any interruption in between.

Explanation

Hishtalshelus, the word for this chain of descent, comes from shalsheles, “a chain,” whose rings are each linked to the next with no gap between them. In Likkutei Torah, V’Zos HaBerachah, the Alter Rebbe uses the same image: intellect gives rise to emotion in its own measure, so such levels bear a relation to each other, with no leap between them.

משא״כ בהתגלות הנ״ל והתהוות העולמות מא״ס ב״ה היה צריך להיות תחלה הסתלקות האור לגמרי והגבהתו למעלה ואח״כ בא ההתגלות לחכמה דרך קו וחוט זהו בחי׳ הדילוג וכ״ז [וכל זה] הוא בההמשכה מא״ס ב״ה לאצי׳

Whereas with the revelation mentioned above and the coming-into-being of the worlds from the Infinite One, blessed be He, there had to be first a complete withdrawal of the light and its elevation on high, and afterwards the revelation came to Chochmah by way of the kav and chut. This is the level of leaping. And all this is in the drawing-down from the Infinite One, blessed be He, to Atzilus.

Explanation

The revelation into Chochmah, and with it the coming-into-being of the worlds, is different: the light first withdrew completely and was lifted away, and only afterwards did a revelation reach Chochmah through the kav, a break followed by a new beginning, which is what “leaping” means. The Alter Rebbe limits this to one step, the drawing-down from the Infinite One to Atzilus.

אבל כל המשכות בעולמות אבי״ע [אצילות בריאה יצירה עשיה] אפילו מאצי׳ לבי״ע לא נק׳ בחי׳ דילוג כי הוא דרך השתלשלות

But all the drawings-down within the worlds of Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, even from Atzilus to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, are not called the level of leaping, for it is by way of hishtalshelus.

Explanation

Within the four worlds, even from Atzilus down to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, the descent is not a leap but a chain. The Kehot note points out that this does not contradict the previous discourse (Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim 32), which calls it Bilam’s error to think that the worlds come from G‑d by cause and effect: the chain is said here only of the worlds from Atzilus downward.

והגם שבאצי׳ איהו וחיוהי מב, גוגרמוהי חד היינו עצמותו והאור והכלים הכל אחד וא״כ איך יכול להיות מזה השתלשלות עולמות בי״ע שהם בעלי גבול מ״מ בכלים דאצי׳ גם כן שייך בחינת גבול

And although in Atzilus “He and His life-forces and His vessels are one,” that is, His essence and the light and the vessels are all one — and if so, how can there come from this a chain of descent of the worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, which are limited? — nevertheless, in the vessels of Atzilus too the aspect of limitation applies.

Explanation

He raises a difficulty from the well-known phrase that in Atzilus “He and His life-forces and His vessels are one”: if G‑d’s essence, the light and the vessels of Atzilus are all one, how can limited worlds descend from Atzilus link by link? The answer is that the vessels of Atzilus already have an aspect of limitation, so a finite world can follow from them.

ולכן שלשים כלים דזו״נ [דזעיר אנפין ונוקבא] מתלבשים בבי״ע ממש ונעשים נשמה להן (וכמשל הנשמה שמתאחדת עם הגוף וכשיש מכאוב ברגל מרגשת הנשמה אף שהגוף גשמי והנשמה רוחנית כך ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דבי״ע הם גופים וכלים לכלים דאצי׳ שנעשים נשמה להן)

Therefore thirty vessels of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva are actually enclothed in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah and become a soul to them. (As in the analogy of the soul, which unites with the body: when there is pain in the foot, the soul feels it, even though the body is physical and the soul spiritual. So the Ten Sefiros of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are bodies and vessels for the vessels of Atzilus, which become a soul to them.)

Explanation

Therefore thirty vessels of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva of Atzilus are themselves enclothed in the lower worlds and become their soul. The parenthesis compares this to soul and body, which are so united that the soul feels a pain in the foot although the soul is spiritual and the body physical; so the Ten Sefiros of the lower worlds serve as bodies for the vessels of Atzilus.

וכמו שדרך גילוי והתלבשות הנשמה בגוף הוא בדרך השתלשלות שבהראש מאיר יותר מן מה שמאיר בידים ובידים יותר מברגלים כך הוא סדר התלבשות למ״ד כלים דאצילות בבי״ע שבבריאה מאיר גילוי בחי׳ עליונה יותר כמו עד״מ גילוי הנשמה במוחין שבראש כו׳

And just as the manner of the soul’s revelation and enclothing in the body is by way of hishtalshelus, for in the head it shines more than it shines in the hands, and in the hands more than in the feet, so is the order of the enclothing of the thirty vessels of Atzilus in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah: in Beriah the revelation of a higher level shines more, like, by way of analogy, the revelation of the soul in the brain (mochin) in the head, etc.

Explanation

This descent follows the pattern of the soul in the body, which is graded: it shines most in the head, less in the hands, and still less in the feet. In the same graded way the thirty vessels of Atzilus are enclothed in the lower worlds, and Beriah receives the highest revelation, like the soul in the brain.

והגם שצריך להיות פרסא מפסקת בין אצילות לבריאה אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] לגבי הצמצום ומקום פנוי שבין א״ס ב״ה לאצילות שהוא הנקרא דלוג אין הפרסא נקרא בשם דילוג כלל רק בחינת השתלשלות

And although there must be a partition (parsa) separating Atzilus from Beriah, nevertheless, in comparison with the tzimtzum and empty space that is between the Infinite One, blessed be He, and Atzilus, which is what is called leaping, the partition is not called by the name “leaping” at all, but only the level of hishtalshelus.

Explanation

The Alter Rebbe adds a qualification: there is indeed a partition, the parsa, between Atzilus and Beriah. Yet compared with the tzimtzum and empty space between the Infinite One and Atzilus, which is the “leap,” the parsa is not called a leap at all; it is still part of the chain of descent.

שהפרסא הוא כמו אור המאיר דרך המסך

For the partition is like light that shines through a screen.

Explanation

The parsa is like light shining through a screen: the screen dims the light but does not cut it off. In Torah Ohr, in the discourse “Eliyahu opened” (Vayera), the Alter Rebbe draws the same line: Atzilus comes into being through the tzimtzum and an actual empty space, while Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah come through the parsa, “and not an empty space.”

וכמו שמתלבש השכל בלבוש המשל שאע״פ [שאף על פי] שהוא העלם והסתר מ״מ לא היה תחלה סילוק כל עצם האור

And it is like the way the intellect is enclothed in the garment of an analogy: although it is concealment and hiding, nevertheless there was not first a withdrawal of the entire essence of the light.

Explanation

A second illustration: when an idea is clothed in an analogy, it is hidden inside a garment, yet the idea was not first taken away. In that Torah Ohr discourse the parsa is compared to a teacher who clothes a great idea in an analogy so that his student can grasp it.

כי אדרבה עצם האור נמשך ומאיר דרך המסך וכן עצם השכל מתלבש בהמשל כ״א שיש מחיצה ומסך כדי שיוכל המקבל לקבל

On the contrary, the essence of the light is drawn forth and shines through the screen, and so too the essence of the intellect is enclothed in the analogy; only, there is a partition and a screen so that the recipient will be able to receive.

Explanation

On the contrary, the light itself passes through the screen, and the idea itself is present in the analogy. The screen or partition is there only so that the receiver, who could not take in the light or the idea directly, is able to receive it.

אבל מאור א״ס ב״ה המאציל לאצי׳ צריך להיות תחלה הסתלקות כל האור למקורו והגילוי נמשך אחר כך רק הארה דרך קו כנ״ל

But from the Infinite Light, blessed be He, the Emanator, to Atzilus, there must first be a withdrawal of all the light to its source, and the revelation is drawn down afterwards, only a radiance, by way of the kav, as mentioned above.

Explanation

From the Infinite Light, the Emanator, to Atzilus, the process is different in kind: all the light must first withdraw into its source, and only afterwards is a revelation drawn down, and even then only a radiance, through the kav.

וזהו הנק׳ דלוג ונק׳ למעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות (ועמ״ש ע״ז ג״כ בד״ה פתח אליהו):

And this is what is called leaping, and it is called above the order of hishtalshelus. (And see what is written about this also in the discourse beginning “Eliyahu opened.”)

Explanation

This is what is called “leaping,” and it is also called “above the order of hishtalshelus.” The text closes by referring to the discourse “Eliyahu opened” (Torah Ohr, Vayera, 13c), which explains the difference between the empty space of the tzimtzum and the parsa.

Paragraph 3 in brief

Applying the verse to the analogy, the Alter Rebbe distinguishes two kinds of descent. From the Infinite One to Atzilus there is a true leap, a complete withdrawal followed by a new revelation through the kav; within the worlds, from Atzilus downward and even across the parsa, the descent is a continuous chain, like light through a screen or an idea clothed in an analogy.

Deeper

What separates the parsa from the tzimtzum is whether the light is first withdrawn: a screen or an analogy hides what passes through it, while the tzimtzum first removes the light entirely, so that what follows is only a radiance. That is why the vessels of Atzilus, which already have an aspect of limitation, can link to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah as a chain, while the Infinite One reaches Atzilus only by a leap.

TermsDilugParsa, masachSefirosHishtalshelus+21
  • Dilug דילוג explained hereThe drawing from Or Ein Sof to Chochmah is a leap: first the light is withdrawn entirely, leaving a void, and only then a kav is drawn, as a leaper leaves air between his feet and the ground. Drawings from Atzilus to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are not called a leap, even through the parsa, since there the light itself shines through the screen.היה צריך להיות תחלה הסתלקות האור לגמרי והגבהתו למעלה ואח״כ בא ההתגלות לחכמה דרך קו וחוט זהו בחי׳ הדילוג
  • Parsa, masach פרסא ומסך explained hereHere, the parsa between Atzilus and Beriah is no “leap”: the light’s very essence shines through the screen, like intellect clothed in a parable, unlike the void before the kav.כי אדרבה עצם האור נמשך ומאיר דרך המסך וכן עצם השכל מתלבש בהמשל
  • Sefiros ספירות explained hereThe Sefiros’ vessels in Atzilus already hold limitation, so Zeir Anpin and Nukva’s thirty vessels clothe themselves in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah as their soul: a chain, not a leap.מ״מ בכלים דאצי׳ גם כן שייך בחינת גבול ולכן שלשים כלים דזו״נ מתלבשים בבי״ע ממש ונעשים נשמה להן
  • Hishtalshelus השתלשלות explained hereThe drawing from Or Ein Sof to Chochmah is a “leap” (dilug), above hishtalshelus, since the light was first withdrawn and then came as a line (kav); everything from Atzilus down, even across the partition into Beriah, is hishtalshelus.כי לשון ההשתלשלות הוא כמו שלשלת אשר טבעת זה אחוז ואדוק בזה בלי שום הפסק בינתיים
  • Kav קו
  • Ihu vegarmohi איהו וגרמוהי חד
  • Nukva נוקבא
  • Mayin nukvin and mayin duchrin מיין נוקבין ומיין דוכרין (מ״ן ומ״ד)
  • Tzimtzum צמצום
  • Mochin מוחין
  • Levushim לבושים
  • Lights and vessels אורות וכלים
  • Atzmus u’mahus עצמות ומהות
  • Yetzirah יצירה
  • Z’eir Anpin זעיר אנפין
  • Ein Sof אין סוף
  • Asiyah עשיה
  • Beriah בריאה
  • Atzilus אצילות

Also NeshamahHislabshusOr Ein SofChochmahHaalaah vehamshachahTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    קול דודי כו׳ מדלג · Song of Songs 2:8
  2. 2
    בא בבחי׳ דילוג שהרי צריך להיות מקודם חלל ומקום פנוי · בענין הדילוג ראה אוה״ת וארא ע׳ קמח. ד״ה וישמע יתרו תרמ״ז ע׳ עד.
  3. 3
    סד״ה קול דודי · לעיל טו, ב.
  4. 4
    כי לשון ההשתלשלות הוא כמו שלשלת · ראה גם לעיל פ׳ ברכה צה, ב.
  5. 5
    אפילו מאצי׳ לבי״ע . . דרך השתלשלות · ראה באוה״ת פ׳ ראה ע׳ תשפז. שלא יוקשה ממה שנתבאר לעיל מ, ג ע״ש.
  6. 6
    ולכן שלשים כלים דזו״נ דאצי׳ · ראה אוה״ת ויקהל ע׳ ב׳קעג. ד״ה תקעו תר״ו ע׳ רפח.
  7. 7
    בד״ה פתח אליהו · תו״א יג, ג ואילך.

