Likkutei Torah · Parshas Matos · Maamar 1
וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות וגו׳ איש כי…
And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
The mitzvos, done with lowly physical things whose root is higher than the soul, draw down G‑d’s holiness that is set apart from all worlds; this explains the Sages’ ladder of abstinence, holiness, humility and fear of sin, Moshe’s “This is the thing,” and why a vow must be tied to something consecrated.
The maamar in brief
The maamar asks why a vow must be linked to a consecrated object, and why the laws of vows were given to “the heads of the tribes.” It answers through the Sages’ ladder: abstinence leads to holiness, holiness to humility, humility to fear of sin. Holiness means being set apart: the worlds live only from a glow of G‑d’s kingship, while His essence is beyond them. Yet through the mitzvos this hidden holiness reaches us. Bread sustains man because the divine word within it comes from a higher root; so too the physical objects of the mitzvos come from a root higher than the soul, and through them the Supernal Will is drawn into the worlds and into the soul as the “desire of the heart,” a love beyond understanding. Because the soul lives only through such lowly things, holiness brings humility, and humility lets a person sense how far a sin reaches: fear of sin. Moshe, the leader whose self-nullification was complete, draws this down; his prophecy, “This is the thing,” came from above time. A vow likewise ties an object, by the power of speech, to its high and holy root.
Outline
- Vows and the ladder of virtuesWhy a vow must be made “by a thing that is vowed,” why it was told to the heads of the tribes, and the Sages’ ladder from abstinence to fear of sin.¶1–2
- Holiness: set apart from the worldsFear of G‑d seems to come first; the answer begins with “Who has sanctified us with His commandments.” The worlds live from a glow of G‑d’s Malchus, while His essence is holy, beyond all thought.¶3–6
- “My bread”: food and its higher rootFood sustains man through the divine word within it, and has an advantage over him because its root, which fell in the breaking of the vessels, is higher than his.¶7–11
- The Supernal Will drawn through actionThe light that fills the worlds, the “appearance of a man,” receives life from the Supernal Will through physical mitzvos and speech of Torah, not through thought; this is why good deeds surpass the World to Come.¶12–15
- The desire of the heart and “Who has sanctified us”Beyond the love born of contemplation, Torah and mitzvos bring ahavah rabbah, the desire of the heart, a love higher than the soul; the blessing over mitzvos is read word by word, followed by a summary.¶16–19
- Humility and fear of sinHoliness brings humility, true self-nullification like Moshe’s; humility brings a sense of how far a sin reaches, which is fear of sin; and all rests on abstinence, the lower teshuvah.¶20–22
- The heads of the tribesThe “heads” that turn a person’s emotions toward love of G‑d are the desire of the heart, drawn down by Moshe’s leadership and humility.¶23–24
- “This is the thing”Moshe’s prophecy came from G‑d’s essence, above time, and through the desire of the heart a person’s Torah study becomes G‑d’s own word.¶25–26
- Vows: tying the object to its holy rootAbstinence grows from seeing the high root of what one gives up; a vow links it to an offering, drawing holiness into it through the power of speech.¶27
Key concepts
- Holiness (kedushah)קדושה
- Being set apart: G‑d’s essence, beyond all worlds, which no thought can grasp. Through the mitzvos this very holiness is drawn down into the worlds and into the soul.
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- G‑d’s kingship; a mere glow of it gives existence and life to all worlds. It is a “garment” that G‑d puts on, not His essence.
- That which comes forth from the mouth of Havayahמוצא פי ה׳
- The divine word that sustains every creature. Motza means both what has already come forth and the source it comes from.
- The Supernal Willרצון העליון
- The divine will above all worlds, the light that encompasses all worlds and the source of the Torah and mitzvos, as against the lower will that clothes itself within the worlds.
- The desire of the heart (re’usa deliba)רעותא דליבא
- Ahavah rabbah, a love for G‑d beyond understanding, “with all your might,” which comes from above through the Torah and mitzvos.
- Humilityענוה
- Not occupying any place at all, being as nothing before G‑d, like Moshe’s “what are we.” It follows from knowing that the soul lives only through lowly things.
- Fear of sinיראת חטא
- Fear of the lack and blemish a sin causes above, which reaches the root of all roots.
- A thing that is vowedדבר הנדור
- A consecrated object, such as an offering, to which a vow must be linked; the link ties the forbidden object to its high, holy root.
Vows and the ladder of virtues ¶1–2
1וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות12 וגו׳ איש כי ידור נדר3 וגו׳. ואמרו בגמ׳ [בגמרא] עד שידור בדבר הנדור4 כגון שיאמר הרי עלי בשר זה כעולה ושלמים5 או שיאמר קונם בשר זה עלי שהקונם הוא לשון קרבן.6
“And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes,” etc.; “When a man vows a vow,” etc. And in the Gemara [our Sages] said: “until he vows by a thing that is vowed”—for example, that he says, “This meat is [forbidden] to me like a burnt-offering and peace-offerings,” or that he says, “Konam: this meat [is forbidden] to me,” for konam is a term for korban (an offering).
The maamar opens with the first verses of Parshas Matos (Numbers 30:2–3), where Moshe teaches the heads of the tribes the laws of vows. The Gemara (Nedarim 13a) learns from these words that a vow takes effect only when the speaker links the object to something already consecrated, as when he says that this meat is to him like an offering. The common vow-word konam is a substitute for korban, “offering,” so it, too, links the object to an offering.
The paragraph quotes the verses that open the laws of vows and the Gemara’s rule that a vow must link the forbidden object to something consecrated, such as an offering.
The Kehot note adds that the vow the Torah speaks of is essentially one that links the object to an offering (Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De’ah 204:1). It also cites the Mishneh LaMelech: a vow phrased only as “this is forbidden to me” works because it is treated as shorthand, and the listener completes it as “like an offering.” The note takes this from a talk of Shabbos Parshas Matos-Masei 5748 (note 12).
Marei mekomos
- 1וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות · הנחת כ״ק אדמו״ר האמצעי נדפס בסה״מ תקס״ד ע׳ קפז.
- 2וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות · Numbers 30:2
- 3איש כי ידור נדר · Numbers 30:3
- 4עד שידור בדבר הנדור · Nedarim 13a:2–3
- 5הרי עלי בשר זה כעולה ושלמים · עיקר נדר האמור בתורה הוא שיתפיס בדבר הנדור, כגון שאומר ככר זה עלי כקרבן, ראה שו״ע יו״ד סד״ר ס״א. וראה משנה למלך ריש הל׳ נדרים שנדר בלשון איסור סתם (שלא התפיסו כקרבן) ”מדין יד הוא דמהני שכשהוא אומר הרי זה אסור עלי אנו גומרין דברים כקרבן” עיי״ש — משיחת ש״פ מטו״מ תשמ״ח הערה 12.
- 6לכללות המאמר ראה גם ד״ה זה בסה״מ תקס״ב ח״א ע׳ רלז [שם ההתחלה · וידבר ה׳ אל משה דבר אל ראשי המטות — וצ״ע]. ח״ב ע׳ תצט. תקס״ז ע׳ רפט. ס׳ מאמרי אדה״ז-פרשיות ח״ב ע׳ תרפח. אוה״ת מטות ע׳ א׳רנה ואילך. שם כרך-ה ע׳ א׳תרפב. כרך-ו ע׳ א׳תתקנד קיצור ללקו״ת. סה״מ תר״ל ע׳ רטז. במאמרי אדה״א פ׳ מטות ע׳ א׳תרצז רק חלק מהמאמר.
2ועל יסוד זה מוסד כל מסכת נדרים בפי׳ דבר הנדור. ולהבין ענין זה למה צריך להתפיס בדבר הנדור דוקא.
And on this foundation the whole Tractate Nedarim is founded, in [its] explanation of “a thing that is vowed.” And [we need] to understand this matter: why must one attach [the vow] specifically to a thing that is vowed?
The Alter Rebbe notes that the whole Tractate Nedarim is built on this rule of the “thing that is vowed.” He asks why a vow must be attached to something consecrated at all, rather than forbidding the object simply by declaring it so.
And also [we need] to understand why this section was said specifically to the heads of the tribes. Now, we learned in [Pirkei] Avos: “Vows are a fence for abstinence.”
A second question: why was the section on vows addressed specifically to “the heads of the tribes”? He begins his answer with the Mishnah in Avos (3:13) that vows are a protective fence for perishus, abstaining even from things that are permitted.
Now, they said: “Abstinence leads to holiness, holiness leads to humility, and humility leads to fear of sin.”
This sequence comes from the Mishnah at the end of Sotah (9:15), Rabbi Pinchas ben Yair’s ladder of spiritual growth: abstinence brings holiness, holiness brings humility, and humility brings fear of sin. The maamar will explain these rungs one by one and, through them, the meaning of vows.
The paragraph states the two questions the maamar will answer, why a vow must be tied to a consecrated object and why vows were taught to the heads of the tribes, and introduces the Sages’ ladder in which abstinence leads to holiness, humility and fear of sin.
The Kehot note cites a talk of Shabbos Matos-Masei 5748 that resolves an apparent contradiction with the Sages’ rebuke, “Is what the Torah forbade not enough for you, that you seek to forbid other things?” Two stages are meant: one who has not yet reached a high level of service needs to abstain even from what is permitted, while one who has reached it may be content with what the Torah forbids. Likkutei Torah later in Matos (84b) draws a similar distinction.
Marei mekomos
- 1תנן באבות נדרים סייג לפרישות · פ״ג, מי״ג.
- 2נדרים סייג לפרישות · ראה בארוכה משיחת ש״פ מטו״מ תשמ״ח שלכאורה מצינו סתירה במאמרי חז״ל ”לא דייך מה שאסרה לך התורה אלא שאתה מבקש לאסור עלך דברים אחרים” (בתמי׳), והתיווך בזה שמדובר אודות שתי דרגות שונות א) מי שעדיין לא הגיע לדרגא נעלית בעבודת ה׳, זקוק לפרוש גם מדברים המותרים קדש עצמך במותר לך, והב) מי שכבר הגיע לדרגא נעלית בעבודת ה׳ אז דייך מה שאסרה לך התורה ע״ש בארוכה. וראה לקמן פד, ב.
- 3פרישות מביאה לידי קדושה · סוף סוטה.
- 4פרישות מביאה לידי קדושה וקדושה מביאה לידי ענוה וענוה מביאה לידי יראת חטא · Mishnah Sotah 9:15
- 5
Holiness: set apart from the worlds ¶3–6
3וצריך להבין למה יראת חטא באה אחר ענוה וקדושה כו׳ והלא כתיב ראשית חכמה יראת1 ה׳ [הגם שנתבאר במ״א ע״פ וידבר דעשרת הדברות2 בענין אם אין חכמה אין יראה3 אם אין יראה אין חכמה.4
And we need to understand why fear of sin comes after humility and holiness, etc. Is it not written, “The beginning of wisdom is the fear of Havayah”? [Although it was explained elsewhere, on the verse “And He spoke” of the Ten Commandments, regarding [the teaching] “If there is no wisdom there is no fear; if there is no fear there is no wisdom,”
If fear of sin comes only near the top of the ladder, after holiness and humility, how does that fit Psalms 111:10, which calls the fear of G‑d the beginning of wisdom? In brackets the Alter Rebbe recalls that he discussed the Mishnah “If there is no wisdom there is no fear; if there is no fear there is no wisdom” (Avos 3:17) in another discourse, on the Ten Commandments.
דיש ב׳ בחי׳ יראה. אך אין די בזה לתרץ הא דיראת חטא בא דוקא אחר ענוה וקדושה כו׳].
that there are two levels of fear—yet this is not enough to resolve why fear of sin comes specifically after humility and holiness, etc.]
That earlier answer was that there are two levels of fear: one that is the beginning of wisdom, and a greater fear that comes only through wisdom. The Alter Rebbe says this does not yet explain why fear of sin in particular must come after humility and holiness.
אך הענין דעיקר הקדושה הוא כמאמר אשר קדשנו במצותיו5 שהמצות הן העיקר והתכלית כמ״ש סוף דבר הכל נשמע את האלקים ירא ואת מצותיו שמור כי זה כל האדם6 וע״י המצות הוא אשר קדשנו.
But the explanation is that the essence of holiness is as the saying, “Who has sanctified us with His commandments”: for the mitzvos are the essence and the purpose, as it is written, “The end of the matter, all having been heard: fear G‑d and keep His commandments, for this is the whole of man.” And it is through the mitzvos that He “has sanctified us.”
The answer starts from the blessing said over a mitzvah, “Who has sanctified us with His commandments”: the main holiness comes through the mitzvos. Ecclesiastes concludes that the whole of man is to fear G‑d and keep His commandments, so the mitzvos are the essence and goal, and they are the channel through which G‑d makes us holy.
The paragraph raises the difficulty that fear of G‑d is called the beginning of wisdom, sets aside the answer that there are two kinds of fear as insufficient, and begins a new answer: the essence of holiness is what comes through the mitzvos.
In the discourse the note points to (Likkutei Torah, Bamidbar 16b–17a), the greater fear arises when the Infinite Light is revealed to the root of the soul above the body, a revelation the mind cannot hold, so it brings trembling rather than understanding. Of such fear it is said, “If there is no wisdom there is no fear,” and it comes through the study of Torah, which comes from Chochmah.
Marei mekomos
- 1ראשית חכמה יראת ה׳ · Psalms 111:10
- 2ע״פ וידבר דעשרת הדברות · לקו״ת במדבר טז, ב.
- 3אם אין חכמה אין יראה · אבות ג, יז.
- 4אם אין חכמה אין יראה אם אין יראה אין חכמה · Pirkei Avot 3:17
- 5דעיקר הקדושה הוא כמאמר אשר קדשנו במצותיו · ראה אוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ קלד ואילך שצריך ביאור דבגמרא פרק ערבי פסחים דף ק״ד ע״א משמע דשם קודש אינו ע״י שמקיים המצות לבד ע״ש.
- 6סוף דבר הכל נשמע . . כי זה כל האדם · Ecclesiastes 12:13
4וביאור ענין זה כי הנה קדוש פי׳ מובדל1 וכו׳ ומהו קדושת המצות זה נרמז בנוסח הברכה בא״י [ברוך אתה ה׳] אמ״ה [אלקינו מלך העולם] פי׳
And the explanation of this matter: “holy” (kadosh) means “set apart,” etc. And what the holiness of the mitzvos is, is alluded to in the wording of the blessing, “Blessed are You, Havayah, our G‑d, King of the world.” The meaning is:
“Holy” means set apart, as Rashi explains on “You shall be holy” (Leviticus 19:2), according to the Kehot note. To understand how the mitzvos make a person holy, the Alter Rebbe turns to the opening words of every blessing: “Blessed are You, Havayah, our G‑d, King of the world.”
כי מלך העולם הוא ע״ד מלכותך מלכות2 כל עולמים שחיות כל העולמות עליונים ותחתונים והתהוותם מאין ליש הוא ע״י מחשבה הקדומה שעלה ברצונו ית׳ אנא אמלוך כו׳. משא״כ קודם שנברא העולם היה הוא ושמו בלבד.34
“King of the world” is in the sense of “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds”: the life-force of all the worlds, higher and lower, and their coming into being from nothing into something, is through the primordial thought that arose in His will, blessed be He, “I will reign,” etc. Whereas before the world was created, there was He and His Name alone.
G‑d is called “King of the world” because His kingship extends over all worlds (Psalms 145:13): the worlds exist and live only through the primordial thought in His will, “I will reign,” His desire to be King. Before creation there was only “He and His Name alone,” as Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer says, so kingship and the worlds belong to one level of G‑d, not to His essence.
The paragraph defines holiness as being set apart and, from the blessing’s words “King of the world,” shows that the worlds draw their existence only from G‑d’s kingship, while before creation there was He and His Name alone.
Malchus (sovereignty) is the last of the Sefiros, the attribute through which G‑d relates to the worlds as their King. The maamar is preparing a contrast between this outward level, which gives life to the worlds, and G‑d’s own essence, which is “holy,” set apart from the worlds.
Marei mekomos
- 1קדוש פי׳ מובדל · כפי׳ רש״י קדושים יט, ב. ראה תניא פ׳ מו. אגה״ת פ״י.
- 2מלכותך מלכות כ״ע · Psalms 145:13
- 3הי׳ הוא ושמו בלבד · פדר״א רפ״ג. וראה ת״ז ת״ה קרוב לסופו. הק׳ השל״ה בתחילתה.
