Likkutei Torah · Parshas Bamidbar · Maamar 13
ביאור על הדרוש וספרתם לכם דחג השבועות
An explanation of the discourse “And you shall count for yourselves” of the Festival of Shavuos
Biur · an explanation of maamar 12Kept on this device only. Sign in to save it on every device
The big idea
Barley, “a measure of five,” is the measured Divine flow that sustains the angels and is drawn down through the Omer offering, while the wheat of Shavuos reveals a hidden Daas above comprehension, G‑d’s own Anochi. The forty-nine days of the count bridge the two through the fiftieth gate of Binah: we draw down its lower aspect day by day, and its upper aspect, the Emanator’s own level, then reveals itself on Shavuos as a gift.
The maamar in brief
This Biur expands a discourse on counting the Omer. Barley (se’orah) is read as shiur hei, “a measure of five”: the food of the angels, emissaries through whom G‑d’s light speaks, whose camps of lion, ox and eagle issue from four of the five articulations of the mouth; the fifth, the palate, is Chochmah, which sweetens their severities. Their sustenance is drawn through Israel’s waving of the barley Omer, which raises Malchus to her source. Wheat, harvested at Shavuos, comes from the Daas of Tohu: like a child who calls “Abba” without understanding, it reveals a knowledge above comprehension, the Anochi of Sinai. The fifty gates of Binah are united in their source in Arich Anpin, and the count draws the light of Keser, the illumination of G‑d’s face, little by little; that light now depends on joyful service. An addition asks whether the count draws the fiftieth gate. Through the Maggid’s reading of Moshe’s hidden grave, the fiftieth gate is a bridge between ayin and yesh with two aspects: we draw its lower aspect, “your holiness,” and its upper aspect, “My holiness,” is revealed of itself on Shavuos.
Outline
- Barley, a measure of five: the angels and their campsAngels are emissaries in whom G‑d’s light speaks, formed from letter-combinations of Malchus of Atzilus, and as varied as the endless inter-inclusion of the Sefiros. Michael’s camp is Chesed, the lion; Gavriel’s is awe and Gevurah, the ox, from whose “sweat” the River of Fire flows; the eagle is compassion, which lifted Israel from Egypt to Sinai. Four camps come from four articulations of the mouth, and the fifth, the palate, is Chochmah, which makes peace among them.¶1–6
- The five articulations and the waving of the OmerThe palatal letters sweeten the severities. Letters draw the soul, or the Divine, outward at levels from action up to will, of which only five are revealed below: inwardly in souls, outwardly in angels. The waving of the barley Omer raises Malchus to her source and so draws down the angels’ measured sustenance.¶7–8
- Wheat: the hidden Daas above comprehensionThe wheat of Shavuos reveals the concealed level above Daas, Anochi, known as a child knows his father. Bread nourishes through the Divine word in it; man is from the World of Tikkun, but wheat is the Daas of Tohu that fell into nogah. The Exodus is the revelation of the concealed, a going out from Egypt, the narrow throat between mind and heart.¶9–13
- The fifty gates in their source and the light of G‑d’s faceIn Arich Anpin the fifty gates are united as the 370 lights, “a great reckoning,” and are drawn to Malchus as the illumination of the face from Keser. Hence the twenty-four books of Shavuos night, the leavened loaves, and the count that grows day by day toward the fiftieth gate. This illumination now depends on service with joy; today the angels carry the Omer and prayer upward, but in the Time to Come Israel will stand above them.¶14–18
- An addition: does the count draw the fiftieth gate?Two readings of “count fifty days” are weighed: that the count itself draws the fiftieth gate, or that we draw only the forty-nine and the fiftieth comes of itself. The Ramaz, the Zohar, the Pardes and Pri Etz Chaim are brought; they suggest an illumination of the fiftieth gate during the count, and the question is left open.¶19–20
- Moshe’s grave and the two aspects of the fiftieth gateThe Maggid’s explanation of Moshe’s hidden grave shows the fiftieth gate as the bridge between ayin and yesh. Like Keser it has two aspects: a lower one, which includes the forty-nine gates and which the count draws down (“your holiness”), and an upper one, the Emanator’s own level, revealed of itself on Shavuos as a gift (“My holiness”). The section ends with a question: how can it be both the Supreme Keser and a gate of Binah?¶21–29
- Keser and Binah; from barley to wheatThe Ramaz, Emek HaMelech, the Arizal and the Tikkunim answer the question. The count from barley, rooted in Binah, to wheat, which is Chochmah, passes through the fiftieth gate, and the forty-nine words and letters of Psalm 67 allude to the gates drawn down.¶30
Key concepts
- Shiur hei, “a measure of five”שעורה שעור ה׳
- Barley read as a measure drawn from the five articulations of the mouth: a measured, limited flow of Divine speech, the food of the angels and the soul’s comprehension “each according to his measure,” rooted in Binah.
- The five articulations of the mouthה׳ מוצאות הפה
- The five places where the letters are formed. Four give rise to the four camps of angels; the fifth, the palatal letters gimmel, yud, kaf, kuf, is Chochmah, which sweetens their severities.
- The hidden Daas (the Daas of Tohu)הדעת הנעלם / דעת דתהו
- A knowledge above comprehension, like a child’s bond with his father; drawn down through the wheat of Shavuos, whose root is in the Daas of Tohu, and revealed as the Anochi of Sinai.
- The fiftieth gateשער החמשים
- The level that unites the forty-nine gates of Binah with their source. It is the bridge between Chochmah (ayin) and Binah (yesh), and it is also called the Supreme Keser.
- Ayin and yeshאין ויש
- Chochmah is ayin, “nothing,” beyond definition; Binah is yesh, “something,” grasped and defined. The fiftieth gate stands between them, so it looks lower from above and higher from below.
- The two aspects of Keserבחי׳ תחתונה שבמאציל / שרש הנאצלים
- As intermediary, Keser includes the lowest level of the Emanator and the root of all the emanated. Our service draws down the second; the first comes only as a gift from above.
- The illumination of the faceהארת פנים
- The light of Keser revealed through the vessel without being blocked: a gentle radiance of the inner dimension, which now depends on an arousal from below, above all on service with joy.
Barley, a measure of five: the angels and their camps ¶1–6
An explanation of the discourse “And you shall count for yourselves” of the Festival of Shavuos.
This heading introduces a Biur, a further explanation, written on an earlier discourse about the verse “And you shall count for yourselves,” the commandment to count the Omer for seven weeks from Pesach until Shavuos. The Biur develops several themes of that discourse: barley and wheat, the forty-nine days of the count, and the fiftieth gate revealed on Shavuos.
The title: an explanation that expands on a discourse for Shavuos on counting the Omer.
Marei mekomos
- 1וספרתם לכם · Leviticus 23:15
2ביאור ענין שעורה שעור ה׳. הנה כתיב אחרי ה׳ ילכו כאריה1 כו׳ שור גועה כו׳ [דהיינו כמו בחי׳ פני אריה שבמרכבה ששואג ואומר קדוש.
An explanation of the matter of se’orah (barley) [as] shiur hei (a measure of five). Now, it is written, “They shall walk after Havayah; like a lion,” etc., “an ox lowing,” etc. [That is, like the level of the face of the lion in the Chariot, which roars and says “Holy.”
The Hebrew word for barley, se’orah, can be read as two words, shiur hei, “a measure of five”; this Biur sets out to explain what that means. It begins with the angels: Hosea’s image of the lion is linked to the face of the lion in the Divine Chariot (Merkavah), whose “roar” is the angels’ song of “Holy.”
ושור גועה היינו בחי׳ פני שור שבמרכבה שעבודתו ביראה בחי׳ מחנה גבריאל ופני ארי׳ הוא בחי׳ אהבה].
And “an ox lowing” is the level of the face of the ox in the Chariot, whose service is in awe, the level of the camp of Gavriel; and the face of the lion is the level of love.]
The “lowing ox” is the face of the ox in the Chariot. Its service is awe, and it belongs to the camp of the angel Gavriel, while the lion stands for love. The two animals thus correspond to the two basic modes of serving G‑d, love and awe.
The Biur states its theme, barley as “a measure of five,” and begins with the angels of the Chariot: the lion of love and the ox of awe.
Marei mekomos
- 1
3והענין כי הנה המלאכים הם שלוחים [כי מלאך נק׳ שליח כנודע] כמ״ש ותקרא שם12 ה׳ הדובר אליה וכן שוב אשוב אליך.34
And the matter is this: the angels are emissaries [for an angel (malach) is called an emissary, as is known], as it is written, “And she called the name of Havayah who spoke to her,” and likewise, “I will surely return to you.”
Before explaining how the angels are nourished, the Alter Rebbe defines an angel: an emissary, which is what the Hebrew word malach means. Two verses show an angel spoken of, or speaking, as G‑d Himself: Hagar called the angel who spoke to her by G‑d’s Name, and the angel who came to Avraham said, “I will surely return to you.”
כי הוא אור א״ס בעצמו המשתלשל ויורד לכל א׳ לפי מדרגתו מיכאל בחסד כו׳ ויש מיכאל דעשיה כו׳.
For it is the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof) itself, which unfolds downward and descends to each one according to his rank: Michael in Chesed (kindness), etc.; and there is a Michael of the World of Asiyah (Action), etc.
The reason is that what acts and speaks through an angel is the Infinite Light itself, descending and taking on the measure of each angel’s level. Thus Michael is the angel of Chesed, and there is a Michael on every level, down to the World of Asiyah.
[דהיינו כי המלאך הוא כלי אל האור המתפשט בו מאלקות וכיון שהוא עצמו רק כלי ובטל לגבי האור והאור הוא העיקר לכך יוכל לומר על עצמו לשון אלהות
[That is: the angel is a vessel for the light from G‑dliness that spreads into him; and since he himself is only a vessel, and is nullified in relation to the light, and the light is the main thing, he can therefore speak of himself in the language of G‑dliness,
The bracketed gloss explains why an angel may speak in G‑d’s own words. The angel is only a vessel for the G‑dly light within it and is wholly nullified before that light; since the light is what truly matters, the angel’s words are really the light’s words.
כי הן אומרים כן ע״י האור המתלבש בהם שהוא אלהות (כמ״ש בפרדס שכ״ד פי״א).5 והאור היינו מבחי׳ צירופי אותיות דמדת מל׳ דאצילות.
for they say so by means of the light that is enclothed in them, which is G‑dliness (as is written in the Pardes, Shaar 24, chapter 11). And the light is from the level of the combinations of letters of the attribute of Malchus (sovereignty) of the World of Atzilus (Emanation).
The gloss cites the Pardes (Pardes Rimonim) for this. It then identifies the light within the angels: it comes from combinations of the letters of Malchus of Atzilus, the Divine “speech” that brings created beings into existence.
כמו מיכאל נתהוה מצירופי אותיות דמדת החסד שבמל׳ דאצי׳ וגבריאל מצירופי אותיות דבחי׳ גבורה שבמל׳]. ופרטי פרטיות בע״ס חסד שבחסד חסד שבגבורה כו׳.
For example, Michael came into being from the combinations of letters of the attribute of Chesed within Malchus of Atzilus, and Gavriel from the combinations of letters of the level of Gevurah (restraint) within Malchus.] And [there are] the finest particulars within the Ten Sefiros: Chesed within Chesed, Chesed within Gevurah, etc.
Each angel is formed from the letters of a particular attribute within that Malchus: Michael from its Chesed, Gavriel from its Gevurah. And the Sefiros divide into ever finer particulars, such as Chesed within Chesed and Chesed within Gevurah, which prepares the next paragraph’s explanation of why the angels are so many and so varied.
Angels are emissaries through whom G‑d’s own light speaks; each is formed from letter-combinations of one attribute of Malchus of Atzilus, and those attributes subdivide into finer and finer particulars.
The cited chapter of the Pardes compares the angels to a body, saying that “the light that flows upon them is the essential thing,” and draws from this that the soul is superior to the angel, since the soul of a tzaddik is the very light that spreads within the angel.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי מלאך נק׳ שליח . . ותקרא שם ה׳ · להעיר מאגה״ק סי׳ כה. קו״א לתניא ד״ה להבין מ״ש בפע״ח.
- 2ותקרא שם ה׳ הדובר אלי׳ · Genesis 16:13
- 3שוב אשוב אליך · שם יח, י.
- 4שוב אשוב אליך · Genesis 18:10
- 5ע״י האור המתלבש בהם שהוא אלהות (כמ״ש בפרדס שכ״ד פי״א) · Pardes Rimmonim 24:15–16
4וכל יו״ד כלול מיו״ד חסד שבחסד דחסד חסד שבחסד דת״ת כו׳ [וכערך שינוי מזיגת הספי׳ כן ערך שינוי המלאכים המתהוים מהם] וכמ״ש היש מספר לגדודיו1
And each of the ten is comprised of ten: Chesed within Chesed of Chesed, Chesed within Chesed of Tiferes (beauty), etc. [and as is the measure of difference in the blending of the Sefiros, so is the measure of difference among the angels that come into being from them]; and as it is written, “Is there any number to His legions?”
Each of the ten Sefiros contains all ten, and each of those again contains ten, giving combinations such as “Chesed within Chesed of Chesed.” Every different blend of the Sefiros produces a different kind of angel, which is why the verse asks, “Is there any number to His legions?”
