LikuteiTorah.comThe Chassidishe Parsha

Likkutei Torah · Parshas Matos · Maamar 6

החלצו מאתכם וגו׳

“Arm from among you”

  • 24 paragraphs · 114 sections
  • about 1 h 5 min of study
  • 170 sources

Begin the maamar Download PDFPDF · 817 KB

Your progress 0 of 114 sections

Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device

The big idea

Midian, whose name means strife, is baseless hatred: the force of division, the direct opposite of the Name Havayah, in which even opposites become one. The war against it is “the vengeance of Havayah,” and it is won only through the two kinds of peace that the Torah makes, above and below, in the worlds and in the soul, until all Israel is one, “as one man.”

The maamar in brief

The maamar asks why Moshe says hechaltzu, which addresses everyone, why the war is “the vengeance of Havayah,” and why the verse says “for all the tribes.” Midian is the kelipah of strife, baseless hatred, for which the Second Temple was destroyed; because it is not plain evil and people justify it, its exile lasts far longer than the seventy years that repaired the seven evil traits of the First Temple. It opposes the Name Havayah, which is “One”: in it opposites unite. The yud (contraction, Chochmah) and the hei (expansion, Binah) are joined by the tip of the yud, a light from above both, drawn down through the Torah: peace in the household above. The vav and the final hei are joined when the left is included in the right, severity serving kindness, as in the Torah’s punishments and its exacting details: peace in the household below. In the soul these are the mind ruling the heart, and the refinement of the animal soul’s emotions into the G‑dly soul’s. So every Jew must fight Midian within himself, and only the unity of all, through Moshe, brings the light of “the wholeness of all” over Midian.

Outline

  1. The questionsWhy hechaltzu, why “the vengeance of Havayah,” and why “for all the tribes.” Midian is the opposite of the Name Havayah; its kelipah was subdued through Yisro before the Giving of the Torah, and the Torah makes peace in the household above and the household below.¶1
  2. Baseless hatred and the long exileThe First Temple fell for sins rooted in the seven evil traits, the seven nations, which were repaired in seventy years; the Second fell for baseless hatred, the strife of Midian, which opposes divine oneness. Because it is hidden and self-justified, like fine waste or a doubtful law, its refinement takes far longer.¶2–4
  3. The yud, the hei and the tip of the yudCreation from nothing required a tzimtzum, the point of the yud, before the expansion of the hei. These opposites, Chochmah and Binah, are joined by the tip of the yud, a light from above both, which is drawn down through Torah study: peace in the household above, and the reason the Torah is called “peace.”¶5–6
  4. The left included in the rightThe six attributes, the vav of the Name, have evil counterparts nourished from the left line. The remedy is to include the left in the right, as in the Torah’s punishments, which repair the sinner, and in its exacting details, Gevuros that serve kindness: peace in the household below.¶7–9
  5. Brain and heartIn the soul, Chochmah in the brain (water) gives lasting nullification of will and humility, and Binah in the heart (fire) gives burning love. The mind must rule the heart, running must lead to returning, and Torah study, drawing down a will above reason, unites them, so that love becomes self-giving.¶10–16
  6. The two soulsThe emotions of the animal soul, the left, must be refined until they are absorbed into those of the G‑dly soul, the right, even turning the evil inclination to love of G‑d. This comes through Daas drawn by the Torah, and through the mitzvos, especially charity, which make peace above between giver and receiver.¶17–19
  7. The answersThe war is “the vengeance of Havayah” because division opposes the Name of unity; hechaltzu because every person must fight it within; “for all the tribes” because unity below draws light from the root of the tribes above. Through Moshe, the source of unity, the soldiers became “all of them matched” and so prevailed over Midian.¶20–24

Key concepts

Baseless hatred (sinas chinam)שנאת חנם
Hatred without cause, the sin for which the Second Temple was destroyed. The maamar identifies it with Midian (madon, “strife”): not complete evil, yet the source of evil and the opposite of divine oneness; because people justify it to themselves, they hardly repent of it, and so its exile is long.
The household above and the household belowפמליא של מעלה ופמליא של מטה
The two realms in which Torah study “makes peace.” Above: the union of the yud and the hei, Chochmah and Binah, which in the soul are mind and heart. Below: the union of the vav and the final hei, the left included in the right, which in the soul is the animal soul refined into the G‑dly soul.
The tip of the yudקוצו של יו״ד
The small point above the letter yud, standing for a level above Chochmah, Keser, which joins the yud and the hei, opposites that cannot unite on their own. In the soul it is the will above reason, which Torah study draws down.
The left included in the rightשמאלא אתכליל בימינא
The Zohar’s phrase for severity included in kindness and serving it. It is the foundation of the Torah, seen in its punishments, which repair the sinner, and in its exacting details; in the soul, it is the refinement of the animal soul’s emotions into those of the G‑dly soul.
Running and returning (ratzo vashov)רצוא ושוב
The heart’s fiery yearning toward G‑d, and the return to settled service. The mind must rule the heart, so that the running leads to returning and humility outweighs enthusiasm.
The wholeness of allשלימותא דכולא
G‑d as including everything, called “All,” whose light rests where there is inter-inclusion below. It is far above the root of Midian, and so unity puts Israel “over” Midian.

Skip to the text

The questions ¶1

1החלצו מאתכם וגו׳. וצ״ל דהל״ל [דהוה ליה למימר] יחלצו כי החלצו משמע כולכם וכיון שנאמר מאתכם דהיינו מקצתם אלף למטה א״כ הל״ל [הוה ליה למימר] יחלצו.

“Arm from among you (hechaltzu me’itchem),” etc. We need to understand this, for it should have said yechaltzu (“let [men] be armed”): hechaltzu (“arm yourselves”) implies all of you, and since it says “from among you,” that is, some of you, “a thousand per tribe,” then it should have said yechaltzu.

Explanation

The maamar opens with Moshe’s command to prepare for the war against Midian. The form hechaltzu is an order addressed to everyone, yet the verse goes on to say “from among you,” and the next verse limits the force to a thousand from each tribe; for a draft of only some of the men, the Torah should have said yechaltzu, “let men be armed.”

גם מהו ענין נקמת הוי׳ במדין. גם מהו לכל מטות והל״ל [והוה ליה למימר] מכל מטות. אך הנה בחינת מדין הוא ממש נגד בחי׳ שם הוי׳

Also, what is [meant by] “the vengeance of Havayah upon Midian”? And also, what is [meant by] “for all the tribes (lechol matos)”? It should have said “from all the tribes (mikol matos).” However, the level of Midian stands directly opposite the level of the Name Havayah;

Explanation

Two more questions: why is this war called “the vengeance of Havayah,” and why does the next verse say “for all the tribes” rather than “from all the tribes,” as one would expect when only some are taken? The answer begins from a principle the maamar will explain at length: Midian is the direct opposite of the Name Havayah.

ולכן קודם מתן תורה היה צ״ל הכנעת קליפת מדין ע״י יתרו כהן מדין שאמר עתה ידעתי כו׳ (כמ״ש בזהר ר״פ יתרו ס״ז ב׳).

and therefore, before the Giving of the Torah, there had to be the subduing of the kelipah (husk) of Midian through Yisro, the priest of Midian, who said, “Now I know,” etc. (as is written in the Zohar at the beginning of Parshas Yisro, 67b).

Explanation

Because Midian opposes the Name, its kelipah, the concealing force behind it, had to be subdued before the Torah could be given. This happened when Yisro, Midian’s own priest, came and acknowledged, “Now I know that Havayah is greater than all the gods”; the Zohar says that only after this was G‑d’s glory exalted above and below, and the Torah given.

והענין ע״ד משארז״ל [מה שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] דבשעת מתן תורה נתקבצו כל האומות כו׳ עד שפתחו כולם ואמרו ה׳ עוז לעמו יתן ה׳ יברך את עמו בשלום וכמארז״ל [וכמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שהעוסק בתורה משים שלום בפמליא של מעלה ובפמליא של מטה.

The matter is along the lines of what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: at the time of the Giving of the Torah all the nations gathered, etc., until all of them opened [their mouths] and said, “Havayah will give strength to His people; Havayah will bless His people with peace.” And as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: one who occupies himself with Torah makes peace in the household above and in the household below.

Explanation

The Talmud relates that when the Torah was given, the kings of the nations gathered in alarm at the tumult, until they learned its cause and declared, “Havayah will bless His people with peace.” The Torah is bound up with peace: the Sages say that one who occupies himself with Torah makes peace in two realms, “the household above” and “the household below,” and these two kinds of peace are the subject of the maamar.

Paragraph 1 in brief

The maamar raises three questions on the command to war against Midian: why hechaltzu implies everyone though only some went, why the war is “the vengeance of Havayah,” and why the verse says “for all the tribes.” It sets out the key to the answers: Midian is the opposite of the Name Havayah, its kelipah had to be subdued before the Torah was given, and the Torah brings peace to the household above and the household below.

Deeper

The Kehot note quotes Hayom Yom (28 Tammuz): each of the Rebbeim had fixed maamarim, said especially to purify the atmosphere of the world, which they would repeat publicly once in two or three years; one of the Alter Rebbe’s was “Hechaltzu” in Likkutei Torah, without the glosses.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    החלצו מאתכם · הנחת כ״ק אדמו״ר האמצעי נדפס בסה״מ תקס״ו ע׳ רפה. וראה אוה״ת מטות ע׳ א׳שלז הגהה השייכת לסיום הביאור. ראה במאמרי אדה״א פ׳ מטות ע׳ א׳תשלט שמיוסד על מאמר זה. ”לכל אחד מהרביים היו מאמרים קבועים ביחוד בשביל זה (לטהר אויר העולם), אשר פעם בשתים או שלש שנים היו חוזרים עליהם ברבים. אחד ממאמרי רבנו הזקן — החלצו שבלקו״ת בלי ההגהות” — היום יום כ״ח תמוז ובהוספות לסה״מ תרנ״ט ע׳ רכב. לכללות מאמר זה — ראה ד״ה החלצו — רנ״ט וההוספה שם (ברוקלין, תש״ט). ובארוכה בס׳ אגרות קודש דכ״ק אדמו״ר מוהריי״צ נ״ע ח״א ע׳ שמה ואילך.
  2. 2
    החלצו מאתכם · Numbers 31:3
  3. 3
    לכל מטות · Numbers 31:4
  4. 4
  5. 5
    עתה ידעתי · Exodus 18:11
  6. 6
    יתרו כהן מדין שאמר עתה ידעתי · Zohar, Yitro 1:8–18
  7. 7
    ע״ד משארז״ל · Zevachim 116a:20
  8. 8
  9. 9
    שהעוסק בתורה משים שלום · Sanhedrin 99b:10–11

Baseless hatred and the long exile ¶2–4

2ולהבין ב׳ שלומות הללו צ״ל דהנה בחורבן בהמ״ק [בית המקדש] ראשון אמרו רז״ל [רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] ויתר הקב״ה על עבודת כוכבים וג״ע [וגילוי עריות] וש״ד [ושפיכות דמים] ולא ויתר על ביטול תורה וחורבן בית שני היה רק בשביל עון שנאת חנם לבד.

To understand these two [kinds of] peace, it must be said: concerning the destruction of the First Temple, our Sages, of blessed memory, said that the Holy One, blessed be He, overlooked idolatry, forbidden relations and bloodshed, but did not overlook the neglect of Torah; and the destruction of the Second Temple came only because of the sin of baseless hatred alone.

Explanation

To explain the two kinds of peace, the Alter Rebbe compares the two destructions. Of the First Temple, the Sages say that G‑d overlooked even idolatry, forbidden relations and bloodshed, and what He did not overlook was the neglect of Torah; the Second Temple, whose generation engaged in Torah and mitzvos, was destroyed only for baseless hatred.

Paragraph 2 in brief

The paragraph lays down the historical premise of the argument: the First Temple fell for the gravest sins together with the neglect of Torah, while the Second Temple fell for baseless hatred alone.

Deeper

In the Jerusalem Talmud and the Midrash on Lamentations, the proof is from the verse “For what is the land lost?… Because they have forsaken My Torah”: the verse names the forsaking of the Torah, not the three cardinal sins, as the cause of the destruction.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ויתר הקב״ה על · Yoma 9b:12–13
  2. 2
    ויתר הקב״ה על עבודת כוכבים וג״ע וש״ד ולא ויתר על ביטול תורה · Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah 1:7
  3. 3
    ויתר הקב״ה על עבודת כוכבים וג״ע וש״ד ולא ויתר על ביטול תורה · Eikhah Rabbah, Petichta 2
  4. 4
    וחורבן ב״ש הי׳ רק בשביל עון שנאת חנם · Yoma 9b

3וא״כ למה עכשיו אריכות הגלות שבית המקדש חרב יותר מי״ז מאות שנה. וגלות בבל שהיה מפני עבירות חמורות הנ״ל אעפ״כ [אף על פי כן] היה רק שבעים שנה.

If so, why is the exile now so long, that the Holy Temple has lain destroyed for more than seventeen hundred years? While the Babylonian exile, which came because of the grave sins mentioned above, was nevertheless only seventy years.

Explanation

If the First Temple’s sins were the gravest, why has the present exile, which followed the destruction of the Second Temple, lasted more than seventeen hundred years, while the Babylonian exile after the First Temple lasted only seventy? The figure reflects the Alter Rebbe’s own time.

אך הענין הוא כי הנה בשבעה אומות שהיו בארץ בעת שבאו אבותינו לארץ הכנעני והחתי כו׳ נאמר והיה אשר תותירו מהם כו׳ כי הם היו שבע מדות הרעות

But the explanation is this: concerning the seven nations that were in the land when our fathers came into the land, the Canaanite and the Hittite, etc., it is said, “And it shall be that those of them whom you leave remaining…,” etc.; for they were the seven evil emotive attributes (middos).

Explanation

The answer begins with the seven nations of Canaan. The Torah warns that any of them left in the land would trouble Israel; the Alter Rebbe explains that, in their spiritual root, the seven nations are the seven evil emotive attributes, the counterparts of the seven holy ones.

