Likkutei Torah · Parshas Acharei · Maamar 2
כי ביום הזה יכפר עליכם לטהר אתכם מכל…
For on This Day He Shall Atone for You
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
Teshuvah is turning back to face G‑d, and its root is self-nullification: Torah study clothes the soul in G‑d’s own garment, while teshuvah from the depths of the heart, the work of the Ten Days culminating on Yom Kippur, reaches even higher, removing both outer and inner arrogance.
The maamar in brief
The maamar asks why the Yom Kippur verse speaks of purification twice and why atonement waits for the tenth day. Teshuvah is defined as turning face to face with G‑d: distance from Him is not of place but of turning one’s back, as when mitzvos are kept coldly by rote. To make this inner turning lasting, the Alter Rebbe explains the greatness of Torah study. The Torah is G‑d’s garment, in which the Infinite Light itself is clothed, and its detailed laws are “the hair of His head”; clarifying them lifts the soul to the Infinite Light and brings a joy greater than Gan Eden. Through self-nullification G‑d’s word speaks in the one who studies, while the mitzvos, from Malchus, are bound to time and place. Arrogance, in contrast, is kelipah and akin to idolatry, and its remedy is shame and a cry from the heart. The Ten Days of Teshuvah repair the soul’s ten powers, ending with self-exaltation on Yom Kippur. “To purify you” removes outer arrogance; “before G‑d you shall be purified” removes inner arrogance through teshuvah that reaches above the Torah’s source, revealed fully on Simchas Torah.
Outline
- The questions and the meaning of teshuvahWhy the double wording and the ten days; teshuvah as turning face to face, since distance from G‑d is a turning of the back, like serving Him by rote.¶1–3
- Study and actionThe Sages’ statements on whether study or action is greater, and how studying the laws of an offering can count as bringing it.¶3–4
- Torah as G‑d’s garmentFrom “One” comes the love to be absorbed in G‑d, reached through Torah, the garment of the Infinite Light; clarifying the laws, the “hair of His head,” lifts the soul above the garment.¶5–8
- The joy of Torah and G‑d’s word in the mouthContemplating this brings supreme joy; through self-nullification G‑d’s word speaks in the one who studies; Torah is above time, while the mitzvos, from Malchus, are bound to it.¶9–13
- Holiness, kelipah and arroganceHoliness is self-nullification and kelipah is self-assertion, so arrogance is akin to idolatry; the remedy is shame before the all-seeing G‑d, which leads to teshuvah and the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy.¶14–17
- The Ten Days and Yom KippurThe ten days repair the soul’s ten powers; the two kinds of arrogance answer the verse’s double wording; the second Tablets and Simchas Torah reveal G‑d’s inner face.¶18–21
Key concepts
- Face to faceפנים בפנים
- The inner relationship in which a person serves G‑d from his innermost will, and G‑d gives from the inner dimension of His will; teshuvah restores it.
- Face and backפנים ואחוריים
- Two modes of Divine giving: gladly, from the inner will (“face”), or reluctantly, as if over the shoulder (“back”).
- Torah as G‑d’s garmentלבושיה כתלג חיור
- The Torah is the garment in which the Infinite Light is clothed; one who studies is clothed in the same garment, like two under one tallis.
- The hair of His headשער רישיה כעמר נקא
- The detailed laws of the Torah, a highly contracted glimmer that is nonetheless attached to the “head,” the source above the garment.
- Koach mahכח מה
- Chochmah read as “the potential of ‘what?’”: holy wisdom is self-nullification, while the wisdom of kelipah is yesh, a sense of self.
- Yeshיש
- The sense of being an independent entity apart from G‑d; in a person it is arrogance, and the maamar compares it to idolatry.
- Outer and inner arroganceגסות הרוח בחיצוניות ובפנימיות
- Seeking others’ esteem while knowing one’s lowliness, versus truly thinking oneself important; the verse’s two purifications address them.
The questions and the meaning of teshuvah ¶1–3
“For on this day He shall atone for you, to purify you; from all your sins, before G‑d, you shall be purified.” [We need] to understand the double expression, “to purify” and “you shall be purified.”
The maamar opens with the Yom Kippur verse. The verse seems to say the same thing twice, “to purify you” and “you shall be purified,” and the maamar will show that each phrase speaks of a different kind of fault.
צריך לבאר ענין עשי״ת ולמה הוקבעו עשרה ימים דוקא והיום הזה הוא יום העשירי יכפר עליכם הלא כל זמן שעושים תשובה היה צריך שיומחל להם מיד.
We need to explain the matter of the Ten Days of Teshuvah: why exactly ten days were fixed, and [why] “this day,” which is the tenth day, “He shall atone for you.” Surely, whenever people do teshuvah, they ought to be forgiven at once.
A second question: why are there exactly ten days of teshuvah, with atonement coming only on the tenth? If teshuvah works whenever it is done, forgiveness should come at once, not on a fixed date.
אך הענין הוא כי ענין התשובה הוא להשיב פנים בפנים אליו ית׳ כי הלא התשובה הוא לשוב ולהתקרב
But the point is that teshuvah is to turn the face back, face to face, toward Him, may He be blessed. For surely teshuvah is to return and draw close
The answer begins by defining teshuvah: not only regret, but turning one’s face back toward G‑d, so that the relationship is face to face. The word teshuvah means “return,” which implies coming close again.
אליו ית׳ ולכאורה לא שייך לשון זה לגבי הקב״ה דכתיב ביה את השמים ואת הארץ אני מלא3 ולמה צריך לשוב ולהתקרב אליו ית׳ ובמה נתרחק.
to Him, may He be blessed. Yet seemingly this expression does not apply with regard to the Holy One, blessed be He, of whom it is written, “I fill the heavens and the earth.” So why must one return and draw close to Him, may He be blessed, and in what way did one become distant?
This raises a difficulty: G‑d fills heaven and earth, so no one is ever physically far from Him. In what sense can a person be distant from Him, or need to come back?
אלא הענין הוא כמשל ב׳ בנ״א שעומדים זה אצל זה רק שחוזרים עורף זה מזה אין לך ריחוק גדול מזה ואין קירוב אלא בהחזרת פנים אל פנים.
Rather, the point is like the analogy of two people who stand next to each other, except that they have turned the backs of their necks to each other: there is no distance greater than this, and there is no closeness except by turning back face to face.
The analogy answers it: two people standing side by side but with their backs turned are as far apart as can be, though no space separates them. Distance from G‑d is a matter of turning away, and closeness comes only by turning back face to face.
The paragraph poses the maamar’s questions (the double wording of the verse and the need for ten days) and introduces its key image: teshuvah as turning back to face G‑d, since distance from Him is not a matter of place but of turning away.
The same analogy of two people standing side by side with their backs turned opens the maamar on “Shuvah Yisrael” in Likkutei Torah (Shabbos Shuvah), to which this maamar later refers.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי ביום הזה יכפר · מאמר זה משנת תק״ע — ראה רשימת המאמרים שבסה״מ תקס״ט ע׳ שמב. במאמרי אדהאמ״צ ויקרא-ב ע׳ תפד מאמר זה וביאורו באריכות. קיצור באוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תקסו.
- 2כי ביום הזה יכפר · Leviticus 16:30
- 3את השמים ואת הארץ אני מלא · Jeremiah 23:24
So too, it is written, “You shall see My back, but My face shall not be seen”: there is a level of face and [a level of] back Above.
G‑d told Moshe he would see His “back” but not His “face.” The Alter Rebbe takes this to mean that Above, too, there is a level of “face” and a level of “back.”
וכתיב יאר ה׳ פניו אליך2 פי׳ שההשפעה תהי׳ בבחי׳ הארת פנים מפנימיות רצונו כדכתיב ואוהב את יעקב3 וכתיב כי מחה אמחה4 כו׳
And it is written, “May G‑d make His face shine upon you”; the meaning is that the flow [of blessing] should be on the level of the shining of the face, from the inner dimension of His will, as it is written, “And I loved Jacob,” and it is written, “For I will utterly blot out,” etc.
The Priestly Blessing asks that G‑d’s face shine upon us, meaning that His flow of blessing should come from the inner dimension of His will, with a shining face. The verses about loving Jacob and about blotting out Amalek show both sides: G‑d’s love for one and His opposition to the other.
ולכן ההשפעה שמשפיע לו להחיותו הוא מבחי׳ אחוריים דהיינו כמאן דשדי בתר כתפוי5 שנותן לשונאו שאינו נותנו ברצון גמור רק כמי שמוכרח להשפיע ואין השפעה זו מבחי׳ פנימיות ועיקר רצונו.
Therefore the flow that He grants him to give him life comes from the level of the back, that is, like one who throws [something] behind his shoulders, who gives to his enemy: he does not give it with full will, but only as one who is compelled to give, and this flow is not from the inner dimension and the essence of His will.
Even what G‑d is opposed to receives life from Him, but only from the “back”: like a man who tosses something over his shoulder to an enemy, giving because he must and not because he wants to. Such giving does not come from His inner and essential will.
אבל לצדיק בא ההשפעה מבחי׳ פנימיות רצונו שנותן ברצון גמור ובהארת פנים בשמחה ובטוב לבב6 ברוב עוז וחדוה.
But to the tzaddik the flow comes from the inner dimension of His will: He gives with full will and with a shining face, in joy and with gladness of heart, with abundant strength and delight.
To the righteous, by contrast, G‑d gives from the inner dimension of His will, gladly and with a shining face. This is the “face” level of Divine giving.
Using verses about G‑d’s “face” and “back,” the paragraph shows that Divine giving has two modes: from the inner will, gladly (“face”), or reluctantly, as if over the shoulder (“back”).
Tanya chapter 22, to which the Kehot note points, explains that the kelipos receive their life only from the “back” of holiness, like a man who throws something over his shoulder to his enemy, while the “face” is the inner will that gives to all that is close to holiness.
Marei mekomos
- 1וראית את אחורי · Exodus 33:23
- 2יאר ה׳ פניו אליך · Numbers 6:25
- 3ואוהב את יעקב · Malachi 1:2
- 4כי מחה אמחה · Exodus 17:14
- 5כמאן דשדי בתר כתפוי · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 22:5
- 6
Study and action ¶3–4
3ועד״ז יובן ג״כ ענין התשובה, כי הנה כתיב כי פנו אלי עורף1 פי׳ כי פנו אלי שפונים אליו ית׳ בקיום תורתו ומצותיו.
In the same way the matter of teshuvah will also be understood. For it is written, “For they have turned to Me the back of the neck.” The meaning of “for they have turned to Me” is that they do turn to Him, may He be blessed, by keeping His Torah and His mitzvos.
Jeremiah’s rebuke, “they have turned to Me the back of the neck,” is read precisely: they do turn to G‑d, since they keep the Torah and mitzvos. But they turn toward Him with their back, not their face.
