Torah Ohr · Parshas Bereishis · Maamar 5
ולהבין בתוס׳ ביאור ענין וייצר ה׳ אלקים את…
To understand with further explanation the matter of “And Havayah Elokim formed…”
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
Levels adjacent in the chain of cause and effect are bound by their very nature, as the emotive attributes are drawn from the intellect; so an animal’s or angel’s body comes forth together with its soul. The inanimate, Malchus and the “letters,” stands outside that chain and is founded directly by Chochmah; so only the highest soul, Adam’s, rooted in supernal Chochmah, could be vested in a body of lifeless dust and transform it.
The maamar in brief
Explaining further why man’s body was first lifeless dust while other creatures came forth body and soul together, the maamar finds the four levels in spirituality too. In the soul, the letters are inanimate, the emotive attributes vegetative, the intellect “living”; above, Malchus, Z’eir Anpin and the supernal Imma. The attributes gestate in the intellect and nurse from it, so vegetative and animal are adjacent and emerge together; the letters have no connection to the intellect. Angels and souls show the same. The purpose of creation is the nullification of the “something.” The angels’ bodies are spiritual and came forth with their souls from Malchus of Atzilus, but their souls, from the outer dimension of the vessels, could not transform a physical body; the G‑dly soul, from the inner dimension, can. From Chochmah down all flows by cause and effect, except Malchus: the letters come from the soul’s essence, so the same letters can express opposite ideas. Thus “With Chochmah He founded the earth.” Adam’s soul is supernal Chochmah, the Name Av; so his body was truly inanimate, and two Names join Chochmah with Malchus.
Outline
- The four levels in the soul and aboveThe question restated: why man’s body was first lifeless dust. The four levels exist in spirituality too: in the soul the letters are inanimate and the emotive attributes vegetative, growing from the intellect; above, Malchus, Z’eir Anpin, and the supernal Imma, called “living.”¶1–3
- Adjacent and distant levelsThe attributes gestate in the intellect and nurse from it, so vegetative and animal are adjacent and an animal’s body and soul came forth together. The letters have no connection to the intellect; only the highest can descend to the lowest, so the speaking soul was vested afterward in an inanimate body.¶4–5
- Angels and souls; the purpose of TikkunAngels too have body and soul, but their bodies are of spiritual fire and air. The purpose of the worlds is the nullification of the “something”: in Tohu the vessels could not contain the lights; Tikkun is their union.¶6–8
- Only the G‑dly soul can transform a physical bodyAngels’ souls come from the outer dimension of the vessels; the G‑dly soul, from the inner dimension, can subdue a physical body, as a great bonfire shines farther. Angels’ bodies and souls came forth together from Malchus of Atzilus, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures.”¶9–11
- Malchus and the letters stand outside the chainThe Patriarchs, the Chariot, gestated and nursed in the supernal Imma: a chain of cause and effect. Malchus, the letters, is not drawn this way; letters come from the soul’s essence, so the same letters can express opposite concepts. Their source is higher, and only from there can Malchus come into being.¶12–15
- “With Chochmah He founded the earth”The attributes take their differentiated form from Tevunah, as a child’s limbs form in the mother’s womb; Malchus is founded by Chochmah itself, “Abba founded the daughter.” Two levels of Chochmah and two kinds of “Adam”: Adam the first man is supernal Chochmah, the Name Av, so his body was inanimate, and two Names join Chochmah with Malchus.¶16–18
- Above and below alikeA high soul can be vested specifically in a low body, in the higher worlds and in this one: animals and angels come forth body and soul together, while the speaking soul enters an inanimate body afterward. So also in Atzilus: “He established the heavens with Tevunah,” while the earth is founded on supernal Chochmah.¶19–20
Key concepts
- Letters, emotive attributes, intellectאותיות, מדות, שכל
- In the soul, the letters are inanimate, having no growth; the emotive attributes are vegetative, growing from a small arousal into a mighty flame; the intellect that gives birth to them is “living.” Above, these are Malchus, Z’eir Anpin and the supernal Imma, while supernal Chochmah, the Yud, is “speaking.”
- Gestation and nursingעבור, יניקה
- The emotive attributes are first concealed in the intellect like a fetus in the womb, and after they emerge they still draw their life from it like a nursing child; this is why the vegetative and the animal are adjacent.
- Chain of cause and effectהשתלשלות עו״ע
- The gradual flow from Chochmah to Binah, Daas and the emotive attributes, each drawn from the one above it. Malchus and the letters are not drawn this way; their coming into being is from a higher place.
- Nullification of the “something”ביטול היש
- The purpose of the descent of the worlds and the essence of the World of Tikkun: the union of lights, the level of “nothing,” with vessels, the level of “something,” which in Tohu could not contain them.
- Outer and inner dimension of the vesselsחיצוניות הכלים, פנימיות הכלים
- The angels’ souls are taken from the outer dimension and could not transform a physical body; the G‑dly soul is taken from the inner dimension, higher than their source, and can transform even a physical body.
- “Abba founded the daughter”אבא יסד ברתא
- Malchus is founded directly by Chochmah: as Chochmah comes from nothing to something, not by a chain of descent, so Malchus, the letters, is drawn from the level of “nothing.”
- The Name Mah and the Name Avשם מ״ה, שם ע״ב
- Two kinds of “Adam”: Tiferes, the general expression of Z’eir Anpin, is the Name Mah; Adam the first man is supernal Chochmah, the very beginning of Atzilus, the Name Av, which is why his body was truly inanimate.
For children · ages 9–13
Only the highest can reach the lowest
The big idea
Only the highest soul can enter the lowest body and make it holy, so Adam’s soul, which comes from G‑d’s highest wisdom, was given a body of plain dust.
This maamar explains further why Adam’s body began as lifeless dust. The four levels, inanimate, plant, animal and speaking, are found inside us too. Our feelings are like plants: they start small and grow out of our mind, as a baby grows inside its mother and then nurses from her, so feelings and mind are close. But our letters, the words we say, are like the inanimate: they come not from the mind but from the very depth of the soul, so the same letters, in a different order, can say opposite things. Angels also have a body and soul that came forth together, but their bodies are of spiritual fire and air. The purpose of the world is that every “something,” everything that feels like its own separate thing, gives itself over to G‑d. An angel could not do this with a physical body; it would fall from its level. Only our G‑dly soul, which comes from a deeper place, can take a body of dust and change it. “With Chochmah (wisdom) He founded the earth”: the highest wisdom builds the lowest place, and Adam’s soul came from that wisdom, so his body could truly be dust.
The mashal
A large bonfire shines much farther than a small one. The angels’ souls are like a smaller fire, so their bodies are made of spiritual fire and air; a physical body would be too far for them to reach. Our G‑dly soul is like the great bonfire: its light reaches all the way down, into a body of dust, and can change it.
Questions for the Shabbos table
- Why can only the highest soul take a body of plain dust and make it holy?
- The verse says, “With Chochmah (wisdom) He founded the earth.” Why would the highest wisdom be the one to build the lowest place?
- Your soul was given a body so that it could make it holy. What is one thing your body does each day, like eating, speaking or helping, that you can do for G‑d this week?
Explanation © likuteitorah.com, CC BY-NC 4.0: retold for children from our translation and explanation, with AI assistance; not yet reviewed by a human editor.
In the Rebbe’s light · 3
AI research Found by AI reading every place in the Rebbe’s works that cites this maamar, and checked against each source by a second AI reader, the less certain by a third. Only what rated high is shown: the Rebbe’s own words, about this very passage. No person has reviewed it yet, so check the place itself before relying on a detail. See something to correct?
The maamar in the Rebbe’s light
Three of the Rebbe’s teachings meet this maamar along its ladder of levels in man. Citing its account of the soul, he explains in a sicha on “man is the tree of the field” (from talks of 5739 and 5740) why the emotions are the “vegetative” (צומח) and the intellect the “living” (חי): the emotions grow in their own line, while the intellect also moves, „אמאל צו חסד און אמאל צו גבורה” (now to Chesed, now to Gevurah), as the matter requires. At the ladder’s foot stand the letters, which the maamar says come not by cause and effect but from the very essence of the soul (עצמיות הנפש); in a note to a sicha of Shabbos Acharei 5719 he cites it for why man is called “medaber” (מדבר), the speaker: the power of speech in man is higher even than his intellect. His maamar Ushavti b’Shalom (9 Kislev 5738) cites these columns for the rule that the “inanimate” in man is rooted higher even than the “vegetative”, since „כל הגבוה גבוה יותר יורד למטה מטה יותר” (whatever is higher goes down lower), and finds it in Yaakov’s stones at his head („ויקח מאבני המקום וישם מראשותיו”): service in speech and deed reaches above the intellect and reveals the essence of the soul. Perhaps, in our own reading, the ladder then reads also as a map of the soul’s service, in which the lowest powers carry the highest.
Paragraph by paragraph
- ¶2
Background from the Rebbe
In a sicha for Parshas Shoftim (from talks of Motzaei Shabbos Vaera 5739 and Shabbos Beshalach 5740), asking why the Torah says “man is the tree of the field”, as though man simply were a tree, and how the “vegetative” can describe man, the speaker, the Rebbe sets out the four levels within man.
Citing this paragraph for the known teaching that the emotions are man’s “vegetative”, because they grow „מקטנות לגדלות” (from small to great), the Rebbe adds that the intellect grows too, but has also the quality of the “living”: movement „ממקום למקום” (from place to place), as an animal moves. The intellect is not bound to one nature; it goes „אמאל צו חסד און אמאל צו גבורה” (now to Chesed, now to Gevurah), as the matter requires, while each emotion of itself stays in its own line and only grows. Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) this fills in why the maamar calls the intellect “living” and the emotions “vegetative”.
The Alter Rebbe
והמדות הן בחי׳ צומח שהרי התפעלות קטנה בתחלתה מתלהבת אח״כ עד שתהי׳ שלהבת עזה
The Rebbe
אין כח השכל איז פאַראַן ניט בלויז דער ענין פון צמיחה מקטנות לגדלות, נאָר אויך דער ענין פון „חי”
Likkutei Sichos, vol. 24, p. 117, note 21 (sicha from p. 115) · from the sichos of Motzaei Shabbos Vaera 5739 and Shabbos Beshalach 5740
- ¶12
The Rebbe explains
In a sicha of Shabbos Acharei, Mevarchim Iyar 5719, on the first chapter of Pirkei Avos (edited in Likkutei Sichos vol. 4), the Rebbe takes up the Talmud’s teaching that man’s craft in this world is „שישים עצמו כאלם” (to make himself as one mute), and asks how silence can be man’s craft when speech is his very distinction, man being called „מדבר” (“the speaker”); a note there gives the reason for that name.
Citing this maamar, with the Mitteler Rebbe’s parallel in Torah Chaim, the Rebbe notes „שכח הדיבור שבאדם נעלה גם מכח השכל שבו, שלכן נק׳ האדם בשם מדבר” (that the power of speech in man is higher even than his intellect, and that this is why man is called medaber, “the speaker”). In this maamar that point is the teaching of our paragraph: the letters „אינן מערך המדות והשכל” (are not of the rank of the emotions and the intellect), but come from higher, „מעצמיות הנפש שקבועים בה כ״ב אותיות אלו” (from the very essence of the soul, in which the twenty-two letters are fixed). In the first part of the maamar (Torah Ohr Bereishis 4, ¶8) the Alter Rebbe draws the name from another side, “yadber amim”: man as the leader who raises all creation.