לכן כשחטאו ישראל אז בבית ראשון ונתגברו בהם השבע מדות הרעות אלו מפני שהשאירו מהם וכמ״ש

Therefore, when Israel sinned then, in [the time of] the First Temple, and these seven evil attributes grew strong in them because they had left [some] of them [remaining], as it is written

Explanation

Because Israel did not drive these nations out completely, the evil traits that they embody gained strength in the people during the First Temple period.

(בשופטים סי׳ א׳ וסי׳ ב׳) ואתם לא תכרתו ברית כו׳ ולא שמעתם בקולי כו׳ ומחמתם נכשלו בעבירות חמורות הנ״ל.

(in Judges, chapters 1 and 2), “And you shall make no covenant…,” etc., “but you have not listened to My voice,” etc.; and because of them they stumbled into the grave sins mentioned above.

Explanation

The book of Judges records that the people made covenants with the inhabitants of the land and did not heed G‑d’s voice, and were told that those nations would become a snare to them. Through these traits Israel came to the grave sins of the First Temple period.

ע״כ היה הגלות בבל שבעים שנה שעי״ז נתקנו שבע מדות הנ״ל לכל מדה עשר שנה כי כל אחד כלולה מעשר.

Therefore the Babylonian exile was seventy years, for through it the seven attributes mentioned above were rectified: ten years for each attribute, since each one is composed of ten.

Explanation

The seventy years of the Babylonian exile rectified those seven traits. Each attribute is composed of all ten aspects, so seven attributes times ten gives seventy years.

אך בבית שני לא היה החטא במדות הרעות עצמן כ״א בשנאת חנם והיא קליפת מדין שאינה נחשבת משבעה עממין הנ״ל ואינו רע גמור כמו תאות רעות כו׳ ניאוף.

In the Second Temple, however, the sin was not in the evil attributes themselves but in baseless hatred; and this is the kelipah of Midian, which is not counted among the seven nations mentioned above, and is not complete evil like evil lusts, etc., [such as] adultery.

Explanation

The sin of the Second Temple was of another kind: baseless hatred, which the Alter Rebbe identifies with the kelipah of Midian. Midian is not one of the seven nations, and its trait is not outright evil, like lust.

כ״א שנאת חנם שזהו לשון מדין ריב ומדון ומדה זו אע״פ [אף על פי] שאינה רע גמור אך הוא מקור התהוות הרע והוא ג״כ הפך הקדושה האלקית (ועי׳ [ועיין] בזהר ויקרא די״ו ע״ב)

Rather, [it is] baseless hatred, for this is the meaning of the word Midian: quarrel and strife (madon). And this trait, although it is not complete evil, is nevertheless the source from which evil comes into being; and it is also the opposite of divine holiness (and see the Zohar, Vayikra, 16b),

Explanation

The name Midian is read as madon, “strife.” Baseless hatred is not complete evil in itself, yet it is the root from which evil comes, and it stands against holiness; the passage of the Zohar cited here expounds “a grumbler separates” as one who separates the unity above.

שהיא דוקא בחינת אחדות והתכללות שהוא יסוד כל התורה כמ״ש הלל הזקן דעלך סני כו׳ ואידך פירושא הוא

which is precisely the quality of oneness and inter-inclusion, which is the foundation of the whole Torah, as Hillel the Elder said, “What is hateful to you…,” etc., “and the rest is its explanation.”

Explanation

Holiness is oneness and the inclusion of each part in the others. When a would-be convert asked Hillel to teach him the whole Torah briefly, he answered, “What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow,” and called the rest its commentary: love between people, the opposite of baseless hatred, is the Torah’s foundation.

והיינו משום דכך הוא למעלה הוי׳ אחד בחי׳ אחדות והתכללות איהו וגרמוהי חד כו׳ הוא היודע והוא הדעה כי פי׳ אחד אין פירושו מהו״ע [מהותו ועצמותו] ית׳ דהוא נקרא יחיד

And this is because so it is above: “Havayah is One”: the quality of oneness and inter-inclusion, “He and His vessels (ihu vegarmohi) are one,” etc., “He is the Knower and He is the Knowledge.” For the meaning of “One” is not His being and essence, may He be blessed, which is called “Singular” (Yachid);

Explanation

This mirrors what is above: the Name Havayah is called “One”; the Tikkunei Zohar says that in Atzilus “He and His vessels are one”; and the Rambam says that G‑d is the Knower and is Himself the Knowledge. The word “One” here does not describe G‑d’s essence in itself, for which the fitting word is “Singular” (Yachid).

אך פי׳ אחד היינו אחד בז׳ רקיעים והארץ ולמעלה הוא בחינות ז׳ מדות שכולם בטלים ומתכללים באחד וע״כ בחי׳ מדין ונרגן מפריד הוא המנגד לשם הוי׳

rather, the meaning of “One” is: One in the seven heavens and the earth, which above are the seven attributes, all of which are nullified and included in the One. And therefore the level of Midian, and “a grumbler separates,” is what opposes the Name Havayah,

Explanation

Rather, “One” means unity within multiplicity: G‑d is One in the seven heavens and the earth, which above correspond to the seven emotive attributes, all nullified and included in the One. Midian, the “grumbler who separates,” is the force of division, and so it opposes the Name Havayah directly.

שהוא אחד שגם כל המדות וההפכיים כולם מתאחדין ובטלים באור הוי׳ כו׳ וע״כ גלות זה שהוא תיקון ובירור בחי׳ שנאת חנם משתהה זמן רב יותר.

which is One, in that even all the attributes and the opposites all become united and nullified in the light of Havayah, etc. And therefore this exile, which is the rectification and refinement of baseless hatred, lasts a much longer time.

Explanation

In the light of the Name Havayah even opposite attributes unite and are nullified. Baseless hatred is the opposite of that unity, and so the exile whose task is to refine it lasts much longer.

Paragraph 3 in brief

The paragraph explains why the present exile is so long. The First Temple’s sins came from the seven evil traits (the seven nations) and were rectified in seventy years; the Second Temple’s sin was baseless hatred, the kelipah of Midian, which opposes the unity expressed by the Name Havayah and takes far longer to refine.

Deeper

The Kehot note quotes the Rebbe’s notes citing the Zohar, the Arizal’s Likkutei Torah and Sefer HaLikkutim: Midian in holiness is love, and in kelipah, enmity and strife. Another note quotes the Mitteler Rebbe that baseless hatred led to actual bloodshed at the end of the Second Temple period, as recorded in Yosippon: an illustration of how it is “the source from which evil comes into being.”

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    והי׳ אשר תותירו מהם · Numbers 33:55
  2. 2
    ואתם לא תכרתו ברית כו׳ ולא שמעתם בקולי · Judges 2:2
  3. 3
    ע״כ הי׳ הגלות בבל . . נתקנו שבע מדות · ראה בסה״מ תרמ״ד ע׳ רעז.
  4. 4
    לשון מדין ריב ומדון · Zohar II, 68a
  5. 5
    אך הוא מקור התהוות הרע · ”שמסיבת שנאת חנם הי׳ שפיכות דמים בפועל ממש בסוף בית שני ע״י פריצי ישראל כמבואר ביוסיפון” — מאמרי אדה״א פ׳ מטות ע׳ א׳תשמג.
  6. 6
    כמ״ש הלל הזקן דעלך סני · Shabbat 31a:6–7
  7. 7
    ה׳ אחד · Deuteronomy 6:4
  8. 8
    איהו וגרמוהי חד · ת״ז בהקדמה.
  9. 9
    איהו וגרמוהי חד · Tikkunei Zohar 3b:9–10
  10. 10
    הוא היודע והוא הדעה · רמב״ם הל׳ יסוה״ת פ״ב, ה״י.
  11. 11
    הוא היודע והוא הדעה · Mishneh Torah, Foundations of the Torah 2:10
  12. 12
    פי׳ אחד היינו אחד בז׳ רקיעים והארץ · סמ״ק סק״ד. הובא בב״י או״ח סי׳ סא. תו״א נה, ב. אוה״ת ואתחנן ע׳ תכט. שבועות ע׳ רב. אוה״ת שמות כרך-ח ד״ה וארא.
  13. 13
    אחד בז׳ רקיעים והארץ · Sefer Mitzvot Katan 104:2
  14. 14
    ונרגן מפריד · Proverbs 16:28
  15. 15

4וזהו שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] ראשונים שנתגלה עוונם נתגלה קצם כו׳ פי׳ נתגלה ע וונם שהיה רע גמור ע״כ עשו תשובה ע״ז מיד.

And this is what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “The earlier ones, whose sin was revealed, had their end revealed,” etc. That is: their sin was revealed, for it was complete evil; therefore they did teshuvah (returned) for it at once.

Explanation

The Talmud contrasts the two Temples: the sins of the First were open, so the end of its exile was revealed in advance; those of the Second were not, so its end is hidden. The Alter Rebbe reads “revealed” as “plainly evil”: because the First Temple’s sins were obviously evil, the people returned from them at once.

משא״כ אחרונים שלא נתגלה עוונם דהיינו ענין שנאת חנם שכל אחד מטעה א״ע [את עצמו] שאין זה עון גמור ע״כ לא נתגלה קצם מפני שאין מתחרטין כ״כ [כל כך] מזה

Whereas the later ones, whose sin was not revealed, that is, the matter of baseless hatred, about which each person deludes himself that it is not a complete sin: therefore their end was not revealed, because people do not regret it so much

Explanation

Baseless hatred is a hidden sin, since each person persuades himself that it is not really wrong. Because people hardly regret it, they do not truly return from it, and so the end of this exile is not revealed.

(וכמ״ש כה״ג [כהאי גוונא] ברבינו יונה רפ״ק [ריש פרק קמא] דברכות שלכך האשם שתי סלעים וחטאת בת דנקא דכיון שהאשם בא על ספק חטא אינו מתחרט כ״כ [כל כך] כו׳ ע״ש), או

(as Rabbeinu Yonah writes along these lines at the beginning of the first chapter of Berachos: that this is why the guilt-offering is two sela’im and the sin-offering is worth a danka, for since the guilt-offering comes for a doubtful sin, one does not regret it so much, etc.; see there). Or

Explanation

The parenthesis brings a parallel from Rabbeinu Yonah: the guilt-offering brought for a doubtful sin must be worth at least two sela’im, far more than the sin-offering for a certain sin, which may be worth a danka, because one who is unsure he sinned feels little remorse. The sentence then goes on to a second explanation.

כמו עד״מ לברר הפסולת הדק צריך שהות יותר מן הפסולת הגס שהוא ניכר לכל שהוא פסולת.

as, by way of analogy, sorting out fine refuse takes more time than coarse refuse, which is recognizable to all as refuse.

Explanation

A second explanation, by analogy: coarse waste is easy to see and remove, while fine waste mixed into the grain takes longer to sort out.

וכן בדינים בגמרא א״צ [אין צריך / אינו צריך] עיון שהעורב אסור והיונה מותרת, אבל לברר דינים המסופקים שאין איסורין ניכר צריך טורח וזמן רב יותר בפלפול ועיון שאח״כ מכירין

So too with laws in the Gemara: there is no need for study [to know] that the raven is forbidden and the dove permitted; but to clarify doubtful laws, where the prohibition is not evident, requires effort and much more time in debate and study, after which one recognizes

Explanation

So too in halachah: clear-cut cases, like the raven being forbidden and the dove permitted, need no study, but doubtful cases need long analysis and debate before one can conclude that something is forbidden.

שהוא אסור וכמ״כ [וכמו כן] תיקון ובירור עון שנאת חנם לפי שאינו נחשב כ״כ [כל כך] לרע גמור בעיני האדם מפני שמדמה ששונאו בדין ע״כ צריך ע״ז זמן רב.

that it is forbidden. So too the rectification and refinement of the sin of baseless hatred: because it is not considered so much as complete evil in a person’s eyes, since he imagines that he hates the other with justice, therefore it needs a long time.

Explanation

Baseless hatred is the “fine waste” and the “doubtful law”: a person who hates another imagines that his hatred is justified, so he does not see it as evil. Rectifying and refining such a sin therefore takes a long time.

אך להבין קצת חומר ענין זה דשנאת חנם איך שהוא המנגד ממש לשם הוי׳. והענין דשם הוי׳ נק׳ ע״ש [על שם] שמהוה מאין ליש.

But to understand somewhat the gravity of this matter of baseless hatred, how it is the very opposite of the Name Havayah: the explanation is that the Name Havayah is so called because it brings into being (mehaveh) from nothing (ayin) to something (yesh).

Explanation

The maamar now turns to why baseless hatred is so grave: it is the direct opposite of the Name Havayah. That Name is so called because it brings things into being (mehaveh) from nothing to something, and the following paragraphs show how its letters express unity.

Paragraph 4 in brief

Baseless hatred is a hidden sin that people justify to themselves, so they do not repent of it; like fine waste or a doubtful law it takes long to refine, which is why the exile that followed the Second Temple has no revealed end. The paragraph then begins to explain its gravity through the Name Havayah, which brings into being from nothing.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    וחטאת בת דנקא · ע׳ זבחים (מח, א). מנחות (קז, ב) תוד״ה כבש. [כ].
  2. 2
    האשם שתי סלעים וחטאת בת דנקא · Zevachim 48a:15–16
  3. 3
    ראשונים שנתגלתה עונם · Yoma 9b:12–13

The yud, the hei and the tip of the yud ¶5–6

5והנה ידוע הקושיא למה נק׳ ההתהוות מאין ליש הלא אדרבה הוא ית׳ היש האמיתי וכולא קמיה כלא חשיב ואין ואפס ממש.

Now, the question is well known: why is the coming into being called “from nothing to something”? On the contrary, He, may He be blessed, is the true Something (Yesh), and “all before Him is considered as nothing,” truly nothing and naught.

Explanation

A well-known question: why is creation called “from nothing to something”? G‑d is the true existence, and before Him all of creation counts as nothing, so the order should seemingly be reversed.