- 4היה הוא ושמו בלבד · Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 3:2–3
5והנה כתיב אני ה׳ לא שניתי1 שגם אחר שנברא העולם אין לפניו שום שינוי ח״ו [חס ושלום] אלא אתה הוא קודם2 שנברא העולם ואתה הוא לאחר כו׳.
Now, it is written, “I, Havayah, have not changed”: that even after the world was created there is no change at all before Him, G‑d forbid; rather, “You are He before the world was created, and You are He after,” etc.
Malachi 3:6 says that G‑d does not change: creating the world brought no change at all in Him. The prayer-book says the same: “You are He before the world was created, and You are He after.”
וכמ״ש אני ראשון ואני אחרון ומבלעדי אין3 אלקים (בישעיה סי׳ מ״ד ו׳), פי׳ אני ראשון קודם שנברא העולם ואני אחרון לאחר שיכלו ימות המשיח וחיי העוה״ב [העולם הבא] שאז יהיה4 הוא ושמו בלבד כמו שהיה קודם שנברא העולם.
And as it is written, “I am first and I am last, and besides Me there is no Elokim” (in Isaiah, chapter 44:6). That is: “I am first”—before the world was created; “and I am last”—after the days of Mashiach and the life of the World to Come have come to an end, for then there will be He and His Name alone, as there was before the world was created.
Isaiah 44:6 is read as a statement about time. “First” is before creation; “last” is after the days of Mashiach and the World to Come have run their course, when once again there will be only He and His Name.
וגם מבלעדי פי׳ באמצעות בין מה שהיה ובין מה שיהיה דהיינו מה שהוא בבחי׳ הוה בעת וזמן בריאת העולם וחיותו וקיומו מששת ימי בראשית שית אלפי שני5 כו׳.
And also “besides Me” means “in the middle,” between what was and what will be—that is, what is in the state of the present, at the time and period of the world’s creation, its life-force and its existence, from the six days of Creation, “six thousand years,” etc.,
The word mibaladai, usually “besides Me,” is read here as “in between”: the whole span between “first” and “last,” the present existence of the world from the six days of creation through its “six thousand years” (Rosh Hashanah 31a). The next paragraph completes the thought: even in this span there is “no Elokim,” no real concealment, before G‑d.
The paragraph shows from Malachi and Isaiah that creation does not change G‑d: before it, after it, and during the whole of its existence, all is before Him as though He and His Name alone existed.
The Kehot note cites the Tzemach Tzedek’s question in Or HaTorah: souls are eternal, as Likkutei Torah itself teaches, so how can there be “He and His Name alone” at the end? He explains that the self-nullification of all things will then be revealed, unlike now, and the light will shine without screens, and perhaps without the mediation of angels.
Marei mekomos
- 1אני ה׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
- 2אתה הוא קודם שנבה״ע · נוסח התפלה.
- 3
- 4לאחר שיכלו ימות המשיח . . שאז יהי׳ הוא ושמו בלבד · באוה״ת במדבר כרך-ו ע׳ א׳תתקנד כ׳ וצ״ע דהא הנשמות משמע שהם נצחיים . . כמ״ש בלק״ת ד״ה את שבתותי תשמרו ספ״א, ומפרש שר״ל שאז יהי׳ גלוי הביטול ולא כמו עכשיו ויאיר שלא ע״י מסכים, וגם אפשר לא ע״י מלאכים ע״ש.
- 5שית אלפי שני · Rosh Hashanah 31a:8–9
6וימות המשיח ותחה״מ [ותחיית המתים] הכל לפניו ית׳ כאלו הוא ושמו בלבד ואין אלקים והסתר כו׳ וכמאמר ומבלעדיך אין לנו מלך אלא אתה1 שאין זה אלא בבחי׳ מלך שמלך הוא העולם
and the days of Mashiach and the Resurrection of the Dead: all is before Him, blessed be He, as though there were He and His Name alone, and there is no Elokim and concealment, etc. And as the saying goes, “And besides You we have no King but You”: for this is only in the aspect of “King,” for “King” is the world,
The days of Mashiach and the Resurrection also belong to this span in which, before G‑d, there is only He and His Name; “no Elokim” means no concealment, since Elokim is the Name of concealment. The words of the Nishmas prayer, “besides You we have no King,” show that the world exists only within the aspect of G‑d as King, because the world is His kingdom.
ואין העולם דבר נפרד חוץ ממנו ח״ו [חס ושלום] ומלכותך מלכות2 כל עולמים שמתפשט למעלה עד אין קץ ולמטה עד אין תכלית ולארבע סטרין מלך מלך וימלוך ואינו
and the world is not a thing separate [and] outside of Him, G‑d forbid. And “Your kingship is the kingship of all worlds,” which extends upward without end and downward without limit, and to the four directions—“He is King, He was King, and He will be King”—and it is nothing
Since the world is His kingdom, it is not a separate thing outside Him. His kingship (Psalms 145:13) spreads without end above, below and to all four directions, as in the liturgical words “He is King, He was King, and He will be King.”
אלא זיו והארה ממדת מלכותו ית׳ המתפשט ומתלבש בעולמות עליונים ותחתונים להוות אותם מאין ליש ולהחיותם ולקיימם.
but a radiance and illumination from the attribute of His Malchus (sovereignty), blessed be He, which extends and clothes itself in the higher and lower worlds, to bring them into being from nothing into something, to give them life and to sustain them.
Yet all this kingship is only a radiance, a glow, from G‑d’s attribute of Malchus (sovereignty). That glow enters the higher and lower worlds, creates them from nothing, keeps them alive and sustains them.
(And see on the subject of “I am first,” etc., in [Midrash] Rabbah, Vayishlach, section 81) (folio 90d): “What is truth (emes)?” etc. And so it is in Parshas Devarim (folio 286b),
Here begins a long parenthesis of sources on “I am first and I am last.” Bereshit Rabbah (81:2) teaches that the word emes, “truth,” is made of the first letter of the alphabet (alef), the middle letter (mem) and the last (tav), alluding to “I am first and I am last.” The Alter Rebbe notes that the Midrash on Devarim has the same teaching.
ובשה״ש [ובשיר השירים]7 ע״פ לסוסתי ברכבי (ד״י [ד׳ יסודות] ע״ג) ועמ״ש בפי׳ ואמת ה׳ לעולם בד״ה ביום השמיני עצרת89 ובביאור ע״פ אלה מסעי.10
and in Shir HaShirim [Rabbah], on the verse “To My mare among the chariots” (folio 10c). And see what is written on the meaning of “And the truth of Havayah is forever” in the discourse beginning “On the eighth day, an assembly,” and in the explanation on the verse “These are the journeys.”
The same teaching appears in Shir HaShirim Rabbah, on “To My mare among the chariots” (Song of Songs 1:9). The Alter Rebbe also points to the explanation of “the truth of Havayah is forever” (Psalms 117:2) in the Shemini Atzeres discourse, and to the explanation on “These are the journeys” in Parshas Masei.
עוד מענין אני ראשון כו׳ ברבות תולדות11 (פס״נ ס״ט ד׳). פ׳ בא ר״פ ט״ו ע״פ ראשון הוא לכם1213 (דקכ״ט ע״ג [עמוד ג׳]).
Further on the subject of “I am first,” etc.: in [Midrash] Rabbah, Toldos (section 63, folio 69d); Parshas Bo, beginning of section 15, on the verse “It shall be the first for you” (folio 129c);
Further sources for “I am first”: Bereshit Rabbah (63:8) on Esav’s birth, where G‑d says “I will reveal Myself to you first,” citing “I am first,” and Shemos Rabbah (15:1), which reads “It shall be the first for you” (Exodus 12:2) as alluding to G‑d, who is called “First.”
קדושים (ס״פ כ״ד). זח״ב [זהר חלק ב׳] תרומה (קנ״ח סע״א [סוף עמוד א]) ס״פ מצורע (דנ״ו א׳) ת״ז [תיקוני זהר] תקון ה׳ (דט״ז ע״א)
Kedoshim (end of section 24); Zohar II, Terumah (158, end of side a); the end of Parshas Metzora (folio 56a); Tikkunei Zohar, Tikkun 5 (folio 16a);
Vayikra Rabbah’s section 24, on Kedoshim, ends with the verse “I am first and I am last.” The list then adds passages in the Zohar and the Tikkunei Zohar, which, according to the Kehot note, the Tzemach Tzedek copied into his Or HaTorah.
סוף תקון י״ט (דמ״א ע״ב) תקון ס״ט (דק״ח)14 ועמש״ל [ועיין מה שכתוב לעיל] בביאור ע״פ אני דפ׳ ציצית15 וזהו ה׳ מלך גאות לבש16 שאינו
the end of Tikkun 19 (folio 41b); Tikkun 69 (folio 108). And see what is written above in the explanation on “I” in the section of tzitzis. And this is [the meaning of] “Havayah reigns; He has clothed Himself in majesty”: that it is nothing
After more Tikkunei Zohar references and a pointer to the earlier explanation of the word “I” in the section of tzitzis (Likkutei Torah, Shelach), the main argument resumes. Psalms 93:1, “Havayah reigns; He has clothed Himself in majesty,” shows that kingship is only something G‑d puts on, a garment, not His essence.
אלא בבחי׳ לבוש ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה יונתי בחגוי,1718 ונק׳ זיו השכינה19 פי׳ מה ששוכן ומתלבש בעולמות עליונים ותחתונים להיות ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין] אין זה
but in the level of a garment. And see what is written about this in the discourse beginning “My dove, in the clefts.” And it is called “the radiance of the Shechinah (Divine Presence)”: that is, that which dwells and clothes itself in the higher and lower worlds, to be the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)—this is nothing
Kingship is a garment, as explained in the discourse “My dove, in the clefts of the rock” (Likkutei Torah, Shir HaShirim). This glow is called “the radiance of the Shechinah,” a name related to shochen, “dwells”: it is the light that dwells in the worlds and fills them, called memalei kol almin.
אלא ע״י זיו והארה בלבד וזיו זה והארה זו נמשכה ממדת מלכותו ית׳20 ממחשבת אנא אמלוך,
other than through a radiance and illumination alone. And this radiance and this illumination is drawn from the attribute of His Malchus, blessed be He—from the thought “I will reign.”
The light that fills the worlds is only a radiance, not G‑d’s essence. It comes from His attribute of Malchus, from the primordial thought “I will reign,” His will to be King over worlds.
אבל בו בעצמו ובכבודו ית׳ לית מחשבה תפיסא ביה כלל2122 סתימא דכל סתימין23 ועליו נאמר ישת חשך סתרו24 שאין העולמות עליונים ותחתונים יכולים לקבל זיו והארה ממנו ית׳ מעצמותו ומהותו ממש כביכול
But in His own Self and His glory, blessed be He, “no thought can grasp Him at all”; [He is] “the most hidden of all hidden,” and of Him it is said, “He made darkness His hiding place”: for the higher and lower worlds cannot receive a radiance and illumination from Him, blessed be He, from His very essence and being, as it were,
G‑d’s own Self is beyond all thought, as Elijah’s prayer in the Tikkunei Zohar says, “No thought can grasp You at all,” and as the phrase “the most hidden of all hidden” expresses. Psalms 18:12, “He made darkness His hiding place,” describes this: the worlds cannot receive any light from His very essence.
for He is holy and set apart, etc., and “We cannot compare His holiness to Him,” and “There is no comparison to You,” etc. [And see what is written about this in Parshas Va’eira, on the verse
This is what “holy” means: G‑d’s essence is set apart from all worlds. Two lines of the liturgy say so: the Yigdal hymn, “We cannot compare His holiness to Him,” and the Shabbos morning blessing, “There is no comparison to You.”
“Therefore, say to the children of Israel,” etc., and in Parshas Beshalach, on the verse “Then Moshe sang,” on the meaning of “We cannot compare His holiness to Him.”]
The bracket points to two discourses in Torah Ohr, on “Therefore, say to the children of Israel” (Va’eira) and on “Then Moshe sang” (Beshalach). As the Kehot note quotes, the latter explains that even His holiness, which is set apart, “cannot be compared to Him,” because He is not within the category of worlds at all.
The paragraph distinguishes two levels: G‑d’s kingship, only a radiance that fills and sustains the worlds as a garment, and His essence, which no thought can grasp and no world can receive; this separateness is what “holy” means.
The Tzemach Tzedek quotes this passage in Or HaTorah (Bereishis, vol. 3, 558a), summarizing that the practical mitzvos refine nogah, whose root is in the world of Tohu, and so draw down the Supernal Will, Keser Elyon. He then asks: if only the angels and the worlds receive their life from Malchus, while souls are rooted in “G‑d’s portion,” what elevation do the mitzvos add? He discusses this at length there.
Marei mekomos
- 1ומבלעדיך אין לנו מלך אלא אתה · תפלת נשמת.
- 2
- 3ועיין מענין אני ראשון ברבות וישלח פ׳ פ״א · ”מהו אמת אלף בראשון של אותיות מ״ם באמצע תיו בסוף ע״ש אני ראשון ואני אחרון ומבלעדיך אין אלקים” — אוה״ת נ״ך-א ע׳ רמב ואילך.
- 4אני ראשון · Bereshit Rabbah 63:8
- 5אני ראשון · Vayikra Rabbah 24:9
- 6מהו אמת · Bereshit Rabbah 81:2
- 7וכ״ה בפ׳ דברים . . ובשה״ש · ראה באוה״ת נ״ך ע׳ רמג.
- 8בד״ה ביום השמיני עצרת · ראה לקמן שמע״צ פד, ד.
- 9ביום השמיני עצרת · Numbers 29:35
- 10אלה מסעי · Numbers 33:1
- 11ברבות תולדות פס״ג · ע״פ ויצא הראשון אדמוני בזכות ולקחתם לכם ביום הראשון אני נגלה לכם ראשון שנאמר אני ראשון כו׳ וכעין זה בפ׳ בא” — אוה״ת נ״ך-א ע׳ רמב. וכ״ה באוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ רעט. אוה״ת בא ע׳ רסא.
- 12ראשון הוא לכם · Exodus 12:2
- 13ראשון הוא לכם · Shemot Rabbah 15:1
- 14קדושים (ס״פ כ״ד) . . זח״ב תרומה (קנ״ח סע״א) . . תקון ס״ט (דק״ח) · נעתקו באוה״ת נ״ך-א ע׳ רמג.
- 15בביאור ע״פ אני דפ׳ ציצית · לעיל פ׳ שלח מח, א.
- 16ה׳ מלך גאות לבש · Psalms 93:1
- 17בד״ה יונתי בחגוי · לקו״ת שה״ש יז, א.
- 18יונתי בחגוי · Song of Songs 2:14
- 19ונק׳ זיו השכינה · יז, א.
- 20וזיו זה . . נמשכה ממדת מלכותו ית׳ · מובא באוה״ת בראשית-ג דף תקנח, א וז״ל ”מבואר בלקו״ת בד״ה ראשי המטות כי חיות כל העולמות הוא מבחי׳ מלכותו ית׳ אבל במהותו ועצמותו ית׳ לית מחשבה תפיסא בי׳ וזהו ענין קדוש ומובדל ועז״נ ישת חושך סתרו וע״י תומ״צ נמשך מקדושה זו ממש ונק׳ לכו לחמו בלחמי והיינו לפי שכל המצות מעשיות הם בירור בחי׳ נוגה ששרשו מעולם התהו וממשיך עי״ז רצון עליון שהוא בחי׳ כתר עליון כו׳ ע״ש, אך עדיין אינו מובן זה שחיות כל העולמות הוא מבחי׳ מלכותו ית׳ בלבד היינו המלאכים ושאר העולמות אבל הנשמות מצד עצמן ג״כ שרשן מבחי׳ כי חלק ה׳ עמו . . וא״כ מהו העלי׳ ע״י המצות, ע״ש בארוכה.
- 21לית מחשבה תפיסא בי׳ כלל · ת״ז בהקדמה (פתח אלי׳).
- 22לית מחשבה תפיסא ביה כלל · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:10–12
- 23סתימא דכל סתימין · ראה שם.
- 24ישת חשך סתרו · Psalms 18:12
- 25הוא קדוש · [נכתב ממעל] הוא ית׳ קדוש. [כ].
- 26שאין העולמות . . כי הוא קדוש ומובדל · מובא באוה״ת ויקרא-א ע׳ ריז, ושם מציין גם לפי׳ אחר המובא בלקו״ת שה״ש ד, ג. וראה גם אוה״ת בראשית-ב דף שט, ב.
- 27ולא נערוך אליו קדושתו · תפלת יגדל.
- 28ואין ערוך לך · ברכת יוצר דשבת.
