Torah Ohr · Parshas Bereishis · Maamar 4
להבין הטעם שנשתנה יצירת גוף האדם משאר כל…
To understand the reason why the formation of man’s body differs…
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
Plants and animals came forth whole, body and soul together, because their levels are adjacent; man’s body was first made as lifeless dust because only the highest soul, rooted in supernal Chochmah, can descend into the lowest, inanimate body — and from there raise all of creation.
The maamar in brief
The maamar asks why man’s body was formed first as lifeless dust, while plants and animals emerged from the earth complete with their life. The four classes of creation — inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking — correspond to the four letters of the Name Havayah. The vegetative and the animal are adjacent levels, so an animal’s body and soul could come into being together; the speaking soul is far removed from the vegetative, and could be joined only to the inanimate. This serves man’s purpose: like a jack lifting a wall from its lowest beam, the soul enters the lowest matter in order to raise the sparks in all creation. The same pattern appears in the soul (letters, emotions, intellect) and in the Sefiros: the emotions grow from Binah by cause and effect, but Malchus, the “letters,” comes directly from Chochmah — “With Chochmah He founded the earth.” Angels, whose bodies and souls are close, cannot transform a physical body; the souls of Israel, from the inner dimension, can. Adam’s soul is from supernal Chochmah, the Name Av, and the two Names “Havayah Elokim” join Chochmah with Malchus.
Outline
- The question: why man’s body was made differentlyPlants and animals came forth whole by G‑d’s word; man’s body was first lifeless dust. The four levels of creation correspond to the letters of Havayah; vegetative and animal are adjacent and could emerge together, but the speaking is too far from the vegetative.¶1–6
- Why the body is inanimate: raising all of creationMan is the purpose of creation, elevating the sparks in the lower realms; like lifting a wall from its lowest beam, the soul enters the lowest matter. The Yud connects with the final Hei, for the beginning is wedged in the end.¶7–9
- “With Chochmah He founded the earth” and the two NamesThe earth (inanimate) is founded with Chochmah and the heavens (vegetative) with Tevunah; hence Adam, whose soul is from supernal Chochmah, began as a golem, and his formation required two Names.¶10–12
- The four levels in the soul and in the SefirosIn the soul, letters are inanimate, emotions vegetative, intellect living; above, Malchus, Z’eir Anpin and Imma. Emotions gestate and nurse from the intellect, but letters bear no relation to it; only the highest can descend to the lowest.¶13–17
- Angels and souls: the purpose of self-nullificationAngels have more spiritual bodies of fire and air. The purpose of creation is the nullification of ‘something’ to ‘nothing,’ the union of lights and vessels in Tikkun. Only souls from the inner dimension of the vessels can transform a physical body; angels’ bodies and souls came forth together from Malchus of Atzilus.¶18–23
- Malchus and the letters come from a higher sourceFrom Chochmah down to the emotions is a chain of cause and effect, but the letters come from the soul’s essence and can express opposite ideas. So Malchus is founded directly by Chochmah (“Abba founded the daughter”); two levels of Chochmah and two kinds of ‘Adam’ are distinguished.¶24–29
- Adam as supernal Chochmah; the pattern in every realmAdam is supernal Chochmah, the Name Av, and so his body was inanimate; the two Names join Chochmah with Malchus. Above and below alike, adjacent levels arise together, while the highest soul enters the lowest body afterward.¶30–32
Key concepts
- Inanimate, vegetative, animal, speakingדומם צומח חי מדבר
- The four classes of creation, corresponding to the four letters of Havayah, which the maamar finds also in the soul (letters, emotions, intellect) and in the Sefiros (Malchus, Z’eir Anpin, Binah, Chochmah).
- Chain of cause and effectהשתלשלות עילה ועלול
- The gradual descent in which each level flows from the one above it, as the emotions flow from the intellect; Malchus and the letters do not arise this way.
- Their beginning is wedged in their endנעוץ תחלתן בסופן
- From Sefer Yetzirah: the highest level connects directly with the lowest, which is why Chochmah founds the ‘earth’ and the highest soul enters the lowest body.
- Nullification of the ‘something’ביטול היש
- The purpose of the descent of the worlds: that created existence be nullified before G‑d, as lights and vessels unite in the World of Tikkun.
- Outer and inner dimension of the vesselsחיצוניות ופנימיות הכלים
- Angels’ souls come from the outer dimension and cannot transform a physical body; the G-dly soul comes from the inner dimension and can.
- Two kinds of Adamשם מ״ה ושם ע״ב
- ‘Adam’ as Tiferes, the Name Mah of Z’eir Anpin, and Adam the first man as supernal Chochmah, the Name Av.
For children · ages 9–13
Why Adam began as dust
The big idea
A person’s body was made from the lowest thing, lifeless dust, so that the soul, coming in at the very bottom, can lift up the whole world.
When G‑d made the plants and the animals, He said, “Let the earth bring forth,” and they came out of the ground whole and alive. But the first man, Adam, was made differently: first his body was formed from lifeless dust, and only afterward did G‑d breathe a soul into it. Why? The world has four levels: things that do not grow, like stones; plants, which grow; animals, which are alive; and people, who can speak. Plants and animals are next to each other, so an animal’s body and life could come together. But a person’s soul is so high that it could be joined only to the very lowest level, lifeless dust. Only the highest can come down all the way to the lowest. And there is a purpose in it. A person is called medaber, “speaking,” which also means “leader.” When we eat bread and wear clothing in order to serve G‑d, we lift up all the levels of creation with us. Even the angels cannot make a body holy; a Jewish soul can.
The mashal
To lift the walls of a house with a jack, you must begin with the lowest beam, and then all the beams above it rise too. If you began from the middle, the lower ones would stay behind. So the soul was placed in a body of the lowest level, so that by lifting it up, everything above it is lifted too.
Questions for the Shabbos table
- Why was Adam’s body made first as lifeless dust, and not together with his soul like the animals?
- What does the jack that lifts the lowest beam of a wall teach us about the soul?
- How can eating, sleeping or getting dressed this week become a way of serving G‑d?
Explanation © likuteitorah.com, CC BY-NC 4.0: retold for children from our translation and explanation, with AI assistance; not yet reviewed by a human editor.
The question: why man’s body was made differently ¶1–6
To understand the reason why the formation of man’s body differs from all the other creatures, such as the vegetative and the animal, whose bodies were all created through G‑d’s utterance,
The maamar opens with its question: why was man’s body made differently from every other creature? Plants and animals came into being directly through G‑d’s spoken word (His “utterance”), body and life together.
כמ״ש ביום ג׳ תדשא הארץ דשא עשב מזריע כו׳ עץ עושה פרי כו׳ ויהי כן3 וכן ביום חמישי ישרצו המים שרץ נפש חיה4 כו׳.
as it is written of the third day, “Let the earth sprout vegetation, herbs yielding seed…, fruit trees yielding fruit…, and it was so”; and likewise on the fifth day, “Let the waters swarm with swarms of living creatures….”
The proof-texts: on the third day G‑d said “Let the earth sprout vegetation” (Genesis 1:11), and on the fifth “Let the waters swarm” (Genesis 1:20). In each case the living thing arises complete from its element at G‑d’s command.
The maamar poses its question: plants and animals came into being complete through G‑d’s word, while man’s body was made in a different way.
Marei mekomos
- 1להבין הטעם שנשתנה יצירת גוף האדם · הנחה אחרת בס׳ מאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות ע׳ טו. בהתחלה: וייצר ה׳ אלקים [נדפס מכת״י מעתיק מוגה בגוכתי״ק כ״ק הצ״צ] מבאר הענינים בארוכה. ראה לעיל בציונים והערות לכ״ק אדמו״ר זי״ע. המאמר עם הגהות באוה״ת בראשית כרך ו תתרנא, א (מלקו״ת לג״פ כג, ד). חלק מהמאמר נמצא גם בסה״מ תרל״ג ע׳ רעא. בד״ה כל שמעשיו מרובים תרנ״ג ע׳ רכ ואילך. בסה״מ תרנ״ד ע׳ רנו ואילך. קונטרס ומעין מאמר טו. ראה ד״ה ויגש אליו יהודה תרס״ח (בהמשך תרס״ו ע׳ תצד). המאמר נמצא בגוכתי״ק כ״ק הצ״צ משנת תקע״א-ב. ד״ה זה נזכר לקמן מד, א. לקו״ת ראה לא, א. ביאוה״ז להצ״צ כרך א ע׳ תכג.
- 2הצומח — ע״י מאמר ה׳ · בתרס״ו שם נוסף: ”ולכן נברא גופם ונפשם כא׳”.
- 3תדשא הארץ דשא . . עץ עושה פרי . . ויהי כן · Genesis 1:11
- 4ישרצו המים שרץ נפש חיה · Genesis 1:20
2וכן בכולם הרי שהארץ הוציאה את העשבים ואת האילנות כאו״א כמו שהוא אח״כ עם הנפש הצומחת שבו
And so with all of them: the earth brought forth the grasses and the trees, each one just as it is afterward, with the vegetative soul within it.
Each plant came out of the ground already in its final form, together with its “vegetative soul” — the life-force that makes it grow.
וכן גם הבע״ח הוציאה הארץ ג״כ כמו שהן חיים את הדוב ואת הארי כו׳ וגם המים שרצו כן שרץ נפש חיה1 הם הם הדגים ג״כ
And likewise the earth also brought forth the animals just as they are, alive — the bear and the lion, etc.; and the waters too swarmed in this way with “swarms of living creatures,” which are the fish, likewise
The same holds for land animals and for fish: the earth and the waters produced them already alive, as the finished creatures we know.
כמו שהן דהיינו הגוף עם הנפש החיונית שבתוכו יחד ע״י מאמר ה׳ שאמר תוצא הארץ2 כו׳
as they are, that is, the body together with the vital soul within it, through the utterance of G‑d, who said, “Let the earth bring forth…,”
“As they are” means body and animating soul together, produced by a single divine utterance, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures” (Genesis 1:24).
ישרצו המים כו׳ והוא צוה ונבראו3 כמו שהן עתה וכמארז״ל בקומתן נבראו.4 משא״כ בבריאת האדם שנעשה גופו תחלה בפ״ע עפר בלי שום נפש חיונית בתוכו.
“Let the waters swarm….” He commanded and they were created as they are now, as our Sages, of blessed memory, said: “They were created in their full stature.” This is not so in the creation of man, whose body was first made by itself, of dust, without any vital soul within it.
The Sages teach that all the works of creation were made “in their full stature,” fully formed. Man is the exception: his body was made first, on its own, as lifeless dust.
Plants and animals emerged complete, body and life together, from a single utterance; only man’s body was first made separately, without a soul.
Marei mekomos
- 1
- 2תוצא הארץ · Genesis 1:24
- 3והוא צוה ונבראו · Psalms 148:5
- 4וכמארז״ל בקומתן נבראו · Rosh Hashanah 11a
The verse says man was formed “of dust from the ground” (Genesis 2:7), and the Talmud describes Adam’s creation hour by hour: in the first hour his dust was gathered, and only afterward was it shaped. Before receiving life he was a golem, a shaped but lifeless mass.