Memalei and sovev ¶4–5

4ב והנה מאצילות ולמטה נק׳ בשם ממלא כל עלמין ודרך השתלשלות כי בחי׳ כלים דמל׳ הם בחי׳ בי״ע

2. Now, from Atzilus downward it is called by the name “the light that fills all worlds” (memalei kol almin), and [it is] by way of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus). For the level of the vessels of Malchus is the level of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.

Explanation

A new section begins (numbered 2). From Atzilus downward the divine light is called memalei kol almin, the light that fills all worlds, and it comes down by a continuous chain (hishtalshelus) rather than by a leap. The reason begins here: the vessels of Malchus of Atzilus are themselves the level of the lower worlds, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.

ובחי׳ מל׳ מקבלת מכל ע״ס [עשר ספירות] דאצילות כידוע שמבחי׳ מל׳ דחסד דאצי׳ נעשה חסד דמלכות דאצי׳ ומספי׳ [ומספירה / ומספירות] מל׳ דגבורה דאצי׳ נעשה גבורה דמל׳ דאצי׳

And the level of Malchus receives from all the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus. As is known, from the level of the Malchus of Chesed (kindness) of Atzilus there comes to be the Chesed of the Malchus of Atzilus, and from the Sefirah of the Malchus of Gevurah (restraint) of Atzilus there comes to be the Gevurah of the Malchus of Atzilus.

Explanation

Malchus of Atzilus receives from all ten Sefiros of Atzilus. Each Sefirah has its own aspect of Malchus, and from the Malchus of Chesed comes the Chesed within Malchus, from the Malchus of Gevurah the Gevurah within Malchus.

לכן שייך לומר בכלל ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין] הגם שעולמות בי״ע הם בע״ג [בעלי גבול / בעל גבול] יש בכלל מאתים מנה ובחי׳ ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין] והשתלשלות הוא דרך עו״ע [עילה ועלול] (וכבר נת׳ [נתבאר] שמ״מ יש פרסא מפסקת כו׳)

Therefore it is fitting to say, in general, “the light that fills all worlds.” Although the worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are finite, “two hundred includes a hundred”; and the level of the light that fills all worlds and of hishtalshelus is by way of cause and effect. (And it has already been explained that nevertheless there is a separating partition, etc.)

Explanation

Since Malchus holds something of all of Atzilus and its vessels are the level of the lower worlds, the whole order from Atzilus down can be spoken of in general as memalei. Although Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are finite, the rabbinic principle “two hundred includes a hundred” applies: the greater includes the lesser. The parenthesis recalls that this chain still has a separating partition (parsa) between Atzilus and Beriah, as the previous section explained.

ובחי׳ הארה וזיו מאור מל׳ דאצי׳ מאיר ומחיה כל עולם ויש הארה והתלבשות בכל עולם לפי ערך המקבל דרך עו״ע [עילה ועלול].

And the level of the radiance and glow from the light of the Malchus of Atzilus shines in and gives life to each world; and there is a radiance and enclothing in each world according to the capacity of the recipient, by way of cause and effect.

Explanation

Through this chain, a radiance from the light of Malchus of Atzilus shines into each world and gives it life. In each world it is enclothed according to what that world can receive, step by step, as cause and effect.

וכמו ד״מ [דרך משל] מן השכל נשתלשלו המדות והשכל נתלבש במדות ובמחשבה דבור ומעשה וגם במעשה הכתב נתגלה השכל וכותבין דבר שכל בכתב

As, for example, from the intellect the emotive attributes (middos) descend in a chain, and the intellect is enclothed in the emotive attributes, and in thought, speech and action; and even in the act of writing the intellect is revealed, and one writes a matter of intellect in writing.

Explanation

An analogy from the human soul: the emotions come from the intellect in a chain, and the intellect is enclothed in the emotions and then in thought, speech and action. It reaches even the physical act of writing, for a person writes an idea down and the idea is revealed in what he writes. Another transcript of this discourse (Sefer HaMaamarim 5570) adds that although the motion of the finger holds more than the idea, the idea is truly enclothed in it, as a spontaneous gesture of the hand shows still more clearly.

וא״כ השכל עצמו נשתלשל ע״י עילה ועלול עד שנשתלשל ונתלבש עצם השכל במעשה הכתב נתגלה השכל נמצא יש ערך לעשייה גשמיות של מעשה הכתב עם השכל הרוחני.

If so, the intellect itself descended in a chain, through cause and effect, until the very essence of the intellect descended and was enclothed in the act of writing, [and] the intellect was revealed. It follows that there is a relation between the physical doing of the act of writing and the spiritual intellect.

Explanation

So the intellect itself has come down step by step, by cause and effect, until its very essence is enclothed and revealed in the act of writing. It follows that even the physical act of writing bears a relation to the spiritual intellect, and this is what a chain of cause and effect means.

Paragraph 4 in brief

From Atzilus downward the divine light is memalei, coming down by an unbroken chain of cause and effect: Malchus of Atzilus, which receives from all ten Sefiros, is enclothed in the lower worlds, just as an idea comes down through emotion, thought and speech until it appears even in the physical act of writing.

Deeper

The contrast with the previous section is deliberate: between the Infinite One and Atzilus there is no relation, hence a leap, while between the intellect and the written word there is a relation, however distant, hence a chain. Another transcript of this discourse refines the analogy: the finger’s motion has more in it than intellect, yet the intellect is truly enclothed in it, and a spontaneous gesture of the hand shows this still more clearly.

TermsMachshavah, dibbur, maasehIlah ve’alulParsa, masachSefiros+14

Also Hislabshus

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    במעשה הכתב נתגלה השכל · בסה״מ תק״ע ע׳ יג: ”(ואעפ״י שהתנועה באצבע כבר יש בה מלבד השכל, אבל השכל מלובש ממש בתנועה זו עכ״פ כמו הרצון שמתלבש ביד לזרוק, ויותר ראי׳ מענין הרמז ביד שאינה בתנועה רצונית רק ממילא לפי אופן השכל שבמוח שבא ומראה פתאום ביד כו׳)”.

5וכ״ש [וכל שכן] משכל למדות ולפי ערך השכל כן נשתלשלו המדות וקטן ששכלו מעט גם מדותיו בדברים קטנים

And all the more so from intellect to the emotive attributes: according to the measure of the intellect, so do the emotive attributes descend; and a child whose intellect is slight, his emotive attributes too are in small things.

Explanation

If even the physical act of writing bears a relation to the intellect, all the more so do the emotions, which follow the intellect in proportion: a small child, whose intellect is slight, has emotions about small things.

כך בעולמות נשתלשל האור ומאיר בכל עולם לפי ערכו ומחיה ומהווה אותם בבריאה מאיר יותר בגילוי וכו׳ עד עשייה שם נתצמצם האור ומחמת זה יכול להיות שינויים בעולמות כמו קיץ וחורף בנין הבית וחורבנו וימות המשיח

So in the worlds, the light descended in a chain and shines in each world according to its measure, and gives them life and brings them into being. In Beriah it shines more in revelation, etc., down to Asiyah; there the light is contracted. And because of this there can be changes in the worlds, such as summer and winter, the building of the [Holy] Temple and its destruction, and the days of Mashiach.

Explanation

The same holds in the worlds: the light comes down in a chain and shines in each world according to that world’s measure, giving it life and existence, more openly in Beriah and less in the worlds below it, until in Asiyah it is contracted. Because the revelation differs from world to world, the worlds can change: summer and winter, the building and the destruction of the Temple, and the days of Mashiach.

כל זה הוא מחמת שהוא רק הארה שמאיר בכל עולם ומחיה אותם בבחי׳ ממלא

All this is because it is only a radiance that shines in each world and gives them life, as the level of memalei.

Explanation

All this is possible because what shines in the worlds is only a radiance, the level of memalei, which gives them life.

וא״כ ממילא אין הגילוי בשוה בכל העולמות רק בצמצום בכל עולם לפי ערכו ככה נתגלה בחי׳ ממלא ולבעבור זה יש שנויי׳ [שנויים] לפי ערך הגילוי

If so, it follows of itself that the revelation is not equal in all the worlds, but rather [it is] with contraction: in each world, according to its measure, so is the level of memalei revealed. And on account of this there are changes, according to the measure of the revelation.

Explanation

It follows that memalei is not revealed equally in all the worlds, but only through contraction, in each world according to its measure. That is why there are changes, following the measure of the revelation.

אכן בחי׳ סוכ״ע שהוא עצם האור הרי לגבי עצמותו ומהותו אני הוי׳ לא שניתי מעלה ומטה שוין גשמיות ורוחניות כמו קודם שנברא העולם

However, the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), which is the essence of the light: in relation to His essence and being, “I, Havayah, have not changed”; above and below are equal, physicality and spirituality, as before the world was created.

Explanation

Sovev kol almin, the light that encompasses all worlds, is different: it is the essence of the light itself, and in relation to G‑d’s essence nothing changes, as the verse says, “I, Havayah, have not changed” (Malachi 3:6). For Him above and below, physical and spiritual, are the same as they were before the world was created.

וכמו ד״מ [דרך משל] זיו השמש שמאיר יכול להיות מסכים המסתיר את האור והזיו אבל מכל זה אין שום שינוי בעצם השמש

And as, for example, with the glow of the sun that shines: there can be screens that hide the light and the glow, but from all this there is no change at all in the sun itself.

Explanation

The analogy is the sun: screens can block its rays and hide its light, but they change nothing in the sun itself.

כמ״כ [כמו כן] לגבי עצם אור א״ס אשר את השמים והארץ אני מלא אין שום שינוי והסתר כחשכה כאורה כלא חשיבי קמיה.

Likewise, in relation to the essence of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), of which [it is said], “the heavens and the earth I fill,” there is no change or concealment at all; “darkness is as light,” and they are regarded as nothing before Him.

Explanation

So too the essence of the Infinite Light, which fills heaven and earth (Jeremiah 23:24), undergoes no change or concealment at all: “darkness is as light” (Psalms 139:12), and everything is as nothing before Him. (The printed כלאר is a slip for כלא, “as nothing.”)

רק כשנסתר ונתצמצם האור העצם ונמשך רק הארה ומאיר הזיו דרך דילוג וחלל ומקום פנוי כנ״ל אז שייך שינויים כנ״ל

Only when the essential light is hidden and contracted, and only a radiance is drawn down, and the glow shines by way of a leap and a void and an empty space, as mentioned above, then changes apply, as mentioned above.

Explanation

Change belongs only to the realm where the essential light was hidden and contracted and only a radiance is drawn down. That is the radiance that comes through the “leap,” the void and the empty space described in the first section.

אבל לע״ל [לעתיד לבוא] כשיהיה התגלות האור מבחי׳ סכ״ע [סובב כל עלמין] יקום גם גוף הגשמי בתחית המתים וליהנות מזיו השכינה ולחיות בלא אכילה ושתיה

But in the Time to Come, when there will be a revelation of the light from the level of sovev kol almin, even the physical body will rise in the Resurrection of the Dead, and [it will] delight in the radiance of the Shechinah (Divine Presence) and live without eating and drinking.

Explanation

In the Time to Come, when the light of sovev is revealed, even the physical body will rise at the Resurrection of the Dead. It will delight in the radiance of the Shechinah and live without eating and drinking, as the Sages describe the World to Come (Berachos 17a); the next part gives the reason.

כי בפני עצם האור אין שום הסתר כלל מב, דולבעבור זה יכול להשגיח על כל פרטי פרטים וכמ״ש מה׳ מצעדי גבר כוננו ואין אדם נוקף אצבעו וכו׳ ידע מה בחשוכא ונהורא עמיה שרא

For before the essence of the light there is no concealment at all. And because of this He can watch over every last detail, as it is written, “By Havayah are a man’s steps established,” and “A person does not bruise his finger,” etc., [and] “He knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with Him.”

Explanation

Before the essence of the light nothing at all is hidden, so G‑d’s providence reaches every last detail. Three sources are brought: “By Havayah are a man’s steps established” (Psalms 37:23); the Talmud’s saying that a person does not bruise his finger below unless it is proclaimed over him above; and the verse in Daniel, “He knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with Him.”

