Torah Ohr · Parshas Megillas Esther · Maamar 12
חייב אינש לבסומי בפוריא עד דלא ידע בין…
A Person Is Obligated to Become Intoxicated on Purim
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
On Purim the Jews’ self-sacrifice, an arousal from below that began with themselves in a time of hiddenness, reached G‑d’s very Essence, above the chain of descent and above every Name. So Purim completed the acceptance of the Torah begun at Sinai, and its joy goes beyond reason, “until he does not know”; yet that great light stays clothed in nature, which is why work is not forbidden and no Name of G‑d appears in the Megillah.
The maamar in brief
The maamar asks why the joy of Purim, which goes beyond reason, exceeds that of the holier festivals, and why the acceptance of the Torah at Sinai counts as compelled. It explains the Torah as “the parable of the Primordial One”: as a parable is the only way to its lesson, the Torah is the way to grasp G‑d’s essence, beyond memalei and sovev. Each soul needs as much of the parable as its root requires, which is why learning must be “in hand” in Gan Eden and why one who could study and does not is “cut off.” Receiving the Torah requires bittul. At Sinai it was awakened by love from above, the mountain held “like a tub”; under Haman the Jews gave their lives on their own, from a love above reason that reaches G‑d’s essence. A bittul begun from below draws a higher light, as “the woman’s seed first bears a male,” so Purim’s joy is above Daas. But that light is clothed in nature, like the Purim miracle itself; so work is permitted, Mordechai’s ban was not accepted, and the Megillah, whose light is above the Names, mentions none.
Outline
- Why Purim’s joy is greater, and why Sinai was “compelled”Purim’s joy exceeds that of the festivals, which are holier and forbid work; and the Talmud calls the acceptance at Sinai compelled and the acceptance in Achashverosh’s days willing. Both questions need explaining.¶1
- Questions on the Torah and its studyWhat is the Giving of the Torah; why must souls in Gan Eden have their learning “in hand”; and why is one who could study and does not judged as “cut off,” when a chapter morning and evening suffices?¶2–3
- The Torah, parable of the Primordial OneThe Primordial One is G‑d’s essence, beyond memalei and sovev. The Torah, from Chochmah in which the Infinite Light is clothed, is its parable; every level of comprehension is a parable for the one above, without end; the light it reveals is from Atik, the inner dimension of Keser.¶4–10
- The answers on Torah studyWithout the whole parable the lesson cannot be grasped, so learning must be “in hand.” The deeper the wisdom, the more parables it needs; each soul needs the measure its root requires, and one who could study more and does not lacks part of his parable.¶11–13
- Sinai: bittul awakened from aboveRevelation requires bittul, “we will do” before “we will hear.” Still immature at the Exodus, Israel was brought to it by love revealed from above, the mountain held over them like a tub (like the chuppah before kiddushin); on Purim the self-sacrifice came from themselves.¶14–15
- Yehudi, Mordechai and the pure myrrhAll Jews are Yehudim for their acknowledgment and bittul, and Mordechai, mor deror, is its source. Musk, made from an animal’s blood, illustrates transforming animal desire, and the dispute over eating it parallels two levels of teshuvah.¶16–18
- Haman’s arrogance and the Jews’ self-sacrificeHaman, heir of Amalek, embodies arrogance, the root of all evil traits, and sought to destroy the Jews for their bittul. Every Jew, even the lowest, can give his life rather than be separated from G‑d.¶19–20
- Self-sacrifice reaches the EssenceThe Torah gives a reason for love, “He is your life,” which concerns only the radiance that gives life to the worlds; self-sacrifice has no reason because it comes from the Essence, which is above that radiance. This bittul is what Purim completed of Sinai.¶21–23
- Why Purim completes SinaiA bittul begun from below draws a higher light than one awakened from above, as “the woman’s seed first bears a male”; Mah and Ban, Moshe and Eliyahu, Moshe and Aharon illustrate the difference.¶24
- The joy beyond knowingFestival joy draws a measured light through the chain of descent and stays within Daas. Purim’s joy comes from the Essence, before which cursed and blessed are alike, so it reaches “until he does not know.”¶25–27
- Why work is permitted on PurimRest from work is an ascent of levels and belongs to the chain of descent. Purim’s light is higher, but in exile it is clothed in nature, like hidden miracles and the holiness of the tallis; Mordechai wanted it revealed like Yom Kippur’s, but the people could not accept the ban.¶28–36
- No Name in the MegillahLike the bridegroom who lodges in a tannery for his bride, G‑d’s love descends into the garment of nature, so no Name appears. The Megillah’s light is above the Names, which is why it will not be nullified, and reading it draws that light down.¶37–39
Key concepts
- The parable of the Primordial One (mashal hakadmoni)משל הקדמוני
- A name for the Torah: as a parable is the only path to the idea it illustrates, the Torah is the path by which the soul grasps G‑d’s essence, the Primordial One.
- The Primordial One of the world (kadmono shel olam)קדמונו של עולם
- G‑d’s being and essence, which is not in the category of worlds at all, above both the light that fills all worlds and the light that encompasses them.
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one’s own will and sense of self before G‑d, as in “we will do” before “we will hear”; only where there is bittul can the Infinite Light be revealed.
- Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
- The readiness to give up life rather than be separated from G‑d’s unity. It comes from a love above reason and reaches His essence, beyond the light that gives life to the worlds.
- Arousal from below and from aboveאתערותא דלתתא / אתערותא דלעילא
- Initiative that begins with the person and draws a response from above, as on Purim, as against initiative from above that awakens a response below, as at Sinai.
- Mah and Banמ״ה וב״ן
- Two Names of G‑d in Kabbalah: Mah (“what?”) stands for true bittul, Ban for descent and a lesser bittul; the maamar uses them for “bearing a male” and “bearing a female.”
- Clothing (hislabshus)התלבשות
- A light revealed not openly but within a garment, as the Purim miracle was clothed in nature; the higher the light, the lower the place in which it is clothed.
Why Purim’s joy is greater, and why Sinai was “compelled” ¶1
1חייב אינש לבסומי בפוריא12 עד דלא ידע בין ארור המן לברוך מרדכי. וצ״ל מפני מה שמחת פורים גדולה הרבה משמחת יום טוב
“A person is obligated to become intoxicated on Purim until he does not know [the difference] between ‘Cursed is Haman’ and ‘Blessed is Mordechai.’” Now we need to understand why the joy of Purim is so much greater than the joy of Yom Tov
The maamar opens with Rava’s ruling in the Talmud that on Purim one must drink until one can no longer tell “Cursed is Haman” from “Blessed is Mordechai.” It asks why the joy of Purim should be so much greater than the joy of the Torah’s own festivals.
(דחייבי׳ בהו בשמחה מדאורייתא ועכ״ז ודאי אין לבסומי כ״כ. וכמ״ש הרמב״ם3 גבי שמחת יו״ט לא ימשך ביין4 כו׳) שנעשה בהם ניסים לאבותינו כמו בפסח קי״ס ובשבועות מ״ת כו׳.5
(for on [the festivals] we are obligated to rejoice by Torah law, and even so one certainly should not become intoxicated to such an extent, as the Rambam writes concerning the joy of Yom Tov, “one should not be drawn after wine,” etc.), on which miracles were done for our fathers, such as on Pesach the Splitting of the Sea of Reeds, and on Shavuos the Giving of the Torah, etc.
On the festivals the Torah itself commands joy, yet the Rambam rules that even then a person must not be drawn after wine; so Purim’s unbounded joy needs explaining. The festivals, too, recall great miracles, such as the Splitting of the Sea on Pesach and the Giving of the Torah on Shavuos.
ובמעלה הרי היו״ט קדושים יותר שאסורים בעשיית מלאכה. משא״כ בפורים דמרדכי גזר ולא קבלו עלייהו.6
And in stature, surely the festivals are holier, for on them the doing of work is forbidden, which is not so on Purim, for “Mordechai decreed, but they did not accept it upon themselves.”
A second difficulty: in holiness the festivals rank above Purim, since work is forbidden on them. On Purim work is permitted: Mordechai decreed against it, but, as the Talmud relates, the people did not accept that prohibition upon themselves.
ויובן בהקדים ענין וקבל היהודים7 את אשר החלו לעשות. דפי׳ החלו היינו בשעת מתן תורה.
This will be understood by first explaining the matter of “And the Jews accepted what they had begun to do.” For the meaning of “they had begun” is at the time of the Giving of the Torah.
To answer, the maamar first explains the verse “And the Jews accepted what they had begun to do.” “What they had begun” is the Giving of the Torah at Sinai, so that on Purim the Jews completed an acceptance that began there.
As our Sages, of blessed memory, said on the verse “The Jews confirmed and accepted”: “They confirmed what they had already accepted.” For at the time of the Giving of the Torah, “He held the mountain over them like a tub,” etc.
The Talmud reads “The Jews confirmed and accepted” as “they confirmed what they had already accepted.” The background is the Talmud’s teaching that at Sinai G‑d held the mountain over the people like an overturned tub, so that their first acceptance of the Torah came under pressure.
ומכאן מודעא רבא לאורייתא אלא דהדר וקבלוה בימי אחשורוש כו׳. וצ״ל מפני מה נחשב מה שכפה עליהם הר כו׳ יותר אונס ממעשה דאחשורוש.1011
“And from here [comes] a great protest of duress (moda’a rabba) against the Torah,” except that “they accepted it again in the days of Achashverosh,” etc. Now we need to understand why His holding the mountain over them, etc., is considered more of a compulsion than the episode of Achashverosh.
Because the Torah was first accepted under such compulsion, the Talmud says this gives “a great protest of duress” (moda’a rabba), a legal ground to claim the commitment did not bind; but in the days of Achashverosh the Jews accepted it again of their own will. The maamar asks why Sinai counts as more of a compulsion than the days of Achashverosh, when Haman’s decree threatened every Jew with death.
The maamar opens with two questions: why the joy of Purim, which goes beyond reason, surpasses that of the festivals, which are holier and forbid work; and why the acceptance of the Torah at Sinai is counted as compelled while the acceptance in the days of Achashverosh, under a threat of death, is counted as free.
A moda’a is a legal term: a declaration that a commitment is being made under duress, which voids it. The maamar will answer that what made Sinai “compelled” was not fear but an overwhelming love revealed from above, while on Purim the self-sacrifice came from the Jews themselves.
Marei mekomos
- 1חייב אינש לבסומי בפוריא · הנחת כ״ק אדמו״ר הצ״צ בבוך תקע״א בכותרת ”פורים יום א׳ תשא”. נדפס בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ קכד. וראה שם ע׳ קלו. באוה״ת מג״א (תש״נ) ע׳ רפח המאמר עם הגהות. ראה לעיל בציונים לכ״ק אדמו״ר זי״ע. באוה״ת מג״א ע׳ רעט מתחיל לבאר הקושיא הראשונה, ע״ש בארוכה.
- 2חייב אינש לבסומי בפוריא · Megillah 7b:7–8
- 3וכמ״ש הרמב״ם · הל׳ יו״ט פ״ו ה״כ.
- 4לא ימשך ביין · Mishneh Torah, Rest on a Holiday 6:20
- 5בפסח קי״ס ובשבועות מ״ת כו׳ · בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ קכד ”וכן בסוכות בענני כבוד”.
- 6דמרדכי גזר ולא קבלו עלייהו · Megillah 5b
- 7וקבל היהודים · Esther 9:23
- 8קימו וקבל היהודים · Esther 9:27
- 9וכמאמר רז״ל ע״פ קימו . . מה שקיבלו כבר · Shabbat 88a:5
- 10יותר אונס ממעשה דאחשורוש · בספה״מ תקע״א ע׳ קכה ”וזה פלא לכאורה דהרי בימי אחשורוש הי׳ אונס יותר כי המן ביקש להשמיד את כל היהודים כו׳”.
- 11בלקו״ש ח״ז ע׳ 27 הערה 55 העיר · בלקו״ת ויקרא ד, ג מציין כ״ק אדמו״ר הצ״צ לד״ה זה בשם ”דרוש פורים” — וי״ל שלכן נק׳ דרוש זה בשם ”דרוש פורים” סתם — אף שישנם כמה דרושים המדברים בעניני פורים — כי במצוה זו [עד דלא ידע] מתבטא ענין פורים. אלא שמ״מ אינו מציין ל”דרוש המתחיל חייב אינש כו׳ עד דלא ידע” — אף שכוונתו ב”דרוש פורים” הוא לענין ”חייב כו׳ עד דלא ידע” שבפורים — כי אז, מכיון שאופן הציון בכ״מ הוא ל”ד״ה כו׳”, לא הי׳ ניכר שמרמז בזה איזה ענין, ובמילא לא היינו יודעים שכוונתו היא (גם) לענין ”חייב כו׳ עד דלא ידע”, כ״א לדרוש המתחיל חייב כו׳, ולכן מציין ל”דרוש פורים”. עכ״ל ע״ש. ובלקו״ת תזריע כא, ג מציין לד״ה זה: לד״ה עד דלא ידעי בין כו׳.
Questions on the Torah and its study ¶2–3
2והנה מתחלה צ״ל מהו ענין מתן תורה. וגם מה שארז״ל אשרי מי שבא לכאן ותלמודו בידו1 הלא בג״ע מתענגים מגילוי אוא״ס ב״ה. ומה שייך בזה שיהיה דוקא תלמודו בידו שהם הלכות שנתלבשו בענינים גשמיים.
Now first we need to understand what the matter of the Giving of the Torah is. And also what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “Fortunate is he who comes here with his learning in his hand.” Surely in Gan Eden [the souls] delight in the revelation of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He. So what bearing does it have on this that one should specifically [come] with his learning in his hand, which consists of laws that have been clothed in physical matters?
Two further questions: what is the inner meaning of the Giving of the Torah, and why do the Sages praise one who arrives in the World to Come “with his learning in his hand”? In Gan Eden the souls already delight in the revelation of G‑d’s infinite light, so why should it matter there that a person brings the laws of the Torah, which deal with physical things?
The paragraph asks what the Giving of the Torah truly is, and why Torah study, which deals with physical matters, should count for souls who already delight in G‑d’s light in Gan Eden.
Marei mekomos
- 1שארז״ל אשרי . . ותלמודו בידו · Pesachim 50a:7–8
And also what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: that whoever is able to occupy himself with Torah and does not occupy himself, of him it is said, “For he has scorned the word of G‑d … the soul shall surely be cut off.”
A third question concerns the Sages’ teaching that one who is able to study Torah and does not is included in the verse “For he has scorned the word of G‑d … the soul shall surely be cut off.” Being “cut off” (kareis) is among the gravest penalties the Torah names.
וזה תמוה לכאורה דמאחר שמי שא״א3 לו לעסוק בתורה כ״כ יוצא י״ח בפרק א׳ שחרית ופרק א׳ ערבית א״כ למה יהי׳ האפשר לו לעסוק ואינו עוסק גדול עונו כ״כ לומר עליו הכרת תכרת כו׳.
At first glance this is puzzling. Since one who is not able to occupy himself with Torah so much fulfills his obligation with one chapter in the morning and one chapter in the evening, then why should the sin of one who is able to occupy himself and does not occupy himself be so great as to say of him, “shall surely be cut off,” etc.?
The difficulty: the Talmud teaches that one chapter in the morning and one in the evening fulfills the duty of Torah study, and this is enough for one who cannot study more. Why then is the one who has more time but does not use it judged so severely, as one who scorns G‑d’s word?
But the matter is this: the Torah is called “the parable of the Primordial One,” as it is written, “As the parable of the Primordial One says: From the wicked comes forth wickedness.”
The answer begins here: the Torah is called “the parable of the Primordial One,” from David’s words to Shaul, “As the parable of the Primordial One says: From the wicked comes forth wickedness.” A parable is the means by which a deeper idea is grasped, and the maamar will show that the Torah is such a means for grasping G‑d Himself.
The paragraph asks why neglecting Torah study when one could study is judged so severely, given that a little study fulfills the duty, and introduces the key to all the questions: the Torah is “the parable of the Primordial One.”
Marei mekomos
- 1מ״ש רז״ל · Sanhedrin 99a:19
- 2כי דבר ה׳ בזה · Numbers 15:31
- 3דמאחר שמי שא״א · ראה אוה״ת נ״ך כרך ע׳ תרמו.
- 4כאשר יאמר משל הקדמוני · I Samuel 24:14
- 5בפרק א׳ שחרית ופרק א׳ ערבית · Menachot 99b:16–17
The Torah, parable of the Primordial One ¶4–10
4והוא מ״ש והאלקים אנה לידו.12 וכן שלמה המלך ע״ה אמר להבין משל ומליצה3 כו׳. והענין כי פי׳ הקדמוני היינו קדמונו של עולם4 שהוא אור א״ס ב״ה עצמו.
And this is what is written, “But G‑d caused it to come into his hand.” And so too King Shlomo, peace be upon him, said, “To understand a parable and an epigram,” etc. And the matter is that the meaning of “the Primordial One” is the Primordial One of the world (kadmono shel olam), which is the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, itself.
The proverb “From the wicked comes forth wickedness” is tied to the Torah’s verse about an accidental killing, “But G‑d caused it to come into his hand,” and King Shlomo too speaks of understanding “a parable and an epigram.” The maamar now defines its term: “the Primordial One” means kadmono shel olam, the One who precedes the world, the Infinite Light itself.
כי בחי׳ סובב כל עלמין וממלא כל עלמין זהו מה שנמשך ממנו ית׳ הארה להיות חיות להעולמות.
For the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) and the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin) is what is drawn forth from Him, may He be blessed, as a radiance, to be life-force (chayus) for the worlds.
The light that “fills all worlds” (memalei) and the light that “encompasses all worlds” (sovev) are not G‑d’s essence but a radiance drawn from Him to give life to the worlds. The first enters each world according to its capacity; the second is too great to enter and affects the worlds from beyond.
The paragraph defines “the Primordial One” as the Infinite Light itself, as distinct from the two lights, memalei and sovev, which are only a radiance from Him directed toward the worlds.
Marei mekomos
- 1והאלקים אנה לידו · Exodus 21:13
- 2והאלקים אנה לידו · Makkot 10b:3–4
- 3להבין משל ומליצה · Proverbs 1:6
- 4קדמונו של עולם · Rashi on I Samuel 24:14
5וא״כ בחי׳ זו היא שייך לעולמות. כי גם בחי׳ סובב הוא בחי׳ ששייך לעלמין שהוא מה שמחיה העולמות רק שהוא בחי׳ אור מקיף. וממכ״ע הוא בחי׳ אור פנימי.
If so, this level is related to the worlds. For the level of the encompassing light (sovev), too, is a level that relates to the worlds, since it is what gives life to the worlds, only that it is the level of a surrounding light (Or Makif); and the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin) is the level of an inner light (Or Pnimi).
Both of these lights relate to the worlds. Sovev also gives the worlds life, but as a surrounding light (Or Makif) that affects them from outside, while memalei is an inner light (Or Pnimi) that enters them.
But His being and essence, may He be blessed, is not within the category of worlds at all, and it is not fitting to say of Him [that He is] sovev kol almin, etc. Therefore He is called the Primordial One of the world.
G‑d’s own being and essence, however, is not in the category of worlds at all; it is not even correct to call Him “the One who encompasses all worlds.” That is why He is called the Primordial One of the world: He precedes and transcends any relation to it.
Since memalei and sovev are both defined by their relation to the worlds, the paragraph reserves the name “Primordial One of the world” for G‑d’s essence, which has no such relation.
Marei mekomos
- 1אבל מהותו ועצמותו · ראה ד״ה ועשית חג שבועות תש״ה ע׳ 186.
- 2ולכן נק׳ קדמונו של עולם · בהנחת כ״ק הצ״צ נוסף: ”(כי קדם אינו כמו תחלה שהתחלה יש לה אמצע וסוף והיינו בבחי׳ השתלשלות שחכמ׳ נק׳ ראשית כו׳ אבל הקדם הוא שהוא יחיד ומיוחד ואין עוד מלבדו והוא קדמון לכל הקדומי׳)”.
6והתורה שנק׳ משל הקדמוני היינו שהתורה היא משל לבחי׳ קדמונו של עולם שכמו שע״י המשל יושג הנמשל כך ע״י שתלמודו בידו יזכה לגלוי מבחי׳ זיו ואור מא״ס ב״ה מה שלמעלה מבחי׳ סוכ״ע וממכ״ע.
And the Torah, which is called “the parable of the Primordial One”: that is, the Torah is a parable for the level of the Primordial One of the world. Just as through the parable the thing it illustrates is grasped, so through having his learning in his hand a person will merit a revelation from the level of the radiance and light of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He: that which is above the level of sovev kol almin and memalei kol almin,
Just as a parable is the way to grasp the idea it illustrates, so the Torah is the way to grasp the Primordial One. Through having one’s learning “in one’s hand,” a soul merits a revelation of G‑d’s radiance from a level above both sovev and memalei.
The paragraph applies the definition: the Torah, “the parable of the Primordial One,” gives the soul access to a light higher than the lights that relate to the worlds.
7ואינו בגדר עלמין כלל. כי הנה בהשגת התורה יש רבוי מדרגות אין קץ בעילוי אחר עילוי כמו מהות ההשגות שבג״ע התחתון אינן ערוך למהות ההשגה שמשיגים בג״ע העליון
and is not within the category of worlds at all. For in the comprehension of Torah there are many levels without end, one ascent above another. For example, the nature of the comprehensions in the lower Gan Eden bears no comparison to the nature of the comprehension that is attained in the higher Gan Eden.
That higher light is beyond the category of worlds. Torah comprehension itself has endless levels, each beyond the last: what souls grasp in the lower Gan Eden cannot even be compared with what is grasped in the higher Gan Eden.
ולכן ההשגות שבג״ע התחתון לגבי השגה שבג״ע העליון הוא רק כמו ערך המשל לגבי הנמשל.
Therefore the comprehensions in the lower Gan Eden, relative to the comprehension in the higher Gan Eden, are only like the relation of a parable to the thing it illustrates.
So the lower comprehension stands to the higher one as a parable stands to the idea it illustrates.