אבל מ״מ אין זה אלא בבחי׳ עורף שאינו מבחי׳ פנימית הרצון מאהבה ותשוקה אלא מצות אנשים2 מלומדה והולך בקרירות.
Nevertheless, this is only on the level of the back of the neck, for it is not from the inner dimension of the will, out of love and longing, but [as] “a commandment of men learned by rote,” and he goes about it coldly.
This is service done out of habit, “a commandment of men learned by rote” (Isaiah), without inner will, love or longing. Such a person goes through the motions coldly.
והתשובה היא החזרת פנים בפנים להיות פנימיות רצונו וחפצו בתורת ה׳ ומצותיו בשמחה ובטוב לבב מרוב כל.3
And teshuvah is turning back face to face, so that his innermost will and desire be in the Torah of G‑d and His mitzvos, in joy and with gladness of heart, more than [from] an abundance of all things.
Teshuvah turns the face back: one’s innermost will and desire become the Torah and mitzvos, done with joy that exceeds every other pleasure.
(ועמ״ש מזה ע״פ שובה ישראל4 והנה ע״י התשובה שהיא החזרת פנים בפנים כנ״ל עי״ז נמשך ג״כ מלמעלה ענין ישר יחזו פנימו5 המבואר במ״א סד״ה כי תשמע בקול6 גבי לעשות הישר).
(And see what is written on this on the verse “Return, O Israel.” Now through teshuvah, which is turning back face to face as mentioned above, through this there is also drawn down from Above the matter of “The upright shall behold His face,” which is explained elsewhere, at the end of the discourse beginning “When you heed the voice,” on [the words] “to do what is right.”)
This parenthetical sends the reader to two other maamarim. It adds that when a person turns his face to G‑d through teshuvah, G‑d in turn shows His inner “face” from Above, as in the verse “The upright shall behold His face.”
אך איך תהיה בחינה זו קבוע בנפש האדם צריך להקדים תחילה מאמר רז״ל גדול תלמוד
But how can this level become fixed in a person’s soul? We must first preface the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, “Great is study,
The Alter Rebbe asks how this inner turning can become a lasting state of the soul. To answer, he first brings the Sages’ teaching that study is great because it leads to action.
שמביא לידי מעשה7 מכלל שהמעשה הוא העיקר8 והתלמוד אינו גדול אלא במה שמביא לידי מעשה. וארז״ל הלומד שלא לעשות910 מוטב שנהפך לו שלייתו וכו׳.
for it leads to action.” By implication, action is the main thing, and study is great only in that it leads to action. And our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “One who learns not in order to do, it would have been better for him had his afterbirth been turned over,” etc.
That teaching implies that action is primary and study is great only because it leads to action. The Sages say this so strongly that one who learns without intending to act would be better off never having been born.
ובירושלמי11 אמרו על פסוק וכל חפצים לא ישוו בה121314 אפילו חפצי שמים שכל המצות אינן כדאי אפילו לדבר אחד של דברי תורה שמעלת עסק התורה יתירה על מעלת קיום המצות.
And in the Jerusalem Talmud they said on the verse “And all things desired cannot compare to her”: even things desired by Heaven; that is, all the mitzvos are not worth even a single word of the words of Torah, for the virtue of occupying oneself with Torah exceeds the virtue of keeping the mitzvos.
Yet the Jerusalem Talmud seems to teach the opposite: even “things desired by Heaven,” the mitzvos, are not worth one word of Torah. This sets up an apparent contradiction about whether study or the mitzvos is greater.
And in our Gemara too (in Moed Katan, folio 9, side b), it sets the verses against each other: it is written, “And all the things you desire cannot compare to her”: the things you desire, but not things desired by Heaven.
The Babylonian Talmud in Moed Katan notes that two verses in Proverbs differ. One says “the things you desire” cannot compare to Torah, which implies that “things desired by Heaven,” the mitzvos, can.
וכתיב וכל חפצים לא ישוו בה אפי׳ חפצי שמים, ומשני כאן במצוה שא״א לעשותה ע״י אחרים וכאן במצוה שאפשר לקיימה ע״י אחרים שמצוה שאפשר לקיימה ע״י אחרים יניחנה ויעסוק בתורה.17
And it is written, “And all things desired cannot compare to her”: even things desired by Heaven. And it answers: here [it speaks] of a mitzvah that cannot be done by others, and there of a mitzvah that can be fulfilled by others; for a mitzvah that can be fulfilled by others, one should leave it and occupy himself with Torah.
The other verse says “all things desired” cannot compare, even the mitzvos. The Gemara resolves this: a mitzvah that others can do does not override Torah study, but one that only this person can do does.
The paragraph applies the face/back image to teshuvah: keeping mitzvos by rote is turning to G‑d with one’s back, while teshuvah turns the face. It then raises the question of how this can be fixed in the soul, opening the discussion of study versus action.
Or HaTorah, as the Kehot note reports, adds further places where Likkutei Torah discusses “face to face” through Torah and mitzvos, and the seeking of G‑d’s face in “Your face, G‑d, I will seek,” which this maamar quotes later.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי פנו אלי ערף · Jeremiah 2:27
- 2
- 3בשמחה ובטוב לבב מרוב כל · Deuteronomy 28:47
- 4ע״פ שובה ישראל · לקו״ת ש״ש סו, ב. ובאוה״ת ויקרא-ב ע׳ תקסו מוסיף על ציון זה ”ועמ״ש בד״ה ואהי׳ אצלו אמון פ״ב [לקו״ת במדבר יח] בענין פנים בפנים דבר ה׳. ועמ״ש בד״ה כי ההרים ימושו פ״א ושם פ״ב [לקו״ת תצא מ, ג] פי׳ שיש החזרת פב״פ ע״י תומ״צ, וע׳ בד״ה כי תצא דרוש השני פ״ג [לקו״ת תצא לו, ב] בענין בקשו פני את פניך ה׳ אבקש” ע״ש.
- 5ישר יחזו פנימו · Psalms 11:7
- 6סד״ה כי תשמע בקול · לקו״ת ראה כד, ב.
- 7גדול תלמוד שמביא לידי מעשה · Kiddushin 40b:8–9
- 8מכלל שהמעשה הוא העיקר · ראה הל׳ ת״ת לאדה״ז פ״ד ה״ג. סה״מ תרכ״ט ע׳ יט.
- 9הלומד שלא לעשות · Vayikra Rabbah 35
- 10הלומד שלא לעשות · Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat 1:2
- 11ובירושלמי · פאה פ״א סוה״א. [כ].
- 12וכל חפצים לא ישוו בה · Proverbs 8:1
- 13וכל חפצים לא ישוו בה · Jerusalem Talmud Peah 1:1
- 14וכל חפצים לא ישוו בה · Proverbs 8:11
- 15וכל חפציך לא ישוו בה · שם ג, טו.
- 16וכל חפציך לא ישוו בה חפציך ולא חפצי שמים · Moed Katan 9b:2–3
- 17
4ולכאורה אינו מובן שהרי כל התורה אינו רק פירוש וביאור כיצד תהא המצוה נעשית ואיך ילמוד הוא
Now seemingly this is not understood, for the whole Torah is nothing but the interpretation and explanation of how the mitzvah is to be done. So how should he study what is
The difficulty: all of Torah is essentially the explanation of how to do the mitzvos. How can studying the explanation be greater than doing the thing it explains?
פירוש וביאו׳ המצוה והמצו׳ עצמה תיעשה ע״י אחרי׳. ועמ״ש מזה בד״ה וידבר אלקים1 כו׳ לאמר אנכי כו׳.
the interpretation and explanation of the mitzvah, while the mitzvah itself is done by others? And see what is written on this in the discourse beginning “And G‑d spoke, etc., saying: I am, etc.”
It seems strange to let others do the mitzvah while one studies its laws. The Alter Rebbe refers the reader to the maamar “And G‑d spoke… saying: I am…” for more on this.
וגם להבין מארז״ל כל העוסק בתורת עולה2 כאילו הקריב עולה והעוסק בתורת מנחה כאלו הקריב מנחה.
[We] also [need] to understand the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory: “Whoever occupies himself with the law of the burnt-offering, it is as if he had offered a burnt-offering; and whoever occupies himself with the law of the meal-offering, it is as if he had offered a meal-offering.”
A second question: the Sages say that studying the laws of an offering is like bringing it. This raises the question of how mere study can count as the act itself.
והלא הקרבנות תלוים בבהמ״ק ובמזבח וההקרבה תלויה בכהנים דוקא. והיאך מעלה עליו הכתוב כאלו הקריב והוא איש זר אשר לא מבני הכהנים
But surely the offerings depend on the Holy Temple and on the altar, and the offering up depends specifically on the kohanim. So how does Scripture account it to him as if he had offered [it], when he is a non-kohen, who is not of the sons of the kohanim,
Offerings require the Temple, an altar and a kohen to bring them. The one who studies may be an ordinary Jew, not a kohen.
וגם אין כאן לא בהמ״ק ומזבח. (ועמ״ש מזה ג״כ במ״א בד״ה בשעה שהקדימו3 ישראל נעשה לנשמע).
and also there is neither Holy Temple nor altar here? (And see what is written on this also elsewhere, in the discourse beginning “When Israel put ‘we will do’ before ‘we will hear.’”)
Moreover, today there is no Temple or altar at all, so how can study be considered an offering? The parenthetical refers to the maamar “When Israel put ‘we will do’ before ‘we will hear’” for more on this.
ויובן כל זה ע״פ ביאור ענין מעלת התו׳ בכללה שהיא מצוה לכל א׳ וא׳ ללמוד כל הלכו׳ התורה אפילו הלכו׳ שאינן צריכות לכל אדם כגון דיני הוראת איסור והיתר שאינה מסורה
All this will be understood by explaining the virtue of the Torah as a whole: it is a mitzvah for each and every one to learn all the laws of the Torah, even laws that are not needed by every person, such as the laws of ruling on what is forbidden and what is permitted, which are entrusted
The answer will come from understanding the value of Torah as a whole. Every Jew must learn all of its laws, even those he will never use in practice, such as the rules for deciding what is forbidden or permitted.
אלא למורי הוראות וכגון משפטים שבין איש לרעהו שאינן מסורים אלא לדיינים ואעפ״כ המצוה היא על כל אדם אפילו מי שאינו רוצה להיות דיין ומורה הוראה בישראל:
only to those who issue rulings, and such as the civil laws between a man and his fellow, which are entrusted only to judges. Even so, the mitzvah is on every person, even one who does not wish to be a judge or one who issues rulings in Israel.
Likewise civil law is entrusted to judges, yet every Jew is commanded to study it, even one who never intends to judge or rule. This shows that Torah study has a value of its own beyond guiding practice.
The paragraph sharpens the question of how Torah study can outweigh the mitzvos and count as bringing an offering, and points to the answer: the mitzvah to study all of Torah, even laws one will never apply.