The Alter Rebbe
האותיות הגשמיים שאינן מערך המדות והשכל כו׳ אלא שהתהוותן הוא מלמעלה יותר והיינו מעצמיות הנפש
The Rebbe
ועד שכח הדיבור שבאדם נעלה גם מכח השכל שבו, שלכן נק׳ האדם בשם מדבר
Likkutei Sichos, vol. 4, p. 1188, note 67 · Shabbos Acharei, Mevarchim Iyar 5719
- ¶15
The Rebbe explains
In a maamar of Motzaei Shabbos Vayetzei, 9 Kislev 5738, explaining Yaakov’s taking „ויקח מאבני המקום וישם מראשותיו” (“of the stones of the place” and putting them at his head), the Rebbe says that service with the “inanimate” in man, speech and action, reaches higher than the service of the intellect.
As bread, the vegetative, sustains man because „המוצא פי הוי׳ שבלחם” (the word of G‑d in it) is rooted higher than the one in man, so too, the Rebbe writes, the letters, „דומם שבאדם” (the “inanimate” in man), are rooted higher even than the “vegetative”, for „דכל הגבוה גבוה יותר יורד למטה מטה יותר” (whatever is higher goes down lower); for this he cites these columns of Torah Ohr. Hence Yaakov’s “stones”, the service of speech and action, reach above his “head”, and through these lowest powers the very essence of the soul is revealed.
The Alter Rebbe
אבל מ״מ לזאת הנה יש בהם מעלה יתירה שהתהוות׳ הוא ממקו׳ יותר עליון
The Rebbe
עד״ז הוא גם בענין האותיות, דומם (שבאדם), ששרשם הוא למעלה יותר גם מבחי׳ צומח, דכל הגבוה גבוה יותר יורד למטה מטה יותר
Sefer HaMaamarim Melukat, vol. 2, p. קסה, note 88 · Motzaei Shabbos Vayetzei, 9 Kislev, the eve of 10 Kislev 5738, in his room
Short quotes only, with the place of each so it can be read in full. The Rebbe’s sichos, letters and maamarim are published by Kehot and by Vaad Hanochos B’Lahak (lahak.org).
The four levels in the soul and above ¶1–3
The maamar begins a second, deeper explanation of the verse on man’s formation: first “formed … of dust from the ground,” and only afterward “He blew into his nostrils the breath of life.”
שהגוף שלו בתחלתו הי׳ [היה] בלא נפש עדיין והי׳ [והיה] דומם מעפר גשמי ואח״כ נתלבשה בו נפש חיה המדברת כו׳ משא״כ בשאר כל הנבראי׳ [הנבראים] דצומח וחי שגופם ונפשם יצאו כא׳ [כאחד] מן הארץ כו׳.
that his body at first was still without a soul, and was inanimate, of physical dust, and afterward the living, speaking soul was vested in it, etc.; whereas in all the other creatures, vegetative and animal, their bodies and souls came forth together from the earth, etc.
Man’s body was first lifeless, inanimate dust and only afterward received a soul, whereas plants and animals received body and soul together from the earth.
¶19 Hold this question: why man's body came first, lifeless. Paragraph 19 sums up the answer.
הענין יובן בהקדם דכמו שיש בגשמיות ד׳ בחי׳ דצח״מ [דומם צומח חי מדבר]. ככה גם ברוחניו׳ [ברוחניות] נמצאים ד׳ בחי׳ אלו.
The matter will be understood by first stating that just as in physicality there are four levels — inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking — so too in spirituality these four levels are found.
The key premise: the four levels of the physical world (inanimate, vegetative, animal, speaking) have counterparts in the spiritual realm — in the human soul and in the Sefiros above.
A fuller explanation of man’s creation begins, built on the premise that the four levels of physical creation exist in spiritual form as well.
TermsDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaberElokim
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר
- Elokim אלקים
Marei mekomos
- 1ולהבין בתוס׳ ביאור · הנחה אחרת [כנראה הנחת כ״ק אדה״א] במאמרי אדה״ז פרשיות ע׳ כב. בארוכה בתו״ח בראשית כג, ב. הגהות באוה״ת בראשית כרך ו תתרנב, ב (מלקו״ת לג״פ פרשיות). נמצא בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ בבוך מאמרים משנת תקע״א-ב.
- 2וייצר ה׳ אלקים את האדם עפר מן האדמה · Genesis 2:7
2ועד״מ בנפש האותיות הן בחי׳ דומם1 שאין בהם גידול כו׳ והמדות הן בחי׳ צומח שהרי התפעלות קטנה בתחלתה מתלהבת אח״כ עד שתהי׳ [שתהיה] שלהבת עזה כו׳
By way of analogy, in the soul: the letters are the level of the inanimate, which have no growth, etc.; and the emotive attributes are the level of the vegetative, for an emotional arousal that is small at first later blazes up until it becomes a mighty flame, etc.
In the human soul, the letters of thought and speech are “inanimate”: a word stays what it is and does not grow. The emotions are “vegetative”: a feeling starts as a small stirring and grows into a strong flame.
וצמיחותם הוא מן השכל כמו שהצומח גשמי הי׳ [היה] בתחלה צפון וטמון בארץ ואח״כ יוצא וצומח לחוץ כן המדות הם כלולים ונעלמים תחלה בשכל המולידם ואח״כ יוצאים בגילוי.
And their growth is from the intellect: just as the physical plant was at first hidden and buried in the ground, and afterward comes out and sprouts outward, so the emotive attributes are at first contained and concealed in the intellect that gives birth to them, and afterward they come out into revelation.
Emotions grow out of the intellect as a plant grows out of the ground: first hidden within the idea that gives birth to them, then emerging into the open.
Within the soul, the letters are the ‘inanimate’ level and the emotions the ‘vegetative,’ growing out of the intellect as plants grow out of the earth.
The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research
Background from the Rebbe
In a sicha for Parshas Shoftim (from talks of Motzaei Shabbos Vaera 5739 and Shabbos Beshalach 5740), asking why the Torah says “man is the tree of the field”, as though man simply were a tree, and how the “vegetative” can describe man, the speaker, the Rebbe sets out the four levels within man.
Citing this paragraph for the known teaching that the emotions are man’s “vegetative”, because they grow „מקטנות לגדלות” (from small to great), the Rebbe adds that the intellect grows too, but has also the quality of the “living”: movement „ממקום למקום” (from place to place), as an animal moves. The intellect is not bound to one nature; it goes „אמאל צו חסד און אמאל צו גבורה” (now to Chesed, now to Gevurah), as the matter requires, while each emotion of itself stays in its own line and only grows. Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) this fills in why the maamar calls the intellect “living” and the emotions “vegetative”.
The Alter Rebbe
והמדות הן בחי׳ צומח שהרי התפעלות קטנה בתחלתה מתלהבת אח״כ עד שתהי׳ שלהבת עזה
The Rebbe
אין כח השכל איז פאַראַן ניט בלויז דער ענין פון צמיחה מקטנות לגדלות, נאָר אויך דער ענין פון „חי”
Likkutei Sichos, vol. 24, p. 117, note 21 (sicha from p. 115) · from the sichos of Motzaei Shabbos Vaera 5739 and Shabbos Beshalach 5740
Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made
TermsDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaberOsiyosHiskallelusMiddos
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר
- Osiyos אותיות
- Hiskallelus התכללות
- Middos מדות
Marei mekomos
- 1האותיות הן בחי׳ דומם · ראה גם בלקו״ת חקת נח, א. תו״ח בראשית יט, ד ואילך. ד״ה חביבין ישראל תרצ״ו. איזהו חכם תש״ב פ״ה. לקוטי שיחות ח״ו ע׳ 113 הערה 54.
3ובנמשל למעלה המל׳ נק׳ דומם וז״א דאצי׳ שהוא המדות נק׳ צומח
And in the analogue above: Malchus is called “inanimate,” and Z’eir Anpin of Atzilus, which is the emotive attributes, is called “vegetative,”
Applied above to the Sefiros of Atzilus: Malchus (divine speech) is “inanimate,” and Z’eir Anpin, the divine emotions, is “vegetative.”
והיינו שצומח מן אימא עלאה שהוא בחי׳ השכל ד, בהעליון שנק׳ בשם חי כמ״ש בחוה כי היא הית׳ [היתה] אם כל חי1 וגם החכ׳ [החכמה] נק׳ חיה כדכתיב והחכמה תחי׳2 כו׳.
meaning that it grows from the supernal Imma, which is the level of the supernal intellect, called by the name “living” (chai), as it is written of Chavah, “for she was the mother of all life (chai)”; and Chochmah too is called “living,” as it is written, “And wisdom gives life…,” etc.
Z’eir Anpin “grows” out of the supernal Imma (“mother”), Binah, the supernal intellect, which is called “living” (chai) after Chavah, “the mother of all life” (Genesis 3:20), the name Chavah itself echoing chai. Chochmah too is called “living,” for “wisdom gives life” (Ecclesiastes 7:12).
¶17 Chochmah called "living": paragraph 17 explains which level of Chochmah this means.
Among the Sefiros, Malchus is the ‘inanimate,’ Z’eir Anpin the ‘vegetative,’ and Binah (and in a sense Chochmah) the ‘living.’
The maamar returns to the verse “wisdom gives life” in paragraph 17, explaining that it refers to a second, lower aspect of Chochmah, while the first aspect is called “speaking.”
TermsDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaberZ’eir AnpinAbba and ImmaAtzilus+2
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר
- Z’eir Anpin זעיר אנפין
- Abba and Imma אבא ואמא
- Atzilus אצילות
- Middos מדות
Also Chochmah
Marei mekomos
- 1כי היא היתה אם כל חי · Genesis 3:20
- 2והחכמה תחי׳ · Ecclesiastes 7:12
Adjacent and distant levels ¶4–5
4ונמצא שהצומח עם החי הם סמוכים זל״ז [זה לזה] בלי דילוג והפסק מדריגה אחרת אמצעית ביניהן והם מתאחדים ומתדבקים זב״ז [זה בזה] מצד עצמותן1 ומהותן
It turns out that the vegetative and the animal are adjacent to each other, without a leap or the interruption of another, intermediate level between them, and they unite and cleave to each other by virtue of their very essence and nature.
So the vegetative (the emotions) and the animal (the intellect) are adjacent, with nothing between them, and bonded by their very nature.
שהרי מתחלה הי׳ [היה] הצומח כלול בחי ממש שהוא ענין העלם המדות בבחי׳ עבור בהשכל כולד הצפון בבטן האם דירך אמו2 הוא ממש
For at first the vegetative was contained within the animal itself — this is the concealment of the emotive attributes in a state of gestation within the intellect, like a fetus hidden in the mother’s womb, which is literally “its mother’s thigh”;
At first the emotions exist hidden within the intellect, a stage called “gestation,” like a fetus in the womb, which the Talmud regards as part of the mother’s body (“a fetus is its mother’s thigh”).
וגם אח״כ ביציאתן לחוץ עדיין צריכין לאמן הם בימי יניקה שהשכל מחי׳ ומגדל את המדות והוא קיומן ממש.
and even afterward, when they come out, they still need their mother in the days of nursing: the intellect enlivens and grows the emotive attributes, and it is their very sustenance.
Even after they emerge, the emotions still depend on the intellect as an infant depends on nursing: the intellect keeps nourishing and growing them.
The analogy of gestation and nursing shows how intimately the emotions are bound to the intellect, like a child to its mother.
Gestation (ibbur), nursing (yenikah) and intellect (mochin) are the stages of the development of Z’eir Anpin in the Arizal’s system; the maamar names them again in paragraph 17.
TermsDilugDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaberIbbur and leidahHiskallelus+1
- Dilug דילוג
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר
- Ibbur and leidah עיבור ולידה
- Hiskallelus התכללות
- Middos מדות
Marei mekomos
- 1שו״ה ומתדבקים — עצמותן · בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ: עצמיותן.