ורבוא רבבות מלאכים מחנה מיכאל2 כלולים מחסד בכמה מיני בחי׳ ומדרגות שונות [ר״ל חסד שבחסד שבחסד או חסד שבגבורה שבחסד וכפי הספי׳ שמקבל ממנה כך בחי׳ המלאך
And myriads of myriads of angels of the camp of Michael are comprised of Chesed in many kinds of aspects and differing levels [that is: Chesed within Chesed within Chesed, or Chesed within Gevurah within Chesed; and according to the Sefirah from which he receives, so is the level of the angel.
Even the camp of Michael alone holds myriads upon myriads of angels, all of Chesed, yet in different combinations, such as Chesed within Chesed within Chesed, or Chesed within Gevurah within Chesed. Each angel’s character follows the particular combination from which it receives its life.
לכן יש כמה רבוא מלאכים במחנה מיכאל לבד אף שכולם מבחי׳ א׳ הוא חסד רק שיש כמה מיני בחי׳ בחסד כנ״ל ועיין מ״ש ר״פ שלח
Therefore there are many myriads of angels in the camp of Michael alone, even though they are all from one level, namely Chesed; only, there are many kinds of aspects within Chesed, as mentioned above. And see what is written at the beginning of Parshas Shelach,
So the enormous number of angels in Michael’s camp does not contradict their all belonging to one attribute: Chesed itself has many shades. The reader is referred to a discourse at the beginning of Parshas Shelach on the episode of the spies.
בד״ה ענין המרגלים] והגם שכלולים מכל הע״ס מ״מ נק׳ בכלל מחנה מיכאל בחי׳ חסד כי התגברות החסד הוא מאד בהם והחסד מתפשט בהם.
in the discourse beginning “The matter of the spies.”] And even though they are comprised of all the Ten Sefiros, they are nevertheless called, in general, the camp of Michael, the level of Chesed, for the predominance of Chesed in them is very great, and Chesed spreads through them.
Every angel contains all ten Sefiros, yet the whole camp is called Michael’s, the camp of Chesed. A camp is named for the attribute that dominates in it and spreads through all its members.
Because the Sefiros contain one another without end, the angels come in countless varieties; each camp is named for the attribute that dominates it, as Michael’s camp is for Chesed.
Marei mekomos
- 1היש מספר לגדודיו · Job 25:3
- 2ורבוא רבבות מלאכים מחנה מיכאל · Chagigah 13b:12
And likewise the camp of Gavriel is, in general, the attribute of awe. And from the sweat of the Chayos issues the River of Fire (Nehar Dinur); “it shall whirl upon the head of the wicked.”
Gavriel’s camp, in general, is the attribute of awe. The Sages teach that the River of Fire issues from the sweat of the Chayos, the holy beings of the Chariot, and pours down “upon the head of the wicked.”
פי׳ זיעתן4 הוא בחי׳ פסולת היוצא מהאש שהוא ממדת הגבורה שבמלאכים אלו. וכמו הזיעה היא יוצאת מכח החמימות שדוחה את הזיעה לחוץ.
The meaning: their sweat is the level of the waste that issues from the fire, which is from the attribute of Gevurah (restraint) in these angels. And just as sweat comes out by force of the heat, which pushes the sweat outward,
That “sweat” is a waste product of the angels’ fire, the Gevurah within them. Just as bodily heat pushes sweat out of the body, the angels’ fervor produces something that is expelled from them.
כך החמימות של המלאכים למעלה שעומדים ביראה ורתת כו׳ ולמטה נעשה זיעה שהוא ענין ארס החום והכעס על ההיפך
so the warmth of the angels above, who stand in awe and trembling, etc., becomes sweat below, which is the matter of the venom of the heat and the anger at what is contrary,
Above, the angels’ heat is their awe and trembling before G‑d. As it descends it becomes “sweat”: a fierce, venomous anger against whatever is contrary to G‑d’s will.
ועל ראש רשעים כי מאחר שמשיגים בגדולת א״ס ב״ה נעשה הרוגז על עוברי רצונו איך מלאו לבם כו׳.5
and “upon the head of the wicked”: for since they apprehend the greatness of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, wrath arises against those who transgress His will: how did their hearts embolden them, etc.
This is why the River of Fire falls “upon the head of the wicked.” Because the angels grasp the greatness of the Infinite One, they are filled with wrath at those who transgress His will, astonished that anyone could dare to do so.
Gavriel’s camp, rooted in awe and Gevurah, gives rise to the River of Fire: the angels’ awe, as it descends, becomes anger against those who defy G‑d’s will.
Marei mekomos
- 1ומזיעתן של חיות · Chagigah 13b:14
- 2
- 3על ראש רשעים יחול · Jeremiah 23:19
- 4פי׳ זיעתן · ראה לקמן שלח מא, א.
- 5לבם כו׳ · בביאור הנ״ל כאן קיצור משנ״ת. [כ].
6וזהו ענין שעורה שעור ה׳ [שהוא מזון המלאכים הנק׳ בהמה אריה ושור כו׳] ששיעור ומדה נקצב להם מבחי׳ ה׳
And this is the matter of se’orah (barley) [as] shiur hei (a measure of five) [which is the food of the angels, who are called “beast”: lion and ox, etc.]: that a measure and limit is apportioned to them from the level of five,
The opening theme returns. Barley, the food of the angels, who are called “beasts” after the lion and ox of the Chariot, is “a measure of five”: the angels’ sustenance is measured and limited, and it flows from a source that is five.
היינו ה׳ מוצאות הפה ונתחלק לד׳ מחנות מחנה מיכאל פני אריה ומחנה גבריאל פני שור ובחי׳ פני נשר הוא רחמנות כו׳
namely, the five articulations of the mouth; and it is divided into four camps: the camp of Michael, the face of the lion; and the camp of Gavriel, the face of the ox; and the level of the face of the eagle is compassion, etc.
The five are the five articulations of the mouth, the five places where the Hebrew letters are formed. From them come the four camps of angels: Michael’s, the face of the lion; Gavriel’s, the face of the ox; and the face of the eagle, which is compassion.
והנה למטה באדם הרחמנות הוא שמעורר רחמים רבים על ריחוקו מה׳ ונופל במ״ש על ריחוקו וכמ״ש בכל עצב1 יהיה מותר.
Now, below, in man, compassion is that he arouses great compassion over his distance from G‑d, and falls into melancholy over his distance; and as it is written, “In all sadness there shall be profit.”
In a human being, compassion is felt over his own distance from G‑d: he arouses great pity on himself and even falls into melancholy over that distance. Of such sadness it is said that it brings profit.
אך למעלה לא שייך לומר כן רק מ״מ הרחמנות ג״כ מגדולת2 א״ס ב״ה ואין ערוך נברא לגבי הבורא ית׳
But above, this cannot be said; only, nevertheless, the compassion too comes from the greatness of the Infinite One (Ein Sof), blessed be He, and [from the fact] that a created being has no comparison whatever to the Creator, may He be blessed;
The angels have no such distance to mourn. Their compassion comes instead from grasping the greatness of the Infinite One, before whom no created being bears any comparison.
לכן גדלה הרחמנות על כל העולמות (ועמ״ש בפ׳ במדבר סד״ה וידבר כו׳ למשפחותם לבית אבותם ובפ׳ ויצא בד״ה וישכם לבן בבקר).
therefore the compassion over all the worlds grows great (and see what is written in Parshas Bamidbar, at the end of the discourse beginning “And He spoke,” etc., “by their families, by their fathers’ house,” and in Parshas Vayetzei, in the discourse beginning “And Lavan rose early in the morning”).
Therefore their compassion extends over all the worlds, since every created world is as nothing beside the Creator. The Alter Rebbe refers to two other discourses, in Parshas Bamidbar and Parshas Vayetzei, for more on this.
וזהו ואשא אתכם על כנפי נשרים3 שלהיות ישראל היו באותו זמן במצרים בחומר ובלבנים.4 וכדי לזכות למ״ת פב״פ דבר5 ה׳ הוא ע״י כנפי נשרים שמגביה למעלה.
And this is [the meaning of] “And I bore you on eagles’ wings”: for since Israel were at that time in Egypt, in mortar and in bricks, and in order to merit the Giving of the Torah, “face to face Havayah spoke,” it was through eagles’ wings, which lift upward.
This explains “I bore you on eagles’ wings”: Israel was sunk in the mortar and bricks of Egyptian slavery, and to rise to the face-to-face revelation at Sinai they needed the eagle, compassion, which lifts upward.
לכן כל הד׳ מחנות הם מד׳ מוצאות הפה. אך מוצא הה׳ הוא בחי׳ גיכ״ק בחיך וכולם בחכמה אתברירו6 הוא העושה שלום כו׳.7
Therefore all four camps are from four articulations of the mouth. But the fifth articulation is the level of [the letters] gimmel, yud, kaf, kuf in the palate, and “all of them are refined through Chochmah (wisdom)”; it is this that “makes peace,” etc.
So all four camps come from four of the five articulations. The fifth, the palatal letters gimmel, yud, kaf and kuf, belongs to Chochmah, through which all things are refined; it makes peace among the others, and the next paragraph explains that it sweetens their severities.
Barley is “a measure of five” because the angels’ measured sustenance flows from the five articulations of the mouth: four form the four camps of angels, including the eagle of compassion that lifted Israel from Egypt, and the fifth, linked with Chochmah, refines them and makes peace among them.
In the passage of Vayikra to which the notes point, “refined through Chochmah” is illustrated by sorting food from waste and by rennet that curdles milk into cheese: the refiner’s own nature is not present in what it refines, yet it brings about the separation of good from bad.
Marei mekomos
- 1בכל עצב יהי׳ מותר · Proverbs 14:23
- 2הרחמנות ג״כ מגדולת · [הרחמנות] על הריחוק כ״כ מגדולת כצ״ל. [כ].
- 3ואשא אתכם על כנפי נשרים · Exodus 19:4
- 4בחומר ובלבנים · Exodus 1:14
- 5פב״פ דבר ה׳ · Deuteronomy 5:4
- 6בחכמה אתברירו · Zohar II, 254b
- 7שלום כו׳ · בהביאור יש כאן תוס׳ [כ]. [ראה גם אוה״ת שבועות ע׳ ריב].
The five articulations and the waving of the Omer ¶7–8
And this is [the meaning of] “His palate is sweetness,” for there is the revelation of the sweetness; as in the physical, “the palate tastes food,” and tastes are in Chochmah (wisdom), etc.
The fifth articulation, the palate, is linked with the verse “His palate is sweetness”: the palate is where sweetness is revealed. Physically the palate tastes food, and in the soul, taste (ta’am, which also means “reason”) belongs to Chochmah.
ואותיות גיכ״ק הם ממתיקים את הגבורות של הד׳ מוצאות3 [וע׳ בזהר פ׳ שמיני דף ל״ט ע״ב4 ועמ״ש בפ׳ ויחי ע״פ חכלילי עינים5 כו׳
And the letters gimmel, yud, kaf, kuf sweeten the Gevuros of the four articulations [and see the Zohar, Parshas Shemini, folio 39b; and see what is written in Parshas Vayechi on the verse “Chachlili (red) are the eyes,” etc.,
The palatal letters gimmel, yud, kaf and kuf “sweeten” the Gevuros, the severities, of the other four articulations, as the previous paragraph said the fifth “makes peace.” A bracketed gloss begins a list of places that discuss the palate, Chochmah and this sweetening: the Zohar on Shemini, and a discourse in Parshas Vayechi on the verse “Chachlili are the eyes.”
בפי׳ כל חיך הטועם כו׳ וע׳ בפע״ח בשער השופר פרק6 א׳ בענין גיכ״ק מהחיך שהוא החכמה כו׳
on the interpretation “every palate that tastes,” etc.; and see Pri Etz Chaim, Shaar HaShofar, chapter 1, concerning [the letters] gimmel, yud, kaf, kuf, [which are] from the palate, which is Chochmah, etc.;
That discourse explains the word chachlili as “every palate (chech) that tastes.” Pri Etz Chaim, in its gate on the shofar, likewise speaks of the palatal letters as coming from the palate, which is Chochmah.
ע״ש ובהרמ״ז ר״פ אחרי ובזהר ס״פ משפטים דקכ״ג א׳ ובאדר״ז דרצ״ה ב׳] והנה ביאור ענין ה׳ מוצאות הפה.
see there; and in the Ramaz at the beginning of Parshas Acharei; and in the Zohar at the end of Parshas Mishpatim, folio 123a; and in the Idra Zuta, folio 295b.] Now, the explanation of the matter of the five articulations of the mouth:
The list closes with the Ramaz on Parshas Acharei, a passage of the Zohar at the end of Mishpatim, and the Idra Zuta. The Biur then turns to explain what the five articulations of the mouth are.
הענין שאותיות הם המשכות כו׳ כמו ויפח באפיו7 נשמת חיים שמהבל עליון נעשה ונתהווה למטה שכל דהיינו נשמת אדה״ר כו׳.
The matter is that letters are a drawing forth, etc.; as in “And He blew into his nostrils the breath of life”: from the supernal breath (hevel) there was made and came into being, below, an intellect, namely the soul of Adam, the first man, etc.
