LikuteiTorah.comThe Chassidishe Parsha

Torah Ohr · Parshas Vayeitzei · Maamar 3

וללבן שתי בנות וגו׳

And Lavan Had Two Daughters

  • 2 paragraphs · 43 sections
  • about 25 min of study
  • 75 sources

Begin the maamar Download PDFPDF · 483 KB

Your progress 0 of 43 sections

Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device

The big idea

Leah and Rachel are divine thought and divine speech, the hidden and the revealed worlds. Yaakov loved Rachel more because the Infinite Light is drawn down most fully through speech and action, where everyone can receive it, though thought must always accompany it.

The maamar in brief

The maamar reads Lavan’s two daughters as the two “lands of the living”: Leah, the letters of thought, the hidden world, and Rachel, the letters of speech, the revealed world. In Temple times Rachel shone openly in the Land of Israel, bringing prophecy and open revelation. In exile Rachel, the open mem, went into exile with Israel, but Leah, the closed mem, remained in the Land, so that great tzaddikim like the Arizal can reach there even higher, hidden insights. Why then was Leah “hated”? Yaakov is the “middle bar” who draws the Infinite Light from Keser down to Malchus, so he longed for its revelation below, in Rachel. Rachel was barren because revelation to the separate lower worlds is so hard, while Leah bore sons within Atzilus: Yehudah (outward self-nullification, the root of David’s kingship), Reuven and Shimon (sight and hearing) and Levi (inward attachment, the root of Moshe). The generation of the wilderness, rooted in Leah, wished to serve G‑d in thought alone, but specifically speech and action draw down the highest light. Leah wanted thought to be primary; Yaakov knew that for most of Israel the main service is speech and action, with thought joined to it.

Outline

  1. Two daughters, two landsLeah and Rachel are thought and speech, the hidden and the revealed worlds. Both shone in the Land in Temple times; in exile Rachel is hidden and silent, while Leah, the higher and hidden level, remains in the Land for great tzaddikim to attain.¶1
  2. Why Yaakov loved RachelYaakov, the middle bar, draws the Infinite Light from Keser down to Malchus, and even the inner kiss of Chochmah, Binah and Daas into Rachel; Lavan is the supernal whiteness of pure kindness.¶1
  3. Rachel barren, Leah’s sonsBirth from speech would mean revelation in the separate lower worlds, which is very hard; Leah bore within Atzilus. Yehudah is outward self-nullification, Levi inward attachment, and Moshe comes from Levi.¶2
  4. Thought and action togetherThe wilderness generation wanted service in thought alone, but action draws down more light. Leah wanted thought first; Yaakov chose Rachel’s tent, speech and action, with sight and hearing from thought joined to it.¶2

Key concepts

The hidden world and the revealed worldעלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא
Two levels of divine self-expression, compared to a person’s private thought and audible speech. Leah is the hidden world; Rachel is the revealed world.
The open mem and the closed memמ״ם פתוחה ומ״ם סתומה
The two forms of the letter mem. Rachel, the open mem, leaves an opening through which the external forces draw nourishment in exile; Leah, rooted in the closed mem, is sealed and not in exile.
The middle barבריח התיכון
The bar that ran through all the Tabernacle’s boards from end to end; the Zohar’s name for Yaakov, who draws the Infinite Light from the highest level down to the lowest.
The supernal whitenessלובן העליון
The root of Lavan in the Arizal’s teaching: the source of all kindness, pure compassion with no judgment, which precedes all of Atzilus.
Attachment and acknowledgmentהתקשרות והודאה
Two kinds of self-nullification: Levi’s inward attachment, invisible from outside, and Yehudah’s acknowledgment, which is shown outwardly, as in bowing.
Their end is embedded in their beginningנעוץ סופן בתחלתן
The principle from Sefer Yetzirah that the lowest level is bound to the highest; hence physical speech and action draw down the greatest revelation.

For children · ages 9–13

Leah and Rachel: thought and speech

The big idea

Thought is very high, but G‑d’s light shines most fully when we speak words of Torah and do mitzvos, with our thoughts joined to them.

Lavan had two daughters, Leah and Rachel. The maamar explains that they stand for two things. Leah is thought, which is hidden inside a person; Rachel is speech, which comes out so that others can hear. Thought is higher and finer than speech. Yet the Torah tells us that Yaakov loved Rachel more. Why? Yaakov is called the “middle bar” that runs from one end to the other. He wanted G‑d’s light to reach all the way down to the lowest place, where everyone can receive it, and that happens through speech and action. Leah’s sons came from thought: Yehudah, whose name means thanking G‑d (a thanks shown outwardly, as when we bow in prayer), and Levi, whose name means being joined to G‑d. The generation in the desert wanted to serve G‑d in thought alone, without going into the Land to do mitzvos with physical things. That was a mistake: G‑d’s light shines most strongly in words of Torah that we say and in mitzvos that we actually do. Only a few great people can serve mainly in thought. Still, thought must come too, so that what we say and do is full of meaning.

The mashal

A person thinking very deeply may not notice at all what is happening around them, because they are so joined to their thought. So it is with Levi, whose name means being joined: his closeness to G‑d was inside, hidden like thought, rather than shown outwardly in words.

Questions for the Shabbos table

  1. Why did Yaakov love Rachel, speech and action, more, even though Leah, thought, is higher?
  2. Yaakov is called the “middle bar” that runs from one end to the other. What does this picture teach us about what he wanted?
  3. This week, when you say a brachah or do a mitzvah, how can you also think about what it means?

Explanation © likuteitorah.com, CC BY-NC 4.0: retold for children from our translation and explanation, with AI assistance; not yet reviewed by a human editor.

In the Rebbe’s light · 9

AI research Found by AI reading every place in the Rebbe’s works that cites this maamar, and checked against each source by a second AI reader, the less certain by a third. Only what rated high is shown: the Rebbe’s own words, about this very passage. No person has reviewed it yet, so check the place itself before relying on a detail. See something to correct?

The maamar in the Rebbe’s light

The Rebbe returns to this maamar for its map of two worlds: Leah, the hidden world of thought (עלמא דאתכסיא), and Rachel, the revealed world of speech (עלמא דאתגליא). In a letter (Likkutei Sichos vol. 10) he insists that Leah here means the letters of thought (אותיות המחשבה), which Yaakov surely grasped, and in his maamar V’Hashem Amar HaMechaseh 5737 he reads the „ב׳ ארצות” (“two lands”) as the two movements of all service: Torah study drawing down, the mitzvos of speech and action raising up. Twice he names this discourse for the difference between the Land of Israel and the lands abroad after the destruction: at Yud-Tes Kislev 5718, that the Land fell deeper and its work is harder; on 12 Sivan 5720, that its hiddenness touches only revelation, while it remains the source of blessing for the world. In sichos of Ki Savo 5732 and Shabbos Bereishis 5712 he shows Lavan’s whiteness as a Chesed that comes only from above, hidden in the physical Lavan until his pursuit revealed it, and in a sicha of Vaera he carries Moshe’s „כבד פה” (“heavy mouth”) to its height, the bittul (ביטול) through which the Shechinah spoke. Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) the thread is that a light is measured by how far down it reaches.

Paragraph by paragraph

  1. ¶1

    The Rebbe explains

    In his maamar for Shabbos Vayeira, 20 Cheshvan 5737, the Rebbe Rashab’s birthday, the Rebbe ties Avraham’s two services, “the way of Havayah” and “righteousness and justice,” to the Rebbe Rashab’s psalm of the previous year (Psalm 116): „אתהלך לפני הוי׳ בארצות החיים” (“I will walk before Havayah in the lands of the living”).

    Citing Torah Ohr, he says the plural “lands” means two lands, „עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא” (the hidden world and the revealed world), and that these are the two movements of drawing down from above and raising up from below. He offers two ways to map them: either the hidden world is the ascent („דעלי׳ למעלה הו״ע של התעלמות”, rising upward is a kind of concealment) and the revealed world the descent; or, following this paragraph’s Leah (thought) and Rachel (speech), the hidden world is Torah study, „שעיקר ענינה הוא הבנה והשגה” (whose core is understanding) and which draws down from above, and the revealed world is the mitzvos done in speech and action, which raise up from below.

    The Alter Rebbeוזהו ענין בארצות החיים. ב׳ ארצות. שבזמן שבהמ״ק היה קיים היו שני הבחינות מאירים בא״י

    The Rebbeומבואר בתו״א שהם (בכלל) ב׳ ארצות, עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא, דב׳ ארצות אלו הם המשכה מלמעלה למטה והעלאה מלמטה למעלה

    Sefer HaMaamarim 5737 (old edition; this maamar edited by the Rebbe, per the publisher’s note on p. 62), vol. תשל״ז, p. 68 (sec. 7); the same text, edited, in Sefer HaMaamarim Melukat vol. 1, p. ריא, where note 4 cites “ויצא כב, ד” · ש״פ וירא, כ״ף מרחשון ה׳תשל״ז

  2. ¶1

    A question the Rebbe raises

    In a letter excerpted among the Vayeitzei additions of Likkutei Sichos vol. 10, the Rebbe takes up an apparent contradiction: Torah Ohr here says „יעקב השיג ודאי בעלמ׳ דאתכסי׳” (that Yaakov surely grasped the hidden world), while the parallel discourse in Torah Chaim says „דלא השיג כלל” (he did not grasp it at all).

    The Rebbe calls the question „לפלא גדול” (very surprising), since each discourse says on the spot what it means: Torah Ohr speaks of Leah as the letters of thought (אותיות המחשבה), which Yaakov certainly grasped, while Torah Chaim speaks of „שרש לאה” (Leah’s root), the inner dimension of Binah, hidden from all thought. He adds that Or HaTorah on this verse does not raise the question of grasping at all, and that the two discourses’ different readings of „כי שנואה לאה” (“Leah was hated”) have a parallel in a disagreement between the Talmud (Bava Basra 123a) and the Midrash (Bereishis Rabbah, start of ch. 71).

    The Alter Rebbeולהבין מ״ש כי שנואה לאה כו׳. הרי יעקב השיג ודאי בעלמ׳ דאתכסי׳

    The Rebbeבתו״א רד״ה וללבן ב׳ בנות דיעקב השיג ודאי בעדאתכ״ס ובתו״ח שם דלא השיג כלל — לפלא גדול שהרי מפורש על אתר

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. י, p. 214 (Vayeitzei additions, from a letter; Kehot note 23:5 cites the same page) · from a letter of the Rebbe, printed undated among the Vayeitzei additions

  3. ¶1

    Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    At a farbrengen on Shabbos Balak 5716, asking why the spreading of Chassidus began outside the Land of Israel (the Baal Shem Tov was prevented from going there; the Alter Rebbe set out and then said he must remain abroad), the Rebbe recalls that the Alter Rebbe said, and also wrote in his Torah Ohr, that some things are found abroad that are not in the Land.

    The Rebbe says that the Alter Rebbe both said and wrote in his Torah Ohr that there are things outside the Land that are not in the Land of Israel; so all the Rebbeim lived abroad, and the wellsprings (המעיינות) were revealed there first and spread from there into the Land. He does not say which passage he means; the editors’ note points to this discourse with the Tzemach Tzedek’s glosses. Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) it is the line that after the destruction Rachel, the revealed world, „גלתה עמהם” (went into exile with Israel), where the work of refinement is done, while only hidden Leah stays in the Land („נשאר מאיר בא״י בחי׳ לאה”); the Tzemach Tzedek’s handwritten version (Kehot note 22:58) says outright that Rachel is then “specifically abroad.”

