Likkutei Torah · Parshas Tazria · Maamar 6
בגמרא דב״מ פרק הפועלים קא מפלגי במתיבתא דרקיע…
In the Gemara, Bava Metzia, chapter HaPoalim: “They were disputing in the Academy of the Firmament…”
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
G‑d is “the Holy One, blessed be He”: “holy,” the encompassing light of Keser, and “blessed,” the indwelling light of Chochmah. The Academy of the Firmament, whose understanding comes from Binah, heard G‑d’s ruling “pure” only as a hidden glimmer of the encompassing light, while Rabbah bar Nachmani, whose soul came from that very radiance, could find its reason in the Torah itself.
The maamar in brief
The maamar explains the Talmud’s account of a dispute in the heavenly academy over a doubtful case of tzara’as, in which G‑d said “pure,” the academy said “impure,” and Rabbah bar Nachmani was called up to decide. It first defines the Name “the Holy One, blessed be He”: “holy” is Keser, the light that encompasses all worlds, and “blessed” is Chochmah, the source of the light that fills them. The “firmament” is Binah, the level of comprehension, which shines in the Higher Gan Eden. Torah study, spoken aloud, draws down a light from above the order of the worlds, which is how the Sages worked miracles. The Alter Rebbe then explains, following the Maggid, that the attributes unite only through the Infinite Light, which shines constantly in Tiferes (hence the Name Havayah) but is absent from kelipas nogah. Tzara’as is the closing off of Chochmah, which lets nogah draw from the “skin”; a doubtful case is pure because this impurity depends on being known. The academy, rooted in Binah, knew G‑d’s ruling but not its reason; Rabbah bar Nachmani, with a spark of Moshe, did. The maamar ends with the halachic question of “it is not in heaven.”
Outline
- The dispute in heaven and the Name “the Holy One, blessed be He”The Talmud’s story; how the Sages worked wonders; “holy” is Keser, sovev, and “blessed” is Chochmah, memalei; baruch as receiver (Malchus) and as source (Chochmah).¶1–4
- The Academy of the FirmamentThe firmament above the upper chayos is Binah, comprehension “frozen” like ice; it shines in the Higher Gan Eden; Torah study for its own sake adds light there, and prayer prepares for it.¶5–8
- Torah, speech and miraclesTorah gladdens the heart because it is one with G‑d; spoken Torah draws out its hidden light; the Sages drew a light above the order of the worlds, so a river could divide; the mitzvos exist in Atzilus, and the souls learn them in Gan Eden.¶9–15
- Kelipas nogah of Atzilus and the Name HavayahHow can there be a kelipah in Atzilus? Following the Maggid, the attributes unite only through the Infinite Light, which Tiferes always has and so bears the Name Havayah; nogah lacks this union and true self-nullification, so it is a “husk,” half good and half evil.¶16–22
- The affliction and the law of the white hairWhen the light of Abba withdraws, nogah draws from the “skin” of Z’eir Anpin; the kohen draws Abba down again; white hair first means nogah draws only from the “hairs,” and a doubt is pure because this impurity depends on being known.¶23–26
- Why the Academy did not know the reasonThe encompassing light shines in Gan Eden only hiddenly, so the Academy, rooted in Binah, knew G‑d’s ruling but not its reason; Rabbah bar Nachmani’s soul, like Moshe’s, came from that radiance, so he found the reason in the Torah.¶27–30
- G‑d’s delight in Gan Eden and the halachic rulingG‑d’s delight with the righteous comes from Eden, above the firmament, earned by drawing down the Crown through Torah; the Rambam rules “impure” because the Torah “is not in heaven,” though here, where G‑d Himself said “pure,” the case may differ.¶31–33
Key concepts
- Holy and blessed (kadosh, baruch)קדוש ברוך
- The two words of the Name “the Holy One, blessed be He”: “holy” is Keser, set apart above the chain of descent and encompassing the worlds; “blessed” is Chochmah, the source from which light flows down to fill them.
- The Academy of the Firmamentמתיבתא דרקיע
- The Higher Gan Eden, named for the “firmament” above the upper chayos, which is Binah: the level at which insight becomes fixed comprehension, like water frozen into ice.
- Encompassing and inner lightאור מקיף ואור פנימי
- Light too great to enter a vessel surrounds it, yet shines into it in a hidden way. The Academy perceived G‑d’s ruling only as this hidden glimmer.
- Inter-inclusion of the attributesהתכללות המדות
- Opposite attributes such as Chesed and Gevurah can unite only through the Infinite Light shining in them; Tiferes, which always has it, bears the Name Havayah.
- Kelipas nogah of Atzilusקליפת נוגה דאצילות
- A “husk” at the level of Atzilus, from the shattered vessels of Tohu: it receives some G‑dly light, but its attributes stay separate, so the Infinite Light only surrounds it.
- Segiru, “closing”סגירו
- The Targum’s word for tzara’as: the closing off of the light of Abba, Chochmah, from Z’eir Anpin, which lets nogah draw nurture from the “skin.”
- “It is not in heaven”לא בשמים היא
- The law is decided by the sages below, by the Torah as it has come down into the inner light, not by the encompassing levels, “heaven.”
The dispute in heaven and the Name “the Holy One, blessed be He” ¶1–4
1בגמרא דב״מ פרק הפועלים1 קא מפלגי במתיבתא דרקיע אם בהרת קודמת לשער לבן טמא ואם שער לבן קודם לבהרת טהור2 ספק הקב״ה אמר טהור וכולהו מתיבתא דרקיע אמרי טמא ואמרי מאן נוכח.3
In the Gemara, [tractate] Bava Metzia, chapter HaPoalim: “They were disputing in the Academy of the Firmament (Mesivta deRakia): If the bright spot (baheres) preceded the white hair, [it is] impure; and if the white hair preceded the bright spot, pure. [In a case of] doubt, the Holy One, blessed be He, said, ‘Pure,’ and the whole Academy of the Firmament said, ‘Impure.’ And they said, ‘Who will decide?’
The maamar opens with a story from the Talmud (Bava Metzia 86a) about a law of tzara’as. A white spot (baheres) with white hairs in it is impure if the spot came first and pure if the hairs came first; in a case of doubt, G‑d ruled “pure” while the whole heavenly academy ruled “impure,” and they looked for someone to decide between them.
נוכח רבה בר נחמני דאמר רבה בר נחמני אני יחיד בנגעים אני יחיד באהלות כו׳
‘Rabbah bar Nachmani will decide,’ for Rabbah bar Nachmani said, ‘I am unique in [the laws of] leprous afflictions (nega’im); I am unique in [the laws of] tent-impurity (ohalos),’” etc.,
They chose Rabbah bar Nachmani, the Amora who called himself unique in the laws of leprous afflictions and of tent-impurity. The Talmud goes on to tell that a messenger was sent to bring him up, but the Angel of Death could not approach him while he did not stop learning.
עד אמר טהור טהור, ובגמ׳ במסכת נזיר (דס״ה ע״ב) פי׳ הטעם דאמר קרא לטהרו או לטמאו4 הואיל5 ופתח בו הכתוב בטהרה תחלה (והובא בהר״ש ספ״ד דנגעים).
up to “he said, ‘Pure, pure.’” And in the Gemara, in tractate Nazir (65b), the reason is explained: for the verse says, “to pronounce it pure or to pronounce it impure”: since Scripture opened with purity first. (This is cited by Rabbeinu Shimshon at the end of chapter 4 of Negaim.)
As his soul departed he said, “Pure, pure,” agreeing with G‑d’s ruling. The Talmud in Nazir gives the reason: the verse (Leviticus 13:59) says “to pronounce it pure or to pronounce it impure,” mentioning purity first, which teaches that the doubtful case is pure.
וצריך להבין ענין התנאים ואמוראים שאנו רואים את המופתים העצומים6 שהיו יכולים לעשות כמו בר׳ פנחס בן יאיר
Now, we need to understand the matter of the Tannaim and Amoraim: we see the tremendous wonders they were able to perform, as with Rabbi Pinchas ben Yair
With the story stated, the Alter Rebbe raises a wider question: how could the Tannaim (the Sages of the Mishnah) and the Amoraim (the Sages of the Talmud) perform such tremendous wonders? His first example is Rabbi Pinchas ben Yair.
פ״ק דחולין7 שאמר גינאי נהרא חלוק לי8 מימיך ומיד נתקיים מה שבהתאסף יחד משה רבינו וששים רבוא ישראל גבי קריעת ים סוף היה זה פלא.
in the first chapter of Chullin, who said, “Ginai, river, divide your waters for me,” and at once it was fulfilled: something that, when Moshe our teacher and the six hundred thousand of Israel were gathered together, at the splitting of the Sea of Reeds, was a marvel.
On his way to redeem captives, Rabbi Pinchas ben Yair told the river Ginai to divide for him, and it did (Chullin 7a). The splitting of the sea, a marvel that came about for Moshe together with all six hundred thousand of Israel, happened at once for this one man.
וכן אמרו זוטרא דבכו מחיה מתים9 וזכו לכ״ז ע״י עסק תורתם.10 וצריך לבאר תחלה פי׳ קריאת שם הקב״ה שקראו בו חז״ל את הבורא ית׳,11 וענין פי׳ מתיבתא דרקיע.
Likewise they said, “The least among you revives the dead.” And they merited all this through their occupation with their Torah. We must first explain the meaning of the name “the Holy One, blessed be He” (HaKadosh Baruch Hu), by which our Sages, of blessed memory, called the Creator, may He be blessed, and the meaning of “the Academy of the Firmament.”
A second example: the Roman ruler Antoninus told Rebbi, “I know that the least among you revives the dead” (Avodah Zarah 10b). The Alter Rebbe says the Sages earned these powers through their Torah study, and announces two things to explain first: the name “the Holy One, blessed be He,” and the term “the Academy of the Firmament.”
והענין כי הנה קדוש הוא בחי׳ כתר12 (וכנודע מענין קדוש יהי׳ גדל פרע13 כו׳ שנאמר גבי נזיר14 וע״ש בלק״ת).
The explanation is this: “holy” (kadosh) is the level of Keser (the Crown) (as is known from the matter of “he shall be holy; he shall let the locks grow long,” etc., which is said of the nazirite; and see there in the Likkutei Torah of the Arizal).
The explanation starts with the two words of the Name. “Holy” belongs to Keser, the Crown, which stands above the ordered levels; the proof is the nazirite, whom the Torah calls “holy” in the same verse that tells him to let the hair of his head grow (Numbers 6:5), and the reader is referred to the Arizal’s Likkutei Torah there.
ואע״פ שלפעמים בחי׳ תפארת דאצילות נק׳ קדוש. זה הוא להיות כי שרש הת״ת הוא מבחי׳ כתר
And although the level of Tiferes (beauty) of the World of Atzilus (Emanation) is sometimes called “holy,” that is because the root of Tiferes is from the level of Keser
An objection: Tiferes of Atzilus, the attribute of harmony, is also sometimes called “holy.” The answer is that Tiferes is itself rooted in Keser, so the holiness it has comes from there.
(כי הוא מקו האמצעי15 ולכן מת״ת דאימא נעשה כתר לז״א.16 ומת״ת דז״א נעשה כתר לנוק׳17 הרי כי התפארת שייך לבחי׳כתר) (ועיין ברבות פ׳ בלק18 ע״פ אשר בך אתפאר19 כו׳ עטרה ונתנה בראשו20 כו׳ ע״ש).
(for it is of the middle line; therefore the Tiferes of Imma becomes the Keser of Z’eir Anpin, and the Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin becomes the Keser of Nukva; thus Tiferes is connected with the level of Keser) (and see the Midrash Rabbah, Parshas Balak, on the verse “in whom I take glory,” etc.: “a crown, and He placed it on his head,” etc.; see there).
Tiferes stands on the middle line of the Sefiros, the central column that reaches straight up to Keser. In the Arizal’s system this shows in how levels pass on: the Tiferes of Imma becomes the Keser of Z’eir Anpin, and the Tiferes of Z’eir Anpin becomes the Keser of Nukva. The Midrash likewise links Israel, “in whom I take glory (espa’er),” the root of the word tiferes, with a crown that the king placed on his head.
ועמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ הראיני את מראיך21 וגם כמו שיתבאר לקמן שבתפארת יש הארה גדולה מא״ס ב״ה יותר מבמדות חו״ג ועי״ז הוא הפועל התכללות מדות חו״ג כו׳
See what is written about this in the explanation of the verse “Let me see your countenance”; and also, as will be explained below, in Tiferes there is a great radiance from the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, more than in the attributes of Chesed and Gevurah, and through this it is what brings about the inter-inclusion of the attributes of Chesed and Gevurah, etc.
The Alter Rebbe refers to his explanation of “Let me see your countenance” (Song of Songs 2:14) and anticipates a point developed later in this maamar: Tiferes receives a greater radiance of the Infinite One than Chesed and Gevurah do, and that radiance is what lets those two opposite attributes merge into one.
והארה זו זהו מבחי׳ הכתר. (וכמ״ש בזהר ס״פ תרומה דקע״ה ב׳ ע״פ והבריח התיכון22 כו׳).
And this radiance is from the level of Keser. (As is written in the Zohar at the end of Parshas Terumah, 175b, on the verse “and the middle bar,” etc.)
That added radiance in Tiferes comes from Keser. The Zohar reads “the middle bar” of the Tabernacle, which ran “from end to end” through all the boards, as Yaakov, the attribute of Tiferes, who holds both sides together.
וכתר נק׳ קדוש דהיינו שהוא בחי׳ קדוש ומובדל ולמעלה מגדר ההשתלשלות. וברוך הוא בחי׳ חכמה23 שהוא ראשית ההשתלשלות וראשית הגילוי.24
Keser is called “holy,” meaning that it is the level of what is holy and set apart, above the bounds of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus). And “blessed” (baruch) is the level of Chochmah (wisdom), which is the beginning of the hishtalshelus and the beginning of revelation.
Now the two words are defined. “Holy” means set apart: Keser is above the bounds of the ordered chain of levels. “Blessed” is Chochmah, the first point at which G‑dliness begins to be revealed and from which the orderly chain of descent begins.
נמצא קדוש הוא בחי׳ סוכ״ע וברוך הוא בחי׳ ממכ״ע.25 וע״כ קראו חז״ל בשם זה הקב״ה שהוא ית׳ סוכ״ע וממכ״ע.262728
It follows that “holy” is the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), and “blessed” is the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin). This is why our Sages, of blessed memory, called [Him] by this name, the Holy One, blessed be He: for He, may He be blessed, is sovev kol almin and memalei kol almin.
So the name “the Holy One, blessed be He” joins both ways in which G‑d relates to the worlds: as “holy” He transcends and encompasses them all (sovev), and as “blessed” He fills them and gives them life from within (memalei). That is why the Sages chose this name for the Creator.
The paragraph opens with the Talmud’s account of the dispute in the Academy of the Firmament about a doubtful case of tzara’as, and asks how the Sages of the Mishnah and Talmud could work miracles through their Torah. It begins the answer by explaining the name “the Holy One, blessed be He”: “holy” is Keser, the light that encompasses all worlds, and “blessed” is Chochmah, the light that fills them.
The Kehot notes show that this theme recurs: the Tzemach Tzedek connects it with Torah Ohr 49b, where drawing down supernal Chochmah is attributed to the Tannaim, and the Rebbe’s maamar Padah VeShalom of 5726 explains that the splitting of the river Ginai was a true innovation, a change even in the river’s own root and source, because what Torah draws down is above hishtalshelus, as this maamar explains further on. The Zohar cited for Chochmah as “the beginning” (1:31b) says that the hidden supernal Crown is first but is not counted, so the second level, Chochmah, is called reshis.
Marei mekomos
- 1פרק הפועלים · דף פו, א.
- 2אם בהרת קודמת לשער לבן טמא ואם שער לבן קודם לבהרת טהור · Mishnah Negaim 4:11
- 3קא מפלגי במתיבתא דרקיע אם בהרת קודמת לשער לבן טמא ואם שער לבן קודם לבהרת טהור ספק הקב״ה אמר טהור וכולהו מתיבתא דרקיע אמרי טמא ואמרי מאן נוכח · Bava Metzia 86a:6–7
- 4
- 5
- 6ענין התנאים ואמוראים שאנו רואים את המופתים העצומים · באוה״ת ויקרא-ד ע׳ א׳נב מציין לתו״א מט, ב ”אך להיות נמשך חכמה עילאה . . הוא ע״י התנאים בעלי המשנה”. וראה גם אוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תקלא. כרך-ג ע׳ תתיז. שה״ש-ב ע׳ תפא. להעיר ממאמרי אדהאמ״צ ויקרא-ב ע׳ תמג ושם נוסף ”יותר מן הנביאים”. בענין המופתים העצומים, ראה ד״ה פדה בשלום תשכ״ו סעיף ד (סה״מ מלוקט ו׳ ע׳ מה).
- 7ברפב״י פ״ק דחולין · ז, א. ונתבאר בד״ה פדה בשלום תשכ״ו הנ״ל שהוא שינוי וחידוש גם לגבי שרשו ומקורו דהנהר.
- 8
- 9זוטרא דבכו מחי׳ מתים · Avodah Zarah 10b:6
- 10וזכו לכ״ז ע״י עסק תורתם · במאמרי אדה״א ויקרא-ב ע׳ תנז מבאר ”כי בחי׳ מס״נ שלהם על שקידת התורה לא הי׳ כמוהו עדיין” ע״ש.
- 11שם הקב״ה . . הבורא ית׳ · ע׳ שה״ש ד״ה ששים המה מלכות הב׳ רפ״ג (מ, ג) [כ]. בארוכה בדרך מצותיך קב, ב. אוה״ת פנחס ע׳ א׳רי. וראה גם בסה״מ תרל״ד ע׳ צז ואילך.
- 12קדוש הוא בחי׳ כתר · באוה״ת ויקרא-ג ע׳ א׳נג כ׳ ”וז״ל הפרדס קדוש הוא בכתר ובתפארת וביסוד, ה׳ ודברי הפרדס לכאורה מקורם מהזוהר פ׳ אמור” ע״ש.
- 13קדש יהי׳ גדל פרע · Numbers 6:5
- 14וכנודע מענין קדוש יהיה . . גבי נזיר · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ קט.
- 15כי הוא מקו האמצעי · ראה אגה״ק סי׳ יב, ובליקוט פי׳ שם.
- 16מת״ת דאימא נעשה כתר לז״א · ע׳ ע״ח ש׳ מוחין דצלם רפ״ה ורפ״ז. ובש׳ דרושי הצלם דרוש ה — עט, ד. ובריש ש׳ מיעוט הירח פ״א. על״ק שה״ש מז, ג. [כ].
- 17ומת״ת דז״א נעשה כתר לנוק׳ · שם [ע״ח] ש׳ א״א ספ״ז. [כ].
- 18ברבות פ׳ בלק · כ, טז.
- 19אשר בך אתפאר · Isaiah 49:3
- 20אשר בך אתפאר כו׳ עטרה ונתנה בראשו · Bamidbar Rabbah 20:19
- 21בביאור ע״פ הראיני את מראיך · אולי הכוונה ללקו״ת שה״ש כ, ד.
- 22והבריח התיכון · Zohar, Terumah 94:908–96:918
- 23וברוך . . חכמה · ראה ג״כ סה״מ תקס״ה ע׳ קסה ובהנסמן לשם.
- 24חכמה . . וראשית הגילוי · Zohar I, 31b
- 25קדוש הוא בחי׳ סוכ״ע וברוך הוא בחי׳ ממכ״ע · ראה לקו״ת שה״ש כא, ב. דרך מצותיך מז, א. קב, ב. אוה״ת פנחס ע׳ א׳ריא.
- 26נתבאר בד״ה פדה בשלום תשכ״ו (סה״מ מלוקט-ו ע׳ מז) · ”שע״י עסק התורה שלהם נעשה שינוי וחידוש בהעולם [חידוש אמיתי שלא הי׳ גם בשורש ומקור העולם]”. ובהערה 22 שם ”כמובן ממ״ש בלקו״ת שם (כג, א) דזה שע״י התורה עשו מופתים הוא לפי שהגילוי שנמשך ע״י התורה הוא מלמעלה מהשתלשלות”.
- 27
- 28
2והנה בתיבת ברוך1 יש ג״כ שני פירושים. הא׳ מלשון והמלך שלמה ברוך2 שהפי׳ שהוא נתברך והיינו שמקבל הברכה עד שנעשה ברוך.
Now, the word baruch (“blessed”) also has two meanings. The first is in the sense of “and King Shlomo shall be blessed,” the meaning being that he has been blessed: that is, he receives the blessing until he becomes blessed.
The Alter Rebbe now shows that baruch itself has two senses. In “and King Shlomo shall be blessed” (I Kings 2:45) it is passive: one who has received blessing and so become blessed.
והפי׳ הב׳ היינו שהוא ברוך ר״ל מקור הברכות שמברך את הכל וכמ״ש מזה ע״פ לבבתני אחותי כלה.3
The second meaning is that He is baruch in the sense of the source of blessings, who blesses everything; as is explained about this on the verse “You have captured my heart, my sister, [my] bride.”
In the second sense, said of G‑d, baruch means the source of all blessings, the One who blesses everything. For more, the Alter Rebbe refers to his discourse on “You have captured my heart, my sister, bride” (Song of Songs 4:9).
Both senses are true, of different levels. Chochmah is called baruch, and Pri Etz Chaim names Yesod of Abba, the channel through which Chochmah flows, as baruch; yet Malchus, the last of the Sefiros, is also sometimes called baruch.
וזהו ענין והמלך שלמה ברוך (ועיין בזהר ר״פ בראשית ד״ג סע״א בענין אות ב׳ דהוא סימן ברכה6 ובזהר הרקיע שם שהיא בחי׳ מלכות כו׳. וכ״מ בזהר ר״פ ויגש דר״ה ע״ב7 ע״פ כי אתה אבינו)89
and this is the meaning of “and King Shlomo shall be blessed.” (See the Zohar at the beginning of Parshas Bereishis, end of 3a, on the letter beis, that it is a sign of blessing; and Zohar HaRakia there, that it is the level of Malchus, etc. So it is also implied in the Zohar at the beginning of Parshas Vayigash, 205b, on the verse “For You are our Father.”)
Malchus is the “King Shlomo” who is blessed. The parenthesis gathers support from the Zohar: at the beginning of Bereishis the world is created with the letter beis, the letter of blessing, and the commentary Zohar HaRakia identifies it with Malchus; the Zohar’s opening of Vayigash, on “For You are our Father” (Isaiah 63:16), implies the same.
(See Me’orei Or, the letter beis, sections 39 and 35; and see Parshas Pekudei, 261a, and the Mikdash Melech there, concerning baruch.)
More references follow: Me’orei Or, a lexicon of Kabbalistic terms, under the letter beis, and the Zohar on Parshas Pekudei with the commentary Mikdash Melech, all on the meaning of baruch.
והוא כפי׳ הא׳ דברוך היינו שהוא מתברך ומקבל הברכה וכך המלכות היא מקבלת הברכה וההמשכה מלמעלה
This accords with the first meaning of baruch, namely that it is blessed and receives the blessing: so too, Malchus receives the blessing and the flow drawn down from above,
Malchus is baruch in the first, receiving sense: it receives blessing and the flow drawn down from above.
והיינו מבחי׳ חכמה שהוא נק׳ ברוך כפי׳ הב׳ מקור הברכה והיינו ר״ת ברוך13 ר אש ומקור כל ברכה14 כמ״ש בפרדס15 בערך ברוך.1617
that is, from the level of Chochmah, which is called baruch in the second meaning, the source of blessing. And this is the acronym of baruch: rosh u’mekor kol berachah, “the head and source of every blessing,” as is written in the Pardes, in the entry baruch.
What Malchus receives comes from Chochmah, which is baruch in the second sense, the source of blessing. The Pardes, quoting the Tikkunei Zohar, reads the letters of baruch as an acronym for “the head and source of every blessing.”
The paragraph shows that baruch has a receiving sense (“blessed”) and a giving sense (“source of blessing”) and assigns each to a level: Malchus is “blessed” because it receives, while Chochmah, through Yesod of Abba, is “blessed” as the head and source of every blessing.