Letters are a “drawing forth”: they carry what is within outward. The model is the creation of Adam: G‑d blew the breath of life into him, and from that supernal breath came Adam’s soul, an intellect.
כי ענין ופי׳ הבל ר״ל התפשטות חיות הנפש כמו התפשטות הכח שביד לעשות כל מלאכה שהרי כשישן אינו יכול לעשות מאומה כו׳.
For the matter and meaning of hevel (breath): it means the spreading forth of the soul’s life-force, like the spreading forth of the power in the hand to do any work; for when one is asleep he cannot do anything, etc.
Here “breath” means the soul’s life-force extending outward, like the power that flows into the hand so it can work. When a person sleeps that power is withdrawn, and he can do nothing.
ובחי׳ זו הוא התפשטות חיצוניות הנפש דהיינו בחי׳ כח העשיה ועד״ז נאמר למעלה ג״כ עשה את השמים ואת הארץ8
And this level is the spreading forth of the outer dimension (chitzoniyus) of the soul, namely the level of the power of action. And along these lines it is also said above, “made the heavens and the earth,”
This extension is the soul’s outermost dimension, the power of action. Likewise above, the verse speaks of G‑d having “made” the heavens and the earth, using the word for action.
שהוא התפשטות חיצוניות בעולם העשיה (וע׳ מזה בד״ה בחדש השלישי בפ׳ יתרו בענין על כל שבח מעשה ידיך)
which is the spreading forth of the outer dimension into the World of Asiyah (Action) (and see about this in the discourse beginning “In the third month,” in Parshas Yisro, concerning “for all the praise of the work of Your hands”).
To “make” is the extension of the outer dimension into the World of Asiyah, the World of Action. The Alter Rebbe refers to a discourse in Parshas Yisro for more on this.
אבל וברוח פיו כל צבאם9 שהם מבחי׳ התפשטות חיות ההבל שהוא יותר פנימי כו׳ ויש בחי׳ התפשטות המחשבה ולמעלה מהם מדות ולמעלה מהם הרצון וכעד״ז כל הע״ס
But “and by the breath of His mouth all their host” are from the level of the spreading forth of the life-force of the breath, which is more inward, etc. And there is the level of the spreading forth of thought, and above them the emotive attributes (middos), and above them the will; and similarly all the Ten Sefiros,
By contrast, “by the breath of His mouth all their host” describes a more inward extension, that of the life-giving breath. Beyond it are extensions of thought, of the emotive attributes and of will, and in the same way of all the Ten Sefiros.
רק שאינם מתגלים למטה רק ה׳ בחי׳ כמ״ש בע״ח. ואותיות מלשון אתא בוקר10 ויאמר אלקים11 יהי אור המשכת החסד כו׳.
only that they are not revealed below except as five levels, as is written in Etz Chaim. And otiyos (letters) is from the term “morning comes (asa)”; “And G‑d said, ‘Let there be light’”: the drawing down of Chesed (kindness), etc.
Yet below only five such levels are revealed, which correspond to the five articulations, as Etz Chaim teaches. The word for letters, otiyos, is related to asa, “comes,” for letters bring the light forth, as “Let there be light” drew forth Chesed.
שהכל המשכת אור א״ס ב״ה בנשמות בבחי׳ פנימי׳ ונהר יוצא מעדן12 להשקות את הגן.13 ובמלאכים בבחי׳ חיצונית שבכל14 עולם שומרי הגן כו׳.
For all is the drawing down of the Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof), blessed be He: in souls, in the manner of the inner dimension (pnimiyus), “and a river goes forth from Eden to water the garden”; and in angels, in the manner of the outer dimension of each world, the keepers of the garden, etc.
All of this is the Infinite Light drawn downward. In souls it comes in an inward way, like the river that flows from Eden to water the garden; in angels it comes as the outer dimension of each world, for the angels are “the keepers of the garden.”
The fifth articulation, the palate, is Chochmah, which sweetens the severities of the other four. The Biur then explains that letters draw the soul, or the Divine, outward at levels from action up to will, of which only five are revealed below: inwardly in souls, outwardly in angels.
In its gate on the shofar, Pri Etz Chaim speaks of gichak as the palate next to the throat, which is Chochmah, joining with Imma, the throat of the guttural letters; the intention in sounding the shofar through them is to subdue the severities.
Marei mekomos
- 1חכו ממתקים · Song of Songs 5:16
- 2חיך אוכל יטעם · Job 12:11
- 3של — מוצאות · כאן יש תוס׳ שם. [כ]. [ראה גם אוה״ת שבועות ע׳ ריב].
- 4בזהר פ׳ שמיני דף ל״ט ע״ב · באוה״ת שבועות ע׳ ריב יש כאן הג״ה. וראה בביאה״ז להצ״צ כרך-א ע׳ שיט.
- 5חכלילי עינים · Genesis 49:12
- 6וע׳ בפע״ח בשער השופר פרק א׳ בענין גיכ״ק מהחיך שהוא החכמה · Pri Etz Chaim, Gate of the Shofer 1:20
- 7ויפח באפיו · Genesis 2:7
- 8עשה את השמים ואת הארץ · Exodus 20:11
- 9וברוח פיו כל צבאם · Psalms 33:6
- 10אתא בוקר · Isaiah 21:12
- 11ויאמר אלקים יהי אור · Genesis 1:3
- 12ונהר יוצא מעדן · שם ב, י.
- 13ונהר יוצא מעדן להשקות את הגן · Genesis 2:10
- 14שבכל — כו׳ · שם יש כאן קיצור משנ״ת. [כ].
8והנה השפעת המלאכים שעור ה׳ הוא ע״י ישראל במנחת העומר שמניף הכהן כו׳ ונק׳ עומר התנופה1 ופי׳ בזהר בלק קפ״ח ב׳ תנו פה תנו כבוד2 כו׳ עליית הנוק׳ למקורה ושרשה ומשם יורד ההשפעה כו׳:
Now, the flow of influence to the angels, the “measure of five,” comes through Israel, by the meal offering of the Omer, which the kohen waves, etc.; and it is called “the Omer of the waving” (tenufah), which the Zohar, Balak, 188b, explains as tenu peh, “give a mouth,” “give honor,” etc.: the ascent of Nukva (the feminine) to her source and root, and from there the flow of influence descends, etc.
The angels’ “measure of five” is drawn down through Israel’s service: the Omer offering of barley, which the kohen waved. The Zohar reads tenufah, “waving,” as tenu peh, “give a mouth”: the waving raises Nukva, the feminine aspect (Malchus), to her source and root, and from there the flow of sustenance descends.
The barley Omer offering, waved by the kohen, raises Malchus to her source and so draws down the angels’ measured sustenance.
Marei mekomos
- 1עומר התנופה · Leviticus 23:15
- 2ופי׳ בזהר בלק קפ״ח ב׳ תנו פה תנו כבוד · Zohar, Balak 6:67–78
Wheat: the hidden Daas above comprehension ¶9–13
9ב אך בשבועות קציר חטים הוא המשכה וגילוי ההעלם שלמעלה מן הדעת. כי עה״ד חטה היתה שאין התינוק יודע כו׳ הרי ע״י החטה נמשך גילוי בחי׳ הדעת והוא גילוי ההעל׳ שלמעל׳ מן הדעת כו׳.
2. But on Shavuos, “the wheat harvest,” there is the drawing down and revelation of the concealed [level] that is above Daas (knowledge). For “the Tree of Knowledge was wheat,” [since] “a child does not know,” etc.; thus through wheat there is drawn down the revelation of the level of Daas, and it is the revelation of the concealed that is above Daas, etc.
The second section turns to Shavuos, the festival of the wheat harvest. Wheat draws down a revelation of the concealed level above Daas: the Sages say the Tree of Knowledge was wheat, since a child does not know to call his father until he has tasted grain; so wheat brings knowledge, and specifically the hidden knowledge above ordinary Daas.
דהיינו בחי׳ אנכי ה׳ אלקיך אנכי מי שאנכי1 דלית מחשבה תפיסא ביה בבחי׳ דעת נגלה ממש
That is, the level of “I am Havayah your G‑d”: Anochi (“I”), “who I am,” whom no thought can grasp, [drawn down] into the level of actually revealed Daas;
That hidden level is the Anochi, “I,” of “I am Havayah your G‑d,” explained as “who I am”: G‑d’s own self, which no thought can grasp. On Shavuos it is revealed as real knowledge, Daas.
רק ע״ד שהתינוק קורא אבא אע״פ שאינו משיג איך הוא אביו ובחי׳ גילוי זו הוא מבחי׳ אנכי מהו״ע ית׳ למעלה מעלה מן הגלוי דבחינת שעורה מזון המלאכים שהוא בחי׳ דבר ה׳ בחי׳ חיצוניות בלבד.2
only, in the way that a child calls out “Abba” (Father), even though he does not grasp how he is his father. And this level of revelation is from the level of Anochi, His very being and essence, may He be blessed, far, far above the revelation of the level of barley, the food of the angels, which is the level of the word of G‑d, the level of the outer dimension alone.
But it is known only the way a small child knows his father: he calls “Abba” without grasping what makes him his father. This revelation of G‑d’s very being is far above the “barley” of the angels, which is only the outer dimension, the word of G‑d.
Shavuos’s wheat, unlike barley, reveals the hidden level above Daas, G‑d’s essence as Anochi, known the way a child knows his father.
Marei mekomos
- 1אנכי מי שאנכי · ראה הנסמן במאמרי אדה״ז — פרשיות לע׳ רט.
- 2בחי׳ חיצוניות בלבד · יש כאן תוס׳ מרובה בהנ״ל. [כ]. [ראה אוה״ת שבועות ע׳ ריב].
10וביאור הדבר הנה כתיב כי לא על הלחם לבדו1 יחיה האדם כי על כל מוצא פי ה׳ וגו׳ פי׳ מוצא פי ה׳ שנשתלשל בלחם ממנו יחיה האדם.
The explanation of the matter: it is written, “For not by bread alone does man live, but by all that comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” etc. The meaning is: [by] what comes forth from the mouth of Havayah, which has descended into the bread, from that man lives.
To explain: the verse says that man lives not by bread alone but by “what comes forth from the mouth of Havayah.” What nourishes him is the Divine word that has descended into the bread.
והגם שבאדם ג״כ נשתלשל ונמשך מוצא פי ה׳ אלא שהאדם הוא מעולם התיקון מזיווג זו״נ כו׳ כמראה אבן ספיר דמות כסא ועל דמות הכסא2 דמות כמראה אדם הכל מעולם התיקון
And although in man, too, what comes forth from the mouth of Havayah has descended and been drawn down, man is from the World of Tikkun (Rectification), from the union of Z’eir Anpin (the emotive attributes) and Nukva, etc., “like the appearance of a sapphire stone, the likeness of a throne; and upon the likeness of the throne, a likeness like the appearance of a man”: all is from the World of Tikkun.
Man himself also comes from the Divine word, but he belongs to the World of Tikkun, the ordered world that issues from the union of Z’eir Anpin and Nukva. The prophet’s vision of “a likeness like the appearance of a man” upon the throne shows that the human form is a form of Tikkun.
But wheat is from what fell, in the breaking of the vessels, into nogah, “and a brightness (nogah) was around it”; and the level of nogah is from the World of Tohu (Chaos).
Wheat, however, comes from sparks that fell into nogah when the vessels shattered; the verse’s “brightness (nogah) around it” is read as that realm. Since nogah has its origin in the World of Tohu, wheat carries something of that earlier world.
Bread gives life through the Divine word within it; man is from the World of Tikkun, but wheat comes from sparks of Tohu that fell into nogah.
Marei mekomos
- 1כי לא על הלחם לבדו · Deuteronomy 8:3
- 2כמראה אבן . . ועל דמות הכסא · Ezekiel 1:26
- 3ונוגה לו סביב · שם א, ד.
- 4ונוגה לו סביב · Ezekiel 1:4
11וחטה הוא בלע שהוא הראשון לז׳ מלכין1 קדמאין דתהו בחי׳ הדעת דתהו אלא שירד למטה מפני שהוא מחיצוניות העולמות דתהו.
And wheat is Bela, who is the first of the seven primordial kings of Tohu, the level of the Daas of Tohu; only, it descended below because it is from the outer dimension of the worlds of Tohu.
Wheat corresponds to Bela, the first of the seven “primordial kings,” the kings of Edom listed in the Torah, who stand in Kabbalah for the World of Tohu; Bela is the Daas of Tohu. It fell low because it came from the outer dimension of those worlds.
אבל מ״מ כיון שהוא מעולם העליון נעשה חיות לאדם וירידתו למטה הוא כמארז״ל אין לך כל עשב מלמטה2 כו׳ [בב״ר פ׳ יו״ד] שההשפעה היא מלמעלה וגבוה מעל גבוה3 כו׳.
But nevertheless, since it is from the higher world, it becomes life-force for man. And its descent below is as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “There is no blade of grass below,” etc. [in Bereishis Rabbah, section 10]: that the influence comes from above, and “one higher than the high,” etc.
Yet because it comes from that higher world, it becomes life-force for man. Its descent is like the Sages’ teaching that every blade of grass below has a force above that strikes it and tells it to grow: the flow comes from above, through one level above another.
Wheat is the Daas of Tohu, fallen from the outer dimension of that higher world, which is why it can give man life and a higher kind of knowledge.