The parallel in Likkutei Torah, Bamidbar, raises the same question: offerings and many mitzvos apply only at fixed times or with the Temple, while Torah study applies at every time and place. It answers there with the image of Torah as the blood that carries life to all the limbs equally.
Marei mekomos
- 1בד״ה וידבר אלקים · לקו״ת במדבר טו, ד.
- 2כל העוסק בתורת עולה · Menachot 110a:13–14
- 3בד״ה בשעה שהקדימו · לקו״ת במדבר יג, א ואילך.
Torah as G‑d’s garment ¶5–8
2. The point is this. It is written, “And these words … shall be, etc.,” “And you shall speak of them when you sit in your house, etc.”
Section 2 begins the answer with the verses of the Shema: “these words” are to be on your heart, and you shall speak of them at home and on the way.
דלכאורה פי׳ הדברים האלה היינו האמורים בק״ש דעלה קאי ובאמת מצות ק״ש היא בשחרית וערבית בלבד ולא כל היום ואיך נאמר ודברת בם בשבתך בביתך ובלכתך כו׳.
For seemingly the meaning of “these words” is those said in the Shema, to which it refers; yet in truth the mitzvah of reciting the Shema is only in the morning and the evening, and not all day. So how is it said, “And you shall speak of them when you sit in your house and when you walk, etc.”?
If “these words” means the Shema itself, there is a problem. The mitzvah to recite the Shema applies only morning and evening, yet the verse speaks of all times.
דמשמע כל היום וכל הלילה תמיד לא יחשה3 בין בשבתך בביתך בין בלכתך בדרך כו׳.
For this implies all day and all night, constantly, never to be silent, whether when you sit in your house or when you walk on the way, etc.
The verse’s language, sitting at home and walking on the way, suggests speaking of them constantly, day and night. The phrase echoes Isaiah’s watchmen, who are never silent all day and all night.
אלא ודברת בם4 בדברי תורה כתיב, וא״כ צריך להבין מהו הדברים האלה דמשמע דקאי על הדברים האמורים למעלה אחד ואהבת כו׳
Rather, “And you shall speak of them” is written of words of Torah. If so, we need to understand what “these words” are, since it implies that it refers to the words said above, “One” and “You shall love,” etc.
The Gemara settles that “you shall speak of them” refers to words of Torah, studied at all times. But then “these words” still seems to point back to the verses just before it, “One” and “You shall love,” so the question is how Torah study relates to them.
(וע׳ מענין על לבבך ברבות בקהלת בפסוק כל הנחלים הולכים אל הים ובפסוק דברתי אני עם לבי).
(And see on the matter of “upon your heart” in the Midrash Rabbah on Koheles, on the verse “All the rivers flow into the sea,” and on the verse “I spoke with my heart.”)
This parenthetical refers the reader to the Midrash Rabbah on Koheles, which discusses the meaning of “upon your heart.”
אך הנה נודע פי׳ מלת אחד שהוא לבדו5 הוא בשמים וארץ וד׳ רוחות העולם כמו שהיה לבדו קודם בריאת העולם.
But the meaning of the word “One” is known: that He alone is in the heavens and the earth and the four directions of the world, just as He was alone before the creation of the world.
“One” in the Shema means that G‑d is alone in all of creation, above, below and in every direction, exactly as He was before anything was created. Creation adds nothing to Him and changes nothing.
וכמ״ש אני ה׳ לא שניתי משום דכולא קמיה כלא ממש חשיב, ואין העולמות תופסים מקום כלל רק בשכמל״ו,6 מלכותך מלכות7 כל עולמים שמבחי׳ מלכותו נתהווה בריאת העולמות מאין ליש,
As it is written, “I, G‑d, have not changed,” because everything before Him is considered as truly nothing, and the worlds take up no room at all, except in [the level of] “Blessed be the Name of the glory of His kingdom forever and ever.” “Your kingship is a kingship over all worlds”: from the level of His Malchus came the creation of the worlds, from nothing to something,
“I, G‑d, have not changed” because before Him the worlds are nothing at all. They have place and existence only from the level of His Malchus, His kingship, to which the phrase “Blessed be the Name of the glory of His kingdom” and the verse “Your kingship is a kingship over all worlds” refer; from Malchus the worlds come into being from nothing.
וכמאמר יחיד חי העולמים מלך8 דהא דכולא קמי׳ כלא חשיב היינו קמיה דוקא משא״כ בבחי׳ מלכותו הוא שכינת עוזו השוכנת בתחתונים
as in the saying, “Unique One, Life of the worlds, King.” For [the statement] that everything before Him is considered as nothing means before Him specifically; whereas on the level of His Malchus, this is the Shechinah (Divine Presence) of His strength, which dwells in the lower realms,
The phrase from the morning prayers, “Unique One, Life of the worlds, King,” holds both sides. “Everything is nothing” is true “before Him,” in His own essence, while on the level of His kingship He is the Shechinah dwelling in the lower worlds.
והיינו ע״י רבוא רבבות צמצומים שיהא נגלה כבוד מלכותו ית׳, (ועמ״ש מזה ע״פ שיר השירים.9 וע״פ צאינה וראינה לא10 זז מחבבה כו׳), ואי לזאת ואהבת את11 הוי׳ אלהיך ממש
and this is through myriads upon myriads of contractions, so that the glory of His kingship, may He be blessed, be revealed. (And see what is written on this on [the verse] “The Song of Songs,” and on “Go forth and see”: “He did not cease to cherish her,” etc.) Therefore, “You shall love Havayah your G‑d,” truly,
For His kingship to be revealed in the worlds, the light passes through countless contractions. From this the Alter Rebbe turns to “You shall love Havayah your G‑d”: the love asked for is that Havayah, who is beyond the worlds, should truly be “your” G‑d.
דהיינו להיות האהבה ורעותא דלבא להבטל אליו ית׳ ממש להיות נפשו נכללת ובטלה במציאות באור א״ס ב״ה ממש דכולא קמיה כלא ממש חשיב.12
that is, that there be love and the yearning of the heart to be nullified to Him, may He be blessed, truly, so that his soul be included and nullified in its very existence in the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, itself, for everything before Him is considered as truly nothing.
This love is the yearning to be nullified before G‑d entirely, so that the soul is absorbed into the Infinite Light. Such love follows from knowing that before Him everything is truly nothing.
וזהו אחד ואהבת שמבחינת אחד נמשך להיות האהבה ורעותא דלבא בנפש האדם להיות הוי׳ ממש אלהיך
And this is “One” [followed by] “You shall love”: from the level of “One” there is drawn [the power] for love and the yearning of the heart to be in a person’s soul, so that Havayah truly be “your G‑d.”
This is why “You shall love” follows “One”: awareness of G‑d’s oneness gives rise in the soul to the love and yearning to be absorbed in Him. Through it Havayah becomes truly “your G‑d.”
והיינו ע״י עסק התורה דכתיב עוטה אור כשלמה13 שאור התורה עוטה הקב״ה כשלמה שאור א״ס ב״ה ממש מתלבש בהתורה
And this is through occupying oneself with Torah, as it is written, “He wraps Himself in light as in a garment”: the light of the Torah wraps the Holy One, blessed be He, like a garment, for the Infinite Light, blessed be He, itself is clothed in the Torah.
This love is reached through Torah study. The verse says G‑d wraps Himself in light as in a garment: the Torah is that garment, and the Infinite Light itself is clothed in it.
(And see what is written on this in the discourse beginning “They shall make for themselves tzitzis.” And see further on this in Parshas Toldos, 142b; Terumah, 164; in Parshas Pinchas, 245b.)
This parenthetical refers to the discourse on tzitzis and to passages in the Zohar on Toldos, Terumah and Pinchas that discuss the same theme.
ועל זה נאמר לבושי׳ כתלג חיוור16 כי תחלת הויית השלג הוא מן המים17 שנקרשו ונעשו שלג ואח״כ כשנפשר ונמס חוזר למים, כך הויית לבוש התורה הוא מבחי׳ המים שהיא בחי׳ חכמה עילאה חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעא.18
And of this it is said, “His garment is white as snow.” For snow first comes into being from water that has congealed and become snow, and afterward, when it thaws and melts, it returns to water. So too, the garment of the Torah comes into being from the level of water, which is the level of Supreme Chochmah: “He is wise, but not with a knowable wisdom.”
Daniel’s vision describes G‑d’s garment as white as snow. Snow is water that has frozen and returns to water when it melts; so the Torah, the “garment,” comes from “water,” Supreme Chochmah, a wisdom beyond any wisdom that can be known.
ומזה נמשך ג״כ בתורה גשמיות שלפנינו להיות גילוי בחי׳ חכמתו ורצונו ית׳. וזהו חכמה בראש וחכמה בסוף.19
And from this there is also drawn, into the Torah in the physical [form] that is before us, a revelation of the level of His wisdom and will, may He be blessed. And this is “wisdom at the beginning and wisdom at the end.”
That Supreme wisdom is drawn down even into the Torah as we have it, in physical form, so that G‑d’s wisdom and will are revealed in it. The phrase “wisdom at the beginning and wisdom at the end” expresses that the same Chochmah is present at the source and at the lowest point.
The paragraph explains why “these words” of Torah study are tied to “One” and “You shall love”: G‑d’s oneness gives rise to the love of being absorbed in Him, and that love is reached through the Torah, the garment in which the Infinite Light itself is clothed.
The image of snow and water describes the Torah as Supreme Chochmah “frozen” into a garment that can be grasped, which “melts” back into its source. The Tzemach Tzedek in Or HaTorah, quoted in the Kehot note, discusses whether snow in fact comes from water, citing the law of the mikveh.
Marei mekomos
- 1והיו הדברים האלה . . ודברת בם · Deuteronomy 6:6
- 2ודברת בם בשבתך בביתך · Deuteronomy 6:7
- 3כל היום וכל הלילה תמיד לא יחשה · Isaiah 62:6
- 4ודברת בם בד״ת כתיב · Berakhot 21a:8–9
- 5אחד שהוא לבדו בשו״א וד״ר · ראה שם יג, ב. טוש״ע או״ח סס״א.
- 6בשכמל״ו · Pesachim 56a
- 7מלכותך מלכות כ״ע · Psalms 145:13
- 8יחיד חי העולמים מלך · ברכת ברוך שאמר.
- 9ע״פ שיר השירים · אולי הכוונה ללקו״ת שה״ש א, א ואילך. ראה אוה״ת שה״ש-א ע׳ טז ואילך.
- 10אני ה׳ לא שניתי · Malachi 3:6
- 11ואהבת את ה״א · Deuteronomy 6:5
- 12דכולא קמי׳ כלא ממש חשיב · Zohar I, 11b
- 13עוטה אור כשלמה · Psalms 104:2
- 14בד״ה ועשו להם ציצית · סידור שער הציצית ג, ד ואילך.
- 15בפ׳ תולדות קמ״ב ב׳. תרומה קס״ד · בפ׳ פנחס רמה, ב. וראה ביהל אור עה״פ ע׳ שצז. ויש לעיין למה ציין דוקא לזהר אלו.