- 2כולד . . דירך אמו · Gittin 23b
5ולכן גם בגשמיו׳ [בגשמיות] במאמר תוצא הארץ נפש חיה1 יצא גוף הבהמות ונפשותן שהם בחי׳ צומח וחי כאחד מן הארץ על היותן סמוכים ומתאחדי׳ זע״ז [זה עם זה / זה על זה] גם בשרשן כנ״ל.
Therefore in physicality too, by the utterance “Let the earth bring forth living creatures,” the bodies of the animals and their souls, which are the levels of the vegetative and the animal, came forth together from the earth, since they are adjacent and united with each other in their root as well, as said above.
That is why, at “Let the earth bring forth living creatures,” the animals’ bodies (vegetative) and souls (animal) came forth together: they are united even at their root.
משא״כ הדומם רחוק מן החי ביותר שהרי בחי׳ צומח מפסיק ביניהן. ועד״מ האותיות אין להם שייכות כלל להשכל שאינן כמו המדות שהם בערך וסוג קרוב עם השכל.
But the inanimate is very far from the animal, for the level of the vegetative interrupts between them. By way of analogy: the letters have no connection at all to the intellect, for they are not like the emotive attributes, which are of a kind and category close to the intellect.
The inanimate, however, is far from the animal, with the vegetative in between. In the soul, the letters bear no relation to the intellect, while the emotions are of a kindred nature with it.
וראוי הוא שיהי׳ [שיהיה] התהוות ההתפעלות מן השכל כמ״ש לפי שכלו יהולל איש.2 וע״כ הם סמוכים זל״ז [זה לזה] כנ״ל.
And it is fitting that the emotional arousal come into being from the intellect, as it is written, “A man is praised according to his intellect.” Therefore they are adjacent to each other, as said above.
Feelings naturally arise from understanding — “a man is praised according to his intellect” (Proverbs 12:8) — so intellect and emotion are adjacent.
אבל האותיות הן הנה ממהות וסוג אחר כי הם גשמיים ממש ואין להם שייכות כלל למהות השכל (ועמש״ל [ועיין מה שכתוב לעיל] בד״ה בכ״ה בכסליו3 גבי נרות וקטורת)
But the letters are of another essence and category, for they are actually physical and have no connection at all to the essence of the intellect (and see what is written above in the discourse beginning “On the twenty-fifth of Kislev,” regarding the lamps and the incense).
The letters, though, are of a different order entirely; the Alter Rebbe refers to his Chanukah discourse, on the lamps and the incense, for more on this.
ולכן גוף האדם שהי׳ [שהיה] דומם וגולם נתהווה כמו שהוא בלא נפש החיונית כי לא יכלה נפש החיה כלל להתחבר עמו.4
Therefore man’s body, which was inanimate and an unformed mass, came into being as it is, without the vital soul, for the animal soul could not join with it at all.
Therefore man’s body, being inanimate, came into being without any life; even the animal soul could not join with it.
אמנם אח״כ נתלבשה בו נפש האדם עם היותה בחי׳ מדבר שהוא למעלה בערך גם מן החי.5
However, afterward the soul of man was vested in it, though it is the level of the speaking, which is above in rank even the animal.
Yet the human soul, higher even than the animal soul, did afterward enter it — which seems surprising.
אבל הענין כי היא הנותנת שבבחי׳ שלמטה מטה ביותר א״א שירד וישפיל א״ע [את עצמו] שם רק מי שהוא גבוה בערך ביותר
But the matter is that this is exactly what dictates it: into the very lowest level, none can descend and lower himself there except one who is highest in rank.
The principle: only something of the very highest rank can descend to the very lowest place.
ולכן בגוף שמבחי׳ דומם היותר נמוך במדרגה נתלבשה נפש המדברת הגבוה מכולן משא״כ בצומח שלא נתלבשה בו רק נפש החיה.
Therefore into the body of the inanimate level, the lowest in rank, the speaking soul, the highest of them all, was vested; whereas into the vegetative only the animal soul was vested.
So the lowest body received the highest soul, while the vegetative body received only the animal soul.
רק שאותה הנפש יצאה כאחד עם הגוף אבל בדומם אינו כן שלא יצאה הנפש המדברת עמו כא׳ [כאחד] רק שאח״כ נתלבשה בו כו׳:
Only, that soul came forth together with the body; but with the inanimate it is not so, for the speaking soul did not come forth together with it; rather, afterward it was vested in it, etc.
The difference: the animal soul came forth together with its body, while the speaking soul entered the inanimate body only afterward.
The analogy is applied: adjacent levels arise together, but only the highest soul can enter the lowest body, and only afterward.
TermsTurning ani into ayinDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaberRichuk makomNefesh habahamis+2
- Turning ani into ayin אני ואין
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר
- Richuk makom ריחוק מקום
- Nefesh habahamis נפש הבהמית
- Osiyos אותיות
- Middos מדות
Marei mekomos
- 1תוצא הארץ נפש חיה · Genesis 1:24
- 2לפי שכלו יהולל איש · Proverbs 12:8
- 3בד״ה בכ״ה בכסלו · לקמן כט, א.
- 4שו״ה החי׳ — עמו · בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ: עמו כו׳.
- 5עם היותה בחי׳ מדבר שהוא למעלה בערך גם מן החי · ראה אוה״ת דרושים לר״ה ע׳ א׳שלז שכאן נתבאר שנשמת האדם הוא מבחי׳ ח״ע, א״כ בחי׳ אדם הוא חכמה, ומה שנתבאר שאדם הוא רצון ”היינו כי אבא מקבל ממזל ונוצר אותיות רצון” ע״ש.
Angels and souls; the purpose of Tikkun ¶6–8
6וביאור כל זה הנה יובן ע״פ ענין ההפרש שבין מלאכים1 לנשמות. כי הנה המלאכים נק׳ בשם חיות ובהמות2 כמ״ש פני ארי׳ [אריה] אל הימין3 ופני שור מהשמאל כו׳.
The explanation of all this will be understood through the difference between angels and souls. For the angels are called by the names of animals, chayos and behemos, as it is written, “The face of a lion on the right, and the face of an ox on the left…,” etc.
To clarify all this, the maamar compares angels with souls. Angels are called by the names of animals, chayos (“living creatures”) and behemos (“beasts”), as in Ezekiel’s vision of the divine chariot, with the faces of a lion and an ox.
¶9 The difference between angels and souls is spelled out in paragraphs 9–10.
והם מורכבים ג״כ מגוף ונפש ונק׳ חומר וצורה4 כמו בנ״א [בני אדם]. רק שההפרש ביניהם לבנ״א [לבני אדם] הוא שגופם רוחני יותר.5
And they too are composed of a body and a soul, called matter and form, as with human beings; only, the difference between them and human beings is that their body is more spiritual.
Angels too have a “body” and a “soul” — matter and form — as humans do, but their body is more spiritual.
Angels, like animals, have a body and soul close to each other; the comparison with human souls will illuminate the question of man’s creation.
Tanya ch. 39 explains that angels are called beasts because their love and awe are natural to them, without free choice; Tanya ch. 40 cites Rabbi Chaim Vital that all angels have matter and form.
Marei mekomos
- 1ההפרש שבין מלאכים ונשמות · ראה אגה״ק סי׳ כ (קל, א). ביאוה״ז לכ״ק אדהאמ״צ ב, א. צח, ג. לקו״ת שה״ש לט, ד. אוה״ת בראשית א קלו, ב. ענינים ע׳ קנ. ושם מבאר כי המלאכים נלקחים מחיצוניות הכלים ולכך אין להם תורה, אבל נש״י נלקחים מפנימיות הכלים ולכך יש להם תורה ע״ש.
- 2המלאכים נק׳ בשם חיות ובהמות · Tanya, Likkutei Amarim 39:1–2
- 3פני ארי׳ אל הימין · Ezekiel 1:10
- 4מגוף ונפש ונק׳ חומר וצורה · ראה תניא פרק מ.
- 5שגופם רוחני יותר · ראה במאמרי אדה״ז ענינים ע׳ קסז ”ומה גם שבריאתם בא כאחד נשמתם וגופם בבת א׳ שגופם לבוש הכח הרוחני שבהם, משא״כ האדם נשמתו מן העליונים וגופו מן התחתונים”
7וכמ״ש הרמב״ן [הרבי משה בן נחמן]1 ע״פ עושה מלאכיו רוחות משרתיו אש לוהט2 שמרוחניות שני היסודות אלו אש ורוח3 נעשה גופות המלאכים יש מהן שגויתם מבחי׳ רוח והוא כמו מחנה מיכאל ויש שמבחי׳ אש וכמו מחנה גבריאל4 כו׳.
As the Ramban writes on the verse “He makes His angels winds, His ministers a flaming fire”: the bodies of the angels are made from the spirituality of these two elements, fire and air; some have bodies of the level of air, such as the camp of Michael, and some of the level of fire, such as the camp of Gavriel, etc.
The Ramban explains “He makes His angels winds, His ministers a flaming fire” (Psalms 104:4) to mean that angels’ bodies are made of the spiritual essence of two elements, fire and air (ruach, also “wind”). The camp of Michael is of air, that of Gavriel of fire.
משא״כ גופות בנ״א [בני אדם] הם מגשמיות ד׳ יסודות ארמ״ע [אש רוח מים עפר].
Whereas the bodies of human beings are of the physicality of the four elements: fire, air, water and earth.
Human bodies, by contrast, are made of all four physical elements: fire, air, water and earth.
אמנם הסבה לזה למה נתנו להם גופות רוחניות מלישראל. כי הנה תכלית הירידה5 בהשתלשלות העולמות הוא רק כמ״ש ולכבודי בראתיו6 כו׳ דהיינו להיות ביטול היש
But the reason for this — why they were given bodies more spiritual than Israel — is that the purpose of the descent in the chain of the worlds is only as it is written, “And for My glory I created him…,” namely, that there be the nullification of the “something.”
Why, then, did the angels receive more spiritual bodies than the Jewish people, who are higher? The answer starts from the purpose of the whole descent of the worlds, “For My glory I created him” (Isaiah 43:7): that the “something” (yesh) — creation’s sense of being a separate existence — be nullified before G‑d.
וזהו עיקר ענין עולם התקון יחוד והתכללות אורות וכלים שהן דרך כלל בחי׳ אין ויש
And this is the essential point of the World of Tikkun (rectification): the union and inclusion of lights and vessels, which are, in general, the levels of “nothing” and “something.”
That is the core of the World of Tikkun (rectification): lights and vessels are united and blended together. The lights are “nothing” (ayin), selfless; the vessels are “something,” defined and distinct.
כי האורות הן בחי׳ הארו׳ והמשכות א״ס ב״ה והן בבחי׳ ביטול והכלים הם בחי׳ יש חו״ב [חכמה ובינה] חו״ג [חסד וגבורה].78
For the lights are the level of the illuminations and emanations of the Infinite One, blessed be He, and they are in a state of self-nullification; and the vessels are the level of “something”: Chochmah and Binah, Chesed and Gevurah.
The lights are rays of the Infinite One and remain wholly nullified; the vessels are the defined Sefiros — Chochmah and Binah, Chesed and Gevurah — each with its own distinct character.
Angelic and human bodies are contrasted, and the purpose of creation is introduced: the nullification of ‘something’ before ‘nothing,’ the union of lights and vessels that defines the World of Tikkun.
Tanya ch. 39 places the camp of Michael on the right (love) and the camp of Gavriel on the left (fear). The Tzemach Tzedek (quoted in the Kehot notes) suggests that when the Rambam calls angels “form without matter,” he means without the matter of Asiyah, but not without spiritual matter.