כמ״ש גלמי ראו עיניך3 עד שאח״כ ויפח באפיו נשמת חיים הרי שלא יצא גופו מן הארץ על דרך שהוא עתה בהיות בו נפש החיונית והמדברת אלא שלקח עפר ועשה ממנו גוף.
as it is written, “Your eyes saw my unformed mass,” until afterward “He blew into his nostrils the breath of life.” Thus his body did not come forth from the earth in the way it is now, with the vital and speaking soul within it; rather, He took dust and made a body of it.
Psalm 139:16, “Your eyes saw my unformed mass,” is read as referring to that lifeless stage. Only afterward did G‑d breathe life into him, so man’s body did not arise alive from the earth as the animals did; it was made from dust as a separate step.
Scripture and the Sages show that Adam’s body was first gathered and shaped from dust as a lifeless form, and only afterward given a soul.
The Rebbe Rashab (Hemshech 5666, quoted in the Kehot notes) adds here the Midrash that Adam as a golem lay “from one end of the world to the other” (Bereshit Rabbah 8:1).
Marei mekomos
- 1וייצר ה׳ אלקים את האדם · Genesis 2:7
- 2שעה ראשונה צבר עפרו · Sanhedrin 38b:2
- 3גלמי ראו עיניך · Psalms 139:16
4ואח״כ נפח נשמה באפו כו׳. וזהו בחי׳ שפלות לגבי האדם שהרי הגוף שלו נמוך במדרגה1 יותר מגופות הבע״ח שנתהווה בבחינת דומם עד שאח״כ ויפח באפיו2 כו׳.3
And afterward He blew a soul into his nostrils, etc. And this is a mark of lowliness with respect to man, for his body is lower in level than the bodies of the animals, since it came into being on the level of the inanimate, until afterward “He blew into his nostrils….”
Being made first as lifeless dust is a mark of lowliness: in its origin man’s body stands lower than an animal’s, since it began at the level of the inanimate (domem), like earth or stone.
[This,] although he is the choicest of the creatures. And this is what is written, “Behind and before….” But we must understand this: why and for what reason did it come to be so?
Yet man is the choicest of creatures. Both sides are hinted at in “Behind and before You formed me” (Psalms 139:5): in body he is last and lowest, in soul first and highest. The question now is why G‑d made him this way.
הענין הוא כי הנה ד׳ בחי׳ דצח״ם6 הם כנגד ד׳ אותיות דשם הוי״ה. הדומם הוא כמו עפר ואבנים ומתכות שאין לו גידול והצומח הם אילנות ועשבים7 כו׳
The explanation is that the four levels — inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking — correspond to the four letters of the Name Havayah. The inanimate is such as dust, stones and metals, which have no growth; the vegetative are trees and grasses, etc.;
The answer begins with the four classes of creation — inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking (human) — which correspond to the four letters of the Name Havayah (Yud, Hei, Vav, Hei). Inanimate things such as dust, stone and metal do not grow; plants do.
animals have all this, and in addition to it the spiritual animal soul. And in the speaking [being] there is added, beyond all of them, the intellectual soul, the speaking soul, etc.
Animals have growth and, beyond it, a spiritual animating soul. The human, the “speaking” being, adds an intellectual soul, which expresses itself in speech.
The paragraph states the paradox — man’s body begins lower than an animal’s though man is the highest creature — and starts the answer by relating the four classes of creation to the four letters of Havayah.
Tanya ch. 38 likewise relates inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking to the four letters of Havayah. Sefer HaMaamarim 5654 (quoted in the Kehot notes) specifies that the inanimate corresponds to the final Hei, like the letters, which do not grow; the vegetative to the Vav, like the emotions, which grow from small to great; and the animal to the first Hei, Binah, of which it is said “the mother of all life.”
Marei mekomos
- 1שהרי הגוף שלו נמוך במדרגה · בד״ה סמכוני תר״ס ע׳ פד ”הגם שבתו״א מבואר שגוף האדם למטה במדרי׳ מגופי הבע״ח שהן מבחי׳ צומח וגוף האדם הוא דומם כו׳ מ״מ הרי מצד הנפש הרי הנפש המדברת הוא גבוה הרבה מנפש החי ונפש הצומחת כו׳” ע״ש.
- 2
- 3בבחינת — עד שאח״כ ויפח באפיו כו׳ · Genesis 2:4
- 4מובחר בנבראים · בהגהת ר׳ אשר: הנבראים.
- 5אחור וקדם · Psalms 139:5
- 6ד׳ בחי׳ דצח״ם · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 38:7–8
- 7שו״ה הם — ועשבים · בתרנ״ד שם ”נגד וא״ו דשם הוי׳ שהמדות צומחין מקטנות לגדלות כו׳”.
- 8שו״ה הם — החי׳ הרוחני׳ · בתרנ״ד שם: ”נגד אות ה׳ ראשונה דשם הוי׳ דבינה הוא בחי׳ חי כמ״ש בחוה אם כל חי” ע״ש עוד.
- 9שו״ה הוי״ה — שאין לו גידול · בתרנ״ד ע׳ רנז נוסף ”והוא נגד ה׳ אחרונה דשם הוי׳, וכמו אותיות שהן דוממין כו׳”.
5והנה דרך כלל הבע״ח הם כלולים מב׳ דברים הגוף שבו הוא בחי׳ צומח1 שהרי נולד קטן ונעשה גדול והנפש שבו היא נפש החי׳ למינה.
Now, in general, animals are made up of two things: the body within them, which is on the level of the vegetative, for it is born small and becomes large; and the soul within them, which is the animal soul of its species.
An animal is made of two components: a body, which belongs to the vegetative level since it grows from small to large, and a soul of the animal level, particular to its species.
ומה ששניהם יצאו ביחד מן הארץ. דהיינו הגוף עם נפש החי׳ שבו ע״י מאמר ה׳ כו׳
And as for the fact that both came forth together from the earth — that is, the body with the animal soul within it — through G‑d’s utterance, etc.:
The question is why these two came out of the earth together, at a single divine command.
היינו משום שבחי׳ צומח וחי עם היותם ב׳ מדריגות זו למעלה מזו אבל הם2 סמוכי׳ זה לזה.
this is because the levels of the vegetative and the animal, although they are two levels, one above the other, are nevertheless adjacent to each other.
The reason: the vegetative and the animal are two distinct levels, one above the other, yet they are adjacent — nothing stands between them.
An animal’s body is ‘vegetative’ and its soul ‘animal’; because these two levels are adjacent, they could emerge together.
Marei mekomos
- 1הגוף שבו הוא בחי׳ צומח · נזכר בהמשך תער״ב סעי׳ קמה.
- 2אבל הם סמוכים זה לזה · ראה לקו״ת קרח נב, ג. אוה״ת יתרו ע׳ א׳ב.
6ולכן יכולים להתחבר יחד דהיינו שיהיה התהוותם בבת אחת כיון שבחי׳ צומח הוא סמוך לבחי׳ חי ואין ביניהם הפסק עוד מדרגה אחרת
Therefore they can be joined together, that is, they can come into being at once, since the level of the vegetative is adjacent to the level of the animal, with no further level interrupting between them.
Because no intermediate level separates the vegetative from the animal, the two can be joined and come into being in one act.
לכן נתהוו הבע״ח גופם ונפשם החיונית בבת אחת כנ״ל. משא״כ המדבר רחוק בדילוג הערך מהצומח ולכן לא הי׳ יכול לצאת עם הגוף כאחד:1
Therefore the animals came into being, their bodies and their vital souls, at once, as said above. But the speaking [being] is distant from the vegetative by a leap in rank, and therefore it could not come forth together with the body as one.
So the animal’s body and life emerged at once. But the human, “speaking” soul is removed from the vegetative by a leap — the animal level lies in between — so it could not come forth together with a body.
Adjacent levels can come into being together; the speaking soul, separated from the vegetative by an intervening level, could not emerge together with a body.
Marei mekomos
- 1ולכן — עם הגוף כאחד · בסה״מ תרנ״ד שם ”וכמו בצומח וחי גופם ונפשם בערך זל״ז ולכן יצאו כאחד ממאמר א׳, כמו״כ מלאכים גופם ונפשם בערך זל״ז . . משא״כ באדם גופו ונפשו רחוקים זמ״ז, דהנפש הוא בחי׳ היותר עליונה מדבר דוקא והגוף הוא דומם בחי׳ היותר תחתונה”.
Why the body is inanimate: raising all of creation ¶7–9
7ואמנם מה שגופו היה דומם דוקא הוא כי היות ידוע דהאדם הוא תכלית הבריאה1 והיינו להיות הוא מעלה הנצוצות שנפלו בדצ״ח
However, the fact that his body was specifically inanimate is because it is known that man is the purpose of creation, namely, that he is to elevate the sparks that fell into the inanimate, vegetative and animal [realms]
Now the maamar explains why man’s body had to be specifically inanimate. Man is the purpose of creation: his task is to raise the “sparks” — the fragments of divine light hidden in all things — that fell into the mineral, plant and animal realms.
ע״י שנטפלים לצרכיו לחם לאכול ובגד ללבוש והוא יש בו דעת לעבוד את ה׳ כו׳.
by their being made subordinate to his needs — bread to eat and clothing to wear — while he has the understanding (daas) to serve G‑d, etc.
He does this by using them for his needs, eating bread and wearing clothing, while he has the understanding to serve G‑d; when what he uses fuels his service, it is elevated with him.
Man’s body is inanimate because his mission is to elevate the sparks within all lower creation, which he does by using it in the service of G‑d.
Marei mekomos
- 1דהאדם הוא תכלית הבריאה · Zohar I, 205b
8ועד״מ כשצריכים להגביה איזה דבר מן הארץ ע״י כלי ההגבהה הנקרא ליווע״ר1 צריכים לאחוז בחלקים התחתונים שבו דוקא
By way of analogy: when one needs to lift something from the ground by means of the lifting device called a “levar” [jack], one must take hold of specifically its lowest parts,
An analogy from lifting heavy things: with a jack (the Yiddish “levar”), one must grip the object at its lowest part.
כמו בהגבהת כותלי בית שצריכים להתחיל להגביה הקורה התחתון דוקא ואז ממילא יוגבהו גם העליונים הימנו.
as in raising the walls of a house, where one must begin by raising specifically the lowest beam, and then the ones above it are automatically raised as well.
When raising the walls of a house, one lifts the bottom beam, and everything resting on it rises along with it.
משא״כ אם היה מתחיל מאמצע הכותל לא היה מגביה התחתונים. כמו״כ נשמת האדם נתלבשה בגוף שמבחי׳ דומם היותר תחתון מכולם ויעלה אותו וממילא יתעל׳ גם הצומח שהוא למעלה מדומם כו׳
But if one were to begin from the middle of the wall, he would not raise the lower ones. So too, the soul of man was vested in a body of the inanimate level, the lowest of them all, and it will raise it, and automatically the vegetative, which is above the inanimate, is also elevated, etc.