Marei mekomos
- 1בלע שהוא הראשון לז׳ מלכין · Genesis 36:32
- 2אין לך כל עשב מלמטה · Bereshit Rabbah 10:6
- 3וגבוה מעל גבוה · Ecclesiastes 5:7
12והנה התינוק שיודע לקרות אבא אין דעתו דעת הגלוי שהרי אינו יודע למה הוא אביו
Now, the child who knows how to call “Abba”: his Daas is not the Daas of revelation, for he does not know why he is his father;
A child who calls “Abba” does not have revealed knowledge: he cannot say why this man is his father.
אלא נעשה לו התקשרות לאביו בלי טעם ודעת והתקשרות זו היא חזקה מאד אך היינו גילוי ההעלם עצמו [פי׳ גילוי הדעת הנעלם שלמעלה מן הדעת המושג
rather, a bond to his father forms in him without reason or knowledge, and this bond is very strong; only, this is the revelation of the concealed itself [meaning: the revelation of the hidden Daas that is above the comprehended Daas,
Instead he has a bond with his father beyond reason, and that bond is very strong; it is a revelation of the concealed itself. The gloss explains that this is the hidden Daas, above the knowledge that is comprehended.
והיינו דעת דתהו שהוא למעלה מהדעת דתיקון שהוא דעת המושג ולפיכך נולד ע״י החטה ששרשה מדעת דתהו.
and this is the Daas of Tohu, which is above the Daas of Tikkun, which is the comprehended Daas; and therefore it is born through wheat, whose root is from the Daas of Tohu.
That hidden Daas is the Daas of Tohu, above the Daas of Tikkun, which is knowledge that is understood. This is why it comes through wheat, whose root is in the Daas of Tohu.
או י״ל דעת הנעלם היינו דעת העליון שהוא למעלה מדעת המושג שהוא דעת תחתון ועמ״ש מענין דעת עליון בביאור ע״פ כה תברכו12 וע״פ החלצו מאתכם3 ועמ״ש ע״פ ואלה המשפטים4 ועמ״ש ע״פ ששת ימים תאכל מצות5]6
Or it may be said that the hidden Daas is the higher Daas, which is above the comprehended Daas, which is the lower Daas. And see what is written about the matter of the higher Daas in the explanation on the verse “Thus shall you bless,” and on the verse “Arm from among yourselves”; and see what is written on the verse “And these are the ordinances”; and see what is written on the verse “Six days you shall eat matzos.”]
Alternatively, the hidden Daas is the “higher Daas,” above the “lower Daas” of comprehension. The gloss refers to several other discourses that discuss the higher Daas.
וגם בשעורה יש מוצא פי ה׳ שמחיה את האדם אלא שאינו משפיע בו גילוי ההעלם שהוא הדעת החזק שמעולם ההעלם כו׳.
And in barley, too, there is “what comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” which gives life to man; only, it does not impart to him the revelation of the concealed, which is the strong Daas that is from the world of concealment, etc.
Barley too holds the Divine word that gives man life, but it does not impart this revelation of the concealed, the strong Daas that comes from the world of concealment.
The child’s bond with his father illustrates the hidden Daas, whether the Daas of Tohu or the higher Daas, which wheat imparts and barley does not.
Marei mekomos
- 1בביאור ע״פ כה תברכו · לקמן פ׳ נשא כח, א.
- 2כה תברכו · Numbers 6:23
- 3החלצו מאתכם · Numbers 31:3
- 4ואלה המשפטים · Exodus 21:1
- 5
- 6ששת ימים תאכל מצות · Deuteronomy 16:8
13וגילוי ההעלם הוא אשר הוצאתיך מארץ מצרים למעלה מעלה מגדר ההשגה [כמ״ש בפנים] מצרים נק׳ בינה ובינה בגרון
And the revelation of the concealed is “who brought you out of the land of Egypt,” far, far above the bounds of comprehension [as is written within]. Egypt (Mitzrayim) is called Binah (understanding), and Binah is in the throat,
The revelation of the concealed is “who brought you out of the land of Egypt”: a going out far beyond the limits of comprehension. Mitzrayim, Egypt, is Binah as it is found in the throat.
שהוא מיצר12 המפסיק בין מוח ללב והוא הקול שמעורר הכוונה34 וכן פרעה במצרים וג׳ שריו קנה וושט וורידין ובגשמיות בין הראש ללב גרון המפסיק
which is a narrow strait (meitzar) that interposes between the brain and the heart; and it is the voice that arouses the intention. And likewise Pharaoh in Egypt, and his three officers: the windpipe, the gullet and the veins. And physically, between the head and the heart, [is] the throat, which interposes;
The throat is a meitzar, a narrow strait (the root of Mitzrayim), between brain and heart, and it is the voice, which awakens intention. Pharaoh and his three officers correspond to the windpipe, gullet and veins of the throat, which physically separates the head from the heart.
כי להיות לב ומדות נמשך מהמוח צריך שיתקצר כו׳ [כמש״ל פ׳ יתרו ובפ׳ וארא ע״פ לכן אמור]:5
for in order that the heart and the emotive attributes be drawn from the brain, it must be narrowed, etc. [as is written above, Parshas Yisro, and in Parshas Va’eira on the verse “Therefore say”].
The narrowing is necessary: for the heart’s emotions to be drawn from the mind, the flow must pass through a constriction. The Alter Rebbe refers to discourses in Parshas Yisro and Parshas Va’eira.
The Exodus is the revelation of the concealed, and Egypt is the “narrow place” of the throat between mind and heart, the constriction through which intellect reaches the emotions.
Marei mekomos
- 1מצרים נק׳ בינה ובינה בגרון שהוא מיצר · ראה פע״ח שער חג המצות פ״א דשם מבאר שהגרון נק׳ מצרים.
- 2מצרים נק׳ בינה ובינה בגרון שהוא מיצר · Pri Etz Chaim, Gate of Passover 1:11
- 3הקול שמעורר הכוונה · ראה טושו״ע או״ח סי׳ סא, ד.
- 4שמעורר הכוונה · Shulchan Arukh, Orach Chayim 61:4
- 5ובפ׳ וארא ע״פ לכן אמור · תו״א נז, ג.
The fifty gates in their source and the light of G‑d’s face ¶14–18
14ג והנה חמשים שערי בינה ענפין מתפרדין אבל במקורם הם כלולים כשהם בא״א ש״ע נהורין1 ר״ך וק״ן חשבון גדול תיקון אריך כו׳
3. Now, the fifty gates of Binah (understanding) are “branches that separate”; but in their source they are included [together], when they are in Arich Anpin: the 370 lights, [that is,] 220 and 150, “a great reckoning,” the tikkun of Arich, etc.
The third section begins: the fifty gates of Binah, as they spread out, are “branches that separate,” but in their source, in Arich Anpin, they are included together. There they are the 370 lights, made up of 220 and 150, called “a great reckoning,” the tikkun of Arich Anpin.
[וכמ״ש בע״ח שער א״א פי״ד וע׳ בפע״ח שער ספירת העומר פ״ז גבי מורי זלה״ה לא היה מסתפר2 כו׳ ועמ״ש מענין פי׳ חשבון גדול בביאור ע״פ על כן יאמרו המושלים3 בואו חשבון.4
[And as is written in Etz Chaim, Shaar Arich Anpin, chapter 14; and see Pri Etz Chaim, Shaar Sefiras HaOmer, chapter 7, concerning “My teacher, may his memory be for the life of the World to Come, would not cut his hair,” etc.; and see what is written about the meaning of “a great reckoning” in the explanation on the verse “Therefore the rulers say, ‘Come to Cheshbon.’”
The gloss cites Etz Chaim on the 370 lights of Arich Anpin, and Pri Etz Chaim on the Arizal’s custom not to cut his hair during the days of the Omer, which it connects with a tikkun of the skull of Arich Anpin. It also refers to a discourse on “Come to Cheshbon” for the meaning of “a great reckoning.”
The fifty gates of Binah, separate in their spread, are united in their source in Arich Anpin as the 370 lights, “a great reckoning.”
Marei mekomos
- 1בא״א ש״ע נהורין · Sefer Etz Chaim 13:14
- 2מורי זלה״ה לא היה מסתפר · Pri Etz Chaim, Gate of the Omer Count 7:9–10
- 3בביאור ע״פ על כן יאמרו המושלים · לקמן סז, א.
- 4על כן יאמרו המושלים בואו חשבון · Numbers 21:27
15ועמ״ש באגה״ק ד״ה וילבש צדקה בענין פי׳ כל פרוטה מצטרפת לחשבון גדול12 כו׳ וע׳ בע״ח שער א״א ספ״ה שבהיות למעלה הם חשבון גדול3 כו׳] ומשם למל׳ דאצי׳ כו׳ הארת פנים יאר ה׳ פניו המשכות הכתר.4
And see what is written in Iggeres HaKodesh, in the letter beginning “And He put on righteousness,” on the meaning of “every perutah adds up to a great reckoning,” etc.; and see Etz Chaim, Shaar Arich Anpin, at the end of chapter 5, that when they are above they are “a great reckoning,” etc.] And from there [it is drawn] to Malchus (sovereignty) of the World of Atzilus (Emanation), etc.: the illumination of the face, “may Havayah make His face shine,” the drawings-down of Keser (the Crown).
The gloss continues with two more places on “a great reckoning”: the Tanya’s letter on charity, where every small coin joins into a great sum, and Etz Chaim, where the numbers of Arich Anpin are “great” above and small below. From that source the light descends to Malchus of Atzilus as “the illumination of the face,” the blessing “may Havayah make His face shine,” which is a drawing down from Keser.
The fifty gates, united in Arich Anpin as “a great reckoning,” are drawn down to Malchus as the illumination of G‑d’s face, a light from Keser.
In the letter cited, the Alter Rebbe explains the Sages’ “every perutah joins into a great reckoning” with the verse “For great is Havayah and highly praised”: the sum is “great” because charity draws from the infinite level that surrounds all worlds.
Marei mekomos
- 1ועמ״ש באגה״ק ד״ה וילבש צדקה בענין פי׳ כל פרוטה מצטרפת לחשבון גדול · Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh 3:1
- 2כל פרוטה מצטרפת לחשבון גדול · Bava Batra 9b:1
- 3וע׳ בע״ח שער א״א ספ״ה שבהיות למעלה הם חשבון גדול · Sefer Etz Chaim 13:5
- 4יאר ה׳ פניו · Numbers 6:25
16והוא ענין תורה שאומרים כ״ד ספרים1 בליל שבועות2 הגם דאורייתא מחכמה נפקת מקורה תרי״ג ארחין34 שהוא הלבנונית מגלגלתא דאריך כתר שבכתר כו׳
And this is the matter of the Torah, that we recite the twenty-four books on the night of Shavuos. Although “the Torah comes forth from Chochmah (wisdom),” its source is the 613 paths, which are the whiteness from the skull (gulgalta) of Arich, Keser within Keser, etc.
This is why the twenty-four books of the Tanach are recited on the night of Shavuos. The Torah comes from Chochmah, but its source is higher: the 613 paths that issue from the “whiteness” of the skull of Arich Anpin, Keser within Keser.
והוא ענין שתי הלחם שבשבועות לכו לחמו בלחמי5 המשכת מוחין מנו״ה דאבא ובפסח מצה לפי שבאצי׳ אין לעורר הגבורות
The two loaves of Shavuos, the “bread” of “Come, eat of my bread,” draw down mochin from Netzach and Hod of Abba. On Pesach the bread is matzah, because within Atzilus the Gevuros, the severities that leaven represents, must not be stirred up.
אבל בשבועות גילוי הכתר שהוא בחי׳ שלמעלה מאצילות חמץ תאפינה6 דייקא ששם הגבורות נכללים כו׳ לית שמאלא בהאי עתיקא7 חירות ממ״ה8 וכמארז״ל בואו ונחזיק טובה9 לאבותינו כו׳.
but on Shavuos there is the revelation of Keser, which is the level that is above Atzilus: “they shall be baked leavened,” specifically, for there the Gevuros are included, etc.; “there is no left in this Atika”; “freedom from the Angel of Death”; and as our Sages, of blessed memory, said, “Come, let us acknowledge the goodness of our fathers,” etc.
On Shavuos, however, Keser is revealed, which is above Atzilus, so the loaves are baked specifically leavened: there the Gevuros are included in kindness, as the Zohar says, “there is no left in this Ancient One.” At the Giving of the Torah Israel reached “freedom from the Angel of Death,” the state the Sages describe in “Come, let us acknowledge the goodness of our fathers,” where they teach that at Sinai Israel were like G‑dly beings, beyond death.
אך צ״ל ממטה למעלה מעט מעט היום יום א׳ שני ימים פי׳ מכיון שממשיכים הרי יש כאן שני ימים שאין המשכה זו של יום זה בחי׳ אחרת משל יום אחר
But it must be from below upward, little by little: “Today is one day,” “two days.” The meaning is: once one draws [it] down, there are here two days, for the drawing down of this day is not a different level from that of the other day,
Yet this must be drawn from below upward, little by little, day by day. That is why we count “Today is two days,” not “the second day”: each day’s drawing down is not a separate level but the same light, growing.