- 29לכן אמור לבני ישראל · Exodus 6:6
- 30אז ישיר משה · Exodus 15:1
- 31ע״פ אז ישיר . . מענין פי׳ ולא נערוך אליו קדושתו · תו״א סב, ד: פי׳ שאפילו קדושתו שהוא קדוש ומובדל כו׳ לא נערוך אליו לפי שאינו בגדר עלמין כלל.
- 32ואמת ה׳ לעולם · Psalms 117:2
- 33
“My bread”: food and its higher root ¶7–11
7ב אך עכ״ז [עם כל זה] אל ה׳ ויאר לנו1 הארה רבה ועצומה מקדושה עליונה הזאת הנפלאה והנעלמה ע״י המצות שנתן לנו כי
2. But nevertheless, “Havayah is G‑d, and He has given us light”: a great and mighty illumination from this supernal holiness, wondrous and hidden, through the mitzvos that He gave us. For
Here section 2 begins. Even though G‑d’s holiness is set apart from all worlds, Psalms 118:27 says “Havayah is G‑d, and He has given us light”: through the mitzvos He gave us, a great illumination from that hidden holiness reaches us.
הנה בתורה ומצות נאמר לכו לחמו בלחמי2 והנה לחמו פי׳ לפי שהתורה היא לחם ומזון לנפש
of the Torah and mitzvos it is said, “Come, eat of My bread.” Now, “eat” is explained by the fact that the Torah is bread and nourishment for the soul,
The Torah and mitzvos are described in Proverbs 9:5 as wisdom’s invitation, “Come, eat of My bread.” That the Torah is called bread is easy to understand: it nourishes the soul.
כמו הלחם הגשמי שהוא מזון לגוף כו׳. אבל מ״מ לחמי צריך ביאור וכי לאכילה ושתיה כו׳.
just as physical bread is nourishment for the body, etc. But nevertheless, “My bread” needs explanation: is it, then, [a matter] of eating and drinking, etc.?
Just as bread nourishes the body, Torah nourishes the soul. But why “My bread,” as if the bread were G‑d’s? G‑d does not eat or drink, so the expression needs explaining.
The paragraph opens the second section: the hidden holiness shines to us through the mitzvos, and the verse “Come, eat of My bread” raises the question of how Torah and mitzvos can be called G‑d’s own bread.
The Gemara the Kehot note cites (Chagigah 14a) reads “every support of bread” as the masters of Talmud, quoting “Come, eat of My bread”: the study of the Torah is the bread that sustains.
Marei mekomos
- 1א-ל ה׳ ויאר לנו · Psalms 118:27
- 2לכו לחמו בלחמי · Proverbs 9:5
8וביאור הדבר הוא ע״ד מארז״ל [מאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] רעייתי פרנסתי12 ישראל מפרנסין3 כו׳, ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה יונתי הנ״ל.
And the explanation of the matter is along the lines of the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory: “My beloved” (rayasi) [means] “My provider” (parnasasi); “Israel provide,” etc. And see what is written about this in the discourse beginning “My dove,” mentioned above.
The Midrash (Shir HaShirim Rabbah on 1:9) reads ra’yasi, “My beloved,” as if from the root “to feed”: Israel are G‑d’s providers, who “feed” Him through the daily offerings. The Zohar likewise says that Israel provide for their Father in Heaven; this is the sense in which the mitzvos are “My bread.”
והענין כי הנה המאכל שהוא דצ״ח [דומם צומח חי] מחיה את האדם שהוא מדבר שהוא במדרגה יותר גבוה מהמאכל ואיך מחיה אותו המאכל,
And the matter is this: food, which is inanimate, vegetative and animal, gives life to man, who is a speaking being, who is on a higher level than the food. How, then, does the food give him life?
To explain how anything can “feed” G‑d, the Alter Rebbe first looks at ordinary eating. Food comes from the inanimate, vegetable and animal kingdoms, while man belongs to the “speaking” kingdom, the highest; so how can something lower give life to something higher?
אך ע״ז נאמר כי על כל מוצא פי4 ה׳ יחיה האדם שמוצא פי ה׳ הוא החיות של המאכל והם העשרה מאמרות שבהם5 נברא העולם6 שבמאמר
But of this it is said, “For by everything that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah does man live”: “that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah” is the life-force of the food, and these are the Ten Utterances by which the world was created—for by the utterance
Deuteronomy 8:3 answers: man lives not by the bread itself but by “that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” G‑d’s creative word within the food. That word is one of the Ten Utterances with which the world was created (Avos 5:1).
תדשא הארץ נברא הצומח ובמאמר תוצא הארץ7 נפש חיה8 נבראו הבע״ח [הבעלי חיים] וכח וחיות המאמר ההוא תמיד מלובש בו להחיותו ולקיימו והוא הוא המחיה את האדם. אך הרי גם האדם נברא במאמר נעשה אדם.910
“Let the earth sprout” the vegetation was created, and by the utterance “Let the earth bring forth living creatures” the animals were created; and the power and life-force of that utterance is always clothed in it, to give it life and to sustain it, and it is this that gives life to man. But man, too, was created by an utterance: “Let us make man.”
Each kind of food was created by its own utterance in Genesis 1, and that utterance remains clothed in it at every moment, keeping it in existence; this divine word is what actually nourishes the person who eats it. But this raises a new question: man too was created by an utterance, “Let us make man.”
The paragraph begins to explain “My bread” through the Sages’ reading of “My beloved” as “My provider,” and through the question of how food, lower than man, can give him life: the answer is the divine utterance clothed in the food.
Marei mekomos
- 1מארז״ל רעיתי פרנסתי · שהש״ר א׳ סד״ה לסוסתי.
- 2רעייתי פרנסתי · Shir HaShirim Rabbah 1:14
- 3ישראל מפרנסין · Zohar III, 7b
- 4כי על כל מוצא פי ה׳ · Deuteronomy 8:3
- 5העשרה מאמרות שבהם נבה״ע · אבות רפ״ה.
- 6העשרה מאמרות שבהם נברא העולם · Pirkei Avot 5:1
- 7תדשא הארץ . . תוצא הארץ · Genesis 1:11
- 8תוצא הארץ נפש חיה · Genesis 1:24
- 9נעשה אדם · שם א, כו.
- 10נעשה אדם · Genesis 1:26
9ויש בו ג״כ מוצא פי ה׳ ולמה צריך להמאכל שיחיה אותו. אבל הענין כי הנה כתיב אחור וקדם צרתני12 אחור למעשה בראשית3 וכו׳ שהאדם באמת הוא אחרון במעשה בראשית בזמן
And he too has in him “that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah”; why, then, does he need food to give him life? But the matter is this: it is written, “Behind and before You formed me”—“behind” [last] in the work of Creation, etc. For man is indeed last in the work of Creation in time,
If man has his own divine utterance, why does he need food? The answer begins with Psalms 139:5, “Behind and before You formed me,” which the Gemara (Eruvin 18a) reads as: man was last in the work of creation. Man was in fact created last, on the sixth day.
וגם במעלה מצד גופו ונפשו הבהמית כמאמר יתוש קדמך45 שכל הדברים דצ״ח [דומם צומח חי] אע״פ [אף על פי] שירדו מטה מטה מאד בעשייה גשמיות להיות יש ודבר גשמי מ״מ אינם דבר נפרד לגמרי
and also in rank, with respect to his body and his animal soul, as the saying goes, “A gnat preceded you.” For all the things that are inanimate, vegetative and animal, even though they descended very, very low into the physical World of Asiyah (Action), to be a yesh (a separate existence) and a physical thing, nevertheless are not a completely separate thing,
He is “last” in rank too, as far as his body and animal soul go, as the Midrash says, “A gnat came before you” (Vayikra Rabbah 14:1; Sanhedrin 38a). The inanimate, plants and animals, though they descended into physical existence, never become entirely separate from G‑d.
כמו האדם שיכול להיות נפרד לגמרי ח״ו [חס ושלום] ועובר6 על רצונו ית׳7 למרות עיני כבודו8 ועיין בס׳ ש״ב [של בינונים] פכ״ד, רק מצד עילוי נשמתו ונפשו האלקית לבדה הוא קדם במעלה יתירה על כל הנבראים
as is man, who can be completely separate, G‑d forbid, and transgress His will, blessed be He, “defying His glorious eyes”—see Sefer Shel Beinonim [the Tanya], chapter 24. Only by virtue of the eminence of his neshamah and his G‑dly soul alone is he “before,” with a surpassing superiority over all created beings.
Man, by contrast, can become completely separate, G‑d forbid, by transgressing G‑d’s will, as Tanya chapter 24 explains. Only his G‑dly soul makes him “before,” first in rank over every creature.
וגם מצד גופו ונפשו החיונית יש לו מעלה יתירה על הדצ״ח [הדומם צומח חי] ברוח חיים שבו שהיא נפש המדברת והמשכלת והמאמרות סדרן ממטה למעלה מתחלה תדשא הארץ9
And also with respect to his body and his vital soul he has a surpassing superiority over the inanimate, vegetative and animal, through the spirit of life within him, which is the speaking and intellectual soul. And the order of the utterances runs from below upward: first, “Let the earth sprout,”
Even his body and vital soul have an advantage over the lower kingdoms, because of his speaking, thinking soul. The order of creation in Genesis 1 runs from below upward, beginning with plants.
שהוא להיות הצומח ואח״כ ישרצו המים10 דגים שאינן בכלל בשר ואח״כ תוצא הארץ נפש חיה ובהמה11 ואח״כ נעשה אדם.12
which is for the vegetation to come into being; afterwards, “Let the waters swarm”—fish, which are not included in [the category of] meat; afterwards, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures,” and cattle; and afterwards, “Let us make man.”
After plants came fish, which the Alter Rebbe notes do not count as “meat,” then land animals, and last of all man. Man’s place at the end of this rising order fits his being “behind,” last, in the work of creation.
The paragraph explains that in the order of creation man is last, in time and, as to his body and animal soul, in rank, since he alone can rebel against G‑d; only his G‑dly soul places him first.
Marei mekomos
- 1אחור וקדם צרתני · תהלים קלט. ה.
- 2אחור וקדם צרתני · Psalms 139:5
- 3אחור למעשה בראשית · Eruvin 18a:17–18
- 4יתוש קדמך · Sanhedrin 38a:13
- 5יתוש קדמך · Vayikra Rabbah 14:1
- 6להיות — ועובר · ויעבור. [כ].
- 7ועובר על רצונו ית׳ · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 24:6
- 8למרות עיני כבודו · Isaiah 3:8
- 9תדשא הארץ · Genesis 1:11
- 10ישרצו המים · Genesis 1:20
- 11תוצא הארץ נפש חיה ובהמה · Genesis 1:24
- 12נעשה אדם · Genesis 1:26
10והנה כל זה הוא בבחי׳ ירידת המדרגות והתהוות השתלשלותם מאין ליש, אבל במקורם ושרשם למעלה מעלה מסדר ההשתלשלות
Now, all this is in terms of the descent of the levels and the coming into being of their chain of descent (hishtalshelus) from nothing into something. But in their source and root, far above the order of the chain of descending worlds,
All this describes the order of creation as it descends, step by step, from nothing into something. At the roots of things, far above that chain of descent, the order is reversed.
הנה הוא להיפך שבחי׳ נפש אלקית שבאדם הוא1 בחינת אחור לגבי מקור וחיות הגוף ונפש הבהמית שנלקחו ממדרגות עליונות וגבוהות מאד
it is the reverse: the level of the G‑dly soul in man is the level of “behind” relative to the source and life-force of the body and the animal soul, which were taken from very lofty and high levels,
At the root, the G‑dly soul is “behind,” lower, compared with the source of the body and the animal soul, which come from very high levels. So the Psalm’s “behind and before” works in both directions.
אלא שנפלו בשבירת הכלים כנודע ושם הוא חיות הדצ״ח [הדומם צומח חי] גבוה ונעלה במעלה יתירה אלא שנפלו למטה יותר בחיות מצומצם מאד
except that they fell in the breaking of the vessels, as is known. And there is the life-force of the inanimate, vegetative and animal, high and exalted with a surpassing superiority, except that they fell lower, into a very contracted life-force,
Those very high levels fell in “the breaking of the vessels,” the Kabbalistic account of how the vessels of the early world of Tohu could not contain its great lights, broke, and fell down into lower existence. The source of the minerals, plants and animals is likewise very exalted, but they fell lower, to a very constricted kind of life.
כמו דומם וצומח כו׳ וכמשל מנפילת החומה שעליון שבה נופל למטה יותר בריחוק מקום יותר כנודע.
such as the inanimate and vegetative, etc.—like the analogy of a falling wall, whose uppermost [part] falls lower, at a greater distance, as is known.
This is why the lowest kingdoms, like stone and plants, have the most constricted life. As when a wall collapses, the stones from the top fall farthest away: the higher the origin, the lower the fall.
The paragraph shows that the order of creation is reversed at the root: the body, the animal soul and the lower kingdoms come from very high levels that fell lowest in the breaking of the vessels.
This reversal explains the Psalm’s “behind and before”: as to his body and animal soul man is last, yet their root is higher than that of his G‑dly soul. It also prepares the maamar’s later point that physical things used for mitzvos can draw down light from a level higher than the soul’s own.
Marei mekomos
- 1שבחי׳ נפש אלקית שבאדם הוא בחי׳ אחור לגבי מקור וחיות הגוף ונה״ב · מובא ביהל אור לקאפיטל קלט ע״פ אחור וקדם ומציין גם ”ובהביאור שם פ״ב כי ס״ג הוא למעלה ממ״ה, והרי עולם התיקון הוא ע״י מסכים ומיעוט האור, ובד״ה שובה ישראל עד נת׳ שהחכמה נק׳ אחור כמ״ש חכם באחור ישבחנה” ע״ש.
11ולפיכך המאכל שהוא מדצ״ח [מדומם צומח חי] מחיה את האדם ויש לו יתרון מעלה על האדם שהאדם צריך להמאכל למלאות די מחסורו אשר יחסר לו1 מבלעדי הלחם והמאכל משא״כ המאכל אין צריך להאדם.
Therefore food, which is from the inanimate, vegetative and animal, gives life to man, and it has an advantage of superiority over man: for man needs the food to supply “sufficient for his need, that which he lacks,” without bread and food; whereas the food does not need man.
Since food comes from a higher root than man, it has an advantage over him: man depends on food to supply what he lacks (in the words of Deuteronomy 15:8), while food does not depend on man.
וזהו כי על כל מוצא פי ה׳ כי מוצא יש לו ב׳ פירושים מוצא מה שכבר יצא מפי ה׳ התפשטות החיות מרוח פיו בעשרה מאמרות שנברא העולם ומוצא לשון מקור וחיי החיים
And this is [the meaning of] “For by everything that comes forth (motza) from the mouth of Havayah”: for motza has two meanings. Motza [is] that which has already come forth from the mouth of Havayah—the extension of the life-force from the breath of His mouth in the Ten Utterances by which the world was created. And motza [is] a term for source, and the Life of all life,
This explains the verse “by everything that comes forth (motza) from the mouth of Havayah.” Motza has two meanings; the first is what has already come out of G‑d’s mouth, the life-force that spread out in the Ten Utterances of creation.
כמו מוצא מים2 שהוא המקור הנובע המעיין דהיינו המקור שממנו יצאו העשרה מאמרות שבמקורן ושרשן הדצ״ח [הדומם צומח חי] מאד נעלה ונמשכים ומשתלשלים ויורדים למטה עליהם ממדריגות עליונות ולפיכך יחיה האדם:
as in motza mayim (a spring of water), which is the welling source, the fountain—namely, the source from which the Ten Utterances came forth, in whose source and root the inanimate, vegetative and animal are very exalted; and they are drawn down, descend link by link, and come down upon them from higher levels. And therefore “does man live.”
The second meaning is “source,” as in motza mayim, a spring of water: the wellspring from which the Ten Utterances came forth, where the lower kingdoms have their exalted root. Because the food carries life from that higher source down to man, “man lives” by it.
The paragraph concludes that food sustains man because of its higher root, and reads motza in the verse in two ways: the divine word already spoken, and the higher source from which that word flows.
Marei mekomos
- 1די מחסרו אשר יחסר לו · Deuteronomy 15:8
- 2כמו מוצא מים · Isaiah 58:11
The Supernal Will drawn through action ¶12–15
12ג והנה ככל הדברים האלה וככל המשל הזה בחיות הלחם הגשמי המחיה את הגוף אדם הגשמי.