The paragraph shows that the relation of parable to idea repeats at every level of Torah comprehension, beginning with the lower and the higher Gan Eden.
In the same way there are levels without end even above the higher Gan Eden, as it is said, “And holy ones praise You every day, selah.”
The ascent goes on without end, even above the higher Gan Eden. The maamar finds this in the words of the Amidah, “holy ones praise You every day, selah”; parallel versions of this maamar explain the “holy ones” as the souls in Gan Eden, which have no bodies.
וכמ״ש בלקוטי הש״ס להאריז״ל2 על מארז״ל צדיקים אין להם מנוחה3 לא בעוה״ז ולא בעוה״ב שנאמר ילכו מחיל אל חיל.45
And as is written in Likkutei HaShas of the Arizal, of blessed memory, on the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory: “The righteous have no rest, neither in this world nor in the World to Come, as it is said, ‘They go from strength to strength.’”
The Arizal’s Likkutei HaShas comments on the Talmud’s closing teaching that the righteous have no rest in this world or in the World to Come, for “they go from strength to strength.” Even in the World to Come the soul keeps rising from one level to the next.
The paragraph shows from the liturgy and from the Sages that the soul’s ascent continues endlessly, even beyond the higher Gan Eden.
The Talmud’s wording is “Torah scholars have no rest”; the Kehot note explains that “the righteous” follows the reading of the Shelah in his introduction Beis Chochmah, and that the transcript in Sefer HaMaamarim 5571 has “Torah scholars.” The Alter Rebbe discusses the Arizal’s comment in Iggeres HaKodesh 17.
Marei mekomos
- 1וקדושים בכל יום · בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ קכז ובאוה״ת מג״א ע׳ רפט כ׳ ”וקדושים הן הנשמות שבלא גוף בג״ע” ע״ש.
- 2בלקוטי הש״ס להאריז״ל · סוף ברכות. ראה גם תניא אגה״ק סי׳ יז.
- 3צדיקים אין להם מנוחה · סוף ברכות. וע״פ גירסת השל״ה בהקדמה בית חכמה (יז, א). עמק המלך שער דיקנא קדישא פ״ח (סא, ג). וראה לעיל פ׳ שמות מט, א. ובלקו״ש חי״ד ע׳ 179. חט״ו ע׳ 137 הערה 5. בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ קכז הגירסא ”ת״ח”.
- 4ילכו מחיל אל חיל · Psalms 84:8
- 5אין להם מנוחה לא בעוה״ז ולא בעוה״ב שנאמר ילכו מחיל אל חיל · Berakhot 64a:12–13
And every comprehension, relative to what is above it, is called a parable. And this is what is written of Shlomo, “And he spoke three thousand parables”: that is, on every matter of the words of Torah.
Every level of comprehension, compared with the level above it, is only a parable. So the Sages read “he spoke three thousand parables” of Shlomo as three thousand parables on every single matter of Torah.
דהיינו שהדבר הזה מושג בג״ע התחתון כך ובג״ע העליון דבר זה עצמו הוא בענין רוחני ונעלה יותר עד שבחי׳ ראשונה הוא רק
That is to say: this matter is grasped in the lower Gan Eden in this way, and in the higher Gan Eden this very matter is in a more spiritual and more exalted form, until the first level is only
For example, a matter of Torah is understood one way in the lower Gan Eden, while in the higher Gan Eden the very same matter is grasped in a far more spiritual and exalted form. The first understanding then becomes no more than a parable for the second.
כמו משל לבד לבחי׳ זו והשיג כך שלשת אלפים מדרגות על כל דבר מדברי תורה. ובאמת נאמר יהללוך סלה בלי קץ כו׳ וזהו ולתבונתו אין מספר.34
like a mere parable for this level. And in this way he grasped three thousand levels in every matter of the words of Torah. And in truth it is said, “they praise You, selah,” without end, etc. And this is “And His understanding is beyond number.”
Shlomo grasped three thousand such levels in every matter of Torah. Yet in truth the levels have no end, as “selah” in “they praise You, selah” implies, and as the verse says of G‑d, “His understanding is beyond number.”
The paragraph generalizes: each level of understanding is a parable for the level above it, so that Shlomo’s three thousand parables are three thousand levels of each teaching, and the ladder has no end.
Marei mekomos
- 1וידבר שלשת אלפים משל · I Kings 5:12
- 2וידבר שלשת אלפים משל. פי׳ על כל דבר מד״ת · Eruvin 21b:21
- 3ולתבונתו אין מספר · Psalms 147:5
- 4חיל — וכל השגה לגבי מה שלמעלה ממנה נק׳ משל · בהנחת כ״ק הצ״צ נוסף: ”כמו המשל שהוא בדמות הנמשל רק במציאות מגושם ממנו כו׳ כן הוא כל השגה לגבי שלמעלה הימנה הגם שהם הכל בבחי׳ א׳ רק שזה באופן גשמי כו׳ ונק׳ משל)”.
Now, “the Torah comes forth from Chochmah (wisdom),” and it is the source and root of all the levels of comprehension mentioned above, as it is written, “And a river goes forth from Eden,” etc.
The Zohar teaches that the Torah “comes forth from Chochmah,” G‑d’s wisdom, and this Chochmah is the source of all the levels of comprehension just described. In Kabbalah, Eden in the verse “a river goes forth from Eden” stands for Chochmah, the source from which everything else flows.
ובחי׳ ח״ע עצמה3 היא בחי׳ משל לבחי׳ קדמונו של עולם ממש כי הגם שאור א״ס ב״ה מרומם ומתנשא לאין קץ מבחי׳ חכמה וכל הע״ס שראשיתן היא בחי׳ חכמה נק׳ בזהר רזא דשמא קדישא4
And the level of the higher Chochmah (Chochmah Ila’ah) itself is the level of a parable for the very level of the Primordial One of the world. For although the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, is exalted and uplifted without end above the level of Chochmah, and all the Ten Sefiros, the first of which is the level of Chochmah, are called in the Zohar “the mystery of the holy Name” (raza dishma kadisha),
Even the higher Chochmah (Chochmah Ila’ah), the first of the Sefiros, is only a “parable” for the Primordial One. The Infinite Light is infinitely higher than Chochmah, and the Zohar calls all ten Sefiros “the mystery of the holy Name”: a name, not the essence.
כמו השם שקוראים לאדם שאינו נוגע לעצמותו ומהותו כלל (וכמש״ל פ׳ תרומה בד״ה מי יתנך) מ״מ אור א״ס ב״ה שורה ומתלבש בחכמה5 עלאה.
like the name by which a person is called, which does not touch his essence and being at all (as explained above in Parshas Terumah, in the discourse beginning “Mi yitencha”), nevertheless the Infinite Light, blessed be He, rests and is clothed in the higher Chochmah.
A person’s name does not touch his essence at all, yet he answers to it. So too, although the Infinite Light is beyond Chochmah, it nevertheless rests and is clothed in the higher Chochmah.
כמ״ש הוי״ה בחכמה. ולכן התורה דמחכמה נפקת נקראת משל הקדמוני דכמו המשל אע״פ שאינו ממהות הנמשל כלל עכ״ז הנמשל מלובש בתוך המשל ובו
As it is written, “G‑d, with Chochmah …” And therefore the Torah, which comes forth from Chochmah, is called “the parable of the Primordial One.” For just as with a parable: although it is not of the nature of the thing it illustrates at all, nevertheless the thing illustrated is clothed within the parable, and in it
The verse “G‑d, with Chochmah [founded the earth]” is read as G‑d being present in Chochmah. That is why the Torah, which comes from Chochmah, is “the parable of the Primordial One”: a parable is not of the same substance as its lesson, yet the lesson is clothed within it.
ועל ידו דוקא ישיגו הנמשל. כך החכמה והתורה היא לבוש לאוא״ס ב״ה. וכמ״ש עטה אור כשלמה.6
and through it specifically one grasps the thing illustrated; so Chochmah and the Torah are a garment for the Infinite Light, blessed be He, as it is written, “He wraps Himself in light as in a garment.”
Only through the parable is the lesson grasped. In the same way Chochmah and the Torah are a garment for the Infinite Light, as the verse says that G‑d “wraps Himself in light as in a garment.”
לכן ע״י עסק התורה יוכל ליהנות מזיו אור א״ס ב״ה ממש מבחי׳ קדמונו של עולם.
Therefore, through occupying oneself with Torah, a person can enjoy the radiance of the Infinite Light, blessed be He, itself, from the level of the Primordial One of the world.
Therefore Torah study lets a person enjoy the radiance of the Infinite Light itself, from the level of the Primordial One of the world.
(והענין כמ״ש באגה״ק ד״ה אשת חיל עט״ב7 והנה אור זה הגנוז לצדיקים לעתיד לבוא הנק׳ בשם נועם ה׳ וצחצחות להתענג כו׳. שהוא הארה מבחי׳ עתיק שבו הוא בחי׳ הצחצחות כמבואר בע״ח והוא בחי׳ פנימי׳ הכתר.
(The matter is as is written in Iggeres HaKodesh, in the passage beginning “Eishes chayil ateres baalah”: “Now, this light that is stored away for the righteous in the Time to Come, which is called by the name ‘the pleasantness of G‑d’ and ‘tzachtzachos’ (dazzling radiances), to delight,” etc.: that it is a radiance from the level of Atik, in which is the level of the tzachtzachos, as explained in Etz Chaim; and it is the level of the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of Keser (the Crown).
A long parenthesis grounds this in Iggeres HaKodesh, which speaks of the light stored away for the righteous in the Time to Come, called “the pleasantness of G‑d” and “tzachtzachos” (dazzling radiances). The maamar identifies it as a radiance from Atik, the inner dimension of Keser (the Crown, the level of will and delight above intellect), where Etz Chaim places the tzachtzachos.
דהנה רצון העליון הוא נק׳ סוכ״ע כמבואר במ״א בענין כל אשר חפץ8 ה׳ עשה ורצון העליון נק׳ כתר. ולכן כתר הוא מלשון כתרו את בנימין9 דפי׳ מקיף והיינו סוכ״ע אך זהו הבחי׳ שבכתר שנק׳ שורש הנאצלים.
For the Supernal Will is called sovev kol almin (the light that encompasses all worlds), as explained elsewhere on the subject of “Whatever G‑d desired, He did”; and the Supernal Will is called Keser. Therefore Keser is from the expression “they surrounded (kitru) Binyamin,” which means encompassing, and that is sovev kol almin. But this is the level within Keser that is called the root of the emanated beings.
The Supernal Will is called sovev, the light encompassing all worlds, as in “Whatever G‑d desired, He did”: His will brings everything into being. It is also called Keser, a word related to “they surrounded (kitru) Binyamin,” since a crown encircles; this outer level of Keser is “the root of the emanated beings,” the source of the Sefiros of Atzilus.
אמנם בחי׳ עתיק שהוא פנימי׳ הכתר הוא למעלה מבחי׳ זו כי הוא בחי׳ תחתונה שבא״ס10 לכן לא שייך לקרותו אפילו שרש לנאצלים.
However, the level of Atik, which is the inner dimension of Keser, is above this level, for it is the lowest level within Ein Sof; therefore it is not fitting to call it even a root for the emanated beings.
Atik, the inner dimension of Keser, is higher still: it is the lowest level of Ein Sof itself, and so it cannot even be called a root of what is emanated.
וזהו פי׳ עתיק יומין11 שנעתק ונבדל מבחי׳ ימות עולם כמ״ש המתנשא מימות עולם12 ובחי׳ זו הוא הנק׳ קדמונו של עולם13 שאינו בגדר עלמין שהוא מובדל ומרומם גם מהיות נק׳ סוכ״ע שזה אינו
And this is the meaning of Atik Yomin (the Ancient of Days): that it is removed (ne’etak) and set apart from the level of the days of the world, as it is said, “Who is uplifted from the days of the world.” And this level is what is called the Primordial One of the world, which is not within the category of worlds, for it is set apart and exalted even from being called sovev kol almin, for that is
The name Atik Yomin (the Ancient of Days) is read as ne’etak, “removed,” from the “days” of the world, as in the morning prayer “Who is uplifted from the days of the world.” This is the level called the Primordial One of the world, beyond even being the light that encompasses all worlds.
רק הבחי׳ השנית שבכתר הנק׳ שרש הנאצלים דהיינו בחי׳ סוכ״ע וגם נק׳ ע״י קדמונו של עולם שהוא נמשך ממל׳ דא״ק כו׳ ואיך זוכים הצדיקים לגילוי אור זה זהו ע״י הלבושים הנעשים מהתורה ומצות כמש״ש באגה״ק.
only the second level within Keser, which is called the root of the emanated beings, that is, the level of sovev kol almin. And Atik Yomin is also called the Primordial One of the world, for it is drawn from the Malchus (sovereignty) of Adam Kadmon, etc. And how do the righteous merit the revelation of this light? This is through the garments that are made from the Torah and mitzvos, as is written there in Iggeres HaKodesh.
Sovev is only the second, outer level within Keser. Atik Yomin is called the Primordial One because it derives from the Malchus of Adam Kadmon (Primordial Man), the level that precedes Atzilus; and the righteous merit its revelation through the “garments” made from their Torah and mitzvos, as Iggeres HaKodesh explains.
וזהו שנק׳ התורה משל הקדמוני. וגם עלזה נאמר ועתיק יומין יתיב14 לבושיה כתלג חיור. דלבושיה קאי על התורה שנמשלה לשלג שהוא עד״מ קרישת המים כך הוא ענין המשל שמעלים על הנמשל.
And this is why the Torah is called “the parable of the Primordial One.” And of this too it is said, “And the Ancient of Days sat; His garment was white as snow.” “His garment” refers to the Torah, which is likened to snow: just as snow is, by way of analogy, the congealing of water, so is the matter of the parable, which conceals the thing it illustrates.
This is why the Torah is called the parable of the Primordial One. Daniel’s vision, “the Ancient of Days sat; His garment was white as snow,” makes the same point: the garment is the Torah, likened to snow, which is water congealed, just as a parable gives a concealing, solid form to the idea within it.
וכמ״ש פי׳ לבושיה כתלג בפרשת אחרי ע״פ כי ביום הזה יכפר15 ע״ש בד״ה הנה חיי כו׳. ולכן איתא בזהר ענין ת׳ עלמין16 דכסופין דירתין צדיקייא שנק׳ ארבע מאות שקל כסף17 עובר לסוחר.18
And as is written on the meaning of “His garment as snow” in Parshas Acharei, on the verse “For on this day He shall atone”; see there, in the discourse beginning “Hinei chayei,” etc. And therefore the Zohar speaks of the four hundred worlds of yearning (almin dikesufin) that the righteous inherit, which are called “four hundred shekels of silver (kesef), current with the merchant (over lasocher).”
The meaning of “His garment as snow” is explained in Likkutei Torah, Parshas Acharei, in the explanation of the discourse “For on this day He shall atone” that begins “Hinei chayei.” The Zohar speaks of four hundred “worlds of yearning” (kesufin, a word related to kesef, silver) that the righteous inherit, alluded to in the “four hundred shekels of silver” that Avraham paid for the Cave of Machpelah.
כי סוחר לשון סחור19 דפי׳ מקיף לסוכ״ע ועלמין דכסיפין ותענוג עליון דירתין צדיקייא לעתיד לבא הוא מבחי׳ שלמעלה מבחי׳ סוכ״ע כנ״ל וזהו עובר לסוחר):
For socher (merchant) is related to sechor (around), which means encompassing, [referring] to sovev kol almin; and the worlds of yearning and the supernal delight that the righteous will inherit in the Time to Come are from the level that is above the level of sovev kol almin, as mentioned above. And this is “over lasocher.”)
The word socher, “merchant,” is read as sechor, Aramaic for “around,” meaning what encompasses, that is, sovev. The delight of the righteous in the Time to Come is “over lasocher,” passing beyond the encompassing light, because it comes from the level above sovev.
The paragraph explains why the Torah is the parable of the Primordial One: the Infinite Light is clothed in Chochmah, the Torah’s source, so Torah study gives access to the light of the Primordial One. The long parenthesis identifies that light as Atik, the inner dimension of Keser, which is beyond even sovev and is revealed to the righteous through the garments of Torah and mitzvos.
The parenthesis distinguishes two levels within Keser: an outer one, the Supernal Will, the root of Atzilus, which is sovev; and an inner one, Atik, the lowest level of Ein Sof, the source of the tzachtzachos. Kehot notes that this account of Atik follows Etz Chaim, Shaar Drushei ABYA, chapter 1. In Iggeres HaKodesh 29, the letter cited here, the Supernal Will is likewise called the outer and “back” dimension of the supernal delight.
Marei mekomos
- 1אורייתא מחכמה נפקת · Zohar II, 121a
- 2ונהר יצא מעדן · Genesis 2:10
- 3ההשגות — ובחי׳ ח״ע עצמה · באוה״ת בראשית כרך ז תתנט, ב דכאן בתו״א מבאר דשורש הראשון לבחי׳ משלים אלו הוא חכמה עילאה, ושם [באוה״ת] משמע דע״י המשל אינו מושג רק הדמות ע״ד אסשא״מ, וכאן בתו״א משמע קצת שע״י משל הקדמוני יושג המהות, ע״ש.
- 4נק׳ בזהר רזא דשמא קדישא · ראה לעיל מט, ד.
- 5ה׳ בחכמה · Proverbs 3:19
- 6עטה אור כשלמה · Psalms 104:2
- 7באגה״ק ד״ה אשת חיל עט״ב · סי׳ כט.
- 8כל אשר חפץ ה׳ עשה · Psalms 135:6
- 9כתרו את בנימין · Judges 20:43
- 10עתיק . . בחי׳ תחתונה שבא״ס · ע״ח שער דרושי אבי״ע פ״א. למה שנתבאר כאן בענין עתיק — ראה סה״מ תקס״ה ח״ב ע׳ תתקמ ואילך. [ובמקבילו באוה״ת בראשית כרך ג##]. סה״מ תרל״ו ע׳ שטז ואילך.
- 11פי׳ עתיק יומין · ראה דרך מצותיך מצות וידוי תשובה פרק ב (לח, ב).
- 12המתנשא מימות עולם · ברכת יוצר. ראה לקו״ת אמור לא, ד בענין ימות עולם.
- 13הוא הנק׳ קדמונו של עולם · ראה באוה״ת נ״ך כרך ג ע׳ א׳קעב שמבאר מה שכתוב כאן.
- 14ועתיק יומין יתיב · Daniel 7:9
- 15ע״פ כי ביום הזה יכפר · לקו״ת אחרי כז, ג.
- 16איתא בזהר ענין ת׳ עלמין · פ׳ חיי שרה קכג, ב בתוספתא. ראה לעיל כד, ג. ושם בשם אד״ר קכח, ב (וראה אוה״ת פ׳ חיי שרה ע׳ קטו, ב).
- 17ארבע מאות שקל כסף · Genesis 23:16
- 18דירתין צדיקייא שנק׳ ארבע מאות שקל כסף עובר לסוחר · Zohar, Idra Rabba 3:14–6:25
- 19לשון סחור · Avodah Zarah 17a
The answers on Torah study ¶11–13
11וזהו שארז״ל אשרי מי שבא לכאן ותלמודו בידו.1 דכמו בנמשל ומשל. א״א לעמוד על הנמשל אם לא שיבין מתחלה את המשל אז עי״ז יעמוד על הנמשל.
And this is what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “Fortunate is he who comes here with his learning in his hand.” For as with a thing illustrated and its parable: it is impossible to arrive at the thing illustrated unless one first understands the parable; then through this one arrives at the thing illustrated.
This answers the question about “his learning in his hand.” One cannot reach the idea a parable illustrates without first understanding the parable; only through it does one arrive at the idea.
ואם יחסר מלהשיג איזו דברים2 מהמשל לא יוכל להשיג את הנמשל כלל (מאחר שהנמשל אין אופן להשיגו כ״א ע״י המשל א״כ כשאינו מבין כל המשל בטוב אין דרך לעמוד על הנמשל).
And if he falls short of grasping some things in the parable, he will not be able to grasp the thing illustrated at all (since there is no way to grasp the thing illustrated except through the parable, then when he does not understand the whole parable well, there is no way to arrive at the thing illustrated).
If one misses parts of the parable, the idea cannot be grasped at all, since the parable is the only path to it.
ועד״ז כיון שהתורה היא היא בחי׳ המשל שעי״ז יושג קדמונו של עולם ע״כ צ״ל תלמודו בידו3 כשבא לכאן
In the same way, since the Torah is itself the level of the parable through which the Primordial One of the world is grasped, therefore one’s learning must be in one’s hand when one comes here,
Since the Torah is the parable through which the Primordial One is grasped, the soul must arrive in the World to Come with its learning “in its hand.”
שע״י שמשיג המשל היטיב אז דוקא יוכל לחזות בהנמשל שהוא נועם הוי״ה4 להשביע בצחצחות5 נפשו כו׳. משא״כ כשאין בידו המשל אין לו דרך להשיג בחי׳ הנמשל הנ״ל.
for through grasping the parable well, then specifically one can behold the thing illustrated, which is “the pleasantness of G‑d,” to “satisfy his soul with tzachtzachos,” etc. Whereas when the parable is not in his hand, he has no way to grasp the level of the thing illustrated mentioned above.
Only by grasping the parable well can the soul behold what it conveys: “the pleasantness of G‑d,” the delight with which the righteous “satisfy their souls with tzachtzachos.” Without the parable there is no path to that delight.
The paragraph answers the question of paragraph 2: Torah learning is the parable through which the soul grasps the Primordial One, so it must bring its learning with it to Gan Eden.
Marei mekomos
- 1אשרי מי שבא לכאן ותלמודו בידו · Pesachim 50a:7–8
- 2ואם יחסר מלהשיג איזו דברים · ראה בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ קכז בארוכה.
- 3ע״כ צ״ל תלמודו בידו · בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ קכח מדייק ”וזהו שאמ׳ ותלמודו בידו כל התלמוד דוקא ולא אמרו סדר א׳ או מס׳ א׳ כי כל המשל צריכים להשגת הנמשל”.