כי לפני עצמותו מעלה ומטה שוין הכל כלא חשיבי קמיה וזהו המגביהי לשבת המשפילי לראות בשמים ובארץ אשר לבעבור שעצמותו מגביהי לשבת סכ״ע [סובב כל עלמין] ואינו בערך עלמין כלל לכן אין שום הפרש בין שמים וארץ

For before His essence above and below are equal; all are regarded as nothing before Him. And this is [the meaning of] “Who is enthroned on high, Who looks down low upon heaven and earth”: because His essence is “enthroned on high,” sovev kol almin, and bears no relation to worlds at all, therefore there is no difference at all between heaven and earth.

Explanation

Before His essence there is no above or below; everything is as nothing before Him. This is the meaning of Psalms 113:5–6: because He is “enthroned on high,” as sovev, beyond any relation to worlds, He “looks down low” upon the earth as upon the heavens, and there is no difference between them.

ועל דבר זה נסמית עינו של בלעם הרשע באמרו ומספר את רובע ישראל

And on this matter the eye of the wicked Bilam was blinded, when he said, “and the number of the fourth part (rova) of Israel.”

Explanation

On this point the wicked Bilam was blinded. In its plain sense his phrase “the number of the rova of Israel” (Numbers 23:10) means a fourth part, one of the four camps of Israel; the Talmud (Niddah 31a) reads it as G‑d counting the marital unions of Israel, awaiting the drop from which a righteous person is formed, and says that Bilam thought it unfitting for the Holy and Pure One to look upon such a thing, and his eye was blinded.

והיינו לפי טעותו שההתהוות הוא דרך השתלשלות והתלבשות בעלמין לכן יש חילוק מעלה ומטה ורחוק אצלם ה׳ בתכלית שישתלשל כ״כ [כל כך] למטה בהשגחה פרטיות בארץ מתחת כמו בשמים ממעל ולכן אומרים על השמים כבודו

That is, according to his error, that the coming-into-being is by way of hishtalshelus and enclothing in the worlds, therefore there is a distinction between above and below; and in their eyes it is utterly remote that G‑d would descend so far below, with individual providence on the earth below as in the heavens above. And therefore they say, “His glory is above the heavens.”

Explanation

His error was to think that creation comes only by a chain of descent and enclothing in the worlds. Then there would be a real distinction between above and below, and it would seem utterly remote that G‑d should come down so far as to watch over the details of the earth as He does the heavens; that is why those who share this error say, “His glory is above the heavens” (Psalms 113:4). Another transcript of this discourse (R. Pinchas’s) names them: the idol-worshippers, who say in their error, “Havayah is high above all nations.”

אבל באמת במקום גדולתו שם ענותנותו שמחמת שמגביהי לשבת משפילי לראות אשר לגבי סוכ״ע ושאין בגדר עלמין כלל אין שום הפרש מעלה ומטה וכלא ממש חשיבי ומתחת זרועות עולם כו׳:

But in truth, “where His greatness is, there is His humility”: because He is “enthroned on high,” He “looks down low.” For in relation to sovev kol almin, which is not within the bounds of worlds at all, there is no difference at all between above and below, and they are regarded as truly nothing; and “beneath are the everlasting (olam) arms,” etc.

Explanation

In truth, “where His greatness is, there is His humility,” as the Sages say (Megillah 31a): precisely because He is enthroned high above, He looks down low. For sovev, which is beyond the bounds of worlds altogether, there is no difference between above and below, all being truly as nothing; and so “beneath are the everlasting arms” (Deuteronomy 33:27), read here as His reach to what is lowest.

Paragraph 5 in brief

Because memalei is a contracted radiance revealed differently in each world, the worlds are subject to change; sovev, the essence of the light, is unchanged and equal above and below, so G‑d’s providence reaches every detail of the lowest world. Bilam, who thought creation was only a chain of descent, could not grasp this.

Deeper

The paragraph turns the contrast of memalei and sovev into a teaching about providence: change belongs to the contracted radiance that came by the leap, but before the essence, which bears no relation to worlds, nothing is hidden and nothing is too low, and His exaltation is the very reason He looks down low. The Resurrection is presented as the time when this level of sovev will be revealed in the physical body itself.

TermsTechiyas hameisimDilugKachasheichah kaorahShamayim va’aretz+21

Also HislabshusChayusHavayahOr Ein Sof

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    אני הוי׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
  2. 2
    את השמים והארץ אני מלא · Jeremiah 23:24
  3. 3
    כחשכה כאורה · Psalms 139:12
  4. 4
    מזיו השכינה · Berakhot 17a:12
  5. 5
    מה׳ מצעדי גבר כוננו · Psalms 37:23
  6. 6
    ואין אדם נוקף אצבעו · Chullin 7b:15–16
  7. 7
    ידע מה בחשוכא · Daniel 2:22
  8. 8
    המגביהי לשבת המשפילי לראות · Psalms 113:5–6
  9. 9
    ועל דבר זה נסמית עינו של בלעם הרשע · Niddah 31a:21–22
  10. 10
    ומספר את רובע ישראל · Numbers 23:10
  11. 11
    ועל דבר זה נסמית . . והיינו לפי טעותו · בסה״מ הנחות הר״פ ע׳ קע: ”אבל העכומ״ז אומרים רם על כל גוים הוי׳ לפי טעותם”. ובענין בלעם נכתב שם להלן אחר תיבת על השמים כבודו. וראה בהנחה אחרת בסה״מ תק״ע ע׳ טז.
  12. 12
    על השמים כבודו · Psalms 113:4
  13. 13
    ומתחת זרועות עולם · Deuteronomy 33:27

Queens, concubines and maidens ¶6–7

6והנה שיאיר בחי׳ סובב בבחי׳ מלא הוא ע״י עסק התורה קול דודי הנה זה בא

Now, that the level of sovev should shine within the level of memalei is through occupation with the Torah: “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes.”

Explanation

A new step: the light of sovev comes to shine within memalei through the study of Torah. The verse “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes” is applied to this.

¶10 Torah draws sovev into memalei; paragraphs 8–10 show what must come first.

כי מתניתין מלכתא ובעסקו בתורה ואומר טהור וכו׳ אני המשנה המדברת בפיך והגילוי מאיר מאור א״ס במשנה בתדירא ו״ק [ו׳ קצוות] מקננין ביצירה ופסקי הדינין הם בחי׳ מדות דיצירה והמדות ששה קצוות מאירין שם בגילוי ובתדירא

For “the Mishnah is a queen”; and when one occupies himself with Torah and says “pure,” etc., “I am the Mishnah that speaks in your mouth.” And the revelation from the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) shines in the Mishnah constantly. The six extremities (vav ketzavos) nest in Yetzirah, and the legal rulings are the level of the emotive attributes (middos) of Yetzirah; and the emotive attributes, the six extremities, shine there in revelation and constantly.

Explanation

The Mishnah is called “a queen,” that is, Malchus, and when a person studies and rules “pure” and so on, it is the Mishnah itself that speaks through his mouth. In the Mishnah the revelation of the Infinite Light shines constantly, for its rulings belong to the emotive attributes of Yetzirah, the world where the six extremities, Z’eir Anpin, “nest,” and there they shine openly and constantly.

כידוע שהתגלות אור א״ס בחכמה ואורייתא מחכמה נפקת וכל הדינין כשר ומותר וכו׳ המבוארים במשניות הם ע״י חכמה אתברירו מברר הטוב מרע ומאיר שם עצם הגילוי ומברר ופוסק הדין שמותר לאכול ועי״ז נתעלה הדבר ההוא או להיפוך

As is known, the revelation of the Infinite Light is in Chochmah (wisdom), and “the Torah came forth from Chochmah”; and all the laws, “kosher” and “permitted,” etc., that are explained in the Mishnayos are “clarified through Chochmah”: it separates the good from the evil, and the very essence of the revelation shines there, and it clarifies and decides the law that [a thing] is permitted to eat, and through this that thing is elevated, or the opposite.

Explanation

The Infinite Light is revealed in Chochmah, the Torah comes from Chochmah, and the laws of the Mishnah, “kosher,” “permitted” and the rest, are “clarified through Chochmah,” which sorts the good from the evil. When a ruling declares a thing permitted to eat, the very essence of the revelation shines in it and the thing is thereby elevated; when it is forbidden, the opposite.

וע״ז נאמר והבדלתם בין הבהמה הטהורה וכו׳ משא״כ בברייתא ההארה והגילוי בהם מועטת ואין בתדירא וכמשל ההולך אל פלגשו וכו׳

And of this it is said, “You shall distinguish between the pure animal,” etc. Whereas in the Baraisa [the teachings left outside the Mishnah], the illumination and the revelation in them are slight, and not constant, like the analogy of one who goes to his concubine, etc.

Explanation

This sorting is what the verse means: “You shall distinguish between the pure animal and the impure” (Leviticus 20:25). In a Baraisa, a teaching of the Sages left outside the Mishnah, the light and revelation are slight and not constant, like a man who goes to his concubine only from time to time, while the queen, the Mishnah, is with him constantly.

כי המשניות הם בחי׳ חג״ת [חסד גבורה תפארת] שהם כלים אמצעים תפארת גופא וכו׳ אכן ברייתות הם בחי׳ נה״י [נצח הוד יסוד] שהם לבר מגופא כלים חיצוני׳

For the Mishnayos are the level of Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes, which are the middle vessels: “Tiferes is the body,” etc. But the Baraisos are the level of Netzach, Hod and Yesod, which are “outside the body,” outer vessels.

Explanation

The Mishnayos correspond to Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes, the middle vessels of the body, Tiferes being the body itself. The Baraisos correspond to Netzach, Hod and Yesod, which are outside the body proper: outer vessels.

לכן נקרא ברייתא לשון חוצה ומתלבשים גם בעשי׳ [בעשיה] לכן נתרבו הברייתות דוקא בזמן הגלות כי אז מטי רגלין ברגלין בחי׳ נה״ח

Therefore it is called Baraisa, an expression of “outside,” and they are enclothed also in Asiyah. Therefore the Baraisos multiplied specifically in the time of the exile, for then “the feet reach the feet,” the level of Netzach, Hod and Yesod;

Explanation

The very name Baraisa means “outside,” and these levels are enclothed even in Asiyah, the lowest world. That is why the Baraisos multiplied in the time of the exile, when “the feet reach the feet,” the lowest levels; the Zohar (Pekudei) links the Mishnah with the Second Temple while the Baraisos dwell outside, “between the thighs,” and in the exile Israel descends until it dwells “in the feet.” (The printed נה״ח is apparently a misprint for נה״י, Netzach, Hod and Yesod, named in the previous part.)

ולכן ההארה והגילוי בהן מועט. אכן מקודם היה הכל נכללין במשנה וע״ד מ״ש אילפא ולא פשיטנא ליה ממתניתין כו׳.

and therefore the illumination and the revelation in them are slight. However, previously everything was included in the Mishnah, along the lines of what Ilfa said: “and I do not resolve it from the Mishnah,” etc.

Explanation

That is why the light in the Baraisos is slight. Originally, however, everything was contained in the Mishnah, as Ilfa claimed that he could resolve any question on the Baraisos of Rabbi Chiya and Rabbi Oshaya from the Mishnah (Taanis 21a). In Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 9, the Alter Rebbe likewise contrasts the days of the Tannaim and Amoraim, when Torah study was the main service, with the “footsteps of Mashiach,” when the Shechinah has come down to the level of the feet.

Paragraph 6 in brief

Torah study is what brings sovev to shine within memalei. The Mishnah, rooted in the emotive attributes of Yetzirah, carries a constant revelation and through its rulings elevates what it permits, while the Baraisos, rooted in the outer vessels Netzach, Hod and Yesod and enclothed even in Asiyah, carry only a slight one; they multiplied in exile, though originally all was contained in the Mishnah.

Deeper

Calling the Mishnah a queen and comparing the Baraisa to a concubine echoes the verse “Sixty are the queens and eighty concubines” (Song of Songs 6:8), which Or HaTorah connects with this discourse. The constant, central revelation of the Mishnah stands against the occasional, outer revelation of the Baraisa, which grew as the exile reached the “feet.” The words “I am the Mishnah that speaks in your mouth” give voice to the Mishnah itself: when a person studies and rules “pure,” the queen speaks through his mouth. So the revelation of the Infinite Light that shines constantly in the Mishnah is voiced through the mouth of the one who studies it.

