Torah Ohr · Parshas Lech Lecha · Maamar 5
שרי אשתך לא תקרא שמה שרי כי שרה שמה וגו׳
Sarai your wife: you shall not call her name Sarai
Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
How a new existence comes into being depends on the level: above, at the level of the higher Chochmah (Abraham), birth comes through contraction, the yud; below, at the level of the lower Chochmah (Sarah), it comes through expansion, the hei. That is why Sarah could bear Isaac only once her yud became a hei.
The maamar in brief
The Midrash teaches that Sarai could not give birth, but Sarah could. This is puzzling: the yud of Sarai stands for Chochmah, the level of ayin (nothing), which is the source of new existence, while the hei of Sarah stands for Binah, called yesh (something). Why would exchanging the higher letter for the lower one give her the power to bear a child? The Alter Rebbe answers that Abraham and Sarah are the higher and the lower Chochmah. Above, a new existence comes about only through tzimtzum: were the Infinite Light to spread forth as it is, nothing finite could ever arise. Below, the reverse is true: contraction would leave only darkness and concealment, and existence comes about through spreading out and expansion, which the broad letter hei expresses. The three tips of the yud and the shape of the two hei’s illustrate this. Abraham too received a hei, but only to become ‘the father of a multitude of nations’, elevating what lies outside holiness; for Isaac, who belongs to holiness, whose nature is self-nullification, he did not need it. Sarah, however, needed the hei for Isaac’s birth.
Outline
- The question: why a hei for Sarah?The name change gave Sarah the power to give birth; yet the yud (Chochmah, ‘nothing’) is the source of new existence and is higher than the hei (Binah, ‘something’). The key: Abraham and Sarah are the higher and the lower Chochmah.¶1
- Contraction above, expansion belowAbove, new existence comes only through tzimtzum; below, at Sarah’s level, it comes through expansion. Abraham’s hei served his role as father of many nations, not Isaac’s birth; Sarah needed the hei for Isaac.¶2
Key concepts
- Yud and heiיו״ד וה״א
- In Kabbalah the yud, a single point, stands for Chochmah and for contraction; the hei, which spreads out in width and length, stands for Binah and for expansion.
- Ayin and yeshאין ויש
- Chochmah is called ayin (‘nothing’), the undefined source from which new existence comes; Binah is called yesh (‘something’), where things have taken definite shape.
- The higher Chochmah and the lower Chochmahחכמה עילאה וחכמה תתאה
- Two levels of Chochmah. Abraham corresponds to the higher, rooted in the Chochmah of Atzilus; Sarah to the lower. Each brings new existence into being in the opposite way.
- tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
- The self-concealment of the Infinite Light; at the higher level it is the only way a finite, new existence can come about.
- Spreading forth and expansionהתפשטות והרחבה
- At the lower level, where the light is already limited, new existence comes through expansion rather than further contraction, which would leave only darkness.
- self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- The nature of the side of holiness; because of it, Isaac’s birth did not require Abraham’s hei of expansion.
For children · ages 9–13
Why Sarai became Sarah
The big idea
Above, new things come into being when G‑d’s light is held back; below, they come into being when it spreads out, which is why Sarah needed the wide letter hei to have Yitzchak.
G‑d told Avraham that his wife Sarai would now be called Sarah, and the Sages teach that this change gave her the power to have a child. But this is puzzling. The letter yud at the end of Sarai stands for Chochmah, wisdom, which is called “nothing” (ayin) and is the source of every new thing. The letter hei of Sarah stands for Binah, understanding, which is called “something” (yesh). How could trading a higher letter for a lower one help her? The Alter Rebbe answers that Avraham and Sarah stand for two levels: a higher wisdom and a lower wisdom. At the higher level, G‑d’s light has no end, and a new thing can come into being only through tzimtzum, holding the light back. That is the small yud. At the lower level it is the opposite: holding back would leave only darkness, and new things come through spreading out. That is the wide hei. Avraham also received a hei, so that he would be “the father of a multitude of nations.” But Sarah needed her hei for the birth of Yitzchak.
Questions for the Shabbos table
- Why is it sometimes holding back, and sometimes spreading out, that lets something new come into being?
- Look at the letters yud and hei. How does the shape of each one fit what the maamar says about it?
- When can holding yourself back help something good happen, and when is it better to give freely and generously?