Me’orei Or (sec. 35, quoted in the Kehot note) connects berachah with Imma Ila’ah, the “upper pool” into which the waters of Chochmah gather and which blesses Malchus, the “lower pool,” the image the next paragraph develops. The Zohar on Pekudei (261a) says that the Shechinah is called baruch when she holds all the blessings drawn into her.
Marei mekomos
- 1והנה בתיבת ברוך · מכאן נמצא גם באוה״ת סידור ע׳ קפב.
- 2והמלך שלמה ברוך · I Kings 2:45
- 3ע״פ לבבתני אחותי כלה · לקו״ת שה״ש כח, ד.
- 4וכמ״ש בפע״ח · שער הברכות פ״א-ב.
- 5יסוד אבא נק׳ ברוך · Pri Etz Chaim, Gate of Blessings 2:1
- 6אות ב׳ דהוא סימן ברכה · Zohar, Introduction 6:28–38
- 7וכ״מ בזהר ר״פ ויגש דר״ה ע״ב · ”שלכן נברא העולם בבית שיש בו סימן ברכה ולא נברא באלף בגין דלא למיהב דוכתא לסט״א דאקרי ארור” — ביאה״ז להצ״צ-א ע׳ תקעב ע״ש שלכאורה אינו מובן הלא האלף בכתר והב׳ בחכמה א״כ איך ארור יש לו יניקה ע״ש.
- 8כי אתה אבינו · Zohar, Vayigash 1:1–2:15
- 9כי אתה אבינו · Isaiah 63:16
- 10ועיין במא״א אות ב׳ סל״ט · מובא באוה״ת בראשית-ג דף תקנא, ב עם הגהות.
- 11סל״ה · וז״ל ברכה מצד אימא עילאה בריכה העליונה (ע׳ בסידור בדרוש ברכת הזימון. ובזהר ס״פ בא דמ״ב ע״ב מענין מקור מעין ים) ששם מימי החכמה נאספים לתוכה (ועיין זח״ב ס״פ בשלח דס״ג ע״ב כד ע״ק סדכ״ס בעי לברכא כו׳ אשרי כולא ואכליל כולא בהאי עמיקא עילאה) המברכת למ׳ בריכה התחתונה כו׳ עכ״ל. אוה״ת בראשית כרך-ג דף תקנא, ב. מובא גם באוה״ת שמות ע׳ פג.
- 12שם גבי ברוך · Zohar, Pekudei 52:796–807
- 13ר״ת ברוך · ת״ז ת״ע (קב, ב). [כ].
- 14ר״ת ברוך ר אש ומקור כל ברכה · Pardes Rimmonim 23:2:32
- 15כמ״ש בפרדס ערך ברוך · בשער ערה״כ.
- 16
- 17
3וכמו בריכה שממשיכים ממנה מים לכל אלא שהבריכה היינו ההמשכה שכבר נמשך מבחי׳ חכמה שנק׳ ברוך מקור הבריכה. וז״ש בזהר איהו ברוך ואיהי ברכה.12
It is like a pool (berechah), from which water is drawn for everyone; only, the pool is the flow that has already been drawn down from the level of Chochmah, which is called baruch, the source of the pool. This is [the meaning of] what is written in the Zohar: “He is baruch, and She is berachah.”
A pool (berechah) is a reservoir from which water is drawn for all. Malchus is such a pool: it holds a flow that has already come down from Chochmah, the pool’s source. So the Zohar says, “He is baruch and She is berachah”: the masculine giver and the feminine receiver.
פי׳ איהי המל׳ נקרא ברכה שהיא בחי׳ ממכ״ע מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים3 איהו היינו יסוד אבא נק׳ ברוך כי הוא מקור המשפיע בבחי׳ ממכ״ע.
That is: “She,” Malchus, is called berachah (“blessing”), for she is the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin): “Your kingship (malchus) is a kingship over all worlds.” “He,” that is, Yesod of Abba, is called baruch, for it is the source of what bestows at the level of memalei kol almin.
The Alter Rebbe reads the Zohar this way: “She,” Malchus, is the blessing that fills and enlivens all worlds, as in “Your kingship is a kingship over all worlds” (Psalms 145:13); “He,” Yesod of Abba, is the source from which that indwelling light flows.
אכן למעלה מהחכמה אין יכול לבוא כלל בבחי׳ ממכ״ע רק סוכ״ע כי אינו יכול לבוא בהתגלות כלל להיות בבחי׳ ממלא
But what is above Chochmah cannot come at all at the level of memalei kol almin, only as the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), for it cannot come into revelation at all so as to be at the level of “filling”;
Above Chochmah, in Keser, the light cannot enter the worlds as an indwelling, “filling” light at all. It can relate to them only as an encompassing light (sovev), because it cannot be openly revealed within them.
רק הוא סובב ומקיף והארתו זורחת בהעלם כידוע שאור הפנימי ואור המקיף דבקים זה בזה.
rather, it encompasses and surrounds, and its radiance shines in concealment; as is known, the inner light and the surrounding light are joined to each other.
Such light surrounds rather than enters, and its effect inside is hidden. This is possible because, as Kabbalah teaches, the inner light and the surrounding light are bound to each other.
אך כי אור המקיף אינו מאיר בתוך הכלי בבחי׳ פנימי׳ וגילוי כי אורו גדול ואין הכלי מגביל אורו כלל
Only, the surrounding light does not shine inside the vessel in an inward and revealed manner, for its light is great and the vessel does not bound its light at all;
The surrounding light cannot shine openly inside a vessel, because it is too great for any vessel to hold or define.
אך אעפ״כ הארה מאור המקיף זורח בתוך הכלי בהעלם שהרי המקיף מצחצח חצי הכלי מבחוץ4 כמ״ש במ״א.
yet even so, a radiance from the surrounding light shines inside the vessel in concealment, for the surrounding [light] burnishes half of the vessel from outside, as is explained elsewhere.
Still, something of it enters in a hidden way: the Arizal’s writings, cited in the notes, describe the surrounding light as burnishing the outer half of the vessel from outside. This idea, that the encompassing light is present within in concealment, becomes central later in the maamar.
The paragraph completes the picture: Malchus is the “pool” of blessing that fills the worlds and Yesod of Abba is its source, while what is above Chochmah only encompasses the worlds; yet its light still reaches into them in a hidden way, as the surrounding light burnishes the vessel from outside.
In both Zohar passages (2:162a and 3:264b), baruch is the “supernal point” from which all blessings flow and berachah is its feminine counterpart, there called the World to Come; the Alter Rebbe applies the pair to Yesod of Abba and Malchus. The Kehot note adds Or HaTorah’s remark, from Zohar 2:63b, that in Binah the blessings shine from Atik.
Marei mekomos
- 1וז״ש בזהר איהו ברוך ואיהי ברכה · Zohar II, 162a
- 2איהו ברוך ואיהי ברכה · Zohar, Vaetchanan 14:87–95
- 3מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים · Psalms 145:13
- 4המקיף מצחצח חצי הכלי מבחוץ · ע׳ ע״ח ריש ש׳ הכללים וסוף ש׳ השתל׳ י״ס. ובש׳ עקודים רפ״ב. וע׳ ש׳ עתיק רפ״ד. וע׳ תו״א מג״א בי׳ יביאו לבוש מלכות ושם בהוספות פ׳ ויקהל בי׳ ע״פ קחו מאתכם תרומה סי׳ ב׳. [כ].
This is [the meaning of] what is written, “And Chochmah (wisdom) is found from ayin (nothing)”: for Chochmah is the beginning of revelation, and therefore from Chochmah onward the aspect of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus) applies.
The verse in Job (28:12), usually read as a question, “Where is wisdom found?”, is read here as a statement: Chochmah is found “from ayin,” from nothing. Chochmah is the first point of revelation, so the orderly chain of descent begins with it.
שהבינה מקבלת מהחכמה ומבינה נמשך במדות דרך עילה ועלול ולכן נק׳ חכמה ברוך אבל החכמה מהכתר כתיב מאין תמצא שלא כדרך השתלשלות
For Binah (understanding) receives from Chochmah, and from Binah [the flow] is drawn into the emotive attributes (middos) by way of cause and effect; therefore Chochmah is called “blessed.” But of Chochmah [as it comes] from Keser it is written, “it is found from ayin,” not in the manner of hishtalshelus;
From Chochmah downward everything follows as cause and effect: Binah receives from Chochmah, and the emotive attributes from Binah; that is why Chochmah is called “blessed,” the source of the flow. But Chochmah itself does not come out of Keser by such a step; it emerges “from nothing,” without proportion between them.
ולכן נאמר תמצא כו׳ וגם הכתר נמשך ממל׳ דא״ס שהוא רק בחי׳ אור וזיו מהמאציל עצמו2 וכמשל הזיו שאינו פועל שינוי בהעצמיות כו׳
therefore it says “is found,” etc. And Keser (the Crown), too, is drawn from the Malchus of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), which is only a level of light and radiance from the Emanator Himself, as in the analogy of radiance, which effects no change in the essence, etc.
The word “found” suggests something that appears rather than something produced by a cause. Keser in turn comes from the Malchus, the lowest aspect, of the Infinite One, which is only a light and radiance of the Emanator; and a radiance, like light shining from its source, makes no change in the essence it comes from.
(ולכן קראוהו חז״ל הקב״ה שהוא בחי׳ סוכ״ע מה שלמעלה מההשתלשלות וע״כ נק׳ קדוש ועל זה נזכר לשון הודאה מודים אנחנו לך34 וכמ״ש מענין ברכה והודאה בביאור ע״פ אתה הצבת5 כל גבולות ארץ6 ובד״ה יהודה אתה7 ובחי׳ ממכ״ע הוא מה שנמשך ע״ד ההשתלשלות ונק׳ ברוך.
(Therefore our Sages, of blessed memory, called Him the Holy One, blessed be He: He is the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), that which is above hishtalshelus, and therefore He is called “holy”; and concerning this the language of acknowledgment is used, “We acknowledge You” (modim anachnu lach), as is explained concerning blessing and acknowledgment in the explanation of the verse “You have set all the borders of the earth,” and in the discourse beginning “Yehudah, you….” And the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin) is what is drawn down in the manner of hishtalshelus, and it is called “blessed.”
This parenthesis applies the point to the Name. “Holy” is the level of sovev, above the chain of descent, and the response to it is acknowledgment, “We acknowledge You” (I Chronicles 29:13), which in Chassidus is the response to what lies beyond understanding; “blessed” is memalei, the light that comes down through the chain. The Alter Rebbe refers to two discourses for the difference between blessing and acknowledgment.
ולפי שהסובב מאיר בממלא רק שהארתו זורחת בהעלם ע״כ ב׳ הבחי׳ קדוש ברוך הכל שם א׳ שהוא ית׳ סוכ״ע וממכ״ע. ועמ״ש סד״ה את שבתותי תשמרו8 בפי׳ אני הוי׳ דכולא חד ע״ש.
And because the encompassing [light] shines into the filling [light], only that its radiance shines in concealment, therefore the two levels, “holy” [and] “blessed,” are all one name: that He, may He be blessed, is sovev kol almin and memalei kol almin. See what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “Keep My Shabbosos,” on the meaning of “I am Havayah,” that all is one; see there.
Because the encompassing light does shine into the indwelling light, though hidden, “holy” and “blessed” are not two names but one: G‑d is at once sovev and memalei. The Alter Rebbe cites his explanation of “I am Havayah” in the discourse “Keep My Shabbosos,” that all is one.
ולכאורה י״ל שזהו ענין ג׳ בחי׳ שבקדושה קדוש ברוך ימלוך. קדוש בחי׳ כתר וממנו נמשך בחכמה וזהו ברוך ואח״כ נמשך לבחי׳ מל׳ כענין והמלך שלמה ברוך9 וזהו ימלוך.
Seemingly, it could be said that this is the matter of the three levels in the Kedushah: “Holy,” “Blessed,” “He shall reign.” “Holy” is the level of Keser; from it [the flow] is drawn into Chochmah, and this is “Blessed”; and afterwards it is drawn to the level of Malchus (sovereignty), as in “and King Shlomo shall be blessed,” and this is “He shall reign.”
A tentative suggestion: the three phrases of the Kedushah prayer, “Holy, holy, holy,” “Blessed is the glory,” and “He shall reign,” could stand for Keser, Chochmah and Malchus, as the light descends from Keser into Chochmah and then into Malchus, which is called “blessed” in the verse about King Shlomo.
אך בזהר הרקיע בפ׳ בראשית שם פי׳ ענין ימלוך שהוא בחי׳ המשכה עליונה בפ״ע מלבד בחי׳ המשכה דברוך כו׳. וב׳ בחי׳ ברוך הנ״ל זהו ג״כ ענין פותח בברוך וחותם בברוך המבואר במ״א בד״ה להבין ענין הברכות):10
However, Zohar HaRakia, in Parshas Bereishis there, explains “He shall reign” as a supernal drawing-down of its own, apart from the drawing-down of “Blessed,” etc. And the two aspects of baruch mentioned above are also the matter of “opening with baruch and closing with baruch,” which is explained elsewhere, in the discourse beginning “To understand the matter of the blessings.”)
But Zohar HaRakia explains “He shall reign” as a separate supernal drawing-down, not simply the receiving sense of “blessed,” so the suggestion is left open. The two senses of baruch do explain why many blessings both open and close with baruch, as the Alter Rebbe explains in his discourse “To understand the matter of the blessings.”
The paragraph grounds the two words of the Name in the order of the Sefiros: Chochmah, “found from nothing,” begins the chain of cause and effect and is “blessed,” while Keser above it is “holy.” Since the encompassing light shines hiddenly in the indwelling light, “Holy” and “Blessed” are one Name.
The Torah Ohr discourse cited at the end explains that the Men of the Great Assembly instituted blessings in the Second Temple era to draw down a revelation of faith that, in the First Temple era, shone openly in the souls of Israel; the blessing makes what is above comprehension “blessed,” drawn down. The Kehot note points to the Rebbe’s discussion (Likkutei Sichos vol. 7, p. 309) of the double expression “light and radiance” used here for the Malchus of the Infinite One.
Marei mekomos
- 1והחכמה מאין תמצא · Job 28:12
- 2שהוא רק בחי׳ אור וזיו מהמאציל עצמו · ראה לקו״ש ח״ז ע׳ 309 בכפל הלשון אור וזיו.
- 3מודים אנחנו לך · דברי הימים-א כט, יג.
- 4
- 5בביאור ע״פ אתה הצבת · בסידור שער ל״ג בעומר שה, ד ואילך. באוה״ת נ״ך כרך-ב בתלים עה״פ.
- 6אתה הצבת כל גבולות ארץ · Psalms 74:17
- 7ובד״ה יהודה אתה · תו״א מה, א.
- 8סד״ה את שבתותי תשמרו · לקמן בהר מג, א.
- 9והמלך שלמה ברוך · I Kings 2:45
- 10בד״ה להבין ענין הברכות · תו״א ו, א.
The Academy of the Firmament ¶5–8
2. The meaning of “the Academy of the Firmament” is this: it is written, “And there was the likeness of a firmament over the heads of the living creature (chayah), like the color of the ice,” etc.
Section 2 explains the term “the Academy of the Firmament.” The key is Ezekiel’s vision of the Chariot: above the heads of the living creatures (chayos) was the likeness of a firmament, like awesome ice (Ezekiel 1:22).
ויש חיוון תתאין וחיוון עילאין חיוון תתאין הם המרכבה דבי״ע מחנה מיכאל מחנה גבריאל והרקיע שעל ראשיהם זהו מבחי׳ מלכות דאצילות וחיוון עילאין הם האבות
There are lower chayos and upper chayos. The lower chayos are the chariot of [the worlds of] Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, the camp of Michael [and] the camp of Gavriel, and the firmament above their heads is from the level of Malchus (sovereignty) of the World of Atzilus (Emanation). The upper chayos are the Patriarchs,
There are two sets of chayos. The lower chayos are the angels of the Chariot in the worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, the camps of the angels Michael and Gavriel, and the firmament above them is Malchus of Atzilus. The upper chayos are the Patriarchs.
אברהם יצחק ויעקב חג״ת דאצי׳ והרקיע שעל ראשם הוא בחי׳ בינה וכמ״ש בזהר בפ׳ ויקהל דרי״ג סע״א ע״פ השמים שמים23 ב׳ בחי׳ שמים היינו שמים עילאין ושמים תתאין והוא ב׳ בחי׳ רקיע הנ״ל.4
Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov, [who are] Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Atzilus, and the firmament above their heads is the level of Binah (understanding). As is written in the Zohar, Parshas Vayakhel, at the end of 213a, on the verse “The heavens, the heavens”: two levels of heavens, namely the upper heavens and the lower heavens, and these are the two levels of firmament mentioned above.
Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov embody Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Atzilus, and the firmament above them is Binah. The Zohar finds two heavens in “The heavens, the heavens” (Psalms 115:16), upper heavens and lower heavens, which match these two firmaments.
The paragraph identifies the “firmament” of the Academy of the Firmament: above the lower angels the firmament is Malchus of Atzilus, but above the “upper chayos,” the Patriarchs, who are Chesed, Gevurah and Tiferes of Atzilus, the firmament is Binah.
The Zohar passage cited (Vayakhel, 213a) speaks of a hidden eighth firmament, “the firmament upon the upper chayos,” which has no color, and reads “The heavens are heavens to G‑d” as referring to it. The Rebbe Maharash, quoted in the Kehot note, explains that this firmament is not counted among the seven firmaments and is above them.
Marei mekomos
- 1ודמות על ראשי החי׳ · Ezekiel 1:22
- 2השמים שמים · Zohar, Vayakhel 25:353–363
- 3השמים שמים · Psalms 115:16
- 4בזהר פ׳ ויקהל דרי״ג סע״א · נתבאר במאמרי אדה״א ויקרא-ב ע׳ תסט ואילך.
6וכמ״ש בפרדס ערך רקיע ועמ״ש מענין זה ע״פ הנותן שלג כצמר12 והטעם שנק׳ הבינה רקיע3 הוא כמבואר במ״א ע״פ הללוהו ברקיע עוזו45 ענין ג׳ בחי׳ אור מים רקיע שהם ג׳ בחי׳ כח״ב6
As is written in the Pardes, in the entry rakia (“firmament”); and see what is written on this subject on the verse “He gives snow like wool.” The reason Binah (understanding) is called “firmament” is as explained elsewhere, on the verse “Praise Him in the firmament of His strength”: the matter of the three levels, light, water [and] firmament, which are the three levels Keser, Chochmah and Binah.
The Pardes, Rabbi Moshe Cordovero’s Kabbalistic encyclopedia, discusses the term rakia. Elsewhere, on “Praise Him in the firmament of His strength” (Psalms 150:1), the Alter Rebbe explains that light, water and firmament, made on the first two days of creation, correspond to Keser, Chochmah and Binah, which is why Binah is called “firmament.”
כי עד״מ באדם האור הוא בחי׳ מקור החכמה ונק׳ משכיל שהוא מקור השכל ומה שאח״כ נמשך ממנו גילוי השכל נק׳ מים ואח״כ כשבא השכל לידי השגה ממש נק׳ רקיע.
For, by way of analogy, in a person the “light” is the level of the source of wisdom, and it is called maskil, which is the source of the intellect; what is afterwards drawn from it, the revelation of the intellect, is called “water”; and afterwards, when the intellect comes to actual comprehension, it is called “firmament.”
The analogy is the human mind. The “light” is the source of insight, the maskil, the faculty that conceives ideas; the first flow of insight from it is “water”; and when that insight becomes something fully grasped, it is “firmament.”
כי רקיע הוא כמ״ש רקיע כעין הקרח7 שהקרח היינו מה שנגלדו המים כי הנה מים ניידי. משא״כ הקרח א״א לשנותו ולהטותו.
For “firmament” is as it is written, “a firmament like the color of the ice”: ice is water that has congealed. For water moves, whereas ice cannot be changed or diverted.
Why “firmament”? Because Ezekiel’s firmament is “like ice,” water that has congealed. Water flows and can be turned in any direction, while ice is fixed, as an idea once comprehended is firm and settled.
The paragraph explains why Binah is called “firmament”: in the sequence light, water, firmament (Keser, Chochmah, Binah), the firmament is the stage at which flowing insight becomes fixed comprehension, like water frozen into ice.
The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah on Nach, quoted in the notes) sums up this section: Binah, called rakia, is the source of the Higher Gan Eden, called the Academy of the Firmament, whose members comprehend according to what flows to them from Binah; but the Holy One, blessed be He, is Keser, called “holy,” and Chochmah, called “blessed,” both above Binah, which is why the Academy said “impure” while G‑d said “pure.”
Marei mekomos
- 1ע״פ הנותן שלג כצמר · ראה סידור סג, ד. סה״מ תקס״ז ע׳ קכט ואילך.
- 2
- 3והטעם שנק׳ הבינה רקיע · ראה בביאה״ז להצ״צ-ב ע׳ תרמא במה שכתוב שם דכה״כ הוא בינה.
- 4ע״פ הללוהו ברקיע עוזו · Song of Songs 4:4
- 5הללוהו ברקיע עוזו · Psalms 150:1
- 6ענין ג׳ בחי׳ אור מים רקיע שהם ג׳ בחי׳ כח״ב · מובא באוה״ת נ״ך-א ומבאר ”ושם פ״ב [= הכוונה לכאן] דענין אמר ר״ת אור מים רקיע הוא כח״ב ובינה נק׳ רקיע היא מקור ג״ע העליון הנק׳ מתיבתא דרקיע ושם ענין קוב״ה אומר טהור וכולהו מתיבתא דרקיע אמרי טמא כי המתיבתא משיגים ע״פ מה שנשפע להם מהבינה הנק׳ רקיע, אבל קודב״ה הוא בחי׳ כתר הנק׳ קדוש וחכמה הנק׳ ברוך שלמעלה מבחי׳ בינה” ע״ש. בענין אור מים רקיע, ראה ביאוה״ז להצ״צ ע׳ תכב. סה״מ תרמ״ד ע׳ קצו. ובד״ה ואתה תצוה תרע״ה (בהמשך תרע״ב כרך ב ע׳ תתצ).
- 7
So too, when the intellect has already been drawn into the level of comprehension, it is called “ice,” etc. See what is written in the discourse beginning “On the eighth day he sent,” on “He casts forth His ice like crumbs.”
Comprehended intellect is like ice, congealed and fixed. The Alter Rebbe refers to his Shemini Atzeres discourse on “He casts forth His ice like crumbs” (Psalms 147:17), where supernal kindness, likened to water, “freezes” as it comes down so that each person can grasp it in his own measure.
ולכן בינה מקננא בכורסייא45 שהוא המאיר בג״ע העליון וע״ז נאמר ונהר יוצא מעדן6 להשקות את הגן כי דוקא לאחר שנמשך בבחי׳ בינה והשגה אז יוכל להאיר לנשמות בג״ע.
Therefore “Binah (understanding) nests in the Throne,” which is what shines in the Higher Gan Eden. Of this it is said, “And a river goes out from Eden to water the garden”: for only after [the light] has been drawn into the level of Binah and comprehension can it shine for the souls in Gan Eden.
Hence the phrase of the Tikkunei Zohar, “Binah nests in the Throne”: Binah is what shines in the Higher Gan Eden. “A river goes out from Eden to water the garden” (Genesis 2:10): only once the light has passed into Binah and comprehension can it reach the souls in the garden.
משא״כ בחי׳ חכמה הוא עדיין למעלה מההשגה (ועיין מזה בביאור ע״פ וידבר כו׳ אנכי7 כו׳ ובד״ה ראה אנכי נותן)89
Whereas the level of Chochmah (wisdom) is still above comprehension (see on this in the explanation of the verse “And [G‑d] spoke…, ‘I am…,’” and in the discourse beginning “See, I give”).
Chochmah, by contrast, is still above comprehension: a flash of insight not yet grasped. The Alter Rebbe refers to his explanations of the Giving of the Torah (“And G‑d spoke… I am”) and of “See, I give” (Deuteronomy 11:26).