Lifting from the middle would leave the lower part behind. So the human soul was placed in a body drawn from the very lowest level, the inanimate, so that by raising it everything above it, beginning with the vegetative, is raised too.
וע״ש זה נק׳ מדבר מלשון ידבר עמים2 כלומר שהוא המנהיג את כולם בהיותו מעלה אותם ע״י עבודתו כו׳.
And on account of this he is called “medaber” (speaking), from the expression “He leads (yadber) peoples,” that is, he is the leader of them all, since he elevates them through his service, etc.
Hence man is called medaber, “speaker,” related to yadber in “He leads peoples under us” (Psalms 47:4), a term for leading and governing: man leads all of creation by lifting it up through his service of G‑d.
Like a jack that lifts a wall by its bottom beam, the human soul was placed in the lowest, inanimate body so that in elevating it, it elevates all of creation.
Maamarei Admur HaZaken and Or HaTorah (cited in the Kehot notes) bring this analogy in the name of the Maggid of Mezritch: when the lowest beam of a building is raised, the whole building is raised.
Marei mekomos
- 1ועד״מ כשצריכים להגבי׳ . . הנקרא ליווע״ר · במאמרי אדה״ז ענינים ע׳ תה ובאוה״ת ענינים ע׳ שכו מביא זה בשם המגיד ז״ל וז״ל: ”כשמגביהין עץ התחתון מהבנין אזי נתעלה כל הבנין כולו”. ראה גם בספר השיחות תנש״א כרך ב ע׳ 758 הערה 80.
- 2ידבר עמים · Psalms 47:4
9והנה נשמת האדם דוקא יען היותו בחי׳ מדבר הגבוה שבכולם יתלבש בדומם דוקא ולא בצומח
Now the soul of man specifically, because it is the level of the speaking, the highest of them all, is vested specifically in the inanimate, and not in the vegetative.
The human soul, being the highest level (“speaking”), is vested specifically in the inanimate, not in the vegetative.
כי צומח רחוק מבחי׳ מדבר רק לבחינת החי הוא סמוך כנ״ל שהם בחי׳ ו׳ ובחי׳ ה׳ עלאה דשם הוי״ה הסמוכה לוי״ו
For the vegetative is distant from the level of the speaking; it is adjacent only to the level of the animal, as said above, for they are the level of the Vav and the level of the upper Hei of the Name Havayah, which is adjacent to the Vav.
The vegetative is far from the speaking level and close only to the animal. In the letters of Havayah these are the Vav and the upper (first) Hei, which stand side by side.
אבל בחינת מדבר הוא יו״ד וקש״י שלמעלה מעלה מן הוי״ו אלא בבחינת ה׳ תתאה שהוא מקור בחינת דומם הוא מתלבש כי נעוץ תחלתן בסופן12 דוקא.
But the level of the speaking is the Yud and the tip of the Yud, which are far, far above the Vav; rather, it is vested in the level of the lower Hei, which is the source of the level of the inanimate, for “their beginning is wedged in their end” specifically.
The speaking level corresponds to the Yud and the tip of the Yud, far above the Vav. It enters instead into the final Hei, the source of the inanimate, because, as Sefer Yetzirah says, the beginning is “wedged” into the end: the highest connects directly with the lowest.
Using the letters of Havayah, the paragraph shows why the highest soul joins the lowest body: the beginning (Yud) is bound to the end (the final Hei), passing over the middle.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי נעוץ תחלתן בסופן · בסה״מ תרל״ג ע׳ רעג ובסה״מ תרנ״ג ע׳ רכב מציינים כאן למה שנתבאר לקמן ד, ג כי מחכמה ולמטה הוא בחי׳ השתלשלות.
- 2נעוץ תחלתן בסופן · Sefer Yetzirah 1:7
“With Chochmah He founded the earth” and the two Names ¶10–12
And the explanation: it is written, “With Chochmah He founded the earth; He established the heavens with Tevunah (understanding).” Heaven and earth are spirituality and physicality, which are, in general, the inanimate and the vegetative.
Proverbs 3:19 says the earth was founded with Chochmah (wisdom) and the heavens established with Tevunah (understanding, i.e., Binah). Heaven and earth stand for the spiritual and the physical — broadly, the vegetative and the inanimate.
כי הדומם הוא הגשם היותר אחרון והצומח יש בו איזה רוחניו׳ ולמעלה היינו זו״נ שהמדות נק׳ צומח שיש בהן קטנות וגדלות אבל האותיות הם בחי׳ דומם שאין בהם גידול כו׳.
For the inanimate is the very last [degree of] physicality, while the vegetative has some spirituality in it. And above, this is Z’eir Anpin and Nukva: the emotive attributes are called “vegetative,” for they have smallness and greatness, but the letters are the level of the inanimate, which has no growth, etc.
The inanimate is the most physical; the vegetative has a measure of spirit, since it lives and grows. Above, in the Sefiros, this is Z’eir Anpin and Nukva: the emotions are “vegetative” since they grow from small to large, while the letters (speech, Malchus) are “inanimate,” fixed and without growth.
The verse about wisdom founding the earth and understanding the heavens is introduced, with heaven and earth related to the vegetative and the inanimate, and above to the emotions (Z’eir Anpin) and the letters (Nukva, Malchus).
Marei mekomos
- 1דכתיב בחכמה יסד ארץ · Proverbs 3:19
11והנה שמים עם היותם נעלים במדרגה הוא כוננם בתבונה שלמטה מהחכמה ובחכמה יסד ארץ1 שלמטה במדרגה משמים. ולכאורה נהפוך הוא.
Now the heavens, although they are exalted in level, He established with Tevunah, which is below Chochmah; and with Chochmah He founded the earth, which is lower in level than the heavens. Seemingly, it should be the reverse!
The puzzle: the heavens are higher, yet they were made with Tevunah, which is below Chochmah, while the lower earth was made with the higher Chochmah. One would expect the reverse.
אבל הענין מטעם הנ״ל כי היא הנותנת שבחי׳ המדות מקבלים מהבינה שמהתבוננות מתפעל והוא בחי׳ חי וצומח משא״כ החכמה היא למעלה מערך זה
But the matter is for the reason stated above; this is exactly what dictates it: the level of the emotive attributes receives from Binah, for from contemplation one is stirred, and this is the level of the animal and the vegetative; whereas Chochmah is above this category.
The answer follows the principle already stated: the emotions come from Binah, since contemplating an idea stirs feeling; this is a gradual, adjacent relationship, the “animal and vegetative” kind. Chochmah is beyond that kind of relationship altogether.
אבל בה יסד ארץ משום דנתחב״ס כו׳ ולכן הי׳ גוף האדם מתחלה דומם דוקא ולא כשאר בע״ח שנתהווה גופם בבחי׳ צומח מתחלתם ולא הי׳ דומם
Yet with it He founded the earth, because “their end is wedged in their beginning,” etc. And therefore the body of man was at first specifically inanimate, and not like the other animals, whose bodies came into being on the level of the vegetative from their very beginning and were not inanimate.
Precisely because Chochmah is so high, it can found the lowest, for “their end is wedged in their beginning.” That is why man’s body began as inanimate, unlike the animals, whose bodies were vegetative from the outset.
משא״כ אדה״ר דכתיב בי׳ גלמי ראו עיניך2 בחי׳ גולם ודומם ואח״כ ויפח3 כו׳ לפי שנשמתו מבחי׳ ח״ע ובחכמה יסד ארץ.
Not so Adam, the first man, of whom it is written, “Your eyes saw my unformed mass” — the level of an unformed mass and of the inanimate — and afterward “He blew…,” because his soul is from the level of supernal Chochmah, and “with Chochmah He founded the earth.”
Adam’s body began as a golem, lifeless and inanimate, before G‑d breathed life into it, because his soul derives from supernal Chochmah — and it is Chochmah that founds the “earth,” the inanimate.
The verse is resolved: the highest level, Chochmah, founds the lowest, the earth, while Binah produces the adjacent intermediate levels; so Adam, whose soul is from supernal Chochmah, received an inanimate body.
Marei mekomos
- 1ובחכמה יסד ארץ · Proverbs 3:19
- 2גלמי ראו עיניך · Psalms 139:16
- 3ויפח · Genesis 2:7
12ובזה יובן מ״ש בבריאת האדם וייצר ה׳ אלקים בב׳ שמות כי להיות התחברות נפשו וגופו מדבר ודומם הרחוקים זמ״ז בערך יותר מריחוק הגוף מהנפש שבשאר כל הבע״ח כנ״ל שצומח וחי סמוכים יחד
With this we will understand what is written of the creation of man, “And Havayah Elokim formed,” with two Names: since it is the joining of his soul and his body — speaking and inanimate — which are farther apart from each other in rank than the body is from the soul in all the other animals, for, as said above, the vegetative and the animal are adjacent to each other;
This explains why the verse about man’s formation uses two divine Names, Havayah and Elokim. Man’s soul (speaking) and body (inanimate) are much farther apart than an animal’s soul and body, which belong to adjacent levels.
משא״כ הדומם עם המדבר שרחוקים זמ״ז מהקצה אל הקצה ולכן כדי שיתחברו יחד הוא ע״י ב׳ שמות:1
whereas the inanimate and the speaking are distant from each other, from one extreme to the other. Therefore, in order that they be joined together, it is through two Names.
Speaking and inanimate stand at opposite extremes, so joining them requires two Names working together; later (paragraph 30) the maamar says that through these two Names Chochmah is joined with Malchus.
The two Names in “Havayah Elokim formed” reflect the need for a double divine force to bind a soul and body that stand at opposite extremes.
In Chassidus, Havayah is the Name of transcendence that brings all into being, and Elokim the Name of concealment and limitation; the union of the highest and the lowest in man requires both.
Marei mekomos
- 1וייצר ה׳ אלקים · Genesis 2:7
The four levels in the soul and in the Sefiros ¶13–17
13ולהבין בתוס׳ ביאור1 ענין וייצר ה׳ אלקים את האדם עפר מן האדמה ואח״כ ויפח באפיו נ״ח2 שהגוף שלו בתחלתו הי׳ בלא נפש עדיין והי׳ דומם מעפר גשמי
To understand with further explanation the matter of “And Havayah Elokim formed the man of dust from the ground,” and afterward “He blew into his nostrils the breath of life” — that his body at first was still without a soul, and was inanimate, of physical dust,
The maamar begins a second, deeper explanation of the same verse: man’s body was first lifeless, inanimate dust, and only afterward received a soul.
ואח״כ נתלבשה בו נפש חיה המדברת כו׳ משא״כ בשאר כל הנבראי׳ דצומח וחי שגופם ונפשם יצאו כא׳ מן הארץ כו׳.
and afterward the living, speaking soul was vested in it, etc.; whereas in all the other creatures, vegetative and animal, their bodies and souls came forth together from the earth, etc.
In contrast, plants and animals received body and soul together from the earth.