TermsFour elementsBittul hayeshTohu and TikkunYichud+7
- Four elements ד׳ יסודות
- Bittul hayesh ביטול היש
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
- Yichud יחוד
- Lights and vessels אורות וכלים
- Malachim מלאכים
- Ein Sof אין סוף
- Yesh and ayin יש ואין
- Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
- Hiskallelus התכללות
Also Bittul
Marei mekomos
- 1וכמ״ש הרמב״ן · בסוף שער הגמול. מובא גם בהפירוש על הרמב״ם פ״ח מהל׳ תשובה. ראה אוה״ת בראשית כרך ג תקנו, ב. דרך מצותיך סא, ב. סה״מ תרמ״ג ע׳ עא.
- 2עושה מלאכיו רוחות משרתיו אש לוהט · Psalms 104:4
- 3שמרוחניות שני היסודות אלו אש ורוח · ראה בלקו״ת ברכה צח, א ”מיסוד הרוח הפשוט ומיסוד האש הפשוט”. וראה גם בהמשך חייב אדם לברך פרק יא נדפס בסה״מ תרל״ח ע׳ קיג.
- 4מחנה מיכאל . . מחנה גבריאל · Zohar III, 118b
- 5כי הנה תכלית הירידה · קטע מכאן מובא בסה״מ תרל״ג כרך א ע׳ עדר.
- 6ולכבודי בראתיו · Isaiah 43:7
- 7והכלים הם בחי׳ יש חו״ב חו״ג · ראה בסה״מ תרל״ג כרך א ע׳ עדר ביאור בענין מה שמבואר כאן דהכלים דבי״ע הם בחי׳ יש חו״ב חו״ג. ע״ש.
- 8בד״ה פדה בשלום עזר״ת ע׳ צט כתב וז״ל · ונ׳ דכוונת הרמב״ם מ״ש שהן צורה בלא גולם היינו לא גולם דעשי׳ אלא גולם רוחני, עכ״ל ע״ש. מובא גם בלקו״ת ברכה צח, א ובעוד כמה מקומות. וראה בלקו״ש ח״ט ע׳ 405. ובהנסמן במאמרי אדה״א בראשית ע׳ קיב. סה״מ תר״ם ח״א ע׳ רצב הע׳ 18.
8והנה בעולם התהו לא יכלו הכלים להכיל את האורות דהיינו שלא הי׳ [היה] היש נכלל ובטל אל האין
Now in the World of Tohu (chaos) the vessels could not contain the lights; that is, the “something” was not included and nullified into the “nothing.”
In the World of Tohu (“chaos”), the stage before the ordered world, the vessels could not hold the lights: the “something” did not merge into the “nothing.”
ועיקר ענין התקון הוא להיות התכללות האורות עם הכלים וכן להיות התכללות חו״ג [חסד וגבורה] שמאלא וימינא כו׳ שהוא בחי׳ ביטול היש לאין.
And the essential point of Tikkun is that there be the inclusion of the lights with the vessels, and likewise the inclusion of Chesed and Gevurah, left and right, etc., which is the nullification of the “something” to the “nothing.”
Tikkun means that lights and vessels are blended, and that the opposing attributes, Chesed (right) and Gevurah (left), include one another; this integration is itself the nullification of “something” to “nothing.”
Tohu is the failure of vessels to contain lights; Tikkun is their integration, which is the essence of self-nullification.
In the Arizal’s teaching, the vessels of Tohu shattered because each Sefirah stood alone without including the others; in Tikkun the Sefiros are interincluded, which the Alter Rebbe identifies with bittul.
TermsBittul hayeshTohu and TikkunLights and vesselsYesh and ayin+2
- Bittul hayesh ביטול היש
- Tohu and Tikkun תהו ותקון
- Lights and vessels אורות וכלים
- Yesh and ayin יש ואין
- Hiskallelus התכללות
Also Bittul
Only the G‑dly soul can transform a physical body ¶9–11
9וגם המלאכים יש להם עבודה זו לבטל היש והגוף שלהם ע״י נשמתם שהיא מבחי׳ אין ונלקחה מחיצוניות הכלים.
The angels too have this service: to nullify the “something,” their body, through their soul, which is of the level of “nothing” and was taken from the outer dimension of the vessels.
The angels too serve by nullifying their “something,” their body, through their soul, which is “nothing”; but their soul comes from the outer dimension of the vessels.
וכן גם ישראל צריכין לבטל היש שהוא הגוף הגשמי שלהם ע״י נפשם האלקית שהיא בעצמה א״צ [אין צריך / אינו צריך] תקון לפי שהיא בבחי׳ אין כו׳ ונלקח׳ מפנימי׳ [מפנימיות / מפנימית] הכלי׳ [הכלים] הגבה למעל׳ [למעלה / למעלת] ממקור מחצב נפשות המלאכים.
And so too Israel must nullify the “something,” which is their physical body, through their G‑dly soul, which in itself needs no rectification, since it is in a state of “nothing,” etc., and was taken from the inner dimension of the vessels, higher than the quarry from which the souls of the angels were hewn.
The Jewish people likewise must nullify their physical body through the G‑dly soul, which needs no rectification itself; it comes from the inner dimension of the vessels, a source higher than that of the angels’ souls.
Angels and Jewish souls alike work to nullify their bodies; the Jewish soul, from the inner dimension of the vessels, is higher than the angels’ souls.
TermsBittul hayeshChitzoniyusAvodas HashemLights and vessels+3
- Bittul hayesh ביטול היש
- Chitzoniyus חיצוניות
- Avodas Hashem עבודת ה׳
- Lights and vessels אורות וכלים
- Malachim מלאכים
- Yesh and ayin יש ואין
Also Bittul
10ולכך יכולה להפוך ולכבש1 גם גוף גשמי משא״כ המלאכי׳ [המלאכים] אילו היה להם גוף גשמי לא היו יכולים להפכו כלל ולהיות בביטול היש אלא היו נופלים ממדרגתם לגמרי.
Therefore it can transform and subdue even a physical body; whereas the angels, had they a physical body, could not transform it at all and bring it to the nullification of the “something”; rather, they would fall from their level entirely.
Because the G‑dly soul is rooted so high, it can transform and master even a coarse physical body. An angel placed in a physical body could not refine it; it would simply be dragged down from its level.
¶6 This completes the angels-and-souls difference raised in paragraph 6.
רק נשמות האדם דוקא מצד מעלת נשמתם עלו במחשב׳ [במחשבה / במחשבת]2 כו׳ יכולים להפוך גם גוף גשמי.
Only the souls of man specifically, by virtue of the loftiness of their soul — they “arose in [G‑d’s] thought,” etc. — can transform even a physical body.
Only human souls, which “arose in G‑d’s thought” before creation (Bereshit Rabbah 1:4), have the power to transform physical matter.
This answers why angels have more spiritual bodies: only the loftiest souls can bear and transform a coarse physical body.
Explained elsewhere AI research
Explained by the Mitteler Rebbe and the Rebbe
The paragraph says that angels given a physical body could not transform it at all and „היו נופלים ממדרגתם לגמרי” (“would fall from their level entirely”). A reader may ask what this rests on, and what such a fall would be.
What would it mean for the angels to “fall”? The Mitteler Rebbe, in his maamar on this verse in Torah Chaim (Bereishis 25c), gives the proof from the Nefilim (הנפילים), the „בני האלקים ממש אשר באו אל בנות האדם” (“sons of Elokim” who came to the daughters of man) (Bereishis 6:2–4): they came down into physical bodies like men’s, and „לא היה ביכולת אור נפשם האלקית להפוך כלל” (the G‑dly light of their soul could not transform) that coarseness at all. An angel’s soul, he explains, is rooted only in the “living”, so its body is made fine enough for it to transform, while man’s soul, rooted in the “speaking”, was given the coarsest body because it has the power to transform it. The Rebbe brings the same illustration when he retells this maamar (Toras Menachem 5727 vol. 3 p. 222, unedited).
the Mitteler Rebbe: Torah Chaim, Bereishis (dibbur hamaschil וייצר ה׳ אלקים, his maamar on this verse, parallel to this one), vol. 1, p. 50 (25c, as the editors of Toras Menachem 5727 cite it)
וראייה מן הנפילים אשר היו בארץ שהן בני האלקים ממש אשר באו אל בנות האדם כו׳ לפי שירדו למטה בגופים חומריי׳ כגופות בנ״א
the Rebbe (unedited): Toras Menachem 5727 (unedited maamar ד״ה ברוך הגומל לחייבים טובות, Shabbos Pinchas, 14 Tammuz 5727), vol. 3, p. 222 (the maamar from p. 206)
וכידוע מענין הנפילים, מבני שמחזאי ועזאל, שנפלו למטה ולא עמדו נגד הגוף, ולכן ניתן להם גוף רוחני בערך נפשם
Where the maamar leaves something unexplained, found by AI in the library and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.
Marei mekomos
- 1שו״ה ולכבש · בהגהת הרה״ח ר׳ אשר: ולכבוש.
- 2עלו במחשב׳ · Bereshit Rabbah 1:4
11וכמשל מדורת אש גדולה שמאירה ד, גלמרחוק יותר מקטנה כו׳. ונמצא מובן עכ״פ [על כל פנים] שגוף ונפש של המלאכים הן קרובים בערך זל״ז [זה לזה] ונתהוו כאחד ממש ממקורם היא בחי׳ מל׳ דאצי׳ שהיא אם כל חי1 דבי״ע
It is like the analogy of a large bonfire, which shines farther than a small one, etc. It is understood, in any case, that the body and soul of the angels are close in rank to each other and came into being truly as one from their source, which is the level of Malchus of Atzilus, “the mother of all life” (chai) of [the worlds of] Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
As a large fire lights up farther, a greater soul reaches further down. Angels’ bodies and souls, being close in rank, came into being as one from their source, Malchus of Atzilus, which is “the mother of all life” for the three lower worlds, Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah.
שע״ז נאמר תוצא הארץ נפש חיה2 פי׳ ארץ העליונה שהיא המל׳ תוצא נפש כל חיה הם המלאכים שנק׳ חיות ויצאו ביחד גופם עם נשמתם
Of this it is said, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures (nefesh chayah)”: meaning, the supernal earth, which is Malchus, shall bring forth the soul of every chayah — these are the angels, who are called chayos (“living creatures”) — and their bodies came forth together with their souls,
“Let the earth bring forth living creatures (nefesh chayah)” is read on this level: the “supernal earth,” Malchus, brings forth the angels, called chayos (“living creatures”) after the chayos of Ezekiel’s vision, body and soul together.
כי הגוף שהוא בחי׳ צומח3 הוא אצל וסמוך לבחי׳ החי כנ״ל שהצומח הי׳ [היה] כלול בחי בבחי׳ עבור כו׳:
for the body, which is the level of the vegetative, is beside and adjacent to the level of the animal, as said above, that the vegetative was contained in the animal in a state of gestation, etc.
Their bodies are of the vegetative level, adjacent to the animal level of their souls, since the vegetative was first contained in the animal as in gestation.
Angels, like animals, came forth body and soul together from Malchus of Atzilus, because their bodies and souls belong to adjacent levels.
The Tzemach Tzedek (Or HaTorah, quoted in the Kehot notes) raises a question here: the angels’ bodies are of fire and air, which are not the vegetative level either.