- 4נועם הוי״ה · Psalms 27:4
- 5להשביע בצחצחות · Isaiah 58:11
12ובזה מתורץ ומובן משארז״ל דכל מי שאפשר לו לעסוק בתורה ואינו עוסק עליו נאמר הכרת תכרת כו׳.
With this, what our Sages, of blessed memory, said is resolved and understood: that whoever is able to occupy himself with Torah and does not occupy himself, of him it is said, “shall surely be cut off,” etc.,
The same principle now resolves the question of paragraph 3: why one who could study Torah and does not is said to be “cut off.”
אע״ג דמי שא״א לו די לו בפרק א׳ שחרית ופרק א׳ ערבית. והענין כמו ע״ד דוגמא בנמשל ומשל שלמטה שבשכל האדם.
even though for one who is not able, one chapter in the morning and one chapter in the evening is enough. The matter is like the example of the thing illustrated and the parable here below, in the intellect of man.
This holds even though, for one who cannot study more, a chapter in the morning and a chapter in the evening is enough. The explanation is drawn from how parables work in ordinary human thought.
הנה לא כל השכליים הנק׳ נמשל הם שוים לענין המשלים. שיש שכל ונמשל אשר יכולים לעמוד עליו ע״י משל אחד ופשוט וקל.
Not all the ideas that are called the thing illustrated are equal with regard to parables. There is an idea, a thing illustrated, which one can arrive at through one parable that is simple and easy.
Not every idea needs the same parables: a simple idea can be reached through one easy parable.
ויש שכל גדול יותר שכדי להשיגו הוא ע״י משלים יותר. וגם המשל הוא נעלה ועמוק יותר
And there is a greater idea, which to grasp requires more parables; and the parable, too, is loftier and deeper
A greater idea needs more parables to be grasped, and deeper and loftier ones.
(וכמו שידוע מענין משלי שלמה. וכן בר׳ מאיר אמרו משמת ר״מ בטלו מושלי משלים.1 כי מי שחכמתו עמוקה יותר נצרך למשלים יותר כדי לעמוד על ידם על עומק חכמתו.
(as is known from the matter of the parables of Shlomo. And so too of Rabbi Meir they said, “When Rabbi Meir died, the tellers of parables ceased.” For one whose wisdom is deeper needs more parables, so that through them [people] may arrive at the depth of his wisdom.
Shlomo’s many parables show this, and so does the Mishnah’s statement that “when Rabbi Meir died, the tellers of parables ceased.” The deeper a person’s wisdom, the more parables are needed to convey it.
וכשאין החכמה עמוקה א״צ למשל ויכולים להשיגה בלי משל. ולכן כל שהחכמה עמוקה יותר נצרך יותר לרבוי משלים עד שיעמדו עליה עד שלחכמת שלמה היה צ״ל שלשת אלפים משל.2 ואצל ר״מ תילתא משלי3 כו׳):
And when the wisdom is not deep, there is no need for a parable, and one can grasp it without a parable. Therefore, the deeper the wisdom is, the more it needs many parables until [people] arrive at it, to the point that Shlomo’s wisdom required three thousand parables. And with Rabbi Meir, a third [of his teaching was] parables, etc.)
A shallow idea needs no parable at all; the deeper it is, the more parables it requires. So Shlomo’s wisdom needed three thousand parables, and a third of Rabbi Meir’s teaching was parables.
The paragraph begins to answer the question about neglecting Torah study with a principle from human thought: the deeper an idea, the more and the deeper the parables needed to convey it.
Marei mekomos
- 1משמת ר״מ בטלו מושלי משלים · Sotah 49a:15–16
- 2שלשת אלפים משל · I Kings 5:12
- 3תילתא משלי · Sanhedrin 38b:22
13וכך הנה גם למעלה הרי אין כל השגות של הנשמות שוים. ויש בהם מדרגות ומעלות אין קץ
So too above: not all the comprehensions of the souls are equal, and among them there are levels and degrees without end,
So too above: the comprehensions of the souls in Gan Eden are not equal, and there are endless levels among them.
וכמארז״ל שכל צדיק נכוה מחופתו של חבירו12 (ולכן מי שדי לו בפרק א׳ שחרית ופרק א׳ ערבית שדי לו במשל זה לערך ההשגה של שרש נשמתו).
as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, that each righteous person “is burned by the canopy of his fellow” (and therefore one for whom one chapter in the morning and one chapter in the evening is enough: this parable is enough for him, relative to the comprehension of the root of his soul).
The Sages say that each righteous person is “burned” by his fellow’s canopy in the World to Come, a sign of how different their stations are. Hence one for whom a chapter morning and evening suffices is one whose soul, by its root, needs only that much of a parable to reach its own level of comprehension.
והיינו דוקא כשא״א לו לעסוק כו׳ שזו הוראה שדי לו בזה.
And this is specifically when he is not able to occupy himself, etc., for this is an indication that this is enough for him.
That holds only when he truly cannot study more; his circumstances are themselves the sign that this is enough for his soul.
(או דכיון שא״א לו ועוסק כל מה שאפשר לו ישלים לו הקב״ה לבוש ומשל להשיג על ידו מה שצריך להשיג. ואיתא כה״ג בזוהר פ׳ אמור דק״א ע״ב3 קוב״ה אשלים ליה4 כו׳ ע״ש)
(Or: since he is not able, and he occupies himself as much as he is able, the Holy One, blessed be He, will complete for him a garment and a parable through which to grasp what he needs to grasp. And something like this is found in the Zohar, Parshas Emor, page 101b: “The Holy One, blessed be He, completes it for him,” etc.; see there.)
Alternatively, when someone who cannot study more does all that he can, G‑d Himself completes for him the garment and parable he needs to grasp what he must. The Zohar in Parshas Emor says something similar: “The Holy One, blessed be He, completes it for him.”
אבל מי שאפשר לו לעסוק בתורה זהו הוראה שנשמתו מבחי׳ שיוכל להשיג הרבה למעלה לכן צ״ל המשל ג״כ גדול ורב מאד כשיעור הזמן שאפשר לו לעסוק בתורה שהיא בחי׳ משל הקדמוני.
But one who is able to occupy himself with Torah: this is an indication that his soul is of a level that can grasp much above. Therefore the parable, too, must be very great and abundant, in the measure of the time in which he is able to occupy himself with Torah, which is the level of “the parable of the Primordial One.”
But a person’s very ability to study more shows that his soul can grasp much higher levels. So his parable, the Torah he must learn, has to be correspondingly great, in proportion to the time he has for it.
וכשאינו עוסק כ״ז שאפשר לו לעסוק הרי הוא מחסר מן המשל הצריך. ולכן עליו נאמר הכרת תכרת כו׳.
And when he does not occupy himself for all the time that he is able to occupy himself, he falls short of the parable that is needed. And therefore of him it is said, “shall surely be cut off,” etc.
When such a person does not study for all the time he could, he lacks part of the parable he needs; that is why “shall surely be cut off” is said of him.
דהיינו שמחמת חסרון שחסר בבחי׳ משל הקדמוני לא יוכל להשיג נועם ה׳ כו׳ שהוא הנמשל
That is: because of what he lacks in the level of “the parable of the Primordial One,” he will not be able to grasp “the pleasantness of G‑d,” etc., which is the thing illustrated
Being “cut off” here means that, lacking the full parable of the Primordial One, he cannot grasp “the pleasantness of G‑d,” the very thing the parable conveys.
(וגם הקב״ה לא ישלים לו לבוש ומשל שחסר כיון שהיה אפשר לו לעסוק ולא עסק ועל זה נאמר כי דבר5 ה׳ בזה כו׳):6
(and the Holy One, blessed be He, will also not complete for him the garment and parable that is lacking, since he was able to occupy himself and did not occupy himself; and of this it is said, “For he has scorned the word of G‑d,” etc.).
Nor will G‑d complete the missing garment for him, since he could have studied and did not. This is the meaning of “he has scorned the word of G‑d.”
The paragraph answers the third question: each soul needs a parable in proportion to its root. One who cannot study more has enough, or has the rest completed by G‑d; one who could study more and does not lacks the parable his soul needs, and so cannot reach the delight it conveys.
Marei mekomos
- 1שכל צדיק נכוה מחופתו של חבירו · Bamidbar Rabbah 21:20
- 2נכוה מחופתו של חבירו · Bava Batra 75a:15
- 3בזוהר פ׳ אמור דק״א ע״ב · בלקו״ש חכ״א ע׳ 248 הערה 52 מציין שנמצא בדף קא, א. וזה קאי על לבושי הנשמה שישלים לו בג״ע (”ההוא עלמא”). אבל פשוט, לכאורה, שאפ״ל תשלום בעוה״ז.
- 4קוב״ה אשלים ליה · Zohar, Emor 40:228–234
- 5כי דבר ה׳ בזה · Numbers 15:31
- 6בפרק א׳ שחרית ופרק א׳ ערבית · Menachot 99b:16–17
Sinai: bittul awakened from above ¶14–15
14והנה ישראל זכו למתן תורה1 על ידי יסורים דגלות מצרים בחומר ובלבנים.2 והקדימו נעשה לנשמע3 כי א״א להיות גילוי והמשכה מאור א״ס ב״ה
Now, Israel merited the Giving of the Torah through the sufferings of the exile of Egypt, “with mortar and with bricks.” And they put “we will do” before “we will hear,” for there cannot be a revelation and drawing down of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He,
Israel merited the Torah through the suffering of Egypt’s “mortar and bricks,” as the Talmud teaches that the Torah was given through suffering. At Sinai they said “we will do” before “we will hear,” because the Infinite Light can be revealed and drawn down only where there is bittul, self-nullification.
אלא במקום שיש בחי׳ בטול דוקא (דלכך אור א״ס ב״ה שורה בחכמה דוקא4 לפי שהיא בחי׳ בטול כח מ״ה כנודע).
except in a place where there is specifically the level of self-nullification (bittul) (which is why the Infinite Light, blessed be He, rests specifically in Chochmah (wisdom): because it is the level of bittul, “the power of mah” (koach mah), as is known).
This is why the Infinite Light rests specifically in Chochmah: Chochmah is koach mah, “the power of mah (what?),” the selfless openness of one who regards himself as nothing.
וזהו ענין הקדמת נעשה לנשמע שהוא בחי׳ הבטול שמבטל רצונו מכל וכל כאלו אין לו רצון בפ״ע רק שירצה כל מה שהוא רצון העליון ב״ה
And this is the matter of putting “we will do” before “we will hear”: it is the level of bittul, in which one nullifies his will utterly, as if he had no will of his own, but wills only whatever is the Supernal Will, blessed be He.
Saying “we will do” before hearing what is commanded is the essence of bittul: setting aside one’s own will entirely and wanting only what G‑d wants.
וזהו בחי׳ עבודה ואותו תעבדו.5 שהעבד אין לו דעה בפ״ע רק את אשר יאמר רבו עושה.
And this is the level of service, “and Him you shall serve”: for a servant has no mind of his own, but does whatever his master tells him.
This is the stance of a servant, as in “and Him you shall serve”: a servant has no opinion of his own but does what his master tells him.
וע״י שהקדימו בחי׳ נעשה שהוא בטול זה יוכל להיות ונשמע דהיינו לקבל הגלוי והאור מאין סוף ברוך הוא.
And through their putting first the level of “we will do,” which is this bittul, there could be “and we will hear,” that is, receiving the revelation and the light from the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He.
Only by first nullifying themselves in “we will do” could the people reach “we will hear,” the receiving of the revelation of the Infinite Light.
(וזהו שקשרו להם שני כתרים כנגד נעשה ונשמע6 שהן בחינת שני המדרגות הנ״ל שבכתר הבחי׳ העליונה נק׳ קדמונו של עולם כנ״ל. והבחינה השנית נקראת סובב כל עלמין וממלא כל עלמין)
(And this is why they tied on them two crowns, corresponding to “we will do” and “we will hear”: these are the two levels in Keser (the Crown) mentioned above. The higher level is called the Primordial One of the world, as mentioned above, and the second level is called the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) and the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin).)
The Talmud relates that angels tied two crowns on each Jew, one for “we will do” and one for “we will hear.” The maamar links them to the two levels in Keser described above: the higher, the Primordial One of the world, and the lower, sovev and memalei.
אך כדי שיבאו לבחי׳ בטול זה דהקדמת נעשה לנשמע. שהרי ביציאת מצרים היו עדיין בבחי׳ קטנות
But in order for them to come to this level of bittul, of putting “we will do” before “we will hear”: since at the Exodus from Egypt they were still in a state of smallness (katnus)
But how could they reach such bittul? At the Exodus they were still in a state of katnus, “smallness,” spiritual immaturity.
(כמש״ל בד״ה זכור את אשר עשה לך עמלק כו׳) ואיך יבאו לבחי׳ בטול גדול כזה
(as explained above in the discourse beginning “Remember what Amalek did to you,” etc.); so how could they come to so great a level of bittul?
That state was explained in an earlier discourse, on “Remember what Amalek did to you.” How then could they rise to so great a bittul?
הנה לזה היה ענין שכפה עליהם הר כגיגית שהוא בחי׳ וימינו תחבקני דהיינו התגלות אהבה העליונה מלמעלה על ישראל
For this there was the matter of His holding the mountain over them like a tub, which is the level of “and His right hand embraces me”: that is, the revelation of the supernal love from above upon Israel,
The answer is the mountain held over them “like a tub”: it stands for “and His right hand embraces me,” a revelation from above of G‑d’s love enveloping Israel.
as it is written, “I have loved you, says G‑d” (see in the discourse beginning “And you shall make holy garments” what is written there on the meaning of “I have loved you,” etc.).
This is the love of “I have loved you, says G‑d”; an earlier discourse, on “And you shall make holy garments,” explains that verse.
שאהבה זו תחבקני לכנס״י ומקפת אותו מכל צד אפי׳ לבחי׳ אחוריים עד שאינו מניחו לפנות ממנו ומוכרח להיו׳ עומד עמו פב״פ.
For this love “embraces” the Community of Israel (Knesses Yisrael) and surrounds it on every side, even on the level of the back (achorayim), until He does not let it turn away from Him, and it is compelled to stand with Him face to face.
Such love embraces the Community of Israel from every side, even from behind, so that it cannot turn away and must stand facing G‑d, face to face.
דהיינו שע״י אהבה עליונה זו נתעורר ג״כ האהבה בנשמות ישראל עד שבאו למעלה ומדרגה שהקדימו נעשה כו׳
That is: through this supernal love, love was also aroused in the souls of Israel, until they came to the stature and level of putting “we will do” first, etc.
This love from above awakened an answering love in the souls of Israel, until they reached the level of saying “we will do” first.
וכמ״ש כמים הפנים לפנים כן לב האדם אל האדם9 פי׳ לב האדם העליון הוא מ״ש ועל דמות הכסא10 דמות כמראה אדם שהוא בחי׳ רמ״ח מצות עשה דאינון רמ״ח אברים דמלכא.11
As it is written, “As water [reflects] face to face, so is the heart of man to man.” The meaning is: the heart of the supernal Man; this is what is written, “And upon the likeness of the throne, a likeness like the appearance of a man,” which is the level of the 248 positive commandments, which are “the 248 limbs of the King.”
As water reflects a face, the heart of the “Man” above evokes the heart of man below. The Man above is the likeness on the Throne in Ezekiel’s vision, made of the 248 positive commandments, called “the 248 limbs of the King.”
The paragraph explains the Giving of the Torah: revelation requires bittul, which Israel showed by saying “we will do” first; but since they were still spiritually immature, G‑d first revealed His love from above, the mountain held over them “like a tub,” and it awakened their love and bittul in return.
The Kehot note points to Tikkunei Zohar, Tikkun 30, for the 248 positive commandments as “the 248 limbs of the King”; the 365 prohibitions, which the next paragraph calls the 365 sinews, complete the image of the supernal Man.
Marei mekomos
- 1ישראל זכו למתן תורה ע״י יסורים · Berakhot 5a:8
- 2בחומר ובלבנים · Exodus 1:14
- 3נעשה לנשמע · Exodus 24:7
- 4אור א״ס ב״ה שורה בחכמה דוקא · תניא פרק לה בהגה.
- 5ואותו תעבדו · Deuteronomy 13:5
- 6קשרו להם שני כתרים כנגד נעשה ונשמע · Shabbat 88a:7
- 7אהבתי אתכם אמר ה׳ · Malachi 1:2
- 8ע׳ בד״ה ועשית בגדי קדש · לעיל פב, ב.
- 9כמים הפנים לפנים . . אל האדם · Proverbs 27:19
- 10ועל דמות הכסא · Ezekiel 1:26
- 11רמ״ח מ״ע · Tikkunei Zohar, Tikkun 30 · 74a:8
The supernal Man is formed of the 248 positive commandments as limbs and the 365 prohibitions as sinews. “To man” is the human form in the lower worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, as Ezekiel says of the beings of the Chariot, “the likeness of their faces was the face of a man.”
הנה הוא כמים הפנים לפנים דהיינו שע״י התגלות אור האהבה מלמעלה בחינת אהבתי אתכם על ידי זה מתעורר גם כן האהבה מלמטה למעלה והוא העלאת כנסת ישראל בכלות הנפש אליו ית׳ (וכמ״ש משכני אחריך נרוצה2 כו׳).
It is “as water [reflects] face to face”: that is, through the revelation of the light of love from above, the level of “I have loved you,” through this the love from below upward is also aroused; and that is the ascent of the Community of Israel (Knesses Yisrael) in the expiry of the soul (kelos hanefesh) toward Him, may He be blessed (as it is written, “Draw me, we will run after You,” etc.).
So the verse describes a reflection: the love revealed from above, “I have loved you,” awakens in return a love rising from below. This is the Community of Israel’s longing for G‑d to the point of kelos hanefesh, “the expiry of the soul,” a yearning so strong the soul would leave the body to cleave to Him, as in “Draw me, we will run after You.”
ולכן נק׳ כנסת ישראל כלה ע״ש כלות הנפש וכמ״ש אחותי כלה מה טבו דדיך מיין3 כו׳.
Therefore the Community of Israel is called a bride (kallah), on account of the expiry (kelos) of the soul, as it is written, “My sister, [my] bride, how much better is your love than wine,” etc.
That is why the Community of Israel is called kallah, “bride,” a word read as kelos, the soul’s yearning to the point of expiry, as in the Song of Songs, “My sister, [my] bride.”
וזהו ענין על כל דבור פרחה נשמתן.4 שע״י הדבור והגילוי מלמעלה פרחה נשמתן בבחינת בטול לאור א״ס ב״ה.
And this is the matter of “At each utterance their souls flew out”: through the utterance and the revelation from above, their souls flew out, in a state of self-nullification (bittul) to the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He.
This explains the Sages’ teaching that at each of G‑d’s utterances at Sinai the people’s souls flew out: the revelation from above brought them to complete bittul before the Infinite Light.
(ועיין מ״ש כיוצא בזה בפרשת לך לך5 בפי׳ מארז״ל בשעה שהדבור יוצא מפי הקב״ה חשות.6 חשות היינו בחי׳ שתיקה ובטול כו׳).
(And see what is written along these lines in Parshas Lech Lecha, on the meaning of the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, “When the utterance goes forth from the mouth of the Holy One, blessed be He, they are silent (chashos).” Chashos is the level of silence and bittul, etc.)
A parallel appears in the discourse on Parshas Lech Lecha, on the Sages’ teaching that the angels of the Chariot are “silent” (chashos) when the utterance goes forth from G‑d: their silence is bittul before the revelation.
וזהו ענין שכפה עליהם הר הוא בחינת אהבה עליונה שנק׳ הר (כמ״ש במ״א בענין אברהם שקראו הר.7 ובענין אהרן א׳ ה״ר ן׳). כגיגית שהוא בחי׳ דבר המקיף סחור כל עלמין שעי״ז נתעורר בהם האהבה
And this is the matter of His holding the mountain over them: it is the level of the supernal love, which is called a mountain (as is written elsewhere on the subject of Avraham, who called it a mountain; and on the subject of Aharon: alef, har (mountain), nun). “Like a tub”: this is the level of something encompassing, “surrounding all worlds” (sechor kol almin), through which the love was aroused in them
The mountain held over Israel is the supernal love, which is called a “mountain” (har): Avraham, the embodiment of love, called the Temple site a mountain, and the name Aharon contains the letters of har. The “tub” is something that surrounds on every side, the level that encircles all worlds, and this encompassing love awakened their love.
(ובזה יתורץ מה שאומרים מקדש עמו ישראל על ידי חופה וקדושין.8 והקשו למה שינו הסדר להקדים חופה לקדושין.9 אלא כי החופה הוא בחינת מקיף והוא ענין שכפה עליהם הר כגיגית שזה בחינת התגלות המקיף כנ״ל.
(and with this, what we say will be resolved: “Who sanctifies His people Israel through chuppah and kiddushin.” And they asked why the order was changed, putting chuppah before kiddushin. Rather, the chuppah is the level of the encompassing (makif), and it is the matter of His holding the mountain over them like a tub, which is the level of the revelation of the encompassing, as mentioned above.
This also resolves a question on the betrothal blessing, which praises G‑d “Who sanctifies His people Israel through chuppah and kiddushin,” although in practice the betrothal (kiddushin) comes before the wedding canopy (chuppah). The chuppah stands for the encompassing light, the same as the mountain held over Israel like a tub.
ולכן הוצרך להקדים החופה לקדושין שכדי שיבואו לקבלת התורה שהוא בחינת הקדושין הוא על ידי המשכת המקיף תחלה10 שעל ידי זה באו לבחינת הבטול להקדים נעשה כו׳. ואז יוכל להיות ההמשכה והגילוי בחינת התורה כנ״ל).
Therefore the chuppah had to be put before the kiddushin: for their coming to the receiving of the Torah, which is the level of kiddushin, is through first drawing down the encompassing, through which they came to the level of bittul, putting “we will do” first, etc.; and then there can be the drawing down and revelation, the level of the Torah, as mentioned above).
The receiving of the Torah corresponds to kiddushin. To reach it, the encompassing light, the chuppah, had to come first and bring them to the bittul of “we will do”; only then could the Torah be drawn down and revealed.