הענין יובן בהקדם דכמו שיש בגשמיות ד׳ בחי׳ דצח״מ. ככה גם ברוחניו׳ נמצאים ד׳ בחי׳ אלו.
The matter will be understood by first stating that just as in physicality there are four levels — inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking — so too in spirituality these four levels are found.
The key premise: the four levels of the physical world (inanimate, vegetative, animal, speaking) have counterparts in the spiritual realm — in the human soul and in the Sefiros above.
A fuller explanation of man’s creation begins, built on the premise that the four levels of physical creation exist in spiritual form as well.
Marei mekomos
- 1ולהבין בתוס׳ ביאור · הנחה אחרת [כנראה הנחת כ״ק אדה״א] במאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות ע׳ כב. בארוכה בתו״ח בראשית כג, ב. הגהות באוה״ת בראשית כרך ו תתרנב, ב (מלקו״ת לג״פ פרשיות). נמצא בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ בבוך מאמרים משנת תקע״א-ב.
- 2וייצר ה׳ אלקים את האדם עפר מן האדמה ואח״כ ויפח באפיו נ״ח · Genesis 2:7
14ועד״מ בנפש האותיות הן בחי׳ דומם1 שאין בהם גידול כו׳ והמדות הן בחי׳ צומח שהרי התפעלות קטנה בתחלתה מתלהבת אח״כ עד שתהי׳ שלהבת עזה כו׳
By way of analogy, in the soul: the letters are the level of the inanimate, which have no growth, etc.; and the emotive attributes are the level of the vegetative, for an emotional arousal that is small at first later blazes up until it becomes a mighty flame, etc.
In the human soul, the letters of thought and speech are “inanimate”: a word stays what it is and does not grow. The emotions are “vegetative”: a feeling starts as a small stirring and grows into a strong flame.
וצמיחותם הוא מן השכל כמו שהצומח גשמי הי׳ בתחלה צפון וטמון בארץ ואח״כ יוצא וצומח לחוץ כן המדות הם כלולים ונעלמים תחלה בשכל המולידם ואח״כ יוצאים בגילוי.
And their growth is from the intellect: just as the physical plant was at first hidden and buried in the ground, and afterward comes out and sprouts outward, so the emotive attributes are at first contained and concealed in the intellect that gives birth to them, and afterward they come out into revelation.
Emotions grow out of the intellect as a plant grows out of the ground: first hidden within the idea that gives birth to them, then emerging into the open.
Within the soul, the letters are the ‘inanimate’ level and the emotions the ‘vegetative,’ growing out of the intellect as plants grow out of the earth.
Marei mekomos
- 1האותיות הן בחי׳ דומם · ראה גם בלקו״ת חקת נח, א. תו״ח בראשית יט, ד ואילך. ד״ה חביבין ישראל תרצ״ו. איזהו חכם תש״ב פ״ה. לקוטי שיחות ח״ו ע׳ 113 הערה 54.
15ובנמשל למעלה המל׳ נק׳ דומם וז״א דאצי׳ שהוא המדות נק׳ צומח והיינו שצומח מן אימא עלאה שהוא בחי׳ השכל העליון שנק׳ בשם חי
Applied above to the Sefiros of Atzilus: Malchus (divine speech) is “inanimate”; Z’eir Anpin, the divine emotions, is “vegetative,” growing out of the supernal Imma (“mother”), that is, Binah, the supernal intellect, which is called “living.”
as it is written of Chavah, “for she was the mother of all life”; and Chochmah too is called “life,” as it is written, “And wisdom gives life…,” etc.
Binah is called “living” after Chavah, “the mother of all life” (Genesis 3:20), since Imma, the mother, is Binah; and Chochmah too is associated with life, for “wisdom gives life” (Ecclesiastes 7:12).
Among the Sefiros, Malchus is the ‘inanimate,’ Z’eir Anpin the ‘vegetative,’ and Binah (and in a sense Chochmah) the ‘living.’
The maamar returns to the verse “wisdom gives life” in paragraph 29, explaining that it refers to a second, lower aspect of Chochmah, while the first aspect is called “speaking.”
Marei mekomos
- 1כי היא היתה אם כל חי · Genesis 3:20
- 2והחכמה תחי׳ · Ecclesiastes 7:12
16ונמצא שהצומח עם החי הם סמוכים זל״ז בלי דילוג והפסק מדריגה אחרת אמצעית ביניהן והם מתאחדים ומתדבקים זב״ז מצד עצמותן1 ומהותן
It turns out that the vegetative and the animal are adjacent to each other, without a leap or the interruption of another, intermediate level between them, and they unite and cleave to each other by virtue of their very essence and nature.
So the vegetative (the emotions) and the animal (the intellect) are adjacent, with nothing between them, and bonded by their very nature.
שהרי מתחלה הי׳ הצומח כלול בחי ממש שהוא ענין העלם המדות בבחי׳ עבור בהשכל כולד הצפון בבטן האם דירך אמו2 הוא ממש
For at first the vegetative was contained within the animal itself — this is the concealment of the emotive attributes in a state of gestation within the intellect, like a fetus hidden in the mother’s womb, which is literally “its mother’s thigh”;
At first the emotions exist hidden within the intellect, a stage called “gestation,” like a fetus in the womb, which the Talmud regards as part of the mother’s body (“a fetus is its mother’s thigh”).
וגם אח״כ ביציאתן לחוץ עדיין צריכין לאמן הם בימי יניקה שהשכל מחי׳ ומגדל את המדות והוא קיומן ממש.
and even afterward, when they come out, they still need their mother in the days of nursing: the intellect enlivens and grows the emotive attributes, and it is their very sustenance.
Even after they emerge, the emotions still depend on the intellect as an infant depends on nursing: the intellect keeps nourishing and growing them.
The analogy of gestation and nursing shows how intimately the emotions are bound to the intellect, like a child to its mother.
Gestation (ibbur), nursing (yenikah) and intellect (mochin) are the stages of the development of Z’eir Anpin in the Arizal’s system; the maamar names them again in paragraph 29.
Marei mekomos
- 1שו״ה ומתדבקים — עצמותן · בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ: עצמיותן.
- 2כולד . . דירך אמו · Gittin 23b
17ולכן גם בגשמיו׳ במאמר תוצא הארץ נפש חיה1 יצא גוף הבהמות ונפשותן שהם בחי׳ צומח וחי כאחד מן הארץ על היותן סמוכים ומתאחדי׳ זע״ז גם בשרשן כנ״ל.
Therefore in physicality too, by the utterance “Let the earth bring forth living creatures,” the bodies of the animals and their souls, which are the levels of the vegetative and the animal, came forth together from the earth, since they are adjacent and united with each other in their root as well, as said above.
That is why, at “Let the earth bring forth living creatures,” the animals’ bodies (vegetative) and souls (animal) came forth together: they are united even at their root.
משא״כ הדומם רחוק מן החי ביותר שהרי בחי׳ צומח מפסיק ביניהן. ועד״מ האותיות אין להם שייכות כלל להשכל שאינן כמו המדות שהם בערך וסוג קרוב עם השכל.
But the inanimate is very far from the animal, for the level of the vegetative interrupts between them. By way of analogy: the letters have no connection at all to the intellect, for they are not like the emotive attributes, which are of a kind and category close to the intellect.
The inanimate, however, is far from the animal, with the vegetative in between. In the soul, the letters bear no relation to the intellect, while the emotions are of a kindred nature with it.
וראוי הוא שיהי׳ התהוות ההתפעלות מן השכל כמ״ש לפי שכלו יהולל איש.2 וע״כ הם סמוכים זל״ז כנ״ל.
And it is fitting that the emotional arousal come into being from the intellect, as it is written, “A man is praised according to his intellect.” Therefore they are adjacent to each other, as said above.
Feelings naturally arise from understanding — “a man is praised according to his intellect” (Proverbs 12:8) — so intellect and emotion are adjacent.
אבל האותיות הן הנה ממהות וסוג אחר כי הם גשמיים ממש ואין להם שייכות כלל למהות השכל (ועמש״ל בד״ה בכ״ה בכסליו3 גבי נרות וקטורת)
But the letters are of another essence and category, for they are actually physical and have no connection at all to the essence of the intellect (and see what is written above in the discourse beginning “On the twenty-fifth of Kislev,” regarding the lamps and the incense).
The letters, though, are of a different order entirely; the Alter Rebbe refers to his Chanukah discourse, on the lamps and the incense, for more on this.
ולכן גוף האדם שהי׳ דומם וגולם נתהווה כמו שהוא בלא נפש החיונית כי לא יכלה נפש החיה כלל להתחבר עמו.4
Therefore man’s body, which was inanimate and an unformed mass, came into being as it is, without the vital soul, for the animal soul could not join with it at all.
Therefore man’s body, being inanimate, came into being without any life; even the animal soul could not join with it.
אמנם אח״כ נתלבשה בו נפש האדם עם היותה בחי׳ מדבר שהוא למעלה בערך גם מן החי.5
However, afterward the soul of man was vested in it, though it is the level of the speaking, which is above in rank even the animal.
Yet the human soul, higher even than the animal soul, did afterward enter it — which seems surprising.
אבל הענין כי היא הנותנת שבבחי׳ שלמטה מטה ביותר א״א שירד וישפיל א״ע שם רק מי שהוא גבוה בערך ביותר
But the matter is that this is exactly what dictates it: into the very lowest level, none can descend and lower himself there except one who is highest in rank.
The principle: only something of the very highest rank can descend to the very lowest place.
ולכן בגוף שמבחי׳ דומם היותר נמוך במדרגה נתלבשה נפש המדברת הגבוה מכולן משא״כ בצומח שלא נתלבשה בו רק נפש החיה.
Therefore into the body of the inanimate level, the lowest in rank, the speaking soul, the highest of them all, was vested; whereas into the vegetative only the animal soul was vested.
So the lowest body received the highest soul, while the vegetative body received only the animal soul.
רק שאותה הנפש יצאה כאחד עם הגוף אבל בדומם אינו כן שלא יצאה הנפש המדברת עמו כא׳ רק שאח״כ נתלבשה בו כו׳:
Only, that soul came forth together with the body; but with the inanimate it is not so, for the speaking soul did not come forth together with it; rather, afterward it was vested in it, etc.
The difference: the animal soul came forth together with its body, while the speaking soul entered the inanimate body only afterward.
The analogy is applied: adjacent levels arise together, but only the highest soul can enter the lowest body, and only afterward.
Marei mekomos
- 1תוצא הארץ נפש חיה · Genesis 1:24
- 2לפי שכלו יהולל איש · Proverbs 12:8
- 3בד״ה בכ״ה בכסלו · לקמן כט, א.
- 4שו״ה החי׳ — עמו · בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ: עמו כו׳.
- 5עם היותה בחי׳ מדבר שהוא למעלה בערך גם מן החי · ראה אוה״ת דרושים לר״ה ע׳ א׳שלז שכאן נתבאר שנשמת האדם הוא מבחי׳ ח״ע, א״כ בחי׳ אדם הוא חכמה, ומה שנתבאר שאדם הוא רצון ”היינו כי אבא מקבל ממזל ונוצר אותיות רצון” ע״ש.