TermsKoach hatzomeachDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaberRichuk makomIbbur and leidah+8
- Koach hatzomeach כח הצומח
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר
- Richuk makom ריחוק מקום
- Ibbur and leidah עיבור ולידה
- Malachim מלאכים
- Yetzirah יצירה
- Asiyah עשיה
- Beriah בריאה
- Malchus מלכות
- Hiskallelus התכללות
- Atzilus אצילות
Also Chayus
Marei mekomos
- 1אם כל חי · Genesis 3:20
- 2תוצא הארץ נפש חי׳ · Genesis 1:24
- 3הם המלאכים שנק׳ חיות . . כי הגוף שהוא בחי׳ צומח · באוה״ת פ׳ בראשית כרך ו בד״ה להבין הטעם שנשתנה יצירת גוף האדם סעי׳ ה (מלקו״ת לג״פ כה, ב) שלכאורה צ״ל הלא גוף המלאכים הם מבחי׳ אש ורוח שהם ג״כ אינם בחי׳ צומח. ראה גם אוה״ת תבא ע׳ תתש.
Malchus and the letters stand outside the chain ¶12–15
12וכמו״כ [וכמו כן] יובן גם למעלה יותר בחיון עלאין שהם האבות שהן הן המרכבה1 והיינו בבחי׳ אצי׳ והיו כלולים מתחלה ג״כ בבטן אימא עלאה בחי׳ עבור ואח״כ יצאו לגילוי.
And so too it will be understood even higher, regarding the supernal chayos (“living creatures”), which are the Patriarchs — “they are the Chariot” — that is, on the level of Atzilus: they too were at first contained in the womb of the supernal Imma, in a state of gestation, and afterward came out into revelation.
The same pattern holds higher, in Atzilus: the supernal chayos (“living creatures”) of the divine Chariot are the Patriarchs, that is, the divine emotions that Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov embodied. These emotions first gestated within the supernal Imma (Binah) and then emerged.
ואז הם בבחי׳ יניקה כו׳ והיינו ענין צומח וחי הסמוכים זה לזה שנמשכים זמ״ז [זה מזה] בדרך השתלשלות עו״ע [עילה ועלול] כו׳.
And then they are in the state of nursing, etc. And this is the matter of the vegetative and the animal, which are adjacent to each other, being drawn from one another by way of a chain of cause and effect, etc.
After emerging they “nurse” from the intellect. This is the adjacent vegetative–animal relationship: each level flows from the one above by cause and effect.
משא״כ בחי׳ הדומם שהיא בחי׳ המל׳ היא מובדלת בערך מהם ואינה נמשכת בבחי׳ השתלשלות עו״ע [עילה ועלול] כדרך המשכת המדות מהשכל.
But the level of the inanimate, which is the level of Malchus, is separated in rank from them and is not drawn by way of a chain of cause and effect, in the way the emotive attributes are drawn from the intellect.
Malchus, the “inanimate,” is different: it is not simply an effect of the level above, as the emotions are an effect of understanding.
כי מן החכמה ולמטה הוא בחי׳ השתלשלות עו״ע [עילה ועלול] חכ׳ [חכמה] ואח״כ בינה ואח״כ דעת עד שאח״כ נמשכים המדות כו׳
For from Chochmah downward it is a chain of cause and effect: Chochmah, and afterward Binah, and afterward Daas, until afterward the emotive attributes are drawn, etc.,
From Chochmah downward the Sefiros form a causal chain: Chochmah produces Binah, then Daas, and these produce the emotions.
עד בחי׳ המל׳ ולא עד בכלל כי התהוות המל׳ שהיא בחי׳ אותיות דבר ה׳ אינן מסוג וערך הבחינה שלמעלה ממנה עד שיתכן לומר שתהא נמשכת בדרך עו״ע [עילה ועלול]
down to the level of Malchus, but not including it. For as to the coming into being of Malchus, which is the level of the letters of the word of G‑d — they are not of the kind and rank of the level above it, that it could be said that it is drawn by way of cause and effect.
But the chain stops short of Malchus. Malchus is the “letters” of G‑d’s word, His speech, and letters are not the same kind of thing as the level above them, so they cannot be drawn from it as its effect.
וכמשל האותיות הגשמיים שאינן מערך המדות והשכל כו׳ אלא שהתהוותן הוא מלמעלה יותר והיינו מעצמיות הנפש שקבועים בה כ״ב אותיות אלו.
It is like the analogy of the physical letters, which are not of the rank of the emotive attributes and the intellect, etc.; rather, their coming into being is from higher up, namely, from the very essence of the soul, in which these twenty-two letters are fixed.
Likewise human letters are not a product of one’s feelings or ideas. They come from something higher, the very essence of the soul, in which the twenty-two letters are inherently fixed.
כי הגם דאחה״ע מהגרון23 כו׳ היינו שהם באים ומתלבשים במוצאות אלו אבל שרשם בנפש כידוע ומבואר באגה״ק [באגרת הקודש] ע״פ ויעש דוד שם.4
For although the letters Alef, Ches, Hei, Ayin are from the throat, etc., this means that they come and are vested in these points of articulation; but their root is in the soul, as is known and explained in Iggeres HaKodesh on the verse “And David made a name.”
The throat letters (Alef, Ches, Hei, Ayin) and the other groups are only expressed through the organs of speech; their root is in the soul itself, as explained in Iggeres HaKodesh, Epistle 5.
Among the Sefiros the emotions descend from the intellect by cause and effect, but Malchus, the ‘letters,’ comes from a higher source — just as human letters are rooted in the soul’s essence rather than in thought or feeling.
Sefer Yetzirah divides the letters by their five points of articulation, beginning with the throat letters. The Rebbe’s corrections to Tanya note that the correct order is אחה"ע, not אהח"ע.
The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research
The Rebbe explains
In a sicha of Shabbos Acharei, Mevarchim Iyar 5719, on the first chapter of Pirkei Avos (edited in Likkutei Sichos vol. 4), the Rebbe takes up the Talmud’s teaching that man’s craft in this world is „שישים עצמו כאלם” (to make himself as one mute), and asks how silence can be man’s craft when speech is his very distinction, man being called „מדבר” (“the speaker”); a note there gives the reason for that name.
Citing this maamar, with the Mitteler Rebbe’s parallel in Torah Chaim, the Rebbe notes „שכח הדיבור שבאדם נעלה גם מכח השכל שבו, שלכן נק׳ האדם בשם מדבר” (that the power of speech in man is higher even than his intellect, and that this is why man is called medaber, “the speaker”). In this maamar that point is the teaching of our paragraph: the letters „אינן מערך המדות והשכל” (are not of the rank of the emotions and the intellect), but come from higher, „מעצמיות הנפש שקבועים בה כ״ב אותיות אלו” (from the very essence of the soul, in which the twenty-two letters are fixed). In the first part of the maamar (Torah Ohr Bereishis 4, ¶8) the Alter Rebbe draws the name from another side, “yadber amim”: man as the leader who raises all creation.
The Alter Rebbe
האותיות הגשמיים שאינן מערך המדות והשכל כו׳ אלא שהתהוותן הוא מלמעלה יותר והיינו מעצמיות הנפש
The Rebbe
ועד שכח הדיבור שבאדם נעלה גם מכח השכל שבו, שלכן נק׳ האדם בשם מדבר
Likkutei Sichos, vol. 4, p. 1188, note 67 · Shabbos Acharei, Mevarchim Iyar 5719
Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made
TermsHei motzaos hapehAvosMerkavahDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaber+13
- Hei motzaos hapeh ה׳ מוצאות הפה
- Avos אבות
- Merkavah מרכבה
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר
- Ein aroch אין ערוך
- Ibbur and leidah עיבור ולידה
- Daas דעת
- Binah בינה
- Abba and Imma אבא ואמא
- Osiyos אותיות
- Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
- Dibbur elyon דבור עליון
- Hiskallelus התכללות
- Atzilus אצילות
- Middos מדות
Marei mekomos
- 1האבות שהן הן המרכבה · Bereshit Rabbah 47:6
- 2דאחה״ע מהגרון · ס״י פ״ב מ״א. ראה הערות ותיקונים לתניא (קז, ב): אחה״ע, לא אהח״ע. וי״ל עפמש״כ בזח״ג קכג, א.
- 3דאחה״ע מהגרון · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 5:6
- 4ויעש דוד שם · II Samuel 8:13
13ולכן אותיות שוים יכולים להורות על ב׳ שכליים הפכים רק בשינוי הצרופים בהקדמת ואיחור אות זה מזה
Therefore the same letters can express two opposite concepts, merely through a change in their combinations, by placing one letter before or after another,
Proof that the letters are not tied to ideas: the same letters can express opposite ideas merely by being rearranged.
אע״פ [אף על פי] שהן הן אותן האותיות ממש ויהיה שינוי גדול בההשכלה מהפוך להפוך כמו מאש למים שזהו חסד וזהו גבורה כו׳.
although they are the very same letters, and there will be a great change in the concept, from one extreme to its opposite, as from fire to water — this is Chesed and this is Gevurah, etc.
The same letters, reordered, can yield concepts as opposite as fire and water, one expressing kindness (Chesed) and the other severity (Gevurah).
The letters’ independence from meaning is shown by how the same letters can form opposite concepts.
14והטעם מפני שבאמת גוף ועצם האותיות אין להם שייכות למהות השכל כלל עד שיתכן לומר שאותיות אלו שייכים לשכל זה דוקא ולשכל שכנגדו יצטרכו אותיות אחרים
The reason is that in truth the body and substance of the letters have no connection at all to the essence of the intellect, such that one could say that these letters belong specifically to this concept, and that for the opposite concept other letters would be needed,
The reason: the letters themselves have no inherent connection to any particular idea, so no idea “owns” certain letters.
כדרך שהוא במדות שיש שכל נוטה כלפי חסד ואינו נוטה כלפי גבורה ויש שכל נוטה כלפי גבורה כו׳ לפי שהן נמשכים בבחי׳ השתלשלות עו״ע [עילה ועלול] כו׳.
as is the case with the emotive attributes, where there is a concept that inclines toward Chesed and does not incline toward Gevurah, and there is a concept that inclines toward Gevurah, etc., because they are drawn by way of a chain of cause and effect, etc.
Emotions are different: a given line of reasoning naturally leads toward kindness or toward severity, because emotions flow from ideas by cause and effect.
Emotions are bound to the ideas that produce them; letters are not.
TermsTurning ani into ayinGevurahOsiyosHishtalshelus+2
- Turning ani into ayin אני ואין
- Gevurah גבורה
- Osiyos אותיות
- Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
- Chesed חסד
- Middos מדות
15וכמו״כ [וכמו כן] למעלה התהוות האותיות אינו בהשתלשלות עו״ע [עילה ועלול]. וכמו שהמדות נמשכים מבינה כי אינם מערך זה כו׳.
So too above, the coming into being of the letters is not by way of a chain of cause and effect, in the way that the emotive attributes are drawn from Binah, for they are not of this rank, etc.
Above too, Malchus (the “letters”) does not come into being as a link in the causal chain, the way the emotions come from Binah; it is not of that category.
אבל מ״מ לזאת הנה יש בהם מעלה יתירה שהתהוות׳ הוא ממקו׳ יותר עליון שמשם דוקא הוא שיכול להיות השפלה זו להיות התהוות מדת המל׳.
But nevertheless, for this very reason, they have an added superiority: their coming into being is from a higher place, for only from there can there be this lowering — the coming into being of the attribute of Malchus.
Yet this very independence is a virtue: it comes from a higher source, and only a higher source could produce such a “lowering” as Malchus, the attribute through which the worlds are created.
Malchus is not a product of the chain of Sefiros; paradoxically, it comes from a higher source, which alone can descend so low.