3. Now, in accordance with all these words and all this analogy of the life-force of physical bread, which gives life to the body of physical man,
Here section 3 begins. Everything said about physical bread giving life to the human body serves as an analogy.
so, in the same way, it is written, “For by everything that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah does man live”—the Man above; that is, what is written, “And upon the likeness of the throne, a likeness like the appearance of a man.”
The verse “by everything that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah does man live” applies also to the “Man” above. This is the figure Ezekiel saw upon the throne, “a likeness like the appearance of a man” (Ezekiel 1:26).
כי נק׳ אדם3 מלשון אדמה לעליון4 כי כמו שבאדם למטה יש רמ״ח אברים כו׳ שבהם ועל ידם מתחלק החיות שבתוכו העין רואה כו׳
For it is called adam (man) from the expression “I will be like (adameh) the Most High.” For just as in man below there are 248 limbs, etc., in which and through which the life-force within him is divided—the eye sees, etc.—
The supernal level is called adam, “man,” from Isaiah 14:14, “I will be like (adameh) the Most High,” since it is the likeness of the Most High. In a human being below, the life-force divides into 248 limbs, each with its own function, such as the eye that sees.
כך למעלה התפשטות החיות הוא בריבוי התחלקות הנבראים מלאכים ונשמות בכמה מיני מדרגות ממדרגות שונות כמ״ש עיני5 ה׳ כו׳ אזני6 ה׳ כו׳
so too above, the extension of the life-force is in the multiplicity of the divisions of the created beings, angels and souls, in many kinds of levels, of different levels, as it is written, “The eyes of Havayah,” etc., “The ears of Havayah,” etc.,
In the same way, the divine life-force above divides into the many kinds and levels of created beings, angels and souls. This is why Scripture speaks of “the eyes of Havayah” and “the ears of Havayah.”
שיש מלאכים ונשמות שנקראים כך והתפשטות החיות של כל אחד ואחד כפי מדריגתו ומזגו ותכונתו נק׳ בשם אדם שהוא בחי׳ ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין].7
for there are angels and souls that are called thus. And the extension of the life-force of each and every one according to its level, its temperament and its character is called by the name adam, which is the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin).
Some angels and souls are called by these names, as the “eyes” or “ears” of G‑d. The divine life-force spread through all of them, each according to its level and nature, is called “Man,” and it is the light that fills all worlds, memalei kol almin.
ולכן כתיב כמראה אדם ולא בחי׳ אדם עצמו ממש8 [ועמ״ש עוד מזה בפ׳ משפטים קכ״ב9 א׳ ועמ״ש בד״ה ויראו כו׳ ותחת רגליו1011 כו׳ ע״ש].
And therefore it is written, “like the appearance of a man,” and not the level of the actual Man himself. [And see what is written further about this in Parshas Mishpatim, 122a, and see what is written in the discourse beginning “And they saw,” etc., “and beneath His feet,” etc.; see there.]
This is why Ezekiel says only “like the appearance of a man”: the light that fills the worlds is only an appearance of Man, not the supernal Man himself. The bracket points to the Zohar on Mishpatim (122a) and to the Torah Ohr discourse on “And they saw the G‑d of Israel, and beneath His feet” for more on this.
The paragraph applies the analogy of bread to the “Man” above: the divine life-force spread through all creatures, called “like the appearance of a man,” is the light that fills all worlds.
The Kehot notes point to the Tikkunei Zohar (introduction, 6b; Tikkun 22, 66a) on the difference between “like the appearance of a man” and the Man himself.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי על כל מוצא פי ה׳ יחיה האדם · Deuteronomy 8:3
- 2ועל דמות הכסא · Ezekiel 1:26
- 3נק׳ אדם מל׳ אדמה לעליון · ראה לעיל פ׳ במדבר יג, ב. וראה בהנסמן במאמרי אדה״א במדבר-ג ע׳ א׳קא.
- 4אדמה לעליון · Isaiah 14:14
- 5עיני ה׳ · Psalms 34:16
- 6אזני ה׳ · Numbers 11:1
- 7נק׳ בשם אדם שהוא בחי׳ ממכ״ע · ראה ד״ה פתח אלי׳ — תרנ״ח ע׳ יב ושם מציין לעיין בד״ה ויטע אשל תר״ל ע׳ יז.
- 8כמראה אדם ולא . . ממש · ע׳ בהקדמת ת״ז (ו, ע״ב). שם (תכ״ב) ד׳ סו, א. [כ].
- 9משפטים קכ״ב א׳ · ראה גם אוה״ת פ׳ ואתחנן ע׳ פו. שבועות ע׳ קלב.
- 10בד״ה ויראו כו׳ ותחת רגליו · תו״א עז, א. ראה בספר הערכים-א טור תרפב.
- 11ויראו כו׳ ותחת רגליו · Exodus 24:10
13והנה חיות הנמשך1 לבחי׳ ומדריגה זו להיות ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין] ולהחיות רוח שפלים2 הוא מבחי׳ מוצא פי ה׳ הוא מקור עליון וראשיתא דכולא בחי׳ סוכ״ע ונק׳ רצון העליון
Now, the life-force that is drawn to this level and rank—to be the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin) and “to revive the spirit of the lowly”—is from the level of “that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” which is the supernal source and “the beginning of all,” the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), and is called the Supernal Will.
The life-force of the light that fills all worlds, which revives “the spirit of the lowly” (Isaiah 57:15), comes from a higher level: the source of the divine word, “the beginning of all,” the light that encompasses all worlds. This higher level is called the Supernal Will.
כי אית רצון3 ואית רצון ורצון העליון הוא פי׳ שעליון על כל העולמות שאינו יכול להתלבש תוך עלמין כלל
For “there is will and there is will.” And “Supernal Will” means that it is supernal over all the worlds, that it cannot clothe itself within the worlds at all,
There are two levels of divine will, “there is will and there is will.” The Supernal Will is above all worlds and cannot enter them at all.
שהוא סתימא דכל סתימין ולית מחשבה תפיסא ביה כלל ורצון התחתון הוא מה שמתלבש תוך עלמין כו׳, והנה רצון העליון הוא מקור התורה והמצות,
for it is “the most hidden of all hidden,” and “no thought can grasp Him at all”; while the lower will is that which clothes itself within the worlds, etc. Now, the Supernal Will is the source of the Torah and the mitzvos.
The Supernal Will is utterly hidden, beyond the grasp of any thought, while the lower will is the one that clothes itself within the worlds. The source of the Torah and mitzvos is the Supernal Will.
ולכן נק׳ לחמי ורעיתי פרנסתי שע״י אתערותא דלתתא אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא] להמשיך חיות ממקור וחיי החיים מבחי׳ סוכ״ע לבחינת ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין] ואתעדל״ת [ואתערותא דלתתא] זו הוא ע״י מעשה המצות דוקא בעשייה גשמיות,
And therefore it is called “My bread,” and “My beloved—My provider”: for through an arousal from below [comes] an arousal from above, to draw down life-force from the Source and the Life of all life, from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds to the level of the light that fills all worlds. And this arousal from below is through the deed of the mitzvos specifically, in physical action,
This is why the mitzvos are called G‑d’s “bread” and Israel His “providers”: the human “arousal from below” calls forth an “arousal from above,” drawing life from the encompassing light into the light that fills the worlds. That arousal from below is the physical performance of the mitzvos.
וגם ע״י דבור התורה דעקימת שפתים הוי מעשה משא״כ הרהור לאו כדיבור דמי45 והרהור לא עביד מידי6 מפני שכח המעשה והדבור נלקח7
and also through the speech of Torah, for “the movement of the lips is [considered] an action”; whereas “thought is not like speech,” and “thought does nothing.” For the power of action and speech is taken
Speaking words of Torah also counts, since the Gemara rules that moving one’s lips is an action. Mere thought does not: “thought is not like speech” (Berachos 20b), and “thought does nothing,” as the Zohar says. The power of action and speech comes from eating, as the next part explains.
מכח האכילה שאוכל שעי״ז מתחזק כחו לדבר ולעשות וכח האכילה בשרשו ומקורו הוא יותר גבוה ונעלה מאשר תוכל נפשו שאת לפי מקור חוצבו כנ״ל.
from the power of the eating that he eats, through which his strength to speak and to act is reinforced. And the power of eating, in its root and source, is higher and more exalted than what his soul can bear according to the source from which it was hewn, as mentioned above.
Food reinforces a person’s ability to speak and act. The power of food is rooted higher than the soul’s own source, as explained above, so speech and action can draw down from a level higher than the soul could reach by itself.
The paragraph identifies the source of the divine word with the Supernal Will, the source of the Torah and mitzvos, which cannot enter the worlds, and explains that only physical action and speech, empowered by food’s high root, can draw it down.
The two levels of will match the two lights already described: the lower will is the light that fills all worlds, entering each and giving it life in its measure, while the Supernal Will is the encompassing light. Torah and mitzvos come from the higher will, which is why they can draw it down.
Marei mekomos
- 1והנה חיות הנמשך · תוכן הדברים מכאן מובא באוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תקסח.
- 2ולהחיות רוח שפלים · Isaiah 57:15
- 3אית רצון · בזה״ק ל״מ. [כ]. מובא בכ״מ בדא״ח בשם הזהר. וראה הערת כ״ק אדמו״ר בסה״מ תש״ט ע׳ 113. וראה בארוכה במאמרי אדה״א כאן ע׳ א׳תשט.
- 4הרהור לאו כדיבור דמי · ברכות כ, סע״ב.
- 5הרהור לאו כדיבור דמי · Berakhot 20b:20–21
- 6והרהור לא עביד מידי · Zohar III, 105a
- 7דעקימת שפתיו הוה מעשה · Bava Metzia 90b:13–14
14וכך יוכל להיות עי״ז אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא] ממעלה מעלה מבחי׳ סוכ״ע וכן מעשה המצות עצמן כגון אתרוג ולולב כו׳
And so, through this there can be an arousal from above from the very highest, from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin). And likewise the deed of the mitzvos themselves, such as esrog and lulav, etc.:
Because speech and action draw on food’s high root, they can bring an arousal from above from the very highest level, the light that encompasses all worlds. The same is true of the objects used for mitzvos, such as the esrog and the lulav.
שהאתרוג הוא מאכל בפ״ע [בפני עצמו] וכן הלולב הוא צומח עכ״פ [על כל פנים] ויש להם מעלה יתירה שבהם ועל ידם יומשך אתעדל״ע [אתערותא דלעילא] מבחינה עליונה וגבוה מאד.
for the esrog is a food in itself, and the lulav, too, is at any rate a plant; and they have a surpassing superiority, in that in them and through them an arousal from above will be drawn down from a very supernal and lofty level.
The esrog is itself a food, and the lulav is at least a plant, so they too come from the high root of the lower kingdoms. That is why performing mitzvos with them can draw down an arousal from a very high level.
The paragraph extends the principle to the objects of the mitzvos: because things like the esrog and lulav have a very high root, mitzvos done with them draw down light from the encompassing level.
15וכן צמר הציצית ומעות הצדקה וכו׳ משא״כ הרהור ומחשבה הוא בחינת חשב מ״ה [שם מ״ה]12 שהוא בחי׳ אדם עצמו ואין כח לאתערותא זו להמשיך חיים עליונים כל כך.
And likewise the wool of the tzitzis and the coins of charity, etc. Whereas reflection and thought (machshavah) is the level of “chashav Mah,” which is the level of Adam himself, and this arousal does not have the power to draw down supernal life to such an extent.
Other mitzvah objects, like the wool of tzitzis and the coins given to charity, likewise come from the lower kingdoms and share their high root. Thought is different: the Zohar reads machshavah, “thought,” as chashav Mah, and Mah has the numerical value of Adam (45), so thought is on the level of man himself. Because it rises no higher than man, it cannot draw down supernal life to such a degree.
וזהו יפה שעה אחת בתשובה3 ומע״ט [ומעשים טובים] בעוה״ז מכל חיי העוה״ב [העולם הבא]4 כי העוה״ב [העולם הבא] הוא שנהנים מזיו השכינה הוא זיו והארה מרובה ותוספת
And this is [the meaning of] “One hour of teshuvah (return) and good deeds in this world is better than all the life of the World to Come.” For the World to Come is that “they delight in the radiance of the Shechinah (Divine Presence),” which is an abundant radiance and illumination, and an increase
This explains the Mishnah, “One hour of teshuvah and good deeds in this world is better than all the life of the World to Come” (Avos 4:17). The Gemara (Berachos 17a) describes the World to Come as the righteous delighting in the radiance of the Shechinah, an abundant revelation that adds to the delight of the souls.
תענוג הנשמות בגילוי בבחי׳ ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין] הנק׳ בשם שכינה ששוכן ומתלבש בעולמות והנה הכח והחיות הנמשך לבחינת ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין] מבחי׳ סוכ״ע הוא נעשה ע״י תשובה ומע״ט [ומעשים טובים] כנ״ל.
in the delight of the souls, in revelation, in the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin), which is called by the name Shechinah, for it dwells and clothes itself in the worlds. And the power and life-force drawn to the level of the light that fills all worlds from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin) is brought about through teshuvah and good deeds, as mentioned above.
That delight is a revelation of the light that fills all worlds, called Shechinah because it “dwells” (shochen) in the worlds. The added light it receives comes from the encompassing light, and it is drawn down by teshuvah and good deeds in this world.
נמצא שהם העושים הזיו והתענוג שבג״ע [שבגן עדן]. ולכן גדלה מעלתם מכל חיי העוה״ב [העולם הבא] שהם הם הממשיכים חיי העוה״ב [העולם הבא] כנ״ל:5
It follows that they are what make the radiance and the delight of Gan Eden. And therefore their superiority is greater than all the life of the World to Come, for they are the very ones that draw down the life of the World to Come, as mentioned above.
So teshuvah and good deeds are what produce the radiance and delight of Gan Eden. That is why an hour of them is greater than all the life of the World to Come: they are its very cause.
The paragraph contrasts physical mitzvos with mere thought, and explains why an hour of teshuvah and good deeds in this world surpasses the World to Come: they draw down the very light the souls enjoy there.
Here the meaning of “My bread” becomes clear: the revelation in Gan Eden, the light that fills the worlds, receives its added light from the encompassing light above it, and that light is drawn down only by deeds done below. What the souls enjoy above is “fed” by the mitzvos of this world.
Marei mekomos
- 1ומחשבה . . חש״ב מ״ה · זח״א (כד, א). [כ].
- 2חשב מ״ה · Zohar, Bereshit 17:193–18:204
- 3יפה שעה אחת בתשובה · אבות ד, יז.
- 4יפה שעה אחת בתשובה ומע״ט בעוה״ז מכל חיי העוה״ב · Pirkei Avot 4:17
- 5העולם הבא הוא שנהנין · Berakhot 17a:12
The desire of the heart and “Who has sanctified us” ¶16–19
16והנה לפי שהתורה והמצות הם בחי׳ רצון העליון לכך יש להם כח להמשיך לנפש האדם ג״כ בחי׳ רצון העליון
Now, because the Torah and the mitzvos are the level of the Supernal Will, they therefore have the power to draw down to the soul of man, too, the level of the Supernal Will.
Since Torah and mitzvos are the Supernal Will, they can also draw a corresponding “supernal will” into the human soul. The soul too has two levels of will.
כי גם בנפש האדם למטה ג״כ אית רצון ואית רצון שיש שמעורר את רצון והאהבה הטבעית המסותרת שבנפשו לגלותה מההעלם אל הגילוי לדבקה בו ית׳ מחמת התבוננות בגדולתו ית׳ המחיה חיים
For in the soul of man below, too, “there is will and there is will.” There is [the case] where one arouses the will and the natural love hidden in his soul, to bring it out from concealment into revelation, to cleave to Him, blessed be He, through contemplating His greatness, blessed be He, who gives life to the living,
The first is the will a person awakens by himself. By contemplating G‑d’s greatness, he brings the natural love for G‑d hidden in his soul out into the open, and comes to long to cleave to Him; this contemplation dwells on G‑d as the One who gives life to all that lives.
which is the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin), as much as his soul can bear, “each one according to his own measure”; and this is the level of “and with all your soul.”
That life-giving greatness is the light that fills all worlds, which each person grasps only as far as his soul can bear, “each according to his measure” (Zohar 1:103a). This love corresponds to “with all your soul” (Deuteronomy 6:5), a love measured by the soul’s capacity.