    The Alter Rebbeשגלו ישראל וגלתה עמהם השכינה. שהיא בחי׳ רחל שהיא בבחי׳ גלות בע׳ שרי׳

    The Rebbeוכן אמר, וגם כתב בספרו תורה־אור, שישנם כמה ענינים בחוץ־לארץ שאינם בארץ ישראל

    Toras Menachem (Hisvaaduyos), vol. יז (תשט״ז ג), p. 92 (the editors’ note 123 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 22d end ff., with the Tzemach Tzedek’s glosses in Or HaTorah 216b ff.) · ש״פ בלק, י״ד תמוז, ה׳תשט״ז (בלתי מוגה)

  4. ¶1

    Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    At the Yud-Tes Kislev farbrengen of 5718, speaking of the Land of Israel in exile, the Rebbe warns against thinking that because it is a time of exile one may give up on anything there.

    In exile, he says, the Land of Israel has fallen deeper than the lands abroad, as a stone from the top of a wall falls further than one from its middle or bottom. Yet this very state places „אחריות גדולה יותר” (a greater responsibility) on those there: even the Land’s material and physical matters „יש להתייגע באותה מדה של יגיעה שמתייגעים בכל עניני תומ״צ” (call for the same toil as Torah and mitzvos), though this is harder than working with the things abroad that stand to be refined, “as the Alter Rebbe explains in dibbur hamaschil Velalavan shtei banos, the difference between the lands abroad and the Land of Israel after the destruction.”

    The Alter Rebbeוהעבודה היא בדרך בירורים כו׳ (וכמ״ש ע״פ במדבר סיני) ומ״מ נשאר מאיר בא״י בחי׳ לאה

    The Rebbeכפי שמבאר רבינו הזקן בד״ה וללבן שני בנות, החילוק שבין חוץ־לארץ לארץ ישראל לאחרי החורבן

    Toras Menachem (Hisvaaduyos), vol. כא (תשח״י א), p. 231–232 (sec. לג (33), which begins on p. 231; the editors’ note 171 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 22d ff.) · י״ט כסלו, ה׳תשח״י (בלתי מוגה)

  5. ¶1

    Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    At a farbrengen on 12 Sivan 5720, explaining why the Previous Rebbe began Chabad’s work in the Land of Israel with deeds, founding Kfar Chabad, the Rebbe says that the order of blessing in the world begins in the Land, “the gate of heaven,” and from there reaches the whole world.

    In this, he says, there is no difference between the time of the Temple and the exile; the difference is only one of concealment and revelation, as this discourse explains: „בזמן הגלות הנה האור האלקי שבארץ ישראל הוא בתכלית ההעלם” (in exile the G‑dly light in the Land of Israel is utterly hidden), so much so that abroad there can be a higher revelation than in the Land. But this does not touch the order of blessing: since the Land „קידשה לשעתה וקידשה לעתיד לבוא” (was sanctified for its time and for the time to come), even in exile it remains „מקור ההשפעה בכל העולם” (the source of blessing for the whole world).

    The Alter Rebbeאך לפי שהוא עלמא דאתכסיא והעלם לכך אין הגילוי אלקות עכשיו בא״י מערך הגילוי שהי׳ בזמן בהמ״ק קיים

    The Rebbeוכמבואר בד״ה וללבן שתי בנות, שבזמן הגלות הנה האור האלקי שבארץ ישראל הוא בתכלית ההעלם, ועד כדי כך, שבחוץ לארץ יכול להיות גילוי נעלה יותר

    Toras Menachem (Hisvaaduyos), vol. כח (תש״כ ב), p. 142–143 (sec. 4; the editors’ note 22 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 22d, note 23 Or HaTorah 217a); the same talk in Yiddish in Sichos Kodesh 5720, p. 324 · י״ב סיון, ה׳תש״כ (בלתי מוגה)

  6. ¶1

    Background from the Rebbe

    In a sicha of Shabbos Ki Savo 5732 on the Bikkurim declaration (“An Aramean sought to destroy my father”), the Rebbe asks why the farmer recalls specifically Lavan and Egypt, and why Rashi calls them „חסדי המקום” (“the kindnesses of the Omnipresent”).

    Explaining it “in the inner dimension,” he quotes the end of this paragraph and the start of the next almost word for word: Lavan of holiness is „לובן העליון מקור החסדים” (the supernal whiteness, the source of kindness), of whom it says „וישכם לבן בבקר” (“Lavan rose early in the morning”), for every day the supernal Chesed grows strong and flows, and Yaakov „הלך לדרכו” (“went on his way”) to draw it far below. So both Yaakov’s going down to Lavan and his leaving, like the descent to Egypt and the Exodus, were Chesed, a drawing from above to below; that is why the reading of the Bikkurim passage, which draws the soul’s root down into the soul in the body, recalls them. In a note he adds, citing the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah (end of Vayeitzei), that this supernal whiteness shines also in Elul, as the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy (י״ג מדה״ר), which ties the Bikkurim passage to that month.

    The Alter Rebbeועל לבן כתיב וישכם לבן בבקר שבכ״י מתגבר ונמשך אור החסד עליון

    The Rebbeכי שניהם (בשני עניניהם: הירידה לשם והיציאה) היו בבחי׳ חסד והמשכה מלמעלה למטה

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. יד, p. 96–97 (Ki Savo 1, the sicha beginning p. 93; sec. ד, „בפנימיות הענין", opens on p. 96; the quote and note 25, citing Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 23a and 24b, are on p. 97) · ש״פ תבא תשל״ב

  7. ¶1

    Background from the Rebbe

    In a sicha of Shabbos Bereishis 5712 on the custom of announcing „ויעקב הלך לדרכו” (“and Yaakov went on his way”) at the end of Tishrei, the Rebbe asks why the verse comes only after Lavan’s pursuit and parting, and explains, following the Maggid, that Lavan chased Yaakov to hand over “letters of Torah,” sparks of holiness, still left with him.

    There were two kinds of sparks at Lavan’s: those Yaakov could refine by his own willed work over twenty years, and loftier ones he could not, because their source, the supernal whiteness (לובן העליון) „נשפל בלבן גשמי” (“that was lowered into a physical Lavan”) (he quotes these words), cannot be drawn down by human effort, only „בדרך אתעדל״ע” (by an arousal from above). Only when Lavan pursued him was the supernal whiteness hidden in the physical Lavan revealed to Yaakov.

    The Alter Rebbeרק שלמטה נשפל בלבן גשמי ומ״מ כתיב כלו הפך לבן טהור הוא

    The Rebbeדי בחי׳ פון לובן העליון [וואָס איז „נשפל” געוואָרן „בלבן גשמי”] קען ניט נמשך ווערן דורך עבודת האדם ואתעדל״ת, נאָר דוקא דורך אתעדל״ע

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. טו, p. 262 (the sicha begins p. 259; note 28 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 23a) · שבת בראשית תשי״ב

  8. ¶1

    Background from the Rebbe

    In a maamar for the second day of Rosh Hashanah 5719, on the beauty that the joy of a mitzvah brings into one’s service, the Rebbe turns to „ורחל היתה יפת תואר ויפת מראה” (“Rachel was of beautiful form and beautiful appearance”) and explains why that beauty belongs to Rachel specifically; he goes on to read the two beauties as the positive and negative mitzvos.

    He answers in this paragraph’s terms: though Leah, the world of thought and the hidden world, is the elder, „ויאהב יעקב את רחל” (Yaakov loved Rachel), because Yaakov is „בריח התיכון המבריח מן הקצה אל הקצה” (the middle bar that runs from end to end), and Rachel, the revealed world, is the one through whom the drawing down reaches lowest. He adds the reason in his own words: it reaches down to this world, where the purpose of creation, „דירה בתחתונים” (a dwelling for G‑d in the lowest realm), is completed.

    The Alter Rebbeוזהו ויאהב (יעקב) גם את רחל מלאה שכל תשוקתו היה להיות גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה למטה

    The Rebbeולכן אהב את רחל להיותה עלמא דאתגלייא, שעל ידה נעשית ההמשכה למטה ביותר, ועד לעוה״ז, שבו נשלמת הכוונה דדירה בתחתונים

    Toras Menachem (Hisvaaduyos), vol. כד (תשי״ט א), p. 6–7 (sec. 2; the editors’ note 39 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 22d end ff.) · יום ב׳ דראש השנה, ה׳תשי״ט (בלתי מוגה)

  9. ¶2

    Background from the Rebbe

    In a sicha on „ראה נתתיך אלקים לפרעה” (“See, I have made you a G‑d to Pharaoh”) (from talks of Shabbos Vaera 5729 and 5715), the Rebbe asks why this came right after Moshe’s complaint „אני ערל שפתים” (“I am of uncircumcised lips”), and why from then on Moshe himself spoke to Pharaoh.

    He starts from this paragraph’s point, citing it: Moshe was „כבד פה וכבד לשון” (“heavy of mouth and heavy of tongue”) because of his bittul to G‑dliness, so absorbed that he could not give out to others. „ערל שפתים” (“Uncircumcised lips”) is then a still greater bittul: heavy speech still speaks, with difficulty, while closed lips do not speak at all. That „ביטול בתכלית” (total bittul) was the preparation for “I have made you a G‑d to Pharaoh”: through it „שכינה מדברת מתוך גרונו של משה” (the Shechinah spoke from Moshe’s throat), with the power needed to break Pharaoh.

    The Alter Rebbeולכן יצא ממנו משה שהיה כבד פה וכבד לשון דהיינו שלגודל התקשרותו בבחי׳ בטול ונחנו מה

    The Rebbeאַז דאָס וואָס משה איז געווען „כבד פה וכבד לשון” האָט זיך עס גענומען מצד זיין ביטול צו אלקות

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. טז, p. 76 (Vaera 3; the sicha begins p. 69 and sec. ט on p. 75; the quote and note 60, citing Torah Ohr 23a end, are on p. 76) · ש״פ וארא תשכ״ט, תשט״ו

Short quotes only, with the place of each so it can be read in full. The Rebbe’s sichos, letters and maamarim are published by Kehot and by Vaad Hanochos B’Lahak (lahak.org).

Skip to the text

Two daughters, two lands ¶1

Why Yaakov loved Rachel ¶1

1וללבן שתי בנות וגו׳. הנה לאה ורחל הם אותיות המחשבה ואותיות הדבור. שהם עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא (עיין לקמן בד״ה בכ״ה בכסליו בפי׳ ושם ה׳ קטנה רחל)

“And Lavan had two daughters,” etc. Now, Leah and Rachel are the letters of thought and the letters of speech, which are the hidden world (alma de’iskasya) and the revealed world (alma de’isgalya). (See below, in the discourse beginning “On the twenty-fifth of Kislev,” in the explanation of “and the name of the younger (haketanah) was Rachel,” [read as] the small hei (hei ketanah): Rachel.)

Explanation

The maamar opens on the verse introducing Lavan’s daughters, Leah and Rachel. In Chassidus they stand for G‑d’s “thought,” an inward, hidden world, and His “speech,” a world that comes out into the open, just as a person’s thought stays private while his speech is heard by others. The Alter Rebbe points ahead to his Chanukah discourse (Torah Ohr, Vayeshev 4:35), which reads “the younger (haketanah) was Rachel” as “the small hei”: the last hei of the Name Havayah, which is Malchus.

וזהו ענין בארצות החיים. ב׳ ארצות. שבזמן שבהמ״ק [שבית המקדש] היה קיים היו שני הבחינות מאירים בא״י [בארץ ישראל].

This is the meaning of “in the lands of the living”: two lands. For when the Holy Temple stood, both levels shone in the Land of Israel.

Explanation

The Psalmist speaks of the “lands” of the living in the plural. The Alter Rebbe reads the two lands as Leah and Rachel, thought and speech, and says that while the Temple stood, both of them shone in the Land of Israel.

והעיקר היה בחי׳ רחל (שנקראת עקרת הבית) כי המחשבה מתלבשת בתוך הדבור והדבור היה מתגלה.

And the main one was the level of Rachel (who is called akeres habayis, “the mainstay of the house”), for thought is enclothed within speech, and speech was revealed.

Explanation

Of the two, Rachel (speech) was the main one in Temple times, because thought does not stay private: it clothes itself in speech, and so what was revealed through speech carried the thought within it. Akeres habayis is a play on words: the Torah says Rachel was akarah, “barren” (Genesis 29:31), and the Midrash reads it as ikar, “Rachel was the mainstay of the house” (Bereishis Rabbah 71:2).