אך הענין הוא משום שא״ס ב״ה כשמו כן הוא אין לו תחלה כו׳ ולכך כשהיה צ״ל המשכת האור להתהוות הנבראים בעלי גבול א״א להיות ע״י השתלשלות עילה ועלול שא״כ היה הכל בחי׳ בלי גבול,

But the explanation is this: the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, is as His name; He has no beginning, etc. Therefore, when there was to be a drawing forth of the light to bring into being created beings that have limits, this could not be through a chain of descent (hishtalshelus) of cause and effect, for if so, everything would have been without limit;

Explanation

The answer: Ein Sof, “without end,” is as its name says, without end and without beginning. Had created beings come from Him through a gradual chain of cause and effect, they would be unlimited like their cause.

אלא צ״ל צמצום עצום בתחלה שיהיה הגילוי רק בחינת הארה מצומצמת לבד בכדי שאז יוכל להיות בחינת הארה זו מקור ושרש להתהוות עולמות בעלי גבול ושלא יתבטלו במציאות

rather, there had to be a tremendous tzimtzum (contraction) at the outset, so that the revelation would be only a contracted illumination, in order that this illumination could then be the source and root for the coming into being of worlds that have limits, and that they not be nullified out of existence.

Explanation

So there first had to be a great tzimtzum, a contraction and concealment, leaving only a limited illumination. Only such a limited light can be the source of finite worlds that do not dissolve back into their source.

וזהו ענין היו״ד דשם הוי׳ שהוא בחינת צמצום ישת חשך סתרו רק גילוי בחינת נקודה ויצא כברק חצו כו׳

And this is the meaning of the yud of the Name Havayah: it is the level of tzimtzum, “He made darkness His hiding place,” only the revelation of a point, “and His arrow shall go forth like lightning,” etc.

Explanation

The yud, the first letter of the Name Havayah, is a mere point: it stands for that tzimtzum, “He made darkness His hiding place,” and for the single point of light that flashes out of it “like lightning.”

ואחר היו״ד נמשך בחי׳ ה׳ שיש בו אורך ורוחב והוא בחי׳ סוכ״ע וממכ״ע [וממלא כל עלמין] למעלה עד אין קץ ולמטה עד אין תכלית שכ״ז [שכל זה] נמשך אחר בחי׳ היו״ד.

After the yud there extends the level of the hei, which has length and breadth; this is the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) and the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin), upward without end and downward without limit, all of which extends after the level of the yud.

Explanation

After the yud comes the hei, a letter with length and breadth, standing for the expansion of the light: both the light that encompasses the worlds and the light that fills them, extending without end above and below. All this expansion follows from the contracted point of the yud.

Paragraph 5 in brief

The paragraph explains why creation is called “something from nothing”: the Infinite One could bring finite beings into being only after a great tzimtzum, represented by the point-like yud of the Name Havayah, after which the light could expand, as represented by the broad hei.

Deeper

The Kehot note quotes the Mitteler Rebbe’s maamar on this passage: the revealed point is like a flash of lightning out of the hiddenness of the clouds, which does not come forth with any spreading or widening at all, but shines and flashes from the very essence of the giver’s concealment.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    כולא קמי׳ כלא חשיב · Zohar I, 11b
  2. 2
    ישת חשך סתרו · Psalms 18:12
  3. 3
    ויצא כברק חצו · Zechariah 9:14

6ולכן נקרא הבריאה יש מאין שמקור התהוות היש הוא ע״י בחי׳ מה שהוא אין וכלא חשיב לגבי מהותו ועצמותו שלמעלה מבחי׳ צמצום זה ועמ״ש בד״ה וירא ישראל.

Therefore creation is called “something from nothing” (yesh me’ayin): for the source of the coming into being of the something is through that which is “nothing” and “considered as nothing” relative to His being and essence, which is above this tzimtzum. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “And Israel saw.”

Explanation

Creation is called “something from nothing” because its source is the contracted illumination left after the tzimtzum, which, compared with G‑d’s essence above the tzimtzum, is as nothing. The text refers to another discourse for more on this.

וזהו שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] כברייתו של עולם ברישא חשוכא הוא בחינת הצמצו׳ [הצמצום] (וע׳ בזהר בפ׳ בלק) (דקצ״א) שפי׳ שחור׳ [שחורה] אני שהוא בחי׳ היוד דלית ביה חיוורי והדר נהורא הוא בחי׳ ההתפשטות.

And this is what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “As in the creation of the world: first darkness”; this is the level of the tzimtzum (and see the Zohar, Parshas Balak) (page 191), which explains “I am black” as the level of the yud, which has no white in it; “and afterwards light”; this is the level of the expansion.

Explanation

The Talmud says the order of creation was “first darkness, then light.” The Alter Rebbe reads the darkness as the tzimtzum, the yud, which the Zohar on Balak, expounding “I am black,” describes as having no white in it; the light that follows is the expansion.

והנה הצמצום וההתפשטות הם ב׳ מדות ההפכיים וצריך שיהי׳ [שיהיה] בחי׳ ממוצע שיחבר ב׳ ההפכיים הללו

Now, the tzimtzum and the expansion are two opposite qualities, and there must be an intermediary to join these two opposites;

Explanation

Contraction and expansion are opposites, and two opposites cannot join by themselves. Something must mediate between them.

והיינו ע״י בחי׳ שלמעלה משניהם שהוא המשכה מאור א״ס ב״ה דקמיה כחשכה כאורה כי חשוכא ונהורא זהו שייך רק בבחינת ומדרגות ברייתו של עולם,

and this is through a level that is above both of them, namely, a drawing forth from the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, before Whom “darkness is as light”; for darkness and light apply only to the levels and degrees of the creation of the world,

Explanation

The mediator must come from a level above both: the Infinite Light as it is in itself, before which, as the Psalm says, “darkness is as light.” The very distinction between darkness and light belongs only to the order of creation.

אבל קודם שנברא העולם לא שייך בחינות אלו וע״י המשכה מבחינה זו יוכל להיות קשר וחיבור בין שני ההפכיים עד שבחי׳ חו״ב [חכמה ובינה] שהן בחי׳ יו״ד וה״א נעשו

but before the world was created these levels do not apply. And through a drawing forth from this level there can be a bond and joining between the two opposites, so that Chochmah (wisdom) and Binah (understanding), which are the yud and the hei, become

Explanation

Before creation such distinctions do not exist, so a light drawn from that level can bind opposites together. Chochmah and Binah, the yud and the hei of the Name, are such a pair of opposites.

תרין ריעין דלא מתפרשין אע״פ [אף על פי] שהן בעצם ב׳ הפכיים ונקרא אין ויש ומ״מ ע״י המשכה מאור א״ס ב״ה שלמעלה מב׳ הבחי׳ הם מתכללים והיו לאחדים והמשכה זו מרומזת בקוצו של יו״ד

“two companions who never part,” although in essence they are two opposites and are called “nothing” and “something.” Nevertheless, through a drawing forth from the Infinite Light, blessed be He, which is above both levels, they are included in each other and become one. And this drawing forth is alluded to in the tip of the yud,

Explanation

Chochmah, the first flash of insight, is called “nothing” (ayin), and Binah, the developed grasp of it, “something” (yesh); yet the Zohar calls them “two companions who never part.” They are united only through a light from above both, alluded to in the small tip at the top of the yud.

שהוא למעלה מעלה מבחי׳ היו״ד ועי״ז מתפשט ומתחבר היו״ד בה״א [בית הלל אומרים] וכמבואר בפרדס שהיו״ד יש לה ג׳ קוצין ומקוץ התחתון נמשך הה״א ובקוץ התחתון יש בחי׳ קוץ העליון

which is far above the level of the yud; and through it the yud spreads out and joins with the hei. As is explained in the Pardes, the yud has three tips; from the lower tip the hei extends, and in the lower tip there is the quality of the upper tip.

Explanation

The tip of the yud stands above the yud itself, and through it the yud spreads into the hei. As the Pardes explains, the yud has three tips; the hei extends from the lowest one, and the lower tip holds something of the upper one, so the power to join comes from above.

ונמצא שזה שיתפשט ויומשך היו״ד בה״א [בית הלל אומרים] נמשך ע״י קוצו של יו״ד שהוא למעלה מעלה מעצם בחי׳ היו״ד והוא הוא המחבר היו״ד עם הה״א

It follows that the yud’s spreading out and extending into the hei comes about through the tip of the yud, which is far above the essential level of the yud; and it is this that joins the yud with the hei.

Explanation

So the yud reaches into the hei not by its own power but through its tip, which is higher than the yud itself. The joining of Chochmah and Binah comes from a level above both of them.

(ועמ״ש בזה באריכות ע״פ לך לך ועיין בזהר פ׳ ויקרא) (ד״י [ד׳ יסודות] ע״ב ודי״א ע״ב) ובמק״מ [ובמקדש מלך] שם בשם הרח״ו [הרבי חיים ויטאל] שקוץ התחתון הוא הדעת

(And see what is written on this at length on [the verse] “Go forth (Lech lecha)”; and see the Zohar, Parshas Vayikra) (pages 10b and 11b), and the Mikdash Melech there, in the name of Rabbi Chaim Vital, that the lower tip is Daas (knowledge);

Explanation

The parenthesis gathers further sources. The Zohar on Vayikra describes the three tips of the yud, and the Mikdash Melech, a commentary on the Zohar, reports in the name of Rabbi Chaim Vital that the lower tip is Daas, the faculty that connects.

והיינו שהדעת הוא המחבר חו״ב [חכמה ובינה] ועיין בזהר הרקיע ר״פ בראשית גבי עאלת אות צ׳ כו׳ ע״ש ובזהר פ׳ אחרי (דע״ז [דעבודה זרה] ב׳) גבי

that is, that Daas is what joins Chochmah and Binah. And see the Zohar HaRakia at the beginning of Parshas Bereishis, on “The letter tzaddi entered,” etc.; see there. And in the Zohar, Parshas Acharei (page 77b), on

Explanation

Daas joins Chochmah and Binah, as the lower tip links the yud with the hei. The text also points to the Zohar HaRakia on the Zohar’s account of the letters coming before G‑d at creation, the tzaddi among them, and to the Zohar on Acharei Mos.

אלא במזלא תליא חבורא דלהון כו׳ ובסה״מ [ובספר הדרת מלך] (סי׳ קט״ו) בשם הלק״ת [הלקוטי תורה (להאריז״ל)] ובפע״ח [ובפרי עץ חיים] (שער הברכות פ״ג [פרק ג׳]) ע״פ ושבילך במים רבים ועוד בסה״מ [בספר הדרת מלך] (ריש סי׳ קנ״ו).

“but their union depends on the mazal,” etc.; and in Sefer Hadras Melech (section 115), in the name of the Likkutei Torah of the Arizal; and in Pri Etz Chaim (Sha’ar HaBerachos, chapter 3), on [the verse] “and Your path is in the great waters”; and further in Sefer Hadras Melech (beginning of section 156).

Explanation

There the Zohar says that the union of the yud with the upper hei does not depend on Chesed but on the mazal, a level above them both, and so they never part. The list continues with Hadras Melech, quoting the Arizal’s Likkutei Torah, and Pri Etz Chaim on the verse “and Your path is in the great waters.”

וע׳ עוד בפרדס בעה״כ [בערכי הכינויים] ערך קוץ. וזהו ענין שהעוסק בתורה משים שלום בפמליא של מעלה כי

And see further in the Pardes, in Erchei HaKinuyim, the entry “Kotz” (tip). And this is the meaning of [the saying] that one who occupies himself with Torah makes peace in the household above: for

Explanation

The last reference is the entry “Kotz” (tip) in Erchei HaKinuyim, the lexicon of Kabbalistic terms in the Pardes. The maamar then returns to the Sages’ saying that Torah study makes peace in the household above.

הנה בחי׳ הגורם להיות השפעה זו מעצמות א״ס ב״ה לחבר בחי׳ י״ה הוא ע״י התורה וזהו או יחזיק במעוזי יעשה שלום לי שלום לי ממש

that which causes this flow from the essence of the Infinite One, blessed be He, to join the yud and hei comes about through the Torah. And this is [the meaning of] “Or let him take hold of My strength, that he may make peace for Me”: peace for Me, literally,

Explanation

What draws a flow from G‑d’s essence to join the yud and the hei is the Torah. Isaiah’s words are read as “he makes peace for Me,” within G‑d’s own Name.

היינו בבחי׳ י״ה דשם הוי׳ והטעם הוא משום דאורייתא מחכמה נפקת וארז״ל [ואמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] כל הקורא ושונה הקב״ה קורא ושונה כנגדו וא״כ ממשיך שיהיה הקב״ה שהוא עצמות א״ס ב״ה נמשך ומתלבש בהתורה דמחכמה נפקת

that is, in the yud and hei of the Name Havayah. The reason is that “the Torah comes forth from Chochmah,” and our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Whoever reads and studies, the Holy One, blessed be He, reads and studies opposite him.” If so, he draws [it] down so that the Holy One, blessed be He, who is the essence of the Infinite One, blessed be He, is drawn down and clothed in the Torah, which “comes forth from Chochmah.”

Explanation

“For Me” means between the yud and the hei of the Name Havayah, that is, Chochmah and Binah. The Torah comes from Chochmah, and when a person studies, the Holy One “studies opposite him,” so the essence of the Infinite One is drawn into the Torah.

וזהו עוסק בתורה לשמה לשם התורה עצמה וגם לשמה לשם ה׳ יען שעי״ז נעשה חיבור אותיות י״ה

And this is [the meaning of] one who occupies himself with Torah lishmah: for its sake, for the sake of the Torah itself; and also lishmah: l’shem hei, “for the sake of the hei,” since through this the joining of the letters yud and hei is accomplished.

Explanation

This explains Torah study lishmah, “for its sake.” Plainly it means for the sake of the Torah itself; the Alter Rebbe also divides the word as l’shem hei, “for the sake of the hei,” since such study unites the yud with the hei.

ולכן נק׳ התורה שלום (כי עי״ז נמשך בחי׳ ומדרגת הקוץ העליון כו׳ כי אורייתא מחכמה נפקת ושרשה ומקורה מבחינה שלמעלה מהחכמה כי תרי״ג מצות דאורייתא עם ז׳ מצות דרבנן הם בחי׳ כתר תר״ך עמודי אור

Therefore the Torah is called “peace” (for through it the level and degree of the upper tip is drawn down, etc.; for “the Torah comes forth from Chochmah,” and its root and source is from a level above Chochmah; for the 613 commandments of the Torah together with the seven commandments of the Rabbis are the level of Keser (the Crown), the 620 pillars of light;

Explanation

This is why the Torah is called “peace.” Its root is above Chochmah, in Keser: the 613 commandments of the Torah and the seven rabbinic ones total 620, the numerical value of כתר (Keser), and they are called the “620 pillars of light.”