Explanation © likuteitorah.com, CC BY-NC 4.0: retold for children from our translation and explanation, with AI assistance; not yet reviewed by a human editor.
The question: why a hei for Sarah? ¶1
“Sarai your wife: you shall not call her name Sarai, for Sarah is her name,” etc. Now, the change of Sarah’s name was so that she would have [the capacity of] giving birth,
The maamar opens with G‑d’s instruction to Abraham to change his wife’s name from Sarai (spelled with a final yud) to Sarah (spelled with a final hei). The Alter Rebbe states the premise: the purpose of this change was to give her the ability to bear a child.
כמארז״ל [כמאמר רבותינו זכרונם לברכה] שרי לא תלד3 כו׳ וא״כ צ״ל הלא מעלת היו״ד גבוה מן הה׳ כי יו״ד חכמה ה׳ בינה.
The Midrash says that as Sarai she could not give birth, but as Sarah she could. This raises a difficulty: in Kabbalah the letter yud stands for Chochmah and the letter hei for Binah, and Chochmah is the higher faculty. Why would exchanging a higher letter for a lower one bring about the ability to give birth?
ונודע כי עיקר הולדה מבחינת חכמה לפי שחכמה בחי׳ אין והחכמה מאין4 כו׳. משא״כ בינה נק׳ יש כו׳
And it is known that giving birth comes chiefly from the level of Chochmah, because Chochmah is the level of ayin (nothing), [as it is written,] “and Chochmah comes from ayin,” etc.; whereas Binah is called yesh (something), etc.
The question is sharpened. Chochmah is called ayin, ‘nothing’, because it is the first flash of insight before anything is defined; bringing something new into being, ‘something from nothing’, is rooted there. Binah, where the idea is developed and takes on definite shape, is called yesh, ‘something’, an existence already there.
ואיך נהפוך הוא שלהיות לה כח ההולדה לוקח מאתה כח היו״ד וניתן לה כח הה׳ במקומו5 כו׳.
So how is it turned around, that for her to have the power of giving birth, the power of the yud is taken from her and the power of the hei is given to her in its place, etc.?
So the change seems backwards: to give Sarah the power to give birth, the yud, the letter of Chochmah and the source of new existence, was taken away, and the hei of Binah was put in its place.
וחענין כי אברהם ושרה הם בחי׳ ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] וח״ת [וחכמה תתאה] כו׳ ששרש אברהם הוא בבחי׳ חכמה דאצי׳.
And the explanation is that Abraham and Sarah are the levels of the higher Chochmah and the lower Chochmah, etc., for Abraham’s root is in the level of the Chochmah of Atzilus.
The answer begins. Abraham and Sarah correspond to two levels of Chochmah: Abraham to the higher Chochmah, rooted in the Chochmah of Atzilus, and Sarah to the lower Chochmah. What is true of how birth works at the higher level is not true of the lower one, as the next paragraph explains.
The paragraph poses the maamar’s question: if the yud (Chochmah, ‘nothing’) is the source of new existence, why did Sarah receive the power to bear a child by exchanging her yud for a hei (Binah, ‘something’)? It then gives the key to the answer: Abraham and Sarah stand for the higher and the lower Chochmah.
Higher Chochmah and lower Chochmah are standard Kabbalistic terms: the Chochmah of Atzilus proper, and Malchus, which receives from it and is its reflection below. The yud is a single point, the letter of contraction, while the hei spreads out in width and length; the maamar’s answer turns on which of these two modes brings a new existence into being at each level.
Marei mekomos
- 1שרי אשתך · בבוך 1101 הוסיף כ״ק הצ״צ בגוכתי״ק על כת״י מעתיק: מוגה. הנחת מהר״א הלוי בספרו עבודת הלוי פ׳ לך לך טז, ד כותרת ”כי״ק בעת ששמע מאדמו״ר הזקן”. ראה לעיל בציונים מכ״ק אדמו״ר זי״ע.
- 2שרי אשתך לא תקרא שמה שרי · Genesis 17:15
- 3שרי לא תלד · Bereshit Rabbah 44:12
- 4והחכמה מאין · Job 28:12
- 5ואיך נהפוך . . וניתן לה כח הה׳ במקומו · בלקו״ת בשלח א, ב מציין לכאן.