The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research
The Rebbe explains
In a maamar of Motzaei Shabbos Vayetzei, 9 Kislev 5738, explaining Yaakov’s taking „ויקח מאבני המקום וישם מראשותיו” (“of the stones of the place” and putting them at his head), the Rebbe says that service with the “inanimate” in man, speech and action, reaches higher than the service of the intellect.
As bread, the vegetative, sustains man because „המוצא פי הוי׳ שבלחם” (the word of G‑d in it) is rooted higher than the one in man, so too, the Rebbe writes, the letters, „דומם שבאדם” (the “inanimate” in man), are rooted higher even than the “vegetative”, for „דכל הגבוה גבוה יותר יורד למטה מטה יותר” (whatever is higher goes down lower); for this he cites these columns of Torah Ohr. Hence Yaakov’s “stones”, the service of speech and action, reach above his “head”, and through these lowest powers the very essence of the soul is revealed.
The Alter Rebbe
אבל מ״מ לזאת הנה יש בהם מעלה יתירה שהתהוות׳ הוא ממקו׳ יותר עליון
The Rebbe
עד״ז הוא גם בענין האותיות, דומם (שבאדם), ששרשם הוא למעלה יותר גם מבחי׳ צומח, דכל הגבוה גבוה יותר יורד למטה מטה יותר
Sefer HaMaamarim Melukat, vol. 2, p. קסה, note 88 · Motzaei Shabbos Vayetzei, 9 Kislev, the eve of 10 Kislev 5738, in his room
Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made
TermsBinahOsiyosHishtalshelusMiddos
- Binah בינה
- Osiyos אותיות
- Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
- Middos מדות
“With Chochmah He founded the earth” ¶16–18
16והוא מ״ש בחכמה יסד ארץ1 כונן שמים בתבונה שבחי׳ ארץ נמשכת מהחכמה דוקא שהיא למעלה משכל המושג הנק׳ תבונה שבו כונן שמים שהם המדות.
And this is what is written, “With Chochmah He founded the earth; He established the heavens with Tevunah”: the level of “earth” is drawn specifically from Chochmah, which is above the comprehended intellect called Tevunah, with which He established the heavens, which are the emotive attributes.
This is the meaning of Proverbs 3:19: “earth” (Malchus) comes from Chochmah, which is above comprehensible intellect (Tevunah, Binah), while the “heavens” (the emotions) come from Tevunah.
אע״פ [אף על פי] דגם המדות נמשכים מחכ׳ [מחכמה] היינו ששם הוא מקורם אבל עיקר התהוותם להיות בהתחלקות כמו שהן עתה הוא מן התבונה.
Although the emotive attributes too are drawn from Chochmah, this means that their source is there; but the main part of their coming into being, to be differentiated as they are now, is from Tevunah.
The emotions are rooted in Chochmah too, but their actual formation as distinct attributes comes from Tevunah.
כי החכמה נק׳ יו״ד שהיא למעלה מהתחלקות עדיין כנקודה שהיא בלתי מתחלקת כידוע והשפעת המדות משם הוא ג״כ בבחי׳ כללות
For Chochmah is called Yud, which is still above differentiation, like a point, which is indivisible, as is known; and the flow of the emotive attributes from there is also in an all-inclusive form.
Chochmah is symbolized by the Yud, a mere point, undivided; whatever it gives the emotions is compressed and general.
והוא כדמיון חלק הבן שמהאב נמשך טפה א׳ לבד רק שהיא כוללת כל גופו אבל עיקר בנינו בגידול אבריו להיות בציור פרצוף אדם בהתחלקות האברים הוא מהאם ע״י עבור בבטן האם.
It is like the analogy of the son’s share: from the father only a single drop is drawn, yet it includes his whole body; but the main part of his building, in the growth of his limbs into the form of a human figure with differentiated limbs, is from the mother, through gestation in the mother’s womb.
So it is with a child: the father’s single drop contains the whole future child in potential, but the development into a formed body with distinct limbs comes from the mother, during gestation. Likewise Binah develops the emotions into distinct attributes.
Chochmah is the undifferentiated source, like the father’s seed; Binah develops the emotions into their distinct form, like the mother’s womb; but the ‘earth,’ Malchus, comes from Chochmah.
TermsTevunahPartzufIbbur and leidahBinah+3
- Tevunah תבונה explained here“He established the heavens with tevunah”: the comprehended intellect is called Tevunah, and in it the middos (heavens) are formed. Their source is in Chochmah, a point above division that gives them only in general, like the father’s drop; their coming into being divided, like the limbs formed in the mother’s womb, is from Tevunah.
שבחי׳ ארץ נמשכת מהחכמה דוקא שהיא למעלה משכל המושג הנק׳ תבונה שבו כונן שמים שהם המדות
- Partzuf פרצוף
- Ibbur and leidah עיבור ולידה
- Binah בינה
- Hiskallelus התכללות
- Middos מדות
Also Chochmah
Marei mekomos
- 1בחכמה יסד ארץ · Proverbs 3:19
17וכך הוא ית׳ כונן שמים שיהיו המדות מתכוננים היטב כפי שצ״ל בבחי׳ פרצוף הוא בתבונה דוקא
And so He, blessed be He, “established the heavens” — that the emotive attributes be well established as they should be, in the form of a complete configuration (partzuf) — specifically “with Tevunah.”
So “establishing the heavens” — shaping the emotions into a complete, structured configuration (partzuf) — is the work of Tevunah.
והיינו ענין עבור המדות בבינה ואח״כ יש ימי יניקה ומוחין כו׳ והוא ענין צומח וחי שהם סמוכים זל״ז [זה לזה] כנ״ל.
And this is the matter of the gestation of the emotive attributes in Binah, and afterward there are the days of nursing and [of] intellect, etc., which is the matter of the vegetative and the animal, which are adjacent to each other, as said above.
That process is gestation in Binah, then nursing and maturity of intellect: the adjacent vegetative–animal relationship.
משא״כ המל׳ הנה בחכמה דוקא יסודה ממש וכמ״ש בזוהר אבא יסד ברתא1
But Malchus is founded specifically with Chochmah itself, as it is said in the Zohar, “Abba founded the daughter.”
Malchus, however, is founded directly by Chochmah, as the Zohar says, “Abba (Chochmah) founded the daughter (Malchus).”
דהיינו שכמו שהחכמה נמשכת מאין ליש שלא בדרך השתלשלות. כך גם המל׳ שהיא בחינת אותיות יש בזה בחי׳ זו במה שנמשכת ג״כ מבחי׳ אין שהרי עפ״י [על פי] השתלשלות לא היה ראוי להיות ד, דהתהוות האותיות מהשכל או מהמדות כו׳
That is, just as Chochmah is drawn from nothing to something, not by way of a chain of descent, so too Malchus, which is the level of the letters, has this quality, in that it too is drawn from the level of “nothing”; for according to the chain of descent it would not be fitting for the letters to come into being from the intellect or from the emotive attributes, etc.
Chochmah itself emerges “from nothing to something,” not as a product of anything before it; in the same way Malchus, the letters, also comes “from nothing,” not as an effect of the intellect or the emotions — by the causal chain alone, letters could never have emerged from them.
(ומש״ל [ומה שכתוב לעיל] דגם חכמה נקרא חי׳ כמ״ש והחכמה תחיה2 היינו כי בחכמה יש ב׳ מדרגות בחי׳ אבא עלאה והוא יו״ד של שם הוי״ה ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] אבל בחינה ב׳ הוא נק׳ ישראל סבא ומרומז באות ה׳ כמ״ש במשנת חסידים מסכת או״א [אבא ואימא].
(And as for what was said above, that Chochmah too is called “living,” as it is written, “And wisdom gives life”: this is because in Chochmah there are two levels: the level of supernal Abba, which is the Yud of the Name Havayah, supernal Chochmah; but the second level is called Yisrael Saba, and is alluded to in the letter Hei, as written in Mishnas Chassidim, Tractate Abba and Imma.
A parenthetical note: Chochmah was earlier called “living” (“wisdom gives life”). That is because Chochmah has two levels: supernal Abba, the Yud of Havayah; and a second level, Yisrael Saba, alluded to in the Hei, as the Kabbalistic work Mishnas Chassidim explains.
¶3 This explains why Chochmah was called "living" in paragraph 3.
והנה בחי׳ ה׳ הוא בחי׳ מקור לבחי׳ חי כמש״ל [כמה שכתוב לעיל] שארבעה אותיות שם הוי״ה הן מקור בחי׳ דצח״מ [דומם צומח חי מדבר] לכך בחי׳ זו הב׳ דחכמה נקרא ג״כ חי וזהו והחכמה תחיה אבל בחי׳ ראשונה נקרא מדבר)
Now the level of Hei is the source of the level of the animal, as explained above that the four letters of the Name Havayah are the source of the levels of inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking; therefore this second level of Chochmah is also called “living,” and this is “And wisdom gives life”; but the first level is called “speaking.”)
Since the Hei is the source of the “animal” level, the second level of Chochmah is called “living,” while the first level, the Yud, is “speaking.”
ולכן אדה״ר [אדם הראשון] היה גופו דומם ממש. כי יש ב׳ מיני אדם.
Therefore Adam, the first man, had a body that was truly inanimate. For there are two kinds of “Adam.”
Therefore Adam’s body was truly inanimate. The maamar distinguishes two kinds of “Adam.”
א׳ הוא בחי׳ שם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] שנק׳ אדם כמ״ש כתפארת אדם לשבת בית3 שבחי׳ ת״ת [תפארת] שהוא כללות ז״א הנק׳ שם מ״ה [שם מ״ה] נקרא אדם.
One is the level of the Name Mah, which is called “Adam,” as it is written, “Like the beauty of a man (adam), to dwell in the house”: the level of Tiferes, which is the general and collective expression of Z’eir Anpin, called the Name Mah, is called “Adam.”
The first is the Name Mah, the spelling of Havayah whose numerical value, 45, equals that of אדם (“man”). This “Adam” is Tiferes, representing all of Z’eir Anpin, as in “like the beauty (tiferes) of a man (adam)” (Isaiah 44:13). The second, higher “Adam” is explained in the next paragraph.
Malchus comes directly from Chochmah, as Chochmah comes from ‘nothing’; this is why Adam, whose soul is rooted in Chochmah, had an inanimate body. Two levels of ‘Adam’ are introduced.
In Kabbalah the spelling of Havayah with Alefs (Mah, 45) belongs to Z’eir Anpin, while the spelling with Yuds (Av, 72) belongs to Chochmah; the next paragraph identifies Adam with the Name Av. In the Kabbalah of the Arizal, the partzuf of Chochmah (Abba) has an upper, inner aspect, Abba Ila’ah (“supernal Father”), paired with Imma, and a lower, outer aspect, Yisrael Saba (“Israel the Elder”), paired with Tevunah. The maamar therefore links the upper aspect to the Yud of the Name, called “speaking,” and the lower aspect to the Hei, the source of the “living,” which is why Chochmah too can be said to “give life.”
TermsAbba yasad brataTevunahPartzufTiferes+18
- Abba yasad brata אבא יסד ברתא explained hereThe middos are “established with understanding,” through gestation in Binah, but Malchus is founded in Chochmah itself. As Chochmah comes from nothing to something, not by a chain of descent, so Malchus, the letters, is also drawn from the level of nothing.