TermsBechochmah isbreruTiferesHodNetzach+9

Also Or Ein SofChochmahTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    קול דודי הנה זה בא · Song of Songs 2:8
  2. 2
    והבדלתם בין הבהמה הטהורה · Leviticus 20:25
  3. 3
    תפארת גופא · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:16–17
  4. 4
    מטי רגלין ברגלין · Zohar II, 255a
  5. 5
    רגלין ברגלין · Zohar, Pekudei 51:734–743
  6. 6
    אילפא ולא פשיטנא ליה ממתניתין · Taanit 21a:5

7ועלמות הוא הלכות תלמוד בבלי ע״י שמותיב ומפרק ניתוספו דינים חדשים ומדמה מילתא למילתא ותלמוד בבריאה שמאיר שם חכמתו יתברך וכמ״ש בע״ח [בעץ חיים] אימא מקננא בבריאה ונקרא עלמין לשון העלם

And “maidens” (alamos) are the laws of the Babylonian Talmud: by raising objections and resolving them, new laws were added, and one compares one matter to another. And the Talmud is in Beriah, where His Chochmah (wisdom), may He be blessed, shines, as is written in Etz Chaim, “Imma (Binah) nests in Beriah.” And they are called alamin, an expression of concealment (he’elem).

Explanation

After the Mishnah, “the queen,” and the Baraisos, compared to concubines, come the “maidens” (alamos), the third group in the verse “Sixty are the queens and eighty concubines, and maidens without number” (Song of Songs 6:8): these are the laws of the Babylonian Talmud, which grew through question and answer and through comparing one case with another. The Talmud is rooted in Beriah, where Imma, that is Binah, “nests” and G‑d’s Chochmah shines, and the word alamin is read as related to he’elem, concealment.

וכמו שאיתא יוצר אור זהו יצירה ובורא חושך עולם הבריאה נקרא חושך

As it is stated: “Who forms (yotzer) light” — this is Yetzirah (Formation); “and creates (borei) darkness” — the World of Beriah (Creation) is called darkness.

Explanation

The phrase “Who forms light and creates darkness” (Isaiah 45:7, said daily in the morning blessings) is read as a statement about the worlds: “forms” (yotzer) points to Yetzirah and “creates” (borei) to Beriah, so that Yetzirah is called light and Beriah darkness. In the first discourse “Shechorah” (Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim 5) the Alter Rebbe explains this darkness with a teacher and his student: Beriah is like the teacher’s thought, still darkness to the student, and Yetzirah like his speech, which is light to him.

והטעם לזה כי יצירה ששם מקננין ו״ק [ו׳ קצוות] דאצילות שהם מדותיו יתברך יכולין לירד ולהתלבש שהמקבל יכל לקבל חסד ממש במדה ומרגיש הטוב הגם שאין ערוך לעצם החסד דאצי׳ כי ביצירה הם בע״ג [בעלי גבול / בעל גבול] אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] שייך לשון אור שהמקבל מקבל על בוריו.

And the reason for this is that in Yetzirah, where the six extremities (vav ketzavos) of Atzilus nest, which are His emotive attributes (middos), may He be blessed, they can descend and be enclothed, so that the recipient can receive actual kindness, in measure, and feel the good. Although there is no comparison to the essence of the Chesed of Atzilus, for in Yetzirah they are finite, nevertheless the term “light” applies, for the recipient receives it clearly.

Explanation

The reason is that in Yetzirah, where the six emotive attributes of Atzilus “nest,” the attributes can come down and be enclothed, so that a recipient receives real kindness, in measured form, and feels its goodness. Though this bears no comparison to the Chesed of Atzilus itself, since in Yetzirah the attributes are finite, it is still called “light,” because what is received is received clearly.

אכן בחי׳ חכמתו אין יכול להשתלשל כ״כ [כל כך] למטה ולכן כל מה שמשיג השגה אינו משיג לשרשו ולעמקו

However, the level of His Chochmah cannot descend in a chain so far below; and therefore, whatever comprehension one attains, he does not attain [it] to its root and its depth.

Explanation

G‑d’s Chochmah, however, cannot come so far down the chain. So whatever one grasps of it, one does not grasp it to its root and depth.

כי חכמתו ובינתו ודעתו של אור א״ס ב״ה שבאצי׳ אינו יכול לבא בהתגלות כלים בע״ג [בעלי גבול / בעל גבול] חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא

For the Chochmah, Binah and Daas of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, that is in Atzilus cannot come into revelation in finite vessels: “wise, but not with a knowable wisdom.”

Explanation

The intellect of Atzilus, its Chochmah, Binah and Daas, cannot be revealed in finite vessels. The phrase “wise, but not with a knowable wisdom” says that G‑d’s wisdom is beyond any wisdom that can be known.

ולכן אף שלמעלה באצי׳ שם חכמה מאיר יותר אבל בהתגלות למטה בבריאה בע״ג [בעלי גבול / בעל גבול] נקרא בורא חושך ויצירה נק׳ אור כי חכמתו אינו יכול לקבל בע״ג [בעלי גבול / בעל גבול]

Therefore, although above, in Atzilus, Chochmah shines more, yet in the revelation below, in Beriah, which is finite, it is called “creates darkness,” and Yetzirah is called “light”; for the finite cannot receive His Chochmah.

Explanation

So although Chochmah shines more brightly above, in Atzilus, when it comes down into finite Beriah it appears as darkness, “creates darkness.” Yetzirah, which holds only the emotive attributes, is called light, because the finite can receive those but cannot receive His Chochmah.

ולכן על תלמוד בבלי נאמר במחשכים הושיבני כי לבעבור שתלמוד הוא טעמי המשנה וחכמתו ית׳ זהו במחשכים כי אין יכול לבא בהתגלות שיבינו הטעם על מכונו ושרשו.

Therefore of the Babylonian Talmud it is said, “He has set me in dark places”; for since the Talmud is the reasons of the Mishnah and His Chochmah, may He be blessed, this is “in dark places,” for it cannot come into revelation such that one would understand the reason on its true foundation and in its root.

Explanation

That is why the Babylonian Talmud is called “dark places” (Lamentations 3:6, as expounded in Sanhedrin 24a). The Talmud gives the reasons of the Mishnah, which are G‑d’s Chochmah, and these cannot be revealed in such a way that one grasps a reason fully, in its true foundation and root.

ולכן תפלה ש״י [של יד] נק׳ יוצר אור שמאיר בה מדותיו משא״כ תפילין של ראש שהוא בחי׳ מוחין נק׳ ובורא חושך שהתגלות מחכמתו ית׳ בא בהעלם ואין מאיר בגילוי ממש

And therefore the tefillin of the hand are called “Who forms light,” for His emotive attributes shine in them; whereas the tefillin of the head, which are the level of the intellect (mochin), are called “and creates darkness,” for the revelation of His Chochmah, may He be blessed, comes in concealment and does not shine in actual revelation.

Explanation

The same pattern appears in the tefillin. The hand-tefillin, in which the emotive attributes shine, are linked with “Who forms light,” and the head-tefillin, which correspond to the intellect, with “and creates darkness,” because the revelation of Chochmah comes in concealment.

(ואפשר להבין ענין זה ע״ד דוגמא ממ״ש במ״א בענין אספקלריא המאירה ואספקלריא שאינה מאירה דבחי׳ עליונה ביותר לא יכול לבוא בהתגלות ע״י אספקלריא המאירה כ״א ע״י אספקלריא שאינה מאירה וכמ״ש בישעי׳ [בישעיה] ואראה את אד׳ אע״פ [אף על פי] שמשה אמר כי לא יראני כו׳.

(This matter can be understood by way of an example from what is written elsewhere on the matter of “the speculum that shines” (aspaklaria hame’irah) and “the speculum that does not shine”: the very highest level cannot come into revelation through the speculum that shines, but only through the speculum that does not shine. As is written in Isaiah, “And I saw Ado-nai,” although Moshe said, “For no man shall see Me,” etc.

Explanation

A parenthesis offers a parallel from what is explained elsewhere about the “shining speculum” and the “speculum that does not shine”: a speculum is a lens or glass through which one sees, and the Talmud (Yevamos 49b) says that all the prophets saw through a speculum that does not shine, while Moshe saw through the shining one. The very highest level can be seen only through the speculum that does not shine, which is how Isaiah could say “I saw Ado-nai” (Isaiah 6:1) although Moshe had said, “No man shall see Me” (Exodus 33:20).

ואספקלריא שאינה מאירה היא בחי׳ חושך לגבי האור דאספקלריא המאירה. ועד״ז הוא ענין הנ״ל דיוצר אור ובורא חושך דלפי שביצירה אין מאיר רק ו״ק [ו׳ קצוות] דאצילות ע״כ מבחינה זו יוכל להיות הגילוי על בוריו כמו עד״מ ע״י אספקלריא המאירה ע״כ נק׳ יוצר אור

And the speculum that does not shine is the level of darkness compared with the light of the speculum that shines. In the same way is the matter mentioned above, of “Who forms light and creates darkness”: since in Yetzirah only the six extremities of Atzilus shine, therefore from this level the revelation can be clear, as, by way of analogy, through the speculum that shines; therefore it is called “Who forms light.”

Explanation

Compared with the shining speculum, the one that does not shine is darkness. In the same way, since only the six emotive attributes of Atzilus shine in Yetzirah, their revelation there can be clear, as through the shining speculum, and therefore Yetzirah is called “Who forms light.”

אבל חב״ד [חכמה בינה ודעת] דאצי׳ שעז״נ [שעל זה נאמר] מאד עמקו מחשבותיך. הנסתרות לה׳ אלקינו. לכן א״א שיאירו בבחי׳ גילוי בבי״ע ע״ד בחי׳ אור ממש.

But Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atzilus, of which it is said, “Your thoughts are very deep,” [and] “The hidden things belong to Havayah our G‑d”: therefore it is impossible for them to shine in revelation in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah in the manner of actual light.

Explanation

But the intellect of Atzilus, of which it is said “Your thoughts are very deep” (Psalms 92:6) and “The hidden things belong to Havayah our G‑d” (Deuteronomy 29:28), cannot shine in the lower worlds as real, open light.

וע״כ נאמר ובורא חושך שבבריאה אשר שם נמשך מחב״ד [מחכמה בינה ודעת] דאצי׳ א״א להיות הגילוי כ״א עד״מ אספקלריא שאינה מאירה או בחי׳ חשוך והעלם יותר) (ועמ״ש סד״ה צאינה וראינה בעטרה כו׳)

And therefore it is said, “and creates darkness”: in Beriah, where [the light] is drawn from Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atzilus, the revelation cannot be other than, by way of analogy, [as through] the speculum that does not shine, or the level of darkness and greater concealment.) (And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “Go forth and see,” on “with the crown,” etc.)

Explanation

Therefore Beriah, which receives from the intellect of Atzilus, is “darkness”: its revelation is like that of the speculum that does not shine, or a still deeper darkness and concealment. A further reference is given to the end of the discourse “Go forth and see,” on “the crown.”

ומפני זה ג״כ נק׳ עלמות לשון עלמה שהיא בתולה ואיש לא ידעה מאחר שטיפת החכמה אין מאיר בתוכה בגילוי ממש.

And for this reason too they are called alamos, an expression of almah (a maiden), who is “a virgin, and no man had known her,” since the drop of Chochmah does not shine within her in actual revelation.

Explanation

This is also why the laws of the Talmud are called alamos: an almah, a maiden, is “a virgin, and no man had known her,” as the Torah says of Rivkah (Genesis 24:16). So too the “drop” of Chochmah does not shine within Beriah in open revelation.

אך אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] נתגלה איזה הארה אכן לא על בוריו לכן ובורא חושך שהתגלות הארה כמו בחושך עד״מ שנתבטל מהותו ואין רואה שום דבר היטב רק מה שרואה איזה דבר אין רואה על בוריו ועל מכונו ואין מקיף את הדבר שרואה בעיני ראי׳ [ראיה] שלו (ועיין מ״ש במ״א בענין משגיח מן החלונות מציץ מן החרכים)

Yet even so, some radiance is revealed, but not clearly. Therefore [it is] “and creates darkness”: the revelation of the radiance is as in darkness, by way of analogy, where one’s being is nullified and one sees nothing well; rather, whatever one does see, one does not see clearly or on its true foundation, and one does not encompass the thing he sees with the eyes of his sight. (And see what is written elsewhere on the matter of “He looks in through the windows, He peers through the lattices.”)