ולפי שרחל שהוא בחי׳ הדבור הוא עלמא דאתגליא לכך היה אז בא״י [בארץ ישראל] גילוי אלקותו ית׳ שהיו חכמים גדולים בעלי רוה״ק [רוח הקודש] ונביאים (וכמו שפרש״י [שפירש רש״י / שפירוש רש״י] גבי יונה ויחזקאל שאין הנבואה שורה אלא בא״י [בארץ ישראל])

And since Rachel, who is the level of speech, is the revealed world, there was therefore at that time in the Land of Israel a revelation of His G‑dliness, may He be blessed: there were great sages who possessed the holy spirit, and prophets (as Rashi explains concerning Yonah and Yechezkel, that prophecy rests only in the Land of Israel).

Explanation

Because Rachel is the “revealed world,” her prominence in the Land of Israel meant that G‑dliness was openly visible there, in sages with the holy spirit (ruach hakodesh) and in prophets. Rashi notes that Yonah fled abroad because the Shechinah does not rest outside the Land, and that the Shechinah rested on Yechezkel in Babylon only because it had first rested on him in the Land.

ובפרט בהמ״ק [בית המקדש] והשראת השכינה בקה״ק [בקדש הקדשים] ואורים ותומים ועבודת הקרבנות שהי׳ [שהיה] יורד אש שלמעלה. משא״כ אחר חורבן בהמ״ק [בית המקדש] שגלו ישראל וגלתה עמהם השכינה.

And in particular [there were] the Holy Temple, and the dwelling of the Shechinah (Divine Presence) in the Holy of Holies, and the Urim and Tumim, and the service of the offerings, when fire from above would descend. This is not so after the destruction of the Holy Temple, when Israel went into exile and the Shechinah went into exile with them.

Explanation

The Temple added further open revelation: the Shechinah in the Holy of Holies, the Urim and Tumim through which the High Priest received answers, and the fire that came down from heaven onto the altar. After the destruction, the Sages teach, the Shechinah itself went into exile with the Jewish people.

שהיא בחי׳ רחל שהיא בבחי׳ גלות בע׳ [בשבעים] שרי׳ ואינה מאירה כלל מערך הגלוי שהיתה מאירה בזמן הבית שהי׳ [שהיה] הדבור מתגלה משא״כ עכשיו כתיב כרחל לפני גוזזי׳ נאלמה.

[The Shechinah] is the level of Rachel, who is in a state of exile among the seventy princes and does not shine at all in comparison with the revelation with which she shone in the time of the Temple, when speech was revealed; whereas now it is written, “Like a ewe [rachel] before her shearers, she is mute.”

Explanation

The exiled Shechinah is Rachel, the level of speech, now hidden among “the seventy princes,” the heavenly powers over the nations. The Alter Rebbe reads Isaiah’s “like a ewe (rachel) before her shearers, she is mute” as Rachel, divine speech, falling silent: she no longer shines as she did.

והעבודה היא בדרך בירורים כו׳ (וכמ״ש ע״פ במדבר סיני) ומ״מ נשאר מאיר בא״י [בארץ ישראל] בחי׳ לאה והיא מדרגה יותר גבוה מבחי׳ כג, ארחל וכמשל המחשבה שהיא רוחניות ונעלית מן הדבור

And the divine service is by way of refinements (beirurim), etc. (as is explained on “In the wilderness of Sinai”). Nevertheless, the level of Leah remains shining in the Land of Israel, and she is a higher rank than the level of Rachel, as in the analogy of thought, which is spiritual and loftier than speech

Explanation

In exile the work is “refinement” (beirurim): drawing out and elevating the sparks of holiness that fell into the world, rather than basking in open revelation. Yet something still shines in the Land of Israel: Leah, the level of thought, which is higher than speech just as a thought is more spiritual and loftier than the words that express it.

(שהיא אינה בגלות כי רחל נק׳ מ״ם פתוחה שיש ממנה פתח ומבוא ליניקת החיצונים בזמן הגלות משא״כ מבחי׳ מ״ם סתומה. ושם הוא שרש לאה עיין בזהר ר״פ תרומה דף קכ״ו ב׳ ודף קכ״ז)

(for she is not in exile: Rachel is called the open mem, from which there is an opening and an entrance for the external forces to draw nourishment during the time of exile; this is not so with the level of the closed mem, and there is the root of Leah. See the Zohar, at the beginning of Parshas Terumah, page 126b and page 127).

Explanation

Leah is not in exile. The final form of the letter mem (ם) is closed on all sides, while the regular mem (מ) has an opening at the bottom. Rachel, speech, is the open mem, through which the “external forces” (kelipah) can draw nourishment in exile; Leah is rooted in the closed mem, where they have no entry; the Alter Rebbe sends the reader to the Zohar at the start of Terumah.

אך לפי שהוא עלמא דאתכסיא והעלם לכך אין הגילוי אלקות עכשיו בא״י [בארץ ישראל] מערך הגילוי שהי׳ [שהיה] בזמן בהמ״ק [בית המקדש] קיים.

But because it is the hidden world, and concealment, the revelation of G‑dliness in the Land of Israel now is therefore not comparable to the revelation there was when the Holy Temple stood.

Explanation

But since Leah is the hidden world, her light does not appear openly. That is why G‑dliness in the Land of Israel today is not visible the way it was in Temple times.

ומ״מ הצדיקים הגדולים אשר בארץ יכולים להשיג עכשיו בא״י [בארץ ישראל] השגות עליונות יותר אפי׳ [אפילו] ממה שהשיגו צדיקים כמותם בזמן הבית (מאחר שההשגה היא בבחי׳ מחשבה עליונה כמו שהיא עדיין למעלה מהתלבשות בעולם הדבור)

Nevertheless, the great tzaddikim who are in the Land can now attain, in the Land of Israel, apprehensions higher even than what tzaddikim like them attained in the time of the Temple (since the apprehension is in the level of supernal thought as it still is, above its enclothement in the world of speech).

Explanation

The hiddenness has a hidden advantage. Great tzaddikim living in the Land can now reach higher insights than tzaddikim of their own stature reached in Temple times, because what remains in the Land is Leah: supernal thought as it is in itself, before it has been clothed in speech.

וכמו האר״י [האלקי רבי יצחק] ז״ל [זכרונו לברכה / זכרונם לברכה] שהשיג השגות עצומות מה שלא השיגו צדיקים גדולים בדורות הקדמונים.

So it was with the Arizal, who attained tremendous apprehensions that great tzaddikim in earlier generations had not attained.

Explanation

The Arizal, Rabbi Yitzchak Luria of Safed, is the proof: in the Land of Israel he attained depths of the Kabbalah that great tzaddikim of earlier generations had not reached.

ולהבין מ״ש כי שנואה לאה כו׳. הרי יעקב השיג ודאי בעלמ׳ [בעלמא] דאתכסי׳.

Now, to understand what is written, “that Leah was hated,” etc.: after all, Yaakov certainly apprehended the hidden world!

Explanation

Now a question: the Torah says G‑d saw “that Leah was hated,” meaning that Yaakov loved her less than Rachel. Why would Yaakov prefer speech to the loftier level of thought, when he certainly could grasp the hidden world? (The Kehot note observes that the parallel discourse in Torah Chaim says Yaakov did not grasp it at all, because there the hidden world means Leah’s root, which is beyond all grasp.)

¶2 Hold this question: paragraph 2 gives a further answer.

אך הענין כי יעקב נק׳ בריח התיכון המבריח מן הקצה אל הקצה. פי׳ שהוא הממשיך אור א״ס ב״ה מן הקצה עליונה (היינו הקו הבוקע החלל כמ״ש במ״א) מבחי׳ כתר למטה ולכן נאמר בו תוספת וי״ו ואלקי יעקב.

But the explanation is that Yaakov is called “the middle bar, which runs through from end to end.” That is to say, he is the one who draws the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, from the upper end (that is, the kav (line of light) that pierces the vacated space, as is explained elsewhere), from the level of Keser (the Crown), downward; and therefore an additional vav is said of him: “and the G‑d of Yaakov.”

Explanation

The answer begins with the Zohar’s name for Yaakov: “the middle bar” of the Tabernacle, which ran through all the boards from one end to the other. Yaakov draws the Infinite Light from the upper end, the kav, the thin line of light that enters the empty space left after the tzimtzum, from Keser down through every level. The extra letter vav (“and”) in “and the G‑d of Yaakov,” which the names of Avraham and Yitzchak lack, signals this drawing downward: the vav is a line drawn down.

וכן והנורא שמייחד ומחבר חו״ג [חסד וגבורה] ע״י המשכת והארת האין והיינו ע״י בחי׳ בטול. וכל ההמשכו׳ שלו הוא עד הקצה התחתונה. דהיינו בבחי׳ מלכות עלמא דאתגלייא.

Likewise “and the awesome,” for he unites and joins Chesed (kindness) and Gevurah (restraint) through the drawing down and illumination of the Ayin [the Nothing], that is, through the level of self-nullification (bittul). And all his drawing down reaches to the lower end, that is, into the level of Malchus (sovereignty), the revealed world.

Explanation

In the blessing “the great, the mighty, and the awesome,” the three words correspond to Avraham (Chesed), Yitzchak (Gevurah), and Yaakov, “the awesome,” who joins the two. He can unite kindness and restraint because he draws down the Ayin, the “Nothing” of G‑dliness that is above both, and in a person this appears as self-nullification (bittul). His drawing down does not stop halfway: it reaches the “lower end,” Malchus, the revealed world.

וזהו ויאהב (יעקב) גם את רחל מלאה שכל תשוקתו היה להיות גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה למטה בעלמא דאתגלייא שעי״ז יוכלו הכל לקבל משא״כ מבחי׳ עלמא דאתכסייא כו׳

This is [the meaning of] “and he (Yaakov) loved Rachel also more than Leah”: his entire yearning was that there be a revelation of the Infinite Light, blessed be He, below, in the revealed world, since through this everyone would be able to receive, which is not so from the level of the hidden world, etc.

Explanation

This is why Yaakov loved Rachel more than Leah. His whole desire was that the Infinite Light be revealed below, in the revealed world of speech, because there everyone can receive it, which is not so with the hidden world of thought.

ולכן כתיב וישק יעקב לרחל על דרך שנקוד על וישקהו

And therefore it is written, “And Yaakov kissed Rachel,” in the manner of [what is said of] the dotted word “and he kissed him”:

Explanation

So the Torah tells that Yaakov kissed Rachel, and the Alter Rebbe reads this kiss like the dotted word “and he kissed him,” when Eisav met Yaakov. Rashi brings two readings of those dots: that Eisav did not kiss him with his whole heart, or, in Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai’s words, that at that moment Eisav’s compassion was stirred and he kissed him with all his heart; the next lines show that the Alter Rebbe means a kiss from the inner core of love.

דהיינו שבחי׳ חב״ד [חכמה בינה ודעת] שהוא זיווג נשיקין ואתדבקו׳ רוחא ברוחא עד״מ הנשיקין שבאין מפנימית האהבה (עמ״ש במ״א ע״פ ישקני מנשיקות וע״פ אמצאך בחוץ אשקך) וגם בחי׳ זו המשיך ברחל.

that is, the level of Chochmah (wisdom), Binah (understanding) and Daas (knowledge), which is the union of kisses and the cleaving of spirit to spirit, as in the analogy of kisses that come from the inner dimension (pnimiyus) of love (see what is explained elsewhere on “Let him kiss me with the kisses” and on “I would find you outside, I would kiss you”); this level, too, he drew into Rachel.

Explanation

A kiss, in the Zohar’s language, is a union of spirit with spirit, the inner closeness that comes from the core of love; in the Sefiros it corresponds to the intellect, Chochmah, Binah and Daas. Yaakov drew even this inner, intellectual level into Rachel, so that speech would carry the depth of thought. The Alter Rebbe points to his own explanations of two verses in the Song of Songs about kissing.