- 16לבושי׳ כתלג חיוור · Daniel 7:9
- 17כי תחלת הויית השלג הוא מן המים · וכ״ה בסידור סג, ב. ובאוה״ת נ״ך-א ע׳ נו כתב ע״ז: ”מש״ש בסידור דהשלג הוא ממים אם שכ״כ בלקו״ת בד״ה כי ביום הזה יכפר, אך אינו מוכרח לפמ״ש במשנה רפ״ז דמקוואות שמהשלג יכול לעשות מקוה בתחלה ומהקרח לפ״ד הרמב״ם אינו כן, י״ל זהו לפי שהקרח נתהווה ממים על כן הוא רק מעלין ולא פוסלין, והשלג שאין התהוותו ממים ע״כ עושין ממנו מקוה מיהו שאר פוסקים אין מחלקים ביניהם”. מובא בסה״מ תער״ב ח״ב ע׳ תתקנז.
- 18חכים ולא בחכמה ידיעה · Tikkunei Zohar 17b:3–4
- 19חכמה בראש וחכמה בסוף · Zohar I, 26b
Now it is written, “The hair of His head is like clean wool”: these are the drawings-down of all the particular laws in the Torah, as it is written, “His locks are curled,” etc.:
The same verse in Daniel says the hair of His head is like clean wool. The “hair” stands for the many particular laws of the Torah, as the Sages read “His locks are curled” (taltalim) as “mounds upon mounds” (tilei tilim) of laws.
תילי תלים של הלכות3 שהן המשכות מבחי׳ שערות בלבד שהם בחי׳ הארה מצומצמת ומועטת מעט מזעיר ע״י צמצומים רבים ושונים כמ״ש נפלאותיך ומחשבותיך אלינו4 אין
mounds upon mounds of laws, which are drawings-down from the level of hairs alone, which are the level of a radiance that is contracted and diminished, a tiny trickle, through many and various contractions. As it is written, “Your wonders and Your thoughts toward us: there is no
Hair grows from the head but carries very little of its life; so the detailed laws are a tiny, highly contracted glimmer of the Divine. The verse from Psalms is brought to show how many contractions stand between G‑d and us.
ערוך אליך אגידה ואדברה עצמו מספר שלהיות המשכת נפלאותיך ומחשבותיך אלינו בעסק התורה שלפנינו המלובשת בגשמיות עצמו מספר הצמצומים רבים ריבוא רבבות מדרגות עד אין מספר.
comparison to You; should I tell and speak of them, they are too many to be counted.” That is, for there to be a drawing-down of “Your wonders and Your thoughts toward us” in the study of the Torah that is before us, which is clothed in physicality, the contractions “are too many to be counted”: myriads upon myriads of levels, beyond number.
The verse says G‑d’s wonders and thoughts reach us, though they are beyond comparison with Him and “too many to count.” The Alter Rebbe reads “too many to count” as the countless contractions needed for His wisdom to be clothed in the physical Torah we study.
(ועמ״ש מזה ע״פ5 ויהי מקץ) כי אין ערוך אליו ית׳ כלל וכמו שנודע פי׳ ערך במספר שאפילו אחד לגבי אלף אלפים ורבבות נקרא בשם ערך
(And see what is written on this on [the verse] “And it came to pass at the end.”) For there is no comparison to Him, may He be blessed, at all; as the meaning of “comparison” in number is known: even one relative to thousands of thousands and myriads is called comparable,
The parenthetical sends the reader to the discourse on “And it came to pass at the end” in Torah Ohr. “There is no comparison to You” is precise: even one compared with millions is still “comparable,” since both are numbers.
שהם מסוג א׳ שהכל נופל תחת סוג המספר, משא״כ לגבי אור א״ס ב״ה שכשמו כן הוא אין לו סוף כו׳ לא שייך ערך כלל.67
since they are of one kind, for all falls under the category of number; whereas with regard to the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, which is as its name, having no end, etc., comparison does not apply at all.
Things of the same kind can always be compared, however different in size. But the Infinite Light has, as its name says, no end, so no finite thing stands in any proportion to it.
The paragraph presents the detailed laws of the Torah as “the hair of His head”: a tiny, highly contracted glimmer of the Divine, reached through countless contractions, because nothing finite compares to the Infinite Light.
Torah Ohr on Miketz, to which the parenthetical refers, explains “Your wonders” as the hidden Supreme Will and “Your thoughts” as Supreme Chochmah, drawn to us through the Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1שער רישי׳ כעמר נקא · Daniel 7:9
- 2קווצותיו תלתלים · Song of Songs 5:11
- 3תלי תלים של הלכות · Eruvin 21b:23–25
- 4נפלאותיך ומחשבותיך אלינו · Psalms 40:6
- 5(ועמ״ש מזה ע״פ ויהי מקץ) · תו״א לא, ד. בתרל״ח שם מציין גם מלקו״ת שה״ש מ, ב.
- 6שהן המשכות מבחי׳ שערות . . לא שייך ערך כלל · מובא בד״ה כי תשא תרל״ח סעי׳ ז.
- 7
7והנה כתיב סלסלה ותרוממך1 פי׳ סלסלה לסלסל ולהפריד השערות שלא יהיו מעורבים ומבולבלין כמארז״ל לא ידעו רבנן2 מאי סלסלה3 עד דשמעי וכו׳ דהוה מהפך במזיי׳ כו׳
Now it is written, “Salseleha, and she will exalt you.” The meaning of salseleha is to curl and separate the hairs, so that they are not mixed and tangled, as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “The Rabbis did not know what salseleha means until they heard,” etc., “one who was turning over his hair,” etc.
Proverbs says of the Torah, “Salseleha, and she will exalt you.” The Sages did not know what salseleha meant until they heard a maid tell a man who was turning his hair over and over, “How long will you curl (mesalsel) your hair?”
שהסלסול הוא בשערות להפרידם שלא יהא עירוב נימא בחברתה, וכך צריך להפריד כל ההלכות שבגמ׳ שלא יהי׳ עירוב ובלבול בין הלכה להלכה.
For curling is done to hairs, to separate them so that one strand is not mixed with its fellow. So too one must separate all the laws in the Gemara, so that there is no mixing and confusion between one law and another.
Curling hair separates the strands so they do not tangle. In the same way, one must keep each law of the Gemara distinct, so that laws do not become confused with one another.
וכמו שמצינו בכמה מקומות בתלמוד דקאמרי ורמינהו וכו׳ ומשני לא קשיא הא ר׳ מאיר כו׳ שמבררין ומלבנין כל הלכה לעצמה שלא תהא הלכה אחרת סותרת אותה ומבלבלתה.
As we find in several places in the Talmud, where they say, “And they raised a contradiction,” etc., and it answers, “It is no difficulty: this is Rabbi Meir,” etc.: they clarify and make clear each law by itself, so that another law does not contradict it and confuse it.
This is what the Talmud does when it raises a contradiction between two teachings and answers, “this is Rabbi Meir’s view and that is another’s.” Each law is clarified on its own terms so that no other law contradicts it.
The paragraph explains “Salseleha” as separating and clarifying the laws, like separating strands of hair, which is the work of the Talmud’s give-and-take.
Marei mekomos
- 1סלסלה ותרוממך · Proverbs 4:8
- 2כמארז״ל לא ידעו רבנן · בר״ה כו, ב. [ובר״ח שם]. [כ].
- 3לא ידעו רבנן מאי סלסלה · Rosh Hashanah 26b:4–5
8והנה בבחינת סלסול הזה כתיב ותרוממך שנפש האדם מתרוממת ע״י זה לבחי׳ שער רישי׳ כעמר נקא1 והוא מקור התורה שהתורה היא
Now of this level of curling it is written, “and she will exalt you”: through this a person’s soul is raised up to the level of “The hair of His head is like clean wool,” and this is the source of the Torah. For the Torah is
“And she will exalt you”: clarifying the laws raises the soul to “the hair of His head,” the source of the Torah. The Torah itself is the level of a garment.
רק בחי׳ לבוש עוטה אור כשלמה2 משא״כ התרוממות זו היא למעלה מבחי׳ לבוש שהיא נוגעת לעצמיות אור א״ס ב״ה ממש (ועמ״ש במ״א ע״פ הנותן שלג כצמר3 מענין לבושיה כתלג ושער רישיה כו׳):
only the level of a garment, “He wraps Himself in light as in a garment,” whereas this exaltation is above the level of a garment, for it touches the very essence of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, itself. (And see what is written elsewhere on [the verse] “He gives snow like wool,” on the matter of “His garment is like snow” and “the hair of His head,” etc.)
The Torah as we study it is G‑d’s “garment,” but its source, the “hair,” is attached to the head itself, above the garment. So this elevation touches the essence of the Infinite Light; the parenthetical points to a discourse on “He gives snow like wool” that discusses both images.
The paragraph shows that the careful clarification of the laws raises the soul above the Torah as “garment” to its source, the “hair of His head,” which touches the essence of the Infinite Light.
The two images of Daniel 7:9, the garment white as snow and the hair like clean wool, mark two levels: the Torah as G‑d’s garment, and its source, which is joined to the “head” itself.
Marei mekomos
- 1שער רישי׳ כעמר נקא · Daniel 7:9
- 2עוטה אור כשלמה · Psalms 104:2
- 3ע״פ הנותן שלג כצמר · סידור סג, ד.
The joy of Torah and G‑d’s word in the mouth ¶9–13
9ג וכאשר ישכיל ויתבונן האדם בנפשו איך שע״י סלסול הלכות של התורה תתרומם נפשו לעלות לאור א״ס ב״ה ממש ממילא יגיל וישמח בחדוות ה׳ הוא
3. And when a person understands and contemplates in his soul how, through the curling of the laws of the Torah, his soul will be exalted to rise to the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, itself, then of itself he will exult and rejoice in the joy of G‑d, that is,
Section 3 draws the practical conclusion. When a person reflects that clarifying the laws raises his soul to the Infinite Light itself, joy follows naturally, the joy of G‑d Himself.
אור א״ס ב״ה מקור החיים מקור התענוגים יותר מרוב כל אפילו מחיי עוה״ב ג״ע תחתון ועליון שאין זה אלא זיו כו׳, וגם בבחי׳ זיו הזה אמרו על אחר מוטב דלידייניה1 כו׳.
the Infinite Light, blessed be He, the Source of life, the Source of delights, more than an abundance of all things, even more than the life of the World to Come, the lower and the upper Gan Eden, for that is only a radiance, etc. And even concerning this radiance they said about Acher, “Better that he be judged,” etc.
This joy surpasses every other pleasure, even Gan Eden, which is only a radiance (ziv) of G‑d. The Gemara says that Acher was better off being judged and then entering the World to Come, so even this radiance is precious.
Section 3 begins by turning the argument into avodah: reflecting on how Torah study lifts the soul to the Infinite Light brings a joy greater than any reward, even Gan Eden.