Angels and souls: the purpose of self-nullification ¶18–23
18וביאור כל זה הנה יובן ע״פ ענין ההפרש שבין מלאכים1 לנשמות. כי הנה המלאכים נק׳ בשם חיות ובהמות2 כמ״ש פני ארי׳ אל הימין3 ופני שור מהשמאל כו׳.
The explanation of all this will be understood through the difference between angels and souls. For the angels are called by the names of beasts and animals, as it is written, “The face of a lion on the right, and the face of an ox on the left…,” etc.
To clarify all this, the maamar compares angels with souls. Angels are called “beasts” (chayos) and animals, as in Ezekiel’s vision of the divine chariot, with the faces of a lion and an ox.
And they too are composed of a body and a soul, called matter and form, as with human beings; only, the difference between them and human beings is that their body is more spiritual.
Angels too have a “body” and a “soul” — matter and form — as humans do, but their body is more spiritual.
Angels, like animals, have a body and soul close to each other; the comparison with human souls will illuminate the question of man’s creation.
Tanya ch. 39 explains that angels are called beasts because their love and awe are natural to them, without free choice; Tanya ch. 40 cites Rabbi Chaim Vital that all angels have matter and form.
Marei mekomos
- 1ההפרש שבין מלאכים ונשמות · ראה אגה״ק סי׳ כ (קל, א). ביאוה״ז לכ״ק אדהאמ״צ ב, א. צח, ג. לקו״ת שה״ש לט, ד. אוה״ת בראשית א קלו, ב. ענינים ע׳ קנ. ושם מבאר כי המלאכים נלקחים מחיצוניות הכלים ולכך אין להם תורה, אבל נש״י נלקחים מפנימיות הכלים ולכך יש להם תורה ע״ש.
- 2המלאכים נק׳ בשם חיות ובהמות · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 39:1–2
- 3פני ארי׳ אל הימין · Ezekiel 1:10
- 4מגוף ונפש ונק׳ חומר וצורה · ראה תניא פרק מ.
- 5שגופם רוחני יותר · ראה במאמרי אדה״ז ענינים ע׳ קסז ”ומה גם שבריאתם בא כאחד נשמתם וגופם בבת א׳ שגופם לבוש הכח הרוחני שבהם, משא״כ האדם נשמתו מן העליונים וגופו מן התחתונים”
19וכמ״ש הרמב״ן1 ע״פ עושה מלאכיו רוחות משרתיו אש לוהט2 שמרוחניות שני היסודות אלו אש ורוח3 נעשה גופות המלאכים יש מהן שגויתם מבחי׳ רוח והוא כמו מחנה מיכאל ויש שמבחי׳ אש וכמו מחנה גבריאל4 כו׳.
As the Ramban writes on the verse “He makes His angels winds, His ministers a flaming fire”: the bodies of the angels are made from the spirituality of these two elements, fire and air; some have bodies of the level of air, such as the camp of Michael, and some of the level of fire, such as the camp of Gavriel, etc.
The Ramban explains “He makes His angels winds, His ministers a flaming fire” (Psalms 104:4) to mean that angels’ bodies are made of the spiritual essence of two elements, fire and air (ruach, also “wind”). The camp of Michael is of air, that of Gavriel of fire.
משא״כ גופות בנ״א הם מגשמיות ד׳ יסודות ארמ״ע. אמנם הסבה לזה למה נתנו להם גופות רוחניות מלישראל.
Whereas the bodies of human beings are of the physicality of the four elements: fire, air, water and earth. But the reason for this — why they were given bodies more spiritual than Israel —
Human bodies, by contrast, are made of all four physical elements: fire, air, water and earth. Why, then, did the angels receive more spiritual bodies than the Jewish people, who are higher?
is that the purpose of the descent in the chain of the worlds is only as it is written, “And for My glory I created him…,” namely, that there be the nullification of the “something.”
The answer starts from the purpose of the whole descent of the worlds, “For My glory I created him” (Isaiah 43:7): that the “something” (yesh) — creation’s sense of being a separate existence — be nullified before G‑d.
וזהו עיקר ענין עולם התקון יחוד והתכללות אורות וכלים שהן דרך כלל בחי׳ אין ויש
And this is the essential point of the World of Tikkun (rectification): the union and inclusion of lights and vessels, which are, in general, the levels of “nothing” and “something.”
That is the core of the World of Tikkun (rectification): lights and vessels are united and blended together. The lights are “nothing” (ayin), selfless; the vessels are “something,” defined and distinct.
For the lights are the level of the illuminations and emanations of the Infinite One, blessed be He, and they are in a state of self-nullification; and the vessels are the level of “something”: Chochmah and Binah, Chesed and Gevurah.
The lights are rays of the Infinite One and remain wholly nullified; the vessels are the defined Sefiros — Chochmah and Binah, Chesed and Gevurah — each with its own distinct character.
Angelic and human bodies are contrasted, and the purpose of creation is introduced: the nullification of ‘something’ before ‘nothing,’ the union of lights and vessels that defines the World of Tikkun.
Tanya ch. 39 places the camp of Michael on the right (love) and the camp of Gavriel on the left (fear). The Tzemach Tzedek (quoted in the Kehot notes) suggests that when the Rambam calls angels “form without matter,” he means without the matter of Asiyah, but not without spiritual matter.
Marei mekomos
- 1וכמ״ש הרמב״ן · בסוף שער הגמול. מובא גם בהפירוש על הרמב״ם פ״ח מהל׳ תשובה. ראה אוה״ת בראשית כרך ג תקנו, ב. דרך מצותיך סא, ב. סה״מ תרמ״ג ע׳ עא.
- 2עושה מלאכיו רוחות משרתיו אש לוהט · Psalms 104:4
- 3שמרוחניות שני היסודות אלו אש ורוח · ראה בלקו״ת ברכה צח, א ”מיסוד הרוח הפשוט ומיסוד האש הפשוט”. וראה גם בהמשך חייב אדם לברך פרק יא נדפס בסה״מ תרל״ח ע׳ קיג.
- 4מחנה מיכאל . . מחנה גבריאל · Zohar III, 118b
- 5כי הנה תכלית הירידה · קטע מכאן מובא בסה״מ תרל״ג כרך א ע׳ עדר.
- 6ולכבודי בראתיו · Isaiah 43:7
- 7והכלים הם בחי׳ יש חו״ב חו״ג · ראה בסה״מ תרל״ג כרך א ע׳ עדר ביאור בענין מה שמבואר כאן דהכלים דבי״ע הם בחי׳ יש חו״ב חו״ג. ע״ש.
- 8בד״ה פדה בשלום עזר״ת ע׳ צט כתב וז״ל · ונ׳ דכוונת הרמב״ם מ״ש שהן צורה בלא גולם היינו לא גולם דעשי׳ אלא גולם רוחני, עכ״ל ע״ש. מובא גם בלקו״ת ברכה צח, א ובעוד כמה מקומות. וראה בלקו״ש ח״ט ע׳ 405. ובהנסמן במאמרי אדה״א בראשית ע׳ קיב. סה״מ תר״ם ח״א ע׳ רצב הע׳ 18.
20והנה בעולם התהו לא יכלו הכלים להכיל את האורות דהיינו שלא הי׳ היש נכלל ובטל אל
Now in the World of Tohu (chaos) the vessels could not contain the lights; that is, the “something” was not included and nullified into
In the World of Tohu (“chaos”), the stage before the ordered world, the vessels could not hold the lights: the “something” did not merge into the “nothing.”
האין ועיקר ענין התקון הוא להיות התכללות האורות עם הכלים וכן להיות התכללות חו״ג שמאלא וימינא כו׳ שהוא בחי׳ ביטול היש לאין.
the “nothing.” And the essential point of Tikkun is that there be the inclusion of the lights with the vessels, and likewise the inclusion of Chesed and Gevurah, left and right, etc., which is the nullification of the “something” to the “nothing.”
Tikkun means that lights and vessels are blended, and that the opposing attributes, Chesed (right) and Gevurah (left), include one another; this integration is itself the nullification of “something” to “nothing.”
Tohu is the failure of vessels to contain lights; Tikkun is their integration, which is the essence of self-nullification.
In the Arizal’s teaching, the vessels of Tohu shattered because each Sefirah stood alone without including the others; in Tikkun the Sefiros are interincluded, which the Alter Rebbe identifies with bittul.
21וגם המלאכים יש להם עבודה זו לבטל היש והגוף שלהם ע״י נשמתם שהיא מבחי׳ אין ונלקחה מחיצוניות הכלים.
The angels too have this service: to nullify the “something,” their body, through their soul, which is of the level of “nothing” and was taken from the outer dimension of the vessels.
The angels too serve by nullifying their “something,” their body, through their soul, which is “nothing”; but their soul comes from the outer dimension of the vessels.
וכן גם ישראל צריכין לבטל היש שהוא הגוף הגשמי שלהם ע״י נפשם האלקית שהיא בעצמה א״צ תקון לפי שהיא בבחי׳ אין כו׳ ונלקח׳ מפנימי׳ הכלי׳ הגבה למעל׳ ממקור מחצב נפשות המלאכים.
And so too Israel must nullify the “something,” which is their physical body, through their G‑dly soul, which in itself needs no rectification, since it is in a state of “nothing,” etc., and was taken from the inner dimension of the vessels, higher than the quarry from which the souls of the angels were hewn.
The Jewish people likewise must nullify their physical body through the G‑dly soul, which needs no rectification itself; it comes from the inner dimension of the vessels, a source higher than that of the angels’ souls.
Angels and Jewish souls alike work to nullify their bodies; the Jewish soul, from the inner dimension of the vessels, is higher than the angels’ souls.
22ולכך יכולה להפוך ולכבש1 גם גוף גשמי משא״כ המלאכי׳ אילו היה להם גוף גשמי לא היו יכולים להפכו כלל ולהיות בביטול היש אלא היו נופלים ממדרגתם לגמרי.
Therefore it can transform and subdue even a physical body; whereas the angels, had they a physical body, could not transform it at all and bring it to the nullification of the “something”; rather, they would fall from their level entirely.
Because the G‑dly soul is rooted so high, it can transform and master even a coarse physical body. An angel placed in a physical body could not refine it; it would simply be dragged down from its level.
רק נשמות האדם דוקא מצד מעלת נשמתם עלו במחשב׳2 כו׳ יכולים להפוך גם גוף גשמי.
Only the souls of man specifically, by virtue of the loftiness of their soul — they “arose in [G‑d’s] thought,” etc. — can transform even a physical body.
Only human souls, which “arose in G‑d’s thought” before creation (Bereshit Rabbah 1:4), have the power to transform physical matter.
This answers why angels have more spiritual bodies: only the loftiest souls can bear and transform a coarse physical body.
Marei mekomos
- 1שו״ה ולכבש · בהגהת הרה״ח ר׳ אשר: ולכבוש.