אך יש רצון שהוא למעלה הימנו ומבקשי ה׳ יבינו כל3 שלפעמים תתלהב ותתלהט הנפש באהבה רבה עזה ועצומה בבחי׳ ובכל מאדך מאד יותר מכדי מדת הנפש בהשגתה באור פני ה׳
But there is a will that is higher than it—and “those who seek Havayah understand all”—that at times the soul will be kindled and set ablaze with an abundant love (ahavah rabbah), strong and mighty, in the level of “and with all your might (me’odecha)”: very much (me’od) more than the measure of the soul in its comprehension of the light of G‑d’s countenance,
Above it is a higher will, as “those who seek Havayah understand all” (Proverbs 28:5). At times the soul blazes with ahavah rabbah, a great and mighty love, corresponding to “with all your might (me’od)”: a love “very much” beyond the soul’s measure and beyond what it grasps of G‑d’s light.
אלא מחמת ביטול השגתה דלית מחשבה תפיסא ביה סתימא דכל סתימין והוא בחי׳ רעותא דליבא דלית מחשבה תפיסא ביה
but rather because of the nullification of its comprehension, for “no thought can grasp Him,” “the most hidden of all hidden.” And this is the level of the desire of the heart (re’usa deliba), which no thought can grasp,
This love comes not from understanding but from understanding falling silent, the realization that no thought can grasp G‑d at all. It is called re’usa deliba, “the desire of the heart,” a yearning that is itself beyond thought.
והוא בחי׳ אהבה רבה שלמעלה מעלה מהעולמות שאינה יכולה להתלבש תוך עלמין אלא כמו שכתוב מי לי בשמים4 ועמך לא חפצתי בארץ.
and this is the level of ahavah rabbah, which is far above the worlds, which cannot clothe itself within the worlds; rather, as it is written, “Whom do I have in heaven? And with You I desire nothing on earth.”
This ahavah rabbah is far above the worlds and cannot be contained within them. Psalms 73:25 expresses it: “Whom do I have in heaven? And with You I desire nothing on earth,” a longing for G‑d Himself and for nothing in any world.
משא״כ האהבה הבאה מחמת התבוננות והשגה בגדולתו יתברך נק׳ אהבת עולם כנודע ואהבה רבה זו שהיא בחינת רעותא דליבא היא באה מלמעלה על ידי התורה והמצות
Whereas the love that comes from contemplation and comprehension of His greatness, blessed be He, is called ahavas olam (“an everlasting love”), as is known. And this ahavah rabbah, which is the level of the desire of the heart, comes from above through the Torah and the mitzvos,
The love born of contemplating G‑d’s greatness is called ahavas olam, a name Chassidus connects with olam, the world, since it grows from contemplating G‑d’s life within the worlds. Ahavah rabbah, the desire of the heart, instead comes from above, given through the Torah and the mitzvos.
which are themselves the Supernal Will—His will and His wisdom, blessed be He. [As is also written about this above, on the verse “Who has counted the dust of Yaakov,” and on the verse “And now, let it be great, I pray.”]
The Torah and mitzvos are themselves G‑d’s will and wisdom, so they can bestow this love. The bracket refers to discussions of the same theme on “Who has counted the dust of Yaakov” (Numbers 23:10) and “And now, let it be great, I pray” (Numbers 14:17).
The paragraph distinguishes two loves in the soul: ahavas olam, born of contemplating G‑d’s greatness and limited by the soul’s grasp, and ahavah rabbah, the “desire of the heart” beyond understanding, which comes from above through the Torah and mitzvos.
The two loves mirror the two levels of will above: the love from contemplation answers to the light that fills all worlds, while the desire of the heart answers to the Supernal Will, which cannot be clothed in the worlds. So “there is will and there is will” holds both above and in the soul.
Marei mekomos
- 1כל חד וחד לפום שיעורא דילי׳ · Zohar I, 103a
- 2ובכל נפשך · Deuteronomy 6:5
- 3ומבקשי ה׳ יבינו כל · Proverbs 28:5
- 4מי לי בשמים · Psalms 73:25
- 5לעיל ע״פ מי מנה · פ׳ בלק סז, ד.
- 6מי מנה עפר יעקב · Numbers 23:10
- 7ועתה יגדל נא · Numbers 14:17
17וזו היא בחינת הלחם והמזון שנעשה לנפש האדם ע״י התורה והמצות שהמוצא פי ה׳ שהוא מקור התורה והמצות עליו יחיה האדם1 ותחיה נפשו במקור וחיי החיים ית׳ דלית מחשבה תפיסא ביה כו׳,
And this is the level of the bread and the nourishment that is made for the soul of man through the Torah and the mitzvos: that by “that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” which is the source of the Torah and the mitzvos, “does man live,” and his soul will live in the Source and Life of all life, blessed be He, whom “no thought can grasp,” etc.
This love is the “bread” that Torah and mitzvos make for the soul. Since their source is “that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” the soul lives by it, in the very Source of life, beyond all thought.
ואין רעותא דליבא זו באה דוקא מחמת ההתבוננות איך שהתורה נותנת חיים ואיך נמשך החיות רק
And this desire of the heart does not come specifically through contemplating how the Torah gives life and how the life-force is drawn down; rather,
The desire of the heart does not depend on first understanding how the Torah gives life or how that life is drawn down. It comes in another way, as the next comparison shows.
כמו המאכל שמחיה את האדם בגשמיות אף אם אינו מבין האיך המאכל מתעכל ונהפך לדם ואיך תשוב להיות בשר כבשרו ואיך הוא כח הדוחה הפסולת כו׳
just as food gives life to man physically even if he does not understand how the food is digested and turned into blood, and how it becomes flesh like his flesh, and how the power that expels the waste [works], etc.,
Physical food keeps a person alive even if he knows nothing of how it is digested, turned into blood and then into flesh, or how the body expels the waste. Its effect does not depend on his understanding.
אלא ממילא יחיה האדם כך בחי׳ רעותא דליבא זו נמשכה מאליה וממילא ע״י קיום התורה והמצות.
but rather man lives as a matter of course—so this level of the desire of the heart is drawn down of itself and as a matter of course, through the fulfillment of the Torah and the mitzvos.
Just as a person lives from food as a matter of course, the desire of the heart comes of itself to one who fulfills the Torah and mitzvos. Understanding is not its precondition.
The paragraph explains that this higher love is the soul’s bread: it comes of itself through keeping the Torah and mitzvos, just as food nourishes without the eater understanding how.
Marei mekomos
- 1יחיה האדם · Deuteronomy 8:3
18וזהו אשר קדשנו במצותיו שע״י המצות נמשך קדושה עליונה מבחי׳ קדוש ומובדל דהיינו מה שאינו יכול להתלבש תוך עלמין הוא בחי׳
And this is [the meaning of] “Who has sanctified us with His commandments”: that through the mitzvos a supernal holiness is drawn down from the level of “holy and set apart”—that is, that which cannot clothe itself within the worlds, which is the level of
Now the blessing “Who has sanctified us with His commandments” can be explained. Through the mitzvos, holiness is drawn down from the level that is “holy and set apart,” the level that cannot be clothed within the worlds.
רצון העליון כנ״ל לקדש אותו ג״כ שיומשך לנפש האדם גילוי הארה זו בנפשו להיות האהבה ורצון העליון שבנפש שהוא בחינת רעותא דליבא ואהבה רבה הנ״ל.
the Supernal Will, as mentioned above—to sanctify him, too: that the revelation of this illumination be drawn down to the soul of man, into his soul, so that there be the love and the supernal will in the soul, which is the level of the desire of the heart and ahavah rabbah mentioned above.
That level is the Supernal Will. Its light is drawn into the person’s soul and sanctifies him too, becoming in him a love and a “supernal will” of his own: the desire of the heart, ahavah rabbah.
וזהו ועשיתם את כל מצותי1 והייתם קדושים לאלקיכם שע״י המצות יהיה שורה בכם קדושה העליונה ממש להיות קדושה זו שוה לאלקיכם
And this is [the meaning of] “And you shall do all My commandments and be holy to your G‑d”: that through the mitzvos the very supernal holiness will rest upon you, so that this holiness be equal to your G‑d.
Numbers 15:40, “You shall do all My commandments and be holy to your G‑d,” is read to mean that through the mitzvos G‑d’s own supernal holiness rests on a person. His holiness becomes, as it were, equal to that of his G‑d.
(ועמ״ש בפי׳ לשון קדושה ע״פ מקושש עצים2 בפ׳ שלח) וזהו ענין הברכה ברוך הוא המשכה להיות הוי׳ שמהווה כל הויות
(And see what is written on the meaning of the term “holiness” on the verse “gathering wood” in Parshas Shelach.) And this is the matter of the blessing: “Blessed” (baruch) is a drawing down, so that there be Havayah, which brings all existences into being,
The text refers to its explanation of the word “holiness” in the discourse on the wood-gatherer in Parshas Shelach. It then reads the blessing word by word: baruch, “blessed,” means drawing down, so that Havayah, the Name that brings all existence into being, is revealed.
דהיינו שרש ומקור כל ההתהוות שיהיה בחי׳ אלקינו שיתאחד עמנו באחדות אחד למהוי אחד באחד3 ע״י אשר
that is, the root and source of all coming-into-being: that it be the level of “our G‑d,” that He unite with us in a single unity, “to be one with one,” through “Who” (asher),
Havayah is the root and source of all existence, and the blessing asks that it become “our G‑d,” united with us “to be one with one,” in the Zohar’s phrase. This comes about through the word asher, “Who.”
שהוא בחי׳ עונג העליון שמשם נמשך להיות קדשנו בקדושתו ממש ע״י מצות יו בקדש העליון שהוא למעלה מעלה מבחי׳ עלמין שמזה נמשך רעותא דליבא לנפש
which is the level of the supernal delight, from which it is drawn down to be “has sanctified us” with His very holiness, through “His commandments” (mitzvos-yud-vav), in the supernal holiness (kodesh), which is far above the level of the worlds; from which the desire of the heart is drawn down to the soul.
Asher is read as the level of supernal delight, from which comes “has sanctified us” with G‑d’s very holiness. The text divides mitzvosav, “His commandments,” into “mitzvos” and the letters yud-vav, linking them to the supernal holiness far above the worlds, from which the desire of the heart reaches the soul.
ואזי נקרא נפש האדם עצמה בחינת אחור לגבי רעותא דליבא הנמשך לו שהוא בחי׳ קדם מקדמונו של עולם:
And then the soul of man itself is called the level of “behind” relative to the desire of the heart that is drawn down to him, which is the level of “before,” from the Primordial One of the world.
Then the soul itself counts as “behind” compared with the desire of the heart it receives, which is “before,” coming from the Primordial One of the world. This applies “behind and before” once more: what reaches the soul through the mitzvos is higher than the soul itself.
The paragraph reads the blessing “Who has sanctified us with His commandments” word by word: through the mitzvos, the holiness set apart from the worlds, the Supernal Will, is drawn into the soul as the desire of the heart, a love higher than the soul itself.
Marei mekomos
- 1ועשיתם את כל מצותי · Numbers 15:40
- 2מקושש עצים · Numbers 15:32
- 3למהוי אחד באחד · Zohar II, 135a
19קיצור. פי׳ אקב״ו [אשר קדשנו במצותיו וצונו] כי חיות כל העולמות הוא רק מבחי׳ מלכותו ית׳ אבל במהותו ועצמותו ית׳ לית מחשבה תפיסא וזהו ענין קדוש מובדל.
Summary. The meaning of “Who has sanctified us with His commandments and commanded us”: the life-force of all the worlds is only from the level of His Malchus (sovereignty), blessed be He, but in His being and essence, blessed be He, “no thought can grasp”; and this is the meaning of “holy”: set apart.
This is a summary of the discussion so far. The blessing “Who has sanctified us with His commandments and commanded us” means that the worlds live only from G‑d’s Malchus, while His essence is beyond thought; that separateness is His holiness.
וע״י התומ״צ [התורה ומצות] נמשך מקדושה זו ממש כי הנה כתיב לכו לחמו בלחמי1 ופי׳ לחמי היינו דכמו שהאדם מקבל חיות מהלחם לפי ששרשו מבחינת מוצא פי ה׳ מוצא היינו מקור.
And through the Torah and mitzvos there is a drawing down from this very holiness. For it is written, “Come, eat of My bread”; and the meaning of “My bread” is: just as man receives life-force from bread because its root is from the level of “that which comes forth (motza) from the mouth of Havayah”—motza meaning source—
Through Torah and mitzvos something of that very holiness is drawn down, as “Come, eat of My bread” implies. Bread sustains a person because its root is in “that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” with motza meaning “source.”
כן בחי׳ ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין] הנק׳ כמראה אדם2 נמשך לבחינה זו חיות מבחי׳ רצון עליון הסוכ״ע והיינו ע״י התורה ומצות שנתלבשו בעשייה שבהן ועל ידן נמשך רצון העליון וזהו ענין רעיתי פרנסתי ולחמי.
so [with] the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin), which is called “like the appearance of a man”: life-force is drawn to this level from the level of the Supernal Will, the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin); and this is through the Torah and mitzvos, which have been clothed in action, in which and through which the Supernal Will is drawn down. And this is the meaning of “My beloved—My provider” and “My bread.”
In the same way, the light that fills all worlds, called “like the appearance of a man,” receives its life from the Supernal Will, the encompassing light. It receives it through the Torah and mitzvos, which are clothed in physical action, and this is why they are called G‑d’s “bread” and Israel His “providers.”
ומהמשכה זו נמשך ג״כ לנפש האדם בחינת רצון העליון לבא לבחינת ובכל מאדך3 אהבה רבה וזהו אק״ב [אשר קדשנו במצותיו] והייתם קדושים:4
And from this drawing down, the level of the Supernal Will is drawn to the soul of man, too, to come to the level of “and with all your might”: ahavah rabbah. And this is [the meaning of] “Who has sanctified us with His commandments” and “You shall be holy.”
From this drawing down, the Supernal Will also reaches the human soul, bringing it to “with all your might,” ahavah rabbah. This is the meaning of “Who has sanctified us with His commandments” and “You shall be holy.”
A summary: the worlds live from G‑d’s kingship while His holiness is beyond them; the Torah and mitzvos draw that holiness down, as bread draws life from its source, into the worlds and into the soul as ahavah rabbah.
Marei mekomos
- 1לכו לחמו בלחמי · Proverbs 9:5
- 2כמראה אדם · Ezekiel 1:26
- 3ובכל מאדך · Deuteronomy 6:5
- 4והייתם קדושים · Numbers 15:40
Humility and fear of sin ¶20–22
20ד והנה קדושה זו מביאה לידי ענוה שהיא שפלות האדם בערך נפשו ונשמתו יען אשר אין חיות ושפע לנפשו ממקור ומוצא פי ה׳ אלא ע״י דברים שפלים גשמיים ממש
4. Now, this holiness leads to humility, which is a person’s lowliness with regard to his nefesh and his neshamah, since there is no life-force and flow for his soul from the Source, “that which comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” except through lowly things, actually physical,
Section 4 begins: holiness leads to humility. Humility here is a person’s sense of his soul’s lowliness, because his soul can receive life from the divine Source only through lowly, physical things.
כמו האתרוג וצמר הציצית וקלף התפילין וכה״ג [וכהאי גוונא] כל מצות מעשיות או ע״י הדבור בהם הוא ת״ת [תלמוד תורה] וכו׳ וענוה זו מביאה לידי יראת חטא1
such as the esrog, the wool of the tzitzis and the parchment of the tefillin, and likewise all the practical mitzvos; or through speech about them, which is Torah study, etc. And this humility leads to fear of sin.
Those lowly things are the objects of the mitzvos, such as the esrog, the wool of tzitzis and the parchment of tefillin, and all the practical mitzvos, or the words of Torah spoken about them. This humility in turn leads to fear of sin.
(בר״ח [בראשית חכמה] שער הענוה2 פ״א הביא דענוה איהי שכינתא עילאה. והנה פי׳ וענין שכינתא עילאה נתבאר בד״ה שיר השירים34 שהוא ענין הביטול דיחודא עילאה.
(In Reishis Chochmah, Shaar HaAnavah [the Gate of Humility], chapter 1, he cites that humility is the higher Shechinah (Divine Presence). Now, the meaning and matter of the higher Shechinah was explained in the discourse beginning “The Song of Songs”: that it is the matter of the self-nullification (bittul) of the higher unity (yichuda ila’ah).
A long parenthesis begins. The ethical-Kabbalistic work Reishis Chochmah (Gate of Humility, chapter 1) says that humility is the “higher Shechinah,” and the discourse on “The Song of Songs” explains the higher Shechinah as the bittul of the “higher unity,” in which all is as nothing before G‑d.