וזהו פירוש מה שאמרז״ל מכאן מודעא רבא לאורייתא.11 דהיינו שהתעוררות זו בלבם לקבלת התורה בבחי׳ מסירת נפש ובטול עד שהקדימו נעשה לנשמע לא היה זה מצדם בבחירה ורצון אשר מעצמם לבד
And this is the meaning of what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “From here [comes] a great protest of duress against the Torah.” That is: this arousal in their hearts to receive the Torah in a state of self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh) and bittul, to the point that they put “we will do” before “we will hear,” did not come from their side, by choice and will from themselves alone,
This is the meaning of the “protest of duress”: the arousal of their hearts to accept the Torah with self-sacrifice and bittul did not come from their own free choice alone.
אלא שעל ידי הגילוי מלמעלה דבחי׳ אהבתי אתכם על ידי זה דוקא נתעורר בהם הרצון והאהבה כו׳.
but rather through the revelation from above, of the level of “I have loved you”: through this specifically the will and the love were aroused in them, etc.
It was awakened by the revelation of “I have loved you” from above. That is what makes it a kind of compulsion: not fear, but a love revealed with a force they could not resist.
ואע״פ כן הדר וקבלוה ברצון גמור בימי אחשורוש.12 שהיה מסירת נפש בכל ישראל מעצמם שלא ע״י התעוררות מלמעלה בתחלה ע״ד גלוי בחינת וימינו תחבקני.
And even so, “they accepted it again” with complete willingness in the days of Achashverosh. For there was self-sacrifice in all of Israel, from themselves, not through an arousal from above first, in the manner of a revelation of the level of “and His right hand embraces me.”
In the days of Achashverosh, by contrast, all of Israel gave themselves over to G‑d on their own, without any prior revelation of “His right hand embraces me.” That is why they are said to have accepted the Torah again with complete willingness.
דהא אז היה בחינת הסתר פנים (ע״ד ועת לרחק מחבק)13 וכמארז״ל אסתר מן התורה מנין14 דכתיב ואנכי הסתר אסתיר פני15 ביום ההוא. ואם כן היה בחינת אתערותא דלתתא מצד עצמם וזהו הדר וקבלוה ברצון גמור:16
For then it was the level of the hiding of the Face (in the manner of “and a time to keep far from embracing”), as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “Where is Esther in the Torah? As it is written, ‘And I will surely hide (haster astir) My face on that day.’” If so, it was the level of an arousal from below (isarusa dilesata), from their own side; and this is “they accepted it again” with complete willingness.
At that time G‑d’s face was hidden, “a time to keep far from embracing,” and the Sages even find Esther’s name in the verse “I will surely hide (haster astir) My face.” So their self-sacrifice was an arousal from below, entirely their own, and that is the complete, willing acceptance.
The paragraph explains the “compulsion” at Sinai as an overwhelming love revealed from above, which awakened Israel’s love and bittul, while the acceptance in the days of Achashverosh, a time of hiddenness, came from Israel’s own self-sacrifice and was therefore fully willing.
The order of chuppah before kiddushin in the blessing mirrors the order at Sinai as the maamar tells it: first the encompassing light (the mountain, the chuppah), then the bittul of “we will do,” and only then the Torah itself (kiddushin).
Marei mekomos
- 1ודמות פניהם פני אדם · Ezekiel 1:10
- 2משכני אחריך נרוצה · Song of Songs 1:4
- 3אחותי כלה מה טבו דדיך מיין · Song of Songs 4:10
- 4על כל דבור פרחה נשמתן · Shabbat 88b:6
- 5מ״ש כיוצא בזה בפרשת לך לך · לעיל יב, ב ואילך.
- 6בשעה שהדבור יוצא מפי הקב״ה חשות · Chagigah 13b:1
- 7אברהם שקראו הר · Pesachim 88a:4
- 8מקדש עמו ישראל על ידי חופה וקדושין · Ketubot 7b:9
- 9למה שינו הסדר להקדים חופה לקידושין · ראה ד״ה והוא כחתן תרנ״ז ע׳ קעב ובהערת כ״ק אדמו״ר שם. ובלקו״ש חכ״ב ע׳ 61 הערה 47.
- 10על ידי המשכת המקיף תחלה · ”בתו״א ד״ה חייב . . שע״י שכפה עליהם הר כגיגית באו להקדמת נעשה לנשמע. ובמדרש תנחומא ובתוס׳ (שבת פח, רע״א) מוכח דהקדמת נעשה לנשמע הי׳ קודם כפיית ההר. מדרשות חלוקות הן. וכמש״כ בתו״א כן הוא במדרש תהלים א, ד. ובמכילתא דרשב״י”. — לקו״ש חי״ג ע׳ 166.
- 11מכאן מודעא רבא לאורייתא · Shabbat 88a:5
- 12נתעורר בהם . . ברצון גמור בימי אחשורוש · ראה בלקו״ש ח״ט ע׳ 149 הערה 53, 54. — שזה גופא מה שהדר וקבלוה בימי אחשורוש הוא לפי שבמ״ת ניתן גם ענין זה אלא שהי׳ בהעלם (שם הערה 54). וראה גם בלקו״ש ח״ז ע׳ 26 סעי׳ ט.
- 13ועת לרחק מחבק · Ecclesiastes 3:5
- 14אסתר מן התורה מנין · Chullin 139b:12–13
- 15ואנכי הסתר אסתיר פני · Deuteronomy 31:18
- 16
Yehudi, Mordechai and the pure myrrh ¶16–18
The explanation of the matter will be understood in light of what is written, “A Jewish man (ish Yehudi),” etc., “and his name was Mordechai,” etc., “a Benjamite man (ish Yemini).” Now we need to understand: since “Yemini”
The explanation begins with the verse that introduces Mordechai: “A Jewish man (ish Yehudi) … and his name was Mordechai … a Benjamite man (ish Yemini).” The maamar asks how one man can be called both “Yehudi” and “Yemini.”
פי׳ שהוא משבט בנימין כדפי׳ רש״י ואם כן למה קרי ליה יהודי דהוא על שם שבט יהודה.
means that he was of the tribe of Binyamin, as Rashi explains, then why does it call him “Yehudi,” which is named for the tribe of Yehudah?
As Rashi explains, “Yemini” means he was of the tribe of Binyamin; why then call him “Yehudi,” a name taken from the tribe of Yehudah?
גם צ״ל דבגזרת המן נאמר להשמיד להרג3 כו׳ היהודים והרי בשבע ועשרים ומאה מדינה מלכות אחשורוש היה גם מכל השבטים אפרים ומנשה
We also need to understand: concerning Haman’s decree it is said, “to destroy, to kill,” etc., “the Jews (haYehudim).” But surely in the hundred and twenty-seven provinces of the kingdom of Achashverosh there were also [Jews] of all the tribes, Ephraim and Menasheh.
Likewise, Haman’s decree was against “the Jews” (Yehudim), yet throughout the 127 provinces of the empire there were Jews of every tribe, such as Ephraim and Menasheh.
אלא שנקראו כולם יהודים מפני בחינת הבטול שיש בהם לאור א״ס ב״ה. כמו שאנו אומרים בשמונה עשרה מודים אנחנו לך.
Rather, all of them were called Yehudim because of the level of self-nullification (bittul) toward the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, that is in them, as we say in the Shemoneh Esreh, “We give thanks (modim) to You.”
The answer: all of them were called Yehudim because of their bittul before the Infinite Light. The name comes from hoda’ah, acknowledgment, as in the Amidah’s “We give thanks (modim) to You.”
שעל שם זה נק׳ יהודי כמ״ש לאה הפעם אודה את4 ה׳ ע״כ קראה שמו יהודה.
For on account of this one is called Yehudi, as it is written [that] Leah [said], “This time I will thank (odeh) G‑d; therefore she called his name Yehudah.”
Leah named her son Yehudah, saying, “This time I will thank (odeh) G‑d”; a Jew is called Yehudi on account of this acknowledgment.
(ויש בכל אחד מישראל בחינת הודאה ובטול זה. וכמש״ל פרשת ויחי ע״פ יהודה אתה56 שזהו בחי׳ ומדרגת שמונה עשרה שהוא בחינת כריעות והשתחואות וכמאמר ואנחנו כורעים ומשתחוים ומודים).
(And in every one of Israel there is this level of acknowledgment (hoda’ah) and bittul, as explained above in Parshas Vayechi, on the verse “Yehudah, you …”: that this is the level and degree of the Shemoneh Esreh, which is the level of bowing and prostration, as it is said, “And we bow and prostrate ourselves and give thanks.”)
Every Jew has this acknowledgment and bittul. An earlier discourse, on “Yehudah, you,” links it to the Shemoneh Esreh, the Amidah prayer, with its bowing and prostration, as in “we bow, prostrate ourselves and give thanks.”
ולכן נק׳ מרדכי איש יהודי. פי׳ שר ליהודים7 כמו איש הר הבית89 כי הוא היה מקור הבטול כמארז״ל מרדכי מן התורה מנין10 דכתיב מר דרור11 ומתרגמינן מירא דכיא.
Therefore Mordechai is called “ish Yehudi”: the meaning is, a lord over the Jews, like “the ish (officer) of the Temple Mount,” for he was the source of the bittul; as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “Where is Mordechai in the Torah? As it is written, ‘pure myrrh (mor deror),’ which we translate [into Aramaic], ‘mira dachya.’”
Mordechai is called “ish Yehudi” in the sense of a leader of the Jews, like “the ish of the Temple Mount,” its officer, because he was the source of their bittul. The Sages find Mordechai in the Torah in “mor deror,” pure myrrh, which the Aramaic translation renders “mira dachya,” a name close to Mordechai.
ומר זה12 לדעת הרמב״ם13 ושאר מפרשים הוא (רק הראב״ד והרמב״ן14 פי׳ בע״א) מושק15 הנזכר בגמ׳ פ׳ כיצד מברכין16 שהוא דם חיה ידוע שנקרש בחטוטרת שבצוארה17 ונעשה בושם הנק׳ מר.
And this myrrh (mor), in the view of the Rambam and other commentators (only the Raavad and the Ramban explain it differently), is the musk mentioned in the Gemara in the chapter Keitzad Mevarchin, which is the blood of a certain animal (chayah yadua) that congeals in the hump on its neck and becomes a spice called mor.
In the view of the Rambam and others, this mor is musk, which the Talmud mentions in the laws of blessings over fragrances: the blood of a certain animal, which congeals in a hump on its neck and becomes a fragrant spice. The Raavad and the Ramban explain the word differently.
והיינו במדות הנפש בחי׳ אתכפייא ואתהפכא ממרירו למיתקו כי הדם הוא הנפש החיונית נפש המתאוה וכשמהפך תאוותיו הבהמיות מתענוגי עוה״ז להיות כל חפצו ותענוגיו בה׳ זהו ענין שנעשה ממנו בושם.18
And in the emotive attributes (middos) of the soul, this is the level of subjugation and transformation (iskafya and is’hapcha), from bitter to sweet. For the blood is the vital soul, the soul that desires; and when one transforms his animal desires from the pleasures of this world, so that all his desire and his delights are in G‑d, this is the matter of a spice being made from it.
In the soul this is iskafya and is’hapcha, subduing and transforming bitter into sweet. Blood stands for the vital, desiring soul; when a person turns his animal desires away from worldly pleasures so that all his desire and delight are in G‑d, the “blood” has become a fragrant spice.
The paragraph explains why all the Jews, and Mordechai above all, are called Yehudim: the name means acknowledgment and bittul before G‑d, and Mordechai, the “pure myrrh,” is its source. Musk, a spice formed from an animal’s blood, illustrates the transformation of animal desire into delight in G‑d.
The Kehot note records that “the hump on its neck” follows the Rosh’s explanation of the passage in Berakhos, while Rashi there describes the musk differently, and that the readings of the Talmud’s text vary.
Marei mekomos
- 1וביאור הענין · הובא באוה״ת מג״א ע׳ רצ. ונתבאר בד״ה מצה זו תר״מ פרק כו ע׳ קעב.
- 2איש יהודי · Esther 2:5
- 3להשמיד להרג · Esther 3:13
- 4הפעם אודה את ה׳ · Genesis 29:35
- 5פרשת ויחי ע״פ יהודה אתה · מה, ג.
- 6יהודה אתה · Genesis 49:8
- 7פי׳ שר ליהודים · באוה״ת מג״א ע׳ רצא: כי איש לשון שררה.
- 8איש הר הבית · משנה רפ״ק דמדות מ״ב. ובתויו״ט שם. ראה גם אוה״ת בראשית כרך ג תקמה, א ואילך.
- 9איש הר הבית · Mishnah Middot 1:2
- 10מרדכי מן התורה מנין · Chullin 139b:12–13
- 11דכתיב מר דרור · Exodus 30:23
- 12ומר זה · ראה לקו״ת פ׳ נשא כא, ב.
- 13ומר זה לדעת הרמב״ם . . ועל דרך זה יש לפרש מחלוקת הפוסקים · הנחה אחרת מקטע זה נדפס בסה״מ תקע״א ע׳ קמג.
- 14והרמב״ן · Exodus 30:23
- 15לדעת . . מושק · הל׳ כלי המקדש פ״א ה״ג. וראה בפי׳ הרדב״ז שם, ובפי׳ ע״ת מרבינו אברהם בן הרמב״ם ע״פ זה. וראה בברכת הנהנין לרבינו הזקן פרק יא הל׳ ה׳ שכ׳ שקורין פיזו״ם ואסור לאכלו משום חשש דם, ע״ש. וראה באוה״ת פ׳ כי תשא ע׳ א׳תתקמד. ראה בד״ה מצה זו תר״מ פרק כו בארוכה. ובסידור כז, ב שהוא חי׳ טמאה ע״ש. ראה טור או״ח סרי״ו.
- 16בגמרא כיצד מברכין · Berakhot 43a
- 17בחטוטרת שבצוארה · כפי׳ הרא״ש שם, אבל רש״י שם פי׳ ”מן הרעי של חי׳”, בגמרא שלפנינו הגירסא ”שמן חי׳”. אבל ברי״ף וברש״י וברא״ש ובדקדוקי סופרים בשם כ״י מינכן הגי׳ ”שהוא מין חי׳”. וראה במעדני יום טוב שם. ולעיל בהערה ד״ה והרמב״ן.
- 18
17ועל דרך זה יש לפרש מחלוקת הפוסקים1 במור הנ״ל שרבינו יונה מתירו2 אפילו באכילה ויש אוסרים אותו באכילה3 דס״ל שלא נתהפך אלא ריחו
Along these lines one may explain the dispute of the halachic authorities concerning the myrrh mentioned above: that Rabbeinu Yonah permits it even to be eaten, and some forbid it to be eaten, for they hold that only its fragrance was transformed
The halachic authorities disagree about this musk: Rabbeinu Yonah permits even eating it, while others, identified in the Kehot note as the Raza”h (Rabbi Zerachyah HaLevi), forbid eating it, holding that only its fragrance was transformed.
אבל גופו אסור באכילה. והרר״י ס״ל שחזר לגמרי להיות היתר. וכמ״ש בטור א״ח סימן רי״ו.
but its substance is forbidden to be eaten; while Rabbeinu Yonah holds that it has entirely become permitted, as is written in the Tur, Orach Chaim, section 216.
On that view its substance remains forbidden as food, while Rabbeinu Yonah holds it has become entirely permitted. The Tur records the dispute in Orach Chaim 216.
ומחלוקתם ע״פ חסידות תלוי בענין הנזכר בגמ׳ ביומא (דף פו ע״ב) גבי תשובה אם זדונות נעשו כשגגות או כזכיות כי שניהם ענין א׳ שהוא מה שהרע נהפך לטוב.
And according to Chassidus, their dispute depends on the matter mentioned in the Gemara in Yoma (page 86b) concerning teshuvah (return): whether deliberate sins become like unwitting ones or like merits. For both are one matter, namely, that the bad is transformed into good.
Chassidus connects the dispute to the Talmud’s two statements about teshuvah: that it turns deliberate sins into unwitting ones, or into merits. Both describe evil being turned to good, in different degrees.
שהרי חיה ידוע הנ״ל הוא ידעוני הנזכר בתורה בפרש׳ שופטים שהוא מקליפות הטמאות כמ״ש ושאל אוב וידעני4 ודרש אל המתים.56
For the “certain” (yadua) animal mentioned above is the yid’oni mentioned in the Torah in Parshas Shoftim, which is of the impure kelipos (husks), as it is written, “or one who inquires of an ov or a yid’oni, or one who consults the dead.”
Rashi explains that the yid’oni, a sorcery the Torah forbids in Parshas Shoftim, used the bone of an animal named yadua; the maamar identifies the musk’s “certain” (yadua) animal with it, so the musk comes from the impure kelipos. Musk is thus a case of something from the side of impurity becoming a fragrance.
The paragraph reads the halachic dispute over musk as a parable for teshuvah: whether the evil is only softened or wholly transformed into good.
Marei mekomos
- 1יש לפרש מחלוקת הפוסקים · ראה גם לקמן קו, ד. לקו״ת נשא כב, ד בשם ”פי׳ הגאונים והרמב״ן”.
- 2שרבינו יונה מתירו · Berakhot 43a
- 3ויש אוסרים אותו באכילה · הרז״ה.
- 4ושאל אוב וידעני · Deuteronomy 18:11
- 5כשגגות או כזכיות · בסה״מ תקע״א: כזכיות או כשגגות.
- 6
18ולכן זה שיהיה הבושם הלז מותר אפילו באכילה הוא כמו שבתשובה מאהבה הזדונות נעשו כזכיות1 שהרע נהפך לגמרי להיות טוב ממש.
Therefore, that this spice should be permitted even to be eaten is like [the case where], through teshuvah out of love, deliberate sins become like merits, for the bad is entirely transformed into actual good.
That the musk is permitted even as food corresponds to teshuvah out of love, through which deliberate sins become merits: the evil is wholly transformed into real good.
ועל זה אמרו במקום שבעלי תשובה עומדים2 אין צדיקים גמורים יכולים לעמוד. אבל בתשובה שלא מאהבה רבה הזדונות הם כשגגות
And of this they said, “In the place where baalei teshuvah stand, perfectly righteous people cannot stand.” But in teshuvah that is not out of great love, the deliberate sins are like unwitting ones,
This is why the Sages say that where baalei teshuvah, those who have returned, stand, even the perfectly righteous cannot stand. Teshuvah that is not out of great love turns deliberate sins only into unwitting ones.
אבל לא נתהפכו לגמרי להיות טוב וזהו מ״ד שהמור הנ״ל אע״פ שריחו טוב מ״מ לא חזר להיות מותר באכילה כו׳.
but they have not been entirely transformed into good. And this is [the view of] the one who holds that the myrrh mentioned above, although its fragrance is good, nevertheless has not become permitted to be eaten, etc.
Such sins are not wholly transformed into good. This matches the view that the musk, though its fragrance is good, has not become permitted as food.
The paragraph completes the parallel: teshuvah out of love transforms evil entirely, like musk permitted as food, while lesser teshuvah only softens it, like musk whose fragrance alone has changed.
Marei mekomos
- 1כזכיות · Yoma 86b
- 2במקום שבעלי תשובה עומדים · Berakhot 34b:22–23
Haman’s arrogance and the Jews’ self-sacrifice ¶19–20
19והנה מרדכי שנק׳ מירא דכיא היינו שהוא מקור הבטול שהוא בחי׳ יסוד אבא1 שחכמה היא כח מ״ה ובחכמה אתברירו. ולכן נק׳ איש יהודי דוקא.
Now, Mordechai, who is called mira dachya (pure myrrh), is the source of the self-nullification (bittul), which is the level of Yesod (foundation) of Abba (Chochmah); for Chochmah (wisdom) is koach mah (“the power of mah”), and “through Chochmah they are refined.” Therefore he is called specifically “ish Yehudi.”
Mordechai, called mira dachya, “pure myrrh,” is the source of bittul. In Kabbalistic terms he is Yesod of Abba, the channel of Chochmah; Chochmah is koach mah, the power of selflessness, and “through Chochmah they are refined.” That is why he in particular is called “ish Yehudi.”
והנה המן הי׳ לעומת זה של בחי׳ זו דוקא כמו שאמר למי יחפוץ המלך לעשות יקר יותר ממני2 שהיה יש ודבר בעיניו ונפרד מאחדותו ית׳ לומר אני ואפסי עוד3
And Haman was the opposite of this, of this level specifically, as he said, “Whom would the king desire to honor more than me?” For he was a something and an entity (yesh vedavar) in his own eyes, and separate from His unity, may He be blessed, so as to say, “I am, and there is none besides me.”
Haman was the exact opposite of this bittul: he asked, “Whom would the king desire to honor more than me?” He was a self-important “something” in his own eyes, separate from G‑d’s unity, saying in effect, “I am, and there is none besides me.”
כי היה מזרע עמלק4 וכתיב ראשית גוים עמלק5 כי ז׳ אומות הכנעני והחתי כו׳ שבפסוק הם ז׳ מדות רעות6 תאות ורציחה כו׳.
For he was of the seed of Amalek, and it is written, “Amalek is the first of the nations.” For the seven nations in the verse, “the Canaanite and the Hittite,” etc., are seven evil traits: lust, and murder, etc.
Haman descended from Amalek, whom the Torah calls “the first of the nations.” In this teaching the seven nations of Canaan named in the verses stand for seven evil traits within the soul, such as lust and murder.
ועמלק הוא גסות הרוח והוא ראשית להם. כי גסות הרוח היא שרש כל המדות רעות.7
And Amalek is arrogance (gasus haruach), and it is first among them, for arrogance is the root of all the evil traits.
Amalek stands for gasus haruach, arrogance, which is “first” among the evil traits because it is the root of them all.
The paragraph sets Mordechai, the source of bittul, against Haman, heir of Amalek, the arrogance that is the root of every evil trait.