אלא הכל הוא בחי׳ אחד מעט מעט ובליל ע״ש אינן אלא מ״ט ימים אבל מכיון שהגיע יום השבועות ממילא נעשו חמשים יום מכיון שהגיעו למקורן כו׳ ושער החמשים הוא המחבר כו׳.10
but all is one level, little by little. And on the night of Erev Shavuos they are only forty-nine days; but once the day of Shavuos has come, they automatically become fifty days, since they have reached their source, etc.; and the fiftieth gate is what joins [them], etc.
On the night when we count forty-nine, the days are only forty-nine; but when Shavuos arrives they become fifty of themselves, for they have reached their source. The fiftieth gate is what joins all the others together.
Shavuos reveals Keser, above Atzilus, which is why its loaves are leavened and the Torah’s source in Arich Anpin is drawn down; the count builds this up day by day until the fiftieth gate joins the forty-nine.
Marei mekomos
- 1שאומרים כ״ד ספרים · שו״ע או״ח סתצ״ד. חק יעקב שם.
- 2שאומרים כ״ד ספרים בליל שבועות · Shulchan Arukh, Orach Chayim 494:1
- 3תרי״ג ארחין · Zohar III, 129a
- 4מקורה תרי״ג ארחין · Zohar, Idra Rabba 25:188–28:199
- 5לכו לחמו בלחמי · Proverbs 9:5
- 6חמץ תאפינה · Leviticus 23:17
- 7לית שמאלא בהאי עתיקא · Zohar III, 129a
- 8חירות ממ״ה · Shemot Rabbah 32:1
- 9בואו ונחזיק טובה · Avodah Zarah 5a:6
- 10חירות ממה״מ · שמ״ר רפל״ב. וש״נ.
17ועי״ז נמשך אור הכתר והוא הארת הפנים גילוי הפנימי׳ דרך הכלי שלא יהיה הכלי מפסיק וגם דרך מוצא פי ה׳ הוא גילוי פנימי אך הוא דרך נקב וחלון כו׳.
And through this the light of Keser is drawn down, and it is the illumination of the face: the revelation of the inner dimension (pnimiyus) through the vessel, so that the vessel does not interpose. And by way of “what comes forth from the mouth of Havayah,” too, there is a revelation of the inner dimension, but it is by way of an opening and a window, etc.
Through the counting the light of Keser is drawn down as “the illumination of the face”: the inner dimension shows through the vessel, which no longer blocks it. The Divine word that sustains the world also reveals something inner, but only as through an opening or a window.
ולא ראי זה כראי זה שדרך נקב הוא גילוי יותר אבל הארת פנים אינו אלא הארה בעלמא כו׳ כמו הארת המצחא.
And the one is not like the other: by way of an opening there is more revelation, whereas the illumination of the face is only a mere illumination, etc., like the illumination of the forehead (mitzcha).
The two differ: through an opening more is revealed, while the illumination of the face is only a glow, like the radiance of the forehead. It is subtler, yet it is the inner light itself.
אך הארת פנים מתחלה כד סליק ברעותא כו׳ [ע׳ בע״ח שער מ״ן ומ״ד דרוש ב׳]1
But the illumination of the face, at first, [was] “when it arose in the will,” etc. [see Etz Chaim, the Gate of Mayin Nukvin and Mayin Duchrin (feminine and masculine waters), Derush 2];
At the beginning of creation this illumination came “when it arose in His will,” freely, with no cause from below, as Etz Chaim explains.
אבל עכשיו באתעדל״ת תליא כמ״ש יאר פניו אתנו2 אתנו דוקא באתעדל״ת מחמת שמחת העבודה בשמחה וטוב לבב3 מעוררין שמחה4 מלמעלה
but now it depends on an arousal from below (isarusa dilesata), as it is written, “May He make His face shine with us”: “with us,” specifically, through an arousal from below; for through the joy of the service, “with joy and with gladness of heart,” joy is aroused from above.
Now it depends on an arousal from below, as “May He make His face shine with us” implies: “with us,” through our own service. Serving G‑d with joy and gladness of heart arouses joy above.
וגם ענין השמחה הוא התגלות הפנימי׳ כמו צהבו פניו של רבי5 כו׳ [ועמ״ש בד״ה צאינה וראינה6 בפי׳ ויין ישמח כו׳ להצהיל פנים משמן]7
And the matter of joy, too, is the revelation of the inner dimension, as in “Rebbi’s face shone,” etc. [and see what is written in the discourse beginning “Go forth and see,” on the explanation of “and wine that gladdens,” etc., “to make the face shine more than oil”].
Joy, too, is a revelation of the inner self: the Talmud says that Rebbi’s face shone with joy. The gloss refers to a discourse on wine that “makes the face shine more than oil.”
והנה תחלה אנו ממשיכים לעומר שהיא הנוק׳ המשכת ש״ע נהורין אר״ך וק״נ ודוקא בזמן שבהמ״ק היה קיים שאז היו מקריבין העומר. משא״כ תפלה ש״י אפי׳ בח״ל שכמה מיני מדרגות כו׳. ע״י הנפת העומר עליות הנוק׳.
Now, first we draw down to the Omer, which is Nukva (the feminine): the drawing down of the 370 lights, arach and kan; and specifically at the time when the Holy Temple stood, for then they would offer the Omer. Whereas prayer applies even outside the Land, for [there are] many kinds of levels, etc. Through the waving of the Omer [come] the ascents of Nukva.
First the light of the 370 lights, the same 370 that the third section counted as 220 and 150, is drawn to the Omer, which is Nukva, Malchus; this was done specifically in Temple times, when the Omer was offered, whereas prayer, with its many levels, applies even outside the Land of Israel. The waving of the Omer raises Nukva.
The counting draws down Keser as the illumination of G‑d’s face, an inner light that now depends on our service with joy; it begins with the Omer, which raises Malchus.
Marei mekomos
- 1ע׳ בע״ח שער מ״ן ומ״ד דרוש ב׳ · Sefer Etz Chaim 39:2
- 2יאר פניו אתנו · Psalms 67:2
- 3בשמחה וטוב לבב · Deuteronomy 28:47
- 4מחמת שמחת העבודה . . מעוררין שמחה למע׳ · Zohar III, 184b
- 5צהבו פניו של רבי · Chullin 7b:4–5
- 6בד״ה צאינה וראינה · לקו״ת שה״ש כו, ב.
- 7ויין ישמח כו׳ להצהיל פנים משמן · Psalms 104:15
18והנה עכ״ז עליי׳ זו ע״י המלאכים אריה דאכיל קרבנין כו׳. אבל לע״ל ירום ונשא וגבה מאד1 אפי׳ מבחי׳ משה2 ובמשכן של משה לא היה ארי׳.
Now, even so, this ascent is through the angels: “the lion that consumes the offerings,” etc. But in the Time to Come, “he shall be exalted and lifted up, and be very high,” even above the level of Moshe; and in the Mishkan of Moshe there was no lion.
Even so, today the Omer’s ascent goes through the angels, the “lion” that consumes the offerings on the altar. In the Time to Come, Moshiach will be “exalted, lifted up and very high,” higher even than Moshe; and the text notes that in the Mishkan of Moshe there was no lion.
וזהו כעת יאמר ליעקב ולישראל מה פעל3 כו׳. ועתידים צדיקים שיאמרו לפניהם קדוש4 כו׳. אז ארי׳ כבקר יאכל תבן תבן הוא השפעת השעורה וזהו שעכשיו המלאכים מעטרין לתפלה גפיף ונשיק ומעטר לה
And this is “At this time it shall be said to Yaakov and to Israel, ‘What has [G‑d] wrought,’” etc. And “the righteous are destined to have ‘Holy’ said before them,” etc. Then “the lion shall eat straw like the ox”: straw is the influence of the barley. And this is [why] now the angels crown the prayer: “he embraces it and kisses it and crowns it.”
So it is said, “At this time it shall be said to Yaakov and to Israel: What has G‑d wrought,” for Israel will stand above the angels, who will say “Holy” before the righteous. Then “the lion shall eat straw like the ox”: the angels will receive only the “barley” of the outer dimension. That is why today the angels “crown” our prayers.
כי להיות התפלה בקול ודבור גשמי א״א לעלות כ״א ע״י המלאכים הממונים (שהם הממוצעים גבוה מעל גבוה5 וכמו הנפש מתלבשת בדם ע״י ממוצעים הם האדים כו׳)
For since prayer is in physical voice and speech, it cannot ascend except through the appointed angels (who are the intermediaries, “one higher than the high”; just as the soul enclothes itself in the blood through intermediaries, which are the vapors, etc.),
Prayer in a physical voice cannot rise by itself; it needs the angels appointed over it as intermediaries, one level above another. In the same way the soul enters the blood through intermediaries, the vapors.
שנותן פנימי ומקיף שלו. אבל לע״ל שיתקיים ומלאה הארץ דעה6 יהיו כל הבחי׳ בישראל עצמן:
who give their own inner and encompassing [aspects]. But in the Time to Come, when “and the earth shall be full of knowledge” is fulfilled, all the levels will be in Israel themselves.
The angels give the prayer their own inner and encompassing light. In the Time to Come, when the earth is full of the knowledge of G‑d, Israel will hold all these levels in themselves.
Today the ascent of the Omer and of prayer depends on the angels; in the Time to Come Israel will be above them and hold all levels themselves, while the angels receive only the outer “straw.”
Marei mekomos
- 1ירום ונשא וגבה מאד · Isaiah 52:13
- 2ירום ונשא וגבה מאד אפי׳ מבחי׳ משה · Yalkut Shimoni on Nach 476
- 3כעת יאמר ליעקב ולישראל מה פעל · Numbers 23:23
- 4ועתידים צדיקים שיאמרו לפניהם קדוש · Bava Batra 75b:3–4
- 5גבוה מעל גבוה · Ecclesiastes 5:7
- 6ומלאה הארץ דעה · Isaiah 11:9
An addition: does the count draw the fiftieth gate? ¶19–20
19מעט תוס׳ ביאור1 על ענין וספרתם לכם2 כו׳ חמשים יום. הנה עפמש״ל כי ענין ספירת העומר הכל הוא המשכת בחי׳ ומדריגת שער החמשים הכולל ומיוחד במקורו רק שנמשך מעט מעט כו׳
A little additional explanation on the matter of “And you shall count for yourselves,” etc., “fifty days.” Now, according to what was written above, the matter of the Counting of the Omer is entirely the drawing down of the level and rank of the fiftieth gate, which is all-inclusive and united in its source; only, it is drawn down little by little, etc.,
A short addition to the Biur on counting “fifty days.” According to the above, the whole count draws down the fiftieth gate, which includes all the others and is one with its source, only little by little.
עד כדי לחבר ולקשר ענפין דמתפרדין כו׳ ע״ש עפ״ז מדויק מאד מ״ש תספרו חמשים יום.3 לומר שספירה זו היא המשכת שער החמשים ממש.
until it joins and binds “the branches that separate,” etc.; see there. According to this, what is written, “you shall count fifty days,” is very precise: to say that this count is the drawing down of the fiftieth gate itself.
The count binds the separated “branches” back to their source. On this reading, “you shall count fifty days” is exact: the counting itself draws down the fiftieth gate.
אך במ״א נת׳ פי׳ תספרו חמשים יום בע״א דהיינו שיום החמשים שהוא שער החמשים אין בנו כח להמשיך
But elsewhere the meaning of “you shall count fifty days” was explained differently: namely, that the fiftieth day, which is the fiftieth gate, we do not have the power to draw down;
Elsewhere, however, the verse was explained differently: the fiftieth day, which is the fiftieth gate, is beyond our power to draw down.
לכן אין בו ספירה רק מ״מ הוא נמשך מאיליו וממילא והיינו דוקא ע״י שכבר נעשה שלימות ההמשכה במ״ט4 ימים
therefore it has no count; but nevertheless it is drawn down of itself and automatically, and this is specifically because the drawing down has already been completed in the forty-nine days;
That is why the fiftieth day is not counted. It comes of itself, but only because the drawing down was completed in the forty-nine days.
ולכן נאמר תספרו חמשים יום וקרוב לזה פי׳ הרמ״ז בפ׳ בראשית (דף ח׳ ע״א) ד״ה אזדמנת למהוי.5
and therefore it is said, “you shall count fifty days.” And close to this the Ramaz explained, on Parshas Bereishis (folio 8a), in the passage beginning “You are destined to be.”
So the verse can still say “count fifty days,” since our forty-nine bring the fiftieth. The Ramaz gives a similar explanation on the Zohar’s “You are destined to be.”
וי״ל דמה שנת׳ שם הוא ע״ד שכתב הרמ״ז שם ובפ׳ אמור דצ״ו שחג שבועות נק׳ ע״ש שבו מתגלים המ״ט בחי׳ הכלולים בשער הנ׳.
And it may be said that what was explained there is along the lines of what the Ramaz wrote there, and in Parshas Emor, folio 96: that the Festival of Shavuos (Weeks) is so called because in it the forty-nine levels that are included in the fiftieth gate are revealed.
That explanation follows the Ramaz, who says Shavuos, “Weeks,” is so named because on it the forty-nine levels included within the fiftieth gate are revealed.
אבל השבעה שבועות דספירת העומר הם מ״ט שע״ב ממש ולא בחי׳ שער החמשים (וכ״מ בזח״ב תצוה קפ״ג א׳. ובפרדס שער השערים פ״ה.6 וכ״מ ממש״ל פ׳ יתרו בד״ה מראיהם ומעשיהם).