ולכן נק׳ ג״ע העליון מתיבתא דרקיע כי רקיע נק׳ בחי׳ בינה שהוא הרקיע שע״ג חיוון עילאין כנ״ל והתפשטותה והמשכתה להאיר בג״ע העליון נק׳ מתיבתא דרקיע ודוקא מבחי׳ בינה שהוא בחי׳ רקיע
Therefore the Higher Gan Eden is called “the Academy of the Firmament”: for the level of Binah is called “firmament,” being the firmament upon the upper chayos, as mentioned above, and its spreading forth and being drawn down to shine in the Higher Gan Eden is called “the Academy of the Firmament.” And specifically from the level of Binah, which is the level of “firmament,”
This is why the Higher Gan Eden is called “the Academy of the Firmament”: its light comes from Binah, the firmament above the upper chayos, as Binah spreads forth and is drawn down to illuminate Gan Eden.
דהיינו כשנמשך האור בגדר השגה מזה יוכל להיות נמשך הג״ע שיהיו נהנין מזיו השכינה10 בבחי׳ השגה ממש
that is, when the light is drawn into the bounds of comprehension, from this Gan Eden can be drawn forth, so that [the souls] will delight in the radiance of the Shechinah (Divine Presence) in actual comprehension
Gan Eden exists only where light has entered the bounds of comprehension, for its reward is that souls “delight in the radiance of the Shechinah” (Berachos 17a) by actually understanding G‑dliness.
(ועמ״ש בד״ה לך לך11 ועיין בסש״ב ח״ב ספ״ה ועיין בזהר הרקיע פ׳ ויקהל בדף רי״ב א׳).
(see what is written in the discourse beginning “Go forth” (Lech lecha); see Sefer Shel Beinonim (Tanya), Part II, end of chapter 5; and see Zohar HaRakia, Parshas Vayakhel, on folio 212a).
The parenthesis gives further references: the discourse “Go forth” (Lech lecha), Tanya, Part II (Shaar HaYichud VehaEmunah), end of chapter 5, and Zohar HaRakia on Parshas Vayakhel.
והנה הזוכים למדרגה זו דמתיבתא דרקיע שהוא בחי׳ גבוה מאד ששרשו רקיע דע״ג חיוון עילאין היינו בינה דאצי׳ המאיר בג״ע העליון וקב״ה אתי לאשתעשע עמהן בג״ע שהוא הארת כתר וחכמה דאצילות.
Now, those who merit this rank of the Academy of the Firmament, which is a very high level, whose root is the firmament upon the upper chayos, that is, Binah of Atzilus, which shines in the Higher Gan Eden, and [for whom] “the Holy One, blessed be He, comes to delight with them” in Gan Eden, which is the radiance of Keser and Chochmah of Atzilus:
Those who reach the Academy of the Firmament stand very high: their root is Binah of Atzilus. Higher still is what is described as the Holy One, blessed be He, coming to delight with the righteous in Gan Eden; that is a radiance of Keser and Chochmah of Atzilus, above Binah.
כ״ז הוא בחי׳ עליונה מאד והיינו ע״י עסק התורה לשמה. שעי״ז ממשיכים תוספת אור בג״ע כמ״ש דרכיה דרכי נועם12 וכמ״ש בד״ה ראו כו׳.13
all this is a very lofty level, and it is through occupation with Torah for its own sake, through which one draws down added light in Gan Eden; as it is written, “Its ways are ways of pleasantness,” and as is explained in the discourse beginning “See…,” etc.
All this is reached through Torah study for its own sake, which adds light in Gan Eden. Torah is called a “way” (“Its ways are ways of pleasantness,” Proverbs 3:17), and the Alter Rebbe refers to his discourse “See that G‑d has given you the Shabbos,” which explains why Torah and mitzvos are called ways.
The paragraph explains the name “Academy of the Firmament”: the Higher Gan Eden receives its light from Binah, the “firmament,” because the souls there enjoy G‑dliness through comprehension, while the delight of the Holy One, blessed be He, with the righteous is a higher radiance of Keser and Chochmah. Both are earned through Torah study for its own sake.
The Tikkunei Zohar’s full phrase is “Imma Ila’ah nests in the Throne, in the three upper Sefiros” (23a), and the Tzemach Tzedek (Biurei HaZohar, cited in the notes) identifies the Throne of Glory with Binah. In Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim 4d, the Alter Rebbe refers back to this discourse: the Higher Gan Eden is called rakia, and G‑d’s light reaches it only through many contractions.
Marei mekomos
- 1בד״ה ביום השמיני שלח · לקו״ת שמע״צ פז, ב.
- 2ביום השמיני שלח · I Kings 8:66
- 3משליך קרחו כפתים · Psalms 147:17
- 4בינה מקננא בכורסיא · ת״ז ת״ו כג, א. וע׳ ע״ח ש׳ ס׳ אבי״ע ספ״ג. [כ].
- 5בינה מקננא בכורסייא · Tikkunei Zohar 23a:10–11
- 6ונהר יוצא מעדן · Genesis 2:10
- 7בביאור ע״פ וידבר כו׳ אנכי · Numbers 17:1
- 8ובד״ה ראה אנכי נותן · לקו״ת ראה יח, א ”ומבואר שם שזהו בחי׳ חכמה כח מה שלמעלה מההבנה וההשגה כו׳” — אוה״ת נ״ך-א ע׳ תרצט.
- 9ראה אנכי נותן · Deuteronomy 11:26
- 10שיהיו נהנין מזיו השכינה · Berakhot 17a:12
- 11בד״ה לך לך · תו״א יא, א.
- 12דרכי׳ דרכי נועם · Proverbs 3:17
- 13בד״ה ראו · לקו״ת בשלח א, א.
8וזה היה כל עסק התנאים והאמוראים ורב יהודה הי׳ מצלי מתלתין יום1 לתלתין יום, כי הנה ענין התורה והתפלה2 היינו שהתפלה היא
This was the entire occupation of the Tannaim and the Amoraim; and Rav Yehudah would pray [only] once every thirty days. For the matter of Torah and prayer is that prayer is,
Torah study of this kind was the whole occupation of the Tannaim and Amoraim. The Talmud records that Rav Yehudah prayed only once every thirty days (Rosh HaShanah 35a); the Alter Rebbe now explains how Torah and prayer relate.
כמו עד״מ הקדמה והכנה לעסק התורה שהתפלה היא להתבונן בגדולת א״ס ב״ה איך שלגדולתו אין חקר3 ואיך שכל השתלשלות העולמות מריש כל דרגין עד סוף כל דרגין מקור התהוותם וחיותם הוא
like, by way of analogy, a preface and preparation for occupation with Torah. For prayer is to contemplate the greatness of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He: how “His greatness is unsearchable,” and how the whole chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus), from the head of all levels to the end of all levels, the source of their coming into being and of their life-force is
Prayer is the preface and preparation for Torah study. Its substance is contemplation of G‑d’s infinite greatness (“His greatness is unsearchable,” Psalms 145:3), and of how all the worlds, from the highest level to the lowest, come into being and live from a single radiance of His light.
רק מהארה אחת לבד שהיא רק עד״מ כטפה נגד הים ויותר מזה אין ערוך כו׳,
only from a single radiance alone, which is, by way of analogy, only like a drop compared with the sea, and more than this, [for] there is no comparison, etc.;
That radiance compares to Him like a drop to the sea, and even this falls short, for in truth there is no comparison at all.
ולכן כל הקרוב יותר קמי׳ ית׳ הוא יותר בבחי׳ ביטול מפני דקמיה דייקא כולא כלא חשיב ולית מחשבה תפיסא ביה כלל.
and therefore, whatever is closer before Him, may He be blessed, is more in a state of self-nullification (bittul), because it is specifically “before Him” that “all is considered as nothing,” and “no thought can grasp Him at all.”
So the closer a level stands to G‑d, the more it is nullified (bittul) before Him, for it is precisely “before Him” that “all is considered as nothing,” and no thought can grasp Him at all.
The paragraph begins to explain how Torah study raises a soul so high: prayer is the preparation, a contemplation of G‑d’s infinite greatness in which all the worlds amount to a single drop, so that whatever is closer to Him is more nullified before Him.
The Tzemach Tzedek (Derech Mitzvosecha 103a, cited in the notes) adds that Rabbi Chiya bar Abba likewise reviewed his learning every thirty days (Berachos 38b).
Marei mekomos
- 1ור״י הי׳ מצלי מתלתין יום · Rosh Hashanah 35a:8–9
- 2ענין התורה והתפלה · נתבאר בסה״מ תרל״ה-א ע׳ רכז ואילך.
- 3לגדולתו אין חקר · Psalms 145:3
Torah, speech and miracles ¶9–15
9ומהתבוננות זו יומשך הדאגה והמרירות ע״ד משארז״ל אין מוסרין רזי תורה1 אלא למי שלבו דואג בקרבו. דבודאי אין ר״ל עצבות ח״ו שהעצבות הרחיקו מאד חכמי האמת.23
From this contemplation there will follow worry and bitterness, along the lines of what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “The secrets of the Torah are transmitted only to one whose heart worries within him.” Certainly this does not mean sadness, G‑d forbid, for the masters of the truth kept very far from sadness.
The contemplation of prayer brings worry and bitterness, and the Talmud (Chagigah 13a) makes such a heart a condition: the Torah’s mysteries are passed on only to one “whose heart worries within him.” The Alter Rebbe stresses that this is not sadness, which the Kabbalists, “the masters of the truth,” rejected entirely.
אלא ר״ל מה שידאוג לבו ויתמרמר ממה שא״א להשיג גילוי עצמיות אלקותו ית׳ כי גם הגילוי שבעולמות עליונים הוא רק כטפה א׳ לבד כו׳
Rather, it means that his heart will worry and be embittered because it is impossible to grasp a revelation of the essence of His G‑dliness, may He be blessed; for even the revelation in the higher worlds is only like a single drop, etc.,
The worry is a longing: the heart is pained that it cannot grasp a revelation of G‑d’s own essence, since even all the revelation in the higher worlds is only a drop compared with Him.
כנ״ל. משא״כ בחי׳ א״ס ב״ה ממש לית מחשבה תפיסא ביה כלל. וכ״ז הוא ענין התפלה.
as mentioned above; whereas the level of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, Himself: “no thought can grasp Him at all.” All this is the matter of prayer.
The Infinite One Himself is beyond any thought. Contemplating this, together with the bitterness it brings, is the work of prayer.
וכמ״ש מזה בד״ה והיה מדי חדש בחדשו45 כו׳ בפי׳ וענין חולת אהבה. והנה בעסק התורה נאמר פקודי הוי׳ ישרים משמחי לב.
As is explained on this in the discourse beginning “And it shall be, from one New Moon to the next,” etc., in the explanation of the matter of “lovesick.” Now, concerning occupation with Torah it is said, “The precepts of G‑d are upright, gladdening the heart.”
The Alter Rebbe refers to his discourse on “from one New Moon to the next” (Isaiah 66:23), which describes the Community of Israel on weekdays as “lovesick,” longing for G‑d. Torah study, by contrast, is described by the verse “The precepts of G‑d are upright, gladdening the heart” (Psalms 19:9).
(ועמ״ש בד״ה צו כו׳ את קרבני6 בפ׳ פנחס) ומדקאמר משמחי משמע שמתחלה לא היה כן והיינו מפני שלבו דואג בקרבו ע״ד הנ״ל.
(See what is written in the discourse beginning “Command… My offering,” in Parshas Pinchas.) And since it says “gladdening,” it implies that at first it was not so, namely because his heart worries within him, in the manner mentioned above.
“Gladdening” implies that the heart was not glad before: it came to Torah study worried and bitter from the contemplation of prayer. The parenthesis refers to the discourse “Command… My offering” in Likkutei Torah, Pinchas.
ואעפ״כ ע״י עסק התורה ישמח לבו והיינו כי אע״ג דלגדולתו אין חקר7 ולית מחשבה תפיסא ביה כלל.
Nevertheless, through occupation with Torah his heart will rejoice. That is: although “His greatness is unsearchable” and “no thought can grasp Him at all,”
Yet Torah study makes that same heart rejoice, even though G‑d’s greatness is unsearchable and no thought can grasp Him.
אבל ע״י עסק התורה שהנפש היא תפיסא בה אזי עי״ז היא תפיסא ומתלבשת בהקב״ה ממש דאורייתא וקב״ה כולא חד89 וכמ״ש בבינונים ח״א פ׳ ד׳ ה׳ ע״ש.1011
yet through occupation with Torah, which the soul does grasp, through this it grasps and is enclothed in the Holy One, blessed be He, Himself; for “the Torah and the Holy One, blessed be He, are all one,” as is written in [Sefer Shel] Beinonim, Part I, chapters 4 [and] 5; see there.
The reason: the soul can grasp Torah, and since the Torah and G‑d are one, by grasping Torah it grasps, and is enclothed in, G‑d Himself. Tanya, chapters 4 and 5, explains how a mind that grasps a teaching of Torah is united with G‑d’s will and wisdom.
The paragraph contrasts prayer and Torah: prayer’s contemplation of G‑d’s infinity leaves the heart worried and longing, while Torah study gladdens it, because Torah, which the soul can grasp, is one with G‑d, so that through it the soul truly holds Him.
In the discourse cited from V’Zos HaBerachah (97b), the weekday state of being “lovesick” is likened to a villager overawed by the king’s exaltedness because it is new to him, while Shabbos is like the city-dweller for whom it is not new, who simply delights in the radiance of the king’s glory.
Marei mekomos
- 1אין מוסרין רזי תורה · Chagigah 13a:6
- 2שהעצבות הרחיקו מאד חכמי האמת · ראה אגה״ק סי׳ יא.
- 3שהעצבות הרחיקו מאד חכמי האמת · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 11:4
- 4בד״ה והי׳ מידי חדש בחדשו · לקו״ת ברכה צז, ב.
- 5והיה מדי חדש בחדשו · Isaiah 66:23
- 6צו כו׳ את קרבני · Numbers 28:2
- 7לגדולתו אין חקר · Psalms 145:3
- 8דאורייתא וקוב״ה כולא חד · Zohar I, 24a
- 9דאורייתא וקב״ה כולא חד · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 4:5
- 10פקודי ה׳ ישרים · Psalms 19:9
- 11בד״ה צו . . בפ׳ פנחס · לקו״ת פנחס עח, ב.
See what is written on this in Parshas Acharei, on the verse “For on this day He shall atone,” etc. And this is the meaning of “Israel is bound to the Torah, and the Torah to the Holy One, blessed be He”:
The Alter Rebbe refers to his discourse on “For on this day He shall atone” (Leviticus 16:30). Torah binds the Jew to G‑d, as the Zohar says: Israel is bound to the Torah, and the Torah to the Holy One, blessed be He.
וכמו הקשר שמחבר שני דברים נפרדים להיות קשורים ומיוחדים יחד בקשר אמיץ וחזק כמו ונפש יהונתן נקשרה4 בנפש דוד.
like a knot, which joins two separate things so that they are tied and united together in a firm and strong bond, as in “And the soul of Yehonasan was bound up with the soul of David.”
A knot joins two separate things firmly into one, like the bond between the souls of Yehonasan and David (I Samuel 18:1). So the Torah ties the soul and G‑d together.
והנה מצות הקריאה בדבור בד״ת הוא כי הנה מבואר בס״י שעשר ספירות בלי מה5 כשלהבת קשורה בגחלת6 ועד״מ השלהבת כשהיא בתוך הגחלת היא בבחי׳ העלם
Now, [the reason for] the mitzvah of reading words of Torah aloud, in speech, is this. It is explained in Sefer Yetzirah that “the ten Sefiros of nothingness (beli mah) are like a flame bound to a coal.” By way of analogy, the flame, while it is within the coal, is in a state of concealment
Now the maamar explains why Torah must be spoken aloud. Sefer Yetzirah (1:7) compares the ten Sefiros to “a flame bound to a coal”: a flame within a glowing coal is present but hidden.
(ועמ״ש סד״ה כי ביום הזה יכפר7 בענין בחי׳ צור עליון צור חיינו שהוא מקור ההויות כו׳) וכדי להמשיך השלהבת מההעלם אל הגילוי הוא ע״י רוח הנופח בכח.8
(see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “For on this day He shall atone,” on the level of the Supernal Rock, “the Rock of our lives,” which is the source of all that comes into being, etc.), and to draw the flame out of concealment into revelation is done by a wind (ruach) blowing with force.
The parenthesis refers to the Yom Kippur discourse on the Supernal Rock, the source of all existence. Blowing on a coal with force is what draws the hidden flame out into the open.
וכך עד״מ ע״י הבל פה של המדבר ד״ת שהוא בחי׳ לרוח ממללא910 עי״ז ממשיך אור התורה ממקורה מההעלם אל הגילוי
So too, by way of analogy, through the breath of the mouth of one who speaks words of Torah, which is the level of “a speaking spirit” (ruach memalela), he thereby draws the light of the Torah from its source, out of concealment into revelation
In the same way, the breath of one who speaks words of Torah, the “speaking spirit” that Onkelos says G‑d gave man (Genesis 2:7), draws the light of the Torah out of its hidden source into revelation.
(ועיין באגה״ק סד״ה ויעש דוד שם גבי ובאורייתא מתקיים עלמא כו׳ כי בדבורם ממשיכים כו׳).
(see Iggeres HaKodesh, at the end of the section beginning “And David made a name,” on “and through the Torah the world is sustained,” etc.: for through their speech they draw down, etc.).
The parenthesis cites Iggeres HaKodesh on “through the Torah the world is sustained”: those who learn draw down G‑dly light through their speech.
וזהו שמברכים נותן התורה לשון הוה.11 כי רוח שרשו גבוה מאד כמ״ש עד יערה עלינו רוח ממרום,12 וכמ״ש בס״י עשר ספירות כו׳
This is why we bless [G‑d as] “Who gives the Torah,” in the present tense. For the root of ruach (breath) is very high, as it is written, “until a spirit (ruach) is poured upon us from on high”; and as is written in Sefer Yetzirah, “the ten Sefiros,” etc.,
This is why the blessing over the Torah says “Who gives the Torah,” in the present tense: the giving goes on whenever the Torah is spoken. Ruach (breath, spirit) has a very high root, as in “until a spirit is poured upon us from on high” (Isaiah 32:15).
כשלהבת קשורה בגחלת כו׳ אחת רוח אלקים חיים13 כו׳ שע״י הרוח נמשך אח״כ גם בחי׳ אש שהוא גילוי בחי׳ השלהבת כו׳ ע״ש.
“like a flame bound to a coal,” etc., “One: the spirit of the living G‑d,” etc.; for through the spirit the level of fire is afterwards drawn forth as well, which is the revelation of the flame, etc.; see there.
In Sefer Yetzirah, after comparing the Sefiros to a flame bound to a coal, the first of the elements is “the spirit of the living G‑d” (1:9), and fire comes after it: spirit draws out fire, the revealed flame. So the breath of speech reveals the light hidden in the Torah.
The paragraph explains why Torah must be studied aloud: Torah binds Israel to G‑d like a knot, and as breath blown on a coal brings out its hidden flame, the breath of speech draws the light of the Torah from concealment into revelation, which is why G‑d is blessed as the One who “gives” the Torah, in the present.
The Rebbe Rashab (Hemshech 5672, cited in the notes) sums it up: “the breath of speech brings the light of the Torah out of concealment into revelation.” In Likkutei Torah, Sukkos (81c), the Alter Rebbe ties the present-tense blessing to “And I have put My words in your mouth”: G‑d gives the Torah every day, and one who learns is like one who answers after what G‑d Himself says.
Marei mekomos
- 1ע״פ כי ביום הזה יכפר · לקמן כה, ג.
- 2כי ביום הזה יכפר · Leviticus 16:30
- 3ישראל מתקשראן באורייתא · Zohar III, 73a
- 4ונפש יהונתן נקשרה · I Samuel 18:1
- 5ע״ס בלי מה · ס״י פ״א, מ״ז. ראה גם באוה״ת פ׳ פינחס ע׳ א׳קמז.
- 6עשר ספירות בלי מה כשלהבת קשורה בגחלת · Sefer Yetzirah 1:7
- 7סד״ה כי ביום הזה יכפר · לקמן כו, ג.
- 8והנה מצות הקריאה בדבור בד״ת . . ע״י רוח הנופח בכח · ”והיינו דרוח הדבור מוציא אור התורה מהעלם לגילוי כו׳” — המשך תער״ב ח״ג ע׳ א׳תו.
- 9לרוח ממללא · Genesis 2:7
- 10לרוח ממללא · Onkelos Genesis 2:7
- 11נותן התורה לשון הוה · ראה לקמן סוכות פא, ג. סה״מ תר״ל ע׳ ריא.
- 12עד יערה עלינו רוח ממרום · Isaiah 32:15
- 13אחת רוח אלקים חיים · Sefer Yetzirah 1:9
11ועמ״ש סד״ה ביום השמע״צ1 גבי ואשים דברי בפיך2 כו׳ מוצא פי3 ה׳ כו׳ ועמ״ש סד״ה ענין ק״ש בפי׳ קורא בתורה.4 אך רוח זה הכל לפי מה שהוא אדם.
See what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “On the eighth day, Atzeres,” on “And I have put My words in your mouth,” etc., [and] “what comes forth from the mouth of G‑d,” etc.; and see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “The matter of the recital of the Shema,” on the meaning of “one who reads in the Torah.” But this breath (ruach) all depends on what the person is.
Further references: the Shemini Atzeres discourse on “And I have put My words in your mouth” (Isaiah 51:16) and “what comes forth from the mouth of G‑d” (Deuteronomy 8:3), and the discourse on the Shema, on “one who reads in the Torah.” But how much light the breath of speech brings out depends on who is speaking.
והתנאים ואמוראים5 שהיו מבחי׳ מוחין דגדלות היה בכחם להמשיך בדיבורם בחי׳ גילוי אור התורה והשלהבת כו׳ שהוא בחי׳ שם הוי׳ כמ״ש כי הוי׳ אלקיך אש אוכלה הוא.6
And the Tannaim and Amoraim, who were of the level of the mature intellect (mochin degadlus), had the power to draw down through their speech the revelation of the light of the Torah and the flame, etc., which is the level of the Name Havayah, as it is written, “For Havayah your G‑d is a consuming fire.”
The Tannaim and Amoraim, whose minds were of “mature intellect” (mochin degadlus), could draw out through their speech the very flame of the Torah, the Name Havayah, of which it is said, “Havayah your G‑d is a consuming fire” (Deuteronomy 4:24).
The power of spoken Torah depends on the speaker; the Sages of the Mishnah and Talmud, with their mature intellect, revealed through their words the “fire” of the Torah, the Name Havayah itself.
Marei mekomos
- 1סד״ה ביום השמע״צ · לקו״ת שמע״צ פד, ב.
- 2ואשים דברי בפיך · Isaiah 51:16
- 3מוצא פי ה׳ · Deuteronomy 8:3
- 4סד״ה ענין ק״ש בפי׳ קורא בתורה · לקו״ת ואתחנן יב, ג.
- 5והתנאים ואמוראים · ראה אוה״ת בראשית קכט, ב.
- 6כי ה״א אש אוכלה הוא · Deuteronomy 4:24
12וע״כ היו יכולים לעשות נסים ומופתים גדולים. וזהו דאמר רפב״י1 גינאי חלוק לי מימיך. והיינו כי ים ויבשה הוא עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא והיינו ההעלם והגילוי שבסדר ההשתלשלות.
Therefore they were able to perform great miracles and wonders. This is [the meaning of] what Rabbi Pinchas ben Yair said, “Ginai, divide your waters for me.” That is: sea and dry land are the concealed world (alma de’iskasya) and the revealed world (alma de’isgalya), namely the concealment and the revelation within the order of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus).
This is how the Sages could work miracles, and the river Ginai shows how. In Kabbalah, sea and dry land stand for the concealed world (alma de’iskasya) and the revealed world (alma de’isgalya), the hidden and the revealed levels within the chain of descent.
אבל גילוי אור א״ס שנמשך ע״י התורה הוא מלמעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות וקמי׳ שוין ההעלם והגילוי שבהשתלשלות העולמות כו׳ שהוא בחי׳ למקצה השמים ועד קצה2 כו׳.
But the revelation of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) that is drawn down through the Torah is from above the order of hishtalshelus, and before it the concealment and the revelation in the chain of the worlds are equal, etc.; and this is the level of “from one end of the heavens to the other end,” etc.
The Infinite Light that Torah draws down comes from above the whole chain, and before it the hidden and the revealed are alike. This is the level the verse calls “from one end of the heavens to the other” (Deuteronomy 4:32).