וכמו העמוד שמחבר הגג עם הקרקע כך עי״ז נעשה התחברות י״ה שיהי׳ [שיהיה] נמשך ההמשכה ומתפשטת גם למטה כו׳ ועמ״ש בד״ה אחרי הוי׳ אלקיכם תלכו גבי ובקולו תשמעו ומ״ש בד״ה ביום השמע״צ [השמיני עצרת] מענין או יחזיק במעוזי יעשה שלום לי כו׳):

and as a pillar joins the roof with the ground, so through this the joining of the yud and hei is accomplished, so that the flow is drawn down and spreads below as well, etc. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “After Havayah your G‑d shall you walk,” on “and to His voice shall you listen,” and what is written in the discourse beginning “On the day of Shemini Atzeres” on the matter of “Or let him take hold of My strength, that he may make peace for Me,” etc.):

Explanation

As a pillar connects the roof with the ground, the mitzvos join the yud and the hei and carry the flow down below. The parenthesis closes with references to two other discourses on this theme.

Paragraph 6 in brief

The paragraph shows how the opposites of contraction and expansion, the yud and the hei, that is, Chochmah and Binah, are joined by a light from above both, alluded to in the tip of the yud. That light is drawn down through the Torah, whose root is in Keser; this is the “peace in the household above” that Torah study makes.

Deeper

The Kehot note records that the Tzemach Tzedek, in Or HaTorah, questioned the reading of the Pardes here, noting that in the Pardes, Sha’ar HaMachriin, “it does not seem so.” On the Torah being called “peace,” the notes cite the Midrash, “the Torah was compared only to peace,” and Midrash Lekach Tov, “there is no peace but Torah.”

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    כברייתו של עולם · Shabbat 77b:8
  2. 2
    שחור׳ אני · Song of Songs 1:5
  3. 3
    כחשיכה כאורה · Psalms 139:12
  4. 4
    תרין רעין דלא מתפרשין · Zohar II, 56a
  5. 5
    קוצו של יו״ד · Zohar, Vayikra 23:146–24:159
  6. 6
    קוצו של יו״ד · Zohar, Vayikra 24:170–25:179
  7. 7
    וכמבואר בפרדס · שער כז, פי״ג.
  8. 8
    קוץ העליון · Pardes Rimmonim 27:13
  9. 9
    ויומשך היו״ד בה״א נמשך ע״י קוצו של יו״ד · באוה״ת פ׳ יתרו ע׳ תתצה מציין ע״ז: ”וצ״ע בפרדס שער המכריעין לא משמע כן”. וראה הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר בסה״מ תרנ״ט ע׳ עה.
  10. 10
    ע״פ לך לך · תו״א ר״פ לך לך. ובארוכה בתו״ח פ׳ לך לך דף פב, ב.
  11. 11
    לך לך · Genesis 12:1
  12. 12
    בזהר פ׳ בלק (דקצ״א) · ראה באריכות בביה״ז לאדה״א והצ״צ.
  13. 13
    בזהר הרקיע ר״פ בראשית · עיין לקמן פז, א.
  14. 14
    עאלת אות צ׳ · Zohar, Introduction 5:21–6:28
  15. 15
    אלא במזלא תליא חבורא דלהון · Zohar, Achrei Mot 62:370–64:378
  16. 16
    ושבילך במים רבים · Psalms 77:20
  17. 17
    לחבר בחי׳ י״ה · ראה אוה״ת שמע״צ ע׳ א׳תרפה.
  18. 18
    או יחזיק במעוזי · Isaiah 27:5
  19. 19
    דאורייתא מחכמה נפקת · Zohar, Yitro 21:378–22:389
  20. 20
    כל הקורא ושונה · תדא״ר פ׳ יח. וראה בסה״מ תרנ״ט ע׳ פא בהערות.
  21. 21
    כל הקורא ושונה הקב״ה קורא · תדא״ר רפי״ח. ועי׳ ד״ה אלה פקודי פ״ב (ג, ב) [כ]. יל״ש איכה רמז תתרלד (בשינוי ל׳ קצת).
  22. 22
    כל הקורא ושונה הקב״ה קורא ושונה כנגדו · Tanna DeBei Eliyahu Rabbah 18:1–2
  23. 23
    עוסק בתורה לשמה · ראה אבות רפ״ו.
  24. 24
    עוסק בתורה לשמה · Pirkei Avot 6:1
  25. 25
    לשם התורה עצמה · ראה תניא פרק ה.
  26. 26
    ולכן נק׳ התורה שלום · ראה ערה״כ לבעל סה״ד ע׳ שלום. ובבמדב״ר פי״א ז: שלא נמשלה התורה אלא בשלום. ובמדרש לקח טוב ר״פ קדושים: אין שלום אלא תורה — לקו״ש ח״כ ע׳ 180.
  27. 27
    נק׳ התורה שלום · Bamidbar Rabbah 11:7
  28. 28
    תרי״ג מצות . . תר״ך עמודי אור · ראה פרדס ש״ח, פ״ג. ועל״ק ראה (כ, ב). ולעיל בחקותי (מז, ב). וש״נ. [כ].
  29. 29
    תרי״ג מצות דאורייתא עם ז׳ מצות דרבנן הם בחי׳ כתר תר״ך עמודי אור · Pardes Rimmonim 8:5–6
  30. 30
    בד״ה אחרי ה׳ · לקו״ת פ׳ ראה כ, ב.
  31. 31
    אחרי הוי׳ אלקיכם תלכו · Deuteronomy 13:5
  32. 32
    אורייתא מחכ׳ נפקת · Zohar II, 121b
  33. 33

The left included in the right ¶7–9

7ב וענין השלום בפמליא של מטה הוא באותיות ו״ה שבשם. כי הנה כתיב לך ה׳ הגדולה והגבורה כו׳ שהם ששה מדות עליונות וזהו בחי׳ הוי״ו דשם הוי״ה

2. The matter of peace in the household below is in the letters vav and hei of the Name. For it is written, “Yours, Havayah, are the greatness and the might,” etc., which are six supernal attributes; and this is the level of the vav of the Name Havayah.

Explanation

Section 2 turns to peace in the household below, which concerns the vav and the final hei of the Name. The verse “Yours, Havayah, are the greatness and the might…” names six attributes, the six emotive Sefiros, which correspond to the vav, whose numerical value is six.

והנה לעומת זה יש ג״כ ז׳ מדות הרעות ומקור ושרש יניקתם הוא מבחי׳ קו השמאל דקדושה וכמ״ש בזהר דאית ימינא ואית שמאלא לעילא בסטרא דקדושה ומקו השמאל משתלשל ונמשך יניקת החיצונים

Now, opposite this there are also seven evil attributes, and the source and root of their nurture is from the left line of holiness; as is written in the Zohar, there is a right and there is a left above, on the side of holiness; and from the left line the nurture of the external forces descends and is drawn.

Explanation

Opposite the holy attributes stand seven evil ones. Their nourishment comes ultimately from the left line, the side of Gevurah within holiness; as the Zohar says, there is a right and a left above, on the side of holiness, and from the left the external forces draw their life.

וכמו נהר דינור נמשך מזיעתן של חיות הרי הגיהנם נתהוה מפסולת הגבורות (ועמ״ש מענין זה בפ׳ חקת ע״פ זאת חקת התורה כו׳)

And just as the River of Fire (Nehar Dinur) issues from the sweat of the Chayos, so Gehinnom came into being from the dross of the Gevuros (and see what is written on this matter in Parshas Chukas, on “This is the statute of the Torah,” etc.).

Explanation

The Talmud says the river of fire issues from the sweat of the Chayos, the holy beings of the divine chariot. In the same way, Gehinnom came into being from the “dross” of the Gevuros, the forces of severity.

ולכן התיקון לזה הוא ע״י שצ״ל שמאלא אתכליל בימינא וכל התורה הוא על יסוד זה וכמ״ש בזהר ר״פ קרח שמזה היה חטא קרח שלא רצה שיהיה שמאלא אתכליל בימינא כו׳ וזהו הפך יסוד התורה

Therefore the rectification for this is that there must be “the left included in the right”; and the whole Torah rests on this foundation. As is written in the Zohar at the beginning of Parshas Korach, from this came the sin of Korach, who did not want the left to be included in the right, etc.; and this is the opposite of the foundation of the Torah.

Explanation

The remedy is that the left be included in the right, Gevurah tempered by Chesed, and this is the foundation of the whole Torah. The Zohar on Korach explains that his dispute came from refusing to let the left be included in the right.

ולכן נק׳ התורה תורת חסד וזהו ימינך ה׳ נאדרי בכח ועי״ז ימינך ה׳ תרעץ אויב.

Therefore the Torah is called “a Torah of kindness (chesed).” And this is [the meaning of] “Your right hand, Havayah, is glorious in power”; and through this, “Your right hand, Havayah, shatters the enemy.”

Explanation

That is why the Torah is called “a Torah of kindness.” In the Song at the Sea, “power” belongs to the right hand: Gevurah included in Chesed, and through that very inclusion the right hand “shatters the enemy.”

Paragraph 7 in brief

The paragraph opens the second section, on peace in the household below: the six emotive attributes (the vav of the Name) have evil counterparts that draw from the left line of holiness, and the remedy is to include the left in the right, the foundation of the Torah, which is therefore called “a Torah of kindness.”

Deeper

In the Zohar on Korach cited here, a person must include the left in the right in all that he does: “whatever your hand finds” is the left, and “to do with your strength” is the right, as in “Your right hand, Havayah, is glorious in power,” the verse with which this paragraph ends.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    לך ה׳ הגדולה והגבורה · I Chronicles 29:11
  2. 2
    וכמ״ש בזהר · ח״א (נג, א). [כ].
  3. 3
    דאית ימינא ואית שמאלא לעילא בסטרא דקדושה · Zohar, Bereshit 89:298–310
  4. 4
    נהר דינור נמשך · Chagigah 13b:13–14
  5. 5
    זאת חקת התורה · בפ״ב. ובביאור שם פ״ג. [כ].
  6. 6
    זאת חקת התורה · Numbers 19:2
  7. 7
    שמאלא אתכליל בימינא · Zohar, Korach 7:29–8:37
  8. 8
    שמאלא אתכליל בימינא · Zohar, Vaera 9:82–10:93
  9. 9
    בזהר ר״פ קרח · ושם (קעח, א) וזח״ב (כו, ב).
  10. 10
    תורת חסד · Proverbs 31:26
  11. 11
    ימינך ה׳ נאדרי בכח · Exodus 15:6

8ועד״ז גם כל עונשי התורה עם היותן בחי׳ גבורות מ״מ הן כלולות בחסדים שהעונש הוא שעי״ז נעשה תיקון לנפש החוטא וכמארז״ל [וכמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] כל חייבי כריתות שלקו נפטרו ידי כריתתן כו׳.

In the same way, all the punishments of the Torah too, although they are Gevuros, are nevertheless included in Chassadim (kindnesses): for the punishment is such that through it a rectification is made for the sinner’s soul. As our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “All who are liable to kares (excision) who were flogged are released from their kares,” etc.

Explanation

Like the Torah as a whole, its punishments are also “the left included in the right”: they are acts of severity, but their purpose is kindness, to repair the sinner’s soul. The Mishnah teaches that one liable to kares, being cut off by Heaven, who has received lashes is released from the kares.

וכן אפי׳ [אפילו] עונש מיתת ב״ד [בית דין] ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] גבי עכן יעכרך ה׳ היום הזה היום הזה אתה עכור ואי אתה עכור לעוה״ב [לעולם הבא] נמצא העונש זהו לתקן נפשו.

So too, even concerning the punishment of death by the court, our Sages, of blessed memory, said regarding Achan: “Havayah will trouble you this day”: this day you are troubled, but you will not be troubled in the World to Come. It follows that the punishment is to rectify his soul.

Explanation

Even execution by a court serves to repair the soul. Joshua told Achan, “Havayah will trouble you this day,” which the Sages read as “this day you are troubled, but not in the World to Come”; the Alter Rebbe concludes that the punishment is there to repair his soul.

משא״כ החטא עצמו הוא מר ממות וכמ״ש את החיים ואת הטוב ואת המות ואת הרע. נמצא הרע גרוע מן המות (ועמ״ש מזה סד״ה ויקח קרח).

The sin itself, however, is more bitter than death, as it is written, “life and good, and death and evil.” It follows that evil is worse than death (and see what is written on this at the end of the discourse beginning “And Korach took”).

Explanation

The real harm lies in the sin, not in the punishment. In the verse “life and good, and death and evil,” evil is listed after death, as something worse than death; the punishment is what repairs that harm.

נמצא בתורה בחי׳ שמאלא אתכלל בימינא משא״כ העונש שהיה קודם מתן תורה היה מבחי׳ גבורות ממש

Thus in the Torah there is [the quality of] the left included in the right. Whereas the punishment that existed before the Giving of the Torah was from the level of Gevuros proper,

Explanation

So the Torah’s punishments carry kindness within them. Before the Torah was given, punishment was sheer severity.

כמו גבי דור המבול ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] דור המבול אין להם חלק לעוה״ב [לעולם הבא] וכו׳ וכן בדור הפלגה

as with the generation of the Flood: our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “The generation of the Flood have no share in the World to Come,” etc.; and so too with the generation of the Dispersion.

Explanation

The Mishnah says that the generation of the Flood and the generation of the Dispersion (the builders of the Tower of Babel) have no share in the World to Come. Their punishment did not atone for them.

ונמצא העונש לא היה בשביל תיקון נפשו של החוטא וזהו גבורות גמורות (ואעפ״כ [ואף על פי כן] תכליתן חסד לטובת העולם בכלל וע׳ בהרמ״ז [בהרב משה זכות] ר״פ שופטים)

It follows that the punishment was not for the sake of rectifying the sinner’s soul; and these are complete Gevuros (yet even so, their purpose is kindness, for the good of the world in general; and see the Ramaz at the beginning of Parshas Shoftim).