Marei mekomos
- 1מוטב דלידייני׳ · Chagigah 15b:3
10ומכ״ש וק״ו שישים נפשו בכפו להיות כל ישעו וכל חפצו בעסק התורה להתענג על ה׳ ממש שהוא מקור החיים ומקור התענוגים
And all the more so, a fortiori, he will place his life in his hand, so that all his salvation and all his desire be in occupying himself with Torah, to delight in G‑d Himself, who is the Source of life and the Source of delights.
If even the radiance of Gan Eden is so precious, then all the more should a person give himself over entirely to Torah study, where he delights in G‑d Himself. G‑d is the Source of all life and all delight, not merely a reflection of it.
ואף שאין התענוג הזה נראה ונגלה בהתגלות היינו משום שגדול כח התענוג ההוא שאין העולמות יכולים לסובלו
And though this delight is not seen and revealed openly, that is because the power of that delight is so great that the worlds cannot bear it,
One might object that this delight is not felt. The Alter Rebbe answers that it is hidden precisely because it is too great: the worlds could not bear it if it were revealed.
ולכן אינו בא לידי גילוי בהשגת הנבראים ואדרבה כ״ש וק״ו השמחה גדולה יותר לאלהים בהתבוננות נפשו
and therefore it does not come to be revealed in the comprehension of created beings. On the contrary, all the more so, a fortiori, the joy in G‑d is greater in his soul’s contemplation
So the delight cannot be grasped by created beings. Far from lessening the joy, this makes it greater, when a person reflects on it.
שבודאי שורה עליו גילוי העונג העליון ב״ה מה שאינו נתפס ונקלט בשום השגה ולית מחשבה תפיסא בי׳,1 וכן בעסק התורה שהיא בחי׳ לבושי׳ כתלג חיוור,
that there surely rests upon him the revelation of the Supreme Delight, blessed be He, which is not grasped or taken in by any comprehension, and “no thought can grasp Him.” And so too in occupying oneself with Torah, which is the level of “His garment is white as snow”:
A person who contemplates this knows that the Supreme Delight surely rests upon him, even though no mind can grasp it, since “no thought can grasp Him.” The Alter Rebbe then turns to Torah study as “His garment.”
הנה נודע שהמחשבה והדיבור של האדם הן בחי׳ לבושים מחשבה לבוש הפנימי ודבור לבוש האמצעי וא״כ כשנפשו של אדם מתלבשת במחשבה ודיבור של התורה
it is known that a person’s thought and speech are the level of garments: thought is the inner garment, and speech the middle garment. If so, when a person’s soul is clothed in the thought and speech of the Torah,
Thought and speech are a person’s garments: through them the soul expresses itself, thought being the more inward and speech the outer. When one thinks and speaks words of Torah, the soul is clothed in them.
הנה היא מתלבשת בלבושו של הקב״ה לבושי׳ כתלג חיוור ממש ואין קרבת ה׳ ממש יותר מזה כמו ע״ד משל שנים שמתכסים בטלית אחד.
it is clothed in the very garment of the Holy One, blessed be He, “His garment is white as snow,” and there is no closeness to G‑d greater than this, like, by way of analogy, two who are covered by one tallis.
Since the Torah is G‑d’s own garment, the one who studies is clothed in the same garment as G‑d. This is the closest possible closeness, like two people wrapped in one tallis.
(ועמ״ש סד״ה ואשה כי תדור),2 ובזה יובן מה שבפרשה שניה של ק״ש אומרים ונתתי מטר ארצכם וכו׳ ונתתי עשב בשדך34 כו׳.
(And see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “And if a woman vows.”) And with this will be understood why in the second paragraph of the Shema we say, “And I will give the rain of your land,” etc., “And I will give grass in your field,” etc.,
This also explains the second paragraph of the Shema, where Moshe says “I will give rain” and “I will give grass” in the first person, as though he were the one giving.
as though he were speaking for himself, whereas in truth the Holy One, blessed be He, is the One who gives. And Moshe our teacher, peace be upon him, said this because the Shechinah speaks from within Moshe’s throat.
Really it is G‑d who gives the rain; Moshe could say “I” because the Shechinah spoke from his throat. His own self was so nullified that G‑d’s words came through him.
The paragraph shows that delight in G‑d through Torah study is real even when unfelt, and that in study the soul is clothed in G‑d’s own garment. It then raises the first-person “I will give” in the Shema as an example of G‑d speaking through a person.
The two-in-one-tallis image expresses that thought and speech of Torah are not merely about G‑d but are His garment, so that the one who studies shares a single covering with Him.
Marei mekomos
- 1ולית מחשבה תפיסא בי׳ · Tikkunei Zohar 17a:10–12
- 2סד״ה ואשה כי תדור · לקמן פ׳ מטות פו, ד.
- 3ונתתי מטר ארצכם . . עשב בשדך · Deuteronomy 11:14
- 4ונתתי עשב בשדך · Deuteronomy 11:15
- 5ששכינה מדברת . . משה · Shemot Rabbah 3:15
- 6לאהבה את ה״א · שם יא, יג.
11וזהו מאמר השכינה שבגרונו שאומרת ונתתי, אבל מה שאנחנו אומרים ג״כ ונתתי אינו מובן לכאורה אלא היינו ע״י שאומרים תחלה לאהבה את1 ה׳ אלהיכם ולעבדו בכל לבבכם ובכל נפשכם.
This is the saying of the Shechinah in his throat, which says “And I will give.” But that we too say “And I will give” is seemingly not understood. Rather, this is through first saying, “to love G‑d your G‑d and to serve Him with all your heart and with all your soul.”
The Shechinah in Moshe’s throat could say “I will give,” but how can we say it when we recite the Shema? The answer is that we first say the verse “to love G‑d your G‑d and to serve Him with all your heart and with all your soul.”
והיינו מסירת נפש ולא בשביל שלא יהא כופר בה׳ ממש אלא היינו ביטול היש וגסות הרוח שבאדם שאמרו רז״ל כל מי שיש בו גסות הרוח ראוי לגדעו2 כאשירה
And this is self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh): not in order not to deny G‑d Himself, but rather the nullification of the yesh (the sense of self) and of the haughtiness of spirit that is in a person, of which our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Whoever has haughtiness of spirit deserves to be cut down like an asherah”
“With all your soul” means self-sacrifice, but not only the readiness to die rather than deny G‑d. It means giving up one’s sense of self and arrogance, which the Sages condemn so sharply that they compare the arrogant person to an asherah, a tree worshipped as an idol, that must be cut down.
(בסוטה דף ה׳ ע״א) שהוא בבחי׳ אשירה ממש שעושה את עצמו ליש ודבר נפרד מיחודו ית׳,
(in Sotah, folio 5, side a), for he is truly in the state of an asherah, making himself into an entity (yesh) and a thing separate from His unity, may He be blessed.
The arrogant person is truly like an idol, because he makes himself into a separate entity apart from G‑d’s unity. That is the essence of idolatry: treating something as existing on its own.
וצריך להיות בבחי׳ ביטול ומסירת נפש לה׳ והיינו כמו שנודע ממאמר מודים אנחנו לך שההודאה היא אליו ית׳3 דכולא קמיה כלא חשיב וכל מה שלמטה מטה הוא יותר כלא ולא
One must be in a state of self-nullification (bittul) and self-sacrifice to G‑d, as is known from the saying “We acknowledge You”: the acknowledgment is to Him, may He be blessed, that everything before Him is considered as nothing, and whatever is lower down is even more as nothing, and not
One must instead nullify oneself to G‑d, as the Modim prayer expresses: acknowledging that before Him everything is as nothing. The lower a thing is, the more it is nothing before Him.
כמו שנראה בערכנו שהבריאה היא יש מאין ונראה לעינינו גשמיות העולם ליש ודבר נפרד כו׳ כמ״ש במ״א.
as it appears from our perspective, that creation is something from nothing, and the physicality of the world appears to our eyes as an entity and a separate thing, etc., as is explained elsewhere.
This is the opposite of how things look to us, where the physical world seems solid and independent. The truth is that before G‑d it is nothing.
The paragraph explains that we can say “I will give” only after “with all your soul,” understood as the self-sacrifice of giving up one’s sense of self, since arrogance is a form of idolatry and the truth is that everything before G‑d is nothing.
Iggeres HaKodesh 15, to which the note points, ties the acknowledgment (hoda’ah) of Modim to this kind of self-nullification.
Marei mekomos
- 1לאהבה את ה׳ אלהיכם ולעבדו בכל לבבכם ובכל נפשכם · Deuteronomy 11:13
- 2
- 3שההודאה היא אליו ית׳ · ראה אגה״ק סי׳ טו.
12וע״י ביטול זה נמשך ומתגלה יחוד אור א״ס ב״ה ממש בנפשו ויכול לומר ונתתי שאור א״ס ב״ה המתגלה
And through this self-nullification, the unity of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, itself is drawn down and revealed in his soul, and he can say “And I will give,” for the Infinite Light, blessed be He, that is revealed
When a person nullifies himself, the unity of the Infinite Light is revealed in his soul. Then he too can say “I will give,” because it is the Infinite Light within him that speaks.
בו הוא הוא המדבר בו וכמ״ש במ״א בפ׳ ואתחנן גבי ק״ש, והוא כענין ודברי אשר שמתי בפיך1 שדבר ה׳ ממש הוא בפיו.
in him is itself what speaks in him, as is explained elsewhere, in Parshas Va’eschanan regarding the Shema. And this is like the matter of “And My words which I have placed in your mouth”: the word of G‑d itself is in his mouth.
The Alter Rebbe refers to a discussion of the Shema in Parshas Va’eschanan. Isaiah’s “My words which I have placed in your mouth” means that G‑d’s own word is in the person’s mouth.
וע״ד זה תמצא במאמר רז״ל אלו ואלו דברי2 אלהים חיים שמה שב״ש אומרים וב״ה אומרים וכן דברי אביי ורבא אין זה דבריהם ממש
And along these lines you will find in the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, “These and these are the words of the living G‑d”: what Beis Shammai say and what Beis Hillel say, and likewise the words of Abaye and Rava, are not truly their own words,
The same is true of Torah study. When the Sages say of the opposing views of Beis Shammai and Beis Hillel that “these and these are the words of the living G‑d,” they mean that these are not merely human opinions.
אלא דבר ה׳ שבפיהם, וכמו שאמר המגיד להבית יוסף אני המשנה המדברת בפיך.3 וזהו ענין התורה. אך המצות הם בקיום מצות המלך4 דוקא.
but the word of G‑d that is in their mouths. And as the Maggid said to the Beis Yosef, “I am the Mishnah that speaks in your mouth.” And this is the matter of Torah. But the mitzvos consist specifically in keeping the command of the King.