The paragraph explains the Sages’ miracles: the light their Torah drew down is above the order of the worlds, where the hidden “sea” and the revealed “dry land” are equal, so at their word a river could become dry land.
The Kehot note cites two of the Rebbe’s maamarim (Shir HaMaalos 5722 and Padah VeShalom 5726), which find two things in the story: a change and innovation in the river that was not present even in its root and source, reflecting the quality of prayer; and that the change came through Rabbi Pinchas ben Yair’s command, reflecting the quality of blessing.
Marei mekomos
- 1וזהו דאמר רפב״י · Chullin 7a:2–3
- 2למקצה השמים ועד קצה · Deuteronomy 4:32
As is written in the Zohar, Parshas Terumah, end of 137a: “The end of the heavens: this is the upper world,” and it is the level of the concealed world, etc.
The Zohar (2:137a) reads “the end of the heavens” as “the upper world,” which is the concealed world: even the hidden realm has an “end,” a boundary.
משא״כ אור א״ס ב״ה אין שייך בו בחי׳ קצה ח״ו שאינו בבחי׳ גבול ח״ו. ולכן ע״י המשכת האור שע״י התורה פעל שהנהר חלק לו מימיו כו׳
Whereas to the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, the notion of an “end” does not apply, G‑d forbid, for it is not bounded, G‑d forbid. Therefore, through the drawing down of the light that comes through the Torah, he caused the river to divide its waters for him, etc.,
The Infinite Light has no “end” at all. So the light drawn down through Torah could make the river divide.
כענין הפך ים ליבשה2 שעלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא שוין נגד המשכה זו שמלמעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות וכמ״ש במ״א ע״פ
as in “He turned the sea into dry land”: for the concealed world and the revealed world are equal relative to this drawing-down, which is from above the order of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus); as is explained elsewhere on the verse
As in “He turned the sea into dry land” (Psalms 66:6): before this light, which is above the order of the worlds, concealed and revealed are equal, so sea can become land.
כי טובים דודיך מיין3 כו׳ (ועמ״ש סד״ה ואלה שמות4 ובד״ה באתי לגני56 בענין עמקו מחשבותיך7 ובד״ה ואהיה אצלו אמון8 בענין זמירות היו לי חקיך9 כו׳).13
“For your love is better than wine,” etc. (See what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “And these are the names,” and in the discourse beginning “I have come into My garden,” on “Your thoughts are very deep,” and in the discourse beginning “And I was with Him as a nursling (amon),” on “Your statutes have been songs to me,” etc.)
The Alter Rebbe refers to his discourses on “For your love is better than wine” (Song of Songs 1:2), “And these are the names,” “I have come into My garden” (on “Your thoughts are very deep”), and “And I was with Him as a nursling” (on “Your statutes have been songs to me”).
והנה הנשמות האלו הם הזוכים ללמוד במתיבתא דרקיע כי הנה התורה ישנה ג״כ באצי׳ ובבי״ע
Now, these souls are the ones who merit to learn in the Academy of the Firmament. For the Torah exists also in the World of Atzilus (Emanation) and in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah,
The maamar returns to the Academy: the souls who draw down such light through Torah are the ones who learn in the Academy of the Firmament. The Torah exists not only in this world but in every world, from Atzilus down through Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
כמו עד״מ מצות ציצית שהיא מצמר הכבשים וענין זה באצי׳10 היינו כמ״ש והכשבים הפריד יעקב11 וכתיב ושער רישי׳ כעמר נקא12 וכמ״ש במ״א, וכן ד׳ פרשיות דתפילין הם באצי׳ ד׳ מוחין כו׳
as, for example, the mitzvah of tzitzis, which is of sheep’s wool; and this matter in Atzilus is as it is written, “And Yaakov separated the lambs,” and it is written, “and the hair of His head like clean wool,” and as is explained elsewhere. Likewise, the four sections of the tefillin are, in Atzilus, the four mochin, etc.,
Tzitzis are made of sheep’s wool; in Atzilus this corresponds to the “lambs” that Yaakov separated (Genesis 30:40) and to the “hair like clean wool” of the Ancient of Days (Daniel 7:9). The four sections in the tefillin correspond in Atzilus to the four mochin: Chochmah, Binah, and the two sides of Daas.
וקשר של תפלין שהוא ד׳ הוא למעלה בחי׳ חיצוניות מל׳ דתבונה והוא שכמו למטה הרצועות עושין מעור החיצון. משא״כ הקלף שכותבין עליו הפרשיות נעשה ע״י גרירה ותיקון של העור כו׳.
and the knot of the tefillin, which is [shaped as the letter] dalet, is, on high, the level of the outer dimension (chitzoniyus) of Malchus of Tevunah. This is like below: the straps are made from the outer skin, whereas the parchment on which the sections are written is made by scraping and preparing the hide, etc.
The knot of the head-tefillin, shaped like the letter dalet, corresponds above to the outer dimension of Malchus of Tevunah, a lower aspect of Binah. Below, too, the straps are made from the outer hide, while the parchment for the sections is made by scraping and refining the skin.
The paragraph completes the explanation of the miracle (before the Infinite Light hidden and revealed are equal) and returns to the Academy: those souls learn Torah as it exists in Atzilus, where every mitzvah has its supernal counterpart, as tzitzis and tefillin show.
In Likkutei Torah, Emor (39a), cited in the note, the Alter Rebbe explains “And Yaakov separated the lambs”: Yaakov, the middle bar, draws from Keser and Chochmah into Z’eir Anpin, and “separated” means he drew this down into the world of separation, so that the supernal self-nullification reaches below as well.
Marei mekomos
- 1קצה השמים דא עלמא עילאה · Zohar, Terumah 16:192–202
- 2הפך ים ליבשה · Psalms 66:6
- 3כי טובים דודיך מיין · Song of Songs 1:2
- 4סד״ה ואלה שמות · אולי הכוונה לתו״א נב, ד ואילך.
- 5ובד״ה באתי לגני · לקו״ת שה״ש לא, ד ואילך.
- 6באתי לגני · Song of Songs 5:1
- 7עמקו מחשבותיך · Psalms 92:6
- 8ואהיה אצלו אמון · Proverbs 8:30
- 9זמירות היו לי חקיך · Psalms 119:54
- 10וענין זה באצי׳ · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תקצא ואילך.
- 11והכשבים הפריד יעקב · Genesis 30:40
- 12ושער רישי׳ כעמר נקא · Daniel 7:9
- 13ובד״ה ואהי׳ אצלו אמון · לקו״ת במדבר יז, ד.
14וכך למעלה הקשר היא בחי׳ הלבוש החיצון שבמל׳ דתבונה שהיא בחי׳ לבוש המחשבה. ויש כמה בחי׳ בלבושים דמחשבה1 עד״מ באדם כשמחשבתו היא בדבר חכמה בחכמה אלקית
So too above, the knot is the level of the outer garment in Malchus (sovereignty) of Tevunah, which is the level of the garment of thought. There are several levels in the garments of thought. By way of analogy, in a person: when his thought is on a matter of wisdom, in G‑dly wisdom,
Above, the knot is the outer garment of Malchus of Tevunah, called “the garment of thought.” To explain this, the Alter Rebbe turns to the garments of thought in a person, which differ according to what one thinks about.
שהיא התורה ה״ז בחי׳ לבוש פנימי שבמחשבה שנפשו מלובשת במחשבה זו שהיא מאד נעלה, ופעמים חושב חכמות אחרים הנצרכים לחכמת התורה2
which is the Torah, this is the level of an inner garment of thought, for his soul is enclothed in this thought, which is very lofty. At times he thinks about other branches of wisdom that are needed for the wisdom of the Torah,
Thinking G‑dly wisdom, the Torah, is the inner garment of thought, in which the soul is enclothed in something very lofty. Thinking other branches of knowledge that the Torah needs is a lower garment.
כמו תכונה או דקדוק וכה״ג והם לבושים בינונים ופעמים חושב בענינים גשמיים שהם לבושים גסים שבמחשבה כו׳.
such as astronomy or grammar and the like, and these are intermediate garments; and at times he thinks about physical matters, which are the coarse garments of thought, etc.
Astronomy and grammar, which serve the Torah, are intermediate garments; thoughts about physical matters are the coarse, outermost garments of thought.
The paragraph explains the “outer garment” of thought by analogy: a person’s thought has inner, intermediate and coarse garments, depending on whether it is occupied with Torah, with knowledge that serves the Torah, or with physical matters.
Tanya, at the end of chapter 8 (cited in the note), says that other branches of wisdom are permitted when one uses them as a tool, to earn a livelihood for serving G‑d, or knows how to use them in the service of G‑d or for His Torah, which is why the Rambam and Ramban engaged in them.
Marei mekomos
- 1ויש כמה בחי׳ בלבושים דמחשבה · ראה אמרי בינה שער הק״ש פל״א ואילך. לקו״ש ח״ז ע׳ 310.
- 2חכמות אחרים הנצרכים לחכמת התורה · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 8:9–10
15וכמ״כ עד״ז יובן למעלה שבמל׳ דתבונה יש ג׳ עורות פנימי׳ אמצעי׳ וחיצוניות. והיינו ג׳ בחי׳ לבושים לאור הבינה
Likewise, in the same way it will be understood above: in Malchus (sovereignty) of Tevunah there are three skins, inner, intermediate and outer, that is, three levels of garments for the light of Binah (understanding),
The same structure exists above: Malchus of Tevunah, the lowest aspect of Binah, has three “skins,” inner, intermediate and outer, which are three garments for the light of Binah.
וכמו שבמחשבה יש ג״כ בחי׳ מחדומ״ע כמ״ש במ״א ובחי׳ לבוש החיצון זהו הנק׳ קשר של ד׳ שבתפלין שהוא עד״מ עור החיצון כו׳ והוא בחי׳ לבוש החשמ״ל1 שמחיצוניות בינה כו׳.
just as in thought, too, there are the levels of thought, speech and action, as is explained elsewhere. And the level of the outer garment is what is called the knot of the dalet in the tefillin, which is, by way of analogy, the outer skin, etc.; and it is the level of the garment of the Chashmal, which is from the outer dimension (chitzoniyus) of Binah, etc.
This parallels a person’s thought, which itself has aspects of thought, speech and action. The outermost garment is the knot of the head-tefillin, the “outer skin”; in Kabbalistic terms it is the garment called Chashmal, a word from Ezekiel’s vision, which comes from the outer dimension of Binah.
והנה אמרז״ל אשרי מי שבא לכאן2 ותלמודו בידו (ועמ״ש בפי׳ ענין זה ע״פ כי תבואו3 אל הארץ4 בפ׳ בהר) שעי״ז זוכה ללמוד ג״כ בג״ע מהו ענין ציצית ותפילין באצילות כו׳ וכן בכל המצות.
Now, our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Fortunate is he who comes here with his learning in his hand” (and see what is written in explanation of this on the verse “When you come into the land,” in Parshas Behar): through this he merits to learn in Gan Eden as well what tzitzis and tefillin are in Atzilus, etc., and likewise all the mitzvos.
The Sages said, “Fortunate is he who comes here with his learning in his hand” (Pesachim 50a). The Alter Rebbe explains that one who learned the laws of tzitzis and tefillin in this world merits to learn in Gan Eden what they are in Atzilus, and so with every mitzvah; he refers to his discourse on “When you come into the land” (Likkutei Torah, Behar).
אך יש כמה מקומות למעלה שלומדים שם וכמ״ש בזהר ועמ״ש בפ׳ מקץ בד״ה מזוזה מימין5 ונ״ח משמאל6 בענין וידבר שלשת אלפים משל7 כו׳ ומתיבתא דרקיע הם הנשמות שבג״ע העליון אשר שם מאיר חב״ד דאצילות כנ״ל:
However, there are several places above where they learn, as is written in the Zohar; and see what is written in Parshas Mikeitz, in the discourse beginning “The mezuzah on the right and the Chanukah lamp on the left,” on “And he spoke three thousand parables,” etc. And the Academy of the Firmament is the souls in the Higher Gan Eden, where Chochmah, Binah and Daas of the World of Atzilus (Emanation) shine, as mentioned above.
There are several places of learning above, as the Zohar describes. The Academy of the Firmament is the souls of the Higher Gan Eden, where Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atzilus shine; the Alter Rebbe also refers to his Chanukah discourse in Torah Ohr on Shlomo’s “three thousand parables” (I Kings 5:12).
The paragraph completes the tefillin example (the knot is the outer garment of Binah, the Chashmal) and explains that one who learned the mitzvos here learns their supernal meaning in Gan Eden; the Academy of the Firmament is the Higher Gan Eden, lit by Chochmah, Binah and Daas of Atzilus.
In the Torah Ohr discourse cited (Mikeitz 42b), the mezuzah, placed on the right, is an ascent from below to above like the mitzvos, while the Chanukah lamp, on the left, is the drawing down of the light of the Torah, since the Greeks sought to make Israel forget the Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1לבוש החשמ״ל · ראה תו״א יב, ד. סה״מ תקס״ב ע׳ רנג ואילך. אוה״ת ויקרא נז.
- 2אשרי מי שבא לכאן · Pesachim 50a:7–8
- 3ע״פ כי תבואו · לקו״ת בהר מ, ד.
- 4כי תבואו אל הארץ · Leviticus 25:2
- 5בד״ה מזוזה מימין · תו״א מב, ב.
- 6מזוזה מימין ונ״ח משמאל · Shabbat 22a:2
- 7וידבר שלשת אלפים משל · I Kings 5:12
Kelipas nogah of Atzilus and the Name Havayah ¶16–22
16ג ומעתה נחזור לעניננו להבין ענין לימוד זה דבהרת איך שייך למעלה בג״ע.1 אך הנה מתחלה צ״ל מה דאיתא בע״ח שמ״ח ושמ״ט פ״ג שקליפת נוגה דאצי׳ היא טו״ר חציה טוב וחציה כלפי חוץ רע.
3. Now let us return to our subject, to understand the matter of this study of the baheres: how does it apply above, in Gan Eden? But first we must understand what is stated in Etz Chaim, Shaar 48 and Shaar 49, chapter 3: that kelipas nogah (the glowing husk) of Atzilus is good and evil, half of it good, and the half facing outward evil.
Section 3 returns to the main question: how can the laws of the baheres, a bodily affliction, be studied in Gan Eden? First a Kabbalistic puzzle: the Arizal’s Etz Chaim speaks of kelipas nogah, the “glowing husk,” even in Atzilus, half of it good and the half facing outward evil.
דלכאורה אין זה מובן כלל איך שייך כלל לומר קליפת נוגה דאצילות הלא נודע פי׳ אצי׳ שהוא בחי׳ אלקות כמבואר במ״א2 שהוא מלשון ויאצל מן הרוח3 דגבי משה.
For seemingly this is not understood at all: how can one speak at all of a kelipas nogah of the World of Atzilus (Emanation)? The meaning of Atzilus is known to be the level of G‑dliness, as is explained elsewhere, that it is from the term “and He drew (vaya’etzel) from the spirit,” said of Moshe.
This is hard to understand, since Atzilus means G‑dliness itself. The word comes from “and He drew (vaya’etzel) from the spirit” (Numbers 11:25), said of the spirit drawn from Moshe to the elders, an emanation that remains close to and one with its source.
Section 3 sets out to explain how the laws of the baheres apply in Gan Eden, and begins with a puzzle: how can there be a kelipah, half of it evil, in Atzilus, which is G‑dliness itself?
Marei mekomos
- 1איך שייך למעלה בג״ע · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תעג.
- 2שו״ה הלא — כמבואר במ״א · ראה תו״א יד, א.
- 3ויאצל מן הרוח · Numbers 11:25
17וא״כ איך שייך לומר קליפות דאצי׳. ומכ״ש ענין חציה רע. עוד צ״ל מה דאיתא בזהר1 ובע״ח שער לאה ורחל פ״ז. שסיבת הנגעים הוא מחמת הסתלקות אור אבא.
If so, how can one speak of kelipos (husks) of Atzilus? And all the more so, that half of it is evil! We must also understand what is stated in the Zohar and in Etz Chaim, Shaar Leah and Rachel, chapter 7: that the cause of the afflictions (nega’im) is the withdrawal of the light of Abba.
The difficulty is sharpened: kelipos in Atzilus, and half of them evil! A second puzzle follows: the Zohar and the Arizal (Shaar Leah and Rachel, ch. 7) say that tzara’as afflictions are caused by the withdrawal of the light of Abba, that is, of Chochmah.
This is why the Targum of tzara’as is segiruta (“closing”): when the light of Abba is hidden and closed off and does not shine in Z’eir Anpin (the emotive attributes), the affliction is drawn forth and comes.
This is why the Targum translates tzara’as as segiru, “closing”: the affliction comes when the light of Abba is closed off and does not shine into Z’eir Anpin, the emotive attributes.
ולכן נאמר והובא אל הכהן4 כי כהן שרשו מחכמה שתיקון הנגע הוא ע״י שממשיכים בחי׳ אור אבא
Therefore it says, “and he shall be brought to the kohen,” for the root of the kohen is in Chochmah (wisdom): the remedy of the affliction is by drawing down the light of Abba,
So the Torah says the afflicted person “shall be brought to the kohen” (Leviticus 13:2): the kohen is rooted in Chochmah, and the remedy is to draw the light of Abba down again.
וזהו ע״י הכהן (וע׳ בזח״א בראשית ל״א א׳ ע״פ לעומת המסגרת. דא הוא אתר סגיר דלא פתיחא5 היינו חכ״ע שנק׳ עדן עין לא ראתה.6
and this is through the kohen. (See the Zohar, Part I, Bereishis, 31a, on the verse “opposite the frame (misgeres)”: “This is a closed place that is not open,” that is, Supernal Chochmah, which is called Eden, [of which it is said,] “no eye has seen”;
The long parenthesis gathers support. The Zohar (1:31a) reads “the frame” (misgeres) as “a closed place that is not open,” Supernal Chochmah, which is called Eden, of which it is said, “no eye has seen” (Isaiah 64:3).
בר בשביל חד דקיק פי׳ בסה״מ סי׳ קט״ז דהיינו יסוד דאבא דאתיידע בגניזו לגביה דהיינו שמאיר בבינה ובזו״נ. וכמ״ש בע״ח שמ״ז פ״ג בפי׳ כולם בחכמה עשית.7
“except through one narrow path,” which is explained in Sefer Hadras Melech, section 116, [as] Yesod of Abba, “which is known in concealment toward it,” that is, it shines into Binah and into Z’eir Anpin and Nukva. And as is written in Etz Chaim, Shaar 47, chapter 3, on the meaning of “You have made them all with Chochmah”:
It opens only through “one narrow path,” which Sefer Hadras Melech explains as Yesod of Abba, through which Chochmah shines into Binah and into Z’eir Anpin and Nukva. The Arizal explains “You have made them all with Chochmah” (Psalms 104:24) in the same way.
כי באצילות אור א״ס מתלבש בחכמה ועל ידו מאיר בכל האצי׳ כו׳. אכן פי׳ סגירותא היינו שנסגר אור אבא לגמרי ואינו מאיר גם ע״י שביל דקיק הנ״ל.
that in Atzilus the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) is enclothed in Chochmah, and through it shines in all of Atzilus, etc. But the meaning of segiruta is that the light of Abba is closed off completely and does not shine even through the narrow path mentioned above.
In Atzilus the Infinite Light is enclothed in Chochmah and shines through it into everything else. Segiru, “closing,” means that the light of Abba is shut off entirely and does not shine even through that narrow path.
וע״דמש״ש בע״ח שהבריאה אינה מקבלת רק מהבינה לבד כו׳ ע״ש וכשנסגר אור אבא עד״ז מבחי׳ ז״א דאצי׳ מזה נמשך בחי׳ הנגע ועיין במא״א אות נון סעיף ז׳.
This is along the lines of what is written there in Etz Chaim, that Beriah receives only from Binah, etc.; see there. And when the light of Abba is closed off in this way from the level of Z’eir Anpin of Atzilus, from this the affliction is drawn forth. And see Me’orei Or, the letter nun, section 7.
Just as the Arizal says that the World of Beriah receives only from Binah, so when the light of Abba is closed off from Z’eir Anpin of Atzilus, Z’eir Anpin is left with Binah alone, and from this the affliction comes about. The reader is also referred to Me’orei Or.
והתיקון לזה הוא ע״י הכהן י״ל ע״ד מ״ש בזח״ב יתרו ס״ז ב׳ שהכהן משמש וממשיך מבחי׳ קדש הקדשים8 שהם ג״ר כח״ב ובפ׳ עקב דף רע״א סע״א גבי ברוך אתה.
The remedy for this through the kohen can be explained along the lines of what is written in the Zohar, Part II, Yisro, 67b: that the kohen serves and draws down from the level of the Holy of Holies, which are the first three [Sefiros], Keser, Chochmah and Binah; and in Parshas Eikev, folio 271a, end, on “Blessed are You”:
Why the kohen is the remedy: following the Zohar (2:67b), the kohen serves and draws down from the Holy of Holies, which the Alter Rebbe identifies with the first three Sefiros, Keser, Chochmah and Binah.
“You (Atah) are a kohen forever”: the level of the kohen, which is called Atah (“You”), draws down from the level of Baruch (“Blessed”), Supernal Chochmah, etc. And see further in Parshas Balak, 193b.)
The Zohar on Eikev (3:271a) reads the blessing formula “Blessed are You” with “You are a kohen forever” (Psalms 110:4): the kohen, called atah (“You”), draws down from baruch (“Blessed”), Supernal Chochmah. So the kohen draws down from Chochmah.
אבל כאשר נסגר ונעלם אור אבא שהוא בחי׳ חכמה עילאה אזי אע״פ שיאיר אור הבינה בז״א עכ״ז יכול להיות התהוות הנגעים
But when the light of Abba, which is the level of Supernal Chochmah, is closed off and hidden, then, even though the light of Binah shines in Z’eir Anpin, nevertheless afflictions can come into being
When the light of Abba, Supernal Chochmah, is closed off, afflictions can arise even though the light of Binah still shines in Z’eir Anpin.
(כי בינה דינין מתערין מינה11 יען שהוא מקור ליש כו׳) וגם זה לכאורה תמוה איך יכול להיות שאע״פ שיאיר אור הבינה אעפ״כ יוכל להיות הנגע.
(for “from Binah judgments are aroused,” since it is the source of yesh (existence), etc.). This too is seemingly puzzling: how can it be that although the light of Binah shines, the affliction can nevertheless occur?
Binah alone is not enough, for “from Binah judgments are aroused” (Zohar 3:10b): it is the source of yesh, of separate existence. Still the Alter Rebbe asks how an affliction can arise while the light of Binah is shining.
ונקדים מ״ש בע״ח12 דשם אל בחסד ושם אלקים בגבורה ושם13 הוי׳ בתפארת והרי שם הוי׳ הוא ראשון וגדול מכל השמות ולמה תפארת
Let us first preface what is written in Etz Chaim: that the Name Kel is in Chesed, the Name Elokim in Gevurah, and the Name Havayah in Tiferes. Now, the Name Havayah is the first and greatest of all the Names; why then is Tiferes,
To answer, he first brings the Arizal’s teaching that the Name Kel is in Chesed, Elokim in Gevurah, and Havayah in Tiferes. But Havayah is the first and greatest of the Names.
שהוא שלישי בסדר המשכת המדות עליונות שסדרן חג״ת הנה הוא נק׳ בשם עליון וגבוה מספירת חסד שהוא ראשון בהמדות.
which is third in the order of the drawing-down of the supernal attributes, whose order is Chesed, Gevurah, Tiferes, called by a name loftier and higher than the Sefirah of Chesed, which is first among the attributes?
So why does Tiferes, third in the order Chesed, Gevurah, Tiferes, bear a higher Name than Chesed, the first of the attributes? The answer will explain the affliction.
The paragraph raises a second puzzle: tzara’as comes from the closing-off of the light of Abba (Chochmah) and is remedied by the kohen, who draws Chochmah down, yet afflictions arise even while Binah shines. To explain this the Alter Rebbe asks why Tiferes, and not Chesed, bears the highest Name, Havayah.
The Zohar (3:49b) explains tzara’as as “the closing of the supernal light, the closing of the supernal goodness, which does not come down to the world,” and the kohen below as the one prepared “to open that closing” and kindle the lamps, so that blessings are found above and below and the affliction passes.