Kehot cites the Arizal’s Pri Etz Chaim, Shaar HaPurim, ch. 5, for Mordechai as Yesod of Abba. In the Or HaTorah version the Tzemach Tzedek adds why arrogance is the root of the other traits: because a person is a “something” in his own eyes, he desires everything for himself, while one who felt superfluous in the world would have nothing to desire.
Marei mekomos
- 1מרדכי . . יסוד אבא · ראה פע״ח שער הפורים פ״ה.
- 2למי יחפוץ . . ממני · Esther 6:6
- 3אני ואפסי עוד · Isaiah 47:8
- 4מזרע עמלק · Esther 3:1
- 5ראשית גוים עמלק · Numbers 24:20
- 6כי ז׳ אומות . . ז׳ מדות רעות · ראה לעיל צה, א.
- 7שרש כל המדות רעות · באוה״ת מג״א ע׳ רצא: (שלפי שהוא יש בעיניו ע״כ הוא בעל תאווה הכל לעצמו כו׳ וכיוצא) משא״כ אם הי׳ כמותר בעולם למה לו להתאוות: ולכן.
20ולכן המן שהוא בחי׳ גסות רצה להשמיד ולהרוג את כל היהודים שהם בבחי׳ בטול הפך היש והגסות.
Therefore Haman, who is the level of arrogance, wanted to destroy and to kill all the Jews, who are in a state of self-nullification (bittul), the opposite of the yesh (sense of self) and of arrogance.
That is why Haman, the embodiment of arrogance, sought to destroy all the Jews: their bittul was the very opposite of his self-importance.
ואם היו כופרים ח״ו לא היו עושי׳ להם כלום שהרי לא גזר רק על היהודים.
And had they renounced [their faith], G‑d forbid, nothing would have been done to them, for he decreed only against the Jews.
Haman’s decree was aimed at Jews as Jews, so had they renounced their faith, nothing would have been done to them.
אך כולם כאחד לא עלה על דעתם מחשבת חוץ ח״ו ומסרו נפשם על אחדותו ית׳
But all of them, as one: no thought of [stepping] outside entered their minds, G‑d forbid, and they gave over their lives for His unity, may He be blessed.
Yet the thought of leaving their faith did not even enter the mind of any of them; all, as one, were ready to give their lives for G‑d’s unity.
וזהו בחי׳ בטול הנ״ל וישנו בכח בכל אחד מישראל ואפי׳ קל שבקלים יכול למסור נפשו בפועל ממש1 שלא ליפרד מאחדותו ית׳ בשום אופן בעולם.
And this is the level of bittul mentioned above, and it is present in potential in every one of Israel; even the lowest of the low can give over his life in actual deed, so as not to be separated from His unity, may He be blessed, in any way in the world.
This is the bittul described above, present in potential in every Jew: even the lowest of the low can actually give up his life rather than be separated from G‑d’s unity.
ומה שעובר שאר עבירות היינו מפני הרוח שטות2 שמטעהו לחשוב שאינו נפרד מהקב״ה על ידי עבירה ההיא כיון שלובש ציצית ומניח תפלין.3
And that one commits other sins is because of the spirit of folly, which misleads him into thinking that he is not separated from the Holy One, blessed be He, through that sin, since he wears tzitzis and puts on tefillin.
Why then does such a person commit other sins? Because a “spirit of folly” deceives him into thinking that the sin does not separate him from G‑d, since he still wears tzitzis and puts on tefillin.
The paragraph shows that the self-sacrifice of the Jews in Haman’s time revealed the bittul hidden in every Jew, which makes even the least of them ready to die rather than be cut off from G‑d.
Tanya ch. 18, to which the Kehot note points, traces this readiness to the “hidden love” in the heart of every Jew, an inheritance from the Patriarchs, present even in one whose understanding of G‑d is small.
Marei mekomos
- 1ואפי׳ קל שבקלים יכול למסור נפשו בפועל ממש · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 18
- 2הרוח שטות · Sotah 3a
- 3ואם היו כופרים ח״ו לא היו עושים להם כלום · וכ״ה במגילת סתרים ע״פ וקבל היהודים. וכ״ה בשערי אורה שער הפורים צ, ב. ובד״ה וקבל היהודים תרע״ח ע׳ רד. ובד״ה וקבל היהודים תשי״א (נדפס בסה״מ מלוקט ח״ג ע׳ סח).
Self-sacrifice reaches the Essence ¶21–23
Self-sacrifice comes from the “hidden love” in every Jewish soul, which is above Daas, reason. That is why the Torah gives a reason for loving G‑d, “for He is your life,” but none for self-sacrifice.
The paragraph traces self-sacrifice to a love above reason, which is why the Torah gives no reason for it.
Marei mekomos
- 1טעם על מס״נ · ראה לקו״ת ויקרא ד, ג. סה״מ תרל״ד ע׳ קז. סה״מ תרנ״ט ע׳ יג. וראה הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר בסה״מ תש״ט ע׳ 121.
- 2לאהבה את הוי׳ אלקיך · Deuteronomy 30:20
22ואין זה טעם על מסירת נפש כיון שהטעם הוא כי הוא חייך והרי מסירת נפש הוא להשליך חייו מנגד.
And this is not a reason for self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh), since the reason is “for He is your life,” whereas self-sacrifice is to cast one’s life away.
“For He is your life” cannot be the reason for self-sacrifice, since self-sacrifice means giving up one’s life.
אלא הענין שאין שייך טעם ושכל על מסירת נפש כי המס״נ נלקח1 מבחינ׳ שלמעלה מן הדעת כי
Rather, the matter is that reason and intellect do not apply to self-sacrifice, for self-sacrifice is taken from a level that is above Daas (knowledge). For
Reason and intellect do not apply to self-sacrifice at all, because it comes from a level above Daas.
הנה פירוש כי הוא חייך היינו מה שהוא ית׳ ממכ״ע וסוכ״ע שעי״ז מחיה ומהוה כ״ע וכבר נת׳ לעיל דבחינת ממלא וסובב הוא
the meaning of “for He is your life” is that He, may He be blessed, is the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin) and the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), through which He gives life to all worlds and brings them into being. And it was already explained above that the level of memalei and sovev is
“He is your life” refers to G‑d as memalei and sovev, the lights through which He gives life to the worlds and brings them into being. As explained above, these are only a radiance from Him.
רק הארה לבד ממנו ית׳ אבל מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ אינו בגדר עלמין כלל אפילו להיות סובב וממלא לעלמין.
only a mere radiance from Him, may He be blessed; but His being and essence, may He be blessed, is not within the category of worlds at all, even [so far as] to be sovev and memalei for the worlds.
G‑d’s being and essence is not in the category of worlds at all, not even to the extent of being the light that surrounds or fills them.
כי לא זה היא עיקר האלקות2 מה שהעולמות מתהוים ממנו ומקבלים חיותם ממנו ית׳. שהרי אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם3 ולאחר שנברא בשוה ממש.4
For this is not the essence of G‑dliness: that the worlds come into being from Him and receive their life-force (chayus) from Him, may He be blessed. For “You are He before the world was created,” and after it was created, exactly the same.
G‑dliness is not essentially about the worlds coming into being and receiving life from Him. As the morning blessings say, “You are He before the world was created,” and after it was created He is exactly the same.
The paragraph shows that the Torah’s reason for love, “He is your life,” concerns only the radiance that gives life to the worlds, while self-sacrifice reaches G‑d’s essence, which is beyond any relation to the worlds.
Sefer HaMaamarim 5655, cited in the Kehot note, illustrates this with a precious stone: its value does not lie in its gleam, and the light it gives comes only from its outermost aspect; so too G‑d’s essence is not there in order to shine into the worlds.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי המס״נ נלקח מבחי׳ שלמעלה מן הדעת · באוה״ת שמות כרך ז ע׳ ב׳תקעג מציין ע״ז ”ור״ל למעלה מהטעם ושכל המושג”.
- 2כי לא זה היא עיקר האלקות · Song of Songs 8:1
- 3אתה הוא עד שלא נברא העולם · נוסח ברכת השחר — ע״פ תדבא״ר פכ״א.
- 4וכבר נתבאר · באוה״ת פ׳ יתרו ע׳ תתמב מציין ע״ז ”נמצא בחי׳ היותו סוכ״ע וממכ״ע להיות העולמות זהו כלא חשיב לגבי מהו״ע שאינו בגדר עלמין כלל, אלא שממהו״ע נמשך ג״כ הארה זו שיהי׳ סוכ״ע וממכ״ע”, ע״ש. וכ״ה בסה״מ תרס״ח ע׳ קפא.
23וגם אילו לא היה בורא העולמות היה הכל שוה לפניו ית׳ אלא מה שמחיה ומהוה העולמות זהו רק הארה ממנו ית׳ וכמ״ש במ״א דלכך נק׳ הבריאה יש מאין.
And even if He had not created the worlds, all would be equal before Him, may He be blessed. Rather, what gives life to the worlds and brings them into being is only a radiance from Him, may He be blessed; as is written elsewhere, that this is why creation is called “something from nothing” (yesh me’ayin).
Even had G‑d not created the worlds, nothing would be different for Him. What gives the worlds life and existence is only a radiance from Him, which is why creation is called yesh me’ayin, “something from nothing.”
שבחי׳ התהוות היש הוא רק ע״י הארה לבד שנק׳ אין לגבי מהותו ועצמותו יתברך (כמש״ל פ׳1 שלח ד״ה וירא ישראל) וכמ״ש ואתה מחיה את כלם.2
For the level of the coming into being of the yesh (something) is only through a mere radiance, which is called ayin (nothing) relative to His being and essence, may He be blessed (as written above in Parshas Shelach, the discourse beginning “Vayar Yisrael”), and as it is written, “And You (ve’atah) give life to them all.”
The “something” comes from a mere radiance, which is “nothing” (ayin) relative to His essence. The printed text here reads “Parshas Shelach,” but the discourse “Vayar Yisrael” is in Torah Ohr, Parshas Beshalach (61d), as the Kehot note’s reading “Beshalach” shows; and the verse “You give life to them all” makes the same point.
פירוש ואתה היינו כ״ב אותיות3 דבר ה׳ מא׳ ועד תי״ו וה׳ מוצאות שעל ידי האותיות מחיה את כולם.
The meaning of “And You (ve’atah)” is the twenty-two letters of the word of G‑d, from alef to tav, and the five points of articulation, for through the letters He gives life to them all.
The word ve’atah, “and You,” is read letter by letter: alef to tav are the twenty-two letters of G‑d’s speech, and hei (five) the five points of articulation of the mouth. Through these letters G‑d gives life to all things.
והאותיות הם רק הארה לבד כמו האותיות באדם הן רק לבושי הנפש כו׳. וא״כ מהותו ועצמותו ית׳4 הוא למעלה גם מבחי׳ ומדרגה זו הנזכר
And the letters are only a mere radiance, just as the letters in man are only garments of the soul, etc. If so, His being and essence, may He be blessed, is above even this level and degree spoken of [in]
Letters are only a radiance, just as a person’s letters, his speech, are only garments of his soul. So G‑d’s essence is above even the level spoken of in “for He is your life.”
כי הוא חייך כי זהו רק היותו ממלא וסובב ומזה נמשך לאהבה כי הוא חייך. וכמ״ש נפשי אויתיך5 כמ״ש בתניא (פמ״ד).6
“for He is your life,” for this is only that He is memalei and sovev, and from this is drawn the love [of] “for He is your life,” as it is written, “My soul, I desire You,” as explained in the Tanya (chapter 44).
“For He is your life” refers only to G‑d as memalei and sovev, and from it comes the love of “My soul, I desire You,” longing for G‑d as for one’s own life, as Tanya ch. 44 explains.
אבל המס״נ להשליך חייו מנגד נמשך שלא ליפרד ממהותו ועצמותו ית׳ שהוא למעלהמחיי החיים וקמיה כלא ממש חשיבי ואתה הוא קודם שנברא כו׳.
But self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh), casting one’s life away, derives from [the will] not to be separated from His being and essence, may He be blessed, which is above the Life of life, and before Whom [all] is considered as truly nothing, and “You are He before [the world] was created,” etc.
Self-sacrifice, giving up life itself, comes from the will not to be separated from His essence, which is above the Life of all life and before which everything is as nothing.
והנה כ״ז הוא שיש בכח כל א׳ מישראל (כי הנצוץ אלהות שבנשמה הוא ג״כ נמשך מבחי׳ שלמעלה מהשכל וכמו שכתוב במ״א ועיין בע״ח שמ״א פ״ג7 והכוונה כי יש נצוץ כו׳)
And all this is within the power of every one of Israel (for the spark of G‑dliness in the soul is also drawn from a level that is above intellect, as is written elsewhere; and see Etz Chaim, Shaar 41, chapter 3, and the intent is that there is a spark, etc.).
This capacity is in every Jew, because the spark of G‑dliness in the soul also comes from a level above intellect. The Kehot note explains that the Etz Chaim reference (Shaar 41, ch. 3) follows the Shklov edition of 5560; other editions have it in Shaar 42, ch. 1.
ולכן היה אז מסירת נפש בפו״מ אצל כל ישראל שלא ליפרד מאחדותו יתברך. וזהו ואת מאמר מרדכי8
Therefore there was then self-sacrifice in actual deed among all of Israel, so as not to be separated from His unity, may He be blessed. And this is “And the word of Mordechai …”,
That is why, in Haman’s time, all of Israel stood ready in actual deed to give their lives rather than be separated from G‑d’s unity. This is the meaning of the Megillah’s “And the word of Mordechai [Esther did].”
for Mordechai was the source of the self-nullification (bittul), “ish Yehudi,” as mentioned above. And this is “And the Jews accepted what they had begun to do”:
Mordechai, the “ish Yehudi,” was the source of their bittul. And this explains “the Jews accepted what they had begun to do.”
שבמתן תורה שהקדימו נעשה לנשמע ועל כל דבור פרחה נשמתם שהוא בחי׳ בטול ומס״נ שלכך זכו למ״ת התגלות אלקות.11
for at the Giving of the Torah they put “we will do” before “we will hear,” and at each utterance their souls flew out, which is the level of bittul and self-sacrifice; and this is why they merited the Giving of the Torah, the revelation of G‑dliness.
At Sinai, putting “we will do” first and having their souls fly out at each utterance were bittul and self-sacrifice, and through them Israel merited the Giving of the Torah, a revelation of G‑dliness. What was begun there was accepted in full on Purim.
The paragraph shows that self-sacrifice reaches G‑d’s essence, beyond the radiance that gives life to the worlds. This capacity is in every Jew; it was revealed in Haman’s time through Mordechai, and it links Purim to the bittul of Sinai.
Marei mekomos
- 1כמש״ל פ׳ בשלח ד״ה וירא ישראל · לעיל סא, ד ואילך.
- 2ואתה מחי׳ את כולם · Nehemiah 9:6
- 3פי׳ ואתה היינו כ״ב אותיות · ראה שער היחוד והאמונה פ״ב.
- 4וא״כ מהותו ועצמותו ית׳ · בלקו״ת ויקרא ג, ב מציין לכאן.
- 5נפשי אויתיך · Isaiah 26:9
- 6כמ״ש בתניא (פמ״ד) · ראה באוה״ת ויקרא כרך ג ע׳ תשמא. ובליקוט פירושים — חיטריק.
- 7בע״ח שמ״א פ״ג · דפוס שקלאב תק״ס. ובדפוסים אחרים שמ״ב פ״א.
- 8ואת מאמר מרדכי · Esther 2:20
- 9מקור הבטול איש יהודי · בהמשך מצה זו תר״ם ספכ״ו הוסיף כ״ק מהר״ש קיצור: שכ״י גם משארי שבטים נק׳ יהודי ע״ש ביטול, ומרדכי מירא דכיא מקור הביטול נק׳ איש יהודי, ולעו״ז הי׳ המן גס הרוח ראשית כל מדה״ר, ועמדו במס״נ שזהו מבחי׳ אהבה מוסתרת שלמעלה משכל, כי ע״פ שכל לאהבה את ה׳ כי הוא חייך ממכ״ע וסוכ״ע. אמנם זהו רק הארה לבד, ואתה קודם שנה״ע כו׳ בשוה ומזה נמשך בחי׳ זו, והוא מבחי׳ ניצוץ האלקי שבנשמה, עכ״ל.
- 10וקבל היהודים את אשר החלו לעשות · Esther 9:23
- 11שנמשך . . וזהו וקבל היהודים כו׳ · בד״ה מצה זו תר״מ פרק כז מוסיף ”וכמ״ש וקבל קבלה גמורה, וכ״ז הוא ע״י היותם יהודים שעמדו בהודים להיות בבחי׳ הביטול”.
Why Purim completes Sinai ¶24
24וכך היה בימי אחשורוש הבטול הזה ביתר שאת כי במ״ת היה בטול זה מחמת כח האתעדל״ע שכפה עליהם הר כו׳. וכמים הפנים כו׳.
And so in the days of Achashverosh there was this self-nullification (bittul) with even greater loftiness. For at the Giving of the Torah this bittul came about by the power of the arousal from above (isarusa dile’eila), in that He held the mountain over them, etc., and “as water [reflects] face to face,” etc.
In the days of Achashverosh the same bittul appeared with greater force. At Sinai it was produced by an arousal from above, the mountain held over them, which their love only reflected back, “as water reflects a face.”
אבל בימי אחשורוש היה הבטול מצד עצמם בחינת אתעדל״ת תחלה. ולכן גם ההמשכה שנמשך עי״ז הוא ממקום עליון יותר עד שהגילוי שבמ״ת נק׳
But in the days of Achashverosh the bittul was from their own side, the level of an arousal from below (isarusa dilesata) first. Therefore the drawing down that was drawn through this is also from a higher place, to the point that the revelation at the Giving of the Torah is called
In Achashverosh’s time the bittul began from the Jews’ own side, an arousal from below. Therefore what it drew down came from a higher place, so much so that the revelation at Sinai is called only a beginning.
רק החלו התחלה לגבי אור ההמשכה שנמשך להם בפורים שנק׳ וקבל שזהו הגמר וזהו וקבל היהודים כו׳.
only “they had begun,” a beginning, relative to the light of the drawing down that was drawn to them on Purim, which is called “accepted,” which is the completion. And this is “And the Jews accepted,” etc.
Compared with the light drawn down on Purim, which is called “accepted,” the completion, Sinai was only “they had begun.” This is the meaning of “And the Jews accepted what they had begun to do.”
(והענין הוא דהנה כתיב מה ראו על ככה1 ומה הגיע אליהם. מ״ה הוא בחינת בטול ומ״נ הגיע אליהם כנודע שיש מ״ה וב״ן.2 ב״ן הוא בחינת ירידה והשתלשלות להיות התהוות יש ודבר.
(The matter is this: it is written, “what (mah) they had seen concerning this, and what (mah) had come upon them.” Mah is the level of bittul, and mayin nukvin (feminine waters) came to them, as is known that there are Mah and Ban. Ban is the level of descent and the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), to bring about the coming into being of a something and an entity (yesh vedavar).
A long parenthesis reads the verse “What (mah) they had seen … and what (mah) had come upon them” through the Name Mah (the Name Havayah spelled out to the value 45), which stands for bittul, paired with the Name Ban (52), which stands for descent through the chain of worlds until a separate “something” comes into being. The abbreviation מ״נ is read here as mayin nukvin, the “feminine waters” of an arousal from below; but since the next lines speak of “this Mah and bittul” as what came to them, and Torah Ohr elsewhere reads the verse as “Mah came to them,” the reading of these two letters is uncertain.
ומ״ה הוא בחי׳ בטול כח מ״ה. ומ״ה ובטול זה הגיע אליהם דהנה אף שבימי אחשורוש היה הבטול באתעדל״ת מצד עצמם היינו שההתחלה היה מהם.
And Mah is the level of bittul, “the power of mah” (koach mah). And this Mah and bittul came to them: for although in the days of Achashverosh the bittul was through an arousal from below, from their own side, that is, the beginning was from them,
Mah is bittul, koach mah, and this Mah “came to them.” Although on Purim the bittul began from the Jews themselves, it was still given to them, as the next part explains.
אבל ודאי שאלמלא עוזרו3 כו׳. א״כ נמשך ג״כ אתעדל״ע להולדת בטול זה וזהו מה ראו כו׳ ומה הגיע אליהם. משא״כ במ״ת היה ההתחלה באתעדל״ע.
yet certainly, “were it not for His help,” etc. If so, an arousal from above was also drawn down, to give birth to this bittul. And this is “what they had seen,” etc., “and what had come upon them.” Whereas at the Giving of the Torah the beginning was with an arousal from above.
As the Sages say of the evil inclination, a person could not overcome it “were it not for G‑d’s help”; so an arousal from above also came, to give birth to this bittul. That is “what they had seen … and what had come upon them,” whereas at Sinai the beginning came from above.
והחילוק הוא ע״ד אשה מזרעת תחלה4 יולדת זכר דכנסת ישראל נקראת אשה וכשהתחלת ההולדה הוא ע״י אתעדל״ת ואח״כ באתעדל״ת אתעדל״ע אזי יולדת זכר שהוא בחי׳ מ״ה ובטול אמתי.
The difference is along the lines of “[when] the woman emits seed first, she bears a male.” For the Community of Israel is called “woman”; and when the beginning of the birth is through an arousal from below, and afterward, through the arousal from below, [comes] an arousal from above, then she bears a male, which is the level of Mah and true bittul.
The difference is illustrated by the Talmud’s teaching that when the woman’s seed comes first, she bears a male. The Community of Israel is the “woman”: when the process begins with an arousal from below, which then evokes an arousal from above, the result is a “male,” the level of Mah and true bittul.
משא״כ בשעת מ״ת שהיה ההתחלה ע״י אתעדל״ע שכפה עליהם הר כגיגית ואע״פ שע״י אתעדל״ע זו נתעוררו באתעדל״ת ובטול להקדים נעשה לנשמע מ״מ כיון שהוא על דרך איש מזריע תחלה לכן יולדת נקבה שהוא בחי׳ ב״ן.
Whereas at the time of the Giving of the Torah, when the beginning was through an arousal from above, in that He held the mountain over them like a tub: although through this arousal from above they were roused to an arousal from below and to bittul, to put “we will do” before “we will hear,” nevertheless, since it is in the manner of “[when] the man emits seed first,” therefore she bears a female, which is the level of Ban.