וז״ש [וזהו שכתוב] אעבדך שבע שנים ברחל בתך הקטנה כי לבן הוא בחי׳ לובן העליון מקור החסדים שכולו רחמים פשוטים דלית שמאלא בהאי עתיקא

And this is what is written, “I will serve you seven years for Rachel, your younger daughter.” For Lavan is the level of the supernal whiteness (loven), the source of the kindnesses (chasadim), which is entirely simple compassion, for “there is no left side in this Atika [the Ancient One]”;

Explanation

“I will serve you seven years for Rachel, your younger daughter”: Yaakov serves Lavan in order to draw Lavan’s light down into Rachel, speech, the lower level. For Lavan, whose name means “white,” is in the Arizal’s teaching the “supernal whiteness,” the source of all kindness, pure compassion with no trace of judgment. The Zohar says of this level, Atika (the Ancient One), that it has “no left side,” no severity at all.

רק שלמטה נשפל בלבן גשמי ומ״מ כתיב כלו הפך לבן טהור הוא אפי׳ [אפילו] הנגע כו׳ ועל לבן כתיב וישכם לבן בבקר שבכ״י [שבכל יום] מתגבר ונמשך אור החסד עליון.

only that below, it was lowered into a physical Lavan. Nevertheless, it is written, “it has all turned white; he is pure,” even the affliction, etc. And of Lavan it is written, “And Lavan rose early in the morning,” for every day the light of the supernal Chesed prevails and is drawn down.

Explanation

The physical Lavan was a deceiver, yet his root is holy: the supernal whiteness fell very low and became a physical person. The law of tzaraas illustrates this: when the white lesion covers the whole body, the person is pure. The verse “Lavan rose early in the morning” hints that the morning, time of kindness, is when the supernal Chesed gains strength and flows down each day.

Paragraph 1 in brief

The paragraph identifies Leah and Rachel with thought and speech, the hidden and the revealed worlds, and uses them to explain why the Land of Israel after the Temple holds hidden, even higher, spiritual possibilities. It then begins to explain why Yaakov loved Rachel more: his task, as “the middle bar,” is to draw the Infinite Light all the way down into the revealed world, where everyone can receive it.

Deeper

The pairing of Leah and Rachel as the hidden and revealed worlds follows the Zohar and the Arizal, where Leah is the upper feminine configuration, rooted in Binah and hidden, and Rachel is Malchus, the revealed feminine. In the Arizal’s Pri Etz Chaim (Sha’ar Kerias Shema, ch. 12), Rachel is called akeres habayis, “the ikar of the house,” and for that reason “Yaakov loved Rachel, for she is the main one.” Etz Chaim (Sha’ar HaAkudim, ch. 1) calls Lavan the secret of the supernal whiteness that precedes all of Atzilus, the one who makes the stages called Akudim, Nekudim and Berudim, alluded to in “for I have seen all that Lavan is doing to you” (Genesis 31:12).

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. The Rebbe explains

    In his maamar for Shabbos Vayeira, 20 Cheshvan 5737, the Rebbe Rashab’s birthday, the Rebbe ties Avraham’s two services, “the way of Havayah” and “righteousness and justice,” to the Rebbe Rashab’s psalm of the previous year (Psalm 116): „אתהלך לפני הוי׳ בארצות החיים” (“I will walk before Havayah in the lands of the living”).

    Citing Torah Ohr, he says the plural “lands” means two lands, „עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא” (the hidden world and the revealed world), and that these are the two movements of drawing down from above and raising up from below. He offers two ways to map them: either the hidden world is the ascent („דעלי׳ למעלה הו״ע של התעלמות”, rising upward is a kind of concealment) and the revealed world the descent; or, following this paragraph’s Leah (thought) and Rachel (speech), the hidden world is Torah study, „שעיקר ענינה הוא הבנה והשגה” (whose core is understanding) and which draws down from above, and the revealed world is the mitzvos done in speech and action, which raise up from below.

    The Alter Rebbeוזהו ענין בארצות החיים. ב׳ ארצות. שבזמן שבהמ״ק היה קיים היו שני הבחינות מאירים בא״י

    The Rebbeומבואר בתו״א שהם (בכלל) ב׳ ארצות, עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא, דב׳ ארצות אלו הם המשכה מלמעלה למטה והעלאה מלמטה למעלה

    Sefer HaMaamarim 5737 (old edition; this maamar edited by the Rebbe, per the publisher’s note on p. 62), vol. תשל״ז, p. 68 (sec. 7); the same text, edited, in Sefer HaMaamarim Melukat vol. 1, p. ריא, where note 4 cites “ויצא כב, ד” · ש״פ וירא, כ״ף מרחשון ה׳תשל״ז

  2. A question the Rebbe raises

    In a letter excerpted among the Vayeitzei additions of Likkutei Sichos vol. 10, the Rebbe takes up an apparent contradiction: Torah Ohr here says „יעקב השיג ודאי בעלמ׳ דאתכסי׳” (that Yaakov surely grasped the hidden world), while the parallel discourse in Torah Chaim says „דלא השיג כלל” (he did not grasp it at all).

    The Rebbe calls the question „לפלא גדול” (very surprising), since each discourse says on the spot what it means: Torah Ohr speaks of Leah as the letters of thought (אותיות המחשבה), which Yaakov certainly grasped, while Torah Chaim speaks of „שרש לאה” (Leah’s root), the inner dimension of Binah, hidden from all thought. He adds that Or HaTorah on this verse does not raise the question of grasping at all, and that the two discourses’ different readings of „כי שנואה לאה” (“Leah was hated”) have a parallel in a disagreement between the Talmud (Bava Basra 123a) and the Midrash (Bereishis Rabbah, start of ch. 71).

    The Alter Rebbeולהבין מ״ש כי שנואה לאה כו׳. הרי יעקב השיג ודאי בעלמ׳ דאתכסי׳

    The Rebbeבתו״א רד״ה וללבן ב׳ בנות דיעקב השיג ודאי בעדאתכ״ס ובתו״ח שם דלא השיג כלל — לפלא גדול שהרי מפורש על אתר

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. י, p. 214 (Vayeitzei additions, from a letter; Kehot note 23:5 cites the same page) · from a letter of the Rebbe, printed undated among the Vayeitzei additions

  3. Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    At a farbrengen on Shabbos Balak 5716, asking why the spreading of Chassidus began outside the Land of Israel (the Baal Shem Tov was prevented from going there; the Alter Rebbe set out and then said he must remain abroad), the Rebbe recalls that the Alter Rebbe said, and also wrote in his Torah Ohr, that some things are found abroad that are not in the Land.

    The Rebbe says that the Alter Rebbe both said and wrote in his Torah Ohr that there are things outside the Land that are not in the Land of Israel; so all the Rebbeim lived abroad, and the wellsprings (המעיינות) were revealed there first and spread from there into the Land. He does not say which passage he means; the editors’ note points to this discourse with the Tzemach Tzedek’s glosses. Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) it is the line that after the destruction Rachel, the revealed world, „גלתה עמהם” (went into exile with Israel), where the work of refinement is done, while only hidden Leah stays in the Land („נשאר מאיר בא״י בחי׳ לאה”); the Tzemach Tzedek’s handwritten version (Kehot note 22:58) says outright that Rachel is then “specifically abroad.”

    The Alter Rebbeשגלו ישראל וגלתה עמהם השכינה. שהיא בחי׳ רחל שהיא בבחי׳ גלות בע׳ שרי׳

    The Rebbeוכן אמר, וגם כתב בספרו תורה־אור, שישנם כמה ענינים בחוץ־לארץ שאינם בארץ ישראל

    Toras Menachem (Hisvaaduyos), vol. יז (תשט״ז ג), p. 92 (the editors’ note 123 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 22d end ff., with the Tzemach Tzedek’s glosses in Or HaTorah 216b ff.) · ש״פ בלק, י״ד תמוז, ה׳תשט״ז (בלתי מוגה)

  4. Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    At the Yud-Tes Kislev farbrengen of 5718, speaking of the Land of Israel in exile, the Rebbe warns against thinking that because it is a time of exile one may give up on anything there.

    In exile, he says, the Land of Israel has fallen deeper than the lands abroad, as a stone from the top of a wall falls further than one from its middle or bottom. Yet this very state places „אחריות גדולה יותר” (a greater responsibility) on those there: even the Land’s material and physical matters „יש להתייגע באותה מדה של יגיעה שמתייגעים בכל עניני תומ״צ” (call for the same toil as Torah and mitzvos), though this is harder than working with the things abroad that stand to be refined, “as the Alter Rebbe explains in dibbur hamaschil Velalavan shtei banos, the difference between the lands abroad and the Land of Israel after the destruction.”

    The Alter Rebbeוהעבודה היא בדרך בירורים כו׳ (וכמ״ש ע״פ במדבר סיני) ומ״מ נשאר מאיר בא״י בחי׳ לאה

    The Rebbeכפי שמבאר רבינו הזקן בד״ה וללבן שני בנות, החילוק שבין חוץ־לארץ לארץ ישראל לאחרי החורבן

    Toras Menachem (Hisvaaduyos), vol. כא (תשח״י א), p. 231–232 (sec. לג (33), which begins on p. 231; the editors’ note 171 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 22d ff.) · י״ט כסלו, ה׳תשח״י (בלתי מוגה)

  5. Background from the RebbeThe Rebbe says this in more than one place

    At a farbrengen on 12 Sivan 5720, explaining why the Previous Rebbe began Chabad’s work in the Land of Israel with deeds, founding Kfar Chabad, the Rebbe says that the order of blessing in the world begins in the Land, “the gate of heaven,” and from there reaches the whole world.

    In this, he says, there is no difference between the time of the Temple and the exile; the difference is only one of concealment and revelation, as this discourse explains: „בזמן הגלות הנה האור האלקי שבארץ ישראל הוא בתכלית ההעלם” (in exile the G‑dly light in the Land of Israel is utterly hidden), so much so that abroad there can be a higher revelation than in the Land. But this does not touch the order of blessing: since the Land „קידשה לשעתה וקידשה לעתיד לבוא” (was sanctified for its time and for the time to come), even in exile it remains „מקור ההשפעה בכל העולם” (the source of blessing for the whole world).

    The Alter Rebbeאך לפי שהוא עלמא דאתכסיא והעלם לכך אין הגילוי אלקות עכשיו בא״י מערך הגילוי שהי׳ בזמן בהמ״ק קיים

    The Rebbeוכמבואר בד״ה וללבן שתי בנות, שבזמן הגלות הנה האור האלקי שבארץ ישראל הוא בתכלית ההעלם, ועד כדי כך, שבחוץ לארץ יכול להיות גילוי נעלה יותר

    Toras Menachem (Hisvaaduyos), vol. כח (תש״כ ב), p. 142–143 (sec. 4; the editors’ note 22 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 22d, note 23 Or HaTorah 217a); the same talk in Yiddish in Sichos Kodesh 5720, p. 324 · י״ב סיון, ה׳תש״כ (בלתי מוגה)

  6. Background from the Rebbe

    In a sicha of Shabbos Ki Savo 5732 on the Bikkurim declaration (“An Aramean sought to destroy my father”), the Rebbe asks why the farmer recalls specifically Lavan and Egypt, and why Rashi calls them „חסדי המקום” (“the kindnesses of the Omnipresent”).

    Explaining it “in the inner dimension,” he quotes the end of this paragraph and the start of the next almost word for word: Lavan of holiness is „לובן העליון מקור החסדים” (the supernal whiteness, the source of kindness), of whom it says „וישכם לבן בבקר” (“Lavan rose early in the morning”), for every day the supernal Chesed grows strong and flows, and Yaakov „הלך לדרכו” (“went on his way”) to draw it far below. So both Yaakov’s going down to Lavan and his leaving, like the descent to Egypt and the Exodus, were Chesed, a drawing from above to below; that is why the reading of the Bikkurim passage, which draws the soul’s root down into the soul in the body, recalls them. In a note he adds, citing the Tzemach Tzedek’s Or HaTorah (end of Vayeitzei), that this supernal whiteness shines also in Elul, as the Thirteen Attributes of Mercy (י״ג מדה״ר), which ties the Bikkurim passage to that month.