Marei mekomos
- 1דאיתא בזהר · ח״ג מז, א. מט, ב [כ].
- 2צרעת סגירותא · Zohar, Tazria 20:87–22:96
- 3צרעת סגירותא · Zohar, Tazria 25:134–27:143
- 4והובא אל הכהן · Leviticus 13:2
- 5דא הוא אתר סגיר דלא פתיחא · Zohar, Bereshit 32:330–35:339
- 6עין לא ראתה · Isaiah 64:3
- 7כולם בחכמה עשית · Psalms 104:24
- 8קדש הקדשים · Zohar, Yitro 1:8–18
- 9אתה כהן לעולם · Zohar, Eikev 1:2–12
- 10אתה כהן לעולם · Psalms 110:4
- 11בינה דינין מתערין מינה · Zohar III, 10b
- 12מ״ש בע״ח · ש׳ השמות פ״ג ופ״ו. וע׳ בפרדס להרמ״ק ז״ל ש׳ השמות פ״ה (א-ל) שם אלקים שם (פ״ז-ח) ושם הוי׳ בת״ת (שם פ״י וי״א) ובזח״ג (רצו, א). [כ].
- 13שם אל בחסד ושם אלקים בגבורה ושם הוי׳ בתפארת · Zohar, Vayikra 24:160–170
The Maggid, may the memory of the righteous and holy be a blessing, answered this: as is known, the shattering of the vessels (sheviras hakeilim) that took place in the World of Tohu (Chaos) was because each attribute stood by itself,
The answer comes from the Maggid of Mezritch, the Alter Rebbe’s teacher. The shattering of the vessels in the World of Tohu (“Chaos”) happened because each attribute stood alone.
ולא היה התכללות המדות זה עם זה וענין עולם התיקון הוא שנעשה התכללות המדות שזה צריך לזה חסד כלול עם גבורה וגבורה עם חסד וע״י מה נעשה ההתכללות
and there was no inter-inclusion of the attributes with one another. And the matter of the World of Tikkun (Rectification) is that the inter-inclusion of the attributes came about, so that one needs the other: Chesed included with Gevurah, and Gevurah with Chesed. And through what does the inter-inclusion come about?
In the World of Tikkun (“Rectification”) the attributes are inter-included: each needs the other, so that Chesed contains Gevurah and Gevurah contains Chesed. But how can opposites merge?
שהרי התכללות זו הוא ענין חיבור ב׳ הפכים חו״ג אש ומים הנה זהו ע״י הארת אור א״ס המאיר בהן שעי״ז הם בבחי׳ ביטול לאור א״ס ב״ה המאיר בהן ועי״ז יוכלו להתחבר יחדיו.
For this inter-inclusion is the joining of two opposites, Chesed (kindness) and Gevurah (restraint), fire and water. This comes about through the radiance of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) that shines in them: through this they are in a state of self-nullification (bittul) to the Infinite Light, blessed be He, that shines in them, and thereby they can join together.
Chesed and Gevurah are opposites, like water and fire. They can join only through the Infinite Light shining in them, before which both are nullified (bittul); in that shared self-nullification they can unite.
וזהו ענין עושה שלום במרומיו2 והיינו שלא תהיה כל מדה בתגבורת עד שלא תוכל להתחבר עם מדה שכנגדה כמו שהיה בעולם התהו כ״א שתתכלל ג״כ עם הפכה מחמת הביטול כו׳.
This is the meaning of “He makes peace in His heights”: that no attribute should be so dominant that it cannot join with the attribute opposite it, as it was in the World of Tohu; but rather that it be included also with its opposite, because of the self-nullification, etc.
This is “He makes peace in His heights” (Job 25:2): no attribute dominates so as to shut out its opposite, as happened in Tohu, but through self-nullification each includes its opposite.
The paragraph gives the Maggid’s principle: Tohu shattered because each attribute stood alone, whereas Tikkun is the inter-inclusion of opposite attributes, made possible only by the Infinite Light shining in them, before which they are nullified and so can join.
Marei mekomos
- 1ותירץ ע״ז המגיד זצוק״ל · מובא גם בביאוה״ז ח, ג. ראה מגיד דבריו ליעקב (הוצאת קה״ת) בהוספות סי׳ כט וסי׳ לו. ראה גם יהל אור ע׳ תקנב. אוה״ת בראשית תרסז, א. ד״ה מצה זו תר״ם ע׳ עב. בהנסמן במאמרי אדה״ז-פרשיות דלהלן.
- 2עושה שלום במרומיו · Job 25:2
19והנה עם היות כי מדות חו״ג דאצי׳ מאיר בהן אור א״ס ב״ה כי איהו וגרמוהי חד12 אעפ״כ נק׳ כל מדה בשם בפ״ע היינו זה בחי׳ חסד
Now, although the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, shines in the attributes of Chesed and Gevurah of Atzilus, for “He and His vessels are one” (ihu vegarmohi chad), nevertheless each attribute is called by a name of its own: this one is the level of Chesed,
Even in Atzilus, where the Infinite Light shines in the attributes (as the Tikkunei Zohar says, “He and His vessels are one”), each attribute still has its own Name and identity. One of them is the attribute of Chesed.
ולכן הוא שם אל כדכתיב חסד אל כל היום וזה הוא בחי׳ גבורה ונק׳ שם אלקים הרי מ״מ הם ב׳ בחי׳ הפכיים3
and therefore it is the Name Kel, as it is written, “The kindness of Kel is all day long”; and this one is the level of Gevurah and is called the Name Elokim. Thus they are, after all, two opposite levels.
Chesed bears the Name Kel, as in “The kindness of Kel is all day long” (Psalms 52:3), and Gevurah bears the Name Elokim. So they remain two opposite qualities.
והיינו משום דכאשר מאיר אור א״ס ב״ה בהמדות עליונות בבחי׳ גילוי רב אזי דוקא נעשה ההתכללות ויחוד המדות להיות לאחדים ממש.
That is because only when the Infinite Light, blessed be He, shines in the supernal attributes in great revelation does the inter-inclusion and unification of the attributes come about, so that they become truly one.
The reason: only when the Infinite Light shines in the attributes in great revelation are they inter-included and united so as to become truly one; otherwise each keeps its own character.
The paragraph sharpens the Maggid’s principle: even in Atzilus, Chesed (Kel) and Gevurah (Elokim) remain distinct opposites; they become truly one only when the Infinite Light shines in them in great revelation.
Marei mekomos
- 1איהו וגרמוהי חד · תקו״ז בהקדמה ג, ב.
- 2איהו וגרמוהי חד · Tikkunei Zohar 3b:9–10
- 3חסד א-ל כל היום · Psalms 52:3
20וזהו פי׳ הוי׳ אחד1 שהוא ענין להיות יחוד המדות ממש שלא יהיו ענפין מתפרדין והיינו ע״י המשכת אור א״ס ב״ה בהם דלאו מכל אינון מדות2 איהו כלל3
This is the meaning of “Havayah is One”: that the attributes be truly united, so that they are not “separated branches”; and this comes about through the drawing down into them of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, for “He is not any of these attributes at all.”
This is the meaning of “Havayah is One” (Deuteronomy 6:4): the attributes become truly one, not “separated branches,” through the Infinite Light drawn into them; for, as the Tikkunei Zohar says, He Himself is none of these attributes.
כי החי״ת מורה על ז׳ רקיעים והארץ שהוא בחי׳ מעלה ומטה והד׳ הוא ד׳ רוחות העולם4 מזרח מערב צפון ודרום
For the ches [of echad] signifies the seven firmaments and the earth, which is the dimension of above and below, and the dalet is the four directions of the world, east, west, north and south;
The laws of reciting the Shema explain the letters of echad, “one”: the ches, whose value is eight, stands for the seven firmaments and the earth, above and below, and the dalet, four, for the four directions of the world.
והיינו בחי׳ ששה קצוות ששרשן מששה מדות עליונות וע״י גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה בהן שזהו ענין אלף אלופו של עולם מתייחדי׳ באחד ממש
that is, the six extremities, whose root is in the six supernal attributes. And through the revelation of the Infinite Light, blessed be He, in them, which is the matter of the alef, the Master (Aluf) of the world, they are united as truly one.
Together these are the six extremities, rooted in the six supernal attributes. The alef, read as aluf, “Master” of the world, stands for the Infinite Light revealed in them, which unites them as truly “one.”
אמנם כאשר אין מאיר בהן א״ס ב״ה בגילוי רב רק כפי בחי׳ האור השייך להמדה ההיא בפרט אזי הן המדות חסד בחי׳ בפ״ע וגבורה בפ״ע.
However, when the Infinite One, blessed be He, does not shine in them in great revelation, but only according to the level of light that belongs to that particular attribute, then the attributes are Chesed, a level by itself, and Gevurah, by itself.
Ordinarily each attribute receives only the light that belongs to it, and then Chesed and Gevurah remain separate, each by itself.
רק כאשר נצרך שיהיה התכללות אז מאיר בהן אור א״ס בגילוי רב יותר מכפי מדתם5 ועי״ז תוכלל המדה בהפכה להיות לאחדים ממש
Only when inter-inclusion is needed does the Infinite Light shine in them in great revelation, beyond their own measure, and through this the attribute is included in its opposite, so that they become truly one.
When inter-inclusion is needed, the Infinite Light shines in them beyond their own measure, and then each attribute is included in its opposite and they become truly one.
נמצא אור א״ס ב״ה אין מאיר בהם בתמידות (ר״ל בגילוי רב) רק לפרקים בעת רצון כאשר נצרך שיתכללו זה בזה ביחוד גמור.
It follows that the Infinite Light, blessed be He, does not shine in them constantly (that is, in great revelation), but only at times, at a time of favor, when they need to be included in each other in complete unity.
So in Chesed and Gevurah this great revelation is not constant. It comes only at times, at “a time of favor,” when they must be joined in complete unity.
והנה יחוד והתכללות זו בין המדות חו״ג הוא ע״י התפארת שמדתו הוא שהוא ממוצע בין חו״ג
Now, this unity and inter-inclusion between the attributes of Chesed (kindness) and Gevurah (restraint) is through Tiferes (beauty), whose attribute is that it mediates between Chesed and Gevurah,
The union of Chesed and Gevurah comes about through Tiferes, whose very nature is to mediate between them.
והוא בחי׳ התכללות ובו הוא שנמשך ומאיר ההארה מא״ס ב״ה בגילוי רב וכמשנ״ת למעלה דת״ת נק׳ קדוש ע״ש שנמשך בו מבחי׳ כתר שהוא למעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות
and it is the level of inter-inclusion; and it is into it that the radiance from the Infinite One, blessed be He, is drawn and shines in great revelation. As was explained above, Tiferes is called “holy” because there is drawn into it from the level of Keser (the Crown), which is above the order of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)
Tiferes is inter-inclusion itself, and into it the radiance of the Infinite One is drawn in great revelation. As explained at the start of the maamar, Tiferes is called “holy” because it receives from Keser, which is above the order of descent.
(וע׳ באג״ה בד״ה והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום67 ובזח״ב תרומה קע״ה ב׳ ע״פ והבריח התיכון)8 וע״י גילוי זה נעשה התכללות ההפכיים דהיינו שהוא המחבר חו״ג וממשיך בהם גילוי זה.
(see Iggeres HaKodesh, in the section beginning “And the work of tzedakah shall be peace,” and the Zohar, Part II, Terumah, 175b, on the verse “and the middle bar”). And through this revelation the inter-inclusion of the opposites comes about: that is, it is what joins Chesed and Gevurah and draws this revelation into them.
The references are to Iggeres HaKodesh, on “And the work of tzedakah shall be peace” (Isaiah 32:17), and to the Zohar on “the middle bar.” This revelation is what joins the opposites, Chesed and Gevurah, and draws the light into them.
ונמצא א״כ מאחר שכל בחי׳ ומהות מדת התפארת הוא ענין התכללות המדות ביחוד גמור ממש מוכרח שיהיה בו הארת אור א״ס בתמידות מאחר שזהו מדת ת״ת
It follows, then, that since the entire nature and essence of the attribute of Tiferes is the inter-inclusion of the attributes in complete, true unity, there must necessarily be in it the radiance of the Infinite Light constantly, since this is the attribute of Tiferes,
Since the whole essence of Tiferes is the union of the attributes, it must have the radiance of the Infinite Light constantly, not only at times.
היינו ההתכללות (ועי׳ בהרמ״ז פ׳ יתרו בדף ע״ח והנה בכל תפארת יש כללות חו״ג כאחד כו׳).
namely, inter-inclusion (and see the Ramaz, Parshas Yisro, on folio 78: “Now, in every Tiferes Chesed and Gevurah are encompassed together as one,” etc.).
The attribute of Tiferes simply is inter-inclusion. The Ramaz (Rabbi Moshe Zacuto) notes in his commentary on the Zohar that in every Tiferes Chesed and Gevurah are encompassed together as one.
וההתכללות אין יכול להיות בלתי הארת אור א״ס ולכן נק׳ תפארת בשם עליון וגבוה מכל המדות היינו שם הוי׳ מאחר שמוכרח שיהיה בו גילוי אור א״ס בתמידות (ועמ״ש בד״ה החלצו)9
And inter-inclusion cannot exist without the radiance of the Infinite Light. Therefore Tiferes is called by a Name loftier and higher than all the attributes, namely the Name Havayah, since there must necessarily be in it a revelation of the Infinite Light constantly (and see what is written in the discourse beginning “Arm yourselves”).
Inter-inclusion is impossible without the Infinite Light, and Tiferes always has it; therefore Tiferes bears the highest Name, Havayah. This answers the question why Tiferes, and not Chesed, carries that Name.
משא״כ בחו״ג שאין בהם הארת אור א״ס עד״ז שבת״ת רק בעת שנמשך היחוד שזהו ענין אמליכתיה למעלה ולמטה ולד׳ רוחות שאזי נעשה התכללות המדות שיתכללו זב״ז ביחוד גמור ולא בתמידות כנ״ל:101112
Whereas in Chesed and Gevurah there is no radiance of the Infinite Light in the way there is in Tiferes, except at the time when the unity is drawn down, which is the matter of “You have made Him King above and below and to the four directions”: for then the inter-inclusion of the attributes comes about, so that they are included in each other in complete unity; but not constantly, as mentioned above.
Chesed and Gevurah receive the Infinite Light in this way only when unity is drawn down, as when one proclaims G‑d King “above and below and to the four directions” in the Shema (Berachos 13b). Then they are united, but not constantly.
The paragraph answers why Tiferes bears the Name Havayah: the attributes become one only through a great revelation of the Infinite Light, which Chesed and Gevurah receive only at times, whereas Tiferes, whose essence is their union, has it constantly.
In the Matos discourse cited (Likkutei Torah, Matos 86a), the Alter Rebbe connects this with the sin of baseless hatred in the Second Temple era: discord is the opposite of the divine holiness, which is oneness and inter-inclusion, as in “Havayah is One” and “He and His vessels are one,” and that is why Hillel called “What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow” the foundation of the whole Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1הוי׳ אחד · Deuteronomy 6:4
- 2דלאו מכל אינון מדות · ת״ז בהקדמה.
- 3דלאו מכל אינון מדות איהו כלל · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:5–7
- 4החי״ת מורה על ז׳ רקיעים והארץ שהוא בחי׳ מעלה ומטה והד׳ הוא ד׳ רוחות העולם · Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim 61:6
- 5בגילוי רב יותר מכפי מדתם · ראה בד״ה באתי לגני תשל״ח (סה״מ מלוקט-ג ע׳ סא הערה 43).
- 6והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום · Isaiah 32:17
- 7והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 12:1
- 8והבריח התיכון · Zohar, Terumah 94:908–96:918
- 9בתמידות — בד״ה החלצו · לקו״ת מטות פו, א.
- 10ביחוד — כנ״ל · ראה להלן בהוספות להערות וציונים.
- 11ח׳ מורה על ז״ר וארץ . . אלופו ש״ע · סמ״ק קד. שו״ע או״ח סס״א ס״ו. שו״ע אדמה״ז שם.
- 12אמליכתי׳ למע׳ . . רוחות · Berakhot 13b:15–16
21והנה עפ״ז יובן ענין ק״נ דאצילות שנק׳ בשם קליפה הגם שהוא12 בבחי׳ אצילות ומאחר שהוא בבחי׳ אצילות הרי עכצ״ל שהיא מקבלת הארת אלקות ואעפ״כ נק׳ בשם ק״נ.
Now, according to this, the matter of kelipas nogah (the glowing husk) of the World of Atzilus (Emanation) will be understood: it is called by the name kelipah although it is on the level of Atzilus; and since it is on the level of Atzilus, you are compelled to say that it receives a radiance of G‑dliness, and nevertheless it is called kelipas nogah.
With this, kelipas nogah of Atzilus can be understood. It belongs to Atzilus and so must receive some G‑dly radiance, yet it is still called a kelipah, a husk.
והענין כי בחי׳ התכללות שיש בע״ס דאצילות שמאיר הארת אור א״ס ועי״ז הם מתכללים זע״ז כנ״ל זו הבחינה אינה כלל בנוגה דאצילות.
The explanation is this: the inter-inclusion that exists in the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus, in which the radiance of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) shines so that they are included in one another, as mentioned above, is a level that is not present at all in the nogah of Atzilus.
What makes the Sefiros of holy Atzilus what they are is their inter-inclusion, brought about by the radiance of the Infinite Light shining in them. That quality is entirely absent from the nogah of Atzilus.
אלא שהמדות שבק״נ דאצי׳ הם ענפין מתפרדין שהחסד אינו מתכלל עם הגבורה ואינן מתייחדין כלל זה עם זה.
Rather, the attributes in kelipas nogah of Atzilus are “separated branches”: the Chesed is not included with the Gevurah, and they do not unite with each other at all.
In nogah the attributes are “separated branches”: its Chesed does not include Gevurah, and the two do not unite at all.
The paragraph resolves the first puzzle: kelipas nogah can exist in Atzilus because, although it receives G‑dly radiance, it lacks the inter-inclusion that the Infinite Light brings, so its attributes remain separate.
Marei mekomos
- 1שהוא — מאיר עליהם בבחי׳ מקיף לבד · ראה המשך תער״ב סעי׳ רי.
- 2שהוא — ע״פ ראה ריח בני · תו״א כ, ג.
22וכנודע שהפסולת משבה״כ דעולם התהו נפל בק״נ וראשיתם ק״נ דאצילות והרי בעולם התהו לא היה בחי׳ התכללות וכ״ש אחר שבה״כ כו׳.
As is known, the waste from the shattering of the vessels (sheviras hakeilim) of the World of Tohu fell into kelipas nogah, and the first of them is kelipas nogah of Atzilus; and in the World of Tohu there was no inter-inclusion, and all the more so after the shattering of the vessels, etc.
As the Arizal teaches, the debris of the shattered vessels of Tohu fell into kelipas nogah, the highest of it being the nogah of Atzilus. Tohu had no inter-inclusion to begin with, and still less after its vessels shattered.
ולכן אין אור א״ס נמשך ומתלבש בהן כלל ע״ד התלבשותו באצי׳ דקדושה מחמת שאינן כלי לגילוי אור א״ס שאינו שורה אלא במקום הביטול ובמקום ההתכללות כו׳
Therefore the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) is not drawn into them and enclothed in them at all in the way it is enclothed in the Atzilus of holiness, since they are not a vessel for the revelation of the Infinite Light, which rests only in a place of self-nullification (bittul) and a place of inter-inclusion, etc.;
So the Infinite Light is not enclothed in these kelipos as it is in holy Atzilus. They are not vessels for it, since it rests only where there is self-nullification and inter-inclusion.
רק שהוא מאיר עליהם בבחי׳ מקיף לבד וכמ״ש במ״א ע״פ ראה ריח בני1 כו׳ וע״כ נקראו קליפות שהקליפה היא שאין לה טעם ולחלוחית כו׳
it only shines upon them as an encompassing light (makif), as is explained elsewhere on the verse “See, the fragrance of my son,” etc. Therefore they are called kelipos, for a kelipah (husk) is something that has no taste and no moisture, etc.,
It only shines on them from outside, as an encompassing light, as explained on “See, the fragrance of my son” (Genesis 27:27). That is why they are called kelipos: like the husk of a fruit, they have no taste and no moisture.
כמו בהפרי (וי״ל כי שם מ״ה נק׳ שקיו דאילנא23 בחי׳ לחלוחית והמשכת אור א״ס שעי״ז נעשה התכללות אמיתי׳ להיות לאחדים עד״מ טבע המים לדבק שחלקי הקמח נעשים גוש אחד ע״י המים.
as with the fruit. (It may be said that the Name Mah is called “the watering of the tree,” the level of moisture and the drawing down of the Infinite Light, through which true inter-inclusion comes about, so that they become one; by way of analogy, it is the nature of water to bind, for the particles of flour become one mass through the water.
The parenthesis adds a Kabbalistic image: the Name Mah is called “the watering of the tree” in the Tikkunei Zohar, the moisture of the Infinite Light that brings true union. As water binds particles of flour into one dough, this moisture binds the attributes into one.
וגילוי זה היינו ע״י שמתחלה הם בבחי׳ תיקון ע״ד רך כקנה4 כו׳ שעי״ז אח״כ קוב״ה שרי באתר שלים והוא גילוי שם מ״ה מלגיו דאיהואורח אצילות ואיהו שקיו דאילנא כו׳
And this revelation comes about because they are first in a state of rectification (tikkun), in the manner of “soft as a reed,” etc., so that afterwards “the Holy One, blessed be He, dwells in a complete place”; and this is the revelation of the Name Mah within, “which is the path of Atzilus and is the watering of the tree,” etc.
This revelation comes when the attributes are first rectified, “soft as a reed” (Taanis 20b), yielding rather than rigid. Then “the Holy One, blessed be He, dwells in a complete place,” and the Name Mah, “the path of Atzilus,” is revealed within them.
משא״כ בק״נ דאצי׳ שהוא מבחי׳ עולם התוהו מבחי׳ שבה״כ שאין בהם ההתכללות כלל וגם הביטול הוא בבחי׳ יש כנודע מענין ראו מ״ה5 שעושה יש ודבר מהביטול שלו כו׳.
Whereas kelipas nogah of Atzilus derives from the World of Tohu, from the shattering of the vessels, in which there is no inter-inclusion at all; and even its self-nullification is in the mode of yesh (self-existence), as is known from the matter of “See: mah (‘what’)!”, which makes a yesh and a ‘something’ out of its own self-nullification, etc.
Nogah of Atzilus comes from Tohu and the shattering, where there is no inter-inclusion at all, and even its self-nullification is a form of self-assertion: it makes a “something” out of its own being “nothing.”
ע״כ אין נמשך בהם כלל בחי׳ שם מ״ה מלגיו ולכן נק׳ קליפות שאין בהם לחלוחית מבחי׳ שקיו דאילנא כו׳)
Therefore the level of the Name Mah within is not drawn into them at all, and so they are called kelipos, for they have no moisture from the level of “the watering of the tree,” etc.)
So the Name Mah, the inner moisture, does not reach these kelipos at all, and they are called husks: they lack the moisture of “the watering of the tree.”
ומק״נ דאצי׳ נמשך אח״כ בבי״ע בחי׳ יש ממש וצבא השמים כו׳. ובזה יובן ג״כ מה דאיתא שק״נ חצי׳ טוב וחצי׳ רע.6
From kelipas nogah of Atzilus there is afterwards drawn into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah the level of actual yesh, and “the host of heaven,” etc. With this, what is stated, that kelipas nogah is half good and half evil, will also be understood.
From nogah of Atzilus there comes, in the lower worlds, real separate existence (yesh) and “the host of heaven,” the heavenly powers. This also explains how nogah can be half good and half evil.
והענין כנודע שהתהוות הרע הוא מחמת שבה״כ שהי׳ בעולם התהו והשבירה הי׳ מחמת שהיו ענפין מתפרדין ומזה נתהווה אח״כ בהשתלשלות בחי׳ הרע.
The explanation, as is known: evil came into being because of the shattering of the vessels in the World of Tohu, and the shattering came about because they were “separated branches”; and from this the level of evil afterwards came into being in the chain of descent (hishtalshelus).
Evil came into being through the shattering of the vessels of Tohu, and they shattered because their attributes were “separated branches.” From this, evil later emerged in the chain of descent.