Contraction above, expansion below ¶2
2והנה למעלה כך הוא המדה1 עיקר ההולדה להיות מציאות הולדה חדשה הוא ע״י צמצום דוקא2 כי אם הי׳ [היה] אא״ס [אור אין סוף] ב״ה מתפשט
Now above, this is the rule: the essence of giving birth, so that a new existence is born, comes specifically through tzimtzum (contraction). For if the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He, were to spread forth
Here the answer is given. At the higher level (Abraham’s), a genuinely new existence comes about only through tzimtzum, the self-concealment of the Infinite Light. Without such contraction, nothing separate could arise.
כמו שהוא בבחי׳ א״ס לא הי׳ [היה] אפשר להיות שום התהדות מציאות כלל אפי׳ [אפילו] ע״י רבוא רבבות השתלשלות כי כשמו כן הוא אין סוף להתפשטותו וכו׳.
as it is, in the level of the Infinite, it would not be possible for any existence at all to come into being, even through myriads upon myriads [of stages] of the chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus); for as its name is, so it is: there is no end to its spreading forth, etc.
If the Infinite Light spread forth as it truly is, no finite existence could come into being, however many stages of descent it passed through, since its nature is to have no end. That is why, at the higher level, the yud, a single contracted point, is the letter of birth.
משא״כ למטה בבחי׳ שרה כו׳ הוא להיפך ממש שאם היה האור מתצמצם היה חשך והעלם והסתר גמור ועיקר התהוות המציאות הוא ע״י בחי׳ התפשטות והרחבה דוקא וכו׳
Whereas below, in the level of Sarah, etc., it is the very opposite: if the light were contracted, there would be darkness, concealment and total hiddenness; and existence comes into being chiefly through the level of spreading forth and expansion specifically, etc.
At the lower level, Sarah’s, it is the reverse. There the light is already limited, so further contraction would leave only darkness and concealment; new existence comes about precisely through spreading out and expansion. The hei, a letter with breadth and length, expresses that expansion.
(וכנודע בענין ג׳ קוצין של3 היו״ד שהקוץ התחתון מקור וכח הבינה תלוי בקוץ העליון כו׳).
(As is known concerning the three tips of the yud: the lower tip, the source and power of Binah, depends on the upper tip, etc.)
The text’s own parenthetical support: the yud is drawn with three tips, an upper, a middle and a lower one. The lower tip is the source of Binah, and it depends on the upper tip, which shows that the spreading out associated with Binah draws its power from what is above it.
וכנודע בענין תמונת ב׳ ההי״ן. ומה שנתוסף לאברהם ה׳ אברם אינו מוליד45 כו׳ אברהם הוא בחי׳ ח״ע [חכמה עילאה] כו׳
And as is known concerning the shape of the two hei’s. And as for the hei being added to Abraham: “Abram does not beget,” etc.; Abraham is the level of the higher Chochmah, etc.
A further support is the shape of the two hei’s in the Name Havayah, a letter that spreads out in width and length. The text then raises an objection: Abraham too received a hei, since the Midrash says ‘Abram does not beget’ but Abraham does; yet Abraham is the higher Chochmah, for whom birth should come through contraction, not expansion.
היינו כמו שמפורש במקרא כי אב המון גוים6 כו׳ ע״ד בחי׳ הנפש אשר עשו בחרן7 בחי׳ העלאות מזלעו״ז [מזה לעומת זה] כו׳.
That is, as is stated explicitly in the verse, “for [I have made you] the father of a multitude of nations,” etc., in the manner of the level of “the souls they had made in Charan,” the level of elevations from the opposing side (zeh le’umas zeh), etc.
The answer: Abraham’s hei was for what the verse states explicitly, that he would be ‘the father of a multitude of nations’, like ‘the souls they had made in Charan’, which our tradition understands as the people Abraham and Sarah drew to the service of G‑d. That is elevation from the side opposed to holiness, which requires expansion outward.
אבל להולדת יצחק8 סט׳ [סטרא] דקדושה לא היה צריך כי אדרבה כל סטרא דקדושה בחי׳ ביטול ולא התפשטות כו׳
But for the birth of Isaac, [who is of] the side of holiness, it was not needed; for on the contrary, the whole side of holiness is the level of self-nullification (bittul) and not of spreading forth, etc.