Explanation

Those punishments did not repair the sinners’ souls, so they were pure Gevuros. Even so, the parenthesis adds, their purpose was kindness to the world as a whole, and it refers to the Ramaz, the Kabbalist Rabbi Moshe Zacuto.

ובחי׳ זו שיהיה שמאלא אתכליל בימינא נקרא שלום בפמליא של מטה והוא ענין המתקת הגבורות בחסדים.

And this level, that the left be included in the right, is called peace in the household below; and it is the sweetening of the Gevuros by the Chassadim.

Explanation

The inclusion of the left in the right, severity in the service of kindness, is the “peace in the household below.” In Kabbalistic terms it is the “sweetening” of the Gevuros by the Chassadim.

וזהו ג״כ ע״י התורה כי הנה בתורה נאמר מימינו אש דת אש שחורה ע״ג [על גבי] אש לבנה וזהו אנכי ולא יהיה לך שהן מקור בחי׳ חסד וגבורה.

This too comes through the Torah, for of the Torah it is said, “From His right hand, a fiery law”: black fire upon white fire. And this is “I am” and “You shall not have,” which are the source of Chesed (kindness) and Gevurah (restraint).

Explanation

This peace too comes through the Torah, which was given “from His right hand” and yet as “a fiery law”; the Sages say it was written in black fire upon white fire. The first two of the Ten Commandments, “I am” and “You shall not have,” are the source of Chesed and of Gevurah.

Paragraph 8 in brief

The Torah’s punishments, though acts of severity, aim at repairing the sinner, unlike the punishments before Sinai, which were sheer severity. This inclusion of the left in the right, the sweetening of the Gevuros by the Chassadim, is the peace in the household below, and it too comes through the Torah, given “from His right hand” as “a fiery law.”

Deeper

The passage in Parshas Korach cited by the Kehot note makes the same point and refers to this very maamar: the judgment that comes upon a sinner is like a remedy for him (“better that he be judged and come to the World to Come”), so that its purpose is kindness and not vengeance, “as is explained in the discourse Hechaltzu me’itchem.”

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    כל חייבי כריתות . . נפטרו ידי כריתתן · מכות פ״ג, מט״ו.
  2. 2
    כל חייבי כריתות שלקו נפטרו ידי כריתתן · Mishnah Makkot 3:15
  3. 3
    יעכרך ה׳ היום הזה · Joshua 7:25
  4. 4
    ארז״ל גבי עכן . . לעוה״ב · סנהדרין פ״ו, מ״ב.
  5. 5
    העונש זהו לתקן נפשו · ראה לעיל פ׳ קרח נג, ד. לקו״ש חכ״ב ע׳ 71 מציין גם לכוזרי מאמר שני פמ״ד. עיקרים מאמר רביעי פ׳ לח. וראה שיחת ש״פ ויחי תנש״א סעיף ה.
  6. 6
    את החיים ואת הטוב · Deuteronomy 30:15
  7. 7
    ויקח קרח · Numbers 16:1
  8. 8
    דור המבול . . הפלגה · סנהדרין פ״י, מ״ג.
  9. 9
    דור המבול אין להם חלק לעוה״ב וכו׳ וכן בדור הפלגה · Mishnah Sanhedrin 10:3
  10. 10
    מימינו אש דת למו · Deuteronomy 33:2
  11. 11
    אש שחורה ע״ג אש לבנה · ראה ירוש׳ שקלים ו, א. הובא ברש״י דברים שם. ע״ל (בחקותי מח, ג). וש״נ. [כ].
  12. 12
    אש שחורה ע״ג אש לבנה · Rashi on Deuteronomy 33:7–8
  13. 13
    אש שחורה ע״ג אש לבנה · Jerusalem Talmud Shekalim 6:1
  14. 14
    אנכי ולא יהי׳ לך · Exodus 20:2
  15. 15
    אנכי ולא יהיה לך · Exodus 20:2–3
  16. 16
    יעכרך ה׳ היום הזה היום הזה אתה עכור ואי אתה עכור לעוה״ב · Mishnah Sanhedrin 6:2

9וכך גם כל דקדוקי התורה הן בחי׳ גבורות וצמצוצים שבכך וכך דוקא יוכשר כו׳ ואם לאו פסול וגבורות אלו הם תכלית החסד שעי״ז יהי׳ [יהיה] גילוי אלקות.

So too, all the fine points of the Torah are Gevuros and contractions: that only in such-and-such a way will it be valid, etc., and if not, it is invalid. And these Gevuros are the ultimate kindness, for through this there will be a revelation of G‑dliness.

Explanation

The Torah’s many precise requirements, that a mitzvah is valid only if done in a particular way, are also Gevuros, restrictions. Yet their purpose is kindness, for through these exact forms G‑dliness is revealed.

וזהו מימינו אש כו׳ והיינו ג״כ ע״י אור ההמשכה שלמעלה מהשתלשלות משם נמשך להיות התכללות חו״ג [חסד וגבורה] אע״פ [אף על פי] שהן מצד עצמם ב׳ הפכיים ולהיות שמאלא אתכליל בימינא ורב חסד נוטה כלפי חסד

And this is [the meaning of] “From His right hand, a fire,” etc. This too is through the light of the drawing forth that is above the chain of descent (hishtalshelus): from there it comes about that Chesed and Gevurah are included in each other, although in themselves they are two opposites, and that the left is included in the right, and “abundant in kindness” inclines toward kindness;

Explanation

This is the “fire” that comes “from His right hand”: severity in the service of kindness. Chesed and Gevurah can include each other only through a light from above the whole order of creation, and then G‑d, “abundant in kindness,” inclines the balance toward kindness.

וזהו שלום יעשה לי ממש להיות התכללות המדות איהו וגרמוהי חד שמתייחדין ביחוד גמור ואמיתי עד שהן אחדות ממש:

and this is “peace he shall make for Me,” literally: that the attributes be included in one another, “He and His vessels (ihu vegarmohi) are one,” so that they are united in a complete and true union, until they are truly one.

Explanation

This is the peace within the Name itself: the attributes are included in one another and united, “He and His vessels are one,” in a complete and true union.

Paragraph 9 in brief

The fine details of the Torah are restrictions that serve kindness; through a light above the chain of descent, Chesed and Gevurah are included in each other and the scale inclines toward kindness, and this is the true union of the attributes.

Deeper

In the Talmud, Beis Hillel explain “abundant in kindness” as “He inclines toward kindness”: when a person’s merits and sins are evenly balanced, G‑d tips the scale toward kindness. The maamar sees in this the left included in the right.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ורב חסד נוטה כלפי חסד · Exodus 34:6
  2. 2
    שלום יעשה לי · Isaiah 27:5
  3. 3
    איהו וגרמוהי חד · Tikkunei Zohar 3b:9–10

Brain and heart ¶10–16

10ג והנה כמ״כ [כמו כן] יש ב׳ שלומות הנ״ל ג״כ בנפש האדם. כי הנה הנפש יש בה ג״כ בחי׳ שם הוי׳

3. Now likewise, the two [kinds of] peace mentioned above are also in the soul of man. For the soul too has in it the level of the Name Havayah

Explanation

Section 3 applies the two kinds of peace to the human soul. The soul, too, carries within it the pattern of the Name Havayah.

(וכמ״ש במ״א בפסוק ולא אבה הוי׳ אלקיך לשמוע אל בלעם כו׳) וכמ״ש כי שם הוי׳ נקרא עליך כי הנפש כלולה מע״ס [מעשר ספירות]

(as is explained elsewhere on the verse “But Havayah your G‑d would not listen to Bilaam,” etc.), as it is written, “that the Name of Havayah is called upon you”; for the soul is composed of the Ten Sefiros.

Explanation

Another discourse explains this through the verse about Bilaam, and the verse “the Name of Havayah is called upon you” says it outright. The soul is made of ten powers corresponding to the Ten Sefiros.

והנה חו״ב [חכמה ובינה] שבנפש בהם מלובש בחי׳ י״ה והנה איתא חכמה מוחא ובינה ליבא וכמאמר הלב מבין.

Now, in the Chochmah (wisdom) and Binah (understanding) of the soul the yud and hei are clothed. And it is stated, “Chochmah is the brain and Binah is the heart,” as the saying goes, “The heart understands.”

Explanation

In the soul, the yud and the hei of the Name are clothed in Chochmah and Binah. The Tikkunei Zohar says, “Chochmah is the brain and Binah is the heart, and with it the heart understands”: Chochmah is seated in the mind, and Binah, the understanding that turns into feeling, in the heart.

וענין ההפרש בין מוח ללב כי המוח הוא קר ולח ששם מקור יסוד המים והליחות והלב הוא משכן יסוד האש.

The difference between the brain and the heart is that the brain is cold and moist, for there is the source of the element of water and moisture, while the heart is the dwelling place of the element of fire.

Explanation

Brain and heart have opposite natures. In the physiology the Alter Rebbe uses, the brain is cold and moist, the source of the element of water, while the heart is the seat of fire.

Paragraph 10 in brief

The two kinds of peace exist in the soul as well: the soul carries the Name Havayah, with Chochmah (the yud) in the brain and Binah (the hei) in the heart, two opposites like water and fire.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    וכמ״ש במ״א בפסוק ולא אבה · לקו״ת תצא לח, ג.
  2. 2
    ולא אבה הוי׳ אלקיך לשמוע אל בלעם · Deuteronomy 23:6
  3. 3
    כי שם ה׳ נקרא עליך · Deuteronomy 28:10
  4. 4
    חכמה מוחא ובינה ליבא · ת״ז בהקדמה (פתח אלי׳).
  5. 5
    חכמה מוחא ובינה ליבא וכמאמר הלב מבין · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:17–19

11וכך בחי׳ חכמה ודעת גדולת ה׳ איך שלגדולתו אין חקר וכולא קמיה כלא חשיב כשהוא משיג זה במוחו

So too [with] the level of Chochmah and the knowledge (daas) of the greatness of G‑d, how “His greatness is unsearchable” and “all before Him is considered as nothing”: when a person grasps this in his mind,

Explanation

In man, the yud of the Name is Chochmah applied to G‑d’s greatness: grasping in one’s mind that “His greatness is unsearchable” and that before Him all is as nothing.

הנה מזה נמשך הביטול רצון לבטל א״ע [את עצמו] לגמרי נגד רצון ה׳ ולכן נק׳ בחי׳ זו יו״ד

from this comes the nullification (bittul) of will: to nullify oneself completely before the will of G‑d. Therefore this level is called yud,

Explanation

Such understanding brings about bittul of will, a setting aside of one’s own will before the will of G‑d. That is why this faculty is called yud.

כי היו״ד הוא בחי׳ צמצום כמש״ל [כמה שכתוב לעיל] וצמצום זה באדם הוא שיבטל רצונו כו׳ וכן לבטל א״ע [את עצמו] במחשבה דבור ומעשה שלא לחשוב ולדבר כרצונו כו׳ גם מזה נמשך הענוה.

for the yud is the level of tzimtzum, as explained above; and this tzimtzum in man is that he nullify his will, etc., and likewise nullify himself in thought, speech and action, not to think and speak as he wishes, etc. Humility, too, comes from this.

Explanation

The yud stands for tzimtzum, contraction; in a person, the tzimtzum is restraining his own will and holding back from thinking, speaking and acting as he pleases. Humility grows from the same root.

Paragraph 11 in brief

The yud in the soul is Chochmah contemplating G‑d’s greatness, which leads a person to nullify his will before G‑d and to restrain himself in thought, speech and action, and gives rise to humility.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    שלגדולתו אין חקר · Psalms 145:3
  2. 2
    וכולא קמיה כלא חשיב · Zohar, Introduction 20:188–22:199

12ולכן נאמר במשה והאיש משה ענו מאד לפי שהיה מבחי׳ חכמה. גם בחי׳ יראה נמשך מהמוח והחכמה כמ״ש ראשית חכמה יראת ה׳ וגם בחכמה יסד ארץ אבא יסד ברתא שנק׳ אשה יראת ה׳.

Therefore it is said of Moshe, “And the man Moshe was very humble,” because he was of the level of Chochmah. Awe, too, comes from the brain and from Chochmah, as it is written, “The beginning of wisdom (chochmah) is the awe of Havayah”; and also, “With wisdom He founded the earth”: “Abba founded the daughter,” who is called “a woman who fears Havayah.”

Explanation

Moshe, who embodied Chochmah, was the humblest of men, which shows that humility flows from Chochmah. Awe of G‑d also comes from Chochmah: “the beginning of wisdom is awe,” and the Zohar reads “With wisdom He founded the earth” as “Abba (Chochmah) founded the Daughter,” Malchus, who is called “a woman who fears Havayah.”

Paragraph 12 in brief

Humility and awe both come from Chochmah: Moshe, who embodied Chochmah, was the humblest of men, and Chochmah “founded” the Daughter, Malchus, the “woman who fears Havayah.”

Deeper

The Zohar passage cited reads Proverbs 3:19 as a whole: “With wisdom He founded the earth”: Chochmah is Abba and the earth is the Daughter; “He established the heavens” is the Son, with Imma, who is Tevunah. The maamar uses the second half of the verse in the next paragraph.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    והאיש משה ענו מאד · Numbers 12:3
  2. 2
    ראשית חכמה יראת ה׳ · Psalms 111:10
  3. 3
    בחכמה יסד ארץ · Proverbs 3:19
  4. 4
    אבא יסד ברתא · Zohar III, 256b
  5. 5
    אבא יסד ברתא · Zohar, Pinchas 100:676–102:682
  6. 6
    אשה יראת ה׳ · Proverbs 31:30

13ולכן העצמות נמשכים מן המוח וענין העצמות הוא שיש בהם חוזק גדול וגם הם בחי׳ עומדים ועמידה היא בחי׳ ביטול רצון וביטול זה הוא בחוזק גדול

Therefore the bones derive from the brain. The nature of the bones is that they have great strength, and they are also the quality of standing; and standing is the quality of the nullification of will, and this nullification is with great strength,

Explanation

The bones were understood to derive from the brain, and spiritually they stand for what comes from Chochmah. Bones are strong and hold a person upright, and “standing” stands for a firm and lasting nullification of will.