The words of the Sages are G‑d’s word in their mouths, as the heavenly Maggid told Rabbi Yosef Karo, author of the Beis Yosef: “I am the Mishnah that speaks in your mouth.” This is the nature of Torah; the mitzvos, by contrast, are the fulfilment of the King’s command.
The paragraph explains that through self-nullification G‑d’s word speaks in a person, which is the nature of Torah study, and contrasts this with the mitzvos, which are the carrying out of the King’s command.
Marei mekomos
- 1ודברי אשר שמתי בפיך · Isaiah 59:21
- 2אלו ואלו דברי א״ח · Eruvin 13b:10–11
- 3אני המשנה המדברת בפיך · מגיד מישרים ר״פ ויקרא. ובכ״מ.
- 4המצות . . מצות המלך · Bava Batra 159a:10–12
13והנה מבחי׳ מלכותו ית׳ הוא חיות כל העולמות בעלי גבול במקום ובזמן מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים וממשלתך בכל דור ודור1 כל עולמים בחי׳ מקום דור ודור בחי׳ זמן ואין בחי׳ מקום וזמן שייך
Now from the level of His Malchus, may He be blessed, comes the life-force of all the worlds, which are bounded in space and in time: “Your kingship is a kingship over all worlds, and Your dominion is in every generation.” “All worlds” is the dimension of space; “every generation” is the dimension of time. And the dimension of space and time applies
All the worlds, limited by space and time, get their life from G‑d’s Malchus, His kingship. The verse speaks of “all worlds,” which is space, and “every generation,” which is time.
אלא בבחי׳ מלכותו ית׳ מלך מלך וימלוך. אבל בא״ס ב״ה עצמו לא שייך בחי׳ זמן ומקום כלל (וכמ״ש בסש״ב ח״ב פ״ז).
only to the level of His Malchus, may He be blessed: “He is King, He was King, and He will be King.” But to the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, Himself, the dimension of time and space does not apply at all. (As is explained in Sefer Shel Beinonim, Part II, chapter 7.)
Space and time belong only to the level of Malchus, as in the liturgical phrase “He is King, He was King, and He will be King,” which speaks in terms of time. G‑d’s own infinite essence is entirely beyond both, as Tanya explains.
והנה עסק התורה נקרא בצלמנו23 שהוא בבחי׳ למעלה מן הזמן משא״כ המצות שהן בבחי׳ מלכות נקרא כדמותנו ושייך בהם לשון הזמן,
Now occupying oneself with Torah is called “in Our image,” since it is on the level above time, whereas the mitzvos, which are on the level of Malchus, are called “after Our likeness,” and the language of time applies to them.
The Alter Rebbe reads “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness” as Torah and mitzvos. Torah is “Our image,” above time; the mitzvos, from Malchus, are “Our likeness,” bound to time.
לכן קיום המצות תלוי בזמן וקרבנות תלויין בזמן בהמ״ק משא״כ עסק התורה אינו תלוי בבהמ״ק וכהן ובגדי כהונה כלל,
Therefore the keeping of the mitzvos depends on time, and the offerings depend on the time of the Holy Temple, whereas occupying oneself with Torah does not depend on the Holy Temple, a kohen or the priestly garments at all.
That is why mitzvos and offerings depend on time and on the Temple, while Torah study needs no Temple, kohen or priestly garments. This begins to answer the question of how studying the laws of an offering can count as bringing it.
ואף שהתורה הוא פי׳ המצות מ״מ במחשבה ודבור עדיין הוא בבחי׳ רוחניות אבל המצות הם במעשה הגוף בפו״מ:
And though the Torah is the explanation of the mitzvos, nevertheless, [being] in thought and speech, it is still on the level of spirituality, whereas the mitzvos are in the action of the body, in actual deed.
Even though Torah explains the mitzvos, it remains in thought and speech, which are spiritual. The mitzvos are carried out by the body, in physical action.
The paragraph distinguishes Torah, which is above time and space (“in Our image”), from the mitzvos, which flow from Malchus and are bound to time and place (“after Our likeness”). This is why Torah study does not depend on the Temple.
Torah Ohr on Yisro, to which the note points, reads “in Our image, after Our likeness” the same way and calls the mitzvos garments and encompassing lights, and the Torah food and inner light.
Marei mekomos
- 1מלכותך מלכות כל עולמים וממשלתך בכל דור ודור · Psalms 145:13
- 2והנה עסק התורה נקרא בצלמינו · וכ״ה בתו״א סח, ב. וראה באוה״ת בראשית-ג דף תקד, א.
- 3בצלמנו · Genesis 1:26
Holiness, kelipah and arrogance ¶14–17
14ד והנה זה לעומת זה1 עשה אלהים שכמו שנפש האלהית מתחלקת לעשר כחות שלשה שכליים ושבע מדות דקדושה, כך יש ג״כ בקליפה
4. Now, “G‑d has made the one opposite the other”: just as the G‑dly soul is divided into ten powers, three intellectual [powers] and seven emotive attributes (middos) of holiness, so too there are [such] also in kelipah (the husk):
Section 4 begins with the principle that G‑d made holiness and its opposite as mirror images. Just as the G‑dly soul has ten powers, three of intellect and seven of emotion, kelipah has a matching set.
כמו חכמה דקדושה יש כנגדה חכמה דקליפה חרטומי מצרים2 וכן חכמים המה להרע3 (בירמיה סי׳ ד׳) וכיוצא בשאר כחות הנפש.
just as there is the Chochmah of holiness, opposite it there is a Chochmah of kelipah, the magicians of Egypt, and likewise, “They are wise to do evil” (in Jeremiah, chapter 4), and similarly with the other powers of the soul.
Opposite holy wisdom stands a wisdom of kelipah, such as that of Pharaoh’s magicians, or of those Jeremiah calls “wise to do evil.” The same holds for each of the soul’s other powers.
וזהו כלל שבסטרא דקדושה הכל בבחי׳ ביטול אליו ית׳ חכמה כח מה4 משא״כ חכמה דקליפה היא בחי׳ יש. וכמ״ש ע״פ בעלי במות ארנון.56
And this is a general rule: on the side of holiness everything is in a state of self-nullification (bittul) to Him, may He be blessed, [as] Chochmah is koach mah, whereas the Chochmah of kelipah is a state of yesh. As is explained on [the verse] “the lords of the high places of Arnon.”
The difference is this: in holiness everything is self-nullified before G‑d, as the word Chochmah is read as koach mah, “the potential of ‘what?’,” the openness of one who sees himself as nothing. The wisdom of kelipah is yesh, a sense of self as something.
וזהו מארז״ל ישראל שבחו״ל7 כו׳, כי ארץ ישראל נק׳ ארץ כנען לשון הכנעה וביטול (עמ״ש סד״ה ויהי בשלח פרעה)8 משא״כ כשהוא בבחי׳ גסות הרוח ויש הוא
And this is the saying of our Sages, of blessed memory, “Jews outside the Land,” etc. For the Land of Israel is called the land of Canaan, an expression of submission (hachna’ah) and self-nullification (see what is written at the end of the discourse beginning “And it came to pass when Pharaoh sent”), whereas when one is in a state of haughtiness of spirit and yesh, he is
This explains the Sages’ saying about Jews outside the Land. The Land of Israel is called Canaan, from hachna’ah, submission, so its quality is self-nullification; one who lives with arrogance and self-importance has left that quality, wherever he is.
כמו עובדי עבודת כוכבים בטהרה הם שענין עובדי כוכבים ומזלות הוא כמ״ש וראית את השמש9 ואת הירח כו׳ והשתחוית להם כו׳.
“like idol worshippers in purity.” For the matter of worshippers of stars and constellations is as it is written, “And you see the sun and the moon,” etc., “and you bow down to them,” etc.
The Sages say such Jews are “idol worshippers in purity”: not actual idolaters, but sharing idolatry’s root. The Torah describes star-worship as seeing the sun and moon and bowing to them.
והנה כתיב ממגד תבואות שמש1011 שהשמש משפיע לתבואות הארץ וכן כל צבא השמים שהם המזלות אין לך עשב מלמטה12 שאין לו מזל מלמעלה כו׳.
Now it is written, “with the bounty of the crops of the sun”: the sun bestows [influence] on the crops of the earth, and likewise all the host of heaven, which are the constellations: “There is no blade of grass below that does not have a constellation above,” etc.
The heavenly bodies do have real influence: the sun ripens crops, and the Midrash says every blade of grass has a constellation above that strikes it and tells it to grow.
אלא שהשתחוי׳ להם אסור מפני שמחשבים אותם ליש ודבר שהם המשפיעים ובאמת אין השפעתם מצד עצמם
Only, bowing down to them is forbidden, because they regard them as an entity and a thing, as being the ones that bestow, whereas in truth their bestowing is not of themselves;
So the error of idolatry is not that the stars do nothing. It is that the worshipper treats them as independent powers, when their influence does not come from themselves.
אלא שהם כלי ההשפעה שבהם ועל ידם עוברת ההשפעה וכן כל עבודת כוכבים שעושה עצמה ליש ודבר אלא דקרו ליה13 אלהא דאלהא.
rather, they are the instruments of the bestowal, in which and through which the bestowal passes. And so too all idolatry makes itself into an entity and a thing, except that they call Him “the G‑d of gods.”
They are only channels through which G‑d’s flow passes. Idolaters, as the Gemara says, still acknowledge a supreme “G‑d of gods,” but they treat the lesser powers as entities of their own.
משא״כ סטרא דקדושה היא בבחי׳ ביטול שאין עוד מלבדו14 וא״כ מי שנמשך אחר גסות רוחו להחשיב עצמו ליש הרי הוא כעובד עבודת כוכבים בטהרה.
Whereas the side of holiness is in a state of self-nullification, [knowing] that “there is nothing else besides Him.” If so, one who is drawn after his haughtiness of spirit, to consider himself an entity, is like an idol worshipper in purity.
Holiness means knowing there is nothing besides G‑d. So a person who treats himself as an independent somebody is, in the root sense, like an idol worshipper, even if his practice is pure.
דהיינו מי שנמשך אחר בגדי כבוד להתפאר בפני בני אדם כי כבוד חכמים ינחלו15 כתיב ועשית
That is, one who is drawn after garments of honor, to glorify himself before people. For “the wise shall inherit honor” is written; [and] “And you shall make
The example is one who seeks robes of honor to show off before people. Proverbs says the wise inherit honor, and the Torah commands that Aaron’s garments be made for honor and glory.
בגדי קדש16 לאהרן אחיך לכבוד ולתפארת שהכבוד הנמשך לבחי׳ חכמה כח מ״ה הוא בבחי׳ ביטול משא״כ שאר כבוד של עוה״ז שהוא יש הוא מסטרא דקליפה.
holy garments for Aaron your brother, for honor and for glory”: the honor that is drawn to the level of Chochmah, koach mah, is in a state of self-nullification, whereas any other honor of this world, which is yesh, is from the side of kelipah.