    The Alter Rebbeועל לבן כתיב וישכם לבן בבקר שבכ״י מתגבר ונמשך אור החסד עליון

    The Rebbeכי שניהם (בשני עניניהם: הירידה לשם והיציאה) היו בבחי׳ חסד והמשכה מלמעלה למטה

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. יד, p. 96–97 (Ki Savo 1, the sicha beginning p. 93; sec. ד, „בפנימיות הענין", opens on p. 96; the quote and note 25, citing Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 23a and 24b, are on p. 97) · ש״פ תבא תשל״ב

  7. Background from the Rebbe

    In a sicha of Shabbos Bereishis 5712 on the custom of announcing „ויעקב הלך לדרכו” (“and Yaakov went on his way”) at the end of Tishrei, the Rebbe asks why the verse comes only after Lavan’s pursuit and parting, and explains, following the Maggid, that Lavan chased Yaakov to hand over “letters of Torah,” sparks of holiness, still left with him.

    There were two kinds of sparks at Lavan’s: those Yaakov could refine by his own willed work over twenty years, and loftier ones he could not, because their source, the supernal whiteness (לובן העליון) „נשפל בלבן גשמי” (“that was lowered into a physical Lavan”) (he quotes these words), cannot be drawn down by human effort, only „בדרך אתעדל״ע” (by an arousal from above). Only when Lavan pursued him was the supernal whiteness hidden in the physical Lavan revealed to Yaakov.

    The Alter Rebbeרק שלמטה נשפל בלבן גשמי ומ״מ כתיב כלו הפך לבן טהור הוא

    The Rebbeדי בחי׳ פון לובן העליון [וואָס איז „נשפל” געוואָרן „בלבן גשמי”] קען ניט נמשך ווערן דורך עבודת האדם ואתעדל״ת, נאָר דוקא דורך אתעדל״ע

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. טו, p. 262 (the sicha begins p. 259; note 28 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 23a) · שבת בראשית תשי״ב

  8. Background from the Rebbe

    In a maamar for the second day of Rosh Hashanah 5719, on the beauty that the joy of a mitzvah brings into one’s service, the Rebbe turns to „ורחל היתה יפת תואר ויפת מראה” (“Rachel was of beautiful form and beautiful appearance”) and explains why that beauty belongs to Rachel specifically; he goes on to read the two beauties as the positive and negative mitzvos.

    He answers in this paragraph’s terms: though Leah, the world of thought and the hidden world, is the elder, „ויאהב יעקב את רחל” (Yaakov loved Rachel), because Yaakov is „בריח התיכון המבריח מן הקצה אל הקצה” (the middle bar that runs from end to end), and Rachel, the revealed world, is the one through whom the drawing down reaches lowest. He adds the reason in his own words: it reaches down to this world, where the purpose of creation, „דירה בתחתונים” (a dwelling for G‑d in the lowest realm), is completed.

    The Alter Rebbeוזהו ויאהב (יעקב) גם את רחל מלאה שכל תשוקתו היה להיות גילוי אור א״ס ב״ה למטה

    The Rebbeולכן אהב את רחל להיותה עלמא דאתגלייא, שעל ידה נעשית ההמשכה למטה ביותר, ועד לעוה״ז, שבו נשלמת הכוונה דדירה בתחתונים

    Toras Menachem (Hisvaaduyos), vol. כד (תשי״ט א), p. 6–7 (sec. 2; the editors’ note 39 cites Torah Ohr, Vayeitzei 22d end ff.) · יום ב׳ דראש השנה, ה׳תשי״ט (בלתי מוגה)

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made

TermsLoven ha’elyonLeah and RachelHidden world and the revealed worldKodesh HaKodashim+22
  • Loven ha’elyon לובן העליון explained hereLavan is the supernal whiteness, the source of kindness, all simple mercy, “no left side in this Atika”; below it fell into the physical Lavan. “Lavan rose early in the morning”: each morning the light of the supernal kindness grows stronger and is drawn down.כי לבן הוא בחי׳ לובן העליון מקור החסדים שכולו רחמים פשוטים דלית שמאלא בהאי עתיקא
  • Leah and Rachel לאה ורחל explained hereLavan’s two daughters are the letters of thought and of speech, the hidden and the revealed worlds. While the Temple stood, Rachel, speech, shone openly in the Land of Israel, with prophecy and the indwelling of the Shechinah; in exile Rachel is “like a ewe mute before her shearers,” while Leah, higher as thought is higher than speech, still shines there, but in a hidden way.הנה לאה ורחל הם אותיות המחשבה ואותיות הדבור. שהם עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא
  • Hidden world and the revealed world עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא explained hereLeah and Rachel are the letters of thought and of speech, the hidden and the revealed world. In Temple times Rachel, speech, was revealed in the Land of Israel; since the exile Leah, higher but hidden, still shines there, so its revelation is not as it was.הנה לאה ורחל הם אותיות המחשבה ואותיות הדבור. שהם עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא
  • Kodesh HaKodashim קדש הקדשים
  • Machshavah hakedumah מחשבה הקדומה
  • Kav קו
  • Chesed olam חסד עולם
  • Korbanos קרבנות
  • Shechinah שכינה
  • Atik עתיק
  • Tzaddik צדיק
  • Kelipah קליפה
  • Hasagah השגה
  • Avodas Hashem עבודת ה׳
  • Birur בירור
  • Mochin מוחין
  • Keser כתר
  • Osiyos אותיות
  • Dibbur elyon דבור עליון
  • Chesed חסד
  • Pnimiyus פנימיות
  • Malchus מלכות

Also HislabshusBittulOr Ein SofHaalaah vehamshachah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    וללבן שתי בנות · ראה לעיל בציונים לכ״ק אדמו״ר זי״ע. במפתח לאוה״ת כרך א מציין המו״ל שהמאמר הוא משנת תקע״א — הוא בדף רטז, ב בהתחלת אתהלך לפני ה׳, ומציין ששייך לפסוק וללבן שתי בנות. בשינוים ועם הגהות, ראה מאמרי אדה״א נ״ך ע׳ קצד שמיוסד על מאמר זה. בבוך 1135 מד, א המאמר בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ באיזה שינויים, וז״ל שם: וללבן שתי בנות וגו׳ הנה לאה ורחל שהם אותיות מחשבה ודיבור היו שניהם מאירים בא״י בזמן הבית וזהו בארצות החיים ב׳ ארצות והעיקר הי׳ בחי׳ רחל, כי המחשבה מתלבשת בתוך הדבור, ונודע כי רחל היא עלמא דאתגליא כמשל הדבור ולכן הי׳ אז בא״י תכלית הגילוי אלקותו ית׳ שהיו חכמים גדולים בעלי רוה״ק ונביאים ובפרט בהמ״ק השראת השכינה בקדה״ק ואורים ותומים וירידת האש שלמעלה כו׳. ואחר החורבן שגלו ישראל לבבל וגלתה עמהם השכינה שהיא בחי׳ רחל עלמא דאתגלייא ואז היא בח״ל דוקא אך א״כ הי׳ ראוי להיות בח״ל גילוי אלקות ע״ד שהי׳ אז בא״י אך הענין כי בבבל היא בבחי׳ גלות בהע׳ שרים והעבודה היא בדרך בירורים כו׳ (ועי״ש ע״פ במדבר סיני) אבל בא״י נסתלקה רחל שהיא עלמא דאתגליא ונשאר בחי׳ לאה שהיא עלמא דאתכסיא שהוא באמת מדרגה יותר גבוה מרחל כמשל המחשבה שהיא למעלה מהדבור ולכן הצדיקי׳ הגדולים יכולים להשיג עכשיו בא״י השגות עליונות יותר גם מבזמן הבית (כיון שישיג בבחי׳ מחשבה עליונה כמו שהיא עדיין למעלה מההתלבשות בעולם הדבור) וכמו האריז״ל שהשיג מה שלא השיגו תנאים ואמוראים משא״כ שארי האנשים לא יוכלו להשיג כי לאה היא אתכסיא כו׳.
  2. 2
    וללבן שתי בנות · Genesis 29:16
  3. 3
    לאה ורחל . . עלמא דאתכסיא ועלמא דאתגליא · באוה״ת שמיני כרך ב ע׳ תפט מציין לכאן.
  4. 4
    בארצות החיים · Psalms 116:9
  5. 5
    והעיקר היה בחי׳ רחל · ראה לקו״ת להאריז״ל פ׳ לך לך ד״ה אל הארץ.
  6. 6
    (שנקראת עקרת הבית) · בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ ליתא.
  7. 7
    שנקראת עקרת הבית · Psalms 113:9
  8. 8
    רחל (שנקראת עקרת הבית) · Bereshit Rabbah 71:2
  9. 9
    (וכמו שפרש״י . . בא״י) · בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ ליתא.
  10. 10
    וכמו שפרש״י גבי יונה ויחזקאל · א, ג.
  11. 11
    ויחזקאל שאין הנבואה שורה אלא בא״י · Rashi on Ezekiel 1:3
  12. 12
    שגלו ישראל וגלתה עמהם השכינה · Megillah 29a:4
  13. 13
    משא״כ אחר חורבן . . ואינה מאירה כלל · באוה״ת שלח ע׳ תנו מבאר שגם עכשיו יש הפרש בין א״י לחו״ל, וכאן מבאר שבזמן שאין בהמ״ק קיים אין יכולים להשיג בארץ יותר מבחו״ל, רק הצדיקים הגדולים, וכתב ע״ז הצ״צ שם ”ע״כ צ״ל דעכשיו עיקר ענין הארץ יכולים להשיג ע״י עסק התורה שבע״פ”, ע״ש בארוכה.
  14. 14
    כרחל לפני גוזזי׳ נאלמה · Isaiah 53:7
  15. 15
    והעבודה היא בדרך בירורים · באוה״ת בראשית כרך א ריז, א מציין ע״ז ”וזוהי עיקר התלבשותה שנופלת ממדרגה למדרגה לברר ולהוציא בלעם מפי׳”.
  16. 16
    (וכמ״ש ע״פ במדבר סיני) · ראה לקו״ת פ׳ במדבר בתחלתה.
  17. 17
    מ״ם פתוחה . . מ״ם סתומה · נתבאר באוה״ת דרושים לשמע״צ ע׳ א׳תתי, ובספר הליקוטים-דא״ח מהצ״צ ערך אותיות אות מ (ע׳ תתנ ואילך). ראה לקו״ת שמע״צ צג, ב.
  18. 18
    עיין בזהר ר״פ תרומה דף קכ״ו ב׳ · Zohar, Terumah 2:12–4:23
  19. 19
    וכמו האר״י ז״ל · במאמרי אדה״א נ״ך ע׳ קצה ”כמו האריז״ל ותלמידיו שזכו לרוה״ק וגילוי אליהו כו׳ והרב הב״י וכיוצא שלא נמצא כזה בחו״ל”.
  20. 20
    וכמו האר״י ז״ל . . בדורות הקדמונים · בבוך 1135 גוכתי״ק הצ״צ: וכמו האריז״ל שהשיג מה שלא השיגו תנאים ואמוראים משא״כ שארי האנשים לא יוכלו להשיג כי לאה היא אתכסיא כו׳: ולהבין מ״ש.
  21. 21
    כי שנואה לאה · Genesis 29:31
  22. 22
    כי שנואה לאה · Bava Batra 123a
  23. 23
    כי שנואה לאה · Bereshit Rabbah 71:1
  24. 24
    הרי יעקב השיג ודאי בעלמ׳ דאתכסי׳ · בתו״א רד״ה וללבן ב׳ בנות דיעקב השיג ודאי בעדאתכ״ס ובתו״ח שם דלא השיג כלל — לפלא גדול שהרי מפורש על אתר: בתו״א — שהמדובר באותיות המח׳. בתו״ח — בשרש לאה, פני׳ בינה, שכל הנעלם מכל רעיון וכו׳. ולהעיר 1) באוה״ת שם אין בכלל הענין שהשיג או לא השיג. 2) ע״ד החילוק בפי׳ כי שנואה בין תו״א ותו״ח — נחלקו ג״כ ב״ב (קכג, א) וב״ר רפע״א. — לקו״ש ח״י ע׳ 214. במאמרי אדה״א נ״ך ע׳ קצו מבאר שהקושיא ”למה אהב יעקב לרחל יותר מלאה דלכאורה בחי׳ לאה יותר עליון מבחי׳ רחל”. וראה ביאוה״ז להצ״צ כרך ב ע׳ תשלז.
  25. 25
    יעקב נק׳ בריח התיכון · Zohar II, 175b
  26. 26
    בריח התיכון המבריח מן הקצה אל הקצה · Exodus 26:28
  27. 27
    פי׳ שהוא הממשיך . . כמ״ש במ״א · ראה אוה״ת בראשית כרך ב שפה, ב ואילך. וראה בהביאור שם שפח, א ואילך.
  28. 28
    והנורא · Deuteronomy 10:17
  29. 29
    ויאהב (יעקב) גם את רחל · Genesis 29:30
  30. 30
    וישקהו · Genesis 33:4
  31. 31
    וישק יעקב לרחל · Genesis 29:11
  32. 32
    ע״פ ישקני מנשיקות · לקו״ת שה״ש א, ד. וראה אוה״ת שה״ש ע׳ כד.
  33. 33
    ישקני מנשיקות · Song of Songs 1:2
  34. 34
    וע״פ אמצאך בחוץ אשקך · לקמן פ׳ תרומה פ, ג.
  35. 35
    אמצאך בחוץ אשקך · Song of Songs 8:1
  36. 36
    אעבדך שבע שנים ברחל · Genesis 29:18
  37. 37
    לבן הוא בחי׳ לובן העליון · ע״ח שער העקודים פ״א.
  38. 38
    לבן הוא בחי׳ לובן העליון · Sefer Etz Chaim 6:1:2
  39. 39
    דלית שמאלא בהאי עתיקא · Zohar III, 129a
  40. 40
    רק שלמטה נשפל בלבן גשמי · ראה לקו״ש חט״ו ע׳ 262.
  41. 41
    כולו הפך לבן טהור · Leviticus 13:13
  42. 42
    וישכם לבן בבקר · Genesis 32:1