והיינו מחמת ההתמדה בתקיעת הדעת בחוזק בגדולת ה׳ תמיד ולא שתהא חולפת ועוברת אחר התפלה.

that is, because of constancy in fixing the mind (daas) firmly on the greatness of G‑d always, and not that it pass and be gone after prayer.

Explanation

That strength comes from constantly and firmly fixing one’s mind on G‑d’s greatness, so that the awareness does not fade once prayer is over.

אך מ״מ להיות שהמוח מים וליחות הוא בבחי׳ קרירות. אבל מעלת הלב שם יסוד האש והצמאון בהתגלו׳ [בהתגלות] אהב׳ [אהבה] ברשפי אש ממש מקרב איש ולב עמוק

Nevertheless, since the brain is water and moisture, it is in a state of coolness. But the virtue of the heart is that there is the element of fire, and thirst, with the revelation of love in veritable flashes of fire, from “the inward part of a man and a deep heart.”

Explanation

Yet because the brain is “water,” its service is cool. The heart’s virtue is fire: a thirst for G‑d and a love that blazes “in flashes of fire” from the depths of the heart.

וזהו נמשך מבחי׳ בינה והוא בחי׳ ה׳ שיש לו התפשטות לאורך ורוחב התפשטות המדות אהבה כו׳ וזהו כונן שמים בתבונה שמים בחינת אש נמשך מבחי׳ תבונה

This comes from the level of Binah (understanding), and it is the level of the hei, which has extension in length and breadth: the extension of the emotive attributes (middos), love, etc. And this is [the meaning of] “He established the heavens with understanding (tevunah)”: the heavens, the level of fire, derive from the level of tevunah;

Explanation

The heart’s fire comes from Binah, the hei, which spreads out in length and breadth, as understanding broadens into love and the other emotions. “He established the heavens with understanding” is read as the heavens, standing for fire, coming from Tevunah.

ומזה נמשך בחי׳ ויגבה לבו בדרכי ה׳ ואתהלכה ברחבה והנה מהלב נמשך הבשר וזהו לבי ובשרי ירננו כו׳.

and from this comes [the quality of] “His heart was lifted up in the ways of Havayah” and “I will walk in a broad place.” Now, from the heart comes the flesh; and this is [the meaning of] “My heart and my flesh sing for joy,” etc.

Explanation

From the heart’s fire comes boldness in serving G‑d, “his heart was lifted up in the ways of Havayah,” and the expansiveness of “I will walk in a broad place.” As the bones come from the brain, the flesh comes from the heart, and so “my heart and my flesh” sing to G‑d.

Paragraph 13 in brief

The brain (Chochmah, water) gives a steadfast, lasting nullification of will, like the strong bones, but it is cool; the heart (Binah, fire) gives burning love and enthusiasm, the broad expansion of the hei.

Deeper

In the passage of Parshas Pinchas that the Kehot note cites, the knowledge and grasp of G‑d’s greatness, each according to his capacity, is called the “bones” that come from the brain, while the love and awe in the heart are the “flesh” that comes from the blood whose seat is the heart.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    העצמות נמשכים מן המוח · Niddah 31a:9
  2. 2
    רשפי אש · Song of Songs 8:6
  3. 3
    מקרב איש ולב עמוק · Psalms 64:7
  4. 4
    כונן שמים בתבונה · Proverbs 3:19
  5. 5
    ויגבה לבו בדרכי ה׳ · II Chronicles 17:6
  6. 6
    ואתהלכה ברחבה · Psalms 119:45
  7. 7
    לבי ובשרי ירננו · שם פד, ג.
  8. 8
    לבי ובשרי ירננו · Psalms 84:3

14והנה באמת צ״ל שני הבחי׳ דמוח ולב דמעלת האש שבו מבשלים הדבר ונתהפך ע״י האש למהות

Now, in truth both levels, of brain and heart, are needed. The virtue of fire is that with it one cooks a thing, and through the fire it is transformed into another

Explanation

Both brain and heart are needed. The virtue of fire is that it cooks: it changes the nature of what it touches.

אחר משא״כ בלא אש ישאר על מהותו הראשון כך ע״י האש יוכל להיות התהפכות המדות דנה״ב [דנפש הבהמית] וגם צ״ל בחי׳ ויגבה לבו כו׳.

nature, whereas without fire it would remain in its original nature. So through the fire there can be a transformation of the emotive attributes of the animal soul. And there must also be [the quality of] “His heart was lifted up,” etc.

Explanation

Without fire, food stays as it was; so the heart’s fiery love can transform the very emotions of the animal soul. The bold, lifted-up heart is needed too.

אך מעלת המוח גדול מאד שממנו נמשך חוזק וקיום הביטול רצון במודומ״ע [במחשבה דבור ומעשה] שלהיות נמשך בפועל ממש הוא דוקא ע״י כח המוח וזהו בחכמה יסד ארץ שהוא בחי׳ מעשה כו׳ וכן הענוה הוא עיקר גדול.

But the virtue of the brain is very great, for from it come the strength and endurance of the nullification of will in thought, speech and action; for it to be carried out in actual deed comes specifically through the power of the brain. And this is [the meaning of] “With wisdom He founded the earth,” which is the level of action, etc. Likewise, humility is a great principle.

Explanation

The brain’s virtue is greater still: it gives the nullification of will its strength and permanence, so that it is carried out in actual thought, speech and deed. “With wisdom He founded the earth” ties Chochmah to the earth, the realm of action; and humility, which comes from Chochmah, is a great principle.

אך הרי הם ב׳ הפכיים מים ואש ולכן צ״ל בחי׳ שלום ביניהם המחברם להיות תרין ריעין ממש.

But they are two opposites, water and fire; therefore there must be peace between them, joining them to be truly “two companions.”

Explanation

But brain and heart, water and fire, are opposites. There must be a peace that joins them, so that they become “two companions.”

Paragraph 14 in brief

Both faculties are needed: the heart’s fire to transform the emotions of the animal soul, and the brain’s strength to make the nullification of will lasting and bring it into action. Since they are opposites, a peace must join them.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    בחכמה יסד ארץ · Proverbs 3:19

15וזהו ענין שלום בפמשמ״ע [בפמליא של מעלה] שבנפש והוא להיות מוח שליט על הלב כי מהלב נמשך בחי׳ רצוא אם רץ לבך

And this is the peace in the household above that is within the soul: that the brain rule over the heart. For from the heart comes the level of running (ratzo), “if your heart runs”;

Explanation

Peace in the “household above” within the soul means the mind ruling over the heart. The heart produces ratzo, an upward “running” of yearning; the term comes from Sefer Yetzirah: “if your heart runs, return to the place.”

אבל אח״כ צ״ל שוב והוא העיקר וגם בענין ויגבה לבו ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] ת״ח [תלמיד חכם / תלמידי חכמים] צ״ל בו שמינית שבשמינית כו׳.

but afterwards there must be returning (shov), and that is the main thing. And also concerning “his heart was lifted up,” our Sages, of blessed memory, said that a Torah scholar should have an eighth of an eighth [of pride], etc.

Explanation

After the running must come shov, a return to settled service, and that is the essential part. Even holy pride has its limits: the Talmud says a Torah scholar should have only “an eighth of an eighth” of it.

א״כ הענוה צ״ל הרבה יותר ויותר מבחי׳ ויגבה לבו כו׳ ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה יביאו לבוש מלכות, וזהו שארז״ל [שאמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] המתפלל צריך לכרוע עד שיראה איסר כנגד לבו פי׳ איסר לשון קשר

If so, humility must be much, much more than [the quality of] “his heart was lifted up,” etc.; and see what is written on this in the discourse beginning “Let them bring royal apparel.” And this is what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: one who prays must bow until an issar is seen opposite his heart. The meaning: issar is a term for binding,

Explanation

So humility must far outweigh the heart’s boldness. The Talmud says that one who prays should bow until the skin over his heart folds to the size of an issar coin; the Alter Rebbe reads issar as “binding,” from the root asar, “to bind.”

וכמו ואסרה אסר והוא לקשר בחי׳ המשכ׳ מהמוח אל הלב שיהיה המוח שליט על הלב ויתקיימו ב׳ המעלות שבמוח ולב ועד״ז היו הכהנים והלוים שעבודת הכהנים בחשאי והוא מבחי׳ חכמה ולוים בשירה וזמרה כו׳

as in “and she binds a bond (ve’asrah issar)”; that is, to bind the flow from the brain to the heart, so that the brain rules over the heart and both virtues, of brain and of heart, are maintained. Along these lines were the Kohanim and the Levites: the service of the Kohanim was in silence, and that is from the level of Chochmah (wisdom); and the Levites [served] with song and music, etc.,

Explanation

The bow in prayer binds the flow from the brain to the heart, so that the brain governs while both virtues remain. The same pattern appeared in the Temple: the Kohanim served in silence, from Chochmah, while the Levites sang and played, the heart’s “running.”

בחי׳ רצוא וכתיב גבי לוים וילוו עליך וישרתוך שהיו בטלים לגבי הכהנים והנה שלום זה בפמליא של מעלה הוא על ידי עסק התורה

the level of running. And it is written of the Levites, “that they may be joined to you and serve you,” for they were nullified before the Kohanim. Now, this peace in the household above comes through occupation with Torah,

Explanation

The Torah says the Levites “shall be joined to you and serve you”: they were subordinate to the Kohanim, as the heart is to the mind. This peace in the soul’s “household above” comes about through Torah study.

שהיא המשכת רצון העליון שלמעלה מחו״ב [מחכמה ובינה] והוא העושה שלום ביניהם וכמש״ל [וכמה שכתוב לעיל] בענין קוש״י [קוצו של יו״ד] וכך יש בנפש ג״כ בחי׳ קוצו של יו״ד והוא הרצון שלמעלה מהטעם כו׳

which is the drawing down of the Supernal Will that is above Chochmah and Binah (understanding), and it is what makes peace between them, as explained above concerning the tip of the yud. So too there is in the soul the level of the tip of the yud: the will that is above reason, etc.;

Explanation

The Torah draws down the Supernal Will, which is above Chochmah and Binah and so can make peace between them, as the tip of the yud does above. In the soul, too, there is a “tip of the yud”: a will that is above reason.

וממנו נמשך בחי׳ הדעת העליון המחבר ומייחד חו״ב [חכמה ובינה] מוח ולב והיינו כי עסק התורה הוא בבחי׳ ביטול אליך ה׳ נפשי אשא מחשבה במחשבה דבור בדבור כו׳.

and from it comes the level of the higher Daas (knowledge), which joins and unites Chochmah and Binah, brain and heart. That is, occupation with Torah is in a state of self-nullification, “To You, Havayah, I lift up my soul”: thought with thought, speech with speech, etc.

Explanation

From that will comes the higher Daas, which unites mind and heart. Torah study does this because it is an act of self-nullification: a person gives his soul over to G‑d, so that his thought is bound with the divine thought and his speech with the divine speech.

Paragraph 15 in brief

Peace in the soul’s “household above” is the mind ruling over the heart: the heart’s fiery “running” must lead to “returning,” and humility must outweigh enthusiasm, as the Levites were subordinate to the Kohanim. This comes through Torah study, which draws down a will above reason, the soul’s “tip of the yud,” from which the higher Daas unites mind and heart.

Deeper

The Zohar passage the Kehot note cites describes the brain as riding upon and ruling over the heart, and the heart over the liver: the order of rule that the maamar asks a person to build within himself.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    מוח שליט על הלב · Zohar III, 224a
  2. 2
    אם רץ לבך · ס״י פ״א, מ״ח.
  3. 3
    אם רץ לבך · Sefer Yetzirah 1:8
  4. 4
    ת״ח צ״ל בו שמינית שבשמינית · Sotah 5a:16
  5. 5
    בד״ה יביאו לבוש מלכות · בתו״א דרושים למגילת אסתר.
  6. 6
    יביאו לבוש מלכות · Esther 6:8
  7. 7
    המתפלל צריך לכרוע . . איסר כנגד לבו · Berakhot 28b:19–20
  8. 8
    ואסרה איסר · Numbers 30:4
  9. 9
    וילוו עליך וישרתוך · Numbers 18:2
  10. 10
    העושה — וכמש״ל · סופ״א [כ].
  11. 11
    אליך ה׳ נפשי אשא · Psalms 25:1

16ולכן עי״ז נמשך להיות מוח שליט על הלב שלא יהיה התפעלות הלב בענין אהבה בבחי׳ יש אני אוהב ויש אני כו׳.

Therefore, through this it comes about that the brain rules over the heart, so that the heart’s arousal in love will not be in the manner of “there is an ‘I’ who loves” and “there is an ‘I,’” etc.,

Explanation

Torah study lets the mind govern the heart, so that even love of G‑d is not self-centered. A love felt as “I exist, and I love” still asserts the self.

אלא בבחי׳ ובכל נפשך ביטול כי אליך ה׳ נפשי אשא מפני שאתה עתיד ליטלה ממני כו׳. ועמ״ש בד״ה וידעת היום גבי שלום לרחוק שנעשה קרוב:

but rather in the manner of “and with all your soul,” self-nullification: for “To You, Havayah, I lift up my soul,” because “You will one day take it from me,” etc. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “And you shall know this day,” concerning “peace to the one who is far” who has become near.

Explanation

True love is “with all your soul,” a giving over of the self: “To You I lift up my soul,” knowing, as the morning blessing says, that G‑d “will one day take it from me.” The text then refers to a discourse on “peace to the one who is far” who has drawn near.

Paragraph 16 in brief

When the mind rules the heart through Torah study, the heart’s love of G‑d is not a self-assertive “I love” but a giving over of the self, “with all your soul.”