For the birth of Isaac, who belongs wholly to the side of holiness, Abraham did not need the hei, because holiness is by nature self-nullification (bittul), not spreading forth. So at Abraham’s level the birth of a holy child still comes through the contraction of the yud.
משא״כ לשרה נתוסף הה׳ ללידת יצחק כו׳ (וע׳ לקמן פ׳ חיי שרה בד״ה יגלה לן טעמי) :
Whereas to Sarah the hei was added for the birth of Isaac, etc. (And see below, in Parshas Chayei Sarah, in the maamar beginning “Yegaleh lan ta’amei.”)
Sarah, however, being the lower Chochmah, did need the hei for Isaac’s birth, since at her level new existence comes through expansion. The text refers the reader to a maamar in Parshas Chayei Sarah, ‘Yegaleh lan ta’amei’, for more on this.
The paragraph resolves the question: at the higher level (Abraham, the higher Chochmah) new existence comes through contraction, the yud; at the lower level (Sarah, the lower Chochmah) it comes through expansion, the hei. Abraham’s added hei served only his role as father of many nations, not the birth of Isaac, whereas Sarah needed the hei for Isaac himself.
The Kehot notes record that other treatments disagree on one point: the Mitteler Rebbe’s Biurei HaZohar explains that the hei added to Abraham was for Isaac’s birth, and the Tzemach Tzedek in Or HaTorah calls the reading in this maamar strained, suggesting instead that Abram needed the hei so that the soul would be drawn down into Beriah, Yetzirah and Asiyah, since a birth in Atzilus alone was not enough. Likkutei Torah (Beshalach) adds that this tzimtzum is not total concealment but like a teacher condensing a lesson for a student.
Marei mekomos
- 1והנה למעלה כך הוא המדה · מובא בלקו״ת פ׳ כי תצא לז, ג.
- 2שו״ה ההולדה — הוא ע״י צמצום דוקא · ראה בלקו״ת בשלח א, א: ”ואין זה הצמצום העלם והסתר גמור, אלא ע״ד לעולם ישנה אדם לתלמידו בדרך קצרה” ע״ש. וראה באוה״ת בראשית כרך ד תשכג, ב.
- 3וכנודע בענין ג׳ קוצין של יו״ד · ראה לעיל יא, ב. ובמ״מ לשם.
- 4אברם אינו מוליד · Bereshit Rabbah 44:12
- 5אברם אינו מוליד · Zohar, Lech Lecha 31:342–32:354
- 6כי אב המון גוים · Genesis 17:5
- 7הנפש אשר עשו בחרן · Genesis 12:5
- 8להולדת יצחק . . לא הי׳ צריך · ראה ביאורי הזהר לכ״ק אדמו״ר האמצעי יג, ב דשם מבואר שהוספת הה׳ הי׳ בשביל לידת יצחק. באוה״ת בראשית כרך ד תשכד, א: ”ומ״ש אברם אינו מוליד היינו להיות אב המון גוים אבל לא בשביל יצחק זה דחוק, וההכרח שהביא לפרש כן היינו משום דהא באצי׳ הגילוי ע״י יו״ד, נ״ל דיש ליישב ולומר דהא אברם הוצרך להוולד שיומשך הנשמה בעשי׳ ולא די בלידה דאצי׳ א״כ לצורך הלידה בבי״ע צ״ל ה׳” ע״ש. ראה גם בספר הערכים-חב״ד ח״א ערך אברהם בהערה 116-7. ראה בסה״מ תרכ״ז ע׳ ש.
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
Questions for discussion
- Why does the Alter Rebbe call Chochmah ayin (‘nothing’), and why should ‘nothing’ be the source of new existence?
- According to the maamar, why can nothing finite come into being unless the Infinite Light is contracted?
- Why would contraction at Sarah’s level lead to darkness and concealment rather than to birth?
- What did Abraham’s added hei accomplish, and why was it not needed for the birth of Isaac?
- How do the three tips of the yud illustrate that the lower level depends on the higher?
Key terms in this maamar
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×5
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×3
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d.
- Tzimtzum (contraction)צמצום
- The self-concealment of the Infinite Light that makes room for finite worlds. ×1
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence. ×1
- The chain of descending worlds (hishtalshelus)השתלשלות
- The step-by-step descent of divine light from the highest level down to this world. ×1
- Self-nullification (bittul)ביטול
- Setting aside one's own sense of self before G‑d. ×1