- 2עלו במחשב׳ · Bereshit Rabbah 1:4
23וכמשל מדורת אש גדולה שמאירה למרחוק יותר מקטנה כו׳. ונמצא מובן עכ״פ שגוף ונפש של המלאכים הן קרובים בערך זל״ז ונתהוו כאחד ממש ממקורם היא בחי׳ מל׳ דאצי׳
It is like the analogy of a large bonfire, which shines farther than a small one, etc. It is understood, in any case, that the body and soul of the angels are close in rank to each other and came into being truly as one from their source, which is the level of Malchus of Atzilus,
As a large fire lights up farther, a greater soul reaches further down. Angels’ bodies and souls, being close in rank, came into being as one from their source, Malchus of Atzilus.
שהיא אם כל חי1 דבי״ע שע״ז נאמר תוצא הארץ נפש חיה2 פי׳ ארץ העליונה שהיא המל׳ תוצא נפש כל חיה הם המלאכים שנק׳ חיות ויצאו ביחד גופם עם נשמתם
which is “the mother of all life” of [the worlds of] Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah. Of this it is said, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures”: meaning, the supernal earth, which is Malchus, shall bring forth the soul of every living being — these are the angels, who are called “beasts” — and their bodies came forth together with their souls,
Malchus of Atzilus is “the mother of all life” for the three lower worlds, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah. “Let the earth bring forth living creatures” is read on this level: the “supernal earth,” Malchus, brings forth the angels, called “beasts,” body and soul together.
כי הגוף שהוא בחי׳ צומח3 הוא אצל וסמוך לבחי׳ החי כנ״ל שהצומח הי׳ כלול בחי בבחי׳ עבור כו׳:
for the body, which is the level of the vegetative, is beside and adjacent to the level of the animal, as said above, that the vegetative was contained in the animal in a state of gestation, etc.
Their bodies are of the vegetative level, adjacent to the animal level of their souls, since the vegetative was first contained in the animal as in gestation.
Angels, like animals, came forth body and soul together from Malchus of Atzilus, because their bodies and souls belong to adjacent levels.
The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah, quoted in the Kehot notes) raises a question here: the angels’ bodies are of fire and air, which are not the vegetative level either.
Marei mekomos
- 1אם כל חי · Genesis 3:20
- 2תוצא הארץ נפש חי׳ · Genesis 1:24
- 3הם המלאכים שנק׳ חיות . . כי הגוף שהוא בחי׳ צומח · באוה״ת פ׳ בראשית כרך ו בד״ה להבין הטעם שנשתנה יצירת גוף האדם סעי׳ ה (מלקו״ת לג״פ כה, ב) שלכאורה צ״ל הלא גוף המלאכים הם מבחי׳ אש ורוח שהם ג״כ אינם בחי׳ צומח. ראה גם אוה״ת תבא ע׳ תתש.
Malchus and the letters come from a higher source ¶24–29
24וכמו״כ יובן גם למעלה יותר בחיון עלאין שהם האבות שהן הן המרכבה1 והיינו בבחי׳ אצי׳ והיו כלולים מתחלה ג״כ בבטן אימא עלאה בחי׳ עבור ואח״כ יצאו לגילוי.
And so too it will be understood even higher, regarding the supernal beasts, which are the Patriarchs — “they are the Chariot” — that is, on the level of Atzilus: they too were at first contained in the womb of the supernal Imma, in a state of gestation, and afterward came out into revelation.
The same pattern holds higher, in Atzilus: the “supernal beasts” of the divine Chariot are the Patriarchs, that is, the divine emotions that Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov embodied. These emotions first gestated within the supernal Imma (Binah) and then emerged.
ואז הם בבחי׳ יניקה כו׳ והיינו ענין צומח וחי הסמוכים זה לזה שנמשכים זמ״ז בדרך השתלשלות עו״ע כו׳.
And then they are in the state of nursing, etc. And this is the matter of the vegetative and the animal, which are adjacent to each other, being drawn from one another by way of a chain of cause and effect, etc.
After emerging they “nurse” from the intellect. This is the adjacent vegetative–animal relationship: each level flows from the one above by cause and effect.
משא״כ בחי׳ הדומם שהיא בחי׳ המל׳ היא מובדלת בערך מהם ואינה נמשכת בבחי׳ השתלשלות עו״ע כדרך המשכת המדות מהשכל.
But the level of the inanimate, which is the level of Malchus, is separated in rank from them and is not drawn by way of a chain of cause and effect, in the way the emotive attributes are drawn from the intellect.
Malchus, the “inanimate,” is different: it is not simply an effect of the level above, as the emotions are an effect of understanding.
כי מן החכמה ולמטה הוא בחי׳ השתלשלות עו״ע חכ׳ ואח״כ בינה ואח״כ דעת עד שאח״כ נמשכים המדות כו׳
For from Chochmah downward it is a chain of cause and effect: Chochmah, and afterward Binah, and afterward Daas, until afterward the emotive attributes are drawn, etc.,
From Chochmah downward the Sefiros form a causal chain: Chochmah produces Binah, then Daas, and these produce the emotions.
עד בחי׳ המל׳ ולא עד בכלל כי התהוות המל׳ שהיא בחי׳ אותיות דבר ה׳ אינן מסוג וערך הבחינה שלמעלה ממנה עד שיתכן לומר שתהא
down to the level of Malchus, but not including it. For as to the coming into being of Malchus, which is the level of the letters of the word of G‑d — they are not of the kind and rank of the level above it, that it could be said that it is
But the chain stops short of Malchus. Malchus is the “letters” of G‑d’s word, His speech, and letters are not the same kind of thing as the level above them.
נמשכת בדרך עו״ע וכמשל האותיות הגשמיים שאינן מערך המדות והשכל כו׳ אלא שהתהוותן הוא מלמעלה יותר והיינו מעצמיות הנפש שקבועים בה כ״ב אותיות אלו.
drawn by way of cause and effect. It is like the analogy of the physical letters, which are not of the rank of the emotive attributes and the intellect, etc.; rather, their coming into being is from higher up, namely, from the very essence of the soul, in which these twenty-two letters are fixed.
Likewise human letters are not a product of one’s feelings or ideas. They come from something higher, the very essence of the soul, in which the twenty-two letters are inherently fixed.
כי הגם דאחה״ע מהגרון2 כו׳ היינו שהם באים ומתלבשים במוצאות אלו אבל שרשם בנפש כידוע ומבואר באגה״ק ע״פ ויעש דוד שם.34
For although the letters Alef, Ches, Hei, Ayin are from the throat, etc., this means that they come and are vested in these points of articulation; but their root is in the soul, as is known and explained in Iggeres HaKodesh on the verse “And David made a name,” see there.
The throat letters (Alef, Ches, Hei, Ayin) and the other groups are only expressed through the organs of speech; their root is in the soul itself, as explained in Iggeres HaKodesh, Epistle 5.
Among the Sefiros the emotions descend from the intellect by cause and effect, but Malchus, the ‘letters,’ comes from a higher source — just as human letters are rooted in the soul’s essence rather than in thought or feeling.
Sefer Yetzirah divides the letters by their five points of articulation, beginning with the throat letters. The Rebbe’s corrections to Tanya note that the correct order is אחה"ע, not אהח"ע.
Marei mekomos
- 1האבות שהן הן המרכבה · Bereshit Rabbah 47:6
- 2דאחה״ע מהגרון · ס״י פ״ב מ״א. ראה הערות ותיקונים לתניא (קז, ב): אחה״ע, לא אהח״ע. וי״ל עפמש״כ בזח״ג קכג, א.
- 3באגה״ק ע״פ ויעש דוד שם · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 5:1
- 4ויעש דוד שם · II Samuel 8:13
25ולכן אותיות שוים יכולים להורות על ב׳ שכליים הפכים רק בשינוי הצרופים בהקדמת ואיחור אות זה מזה
Therefore the same letters can express two opposite concepts, merely through a change in their combinations, by placing one letter before or after another,
Proof that the letters are not tied to ideas: the same letters can express opposite ideas merely by being rearranged.
אע״פ שהן הן אותן האותיות ממש ויהיה שינוי גדול בההשכלה מהפוך להפוך כמו מאש למים שזהו חסד וזהו גבורה כו׳.
although they are the very same letters, and there will be a great change in the concept, from one extreme to its opposite, as from fire to water — this is Chesed and this is Gevurah, etc.
The same letters, reordered, can yield concepts as opposite as fire and water, one expressing kindness (Chesed) and the other severity (Gevurah).
The letters’ independence from meaning is shown by how the same letters can form opposite concepts.
26והטעם מפני שבאמת גוף ועצם האותיות אין להם שייכות למהות השכל כלל עד שיתכן לומר שאותיות אלו שייכים לשכל זה דוקא ולשכל שכנגדו יצטרכו אותיות אחרים כדרך
The reason is that in truth the body and substance of the letters have no connection at all to the essence of the intellect, such that one could say that these letters belong specifically to this concept, and that for the opposite concept other letters would be needed, as is the case
The reason: the letters themselves have no inherent connection to any particular idea, so no idea “owns” certain letters.
שהוא במדות שיש שכל נוטה כלפי חסד ואינו נוטה כלפי גבורה ויש שכל נוטה כלפי גבורה כו׳ לפי שהן נמשכים בבחי׳ השתלשלות עו״ע כו׳.
with the emotive attributes, where there is a concept that inclines toward Chesed and does not incline toward Gevurah, and there is a concept that inclines toward Gevurah, etc., because they are drawn by way of a chain of cause and effect, etc.
Emotions are different: a given line of reasoning naturally leads toward kindness or toward severity, because emotions flow from ideas by cause and effect.
Emotions are bound to the ideas that produce them; letters are not.
27וכמו״כ למעלה התהוות האותיות אינו בהשתלשלות עו״ע. וכמו שהמדות נמשכים מבינה כי אינם מערך זה כו׳.
So too above, the coming into being of the letters is not by way of a chain of cause and effect, [as] the emotive attributes are drawn from Binah, for they are not of this rank, etc.
Above too, Malchus (the “letters”) does not come into being as a link in the causal chain, the way the emotions come from Binah; it is not of that category.
אבל מ״מ לזאת הנה יש בהם מעלה יתירה שהתהוות׳ הוא ממקו׳ יותר עליון שמשם דוקא הוא שיכול להיות השפלה זו להיות התהוות מדת המל׳.
But nevertheless, for this very reason, they have an added superiority: their coming into being is from a higher place, for only from there can there be this lowering — the coming into being of the attribute of Malchus.
Yet this very independence is a virtue: it comes from a higher source, and only a higher source could produce such a “lowering” as Malchus, the attribute through which the worlds are created.
Malchus is not a product of the chain of Sefiros; paradoxically, it comes from a higher source, which alone can descend so low.
28והוא מ״ש בחכמה יסד ארץ1 כונן שמים בתבונה שבחי׳ ארץ נמשכת מהחכמה דוקא שהיא למעלה משכל המושג הנק׳ תבונה שבו כונן שמים שהם המדות.