Rachel barren, Leah’s sons ¶2

Thought and action together ¶2

2וינשק לבניו ובנותיו שנמשך בכל פרצופי האצי׳ זכרים ונקבות. ואח״כ ולבן שב למקומו למעלה מעלה ויעקב הלך לדרכו להמשיך בחינת לובן העליון הנ״ל למטה מטה ברחל בתו הקטנה בחי׳ דבור כו׳.

“And he kissed his sons and his daughters”: [meaning] that it is drawn into all the configurations (partzufim) of the World of Atzilus (Emanation), male and female. And afterward, “and Lavan returned to his place,” higher and higher, “and Yaakov went on his way,” to draw the level of the supernal whiteness mentioned above lower and lower, into Rachel, his younger daughter, the level of speech, etc.

Explanation

Lavan, the supernal whiteness, “kissed his sons and daughters”: his kindness flowed into all the configurations (partzufim) of Atzilus, the male and female ones alike. Then he “returned to his place,” withdrawing to his lofty root, while Yaakov “went on his way,” his mission being to bring that supernal whiteness far down into Rachel, the level of speech.

ולכן היתה רחל עקרה כי ההולדה מבחי׳ הדבור הוא להיות הגילוי בבי״ע וא״א להיות הולדה וגילוי בבי״ע שהרי הנבראים הם נפרדים וא״א להתגלות להם בחי׳ לובן העליון הנ״ל.

And therefore Rachel was barren, because birth from the level of speech means that there be revelation in the Worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah; and it is impossible for there to be birth and revelation in Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, since the created beings are separate, and it is impossible for the level of the supernal whiteness mentioned above to be revealed to them.

Explanation

This explains why Rachel was barren. For speech to “give birth” means that G‑dliness would be revealed in the lower worlds of Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, where created beings feel themselves separate from G‑d. Such beings cannot receive the supernal whiteness openly, so birth from Rachel was blocked.

(ומש״ל [ומה שכתוב לעיל] דרחל נק׳ עלמא דאתגלייא מ״מ להיות הגילוי ע״ד בחי׳ לידה הוא קשה ביותר כו׳ ויש חילוק גדול בין שארי השפעות לבחי׳ לידה שהוא גילוי עליון יותר ועמ״ש בזוהר פ׳ פנחס דרמ״ט)

(And as for what was said above, that Rachel is called the revealed world: nevertheless, for the revelation to be in the manner of the level of birth is exceedingly difficult, etc. There is a great difference between other kinds of influence and the level of birth, which is a higher revelation. See what is written in the Zohar, Parshas Pinchas, page 249.)

Explanation

The Alter Rebbe anticipates an objection: Rachel is the “revealed world,” so why can she not reveal? Because birth is not an ordinary flow of influence: it is a much higher kind of revelation, and for revelation to take that form is extremely hard to achieve in the lower worlds. He refers to the Zohar on Pinchas, page 249, for this distinction.

אבל לאה שהיא המחשבה ילדה ששה בנים שהם הספי׳ [הספירה / הספירות] שבאצי׳ עצמו ששם היה שרש השבטים ולכן נק׳ שבטי יה.

But Leah, who is thought, bore six sons, who are the Sefiros in Atzilus itself, for that is where the root of the tribes was; and therefore they are called “the tribes of Kah.”

Explanation

Leah, thought, did give birth: six sons. Her births took place within Atzilus itself, among the Sefiros, where there is no separateness to block revelation; that is where the tribes are rooted, and so the Psalmist calls them “the tribes of Kah.” Kah (yud-hei), the first two letters of the Name Havayah, stands for Chochmah and Binah, the level of thought.

יהודה הפעם אודה בחי׳ בטול והודאה הרי הוא נמשך ומסתעף מן המחשבה דוקא.

Yehudah, “this time I will acknowledge (odeh),” is the level of self-nullification (bittul) and acknowledgment, which is drawn and branches out specifically from thought.

Explanation

Leah named Yehudah from “this time I will acknowledge” (odeh). Acknowledgment is a form of self-nullification, and such bowing before G‑d grows out of thought, out of contemplation, not out of speech.

וכן ראובן ושמעון ראיה ושמיעה הוא ג״כ למעלה מבחי׳ הדבור אלא מן המחשבה הן נמשכים כו׳ (כמ״ש במ״א ע״פ יהודה אתה כו׳)

Likewise Reuven and Shimon, sight and hearing, are also above the level of speech; rather, they are drawn from thought, etc. (as is explained elsewhere on “Yehudah, you,” etc.).

Explanation

Reuven’s name comes from “seeing” and Shimon’s from “hearing”: at their births Leah said that Havayah “has seen my affliction” and “has heard” (Genesis 29:32–33). Seeing and hearing take in rather than express, so they too are above speech and stem from thought. The Alter Rebbe points to his discourse on “Yehudah, you,” where Reuven is the sight that arouses love and Shimon the hearing that brings awe.

וגם לוי שהוא בחי׳ התקשרות כמ״ש הפעם ילוה כו׳ נמשך ונולד ג״כ מן המחשבה

And also Levi, who is the level of attachment, as it is written, “This time [my husband] will be attached (yilaveh),” etc., is also drawn and born from thought,

Explanation

Levi’s name comes from “will be attached” (yilaveh): “this time my husband will be attached to me.” Levi thus stands for attachment (hiskashrus), a deep bond of the mind, and this too is born of thought.

כנראה בחוש במי שהוא בעל מחשבה שאינו מרגיש כלל בעסקים החולפים לפניו מחמת גודל התקשרות שיש לו בהמחשבה.

as is seen plainly in a person of thought, who does not feel at all the affairs passing before him, because of the greatness of the attachment he has to the thought.

Explanation

Anyone can see this in a person deeply absorbed in thinking: he does not notice what is going on around him, because his mind is bound up entirely in the idea.

וכמ״ש במדרש בעובדא דר׳ [דרבי] חייא רבה. וכן גבי רבא (בפ׳ אר״ע [אמר רבי עקיבא]) דהוה מעיין בשמעתי׳ [בשמעתיה] כו׳.

And as is related in the Midrash in the incident of Rabbi Chiya Rabbah; and likewise concerning Rava (in the chapter “Rabbi Akiva said”), who was delving into his study, etc.

Explanation

Two stories illustrate this. In the Jerusalem Talmud (Kilayim 9:3, the Kehot note shows), Rabbi Chiya Rabbah did not rise before Rabbi Yishmael son of Rabbi Yosi in the bathhouse, because at that moment his mind was going through the whole book of Psalms; and the Babylonian Talmud tells that Rava, absorbed in study, did not notice that his fingers were bleeding.

ולכן יצא ממנו משה שהיה כבד פה וכבד לשון דהיינו שלגודל התקשרותו בבחי׳ בטול ונחנו מה לא היה יכול להיות משפיע כו׳ שהיא בחי׳ הדבור כו׳

And therefore Moshe came from him, who was “heavy of mouth and heavy of tongue”: that is, because of the greatness of his attachment in the level of self-nullification, “and what are we,” he could not be one who imparts, etc., which is the level of speech, etc.

Explanation

That is why Moshe descended from Levi. Moshe said he was “heavy of mouth and heavy of tongue”: his attachment to G‑d and his self-nullification, voiced in his words “and what are we?”, were so deep that he could not easily turn outward to give to others, and giving to others is the level of speech.

ועיקר ההפרש בין התקשרות דלוי שהוא בחי׳ בטול ובין הודיה דיהודה שהוא ג״כ בחי׳ בטול הוא כי יהודה הוא בחי׳ הבטול בגילוי כענין כג, במודים שכורע ומשתחוה

And the main difference between the attachment of Levi, which is the level of self-nullification, and the acknowledgment of Yehudah, which is also the level of self-nullification, is that Yehudah is the level of self-nullification in revealed form, like [the blessing of] Modim, when one bends and bows down.

Explanation

The Alter Rebbe now distinguishes Levi’s attachment from Yehudah’s acknowledgment, since both are self-nullification. Yehudah’s is visible and outward, like bowing at Modim, the blessing of thanks in the Amidah, where one bends the body.

ולכן יצאו ממנו מלכי בית דוד שבטולם הוא בחי׳ הבטול שבהתגלות וחיצוניות.

And therefore the kings of the House of David came from him, whose self-nullification is the self-nullification that is in revelation and in the outer dimension (chitzoniyus).

Explanation

So the kings of the House of David, who descend from Yehudah, embody a self-nullification that shows itself openly, in revelation and in the outer dimension.

אבל לוי שהוא בחי׳ ההתקשרות והבטול בפנימיותו ועצמותו הגם שבחיצוניות אינו נגלה כלל וכענין בטול דצבא השמים לך משתחוים שההשתחואה של המלאכים אינו ענין השתחואה גשמיות אלא שמשתחוה ובטל בהשגתו ברוחניות

But Levi is the level of attachment and self-nullification in his inner dimension (pnimiyus) and his essence, even though outwardly it is not revealed at all, like the self-nullification of “the host of heaven bows to You”: the bowing of the angels is not a matter of physical bowing; rather, [each] bows and is nullified in its apprehension, spiritually.

Explanation

Levi’s self-nullification is inward and essential, not visible at all. It resembles the angels, of whom it is said that “the host of heaven bows to You”: angels have no bodies to bow with, so their bowing is the nullification of their being in the act of grasping G‑d.