At Sinai the process began from above, with the mountain held over them. Although this awakened their bittul and their “we will do,” since it was like “the man’s seed coming first,” the result was a “female,” the level of Ban.
כי גם שם ב״ן הוא בחי׳ בטול היש וכנודע מענין משה ואליהו שאליהו בגימטריא ב״ן והיה בו בטול הגוף עד שעלה בסערה כו׳
For the Name Ban, too, is the level of the nullification of the yesh, as is known from the matter of Moshe and Eliyahu: that Eliyahu is numerically equal to Ban (52), and in him there was the nullification of the body, to the point that he went up in a storm wind, etc.;
Ban too is a bittul of the yesh, the sense of self: Eliyahu, whose name has the numerical value 52, like Ban, so nullified his body that he went up to heaven in a storm wind.
ומ״מ בטול דבחי׳ משה שהוא בחי׳ מ״ה ממש כמ״ש ונחנו מה היה גדול יותר מבטול דאליהו כו׳. או י״ל החילוק בין הבטול דשעת מ״ת לבטול דבימי אחשורוש
and nevertheless, the bittul of the level of Moshe, which is the level of Mah itself, as it is written, “And what (mah) are we,” was greater than the bittul of Eliyahu, etc. Or it can be said that the difference between the bittul at the time of the Giving of the Torah and the bittul in the days of Achashverosh
Yet the bittul of Moshe, who said “What (mah) are we?”, the level of Mah itself, was greater than the bittul of Eliyahu. The maamar then offers a second way to explain the difference between Sinai and Purim.
ע״ד שנתבאר במ״א גבי משה ואהרן שבשניהם נאמר ונחנו מה ומ״מ משה הוא מ״ה דמ״ה ואהרן ב״ן דמ״ה ובחי׳ בטול דב״ן דמ״ה זהו בחי׳ הנק׳ יולדת נקבה לגבי בטול מ״ה דמ״ה שהוא בטול עליון יותר כו׳.
is along the lines of what was explained elsewhere concerning Moshe and Aharon: that of both of them it is said, “And what are we,” and nevertheless Moshe is Mah of Mah and Aharon is Ban of Mah; and the level of the bittul of Ban of Mah is the level called “she bears a female,” relative to the bittul of Mah of Mah, which is a higher bittul, etc.
Elsewhere it is explained that both Moshe and Aharon said “What are we?”, yet Moshe is Mah of Mah and Aharon is Ban of Mah. The bittul of Ban of Mah corresponds to “bearing a female” relative to the higher bittul of Mah of Mah.
והנה על כל פנים מובן שהבטול ומס״נ דכללות ישראל בימי אחשורוש היה גדול יותר במדרגה מבחי׳ הבטול דשהקדימו נעשה כו׳ והיינו בחי׳ אשה מזרעת תחלה יולדת זכר.
In any case, it is understood that the bittul and self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh) of the Jewish people as a whole (klalus Yisrael) in the days of Achashverosh was greater in level than the level of the bittul of their putting “we will do” first, etc.; and this is the level of “the woman emits seed first, she bears a male.”
Either way, the bittul and self-sacrifice of the whole Jewish people in the days of Achashverosh was greater than the bittul of “we will do” at Sinai: it is the case of “the woman’s seed first, she bears a male.”
והנה כמו שהוא בענין הבטול כך הוא ג״כ בענין עצם גלוי האור שלמעלה שהוא בחי׳ התורה נק׳ במ״ת החלו לעשות לגבי פורים שנק׳ וקבל כו׳ הדר וקבלוה כו׳ שהוא גלוי עליון יותר ממקור התורה שנקראת משל הקדמוני כנ״ל.
And just as it is with the bittul, so it is also with the very revelation of the light above, which is the level of the Torah: at the Giving of the Torah it is called “they had begun to do,” relative to Purim, which is called “accepted,” etc., “they accepted it again,” etc., which is a higher revelation, from the source of the Torah, which is called “the parable of the Primordial One,” as mentioned above.
The same holds for the light revealed from above, the Torah. At Sinai it was only “they had begun”; on Purim, when “they accepted it again,” the revelation came from a higher place, the source of the Torah, called “the parable of the Primordial One.”
כי אשה מזרעת תחלה יולדת זכר משא״כ איש מזריע תחלה יולדת נקבה. וזהו תורה צוה לנו משה מורשה5 מאורשה כו׳ ושייך בחינה זו גם באור התורה ע״פ מ״ש בע״ח שי״א פ״א6 כי עתיק יומין כו׳
For “the woman emits seed first, she bears a male,” which is not so when “the man emits seed first, she bears a female.” And this is “Moshe commanded us the Torah, an inheritance (morashah),” [read] “betrothed” (me’orasah), etc. And this level applies also to the light of the Torah, according to what is written in Etz Chaim, Shaar 11, chapter 1, that Atik Yomin, etc.,
The Sages read “Moshe commanded us the Torah, an inheritance (morashah)” as me’orasah, “betrothed”: Israel is betrothed to the Torah, so the image of male and female applies to the light of the Torah too. The maamar grounds this in Etz Chaim’s account of Atik Yomin.
ובחי׳ מ״ה שבו כו׳ ע״ש [ועיין מ״ש בביאור ע״פ שימני כחותם]7 וזהו מה ראו כו׳ ומה הגיע אליהם מה ראו היינו בחי׳ הבטול ומה הגיע אליהם היינו בחי׳ התורה דמחכמה נפקת כח מ״ה שהיא בחי׳ משל הקדמוני כנ״ל):89
and the level of Mah within it, etc.; see there [and see what is written in the explanation on the verse “Set me as a seal”]. And this is “what they had seen,” etc., “and what had come upon them”: “what they had seen” is the level of the bittul, and “what had come upon them” is the level of the Torah, which comes forth from Chochmah (wisdom), koach mah, which is the level of “the parable of the Primordial One,” as mentioned above.)
Atik Yomin contains a level of Mah, so the Torah too can come from the higher, “male” level. “What they had seen” is the bittul, and “what had come upon them” is the Torah, which comes from Chochmah, koach mah, “the parable of the Primordial One.”
The paragraph explains why Purim completed Sinai: at Sinai the bittul was produced from above, while in the days of Achashverosh it began from below, and a bittul that begins from below draws a higher revelation, as “the woman’s seed first, she bears a male.” So the Torah accepted again on Purim came from a higher source.
Kehot quotes Or HaTorah (Vayikra, vol. 2, p. 500), which states the conclusion plainly: Atik of Atzilus is made of Mah and Ban, the Mah in it being “the male of Atik” and the Ban “the female of Atik,” so through “and the Jews accepted” the Torah was drawn down from “the male of Atik.” The Etz Chaim reference (Shaar 11, ch. 1) follows the Shklov edition of 5560; in other editions it is the Gate of Atik, Shaar 12, ch. 1. For Mah and Ban, Kehot cites Etz Chaim, Shaar Shevirat HaKelim (Shaar 9), ch. 7.
Marei mekomos
- 1מה ראו על ככה · Esther 9:26
- 2כנודע שיש מ״ה וב״ן · ראה ע״ח שער שביה״כ, ש״ט פ״ז. אוה״ת נצבים ע׳ א׳רלג. וראה בספר הליקוטים ממאמרי הצ״צ ערך מ״ה.
- 3אלמלא עוזרו · Kiddushin 30b:7
- 4אשה מזרעת תחלה · Berakhot 60a:14
- 5תורה צוה לנו משה מורשה · Deuteronomy 33:4
- 6ע״פ מ״ש בע״ח שי״א פ״א · דפוס שקלאב תק״ס. ובדפוסים אחרים שער עתיק שי״ב פ״א. ראה באוה״ת פ׳ בלק ע׳ א׳תרסד. וראה הלשון באוה״ת ויקרא כרך ב ע׳ תק ”וז״ל וי״ל כי עת״י דאצי׳ כל עצמותו נעשה משני בחי׳ אלו שהם מ״ה וב״ן ובחי׳ מ״ה שבו הוא הנק׳ עתיק דדכורא ובחי׳ הב״ן שבו היא הנק׳ נקבה דעתיק עכ״ל. וא״כ בימי הפורים ע״י וקבל היהודים היה המשכת התורה הנק׳ משל הקדמוני מבחי׳ יולדת זכר היינו שיהי׳ הגילוי מבחי׳ עתיק דדכורא” ויש שם קיצור. וכ״ה בסה״מ תרכ״ו (הוצאת תשמ״ט) ע׳ עז.
- 7ועיין מ״ש בביאור ע״פ שימני כחותם · לקו״ת שה״ש מו, ב.
- 8בחי׳ משל הקדמוני כנ״ל) · ראה בד״ה מצה זו תר״מ פרק כז סיום המשך הפי׳ למה ראו על ככה, ובסופו יש קיצור מהסעי׳: קיצור. במ״ת כפה עליהם הר אתעדל״ע שמעורר אתעדל״ת לכן נק׳ החלו לעשות, נגד בימי אחשורוש שהי׳ קבלה גמורה שהי׳ אתעדל״ת תחלה, וזהו מ״ה ראו על ככה, ועי״ז מה הגיע אליהם שהי׳ גילוי עליון יותר, וע״ד יולדת זכר, חכמה כח מ״ה, וז״ע יר״ע ויר״ת שרשה מיר״ע, ולכן בזאת יבא אהרן אל הקדש, וגם בינה יתירה י״ה דעת״י ע״ד אד׳ מי בינה דעתיק כו׳. עכ״ל.
- 9שו״ה כו׳ — (והענין הוא דהנה כתיב · קטע מכאן מובא באוה״ת ויקרא כרך ב ע׳ תצט.
The joy beyond knowing ¶25–27
25ועפ״ז יובן מארז״ל חייב אינש לבסומי בפוריא עד דלא ידע כו׳. ששמחת פורים עצומה ויתירה מהשמחה שביו״ט.1
According to this, the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, will be understood: “A person is obligated to become intoxicated on Purim until he does not know,” etc.: that the joy of Purim is mightier and greater than the joy of Yom Tov.
Now the opening saying is explained: the joy of Purim is mightier than the joy of Yom Tov, and so one drinks “until he does not know.”
כי הנה על כל יו״ט כתיב רננו צדיקים2 בהוי״ה. וכמבואר בזוהר תרומה (ד׳ קל״ז ע״ב) דלכך אומרים מזמור זה בשבתות וימים טובים.
For concerning every Yom Tov it is written, “Sing joyfully, O righteous ones, in Havayah,” as is explained in the Zohar, Terumah (page 137b), that this is why this psalm is said on Shabbosos and festivals.
Of every festival it is written, “Sing joyfully, O righteous ones, in Havayah”; the Zohar explains that this is why that psalm is said on Shabbos and festivals.
והנה הוי״ה הוא בחי׳ השתלשלות העולמות יו״ד חכמה ה׳ בינה כו׳ ורננו בהוי״ה היינו שממשיכים תוספת אור וגלוי מלמעלה מהשתלשלות בסדר ההשתלשלות.
Now, Havayah is the level of the chain of descent of the worlds (hishtalshelus): yud is Chochmah (wisdom), hei is Binah (understanding), etc. And “sing joyfully in Havayah” means that they draw down an addition of light and revelation from above the chain of descent into the order of the chain of descent.
Havayah, the four-letter Name, maps the chain of descent: its yud is Chochmah, its first hei Binah, and so on. To sing “in Havayah” means to draw an added light from above the chain of descent into its ordered levels.
וכמו שכתבתי במ״א על פסוק שוש אשיש בהוי״ה3 דהפי׳ שכנ״י מפעילים השמחה בשם הוי׳ כו׳.
As I have written elsewhere on the verse “I will greatly rejoice in Havayah”: that the meaning is that the Community of Israel (Knesses Yisrael) brings about the joy in the Name Havayah, etc.
Similarly, “I will greatly rejoice in Havayah” means that the Community of Israel brings about joy within the Name Havayah.
ועד״ז הוא פירוש רננו צדיקים בהוי״ה. וצדיקים היינו צדיק עליון וצדיק תחתון.4 והנה תוספת אור זה הוא ג״כ בשיעור ומדה (ע״פ קו המדה כו׳)
In the same way is the meaning of “Sing joyfully, O righteous ones, in Havayah.” And “righteous ones” means the supernal tzaddik and the lower tzaddik. Now, this additional light, too, is in a measure and dimension (according to the line of measure, etc.),
“The righteous” in the plural refers to two levels, a supernal tzaddik and a lower one; in Kabbalah, “tzaddik” designates the Sefirah of Yesod. This added light, too, comes in a fixed measure, “according to the line of measure.”
מאחר שנמשך בהשתלשלות חו״ב ואינו ערוך למהותו ועצמותו ית׳ הפשוט בתכלי׳ הפשיטו׳ וסדר ההשתלשלו׳ הוא רק כטפה מן הים כו׳
since it is drawn through the chain of descent of Chochmah and Binah, and it bears no comparison to His being and essence, may He be blessed, which is simple in the utmost simplicity; and the order of the chain of descent is only like a drop from the ocean, etc.
Since it is drawn through Chochmah and Binah, it is limited and bears no comparison to G‑d’s essence, which is utterly simple; the whole chain of descent is like a drop from the ocean compared with Him.
ולכן מצות שמחת יו״ט שנאמר ושמחת בחגך5 היא בגבול ומדה בשלמי שמחה אין שמחה אלא בבשר ועכשיו משחרב בהמ״ק אין שמחה
Therefore the mitzvah of the joy of Yom Tov, of which it is said, “And you shall rejoice in your festival,” is within limit and measure: with the peace-offerings of joy, “there is no joy except with meat”; and now that the Holy Temple has been destroyed, “there is no joy
That is why the festival’s mitzvah of joy is measured. In Temple times it was fulfilled with peace-offerings, for “there is no joy except with meat,” and after the Temple’s destruction, with wine.
אלא ביין וברביעית יין6 יוצא ידי חובת שמחת יו״ט שהשמחה היא בגבול ושיעור (וכמו שלמעלה תוספת האור מתלבש בחו״ב כו׳ כך הוא למטה שהשמחה מתלבשת בהדעת כו׳)
except with wine,” and with a revi’is of wine one fulfills the obligation of the joy of Yom Tov, for the joy is within limit and measure (and just as above the additional light is clothed in Chochmah and Binah, etc., so it is below, that the joy is clothed in Daas (knowledge), etc.).
A revi’is, a small measure of wine, fulfills the obligation, for this joy is limited. Just as above the added light is clothed in Chochmah and Binah, so below the joy is clothed in Daas, awareness, and stays within it.
משא״כ שמחת פורים שהשמחה גדולה יותר למעלה מהדעת עד דלא ידע כו׳ והוא מפני ענין המבואר למעלה שע״י המס״נ שהיה בהם אז כל השנה שהוא בחי׳ שלמעלה מהטעם ודעת
Whereas the joy of Purim is a greater joy, above Daas, “until he does not know,” etc. And this is because of the matter explained above: that through the self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh) that was in them then, the whole year, which is a level above reason and Daas,
Purim’s joy is greater, above Daas, “until he does not know.” This is because of the self-sacrifice the Jews showed throughout that year, which is above reason and understanding.
הנה באתעדל״ת ובטול זה הגיעו למעלה מעלה בעצמות א״ס ב״ה שלמעלה מעלה מגדר ההשתלשלות שאינו בגדר סובב וממלא כו׳ שמזה דוקא נמשך בחי׳ המס״נ כנ״ל באריכות.7
through this arousal from below (isarusa dilesata) and self-nullification (bittul) they reached to the very heights, into the Essence of Ein Sof (the Infinite One), blessed be He, which is far above the bounds of the chain of descent, which is not within the category of sovev and memalei, etc.; and it is from this specifically that the level of self-sacrifice derives, as explained above at length.
Through this arousal from below and bittul they reached the very Essence of Ein Sof, far above the chain of descent and beyond sovev and memalei; it is from that Essence, as explained, that self-sacrifice itself derives.
The paragraph answers the first question: festival joy draws a measured light through the chain of descent and so stays within Daas, while the joy of Purim comes from the Essence of Ein Sof, reached through self-sacrifice, and so goes beyond reason.
Kehot notes that the Tur and Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim 529), which bring the ruling that festival joy is now with wine, mention no measure for the wine at all.
Marei mekomos
- 1ששמחת פורים עצומה ויתירה מהשמחה שביו״ט · ראה לקו״ת נצבים מח, א שמציין לכאן.
- 2רננו צדיקים בה׳ · Psalms 33:1
- 3שוש אשיש בהוי״ה · Isaiah 61:10
- 4כי הנה על כל יו״ט . . וצדיקים היינו צדיק עליון וצדיק תחתון · מובא בביאוה״ז להצ״צ כרך ב ע׳ תשכח.
- 5ושמחת בחגך · Deuteronomy 16:14
- 6משחרב בהמ״ק אין שמחה אלא ביין וברביעית יין · Pesachim 109a:5
- 7
Therefore the joy from this revelation is above Daas (knowledge); and this is “until he does not know [the difference] between ‘Cursed is Haman’ and ‘Blessed is Mordechai,’”
So the joy that comes from this revelation is above Daas, and that is “until he does not know the difference between ‘Cursed is Haman’ and ‘Blessed is Mordechai.’”
כי בהגלות נגלות הארת עצמותו ית׳ כולם שוים ממש וכחשכה כאורה כמ״ש גם חשך לא יחשיך.2
for when the radiance of His essence, may He be blessed, is openly revealed, all are truly equal, and “the darkness is as the light,” as it is written, “Even darkness does not darken.”
When the radiance of G‑d’s essence is revealed, all distinctions are truly equal before it, “the darkness is as the light,” as the psalm says, “Even darkness does not darken for You.” The joy that comes from it is therefore beyond the knowing that distinguishes.
The paragraph explains the ruling itself: the joy of Purim comes from G‑d’s essence, before which light and darkness are alike, so it goes beyond the knowledge that tells Haman from Mordechai.
Marei mekomos
- 1עד דלא ידע בין ארור המן לברוך מרדכי · Megillah 7b:7–8
- 2גם חשך לא יחשיך · Psalms 139:12
27וכמ״ש אם צדקת מה תתן לו1 ורבו פשעיך מה תעשה לו.2 אמנם לענין איסור עשיית מלאכה הוא דוקא ביו״ט ולא בפורים וכמארז״ל ולבסוף כתיב לעשות אותם ימי משתה ושמחה3 ואילו יו״ט לא כתיב.45
As it is written, “If you are righteous, what do you give Him?” and “If your transgressions are many, what do you do to Him?” However, as for the prohibition of doing work, it is specifically on Yom Tov and not on Purim, as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “And in the end it is written, ‘to make them days of feasting and joy,’ whereas ‘Yom Tov’ is not written.”
Before the revelation of G‑d’s essence, righteousness and sin make no difference to Him, as Elihu says to Job, “If you are righteous, what do you give Him?” The maamar now turns to the second question, why work is forbidden on Yom Tov but not on Purim, where the Talmud notes that the Megillah’s later verse speaks of “days of feasting and joy” and drops the words “Yom Tov.”
The paragraph closes the explanation of Purim’s joy and opens the second question: why the festivals forbid work while Purim does not.
Marei mekomos
- 1אם צדקת מה תתן לו · Job 35:7
- 2ורבו פשעיך מה תעשה לו · Job 35:6
- 3לעשות אותם ימי משתה ושמחה · Esther 9:22
- 4וכמארז״ל . . ואילו יו״ט לא כתיב · נסמן לעיל צח, א.
- 5ולבסוף כתיב לעשות אותם ימי משתה ושמחה ואילו יו״ט לא כתיב · Megillah 5b:10–11
Why work is permitted on Purim ¶28–36
28והענין כי היא הנותנת כי הנה ענין איסור דעשיית מלאכה שהוא עליות השכל והמדות לשרשן שזהו ענין השביתה והוא ענין עליות העולמות כנודע מענין
The matter is that this itself is the reason. For the matter of the prohibition of doing work, which is the ascent of the intellect and the emotive attributes (middos) to their root, for this is the matter of resting, and it is the matter of the ascent of the worlds, as is known from the matter of
The very point already made is the reason. Refraining from work on Shabbos and festivals represents the ascent of intellect and emotions to their root, and the ascent of the worlds, as in “for on it He rested.”
כי בו שבת1 כו׳ כ״ז אינו שייך אלא בההארה שבסדר ההשתלשלות דשייך שם מעלה ומטה במדרגה.
“for on it He rested,” etc.: all this applies only to the radiance within the order of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), where there is higher and lower in level.
All this applies only to the radiance within the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), where there are higher and lower levels to rise between.
The paragraph explains that rest from work is an ascent from lower to higher, which has meaning only within the ordered levels of the chain of descent.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי בו שבת · Genesis 2:3
29ולכן ששת ימים תעשה מלאכה ואח״כ ביום השביעי שהוא מדרגה יותר נעלית הרבה תשבות להיות עליות העולמות ממדרגה שלמטה למדרגות עליונות יותר
Therefore, “six days you shall do work,” and afterward, “on the seventh day,” which is a much loftier level, “you shall rest,” so that there be the ascent of the worlds from a lower level to higher levels.
Six days of work and a seventh of rest correspond to an ascent of the worlds: on Shabbos, a much higher level, they rise from lower levels to higher ones.
וכן עד״ז בכל היו״ט שנמשך בהם תוספת אור וגלוי ועי״ז שייך איסור מלאכה ושבתון מהמלאכה שהוא בחי׳ עשייה למדרגה העליונה המתגלה אז וכ״ז אינו אלא בסדר השתלשלות דשייך שם מדרגת מעלה ומטה רוחניים.
And so too, in the same way, on all the festivals, in which an addition of light and revelation is drawn down: through this the prohibition of work applies, and rest from work, which is the level of doing, relative to the higher level that is revealed then. And all this is only in the order of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), where there are spiritual levels of higher and lower.
The festivals likewise draw down an added light, so on them too work is forbidden: work is the level of “doing,” which gives way to the higher level then revealed. All this belongs to the chain of descent, where there are spiritual levels of higher and lower.