Explanation

Still, some radiance is revealed there, though not clearly; that is the sense of “creates darkness.” It is like seeing in the dark, where one’s own being is as nullified and nothing is seen well: whatever is seen is not seen clearly or in its true setting, nor taken in fully by the eye. A further reference is given to the verse “He looks in through the windows, He peers through the lattices” (Song of Songs 2:9).

וזהו לרקמות תבל למלך בתולות אחריה רעותיה

And this is [the meaning of] “In embroidered garments she is brought to the King; virgins behind her, her companions.”

Explanation

The verse “In embroidered garments she is brought to the King; virgins behind her, her companions” (Psalms 45:15) is now read in these terms: the bride brought to the King is Malchus, and the virgins who follow her are the laws, the alamos.

כי בהלכות שהם נקראים עלמות שהם שבעה היכלות דבריאה והם נקראים בתולות שלא קיבלה ההארה בתוכה בהתגלות רק בבחי׳ ביטול מהותה

For the laws, which are called alamos, are the seven chambers (heichalos) of Beriah, and they are called “virgins” (besulos), for she did not receive the radiance within her in revelation, but only in the manner of the nullification (bittul) of her being.

Explanation

The laws called alamos correspond to the seven chambers (heichalos) of Beriah, and they are the “virgins” (besulos) of the verse. They are so called because the radiance did not enter them openly; they received it only through the nullification of their own being.

כי מ״מ איזה הארה יש מאיר אך לא יכול לבא בהתגלות בכלי בע״ג [בעלי גבול / בעל גבול] אשר לבעבור זה נתבטל המהות

For nevertheless some radiance does shine, but it cannot come into revelation in a finite vessel; and because of this the being is nullified.

Explanation

Some radiance does shine there, but it cannot be revealed in a finite vessel. That is why the recipient’s being is nullified before it.

ולכן נק׳ אחריה רעותיה וכשיש עליה לבחי׳ מלכות ותובל למלך כו׳ אז נתעלים גם ז׳ היכלות הנ״ל מובאות לך ממילא

And therefore they are called “behind her, her companions.” And when there is an ascent of the level of Malchus (sovereignty), “she is brought to the King,” etc., then the seven chambers mentioned above are also elevated: “they are brought to You” of themselves,

Explanation

That is why they are “behind her, her companions”: they follow the queen, Malchus. When Malchus rises, “she is brought to the King,” the seven chambers rise with her, “brought to You” as a matter of course.

כי לא קיבלו ההשפעה תוך תוכם ואין מאיר בה בהתגלות בתוך הכלי שאין הכלי יכול להגביל אורה אך מחמת ההתגלות שיש מובאות לך ממילא

for they did not receive the influence into their very inwardness, and it does not shine in her in revelation within the vessel, for the vessel cannot contain its light; but because of the revelation that there is, “they are brought to You” of themselves.

Explanation

They rise along with her not because they received the light inwardly, for the light does not shine openly within the vessel, which cannot contain it, but because of the revelation that is there: so they are “brought to You” of themselves.

(ועמ״ש במ״א ע״פ והנה רבקה יוצאת וע׳ בפ׳ ויקהל קצ״ז ב׳ פקודי רל״ה א׳ רל״ח א׳ ועיין פ׳ אחרי ס״ז ב׳):

(And see what is written elsewhere on the verse “And behold, Rivkah was coming out”; and see [in the Zohar,] Parshas Vayakhel, 197b; Pekudei, 235a, 238a; and see Parshas Acharei, 67b.)

Explanation

The closing parenthesis refers to a discourse on “And behold, Rivkah was coming out” (Genesis 24:15) and to passages of the Zohar in Parshas Vayakhel, Pekudei and Acharei.

Paragraph 7 in brief

The laws of the Babylonian Talmud, the “maidens,” are rooted in Beriah, where the intellect of Atzilus shines only in concealment: so Beriah is “darkness” and Yetzirah, which holds the emotive attributes, is “light,” as with the shining speculum and the one that does not shine. Receiving the radiance only through nullification, the seven chambers of Beriah are the maidens who follow the queen and rise with her when Malchus ascends to the King.

Deeper

There is a paradox here: Chochmah is higher than the emotive attributes, yet below it is called darkness because the finite cannot hold it, just as the highest vision comes only through the speculum that does not shine. In the passage the Kehot note points to (Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim 4c), the Alter Rebbe makes the same point with a teacher and his student: the teacher’s speech is light to the student, while his thought is still darkness to him.

TermsAspaklaria hameirah / she’einah meirahYetzirahBeriahHamtakah+20
  • Aspaklaria hameirah / she’einah meirah אספקלריא המאירה ושאינה מאירה explained hereHere the highest level can appear only through the non-shining glass, not the shining one; so Yetzirah’s middos shine clearly (“light”) while Atzilus’s Chochmah in Beriah comes as “darkness.”דבחי׳ עליונה ביותר לא יכול לבוא בהתגלות ע״י אספקלריא המאירה כ״א ע״י אספקלריא שאינה מאירה
  • Yetzirah יצירה explained hereThe six (middos) of Atzilus dwell in Yetzirah and can come down and be clothed, so the receiver grasps kindness as it is, though limited; therefore Yetzirah is called “light” (“Who forms light”) while Beriah is “darkness.”יצירה ששם מקננין ו״ק דאצילות שהם מדותיו יתברך יכולין לירד ולהתלבש
  • Beriah בריאה explained hereImma (Binah) dwells in Beriah and His Chochmah shines there, but limited vessels cannot receive Chochmah openly, so Beriah is called “darkness” (“Who creates darkness”); Yetzirah, where the six of Atzilus come down to be grasped, is called “light.”ובורא חושך עולם הבריאה נקרא חושך
  • Hamtakah דינים והמתקתם
  • Heichalos היכלות
  • Ein aroch אין ערוך
  • Ibbur and leidah עיבור ולידה
  • Hasagah השגה
  • Mochin מוחין
  • Daas דעת
  • Lights and vessels אורות וכלים
  • Binah בינה
  • Tefillah תפלה
  • Or Makif אור מקיף
  • Abba and Imma אבא ואמא
  • Asiyah עשיה
  • Chesed חסד
  • Malchus מלכות
  • Atzilus אצילות
  • Middos מדות

Also HislabshusBittulOr Ein SofChochmah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ועלמות · Song of Songs 6:8
  2. 2
    וכמ״ש בע״ח אימא מקננא בבריאה · ש׳ סדר אבי״ע פ״ג. ת״ז (ת״ו) כג, א. [כ].
  3. 3
    אימא מקננא בבריאה · Sefer Etz Chaim 47:3:1–2
  4. 4
    אימא מקננא בבריאה · Tikkunei Zohar 23a:11–13
  5. 5
    יוצר אור זהו יצירה · ע״ל שחורה הא׳ פ״ב (ד׳ סע״ג). [כ].
  6. 6
    חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:3–4
  7. 7
    על תלמוד בבלי נאמר במחשכים · Sanhedrin 24a:18–19
  8. 8
    במחשכים הושיבני · Lamentations 3:6
  9. 9
    ולכן תפלה של יד נק׳ יוצר אור · ראה משנת חסידים מס׳ תפלת הבריאה פ״א מ״ז. ובסה״מ תק״ע ע׳ כב מציין למ״ש במשנת חסידים דכשאומר יוצר אור צריך למשמש בתפלה של יד.
  10. 10
    אספקלריא שאינה מאירה · Yevamot 49b:10–11
  11. 11
    ואראה את אד׳ · Isaiah 6:1
  12. 12
    כי לא יראני · Exodus 33:20
  13. 13
    יוצר אור ובורא חושך · Isaiah 45:7
  14. 14
    מאד עמקו מחשבותיך · Psalms 92:6
  15. 15
    הנסתרות לה׳ אלקינו · Deuteronomy 29:28
  16. 16
    בתולה ואיש לא ידעה · Genesis 24:16
  17. 17
    משגיח מן החלונוץ מציץ מן החרכים · Song of Songs 2:9
  18. 18
    לרקמות תבל למלך בתולות אחריה רעותיה · Psalms 45:15
  19. 19
    והנה רבקה יוצאת · Genesis 24:15

Prayer, the arousal from below ¶8–10

8ג והנה להמשיך ע״י עסקו בתורה כל הנ״ל צריך להיות מקודם אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא] ע״י ק״ש [קריאת שמע] ותפלה וכידוע שתפלה היא ח״י ברכאן דצלותא שמחברת ח״י חוליות שבשדרה מראש עד הרגלים וזה נעשה ע״י העלאת מ״ן [מיין נוקבין] שבק״ש [שבקריאת שמע].

3. Now, in order to draw down all of the above through one’s occupation with Torah, there must first be an arousal from below (isarusa dilesata), through the Shema and prayer. As is known, prayer is the eighteen blessings of prayer, which join the eighteen vertebrae of the spine, from the head to the feet; and this is accomplished through the raising of mayin nukvin (feminine waters) that is in the Shema.

Explanation

A third section begins (numbered 3). Drawing all of this down through Torah study requires a prior arousal from below, through the Shema and prayer: the eighteen blessings of the Amidah join the eighteen vertebrae of the spine, from head to feet, and this is brought about by the raising of mayin nukvin, the “feminine waters,” the soul’s upward striving, in the Shema.

Paragraph 8 in brief

Before Torah study can draw down the revelation described above, there must be an arousal from below in the Shema and prayer, whose eighteen blessings join the whole “spine” from head to feet through the mayin nukvin raised in the Shema.

Deeper

The order matters: prayer, the arousal from below, comes first, and only then does Torah study draw down the light from above. The closing paragraph of the maamar returns to this sequence.

Explained elsewhere AI research

  1. Explained by the Alter Rebbe

    „ח״י ברכאן דצלותא שמחברת ח״י חוליות שבשדרה” (the eighteen blessings of prayer join the eighteen vertebrae of the spine) is brought as known, without its source or why it matters here.

    Setting the eighteen blessings of the Amidah against the eighteen vertebrae of the spine is from the Sages (Berachos 28b) and the Zohar. The Alter Rebbe explains elsewhere (Maamarei Admur HaZaken 5568) that the vertebrae are all held together „בחוט השדרה המחברם” (by the spinal cord that joins them), which begins at the back of the head, so that through it life is drawn from the mind into all of them. In the same discourse he says that the light of the Torah cannot be received unless prayer comes first, „והאומר אין לי אלא תורה אפי׳ תורה אין לו” (one who says, I have only Torah, has not even Torah), the order ¶8–10 here follow.

    the Alter Rebbe: Maamarei Admur HaZaken 5568, vol. א, p. פה דח״י ברכאן ש״ע הם לנגד ח״י חוליות שבשדרה וח״י חוליות שבשדרה ידוע שאחוזים ומקושרים כולן בחוט השדרה המחברם

Where the maamar leaves something unexplained, found by AI in the library and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.

TermsMayin nukvin and mayin duchrinIsarusa dilesataKrias ShemaTefillah+2

Also Haalaah vehamshachahTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    חוליות שבשדרה · Berakhot 28b:17–18

9וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] אחת היא יונתי פי׳ שצ״ל בחי׳ אחת ואחת הוא לשון נוק׳ [נוקבא] שמקבלת מאחד ז״א.

And this is [the meaning of] what is written, “One is she, my dove.” That is, there must be the level of achas (“one,” in the feminine); and achas is a term for Nukva (the feminine), who receives from echad (“one”), Z’eir Anpin.

Explanation

The verse “One is she, my dove” (Song of Songs 6:9) describes this preparation: the soul must reach the level of achas, “one” in the feminine form. Achas stands for Nukva, the receiving feminine aspect, which receives from echad, “One,” that is, Z’eir Anpin.

וע״י העלאת מ״נ [מיין נוקבין] למטה בבחי׳ אחת אז רוח אייתי רוח ואמשיך רוח וזהו יונתי ע״ש [על שם] עיניך יונים

And through the raising of mayin nukvin (feminine waters) below, in the level of achas, then “spirit brings spirit and draws down spirit.” And this is “my dove,” named for “your eyes are doves.”

Explanation

When mayin nukvin are raised from below in this state of achas, then, in the words of the Zohar, “spirit brings spirit and draws down spirit”: the arousal below draws down a response from above. “My dove” recalls “your eyes are doves” (Song of Songs 4:1), and the next words say what the eyes do: they gaze at the glory of the King.