משא״כ המל׳ הנה בחכמה דוקא יסודה ממש וכמ״ש בזוהר אבא יסד ברתא
- Tevunah תבונה
- Partzuf פרצוף
- Tiferes תפארת
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר
- Ibbur and leidah עיבור ולידה
- Mah and Ban מ״ה וב״ן
- Yesh me’ayin יש מאין
- Mochin מוחין
- Higher Chochmah and the lower Chochmah חכמה עלאה וחכמה תתאה
- Yud-hei and vav-hei י״ה ו״ה
- Binah בינה
- Shabbos שבת
- Z’eir Anpin זעיר אנפין
- Abba and Imma אבא ואמא
- Osiyos אותיות
- Yesh and ayin יש ואין
- Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
- Hiskallelus התכללות
- Middos מדות
Marei mekomos
- 1אבא יסד ברתא · Zohar III, 248a
- 2והחכמה תחיה · Ecclesiastes 7:12
- 3כתפארת אדם לשבת בית · Isaiah 44:13
18ואמנם בחי׳ אדה״ר [אדם הראשון] היינו בחי׳ ח״ע [חכמה עילאה]1 שהיא ראשית האצי׳ ממש והוא בחי׳ שם ע״ב [שם ע״ב]. ולכן הוא דוקא שהיה גופו דומם.
However, the level of Adam, the first man, is the level of supernal Chochmah, which is the very beginning of Atzilus, and it is the level of the Name Av. Therefore it was specifically he whose body was inanimate.
The second, higher “Adam” — Adam the first man — corresponds to supernal Chochmah, the very beginning of Atzilus, and to the Name Av (Havayah spelled out with Yuds, numerical value 72). That is precisely why his body was inanimate.
כי בחכמה דוקא יסד ארץ2 שמהחכמה הוא שיכול להיות התהוות הדומם ואדרבה בדומם דוקא מתלבשת החכמה משא״כ בצומח שהרי כונן שמים הוא בתבונה בלבד.
For specifically “with Chochmah He founded the earth”: it is from Chochmah that the inanimate can come into being; on the contrary, Chochmah is vested specifically in the inanimate — not so in the vegetative, for “He established the heavens” only “with Tevunah.”
Since “with Chochmah He founded the earth,” Chochmah produces the inanimate and even vests itself specifically in it, whereas the vegetative, the “heavens,” comes only from Tevunah.
משא״כ נפש החי לא יכלה להתלבש בגוף שמבחי׳ דומם
Whereas the animal soul could not be vested in a body of the inanimate level.
The animal soul, which derives from Binah, could not enter an inanimate body.
שהרי מהבינה לא יכול להיות רק בחי׳ השתלשלות בלבד עו״ע [עילה ועלול] והוא בחי׳ צומח ולא התהוות בחי׳ המל׳ הנקרא דומם שזה אינו אלא מח״ע [מחכמה עילאה] דוקא כו׳.
For from Binah there can be only a chain of cause and effect, which is the level of the vegetative, and not the coming into being of the level of Malchus, called “inanimate,” which is only from supernal Chochmah specifically, etc.
For Binah can only produce things in a gradual chain of cause and effect, which yields the vegetative level, not Malchus, the “inanimate”; Malchus comes only from supernal Chochmah.
וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] בבריאת האדם דוקא וייצר ה׳ אלקים בב׳ שמות. שבהן ועל ידן הוא התחברות החכ׳ [החכמה] עם המל׳ כו׳:3
And this is why it is written specifically in the creation of man, “And Havayah Elokim formed,” with two Names: for in them and through them is the joining of Chochmah with Malchus, etc.
Hence the two Names in “Havayah Elokim formed man”: through them Chochmah is joined with Malchus — the highest soul with the lowest body.
Adam’s soul is from supernal Chochmah, the only level able to produce and inhabit the ‘inanimate’; the two Names of the verse express this joining of Chochmah and Malchus.
TermsName AvDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaberTevunahHigher Chochmah and the lower Chochmah+6
- Name Av שם ע״ב explained hereAdam the first man is Chochmah Ila’ah, the very beginning of Atzilus, the Name Av. So his body was formed from inanimate earth: “with Chochmah He founded the earth,” and only Chochmah, not Binah, brings the inanimate into being.
ואמנם בחי׳ אדה״ר היינו בחי׳ ח״ע שהיא ראשית האצי׳ ממש והוא בחי׳ שם ע״ב
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר explained hereHere Adam, rooted in Chochmah Ila’ah, had an inanimate body, since only Chochmah brings the inanimate into being and clothes itself there; Binah yields only the growing.
שמהחכמה הוא שיכול להיות התהוות הדומם ואדרבה בדומם דוקא מתלבשת החכמה
- Tevunah תבונה
- Higher Chochmah and the lower Chochmah חכמה עלאה וחכמה תתאה
- Binah בינה
- Elokim אלקים
- Hishtalshelus השתלשלות
- Atzilus אצילות
Also HislabshusChochmah
Marei mekomos
- 1אדה״ר היינו בחי׳ ח״ע · ראה לקמן עג, א. ובאוה״ת פ׳ בראשית כרך ג תקסז, א ובלקו״ת לג״פ לח, א. בספר הערכים-חב״ד ערך אדם הראשון הערה 10 מצויין שכאן בתו״א משמע שזהו לפני החטא, אמנם ממ״ש באוה״ת ובלקו״ת לג״פ הנ״ל ובד״ה חייב אדם לברך תרל״ח פל״ו בענין אלף שנה, מוכח שהכוונה לאדה״ר אחרי החטא.
- 2בחכמה דוקא יסד ארץ · Proverbs 3:19
- 3וייצר ה׳ אלקים · Genesis 2:7
Above and below alike ¶19–20
19ונמצא מובן מכ״ז [מכל זה] עכ״פ [על כל פנים] בטוב טעם ודעת מה שנפש החיה יש לה גוף שמבחינת צומח דוקא ונפש המדברת היותר עליונה יש לה גוף מבחינת דומם.
It turns out that from all this we understand, at any rate, with good reason and knowledge, why the animal soul has a body specifically of the vegetative level, while the speaking soul, which is higher, has a body of the inanimate level.
Summary: the animal soul has a vegetative body; the higher, human soul has an inanimate body.
¶1 This answers the question from paragraph 1.
כי אדרבה היא הנותנת כי נשמה גבוה היא שיכולה להתלבש בגוף נמוך דוקא כו׳.
For, on the contrary, this is exactly what dictates it: it is a high soul that can be vested specifically in a low body, etc.
This is not despite the soul’s height but because of it: only a high soul can enter a low body.
וזהו בין למעלה ובין למטה כלומר בין בעולמות עליונים שיש שם דצח״מ [דומם צומח חי מדבר] והם בחי׳ מלאכים הנק׳ בשם חיות ועופות כנ״ל כמ״ש פני אריה1 ופני שור ופני נשר כו׳
And this is so both above and below; that is, both in the higher worlds, where there are inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking — these being the angels, who are called by the names chayos (“living creatures”) and birds, as mentioned above, as it is written, “The face of a lion and the face of an ox and the face of an eagle…,” etc. —
The same pattern holds “above” as well: in the higher worlds too there are the four levels. The angels, called chayos (“living creatures”) and birds after the faces of a lion, an ox and an eagle in Ezekiel’s vision, correspond to the animal level.
ויש שם בחינת מדבר. ונשמת אדה״ר [אדם הראשון] כולל כל נש״י [נשמות ישראל]234 כו׳. וכולם נולדים מהארץ שהיא מל׳ דאצילות.
and there is the level of the speaking there. And the soul of Adam, the first man, includes all the souls of Israel, etc. And they are all born from the “earth,” which is Malchus of Atzilus.
There is also a “speaking” level there: the soul of Adam, which contained all the souls of Israel. All of them are born from the supernal “earth,” Malchus of Atzilus.
The principle that a higher soul can inhabit a lower body applies both in the spiritual worlds and in the physical world.
The Arizal teaches that all souls were originally included in the soul of Adam and were scattered and diminished through his sin (Sha’ar HaGilgulim, Introductions 7 and 12).
TermsDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaberDaasMalachimAtzilus+3
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר
- Daas דעת
- Malachim מלאכים
- Atzilus אצילות
Marei mekomos
- 1פני ארי׳ · Ezekiel 1:10
- 2ונשמת אדה״ר כולל כל נש״י · שער המצות פ׳ תצא, שער הגלגולים הק׳ ו, ז, יב. שער הפסוקים בראשית דרוש ג.
- 3ונשמת אדה״ר כולל כל נש״י · Sha'ar HaGilgulim 7:11–12
- 4ונשמת אדה״ר כולל כל נש״י · Sha'ar HaGilgulim 12:2–3
20והנה במאמר תוצא הארץ נפש חיה1 ועוף יעופף2 שהוא ענין התהוות נפש החיה אזי הגוף שלה יצא כאחד עם הנפש דהיינו שהיה הגוף בחינת צומח ויצא ביחד עם הנפש.
Now, by the utterance “Let the earth bring forth living creatures… and let birds fly…,” which is the coming into being of the animal soul, its body came forth together with the soul; that is, the body was of the vegetative level and came forth together with the soul.
Above: when Malchus of Atzilus produced the angels (“living creatures” and “birds”), their bodies came forth together with their souls; their body is of the vegetative level.
והיינו מפני שגם הנפש נלקחה מחיצוניות הכלים דמל׳ לכן גופו ג״כ רוחני והוא בחי׳ צומח כו׳.
This is because the soul too was taken from the outer dimension of the vessels of Malchus; therefore its body too is spiritual, and it is the level of the vegetative, etc.
This is because the angels’ souls come from the outer dimension of Malchus’ vessels, so their bodies are correspondingly spiritual.
אבל נפש המדברת של האדם לא נתהוית ביחד עם הגוף רק שאח״כ מתלבשת בגוף דומם דוקא היותר נמוך.
But the speaking soul of man did not come into being together with the body; rather, afterward it is vested specifically in an inanimate body, the lowest.
The human soul, in contrast, did not come into being with its body; it later entered the lowest, inanimate body.
כי להיותה בעצמה עליונה ביותר ע״כ יכלה לסבול גם גוף גשמי כו׳
For since it is in itself exceedingly high, it could therefore bear even a physical body, etc.
Being so high in itself, the human soul can bear even a physical body.
(וכמ״ש ג״כ במ״א שזהו ענין ההפרש בין זיווג נשיקין3 שממנו התהוות המלאכים שהוא רוחני ביותר. ומ״מ הוא רק השפעה חיצוני׳ ולכן לא יכולים להתלבש בגוף גשמי. אבל זיווג גופני שממנו נשמות עם היותו השפעה גשמית אבל שרשו בפנימי׳ [בפנימיות / בפנימית] דייקא וע״כ מתלבשים בגופות כו׳)
(As is also written elsewhere, that this is the difference between the “union of kisses,” from which the angels came into being, which is exceedingly spiritual and nevertheless is only an external influence, and therefore they cannot be vested in a physical body; and the physical union, from which the souls [come], which, although it is a physical influence, has its root specifically in the inner dimension, and therefore they are vested in bodies, etc.)
A parenthesis explains this in Kabbalistic terms: angels are born of the “union of kisses,” a purely spiritual union between the Sefiros, which conveys only an outer influence, so angels cannot be vested in physical bodies. Souls are born of the “physical union,” which, though more “physical,” is rooted in the innermost dimension; therefore souls enter physical bodies.
ובין למטה דהיינו בהתהוות דצח״מ [דומם צומח חי מדבר] גשמיים מהארץ הלזו שנפש החיה יצאה מהארץ ממש
And [so it is] below, that is, in the coming into being of the physical inanimate, vegetative, animal and speaking from this earth: the animal soul came forth from the earth itself.
Below, in the physical world, the same holds: the animal soul came forth from the earth itself.
דהיינו שחומר וצורה של החי שהוא ענין נפשו החיונית וגופו יצאו שניהם מן הארץ כמו שיצא הצומח בחומר וצורה שלו ויצאו שניהם כא׳ [כאחד] להיות סמוכים וקרובים בערך כנ״ל.