והנה משבה״כ דעולם התהו נפלו בנוגה דאצילות ולכן אף שמקבלת מאצילות וע״כ חציה דכלפי פנים הוא טוב
Now, from the shattering of the vessels of the World of Tohu [fragments] fell into the nogah of Atzilus. Therefore, although it receives from Atzilus, and therefore its half that faces inward is good,
Fragments of the shattered vessels fell into the nogah of Atzilus. Because it receives from Atzilus, its inner half is good.
אך מחמת שגם בחציה זו אין בה בחי׳ ההתכללות כלל וממילא אין מאיר בה גילוי אור א״ס בבחינת פנימי כנ״ל
yet because even in this half there is no inter-inclusion at all, and consequently the revelation of the Infinite Light does not shine in it in an inward manner, as mentioned above,
But even that inner half lacks inter-inclusion, so the Infinite Light does not shine within it in an inward way.
לכן יכול להיות שחציה כלפי חוץ רע (וכמו שמעולם התהו נתהוו הקליפות כו׳. ובזה יובן מארז״ל ברבות ס״פ נשא ס״פ י״ד ע״פ ולא קם נביא עוד בישראל כמשה.7
therefore it can be that its outward-facing half is evil (just as the kelipos came into being from the World of Tohu, etc. With this will be understood the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, in the Midrash Rabbah at the end of Parshas Naso, end of section 14, on the verse “And there has not arisen another prophet in Israel like Moshe”:
Therefore its outward-facing half can be evil, just as the kelipos arose from Tohu. The parenthesis then turns to the Midrash on “There has not arisen another prophet in Israel like Moshe” (Deuteronomy 34:10).
בישראל לא קם אבל באו״ה קם כו׳ זה בלעם בן בעור8 כו׳ והנה נבואת משה היה מאצילות. וא״כ איך באו״ה קם נביא כמשה. אלא הענין שנבואת בלעם היה מק״נ דאצילות כו׳):
“In Israel none arose, but among the nations of the world one did arise,” etc., “this is Bilaam son of Beor,” etc. Now, Moshe’s prophecy was from Atzilus; if so, how did a prophet like Moshe arise among the nations of the world? Rather, the explanation is that Bilaam’s prophecy was from kelipas nogah of Atzilus, etc.)
The Midrash says that among the nations one did arise: Bilaam. Since Moshe’s prophecy came from Atzilus, how could Bilaam equal it? The answer: Bilaam’s prophecy came from kelipas nogah of Atzilus, at the height of Atzilus yet outside holiness.
The paragraph explains why nogah of Atzilus is a “husk”: it comes from the shattered vessels of Tohu and lacks inter-inclusion and true self-nullification, so the Infinite Light only surrounds it. Its inner half is good because it receives from Atzilus, while its outer half can be evil; this is how Bilaam’s prophecy could rival Moshe’s.
The Midrash itself (Bamidbar Rabbah 14:20) gives a reason why such a prophet arose among the nations: so that they would have no claim that, had they had a prophet like Moshe, they would have served G‑d. It then goes on to list the differences between Moshe’s prophecy and Bilaam’s.
Marei mekomos
- 1ראה ריח בני · Genesis 27:27
- 2נק׳ שקיו דאילנא · ת״ז בהקדמה.
- 3שקיו דאילנא · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:19–22
- 4רך כקנה · Taanit 20b:3
- 5כנודע מענין ראו מ״ה · ועל״ק פ׳ בהר ד״ה את שבתותי רפ״ה [כ]. להלן מג, א וש״נ.
- 6שק״נ חצי׳ טוב וחצי׳ רע · ע״ח שמ״ט.
- 7ולא קם נביא עוד בישראל כמשה · Deuteronomy 34:10
- 8בישראל לא קם אבל באו״ה קם כו׳ זה בלעם בן בעור · Bamidbar Rabbah 14:20
The affliction and the law of the white hair ¶23–26
23ד ועפ״ז יובן ג״כ מש״ל בשם הזהר וע״ח שבהסתלקות אור אבא מז״א הוא סיבת התהוות הנגע,
4. According to this, what was said above in the name of the Zohar and Etz Chaim will also be understood: that the withdrawal of the light of Abba from Z’eir Anpin (the emotive attributes) is the cause of the coming into being of the affliction.
Section 4 resolves the second puzzle: why the withdrawal of the light of Abba from Z’eir Anpin causes tzara’as, as the Zohar and Etz Chaim say.
והענין כי התלבשות אור א״ס הוא בחכמה דוקא כמ״ש בסש״ב פרק ל״ה בהג״ה ולכן כדי שיהי׳ התכללות גמור בז״א הוא ע״י גילוי אור אבא
The explanation is this: the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) is enclothed specifically in Chochmah (wisdom), as is written in Sefer Shel Beinonim (Tanya), chapter 35, in the gloss; therefore, for there to be complete inter-inclusion in Z’eir Anpin, this comes about through the revelation of the light of Abba.
The Infinite Light is enclothed specifically in Chochmah (Tanya, chapter 35, in the gloss). So the complete union of the attributes in Z’eir Anpin, which depends on the Infinite Light, comes about through the revelation of Abba, which is Chochmah.
(והגם שהוא ע״י תפארת היינו כמ״ש בפע״ח1 גבי קדוש דיוצר דפי׳ שת״ת הנק׳ וי״ו עולה ומקבל הארה מחכמה עילאה הנק׳ קדש ועי״ז נק׳ קדוש. ועמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ ונקדשתי בתוך בנ״י23 בפ׳ אמור.
(And although it comes about through Tiferes, this is as is written in Pri Etz Chaim concerning the kadosh of the Yotzer blessing: the meaning is that Tiferes, which is called vav, ascends and receives a radiance from Supernal Chochmah, which is called kodesh, and through this it is called kadosh. See what is written on this in the explanation of the verse “And I shall be sanctified among the children of Israel,” in Parshas Emor.
An objection: earlier the union was credited to Tiferes. The answer comes from Pri Etz Chaim on the word kadosh in the Yotzer blessing: Tiferes, the letter vav, rises to receive from Supernal Chochmah, called kodesh, and so becomes kadosh, kodesh with a vav; even Tiferes unites the attributes by virtue of Chochmah.
והגם דלעיל אמרנו דקדוש נק׳ הת״ת ע״ש שמקבל מבחי׳ כתר היינו כי אור הכתר מאיר באצי׳ ע״י חכמה עילאה כמ״ש בע״ח דאור א״ס מתלבש באצי׳ בחכמה4 לבדו כו׳)
And although we said above that Tiferes is called “holy” because it receives from the level of Keser, that is because the light of Keser shines in Atzilus through Supernal Chochmah, as is written in Etz Chaim that the Infinite Light is enclothed in Atzilus in Chochmah alone, etc.)
And earlier Tiferes was called “holy” because it receives from Keser; but the light of Keser itself shines in Atzilus only through Supernal Chochmah, for, as Etz Chaim says, the Infinite Light is enclothed in Atzilus in Chochmah alone.
ולכן כאשר מאיר אור אבא שבו מלובש אור א״ס ב״ה ועי״ז נעשה ההתכללות ויחוד ע״ס דאצי׳ אזי עי״ז לא תוכל קליפת נוגה דאצי׳ להיות לה יניקה מבחי׳ עור אדם העליון
Therefore, when the light of Abba shines, in which the Infinite Light, blessed be He, is enclothed, and through this the inter-inclusion and unity of the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus come about, then kelipas nogah of Atzilus cannot draw nurture from the level of the skin of the Supernal Man,
So when the light of Abba shines, carrying the Infinite Light, and the Ten Sefiros of Atzilus are united, nogah of Atzilus cannot draw nurture from the “skin” of the Supernal Man, the outer layer of Z’eir Anpin.
דהיינו בחי׳ ז״א לפי שבה אין מאיר שום הארת אור א״ס שיתכללו יחד כי שרש נוגה הוא משבה״כ מעולם התהו שאין בה התכללות.
that is, the level of Z’eir Anpin; since in it [nogah] no radiance of the Infinite Light shines so that [its attributes] would be included together, for the root of nogah is from the shattering of the vessels of the World of Tohu, in which there is no inter-inclusion.
Nogah has no hold on a united Z’eir Anpin because nogah itself, rooted in the shattered vessels of Tohu, has no inter-inclusion and no radiance of the Infinite Light to unite it.
אמנם בהסתלקות אור אבא מז״א ואזי לא יש בחי׳ התכללות במדות דאצילות וכנ״ל שעיקר ההתכללות הוא ע״י הארת אור א״ס שמאיר ע״י החכמה.
However, when the light of Abba withdraws from Z’eir Anpin, then there is no inter-inclusion in the attributes of Atzilus, as mentioned above, for inter-inclusion comes chiefly through the radiance of the Infinite Light that shines through Chochmah.
But when the light of Abba withdraws from Z’eir Anpin, the attributes of Atzilus lose their inter-inclusion, which depends on the Infinite Light shining through Chochmah.
Section 4 explains why the withdrawal of Abba causes the affliction: the attributes are united only by the Infinite Light, which shines through Chochmah. While Abba shines, nogah, which lacks inter-inclusion, has no hold on Z’eir Anpin; when Abba withdraws, the attributes lose their union.
In the Emor discourse cited (33b), the Alter Rebbe reads “And I shall be sanctified among the children of Israel” as preparing the vessel, the inner point of the heart burning toward G‑d’s holiness like the Seraphim; afterwards “I am G‑d who sanctifies you” draws that holiness down into all the mitzvos, as silver vessels are first heated in fire and only then shaped.
Marei mekomos
- 1היינו כמ״ש בפע״ח · שער הק״ש פ״ב.
- 2ע״פ ונקדשתי בתוך בנ״י · לקמן בפ׳ אמור לג, ב.
- 3ונקדשתי בתוך בנ״י · Leviticus 22:32
- 4כמ״ש בע״ח דאור א״ס . . בחכמה · ש׳ ס׳ אבי״ע פ״ו. ובסש״ב ח״א פל״ה בהגה. [כ].
24ואזי מחמת שאין בה התכללות זו אזי יוכל להיות יניקה לק״נ דאצי׳ מעור המל׳ או מז״א. וזהו ענין הנגע שהוא מה שיונקים ק״נ דאצילות יניקה מעור זו״נ דאצילות.
And then, because this inter-inclusion is not there, kelipas nogah (the glowing husk) of Atzilus can draw nurture from the skin of Malchus or of Z’eir Anpin. This is the matter of the affliction: that kelipas nogah of Atzilus draws nurture from the skin of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva of Atzilus.
When Z’eir Anpin lacks this union, nogah of Atzilus can draw nurture from the “skin” of Malchus or of Z’eir Anpin. That is the affliction above: nogah feeding on the skin of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva of Atzilus.
ולכן התיקון לזה הוא והובא אל הכהן1 שהוא המשכת אור אבא שהוא דוחה החיצונים והיינו שלא יהיה יניקת הקליפות רק משערות דנוק׳2 ולא מהעור עצמו.
Therefore the remedy for this is “and he shall be brought to the kohen,” which is the drawing down of the light of Abba, which repels the external forces, so that the kelipos draw nurture only from the hairs of Nukva and not from the skin itself.
So the remedy is “he shall be brought to the kohen” (Leviticus 13:2): drawing down the light of Abba, which repels the external forces, so that the kelipos draw only from the “hairs” of Nukva and not from the skin itself.
The paragraph defines the affliction above as nogah of Atzilus drawing nurture from the “skin” of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva when Abba withdraws, and the kohen’s remedy as drawing Abba down again, so that nogah can draw only from the “hairs.”
The Rebbe Rashab (maamar Amar LiTzafon Teni, 5650, cited in the notes) observes that here the repelling of the affliction by the light of Abba means that the kelipos draw only from the hairs of Nukva and not from the skin, and he lists other places where it is explained differently.
Marei mekomos
- 1והובא אל הכהן · Leviticus 13:2
- 2שלא יהי׳ יניקת הקליפות רק משערות דנוק׳ · בד״ה אמר לצפון תני — תר״ן ע׳ שצ כ׳ דכאן מבואר שדחיית הנגע נעשה ע״י אור אבא הוא שלא ינקו מהעור כ״א מהשערות דנוקבא, ומציין לכמה מקומות שמבואר באופן אחר ע״ש.
Now, the affliction is a white baheres. By way of analogy, below, in a person, it is the withdrawal of the blood from that place, for “the blood is the soul.”
The affliction is a white spot (Leviticus 13:4). In a human body, whiteness means the blood has withdrawn from that place, and “the blood is the soul” (Deuteronomy 12:23), the carrier of life.
ועמ״ש בביאור בשעה שהקדימו3 נעשה4 ובד״ה לסוסתי5 וכך למעלה בחי׳ החכמה תחיה והוא בחי׳ אדם א׳ דם ובהסתלקות אור אבא הוא ענין הסתלקות בחי׳ והחכמה תחי׳ מאותו בחי׳ עור.
See what is written in the explanation of “When they put ‘we will do’ first,” and in the discourse beginning “To My mare.” So too above: the level of Chochmah is “and Chochmah gives life,” and this is the level of Adam, alef [and] dam (“blood”); and the withdrawal of the light of Abba is the withdrawal of the level of “and Chochmah gives life” from that level of skin.
Above, Chochmah is what “gives life” (Ecclesiastes 7:12), and adam, “man,” is alef joined to dam, “blood”: Chochmah within the blood. The withdrawal of Abba is the withdrawal of this life-giving Chochmah from that “skin.” The Alter Rebbe refers to two discourses for more.
וזהו ענין הבהרת ועמ״ש מזה ג״כ סד״ה ביום השמע״צ6 שהבהרת הוא ענין שמעכב ההשפעה והמשכת החיות וע׳ במא״א אות ב׳ ס״ח.
And this is the matter of the baheres. See what is written on this also at the end of the discourse beginning “On the eighth day, Atzeres”: that the baheres is what holds back the flow of influence and the drawing down of life-force. And see Me’orei Or, the letter beis, section 8.
That is the baheres: it holds back the flow of influence and of life-force, as explained at the end of the Shemini Atzeres discourse.
ואח״כ כשיש שער לבן יונקי׳ ק״נ מהעור ע״י השער לבן כו׳ ולכן צריך הסגר (ופי׳ וענין עור יובן ע״ד שנת׳ למעלה בענין פי׳ קשר של תפילין למעלה שהוא מבחי׳ עור כו׳.
Afterwards, when there is white hair, kelipas nogah draws nurture from the skin through the white hair, etc., and therefore quarantine is needed. (The meaning and matter of “skin” will be understood in the way explained above on the meaning of the knot of the tefillin above, which is from the level of skin, etc.
Then, when white hair appears, nogah draws from the skin through the hair, which is why the afflicted person must be quarantined. The “skin” above is to be understood like the knot of the tefillin explained earlier, which is of the level of skin.
ועד״ז יובן גם כאן פי׳ וענין יניקת ק״נ דאצילות מעור דז״א. ועיין בע״ח בדרוש הנגעים שם7 ולכן תמורת ג׳ אורות אשר8 יוצאין ומתקנין את לאה ורחל כו׳
In the same way, here too will be understood the meaning and matter of kelipas nogah of Atzilus drawing nurture from the skin of Z’eir Anpin. And see Etz Chaim, in the discourse on the afflictions, there: “And therefore, in place of three lights that go out and rectify Leah and Rachel,” etc.,
In the same way nogah of Atzilus draws from the “skin” of Z’eir Anpin. The Arizal’s discussion of afflictions in Etz Chaim speaks of lights that go out to rectify Leah and Rachel, two configurations of the feminine Malchus.
ואל תתמה בזה כי הנגע אינו טומאה בעצמה רק בחי׳ דינא קשיא כו׳ ע״ש והיינו שמהנגע נמשך אח״כ יניקה לק״נ דאצילות כו׳ וזהו הטומאה כשמטמאים הנגע ועיין בהרמ״ז ס״פ תזריע).
“and do not wonder at this, for the affliction is not impurity in itself, but only a level of harsh judgment,” etc.; see there. That is: from the affliction nurture is afterwards drawn for kelipas nogah of Atzilus, etc., and this is the impurity when the affliction is pronounced impure. And see the Ramaz at the end of Parshas Tazria.)
Etz Chaim adds that the affliction is not impurity in itself, only harsh judgment. The impurity is the nurture that nogah afterwards draws from it, and that is what is meant when the affliction is pronounced impure.
ובזה יובן ענין אם שער לבן קודם לבהרת טהור כי כך הוא הדבר שיש יניקה לק״נ דאצי׳ משערות דנוק׳
With this, the matter of “if the white hair preceded the baheres, it is pure” will be understood. For this is how things are: kelipas nogah of Atzilus does draw nurture from the hairs of Nukva,
Now the law can be explained: if the white hair came before the spot, it is pure. For nogah of Atzilus always draws some nurture from the “hairs” of Nukva.
כי מאחר שהקב״ה ברא אותן ממילא מוכרח להיות להם יניקה והיינו מבחי׳ השפעה אחרונה דאצי׳.
for since the Holy One, blessed be He, created them, they must necessarily have nurture, namely from the last flow of influence of Atzilus,
Since G‑d created the kelipos, they must have some sustenance, and it comes from the very last flow of influence of Atzilus.
דהיינו בחי׳ שערות שהן גדילי׳ מהעור והשערות הוא בחי׳ היותר אחרונה ולמטה מטה מהעור שהרי מהעור יצא דם ע״י נקב
that is, the level of hairs, which grow from the skin. The hairs are the very last level, lower even than the skin; for from the skin blood comes out through a puncture
That last flow is the “hair,” which grows out of the skin and is lower than it. The skin still holds life: puncture it, and blood comes out.
(וא״כ מלובש בו עצמיות האור והחיות מבחי׳ ח״ע המלובש בהדם ועיין בלק״ת פ׳ וירא9 גבי ענין הדפק כו׳) משא״כ השערות
(and if so, the very essence of the light and life-force from the level of Supernal Chochmah, which is enclothed in the blood, is enclothed in it; and see the Likkutei Torah of the Arizal, Parshas Vayera, on the matter of the pulse, etc.), which is not so with the hairs.
So the skin contains the very essence of the light and life of Supernal Chochmah, which is enclothed in the blood; the Arizal’s Likkutei Torah on Vayera discusses this in connection with the pulse. The hair contains no such life.
ולכן מהשערות ניתן להם יניקה וכיון ששער לבן קדמה לבהרת אין להם יניקה בהעור רק מהשערות ולכן הוא טהור.
Therefore they are given nurture from the hairs; and since the white hair came before the baheres, they have no nurture in the skin, only from the hairs, and therefore it is pure.
So the kelipos are allowed nurture from the hair. If the white hair came first, they draw only from the hair and not from the skin, and the person is pure.
אבל אם בהרת קדמה לשער לבן היינו שיש יניקה לנוגה דאצי׳ מעור הנוק׳ כי תרגום צרעת סגירו.10 סגירו דנהורא11 שהן מוחין דאבא שלא נתגלו בזו״נ.12
But if the baheres came before the white hair, this means that nogah of Atzilus has nurture from the skin of Nukva; for the Targum of tzara’as is segiru: “the closing of the light,” which is the mochin of Abba that have not been revealed in Z’eir Anpin and Nukva.
But if the spot came first, nogah is drawing from the “skin” of Nukva itself. The Targum calls tzara’as segiru, and the Zohar calls it “the closing of the light”: the mochin of Abba that have not been revealed in Z’eir Anpin and Nukva.
The paragraph maps the law onto the supernal structure: the white spot is the withdrawal of Chochmah’s life from the “skin,” and white hair is the channel through which nogah draws. If the hair came first, nogah draws only from the “hairs,” its allotted last portion, and the person is pure; if the spot came first, nogah feeds on the skin itself, and the person is impure.
A Kehot note records that the wording in Etz Chaim is “lights, etc., which,” rather than “three lights which.” In the Bamidbar discourse cited (14c), the Alter Rebbe explains that the halachos of the Torah are rooted in the “hairs” of the Crown, which grow from its hidden wisdom, while the mitzvos come from its outer level.
Marei mekomos
- 1בהרת לבנה · Leviticus 13:4
- 2כי הדם הוא הנפש · Deuteronomy 12:23
- 3בביאור בשעה שהקדימו · לקו״ת במדבר יד, ג.
- 4בשעה שהקדימו נעשה · Shabbat 88a:7–8
- 5לסוסתי · Song of Songs 1:9
- 6סד״ה ביום השמע״צ · לקו״ת שמע״צ פו, א.
- 7בדרוש הנגעים שם · ש׳ לאה ורחל פ״ז. [כ].
- 8ג׳ אורות אשר · אורות כו׳ אשר. [כ].
- 9בלקו״ת פ׳ וירא · ראה הלשון באוה״ת שה״ש-ב ע׳ תפו. נזכר גם לעיל פ׳ פקודי ז, ד. פ׳ אמור לח, ב. סה״מ תקס״ה-א ע׳ תלג. לבן — במ״א ע״פ עד הגל:
- 10צרעת סגירו · Onkelos Leviticus 13:2
- 11סגירו דנהורא · Zohar, Tazria 25:134–27:143
- 12החכ׳ תחי׳ · Ecclesiastes 7:12
26וזהו ענין הבהרת שהיא המעכבת סיבוב והילוך והתפשטות הנפש והחיות במקום זה. וברוחניות למעלה זהו ענין עיכוב ומניעת התגלות המוחין דאבא כו׳ וכן ענין כל הד׳ מראות נגעים.1
This is the matter of the baheres: it holds back the circulation, flow and spreading of the soul and the life-force in that place. And spiritually, above, this is the holding back and prevention of the revelation of the intellect (mochin) of Abba, etc.; and so with all four appearances of afflictions.
The baheres, a white spot, holds back the flow of life to that place. Above, it is the holding back of the revelation of the mochin, the intellect, of Abba; the same applies to all four appearances of afflictions that the Mishnah lists.
ולכן כשהבהרת קדמה לשער לבן אזי יונק ק״נ דאצי׳ מעצמיות עור הנוק׳ ע״י השער לבן כו׳ שהיניקה נק׳ ע״ש שער לבן
Therefore, when the baheres preceded the white hair, kelipas nogah (the glowing husk) of Atzilus draws nurture from the very essence of the skin of Nukva through the white hair, etc., the nurture being named after the white hair
So when the spot came before the white hair, nogah of Atzilus draws nurture from the very substance of the “skin” of Nukva. It does so through the white hair, which gives this nurture its name.
(כי זה לעומ״ז עשה2 וכנודע מענין לבן ויעקב שיש לובן העליון בקדושה בגדי לבן ושער רישי׳ כעמר נקא.3 ולעומת זה ג״כ לבן דקליפה כו׳ וכמ״ש בפרדס ש״ג פ״ז וכמ״ש ג״כ במ״א ע״פ עד הגל4 כו׳)
(for “He made one opposite the other,” as is known from the matter of Lavan and Yaakov: there is the supernal whiteness in holiness, the white garments and “the hair of His head like clean wool,” and opposite it there is also the “white” (lavan) of kelipah, etc.; as is written in the Pardes, Shaar 3, chapter 7, and as is also explained elsewhere on the verse “The mound is witness,” etc.).
Holiness and kelipah mirror each other: “G‑d made one opposite the other” (Ecclesiastes 7:14). There is a holy whiteness, the white garments of the Kohen Gadol and the hair “like clean wool” of the Ancient of Days (Daniel 7:9), and opposite it the “white” of kelipah, embodied by Lavan (“white”) against Yaakov.
והנה מק״נ דאצי׳ נמשך אח״כ גם בעשיי׳ ששם הם עומקי׳ הקליפות. ולכן אם בהרת קודמת לשער לבן הוא טמא וצריך תיקון ע״י הסגר כו׳.
Now, from kelipas nogah of Atzilus [nurture] is afterwards drawn also into Asiyah, where the depths of the kelipos are. Therefore, if the baheres preceded the white hair, it is impure and requires rectification through quarantine, etc.
From nogah of Atzilus this nurture extends down into Asiyah, where the kelipos are deepest. So if the spot came first, the person is impure and needs the remedy of quarantine.
ספק קוב״ה אמר טהור. וכולהו מתיבתא דרקיע אמרי טמא.5 כי ע״פ ההשגה של המתיבתא הרי כך הוא דין תורה דכל ספיקא דאורייתא לחומרא.6
[In a case of] doubt, “the Holy One, blessed be He, said, ‘Pure,’ and the whole Academy of the Firmament said, ‘Impure.’” For according to the comprehension of the Academy, this is the law of the Torah: every doubt in a Torah law is [resolved] stringently.