The honor that comes to Chochmah, koach mah, is holy because it rests on self-nullification, like the priestly garments. Worldly honor that inflates the self is from kelipah.
Section 4 shows that holiness is self-nullification and kelipah is self-assertion, so that arrogance, like idolatry, treats something as existing apart from G‑d. It distinguishes the honor of holy wisdom from worldly honor.
The comparison to star-worship sharpens the point: the stars really do channel G‑d’s flow, and the sin lies in seeing them as independent. In the same way a person’s gifts are real, and the fault lies in treating them as his own.
Marei mekomos
- 1זה לעומת זה · Ecclesiastes 7:14
- 2חרטומי מצרים · Genesis 41:8
- 3חכמים המה להרע · Jeremiah 4:22
- 4חכמה כח מה · Zohar III, 28a
- 5ע״פ בעלי במות ארנון · לקמן חקת סה, ב ואילך.
- 6בעלי במות ארנון · Numbers 21:28
- 7ישראל שבחו״ל · Avodah Zarah 8a:17
- 8(עמ״ש — סד״ה ויהי בשלח פרעה · תו״א סא, ד.
- 9וראית את השמש · Deuteronomy 4:19
- 10ממגד תבואות שמש · שם לג, יג.
- 11ממגד תבואות שמש · Deuteronomy 33:14
- 12אין לך עשב מלמטה · Bereshit Rabbah 10:6
- 13אלא דקרו לי׳ · Menachot 110a:5–6
- 14שאין עוד מלבדו · Deuteronomy 4:35
- 15כבוד חכמים ינחלו · Proverbs 3:35
- 16ועשית בגדי קדש · Exodus 28:2
And with this will be understood what our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “This is the way of the Torah: bread with salt,” etc., “if you do so, happy are you in this world,” etc.
The Mishnah in Avos describes the Torah’s way as a simple life of bread with salt, and promises, “happy are you in this world.”
ולכאורה אינו מובן מהו העוה״ז בזה אלא הענין שכאשר ישים אל לבו ההכנעה וביטול אליו ית׳ שבזה שורה עליו עונג עליון כנ״ל. אין לך עוה״ז גדול מזה.
Seemingly it is not understood what “this world” there is in this. But the point is that when he takes to heart the submission and self-nullification to Him, may He be blessed, through which the Supreme Delight rests upon him, as mentioned above, there is no “this world” greater than this.
What is the “this world” happiness of a life of bread and salt? It is the Supreme Delight that rests on one who submits and nullifies himself to G‑d: no pleasure of this world is greater.
The paragraph explains the Mishnah’s promise of happiness “in this world” for a life of simplicity: self-nullification brings the Supreme Delight, the greatest happiness possible here.
Marei mekomos
- 1כך היא דרכה של תורה · אבות ו, ד.
- 2כך הוא דרכה של תורה פת במלח · Pirkei Avot 6:4
16ועל זה אמרו יפה שעה אחת12 כו׳. אבל כשנמשך אחר תענוגי עוה״ז הרי ממשיך עליו סטרא דקליפה ומלביש א״ע בגדים צואים וכשישים אל
And of this they said, “Better is one hour,” etc. But when one is drawn after the pleasures of this world, he draws the side of kelipah upon himself and clothes himself in filthy garments. And when he takes to
This is why the Mishnah says one hour of teshuvah and good deeds in this world is better than all the life of the World to Come. One who chases worldly pleasure instead draws kelipah onto himself, as if dressing in filthy clothes.
לבו שהקליפות סבבוהו לא יהי׳ לו תענוג מעוה״ז כלל משא״כ כשפת במלח תאכל כו׳ ישמח לבו ויגל כי אין לו לבוש מסטרא דקליפה ומבגדים הצואים.
heart that the kelipos have surrounded him, he will have no pleasure from this world at all; whereas when “you eat bread with salt,” etc., his heart will rejoice and exult, for he has no garment from the side of kelipah or from the filthy garments.
Once he realizes that kelipos surround him, his worldly pleasures lose all taste. The person who lives simply, with bread and salt, rejoices, since he wears no garment of kelipah.
אך מי שפגם והעביר את הדרך בהמשיך את לבו אחר היש והגסות, העצה היעוצה לצעוק אל ה׳ בצר לו צעק לבם3 שיהא הלב צועק בקרבו מקרב
But one who has blemished and strayed from the way by drawing his heart after the yesh and the haughtiness, the counsel given is to cry out to G‑d in his distress, “their heart cried out”: that the heart cry out within him, from “the inward
For one who has already fallen into arrogance, the counsel is to cry out to G‑d from the depths of the heart, as Eichah says, “their heart cried out.”
איש ולב עמוק איך לא שם לנגד עיניו אור א״ס ב״ה הסובב כל עלמין שלפניו כחשיכה כאורה4 ורוחניות וגשמיות שוין וימלא בושה וכלימה וכמ״ש ולא נבוש5 לעולם ועד.
part of man and the deep heart”: how did he not set before his eyes the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, which encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), before whom darkness is as light, and spirituality and physicality are equal? And he will be filled with shame and disgrace, as it is said, “And we shall not be ashamed forever and ever.”
His cry is shame: how did he forget the Infinite Light that surrounds all worlds, before which darkness and light, spiritual and physical, are the same? This shame is what the morning prayer means by asking that we never be ashamed.
The paragraph contrasts the joy of a simple life with the “filthy garments” of worldly pleasure, and gives the remedy for arrogance: a cry from the depths of the heart, born of shame before the Infinite Light that sees everything.
Marei mekomos
- 1יפה שעה אחת · שם ד, יז.
- 2יפה שעה אחת · Pirkei Avot 4:17
- 3צעק לבם · Lamentations 2:18
- 4כחשיכה כאורה · Psalms 139:12
- 5ולא נבוש · ברכת ק״ש של שחרית.
17וכמשל מי שהולך ערום בלא הודע לו שיש אנשים רואים אותו ואח״כ כשרואה שהאנשים רואים אותו יתמלא בושה,
It is like the analogy of one who walks about naked, without being aware that there are people watching him; afterward, when he sees that people are watching him, he will be filled with shame.
The analogy: someone walking about naked, unaware he is being watched, feels no shame until he realizes people can see him.
כן ויותר מכן יש ליבוש מאור א״ס ב״ה הסובב כל עלמין דכתיב בי׳ את השמים ואת הארץ אני מלא.1
So too, and even more so, one should be ashamed before the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, which encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin), of which it is written, “I fill the heavens and the earth.”
So much more should a person be ashamed before the Infinite Light that fills heaven and earth and sees everything. The sinner’s shame comes when he realizes he was never unseen.
(And see what is written on this in the discourse beginning “A menorah of gold.”) And of this it is said, “For no man shall see Me and live”: in his lifetime he does not see,
The parenthetical refers to the discourse “A menorah of gold.” G‑d told Moshe that no man can see Him and live, which the Sages read as: in life one does not see Him.
אבל בשעת מיתתו רואה4 והיינו כדי שיתמלא בושה וכלימה בראותו ה׳ נצב עליו ורואה במעשיו ועי״ז ישוב בתשובה שלימ׳ לפניו את פניך56 ה׳ אבקש
but at the time of his death he sees. That is, so that he be filled with shame and disgrace on seeing G‑d standing over him and seeing his deeds, and through this he will return in complete teshuvah before Him: “Your face, G‑d, I will seek,”
At death one does see, and the purpose is that he be filled with shame at seeing G‑d standing over him and watching his deeds. That shame brings him to complete teshuvah, as in “Your face, G‑d, I will seek.”
דהיינו לבקש פנימיות ה׳ גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה ממש דהיינו להחזיר פנים בפנים כנ״ל וכמים הפנים7 כתיב וזרקתי עליכם מים טהורים8 י״ג מכילין דרחמי
that is, to seek the inner dimension of G‑d, the revelation of the Infinite Light, blessed be He, itself, which is to turn back face to face, as mentioned above. And [corresponding to] “As water, face to face,” it is written, “And I will sprinkle pure water upon you”: the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy,
Seeking G‑d’s “face” means seeking His inner dimension, the revelation of the Infinite Light itself, which is the face-to-face turning of teshuvah. As water reflects a face, G‑d responds face to face, sprinkling “pure water,” the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy.
שהם בחי׳ פנימיות והן מקור התורה ולכך ממלא כל הפגמים שפגם בתורה. כמ״ש אנת הוא ממלא כל שמהן9 ואנת הוא שלימו דכולהו ועי״ז וטהרתם.
which are the level of the inner dimension and are the source of the Torah; and therefore they fill all the blemishes that he made in the Torah. As it is said, “You are He who fills all the Names, and You are the completion of them all.” And through this, “and you shall be purified.”
The Thirteen Attributes of Mercy are the inner dimension of G‑d and the source of the Torah, so they can fill every flaw a person caused in his Torah. This is the purification of the verse, “and you shall be purified.”
The paragraph uses the image of shame before an unseen watcher to explain how teshuvah begins, and shows that turning face to face draws down the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy, the “pure water” that purifies.
The Thirteen Attributes of Mercy, being the source of the Torah, are above the Torah itself, which is why they can repair the flaws a person made in his Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1את השמים ואת הארץ אני מלא · Jeremiah 23:24
- 2השמים — בד״ה מנורת זהב · אולי הכוונה לפ׳ בהעלותך לג, ג.
- 3כי לא יראני האדם וחי · Exodus 33:20
- 4אבל בשעת מיתתו רואה · ע׳ ספרא ויקרא (פ״ב), ושם אי׳ אבל רואים במיתתן, ובילקוט (רמז תלא) ”בשעת מיתתן” וכ״ה במד״ר (ספי״ד) ובמס׳ כלה רבתי (רפ״ג) אי׳ בזה״ל ”בחייהם אינם רואים אבל במיתתם רואים”, יעו״ש. [כ].
- 5את פניך ה׳ אבקש · תהלים כז, כח.
- 6את פניך ה׳ אבקש · Psalms 27:8
- 7וכמים הפנים · Proverbs 27:19
- 8וזרקתי עליכם מים טהורים · Ezekiel 36:25
- 9אנת הוא ממלא כל שמהן · Tikkunei Zohar, Patach Eliyahu · 17b:2–3
The Ten Days and Yom Kippur ¶18–21
18והנה על בחי׳ החזרת פנים בפנים נתקנו כל עשרת ימי תשובה כנגד עשר כחות הנפש שבכל יום נתקן כח אחד שביום ראשון נתקן בחי׳ החכמה
Now, for the turning back face to face, all the Ten Days of Teshuvah were instituted, corresponding to the ten powers of the soul, so that on each day one power is rectified. On the first day the level of Chochmah is rectified,
The Ten Days of Teshuvah, the subject of the opening question, are for this turning face to face. Each day repairs one of the soul’s ten powers, beginning with Chochmah on the first day.