ועפ״ז [ועל פי זה] י״ל [יש לומר] פי׳ ענוה היינו שהוא מחזיק עצמו לאין ממש כמו שהוא קמי׳ [קמיה] ית׳ דכולא קמי׳ [קמיה] כלא חשיב5 ועמ״ש בד״ה קטנתי6 מכל החסדים.7 ועמ״ש בד״ה ארץ הרים ובקעות89 בענין חותם שוקע ביטול ענוה שלמעלה מהאהבה.
And according to this it can be said that the meaning of humility is that he regards himself as actually nothing, as he is before Him, blessed be He, for “all before Him is considered as nothing.” And see what is written in the discourse beginning “I have become small from all the kindnesses.” And see what is written in the discourse beginning “A land of mountains and valleys,” regarding the “sunken seal”: the self-nullification of humility, which is higher than love.
Accordingly, humility means regarding oneself as truly nothing, as one is before G‑d, for “all before Him is considered as nothing” (Zohar). The text refers to the letter “I have become small from all the kindnesses” and to the discourse on “A land of mountains and valleys,” where the “sunken seal,” the bittul of humility, ranks higher than love.
ועפ״ז [ועל פי זה] א״ש [אתי שפיר] מ״ש בספרים10 בענין ענוה שהיא ביטול והכנעה להקב״ה דלכאורה אינו מובן וכי צריך לומר זה שהאדם בריה שפלה ואפלה יקטין א״ע [את עצמו] לגבי הבורא ית׳.
And according to this, what is written in the books on the subject of humility—that it is self-nullification and submission to the Holy One, blessed be He—is well understood. For at first glance it is not understood: does one need to say this, that man, a lowly and dark creature, should make himself small relative to the Creator, blessed be He?
This explains what “the books” say about humility, that it is bittul and submission before G‑d; the Kehot note points to works such as Midrash Tanchuma and Reishis Chochmah. At first this seems hardly worth saying, since a lowly creature obviously should feel small before the Creator.
אכן לפי הנ״ל א״ש [אתי שפיר] דפי׳ וענין ענוה זו דשייך מהאדם לגבי הקב״ה היינו שלא יהיה תופס מקום כלל אלא כלא חשיב ממש. ועד״ז נאמר במשה והאיש משה ענו מאד11 כי במשה נאמר ונחנו מה12 ועיין בגמרא)
But according to what was said above it is well understood: the meaning and matter of this humility that applies from man toward the Holy One, blessed be He, is that he should not occupy any place at all, but be actually considered as nothing. And in this way it is said of Moshe, “And the man Moshe was very humble,” for of Moshe it is said, “And what (mah) are we?” And see in the Gemara)
But in light of the above, the humility meant is not merely feeling small: it is not occupying any place at all, being truly as nothing before G‑d. This is the humility of Moshe, of whom it says “the man Moshe was very humble” (Numbers 12:3), and who said, “And what are we?” (Exodus 16:7).
(ספ״ו דחולין דפ״ט א׳) גדול מה שנאמר במשה כו׳ שביטול דמשה היה למעלה מבחינת הביטול דואנכי עפר ואפר1314 כי הוא מ״ה [שם מ״ה] ממש וזהו עניו מאד ועיין בפ׳ שלח (קס״ג סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב]).
(end of chapter 6 of Chullin, folio 89a): “Greater is what was said of Moshe,” etc.: that the self-nullification of Moshe was above the level of the self-nullification of “And I am dust and ashes,” for he was actually mah (“what”); and this is “very humble.” And see Parshas Shelach (163, end of side b).
The Gemara (Chullin 89a) says that what Moshe said is greater than what Avraham said: Avraham called himself “dust and ashes,” which is still something, while Moshe said “what are we,” nothing at all. Moshe was truly mah, “what,” and that is the meaning of “very humble.”
והנה שכינתא עילאה היא בינה15 ולפ״ז [ולפי זה] וענוה מביאה לידי יראת חטא הוא בחי׳ חכמה שהיא יראה עילאה.
Now, the higher Shechinah is Binah (understanding); and according to this, “and humility leads to fear of sin” is the level of Chochmah (wisdom), which is the higher fear.
In Kabbalah the higher Shechinah is Binah, so if humility is the higher Shechinah, the fear it leads to is at the level of Chochmah, called “higher fear.” In this reading the ladder climbs from Binah to Chochmah.
וריב״ל [ורבי יהושע בן לוי] דס״ל [דסבירא ליה / דסבירא להו] ענוה גדולה מכולן16 י״ל [יש לומר] זהו כמ״ש בר״ח שם ועוד ימצא הענוה אפילו בכתר כו׳ והוא נקרא אין להיותו מחשיב עצמו לאין נגד המאציל עכ״ל [עד כאן לשונו].
And Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi, who holds that “humility is greatest of all”: it can be said that this is as is written in Reishis Chochmah there: “And further, humility is found even in Keser (the Crown), etc., and it is called Ayin (Nothing) because it regards itself as nothing before the Emanator.” End of quote.
Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi holds that “humility is greatest of all” (Avodah Zarah 20b), above all the other rungs. Reishis Chochmah explains why: humility exists even in Keser, the Crown, which is called Ayin, “Nothing,” because it regards itself as nothing before the Emanator.
The paragraph explains that the holiness drawn through lowly physical mitzvos brings humility, and in a long parenthesis defines humility as true self-nullification, Moshe’s “what are we,” rooted in the higher Shechinah and even in Keser.
In Kabbalah there is a higher and a lower Shechinah, Binah and Malchus (Pardes Rimonim, Gate 23); the discourse on “The Song of Songs” links them with the higher and the lower unity. Humility as the higher Shechinah is therefore the bittul of the higher unity, in which the worlds are as nothing, and not only of the lower unity, in which G‑d is present within them.
Marei mekomos
- 1וענוה זו מביאה לידי יראת חטא · ראה לקו״ש-יג ע׳ 36.
- 2בר״ח שער הענוה · הלשון נעתק באוה״ת בראשית כרך-ב דף רנט, א. ושם הענין יותר באריכות.
- 3בד״ה שיר השירים · לקו״ת שה״ש א, ב.
- 4שיר השירים · Song of Songs 1:1
- 5דכולא קמי׳ כלא חשיב · Zohar I, 11b
- 6בד״ה קטנתי · אגה״ק סי׳ ב.
- 7קטנתי מכל החסדים · Genesis 32:11
- 8בד״ה ארץ הרים ובקעות · לקו״ת פ׳ עקב יז, ד.
- 9ארץ הרים ובקעות · Deuteronomy 11:11
- 10מ״ש בספרים · ע׳ תנחומא צו (סי׳ יג) שפל וסבלן. ובלקח טוב פ׳ בהעלתך [פ׳ יב, ג]. וע׳ בר״ח ש׳ הענוה פ״א. על״ק נצבים (ר״ד מח). [כ].
- 11והאיש משה ענו מאד · Numbers 12:3
- 12ונחנו מה · Exodus 16:7
- 13
- 14ואנכי עפר ואפר · Genesis 18:27
- 15שכינתא עילאה היא בינה · Pardes Rimmonim 23:21
- 16ענוה גדולה מכולן · Avodah Zarah 20b:11
And see what is written in the explanation on the verse “Who has counted,” on the matter of “black (ukam) is kedem (before),” etc.; and this is the matter of “He made darkness His hiding place.”
The text points to its explanation of “black (ukam) is kedem” in the discourse on “Who has counted” in Parshas Balak. It links this to “He made darkness His hiding place” (Psalms 18:12), the concealment of G‑d’s essence described earlier.
ועמ״ש מענין ענוה סד״ה שוש אשיש3 כי הנה את זה לעומת זה עשה האלקים4 שכמו שבקדושה עשיית המצות הוא מעלה את האדם
And see what is written on the subject of humility at the end of the discourse beginning “I will greatly rejoice.” For “G‑d made this opposite that”: just as in holiness, the doing of the mitzvos raises a person up
After a pointer on humility to the end of the discourse “I will greatly rejoice,” the main argument resumes with Ecclesiastes 7:14: “G‑d made this opposite that,” so holiness and its opposite correspond. Doing a mitzvah lifts a person so that he draws down supernal life.
להמשיך חיים עליונים מבחי׳ רצון העליון כמ״כ [כמו כן] להיפך בעבירה כתיב ונכרתה הנפש ההיא מלפני אני5 ה׳ פי׳ אני ה׳ מה
to draw down supernal life from the level of the Supernal Will, so too, conversely, regarding a transgression it is written, “That soul shall be cut off from before Me; I am Havayah.” The meaning of “I am Havayah” is that which
Just as a mitzvah draws down life from the Supernal Will, a transgression reaches just as high in the opposite direction. Of a transgression the Torah says, “That soul shall be cut off from before Me; I am Havayah” (Leviticus 22:3), and the Alter Rebbe explains each phrase.
שהוא מהווה כל הויות להחיות כל העולמות וכל הנבראים ומלפני כלומר למעלה מבחי׳ ומדריגה זו שם מגיע הפגם והעונש של העבירה שהכרת תכרת6 בשרש כל השרשים וצריך להיות לאדם יראת חטא.
brings all existences into being, to give life to all the worlds and all the created beings; and “from before Me” means higher than this level and rank: there the blemish and the punishment of the transgression reach, so that “it shall be utterly cut off” in the root of all roots. And a person must have fear of sin.
“I am Havayah” is G‑d as the One who brings all existence into being and gives life to all worlds, and “from before Me” is a level higher still. The blemish and punishment of the sin reach there, so the “cutting off” (karet) touches the root of all roots, and this is why a person must have fear of sin.
פי׳ יראה מחמת החטא והחסרון והפגם שנעשה למעלה כ״כ [כל כך] וחטא הוא לשון חסרון ופגם שלשון חטא נופל אפילו על ביטול מ״ע [מצות עשה] ודקדוקי סופרים שעכ״פ [שעל כל פנים] יש חסרון ופגם. משא״כ עון הוא על ל״ת [לא תעשה] כו׳.
That is, fear because of the sin and the lack and the blemish that is caused above to such an extent. And chet (sin) is a term for lack and blemish, for the term chet applies even to neglecting a positive commandment and the fine points of the Scribes, in which there is at any rate a lack and blemish; whereas avon (iniquity) applies to prohibitions, etc.
Fear of sin means fear of the lack and blemish a sin causes above. The word chet, “sin,” means lack, as the Kehot note shows from Rashi on 1 Kings 1:21, so it applies even to failing to do a positive commandment or a rabbinic detail, while avon, “iniquity,” is used for violating a prohibition.
The paragraph sets out the mirror image of the mitzvos: a sin reaches above even the level of Havayah, to the root of all roots, and fear of sin is fear of the lack and blemish it causes there.
In Likkutei Torah on Nitzavim, which the note cites, failing to do a positive mitzvah is called chet, “lack,” because it withholds the “sowing” in the supernal land that a mitzvah accomplishes, while violating a prohibition is called avon, from “twisting,” because it draws nourishment to the forces outside holiness.
Marei mekomos
- 1מי מנה · Numbers 23:10
- 2ישת חשך סתרו · Psalms 18:12
- 3שוש אשיש · Isaiah 61:10
- 4את זה לעומת זה עשה האלקים · Ecclesiastes 7:14
- 5ונכרתה הנפש ההיא מלפני אני ה׳ · Leviticus 22:3
- 6הכרת תכרת · Numbers 15:31
22והנה יראת חטא בבחינה זו באה אחר ענוה וקדושה דוקא דהיינו אחר שיתקדש בקדושה העליונה הבאה מלמעלה ע״י המצות ויבא למדרגת ענוה שיכיר שפלות נפשו
Now, fear of sin in this sense comes specifically after humility and holiness—that is, after he is sanctified with the supernal holiness that comes from above through the mitzvos, and comes to the level of humility, recognizing the lowliness of his soul;
Now the opening question is answered. Fear of sin in this sense comes only after holiness and humility: first a person is sanctified through the mitzvos with the holiness from above, and then he reaches humility and recognizes the lowliness of his soul.
אזי יכיר וירגיש ג״כ בזה לעומת זה1 כמה גדול עונש החטא והפגם שמגיע למעלה ויהיה לו יראה גדולה מחמת החטא והפגם (ועמ״ש עוד בפי׳ וענין יראת חטא בד״ה אלה מסעי).2
then he will also recognize and feel, through this—“this opposite that”—how great is the punishment of the sin and the blemish that reaches above, and he will have great fear because of the sin and the blemish. (And see what is written further on the meaning and matter of fear of sin in the discourse beginning “These are the journeys.”)
Then, “this opposite that,” he can sense how great is the blemish and punishment a sin causes above, and a great fear of sin comes over him. The text refers to further explanation in the discourse “These are the journeys.”
אך קדושה וענוה זו אינה באה אלא אחר מדרגות הפרישות שהוא להפריד הרע שבנפש הבהמית מקליפות נוגה וקדש את עצמך במותר לך3
But this holiness and humility come only after the levels of abstinence, which is to separate the evil in the animal soul from the kelipos (husks) of nogah, and “Sanctify yourself in what is permitted to you”;
Holiness and humility themselves come only after abstinence: separating out the evil in the animal soul, which draws from kelipas nogah, the “translucent husk” in which good and evil are mixed. This is the Gemara’s “Sanctify yourself in what is permitted to you” (Yevamos 20a).
והוא בחינת תשובה תתאה כמארז״ל [כמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] תשובה ומע״ט [ומעשים טובים]4 כו׳ שבלא תשובה תחלה אין המעשים טובים ומאירים מלשון את האור כי טוב5 כו׳.
and this is the level of lower teshuvah (return), as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “teshuvah and good deeds,” etc.: for without teshuvah first, the deeds are not “good” and shining—from the expression “the light, that it was good,” etc.
Abstinence is the “lower teshuvah,” as the Mishnah pairs “teshuvah and good deeds” (Avos 4:11): without teshuvah first, deeds are not truly “good.” “Good” here means shining, as in “G‑d saw the light, that it was good” (Genesis 1:4).
The paragraph answers the opening question: fear of sin, as fear of the blemish a sin causes above, can come only after holiness and humility, and these in turn require abstinence, the lower teshuvah.
The order of the ladder is now clear: abstinence, the lower teshuvah, separates out the evil; the mitzvos, now shining, bring supernal holiness; holiness brings humility, the sense that the soul lives only through lowly things; and humility, “this opposite that,” lets a person sense how far a sin reaches, which is fear of sin.
Marei mekomos
- 1בזה לעומת זה · Ecclesiastes 7:14
- 2אלה מסעי · Numbers 33:1
- 3וקדש את עצמך במותר לך · Yevamot 20a:15
- 4תשובה ומע״ט · Pirkei Avot 4:11
- 5את האור כי טוב · Genesis 1:4
The heads of the tribes ¶23–24
And with all the above, what is written, “And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes (matos),” will be understood. Matos is in the sense of “He inclines (mateh) toward kindness,”
With all this, the opening verse can be explained. Matos, “tribes,” is linked to the Talmudic phrase “He inclines (mateh) toward kindness,” said of G‑d tipping the scales of judgment toward mercy.
שהוא ענין להטות ולהפוך המדות שבנפש שיהי׳ [שיהיה] כלפי חסד ואהבת את ה׳ לדבקה בו45 והמטים ומהפכים הם בחינת הראשים
which is the matter of inclining and turning over the emotive attributes (middos) in the soul, so that they be toward kindness, and “you shall love Havayah,” “to cleave to Him.” And those who incline and turn [them] over are the level of the “heads,”
The “tribes” are what incline and turn a person’s emotions toward kindness, toward “you shall love Havayah … to cleave to Him.” What inclines and turns the emotions in this way are the “heads.”
שהם בחינת רעותא דליבא שנמשך מבחינת משה הוא בחינת דעת עליון וקדש העליון שלמעלה מעלה מבחינת עלמין ובחי׳ משה הוא המנהיג
which are the level of the desire of the heart, which is drawn from the level of Moshe, which is the level of the supernal Daas (knowledge) and the supernal holiness (kodesh), far above the level of the worlds. And the level of Moshe is the leader
The “heads” are the desire of the heart, which is drawn from the level of Moshe: supernal Daas and the supernal holiness far above the worlds. Moshe is the leader of Israel in this sense.