אבל בעצמותו ומהותו ית׳ שאינו בגדר עלמין כלל אין שייך כלל בחי׳ שביתה שהוא עליות המדרגות
But in His essence and being, may He be blessed, which is not within the category of worlds at all, the level of resting, which is the ascent of the levels, does not apply at all.
In G‑d’s essence, which is beyond the category of worlds, rest, the ascent from level to level, has no meaning at all.
שהרי מעלה ומטה שוין אצלו לגמרי שהעשייה גשמיות עם ח״ע שניהן שוין ממש כלא חשיבי
For higher and lower are entirely equal before Him: the physical [World of] Asiyah (Action) and the higher Chochmah (Chochmah Ila’ah) are both truly equal, considered as nothing.
Before Him higher and lower are entirely equal: the physical World of Asiyah and the higher Chochmah are alike as nothing.
ולכן גבי שבת נא׳ שבת להוי״ה. וכנ״ל בענין רננו צדיקים בהוי״ה. ולכן בפורים מותר בעשיית מלאכ׳ כו׳.
Therefore regarding Shabbos it is said, “a Shabbos to Havayah,” as mentioned above concerning “Sing joyfully, O righteous ones, in Havayah.” And therefore on Purim the doing of work is permitted, etc.
That is why Shabbos is called “a Shabbos to Havayah”: it belongs to the Name Havayah, the chain of descent, just as the festival joy is “in Havayah.” And that is why work is permitted on Purim, whose light comes from beyond that level.
(ועמ״ש בד״ה למנצח על השמינית1 בענין ששאל מין2 א׳ לר׳ יהושע3 כתיב כי בו שבת4 כו׳. והלא הקב״ה מוריד גשמים ומצמיח דשאים כו׳ והשיב לו משל מעירוב והוצאה שברשות א׳ א״צ עירוב והוצאה כך כל העולם שלו הוא.
(And see what is written in the discourse beginning “Lamenatze’ach al hasheminis,” on the matter that a certain heretic asked Rabbi Yehoshua: “It is written, ‘for on it He rested,’ etc.; but surely the Holy One, blessed be He, makes the rain fall and the grasses grow,” etc. And he answered him with a parable from eruv and carrying: that within a single domain there is no need for an eruv, nor [any question of] carrying; so too, the whole world is His.
From here on, according to the Kehot note, the text is apparently a gloss of the Tzemach Tzedek. It cites the midrash in which a heretic asked how G‑d can be said to rest on Shabbos when He makes rain fall and grass grow, and the answer by a parable from eruv: one who lives alone in a courtyard may carry throughout it, and the whole world is His.
ולכאורה אינו מובן התירוץ שהרי שאר כל ל״ח אבות מלאכות זולת מלאכת ההוצאה אינן תלויות בחילוק רשויות כלל שאסור לחרוש ולזרוע ברה״י כמו ברה״ר.
At first glance the answer is not understood, for all the other thirty-eight primary categories of work, besides the work of carrying, do not depend on the distinction of domains at all, for it is forbidden to plow and to sow in the private domain just as in the public domain.
The answer seems puzzling: of the thirty-nine categories of labor only carrying depends on domains, while plowing and sowing are forbidden even in a private domain.
אלא שהתירוץ הוא כי ענין השביתה לא שייך רק בסדר ההשתלשלות שיש שם מדרגות רבות כמו חילוק רשויות
Rather, the answer is that the matter of resting applies only in the order of the chain of descent, where there are many levels, like the distinction of domains;
The real point of the answer is that rest applies only within the chain of descent, where there are many levels, like separate domains.
אבל בבחי׳ המקיף את כל העולמות בשוה הרי כל העולם כולו שלו הוא והכל בבחי׳ השוואה אחת לפניו כחשכה כאורה5 הרי בבחי׳ זו לא שייך ענין שביתה כו׳ וע״ש. ומזה יובן יותר למ״ש לענין הא דפורים מותר בעשיית מלאכה.
but at the level that encompasses all the worlds equally, the whole world is entirely His, and everything is in one state of equality before Him, “the darkness is as the light”; at this level the matter of resting does not apply, etc.; and see there. And from this, what was written about Purim’s permitting the doing of work will be understood better.
At the level that surrounds all worlds equally, the whole world is one domain and everything is equal before Him, “the darkness is as the light”; there rest has no meaning. This sheds further light on why work is permitted on Purim.
אך עדיין צריך למודעי דא״כ דהא דפורים מותר בעשיית מלאכה הוא מפני שכשהגילוי הוא מבחי׳ עליונה יותר אין שייך איסור מלאכה א״כ איך מרדכי גזר בעשיית מלאכה ורצה שיהיה פורים יו״ט לאסור במלאכה.
But this still needs clarification: if so, that Purim’s permitting the doing of work is because when the revelation is from a higher level the prohibition of work does not apply, then how did Mordechai decree regarding the doing of work, and wish that Purim be a Yom Tov, forbidden in work?
A difficulty remains: if work is permitted on Purim because its revelation is from a higher level, why did Mordechai decree a ban on work and wish to make Purim a Yom Tov?
ובודאי לא עלה על דעתו למעט במדרגת הגלוי שלא יהיה מבחי׳ עליונה כ״כ. ועוד דבכמה דרושים דלעיל מבואר דפורים ויוה״כ בחד דרגא אינון דכמו שבמקדש ביוה״כ היה גורלות גורל6 א׳ להוי״ה כו׳
And certainly it did not enter his mind to diminish the level of the revelation, so that it should not be from so high a level. Furthermore, in several discourses above it is explained that Purim and Yom Kippur are on one level: for just as in the Temple on Yom Kippur there were lots, “one lot for G‑d,” etc.,
Surely he did not mean to lower its revelation. Moreover, earlier discourses teach that Purim and Yom Kippur are on one level: on Yom Kippur in the Temple lots were cast, “one lot for G‑d.”
כן נק׳ פורים ע״ש הפור הוא הגורל כו׳ עמש״ל בד״ה כי אברהם לא ידענו.7 וגם מהא דאיתא דכל המועדים בטלים לע״ל חוץ מימי הפורים ויוה״כ משמע כן.
so Purim is named for the pur, “that is, the lot,” etc.; see what is written above in the discourse beginning “Ki Avraham lo yeda’anu.” And this is also implied by what is stated, that all the festivals will be nullified in the Time to Come except for the days of Purim and Yom Kippur.
Purim is named for the pur, “that is, the lot”; and the Sages’ teaching that all the festivals will be nullified in the Time to Come except Purim and Yom Kippur also shows that they are alike.
והרי יוה״כ אסור בעשיית מלאכה יותר משאר היו״ט. והענין הוא דעם היות כי אמת נכון הדבר דהא דפורים אין בו איסור בעשיית מלאכה כביו״ט הוא מפני שהאור מבחי׳ עליונה הרבה יותר מביו״ט.
And surely Yom Kippur is forbidden in the doing of work more than the other festivals. The matter is this: although “the thing is true and certain” that Purim’s having no prohibition of doing work, as on Yom Tov, is because the light is from a level much higher than on Yom Tov,
Yet Yom Kippur forbids work more than the other festivals. The answer begins: it is indeed true that Purim permits work because its light is far higher than that of Yom Tov.
מ״מ מצד א׳ יש בקדושת יו״ט מעלה יתירה משא״כ בפורים. והוא בהקדים מש״ל )(בד״ה כי אברהם לא ידענו)
nevertheless, in one respect there is an added superiority in the holiness of Yom Tov, which is not so on Purim. This [will be understood] by first introducing what was written above (in the discourse beginning “Ki Avraham lo yeda’anu”)
Nevertheless, in one respect the holiness of Yom Tov has an advantage over Purim. To explain it, the maamar recalls the earlier discourse “Ki Avraham lo yeda’anu.”
בענין הטעם שבזמן הגלות על הרוב כל הניסים והנפלאות נעשים דרך הטבע וכמו נס דפורים שלא היה דבר נראה לעין שהוא למעלה מהטבע
on the reason why in the time of exile, for the most part, all the miracles and wonders are done by way of nature, like the miracle of Purim, in which there was nothing visible to the eye that was above nature,
That discourse asks why in exile most miracles happen through nature, like the Purim miracle, in which nothing visibly supernatural occurred.
משא״כ בזמן הבית שהיו ניסים יוצאים מהטבע שהוא מפני שנסתלקו המדות דאצי׳ שהיו מאירים פב״פ בזמן הבית ונשארה ההארה ממקום עליון יותר שלמעלה מהמדות ע״כ צריך להתלבש בדברים תחתונים
whereas in the time of the Temple there were miracles that departed from nature. This is because the emotive attributes (middos) of Atzilus, which shone face to face in the time of the Temple, withdrew, and there remained the radiance from a higher place, above the middos; therefore it must be clothed in lower things,
In Temple times miracles broke nature openly. In exile the middos, the emotive attributes of Atzilus that shone “face to face” in Temple times, withdrew, and only a radiance from a higher place remained, which must clothe itself in lower things.
שהוא ע״פ הטבע מפני שמרוב מדרגתו הגבוה אין לו כלום במה להתלבש אלא במקום היותר נמוך.
which is according to nature: because, on account of the greatness of its high level, it has nothing at all in which to be clothed except in the lowest place.
That higher radiance clothes itself in nature precisely because it is so high: it has nothing in which to rest except the lowest place.
The paragraph explains why rest from work belongs to the festivals and not to Purim, whose light transcends the levels of the chain of descent; it then raises the difficulty of Mordechai’s decree and of Yom Kippur, and begins its answer from the principle that in exile the highest light is clothed in nature.
Kehot notes that the Tzemach Tzedek’s transcript ends at the reference to “Lamenatze’ach al hasheminis” and that what follows is apparently his own gloss. It also notes that Likkutei Torah, the Siddur and Bereishis Rabbah name Rabbi Akiva as the one who was asked, and records the Rebbe’s remark that among the Tannaim it was Rabbi Yehoshua (ben Chananiah) who regularly answered heretics (see Chagigah 5b).
Marei mekomos
- 1בד״ה למנצח על השמינית · לקו״ת תזריע כא, ג. וראה גם לקו״ת שה״ש כג, ד. וראה בסידור שער המילה. עד כאן נמצא בהנחת הצ״צ, וכנראה שמכאן ואילך הוא הגה״ה מהצ״צ.
- 2ששאל מין אחד · Bereshit Rabbah 11:6
- 3לר׳ יהושע · Chagigah 5b
- 4כי בו שבת · Genesis 2:3
- 5כחשכה כאורה · Psalms 139:12
- 6גורלות גורל א׳ להוי״ה · Leviticus 16:8
- 7בד״ה כי אברהם לא ידענו · לעיל צג, ג.
30וכנזכר המשל שם מענין פני אריה כו׳ ע״ש ונמצא עם היות דניסים אלו שבהתלבשות הם ממקום עליון יותר.
As in the parable mentioned there, from the matter of “the face of a lion,” etc.; see there. It follows that although these miracles that are clothed [in nature] are from a higher place,
The earlier discourse illustrates this with a parable drawn from “the face of a lion.” It follows that miracles clothed in nature come from a higher place.
אעפ״כ ודאי יש ג״כ מעלה יתירה כשהניסים הם בהתגלות שלא ע״י לבוש הטבע כלל שהרי זהו התגלות אלקות נראה לעין ולכן קובל הנביא אותותינו לא ראינו1 כו׳.
nevertheless there is certainly also an added superiority when the miracles are revealed, not through the garment of nature at all, for this is a revelation of G‑dliness visible to the eye. And therefore the prophet laments, “Our signs we have not seen,” etc.
Still, open miracles, not clothed in nature at all, have an advantage of their own: they are a revelation of G‑dliness that the eye can see. That is why the psalm laments in exile, “Our signs we have not seen.”
The paragraph weighs the two kinds of miracle: those clothed in nature come from a higher place, but open miracles have the advantage of being seen.
Marei mekomos
- 1אותותינו לא ראינו · Psalms 74:9
31וע׳ בזהר ר״פ ויקרא1 ע״פ שאל לך אות23 כו׳ שכוונתו שהניסים שבהתלבשות הם ע״י אות4 ה׳ אחרונה דשם הוי״ה ונק׳ העמק שאלה שמתלבשת בלבושים המסתירים.
And see in the Zohar at the beginning of Parshas Vayikra, on the verse “Ask for yourself a sign,” etc.: its intent is that the miracles that are clothed [in nature] come through the final letter hei of the Name Havayah, which is called “ask it deep,” for it is clothed in concealing garments.
The Zohar at the beginning of Vayikra, on Isaiah’s words to Achaz, “Ask for yourself a sign … ask it deep, or high above,” teaches that miracles clothed in nature come through the final hei of the Name Havayah (Malchus), called “ask it deep,” because it is clothed in concealing garments.
והניסים נגלים הם ע״י אות י׳ דשם הוי״ה ונק׳ הגבה למעלה א״כ הרי הניסים שבהתגלות הן בחי׳ הגבה למעלה
And the revealed miracles come through the letter yud of the Name Havayah, which is called “high above.” If so, the miracles that are revealed are the level of “high above,”
Revealed miracles come through the yud of the Name, Chochmah, which is called “high above”; so open miracles belong to the level of “high above.”
וכמ״ש ג״כ לקמן בס״ד גבי פסח (בד״ה להבין מפני מה)5 אלא שמעלה יתירה זו הוא רק ענין ההתגלות בלי לבוש
as is also written below, with the help of Heaven, concerning Pesach (in the discourse beginning “Lehavin mipnei mah”). But this added superiority is only a matter of the revelation without a garment;
This is also explained later, regarding Pesach, in the discourse “Lehavin mipnei mah.” But the advantage of open miracles is only in being revealed without a garment.
אבל בעצם האור הרי מבואר דבניסים שבהתלבשות הוא ממקום עליון יותר הרבה שזהו פי׳ כי אתה אבינו כי אברהם6 שהוא בחי׳ המדות עליונות לא ידענו כו׳ ע״ש.
but as for the light itself, it is explained that in the miracles that are clothed [in nature] it is from a much higher place. And this is the meaning of “For You are our Father, for Avraham,” who is the level of the supernal attributes, “does not know us,” etc.; see there.
As for the light itself, the miracles clothed in nature come from a much higher place. That is the meaning of “For You are our Father, for Avraham does not know us”: Avraham stands for the supernal attributes, and in exile the light comes from beyond them, from “our Father.”
The paragraph distinguishes two kinds of advantage: open miracles excel in visibility, as the “high above” of the yud, while miracles clothed in nature come from a higher light, beyond the attributes represented by Avraham.
Marei mekomos
- 1בזהר ר״פ ויקרא · ב, א. וראה ביאוה״ז להצ״צ כרך ב ע׳ שטז.
- 2שאל לך אות · Isaiah 7:11
- 3שאל לך אות · Zohar, Vayikra 1:1–7
- 4שבהתלבשות הם ע״י אות ה׳ אחרונה דשם הוי״ה · בלקו״ש חט״ז ע׳ 358 הערה 54 מציין: ”ובאוה״ת אחרי (ס״ע תקסד) בשם הרמב״ן (לך יז, א. וארא ו, ב) דנסים המלובשים בטבע הם משם שד״י. וראה פיה״מ מהדו״ב פקל״ט (צב, ריש ע״ב)”.
- 5בד״ה להבין מפני מה · לקו״ת צו טז, א.
- 6כי אתה אבינו כי אברהם · Isaiah 63:16
32וכעין זה הוא ג״כ ענין הפרש שבין קדושת יו״ט לפורים כי הנה מה שיו״ט אסור במלאכה היינו מפני השראת קדושה עליונה למטה שבששת ימי המעשה נמשך האור והחיות ע״י ההתלבשות בעשייה
Similar to this is also the matter of the difference between the holiness of Yom Tov and Purim. For the fact that Yom Tov is forbidden in work is because of the resting of a supernal holiness below: for on the six weekdays the light and the life-force (chayus) are drawn down through being clothed in [the World of] Asiyah (Action),
A similar distinction applies to the holiness of Yom Tov compared with Purim. Work is forbidden on Yom Tov because a higher holiness rests below: on weekdays the light and life-force come clothed in Asiyah, the World of Action.
משא״כ ביו״ט נמשך מעולם הבריאה כו׳. וכמ״ש בפע״ח שער מקראי קדש פ״ג וזהו בחי׳ השבתון מהמלאכה והעשייה.
whereas on Yom Tov it is drawn from the World of Beriah (Creation), etc., as is written in Pri Etz Chaim, Shaar Mikra’ei Kodesh, chapter 3. And this is the level of resting from work and from doing.
On Yom Tov the light is drawn from the higher World of Beriah, as the Arizal’s Pri Etz Chaim explains, and that is the meaning of resting from work and from “doing.”
וא״כ בפורים שלא נאסר בעשיית מלאכה היינו מפני שאין למטה הגילוי מעולם הבריאה כמו ביו״ט
If so, that on Purim the doing of work was not forbidden is because below there is not the revelation from the World of Beriah, as on Yom Tov,
Work is not forbidden on Purim because its light is not revealed below from the World of Beriah, as on Yom Tov.
אלא ע״י התלבשות ומ״ש גם כן גבי ר״ח דמותר בעשיית מלאכה (ע׳ בד״ה והיה מדי חדש בחדשו1 כו׳).
but only through being clothed; and also what is written concerning Rosh Chodesh, that the doing of work is permitted (see the discourse beginning “Vehayah midei chodesh bechodsho,” etc.).
On Purim the light comes only clothed, as on Rosh Chodesh, when work is also permitted; the discourse “Vehayah midei chodesh bechodsho” explains this.
וא״כ מצד זה יש מעלה יתירה ביום טוב שבא האור בהתגלות משא״כ בפורים הוא בהתלבשות והוא דוגמת מעלת הנס שבהתגלו׳ על הניסים שבהתלבשות.
If so, in this respect there is an added superiority to Yom Tov, in that the light comes in revelation, whereas on Purim it is in a clothed form; and this is like the superiority of the revealed miracle over the miracles that are clothed [in nature].
In this respect Yom Tov has an advantage: its light comes openly, while Purim’s comes clothed, just as an open miracle has an advantage over one clothed in nature.
ולכן נק׳ יו״ט מקרא קדש משא״כ פורים. אמנם מצד עצם האור שבהלבוש הרי מבואר שבפורים הוא המשכת אוא״ס ב״ה ממש ע״י המס״נ העצום שלמעל׳ מעלה מהאור שביו״ט.
Therefore Yom Tov is called “a holy convocation” (mikra kodesh), which is not so of Purim. However, as for the light itself within the garment, it has been explained that on Purim it is the drawing down of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, itself, through the mighty self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh), far higher than the light of Yom Tov.
That is why Yom Tov is called mikra kodesh, “a holy convocation,” and Purim is not. Yet the light within Purim’s garment is the Infinite Light itself, drawn down by the mighty self-sacrifice of that time and far above the light of Yom Tov.
The paragraph resolves the paradox: Yom Tov excels in that its light is revealed openly from Beriah, which is why work is forbidden, while Purim’s far greater light comes clothed, like a miracle hidden in nature.
Marei mekomos
- 1בד״ה והיה מדי חדש בחדשו · לקו׳ת ברכה צז, ב ואילך.
33וגם זה ההתלבשות אינו העלם גמור רק כמו דוגמת הנס דפורים שאע״פ שלא היה דבר נראה לעין
And this clothing, too, is not a complete concealment, but like the example of the miracle of Purim: although there was nothing visible to the eye
This clothing is not a total concealment, as the Purim miracle shows: outwardly nothing supernatural was seen.
שהוא למעלה מהטבע רק ע״י אהבת אסתר מ״מ נראה בחוש שכל הסיבות היו רק למעלה מהטבע רק שנשתלשל ובא להתלבש בדרך הטבע.
that was above nature, only through the love for Esther, nevertheless it is plainly seen that all the causes were entirely above nature, except that it descended in a chain and came to be clothed in the way of nature.
Everything seemed to happen through the king’s love for Esther, yet one can plainly see that all the causes were above nature; they only came down and were clothed in natural events.
וא״כ אין זה העלם גמור וכך ע״ד זה גם גלוי אוא״ס ב״ה בפורים מאיר על כל א׳ מישראל בחי׳ כי אתה אבינו כו׳.
If so, this is not a complete concealment. And so, in the same way, the revelation of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, on Purim also shines upon every one of Israel: the level of “For You are our Father,” etc.
So the concealment is not complete. In the same way the revelation of the Infinite Light on Purim shines upon every Jew, the level of “For You are our Father.”
עוד יובן דוגמא לכ״ז ממ״ש בפ׳ שלח (סד״ה והיה לכם לציצית)1 דכ׳ האריז״ל2 שקדושת הטלית גדלה מעלתה במאד מאד על קדושת הציצית שהן
An example of all this will be further understood from what is written in Parshas Shelach (at the end of the discourse beginning “Vehayah lachem letzitzis”): that the Arizal, of blessed memory, wrote that the holiness of the tallis is very, very much greater in stature than the holiness of the tzitzis, which are
An example comes from a discourse in Parshas Shelach on tzitzis: the Arizal writes that the holiness of the tallis is far greater than that of the tzitzis, which are merely threads extending from it.
רק נימין נמשכים מהטלית רק שמפני גודל מעלת קדושתה אינה יכולה להתלבש בטלית הגשמי׳ ממש
only threads extending from the tallis; except that, because of the greatness of the stature of its holiness, it cannot be clothed in the actual physical tallis
Because the holiness of the tallis is so great, it cannot be clothed in the physical garment itself, the way the holiness of the tzitzis is clothed in the threads.
כמו בציצית ולכן אין בטלית הגשמית שום קדושה כלל ומותר להשתמש בה דברי חול3 משא״כ בציצית.
as in the tzitzis; and therefore the physical tallis has no holiness at all, and it is permitted to use it for mundane things, which is not so with the tzitzis.
Therefore the physical tallis has no holiness and may be used for mundane purposes, while the tzitzis may not.
The paragraph shows that the clothing of Purim’s light is not a total concealment, and illustrates with the tallis and its tzitzis how a greater holiness can be less visible than a lesser one.