But the seven weeks of the Counting of the Omer are the forty-nine gates of Binah (understanding) themselves, and not the level of the fiftieth gate (and so it is implied in the Zohar, Part II, Tetzaveh, 183a; and in the Pardes, Shaar HaShearim, chapter 5; and so it is implied by what was written above, Parshas Yisro, in the discourse beginning “Their appearance and their workings”).
On this view the seven weeks of the count are the forty-nine gates of Binah themselves, not the fiftieth gate. The text cites the Zohar on Tetzaveh, the Pardes and a discourse in Parshas Yisro as implying this.
אמנם לפמש״כ משמע לכאורה דבספה״ע שבע שבתות לבד מה שממשיכים בחי׳ מ״ט שערי בינה עוד ממשיכים ג״כ עליהם הארת שער החמשים ג״כ
However, according to what is written [here], it seemingly follows that in the Counting of the Omer, the “seven weeks,” besides drawing down the level of the forty-nine gates of Binah, we further draw down upon them also an illumination of the fiftieth gate as well;
But what was written in this Biur seems to imply more: that during the count, besides the forty-nine gates, an illumination of the fiftieth gate is also drawn down upon them.
וזהו ענין וספרתם לכם ממחרת השבת דהיינו מבחי׳ שלמעלה מהשבת שהוא הבינה כמ״ש לעיל בפ׳אמור בד״ה וספרתם לכם ובד״ה והניף הכהן את העומר.
and this is the matter of “And you shall count for yourselves from the morrow of the Shabbos,” that is, from the level that is above Shabbos, which is Binah, as is written above in Parshas Emor, in the discourse beginning “And you shall count for yourselves,” and in the discourse beginning “And the kohen shall wave the Omer.”
This is hinted in “from the morrow of the Shabbos”: from the level above Shabbos, Binah. Earlier discourses in Parshas Emor are cited for this.
The addition weighs two readings of “count fifty days”: that the count itself draws the fiftieth gate, or that we draw only the forty-nine and the fiftieth comes of itself; it suggests that an illumination of the fiftieth gate is drawn during the count.
Marei mekomos
- 1מעט תוס׳ ביאור · נדפס ג״כ באוה״ת אמור-ג ע׳ תתעג. עם תוספת הגהות וקיצורים באוה״ת במדבר ע׳ ריב.
- 2וספרתם לכם · Leviticus 23:15
- 3תספרו חמשים יום · Leviticus 23:16
- 4והיינו דוקא ע״י שכבר נעשה שלימות ההמשכה במ״ט · ראה בסה״מ — מלוקט כרך-ג ע׳ קטו הערה 17.
- 5ד״ה אזדמנת למהוי · Zohar, Introduction 13:123–14:132
- 6ובפרדס שער השערים פ״ה · Pardes Rimmonim 13:5–6
20ולדברי הפרדס שער השערים פ״ה שער החמשים היא בינה בעצמה1 ומ״ט שערי בינה הם בשבעת ימי הבנין וע״ש בעה״כ ערך יובל וערך שבת.
And according to the words of the Pardes, Shaar HaShearim, chapter 5, the fiftieth gate is Binah itself, and the forty-nine gates of Binah are in the seven days of building; and see there, in Erchei HaKinuyim, the entry “Yovel” and the entry “Shabbos.”
According to the Pardes, the fiftieth gate is Binah itself, while the forty-nine gates of Binah are in the seven “days of building,” the seven lower Sefiros. The Pardes’s lexicon of Kabbalistic names, under “Jubilee” and “Shabbos,” is cited too.
וכיון שבספה״ע ממשיכים ז״ת דאימא ה״ז הארת שער החמשים ובשבועות נמשך ומתגלה עצמיות שער החמשים. וגם עפמ״ש בפע״ח שכ״ב רפ״א שבספה״ע ממשיכים ג״כ המוחין דגדלות דאו״א.2
And since in the Counting of the Omer we draw down the seven lower [Sefiros] of Imma, this is an illumination of the fiftieth gate, and on Shavuos the very essence of the fiftieth gate is drawn down and revealed. And also according to what is written in Pri Etz Chaim, Shaar 22, at the beginning of chapter 1, that in the Counting of the Omer we also draw down the mochin of gadlus (mature intellect) of Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah).
Since the count draws down the seven lower Sefiros of Imma (Binah), it is an illumination of the fiftieth gate, and on Shavuos its very essence is revealed. Pri Etz Chaim likewise says that the count draws down the mature mochin of Abba and Imma.
וגם עפמ״ש במ״א בענין ברכת הזימון גבי יין המשומר בענביו3 משי״ב שבספה״ע ממשיכים ו״ק דאבא שמתלבשים בו״ק דבינה. א״כ עפ״ז אפשר לומר שזהו ג״כ הארת שער החמשים. ומ״מ צ״ע.
And also according to what is written elsewhere, on the matter of the zimun blessing, concerning “the wine preserved in its grapes since the six days of Creation”: that in the Counting of the Omer we draw down the six extremities (vav ketzavos) of Abba, which are enclothed in the six extremities of Binah. If so, according to this one can say that this, too, is an illumination of the fiftieth gate. Nevertheless, this requires examination.
Another discourse says the count draws down the six extremities of Abba, enclothed in those of Binah. That too could be an illumination of the fiftieth gate, though the Alter Rebbe leaves the question open for further study.
Several sources support the view that the count already draws an illumination of the fiftieth gate, with its essence revealed on Shavuos, though the question is left open.
Marei mekomos
- 1ולדברי הפרדס שער השערים פ״ה שער החמשים היא בינה בעצמה · Pardes Rimmonim 13:6–7
- 2עפמ״ש בפע״ח שכ״ב רפ״א שבספה״ע ממשיכים ג״כ המוחין דגדלות דאו״א · Pri Etz Chaim, Gate of the Omer Count 1
- 3יין המשומר בענביו · Berakhot 34b:24–25
Moshe’s grave and the two aspects of the fiftieth gate ¶21–29
21והנה אם נאמר כן יהיה מדויק יותר ענין תספרו חמשים יום וכן מה שאומרים היום שני ימים שלשה ימים ולא יום שני יום שלישי כו׳
Now, if we say so, the matter of “you shall count fifty days” will be more precise; and likewise what we say, “Today is two days,” “three days,” and not “the second day,” “the third day,” etc.,
If the count does draw down an illumination of the fiftieth gate, the verse’s “count fifty days” is more exact, and so is the wording of the count: “Today is two days,” a whole that grows, rather than “the second day.”
וכנ״ל, ואין זה סותר למ״ש במ״א ששער החמשים אין בנו כח להמשיך אלא שנמשך ממילא בחג השבועות כו׳.
as mentioned above. And this does not contradict what is written elsewhere, that the fiftieth gate we do not have the power to draw down, but rather it is drawn down automatically on the Festival of Shavuos, etc.
This need not contradict the other explanation, that we cannot draw down the fiftieth gate and it comes of itself on Shavuos. To reconcile the two, the Alter Rebbe first brings a teaching of the Sages.
ויש להקדים מה שארז״ל ספ״ק דסוטה ע״פ ולא ידע איש את קבורתו לאותם שעמדו למעלה נדמה להם למטה ולאותם שעמדו למטה נדמה להם למעלה.1 וביאר זה המגיד2 נ״ע.
And we must preface what our Sages, of blessed memory, said at the end of the first chapter of Sotah, on the verse “And no man knows his burial place”: to those who stood above, it appeared to them below; and to those who stood below, it appeared to them above. And the Maggid, whose soul is in Eden, explained this.
The Talmud relates that those who searched for Moshe’s grave saw it below when they stood above, and above when they stood below, fulfilling “no man knows his burial place.” The Maggid, the Alter Rebbe’s teacher, explained this.
כי הנה מרע״ה השיג בחייו מ״ט שע״ב אבל שער החמשים לא אתייהב למשה כמ״ש בגמ׳ ובתיקונים (סוף תיקון כ״ב)3 וגדולים צדיקים במיתתם4 יותר מבחייהם שאז השיג שער החמשים
For Moshe our teacher, peace be upon him, attained in his lifetime the forty-nine gates of Binah (understanding), but the fiftieth gate “was not given to Moshe,” as is written in the Gemara and in the Tikkunim (end of Tikkun 22); and “the righteous are greater in their death than in their life,” for then he attained the fiftieth gate.
In his lifetime Moshe attained forty-nine of the fifty gates of understanding; the fiftieth was not given to him. But the righteous are greater after their passing, and at his passing Moshe attained the fiftieth gate.
And this is the matter of “And no man knows his burial place,” and as is written in the Zohar, Parshas Yisro (folio 89a): “Just as Atika Kadisha is the most hidden of all hidden,” etc.; see there.
That is why his burial place cannot be known: it belongs to the fiftieth gate. The Zohar likens this hiddenness to that of Atika Kadisha, the most hidden of all.
אמנם פי׳ לעליונים נדמה להם למטה כו׳ היינו כי שער החמשים דבינה הוא הממוצע בין חכמה לבינה
However, the meaning of “to those above it appeared below,” etc., is that the fiftieth gate of Binah is the intermediary between Chochmah (wisdom) and Binah;
The Maggid’s explanation: the fiftieth gate of Binah stands between Chochmah and Binah.
כי חכמה היא בחי׳ אין ובינה נק׳ יש והממוצע ביניהם המחברם הוא שער החמשים ולכן לעליונים היינו לגבי בחי׳ אין ממש נדמה למטה
for Chochmah is the level of ayin (nothing), and Binah is called yesh (something), and the intermediary between them, which joins them, is the fiftieth gate. Therefore “to those above,” that is, in relation to the level of ayin itself, it appeared below;
Chochmah is ayin, “nothing,” beyond definition, while Binah is yesh, “something,” grasped and defined. The fiftieth gate joins them, so from the standpoint of ayin it looks lower.
כי השער החמשים כיון שהוא הממוצע בין אין ליש א״כ הוא למטה מבחי׳ אין ולגבי תחתונים בחי׳ יש והשגה נדמה שהוא למעלה דהיינו שהוא בחי׳ אין ממש.89
for since the fiftieth gate is the intermediary between ayin and yesh, it is then below the level of ayin; and in relation to those below, the level of yesh and comprehension, it appears to be above, that is, to be the level of ayin itself.
Because it lies between ayin and yesh, from above it seems below ayin, while from below, from the standpoint of yesh and comprehension, it seems to be ayin itself. That is the grave seen below from above and above from below.
The double view of Moshe’s grave illustrates the fiftieth gate: as the bridge between Chochmah (ayin) and Binah (yesh), it looks low from above and lofty from below.
Marei mekomos
- 1לאותם שעמדו למעלה נדמה להם למטה ולאותם שעמדו למטה נדמה להם למעלה · Sotah 14a:1
- 2וביאר זה המגיד · ראה גם סה״מ תקס״ה ח״א ע׳ קפד. אוה״ת יהל אור ע׳ תב. וראה לקו״ש חי״ד ע׳ 451.
- 3לא אתייהב למשה כמ״ש בגמ׳ ובתיקונים (סוף תיקון כ״ב) · Tikkunei Zohar 68b:5
- 4וגדולים צדיקים במיתתם · Chullin 7b:10
- 5ולא ידע איש את קבורתו · Deuteronomy 34:6
- 6בזהר פ׳ יתרו (דפ״ט ע״א) · ראה גם אוה״ת שמות ע׳ טז.
- 7מה ע״ק טמירא מכל טמירין · Zohar, Yitro 27:464–475
- 8כמ״ש בגמרא · Rosh Hashanah 21b
- 9
22ועכ״פ לפ״ז מבואר ששער החמשים הוא בחי׳ ממוצע בין אין ויש, וכן לפמ״ש בת״ז ובע״ח שם דשער החמשים הוא כתר עליון הרי נודע ג״כ דהכתר הוא הממוצע בין המאציל לנאצלים כמ״ש בע״ח (שמ״א פ״ג)
At any rate, according to this it is explained that the fiftieth gate is the level of an intermediary between ayin and yesh. And likewise, according to what is written in the Tikkunei Zohar and in Etz Chaim there, that the fiftieth gate is the Supreme Keser (Keser Elyon), it is also known that Keser is the intermediary between the Emanator and the emanated, as is written in Etz Chaim (Shaar 41, chapter 3).
So the fiftieth gate is a middle level between ayin and yesh. The Tikkunei Zohar and Etz Chaim also call it the Supreme Keser, and Keser is known to be the intermediary between the Emanator, G‑d Himself, and the emanated Sefiros.
ועמ״ש בביאור ע״פ אני ה׳ אלקיכם דפ׳ ציצית בפי׳ היש הוי׳ בקרבנו אם אין1 (וע׳ באדר״ז דף רפ״ח ע״ב).
And see what is written in the explanation on the verse “I am Havayah your G‑d” of the section of tzitzis, on the meaning of “Is Havayah in our midst, or not (ayin)?” (and see the Idra Zuta, folio 288b).
The Alter Rebbe refers to his explanation, in a discourse on the section of tzitzis, of the verse “Is Havayah in our midst, or not (ayin)?”, and to the Idra Zuta, for more on Keser as the intermediary.