Now the dispute itself: in the doubtful case G‑d said “pure” and the Academy said “impure.” The Academy reasoned by the general rule that a doubt in a Torah law is resolved stringently (Beitzah 3b).
אבל הקב״ה אמר טהור היינו שכאן אין מטמא אא״כ ודאי הבהרת קדמה אבל אם הוא ספק שאין נודע לנו אם הבהרת קדמה טהור הוא.
But the Holy One, blessed be He, said, “Pure”: that is, here it does not make impure unless the baheres certainly came first; but if it is a doubt, and it is not known to us whether the baheres came first, it is pure.
G‑d’s ruling means that here a person becomes impure only if it is certain that the spot came first; if that is not known, he is pure.
אף שיוכל להיות שהבהרת קדמה מ״מ כאן הוא גזה״כ שכל שהוא ספק אצלנו ולא נודע לנו שהבהרת קדמה אינו טמא.
Even though it may be that the baheres came first, nevertheless here it is a decree of Scripture that whatever is a doubt to us, where it is not known to us that the baheres came first, is not impure.
Even though the spot may in fact have come first, Scripture decrees that in this case a doubt does not make impure.
והיינו או משום שכל שלא נודע שהבהרת קדמה אין נמשך להם יניקה יותר מהראוי או שלא יהיה מיניקה זו התעוררות דינים
This is either because, as long as it is not known that the baheres came first, no more nurture than is proper is drawn to them, or because no arousal of judgments will come from this nurture.
Two reasons are suggested: as long as it is not known, the kelipos draw no more nurture than they are allotted; or the nurture they draw does not arouse judgments.
(ויש למצוא קצת טעם לזה בהא דבידיעה תליא מילתא בספק זה שבטומאת צרעת, והוא ע״פ מ״ש הרמ״ז ס״פ תזריע וז״ל והבן ענין גדול שאין טומאת הצרעת ככל שאר טומאות שזו אין טומאתה נודעת ולא מטמאה עד שיבוא הכהן כנודע כו׳ עכ״ל.
(Some reason can be found for this, that in this doubt concerning the impurity of tzara’as the matter depends on knowledge, based on what the Ramaz writes at the end of Parshas Tazria. These are his words: “Understand a great matter: the impurity of tzara’as is not like all other impurities, for its impurity is not known, and it does not make impure, until the kohen comes, as is known,” etc. End of quotation.
Support comes from the Ramaz (Rabbi Moshe Zacuto): tzara’as is unlike all other impurities, for it is not impure until the kohen comes and its impurity becomes known. Its impurity depends on knowledge.
וע״ש הטעם ע״פ הע״ח. וא״כ הרי אפי׳ בצרעת שהיא ראויה להיות ודאי טמא עכ״ז גזה״כ הוא שאינה מטמא עד שיבוא הכהן ויוודע טומאתה מהכהן כו׳,
See there the reason, according to Etz Chaim. If so, even with tzara’as that is fit to be certainly impure, it is nevertheless a decree of Scripture that it does not make impure until the kohen comes and its impurity becomes known from the kohen, etc.;
So even a case that ought to be certainly impure is not impure until the kohen knows and declares it, by a decree of Scripture; the Ramaz explains why on the basis of Etz Chaim.
לכן שפיר י״ל הטעם דספק זה טהור משום דכל שהוא ספק ולא נודע שהבהרת קדמה טהור), וכה״ג הוא ענין ספק ממזר7 דארז״ל ממזר ודאי לא יבא8 אבל ספק ממזר כשר מדאורייתא לבוא בקהל:
therefore it may well be said that the reason this doubt is pure is that whatever is a doubt, where it is not known that the baheres came first, is pure.) And similar to this is the matter of a doubtful mamzer, as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: a certain mamzer may not enter [the congregation], but a doubtful mamzer is fit by Torah law to enter the congregation.
It follows that an unknown case, a doubt, is pure. The same principle appears with a doubtful mamzer: the Torah bars only a certain mamzer from entering the congregation, while by Torah law a doubtful one may enter (Kiddushin 73a).
The paragraph applies the analysis to the halachah and to the dispute above: when the spot comes first, nogah feeds on the skin of Nukva and the person is impure. The Academy applied the general rule that Torah doubts are treated stringently, but G‑d ruled “pure,” because the impurity of tzara’as depends on its being known, as with the doubtful mamzer.
The Kehot note records that this comparison between the doubtful case of tzara’as and the doubtful mamzer is also mentioned in the Tzemach Tzedek’s responsa (Even HaEzer, sec. 327).
Marei mekomos
- 1הד׳ מראות נגעים · Mishnah Negaim 1:1
- 2זה לעומ״ז עשה · Ecclesiastes 7:14
- 3ושער רישי׳ כעמר נקא · Daniel 7:9
- 4עד הגל · Genesis 31:52
- 5ספק קוב״ה אמר טהור. וכולהו מתיבתא דרקיע אמרי טמא · Bava Metzia 86a:7–8
- 6ספיקא דאורייתא לחומרא · Beitzah 3b:6–7
- 7וכה״ג הוא ענין ספק ממזר · ענין זה נזכר בשו״ת צמח צדק חלק אהע״ז סי׳ שכז (בהוצאת תשנ״ה).
- 8ממזר ודאי לא יבא · Kiddushin 73a
Why the Academy did not know the reason ¶27–30
27ה אך להבין הענין שהמתיבתא דרקיעא אע״פ שזכו לגילוי זה דקוב״ה אמר טהור. עכ״ז הטעם לא ידעו1 עד שאמרו מאן נוכח כו׳.
5. But we must understand: although the Academy of the Firmament merited this revelation, that the Holy One, blessed be He, said “Pure,” they nevertheless did not know the reason, so that they said, “Who will decide?” etc.
Section 5 asks: if the Academy was granted to hear G‑d say “pure,” why did they not know the reason, so that they needed someone to decide?
והענין כי הנה מבואר למעלה כי התנאים ואמוראים היו תורתם אומנתם הכל להמשיך מכתר עליון מלמעלה למטה מבחי׳ סוכ״ע לבחי׳ מל׳ שהוא בחי׳ ממכ״ע.
The explanation is this. It was explained above that for the Tannaim and Amoraim, whose Torah was their occupation, it was all to draw down from the Supernal Keser (Crown), from above to below, from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) to the level of Malchus (sovereignty), which is the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin).
As explained earlier, the Tannaim and Amoraim, whose whole occupation was Torah, drew light down from the Supernal Crown, the encompassing level (sovev), into Malchus, the indwelling level (memalei).
והנה בחי׳ סוכ״ע א״א שיאיר בהכלי בהתגלות ממש בהשגה אפילו בג״ע עד תח״ה (וכמ״ש באגה״ק ד״ה נודע דבאתעדל״ת כו׳ ע״ש), רק הארתו מאיר בהעלם
Now, the level of sovev kol almin cannot shine in the vessel in actual revelation, in comprehension, even in Gan Eden, until the Resurrection of the Dead (as is written in Iggeres HaKodesh, in the section beginning “It is known that through an arousal from below,” etc.; see there); only its radiance shines in concealment,
But the encompassing light cannot be openly revealed in a vessel, in comprehension, even in Gan Eden, until the Resurrection of the Dead (as Iggeres HaKodesh explains). Only its radiance shines there, in a hidden way.
כי מחמת שהאור פנימי והאור מקיף הם דבקים יחד זה עם זה לכן הארה מן המקיף זורח בפנימי בהעלם וכמש״ל
for since the inner light and the encompassing light are joined together with each other, a radiance from the encompassing [light] shines into the inner [light] in concealment, as was written above
This is possible because the inner and encompassing lights are joined to each other, so the encompassing light shines into the inner light in concealment, as explained at the beginning.
(ועמ״ש בביאור ע״פ יביאו לבוש מלכות23 בענין שהמקיף מצחצח חצי הכלי כו׳. ועי׳ בפע״ח בשער השבת פי״ב בענין סכך הסוכה שצ״ל לכתחלה בענין שיהיו כוכבים נראים מתוכו שהם ניצוצי החסדים המאירים ממקומם דרך הנקבים כו׳
(see what is written in the explanation of the verse “Let them bring a royal garment,” on how the encompassing [light] burnishes half of the vessel, etc. And see Pri Etz Chaim, Shaar HaShabbos, chapter 12, on the covering (sechach) of the sukkah, which ideally should be such that stars are visible through it: these are sparks of the chasadim (kindnesses) that shine from their place through the openings, etc.;
The parenthesis cites the discourse on “Let them bring a royal garment” (Esther 6:8) on how the encompassing light burnishes half the vessel. Pri Etz Chaim says that the sukkah’s covering, which stands for the encompassing lights, should ideally let the stars be seen through it; the stars are sparks of kindness shining through the gaps.
והסכך הוא בחי׳ מקיפים כנודע אלא שמ״מ הארת המקיף מאיר בהא״פ וזהו ענין הנקבים כו׳ ועמ״ש באגה״ק ע״פ וילבש צדקה כשריון)4 וידוע כי היום לעשותם5 ולמחר לקבל שכרם.6
and the sechach is the level of the encompassing lights, as is known, but the radiance of the encompassing [light] nevertheless shines into the inner light, and this is the matter of the openings, etc. And see what is written in Iggeres HaKodesh on the verse “And He donned tzedakah like armor.”) Now, it is known that “today [is] to do them, and tomorrow to receive their reward.”
The gaps in the covering show that the encompassing light still shines into the inner light. Then comes the key principle: “Today to do them, and tomorrow to receive their reward” (Eruvin 22a): this world is for doing the mitzvos, the next for receiving their reward.
ולכן בג״ע כשלמדו התורה שם ע״ד קיבול שכר הנה עם היות כי אע״פ שאור המתגלה בג״ע הוא מבחי׳ ממכ״ע.
Therefore in Gan Eden, when they learned the Torah there by way of receiving reward, then, although the light revealed in Gan Eden is from the level of memalei kol almin,
In Gan Eden, where the Torah is learned as reward, the light that is revealed is of the indwelling level (memalei).
אעפ״כ מחמת שהא״מ שהוא סוכ״ע זורח בהא״פ לכן ראו אור הזורח מסוכ״ע והיינו קוב״ה אומר טהור.
nevertheless, because the encompassing light, which is sovev kol almin, shines into the inner light, they saw the light shining from sovev kol almin; and this is “the Holy One, blessed be He, says, ‘Pure.’”
Yet because the encompassing light shines hiddenly into the inner light, the souls there perceived the light of sovev as well; that is what is meant by “the Holy One, blessed be He, says ‘pure.’”
Section 5 begins to explain why the Academy heard G‑d’s ruling but not its reason: the revealed light of Gan Eden is of the indwelling level, and the encompassing light that the Sages’ Torah drew down shines there only in a hidden way, which the Academy perceived as “the Holy One says ‘pure.’”
The Rebbe (Kuntres Torah Chadashah Me’iti Teitzei, 5751, quoted in the notes) asks how the Academy could rule against what they heard G‑d say, and answers that their ruling had to follow their own understanding: since they did not grasp G‑d’s reason, they had to rule as their understanding accepted; he refers to this passage.
Marei mekomos
- 1הטעם לא ידעו · ”לכאורה כששומעים שהקב״ה אומר כך, איך אומרים דלא כהקב״ה — אלא כיון שהפס״ד שלהם צ״ל ע״פ דעתם, לכן, כשלא השיגו בדעתם הטעם של הקב״ה, הוכרחו לפסוק כפי שמתקבל בדעתם (ראה לקו״ת תזריע כד, ב ואילך)” — קונטרס בענין תורה חדשה מאתי תצא — תנש״א הערה 61.
- 2ע״פ יביאו לבוש מלכות · תו״א צב, ב.
- 3יביאו לבוש מלכות · Esther 6:8
- 4וילבש צדקה כשריון · Isaiah 59:17
- 5היום לעשותם · Deuteronomy 7:11
- 6ולמחר לקבל שכרם · Eruvin 22a:5–6
28וכנ״ל שקדוש הוא בחי׳ כתר סוכ״ע אשר ע״פ הארת הכתר והחכמה שמאיר בג״ע דין הוא שספק זה טהור אכן לא השיגו
As mentioned above, “holy” is the level of Keser (the Crown), sovev kol almin; and according to the radiance of Keser and Chochmah that shines in Gan Eden, the law is that this doubt is pure. However, they comprehended
As said at the start, “holy” is Keser, the encompassing light. By the radiance of Keser and Chochmah that shines in Gan Eden, the doubtful case is pure, but the Academy grasped only part of this.
רק גילוי הרצון שכך טהור אבל האור והפנימי׳ והטעם של הרצון מדוע ספק זה הוא טהור לא השיגו.
only the revelation of the will, that it is pure; but the light, the inner dimension and the reason of the will, why this doubt is pure, they did not comprehend.
They grasped only the revealed will, that it is pure, but not the inner light and reason of that will.
והיינו מחמת כי התגלות הנ״ל הוא מבחי׳ מקיף וסוכ״ע שאינו זורח בהא״פ רק בהעלם ולא בהתגלות ממש
That is because this revelation is from the level of the encompassing [light] and sovev kol almin, which shines into the inner light only in concealment, and not in actual revelation
This is because the revelation came from the encompassing level, which shines into the inner light only in a hidden way, not openly.
(ולכן השיגו הפסק דין שספק זה טהור אכן הטעם שהוא הפנימיות לא השיגו וכמו ע״ד גולגלת׳ דחפיא על מוחא.
(and therefore they comprehended the ruling that this doubt is pure, but the reason, which is the inner dimension, they did not comprehend; as in the manner of “the skull (Gulgalta) that covers the brain.”
So they knew the ruling but not its inner reason. The image is “the skull that covers the brain”: the outer level of the Crown, the Gulgalta, covers its inner, hidden wisdom.
שמו״ס שהוא פנימי׳ הכתר לא יכול לבא בגילוי כלל עד לע״ל שיתגלו טעמי תורה1 והגילוי שבתורה שלפנינו הוא מבחי׳ גלגלתא שהוא הרצון בחי׳ חיצוניות כו׳ אלא שזהו בהיום לעשותם
For the hidden brain (Mocha Stima’ah), which is the inner dimension of Keser, cannot come into revelation at all until the Time to Come, when the reasons of the Torah will be revealed; and the revelation in the Torah as we have it is from the level of the Gulgalta, which is the will, the level of the outer dimension (chitzoniyus), etc. But this is in “today, to do them.”
The Mocha Stima’ah, the hidden brain and inner dimension of the Crown, will be revealed only in the Time to Come, when the reasons of the Torah are revealed. The Torah revealed to us now comes from the Gulgalta, G‑d’s will, the outer level: it tells us what to do, the task of “today.”
אך כמ״כ בג״ע הגם שהוא בחי׳ לקבל שכרם אבל להיות ששם הגילוי מבחי׳ ממכ״ע ומבחינת סוכ״ע אינו מאיר כ״א בבחי׳ העלם מה שהמקיף זורח הארה בא״פ.
So too in Gan Eden: although it is the level of “to receive their reward,” since the revelation there is from the level of memalei kol almin, and from the level of sovev kol almin there shines only, in concealment, the radiance that the encompassing [light] shines into the inner light,
Gan Eden is the place of “receiving reward,” yet its revelation is of the indwelling level, and the encompassing light shines there only hiddenly, through what it radiates into the inner light.
לכן ענין גילוי זה שאינו גילוי גמור היינו ע״ד הגילוי מבחי׳ גלגלתא דחפיא על מו״ס שידעו הפסק דין שכך טהור והטעם שמבחי׳ מו״ס לא השיגו כלל)
therefore this revelation, which is not a complete revelation, is like the revelation from the level of the Gulgalta that covers the Mocha Stima’ah: they knew the ruling that it is pure, but the reason, which is from the level of the Mocha Stima’ah, they did not comprehend at all.)
So the revelation there was incomplete, like the Gulgalta covering the Mocha Stima’ah: they knew the ruling, “pure,” but not its reason, which belongs to the hidden brain.
ואדרבה ע״פ ההשגה שבמתיבתא דרקיעא שהוא מבחי׳ ממכ״ע כנ״ל שהרקיע הוא מבחי׳ בינה כו׳. הנה ע״פ השגה זו אמרו כלהו טמא כדין ספיקא דאורייתא לחומרא.
On the contrary: according to the comprehension in the Academy of the Firmament, which is from the level of memalei kol almin, as mentioned above, for the firmament is from the level of Binah (understanding), etc., according to this comprehension they all said “impure,” in accordance with the law that a doubt in a Torah law is [resolved] stringently.
Their own comprehension, drawn from Binah, the “firmament,” at the level of memalei, led them the other way, to “impure,” by the rule that a doubt in a Torah law is treated stringently.
אמרו מאן נוכח נוכח רבה בר נחמני2 דאמר רב״נ אני יחיד בנגעים כו׳ ולכן ידע הדין על מקורו.
They said, “Who will decide? Rabbah bar Nachmani will decide,” for Rabbah bar Nachmani said, “I am unique in [the laws of] leprous afflictions,” etc.; and therefore he knew the law at its source.
So they asked who would decide, and the answer was Rabbah bar Nachmani, “unique in nega’im,” who knew the law at its source, as the next paragraph explains.
The paragraph explains why the Academy knew G‑d’s ruling but not its reason: the ruling came from the encompassing level of Keser, which shines in Gan Eden only hiddenly, like the outer Crown covering the hidden brain. By their own understanding, drawn from Binah, they ruled “impure,” and so they needed Rabbah bar Nachmani, who knew the law at its source.
Marei mekomos
- 1לע״ל שיתגלו טעמי תורה · ראה רש״י שה״ש א, ב.
- 2מאן נוכח נוכח רבה בר נחמני · Bava Metzia 86a:7–8
29ומצא פסוק ודרש שגם בתורה כתוב שאין טמא אא״כ ודאי בהרת קדמה אבל ספיקו טהור.
And he found a verse and expounded it: that it is also written in the Torah that it is not impure unless the baheres certainly came first, but its doubt is pure.
Rabbah bar Nachmani found a verse and expounded it: the Torah itself teaches that the person is impure only when it is certain that the spot came first, while a doubt is pure. This is the derivation from “to pronounce it pure or to pronounce it impure” cited at the start of the maamar.
משא״כ לפי השגת המתיבתא דרקיעא לא מצאו זה בתורה שיהיה ספיקו טהור רק ששמעו ע״ד קיבול שכר בג״ע שקוב״ה אמר טהור.
Whereas according to the comprehension of the Academy of the Firmament, they did not find this in the Torah, that its doubt should be pure; they only heard, by way of receiving reward in Gan Eden, that the Holy One, blessed be He, said, “Pure.”
The Academy found no such teaching in the Torah. They only heard, as part of their reward in Gan Eden, that G‑d said “pure.”
אבל לפי השגתם בתורה נראה להם שהוא טמא והיינו לפי שהשגתם בג״ע הוא מבחי׳ ממכ״ע כו׳.
But according to their comprehension of the Torah, it seemed to them that it is impure; that is because their comprehension in Gan Eden is from the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin), etc.
By their own understanding of the Torah the case seemed impure, because their comprehension in Gan Eden comes from the indwelling level, memalei kol almin.
The paragraph contrasts Rabbah bar Nachmani, who found in the Torah the source for the doubtful case being pure, with the Academy, who only heard G‑d’s ruling and by their own understanding thought the case impure.
30ועפ״ז נראה להם שספק זה צ״ל טמא כנ״ל. ומה שלמעלה מבחי׳ השגה נק׳ עדן שע״ז ארז״ל עין לא ראתה1 כו׳ והיא בחי׳ המקיף רק מ״מ מה שזורח המקיף בבחי׳ פנימי בהעלם זה ראו בג״ע
According to this, it seemed to them that this doubt must be impure, as mentioned above. And what is above the level of comprehension is called Eden, of which our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “No eye has seen,” etc., and it is the level of the encompassing [light]; but nevertheless, what the encompassing [light] shines inwardly, in concealment, this they saw in Gan Eden;
What is above comprehension is called Eden, of which it is said, “No eye has seen” (Isaiah 64:3; Berachos 34b): the encompassing level. What the Academy saw in Gan Eden was only the hidden glimmer of that encompassing light within the inner light.
לכן השיגו שקוב״ה אמר טהור אבל טעם ע״ז לא השיגו כי המקיף אין זורח בהא״פ והכלי רק בבחי׳ העלם.
therefore they grasped that the Holy One, blessed be He, said “Pure,” but they did not grasp the reason for it, for the encompassing [light] shines into the inner light and the vessel only in concealment.
So they grasped that G‑d said “pure,” but not why, since the encompassing light shines into the inner light and the vessel only in concealment.
אכן רב״נ שהוא יחיד בנגעים פי׳ שמדרגתו הוא מבחי׳ הארה זו עצמה ממש מה שהמקיף זורח בהא״פ וע״כ נק׳ יחיד
But Rabbah bar Nachmani, who was “unique in nega’im”: that is, his rank was from the level of this very radiance itself, what the encompassing [light] shines into the inner light; and therefore he is called “unique,”
Rabbah bar Nachmani was “unique in nega’im” because his very soul came from that radiance itself, the shining of the encompassing light into the inner light.
שהוא למעלה ממדרגת שאר כל החכמים שהם מבחי׳ הא״פ ומה שהמקיף זורח בהא״פ הוא בבחי׳ העלם מהם,
for he is above the rank of all the other sages, who are from the level of the inner light, and for whom what the encompassing [light] shines into the inner light is hidden;
That set him above all the other sages, whose souls came from the inner light and from whom the radiance of the encompassing light was hidden.
אבל רב״נ הוא עצמו מבחי׳ הארה זו דהא״מ מה שזורח בהא״פ כו׳ וע״כ מצא טעמו ממש2 שע״פ הדין הכתוב ומפורש בתורה צ״ל ספק זה טהור הואיל ופתח בו הכתוב בטהרה תחלה3 כו׳.
but Rabbah bar Nachmani is himself from the level of this radiance of the encompassing light, what shines into the inner light, etc. Therefore he found its actual reason: that according to the law written and stated explicitly in the Torah, this doubt must be pure, “since Scripture opened with purity first,” etc.
Since he himself belonged to that radiance, he could find the actual reason in the written Torah: the doubt is pure “since Scripture opened with purity first” (Nazir 65b).
(וענין בחי׳ זו שנשמתו הוא מהארת המקיף י״ל ע״ד מ״ש ע״פ אז ישיר משה4 בענין מן המים משיתיהו5 דגבי משה דהיינו מבחי׳ עלמא דאתכסייא שהוא בחי׳ סוכ״ע משם נמשך נשמת משה
(The matter of this level, that his soul is from the radiance of the encompassing [light], may be explained along the lines of what is written on the verse “Then Moshe sang,” on “for I drew him out of the water,” said of Moshe: that is, from the level of the concealed world, which is the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), from there the soul of Moshe was drawn;
Such a soul can be understood from Moshe. The discourse on “Then Moshe sang” explains “for I drew him out of the water” (Exodus 2:10): Moshe’s soul came from the “water,” the concealed world, sovev kol almin.
והיינו מה שהמקיף זורח בפנימי שהרי מן המים משיתיהו ליבשה כו׳. ועמ״ש ג״כ ע״פ ואלה המשפטים67 שמשה שרשו מבחי׳ עגולים ומקיפים סוכ״ע כו׳.
and this is what the encompassing [light] shines into the inner, for “out of the water I drew him” onto dry land, etc. And see also what is written on the verse “And these are the ordinances,” that Moshe’s root is from the level of the circles and encompassing lights, sovev kol almin, etc.
Being drawn out of the water onto dry land is the encompassing light shining into the inner light. The discourse on “And these are the ordinances” (Exodus 21:1) likewise says that Moshe’s root is in the “circles” and encompassing lights.
ועמ״ש בפ׳ יתרו סד״ה מראיהם ומעשיהם89 בפי׳ ענין משה שפיר קאמרת10 ומשם יובן שיכול להיות בחי׳ המשכת ניצוץ משה ממש ברבה בר נחמני וזהו שהי׳ ג״כ יחיד בבחי׳ זו דהיינו שהוא מבחי׳ הארת המקיף כו׳.)