That is, the matter and form of the animal, which are its vital soul and its body, both came forth from the earth, just as the vegetative came forth in its matter and form; and both came forth together, being adjacent and close in rank, as said above.
The animal’s matter and form, its vital soul and its body, came out of the earth both together, just as the plant emerges with its matter and form, because they are adjacent in rank.
אבל במדבר אינו כן כנ״ל שהגוף נתהווה מן הארץ בבחי׳ דומם ואח״כ נתלבשה בו נפש מלמעלה והיא הנפש המדברת שלא יכלה לשכון בבחי׳ צומח רק בדומם גשמי כו׳.
But with the speaking it is not so, as said above: the body came into being from the earth on the level of the inanimate, and afterward a soul from above was vested in it — this is the speaking soul, which could not dwell in the vegetative level, but only in the physical inanimate, etc.
Not so man: his body came from the earth as inanimate matter, and afterward a soul from above entered it; the speaking soul cannot dwell in the vegetative, only in inanimate matter.
והיינו כי גם למעלה מעלה בבחי׳ אצי׳ הוא כמו״כ [כמו כן] שהחי מתלבש בצומח והם סמוכים כאחד והוא מ״ש כונן שמים בתבונה4 וארץ יסודתה בהררי קדש5 ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] כו׳:
And this is because even far above, on the level of Atzilus, it is likewise so: the animal is vested in the vegetative, and they are adjacent as one. And this is what is written, “He established the heavens with Tevunah,” and the earth — “its foundation is in the holy mountains,” [that is,] supernal Chochmah, etc.
The root of all this is in Atzilus: the animal (Binah) is vested in the vegetative (the emotions), adjacent to it, as “He established the heavens with Tevunah”; while the “earth” is founded “in the holy mountains” (Psalms 87:1), which the Alter Rebbe identifies with supernal Chochmah.
The maamar concludes by tracing the pattern in all three realms — angels, physical creatures and the Sefiros of Atzilus: adjacent levels are joined as one (among angels and physical creatures they arise together), while the highest soul enters the lowest body afterward, because the ‘earth’ is founded in supernal Chochmah.
Explained elsewhere AI research
Explained by the Alter Rebbe, in the Mitteler Rebbe’s writing and the Rebbe, bringing the Tzemach Tzedek’s explanation
The parenthesis says the „זיווג נשיקין” (“union of kisses”), though more spiritual, is only an outer influence, while the „זיווג גופני” (“physical union”) „שרשו בפנימי׳ דייקא” (has its root in the inner dimension); it does not say why the more “physical” union is the more inward.
Why is the “physical” union the more inward? A maamar of the Alter Rebbe (Shabbos Toldos 5567), as the Mitteler Rebbe wrote it out in his Biurei HaZohar, explains it from the human mind: a teacher’s idea reaches the student whole, yet it is only an outer influence and nothing new is born of it, while the drop drawn from the very essence of the mind comes down only in physical form, and a new being is born of it. So the angels, from the „זיווג נשיקין דחו״ב” (“union of kisses” of Abba and Imma), are like letters of thought, each fixed in itself, while souls, from the “physical union” of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva, come from the essence, „דבחי׳ השפעה הפנימיות והעצמיות גבוה הרבה בערך מבחי׳ השפעה החיצוניות” (which is so far above the outer influence) that it can come down only in physical form. The Rebbe brings the same explanation, in the Tzemach Tzedek’s name, in a maamar of Acharon shel Pesach 5723 (unedited); perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) the Alter Rebbe’s maamar is the “elsewhere” our parenthesis refers to.
the Alter Rebbe, in the Mitteler Rebbe’s writing: Biurei HaZohar of the Mitteler Rebbe, Bereishis, on 'לא טוב היות האדם לבדו׳ (Zohar I 27b); by the editors’ note 1, a maamar the Alter Rebbe said on Shabbos Toldos 5567, found in the Mitteler Rebbe’s own hand, p. 9–10 (the place Kehot’s note 4:40 on these words cites as 1d)
דבחי׳ השפעה הפנימיות והעצמיות גבוה הרבה בערך מבחי׳ השפעה החיצוניות… שלא בא אור השפע מבחי׳ העצמיות רק בבחי׳ גשמיות
the Rebbe (unedited), bringing the Tzemach Tzedek’s explanation: Toras Menachem 5723 (unedited maamar), vol. 2, p. 298 (§ו; the maamar from p. 290)
יש מעלה בזיווג גופני דזו״נ, ששרשו מעצמיות השכל, ולא מבחי׳ הארה בלבד כמו אותיות השכל
Where the maamar leaves something unexplained, found by AI in the library and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.
TermsDomem, tzomeach, chai, medaberChomer vetzurahTevunahChitzoniyus+8
- Domem, tzomeach, chai, medaber דומם צומח חי מדבר explained hereHere the living and the growing are close: an animal’s body and soul came from the earth together; the speaking soul, higher, came from above into an inanimate body.
ויצאו שניהם כא׳ להיות סמוכים וקרובים בערך
- Chomer vetzurah חומר וצורה
- Tevunah תבונה
- Chitzoniyus חיצוניות
- Higher Chochmah and the lower Chochmah חכמה עלאה וחכמה תתאה
- Lights and vessels אורות וכלים
- Malachim מלאכים
- Binah בינה
- Atzilus אצילות
Marei mekomos
- 1תוצא הארץ נפש חיה · Genesis 1:24
- 2ועוף יעופף · Genesis 1:20
- 3שזהו ענין ההפרש בין זיווג נשיקין · בארוכה נתבאר בביאה״ז לכ״ק אדמו״ר האמצעי א, ד. ובביאה״ז לצ״צ כרך ב ע׳ תריב. וראה גם בד״ה וביום שמחתכם תרנ״ו ע׳ רמז.
- 4כונן שמים בתבונה · Proverbs 3:19
- 5יסודתה בהררי קדש · Psalms 87:1
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.
In one’s avodah
The purpose of all the worlds is the nullification of the “something,” and Israel must nullify their physical body through the G‑dly soul. The angels could not do this: had they a physical body they would fall from their level entirely. The G‑dly soul, drawn from the inner dimension and needing no rectification itself, is so high that it can be vested in the lowest body and subdue and transform it.
Questions for discussion
- In what sense are the letters “inanimate,” the emotive attributes “vegetative” and the intellect “living,” and why are the attributes adjacent to the intellect while the letters are not?
- How do gestation and nursing describe the bond between the emotive attributes and the intellect?
- Why could the angels not transform a physical body, while the G‑dly soul can? What does the analogy of the great bonfire add?
- Why can the same letters express opposite concepts, and what does this reveal about where the letters come from?
- What distinguishes the two kinds of “Adam,” and why was it specifically Adam the first man whose body began as lifeless dust?
Key terms in this maamar
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Name meaning “He brings into being”: by contraction and expansion, its four letters, He brings all worlds into being while Himself unchanged; was, is and will be are one to Him. Elokim conceals it.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- The Name of contraction and concealment, the shield and sheath over Havayah, through which creation appears separate (yesh) and runs as nature (hateva, numerically Elokim). Relative to a higher revelation, Havayah counts as Elokim. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- The emotive powers (in the soul: love, fear, mercy). Born from the intellect and matching its measure, they are rooted above it, in the will; above, the middos of Z”A, emanated to conduct the worlds. ×17Where it’s explained
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- G‑d’s kingship: the lowest Sefirah, His “speech” and the revealed world, through which all worlds come into being from nothing and live, without touching His essence (“there is no king without a people”).Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Z'eir Anpin (the emotive attributes)ז״א
- The partzuf of the six middos of Atzilus (Chesed to Yesod), born from Imma and filled out by the mochin of Abba and Imma; Nukva’s masculine partner, through which the light reaches her. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The first revelation in the chain of worlds (vayaetzel, “drew off”): the ten Sefiros, where Or Ein Sof rests and lights and vessels are one with Him; Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are created from nothing. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first Sefirah of revelation: a single point of insight (koach mah, the yud of Havayah) that comes from the “nothing” above it; being bittul, Or Ein Sof rests in it, and Binah expands it. ×14Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Lights and vesselsאורות וכלים
- The two sides of each sefirah: the lights, a radiance of Or Ein Sof, boundless; and the vessels, the defined attributes (Chesed, Gevurah…) that limit that light so it can give life to finite beings. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently, Sefer HaErchim
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Self-nullification before G‑d, the condition for the Or Ein Sof to rest. Its lower degree is a “something” that bows; its higher, Chochmah’s “what are we,” takes up no place at all. ×4Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- The name for G‑d as without end or limit, beyond all grasp; what is drawn from Him is Or Ein Sof, only a radiance; all revelation comes from Malchus of Ein Sof.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- The Sefirah of comprehension (Imma, the first hei): it expands Chochmah’s flash in length and breadth; letters of thought appear in it; it is “yesh,” and from it love, joy and the middos are born. ×4Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- The Sefirah of kindness (the right arm; Avraham): giving that comes from its nature to do good, spreading from highest to lowest like water. Gevurah, its opposite, limits it; in tikkun each includes the other. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- The Sefirah of might (the left; Yitzchak), opposite Chesed: described as what limits and contracts Chesed’s flow, and as the life-force in greater intensity, which becomes judgment; included in Chesed, it gives life. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The outer dimension of a level: the part that goes out to give to others, as against pnimiyus, which cleaves to the source. Only the outer descends, becoming the inner of the level below. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The G‑dly soulנפש האלקית
- The soul in every Jew that is “a part of G‑d above”: by nature in bittul, it needs no correction itself, and descends into the body and animal soul to refine them.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The inner dimension: the part of anything that turns toward and cleaves to its source (from panim, face), its depth and chief will. Its partner, chitzoniyus, goes out to others; the inner does not descend.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
- The first created world, below the partition (parsa) under Atzilus: something new from nothing (yesh me’ayin), corresponding to thought, where Binah of Atzilus dwells; world of the seraphim, souls and Gan Eden HaElyon.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
- The world of formation, between Beriah and Asiyah: like speech, it reveals what was hidden in Beriah (something from something, not new creation); the middos of Atzilus shine there; the world of the angels.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest of the four worlds, corresponding to action: its ten Sefiros are still holy, but below them lies kelipas nogah; this physical world is Malchus of Asiyah, its lowest level.Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Knowledge as felt recognition: the intellect bound into the soul until it is felt as if seen. Daas unites Chochmah with Binah and spreads into the middos as their inner life; the middos follow it. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- The intellect, Chochmah, Binah and Daas, as the “brains” of a level; chiefly the light of Abba and Imma clothed in Z’eir Anpin, the middos, by which they grow. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah)אבא ואמא
- Chochmah and Binah as father and mother, who beget the middos (love and awe, “son and daughter”). Abba is self-nullifying insight, source of the chassadim; Imma is comprehension, source of the gevuros.Where it’s explained, stated differently, Sefer HaErchim
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- The Sefirah of the middle line (Yaakov’s attribute) between Chesed and Gevurah: it joins and includes them, so Or Ein Sof shines in it constantly. It is mercy and truth, and is rooted in Keser. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The descent of levels from cause to effect, linked like the rings of a chain, from Chochmah downward; each reveals what was hidden in the one above. Or Ein Sof itself is above this order. ×9Where it’s explained, stated differently
- Life-forceחיות
- Life-force: the G‑dly vitality that brings each creation into being and keeps it alive, drawn to each according to its level and renewed from nothing, as the soul enlivens the body. ×3Where it’s explained, stated differently
- The general and collective expression (klalus)כללות
- The general, undivided form of a thing, holding its particulars (pratim) as one. It is revealed first, like the soul’s life in the head, and particular life spreads from it to each part. ×2Where it’s explained