ע״י אסתכלותא ביקרא דמלכא בא לבחי׳ אחת ע״י התבוננותו בפסוד״ז [בפסוקי דזמרה] משובח ומפואר עדי עד שמו הגדול פי׳ כל השבחים והתפארות מריש כל דרגין עד אין קץ זהו עדי עד הוא רק מבחי׳ שמו הגדול היינו רק בחי׳ הארה וזיו מעצמותו

Through gazing at the glory of the King one comes to the level of achas, through his contemplation in the Verses of Praise (Pesukei deZimra): “praised and glorified forever and ever is His great Name.” The meaning is: all the praises and glorifications, from the head of all levels to no end, which is “forever and ever,” are only from the level of “His great Name,” that is, only the level of a radiance and glow from His essence.

Explanation

One reaches achas by gazing at the glory of the King, that is, by the contemplation in Pesukei deZimra, the Verses of Praise, whose opening blessing ends “praised and glorified forever and ever is His great Name.” The Alter Rebbe reads “forever and ever” as all the praises and glories, from the head of all levels without end, and all of them come only from “His great Name,” a mere radiance and glow of His essence.

ישתבח שמך לעד שכל בחי׳ השתלשלות מרום המעלות הכל הוא בחי׳ שמך.

“May Your Name be praised forever”: all the levels of hishtalshelus, from the loftiest heights, all are the level of “Your Name.”

Explanation

So too the closing blessing of Pesukei deZimra, “May Your Name be praised forever,” says that the whole chain of descent, from the highest of heights, is only “Your Name.”

Paragraph 9 in brief

“One is she, my dove” describes the soul’s preparation: by contemplating in Pesukei deZimra that all the levels of creation, however lofty, are only a glow of His Name, the soul becomes achas, the receiving Nukva, and raises mayin nukvin that draw down a response from above.

Deeper

The pair achas and echad maps the relationship of the soul to G‑d onto Nukva and Z’eir Anpin: the soul becomes a recipient united with the One. Contemplating that all of hishtalshelus is only “His Name” brings this about, for it shows every level of the worlds to be a mere radiance of the essence.

TermsZiv haShechinahAtzmus u’mahusZ’eir AnpinHishtalshelus+1

Also Haalaah vehamshachah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    אחת היא יונתי · Song of Songs 6:9
  2. 2
    רוח אייתי רוח ואמשיך רוח · Zohar, Terumah 64:660–66:669
  3. 3
    עיניך יונים · Song of Songs 4:1

10והנה ע״י התבוננות בפסוד״ז [בפסוקי דזמרה] באריכות אז הוא בא לבחי׳ אחד ואהבת וכו׳ כל מאדך בלי גבול מס״נ [מסירות נפש] ולבעבור זה אומרים לשם יחוד קוב״ה [קודשא בריך הוא] ושכינתיה היינו שגם למטה צריך להיות יחוד מס״נ [מסירות נפש].

Now, through contemplation at length in the Verses of Praise (Pesukei deZimra), he then comes to the level of echad (“One”), and [to] “You shall love,” etc., “all your might,” without limit: self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh). And for this reason we say, “For the sake of the unification of the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shechinah (Divine Presence)”: that is, that below too there must be the unification of self-sacrifice.

Explanation

Lengthy contemplation in the Verses of Praise brings a person to the level of echad, the “One” of the Shema, and to “You shall love Havayah your G‑d … with all your might” (Deuteronomy 6:5), a love without limit that is self-sacrifice. This is why we say “For the sake of the unification of the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shechinah”: a unification must take place below as well, and it comes about through self-sacrifice.

גם במה ששוכן בתחתונים ע״י העלא׳ [העלאת / העלאה] מ״נ [מיין נוקבין] בלי גבול ובכל מאדך אז ע״י אתעדל״ת [אתערותא דלתתא] אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא] יחוד סובב וממלא

Also in that which dwells (shochen) among the lower realms, through the raising of mayin nukvin (feminine waters) without limit, and “with all your might,” then through the arousal from below (isarusa dilesata) [there comes] an arousal from above, the unification of sovev and memalei.

Explanation

“That which dwells (shochen) among the lower realms” is the Shechinah, whose name comes from the same root, “to dwell.” When a person raises mayin nukvin, the soul’s upward striving, without limit and “with all your might,” this arousal from below calls forth an arousal from above: the union of sovev, the light beyond the worlds, with memalei, the light within them.

ובלא זה אין יכול להיות התגלות סובב בממלא ואין יכול להמשיך ע״י למודו התגלות הסובב מה שהוא קדוש ומובדל ואין בגדר עלמין כלל והאומר אין לי אלא תורה אפילו תורה אין לו.

And without this there cannot be a revelation of sovev within memalei, and one cannot draw down through his study the revelation of the sovev, that which is holy and set apart, and not within the bounds of worlds at all. And one who says, “I have nothing but Torah,” does not have even Torah.

Explanation

Without this union sovev cannot be revealed within memalei, and Torah study cannot draw down the revelation of sovev, which is “holy and set apart,” beyond the bounds of any world. The Talmud’s saying that one who says “I have nothing but Torah” does not have even Torah (Yevamos 109b) is applied here: Torah study without the self-sacrifice of prayer cannot draw down this revelation.

כ״א כשיש לו מס״נ [מסירות נפש] בלי גבול בחילא יתיר יותר מהכלי אז ממשיך ע״י עסק התורה התגלות סובב (ועמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ והנה מנורת זהב כולה וגולה על ראשה כו׳)

Rather, when he has self-sacrifice without limit, with surpassing strength, more than the vessel [can hold], then he draws down, through occupation with the Torah, the revelation of sovev. (And see what is written about this in the explanation on the verse “And behold, a menorah all of gold, and its bowl on its top,” etc.)

Explanation

Only when a person brings self-sacrifice without limit, a strength greater than the vessel can hold, does his Torah study draw down the revelation of sovev. The parenthesis sends the reader to the explanation, elsewhere in Likkutei Torah, of Zechariah’s vision of the golden menorah with its bowl on top (Zechariah 4:2).

¶6 This completes the point from paragraph 6: self-sacrifice in prayer lets Torah draw sovev.

ולכן שייך הלשון יחוד קוב״ה [קודשא בריך הוא] ושכינתיה שנעשה יחוד מ״נ [מיין נוקבין] ומ״ד [ומיין דוכרין] לשון הגמרא אין טפה יורדת מלמעלה שאין טיפיים עולים מלמטה.

Therefore the expression “the unification of the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shechinah” applies, for there comes about a unification of mayin nukvin and mayin duchrin (masculine waters); [in] the words of the Gemara, “No drop descends from above without two drops rising from below.”

Explanation

That is why the formula speaks of uniting “the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shechinah”: it is a union of mayin nukvin, rising from below, with mayin duchrin, the “masculine waters” that flow from above in response. The Talmud says the same of rain (Taanis 25b), and the Zohar quotes it in the form given here: no drop descends from above without two drops rising from below to meet it.

וע״י תפלה נעשה הבירור מק״נ [מקליפת נוגה] כי מחמת שאכל המאכלים המותרים ניתוסף בו כח וחיות ובכח זה הוא מתפלל ואומר שמע ישראל כו׳ ואהבת וכו׳

And through prayer the refinement (birur) from kelipas nogah [the glowing husk] comes about. For because he ate the permitted foods, strength and life-force were added to him, and with this strength he prays and says, “Hear, O Israel,” etc., [and] “You shall love,” etc.

Explanation

Prayer also accomplishes the refinement (birur) of the sparks held in kelipas nogah, the “glowing husk” in which good and evil are mixed and from which permitted things draw their life. The permitted food a person has eaten adds strength and life-force to him, and with that very strength he prays and says “Hear, O Israel” and “You shall love” (Deuteronomy 6:4–5).

עי״ז נתבררו הניצוצים מק״נ [מקליפת נוגה] ונכלל בחי׳ אחת בחי׳ אחד וע״י התבוננות בתפלה מאיר הנשמה בהגוף שלא תהיה שום מונע מהגוף

Through this the sparks are refined from kelipas nogah, and the level of achas is included in the level of echad. And through contemplation in prayer the soul shines in the body, so that there will be no hindrance at all from the body.

Explanation

When that strength is spent on the Shema, the sparks in the food are refined out of kelipas nogah, and achas, the receiving soul, is included in echad, the One. Contemplation in prayer makes the soul shine in the body, so that the body no longer hinders it.

אכן המס״נ [המסירות נפש] הוא מצד נשמה מג, בנפש אלקית כי חלק וגו׳ שהנשמה הוא חלק הוי׳ ברא כרעא דאבוה ממש שאין שום מניעה מחמת הרגל ד״מ [דרך משל]

However, the self-sacrifice comes from the side of the soul, the G‑dly soul, for “the portion,” etc.: the soul is a portion of Havayah, “a son is the leg of his father,” literally, in that there is no hindrance at all on the part of the foot, by way of analogy.

Explanation

The self-sacrifice itself comes from the G‑dly soul, which is capable of it because it is “the portion of Havayah” (Deuteronomy 32:9), truly, in the Talmudic idiom, “a son is the leg of his father.” The analogy is of a foot, which never resists the head; another transcript of this discourse (R. Pinchas’s) adds here the verse “My son, My firstborn, Israel.”

ולכל אשר יחפוץ הראש להושיט את הרגל אם במקום קר או במקום חם היא בטלה ועושה מחמת כי היא באחדות ממש עם הראש וכל החיות שלה בטל לשם.

And wherever the head wishes to stretch out the foot, whether into a cold place or into a hot place, it is nullified and does [it], because it is in actual unity with the head, and all its life-force is nullified toward there, [to the head].

Explanation

Wherever the head moves the foot, into cold or into heat, the foot simply yields and does it, because it is truly one with the head and its whole life-force is nullified to it. Its obedience comes from that unity, not from a decision of its own.

ככה ממש הנשמות חלק אלקים וכרעא דאבוה ויש בזה בכח כל נפש למס״נ [למסירות נפש] ממש רק המניעה הוא מחמת נפש השכלית של בהמיות.

Exactly so are the souls, a portion of G‑d and “his father’s leg”; and by this it is within the power of every soul [to come] to actual self-sacrifice. Only, the hindrance is because of the intellectual soul of animality.

Explanation

So it is with souls: each is a portion of G‑d and, as it were, “his father’s leg,” so every soul has within it the power for real self-sacrifice. What holds it back is only the intellectual soul of the animal side, the mind that belongs to a person’s animal nature.

אכן ע״י התבוננות בתפלה כנ״ל אז גם נפש השכלית תסכים ע״ז לאשתאבא בגופא דמלכא מי לי בשמים ועמך לא חפצתי בארץ

However, through contemplation in prayer, as mentioned above, then the intellectual soul too will consent to this, “to be absorbed into the body of the King”: “Whom have I in heaven? And with You, I desire nothing on earth.”

Explanation

Contemplation in prayer brings even this intellectual soul to consent “to be absorbed into the body of the King,” a phrase of the Zohar (1:217b). Its stance becomes that of the psalm: “Whom have I in heaven? And with You, I desire nothing on earth” (Psalms 73:25).

ואדרבה אז נתעלה יותר א״ח [אשת חיל] עטרת בעלה כמבואר במ״א והלימוד שבכל יום עולה בתפלה של אותו היום ותפלה של כל השבוע עולה בתפלה של שבת

On the contrary, it is then elevated even more: “a woman of valor is the crown of her husband,” as is explained elsewhere. And the learning of each day ascends in the prayer of that day, and the prayer of the whole week ascends in the prayer of Shabbos.

Explanation

Beyond consenting, the intellectual soul is then raised even higher, as in “a woman of valor is the crown of her husband” (Proverbs 12:4), a point the text says is explained elsewhere. The same pattern of ascent links study and prayer: each day’s learning rises in that day’s prayer, and the prayer of the whole week rises in the prayer of Shabbos.

לכן ע״י יונתי היינו בחי׳ הסתכלות ביקרא דמלכא נעשה תמתי תמימות ושלימות בכל הבחי׳ יחוד קוב״ה [קודשא בריך הוא] ושכינתי׳ וע״י מס״נ [מסירות נפש] כנ״ל נעשה ונתגלה יחוד סובב בממלא כנ״ל.