And see what is written in Parshas Yisro, at the end of the discourse beginning “Their appearance and their deeds,” on the meaning of “Moshe, you have spoken well”; and from there it will be understood that there can be a drawing of an actual spark of Moshe in Rabbah bar Nachmani, and this is why he too was “unique” in this level, namely that he was from the level of the radiance of the encompassing [light], etc.)
The Amoraim would say to a colleague, “Moshe, you have spoken well” (Shabbos 101b), and the discourse “Their appearance and their deeds” shows that an actual spark of Moshe can be drawn into a sage. So Rabbah bar Nachmani, with Moshe’s spark, was “unique” in this level of the encompassing light.
(ועיין מ״ש מענין עדן בביאור ענין קי״ס גבי והניף ידו על הנהר).1112 והנה לתוספת ביאור בענין קוב״ה אומר טהור י״ל עפמ״ש בזהר פ׳ בא דל״ו ע״ב13 בשעתא דקוב״ה אתחזי על גנתא14 כו׳ עד ולא מתפרש מעדן.
(And see what is written about Eden in the explanation of the splitting of the Sea of Reeds, on “and He shall wave His hand over the river.”) Now, for further explanation of “the Holy One, blessed be He, says ‘Pure,’” it may be said according to what is written in the Zohar, Parshas Bo, 36b: “When the Holy One, blessed be He, appears over the garden,” etc., up to “and it does not separate from Eden.”
For more on Eden the Alter Rebbe refers to his explanation of the splitting of the sea and of the future “He shall wave His hand over the river” (Isaiah 11:15). He then adds a further explanation from the Zohar: “When the Holy One, blessed be He, appears over the garden… it does not separate from Eden.”
נמצא שהתגלו׳ זו הוא מבחי׳ עדן שהוא בחי׳ חכמה וכתר משא״כ השגת המתיבתא דרקיעא בעצמם בג״ע הוא נמשך מבחי׳ בינה דאצי׳ שהיא בחי׳ רקיע העליון כו׳.
It follows that this revelation is from the level of Eden, which is the level of Chochmah (wisdom) and Keser (the Crown); whereas the comprehension of the Academy of the Firmament itself in Gan Eden is drawn from the level of Binah of Atzilus, which is the level of the upper firmament, etc.
So G‑d’s appearance in the garden comes from Eden, which is Chochmah and Keser, while the Academy’s own comprehension in Gan Eden comes from Binah of Atzilus, the upper firmament.
אבל בחי׳ הגילוי דקב״ה אתי לאשתעשע עם צדיקייא בג״ע זהו הגילוי מלמעלה מעלה מבחי׳ בינה.15
But the level of the revelation of “the Holy One, blessed be He, comes to delight with the righteous in Gan Eden” is a revelation from far above the level of Binah.
The revelation of “the Holy One, blessed be He, comes to delight with the righteous in Gan Eden” is therefore far higher than Binah. That is why the Academy heard G‑d’s ruling without grasping its reason.
The paragraph explains why only Rabbah bar Nachmani could decide: the Academy, whose understanding came from Binah, saw G‑d’s ruling only as a hidden glimmer of the encompassing light, while Rabbah bar Nachmani’s soul, like Moshe’s, came from that very radiance, so he could find the ruling’s reason in the Torah itself.
The Rebbe (Likkutei Sichos vol. 12, p. 68, cited in the notes) adds that Rabbah bar Nachmani could decide because his soul was then still enclothed in a physical body; and the Alter Rebbe’s discourse Ushavsah of 5562 (printed in Derech Mitzvosecha 167b) says that only those below, enclothed in a body, have the power to decide a law in doubt, for the kelipos conceal that law, and those in a body can refine and raise up what fell in the shattering.
Marei mekomos
- 1ארז״ל עין לא ראתה · Isaiah 64:3
- 2אבל רב״נ הוא עצמו מבחי׳ הארה זו דהא״מ מה שזורח בהא״פ כו׳ וע״כ מצא טעמו ממש · ראה לקו״ש-יב ע׳ 68 דזה שהי׳ יכול להכריע ולפסוק בזה הוא מפני שנשמתו למטה היתה מלובשת בגוף גשמי. ראה גם ד״ה פדה בשלום — תשמ״ו. ד״ה קדש ישראל — תשמ״ז. בד״ה ושבתה — תקס״ב (נדפס בדרך מצותיך קסז, ב) ”(ולפי שרבה הי׳ יחיד בנגעים ואהלות לכן שאלו ממנו ספק זה, כי לתחתונים דוקא יש כח זה לפסוק הדין שמסתפקים בו מחמת שהקליפות מעלימי׳ על הלכה זו והתחתונים יש בהן כח לברר ולהעלות מהשבירה לפי שהן מלובשים בגוף כו׳ כמ״ש באגה״ק בביאור מאמר הר״מ פ׳ נשא והמשכילים...)”.
- 3הואיל ופתח בו הכתוב בטהרה תחלה · Nazir 65b:5–6
- 4אז ישיר משה · Exodus 15:1
- 5מן המים משיתיהו · Exodus 2:10
- 6ע״פ ואלה המשפטים · תו״א עה, ד.
- 7ואלה המשפטים · Exodus 21:1
- 8סד״ה מראיהם ומעשיהם · תו״א סט, ג.
- 9מראיהם ומעשיהם · Ezekiel 1:16
- 10משה שפיר קאמרת · Shabbat 101b:3
- 11בביאור ענין קי״ס גבי והניף ידו על הנהר · ראה לעיל צו יז, א.
- 12והניף ידו על הנהר · Isaiah 11:15
- 13בזהר פ׳ בא דל״ו ע״ב · ראה גם לקמן שה״ש מח, ד.
- 14בשעתא דקוב״ה אתחזי על גנתא · Zohar, Bo 4:92–5:101
- 15
G‑d’s delight in Gan Eden and the halachic ruling ¶31–33
31ועמ״ש ע״פ באתי לגני1 כו׳ וע״פ הזהר בפ׳ בראשית דכ״ז ע״ב2 אעשה לו עזר3 בענין מעלת גילוי זה דקב״ה אתי כו׳.
See what is written on the verse “I have come into My garden,” etc., and on the Zohar in Parshas Bereishis, 27b, [on] “I will make him a helper,” concerning the superiority of this revelation, that “the Holy One, blessed be He, comes,” etc.
The superiority of this revelation, G‑d coming to delight with the righteous, is discussed in the discourse “I have come into My garden” (Song of Songs 5:1) and in the Zohar on “I will make him a helper” (Genesis 2:18).
וזהו ג״כ כענין המבואר במ״א ע״פ ויהי קול מעל לרקיע.45 דפי׳ קול ר״ל המשכה וגילוי מלמעלה מבחי׳ הרקיע והפרסא והוא מבחי׳ סכ״ע.
And this is also like the matter explained elsewhere on the verse “And there was a voice from above the firmament”: “voice” means a drawing-down and revelation from above the level of the firmament and the partition (parsa), and it is from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin).
It is like “a voice from above the firmament” (Ezekiel 1:25): the “voice” is a revelation from above the firmament and the partition (parsa) between levels, from sovev kol almin.
The paragraph supports the point that G‑d’s delight with the righteous comes from above the “firmament,” comparing it with Ezekiel’s “voice from above the firmament,” a revelation from sovev kol almin.
Marei mekomos
- 1באתי לגני · Song of Songs 5:1
- 2וע״פ הזהר בפ׳ בראשית דכ״ז ע״ב · ביאה״ז לכ״ק אדה״א ב, ג.
- 3אעשה לו עזר · Genesis 2:18
- 4ע״פ ויהי קול מעל לרקיע · אוה״ת במדבר ע׳ א׳תכט. ובאוה״ת שמות-ח ע׳ א׳תתקעז עם הגהות.
- 5ויהי קול מעל לרקיע · Ezekiel 1:25
32וכך ענין גילוי זה היא מלמעלה משרש השגת המתיבתא דרקיע ששרש השגתם מבחי׳ רקיע העליון דבינה.
So too, this revelation is from above the root of the comprehension of the Academy of the Firmament, whose comprehension is rooted in the level of the upper firmament of Binah (understanding).
This revelation is above the root of the Academy’s comprehension, which lies in the upper firmament, Binah.
אבל המשכה זו מבחי׳ עדן זהו מעל לרקיע כו׳ וכ״ז נמשך להם ע״י שבעסק תורתם בהיום לעשותם המשיכו ג״כ מבחי׳ כתר עליון מבחי׳ סוכ״ע ועי״ז זוכים ג״כ בג״ע לגילוי הארה זו להיות קב״ה אתי לאשתעשעא כו׳.
But this drawing-down from the level of Eden is “above the firmament,” etc. And all this is drawn to them because, in their Torah study during “today, to do them,” they also drew down from the level of the Supernal Keser (Crown), the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin); and through this they merit in Gan Eden as well the revelation of this radiance, that “the Holy One, blessed be He, comes to delight,” etc.
The drawing-down from Eden is “above the firmament.” The Sages earn it because in their Torah study in this world, the time “to do them,” they drew down from the Supernal Crown, sovev, and so in Gan Eden they merit that G‑d “comes to delight” with them.
(ועמ״ש בד״ה כי כאשר השמים1 החדשים2 בענין ויניחהו בג״ע לעבדה3 כו׳) עוי״ל עפמ״ש במ״א בד״ה צאינה וראינה45 בפי׳ שאו ידיכם קדש וברכו את6 הוי׳ כו׳.
(See what is written in the discourse beginning “For as the new heavens,” on “and He placed him in Gan Eden to work it,” etc.) One may further explain according to what is written elsewhere, in the discourse beginning “Go out and see,” on the meaning of “Lift up your hands [in] holiness and bless Havayah,” etc.
Further references: the discourse “For as the new heavens” (Isaiah 66:22), on “and He placed him in Gan Eden to work it” (Genesis 2:15). Another explanation draws on the discourse “Go out and see” (Song of Songs 3:11), on “Lift up your hands in holiness and bless G‑d” (Psalms 134:2).
וזהו שנק׳ הקב״ה ע״ש באריכות וברכה זו הוא ע״י עסק התורה כמ״ש בזהר ויקרא די״ג א׳ ולכן מברכתם יבורכו גם הם אשר לכן הקב״ה אתי לאשתעשעא עם צדיקייא בג״ע כו׳.
And this is why He is called “the Holy One, blessed be He”; see there at length. And this blessing comes through occupation with Torah, as is written in the Zohar, Vayikra, 13a; and therefore “from their blessing they too will be blessed,” which is why the Holy One, blessed be He, comes to delight with the righteous in Gan Eden, etc.
There it is explained that the “holy” must be blessed, that is, drawn down, which is why G‑d is called “the Holy One, blessed be He.” This blessing comes through Torah study, and those who bless are themselves blessed; so G‑d comes to delight with the righteous in Gan Eden.
וע׳ בהרמ״ז פ׳ כי תצא בד׳ רע״ח א׳ כ׳ מתיבתא דקב״ה הוא בבריאה ששם ג״ע העליון ומתיבתא דרקיע הוא ביצירה. (ועיין בזהר בפ׳ בלק דר״ג ע״ב).
And see the Ramaz, Parshas Ki Seitzei, on folio 278a; he writes: the Academy of the Holy One, blessed be He, is in Beriah, where the Higher Gan Eden is, and the Academy of the Firmament is in Yetzirah. (And see the Zohar, Parshas Balak, 203b.)
The Ramaz places the Academy of the Holy One, blessed be He, in Beriah, where the Higher Gan Eden is, and the Academy of the Firmament in Yetzirah.
והנה הרמב״ם ספ״ב מהט״צ פסק כהמתיבתא דספיקו טמא7 וכ׳ הכ״מ משום דת״ק ור׳ יהושע פליגי בזה ספ״ד דנגעים8 והלכה כת״ק ואע״ג דקוב״ה אמר טהור לא בשמים היא9 כו׳.
Now, the Rambam, at the end of chapter 2 of the Laws of the Impurity of Tzara’as, ruled like the Academy, that its doubt is impure; and the Kesef Mishneh writes that this is because the Tanna Kamma and Rabbi Yehoshua disagree about this at the end of chapter 4 of Negaim, and the law follows the Tanna Kamma; and although the Holy One, blessed be He, said “Pure,” “it is not in heaven,” etc.
Now to the practical law. The Rambam (Laws of Tzara’as 2:9) rules like the Academy that the doubt is impure; the Kesef Mishneh explains that the Mishnah (Negaim 4:11) records a dispute between the first Tanna and Rabbi Yehoshua, that the law follows the first Tanna, and that G‑d’s “pure” does not decide the law, since the Torah “is not in heaven” (Deuteronomy 30:12).
אמנם בהר״ש ספ״ד דנגעים משמע דהל׳ כר׳ יהושע משום דקוב״ה אמר טהור כו׳ הענין י״ל ע״פ מ״ש במ״א בענין שארז״ל על ר״מ10 שהיה אומר על טמא טהור ומראה לו פנים כו׳
However, from Rabbeinu Shimshon, at the end of chapter 4 of Negaim, it is implied that the law follows Rabbi Yehoshua, because the Holy One, blessed be He, said “Pure,” etc. The explanation may be given according to what is written elsewhere concerning what our Sages, of blessed memory, said about Rabbi Meir, that he would say of the impure, “pure,” and show a face (panim) for it, etc.;
Rabbeinu Shimshon, however, implies that the law follows Rabbi Yehoshua, because G‑d said “pure.” To explain the two views, the Alter Rebbe cites what the Sages said of Rabbi Meir: he could declare the impure pure and “show a face” for it (Eruvin 13b).
כי החכמה היא נמשכת מלמעלה דרך שערות שהם י״ג ת״ד זקן שקנה חכמה.11 שרש י״ג מדות שהתורה נדרשת12 בהם והשערות הם צמצומים.
for wisdom is drawn from above through hairs, which are the thirteen tikkunim of the beard: zaken, “one who has acquired wisdom,” the root of the thirteen principles by which the Torah is expounded; and the hairs are contractions (tzimtzumim).
Wisdom descends through “hairs,” the thirteen tikkunim of the beard of Arich Anpin; zaken, “elder,” written with the same letters as zakan, “beard,” is “one who has acquired wisdom” (Kiddushin 32b). These are the root of the thirteen principles by which the Torah is expounded, and hairs are contractions, narrow channels.
אבל כשהחכמה היא בכתר שם היא בהרחבה גדולה בחי׳ א״ס וזהו ענין ומראה לו פנים שהי׳ מאיר וממשיך מבחי׳ הפנים דא״א שהוא פנוי משערות ולמעלה מבחי׳ הצמצומים (ועמ״ש מזה באריכות בביאור ע״פ אלה מסעי).1314
But when wisdom is in Keser, there it is in great expansiveness, the level of the Infinite (Ein Sof); and this is the meaning of “and show a face for it”: he would shine and draw down from the level of the Face (panim) of Arich Anpin, which is free of hairs and above the level of the contractions (and see what is written about this at length in the explanation of the verse “These are the journeys”).
When wisdom is still in the Crown it is broad and unbounded. Rabbi Meir “showed a face” because he drew from the “Face” of Arich Anpin, which is free of hair and above all the contractions.
ע״כ היה יכול לומר גם על הטמא טהור כו׳ וזה היה ענין ר״מ. אבל רוב החכמים שבדורו לא15 היו משיגים התורה רק
Therefore he was able to say even of the impure, “pure,” etc., and this was the matter of Rabbi Meir. But most of the sages of his generation comprehended the Torah only
So Rabbi Meir could declare even the impure pure. Most of the sages of his generation, however, grasped the Torah only in a more limited form.
כמו שכבר נמשכה בחכמה דאצי׳ המקבלת ע״י שערות י״ג ת״ד וזהו נובלות חכמה16 שלמעלה תורה כו׳ וכמ״ש בביאור ע״פ תורה צוה לנו משה.17181920
as it had already been drawn into Chochmah of Atzilus, which receives through the hairs of the thirteen tikkunim of the beard; and this is [the meaning of] “the unripe fruit of the supernal wisdom is Torah,” etc., as is explained in the explanation of the verse “Moshe commanded us the Torah.”
They grasped it only as it is drawn into Chochmah of Atzilus through the “hairs,” the thirteen tikkunim; that Torah is “the unripe fruit of the supernal wisdom” (Bereishis Rabbah 17:5).
The paragraph explains that the Sages earn G‑d’s delight with them in Gan Eden by drawing down the Crown through their Torah, and then turns to the halachic dispute: the Rambam rules “impure” because the Torah “is not in heaven,” while Rabbeinu Shimshon follows G‑d’s “pure.” The Alter Rebbe begins to explain this through Rabbi Meir, whose wisdom came from the “Face” above the contractions.
The Talmud there (Eruvin 13b) gives the reason the law was not fixed like Rabbi Meir: his colleagues could not fathom the depth of his reasoning, which is the point the next paragraph takes up. In the discourse “Moshe commanded us the Torah” (Likkutei Torah, V’Zos HaBerachah 95a), the Alter Rebbe explains that Supernal Chochmah is “wise, but not with a knowable wisdom,” above comprehension, and the Torah is its “unripe fruit,” what is drawn down from it.
Marei mekomos
- 1בד״ה כי כאשר השמים · ראה תו״א ב, ד.
- 2כי כאשר השמים החדשים · Isaiah 66:22
- 3ויניחהו בג״ע לעבדה · Genesis 2:15
- 4בד״ה צאינה וראינה · לקו״ת שה״ש כא, ב.
- 5צאינה וראינה · Song of Songs 3:11
- 6שאו ידיכם קדש וברכו את הוי׳ · Psalms 134:2
- 7דספיקו טמא · Mishneh Torah, Defilement by Leprosy 2:9
- 8ספ״ד דנגעים · במאמרי אדהאמ״צ ע׳ תפג מוסיף: ועיי׳ בתוס׳ יו״ט וכו׳.
- 9לא בשמים היא · Deuteronomy 30:12
- 10ארז״ל על ר״מ שהי׳ אומר · Eruvin 13b:3
- 11זקן שקנה חכמה · Kiddushin 32b:8
- 12יג״מ שהתורה נדרשת · ברייתא דר״י ת״כ ר״פ ויקרא.
- 13בביאור ע״פ אלה מסעי) · לקו״ת מסעי צג, א ואילך.
- 14אלה מסעי · Numbers 33:1
- 15רוב החכמים שבדורו לא היו משיגים התורה רק . . בחכ׳ דאצי׳ · ראה לעיל ד, א הערה שכל. וראה הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר במאמרי אדה״ז תקס״ב ע׳ שיד.
- 16נובלות חכמה שלמע׳ תורה · Bereshit Rabbah 17:5
- 17בביאור ע״פ תורה צוה לנו משה · לקו״ת ברכה צה, א ואילך.
- 18תורה צוה לנו משה · Deuteronomy 33:4
- 19
- 20
Therefore they did not fix the law in accordance with him, for “follow the majority to decide”; and see the Midrash on Tehillim, on the verse “The words of G‑d,” etc.,
This is why the law was not fixed like Rabbi Meir: “follow the majority to decide” (Exodus 23:2). The Midrash on Tehillim, on “The words of G‑d are pure words… refined sevenfold,” teaches that the Torah was given with forty-nine ways to argue “pure” and forty-nine “impure,” and the decision was left to the majority.
מזוקק שבעתים3 כו׳ וזהו ענין לא בשמים היא4 כי שמים הם מקיפים דחיה ויחידה. והתורה כבר נמשכה מהמקיפים לתוך א״פ במדות דאצילות.
“refined sevenfold,” etc. And this is the meaning of “it is not in heaven”: for “heaven” is the encompassing levels of chayah and yechidah, and the Torah has already been drawn down from the encompassing levels into the inner light, in the attributes of the World of Atzilus (Emanation).
This is what “it is not in heaven” means: “heaven” is the encompassing levels of the soul, chayah and yechidah, while the Torah has already been drawn down from them into the inner light, the attributes of Atzilus, where it is decided by understanding.
ועפ״ז יש לפרש דעת הרמב״ם דפסק כת״ק. כי רבה שהיה יחיד בנגעים ואהלות היינו מבחי׳ המקיף דחיה יחידה.
According to this, the view of the Rambam, who ruled like the Tanna Kamma, may be explained: Rabbah, who was “unique in nega’im and ohalos,” was from the level of the encompassing [light] of chayah [and] yechidah;
This explains the Rambam’s ruling like the first Tanna: Rabbah bar Nachmani, unique in nega’im and ohalos, drew from the encompassing levels of chayah and yechidah.
ואעפ״כ אחרי רבים להטות ומ״מ באמת י״ל דהכא שאני דאין זה דומה להא דאחרי רבים להטות דהיינו דוקא בפלוגתא דחכמי המשנה זע״ז אבל הכא שאני דקוב״ה אומר טהור כו׳:
and nevertheless, “follow the majority to decide.” Yet in truth it can be said that here it is different: this is not comparable to “follow the majority to decide,” which applies only to a dispute of the sages of the Mishnah with one another; but here it is different, for the Holy One, blessed be He, says “Pure,” etc.
Even so, the law follows the majority, whose understanding is of the inner light. Yet the Alter Rebbe suggests that this case may be different: “follow the majority” governs disputes among the sages themselves, but here G‑d Himself said “pure,” which would support the view of Rabbeinu Shimshon.
The maamar closes with the halachic question: by the principle “it is not in heaven,” the law follows the majority of the sages, whose understanding is of the Torah as drawn into the inner light, and so the Rambam rules “impure”; yet the Alter Rebbe suggests that a case in which G‑d Himself said “pure” may be different.
Marei mekomos
- 1אחרי רבים להטות · Exodus 23:2
- 2אחרי רבים להטות · Midrash Tehillim 12:3
- 3מזוקק שבעתים · Psalms 12:7
- 4לא בשמים היא · Deuteronomy 30:12
- 5במדרש תהלים ע״פ אמרות ה׳ · יב, ז.
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
In one’s avodah
Prayer is a preparation for Torah study: contemplating G‑d’s infinite greatness, before which all the worlds are a single drop, brings a longing and “worry” of the heart that is not sadness. Torah study then gladdens that heart, because the soul can grasp Torah, and Torah and G‑d are one, so through it the soul grasps G‑d Himself. Torah should be spoken aloud, since the breath of speech draws its hidden light into revelation, and learned for its own sake, which adds light in Gan Eden.
Questions for discussion
- Why does the maamar identify “holy” with Keser and “blessed” with Chochmah, and how does that explain the Sages’ choice of the Name “the Holy One, blessed be He”?
- Why is Binah called a “firmament,” and what does the image of water freezing into ice teach about comprehension?
- How can contemplation in prayer bring “worry” that is not sadness, and why does Torah study then gladden the heart?
- According to the Maggid’s answer, why does Tiferes, and not Chesed, bear the Name Havayah, and how does this explain kelipas nogah of Atzilus?
- Why could the Academy hear G‑d say “pure” and still not know the reason, and what made Rabbah bar Nachmani able to decide?
Key terms in this maamar
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×20
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- Harmony of kindness and restraint; associated with compassion. ×10
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d. ×24
- Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
- Malchus as the receiving configuration.
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence.
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×8
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- Measure, limitation and judgment. ×6
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×13
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×35
- The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
- Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond.
- The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
- Divine light that enters each world and gives it life according to its measure.
- Yesod (foundation)יסוד
- The channel that connects and transmits. ×3
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds. ×6
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×20
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×22
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×2
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions. ×1
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d's presence as it dwells in the world. ×1
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×3
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×6
- The Sefirosספירות
- The ten divine attributes through which G‑d relates to creation. ×2
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- Chochmah, Binah and Daas as a whole. ×4
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The external, expressive aspect. ×4
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×1
- Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
- The forces of concealment that oppose holiness. ×3
- Z'eir Anpin (the emotive attributes)ז״א
- The six emotive Sefiros as one configuration.
- Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah)אבא ואמא
- The intellectual configurations.
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×3
- “He and His vessels” (ihu vegarmohi)איהו וגרמוהי
- From the Tikkunei Zohar: in Atzilus the Light and the vessels are one. Always “vessels”, never “organs”, “causations” or “bones”. Its companion איהו וחיוהי is “He and His life-forces”. Not מגרמיה (“of itself”). ×1
- An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
- Human initiative that draws down a divine response.
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×4
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level. ×1