And this is what is written, “With Chochmah He founded the earth; He established the heavens with Tevunah”: the level of “earth” is drawn specifically from Chochmah, which is above the comprehended intellect called Tevunah, with which He established the heavens, which are the emotive attributes.
This is the meaning of Proverbs 3:19: “earth” (Malchus) comes from Chochmah, which is above comprehensible intellect (Tevunah, Binah), while the “heavens” (the emotions) come from Tevunah.
אע״פ דגם המדות נמשכים מחכ׳ היינו ששם הוא מקורם אבל עיקר התהוותם להיות בהתחלקות כמו שהן עתה הוא מן התבונה.
Although the emotive attributes too are drawn from Chochmah, this means that their source is there; but the main part of their coming into being, to be differentiated as they are now, is from Tevunah.
The emotions are rooted in Chochmah too, but their actual formation as distinct attributes comes from Tevunah.
כי החכמה נק׳ יו״ד שהיא למעלה מהתחלקות עדיין כנקודה שהיא בלתי מתחלקת כידוע והשפעת המדות משם הוא ג״כ בבחי׳ כללות והוא כדמיון חלק הבן שמהאב נמשך טפה א׳ לבד רק שהיא כוללת כל גופו
For Chochmah is called Yud, which is still above differentiation, like a point, which is indivisible, as is known; and the flow of the emotive attributes from there is also in an all-inclusive form. It is like the analogy of the son’s share: from the father only a single drop is drawn, yet it includes his whole body;
Chochmah is symbolized by the Yud, a mere point, undivided. Whatever it gives the emotions is compressed and general, like the father’s single drop, which contains the whole future child in potential.
אבל עיקר בנינו בגידול אבריו להיות בציור פרצוף אדם בהתחלקות האברים הוא מהאם ע״י עבור בבטן האם.
but the main part of his building, in the growth of his limbs into the form of a human figure with differentiated limbs, is from the mother, through gestation in the mother’s womb.
The development into a formed body with distinct limbs comes from the mother, during gestation; likewise Binah develops the emotions into distinct attributes.
Chochmah is the undifferentiated source, like the father’s seed; Binah develops the emotions into their distinct form, like the mother’s womb; but the ‘earth,’ Malchus, comes from Chochmah.
Marei mekomos
- 1בחכמה יסד ארץ · Proverbs 3:19
29וכך הוא ית׳ כונן שמים שיהיו המדות מתכוננים היטב כפי שצ״ל בבחי׳ פרצוף הוא בתבונה דוקא
And so He, blessed be He, “established the heavens” — that the emotive attributes be well established as they should be, in the form of a complete configuration (partzuf) — specifically “with Tevunah.”
So “establishing the heavens” — shaping the emotions into a complete, structured configuration (partzuf) — is the work of Tevunah.
והיינו ענין עבור המדות בבינה ואח״כ יש ימי יניקה ומוחין כו׳ והוא ענין צומח וחי שהם סמוכים זל״ז כנ״ל.
And this is the matter of the gestation of the emotive attributes in Binah, and afterward there are the days of nursing and [of] intellect, etc., which is the matter of the vegetative and the animal, which are adjacent to each other, as said above.
That process is gestation in Binah, then nursing and maturity of intellect: the adjacent vegetative–animal relationship.
משא״כ המל׳ הנה בחכמה דוקא יסודה ממש וכמ״ש בזוהר אבא יסד ברתא1 דהיינו שכמו שהחכמה נמשכת מאין ליש שלא בדרך השתלשלות.
But Malchus is founded specifically with Chochmah itself, as it is said in the Zohar, “Abba founded the daughter”; that is, just as Chochmah is drawn from nothing to something, not by way of a chain of descent,
Malchus, however, is founded directly by Chochmah, as the Zohar says, “Abba (Chochmah) founded the daughter (Malchus).” Chochmah itself emerges “from nothing to something,” not as a product of anything before it.
כך גם המל׳ שהיא בחינת אותיות יש בזה בחי׳ זו במה שנמשכת ג״כ מבחי׳ אין שהרי עפ״י השתלשלות לא היה ראוי להיות התהוות האותיות מהשכל או מהמדות כו׳
so too Malchus, which is the level of the letters, has this quality, in that it too is drawn from the level of “nothing”; for according to the chain of descent it would not be fitting for the letters to come into being from the intellect or from the emotive attributes, etc.
In the same way Malchus, the letters, also comes “from nothing,” not as an effect of the intellect or the emotions; by the causal chain alone, letters could never have emerged from them.
(ומש״ל דגם חכמה נקרא חי׳ כמ״ש והחכמה תחיה2 היינו כי בחכמה יש ב׳ מדרגות בחי׳ אבא עלאה והוא יו״ד של שם הוי״ה ח״ע אבל בחינה ב׳ הוא נק׳ ישראל סבא ומרומז באות ה׳ כמ״ש במשנת חסידים מסכת או״א.
(And as for what was said above, that Chochmah too is called “living,” as it is written, “And wisdom gives life”: this is because in Chochmah there are two levels: the level of supernal Abba, which is the Yud of the Name Havayah, supernal Chochmah; but the second level is called Yisrael Saba, and is alluded to in the letter Hei, as written in Mishnas Chassidim, Tractate Abba and Imma.
A parenthetical note: Chochmah was earlier called “living” (“wisdom gives life”). That is because Chochmah has two levels: supernal Abba, the Yud of Havayah; and a second level, Yisrael Saba, alluded to in the Hei, as the Kabbalistic work Mishnas Chassidim explains.
והנה בחי׳ ה׳ הוא בחי׳ מקור לבחי׳ חי כמש״ל שארבעה אותיות שם הוי״ה הן מקור בחי׳ דצח״מ לכך בחי׳ זו הב׳ דחכמה נקרא ג״כ חי וזהו והחכמה תחיה אבל בחי׳ ראשונה נקרא מדבר)
Now the level of Hei is the source of the level of the animal, as explained above that the four letters of the Name Havayah are the source of the levels of inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking; therefore this second level of Chochmah is also called “living,” and this is “And wisdom gives life”; but the first level is called “speaking.”)
Since the Hei is the source of the “animal” level, the second level of Chochmah is called “living,” while the first level, the Yud, is “speaking.”
ולכן אדה״ר היה גופו דומם ממש. כי יש ב׳ מיני אדם. א׳ הוא בחי׳ שם מ״ה שנק׳ אדם
Therefore Adam, the first man, had a body that was truly inanimate. For there are two kinds of “Adam”: one is the level of the Name Mah, which is called “Adam,”
Therefore Adam’s body was truly inanimate. The maamar distinguishes two kinds of “Adam”; the first is the Name Mah, the spelling of Havayah whose numerical value, 45, equals that of אדם (“man”).
כמ״ש כתפארת אדם לשבת בית3 שבחי׳ ת״ת שהוא כללות ז״א הנק׳ שם מ״ה נקרא אדם.
as it is written, “Like the beauty of a man, to dwell in the house”: the level of Tiferes, which is the general and collective expression of Z’eir Anpin, called the Name Mah, is called “Adam.”
This “Adam” is Tiferes, representing all of Z’eir Anpin, as in “like the beauty (tiferes) of a man” (Isaiah 44:13). The second, higher “Adam” is explained in the next paragraph.
Malchus comes directly from Chochmah, as Chochmah comes from ‘nothing’; this is why Adam, whose soul is rooted in Chochmah, had an inanimate body. Two levels of ‘Adam’ are introduced.
In Kabbalah the spelling of Havayah with Alefs (Mah, 45) belongs to Z’eir Anpin, while the spelling with Yuds (Av, 72) belongs to Chochmah; the next paragraph identifies Adam with the Name Av.
Marei mekomos
- 1אבא יסד ברתא · Zohar III, 248a
- 2והחכמה תחיה · Ecclesiastes 7:12
- 3כתפארת אדם לשבת בית · Isaiah 44:13
Adam as supernal Chochmah; the pattern in every realm ¶30–32
30ואמנם בחי׳ אדה״ר היינו בחי׳ ח״ע1 שהיא ראשית האצי׳ ממש והוא בחי׳ שם ע״ב. ולכן הוא דוקא שהיה גופו דומם.
However, the level of Adam, the first man, is the level of supernal Chochmah, which is the very beginning of Atzilus, and it is the level of the Name Av. Therefore it was specifically he whose body was inanimate.
The second, higher “Adam” — Adam the first man — corresponds to supernal Chochmah, the very beginning of Atzilus, and to the Name Av (Havayah spelled out with Yuds, numerical value 72). That is precisely why his body was inanimate.
כי בחכמה דוקא יסד ארץ2 שמהחכמה הוא שיכול להיות התהוות הדומם ואדרבה בדומם דוקא מתלבשת החכמה משא״כ בצומח שהרי כונן שמים הוא בתבונה בלבד.
For specifically “with Chochmah He founded the earth”: it is from Chochmah that the inanimate can come into being; on the contrary, Chochmah is vested specifically in the inanimate — not so in the vegetative, for “He established the heavens” only “with Tevunah.”
Since “with Chochmah He founded the earth,” Chochmah produces the inanimate and even vests itself specifically in it, whereas the vegetative, the “heavens,” comes only from Tevunah.
משא״כ נפש החי לא יכלה להתלבש בגוף שמבחי׳ דומם שהרי מהבינה לא יכול להיות רק בחי׳ השתלשלות בלבד עו״ע
Whereas the animal soul could not be vested in a body of the inanimate level, since from Binah there can be only a chain of cause and effect,
The animal soul, which derives from Binah, could not enter an inanimate body, because Binah can only produce things in a gradual chain of cause and effect.
והוא בחי׳ צומח ולא התהוות בחי׳ המל׳ הנקרא דומם שזה אינו אלא מח״ע דוקא כו׳.
which is the level of the vegetative, and not the coming into being of the level of Malchus, called “inanimate,” which is only from supernal Chochmah specifically, etc.
Such a chain yields the vegetative level, not Malchus, the “inanimate”; Malchus comes only from supernal Chochmah.
וז״ש בבריאת האדם דוקא וייצר ה׳ אלקים בב׳ שמות. שבהן ועל ידן הוא התחברות החכ׳ עם המל׳ כו׳:3
And this is why it is written specifically in the creation of man, “And Havayah Elokim formed,” with two Names: for in them and through them is the joining of Chochmah with Malchus, etc.
Hence the two Names in “Havayah Elokim formed man”: through them Chochmah is joined with Malchus — the highest soul with the lowest body.
Adam’s soul is from supernal Chochmah, the only level able to produce and inhabit the ‘inanimate’; the two Names of the verse express this joining of Chochmah and Malchus.
Marei mekomos
- 1אדה״ר היינו בחי׳ ח״ע · ראה לקמן עג, א. ובאוה״ת פ׳ בראשית כרך ג תקסז, א ובלקו״ת לג״פ לח, א. בספר הערכים-חב״ד ערך אדם הראשון הערה 10 מצויין שכאן בתו״א משמע שזהו לפני החטא, אמנם ממ״ש באוה״ת ובלקו״ת לג״פ הנ״ל ובד״ה חייב אדם לברך תרל״ח פל״ו בענין אלף שנה, מוכח שהכוונה לאדה״ר אחרי החטא.