והנה מבואר בע״ח שם שהממוצע כלול מב׳ הבחינות שהוא ממוצע ביניהם דהיינו שיש בכתר ב׳ בחי׳ הבחי׳ הא׳ הוא בחי׳ תחתונ שבמאציל והבחי׳ הב׳ הוא שרש כל הנאצלים דהיינו שכולל כולם כאחד כו׳.
Now, it is explained in Etz Chaim there that the intermediary is comprised of the two levels between which it mediates: that is, in Keser there are two aspects. The first aspect is the lowest level of the Emanator, and the second aspect is the root of all the emanated, that is, it includes them all as one, etc.
As Etz Chaim explains, an intermediary contains both sides that it connects. So Keser has two aspects: the lowest level of the Emanator, and the root of all the emanated, which includes them all as one.
The fiftieth gate is likened to Keser, the intermediary between the Emanator and the emanated, which has two aspects: the lowest level of the Emanator and the root of the emanated.
Marei mekomos
- 1היש הוי׳ בקרבנו אם אין · Exodus 17:7
23ועד״ז ג״כ בכל בחי׳ כתר יש ב׳ בחי׳ אלו כמו בכתר דז״א שנעשה מת״ת דאימא יש ג״כ ב׳ בחי׳
And along these lines, in every level of Keser there are these two aspects; as in the Keser of Z’eir Anpin (the emotive attributes), which is formed from the Tiferes (beauty) of Imma, there are also two aspects
Every Keser has these two aspects. The Keser of Z’eir Anpin, for example, is formed from the Tiferes of Imma, the configuration of Binah.
אלו הא׳ הוא נק׳ בחי׳ תחתונה שבעליון הב׳ נק׳ שרש וראש התחתון וזהו ענין ג׳ שלישים שיש בת״ת דאימא כו׳ וע׳ במ״ח בתחלתו מענין זה.
of these: the first is called the lowest level of the higher one; the second is called the root and head of the lower one. And this is the matter of the three thirds that are in the Tiferes of Imma, etc. And see Mishnas Chassidim, at its beginning, on this matter.
Its first aspect is called “the lowest level of the higher one,” and its second “the root and head of the lower one.” This is why the Tiferes of Imma is described as having three thirds; Mishnas Chassidim discusses this at its beginning.
The two-sided structure of Keser repeats at every level, for example in the Keser of Z’eir Anpin, formed from the Tiferes of Imma.
24וכך ג״כ בענין שער החמשים שהוא הממוצע בין מ״ט שערי בינה. ובין מה שלמעלה מהבינה.
And so too in the matter of the fiftieth gate, which is the intermediary between the forty-nine gates of Binah and what is above Binah.
The fiftieth gate, too, mediates: between the forty-nine gates of Binah and what is above Binah.
וכמבואר שבו ועל ידו יתייחדו המ״ט שערי׳ במאצילן ב״ה שהוא גילוי אנכי מי שאנכי א״כ יש בו ב׳ הבחי׳ היינו הבחי׳ תחתונה שבו הוא הכולל כל המ״ט שערים כא׳.
And as is explained, in it and through it the forty-nine gates are united with their Emanator, blessed be He, which is the revelation of “Anochi: who I am.” If so, there are in it the two aspects: the lower aspect in it is what includes all the forty-nine gates as one,
Through it the forty-nine gates are united with their Emanator, which is the revelation of “Anochi: who I am.” So it also has two aspects, and its lower aspect includes all forty-nine gates as one.
כענין מ״ש בע״ח דהבחי׳ שבכתר הנק׳ שורש הנאצלים יש בו שרש כל הי״ס בהעלם ודקות גדול שא״א לנאצל להיות יותר דקות ממנו.
like what is written in Etz Chaim, that the aspect in Keser called the root of the emanated has in it the root of all ten Sefiros, in concealment and great subtlety, such that it is impossible for an emanated being to be more subtle than it,
This parallels what Etz Chaim says of the aspect of Keser called “the root of the emanated”: it holds the root of all ten Sefiros in such hidden subtlety that nothing emanated could be subtler.
Like Keser, the fiftieth gate has a lower aspect that includes the forty-nine gates as their subtle root.
25ולמעלה מעלה ממהות המ״ט שערים שנמשכו אח״כ ממנו שהוא כענין המשכת הע״ס משרש הנאצלים, אמנם הבחי׳ העליונה שבשער החמשים דבינה אין שייך לומר בו
and far, far above the essence of the forty-nine gates that were afterward drawn from it, which is like the drawing forth of the Ten Sefiros from the root of the emanated. However, of the upper aspect of the fiftieth gate of Binah one cannot say
That root is far above the forty-nine gates that later issue from it, just as the ten Sefiros issue from the root of the emanated. But the upper aspect of the fiftieth gate cannot even be called their root.
שהוא שרש המ״ט שערים כי הוא למעלה לגמרי מגדר שערי בינה כי אינו בגדר הבנה והשגה.
that it is the root of the forty-nine gates, for it is entirely above the bounds of the gates of Binah, since it is not within the bounds of understanding and comprehension.
It is entirely beyond the gates of Binah, beyond understanding and comprehension altogether.
The upper aspect of the fiftieth gate transcends the forty-nine gates entirely and is not even their root.
26וזהו ענין שיש בכתר בחי׳ תחתונה שבמאציל דלית מחשבה תפיסא ביה כלל הוא בחי׳ אנכי מי שאנכי,
And this is the matter that in Keser there is the lowest level of the Emanator, whom “no thought can grasp” at all: it is the level of “Anochi: who I am.”
This corresponds to Keser’s “lowest level of the Emanator,” which no thought can grasp at all: “Anochi: who I am.”
ומעתה יבואר ג״כ הא דלפעמים נזכר ששער החמשים אין בנו כח להמשיך כלל אלא שנמשך מאליו וממילא בחג השבועות.
And from this it will also be understood why it is sometimes said that the fiftieth gate we have no power to draw down at all, but rather it is drawn down of itself and automatically on the Festival of Shavuos.
It explains the other statement, that we cannot draw down the fiftieth gate at all and that it comes of itself on Shavuos: that statement refers to its upper aspect.
The upper aspect of the fiftieth gate is the Emanator’s own level, which is why we cannot draw it down.
27וכאן נתבאר דספירת העומר הוא המשכת בחי׳ ומדרגת שער החמשים כו׳ והיינו כמשנ״ת במ״א בענין פי׳ קדושתי למעלה
And here it was explained that the Counting of the Omer is the drawing down of the level and rank of the fiftieth gate, etc. And this is as was explained elsewhere on the meaning of “My holiness is above
Here, by contrast, the count was said to draw down the fiftieth gate. The two fit together, as was explained elsewhere on the Midrash “My holiness is above your holiness.”
מקדושתכם1 שמה שיש בכחנו להמשיך ע״י אתעדל״ת בקיום המצות זהו מבחי׳ התחתונה שבכתר הנק׳ שורש הנאצלים וזהו ענין קדושתכם אשר קדשנו במצותיו,
your holiness”: that what we have the power to draw down through an arousal from below (isarusa dilesata), by fulfilling the mitzvos, is from the lower aspect of Keser, which is called the root of the emanated; and this is the matter of “your holiness,” “who has sanctified us with His commandments.”
What we can draw down by our own service, the mitzvos, comes from the lower aspect of Keser, the root of the emanated. That is “your holiness,” the holiness of “who has sanctified us with His commandments.”
אבל הבחי׳ שבכתר שהוא בחי׳ תחתונה שבמאציל זה א״א לנו להמשיך וזהו ענין קדושתי למעלה מקדושתכם כלומר שזה נמשך אח״כ מלמעלה בתורת מתנה כו׳
But the aspect in Keser that is the lowest level of the Emanator, this we cannot draw down; and this is the matter of “My holiness is above your holiness,” that is to say, that this is drawn down afterward from above as a gift, etc.
The aspect that is the lowest level of the Emanator we cannot draw down; it comes afterward from above, as a gift. That is “My holiness is above your holiness.”
ואפשר שעד״ז ג״כ יש לפרש מה שאומרים בשבת ויו״ט קדשנו במצותיך אע״פ שאומרים אשר קדשנו במצותיו שכבר קדשנו כו׳.
And possibly along these lines one may also explain what we say on Shabbos and Yom Tov, “Sanctify us with Your commandments,” even though we say “who has sanctified us with His commandments,” [meaning] that He has already sanctified us, etc.
Perhaps, the Alter Rebbe suggests, this is why on Shabbos and Yom Tov we pray “Sanctify us with Your commandments,” though we have already said “who has sanctified us with His commandments”: the request is for the higher holiness, which comes as a gift.
The two aspects of Keser explain the Midrash: our mitzvos draw down the lower aspect, “your holiness,” while the higher, “My holiness,” comes only as a gift from above.
Marei mekomos
- 1קדושתי למעלה מקדושתכם · Vayikra Rabbah 24:9
28וכמ״כ בענין ספה״ע וחג השבועות, דאף לפמ״ש כאן דאפשר שע״י ספירת העומר אנו ממשיכים ג״כ גם מבחי׳ שער החמשים אכן זהו רק הבחינה תחתונה שבו היינו הבחי׳ שבו הכולל המ״ט שערים
So too in the matter of the Counting of the Omer and the Festival of Shavuos: even according to what is written here, that through the Counting of the Omer we may also draw down from the level of the fiftieth gate, this is indeed only its lower aspect, that is, the aspect in it that includes the forty-nine gates;
The same applies to the count and to Shavuos. If the count does draw from the fiftieth gate, it draws only its lower aspect, the one that includes the forty-nine gates.
וזה ממשיכים מעט מעט בימי ספה״ע וזהו ענין היום שני ימים היום שלשה ימים כו׳,
and this we draw down little by little in the days of the Counting of the Omer, and this is the matter of “Today is two days,” “Today is three days,” etc.
That aspect is drawn little by little through the days of the count, which is why we say “Today is two days,” “three days.”
אבל הבחי׳ העליונה שבו שלמעלה משרש המ״ט שערים זה אין בכחנו להמשיך כלל אלא שלאחר שסופרין וממשיכין הבחינה הכוללת המ״ט שערים
But its upper aspect, which is above the root of the forty-nine gates, this we have no power to draw down at all; rather, after we count and draw down the aspect that includes the forty-nine gates,
The upper aspect, above the root of the forty-nine gates, we cannot draw down at all.
וזהו ענין היום מ״ט ימים כו׳ אזי ממילא ומאיליו מתגלה אח״כ בחג השבועות הבחינה העליונה שבו כו׳
and this is the matter of “Today is forty-nine days,” etc., then automatically and of itself its upper aspect is revealed afterward, on the Festival of Shavuos, etc.,
But once we have counted “Today is forty-nine days,” drawing down the aspect that includes all forty-nine, the upper aspect reveals itself of its own accord on Shavuos.
שהוא ענין התגלות בחינה תחתונה שבמאציל. אמנם להבין איך שייך לומר דשער החמשים הוא הממוצע בין חכמה לבינה.
which is the matter of the revelation of the lowest level of the Emanator. However, [we need] to understand how one can say that the fiftieth gate is the intermediary between Chochmah and Binah,
That is the revelation of the lowest level of the Emanator. A question now arises: how can the fiftieth gate be called the intermediary between Chochmah and Binah?
Both explanations hold: the count draws down the lower aspect of the fiftieth gate, and its upper aspect, the Emanator’s own level, is revealed of itself on Shavuos.
29ולעליונים דהיינו לגבי חכמה עילאה נדמה שהוא למטה. והלא בתיקונים וע״ח אומר דשער החמשים הוא כתר עליון.
and that “to those above,” that is, in relation to the supernal Chochmah (Chochmah Ila’ah), it appears to be below. But do not the Tikkunim and Etz Chaim say that the fiftieth gate is the Supreme Keser?
How can it seem “below” in relation to supernal Chochmah, if the Tikkunim and Etz Chaim call the fiftieth gate the Supreme Keser, which is above Chochmah?
אך כי בלא״ה צ״ל איך שייך לומר שהוא כתר עליון וגם הוא שער הנ׳ דבינה.
But in any case, even without this, we need to understand how one can say that it is the Supreme Keser and also the fiftieth gate of Binah.
And even apart from this, how can one level be both the Supreme Keser and the fiftieth gate of Binah? The next paragraph takes up the question.
The Alter Rebbe raises a difficulty: the fiftieth gate is called the Supreme Keser, so how can it be below Chochmah, and how can it be both Keser and a gate of Binah?
Keser and Binah; from barley to wheat ¶30
30ובהרמ״ז בפ׳ בראשית שם ובפ׳ פנחס דרנ״ג משמע דמ״ש שהוא כתר עליון1 ר״ל כתר דז״א שנמשך לו מבחי׳ שער הנ׳ דבינה ממש.
And from the Ramaz on Parshas Bereishis there, and on Parshas Pinchas, folio 253, it is implied that what is said, that it is the Supreme Keser (Keser Elyon), means the Keser of Z’eir Anpin (the emotive attributes), which is drawn to it from the level of the fiftieth gate of Binah (understanding) itself.
A first answer comes from the Ramaz: when the Tikkunim call the fiftieth gate “the Supreme Keser,” they mean the Keser of Z’eir Anpin, which Z’eir Anpin receives from the fiftieth gate of Binah itself.