Therefore, through “my dove,” that is, the level of gazing at the glory of the King, there comes about “my perfect one” (tamasi): wholeness (temimus) and completeness in all the levels, the unification of the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shechinah. And through self-sacrifice, as mentioned above, the unification of sovev within memalei comes about and is revealed, as mentioned above.

Explanation

So “my dove,” the gazing at the glory of the King, brings about “my perfect one” (tamasi) (Song of Songs 6:9), wholeness and completeness in every level, which is the unification of the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shechinah. And through the self-sacrifice described above, the union of sovev within memalei comes about and is revealed.

Paragraph 10 in brief

Contemplation in the Verses of Praise leads to the Shema’s love “with all your might,” a self-sacrifice without limit that unites the Holy One and His Shechinah below; only this arousal from below lets Torah study draw down sovev into memalei. The G‑dly soul is ready for this by nature, like a foot that obeys the head, and prayer brings even the animal side’s intellect to consent, so that what is below is raised and becomes a crown.

Deeper

The Zohar passage the Kehot note cites (3:247b, in the Raaya Mehemna) quotes the saying from Taanis in the same form as here, “no drop descends from above unless two drops rise against it,” in a discussion of the holy drops drawn down from above. Here it explains why the unification must begin below: the mayin nukvin raised in prayer are what call forth the mayin duchrin.

TermsLeishtaava begufa demalkaEshes chayil ateres baalahAchdus HashemNefesh ha’elokis+24

Also NeshamahChayusBittulHavayahTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ואהבת וכו׳ בכל מאדך · Deuteronomy 6:5
  2. 2
    אין לי אלא תורה אפילו תורה אין לו · Yevamot 109b:5–6
  3. 3
    בביאור ע״פ והנה מנורת זהב · לעיל פ׳ בהעלותך.
  4. 4
    והנה מנורת זהב כולה וגולה על ראשה · Zechariah 4:2
  5. 5
    שמע ישראל כו׳ · Deuteronomy 6:4
  6. 6
    כי חלק וגו׳ · Deuteronomy 32:9
  7. 7
    שהנשמה הוא חלק הוי׳ · בהנחת הר״פ ע׳ קעב נוסף: בני בכורי ישראל.
  8. 8
    כרעא דאבוה · Eruvin 70b:2–3
  9. 9
    לאשתאבא בגופא דמלכא · זח״א (ריז, ב). [כ].
  10. 10
    לאשתאבא בגופא דמלכא · Zohar, Vayechi 19:134–20:147
  11. 11
    מי לי בשמים ועמך לא חפצתי בארץ · Psalms 73:25
  12. 12
    ועמ״ש במ״א ע״פ והנה רבקה יוצאת · ראה מאמרי אדה״ז על מארז״ל ע׳ רד-רי.
  13. 13
    וע׳ בפ׳ ויקהל קצ״ז ב׳ פקודי רל״ה א׳ רל״ח א׳ ועיין פ׳ אחרי ס״ז ב׳ · נעתקו ביהל אור ע׳ קעו.
  14. 14
    אחת היא יונתי · Song of Songs 6:9
  15. 15
    רוח אייתי רוח ואמשיך רוח · Zohar II, 162b
  16. 16
    עיניך יונים · Song of Songs 4:1
  17. 17
    אין טפת יורדת מלמע׳ · Taanit 25b
  18. 18
    אשת חיל עטרת בעלה · Proverbs 12:4

Rising to Binah ¶11

11וזהו אחת היא לאמה כשהיא בבחי׳ אחת הנכללת בחד כנ״ל אז היא עולה לבחי׳ אמה בינה אם הבנים כי הנה בדבר ה׳ שמים נעשו והנה ד״מ [דרך משל] באדם הדבור נמשך ממחשבה.

And this is [the meaning of] “One is she to her mother”: when she is in the level of achas, which is included in the One (chad), as mentioned above, then she ascends to the level of “her mother,” Binah (understanding), “the mother of the children.” For behold, “By the word of Havayah the heavens were made”; and behold, by way of analogy, in a person speech is drawn from thought.

Explanation

The verse continues, “One is she to her mother” (Song of Songs 6:9): when the soul is achas, included in the One, it rises to “her mother,” which is Binah, called “the mother of the children” (Psalms 113:9). To show why this is an ascent, the text recalls that the heavens were made “by the word of Havayah” (Psalms 33:6), and that in a person speech is drawn from thought.

אכן הנשמות עלו במחשבה וכשנשמתו הגיע לבחי׳ אחת ושגם הגוף מסכים על מס״נ [מסירות נפש] יחדו קב״ה [קודשא בריך הוא] ושכינתי׳ שנכלל בבחי׳ אחד אז עולה כל השתלשלות ונתעלו למקורן ושרשן

However, the souls arose in thought. And when his soul has reached the level of achas, and the body too consents to self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh), the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shechinah (Divine Presence) are united, in that it is included in the level of echad; then the whole chain of descent (hishtalshelus) ascends, and they are elevated to their source and root.

Explanation

The souls, by contrast, “arose in thought,” a level above the divine speech that made the world. So when a person’s soul reaches achas and the body too consents to self-sacrifice, the Holy One and His Shechinah are united, and the whole chain of descent ascends, and all its levels are raised to their source and root.

וזהו ברה היא ליולדתה בינה אם הבנים וע״י תורה ותפלה נגמר כל הבירורין וברה היא ונכללים ועולים ליולדתה כנ״ל אשר נתבררו הבירורים מק״נ [מקליפת נוגה] ע״י שאכל המאכלים אשר שרשם מק״נ [מקליפת נוגה]

And this is “pure (barah) is she to the one who bore her”: Binah, “the mother of the children.” And through Torah and prayer all the refinements (birurim) are completed, and “pure is she,” and they are included and ascend “to the one who bore her,” as mentioned above; for the refinements have been refined from kelipas nogah through his having eaten the foods whose root is from kelipas nogah,

Explanation

This is “pure (barah) is she to the one who bore her” (Song of Songs 6:9), where the one who bore her is Binah, the mother. Barah is read as birur, refinement: through Torah and prayer all the refinements are completed, and the refined sparks are included and rise to Binah, for they were drawn out of kelipas nogah when the person ate food whose root is in kelipas nogah.

ובזה הכח התפלל אחד ואהבת וכו׳ וידוע כי שרשם הוא מעולם התהו

and with this strength he prayed “One” and “You shall love,” etc. And it is known that their root is from the World of Tohu [Chaos].

Explanation

With the strength of that food he prayed the Shema’s “One” and “You shall love.” The root of these sparks is known to be in the World of Tohu, the world of chaos that preceded our ordered world, whose vessels shattered so that its sparks fell below.

כי לא על הלחם לבדו יחיה האדם כי על כל מוצא פי הוי׳ יחיה האדם שהמוצא פי הוי׳ שבמאכלים הם גבוהים יותר בשרשם

For “not by bread alone does man live, but by all that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah does man live”: for what comes forth from the mouth of Havayah in the foods is higher in its root.

Explanation

The verse “Man does not live by bread alone, but by all that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah does man live” (Deuteronomy 8:3) shows that what truly nourishes is the divine utterance within the food. That utterance in the food is higher in its root, coming as it does from Tohu.

ולכן כשמתפלל במס״נ [במסירות נפש] בכח המאכלים כנ״ל אז נכלל הכל ונעשה מזה אח״ז [אחר זה] התגלות סובב בממלא העלאת מ״נ [מיין נוקבין] כנ״ל והמשכת מ״ד [מיין דוכרין] כנ״ל.

Therefore, when he prays with self-sacrifice by the strength of the foods, as mentioned above, then everything is included, and from this there afterwards comes about the revelation of sovev within memalei: the raising of mayin nukvin (feminine waters), as mentioned above, and the drawing down of mayin duchrin (masculine waters), as mentioned above.

Explanation

So when a person prays with self-sacrifice using the strength of the food, everything is included and raised, and from this the revelation of sovev within memalei follows. This is the pattern described above: the raising of mayin nukvin from below and, in response, the drawing down of mayin duchrin from above.

ולכן ע״י תפלה שהיא העלאת מ״נ [מיין נוקבין] מקודם אז ע״י עסקו בתורה נמשך התגלות סובב בממלא קול דודי הנה זה בא וכו׳:

Therefore, through prayer, which is the raising of mayin nukvin beforehand, then through his occupation with Torah the revelation of sovev within memalei is drawn down: “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes,” etc.

Explanation

The maamar closes on the order with which this section began: prayer, the raising of mayin nukvin, must come first, and then Torah study draws down the revelation of sovev within memalei. This is “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes” (Song of Songs 2:8), the verse whose next words, “leaping upon the mountains,” opened the maamar.

Paragraph 11 in brief

The rest of the verse completes the picture: the soul that has become achas rises to “her mother,” Binah, the level of thought in which the souls are rooted, and “pure is she” means that the refinements gained through eating and prayer are completed and raised there. Prayer with self-sacrifice thus raises mayin nukvin, and afterwards Torah study draws down sovev into memalei: “The voice of my beloved! Behold, he comes.”

Deeper

In the transcript in Sefer HaMaamarim 5570 to which the Kehot note points, barah is explained as refinement and cleanness in the utmost beauty, as in “clear as the sun.” The claim that the sparks in permitted food come from Tohu, whose root is higher, explains why prayer said with that food’s strength can raise everything up to Binah.

TermsAchdus HashemParsa, masachMesirus nefeshMayin nukvin and mayin duchrin+11

Also NeshamahHavayahHaalaah vehamshachahTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    אמה בינה אם הבנים · Psalms 113:9
  2. 2
    בדבר ה׳ שמים נעשו · Psalms 33:6
  3. 3
    עלו במחשבה · Bereshit Rabbah 1:4
  4. 4
    ברה היא ליולדתה · Song of Songs 6:9
  5. 5
    כי לא על הלחם לבדו · Deuteronomy 8:3
  6. 6
    קול דודי הנה זה בא · Song of Songs 2:8

Finished the maamar?

Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.

Download PDFPDF · 618 KB

Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.

In one’s avodah

Prayer must come before study. Contemplate at length in Pesukei deZimra that all levels, from the highest of heights, are only a glow of His Name, until the soul gives itself over in the Shema “with all your might,” and spend on that prayer the strength gained from permitted food, so that its sparks are refined. Only Torah study that follows such prayer draws down the light beyond the worlds, for “one who says ‘I have nothing but Torah’ does not have even Torah”; each day’s learning rises in that day’s prayer, and the prayer of the whole week rises in the prayer of Shabbos.

Questions for discussion

  1. Why is the passage from the Infinite Light to Atzilus called “leaping,” while the passage from Atzilus to Beriah is not, even though a parsa separates them?
  2. If sovev does not change and above and below are equal before it, what does that explain about G‑d’s providence over every detail, and what was Bilam’s error?
  3. Why is the Babylonian Talmud, which carries G‑d’s Chochmah, called “dark places,” while the rulings of the Mishnah shine clearly?
  4. Why must prayer with self-sacrifice come before Torah study for the study to draw down sovev?
  5. How does eating permitted food become part of the soul’s ascent in prayer?