(כי וידבר מלשון ידבר עמים תחתינו6 לשון הנהגה) וממשיך בחינה זו להיות רעותא דליבא (ועיין עוד מענין ראשים בפ׳ פנחס) (דרנ״ג ע״ב) ע״פ שאו שערים ראשיכם7 גם
(for vayedaber, “and he spoke,” is from the expression “He subdues (yadber) peoples under us,” a term of leadership), and he draws this level down to be the desire of the heart. (And see further on the subject of “heads” in Parshas Pinchas) (folio 253b), on the verse “Lift up your heads, O gates.” Also,
Vayedaber, “and he spoke,” is related to yadber in “He subdues peoples under us” (Psalms 47:4), a term of leading, so Moshe “spoke” by leading and drawing this level down into the desire of the heart. The text adds a reference to Parshas Pinchas (253b) on “Lift up your heads, O gates” (Psalms 24:7).
כי משה הוא בחי׳ ונחנו מ״ה [מה]8 בחי׳ עניו מאד9 ולכן וידבר משה כו׳ ועמ״ש סד״ה משה ידבר וסד״ה מראיהם ומעשיהם:10
because Moshe is the level of “And we are Mah,” the level of “very humble”; and therefore, “And Moshe spoke,” etc. And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “Moshe would speak,” and at the end of the discourse beginning “Their appearance and their works.”
Moshe could draw this down also because he embodied “And we are Mah,” utter humility, “very humble.” The text points to the endings of two Torah Ohr discourses, “Moshe would speak” and “Their appearance and their works,” for more.
The paragraph explains the opening verse: the “heads of the tribes” are the desire of the heart that turns a person’s emotions toward love of G‑d, drawn down by Moshe, whose leadership and utter humility connect Israel with the supernal holiness.
The two reasons fit together: as leader, Moshe draws the supernal level down, and his humility, being “what,” makes him a fitting channel, for, as Likkutei Torah explains elsewhere, the Infinite Light rests and is revealed only in what is nullified before it.
Marei mekomos
- 1משה ידבר · Exodus 19:19
- 2וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות · Numbers 30:2
- 3מטה כלפי חסד · Rosh Hashanah 17a:2–3
- 4לדבקה בו · Deuteronomy 11:22
- 5לדבקה בו · Deuteronomy 30:20
- 6ידבר עמים תחתינו · Psalms 47:4
- 7שאו שערים ראשיכם · Psalms 24:7
- 8ונחנו מ״ה · Exodus 16:7
- 9עניו מאד · Numbers 12:3
- 10מראיהם ומעשיהם · Ezekiel 1:16
Summary: The matter of “holiness leads to humility, and humility leads to fear of sin”; and the matter of “And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes.”)
This summary restates the two themes of section 4: how holiness leads to humility and humility to fear of sin, and the meaning of “And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes.”
A brief summary of section 4.
Marei mekomos
- 1קדושה מביאה לידי ענוה וענוה מביאה לידי יראת חטא · Mishnah Sotah 9:15
“This is the thing” ¶25–26
25ה לאמר זה הדבר1 כו׳. וארז״ל [ואמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שכל הנביאים נתנבאו בכה נוסף עליהם משה שנתנבא בזה2 כו׳.
5. “Saying: This is the thing,” etc. And our Sages, of blessed memory, said that all the prophets prophesied with “Thus” (koh); Moshe surpassed them, in that he prophesied with “This” (zeh), etc.
Section 5 explains the next words of the verse, “saying: This is the thing.” Rashi, citing the Sifrei, says that all the prophets prophesied with “Thus (koh) says G‑d,” while Moshe surpassed them, prophesying with “This (zeh) is the thing.”
והענין דכתיב נעשה אדם בצלמנו כדמותנו3 כדמותנו הוא בחינת ממכ״ע [ממלא כל עלמין] דכ״ף הדמיון כמו הדמות כו׳,
And the matter is: it is written, “Let us make man in Our image, as Our likeness.” “As Our likeness” is the level of the light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin), for the kaf of comparison [means] like the likeness, etc.;
In “Let us make man in Our image, as Our likeness” (Genesis 1:26), “as Our likeness” is the light that fills all worlds. The letter kaf, “as,” signals a comparison: something only like the likeness, not the thing itself.
משא״כ בצלמנו הוא בחי׳ גילוי עצמותו ית׳ ממש כביכול (ועיין מזה לקמן בד״ה אלה מסעי4 הנ״ל ובד״ה כי ביום הזה יכפר).5
whereas “in Our image” is the level of the revelation of His very essence, blessed be He, as it were. (And see about this below, in the discourse beginning “These are the journeys,” mentioned above, and in the discourse beginning “For on this day He shall atone.”)
“In Our image,” without the kaf, is the revelation of G‑d’s very essence, as it were. The text refers to the discourses “These are the journeys” and “For on this day He shall atone” for more on this.
והנה ע״י רעותא דליבא למעלה מבחינת כח הנפש נעשה עי״ז אתערותא דלעילא גילוי בחינת עצמותו ית׳ למעלה מבחי׳ עלמין מה שאינו יכול להתלבש תוך עלמין וכמ״ש ואשים דברי בפיך6 דברי ממש.
Now, through the desire of the heart, which is above the level of the power of the soul, there is brought about through this an arousal from above: a revelation of the level of His essence, blessed be He, above the level of the worlds, that which cannot clothe itself within the worlds. As it is written, “And I have put My words in your mouth”—My very words.
The desire of the heart, which is beyond the soul’s own powers, brings an arousal from above: a revelation of G‑d’s essence, which is above the worlds and cannot be clothed in them. So Isaiah 51:16 says “I have put My words in your mouth”: G‑d’s very own words.
The paragraph begins explaining “This is the thing”: “as Our likeness” is the light that fills the worlds, “in Our image” is G‑d’s essence, and the desire of the heart draws down that essence so that G‑d’s own words are in a person’s mouth.
The text sets the prophets’ koh, “thus,” beside the kaf of comparison in kidmuseinu: both speak of a likeness. Moshe’s zeh, “this,” like “in Our image,” points to the essence itself.
Marei mekomos
- 1לאמר זה הדבר · Numbers 30:2
- 2שכל הנביאים נתנבאו בכה נוסף עליהם משה שנתנבא בזה · Rashi on Numbers 30:3
- 3נעשה אדם בצלמנו כדמותנו · Genesis 1:26
- 4אלה מסעי · Numbers 33:1
- 5כי ביום הזה יכפר · Leviticus 16:30
- 6ואשים דברי בפיך · Isaiah 51:16
26והיינו לאמר זה הדבר1 כו׳ דהיינו באמירת כאו״א [כל אחד ואחד] פרשה שבתורה או נביאים וכתובים הלכות ואגדות יהיה זה הדבר עצמו שנאמר מאז ומקדם.
And this is [the meaning of] “Saying: This is the thing,” etc.: that is, when each and every one says a section of the Torah, or of the Prophets and the Writings, laws and aggados, it will be this very thing that was said long ago, of old.
“This is the thing” is now applied to Torah study. When anyone recites a section of the Torah, the Prophets or the Writings, or laws and aggados, it can be the very same word that G‑d spoke long ago.
As it is written, “And these words that I command you today shall be,” etc., “and you shall speak of them,” etc.: that these very words
Deuteronomy 6:6–7 says the same: “These words that I command you today shall be… and you shall speak of them.” The words meant are the very ones Moshe spoke.
שאמר משה באותו יום יהיו אצלך ודברת בם עצמם לפי שע״י בחינת רעותא דליבא נמשך בחינה מה שלמעלה מבחינת עלמין ושם הוא למעלה מן הזמן
that Moshe said on that day shall be with you, and “you shall speak of them,” of these very [words]. For through the level of the desire of the heart, a level is drawn down of that which is above the level of the worlds, and there it is above time.
The very words Moshe said on that day are to be with each person, and he speaks those same words. This is possible because the desire of the heart draws down a level above the worlds, which is also above time, so the words of “today” are not left in the past.
(ועמ״ש ע״פ קול דודי הנה זה בא4 וסד״ה והגדת לבנך5 בענין בעבור זה וסד״ה בחדש השלישי6 כו׳ ביום הזה)7 ושם היה בחינת נבואתו של משה שהוא היה בחינת קדש העליון למעלה מבחינת עלמין
(And see what is written on the verse “The voice of my beloved! Behold, this one comes,” and at the end of the discourse beginning “And you shall tell your son,” on the subject of “because of this,” and at the end of the discourse beginning “In the third month,” etc., “on this day.”) And there was the level of Moshe’s prophecy, for he was the level of the supernal holiness (kodesh), above the level of the worlds.
The text refers to discourses on “The voice of my beloved, behold, this one comes,” on “And you shall tell your son” (on “because of this”) and on “In the third month… on this day,” all of which turn on the word “this.” Moshe’s prophecy came from this level, the supernal holiness above the worlds.
ולכן ארז״ל [אמרו רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שהיה פרוש מן האשה8 משא״כ כל הנביאים כו׳ (וע׳ מזה בפ׳ ויצא) (דקנ״ב ב׳) ו במק״מ [במקדש מלך] שם ובפ׳ בראשית (כ״ב9 א׳)
And therefore our Sages, of blessed memory, said that he was separated from [his] wife, which was not so with all the prophets, etc. (And see about this in Parshas Vayeitzei) (folio 152b), and in the Mikdash Melech there, and in Parshas Bereishis (22a);
That is why, the Sages say, Moshe separated from his wife, which the other prophets did not do (Shabbos 87a). The text points to the Zohar on Vayeitzei (152b) and Bereishis (22a), and to the Mikdash Melech commentary there.
וביארו הרמ״ז [הרב משה זכות] פ׳ ואתחנן10 (דר״ס סע״ב [סוף עמוד ב]) גבי רב לך11 כו׳ וע׳ בפ׳ בלק (קפ״ז ב׳).
and the Ramaz explained it, Parshas Va’eschanan (folio 260, end of side b), regarding “Enough for you,” etc. And see Parshas Balak (187b).
The Ramaz (Rabbi Moshe Zacuto) explains this on the Zohar to Va’eschanan, on “Enough for you.” According to the Kehot note, he explains that Moshe separated because he could draw down an inner union higher than that of Yaakov and Rachel, which brings down souls.
ומכ״ז [ומכל זה] יובן איך שנבואתו היה מבחינת שלמעלה מגדר זמן שבחי׳ הזמן אין לו יחס רק במדת מלכותו ית׳ בחי׳ כדמותנו בחינת עלמא דנוקבא כו׳
And from all this it will be understood how his prophecy was from a level that is above the bounds of time; for the level of time has relevance only in the attribute of His Malchus (sovereignty), blessed be He—the level of “as Our likeness,” the level of the “world of the Nukva (the feminine),” etc.,
All this shows that Moshe’s prophecy came from a level above time. Time relates only to G‑d’s attribute of Malchus, the level of “as Our likeness,” called “the world of the Nukva (the feminine).”
דהיינו כשנעשית מקור לבי״ע ועיין בפ׳ ויחי (דרמ״ו סע״א [סוף עמוד א] וע״ב)12 ועמ״ש בד״ה יונתי בחגוי הסלע13 בפי׳ קומי לך רעיתי.
that is, when it becomes the source for [the worlds of] Beriah (Creation), Yetzirah (Formation) and Asiyah (Action). And see Parshas Vayechi (folio 246, end of side a, and side b), and see what is written in the discourse beginning “My dove, in the clefts of the rock,” on the meaning of “Arise, my beloved.”
Malchus relates to time when it becomes the source of the lower worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah. The text refers to the Zohar on Vayechi and to the discourse “My dove, in the clefts of the rock,” on “Arise, my beloved.”
ומשם יובן בתוספת ביאור מש״כ [מה שכתוב] שע״י רעותא דליבא דייקא נמשך שיהיה עסק התורה בבחינת לאמר זה הדבר כו׳.
And from there will be understood, with additional explanation, what was written: that it is specifically through the desire of the heart that it is brought about that the occupation with Torah is in the manner of “Saying: This is the thing,” etc.
From that discourse one can understand more fully why it is specifically the desire of the heart that makes a person’s Torah study “This is the thing,” G‑d’s own word.
איש כי ידור נדר14 וגו׳ עד שידור בדבר הנדור.15 הענין כי הנה נדרים סייג לפרישות.161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839
“When a man vows a vow,” etc.: “until he vows by a thing that is vowed.” The matter is this: “Vows are a fence for abstinence.”
The maamar now returns to its first question, about vows. “When a man vows a vow” requires vowing “by a thing that is vowed,” and the explanation starts from the Mishnah, “Vows are a fence for abstinence.”
The paragraph applies “This is the thing” to Torah study: through the desire of the heart, which reaches above time, a person’s Torah becomes G‑d’s own word as Moshe heard it, since Moshe’s prophecy came from above the worlds; it then returns to the question of vows.
Time comes into being with Malchus, as the source of the lower worlds; what is above Malchus is above time. This is why words drawn from the level of “in Our image,” above Malchus, are not confined to the moment they were first spoken.
Marei mekomos
- 1לאמר זה הדבר · Numbers 30:2
- 2והיו הדברים . . ודברת בם · Deuteronomy 6:6
- 3ודברת בם · Deuteronomy 6:7
- 4קול דודי הנה זה בא · Song of Songs 2:8
- 5והגדת לבנך · Exodus 13:8
- 6סד״ה בחדש השלישי · תו״א פ׳ יתרו.
- 7בחדש השלישי כו׳ ביום הזה · Exodus 19:1
- 8שהי׳ פרוש מן האשה · Shabbat 87a:2
- 9ובפ׳ בראשית (כ״ב א׳) · ”משה אתפרש מאתתי׳ כו׳ לבתר אתדבק רוחא ברוחא עילאה כו׳” — אוה״ת ויקרא כרך-ב ע׳תשי.
- 10וביארו הרמ״ז פ׳ ואתחנן · ”גבי ורב לך דאזדווג בשכינתי׳ בענין הטעם שמשה פרש א״ע מן האשה כי הי׳ בו כח להמשיך יחוד הפנימי שלמעלה מבחי׳ יחוד יעקב ורחל שהוא יחוד דו״נ להוליד נשמות ע״ש” — אוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תשי.
- 11רב לך · Deuteronomy 3:26
- 12בפ׳ ויחי (דרמ״ו סע״א וע״ב) · ראה הלשון עם הגהות באוה״ת בראשית-ו דף תתשמב, ב.
- 13יונתי בחגוי הסלע · Song of Songs 2:14
- 14איש כי ידור נדר · Numbers 30:3
- 15עד שידור בדבר הנדור · Nedarim 13a:2–3
- 16נדרים סייג לפרישות · Pirkei Avot 3:13
- 17ואנכי עפר ואפר · Genesis 18:27
- 18שכינתא עילאה היא בינה · פרדס שכ״ג, פכ״א. קה״י בערכו.
- 19בר״ח שם · נעתק גם באוה״ת בראשית-ב דף רנט, ב. ושם בכרך-א דף צד, א.
- 20בביאור ע״פ מי מנה · לעיל פ׳ בלק.
- 21סד״ה שוש אשיש · לקו״ת פ׳ נבים מז, ד ואילך.
- 22את זלעו״ז עשה האלקים · Ecclesiastes 7:14
- 23ונכרתה הנפש ההיא מלפני · Leviticus 22:3
- 24והחסרון והפגם שנעשה למעלה · ראה ד״ה ע״כ יאמרו תרצ״א (בסה״מ קונטרסים ח״א) פ״א. ובכ״מ.
- 25וחטא הוא ל׳ חסרון · ראה מ״א א, כא ובפרש״י שם. לקו״ת פ׳ נצבים נא, א. סה״מ תרס״ד ע׳ שטז. ד״ה על כן יאמרו המושלים תרצ״א בתחלתו. ראה לקו״ש ח״ד ע׳ 1200 הערה 42. לקו״ש ח״כ ע׳ 318. ולהעיר מהקדמת דרך חיים לכ״ק אדמו״ר האמצעי.
- 26בד״ה אלה מסעי · פח, א-ב. שם, ד.
- 27וקדש א״ע במותר לך · Yevamot 20a:15
- 28תשובה ומע״ט · אבות פ״ד, מי״א. [כ].
- 29את האור כי טוב · Genesis 1:4
- 30ואהבת את ה׳ לדבקה בו · Deuteronomy 11:22
- 31ידבר עמים תחתינו · Psalms 47:4
- 32סד״ה משה ידבר · תו״א סח, ב ”פי׳ הענווה למעלה זהו ירידת אוא״ס ב״ה והתלבשותו בחכמה וחסד שהוא בחי׳ ירידה ושפלות לגבי אוא״ס ב״ה” — אוה״ת פ׳ וירא כרך-א צד, א.
- 33וסד״ה מראיהם ומעשיהם · תו״א פ׳ יתרו.
- 34שכל הנביאים . . בזה · ברש״י ר״פ מטות (מספרי [פי׳ קנג]). ובלקח טוב עה״ת. [כ].