Kehot points to the Arizal’s Shaar HaKavanos (on tzitzis, Derush 2) and Pri Etz Chaim (Shaar HaTzitzis, ch. 3) for the teaching about the tallis and the tzitzis.
Marei mekomos
- 1סד״ה והי׳ לכם לציצית · לקו״ת שלח מד, ב.
- 2דכ׳ האריז״ל · ראה שער הכוונות ענין הציצית דרוש ב׳ בתחלתו. פע״ח שער הציצית פ״ג.
- 3ומותר להשתמש בה דברי חול · ראה שו״ע אדה״ז סי׳ כא. ובלקו״ש חי״ט ע׳ 421. חל״ו ע׳ 158.
34וכך עד״ז האור הנמשך בפורים גדלה מעלתו במאוד מאד על האור שמאיר ביו״ט ולכן שמחת פורי׳ גדלה במאד משמחת יו״ט כנ״ל
And so, in the same way, the light that is drawn down on Purim is very, very much greater in stature than the light that shines on Yom Tov, and therefore the joy of Purim is very much greater than the joy of Yom Tov, as mentioned above;
So too the light drawn down on Purim is far greater than the light of Yom Tov, and therefore the joy of Purim is far greater.
רק שמפני גודל האור בבחי׳ א״ס ממש אינו יכול להאיר בגלוי כמו האור המאיר ביו״ט ולפיכך אין איסור בעשיית מלאכה בפורים משא״כ ביו״ט.
only that, because of the greatness of the light, at the level of Ein Sof (the Infinite One) itself, it cannot shine openly like the light that shines on Yom Tov; and therefore there is no prohibition of doing work on Purim, which is not so on Yom Tov.
But because it is the light of Ein Sof itself, it cannot shine openly as the light of Yom Tov does; so Purim has no prohibition of work, while Yom Tov does.
The paragraph applies the analogy of the tallis: Purim’s light is greater but cannot be openly revealed, so it brings greater joy but no prohibition of work.
35ומרדכי דגזר בעשי׳ מלאכה בפורים רצה שיהי׳ ב׳ המעלות בפורים שהאור הגדול הזה יאיר ג״כ בגילוי
And Mordechai, who decreed regarding the doing of work on Purim, wanted both superiorities to be on Purim: that this great light should also shine in revelation,
In decreeing a ban on work on Purim, Mordechai wanted Purim to have both advantages: its great light, and its open revelation as well.
ע״ד שהאור שביו״ט מאיר בגלוי וכמו בחי׳ יוה״כ שהוא בחד דרגא עם פורים שמאיר בו ג״כ בבחי׳ האור הגדול הזה
in the way that the light of Yom Tov shines in revelation; and like the level of Yom Kippur, which is on one level with Purim, in which there also shines the level of this great light.
He wanted Purim’s light to shine openly as the light of Yom Tov does, like Yom Kippur, which is on one level with Purim and in which this great light also shines.
וזהו ענין הגורל במקדש כו׳ ששם אין עונות מבדילין וזדונות נעשו כזכיות1 ונק׳ שבת שבתון שהוא למעלה מבחי׳ שבת
And this is the matter of the lot in the Temple, etc., for there sins do not separate, and deliberate sins become like merits; and it is called “a Shabbos of Shabbosos” (Shabbos Shabboson), which is above the level of Shabbos,
That is the meaning of the lots cast in the Temple on Yom Kippur: on it sins do not separate from G‑d, deliberate sins become like merits, and it is called “a Shabbos of Shabbosos,” above even Shabbos.
כמ״ש במ״א (בד״ה האזינו השמים) והרי האור מאיר בגלוי שלכן יוהכ״פ אסור בעשיי׳ מלאכה יותר מיו״ט
as is written elsewhere (in the discourse beginning “Ha’azinu hashamayim”). And the light shines in revelation, which is why Yom Kippur is forbidden in the doing of work more than Yom Tov.
On Yom Kippur that light shines openly, which is why work is forbidden on it more strictly than on Yom Tov; the discourse “Ha’azinu hashamayim” explains this.
לכן עד״ז רצה מרדכי שיהיה בפורים ג״כ מאיר בחי׳ זו בגלוי. ולכן רצה לגזור בעשיית מלאכה.
Therefore, in the same way, Mordechai wanted this level to shine in revelation on Purim too. And therefore he wanted to make a decree regarding the doing of work.
Mordechai therefore wanted Purim, too, to reveal this level openly, and so he sought to forbid work.
ולא קבלו עלייהו כי ביוה״כ שהוא דאורייתא מי מונע ומי מעכב וג״ז הוא ע״י קדימת עשי״ת וממעמקים קראתיך2 כו׳
But they did not accept it upon themselves. For on Yom Kippur, which is from the Torah, who can prevent and who can hold back? And this too is through the Ten Days of Teshuvah that come before it, and “From the depths I have called You,” etc.,
But the people did not accept it. Yom Kippur is commanded by the Torah, so nothing can hinder its revelation, and it is prepared for by the Ten Days of Teshuvah and by crying to G‑d “from the depths.”
ויום אסו׳ באכילה ושתיה כו׳ אבל בפורי׳ אין לנו כח להמשיך בחי׳ זו בגלוי ממש.
and a day forbidden in eating and drinking, etc. But on Purim we do not have the power to draw down this level in actual revelation.
It is also a day without eating and drinking. On Purim, however, we lack the power to draw this level down into actual open revelation.
The paragraph explains Mordechai’s decree: he wanted Purim’s great light to be revealed openly like that of Yom Kippur, but the people could not accept it, since Purim lacks the Torah’s command, the Ten Days of Teshuvah and the fast that make Yom Kippur’s revelation possible.
Marei mekomos
- 1וזדונות נעשו כזכיות · Yoma 86b:3
- 2ממעמקים קראתיך · Psalms 130:1
36ועוד מפני שהענין היה בימי הגלות שזה גורם בחי׳ ההתלבשות כו׳ שאותותינו לא ראינו1 וכמו שגם הנס נתלבש כו׳ כנ״ל.
And further, because the event was in the days of exile, which causes the level of being clothed, etc., for “our signs we have not seen,” just as the miracle, too, was clothed, etc., as mentioned above.
A further reason: the miracle happened in exile, which itself causes the light to be clothed, “our signs we have not seen,” just as the Purim miracle itself was clothed in nature.
והגם דלעיל נת׳ דמצד עצם האור שבפורים אין שייך איסו׳ עשיית מלאכה משום שהוא מבחי׳ שלמעלה מגדר התחלקות מדרגות מעלה ומטה את״ל דפורים ויוה״כ חד דרגא אינון ויוה״כ אסור במלאכה עכצ״ל דמצד האור
And although it was explained above that, as regards the light of Purim itself, the prohibition of doing work does not apply, because it is from a level above the bounds of division into levels of higher and lower: if you say that Purim and Yom Kippur are on one level, and Yom Kippur is forbidden in work, you are compelled to say that as regards the light
It was said above that Purim’s light itself is beyond the distinction of higher and lower, so no prohibition of work applies to it. But if Purim and Yom Kippur are on one level and Yom Kippur forbids work, one must say that this holds only for the light as it is above.
כמו שהוא למעלה הוא כך אבל כשנמשך להאיר בגלוי באבי״ע ודאי לא כמו שמאיר באצי׳ כך מאיר בבריאה כו׳
as it is above, it is so; but when it is drawn down to shine in revelation in Atzilus, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, certainly the way it shines in Atzilus is not the way it shines in Beriah, etc.
When that light is drawn down to shine openly in the four worlds, it certainly does not shine in Beriah as it shines in Atzilus.
וא״כ מצד התגלותו בעולמות שייך ענין שבתון שהיא עליית המדרגות כו׳. וזהו איסור המלאכה ביוה״כ.
If so, with respect to its revelation in the worlds, the matter of resting applies, which is the ascent of the levels, etc. And this is the prohibition of work on Yom Kippur.
So in its revelation within the worlds, rest, the ascent from level to level, does apply, and this is the prohibition of work on Yom Kippur.
ומרדכי גזר גם בפורים ולא קבלו עלייהו משום שבפורים אין מאיר למטה בהתגלות מעולם הבריאה כמו ביו״ט כ״א ע״י התלבשות כו׳ כנ״ל.
And Mordechai decreed on Purim too, but they did not accept it upon themselves, because on Purim [the light] does not shine below in revelation from the World of Beriah, as on Yom Tov, but only through being clothed, etc., as mentioned above.
Mordechai decreed the same for Purim, but the people did not accept it, because on Purim the light does not shine openly below from the World of Beriah, as on Yom Tov, but only clothed.
The paragraph reconciles the two claims: the light of Purim and of Yom Kippur is in itself beyond the levels, but once revealed in the worlds it brings the ascent that forbids work; on Purim the light stays clothed, and so the prohibition was not accepted.
Marei mekomos
- 1אותותינו לא ראינו · Psalms 74:9
No Name in the Megillah ¶37–39
Now, with all this the reason will be understood why the Name Havayah is not mentioned in the Megillah, nor the other names of the Holy One, blessed be He. The matter is
All this explains why the Megillah never mentions the Name Havayah, nor any other Name of G‑d. The explanation follows a parable in the Zohar.
along the lines of the parable explained in the Zohar at the end of Parshas Bechukosai, concerning “lechalosam” (“to destroy them”) as it is spelled: like the parable of the bridegroom who goes to lodge in a tannery for the sake of the bride, etc.;
The Zohar on the verse “I will not … destroy them (lechalosam)” reads the word, by its spelling, as kallasam, “their bride.” It compares G‑d to a bridegroom who goes to lodge in a tannery, a foul-smelling place, for the sake of his bride who is there.
ע״ש כן מל׳ דאצי׳ נשפלת למטה מאד בעולמות תחתוני׳ ומתלבשת בק״נ ולמטה יותר וכמארז״ל גלו לבבל שכינה עמהם.5
see there. So Malchus (sovereignty) of Atzilus is lowered very far down in the lower worlds and is clothed in kelipas nogah, and lower still, as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “They were exiled to Babylon; the Shechinah (Divine Presence) was with them.”
So Malchus of Atzilus, the Shechinah, descends very low into the lower worlds and is clothed in kelipas nogah, the husk in which good and evil are mixed, and even lower; as the Sages say, “They were exiled to Babylon; the Shechinah was with them.”
The paragraph begins to explain why no Name of G‑d appears in the Megillah, through the Zohar’s parable of the bridegroom who lodges in a tannery for his bride’s sake.
Kehot notes that the Ibn Ezra, Tosafos and the Shulchan Aruch remark that the Megillah has no mention of the Name, and that the Arizal’s Pri Etz Chaim (Shaar HaPurim, ch. 6) speaks of the Name Havayah in particular; the words “nor the other Names” are this maamar’s addition. It also points to Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, ch. 25, alongside the Zohar’s parable.
Marei mekomos
- 1שם הוי׳ · כ״ה בפע״ח (שער הפורים פ״ו). וראה גם משנת חסידים מס׳ אדר פ״ו מ״ג. תו״א ק, ב (ושם [דהיינו כאן] מוסיף: ולא משאר שמות של הקב״ה). קכא, ב. בסה״מ תקס״ה (כרך א ע׳ שצז) ואוה״ת אסתר (ע׳ דש) מוסיף: וגם לא שם אלקים ואד׳. — לקו״ש חכ״א ע׳ 201.
- 2בזהר ס״פ בחקתי · קטו, ב. ולהעיר מפדר״א פכ״ה. וראה בלקו״ש ח״ז ע׳ 40.
- 3לכלתם · Leviticus 26:44
- 4לכלתם · Zohar, Bechukotai 14:53–16:61
- 5גלו לבבל שכינה עמהם · Megillah 29a:4
- 6שלא נזכר שם הוי׳ במגילה · Shabbat 115b:3–4
38ועכ״ז החתן העליון בחי׳ חסד שלמעלה נמשך ויורד לשם וא״כ אדרבה אז נראה ונפלאה האהבה יותר ועד״ז הוא ג״כ התלבשות הנס בלבוש הטבע כו׳
And nevertheless the supernal Bridegroom, the level of the Chesed (kindness) above, is drawn and descends there. If so, on the contrary: then the love is seen and is more wondrous. And in the same way is also the clothing of the miracle in the garment of nature, etc.,
Even so, the supernal Bridegroom, the Chesed above, comes down to that lowly place, and so His love is seen all the more. The clothing of the Purim miracle in nature is the same: it is a sign of great love.
שהוא מעוצם האהבה הולך ג״כ להתלבש בבית הבורסקי שהוא לבוש הטבע כו׳ וע״כ לא נזכר שם הוי״ה במגלה מפני שאז הי׳ הכלה הכלולה בתכלית השפלות שמסתתרת כו׳.
for out of the intensity of the love He also goes to be clothed in the tannery, which is the garment of nature, etc. And therefore the Name Havayah is not mentioned in the Megillah, because then the bride, the perfected one (kelulah), was in the utmost lowliness, hiding, etc.
Out of the intensity of His love He “lodges in the tannery,” the garment of nature. The Name Havayah is not mentioned in the Megillah because the bride, Malchus, was then in the utmost lowliness and hidden.
ע״כ מוכרח להיות גלוי החסד שלמעלה ג״כ בבחינת התלבשות לירד לשם אל המקום אשר הם ולכן לא נז׳ השמות שהוא בחי׳ הגלוי שבלי לבוש כו׳.
Therefore the revelation of the Chesed above must also be in a state of being clothed, to descend there, to the place where they are; and therefore the Names are not mentioned, for they are the level of the revelation that is without a garment, etc.
So the revelation of the Chesed above must also come clothed, descending to where they are. Therefore the Names, which are revelation without a garment, are not mentioned.
אך כמו שבהמשל הנה ירידה זו הוא מורה על עוצם האהבה כמ״ש בזהר שם. כמו״כ האור המלובש במגלה זו הוא למעלה מבחי׳ שמות.
But just as in the parable this descent indicates the intensity of the love, as is written in the Zohar there, so too the light that is clothed in this Megillah is above the level of Names.
But just as in the parable the descent shows the depth of the love, so the light clothed in the Megillah is higher than the level of the Names.
The paragraph explains the absence of G‑d’s Names as love’s descent into concealment: the light clothed in the Megillah is in fact above the level of the Names.
39ותדע שהרי ארז״ל שהנביאים עתידים להבטל לע״ל1 ומגלת אסתר לא תבטל2 אע״פ שאין בה שם ובנביאים יש שמות הרבה3 אלא הענין
And know [that this is so]: for our Sages, of blessed memory, said that the Prophets will be nullified in the Time to Come, but the Scroll of Esther will not be nullified, even though there is no Name in it, while in the Prophets there are many Names. But the matter is
A proof that the Megillah’s light is above the Names: the Sages say that the books of the Prophets will be nullified in the Time to Come but the Scroll of Esther will not, although the Prophets are full of G‑d’s Names and the Megillah has none.
כי השם שהוא גלוי הארה שבסדר ההשתלשלות יו״ד חכ׳ ה׳ בינה כו׳ הוא רק כטפה מהים לגבי עצמיות אוא״ס ב״ה וכמו שם האדם שאין זה עצמיותו.
that the Name, which is the revelation of the radiance within the order of the chain of descent (hishtalshelus), yud Chochmah (wisdom), hei Binah (understanding), etc., is only like a drop from the ocean relative to the very essence of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He; just like a person’s name, which is not his essence.
A Name of G‑d, such as Havayah, whose letters stand for Chochmah, Binah and the rest, is the revelation of a radiance within the chain of descent. Compared with the essence of the Infinite Light it is like a drop from the ocean, just as a person’s name is not his essence.
אבל בפורים ע״י המס״נ הגיעו לעצמות א״ס ב״ה שלמעלה מבחי׳ שם הוי״ה ועמש״ל בד״ה ובבואה לפני המלך4 בענין א״ת שמות אלא שמות5 כו׳
But on Purim, through the self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh), they reached the Essence of Ein Sof (the Infinite One), blessed be He, which is above the level of the Name Havayah. And see what is written above in the discourse beginning “Uv’vo’ah lifnei hamelech,” on the matter of “Do not read shamos (desolations) but shemos (names),” etc.;
On Purim, through their self-sacrifice, the Jews reached the Essence of Ein Sof, above even the Name Havayah. The earlier discourse “Uv’vo’ah lifnei hamelech” develops this through the Sages’ wordplay, “Do not read shamos (desolations) but shemos (names).”
ע״ש א״כ האור המלובש במגלה זו היא למעלה מבחי׳ השמות אלא שמ״מ ההתלבשות בהמגלה הוא ע״י לבושי׳ שלמט׳ מבחי׳ השמות בסיפור המעשה דמרדכי ואסתר ואחשורוש והמן ושתי.
see there. If so, the light that is clothed in this Megillah is above the level of the Names; except that nevertheless the clothing in the Megillah is through garments that are below the level of the Names, in the story of the events of Mordechai and Esther, Achashverosh, Haman and Vashti.
So the light clothed in the Megillah is above the Names, even though its garments, the story of Mordechai and Esther, Achashverosh, Haman and Vashti, are below the level of the Names.
אסתר הוא בחי׳ מל׳ דאצי׳ כשמסתתרת בראש הבריאה ושבע נערותיה הראויות לתת לה מבית המלך6 הן ז׳ היכלות דבריאה.
Esther is the level of Malchus (sovereignty) of Atzilus when it is hidden in the head of [the World of] Beriah; and “her seven maidens, fit to be given to her from the king’s house,” are the seven chambers (heichalos) of Beriah.
In Kabbalistic terms Esther is Malchus of Atzilus hidden in the “head” of the World of Beriah, and her seven maidens “from the king’s house” are the seven heichalos, the chambers, of Beriah.
מרדכי הוא בחי׳ יסוד אבא. וענין קריאת המגלה הוא כמו קורא בתורה שקורא וממשיך גלוי האור:7
Mordechai is the level of Yesod (foundation) of Abba. And the matter of the reading of the Megillah is like one who reads in the Torah: he reads and draws down the revelation of the light.
Mordechai is Yesod of Abba. Reading the Megillah is like reading the Torah: by reading it one draws down the revelation of the light hidden within it.
The paragraph concludes that the absence of G‑d’s Names in the Megillah shows its light to be above the Names, from the Essence reached through self-sacrifice; the story is that light’s garment, and reading the Megillah draws it down.
As Kehot quotes, the Rebbe explains (Likkutei Sichos, vol. 7) that through the reading of the Megillah a revelation of light is drawn from the very concealment, “that there is no Name at all in the Megillah,” and that this revelation is of the Essence of Ein Sof, above the level of Names. The Rebbe also notes that the Song of Songs, too, does not mention G‑d’s Name.
Marei mekomos
- 1שהנביאים עתידים להבטל לע״ל · ירושל׳ מגילה פ״א ה״ה.
- 2ומגלת אסתר לא תבטל · Jerusalem Talmud Megillah 1:8
- 3ובנביאים יש שמות הרבה · ראה בארוכה בלקו״ש חכ״א ע׳ 201 הערה 45, ובהערה 46 שם שגם בשה״ש לא נזכר שם ה׳.
- 4ועמש״ל בד״ה ובבואה לפני המלך · לעיל צו, א.
- 5א״ת שמות אלא שמות · Berakhot 7b:10–11
- 6הראויות לתת לה מבית המלך · Esther 2:9
- 7שקורא וממשיך גלוי האור · בלקו״ש ח״ז ע׳ 40 ואילך סעי׳ ג: ד. ה. אַז פון דעם העלם ”שאין שום שם במגלת אסתר” ווערט (דורך קריאת המגילה) נמשך אַ גילוי אור ואדרבה: דער גילוי וואָס קומט דערפון איז אַ גילוי פון עצמות א״ס ב״ה וואָס איז ”למעלה מבחי׳ שמות” עכ״ל ע״ש. ובהערה 46: שלמעלה גם מבחי׳ האור שלא נגע בו הצמצום שממנו נמשך הקו.
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
In one’s avodah
Every Jew, even the lowest, has the power of self-sacrifice that will not let him be separated from G‑d; when a person sins, it is only because a spirit of folly makes him think the sin does not separate him. And one who has the time to study Torah must use it, for his soul needs the whole parable to reach “the pleasantness of G‑d.”
Questions for discussion
- Why does the maamar call the Torah a “parable,” and what does this imply about studying laws that deal with physical matters?
- How can the acceptance of the Torah at Sinai be called “compelled” if what moved the people was love and not fear?
- Why does a bittul that begins from below draw down a higher light than one awakened from above?
- How can Purim’s light be greater than that of Yom Tov while only Yom Tov forbids work?
- What does the absence of G‑d’s Name from the Megillah teach about His presence in times of hiddenness?
Key terms in this maamar
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
- Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond. ×2
- The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
- Divine light that enters each world and gives it life according to its measure. ×2
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×2
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence. ×1
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×14
- The Sefirosספירות
- The ten divine attributes through which G‑d relates to creation.
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level.
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×7
- Delightתענוג
- Pleasure; the inner root of will. ×1
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×8
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds. ×1
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d.
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×7
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions.
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
- Giving oneself over entirely to G‑d.
- An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
- Human initiative that draws down a divine response. ×1
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×7
- Teshuvah (return)תשובה
- Returning to G‑d; not only repentance. ×4
- Yesod (foundation)יסוד
- The channel that connects and transmits. ×2
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×7
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being. ×2
- An arousal from aboveאתערותא דלעילא
- Divine initiative, unprompted by us.
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×10
- The general and collective expression (klalus)כללות
- That which encompasses the particulars as one: their general and collective expression (the klal, as against the prat). Never “sum”, “sum total”, “totality” or “general principle”, as if the particulars were added up (וכללותן היא מצות הצדקה is “their general and collective expression is the mitzvah of charity”). Render by sense: “their general and collective expression”, “that which encompasses them all”, “X in general”, “X as a whole”. Keep התכללות as “inclusion” / “inter-inclusion”. ×1
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×2
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d.
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d's presence as it dwells in the world. ×1
- Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
- The forces of concealment that oppose holiness.
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×2
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- ×6