ולכן יצא ממנו משה (ועמ״ש במ״א ההפרש בין משה ואליהו שהוא גם כן עד״ז) ואח״כ ותעמוד מלדת שלא היה יכול להיות בחי׳ גילוי עוד.

And therefore Moshe came from him (and see what is explained elsewhere about the difference between Moshe and Eliyahu, which is also along these lines). And afterward, “and she stopped bearing,” for there could no longer be a level of revelation.

Explanation

Moshe, the most inward of all, therefore comes from Levi; the Alter Rebbe notes that the difference between Moshe and Eliyahu follows the same pattern. After four sons, Leah “stopped bearing”: the revelation that thought can produce reached its limit.

(ועמ״ש ע״פ טובה הארץ מאד מאד דענין דור המדבר שהיה מבחי׳ לאה עולם המחשבה וטענו למה צריכים לירד בבחי׳ עולם הדבור שהוא בחי׳ מל׳ ארץ תתאה לקיים המצות בדבור ובמעשה הלא זה אפשר לקיים גם ע״י התומ״צ [התורה ומצות] ברוחניות דהיינו ע״י המחשבה כו׳

(And see what is explained on “The land is very, very good,” that the matter of the generation of the wilderness was that it was of the level of Leah, the world of thought; and they argued: why must we descend into the level of the world of speech, which is the level of Malchus (sovereignty), the lower earth, to fulfill the mitzvos in speech and in action? Is it not possible to fulfill this also through Torah and mitzvos in spirituality, that is, through thought, etc.?

Explanation

A long parenthesis now applies this to the generation of the wilderness, who were rooted in Leah, the world of thought. Their argument, as the Alter Rebbe presents it: why must we enter the Land, the lower earth of Malchus, and keep the mitzvos with physical speech and action, when Torah and mitzvos can be fulfilled spiritually, in thought?

אך באמת היו בטעות גדול דע״י דבור ומעשה דוקא נמשך גילוי אוא״ס [אור אין סוף] ב״ה ביתר שאת לאין קץ כי נעוץ סופן בתחלתן כו׳ ומרבע״ה [ומשה רבינו עליו השלום] התפלל תקט״ו תפלות ליכנס לארץ כו׳.

But in truth they were in great error, for specifically through speech and action a revelation of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, is drawn down with an infinitely greater excellence, for “their end is embedded in their beginning,” etc. And Moshe Rabbeinu, peace be upon him, prayed five hundred and fifteen prayers to enter the Land, etc.

Explanation

They were badly mistaken. Precisely physical speech and action draw down the Infinite Light far more powerfully, because, as Sefer Yetzirah says, “their end is embedded in their beginning”: the lowest point is bound to the highest. That is why Moshe Rabbeinu, though he was of Leah’s inward kind, prayed 515 times to be allowed to enter the Land, the number the Midrash finds in va’eschanan, “and I pleaded.”

ועפ״ז [ועל פי זה] יובן עוד ענין ויאהב יעקב את רחל דוקא שהיא בחי׳ דבור ומעשה כי שנואה לאה ההפך מכוונת דור המדבר.

And according to this, one will further understand the matter of “and Yaakov loved Rachel” specifically, she being the level of speech and action, and “that Leah was hated”: the opposite of the intention of the generation of the wilderness.

Explanation

This sheds further light on Yaakov loving Rachel specifically: she is speech and action. That Leah was “hated” is the reverse of the wilderness generation’s wish to stay in the world of thought.

¶1 This further answers the question from paragraph 1.

ואמנם צריך ביאור מ״ש לאה הפעם ילוה אישי אלי דוקא דודאי לא עלה על דעתה לאפוקי מבחי׳ דבור ומעשה.

However, what Leah said, “This time my husband will be attached to me,” specifically, requires explanation, for it surely did not occur to her to exclude the level of speech and action.

Explanation

But this raises a question about Leah. When she said “this time my husband will be attached to me,” she clearly did not mean to exclude speech and action; so what did she want?

אלא הענין כי באמת צ״ל ב׳ הבחי׳ מודו״מ [מחשבה דבור ומעשה] דהא בלא הא לא סגי ועמ״ש במ״א בענין לויתן ושור הבר שהוא ג״כ ענין ב׳ בחי׳ הנ״ל לויתן לשון התקשרות בחי׳ בטול דנוני ימא כמו הפעם ילוה כו׳

Rather, the matter is that in truth there must be both levels, thought and speech and action, for one without the other does not suffice. And see what is explained elsewhere on the matter of the Leviathan and the wild ox, which is also the matter of the two levels mentioned above: Leviathan (livyasan) is a term of attachment, the level of the self-nullification of the fish of the sea, like “this time [my husband] will be attached (yilaveh),” etc.

Explanation

The answer: both levels are necessary, thought and speech-and-action, and neither suffices alone. The Leviathan and the wild ox of the future feast represent these two levels: the Leviathan (livyasan), whose name shares the root of yilaveh, “will be attached,” stands for the fish of the sea, who live entirely within their source and are nullified to it.

ולאה רצתה שיהיה העיקר ע״י בחינה זו ע״ד שאמרו בחסידים הראשונים שהיו שוהין ט׳ שעות בכל יום בתפלה שהוא כענין בטול והתקשרות הנ״ל דמחשבה כו׳.

And Leah wanted the main thing to be through this level, in the manner of what was said of the early pious ones (chassidim), who would spend nine hours every day in prayer, which is like the matter of self-nullification and attachment of thought mentioned above, etc.

Explanation

Leah wanted inward attachment to be the main thing, with speech and action secondary. This resembles the early pious ones, whom the Talmud describes as waiting an hour, praying an hour and waiting an hour, three times a day, nine hours in prayer, absorbed in self-nullification and attachment of the mind.

ואימתי תורתן נעשית אלא מתוך שחסידים הן כו׳ הרי רוב עסקם היה עד״ז )(ומבואר ענין זה לקמן בד״ה ששים המה מלכות כו׳ אחת היא יונתי כו׳)

“And when is their Torah [study] done? Rather, because they are pious,” etc.: so most of their occupation was of this kind.) (And this matter is explained below, in the discourse beginning “There are sixty queens,” etc., “My dove is one,” etc.)

Explanation

The Talmud asks how those pious ones kept their Torah and did their work, and answers that because they were pious, their Torah is preserved and their work is blessed. So most of their occupation was inward attachment; the Alter Rebbe adds that the discourse on “There are sixty queens … My dove is one” explains this at length.

ואמנם יעקב ידע שזה אי אפשר רק לבני עלייה שהן מועטים אבל כל ישראל עיקר רוב העסק הוא ע״י דבור ומעשה

However, Yaakov knew that this is possible only for the elite (bnei aliyah), who are few; but for all of Israel, the main part of their occupation is through speech and action.

Explanation

Yaakov, however, knew that this path is possible only for the bnei aliyah, the few people of a higher order, in the Talmud’s phrase. For the Jewish people as a whole, the main service is through speech and action, Torah study and practical mitzvos.

ולכן היה באהל רחל עיקר קביעותו שהוא בחי׳ דומ״ע [דבור ומעשה] ומ״מ צ״ל ג״כ מחשבה שמזה נמשך ראיה ושמיעה לאסתכלא ביקרא דמלכא כו׳

And therefore his main dwelling was in the tent of Rachel, which is the level of speech and action. Nevertheless, there must also be thought, from which are drawn sight and hearing, “to gaze upon the glory of the King,” etc.

Explanation

So Yaakov made Rachel’s tent his main home, as Rashi says on “he came into Rachel’s tent”: Yaakov was always with her. Yet thought is still necessary, since from it come “seeing and hearing” (Reuven and Shimon), “to gaze upon the glory of the King,” the contemplation that arouses love.

וכל האומר אין לי אלא תורה כו׳ אלא צ״ל רו״ש [רצוא ושוב] רק כי אז נעוץ סופן כו׳:

And “whoever says, ‘I have only Torah,’” etc. Rather, there must be sight and hearing; only that then “their end is embedded,” etc.

Explanation

The Talmud says that one who claims to have only Torah study, without deeds, lacks even Torah. Likewise one needs both: the seeing and hearing of thought, together with action, since then the end is joined to the beginning and the lowest deed draws down the highest light.

Paragraph 2 in brief

The paragraph explains why Rachel (speech) was barren while Leah (thought) bore children within Atzilus, and draws distinctions among Leah’s sons: Yehudah’s outward self-nullification, Levi’s inward attachment, and Moshe descending from Levi. It then uses the generation of the wilderness to show why Yaakov chose Rachel: action draws down the highest light, but thought must accompany it.

Deeper

The contrast between Yehudah and Levi, outward and inward self-nullification, underlies the Chassidic distinction between the kingship of David and the priesthood and prophecy of Levi and Moshe. The spies’ argument appears in Likkutei Torah on Shelach, where the Alter Rebbe presents them as rooted in the world of thought rather than as simply sinful. “Their end is embedded in their beginning” is the principle that the lowest level, physical action, reaches the highest root, which recurs throughout Chabad teaching.

Explained elsewhere AI research

  1. Explained by the Alter Rebbe and a gloss in the Alter Rebbe’s maamarim; the glossator is not named

    „ועמ״ש במ״א ההפרש בין משה ואליהו שהוא גם כן עד״ז” (“And see what is explained elsewhere about the difference between Moshe and Eliyahu, which is also along these lines”): no place is given (the Kehot notes give none), and our explain only repeats the remark.

    Perhaps (biur b’derech efshar) the place meant is where the Alter Rebbe sets Moshe and Eliyahu side by side: „דמשה הוא מבחי׳ פנימיות ואליהו מבחי׳ חיצוניות” (Moshe belongs to the inner dimension and Eliyahu to the outer) (Torah Ohr, Miketz). A gloss in Maamarei Admur HaZaken 5562 spells it out: inwardly Moshe’s self-nullification, „ונחנו מה” (“and what are we”), is far higher, yet outwardly Eliyahu’s was greater, so that even his body was nullified and „גופו עלה בסערה” (rose to heaven in a storm) (so too Torah Ohr, Megillas Esther). This matches the contrast drawn here between Levi’s inward bittul, not seen at all, and Yehudah’s revealed bittul („הבטול בגילוי”).

    the Alter Rebbe: Torah Ohr, Miketz (the Chanukah discourse on the seven shepherds and eight princes), p. 68 ולכן משה הוא מהרועים. ואליהו מהנסיכים. ונודע דמשה הוא מבחי׳ פנימיות ואליהו מבחי׳ חיצוניות

    the Alter Rebbe: Torah Ohr, Megillas Esther (on “מה ראו על ככה ומה הגיע אליהם”), p. 198 וכנודע מענין משה ואליהו שאליהו בגימטריא ב״ן והיה בו בטול הגוף עד שעלה בסערה

    a gloss (hagahah) in the Alter Rebbe’s maamarim; the glossator is not named: Maamarei Admur HaZaken 5562, vol. א, p. רצח (gloss) שאע״פ שבפנימית היה הביטול דמשה גבוה הרבה מביטול דאליהו כי משה ונחנו מ״ה ואליהו גימ׳ ב״ן עכ״ז בחיצונית היה הביטול אצל אליהו יותר

Where the maamar leaves something unexplained, found by AI in the library and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail.

The Rebbe on this paragraph AI research

  1. Background from the Rebbe

    In a sicha on „ראה נתתיך אלקים לפרעה” (“See, I have made you a G‑d to Pharaoh”) (from talks of Shabbos Vaera 5729 and 5715), the Rebbe asks why this came right after Moshe’s complaint „אני ערל שפתים” (“I am of uncircumcised lips”), and why from then on Moshe himself spoke to Pharaoh.