- 35נעשה אדם בצלמינו כדמותנו · Genesis 1:26
- 36בד״ה אלה מסעי · פח, ג ואילך.
- 37דכ״ף הדמיון כמו הדמות · ראה באוה״ת פ׳ מטות ע׳ א׳שטז בזה.
- 38ובד״ה כי ביום הזה יכפר · אחרי כז, ב.
- 39ואשים דברי בפיך · Isaiah 51:16
Vows: tying the object to its holy root ¶27
27והנה פרישות הוא להיות קדש א״ע [את עצמו] במותר לך1 וכדי להיות מדריגה זו נטועה וקבועה בלבו באמת לאמתו צריך לעשות עצות בנפשו כענין שנתבאר למעלה בענוה שמביאה לידי יראת חטא
Now, abstinence is to be [in the manner of] “Sanctify yourself in what is permitted to you.” And for this level to be planted and fixed in his heart in absolute truth, he must devise counsels in his soul, in the manner explained above regarding humility, which leads to fear of sin:
Abstinence means “Sanctify yourself in what is permitted to you” (Yevamos 20a). To make it truly rooted in the heart, a person needs a way of reflecting on it, like the way humility was said to lead to fear of sin.
דהיינו שישפיל עצמו איך הדבר שרוצה לפרוש ממנו כגון הנודר מן הבשר כו׳ שהבשר וכיוצא בו הוא גבוה ממנו במעלה בשרשו ששרשו גבוה מאד נעלה מבחי׳ ומדרגות האדם
namely, that he humble himself [by considering] how the thing from which he wishes to abstain—for example, one who vows [to abstain] from meat, etc.: that meat and the like is higher than he in rank in its root, for its root is very high, exalted above the level and the ranks of man,
He should humble himself by reflecting that the thing he wants to abstain from, such as meat, is higher than he is in its root. Its root is far above the level of man.
אלא שבשבירת הכלים נפלו למטה מטה מן האדם בדצ״ח [בדומם צומח חי] אבל מ״מ הרי יש לו יתרון ומעלה שמחיה את האדם והאדם צריך לו
except that in the breaking of the vessels they fell far, far below man, into the inanimate, vegetative and animal. But nevertheless, it has an advantage and superiority, in that it gives life to man, and man needs it,
It fell below man, into the animal, vegetable and mineral kingdoms, only through the breaking of the vessels. Even so it keeps an advantage over him: it gives him life, and he needs it.
והמאכל א״צ [אין צריך / אינו צריך] להאדם ואי לזאת אינו ראוי להורידו כ״כ [כל כך] בגשמיות להיות נהנה ממנו למלאות תאוות גופו ולהיות בזוללי בשר וסובאי יין2 כ״א להרחיב דעתו לה׳,
while the food does not need man. And therefore it is not fitting to bring it down so far into physicality, to benefit from it to fill the desires of his body and to be among “the gluttons of meat and the guzzlers of wine,” but rather to broaden his mind for G‑d.
Food does not need man, so it is not right to drag it down into crude physicality merely to satisfy bodily cravings, becoming one of “the gluttons of meat and the guzzlers of wine” (Proverbs 23:20). It should be eaten to broaden one’s mind for serving G‑d.
וכן דרך הנודרים לש״ש [לשם שמים] הוא מפני שרואים ירידתם מן הדבר שנודרים ממנו שהדבר ההוא גורם להם ירידה והטייה מאחרי ה׳ והיינו אחר שמורידים הדבר ההוא לגשמיות ממילא ממשיך ומוריד גם את הגוף האדם אחריו
And so the way of those who vow for the sake of Heaven is because they see their descent [caused] by the thing from which they vow: that thing causes them a descent and a turning away from following G‑d. That is, after they bring that thing down into physicality, as a matter of course it draws and brings down the body of the man, too, after it.
This is why people vow for the sake of Heaven: they see that the thing pulls them down and turns them away from G‑d. Once they bring it down into physicality, it drags them down with it.
(ועמ״ש בד״ה בהעלותך3 את הנרות4 בענין ע״ה אסור לאכול בשר5 ואף דהכא מיירי בת״ח [בתלמיד חכם / בתלמידי חכמים]. מ״מ נהי דאינו אסור מ״מ שייך שירא שלא ירד ממדרגתו כו׳) אבל באמת צריך לראות בשרשו איך ששרשו גבוה מאד נעלה.
(And see what is written in the discourse beginning “When you light the lamps,” on the subject of “an unlearned person is forbidden to eat meat.” And although here we are speaking of a Torah scholar, nevertheless, granted that it is not forbidden, nevertheless it is relevant that he fear lest he descend from his level, etc.) But in truth he must look into its root, how its root is very high and exalted.
The parenthesis cites the discourse on “When you light the lamps,” which explains the Sages’ saying that an unlearned person may not eat meat (Pesachim 49b). Here the subject is a Torah scholar, for whom meat is permitted, yet he may fear falling from his level; but in truth he should look at the meat’s high root.
ועי״ז פירש ממנו. ולכן צריך הנודר לומר הרי זה כעולה וכקרבן שהן קודש ודבר הנדור ומופרש בשרשו הגבוה למעלה וכמ״ש
And through this he separates from it. And therefore the one who vows must say, “This is like a burnt-offering” and “like an offering,” which are holy—a thing that is vowed and set apart in its high root above. And as it is written,
Recognizing that high root is what makes him separate from it. That is why a vow says, “This is like a burnt-offering” or “like an offering”: offerings are holy, set apart in their high root above.
“When he shall pronounce (yafli) a vow”: a term of [something] wondrous (mufla) and covered, as though he vows by the life of the King, whose root is the supernal life, from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin).
“When he shall pronounce (yafli) a vow” (Numbers 6:2) uses a word that means wondrous and covered, as in the Gemara’s “what is wondrous for you… what is covered from you” (Chagigah 13a). So a vow is as though made by the life of the King, rooted in the supernal life of the encompassing light.
(ועיין מענין נדר בזח״ב [בזהר חלק ב׳] יתרו צ״א ב׳ משפטים קט״ו ב׳ פנחס דר״ה [דראש השנה] א׳ ב׳ ובפרדס ערך נדר9 ובמא״א [ובמאורי אור] אות10 נו״ן ס״ט רבות ויצא ר״פ ע׳ [עיין]11
(And see on the subject of a vow in Zohar II, Yisro, 91b; Mishpatim, 115b; Pinchas, folio 205a–b; and in the Pardes, the entry Neder (vow); and in Me’orei Or, the letter Nun, 69; [Midrash] Rabbah, Vayeitzei, beginning of section 70;
The parenthesis lists sources on vows in the Zohar, the Pardes (entry “Neder”), the Me’orei Or and the Midrash on Vayeitzei. The Kehot note corrects the folio given for the Zohar on Pinchas from 205 to 255.
כי תשא פמ״ג נשא פ״י [פרק י׳ / פרשה י׳] ע״פ כי יפליא באיכה בפסוק ישבו לארץ ידמו12 ובבחיי פ׳ יתרו)13 ומשם נשתלשלו כל בחי׳ אורות המקיפים שבעולמות עליונים
Ki Sisa, section 43; Naso, section 10, on the verse “When he shall pronounce”; in Eichah, on the verse “They sit on the ground, they are silent”; and in Bachya, Parshas Yisro.) And from there all the levels of the encompassing lights (oros makifim) in the higher worlds descended link by link,
The list continues with the Midrash on Ki Sisa and on Naso, Midrash Eichah on “They sit on the ground, they are silent” (Lamentations 2:10), and Rabbeinu Bachya on Yisro. From the supernal life of the King, all the encompassing lights of the higher worlds descend.
וגם למטה באדם התחתון בבחינת הבל ודבור היוצא מהפה כידוע לי״ח (ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה וארשתיך לי).14
and also below, in the lower man, in the level of the breath and speech that issue from the mouth, as is known to those versed in the hidden wisdom. (And see what is written about this in the discourse beginning “And I will betroth you to Me.”)
Below, in man, the encompassing light corresponds to breath and speech, which issue from the mouth, as those versed in Kabbalah know. The text refers to the discourse “And I will betroth you to Me” for more.
וזהו דבר הנדור15 שמקדיש הקרבן ואמר ה״ז [הרי זה] עולה או שלמים להמשיך בפיו קדושה עליונה מבחי׳ סוכ״ע מקור כל הקדושות וגם הנדרים שהן קונמות הן הקדש
And this is [the meaning of] “a thing that is vowed”: that he consecrates the offering and says, “This is a burnt-offering” or “peace-offerings,” to draw down with his mouth supernal holiness from the level of the light that encompasses all worlds, the source of all holinesses. And also the vows that are konamos are hekdesh (consecrated property),
This is what “a thing that is vowed” means: when one consecrates an offering by saying “This is a burnt-offering” or “peace-offerings,” his mouth draws down supernal holiness from the encompassing light, the source of all holiness. Vows made with konam likewise make the object hekdesh, consecrated property.
כדאיתא בגמרא16 (וזהו כענין המבואר בד״ה כה תברכו1718 בפ׳ נשא בפי׳ ענין ויקרא האדם שמות19 כו׳ להעלותן עי״ז ולקדשן במקורן כו׳ ע״ש וכעין זה הוא ענין קונמות שמתפיסו בדבר הנדור וקדוש ועי״ז ממשיך בו קדושה עד שהן הקדש.
as is stated in the Gemara. (And this is like the matter explained in the discourse beginning “Thus shall you bless,” in Parshas Naso, on the meaning of “And the man gave names,” etc.—to elevate them through this and to sanctify them in their source, etc.; see there. And similar to this is the matter of konamos: that he attaches it to a thing that is vowed and holy, and through this he draws holiness into it, until they are hekdesh.
The Gemara says that konamos are hekdesh (Nedarim 10a, according to the Kehot note). The text compares this to the discourse “Thus shall you bless,” on Adam naming the creatures: by naming them he raised and sanctified them in their source, and similarly a vow links an object to something holy and draws holiness into it.
והכח הזה בפה האדם הוא ממש כענין הנ״ל דויקרא האדם שמות כו׳ ועוד נ׳ לומר כי הכח הזה הוא מעין ודוגמא הכח דלאמר זה הדבר20 הנזכר לעיל. שנמשך מבחי׳ וידבר משה אל ראשי המטות כו׳.
And this power in the mouth of man is actually like the above-mentioned matter of “And the man gave names,” etc. And it seems one may further say that this power is a semblance and an example of the power of “Saying: This is the thing,” mentioned above, which is drawn from the level of “And Moshe spoke to the heads of the tribes,” etc.
This power of the human mouth is the same as Adam’s power in naming the creatures. It is also a reflection of the power of “This is the thing,” drawn from Moshe speaking to “the heads of the tribes.”
וזהו שייכות ענין וידבר משה כו׳ לאמר זה הדבר לפ׳ נדרים ולכן עכשיו שנתמעטו הלבבות21 צריך לומר בלי נדר22 וכמ״ש במ״א):
And this is the connection of the matter of “And Moshe spoke,” etc., “saying: This is the thing,” to the section of vows. And therefore now, when hearts have diminished, one must say “without a vow,” as is written elsewhere.)
This is the connection between “And Moshe spoke… saying: This is the thing” and the section on vows. Since hearts have now diminished, one should say “without a vow” (bli neder), as written elsewhere.
The paragraph explains vows: abstinence takes root through recognizing the high origin of what one abstains from, and a vow ties the object to a consecrated thing, drawing holiness into it by the power of speech, a power that stems from Moshe’s “This is the thing.”
The Kehot note cites a talk of Shabbos Matos-Masei 5748: the closing words seem to say that we can no longer draw down this level, yet the law is clear that a vow takes effect today too, so they must mean that the Torah speaks of the common case. For the law, the note refers to the Tur and Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh De’ah 203:4).
Marei mekomos
- 1קדש א״ע במותר לך · Yevamot 20a:15
- 2בזוללי בשר וסובאי יין · Proverbs 23:20
- 3בד״ה בהעלותך · לעיל לא, ג.
- 4בהעלותך את הנרות · Numbers 8:2
- 5ע״ה אסור לאכול בשר · Pesachim 49b:3
- 6כי יפליא לנדור · Numbers 6:2
- 7לשון מופלא ומכוסה · כוונתו הק׳ לחגיגה (יג רע״א). וע׳ בת״ז דפוס זיטאמיר ה״פ [ה׳ פעמים] (קנא, ב). [תז״ח צה, א] קמט ריש ב [שם צד, ג] קנא, א [ב שם צו, ד] קנז, ב [שם ק, ד] קנח, א [שם קא, ג]). [כ].
- 8מופלא ומכוסה · Chagigah 13a:2
- 9ובפרדס ערך נדר · הלשון נעתק באוה״ת מטות ע׳ א׳רעו בענין שלשון נדר מלשון דירה.
- 10ובמאו״א אות נ׳ ס״ט · ”נדר אימא עילאה כו׳ ולכן נדר גימט׳ רמ״ח והואו היתירים ג׳ מוחין דז״א וג׳ לבושין שלהם כו׳” — ביאה״ז להצ״צ כרך-ב ע׳ תשעה.
- 11רבות ויצא ר״פ ע׳ · הלשון נעתק באוה״ת במדבר כרך-ו ע׳ א׳תתקנג.
- 12
- 13בזח״ב יתרו צ״א ב׳ . . ובבחיי פ׳ יתרו · מובא באוה״ת מטות ע׳ א׳רעג. א׳שלז.
- 14וארשתיך לי · Hosea 2:21
- 15שו״ה דר״ה · צ״ל רנ״ה. [כ].
- 16כדאיתא בגמרא · נדרים (י, א) ובכ״ד. [כ].
- 17בד״ה כה תברכו · לעיל פ׳ נשא כו, ב.
- 18כה תברכו · Numbers 6:23
- 19ויקרא האדם שמות · Genesis 2:20
- 20לאמר זה הדבר · Numbers 30:2
- 21ולכן עכשיו שנתמעטו הלבבות צ״ל בלי נדר · דמשמעות הענין (לכאורה) שעכשיו אין לנו כח להמשיך בחי׳ זו. אבל, כיון שהדין ברור דנדר חל גם עכשיו, עכצ״ל שלא זה כוונת הלקו״ת כ״א ע״ד שהתורה על הרוב תדבר ולכן צ״ל כו׳, וכיו״ב” — משיחת ש״פ מטו״מ תשמ״ח הערה 17 בשולי העמוד.
- 22צ״ל בלי נדר · ראה טושו״ע יו״ד סר״ג, ד. וראה לקו״ש-יג ע׳ 109.
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
In one’s avodah
The maamar draws the lesson itself. To make abstinence real, a person should reflect that the food or pleasure he gives up has a higher root than he does, so he should not drag it down to serve his cravings, but use it only to broaden his mind for serving G‑d. Through simple physical mitzvos he draws down G‑d’s holiness and comes to humility, and humility lets him feel how far a sin reaches, which is fear of sin. And since hearts have diminished, he should say “without a vow” rather than vow.
Questions for discussion
- Why does food, which is lower than man, have the power to give him life, and how does this explain calling the mitzvos G‑d’s “bread”?
- What is the difference between the love that comes from contemplation (ahavas olam) and the “desire of the heart” (ahavah rabbah), and how does each come about?
- Why must fear of sin come after holiness and humility, if “the beginning of wisdom is the fear of Havayah”?
- How does Moshe’s humility, “what are we,” relate to his prophecy “This is the thing,” and what does it mean for one’s own Torah study?
- Why must a vow be tied to a consecrated thing, and what does this teach about abstaining from permitted pleasures?
Key terms in this maamar
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×20
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×19
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds. ×2
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d's presence as it dwells in the world. ×3
- The light that fills all worlds (memalei kol almin)ממלא כל עלמין
- Divine light that enters each world and gives it life according to its measure.
- The animal soulנפש הבהמית
- The soul that animates the body and its drives. ×2
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'.
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×1
- The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
- Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond.
- An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
- Human initiative that draws down a divine response. ×1
- An arousal from aboveאתערותא דלעילא
- Divine initiative, unprompted by us. ×1
- Teshuvah (return)תשובה
- Returning to G‑d; not only repentance. ×5
- Delightתענוג
- Pleasure; the inner root of will. ×2
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×7
- The higher unity (yichuda ila'ah)יחודא עילאה
- The world is nothing next to G‑d. ×1
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×4
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×1
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×1
- Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
- The forces of concealment that oppose holiness.
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×1
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×1
- Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
- Malchus as the receiving configuration. ×1
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence.
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions.
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×4
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×2