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ובכל נפשך · Deuteronomy 6:5
  2. 2
    אליך ה׳ נפשי אשא · Psalms 25:1
  3. 3
    שאתה עתיד ליטלה ממני · ברכת אלקי נשמה.
  4. 4
    שאתה עתיד ליטלה ממני · Berakhot 60b:4
  5. 5
    בד״ה וידעת היום · לקו״ת פ׳ ואתחנן.
  6. 6
    וידעת היום · Deuteronomy 4:39
  7. 7
    שלום לרחוק · Isaiah 57:19

The two souls ¶17–19

17ד וענין השלום בפמליא של מטה הוא לאכללא שמאלא בימינא פי׳ כי מדות שבנפש האלקית נקראו בכלל בחי׳ ימינא שהחסד גובר בהם

4. The matter of peace in the household below is to include the left in the right. That is: the emotive attributes (middos) of the G‑dly soul are called, in general, the right, since Chesed (kindness) prevails in them;

Explanation

Section 4 explains peace in the “household below” within the soul: including the left in the right. The emotions of the G‑dly soul are called the “right” because kindness prevails in them.

ולכן נקראת הנשמה בת כהן אבל המדות דנה״ב [דנפש הבהמית] הן בחי׳ שמאלא ששרש ומקור נה״ב [נפש הבהמית] מפני שור מהשמאל.

and therefore the soul is called “the daughter of a Kohen.” But the attributes of the animal soul are the left, for the root and source of the animal soul is from “the face of an ox on the left.”

Explanation

That is why the soul is called “the daughter of a Kohen,” the Kohen being the man of Chesed. The emotions of the animal soul are the “left,” since its root is “the face of an ox on the left” in Ezekiel’s vision of the divine chariot.

Paragraph 17 in brief

The emotions of the G‑dly soul are the “right,” where kindness prevails, and those of the animal soul are the “left”; peace in the household below means including the left in the right.

Deeper

The Zohar passage cited by Kehot, from the discourse of the Elder in Mishpatim, reads “the daughter of a Kohen” as the supernal soul, the daughter of Avraham our father.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    וענין השלום . . לאכללא שמאלא בימינא · ראה אוה״ת פ׳ יתרו ע׳ תשצא ואילך.
  2. 2
    פני שור מהשמאל · Ezekiel 1:10
  3. 3
    ולכן נק׳ הנשמה בת כהן · Zohar II, 95a

18והנה יש כ״ח עתים שלפעמים הנה״ב [הנפש הבהמית] כפופה להנה״א [להנפש האלקית] בתכלית ופעמים מתגבר לימשך אחר תאות גשמיים ואין זה שלום,

Now, there are twenty-eight “times”: at times the animal soul is utterly subdued to the G‑dly soul, and at times it grows strong, to be drawn after physical desires; and this is not peace.

Explanation

Koheles lists twenty-eight “times” in pairs of opposites, and a person’s inner life swings in the same way. Sometimes the animal soul is fully subdued, and sometimes it overpowers him; such an alternation is not peace.

אבל השלום הוא שיהי׳ [שיהיה] שמאלא אתכלל בימינא שיתבררו המדו׳ [המדות] דנה״ב [דנפש הבהמית] להבטל בהמדו׳ דנה״א [דנפש האלקית] ועמ״ש מזה בביאו׳ [בביאור] ע״פ ואהיה אצלו אמון

Rather, peace is that the left be included in the right: that the attributes of the animal soul be refined so as to be nullified in the attributes of the G‑dly soul. And see what is written on this in the Biur (explanation) on “And I was with Him as a nursling (amon),”

Explanation

True peace is the inclusion of the left in the right: the emotions of the animal soul are refined until they are absorbed into those of the G‑dly soul. The text refers to its Biur on “And I was with Him as a nursling” for more on this.

וכמ״ש בכל לבבך בשני יצריך שישוב היצה״ר [היצר הרע] ממש לאהבת ה׳ ע״י ההתבוננות איך שבאמת אין עוד ממש וא״כ למי יחפוץ זולתו ית׳

and as it is said, “with all your heart (levavcha)”: with both your inclinations; that the evil inclination itself be turned to the love of G‑d, through contemplating how in truth “there is nothing else,” literally; and if so, whom should one desire besides Him, may He be blessed?

Explanation

The Mishnah reads “with all your heart (levavcha),” written with a doubled beis, as “with both your inclinations.” Even the evil inclination is to be turned to love of G‑d, through contemplating that in truth there is nothing besides Him, so that there is nothing else to desire.

והנה שלום זה נעשה ג״כ ע״י התורה כי עיקר בירור המדות הוא ע״י המשכת הדעת שהוא חיות המדות ופנימיותן והוא הממשיך בחי׳ חו״ב [חכמה ובינה] במדות להיות בחכמה אתברירו המדות של נה״ב [נפש הבהמית]

Now, this peace too is brought about through the Torah. For the main refinement of the attributes is through the drawing down of Daas (knowledge), which is the life-force of the attributes and their inner dimension; and it is what draws Chochmah (wisdom) and Binah (understanding) into the attributes, so that “through Chochmah they are refined,” the attributes of the animal soul

Explanation

This peace too comes through the Torah. The emotions are refined through Daas, their inner life, which draws Chochmah and Binah into them; as the Zohar says, “through Chochmah they are refined.”

(כמ״ש מזה בביאור ע״פ מים רבים לא יוכלו לכבות את האהבה בענין הדעת מהו משמש.

(as is written on this in the Biur on “Many waters cannot quench the love,” on the matter of Daas: what its function is.

Explanation

The parenthesis refers to the Biur on “Many waters cannot quench the love,” which explains what Daas does.

ועמ״ש ג״כ בד״ה וכל בניך בענין א״ת [אל תקרי] בניך אלא בוניך שכדי להיות בחי׳ ורב שלום זהו ע״י בחי׳ בוניך שהיא עול תורה ועמ״ש בביאור ע״פ מים רבים כו׳)

And see also what is written in the discourse beginning “And all your children,” on the matter of “Do not read ‘your children’ (banayich) but ‘your builders’ (bonayich)”: that for there to be [the quality of] “and great peace,” this comes through the level of “your builders,” which is the yoke of Torah. And see what is written in the Biur on “Many waters,” etc.)

Explanation

The Talmud reads Isaiah’s “and all your children (banayich)” as “your builders (bonayich),” the Torah scholars who increase peace in the world. The Alter Rebbe identifies the “builders” with the yoke of Torah, the disciplined acceptance of Torah study, through which comes “great peace.”

והנה עי״ז נמשך למעלה המתקת הגבורות והוא ענין יחוד ו״ה והוא המשכת סוכ״ע בממכ״ע [בממלא כל עלמין] וכלל המשכה זו הוא ע״י מעשה המצות

Now, through this the sweetening of the Gevuros is drawn forth above; and this is the union of vav and hei, which is the drawing of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) into the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin). And this drawing forth, in general, comes through the performance of the mitzvos.

Explanation

Through this refinement below, the Gevuros are sweetened above: the vav of the Name unites with the final hei, and the light that encompasses the worlds is drawn into the light that fills them. In general, this drawing forth comes through doing the mitzvos.

וזהו והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום שהצדקה ממשיך ג״כ בחי׳ שלום הנ״ל דכמו שע״י הצדקה נעשה שלום למטה שהעני מתקנא בהעשיר וע״י הצדקה נעשה שלום ביניהם כך ג״כ גורם שלום למעלה בין משפיע למקבל כו׳.

And this is [the meaning of] “And the work of charity (tzedakah) shall be peace”: charity too draws down the peace mentioned above. For just as through charity peace is made below, since the poor man envies the rich one, and through charity peace is made between them, so too it brings about peace above, between the giver and the receiver, etc.

Explanation

Isaiah says that “the work of charity shall be peace.” Below, a poor man may envy a rich one, and charity makes peace between them; above, charity likewise makes peace between the giver and the receiver of the divine flow.

Paragraph 18 in brief

Peace in the soul’s “household below” is the refinement of the animal soul’s emotions until they are absorbed into those of the G‑dly soul, even turning the evil inclination to love of G‑d. It comes through Torah, which draws Daas into the emotions, and through the mitzvos, especially charity, which make peace above between giver and receiver.

Deeper

The Torah Ohr passage cited by Kehot distinguishes two kinds of Daas: the higher Daas, drawn from Keser, which joins Chochmah with Binah and Chesed with Gevurah, and the lower Daas, which spreads into the emotions to bring into them the light of Chochmah and Binah. The first is the peace of the household above described in paragraph 15; the second is the refinement described here.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    יש כ״ח עתים · Ecclesiastes 3:2
  2. 2
    ואהיה אצלו אמון · Proverbs 8:30
  3. 3
    בכל לבבך בשני יצריך · ברכות פ״ט, מ״ה.
  4. 4
    בכל לבבך בשני יצריך · Mishnah Berakhot 9:5
  5. 5
    אין עוד · Deuteronomy 4:39
  6. 6
    בחכמה אתברירו · Zohar II, 254b
  7. 7
    בביאור ע״פ מים רבים · תו״א יט, ב ואילך.
  8. 8
    מים רבים לא יוכלו לכבות את האהבה · Song of Songs 8:7
  9. 9
    בד״ה וכל בניך · לקו״ת פ׳ ראה כט, ד.
  10. 10
    וכל בניך · Isaiah 54:13
  11. 11
    א״ת בניך אלא בוניך · Berakhot 64a:14
  12. 12
    והי׳ מעשה הצדקה שלום · Isaiah 32:17

19וע׳ באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש] בד״ה והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום ועמ״ש עוד מענין זה דשלום בפמשמ״ע [בפמליא של מעלה] חיבור הרצוא ושוב דלב ומוח ושלום בפמליא של מט׳ [מטה] בד״ה וכל העם רואי׳ [רואים] את הקולות בפ׳ יתרו ע״ש.

And see Iggeres HaKodesh, in the letter beginning “And the work of charity shall be peace.” And see what is written further on this matter, of peace in the household above, the joining of the running and returning (ratzo vashov) of heart and brain, and of peace in the household below, in the discourse beginning “And all the people saw the voices,” in Parshas Yisro; see there.

Explanation

The text refers to the Alter Rebbe’s letter in Iggeres HaKodesh on “And the work of charity shall be peace,” and to a Torah Ohr discourse on Parshas Yisro that treats both kinds of peace: the joining of the heart’s running and returning with the mind, and the peace below.

Paragraph 19 in brief

A list of further references on charity and on the two kinds of peace.

Deeper

In the Torah Ohr discourse referred to, the positive commandments are “water,” kindness that draws the Infinite Light down below, yet each also has “fire”: its exact details and limits, as a sukkah taller than twenty cubits is invalid. These limits are Gevuros included in Chassadim, as in paragraph 9 here.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    והיה מעשה הצדקה שלום · Isaiah 32:17
  2. 2
    בד״ה וכל העם רואים · תו״א עד, א. ובאוה״ת פ׳ יתרו ע׳ תשצא.
  3. 3
    וכל העם רואי׳ את הקולות · Exodus 20:15

The answers ¶20–24

20ואחר כ״ז [כל זה] יובן ענין נקמת הוי׳ במדין כי בחי׳ שנאת חנם ופירוד זהו ממש המנגד לשם הוי׳ שעיקרו השלום וההתכללות בפמשמ״ע [בפמליא של מעלה] ושל מטה.

After all this, the matter of “the vengeance of Havayah upon Midian” will be understood: for baseless hatred and separation is the very thing that opposes the Name Havayah, whose essence is the peace and inter-inclusion in the household above and in the one below.

Explanation

Now “the vengeance of Havayah upon Midian” is understood. Baseless hatred and division are the exact opposite of the Name Havayah, whose essence is the peace and inter-inclusion of both “households.”

והענין שע״י בחי׳ התכללות שנעשה עי״ז נמשך אור עליון מבחי׳ שלימותא דכולא הכולל הכל כי ממך הכל כתיב. משא״כ בחינת הפירוד כו׳.

The explanation is that through the inter-inclusion that is brought about, a supernal light is drawn down from the level of “the wholeness of all” (shelimusa dechola), which includes everything, for it is written, “For all comes from You.” Whereas with separation, etc.

Explanation

Inter-inclusion draws down a light from “the wholeness of all,” G‑d as including everything, as David said, “For all comes from You.” Division blocks that light.

Paragraph 20 in brief

The war against Midian is “the vengeance of Havayah” because Midian, baseless hatred, is division, the opposite of the Name Havayah, whose essence is peace and inter-inclusion; through inter-inclusion the light of “the wholeness of all” is drawn down.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ממך הכל · I Chronicles 29:14

21ולכן מלחמת מדין הוא לנקום נקמת שם הוי׳ ממש. וזהו החלצו דמשמע כולכם פי׳ כי כל אדם צריך לעמוד במלחמה זו ללחום עם יצרו בעד שם הוי׳ המורה על יחוד

Therefore the war against Midian is to take the vengeance of the Name Havayah itself. And this is [the meaning of] “Arm yourselves (hechaltzu),” which implies all of you: that is, every person must stand in this war, to fight with his inclination for the sake of the Name Havayah, which denotes unity;

Explanation

The war against Midian is fought for the Name Havayah itself. Hence hechaltzu, addressed to all: every person must join this war, fighting his own inclination for the sake of the Name that denotes unity.

והיינו שיהיה ההתכללות כולם כאחד ממש כאיש אחד בלי שום פירוד לבבות וכו׳ ועי״ז דוקא יכניעו את מדין.

that is, that there be inter-inclusion, all of them truly as one, as one man, without any division of hearts, etc.; and specifically through this they will subdue Midian.

Explanation

The weapon is unity: all as one, “as one man,” with no division of hearts. Only through this is Midian subdued.

Paragraph 21 in brief

This answers the first question: hechaltzu addresses everyone because each person must fight his own inclination for the sake of the Name of unity, and only the unity of all, “as one man,” subdues Midian.

22וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] לכל מטות כי הנה ס״ר נשמות הן נגד ו״ק [ו׳ קצוות] הכלולים כ״א [כל אחד / כל אחת] מיו״ד ויו״ד מיו״ד כו׳

And this is [the meaning of] what is written, “for all the tribes (matos)”: for the six hundred thousand souls correspond to the six extremities (vav ketzavos), each of which is composed of ten, and [each] ten of ten, etc.

Explanation

This answers the question about “for all the tribes.” The six hundred thousand souls of Israel correspond to the six emotive attributes, each composed of ten, and each ten of ten again, until they number six hundred thousand.