- 2בחכמה דוקא יסד ארץ · Proverbs 3:19
- 3וייצר ה׳ אלקים · Genesis 2:7
31ונמצא מובן מכ״ז עכ״פ בטוב טעם ודעת מה שנפש החיה יש לה גוף שמבחינת צומח דוקא ונפש המדברת היותר עליונה יש לה גוף מבחינת דומם.
It turns out that from all this we understand, at any rate, with good reason and understanding, why the animal soul has a body specifically of the vegetative level, while the speaking soul, which is higher, has a body of the inanimate level.
Summary: the animal soul has a vegetative body; the higher, human soul has an inanimate body.
כי אדרבה היא הנותנת כי נשמה גבוה היא שיכולה להתלבש בגוף נמוך דוקא כו׳.
For, on the contrary, this is exactly what dictates it: it is a high soul that can be vested specifically in a low body, etc.
This is not despite the soul’s height but because of it: only a high soul can enter a low body.
וזהו בין למעלה ובין למטה כלומר בין בעולמות עליונים שיש שם דצח״מ והם בחי׳ מלאכים הנק׳ בשם חיות ועופות כנ״ל
And this is so both above and below; that is, both in the higher worlds, where there are inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking — these being the angels, who are called by the names of beasts and birds, as mentioned above,
The same pattern holds “above” as well: in the higher worlds too there are the four levels; the angels, called beasts and birds, correspond to the animal level.
כמ״ש פני אריה1 ופני שור ופני נשר כו׳ ויש שם בחינת מדבר. ונשמת אדה״ר כולל כל נש״י234 כו׳. וכולם נולדים מהארץ שהיא מל׳ דאצילות.
as it is written, “The face of a lion and the face of an ox and the face of an eagle…,” etc. — and there is the level of the speaking there. And the soul of Adam, the first man, includes all the souls of Israel, etc. And they are all born from the “earth,” which is Malchus of Atzilus.
This is seen in Ezekiel’s vision of the faces of a lion, an ox and an eagle. There is also a “speaking” level there: the soul of Adam, which contained all the souls of Israel. All of them are born from the supernal “earth,” Malchus of Atzilus.
The principle that a higher soul can inhabit a lower body applies both in the spiritual worlds and in the physical world.
The Arizal teaches that all souls were originally included in the soul of Adam and were scattered and diminished through his sin (Sha’ar HaGilgulim, Introductions 7 and 12).
Marei mekomos
- 1פני ארי׳ · Ezekiel 1:10
- 2ונשמת אדה״ר כולל כל נש״י · שער המצות פ׳ תצא, שער הגלגולים הק׳ ו, ז, יב. שער הפסוקים בראשית דרוש ג.
- 3ונשמת אדה״ר כולל כל נש״י · Sha'ar HaGilgulim 7:11–12
- 4ונשמת אדה״ר כולל כל נש״י · Sha'ar HaGilgulim 12:2–3
32והנה במאמר תוצא הארץ נפש חיה1 ועוף יעופף2 שהוא ענין התהוות נפש החיה אזי הגוף שלה יצא כאחד עם הנפש דהיינו שהיה הגוף בחינת צומח ויצא ביחד עם הנפש.
Now, by the utterance “Let the earth bring forth living creatures… and let birds fly…,” which is the coming into being of the animal soul, its body came forth together with the soul; that is, the body was of the vegetative level and came forth together with the soul.
Above: when Malchus of Atzilus produced the angels (“living creatures” and “birds”), their bodies came forth together with their souls; their body is of the vegetative level.
והיינו מפני שגם הנפש נלקחה מחיצוניות הכלים דמל׳ לכן גופו ג״כ רוחני והוא בחי׳ צומח כו׳.
This is because the soul too was taken from the outer dimension of the vessels of Malchus; therefore its body too is spiritual, and it is the level of the vegetative, etc.
This is because the angels’ souls come from the outer dimension of Malchus’ vessels, so their bodies are correspondingly spiritual.
אבל נפש המדברת של האדם לא נתהוית ביחד עם הגוף רק שאח״כ מתלבשת בגוף דומם דוקא היותר נמוך.
But the speaking soul of man did not come into being together with the body; rather, afterward it is vested specifically in an inanimate body, the lowest.
The human soul, in contrast, did not come into being with its body; it later entered the lowest, inanimate body.
כי להיותה בעצמה עליונה ביותר ע״כ יכלה לסבול גם גוף גשמי כו׳ (וכמ״ש ג״כ במ״א שזהו ענין ההפרש בין זיווג נשיקין3 שממנו התהוות המלאכים שהוא רוחני ביותר.
For since it is in itself exceedingly high, it could therefore bear even a physical body, etc. (As is also written elsewhere, that this is the difference between the “union of kisses,” from which the angels came into being, which is exceedingly spiritual —
Being so high in itself, it can bear a physical body. The parenthesis explains this in Kabbalistic imagery: angels are born of the “union of kisses,” a purely spiritual union between the Sefiros.
ומ״מ הוא רק השפעה חיצוני׳ ולכן לא יכולים להתלבש בגוף גשמי. אבל זיווג גופני שממנו נשמות עם היותו השפעה גשמית אבל שרשו בפנימי׳ דייקא וע״כ מתלבשים בגופות כו׳)
nevertheless, it is only an external influence, and therefore they cannot be vested in a physical body; but the physical union, from which the souls [come], although it is a physical influence, has its root specifically in the inner dimension, and therefore they are vested in bodies, etc.)
That union conveys only an outer influence, so angels cannot be vested in physical bodies. Souls are born of the “physical union” (in Kabbalistic terms), which though more “physical” is rooted in the innermost dimension; therefore souls enter physical bodies.
ובין למטה דהיינו בהתהוות דצח״מ גשמיים מהארץ הלזו שנפש החיה יצאה מהארץ ממש דהיינו שחומר וצורה של החי
And [so it is] below, that is, in the coming into being of the physical inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking from this earth: the animal soul came forth from the earth itself, that is, the matter and form of the animal —
Below, in the physical world, the same holds: the animal’s matter and form — its body and its vital soul — came out of the earth itself.
שהוא ענין נפשו החיונית וגופו יצאו שניהם מן הארץ כמו שיצא הצומח בחומר וצורה שלו ויצאו שניהם כא׳ להיות סמוכים וקרובים בערך כנ״ל.
which is its vital soul and its body — both came forth from the earth, just as the vegetative came forth in its matter and form; and both came forth together, being adjacent and close in rank, as said above.
They came out both together, just as the plant emerges with its matter and form, because they are adjacent in rank.
אבל במדבר אינו כן כנ״ל שהגוף נתהווה מן הארץ בבחי׳ דומם ואח״כ נתלבשה בו נפש מלמעלה והיא הנפש המדברת שלא יכלה לשכון בבחי׳ צומח רק בדומם גשמי כו׳.
But with the speaking it is not so, as said above: the body came into being from the earth on the level of the inanimate, and afterward a soul from above was vested in it — this is the speaking soul, which could not dwell in the vegetative level, but only in the physical inanimate, etc.
Not so man: his body came from the earth as inanimate matter, and afterward a soul from above entered it; the speaking soul cannot dwell in the vegetative, only in inanimate matter.
והיינו כי גם למעלה מעלה בבחי׳ אצי׳ הוא כמו״כ שהחי מתלבש בצומח והם סמוכים כאחד והוא מ״ש כונן שמים בתבונה4 וארץ יסודתה בהררי קדש5 ח״ע כו׳:
And this is because even far above, on the level of Atzilus, it is likewise so: the animal is vested in the vegetative, and they are adjacent as one. And this is what is written, “He established the heavens with Tevunah,” and the earth — “its foundation is in the holy mountains,” [that is,] supernal Chochmah, etc.
The root of all this is in Atzilus: the animal (Binah) is vested in the vegetative (the emotions), adjacent to it, as “He established the heavens with Tevunah”; while the “earth” is founded “in the holy mountains” (Psalms 87:1), which the Alter Rebbe identifies with supernal Chochmah.
The maamar concludes by tracing the pattern in all three realms — angels, physical creatures and the Sefiros of Atzilus: adjacent levels arise together, while the highest soul enters the lowest body afterward, because the ‘earth’ is founded in supernal Chochmah.
Marei mekomos
- 1תוצא הארץ נפש חיה · Genesis 1:24
- 2ועוף יעופף · Genesis 1:20
- 3שזהו ענין ההפרש בין זיווג נשיקין · בארוכה נתבאר בביאה״ז לכ״ק אדמו״ר האמצעי א, ד. ובביאה״ז לצ״צ כרך ב ע׳ תריב. וראה גם בד״ה וביום שמחתכם תרנ״ו ע׳ רמז.
- 4כונן שמים בתבונה · Proverbs 3:19
- 5יסודתה בהררי קדש · Psalms 87:1
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
In one’s avodah
Man was placed in the lowest, most physical body precisely so that he can raise everything above it: by using bread and clothing for his needs while serving G‑d with understanding, he elevates the sparks in the inanimate, vegetative and animal realms; and through his G-dly soul he must nullify and transform his physical body, something even the angels cannot do.
Questions for discussion
- Why could an animal’s body and soul come into being together, while man’s body had to be formed first as lifeless dust?
- How does the analogy of lifting a wall from its lowest beam explain man’s role as the purpose of creation?
- In what sense are the letters of speech “inanimate,” and what does the ability of the same letters to express opposite ideas show about their source?
- Why does “With Chochmah He founded the earth” assign the lowest level to the highest attribute?
- What can the G-dly soul do with a physical body that an angel could not, and why?
Key terms in this maamar
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×4
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×3
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×19
- Z'eir Anpin (the emotive attributes)ז״א
- The six emotive Sefiros as one configuration. ×2
- Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
- Malchus as the receiving configuration.
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×5
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×19
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds.
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d. ×1
- Lights and vesselsאורות וכלים
- Divine revelation and the forms that contain and express it. ×1
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×4
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence.
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×2
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- Measure, limitation and judgment. ×3
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The external, expressive aspect. ×2
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul that is 'a part of G‑d above'.
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level.
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first world of separate existence. ×1
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of the angels and emotions.
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one.
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- Chochmah, Binah and Daas as a whole. ×1
- Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah)אבא ואמא
- The intellectual configurations.
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- Harmony of kindness and restraint; associated with compassion. ×1
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×9
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×3
- The general and collective expression (klalus)כללות
- That which encompasses the particulars as one: their general and collective expression (the klal, as against the prat). Never “sum”, “sum total”, “totality” or “general principle”, as if the particulars were added up (וכללותן היא מצות הצדקה is “their general and collective expression is the mitzvah of charity”). Render by sense: “their general and collective expression”, “that which encompasses them all”, “X in general”, “X as a whole”. Keep התכללות as “inclusion” / “inter-inclusion”. ×2