דהיינו מה שהלביש נפשו בחכ׳ דקליפה שהוא בחינת יש ע״ד מ״ש ראיתי איש חכם בעיניו1 תקוה לכסיל ממנו יבא לבחי׳
that is, [the fault] that he clothed his soul in the Chochmah of kelipah, which is the level of yesh, in the manner of what is written, “I have seen a man wise in his own eyes; There is more hope for a fool than for him”: [so that] he come to the level of
Repairing Chochmah means undoing the wisdom of kelipah, the person who is wise in his own eyes, of whom Proverbs says a fool has more hope. He must come to self-nullification.
ביטול כח מה עד שביום עשירי הוא יום כיפור נתקן בחי׳ התנשאות, ועל דבר הנ״ל נק׳ עליית המל׳ שהוא מ״ש לך ה׳ הממלכה בבחי׳ ביטול,
self-nullification, koach mah. [And so on,] until on the tenth day, which is Yom Kippur, the level of self-exaltation is rectified. And for the reason mentioned above it is called the ascent of Malchus, which is what is written, “Yours, G‑d, is the kingdom,” in a state of self-nullification.
Holy Chochmah is koach mah, self-nullification. On the tenth day, Yom Kippur, the last level, self-exaltation, is repaired; this is called “the ascent of Malchus,” when the kingship is given back to G‑d: “Yours, G‑d, is the kingdom.”
לכן ביום הכפורים אסור באכילה ושתיה2 ונעילת הסנדל שהן הכל בחי׳ הלבשת היש ולהיות בבחי׳ ביטול ממש אליו ית׳, ועד״ז הן כל הכריעות והשתחוואות שביום כפור שנופלים על פניהם להיות בבחי׳ בטול.345
Therefore on Yom Kippur eating, drinking and wearing shoes are forbidden, for all of these are the level of clothing the yesh; and [this is] in order to be in a state of true self-nullification to Him, may He be blessed. In the same way are all the bowings and prostrations of Yom Kippur, when they fall on their faces: to be in a state of self-nullification.
This explains the prohibitions of Yom Kippur: eating, drinking and wearing shoes all “clothe” and support the sense of self, so we refrain from them to be fully nullified. The bowings and prostrations of the day express the same self-nullification.
The paragraph answers the opening question: the ten days repair the soul’s ten powers one by one, culminating on Yom Kippur in the repair of self-exaltation, which is why the day’s laws and bowings all express self-nullification.
Marei mekomos
- 1ראיתי איש חכם בעיניו · Proverbs 26:12
- 2ביום הכפורים אסור באכילה ושתיה · Mishnah Yoma 8:1
- 3לך ה׳ הממלכה · דברי הימים-א כט, יא.
- 4ביוהכ״פ אסור כו׳ · יומא פ״ח מ״א.
- 5לך ה׳ הממלכה · I Chronicles 29:11
19והנה יש ב׳ מיני גסות הרוח בחי׳ חיצוניות שיודע בעצמו ערכו השפל ואעפ״כ מחשב א״ע ליש ודבר בעיני הבריות, ויש בבחי׳ פנימיות שהוא בחי׳ עצמיות הגסות שדרכו ישר בעיניו והוא באמת חשוב גם בעיני עצמו.
Now there are two kinds of haughtiness of spirit. [One is] on the outer level (chitzoniyus): he knows within himself his lowly worth, and nevertheless regards himself as an entity and a thing in the eyes of people. And there is [one] on the inner level (pnimiyus), which is the very essence of haughtiness: his way is right in his own eyes, and he is truly important in his own eyes as well.
There are two kinds of arrogance. The outer kind knows it is lowly but wants others to think it important; the inner kind is arrogance itself, where a person truly believes he is right and important even in his own eyes.
The paragraph distinguishes outer arrogance, which seeks others’ esteem, from inner arrogance, which truly thinks itself important. This sets up the reading of the verse’s two expressions of purification.
Now of the first kind it is said, “For on this day He shall atone for you (aleichem), to purify you”: aleichem, “upon you,” precisely, that is, what is upon you, on the outside.
Now the opening question about the verse’s double wording is answered. “He shall atone for you” uses aleichem, literally “upon you,” which refers to the outer arrogance, the kind that sits on a person like a garment for others to see.
ועל הבחינה הב׳ אמר מכל חטאתיכם דהיינו חטאת פנימיות שלכם לפני ה׳ תטהרו. פי׳ לפני ה׳ קודם בחי׳ הוי׳.
And of the second kind it says, “from all your sins,” that is, your inner sin: “before G‑d you shall be purified.” The meaning of “before G‑d” is: prior to the level of Havayah.
“From all your sins” refers to the inner arrogance, which is part of the person himself. Its purification is “before G‑d,” read as “prior to” the level of Havayah, a level even higher than the Name.
כי התורה היא שמותיו של הקב״ה2 יו״ד היא חכמה אורייתא מחכמה נפקת.3 אבל ע״י התשובה מעומקא דליבא ממעמקים קראתיך4 ה׳ שממשיך בחי׳ הוי׳.
For the Torah is the Names of the Holy One, blessed be He; the yud is Chochmah, [and] “the Torah comes forth from Chochmah.” But through teshuvah from the depth of the heart, “From the depths I call You, G‑d,” which draws down the level of Havayah.
Torah reaches only up to the Divine Names, since it comes from Chochmah, the yud of Havayah. Teshuvah from the depths of the heart, “from the depths I call You,” reaches higher and draws down the level of Havayah from beyond it.
The paragraph resolves the verse’s double wording: “to purify you” (aleichem, “upon you”) cleanses outer arrogance, while “before G‑d you shall be purified” cleanses inner arrogance by teshuvah from the depths, which reaches above the Torah’s source.
Since the Torah comes from Chochmah, the yud of the Name, its reach is the Name itself. Teshuvah from the heart’s depths reaches what is “before” the Name and draws it down, which is why it can repair even flaws in a person’s Torah.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי ביום הזה יכפר עליכם לטהר אתכם · Leviticus 16:30
- 2התורה היא שמותיו של הקב״ה · נסמן לעיל כד, ד.
- 3אורייתא מחכמה נפקת · Zohar II, 85a
- 4ממעמקים קראתיך ה׳ · Psalms 130:1
21ואז תטהרו מסטרא דקליפה בכדי שלא יהא העלם והסתר מאור א״ס ב״ה הסובב כל עלמין. וזהו שנתנו לוחות אחרונות ביום כיפור גילוי אנכי ה׳ אלהיך.
And then “you shall be purified” from the side of kelipah, so that there be no concealment and hiding of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, which encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin). And this is why the second Tablets were given on Yom Kippur: the revelation of “I am G‑d your G‑d,”
After this teshuvah a person is purified of kelipah, so nothing hides the encompassing Infinite Light from him. This is why the second Tablets were given on Yom Kippur, revealing “I am G‑d your G‑d.”
אנכי ממש ובזה לא יהיה לך אלהים אחרים על פני1 פי׳ שזהו הבטחה שלא יהיו אלהים אחרים מעלימים ומסתירים את בחי׳ פנימיות כי עונותיכם מבדילים2 כו׳.
the very “I.” And through this, “You shall have no other gods before My face”: that is, this is a promise that no other gods will conceal and hide the level of the inner dimension, for “your iniquities separate,” etc.
“I” (Anochi) means G‑d’s very self. “You shall have no other gods before My face” is read as a promise that no “other gods” will hide G‑d’s inner face, since, as Isaiah says, it is sins that separate us from Him.
אך ביום כיפור הוא בהעלם כי לוחות אחרונות נתנו בצנעה345 אבל הגילוי הוא בשמחת תורה שמחה של תורה דהיינו גילוי מקור התורה והוא גילוי עונג העליון ב״ה:6
But on Yom Kippur it is in concealment, for the second Tablets were given privately; the revelation is on Simchas Torah, the rejoicing of the Torah, that is, the revelation of the source of the Torah, and this is the revelation of the Supreme Delight, blessed be He.
On Yom Kippur this revelation is still hidden, as the second Tablets were given quietly. It comes into the open on Simchas Torah, the joy of the Torah, which reveals the Torah’s source, the Supreme Delight.
The paragraph completes the maamar: Yom Kippur’s teshuvah removes the concealment of kelipah and reveals G‑d’s inner face, as in the giving of the second Tablets, and this revelation, hidden on Yom Kippur, comes into the open on Simchas Torah.
Likkutei Torah on Masei, to which the note points, explains that the second Tablets were given “quietly” on Yom Kippur because the day’s ascent is through the inner heart, and ties it to “From the depths I call You.”
Marei mekomos
- 1לא יהיה לך אלהים אחרים על פני · Exodus 20:3
- 2עונותיכם מבדילים · Isaiah 59:2
- 3שנתנו לוחות האחרונות ביוהכ״פ . . בצנעה · תנחומא תשא לא.
- 4כי לוחות אחרונות נתנו בצנעה · ראה לקמן פ׳ מסעי צ, א.
- 5לוחות אחרונות נתנו בצנעה · Midrash Tanchuma, Ki Tisa 31:2
- 6אנכי ה״א . . לא יהי׳ לך · Exodus 20:2
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
In one’s avodah
A person should not keep the mitzvos coldly, with his back to G‑d, but turn his face to Him with his innermost will. He should study Torah, including its detailed laws, knowing that this clothes his soul in G‑d’s own garment and raises it to the Infinite Light, and rejoice in it more than in any reward. He should root out arrogance, outer and inner, through self-nullification, and when he has fallen, cry out from the depths of his heart in shame before G‑d who sees everything; this is the work of the Ten Days of Teshuvah and of Yom Kippur.
Questions for discussion
- How does the analogy of two people standing back to back answer the question of how one can be far from G‑d, who fills heaven and earth?
- Why does the maamar call the study of the Torah’s detailed laws “the hair of His head,” and why does clarifying them lift the soul above the Torah as G‑d’s garment?
- In what sense is a haughty person “like an idol worshipper in purity,” according to the comparison with the worship of the stars?
- How do the two kinds of arrogance explain the two expressions of purification in the verse?
- Why can teshuvah from the depths of the heart reach higher than Torah study, and how does this relate to the second Tablets and Simchas Torah?
Key terms in this maamar
- Teshuvah (return)תשובה
- Returning to G‑d; not only repentance. ×9
- The Holy One, blessed be Heקב״ה
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level. ×9
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×3
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds. ×3
- The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
- G‑d's presence as it dwells in the world. ×2
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×12
- Delightתענוג
- Pleasure; the inner root of will. ×3
- Self-sacrifice (mesirus nefesh)מסירות נפש
- Giving oneself over entirely to G‑d.
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×11
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×1
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence.
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'.
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×1
- Kelipah (the husk)קליפה
- The forces of concealment that oppose holiness. ×8
- The light that encompasses all worlds (sovev kol almin)סובב כל עלמין
- Divine light too great to enter the worlds; it 'surrounds' them and affects them from beyond. ×3
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The external, expressive aspect. ×1
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- Harmony of kindness and restraint; associated with compassion. ×1
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×1