והנה יש ו״ק [ו׳ קצוות] מלמעלה למטה וממטה למעל׳ [למעלה / למעלת] והן ב׳ בחי׳ שבטים כמ״ש ששם עלו שבטים שבטי י״ה היינו מעלמא דדכורא ועלמא דנוק׳ [דנוקבא].

Now, there are six extremities from above to below and from below to above, and these are two levels of tribes, as it is written, “where the tribes went up, the tribes of Yah”: that is, from the masculine world and the world of Nukva (the feminine).

Explanation

The six attributes flow in two directions, from above to below and from below to above, and so there are two levels of “tribes”: the “tribes of Yah,” the tribes in their supernal root, from the “masculine world,” and the tribes below, from the “world of Nukva,” the feminine.

וכן במטות יש ב׳ בחי׳ הא׳ ההטייה וההמשכה מלמעלה למטה כמו הט שמיך ותרד (תהלים קמ״ד). ויש הטיה מלמטה למעלה נטיתי לבי לעשות חקיך.

So too with matos there are two levels: the first, inclining and drawing down from above to below, as in “Incline Your heavens and come down” (Psalms 144); and there is inclining from below to above: “I have inclined my heart to perform Your statutes.”

Explanation

Matos also means “staffs,” and the Alter Rebbe links it with hatayah, “inclining.” One inclining is from above to below, as in “Incline Your heavens and come down”; the other is from below to above, as in “I have inclined my heart to perform Your statutes.”

והנה פרח מטה אהרן. הרם את מטך כו׳ וצ״ל ההתכללות מכל הבחי׳ ע״י ב׳ השלומות הנ״ל דפמשמ״ע [דפמליא של מעלה] ושל מטה.

“And behold, the staff (mateh) of Aharon had blossomed”; “Lift up your staff (mateh),” etc. And there must be the inter-inclusion of all the levels, through the two [kinds of] peace mentioned above, of the household above and of the one below.

Explanation

The text cites two staffs: Aharon’s, which blossomed, and the staff Moshe was told to lift over the sea. All these levels must be included in one another, through the two kinds of peace, above and below.

וזהו לכל מטות ולא מכל דמכל היה משמע רק מהשבטים שלמטה שהן מבחי׳ עלמא דנוק׳ [דנוקבא]

And this is [why it says] “for all the tribes” and not “from all”: for “from all” would imply only from the tribes below, which are of the level of the world of Nukva;

Explanation

“From all the tribes” would mean only the tribes below, which belong to the “world of Nukva,” the receiving side.

אבל לכל משמע כולן והיינו שע״י בחי׳ ההתכללות למטה בי״ב שבטים שלמטה יומשך אור מלמעלה משרש הי״ב שבטים שנק׳ שבטי י״ה בחי׳ פמשמ״ע [פמליא של מעלה] כנ״ל.

but “for all” implies all of them. That is, through the inter-inclusion below, in the twelve tribes below, light will be drawn from above, from the root of the twelve tribes, which are called “the tribes of Yah,” the level of the household above, as mentioned above.

Explanation

“For all” includes their root as well: through unity among the twelve tribes below, light is drawn from the root of the tribes above, the “tribes of Yah,” which is the level of the household above.

Paragraph 22 in brief

This answers the question about “for all the tribes”: the tribes (matos) exist on two levels, below and in their supernal root, “the tribes of Yah”; when the tribes below are united, light is drawn from their root above, so the war involves “all” of them.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    לכל מטות · Numbers 31:4
  2. 2
    ששם עלו שבטים · Psalms 122:4
  3. 3
    נטיתי לבי לעשות חוקיך · שם קיט, קיב.
  4. 4
    נטיתי לבי לעשות חקיך · Psalms 119:112
  5. 5
    והנה פרח מטה אהרן · Numbers 17:23
  6. 6
    הרם את מטך · Exodus 14:16
  7. 7

23וזהו ויהיו על מדין שעי״ז ישרה עליהם אור מבחי׳ שלימותא דכולא שלמעלה מעלה משרש בחי׳ מדין כו׳.

And this is [the meaning of] “and let them be over (al) Midian”: that through this there will rest upon them a light from the level of “the wholeness of all,” which is far above the root of the level of Midian, etc.

Explanation

The verse says the soldiers should “be against Midian,” literally “over” it. The Alter Rebbe reads this as a light from “the wholeness of all,” far above the root of Midian, resting upon the people through their unity.

וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] אמרו אליו כל שהוא ית׳ נק׳ כל שכולל הכל ושורה ע״י ההתכללות למטה. ובכל הנ״ל יובן חומר שנאת חנם. ועמ״ש בד״ה הן עם אחד ושפה אחת.

And this is [the meaning of] what is written, “Say to Him, ‘All’”: for He, may He be blessed, is called “All,” since He includes everything, and He rests [upon them] through the inter-inclusion below. From all the above, the gravity of baseless hatred will be understood. And see what is written in the discourse beginning “Behold, one people and one language.”

Explanation

Hosea’s “Say to Him, all” is read as a name of G‑d: He is called “All” because He includes everything, and He rests where there is inter-inclusion below. This shows how grave baseless hatred is, since it drives that presence away; the text then refers to a discourse on “Behold, one people and one language,” said of the builders of the Tower of Babel.

Paragraph 23 in brief

Unity draws upon the people a light from “the wholeness of all,” above the root of Midian, and so they come to be “over” Midian; G‑d, called “All,” rests where there is inter-inclusion below, which shows the gravity of baseless hatred.

Deeper

According to the Kehot note, in manuscript 127 (where this maamar appears with several variations) this gloss is missing, and in its place is written: “…baseless [hatred]; and this is the cause of the length of the exile, until there will be inter-inclusion in all the particular souls.”

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ויהיו על מדין · Numbers 31:3
  2. 2
    אמרו אליו כל · Hosea 14:3
  3. 3
    ועמ״ש בד״ה הן עם אחד ושפה אחת · תו״א נח י, ב. בכת״י 127 (ועוד — שם נמצא מאמר זה בכמה שינויים) ליתא הגהה זו, ובמקומה רשום: חנם — וזהו סבת אריכות הגלות עד שיהי׳ ההתכללות בכל פרטי הנשמות — והנה.
  4. 4
    הן עם אחד ושפה אחת · Genesis 11:6

24והנה הגורם החיבור והתכללות הוא בחי׳ משה ונחנו מה כו׳ ולכן היה צ״ל מלחמת ונקמת מדין ע״י משה דוקא,

Now, what brings about the joining and inter-inclusion is the level of Moshe, “and what are we,” etc.; therefore the war and the vengeance against Midian had to be specifically through Moshe.

Explanation

What joins and unites Israel is the quality of Moshe, who said of himself and Aharon, “and what are we?”: complete self-nullification. Therefore the war against Midian, the force of division, had to be carried out through Moshe.

וזהו מ״ש ברבות בשה״ש [בשיר השירים] ע״פ שניך כעדר הרחלים כו׳ שכולם מתאימות דקאי על ישראל שהלכו במלחמת מדין וכ״ה ג״כ ברבות (ר״פ מטות),

And this is what is said in [Midrash] Rabbah on Song of Songs, on the verse “Your teeth are like a flock of ewes,” etc., “all of which are matched,” that it refers to Israel, who went to the war against Midian; and so it is also in [Midrash] Rabbah (at the beginning of Parshas Matos).

Explanation

The Midrash on Song of Songs reads “Your teeth are like a flock of ewes… all of which are matched” as describing the Israelites who went to war against Midian, and the Midrash at the beginning of Parshas Matos says the same.

והענין כמ״ש במ״א ע״פ הנ״ל דפי׳ שעלו מן הרחצה הוא ענין המשכת מ״ד [מיין דוכרין] מבחינת ים החכמה והיינו ע״י משה רע״מ [רעיא מהימנא] שנא׳ [שנאמר] בו כי מן המים משיתיהו

The explanation, as is written elsewhere on the verse mentioned above, is that the meaning of “which have come up from the washing” is the drawing forth of mayin duchrin (masculine waters) from the sea of Chochmah (wisdom); and this is through Moshe, the faithful shepherd (Raaya Mehemna), of whom it is said, “for I drew him out of the water.”

Explanation

Another discourse explains “which have come up from the washing” as the drawing of “masculine waters,” the flow of influence, from the sea of Chochmah. That comes through Moshe, the faithful shepherd, who was drawn out of the water.

ולכן שעלו מן הרחצה הוא ר״ת [ראשי תיבות] משה, ועי״ז נעשו שכולם מתאימות שהוא בחי׳ ההתכללות יחד ממש ולכן הם דוקא שנלחמו על מדין וכנ״ל שלהיות על מדין הוא ע״י ההתכללות יחד:

Therefore “which have come up from the washing” (she’alu min harachtzah) has the initials of Moshe. And through this they became “all of them matched,” which is the level of inter-inclusion, truly together; and therefore it was specifically they who fought against Midian, as mentioned above: to be over Midian comes through inter-inclusion together.

Explanation

The initials of she’alu min harachtzah, shin, mem and hei, are the letters of Moshe’s name. Through Moshe the soldiers became “all of them matched,” truly united, and so it was they who could fight Midian, since being “over Midian” comes only through such unity.

Paragraph 24 in brief

Moshe, whose essence is self-nullification (“what are we?”), is the source of Israel’s unity, so the war against Midian had to be through him. The Midrash applies “all of which are matched” to the soldiers, whose unity came through Moshe, as the initials of “which have come up from the washing” show.

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    ונחנו מה · Exodus 16:7
  2. 2
    שניך כעדר הרחלים · Song of Songs 6:6
  3. 3
    כי מן המים משיתיהו · Exodus 2:10

Finished the maamar?

Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.

Download PDFPDF · 817 KB

In one’s avodah

Every person must stand in the war against Midian within himself: fight the baseless hatred he is inclined to justify, and be one with others “as one man,” without division of hearts. In his own soul he must let the mind rule the heart, so that his love of G‑d is self-giving and not “I love,” with humility far outweighing boldness; and he must refine the desires of the animal soul until they turn to love of G‑d, by contemplating that there is nothing besides Him. Torah study with self-nullification, the mitzvos, and especially charity bring about this peace.

Questions for discussion

  1. Why does baseless hatred, which the maamar says is not complete evil, cause a far longer exile than idolatry, forbidden relations and bloodshed?
  2. How can the tip of the yud, a level above both Chochmah and Binah, join two opposites that cannot join by themselves, and why is the Torah the means of drawing it down?
  3. In what sense are the Torah’s punishments and its exacting details “the left included in the right”?
  4. What is the difference between love of G‑d felt as “I love” and love “with all your soul,” and how does the mind’s rule over the heart bring about the second?
  5. Why does the maamar read hechaltzu as a call to every person, and what does that war look like in a person’s own life?

Key terms in this maamar

The Name Havayahהוי׳
The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
The forces of concealment that oppose holiness.
The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×18
“He and His vessels” (ihu vegarmohi)איהו וגרמוהי
From the Tikkunei Zohar: in Atzilus the Light and the vessels are one. Always “vessels”, never “organs”, “causations” or “bones”. Its companion איהו וחיוהי is “He and His life-forces”. Not מגרמיה (“of itself”). ×2
Teshuvah (return)תשובה
Returning to G‑d; not only repentance. ×1
The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
G‑d's own boundless essence.
The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×2
Tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
The self-concealment of the Infinite Light that makes room for finite worlds. ×6
The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond.
The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
Divine light that enters each world and gives it life according to its measure.
The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
The first flash of insight. ×14
Binah (understanding)בינה
Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×2
Daas (knowledge)דעת
Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×7
Keser (the Crown)כתר
The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×1
Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
Measure, limitation and judgment. ×2
Chesed (kindness)חסד
Expansive giving. ×7
The Sefirosספירות
The ten divine attributes through which G‑d relates to creation.
Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×7
Willרצון
Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×6
The animal soulנפש הבהמית
The soul that animates the body and its drives.
The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'. ×1
Life-forceחיות
The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×2
The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
The innermost core of a level.
Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
Malchus as the receiving configuration.
Yesod (foundation)יסוד
The channel that connects and transmits. ×6
The kav (line of light)קו
The thin ray of light drawn into the space left after the tzimtzum. ×3

Text size

Theme

How I learn

Calendar

Show

Abbreviations

Tap an abbreviation, or turn on Written out. A Kindle has no hover, so Written out is how to read them there.

PDF

CompleteHebrew, translation, explanations and notes · PDF · 817 KBText onlyThe Hebrew and the translation · PDF · 243 KB

EPUB

For your e-readerThe Hebrew, translation, explanations and notes · EPUB · 203 KB
The whole books, ready to print

Language

English

This page is in English only for now. Also in, so far:

Español319 maamarim so farFrançais319 maamarim so farעברית319 maamarim so farPortuguês319 maamarim so farРусский319 maamarim so far

Send us a suggestion

Corrections, ideas, questions. Leave your email so we can answer.

We send it by email to the editor, with the page you’re on. Nothing is published.

Contents

Likkutei Torahלקוטי תורה

Parshas Matosמטות

  1. 1וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות וגו׳…And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes
  2. 2ביאור ע״פ וידבר משה אל ראשי…An explanation of the verse “And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes”
  3. 3ואשה כי תדור נדר לה׳ כו׳…“And a woman, when she vows a vow to Havayah”
  4. 4ושמע אביה את נדרה“And her father hears her vow”
  5. 5עיני כל אליך ישברו וגו׳“The eyes of all look to You with hope”
  6. 6החלצו מאתכם וגו׳“Arm from among you”
    1. The questions ¶1
    2. Baseless hatred and the long exile ¶2–4
    3. The yud, the hei and the tip of the yud ¶5–6
    4. The left included in the right ¶7–9
    5. Brain and heart ¶10–16
    6. The two souls ¶17–19
    7. The answers ¶20–24
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    5. 5
    6. 6
    7. 7
    8. 8
    9. 9
    10. 10
    11. 11
    12. 12
    13. 13
    14. 14
    15. 15
    16. 16
    17. 17
    18. 18
    19. 19
    20. 20
    21. 21
    22. 22
    23. 23
    24. 24
  7. 7ביאור ענין החלצו מאתכם יחלצו מיבעי…An explanation of “Arm yourselves from among you”