    He starts from this paragraph’s point, citing it: Moshe was „כבד פה וכבד לשון” (“heavy of mouth and heavy of tongue”) because of his bittul to G‑dliness, so absorbed that he could not give out to others. „ערל שפתים” (“Uncircumcised lips”) is then a still greater bittul: heavy speech still speaks, with difficulty, while closed lips do not speak at all. That „ביטול בתכלית” (total bittul) was the preparation for “I have made you a G‑d to Pharaoh”: through it „שכינה מדברת מתוך גרונו של משה” (the Shechinah spoke from Moshe’s throat), with the power needed to break Pharaoh.

    The Alter Rebbeולכן יצא ממנו משה שהיה כבד פה וכבד לשון דהיינו שלגודל התקשרותו בבחי׳ בטול ונחנו מה

    The Rebbeאַז דאָס וואָס משה איז געווען „כבד פה וכבד לשון” האָט זיך עס גענומען מצד זיין ביטול צו אלקות

    Likkutei Sichos, vol. טז, p. 76 (Vaera 3; the sicha begins p. 69 and sec. ט on p. 75; the quote and note 60, citing Torah Ohr 23a end, are on p. 76) · ש״פ וארא תשכ״ט, תשט״ו

Found by AI in the Rebbe’s works and checked against each source; not yet reviewed by a person, so check the place before relying on a detail. How it was made

TermsNunei yamaLoven ha’elyonPartzufLeah and Rachel+22

Also BittulOr Ein SofTorah and mitzvosTorah

Marei mekomos

  1. 1
    וינשק לבניו · Genesis 32:1
  2. 2
    ויעקב הלך לדרכו · Genesis 32:2
  3. 3
    רחל עקרה · Genesis 29:31
  4. 4
    (ומש״ל דרחל . . פנחס דרמ״ט) · ראה אוה״ת כאן ריז, ב שמבאר ”כי הלידה הוא בחי׳ גילוי ההעלם כמו שהוא בעצמותו, וא״א להיות האצי׳ כמו שהוא נמשך בבריאה, ולכן היתה מקשה ללדת”. ע״ש.
  5. 5
    שהם הספי׳ שבאצי׳ · ל״ת להאריז״ל פ׳ ויצא.
  6. 6
    שבטי יה · Psalms 122:4
  7. 7
    יהודה הפעם אודה · Genesis 29:35
  8. 8
    כמ״ש במ״א ע״פ יהודה אתה · לקמן ר״פ ויגש.
  9. 9
    ע״פ יהודה אתה · Genesis 49:8
  10. 10
    הפעם ילוה · Genesis 29:34
  11. 11
    וכמ״ש במדרש בעובדא דר׳ חייא רבה · ראה ירושלמי כלאים פ״ט ה״ג.
  12. 12
    וכמ״ש במדרש בעובדא דר׳ חייא רבה · Jerusalem Talmud Kilayim 9:3:8
  13. 13
    וכן גבי רבא (בפ׳ אר״ע) · Shabbat 88a
  14. 14
    ולכן יצא ממנו משה · בלקו״ת צו ח, ג מציין לכאן וציין גם לזח״ב יא, ב.
  15. 15
    כבד פה וכבד לשון · Exodus 4:10
  16. 16
    שלגודל התקשרותו בבחי׳ בטול · ראה לקו״ת עקב יד, ב. סידור קי, ב. אוה״ת ויצא רו, א. ביאוה״ז להצ״צ ע׳ תמז.
  17. 17
    ונחנו מה · Exodus 16:7
  18. 18
    צבא השמים לך משתחוים · Nehemiah 9:6
  19. 19
    דצבא השמים . . אינו ענין השתחואה גשמיות אלא שמשתחוה · בגוכי״ק הצ״צ [וכ״ה באוה״ת בשלח ע׳ שנה שמציין לכאן]: דצבא השמים לך משתחוים שאינו ענין השתחואה גשמית שהרי מיכאל מהלך ת״ק שנה היה כופף הרקיע כו׳: אלא שמשתחוה. ע״כ. בסה״מ תרס״ט ע׳ קכו מציין לכאן.
  20. 20
    ע״פ טובה הארץ מאד מאד · לקו״ת שלח לח, ב. ושם מציין לכאן.
  21. 21
    טובה הארץ מאד מאד · Numbers 14:7
  22. 22
    נעוץ סופן בתחלתן · Sefer Yetzirah 1:7
  23. 23
    ומרבע״ה התפלל תקט״ו תפלות · Devarim Rabbah 11:6
  24. 24
    ומרבע״ה התפלל תקט״ו תפלות ליכנס לארץ · Devarim Rabbah 11:10
  25. 25
    ויאהב יעקב את רחל · Genesis 29:18
  26. 26
    וגם לוי . . הפעם ילוה אישי · בלקו״ת שמיני יח, ג. נשא כא, ד מציין לכאן.
  27. 27
    ועמ״ש במ״א בענין לויתן · ראה לקו״ת שמיני יח, ב.
  28. 28
    בחסידים הראשונים · Berakhot 32b:20–22
  29. 29
    ששים המה מלכות · Song of Songs 6:8
  30. 30
    אחת היא יונתי · Song of Songs 6:9
  31. 31
    (ומבואר . . יונתי כו׳) · כל המוסגר ליתא בגוכתי״ק הצ״צ.
  32. 32
    באהל רחל · Genesis 31:33
  33. 33
    וכל האומר אין לי אלא תורה · Yevamot 109b:4–5

Finished the maamar?

Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.

Download PDFPDF · 483 KB

Each Rosh Chodesh the names of those learning here are brought to the Ohel. Add your name, and mark what you learn so it is counted.

In one’s avodah

A person may be drawn to a purely inward service of contemplation and attachment, but for most of us the main service is Torah study spoken aloud and mitzvos done in action, because precisely there the Infinite Light is revealed most fully. Yet action must not be empty: thought, the “seeing and hearing” of the mind, must accompany it, just as Yaakov made Rachel’s tent his main home yet needed Leah’s sons, sight and hearing, too.

Questions for discussion

  1. Why is the level of Leah, thought, higher than Rachel, speech, yet Yaakov loved Rachel more?
  2. How can the Land of Israel after the destruction offer higher insights than in Temple times, even though G‑dliness there is less revealed?
  3. What is the difference between Yehudah’s self-nullification and Levi’s, and why did kings come from one and Moshe from the other?
  4. What was the error of the generation of the wilderness, and how does “their end is embedded in their beginning” answer it?
  5. What did Leah want when she said “this time my husband will be attached to me,” and how does Yaakov’s choice balance thought with speech and action?

Key terms in this maamar

Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
G‑d’s kingship: the lowest Sefirah, His “speech” and the revealed world, through which all worlds come into being from nothing and live, without touching His essence (“there is no king without a people”). ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Shechinah (Divine Presence)שכינה
G‑d’s Malchus as it “dwells” among created beings to give them life: Malchus of Atzilus come down below Atzilus. Its being clothed below, down to the kelipos, is called the exile of the Shechinah. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
The boundless light radiating from G‑d’s Essence like sunlight from the sun: His “Name,” a revelation, not the Essence. Chiefly the light before the tzimtzum; also that light as clothed in the sefiros.Where it’s explained, stated differently, Sefer HaErchim
The kav (line of light)קו
The thread-like line of Or Ein Sof drawn into the vacated space after the tzimtzum: a small revelation, root of all hishtalshelus and the inner light, narrowing as it descends until it ends in Atzilus. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
Keser (the Crown)כתר
The Crown over the Sefiros: intermediary between Or Ein Sof and the emanated, holding the lowest level of the Infinite; the Supernal Will and source of delight, beyond grasp; Chochmah emerges from it. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
Chesed (kindness)חסד
The Sefirah of kindness (the right arm; Avraham): giving that comes from its nature to do good, spreading from highest to lowest like water. Gevurah, its opposite, limits it; in tikkun each includes the other. ×1Where it’s explained, stated differently
Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
The Sefirah of might (the left; Yitzchak), opposite Chesed: described as what limits and contracts Chesed’s flow, and as the life-force in greater intensity, which becomes judgment; included in Chesed, it gives life.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
Self-nullification before G‑d, the condition for the Or Ein Sof to rest. Its lower degree is a “something” that bows; its higher, Chochmah’s “what are we,” takes up no place at all.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
The first Sefirah of revelation: a single point of insight (koach mah, the yud of Havayah) that comes from the “nothing” above it; being bittul, Or Ein Sof rests in it, and Binah expands it.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Binah (understanding)בינה
The Sefirah of comprehension (Imma, the first hei): it expands Chochmah’s flash in length and breadth; letters of thought appear in it; it is “yesh,” and from it love, joy and the middos are born.Where it’s explained, stated differently
Daas (knowledge)דעת
Knowledge as felt recognition: the intellect bound into the soul until it is felt as if seen. Daas unites Chochmah with Binah and spreads into the middos as their inner life; the middos follow it.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
The inner dimension: the part of anything that turns toward and cleaves to its source (from panim, face), its depth and chief will. Its partner, chitzoniyus, goes out to others; the inner does not descend.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
The first revelation in the chain of worlds (vayaetzel, “drew off”): the ten Sefiros, where Or Ein Sof rests and lights and vessels are one with Him; Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah are created from nothing.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Beriah (Creation)בריאה
The first created world, below the partition (parsa) under Atzilus: something new from nothing (yesh me’ayin), corresponding to thought, where Binah of Atzilus dwells; world of the seraphim, souls and Gan Eden HaElyon.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Yetzirah (Formation)יצירה
The world of formation, between Beriah and Asiyah: like speech, it reveals what was hidden in Beriah (something from something, not new creation); the middos of Atzilus shine there; the world of the angels.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
The lowest of the four worlds, corresponding to action: its ten Sefiros are still holy, but below them lies kelipas nogah; this physical world is Malchus of Asiyah, its lowest level.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The Sefirosספירות
Ten emanated powers, Keser (or Daas) and Chochmah through Malchus, each a light in a vessel; through them G‑d conducts the worlds, His essence unchanged; they recur in every world and in man.Where it’s explained, stated differently
The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
The outer dimension of a level: the part that goes out to give to others, as against pnimiyus, which cleaves to the source. Only the outer descends, becoming the inner of the level below. ×2Where it’s explained, stated differently

Language

Hebrew size

100%

English size

100%

Hebrew letters

Theme

How I learn

Calendar

Freg button

Show

Abbreviations

Tap an abbreviation, or turn on Written out. A Kindle has no hover, so Written out is how to read them there.

NikudBeta

Vowels on the maamar’s Hebrew. Verses take theirs from the Leningrad Codex; every other word is vowelled by Dicta’s Nakdan, automatically, and has not been proofread, so expect mistakes. The letters are Kehot’s, unchanged.

Review mode

Off hides the review bar and your notes on this device, to read without them.

PDF

CompleteHebrew, translation, explanations and notes · PDF · 483 KBText onlyThe Hebrew and the translation · PDF · 131 KB

EPUB

For your e-readerThe Hebrew, translation, explanations and notes · EPUB · 173 KB
The whole books, ready to print

Language

EnglishالعربيةDeutschEspañolفارسیFrançaisעבריתItalianoPortuguêsРусскийУкраїнська中文(简体)中文(繁體)

Send us a suggestion

Corrections, ideas, questions. Leave your email so we can answer.

We send it by email to the editor, with the page you’re on. Nothing is published.

Contents

Torah Ohrתורה אור

Parshas Vayeitzeiויצא

  1. 1ושבתי בשלום אל בית אבי והיה…“And I Shall Return in Peace to My Father’s House”
  2. 2ביאור על הנ״לAn Explanation of the Above
  3. 3וללבן שתי בנות וגו׳And Lavan Had Two Daughters
    1. Two daughters, two lands ¶1
    2. Why Yaakov loved Rachel ¶1
    3. Rachel barren, Leah’s sons ¶2
    4. Thought and action together ¶2
    1. 1
    2. 2
  4. 4אם לא תדעי לך היפה בנשים…“If you do not know for yourself, O fairest among women”
  5. 5וישכם לבן בבקר וינשק לבניו ולבנותיו…“And Lavan rose early in the morning, and he kissed his sons and his daughters”
Ask Freg about any paragraph