Key terms in this maamar

The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
The first revelation in the chain of worlds (vayaetzel, “drew off”): the ten Sefiros, where Or Ein Sof rests and lights and vessels are one with Him; Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are created from nothing. ×7Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
The first created world, below the partition (parsa) under Atzilus: something new from nothing (yesh me’ayin), corresponding to thought, where Binah of Atzilus dwells; world of the seraphim, souls and Gan Eden HaElyon. ×9Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
The world of formation, between Beriah and Asiyah: like speech, it reveals what was hidden in Beriah (something from something, not new creation); the middos of Atzilus shine there; the world of the angels. ×7Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
The lowest of the four worlds, corresponding to action: its ten Sefiros are still holy, but below them lies kelipas nogah; this physical world is Malchus of Asiyah, its lowest level.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
The boundless light radiating from G‑d’s Essence like sunlight from the sun: His “Name,” a revelation, not the Essence. Chiefly the light before the tzimtzum; also that light as clothed in the sefiros.Where it’s explained, stated differently, Sefer HaErchim
The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
The descent of levels from cause to effect, linked like the rings of a chain, from Chochmah downward; each reveals what was hidden in the one above. Or Ein Sof itself is above this order. ×14Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
The name for G‑d as without end or limit, beyond all grasp; what is drawn from Him is Or Ein Sof, only a radiance; all revelation comes from Malchus of Ein Sof.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
Contraction: Or Ein Sof (not Ein Sof Himself) hidden in its source so finite worlds can exist, leaving a “vacated space” for the kav; also each later narrowing of light, as in Chochmah. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
The kav (line of light)קו
The thread-like line of Or Ein Sof drawn into the vacated space after the tzimtzum: a small revelation, root of all hishtalshelus and the inner light, narrowing as it descends until it ends in Atzilus. ×5Where it’s explained, stated differently
Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
G‑d’s kingship: the lowest Sefirah, His “speech” and the revealed world, through which all worlds come into being from nothing and live, without touching His essence (“there is no king without a people”). ×7Where it’s explained, stated differently
Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
The first Sefirah of revelation: a single point of insight (koach mah, the yud of Havayah) that comes from the “nothing” above it; being bittul, Or Ein Sof rests in it, and Binah expands it. ×10Where it’s explained, stated differently
The intellect (mochin)מוחין
The intellect, Chochmah, Binah and Daas, as the “brains” of a level; chiefly the light of Abba and Imma clothed in Z’eir Anpin, the middos, by which they grow. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
Malchus of Atzilus as a partzuf: the feminine partner of Z’eir Anpin, built after it and from the gevuros; receiving from above, she gives to Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah below.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Sefirosספירות
Ten emanated powers, Keser (or Daas) and Chochmah through Malchus, each a light in a vessel; through them G‑d conducts the worlds, His essence unchanged; they recur in every world and in man.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
G‑d’s life-force clothed within each world and creature by its level, like a soul in a body; it can be known, and it varies with its receivers. Sovev, its partner, is not clothed in them. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
Chesed (kindness)חסד
The Sefirah of kindness (the right arm; Avraham): giving that comes from its nature to do good, spreading from highest to lowest like water. Gevurah, its opposite, limits it; in tikkun each includes the other. ×4Where it’s explained, stated differently
Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
The Sefirah of might (the left; Yitzchak), opposite Chesed: described as what limits and contracts Chesed’s flow, and as the life-force in greater intensity, which becomes judgment; included in Chesed, it gives life. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
The emotive powers (in the soul: love, fear, mercy). Born from the intellect and matching its measure, they are rooted above it, in the will; above, the middos of Z”A, emanated to conduct the worlds. ×6Where it’s explained
The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
G‑d’s light that is not clothed in the worlds: equal in all worlds, above and below, unchanged by them, it gives them life as an encompassing light. Its partner, memalei, is clothed within each world.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Name Havayahהוי׳
The Name meaning “He brings into being”: by contraction and expansion, its four letters, He brings all worlds into being while Himself unchanged; was, is and will be are one to Him. Elokim conceals it.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
G‑d’s Malchus as it “dwells” among created beings to give them life: Malchus of Atzilus come down below Atzilus. Its being clothed below, down to the kelipos, is called the exile of the Shechinah. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
The Sefirah of the middle line (Yaakov’s attribute) between Chesed and Gevurah: it joins and includes them, so Or Ein Sof shines in it constantly. It is mercy and truth, and is rooted in Keser. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
Netzach (victory)נצח
The Sefirah below Chesed on the right line, its branch: giving carried through by resolve after its reason has gone. With its partner Hod it is “outside the body,” yet rooted in Keser.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Hod (splendor)הוד
The Sefirah below Gevurah on the left line, its branch, and Netzach’s partner: acknowledgment (hodaah) from afar of what one does not truly grasp. Like Netzach it is “outside the body,” yet rooted in Keser.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Yesod (foundation)יסוד
The Sefirah of binding: a giver’s lowest level, through which it ties itself to the receiver and draws its flow to it. Called kol (all), chai (living), tzaddik and bris (covenant); linked to Yosef.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Binah (understanding)בינה
The Sefirah of comprehension (Imma, the first hei): it expands Chochmah’s flash in length and breadth; letters of thought appear in it; it is “yesh,” and from it love, joy and the middos are born. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
Daas (knowledge)דעת
Knowledge as felt recognition: the intellect bound into the soul until it is felt as if seen. Daas unites Chochmah with Binah and spreads into the middos as their inner life; the middos follow it.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
Self-nullification before G‑d, the condition for the Or Ein Sof to rest. Its lower degree is a “something” that bows; its higher, Chochmah’s “what are we,” takes up no place at all. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
A stirring that begins with the person (love and awe won by toil, self-nullification, the deed of the mitzvos) which, “as water reflects a face,” awakens a matching arousal from above.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
Giving over one’s life to G‑d: nullifying one’s very existence in the Or Ein Sof, as at “One” in the Shema. It stems from above reason, and every Jew has it in potential.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
Aramaic, “the Holy One, blessed be He”: G‑d as holy, set apart from the worlds, paired with Shechinteh, His indwelling; read as sovev kol almin, Z’eir Anpin, Atzmus, and sometimes memalei kol almin.Where it’s explained, stated differently
An arousal from aboveאתערותא דלעילא
G‑d’s stirring toward the world and the soul: it may answer an arousal from below, come first to awaken one, or come from a level no arousal from below reaches.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
The “husks” that cover and conceal holiness: forces of yesh set opposite holiness, whose mark is bittul. They came into being through the breaking of the vessels and draw their nurture from holiness.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Life-forceחיות
Life-force: the G‑dly vitality that brings each creation into being and keeps it alive, drawn to each according to its level and renewed from nothing, as the soul enlivens the body. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
The soul in every Jew that is “a part of G‑d above”: by nature in bittul, it needs no correction itself, and descends into the body and animal soul to refine them.Where it’s explained, stated differently

Hebrew size

100%

English size

100%

Hebrew letters

Theme

How I learn

Calendar

Freg button

Show

Abbreviations

Tap an abbreviation, or turn on Written out. A Kindle has no hover, so Written out is how to read them there.

NikudBeta

Vowels on the maamar’s Hebrew. Verses take theirs from the Leningrad Codex; every other word is vowelled by Dicta’s Nakdan, automatically, and has not been proofread, so expect mistakes. The letters are Kehot’s, unchanged.

Review mode

Off hides the review bar and your notes on this device, to read without them.

PDF

CompleteHebrew, translation, explanations and notes · PDF · 618 KBText onlyThe Hebrew and the translation · PDF · 228 KB

EPUB

For your e-readerThe Hebrew, translation, explanations and notes · EPUB · 212 KB
The whole books, ready to print

Language

English

This page is in English only for now. Also in, so far:

العربية71 maamarim so farDeutsch71 maamarim so farEspañol71 maamarim so farفارسی71 maamarim so farFrançais71 maamarim so farעברית71 maamarim so farItaliano71 maamarim so farPortuguês71 maamarim so farРусский71 maamarim so farУкраїнська71 maamarim so far中文(简体)71 maamarim so far中文(繁體)71 maamarim so far

Send us a suggestion

Corrections, ideas, questions. Leave your email so we can answer.

We send it by email to the editor, with the page you’re on. Nothing is published.

Contents

Likkutei Torahלקוטי תורה

Parshas Shir HaShirimשיר השירים

  1. 1שיר השירים אשר לשלמה ישקנו מנשיקות…The Song of Songs, which is Shlomo’s
  2. 2שיר השירים אשר לשלמהThe Song of Songs, which is Shlomo’s
  3. 3לריח שמניך טובים שמן תורק שמך…For Fragrance, Your Oils Are Good
  4. 4לריח שמניך טובים שמן תורק שמך…For the fragrance of your goodly oils
  5. 5שחורה אני ונאוה בנות ירושלים וגו׳“I am black and comely, O daughters of Jerusalem”
  6. 6שחורה אני ונאוה בנות ירושלים כאהלי…“I Am Black, yet Comely, O Daughters of Jerusalem”
  7. 7ביאור ענין שחורה אני ונאוהAn Explanation of “I Am Black, yet Comely”
  8. 8ביאור הדברים ע״פ שחורה אני ונאוהAn Explanation of the Matters on “I Am Black, Yet Comely”
  9. 9לסוסתי ברכבי פרעה דמיתיך רעיתי“To My Mare Among Pharaoh’s Chariots I Have Likened You, My Beloved”
  10. 10לסוסתי ברכבי פרעה דמיתיך רעיתיTo My Mare Among Pharaoh’s Chariots
  11. 11נאוו לחייך בתורים צוארך בחרוזים“Your Cheeks Are Comely with Torim, Your Neck with Strings of Beads”
  12. 12הנך יפה רעיתי יפה עיניך יונים…“Behold, You Are Fair, My Beloved; Your Eyes Are Doves”
  13. 13קול דודי הנה זה בא מדלג…“The Voice of My Beloved! Behold, He Comes, Leaping over the Mountains”
  14. 14ולהבין ענין מדלג על ההרים מקפץ…To Understand “Leaping over the Mountains, Skipping over the Hills”
  15. 15יונתי בחגוי הסלע בסתר המדרגהMy dove, in the clefts of the rock, in the hidden place of the step: show me your appearance
  16. 16ביאור ע״פ יונתי בחגוי הסלע וגו׳An explanation of the verse “My dove, in the clefts of the rock”
  17. 17עוד ביאור הדברים ע״פ יונתי בחגוי…A further explanation of “My dove, in the clefts of the rock”
  18. 18צאינה וראינה בנות ציון במלך שלמה…Go Out and Gaze, O Daughters of Zion
  19. 19להבין ענין הטעם למה שהאתדל״ע הבאה…To Understand Why the Arousal from Above That Follows the Arousal from Below…
  20. 20צאינה וראינה בנות ציון במלך שלמה…Go Out and Gaze, O Daughters of Zion
  21. 21ביאור הדבריםAn Explanation of the Matter: “Keser Is Above All the Ten Sefiros”
  22. 22לבבתני אחותי כלהYou Have Captured My Heart, My Sister, My Bride
  23. 23ביאור על פסוק לבבתניAn Explanation of the Verse “You Have Captured My Heart”
  24. 24באתי לגני אחותי כלה אריתי מורי…“I Have Come into My Garden, My Sister, [My] Bride”
  25. 25ביאור ע״פ באתי לגניAn Explanation of the Verse “I Have Come into My Garden”
  26. 26אני ישנה ולבי ער קול דודי…“I Am Asleep, but My Heart Is Awake”
  27. 27להבין ביאור הדברים ע״פ אני ישנה…To Understand the Explanation of “I Am Asleep, but My Heart Is Awake”
  28. 28הסבי עיניך וגו׳“Turn Away Your Eyes”
  29. 29שניך כעדר הרחלים שעלו מן הרחצה…Your Teeth Are Like a Flock of Ewes That Have Come Up from the Washing
  30. 30ששים המה מלכות ושמונים פילגשים ועלמות…There are sixty queens, and eighty concubines, and maidens without number
  31. 31לבאר הדברים ע״פ ששים המה מלכות…“There Are Sixty Queens”
  32. 32ששים המה מלכות ושמונים פילגשים כו׳There are sixty queens and eighty concubines
  33. 33הנה ענין מדלג על ההרים הוא…“Leaping upon the Mountains”
    1. Leaping and walking ¶1–3
    2. Memalei and sovev ¶4–5
    3. Queens, concubines and maidens ¶6–7
    4. Prayer, the arousal from below ¶8–10
    5. Rising to Binah ¶11
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    5. 5
    6. 6
    7. 7
    8. 8
    9. 9
    10. 10
    11. 11
  34. 34מה יפו פעמיך בנעלים כו׳How Beautiful Are Your Footsteps in Shoes
  35. 35מי יתנך כאח לי יונק שדי…“Who Will Make You as a Brother to Me”
  36. 36שימני כחותם על לבך כו׳“Set Me as a Seal upon Your Heart”
  37. 37ביאור על זהAn Explanation of “Set Me as a Seal upon Your Heart”
  38. 38כי על כל כבוד חופה“For Over All Glory, a Chuppah”
  39. 39ביאור הדברים ע״פ כי על כל…An Explanation of “For Over All Glory, a Canopy”
  40. 40תנו רבנן כיצד מרקדין לפני הכלה…Our Rabbis Taught: How Does One Dance Before the Bride?
  41. 41כי כאשר השמים החדשים כו׳For just as the new heavens
  42. 42ביאור ע״פ כי כאשר השמים כו׳An explanation of “For just as the heavens…”
Ask Freg about any paragraph