וא״כ לפ״ז שייך ג״כ לומר ששער זה החמשים הוא ממוצע בין חו״ב. אמנם גם לפי פשט לשון התיקונים דר״ל כתר עליון ממש עכ״ז יתכן לומר
And if so, according to this one can also say that this fiftieth gate is an intermediary between Chochmah (wisdom) and Binah. However, even according to the plain sense of the wording of the Tikkunim, that it means the Supreme Keser itself, it is nevertheless possible to say
On that reading the fiftieth gate can indeed stand between Chochmah and Binah. But even if the Tikkunim mean the Supreme Keser literally, there is another way to explain it.
שהוא ממוצע בין חכמה שהיא בחי׳ אין לבחי׳ בינה ע״פ מ״ש בספר עמק המלך שער ט׳ דבחי׳ אין הוא חכמה
that it is an intermediary between Chochmah, which is the level of ayin, and the level of Binah, according to what is written in the book Emek HaMelech, Shaar 9, that the level of ayin is Chochmah
The book Emek HaMelech teaches that the level of ayin, “nothing,” is Chochmah.
והוא למעלה מבחי׳ אריך שהיא בחי׳ בינה כו׳ וכן הוא בביאור האדרא מהאריז״ל גבי ההוא ארחא אתפרשא לתרי״ג אורחין דאורייתא.2
and it is above the level of Arich, which is the level of Binah, etc. And so it is in the Arizal’s explanation of the Idra, concerning “that path that divides into the 613 paths of the Torah”
And this ayin is above Arich Anpin, which, relative to it, is the level of Binah. The Arizal’s commentary on the Idra says the same, on the passage about the path that divides into the 613 paths of the Torah.
(באדרא דקכ״ט א׳) וז״ל ודע שגלגלתא זאת המקיף את המוח הוא בינה שהוא היכל לחכמה כו׳.
(in the Idra, folio 129a); and these are his words: “And know that this skull (gulgalta), which surrounds the brain, is Binah, which is a chamber for Chochmah,” etc.
There the Arizal writes that this skull (gulgalta), which surrounds the brain, is Binah, a chamber for Chochmah.
א״כ שפיר י״ל דשער החמשים דבינה הוא הממוצע בין אין לבחי׳ בינה ועמ״ש עוד בענין אין בביאור ע״פ את שבתותי תשמרו.
If so, it can well be said that the fiftieth gate of Binah is the intermediary between ayin and the level of Binah. And see what is written further on the matter of ayin in the explanation on the verse “You shall keep My Sabbaths.”
On this view the Supreme Keser, Arich Anpin, is itself “Binah” relative to the ayin above it, so the fiftieth gate can be the intermediary between ayin and Binah. The Alter Rebbe refers to a discourse on “You shall keep My Sabbaths” for more on ayin.
(עוד יש לתרץ מ״ש בתיקונים דכתר עליון איהו שלימו דחמשים שערי בינה3 והוא ע״פ משנ״ת בפ׳ לך לך שהתגלות עתיק הוא בבינה דוקא וזהו ענין ה׳ שנתוסף לאברהם להיות מאב רם שהוא ח״ע אברהם כו׳ וקרוב לזה תירץ בפרדס שם פ״ז).
(One may further resolve what is said in the Tikkunim, that the Supreme Keser “is the completion of the fifty gates of Binah,” according to what was explained in Parshas Lech Lecha, that the revelation of Atik is specifically in Binah; and this is the matter of the hei that was added to Avraham, [so that] from Av-ram, which is the supernal Chochmah (Chochmah Ila’ah), [he became] Avraham, etc. And close to this the Pardes resolved it, there, chapter 7.)
A further answer: the Tikkunim call the Supreme Keser “the completion of the fifty gates of Binah” because, as explained in Parshas Lech Lecha, Atik is revealed specifically in Binah. This is the hei added to Avram’s name: from Av-ram, the supernal Chochmah, he became Avraham. The Pardes gives a similar answer.
והנה ע״פ משנ״ת בשם המגיד נ״ע דשער החמשים הוא הממוצע בין בינה שהיא בחי׳ יש לחכמה שהיא בחי׳ אין, יובן ענין ספה״ע שהוא מקציר שעורים עד קציר חטים.
Now, according to what was explained in the name of the Maggid, whose soul is in Eden, that the fiftieth gate is the intermediary between Binah, which is the level of yesh, and Chochmah, which is the level of ayin, the matter of the Counting of the Omer will be understood: that it is from the barley harvest to the wheat harvest.
Now the Maggid’s teaching, that the fiftieth gate bridges Binah (yesh) and Chochmah (ayin), explains why the Omer is counted from the barley harvest at Pesach to the wheat harvest at Shavuos.
כי הנה ענין שעורה שעור ה׳ שהוא ענין השגת הנפש לכל חד לפום שיעורא דיליה הנה שורש המשכה זו מבחי׳ בינ ה.
For the matter of se’orah (barley) [as] shiur hei (a measure of five), which is the matter of the soul’s comprehension, “each one according to his own measure”: the root of this drawing down is from the level of Binah.
Barley, “a measure of five,” is the soul’s comprehension, each according to his own capacity, and its root is in Binah.
אבל חטה שהוא ענין המשכת הדעת הנעלם שלמעלה מן הדעת המושג ומובן זהו בחי׳ חכמה וכמבואר במ״א (בד״ה להבין מ״ש בהגדה מצה זו) ענין מוחין דאבא שהוא למעלה מעלה ממוחין דאימא.
But wheat, which is the matter of the drawing down of the hidden Daas (knowledge) that is above the Daas that is comprehended and understood, this is the level of Chochmah; and as is explained elsewhere (in the discourse beginning “To understand what is said in the Haggadah, ‘This matzah’”), the matter of the mochin (intellect) of Abba, which are far, far above the mochin of Imma.
Wheat draws down the hidden Daas, above knowledge that is understood, and this is Chochmah: the mochin of Abba, far above those of Imma, as a discourse on “This matzah” in the Haggadah explains.
והממוצע ביניהם הוא שער החמשים דבינה וזהו ענין ספירת העומר שהוא המשכת שער החמשים לבחי׳ שעורה כו׳ ע״ד הנ״ל.
And the intermediary between them is the fiftieth gate of Binah; and this is the matter of the Counting of the Omer, which is the drawing down of the fiftieth gate to the level of barley, etc., along the lines mentioned above.
The fiftieth gate of Binah is the bridge between them, and the count of the Omer draws it down to the level of barley, as explained above.
והנה ע״פ האמור שבספה״ע ממשיכים ג״כ משער החמשים והמשכה זו היא למ״ט שערי בינה ממש לקשרם ולחברם לשער החמשים הממוצע כו׳. עפ״ז י״ל דזהו ענין מ״ט תיבות שבמזמור אלקים יחננו4 ומ״ט אותיות שבפסוק ישמחו.5
Now, according to what was said, that in the Counting of the Omer we also draw down from the fiftieth gate, and this drawing down is to the forty-nine gates of Binah themselves, to bind them and join them to the fiftieth gate, the intermediary, etc.: according to this it may be said that this is the matter of the forty-nine words in the psalm “May G‑d be gracious to us” and the forty-nine letters in the verse “Let them rejoice.”
Since the count draws from the fiftieth gate into the forty-nine gates themselves, binding them to it, this may be why Psalm 67, “May G‑d be gracious to us,” has forty-nine words, and its verse “Let them rejoice” has forty-nine letters.
היינו שרומזים למ״ט שערי בינה ולמ״ט בחי׳ אלו הכלולים בשער החמשים שממשיכים ע״י ספה״ע ממ״ט בחי׳ שבשער הנ׳ אל מ״ט שע״ב כדי להעלותן למקורן ושרשן ולייחדן במאצילן ב״ה
That is, they allude to the forty-nine gates of Binah and to these forty-nine levels included in the fiftieth gate, which, through the Counting of the Omer, we draw down from the forty-nine levels in the fiftieth gate to the forty-nine gates of Binah, in order to raise them to their source and root and to unite them with their Emanator, blessed be He.
These allude to the forty-nine gates of Binah and to the forty-nine levels within the fiftieth gate, which the count draws into them, raising the gates to their source and uniting them with their Emanator.
(בספר ע״ה ש״ז פ״ה איתא דחטה הוא בחכמה דעולם התהו ושעורה בבינה. ומחו״ב הנז׳ נעשה אח״כ בעולם התיקון בחי׳ אין ואריך אנפין כו׳):
(In the book Emek HaMelech, Shaar 7, chapter 5, it is stated that wheat is in the Chochmah of the World of Tohu (Chaos), and barley in the Binah. And from the Chochmah and Binah mentioned, there were made afterward, in the World of Tikkun (Rectification), the level of ayin and Arich Anpin, etc.)
Emek HaMelech similarly places wheat in the Chochmah of the World of Tohu and barley in its Binah; from these, in the World of Tikkun, came the level of ayin and Arich Anpin.
The Alter Rebbe resolves how the fiftieth gate, called the Supreme Keser, can stand between Chochmah and Binah, and uses this to explain the count from barley (Binah) to wheat (Chochmah), with the forty-nine words and letters of Psalm 67 alluding to the gates.
The Tikkunei Zohar passage adds that this Supreme Keser, “the completion of the fifty gates of Binah,” is what was not given to Moshe: a source without end, which no one can grasp or find.
Marei mekomos
- 1
- 2ההוא ארחא אתפרשא לתרי״ג אורחין דאורייתא · Zohar, Idra Rabba 6:25–7:37
- 3מ״ש בתיקונים דכתר עליון איהו שלימו דחמשים שערי בינה · Pardes Rimmonim 13:7
- 4שבמזמור אלקים יחננו · Psalms 67:2
- 5שבפסוק ישמחו · Psalms 67:5
Finished the maamar?
Mark it as learned; it counts toward the week and the year’s siyum.
In one’s avodah
The count must go from below upward, little by little: day by day a person’s own service, the mitzvos, draws down “your holiness,” and when he has done his part the higher holiness reveals itself as a gift, as the fiftieth day comes of itself on Shavuos. The illumination of G‑d’s face now depends on an arousal from below: serving with joy and gladness of heart awakens joy above. And a person’s compassion on his own soul, over its distance from G‑d, is a sadness that brings profit.
Questions for discussion
- Why are the angels nourished by “barley,” a measured flow from the five articulations of the mouth, while Israel receives on Shavuos a “wheat” that reveals knowledge above comprehension?
- How does a small child calling “Abba” illustrate the hidden Daas revealed through the wheat of Shavuos?
- Why do we count “Today is two days” rather than “the second day,” and how does this fit the idea that every day draws down the same light, growing?
- How does the Maggid’s explanation of Moshe’s hidden grave show that the fiftieth gate stands between ayin and yesh?
- What is the difference between “your holiness,” which we draw down by the mitzvos, and “My holiness,” which comes as a gift, and how does it resolve the two explanations of “count fifty days”?
Key terms in this maamar
- Love and aweאהבה ויראה
- The two 'wings' of divine service.
- The Infinite Light (Or Ein Sof)אור אין סוף
- G‑d's light as it is, beyond all limits, before any contraction.
- Chesed (kindness)חסד
- Expansive giving. ×22
- The World of Asiyah (Action)עשיה
- The lowest world, including our physical one. ×3
- Malchus (sovereignty)מלכות
- Kingship: the level through which G‑d's word creates and rules the worlds.
- The World of Atzilus (Emanation)אצילות
- The highest world, still one with G‑d. ×2
- Gevurah (restraint)גבורה
- Measure, limitation and judgment. ×4
- The Sefirosספירות
- The ten divine attributes through which G‑d relates to creation.
- Tiferes (beauty)תפארת
- Harmony of kindness and restraint; associated with compassion.
- The Infinite One (Ein Sof)אין סוף
- G‑d's own boundless essence.
- Chochmah (wisdom)חכמה
- The first flash of insight. ×14
- Life-forceחיות
- The divine vitality that sustains every creation. ×4
- The outer dimension (chitzoniyus)חיצוניות
- The external, expressive aspect. ×4
- The emotive attributes (middos)מדות
- Love, awe, compassion and the rest. ×2
- Willרצון
- Desire; in G‑d, the level above intellect. ×1
- The inner dimension (pnimiyus)פנימיות
- The innermost core of a level.
- Nukva (the feminine / Malchus)נוקבא
- Malchus as the receiving configuration.
- Daas (knowledge)דעת
- Deep connection to an idea, bridging intellect and emotion. ×21
- The Name Havayahהוי׳
- The Tetragrammaton: G‑d as transcending time and bringing all into being.
- Z'eir Anpin (the emotive attributes)ז״א
- The six emotive Sefiros as one configuration.
- Binah (understanding)בינה
- Developing and grasping an insight in detail. ×30
- Keser (the Crown)כתר
- The level above intellect: divine will and delight. ×20
- The intellect (mochin)מוחין
- Chochmah, Binah and Daas as a whole. ×4
- Netzach (victory)נצח
- Perseverance, the drive to overcome.
- Hod (splendor)הוד
- Acknowledgment and yielding.
- An arousal from belowאתערותא דלתתא
- Human initiative that draws down a divine response.
- Abba and Imma (Chochmah and Binah)אבא ואמא
- The intellectual configurations.
- The Name Elokimאלקים
- G‑d as concealed within nature, measuring and limiting. ×2